Uh-oh. You're thinking of using someone else's SSN? That sounds a lot like what LDrew got in trouble for; that is, pretending to be someone you're not.
That's probably right. Perhaps better is not to link the crime with the disposition of the criminal during the crime. I really do not go for the temporary insanity being a valid excuse. The same goes for lack of sanity or clarity of mind while on a drug and committing a crime.
Punish the criminal for the crime, and not for the state of mind or extenuating circumstances.
Feasibility is the issue as you're talking about having a 45 mile by 45 mile square covered with solar panels. I don't know about you, but that's really a lot of land. No, really.
comes from a sense of being tied to the game. I've only felt this when playing hard-core on battle.net. For those who don't know, in hard-core, when your character "dies", it is completely wiped-out. When you've got an attachment to the character in that all you've been doing can be completely lost, there's more "engagement" and you really do feel true fear of loss.
You're confusing (and abusing) what "+" means.
"+" implies nor is defined by any interaction.
In the case of antimatter/mudballs, you're injecting interaction into the "+" function.
1 is 1. That is, it's not a thing, it's an amount.
And by definition of how we humans use it, 2 is defined to be exactly equal to two 1s. Therefore in any universe 1+1=2, irregardless of the units involved.
Just wait a second here. I think that's pretty sexist to assume that it was women who kept track of the menstrual cycle. After all, the guy probably also kind of had an interest in knowing this bit of information.
This XP fanboi just hates the Vista interface. It's like microsoft decided that their workstation test was too easy and needed to update the questions so wrote an shell around new convoluted questions.
And magically, you didn't see what you just did there.
Payer A's 8% of 16000 is alot less than Payer B's 8% of 90000 (current cap) while both payers will get the SAME benefits back out.
Tell me that the burden is quite the same now...
So, what we need is 12 years of learning critical thinking?
That's 1 year (max). If you don't learn critical thinking within that time frame you're a broom engineer.
The remainder of the 11 years is still "teaching to the test".
So, let me get this straight.
What's best for an economy is to take away wealth from the rich because they don't have a right to it whether they earned it, found it, invented it, or were given it.
Makes me want to run right out there and earn my own so that it can be taken away...
Right, I'll go for this right after firefox reaches IE's compatibility...
Because it's cheaper to just makes laws like these. There's no need for any government to be intelligent when it can just be more forceful.
Or just use steganography to hide all your "illegal" documents within your vacation pictures?
Uh-oh. You're thinking of using someone else's SSN? That sounds a lot like what LDrew got in trouble for; that is, pretending to be someone you're not.
if there were actual private ownership therein. Hell, they can come up with all-sorts-of-random-crap.cn and wow, they're wickedly huge now.
Oh. You don't know her like I do. She's guilty alright...
That's probably right. Perhaps better is not to link the crime with the disposition of the criminal during the crime. I really do not go for the temporary insanity being a valid excuse. The same goes for lack of sanity or clarity of mind while on a drug and committing a crime. Punish the criminal for the crime, and not for the state of mind or extenuating circumstances.
A factor in being a successful virus is that it shouldn't kill off its host too quickly or at all.
The way our governments works, they'd probably still require a smog check for this vehicle...
Feasibility is the issue as you're talking about having a 45 mile by 45 mile square covered with solar panels. I don't know about you, but that's really a lot of land. No, really.
wow. NFL casting DDD Broads...
The key word in all you're stating above is : ineffectively. This sums up all government "programs"...
Govmint plowing forward despite widespread protest from people and politicians, eh? How's that democracy workin' out for yeh?
comes from a sense of being tied to the game. I've only felt this when playing hard-core on battle.net. For those who don't know, in hard-core, when your character "dies", it is completely wiped-out. When you've got an attachment to the character in that all you've been doing can be completely lost, there's more "engagement" and you really do feel true fear of loss.
You're confusing (and abusing) what "+" means. "+" implies nor is defined by any interaction. In the case of antimatter/mudballs, you're injecting interaction into the "+" function. 1 is 1. That is, it's not a thing, it's an amount. And by definition of how we humans use it, 2 is defined to be exactly equal to two 1s. Therefore in any universe 1+1=2, irregardless of the units involved.
Just wait a second here. I think that's pretty sexist to assume that it was women who kept track of the menstrual cycle. After all, the guy probably also kind of had an interest in knowing this bit of information.
Irregardless of units, that's still 2 Black Holes. "+" != "concatenate"
This is true, but for equal or congruent values of 1
Speaking of which, can child pornagraphy be copywritten or is it copyleft?
This XP fanboi just hates the Vista interface. It's like microsoft decided that their workstation test was too easy and needed to update the questions so wrote an shell around new convoluted questions.
And magically, you didn't see what you just did there. Payer A's 8% of 16000 is alot less than Payer B's 8% of 90000 (current cap) while both payers will get the SAME benefits back out. Tell me that the burden is quite the same now...
So, what we need is 12 years of learning critical thinking? That's 1 year (max). If you don't learn critical thinking within that time frame you're a broom engineer. The remainder of the 11 years is still "teaching to the test".
While you're accurate in saying that you don't want to "tell me what to do", you're just going to have the same legislated. nice end-run.
So, let me get this straight. What's best for an economy is to take away wealth from the rich because they don't have a right to it whether they earned it, found it, invented it, or were given it. Makes me want to run right out there and earn my own so that it can be taken away...
You'd think that if something were not the job of the government that the holy-9 would step up and say so. Isn't that supposed to be /their/ job?