Of course, the Labour party are the people that changed the law to make it legal for them to discriminate against men. Amazed they found the time in between ruining the economy and taking the UK into illegal wars.
That people will suddenly use their Yahoo/GMail/Facebook account that you force them to create?
I thought Flickr required you to use a Yahoo account because they were owned by Yahoo. "Have an account with us to access our service" isn't terribly unreasonable.
All of which is irrelevant as the new owners are removing that requirement, which makes the rest of your post entirely redundant.
Current situation: Uniformed official asks you questions, validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country. Future situation: Computer program asks you questions, validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country. If it can't provide validation then it hands off to a uniformed official who asks you questions and validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country.
Wait? The future state is cheaper for the Government to operate and yet offers twice the chances for you to successfully enter the country? Yeah, really fucking hurting freedom of movement there.
Right now there is screening for EU citizens moving within the EU. There is screening for non-EU citizens moving within the EU. There is screening for anybody entering the EU.
Where the Schengen agreement allows people to skip the whole business now why would you assume it would be different in the future?
Well, shit. You really want me to include the millions killed by Che, Mao, Stalin and others sharing their politics?
Or do you want to just acknowledge the fairly uncontroversial point that I was making which is that political violence is committed in support of a very wide range of political views.
you're just a whiny apologist for violent fascists
You're making shit up. I haven't apologised for anybody. I don't support violent fascists. I also don't support violent anti-fascists. One of those seems to upset you.
You scream "Antifa" because they look scary
No. I drew Antifa into the conversation because they've been declared a terrorist organisation. My views on them are irrelevant to that designation.
Take it up with the US Government if you disagree.
censoring (i.e. deleting or hiding) any videos that question the veracity of the synagogue 'attack'. Why is that?
Because only hateful racist idiots are posting them? Because there's plentiful evidence that someone murdered people in a synagogue? Because there's someone charged with multiple counts of murder?
Fucking hell, feel free to be a fuckwit but please, do try not to infest the rest of us.
Yes, there are incidents at some protests. But one side has a real problem with more than just idiots and vandals, it has people convinced that there is a literal war and that they are soldiers in it.
Or maybe, just possibly, he didn't just write the 14th Amendment, he could conceivably have written additional commentary and thoughts on its purpose and intended use.
That writing could even have explicitly articulated what the amendment was not meant to cover or be used for.
If only we had access to such writing. Just imagine.
some kind of natural feature there
Yeah. There's a desert. Deserts are fucking awesome.
I like the Mojave Desert. It's better even than the Western edge of the Sahara and that's got some gorgeous desert mountains.
I was trying to work out if Elon is becoming Trump or just unduly influenced by him.
Time to link my favourite shit-eating grin on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
You're very much like the trans people I know. Normal, with a small facet of your life that most people don't need to deal with it.
Be assured that I don't think the freaks represent you.
Turns out the privileged majority fight hard when you threaten their privilege:
https://news.sky.com/story/300...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/ne...
Of course, the Labour party are the people that changed the law to make it legal for them to discriminate against men. Amazed they found the time in between ruining the economy and taking the UK into illegal wars.
I've known a few trans people. They were all just trying to get on with their lives.
But they would also not use idiotic terms like "trying to erase me" so maybe I only know intelligent trans people.
No police were called. No stress or strain
Yet...
He was store security. The woman who I had talked to had alerted them that I was there and could probably use some help
Clearly he and she both thought there was a risk of stress and strain. You may have been thinking it was all fine but others were not.
In the UK you'd be struggling to meet legal requirements for gender based pay reporting.
Of course, it's all a crock of shit anyway but the requirement is there nonetheless.
All those girls that like a bit of anal are homosexual? I didn't know that.
Last I saw bathrooms in the US had individual stalls. So basically, sure, why not?
Anyway, she might like bald guys with tattoos. Could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship.
That people will suddenly use their Yahoo/GMail/Facebook account that you force them to create?
I thought Flickr required you to use a Yahoo account because they were owned by Yahoo. "Have an account with us to access our service" isn't terribly unreasonable.
All of which is irrelevant as the new owners are removing that requirement, which makes the rest of your post entirely redundant.
Youtube wont let me watch that :(
Not to worry, I'm sure it'll be viewed in court by the judge and jury, and more evidence is a good thing.
How will this reduce freedom of movement?
Current situation: Uniformed official asks you questions, validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country.
Future situation: Computer program asks you questions, validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country. If it can't provide validation then it hands off to a uniformed official who asks you questions and validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country.
Wait? The future state is cheaper for the Government to operate and yet offers twice the chances for you to successfully enter the country? Yeah, really fucking hurting freedom of movement there.
They have a right wing extremist government.
I've learned not to trust statements like this on Slashdot, epecially from ACs.
On this occasion the research actually backs you up. Now I'm wondering why my mother loves Budapest so much.
What the fuck does that have to do with it?
Right now there is screening for EU citizens moving within the EU. There is screening for non-EU citizens moving within the EU. There is screening for anybody entering the EU.
Where the Schengen agreement allows people to skip the whole business now why would you assume it would be different in the future?
Which fucking graph has a fucking hockey stick shape?
https://www.sportsdirect.com/h...
Fucking Americans.
Nuclear winter?
Well, shit. You really want me to include the millions killed by Che, Mao, Stalin and others sharing their politics?
Or do you want to just acknowledge the fairly uncontroversial point that I was making which is that political violence is committed in support of a very wide range of political views.
Your side
You don't know which side that is. For instance..
you're just a whiny apologist for violent fascists
You're making shit up. I haven't apologised for anybody. I don't support violent fascists. I also don't support violent anti-fascists. One of those seems to upset you.
You scream "Antifa" because they look scary
No. I drew Antifa into the conversation because they've been declared a terrorist organisation. My views on them are irrelevant to that designation.
Take it up with the US Government if you disagree.
Also 120 liters of liquid Helium is NOT 90,000 cubic meters of gas. It is about 90 cubic meters.
Sure, for the first second after the leak. That's the thing about leaks.
But actually, yes, good spot.
One Antifa member attempted to murder seven people with a bike lock. Fortunately he showed all the competence of the average Antifa member.
But it's not me calling them terrorists, it's the US government.
Incidentally 2001 is an interestingly arbitrary date. Democrat kill a bunch of people in 2000 or something?
censoring (i.e. deleting or hiding) any videos that question the veracity of the synagogue 'attack'. Why is that?
Because only hateful racist idiots are posting them?
Because there's plentiful evidence that someone murdered people in a synagogue?
Because there's someone charged with multiple counts of murder?
Fucking hell, feel free to be a fuckwit but please, do try not to infest the rest of us.
Yes, there are incidents at some protests. But one side has a real problem with more than just idiots and vandals, it has people convinced that there is a literal war and that they are soldiers in it.
Yes, indeed. Luckily the authorities took notice.
https://www.independent.co.uk/...
Or maybe, just possibly, he didn't just write the 14th Amendment, he could conceivably have written additional commentary and thoughts on its purpose and intended use.
That writing could even have explicitly articulated what the amendment was not meant to cover or be used for.
If only we had access to such writing. Just imagine.
i don't see democrats shooting up churches or schools or ramming their cars through crowds of people.....
You forgot to mention sending mail bombs.
But you also forgot opening fire with a rifle at congressional baseball practice.
Political violence is not restricted to any specific political view.