Slashdot Mirror


User: Mister+Whirly

Mister+Whirly's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,335
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,335

  1. Re:Well if they have nothing to fear on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    Anymore baseless FUD you want to spread by conjecturing about things with absolutely no proof, or just this one for now?

  2. Re:Obligitory - Why bother? on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    Now if you could only dump the dollar sign every time you write "MS", and dump calling Windows windoze, doze, etc.

    "Have also been working on a FreeBSD install, but after 3 weekends, still don't have a working desktop."
    And people still actually wonder why this isn't "The Year of *nix on Desktops". I think you just gave the answer why. And you probably LIKE tinkering around with computers. Imagine how frustrating it would be to people that don't.

  3. Re:I downloaded pifts.exe... on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    It will run just fine under WINE, it just takes a few adjustments in the configuration.

  4. Re:Any idea what it is? on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    Securing a computer is a process completely independent of what operating system the machine is running. Security is not a product, a piece of software, or something you can buy off a shelf. it is an ongoing, never ending strategy. The second you start confusing operating systems and software packages for security you are sunk. The same principles apply to every computer no matter what it is running. Sure the OS can help to predict the probability of security problems, but that has nothing to do with actually securing it.

  5. Re:law enforcement back door on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    And I have a friend that works there that claims that not to be true. He also claims that Santa Claus is the CEO of Symantec

    See how easy it is to refute any information from "an anonymous friend of an anonymous friend", and also how easy it is to put ridiculous FUD in at the same time? Why should we believe you anymore than anyone should believe my post?

  6. Re:Rootkit? Nice timing on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    IANAP (I am not a priest) but I would imagine one would "hope to God" by thinking/saying/communicating to God "Gee God, I really hope [fill in the blank] happens/doesn't happen."

    DISCLAIMER: I am not a religions person by any means, and was just making an educated guess. Offer only good at participating stores. Limit one per customer. Your mileage may vary.

  7. Re:Windows Users Beware... on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    And that is your right, absolutely. That is why the next line (which you didn't quote) of that same post was "That said, Norton is being stupid by trying to cover all this stuff up, it I'm sure it will reflect badly on their customer relations."

    Although, throwing around words like "tyrants" so casually does lessen the impact of the word itself. I generally try to reserve such strong condemnations for those much more deserving of the title. But that is only my opinion - you operate however it is you sit fit for yourself.

    The world is made up almost entirely of shades of gray - black and white are rarely seen.

  8. Re:use a better os on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    "Windows spreads virus's in the same way AIDS spreads."

    In impoverished third world countries?

    P.S. It is "viruses" - no apostrophe needed. Not virii either.

  9. Re:Rootkit? Or ...more properly an anti-piracy dev on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    Which is weird if true, because I am running the Corporate version from the University where I work, and I have not noticed the pifs.exe file on any of my machines yet. i assumed this was a non-corporate version problem only. So has anyone out there running the corp version noticed this file on their systems? I am running Symantec Antivirus Corporate ver 10.1.6.6000.

  10. Re:Rootkit? Nice timing on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1

    Because detection rate is not the one and only criteria. The conversation was more about footprint on the system than how many things it is able to detect.

  11. Re:Windows Users Beware... on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 1, Troll

    And if it is a businesses right to delete comments they want deleted, as they stated in the terms that all posters agree to, it isn't censorship either. If I go onto a Disney children's forum and post nothing but swear words, and Disney deletes it, is that censorship too?

  12. Re:Windows Users Beware... on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Norton's forum is not a government. "Censorship" is done by governments, not private businesses. Private businesses have the right to conduct their own business however they see fit. That said, Norton is being stupid by trying to cover all this stuff up, it I'm sure it will reflect badly on their customer relations. Just recall how good the PR was for the Sony rootkit - and they even owned up to it.

  13. Re:Good reason to get shut on US Forgets How To Make Trident Missiles · · Score: 1

    the word you were looking for was "nationalism" not "racism". For future rants...

    And what does owning guns have to do with being racist? You do realize guns can be used to eliminate the racists (See Civil War of the United States), right? Guns are neither inherently evil or good. That all depends on who is holding them.

  14. Re:You Have Stolen From Your Bandmates & the R on Lars Ulrich Pirates His Own Album · · Score: 1

    Distribution rights are not necessarily songwriter's rights. If they have a publishing company (generally owned by the musicians themselves, if they are smart) they own the rights to the words. It is fairly trivial to set up your own publishing company. But a lot of bands starting out sign away these rights too, not realizing the implications that the future may hold with their decision.

  15. Re:remove the Mormons tag on Utah Trying To Restrict Keyword Advertising ... Again · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, that would be a full time job around here. With a few assistants. Working 28 hour days.

  16. Re:You Have Stolen From Your Bandmates & the R on Lars Ulrich Pirates His Own Album · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep up with the times grandpa. They are bigger than Xenu.

  17. Re:Whatever on The Best Way Through the Great Firewall of China · · Score: 1

    With the added bonus that since so many people are doing it, the Chinese government can pick and choose the people they find objectionable to selectively prosecute and punish.

  18. Re:No, they don't on Should Job Seekers Tell Employers To Quit Snooping? · · Score: 1

    Maybe so, but when was the last time you had to APPLY for a job? Keeping a job is fairly easy once you are hired. It is the getting hired part that can be difficult. If you are currently employed, and your employer finds out some info about you on the net, it is much harder for them to fire you for it than it is to not hire you if you weren't already employed there. If they decide not to hire you, they don't even have to give you a reason. Not the same standards for terminating someone's employment.

  19. Re:No, they don't on Should Job Seekers Tell Employers To Quit Snooping? · · Score: 1

    To Michael Phelps: You are a public figure and should be aware that doing certain things in public could reflect badly on you.

    NOTE:I am in no way saying "Don't take bong hits." I am merely saying "Don't take bong hits in public where there are low-lifes waiting to take a picture of you and sell it to tabloids." People in the public eye need to realize that they will always be targets for this kind of stuff, and act accordingly (in public).

  20. Re:rainbow gold on A Short Summary Following the Pirate Bay Trial · · Score: 1

    Oh, ok. Didn't get that from the post, but I see what you were saying now.

  21. Re:Workplaces are juntas? on Should Job Seekers Tell Employers To Quit Snooping? · · Score: 1

    "They called it the Dark Ages for a reason.

    Yes, because the church was the highest authority at the time.

  22. Re:rainbow gold on A Short Summary Following the Pirate Bay Trial · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    digital converter boxes != big screen TVs

    They may connect to each other, but they are not the same device.

  23. Re:Too bad, so sad on Diebold Election Audit Logs Defective · · Score: 2

    and only the most right-wing conservatives can say that with a straight face. Seriously, the only player in the last election that wasn't a flaming centrist was the nutjob from Alaska.

  24. Re:Fraud on Diebold Election Audit Logs Defective · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have made applications myself using VB commands and an MS Access database that was far less bug prone than the GEMS software. Bad programming is bad programming no matter what the front or back ends are.

  25. Re:Secret reason for this change! on Uproar Over Netflix's New Instant Viewer · · Score: 1

    Don't try to bring facts into a baseless Slashdot rant!