In Freedomtown USA, you'd be charged with felony wire tapping, and they would use your own phone and internet records against you. Probably your healthcare history and grade school report cards too.
I think I have read before (and it would seem to make logical sense) that if the Feds run more than 50% of the Tor nodes, they can start to reliably trace traffic? If this is the case, I have no doubt that the US gov't has the computing power. The "drug war" is very well funded.
I taught myself BASIC at 5 and was writing servers and web applications at 14... I've worked full-time as a systems engineer and web developer for the past 9 years. I've taught myself everything I know and always worked alone... I've never had another set of eyes on my code except for one project, and after they saw the first 10 lines of code they passed. Yeah. That's all the feedback I've ever received, and it was completely useless.
How can I get critical feedback - not just a list of everything I'm doing wrong, but actual constructive feedback on how I can add/change/improve those shortcomings? It SHOULD be a centerpiece of my job, but it hasn't happened once. Between that, and being self-taught, I have no intention on paying for a programming course.
I've always been able to program ANYTHING and make it work. I'm torn between the fact that I've been able to build tons of complicated applications over the years and I'm doing some really cool work with "Big Data" processing right now, but feel like my code is probably garbage. I wasn't hired as a developer and never took a programming class, but it has always the majority of what I do day-to-day... I took compsci in high school and it made everything that I loved about computers seem so miserable and mundane and boring and painful - their teaching method sucked and I'd never have chosen this industry if that was my introduction to this field!!)
The final kicker here? I work for the research institution of the computer science program at a major university. And not a single person I work along-side writes code for a living. I don't need feedback to know I need a new job, but I do need some suggestions on how I can improve my code when I don't have anyone to help me:-(
Funny that when I went to the slashdot 15th anniversary meetup in Brooklyn last year, two of the founders were there - one with a masters of fine arts, the other a PhD in divinity.
I'm a systems engineer / data scientist and I have a bachelor or arts degree in political science (and I totally love my job!). ^_-
I'm a first-generation Quebecois in America (ugh!) and my French = NULL. I studied it some on my own as a kid and took it for 5 years in school. I also studied Latin for 2 years, and German and Chinese for 1. I tried, I really did.
I can't speak a single damn one of them and can barely read a tourist map.
I studied linguistics for 2 years and was very good at it, but it simply feels impossible to learn another language. The amount of rote memorization, unusual grammar, and idioms makes the task seem insurmountable; I'm done trying. I guess I'm just lazy.
A joke they told in my language classes was that a person who spoke three languages was trilingual, a person who spoke two was bilingual, and a person who spoke one was an American. Without having exposure to many different languages at an early age - not just exposure but living amongst them - Americans are pretty much doomed when it comes to learning a second language. Before the age of 4 children can acquire just about any language with ease, and this decreases until the age of 11 or 12 or so - after that, its really really hard to learn another.
It sucks living in New York City and feeling like I'm the only person who doesn't speak another language, but that's just life. At least I speak only English and not only French.
I'd love to have your big corporate budget, but I don't.
I'd love to have your department full of programmers, but I don't.
I'd love to have your nice long deadlines, but I don't.
I'd love to have a professional development budget - hell, **I** want some professional development!
I don't have the time to train someone. When I have 100 resumes to flip through, and 20% look even remotely qualified, shouldn't I be able to find at least ONE programmer who knows wtf they're doing?? If I don't hire someone, I end up doing the project myself, working with technology that I don't know. If I can do it, why can't someone else?! Do your damn job - you learn by NEEDING to learn something new to get the job done, and by DOING it. I'm not going to "train" you by doing the job for you.
I am a systems engineer/project manager in the software dev institute of a major research university - I don't expect to hire an out-of-the-box worker, and I want the project to be just as much a learning experience for them as it is a paid job, by giving them the opportunity to analyze and propose their own solutions under my leadership/guidance. If there is a particular technology they want to learn and that I agree is a good tool for the job, then by all means I encourage them to use it. I need them to be interested enough and self-motivated enough to learn the skills they need to get the job done. Otherwise it'll just be me reading the manual and telling them how to do the job; in that situation, it's easier for me to do it myself.
When hiring, my three basic criteria are: are you smart, are you motivated, and have you done any projects on your own time (which speaks to the previous two). It's usually easy to tell if they're fluffing a skill or not because if they have actual experience, they are specific about which technologies they've used. A candidate who puts "Linux" isn't the same as one who lists "Debian"
Compsci has basically nothing to do with computers, and that's half the problem. Students think that when they take up computer science, they'll be studying, you know, actual technology. It is far more useful to an employer (me) that a worker can write SQL (3rd year DB students with +90% GPAs who cant GROUP a query?!), not just use some query-building IDE software for a class project that does the heavy-lifting for them. I need someone who can intersect and transform arrays - they can't even do that. The crap I did at the age of 15, these college students have never even seen before! I don't expect them to have that experience, but comon, if you want to work in this field you gotta know SOMETHING outside the classroom!
This is why I can't find qualified students. If I need someone to sniff a network, it's far more useful to me that they know how to use a damn sniffer than for them to know the OSI model but can't make heads or tails of a packet payload. Is the OSI model useful? Sure. Does it get the job done? Not at all.
Colleges teach high-level theories and models and UMLs and chess board Java CS projects - useless to 99.9% of tech employers. So many compsci students I see come into class half-asleep, barely pay attention in class, and don't seem to think much about it once they leave the classroom. They think they're going to make a ton of money as.NET developers by using drag-and-drop software like Visual Studio. I am looking to hire 3 student programmers right now, and even amongst our best candidates, they can't write a simple 4-line script to output a file to screen. They are very, very smart students, but they don't have any skills!
Employers need workers with practical experience, and in general WANT workers who have lots of experience with specific software. Colleges don't teach software suites, they teach theories.
Programming and information technology should be taught as vocations... high-paying, of course.
Younger people ( say 35 ) have been fleeing Facebook in droves, because it's been around a while, and not "cool" when your PARENTS have joined, friended you, friended your friends, and then gossip more to you about what they're doing than you know yourself. Because they're old and have no life. I deal with this every day.
Needless to say, Mark is keeping 'Whatsapp' separate because he knows that Facebook will be toast within the next 10 years and he doesn't want to drag this investment down by attaching it to an ailing brand.
Wise move.
Pacman is boring and repetative. I was tired of it 20 years ago, and even the nostalgia of playing it on a full-sized console wears off after feeding it quarters. It's boring. Ladybug was cool though. And at least Donkey Kong and Frogger took skill. I'd take the old Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat over any GTA, any day.
GTA has to be one of the most boring games I've ever played. Boring!!!! I'd rather play the card game 'war' - sure the outcome is already decided from the moment you stop shufflng the deck, but at least you don't know what's going to happen next. GTA? Cops and robbers - pacman with a car and guns.
I want them to continue developing Half Life ! And I miss the simulation games of yore - Age of Empires, Civilization, Roller Coaster Tycoon, etc. They don't make many sim games any more:-( Sim City 4 is nice, but they are going to be selling "upgrades" so that we can... have the same features we had in the last version like 10 years ago. Want to build a bigger city? Pay us and we'll make your border bigger! Subways?! Gotta pay extra for that too I'm gonna guess.
It is also crap that most games these days *need* to be played online because of DRM. I like the Steam/Origin model because I don't have to worry about losing the media, but if I ain't online I can't play Sim City (without a workaround - which would probably screw up my cities online anyways),
Game developers complain about how expensive it is to create a new game - I'd much prefer something challenging and stimulating than a boring game cloned from 15 years ago because they haven't bothered to come up with anything new and just want to jazz it up with eye-candy, give it a new name, and sell if for $60 when the original was like, $20 (I'm looking at you, Microsoft)
I guess I'll just be stuck with Age of Empires 2 and Civ 4 and Roller Coaster Tycoon - but at least they're still fun and challenging after all these years!
My point stands: the majority of information is unjustifiably secret and should be released without issue, and a lot of what remains makes people look bad.
Also, the government intentionally drags its feet, "loses" documents (yeah... but they can find an original income tax receipt from 40 years ago), and redacts entire pages of everything except the "the"s and the "is"s
There is a reason that the government fights so hard against releasing this information, and it definitely isn't for our own good.
A Congressional audit has found extreme waste in the document security system... classified documents are very burdensome to track and secure. I believe it was something like 30% of all documents contain no sensitive information whatsoever. The government opposes releasing information because it can make them look bad by exposing wasteful spending, secret investigations where prosecution was declined, or the government intentionally poisoning its soldiers to test chemical weapons and "cures".
A very small percentage of documents are secret because they stand to damage national security. Most are secret to cover up bad behavior because the contents would make some important people look bad.
Slashdot Mirror
In Freedomtown USA, you'd be charged with felony wire tapping, and they would use your own phone and internet records against you. Probably your healthcare history and grade school report cards too.
I wish I had mod points to give you, but, thanks anyways for the insightful explanation :-)
So basically, once global warming takes its course, Earth is going to look like Mars.
I think I have read before (and it would seem to make logical sense) that if the Feds run more than 50% of the Tor nodes, they can start to reliably trace traffic? If this is the case, I have no doubt that the US gov't has the computing power. The "drug war" is very well funded.
Hear hear!! I wish I had mod points for you. Call a terrorist what it is.
I taught myself BASIC at 5 and was writing servers and web applications at 14... I've worked full-time as a systems engineer and web developer for the past 9 years. I've taught myself everything I know and always worked alone... I've never had another set of eyes on my code except for one project, and after they saw the first 10 lines of code they passed. Yeah. That's all the feedback I've ever received, and it was completely useless.
:-(
How can I get critical feedback - not just a list of everything I'm doing wrong, but actual constructive feedback on how I can add/change/improve those shortcomings? It SHOULD be a centerpiece of my job, but it hasn't happened once. Between that, and being self-taught, I have no intention on paying for a programming course.
I've always been able to program ANYTHING and make it work. I'm torn between the fact that I've been able to build tons of complicated applications over the years and I'm doing some really cool work with "Big Data" processing right now, but feel like my code is probably garbage. I wasn't hired as a developer and never took a programming class, but it has always the majority of what I do day-to-day...
I took compsci in high school and it made everything that I loved about computers seem so miserable and mundane and boring and painful - their teaching method sucked and I'd never have chosen this industry if that was my introduction to this field!!)
The final kicker here? I work for the research institution of the computer science program at a major university. And not a single person I work along-side writes code for a living. I don't need feedback to know I need a new job, but I do need some suggestions on how I can improve my code when I don't have anyone to help me
Funny that when I went to the slashdot 15th anniversary meetup in Brooklyn last year, two of the founders were there - one with a masters of fine arts, the other a PhD in divinity.
I'm a systems engineer / data scientist and I have a bachelor or arts degree in political science (and I totally love my job!). ^_-
"The lawyers at General Mills should have known better.”"
What they mean is: the lawyers should have written it more obscurely so they didnt get caught
I'm a first-generation Quebecois in America (ugh!) and my French = NULL. I studied it some on my own as a kid and took it for 5 years in school. I also studied Latin for 2 years, and German and Chinese for 1. I tried, I really did.
I can't speak a single damn one of them and can barely read a tourist map.
I studied linguistics for 2 years and was very good at it, but it simply feels impossible to learn another language. The amount of rote memorization, unusual grammar, and idioms makes the task seem insurmountable; I'm done trying. I guess I'm just lazy.
A joke they told in my language classes was that a person who spoke three languages was trilingual, a person who spoke two was bilingual, and a person who spoke one was an American. Without having exposure to many different languages at an early age - not just exposure but living amongst them - Americans are pretty much doomed when it comes to learning a second language. Before the age of 4 children can acquire just about any language with ease, and this decreases until the age of 11 or 12 or so - after that, its really really hard to learn another.
It sucks living in New York City and feeling like I'm the only person who doesn't speak another language, but that's just life. At least I speak only English and not only French.
I'd love to have your big corporate budget, but I don't.
I'd love to have your department full of programmers, but I don't.
I'd love to have your nice long deadlines, but I don't.
I'd love to have a professional development budget - hell, **I** want some professional development!
I don't have the time to train someone. When I have 100 resumes to flip through, and 20% look even remotely qualified, shouldn't I be able to find at least ONE programmer who knows wtf they're doing?? If I don't hire someone, I end up doing the project myself, working with technology that I don't know. If I can do it, why can't someone else?! Do your damn job - you learn by NEEDING to learn something new to get the job done, and by DOING it. I'm not going to "train" you by doing the job for you.
I am a systems engineer/project manager in the software dev institute of a major research university - I don't expect to hire an out-of-the-box worker, and I want the project to be just as much a learning experience for them as it is a paid job, by giving them the opportunity to analyze and propose their own solutions under my leadership/guidance. If there is a particular technology they want to learn and that I agree is a good tool for the job, then by all means I encourage them to use it. I need them to be interested enough and self-motivated enough to learn the skills they need to get the job done. Otherwise it'll just be me reading the manual and telling them how to do the job; in that situation, it's easier for me to do it myself.
When hiring, my three basic criteria are: are you smart, are you motivated, and have you done any projects on your own time (which speaks to the previous two). It's usually easy to tell if they're fluffing a skill or not because if they have actual experience, they are specific about which technologies they've used. A candidate who puts "Linux" isn't the same as one who lists "Debian"
Compsci has basically nothing to do with computers, and that's half the problem. Students think that when they take up computer science, they'll be studying, you know, actual technology. It is far more useful to an employer (me) that a worker can write SQL (3rd year DB students with +90% GPAs who cant GROUP a query?!), not just use some query-building IDE software for a class project that does the heavy-lifting for them. I need someone who can intersect and transform arrays - they can't even do that. The crap I did at the age of 15, these college students have never even seen before! I don't expect them to have that experience, but comon, if you want to work in this field you gotta know SOMETHING outside the classroom!
This is why I can't find qualified students. If I need someone to sniff a network, it's far more useful to me that they know how to use a damn sniffer than for them to know the OSI model but can't make heads or tails of a packet payload. Is the OSI model useful? Sure. Does it get the job done? Not at all.
Biz logic programmers are nothing more than code jockeys aka 'brogrammers'
Colleges teach high-level theories and models and UMLs and chess board Java CS projects - useless to 99.9% of tech employers. So many compsci students I see come into class half-asleep, barely pay attention in class, and don't seem to think much about it once they leave the classroom. They think they're going to make a ton of money as .NET developers by using drag-and-drop software like Visual Studio. I am looking to hire 3 student programmers right now, and even amongst our best candidates, they can't write a simple 4-line script to output a file to screen. They are very, very smart students, but they don't have any skills!
Employers need workers with practical experience, and in general WANT workers who have lots of experience with specific software. Colleges don't teach software suites, they teach theories.
Programming and information technology should be taught as vocations... high-paying, of course.
Younger people ( say 35 ) have been fleeing Facebook in droves, because it's been around a while, and not "cool" when your PARENTS have joined, friended you, friended your friends, and then gossip more to you about what they're doing than you know yourself. Because they're old and have no life. I deal with this every day. Needless to say, Mark is keeping 'Whatsapp' separate because he knows that Facebook will be toast within the next 10 years and he doesn't want to drag this investment down by attaching it to an ailing brand. Wise move.
TV watch you.
Nah - there's just lots of bums in the subway. Most smell like pee :-/
I can confirm this as true on ALL lines, at ALL times of the day.
You're lame.
I wish I had a mod point :-)
More skill. Bigger levels. More options for gameplay.
Ladybug > Pacman
GTA *
Pacman is boring and repetative. I was tired of it 20 years ago, and even the nostalgia of playing it on a full-sized console wears off after feeding it quarters. It's boring. Ladybug was cool though. And at least Donkey Kong and Frogger took skill. I'd take the old Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat over any GTA, any day.
GTA has to be one of the most boring games I've ever played. Boring!!!! I'd rather play the card game 'war' - sure the outcome is already decided from the moment you stop shufflng the deck, but at least you don't know what's going to happen next. GTA? Cops and robbers - pacman with a car and guns.
:-( Sim City 4 is nice, but they are going to be selling "upgrades" so that we can... have the same features we had in the last version like 10 years ago. Want to build a bigger city? Pay us and we'll make your border bigger! Subways?! Gotta pay extra for that too I'm gonna guess.
I want them to continue developing Half Life ! And I miss the simulation games of yore - Age of Empires, Civilization, Roller Coaster Tycoon, etc. They don't make many sim games any more
It is also crap that most games these days *need* to be played online because of DRM. I like the Steam/Origin model because I don't have to worry about losing the media, but if I ain't online I can't play Sim City (without a workaround - which would probably screw up my cities online anyways),
Game developers complain about how expensive it is to create a new game - I'd much prefer something challenging and stimulating than a boring game cloned from 15 years ago because they haven't bothered to come up with anything new and just want to jazz it up with eye-candy, give it a new name, and sell if for $60 when the original was like, $20 (I'm looking at you, Microsoft)
I guess I'll just be stuck with Age of Empires 2 and Civ 4 and Roller Coaster Tycoon - but at least they're still fun and challenging after all these years!
GTA is for 'brogrammers' and frat boys.
My point stands: the majority of information is unjustifiably secret and should be released without issue, and a lot of what remains makes people look bad. Also, the government intentionally drags its feet, "loses" documents (yeah... but they can find an original income tax receipt from 40 years ago), and redacts entire pages of everything except the "the"s and the "is"s There is a reason that the government fights so hard against releasing this information, and it definitely isn't for our own good.
A Congressional audit has found extreme waste in the document security system... classified documents are very burdensome to track and secure. I believe it was something like 30% of all documents contain no sensitive information whatsoever. The government opposes releasing information because it can make them look bad by exposing wasteful spending, secret investigations where prosecution was declined, or the government intentionally poisoning its soldiers to test chemical weapons and "cures". A very small percentage of documents are secret because they stand to damage national security. Most are secret to cover up bad behavior because the contents would make some important people look bad.