Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Are Any Certifications Worth Going For?

An anonymous reader writes: I am an IT professional in my 30s and have had some form if IT employment for the last 15 years. I've worked my way from technical support to IS manager, but my career seems to have stalled. I have a fancy 4-year degree in Information Systems (I was never much of a programmer) from an actual college, and a good deal of real-world experience combined with reading the odd technical book here and there to keep abreast of what's going on in the world of tech, but what I don't have is any certifications. None.

When I was a poor student fresh from college, I decided that certifications were a waste of money, since the jobs I was applying for at the time didn't care about them, and the tests were several hundred dollars each. Now, it seems most jobs I see listed want some certifications, and I suspect HR systems are weeding out resumes that don't have the correct alchemical formula of certifications.

So my question is: are any certifications now worth it? If so, where do I start? I will probably stick to the track I'm on (I'm better at managing than developing). Going to classes might be an option, but I'd prefer to be able to self-study if possible to work around being on-call constantly (and, to be blunt, classes are expensive). I don't want to stump up for a class only to find out I don't actually like the class or the material or the certification isn't actually what I thought it was.

317 comments

  1. practical-based certs hold their value by scubacuda · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would argue that certs with practicals (CCIE, JNCIE, RHCE, etc) tend to hold their value much better than those that can simply be gotten by taking tests.

    1. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by ruckc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree with this. I just took the RHSA, and I can honestly say that having book knowledge wouldn't allow you to pass if you've never done some of the tasks before.

    2. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I know employers who want talk to you if you do not have both the ccna and mcsa as much as we bash paper mcses here.

      HR uses them as a filtering mechanism and colleagues respect you more. I had perspective employer make the MS certification requirement being current a condition of employment. Goes outdated? You're fired.

    3. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, showing up for the RHCE and correcting their questions..... does not endear you to the instructor or the class.

    4. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      CCIE is worth it if you have a passion for routers and networking. The rest (including the other Cisco certs) are trash.

      Your career is stalled because you're not interested in programming and don't have an easy knack for management. You've reached the pinnacle of general systems administration and no certifications will change that. There will be more raises as you refine your expertise but you're no longer on a fast growth curve.

      If I'm wrong, go get your MBA or MSCS and your career will un-stall.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    5. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by xQx · · Score: 1

      The CCIE isn't a certification you just go and get!

      Maybe you can just sit down and study pass the CCIE qualification exam, but the CCIE Lab is an 8 hour puzzle that only the most proficient Cisco engineers can pass.

      If you're a CCIE and you just woke up one day and said "I'm going to go and get my CCIE qualification" and thought the CCIE Lab was a straightforward (not easy, but you know, not has hard as getting a postgraduate degree) affair, feel free to let me know in reply!

      Were you thinking of the CCNA? In which case, yeah. I'd recommend you study and just get that qualification. It teaches you the fundamentals that every IT professional should know.

      But telling someone with no Cisco training to "Go and get a CCIE" is like telling a year 12 student to "Go and get a PhD".

    6. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, showing up for the RHCE and correcting their questions..... does not endear you to the instructor or the class.

      Then don't do that.
      Or be satisfied with not being endeared to the instructor.

      There are two reasonable options here.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by mysidia · · Score: 1

      These are valuable certifications. They are also (I suspect) entirely out of reach for the OP for now, probably, seeing as he's in his 30s and has not pursued even the lower level certs. The thing is, these certs are somewhat progressive, and you need to have some experience preparing and taking certification tests before you take the slightly harder tests like the CCIE written, which is still, I understand, a cakewalk compared to the IE lab.

      You don't just wake up one day and decide to sit the CCIE; you build-up to that level.... most candidates would earn a CCNA, then a CCNP; the NA is really rough for folks who have little experience in IT or little experience with certs, or who don't know binary like the back of their hand, the NA then needs 2 to 3 years of experience before they are ready to consider tackling NP, then require an additional 18 to 24 months after you earned that CCNP, working extensively with the technology building up experience, having little time for a family or social life, and dedicating practically every other waking minute outside work to preparing for the extremely rigorous lab.

      I believe the formal description is "certification track". The RHCE, the CCIE, the JNCIE, or the VCDX is the pinnacle. Those are the certs you want to put on a resume. The others exist as milestones.

      Once you achieve those milestones, you know you have been heading in the right direction, which is why you don't ignore those milestones.

      If you pass the CCIE troubleshooting and configuration lab, the in-person interview, and the written test, then you can truly call that an accomplishment, and it will truly set your resume apart.

      Listing any of the other certs is just saying "I'm one out of the other X million peopl on that path of development who can't yet put down a pinnacle cert."

    8. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by mysidia · · Score: 1

      But telling someone with no Cisco training to "Go and get a CCIE" is like telling a year 12 student to "Go and get a PhD".

      Well..... I think there is one good reason to tell this to someone who has no certifications and has stated that they think certs aren't worth it: It should be a humbling experience, and hopefully they won't get to the point of blowing stupid amounts of money on an exam they can't possibly expect to pass. :)

    9. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see employers asking for a CCIE offering 70K a year. Screw that. CCIE is God level. I have a CCNA and it has expired. renewing it is a lot of work.

    10. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I am heading for a CCIE attempt next month. I was a live long protocol engineer, software engineering, OS design engineer, compiler guy. I have little respect for the computer field where there's no real math involved.

      I quit programming about 3 years back. I don't even have the CCIE yet and I've moved WAY UP the list. I have dozens of certs (all earned). IT is great since it's super easy and all you typically do is the same stuff other people did before you. There's always a web page that explains it for you step by step.

      It's really funny, I have been making a gigantic push to bring TDD to IT. I am designing systems for it. I'm also going to get involved with the universities and business schools to rewrite their IT related curriculum. Since I've moved into IT, I have not yet seen :
        a) Originality. Everyone just does the same thing as everyone else and does it over and over again... differently... for no reason
        b) Verification and rollback scripts. People just bang on keyboards and hope it doesn't break anything. It's the most horrible thing I've ever seen
        c) Up to date documentation. People just change stuff all the time and never update the docs.
        d) Active management. People are always managing project reactively... or should I say the networks manage them.
        e) People insist on using command lines and GUIs for everything. WTF!!! How stupid can you be? I honestly watch TOP IT guys typing commands on keyboards during rollouts and manually verifying things. What's worse, they make constant assumptions (if this link is up, the other 5 must be too).

      That said, certs are expensive but easy for anyone who has a real education in computers. It's mainly just memorization of commands and features.

    11. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1
      Hmm doing a dictionary search (Chrome extension), RHSA is

      The RSHA, or Reichssicherheitshauptamt was an organization subordinate to Heinrich Himmler in his dual capacities as Chef der Deutschen Polizei and Reichsführer-SS

      You must have "done some of the tasks" before.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    12. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by ruir · · Score: 2

      Yep, over the years I learned that in classes professors do not like to be corrected. The best strategy is to keep unnoticed.

    13. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by ruir · · Score: 1

      It depends on your objectives, and which market you are working on. I have LPI certs, as I do not work with RH, and I am always getting contacted. Experience counts too, certs are to get you on the door.

    14. Re: practical-based certs hold their value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HB-1 workers drive the price/salary down.
      Why pay you six figures when I can hire an indentured servant for less?

    15. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by nctritech · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering lately if any of the CompTIA certs really matter to companies anymore. When I took the A+ exam many many moons ago, I found questions with no valid answer given, questions with multiple valid answers, and I completed both of the 90-minute tests in about 80 minutes. I was not impressed, but things may have changed in the decade or so since then. Do CompTIA certs matter to anyone other than Geek Squad and the like?

    16. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by qubezz · · Score: 1

      If you are working in a place that fixes computers and is an A+ shop, like using in their marketing, then they need to have 50%+ A+ certified techs. If the person hiring you only has an A+, then they might consider you in their club.

      It's still just one more letter code that can be in an HR resume keyword search, and it's dead simple. It uses adaptive testing; I scheduled the first 90 minute test, and by answering every IRQ question and other bits of impractical knowledge, was done in about 15 minutes. The test administrator asked if I wanted to take the second of the two - another 15 minutes once the machine figures it can throw the hardest questions at you and get them answered. Computer repairman are going the way of stagecoach repairmen though, although it's one thing that can't be off-shored...

      That being said, any single Microsoft IT test is cheaper, and just having one lets you say "Microsoft Certified Professional". If there is a closet of Microsoft stuff in a server room that would make this cert appealing to a company, I would dread the daily grind working there.

    17. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by afidel · · Score: 1

      CCIE is God level

      Not really, as of 3/2013 there were 38,005 worldwide, a little more than one in 200,000 people worldwide holds the cert. That IS roughly the same density as neurosurgeons though, and those guys do tend to think they're gods too.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, over the years I learned that in classes professors do not like to be corrected. The best strategy is to keep unnoticed.

      Fuck that shit.

      Sorry, but that old codger mentality of my-way-or-the-highway does not bode well for me when it comes to spending hundreds on just the test, along with likely thousands in training classes (or hours spent studying).

      It's one thing to know how to answer certain questions (yes, I'm looking at you, Microsoft) but I'd be rather pissed if those 5 - 10 "unnoticed" questions on the test resulted in my failure.

      People are human, which means we make mistakes. That especially goes for those arrogant cocksuckers in the front of the class who think they're never wrong.

    19. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by jbengt · · Score: 1

      What does "old codger" have to do with that mentality?

    20. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      I would argue that certs with practicals (CCIE, JNCIE, RHCE, etc) tend to hold their value much better than those that can simply be gotten by taking tests.

      Since he mentioned that he is more into management than programming/engineering, the other very relevant "cert" is the PMI Project Management Professional endorsement. This would be the direction to go if he doesn't want to get deeper into the technical soup of vendor-specific credentials.

    21. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A decade ago I took the CompTIA A+ and Network+ certifications, and a Microsoft Windows 2000 certification, which gave me a big boost in the job market I've done IT work on the side while being a video game tester for six years. Too many people think testing video games is all fun and games (it's not!). Without those certifications, I don't think I would have gotten into IT.

      I'm now studying for the CompTIA Security+ certification, as I'm doing security remediation for a company with 80,000+ workstations. Most of my coworkers have A+, Network+ and another certification (i.e., Security+ or Red Hat Certified Engineer). Beyond that I may pursue a CCNA and CCNA Security.

    22. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      My experience has been the opposite. MCSE, CCNA, and so on, the technical certifications, have been valueless. High-level technical certifications, such as the CCIE, are never asked for, but hold their respect... and can bill you as overqualified (a CCIE is like that CCNA you need, except made of solid gold and way more expensive and hefty than the paper mache model you wanted). They can bolster your CV if they're recent, but are quickly eclipsed by actual experience.

      The non-technical certs tend to hold up better. CAPM and PMP are known as the most valuable certifications, but they're project management; while these skills are helpful if you're a programmer or IT engineer, and the CAPM can be had with 6 months of deliberate study and $2000 of investment, I'm not sure you'd gain much from certification that you wouldn't get by just spending $150 on books (i.e. an RMCProject CAPM study guide and the PMBOK5e) and giving a casual read of the material. Likewise, BPM, data management, PHR, and so on all have immense value, but are useless if you're a technical person (unless you're looking for a job writing BPM software).

      Go for the light certifications as a vehicle to expand your skills; leverage them to decorate your resume; but catalog your skills and collect your experience. In the technical fields, being active and current is more valuable than being certified.

    23. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      CCIE is definitely a great cert. It's been a quest of mine for a while. I basically took off January to develop some software and to study and get my CCIE SP. I have more hours in studying than most CCIEs because I feed myself as a Cisco instructor. As an example, I'm teaching MPLS this week, so I get a lot of practice and am hardening those little corner topics like label filtering which generally don't play a big role in most networks since leaking is typically done through BGP as opposed to LDP.

      I have been using my somewhat visible position to start altering universities in Norway to require that Information Technology education looks more like Computer Science. I feel that the standard for IT guys is WAY TOO LOW!!! Even a CCIE who might be the ultimate troubleshooter probably is a half ass scripter. I refuse to have anyone on my team which actually performs changes without making change scripts and verification scripts and uses revision control and scrum. I tell all my adult students that they better learn to program because in the future, IT guys out of the university will have those skills and banging on keyboards like lower primates is not interesting in the new world.

    24. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by Enry · · Score: 1

      It should - when I took my RHCE training/test the instructor went around the room trying to gauge people's expertise with Linux. When he came to me and I was done rattling off what I had been doing he looked at me and said "how about we switch places?". We got along great during that week.

  2. It depends on your field. by The+Last+Gunslinger · · Score: 1

    For example, I'm in the IT security field, and a CISSP does carry a good bit of weight.

    I've also worked in virtualization, and have a VCP5 certification...I can tell you it might or might not mean something to a prospective employer, but I can damned sure tell when I'm talking about the workings of a particular client's virtual infrastructure whether their people are VCPs.

    1. Re:It depends on your field. by afidel · · Score: 1

      The VCP isn't very valuable, but the VCDX certainly is.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  3. CISSP is worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you learn about security, a CISSP opens many doors. But I cannot say what it takes for general IT management; possibly a Project Management certification would help, but I don't know for sure.

  4. Of course it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you phrase the question like that, I suppose certifications aren't worth it, because it sounds like the only reason for you to pursue them is to proof something to somebody else.

    However if what you mean to ask is whether continued education is worth it, then yes, it most definitely is and the benefits will far outweigh the costs of an exam or even the materials.

  5. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All questions posed on slashdot. The answer is 'no.' Get skills, not paper

  6. Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by UnderAttack · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are serious about infosec certifications, check out GIAC (http://www.giac.org) . The certs are very applied and test practical knowledge (e.g. they are open book... no need to test how well you can memorize stuff). CISSP is good to get you started in the field.

    --
    ---- join dshield.org Distributed Intrusion Detec
    1. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by Minupla · · Score: 1

      +1 to CISSP, I had essentially the same experience as the OP, and decided that IS manager tedious. I went and wrote my CISSP, got 'lucky' a couple of times with breach issues and poof, 5 yrs later I'm a Sr Infosec Manager.

      While it doesn't have a practical component, I've met very few people who honestly say they left the exam knowing if they passed or failed. Most nerve wracking test I've ever sat for anyways. And most of infosec (absent specialties such as pentest, and even then arguably) is 90% thinking anyways. Very seldom is it important to know what command to type. Much more important to know the theory like the back of your hand.

      All that having been said, if you don't like handling people, infosec is likely a poor fit. You'll top out soon if you can't have a coherent argument with someone that doesn't degenerate into "Because I said so".

      Min

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    2. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by lucm · · Score: 1

      Those certifications are very expensive, and they require a fair amount of relevant experience. They are not a good way to get started in a field, they are a strong commitment to an existing career path. Same as a PMI certification. Very bad choice for someone who comes on Slashdot to ask for general career advice.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are really serious about InfoSec, you should look to DoD 8570 baselines for certifications:

      • Technical:
        • CISSP
        • CISA
        • CASP
        • GCED
        • GCIH
      • Management:
        • CISSP
        • GSLC
        • CISM
      • Defense:
        • CEH
        • GSNA
        • CSIH

      Security is big business right now. It is hard to produce a secure system as shown by the successes in attacking actual secure interfaces (Heartbleed, Winshock, etc.). This is big business commercially, also.

    4. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by geekmux · · Score: 1

      If you are serious about infosec certifications, check out GIAC (http://www.giac.org) . The certs are very applied and test practical knowledge (e.g. they are open book... no need to test how well you can memorize stuff). CISSP is good to get you started in the field.

      CISSP is not a "Security for Dummies" cert, and the fact that you have to demonstrate five years worth of relevant experience in the security field isn't exactly a path to "get you started". You've practically committed to an InfoSec career at that point.

      If you're truly looking for entry level, or are looking to half-ass a security career and just want the cert, then go after the SSCP instead.

    5. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you took the CISSP exam when it was paper based. From many people's descriptions of being nerve wracked while waiting for results, it makes me think the exam used to be much harder than it is now.

      I took the exam back in October, and was really, really disappointed. No, it wasn't "easy" but there was no critical thinking on the exam. Nothing measured my ability to actually perform in any of the domains. Instead, it was a gauge of how comfortable I am with the terminology. With the amount of time (and money) I spent on that exam, I wanted some more wow factor connected to that certification. With all the people who follow their name with CISSP like it's a PhD, I expected more.

      As far as InfoSec certs go, take a look at the DoD 8570 certification matrix. If you plan on working a government job in Info Sec, (Contractor or Civilian), those will help get your resume through the usajobs sausage grinder.

      If I was hiring, I'd want to see how you applied the knowledge behind the certification. I am no more capable of doing my job after my CISSP. I was slightly more equipped to do my job after my two GIAC certs. Find a way to show off your skillset and knowledge, which I'm not convinced multiple choice tests truly do. Granted, the certs help me get past HR, but they don't really help me in the interview.

      I started volunteering as a coach for my alma mater's budding cyber team. Working through CTF problems and teaching college students how to reverse engineer assembly code in order to extract format string vulnerabilities has proven challenging, but a lot of fun. In some recent interviews, this volunteering has been a unique topic of conversation with which the interviewers seem intrigued.

      For OP: Again, if I was hiring, I'd be impressed with related work provided to the open source community. If you're a programmer, consider developing a portfolio showing off your skill set. If you are a manager, start a blog and write about topics that demonstrate your leadership philosophy and critical thinking. If you're an analyst, do some malware analysis at home, and start writing about what the malware does and, more importantly, how you figured it out. Certs have their place, but there are enough people who have them and are still ill equipped for the job that they carry a negative stigma if that's all you have.

      For what it's worth, I've been doing true info sec for 3 years. I've been a manager in the federal government for 10, 7 of which in IT. I have three GIAC certs (two technical, one managerial) and CISSP. I'm currently job hunting to transition into the private sector.

    6. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, a GIAC class is around $5000, which is quite expensive. However, they don't really require prior relevant experience. GSEC, for example, is a great entry point to the InfoSec world.

    7. Re:Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CISSP is good to get you started in the field.

      Have things changed?
      The CISSP used to require 5 years working in the field. Half a decade required experience already in a field is not "getting started" in a field. 5 years is a normal college run for a 4 year degree.

  7. Unsecure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not meaning this in a bad way. I have been fully in IT for 15 years. I don't hold many certs and the ones I do were forced upon me by management. However I am the lead on my team and have to help out most of the rest of the team with mundane tasks. So what I'm trying to say is if you need them to seek a new employer, they might be valuable. If you have a good resume them maybe you don't need them. If you want to progress in your current workplace then start making things better and show your value to your peers.

  8. Embrace your true nature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave IT and answer your true calling. Your soul knows what that is. Good day.

    1. Re: Embrace your true nature. by tandavanadesan · · Score: 0

      Cue "... Oh I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK"

  9. Get an MBA by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are already moving in that direction and admittedly not a programmer. It is basically a paper chase not too far removed from a cert but non-revocable. You will have an IS degree + years of experience + an MBA. There s a large amount of career potential in that.

    But stop hanging out at /., instead lurk around at CO.com and datamation.com to ensure you know all the latest trends.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Get an MBA by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      What's co.com?

    2. Re:Get an MBA by plopez · · Score: 2

      oops cio.com

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Get an MBA by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Definitely the better option. In your mid-thirties you're coming up on your "best before" date for a lot of IT jobs, if only because employers will assume you're not up-to-date on the latest and greatest (and because they'd rather pay someone who is younger and less likely to object to work conditions that can be pretty bad).

      It's either "up or out" time.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re: Get an MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MBAs are mocked in IT

    5. Re:Get an MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it is an MBA from one of the top 5 universities, it's just a very expensive paper.
      And even if you would get one, you're in your 30's and probably not willing to work for the salary they offer kids right out of college.

    6. Re:Get an MBA by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      Actually, being in the IT field with an aptitude for management would make him the ideal candidate for a PMI PMP (Project Manager Professional) certification. You need to know some stuff about IT, like the effort it takes for development, the kinds of tools and system available, the tradeoffs between budget, time, and quality, etc. Lots of companies (and governments) look for PMP certifications for project manager positions. And since the OP doesn't particularly like coding, he can spend his whole day in meetings, compiling reports, evaluating build progress, and writing memos. No coding required.

      Pays really well, too.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    7. Re:Get an MBA by mysidia · · Score: 1

      You will have an IS degree + years of experience + an MBA. There s a large amount of career potential in that.

      Or go for a Doctor of Business Administration. Anyways... I thought the snazzy thing these days was "MBA Equivalent"; you know... like getting a Masters in Finance and taking some other random classes. So you are slightly differentiated from the standard 'MBA' curriculua :)

    8. Re:Get an MBA by lucm · · Score: 1

      In more than 15 years I haven't met a certified PM who lasted more than a few years in that kind of job. The good ones evolve towards senior management, the bad ones end up leading scrum master workshops where people spend their time openly playing angry birds on their phone then use the cheap printout certificate of achievement as an ironic prop in their cubicle.

      I wish some stats were available to back my claims, but I suspect that PM is the discipline in IT with the highest burn-out and/or suicide rate. Other good candidates to gasket blowing: people who manage DR sites, business analysts who become specialized in writing test cases (aka the kiss of death), and anyone who feels like they won the lottery when the quorum is not met for the CAB meeting.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    9. Re:Get an MBA by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      In more than 15 years I haven't met a certified PM who lasted more than a few years in that kind of job. The good ones evolve towards senior management, the bad ones end up leading scrum master workshops where people spend their time openly playing angry birds on their phone then use the cheap printout certificate of achievement as an ironic prop in their cubicle.

      Having been involved in IT PM I concur. I ran away as fast as I could and even quit a job after they asked me to go manage another project; trying to run herd on a bunch of techies, sitting in on endless worthless meetings where nothing is decided, and fighting management who seems to think changing specifications constantly will somehow magically keep a project on schedule is not my idea of fun. Oh yea, and having management that believed everything the salesperson said and then argues when you try to explain that converting thousands of records, all of which where entered in a system that didn't enforce data integrity, will take longer than 2 weeks, cost 10x as much and they will still loses 20% of the data. Don't even get me started on the "We're different at this location so we need to do it this way" after everyone agreed to one standard approach.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    10. Re:Get an MBA by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Unless it is an MBA from one of the top 5 universities, it's just a very expensive paper. And even if you would get one, you're in your 30's and probably not willing to work for the salary they offer kids right out of college.

      Er, I'm just curious. MBA holders are not hired to clean toilets. They gain those skills in order to run the business well.

      That said, what company is stupid enough to hire the MBA "right out of college"?

      Funny thing about business. It tends to help a LOT when you actually have real-world experience doing it.

    11. Re:Get an MBA by Maxwell · · Score: 2

      You sound like a horribly bad PM, the things you complained about are the PM's responsibility . I am sure no one was sad to see you go....

      sheesh.

    12. Re:Get an MBA by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      You sound like a horribly bad PM, the things you complained about are the PM's responsibility . I am sure no one was sad to see you go....

      sheesh.

      Actually, no. The problem was I was very good at it, knew how to work the system to get stuff done and minimize the impact of stupidity on my team, and as a result kept getting picked to do PM work on tough projects even when I said I do not do PM work; that's not what I was hired to do nor what I want to spend a career doing. And, yes, that is the PM's job and was why I did it but I finally said "screw this" and left. As for my team, I had their back and took care of them which is why they kept working for me even when they could leave the project. I can see why good PMs bail; they don't need all the crap that goes with the job when they can make more money and have less stress doing something else.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    13. Re:Get an MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit.

      Its pretty funny when the person whose job it is to say "No" just keeps saying "Yes"...then freaks out and quits.

      When youre the project manager, other peoples job titles dont mean shit. Its your job to tell Sales NO or the CEO NO. If they dont like it, tough shit, they can fire you - thats far better than quitting.

    14. Re:Get an MBA by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      In your mid-thirties you're coming up on your "best before" date for a lot of IT jobs

      I didn't get started in IT until my 30's. Now I'm 45-years-old, still in IT, and studying for the CompTIA Security+ certification. I do security remediation for a company with 80,000 workstations. I'm one of the youngest member of the security team.

    15. Re:Get an MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend, you sound like you're in some really strange industry. I know many PMs who have been PM's for years and are quite happy. Personally, I'm a PM consultant by choice. I know that I won't be going into executive management - but that's by choice. On the flipside, I enjoy what I do, work in various industries and with different clients, and get compensated very well.

      It can be a high stress job, but no more so than any other management position.

      MKS

    16. Re:Get an MBA by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You got in just after the turn of the century (my, how time flies), just after the whole y2k thing. A lot has changed in the last decade or so ... we have an over-supply of workers (thanks, H1Bs), and more competition for each job nowadays.

      What worked for you then won't necessarily work for him now. And he's going to have to get up to speed (which takes time and money), and by then, even more competition. At least an MBA doesn't tie him in to one sector of industry (or even one industry).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    17. Re:Get an MBA by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And he's going to have to get up to speed (which takes time and money), and by then, even more competition.

      The expectation about ten years ago was the Southeast Asian nations would turn inward to stop exporting I.T. workers and baby boomers would retire en masse, creating a shortage of skilled I.T. workers in the United States. Alas, the Great Recession came and went. I think the labor shortage got postponed for now. I'm expecting less competition in the future.

    18. Re:Get an MBA by lucm · · Score: 1

      Life is not that simple. I've never seen a major IT project where the PM had any power to say NO to anything important. The PM is usually trying to facilitate communication and provide metrics, and sometimes his opinion will be requested, but the decisions are made by the project owners, which is usually a big team of people who disagree with each other, get quickly hypnotized by vendors, and have zero trust in what their own IT people tell them.

      Also unless this is a tiny company I've never seen a CEO actively involved in a project. If there's a C level executive involved it's usually a COO or CIO, and yes, they will easily fire the PM if he is not "a team player". PM are often contractors so they are easy to silence.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    19. Re:Get an MBA by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Many of the retirees were going to be obsolete anyways, since they were so busy working they hadn't kept up with technologies. This is still a problem ... the treadmill is more like a hamster wheel - run faster just to stay in place. The more work you do, the greater the technical debt you build up.

      Companies won't invest in keeping people up-to-date when they can hire someone else younger who is up to speed on the "latest and greatest" fad of the year. It's a poor long-term strategy, but if you don't survive the short term, who cares about the long term?

      As for workers in the rest of the world, they're not going away in 10 years, or 20. The barriers of entry are simply too low. We're even exporting the reading of xrays to workers in other countries

      At 6:30 a.m. that Saturday, teleradiologist Edward Wong, M.D., opened Drumm's file. Dr. Wong's employer, Virtual Radiologic Consultants, was headquartered in Minnesota. Dr. Wong was licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania. But as he studied the images of Drumm's head, he was at his home in Hong Kong.

      ...

      Perhaps most troubling: How do you know who is reading your scans? Ideally, a qualified radiologist would see them, or at least a physician with extra training in the field. But doctors are expensive, and unethical companies can reap profits by having lower-paid, unqualified technicians read scans. Radiologists warn of the potential for "ghosting," an illegal practice whereby a doctor simply rubber-stamps the reading by a technician without giving it so much as a glance. Doctor's electronic "signatures" on radiology reports are digitized, too, so it can be easy for techs to forge them. "Most people assume that images are going to be read in the hospital," says Arl Van Moore, M.D., former president of the American College of Radiology (ACR) in Reston, Virginia. That's usually not the case, and "there is no way for the patient to know if someone putting his name on the report has actually read it."

      Expect more jobs to be offshored in the future.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    20. Re:Get an MBA by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Life is not that simple.

      In this case, yea, it is. If you're a descent PM, when you start seeing that kind of stuff cropping up, you do two things, simultaneously. 1 - you start pointing out the issues, in many ways and using as many analogies you can think of, to the project sponsors, in hopes of righting the ship. AND 2 - start making contacts and keeping your resume up to date. It's fix or exit time. Real PMs don't have much power, but the good ones can come into any situation and improve things. Whether they can actually make enough difference in a troubled project depends very much on the PM and the organization. Both.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  10. Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A different question - I had submitted this to 'Ask Slashdot', but obviously wasn't worth a subject on its own, so I'll post it here.

    I have been studying IPv6 independently for a while now, and am looking at making it my new career. Since I don't have a work history in networking (and only have an N+ certification to even begin to claim qualification), it looks like the only way to do it would be to get an IPv6 certification. Therein lies the question: which certifications would be most likely to advance a career in IPv6? I looked at CCNA a while back, but IPv6 is just briefly touched by it in a single chapter. However, my goal is to get something that will put me in a position to help organizations transition to IPv6 — be it a dual-stack strategy or a migration to IPv6 only. So what, in your experience, is the best way to go about it?

    1. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I saw your question in the firehose. The reason they only devote a chapter to ipv6 is because you still need to know all that other stuff. After all, you need to know what they're transiting from, right? It's probably one of those cases of "you can't get there from here."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      As far as I know there aren't any well known (or even up and coming) certifications specifically geared towards IPv6...yet. I suspect they will start coming once consulting on IPv6 transitions becomes a thing...and I'm pretty sure it will. Some day CIOs will wake up and decide they want IPv6 because they read about it somewhere, or their buddy CIO is doing it, or their competitor is doing it, or a supplier is requiring it, or a customer is requiring it, or any one of a million other reasons.

      When that day comes there will be demand for a good number of IPv6 transition consultants because:
      1) Most IT people are too busy doing their job as it is to learn IPv6, especially IPv6 transition strategies. It's not something you can learn in a couple of afternoon workshops.
      2) IPv6, especially transition strategies, is complicated enough and foreign enough that it can be confusing at first to get your head around it.
      3) If you do it wrong you can cause lots of problems
      4) The transition and planning part, which is the trickiest part, is a one-time thing so it will likely make sense to bring in a consultant.

      The demand for consultants with a fairly new technology (well, sort of new, new to most people anyway), meaning that experience is hard to come by, will likely encourage some sort of IPv6 certification movement to substitute for experience in verifying skills.

      All that said...take another look at the CCNA. You're likely to need this if you want to be taken seriously in networking anyway and Cisco has consistently been adding more and more IPv6 to it in each of the last several revisions.

    3. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares if you're a tranny, if you don't want people judging you by that, then stop bragging about it.

    4. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw your question in the firehose. The reason they only devote a chapter to ipv6 is because you still need to know all that other stuff. After all, you need to know what they're transiting from, right? It's probably one of those cases of "you can't get there from here."

      Same AC here.

      Reason I ask is that one of the things I've read is that one needs to stop thinking about IPv6 - particularly addressing - with an IPv4 mindset. In other words, while it's good to know VLANs, OSPF/EIGRP, IOS, SDM, and so on, other things, like IPv4 subneting and VLSMs would be needless as far as migration to IPv6 goes, as long as one has enough subnets on the IPv6 end to cover whatever is needed.

    5. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Reason I ask is that one of the things I've read is that one needs to stop thinking about IPv6

      Fixed That For You. There is not a *single* commercial website that is dependent only on IPv6. And I've seen exactly *zero* companies using IPv6 internally in the last 30 years. They all use NAT internally to avoid the external IPv4 depletion.

      Frankly, by the time IPv6 becomes necessary, I expect us to be on yet another fundamental network technology anyway.

    6. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurricane Electric/TunnelBroker.net IPv6 certification. If you need a hand with any of that, ][CyberPillar][ IPv6 Tutorial is available, or the video tutorials at HE.Net/TunnelBroker Presentations and/or HE.Net/TunnelBroker Cert FAQ.

      So, there's your answer. A free IPv6 cert.
      Oh, did you want a popular IPv6-centric cert that the business world is clamoring for? Ooh... that's not going to be so easy to find.

      The problem is, nobody seems to care about IPv6 enough to want to pay much for it. Even now that operating systems are supporting IPv6 more, IPv6 seems to be in a bit of flux; DHCPv6 has been getting to be used for default gateway info, which was previously expected to be handled by router advertisements and not DHCPv6. The whole idea of breaking up the first bits into pieces for the ISP and so forth has been thrown out, just like IPv4 classes got thrown out when classless inter-domain routing (CIDR) took over. Nuances are still seeming more likely to be subject to change than what they are likely to be bringing additional income to a company, so there's little interest in investing in that quite yet, still.

      And, in the end, IPv6 is likely to be a rather minor issue at most, because end users shouldn't ever have to do anything with IPv6. For that matter, end users really shouldn't have to use IPv4 addresses either; they should just be relying on DNS. So what you're saying you want to focus on is getting packets from one location to another using IPv6, rather than using IPv4. That's kind of like saying you want to focus on Wi-Fi instead of Ethernet. The thing is, when it works properly, end users shouldn't notice any difference in their browser.

      Cisco and Microsoft and others (presumably CompTIA will soon, if they haven't already) are starting to actually require more IPv6 knowledge in their general networking certs, so soon enough there will be plenty of people who have learned the most basic of IPv6 topics.

      More advanced topics will often involve networking theories, higher layers of the OSI Model, or other factors that are not really specific to IPv6 (nor are they specific to only IPv4). You'll probably need to broaden your scope to be very marketable as a networking expert.

      But, in the mean time, go ahead and get that free IPv6 cert. It's an interesting one: take it at home, free. But unlike all those certs that people pay for, so that those people can prove how much head knowledge they memorized, getting this cert involves creating working services. HE.Net/TunnelBroker.net will have their automated systems interact with your servers to make sure that your stuff actually works.

    7. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://he.net/

      They offer IPv6 certifications. I don't know if they are valuable, but I think they are the only game in town right now.

    8. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says someone without a clue as to what IPv6 is, and how long IPv4 can last

    9. Re:Certifications for IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a server, but for starters, I wanted to try it out on my laptop, and slowly figure things out. This one does sound interesting, and if it's something that companies are willing to accept as a prima facie evidence of one's competence in IPv6, it would certainly be useful to have.

  11. Don't get an MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear god please, we already have enough of you and I don't think I can take another.

    1. Re:Don't get an MBA by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Dear god please, we already have enough of you and I don't think I can take another.

      What? And be a lawyer? I know it's a step up but...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  12. Certs by drewzilla · · Score: 1

    Evening, Soulskill! I feel your pain. I'm in the exact same boat as you and have the exact same question. Hope to hear some valid feedback on this subject, as well!

  13. PMP, if you aren't a technical person by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 2

    Since it sounds like you aren't really technical anymore and don't have a desire to be technical, then I wouldn't recommend any of the technical certifications (RHCE, etc). Those are going to get you job offers for things you don't want to do. You should probably look for something more along the lines of Project Management Professional (PMP) certification, or something of that ilk. That will really help you manage projects and it probably looks good on a resume. Just my 2 cents.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  14. Certifications get squat by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    I interviewed someone with certifications. They had no skill.

    I work in an office with no certifications.

    Certifications might get you a raise, might not, averages on not. Won't get you a job. Averages on won't.

    It might get you past the HR filter. But the best way to get past the HR filter is know someone. Good old fashioned networking.

    If you have a job, get a cert and get a raise. If you have nothing else to do, get a cert and possibly get past the HR filter. But be prepared for the non-cert questions. Cos those are what matters.

    1. Re:Certifications get squat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically agree with the above. I get a lot of resumes and applicants for my company, but certifications are a minor point. Our consideration process is informal, but basically something like this.

      - Is the applicant roughly qualified to address our needs? (e.g, do they have approximate experience in solving problems like what we need solved > certifications.)

      - Do they present themselves well? Are they proactive? Do we feel their attitude is positive and we can trust them?

      Assuming yes, then maybe an interview - ...and from there it's 80% attitude, 20% skill. There are so many other considerations in what makes a team member productive and worth hiring. Communication ability, sense of responsibility, etc. The goal is to make the business successful. We know that hardworking, smart people will learn what they need to do to help us be successful.

      My company is very technical, very aggressive on new development and innovation, so our approach makes sense to us. For, say, a legacy 3rd party IT vendor, maybe the case would be different. But I doubt it. We've talked to HR managers at old, big, enterprise institutions and found they take the same approach more often than not.

      Hope that's of some help.

    2. Re:Certifications get squat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I interviewed someone with certifications. They had no skill.

      A lot of Certs are like that. The Cisco series are less so, if the Cert is from the more recent exams (i.e. less than about 5 years old or so). And they don't really say that someone has a lot of skill, they simply prove the person has at least a somewhat decent grasp of networking fundamentals. If you think you have the skills, then go spend a couple hundred bucks for your CCENT or CCNA, and you'll have the paper as well. A lot of people who scoff at the Cisco exams and then take them, quickly find out they aren't nearly as easy as they might seem. And many, many employers find a good bit of value in them. At the very least, it will get you a little more consideration than the other guys tossing a resume in the pile saying "Certs are for suckers, I've got l33t skillz and don't need them".

    3. Re:Certifications get squat by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      This has mostly been my experience. Certs will help get you an interview, but they won't get you the job if you don't know your stuff. If you know your stuff, and have some kind of prior experience, anyplace decent should have no problem hiring you. The only exception to that is in some government/government contracting work, where specific certifications are required by federal regulations (like DoD 8570), and they have to have someone with one of those certs in that seat.

    4. Re: Certifications get squat by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      I've been studying for the CCNA for some time now and, to be honest, I'm about to give up on it. Have read the Cisco cert books ( from Cisco Press ) twice, attended a boot camp and watched the CCENT / CCNA training series from CBT Nuggets twice as well. Run all Cisco gear on my home network and have a few routers and switches to play with for test setups as well. In addition, I also play with Cisco's Simulation software and have a few practice tests I can take. I can build a router and or switch from scratch and understand the core concepts pretty well. I also have the CCNP level cert books on my desk so I'll peruse those eventually for the concepts I'm interested in. ( BGP, VRF and VPN mostly )

      My test is already paid for ( part of the boot camp fee ) but it's likely I won't even bother to take it.

      This is due to a number of reasons.

      First, it will do absolutely zero for me where I work ( and have worked for 15+ years ). My pay will not increase one dime.

      Second, CCNA has to be renewed every three years. CCNP is either two or three years and CCIE is every two. I really have no desire to go through all this all over again a few years from now relearning intricate details of routing protocols most don't use any longer. ( Rip ? Really ? )

      Third. The practice tests are full of pointless questions that only the most OCD level folks will care about. No, I don't recall what year 802.11b became a standard and neither does anyone else :/ Unless you teach this stuff for a living, it's unlikely you can recite from memory what the default STP bridge ID's are or the joys of subnetting by hand.

      My thoughts are the only way you'll pass the current Cisco Certification exams is if you walk, talk, eat, sleep and breathe this stuff. If you LIVE for deciphering Wireshark traffic or can't wait to break down some addresses into binary so you can manually summarize the routes, then you'll do well with Cisco Certifications :D

      I've come to realize that you really have to like this stuff to take it to it's highest levels. Since I don't get excited about it and only do this sort of work because it pays the bills, I just can't justify the cost and stress of obtaining ( and keeping current ) certs I may never really need.

      YMMV of course.

  15. No, not even many BS degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not even a BS. Especially in a subject like English, where you'd surely be taught that ending a sentence in a preposition is bad. Nobody cares. We get what you mean. The so called STEM degrees might still be worth it; but those aren't the "certs" that most people think of. In many shops, the fact that somebody has a cert is actually a negative. It says, "I was too out of touch with the field to know that certs are worthless. I saw some ad for some training on late night TV and it sounded like a way out of the basement.".

  16. Re:Just Lie by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just lie about what certs you have, in 12 years I've never had a single company ever ask me for proof of any of my dozens of certs.

    Really bad advice. NEVER lie to a prospective employer. Sure, it may get you an interview and you might be able to BS your way into a job by claiming stuff you don't officially have, but is it worth it?

    Is it worth it to be sitting on pins and needles waiting for them to check up on you and fire you? The IT world is generally pretty small in most areas. Unless you live in an area where there are a LOT of employers, lying to get a job is a reputation killer. You may think you can just walk away and get away with it, but don't be so sure.

    However, the best reason to not lie is that it is not ethical. ALWAYS do the ethical thing. Stay above the fray, tell the truth and get the certifications for real. It may take longer and be harder, but in the long run it will be worth it.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  17. Does anyone check? by koan · · Score: 1

    To see if said certs on a resume were actually earned?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Does anyone check? by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      Yes. Governmental employer HR departments tend to take position requirements very seriously.

    2. Re:Does anyone check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Background checks include verifying certifications and education claimed.

      If it can't be verified, you won't get a call back, which is a problem I run into a lot.
      (The elementary school I went to was shut down, and nobody knows what happened to its records.
      The middle school I went to closed for financial reasons, and nobody knows what happened to its records.
      The high school I went to changed names, and lost all records from before the name change.
      The college I graduated from changed names, then closed up due to financial issues.
      The graduate school I attended changed names, and lost all student records
      With two exceptions, every company I've worked for has gone out of business.
      Every location I've worked at, was shut down by the company I was working for.
      At interviews,I let the interviewer thumb through my brag book.
      If they ask permission to photocopy anything, I've a 50% chance of being hired.
      If I didn't have that brag book with me, there would be zero chance of me being hired.)

    3. Re: Does anyone check? by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      Dude, given that tale of woe, I don't think I'd hire you just for my own safety's sake. Sounds to me like any company thst hires you is on the path of oblivion.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    4. Re:Does anyone check? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      add to that list that with a name like 'anonymous coward', it's hard to pass the credit check.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    5. Re: Does anyone check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some employers do. Of you let you probably want to go to a smaller company.

    6. Re:Does anyone check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had anyone check, to my knowledge (Hell, I'm not even sure *I* can check anymore, but who cares about a Solaris 8 admin cert?). But if I see it on a resume, it's fair game in an interview, and failing there is a guaranteed flush from consideration. Had someone once who claimed to be a certified Solaris admin, but they couldn't tell me what disk slices were. Further questioning revealed he'd taken some kind of quickie certificate through DeVry or somesuch, NOT the Sun Certified System Administrator exam. After that interview, I don't think he was surprised when he wasn't offered the position.

    7. Re: Does anyone check? by lucm · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't change a thing. If that guy applies to your company, it's doomed. He's not bringing bad luck with him, he has a death wish and a sixth sense allowing him to find potential disasters.

      Slashdot will probably go bankrupt or get hacked pretty soon.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:Does anyone check? by ruir · · Score: 1

      How about asking references from ex-colleagues?

    9. Re:Does anyone check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always amuses me how on a board full of techs who spend days arguing about why privacy is so important, scripts reading your email is a sin, and how you somehow need to use TOR to connect to your bank accounts online... how you all still masturbate each other like drunken frat boys on a pledge over those who've chosen to post without a uniquely tracked identifier.

  18. Stalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean by stalled?

  19. I never really needed any certifications. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an 18 years career in IT and I've never needed them even once to get hired
    for employment.

    One time everybody working on a project needed to be DB/2 certified. My company
    handled it in that we got a trainer for two days and he coached us through the exam. That
    was in the 90s still when certifications were starting to come out so at a point in time
    when these things were starting to get hyped. Then the only other time I had to have
    certifications was when I was giving classes. I have a MySQL 5.x Professional and
    DBA certification sometime back in 2006.. to coach other people through that cert.

    Although I have never actually worked with Windows (I have worked with open-source tech
    all my life) most of all life, I have given classes on Active Directory and
    Sharepoint. But I was never certified in any of that and never jumped through the hoops to
    actually become a "MCT" (Microsoft Certified Trainer). I am sure someone somewhere will
    upset over this but figure out which court to sue me in first. Yeah this time around I
    didn't even bother with getting certified to do the classes. (Before you whine about me being
    a bad teacher, I take pride in my teaching. I prepare every class according to the manual
    and I make damn sure all examples work the way they are supposed to. Plus I got good
    feedback scores from the participants and so I got invited back for years to do these classes).

    Anyhow bottom line, the only time I needed a certification was once in the 90s for
    some bs customer who thought it would be neat if people who worked on their project
    were certified and then when I got in on the training + certification action myself as
    a trainer and I am not sure I really needed the MySQL thing either.

    I have never otherwise in a job interview been asked if I am certified and I have never
    brought it up either on my resumes and I think it is just downright fraud perpetrated
    on the naive.

    Maybe if you went for some really tough thing like Oracle's top-tier DBA
    certification or the Cisco something or other where you actually have to appear in person
    and go through an 8 hour hands-on examination marathon. That might impress me a bit
    but a.) I hear it's expensive and b.) I've never found I had to go through that. If your
    resume says you are a Certified XYZ Engineer I am not going to hold it against you but
    I would wish you had read my rant here before you went and wasted your time and money
    on it. It's not going to impress me.

    Your real certification is when I look at you, when we get down to business during the
    interview. I will have a look at your previous jobs and I am the guy who if you're saying you
    worked with XYZ years ago and I happened to do that too, I am going to ask you a few questions
    about that depending how much I still remember myself ;-).

    Take care and invest your money but above all your time wisely.

  20. MCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All questions posed on slashdot. The answer is 'no.' Get skills, not paper

    No, the answer is "What do you mean when you say The IT Field?" Serious question. There are a shitload of different types of career paths which are commonly lumped together under 'IT'.

    Certifications vary in value. If any of them are applicable to your field, the Cisco certs are not a bad idea. I would say the CCENT is going to be somewhat valuable in pretty much any IT related field, but whether going beyond it (in any of the paths) is worth it all depends on what you're looking at doing.

    Some platforms may have value if an employer uses them. So if you can narrow down your plans a little bit, you'll probably get some better advice on which certs can actually be useful (either from a paperwork or knowledge angle) and which are more of a waste of money and time.

  22. My Company Requires SalesForce Certs by glennrrr · · Score: 1

    My company, which is otherwise one of the best places you are ever likely to work, requires all employees to take and pass at least the SalesForce Developers cert. They do pay for it, but it's probably a big advantage to have it before applying.

  23. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  24. ITIL by Sivaraj · · Score: 2

    For you profile, ITIL certification may be worth looking at. It gives knowledge essential for managing large IS departments, implementations, and data centres. It may not be as glamorous as PMP, but is essential part of managing IT for large companies. It is still a rare certification so it may actually be worth it. Being an IS manager you may appreciate many sections of the standard and contrast it with the way of doing things in your previous jobs.

    1. Re:ITIL by leitz · · Score: 1

      Agreed, if you want to work for large businesses. Processes are important as small start-ups learn to deal with enterprise class problems. You might also take your experience and see about contributing your skills to an Open Source project. Not everyone is or should be a code monkey. What you will get, if you persevere, is an understanding of the challenges very small high energy teams face. You may have that now, in which case you're likely to really help the project! If you like your skillset, take it outside the office. Contribute to projects and get known in the communities. Have fun! You'll age slower and be the envy of the Wall Street mega rich.

    2. Re:ITIL by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I would agree with this one, as I have seen it around on job competitions a lot. Many of the other ones like Oracle are specific to a particular job, just like some of the code heavy ones.

      That said, I think this is more endemic of the whole issue of HR departments and Management that make the decisions not having a clue and need some sort of thing to base a decision on. I've seen many just list a great many certs and other qualifications, where if I had everything they were asking for, I certainly wouldn't be applying for their crappy job because I would be some sort of computer god. Not to mention silly things like years of experience that do not match up with the length of time a certain piece of technology has even existed for.

      I find that so much crap is listed as qualifications that you don't really know what the actual job is because it is basically *everything*. I have done a number of interviews that were pretty much a waste of my time, because you try and guess from the Job title (which can be ambiguous) and the qualifications (which can be a bunch of BS and include everything including the kitchen sink), then when you actually get the interview and see what kinds of specific questions they are asking you see the actual focus of the job (which has little to do with 90% of the qualifications listed) and find you are either ill suited, or not interested, you just did a lot of work for nothing. It is frustrating to say the least.

    3. Re:ITIL by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I worked at help desk when the company hired a new manager who decided that everyone needed ITIL certification. The entire department took ITIL classes taught by the manager. No one got certified because the company refused to pay for it. After the manager got promoted elsewhere, no one mentioned ITIL again.

  25. Who wants to work for... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

    Who wants to work for a bunch of clowns who rely on certification to hire people? It is a clear sign the HR guys don't have a clue about skills and competences and decided to outsource the job to learn about it. So, seriously, do you believe such working environment can be of any value? Do you believe your skills will really be recognized?

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  26. Get an MBA at a cheap school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What you learn in the program will be useful, because you will then speak "finance speak". In most companies, finance runs the show, because, after all, they're in business to make money (or at least, not lose money). Whether you are in a finance position or not, knowing what it means is valuable as a manager. You're not going to be doing T accounts or computing EBITDA, but you'd better know what they are and why they're being done.

    I can't even count the number of leaf nodes or managers who have no idea why "corporate" is issuing the edicts they do, but if you have even a smattering of finance knowledge, it's obvious.

    Unless you're contemplating seeking a job at a high end firm, nobody will care where you got your MBA, nor what your GPA was. It's the fact that you can talk the talk and walk the walk that counts, more than the stretched and hammered sheepskin on the wall. Except for HR.. they need to see that caprine epidermis. But *they* do not care if it was from Wharton, Thunderbird, Kellogg or from podunk college. It's just to get past the filter.

    1. Re:Get an MBA at a cheap school by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

      Western Governor's University (wgu.edu) is a fully accredited university.

      They do MBA programs for a reasonable price. It is an online school. They have have an MBA in IT Administration.

      You are management, that is the "cert" that management is looking for to move up the ladder

      Certs are for technical people

  27. Six Sigma / Lean / PMM by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

    It doesn't sound like you are a in the trenches programmer / admin so, why not take the strengths that you have (higher level technical ability and management) and work toward becoming a business process person. Being able to speak tech and business is quite valuable. Six Sigma / Lean are quite popular these days in organizations looking to become more efficient in their process then support the process with technology systems if appropriate. PMM is some sort of Project Management Methodology Certification, don't know much about it, but it seems popular in tech management circles.

    1. Re:Six Sigma / Lean / PMM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I read this and immediately want to punch you in the face. I hate big corporate environments. Fuck that shit.

    2. Re:Six Sigma / Lean / PMM by MTEK · · Score: 2

      There's probably a nicer way of expressing that, but I've been a contractor in a big organization for 10-years now, and understand the resentment. Self-motivated professionals need not apply; you'll be outnumbered by people who are simply out to check the boxes.

  28. Some advice.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    It looks like you want to continue on the management track. In that case, your best best is to get an MBA. Yes, it's difficult and expensive but you might be able to get your employer to pay for at least part of it. I think that certifications are generally better for hands-on types. As a manager you're not likely to get much of that. If you just want to nibble around the edges in the technology then look at taking some of the free online courses. You won't get degree or any course credit out of it but it will give you an exposure to it.

    1. Re:Some advice.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Management pays better. And it opens the door to executive positions. Normal people prefer the work over the kind of works that code-bangers do, too. If you are normal, it is a win all around.

    2. Re:Some advice.... by nephillim · · Score: 0

      I would agree with the above sentiment above on project management or even business administration courses if you feel you enjoy working with the people more than the code/technology itself. There is always a spot for management that came up through the ranks and understands the actual job of those around them. There are some great alternatives to just an MBA that combine some business/accounting with other skills depending on your career path. One example is University of Wisconsin's Masters in Engineering Management (formerly Masters of Engineering in Professional Practice). There are other similar degrees to this one that might be closer to your ambitions than an MBA if you look around.

    3. Re:Some advice.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difficult my ass. Do a "marketing study" and just spout the corporate b.s. that you have to improve your bottom line by cutting jobs ("cutting costs") and you're there.

    4. Re:Some advice.... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      management track people have higher turnover.

      and harder time finding a job later. it's just mathematics that dictate it, also it tells that they're not really that much into the field itself, so while in theory they might be able to manage any kind of project(not just IT), it's pretty hard for many to find any.

      also this is related to the supposed age discrimination in IT. the older you are, the more detached you are from the trench work the less likely it is for anyone to hire you since they could hire just anyone else with "management skills" to do the job, since all you have is "management skills", just like 10%+ of population.

      anyhow, that's my experience - that management people have much higher turnover in the IT business. the more they are on the "management track" the less likely it is for them to be working 10 years from now(and I don't mean that they're "happily retired" either, just that nobody calls them up the second they hear they're out of work, where as the tech track people get contacted immediately).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  29. FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I strongly suggest getting an FBI badge (Federal Boobie Inspector).

    1. Re:FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Federal Bikini Inspector? Or CIA (Cunt Inspectors of America).

  30. There is a reason for this! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Informative

    The multiple guess tests show no practical application for knowledge. I have met plenty of people with certifications that are worthless, and the people with them were just as useless.. sometimes with dozens of these tests. These people were duped into spending tons of cash to get these certificates and had no practical knowledge. Knowing how to enter a netmask in someone's GUI does not mean you understand what a netmask is, or what a broadcast address is, or how to calculate either from the other.

    RHCE, CEH, etc.. require practical knowledge. Having work experience can be, and usually is, enough to compensate for the lack of a certificate. The more experience you have the less essential a certification is. I have been in the business for nearly 3 decades, and quite honestly I'm never asked about certificates. Go back even 15 years and people did ask, and I did have some certificates. Today, I'm never asked and have a steady stream of requests to review job offers and even suggest candidates.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:There is a reason for this! by BenFranske · · Score: 2

      Many more recent certs are no longer relying solely on multiple choice. For example, the past several revisions of the CCNA exam have become more and more focused on network simulator questions and multiple choice has been relegated to checking for things best asked through multiple choice. The multiple-choice only cert test is a relic which is well on the way to being gone (at least in the networking area).

    2. Re:There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Knowing how to enter a netmask in someone's GUI does not mean you understand what a netmask is, or what a broadcast address is, or how to calculate either from the other.

      If you don't know what a netmask is, you shouldn't be able to pass CCNA (though could get an MCSE or RHCE). I was just chatting with a server admin here and they don't know the difference between a switch and router (almost all switches are L-3 switches, and almost all routers will bridge ports, so is there a difference?).

    3. Re:There is a reason for this! by phizi0n · · Score: 1

      If you don't know what a netmask is, you shouldn't be able to pass CCNA (though could get an MCSE or RHCE). I was just chatting with a server admin here and they don't know the difference between a switch and router (almost all switches are L-3 switches, and almost all routers will bridge ports, so is there a difference?).

      The functionality can be very similar and the lines are increasingly blurred but the key difference is that switches have ASIC's to do the majority of the work while routers have general purpose processors that do most of the work.

    4. Re:There is a reason for this! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Which is why IT departments are now requiring CCNA in addition to the MCSE. Wan engineers are tired of sys admins opening tickets.

      The CCNA is way overkill just like requiring network admins to be mcse certified in case they use a shared drive. But to run viritual machines you need to setup viritual networks and subnet and and diagnose connection problems

    5. Re:There is a reason for this! by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Understanding netmasks and broadcast addresses is worthy of a certification? Really? Are there really people who work in IT who don't understand the basic concepts of networking? Isn't this taught in the first year of college? I mean we're not in 1980 anymore!

    6. Re:There is a reason for this! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      certifications that are worthless

      That's a very good point. When you can repeatedly tell the world that you are an engineer without an actual qualification, or experience, that resembles an engineering degree in any way it is natural that you would think that way.
      The "I'm an engineer and I say steel doesn't get soft when hot so 9/11 was faked" from you was a blight on a profession that you are not a member of.

    7. Re:There is a reason for this! by xQx · · Score: 1

      Understanding netmasks and broadcast addresses is worthy of a certification? Really? Are there really people who work in IT who don't understand the basic concepts of networking? Isn't this taught in the first year of college? I mean we're not in 1980 anymore!

      Yes, Yes, Yes, Maybe - but the first year of college is about booze and women - P's get Degrees!

      It is worth certification because it is such a fundamental component of the job of an IT person now that the Internet is ubiquitous, and because such a horrifying number of IT people don't have any understanding of switching, routing and subnetting is.

      There is a reason CCNA qualifications are so widely sought - it teaches the fundamentals of networking that every IT professional should know.

    8. Re:There is a reason for this! by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Are you a Certified Architect?

      Same advice to the OP, look into an Open Group Architect certification.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    9. Re:There is a reason for this! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Almost all switches are L-3 switches, and almost all routers will bridge ports, so is there a difference?

      A Layer 3 switch is just another word that means the exact same thing as router.

      In fact.... the world's very first router ran on what is now an ancient microcomputer, and it was called a packet switch

      Usually, when a vendor has multiple product lines and they describe some products as Layer 3 Switches and some products as Routers; what they are actually telling you is what primary task the device has been designed for. Something called a "Router" is a device designed primarily for a specific layer 3 duty, usually WAN, Edge, or Core routing IP services.

      For example: Typically, when Cisco calls something a switch or Layer 3 switch, what this means is that the device is primarily designed for Layer 2 switching with light or "simple" Layer 3 duties, with limited flexibility (As in, the ASICs, TCAM, forwarding table sizes, and policy feature support will be smaller or partitioned differently by default than in a router).

      It is probably great for Inter-Vlan routing at the edge and forming adjacencies with other Layer 3 switches and the core routers over common routing protocols such as OSPF, and with an advanced license, it may sometimes provide more "advanced" features such as BGP, however, the CPU and memory capacity available in the Layer 3 switch will not be designed for the heavy core router duties.

      This is only a rule of thumb.... in some cases they are so close, that it is practically meaningless to distinguish between the "Router" and the "Switch".... the Cisco 76xx routing platform versus 68xx switching platform comes to mind.

      However; the differences in the design of the specific devices specifications, and featuresets available tend to be more pronounced in fixed-configuration devices.

      In the modular devices, you can pretty much use the modules to configure router as switch and vice-versa, so "L3 Switch" and "Router" have no real difference in that case

    10. Re:There is a reason for this! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Understanding netmasks and broadcast addresses is worthy of a certification? Really? Are there really people who work in IT who don't understand the basic concepts of networking? Isn't this taught in the first year of college? I mean we're not in 1980 anymore!

      Yes, Yes, Yes, Maybe - but the first year of college is about booze and women - P's get Degrees!

      It is worth certification because it is such a fundamental component of the job of an IT person now that the Internet is ubiquitous, and because such a horrifying number of IT people don't have any understanding of switching, routing and subnetting is.

      There is a reason CCNA qualifications are so widely sought - it teaches the fundamentals of networking that every IT professional should know.

      The CCNA in its current iteration is ridiculous. It is the hardest now of all the tests and requires 5 months and buying your own switches and routers as the training material and simulators do not cover everything. It is says associate but it is like requiring a WAn engineer to take the MCSE so he can troubleshoot login issues. Yes I know the tests progress supposedly but the CCNA you need to know not just subnetting, but span trees, tons and tons of theory, CIDS, and a dozen other topologies and requires like 1500 page books to master the material.

      I would think more entry level certifications would be better for a non network engineer to take. If you can pass the CCNA you can setup a network of any size with ease. Not just tell me what a subnet mask is which is the intention of taking it.

    11. Re:There is a reason for this! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      If you don't know what a netmask is, you shouldn't be able to pass CCNA (though could get an MCSE or RHCE).

      That's absurd. Whatever your opinion of MCSE, you aren't going to get one without knowing what a subnet mask is.

    12. Re:There is a reason for this! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Cisco has skewed the definitions and those who with certs say the CISCO versions to show how smart they are.

    13. Re:There is a reason for this! by mysidia · · Score: 3, Informative

      What the vendor calls the device is more about what the primary intended place for the device is on the network; it is a reflection on the "standard" configuration of the device, or at least the defaults.

      The problem with this assessment "Switches use ASICs; routers don't" is it is only true for low-end devices. The only way you are getting away without ASICs is if you are in a small-business, branch office, or Enterprise WAN with little traffic.

      Switches require ASICs, but "routers" need them too. Routers typically need more advanced ASICs, since they need to look at Layer 3 network prefixes, not just a simple list of MAC addresses for L2 bridging.

      The Cisco ASR routers use ASICs extensively, ditto for 76xx routers; in fact, they are exclusively used for forwarding, there is very little or no software-based switching through a high-end router. If a condition occurs where you run out of hardware TCAM or lose CEF and revert to non-ASIC-based software switching, it will be a very bad day indeed.

      Juniper M/T/MX series edge routers are the same way. All forwarding is done in a separate ASIC-based hardware forwarding plane. Packets are not interpreted or forwarded by software. Even firewall rules, QoS policies, etc, are handled by ASICs on a reasonably high end router.

      Once upon a time there were cases where you needed to upgrade PBB cards or policy feature cards on routers to add to policy management/access list functionality. These are definitely hardware-driven functions.

      Common Layer 3 switches in fixed access configs have similar capability in some respects but more limited featuresets and limited capacity for table sizes, typically; you often don't have quite the same IP policy management features as on a full blown router; some of the L3 switches don't even have decent QoS (which is terrible).

      Also if you need to take a full BGP table; you are not going to want to use a fixed-configuration Layer 3 access switch to do that --- since it probably lacks the memory, and even if it had the memory, generally there will be no supervisor redundancy.

      The requirement to support a huge IP forwarding table, which requires extra memory and CPU, is what an Edge router needs on a multihomed network.

      So there are clearly devices that specialize in being better edge routers than switches.

    14. Re:There is a reason for this! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      That it exists and perhaps some memorization of the major ABC classes. Nothing about what it actually is or anything about the math involved in calculating it.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    15. Re:There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As absurd as it is, I know more than one person that got an MCSE and didn't know what a subnet mask is (other than you always set it to 255.255.255.0 for a server). When I got my MCSE, it would have helped to know what it was, but wasn't required.

    16. Re:There is a reason for this! by lucm · · Score: 0

      I was just chatting with a server admin here and they don't know the difference between a switch and router

      And you wonder why you always end up seated at the losers table for the office Christmas party. Or why there's a faint smell of fart in your cubicle when you come back from lunch.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    17. Re:There is a reason for this! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      ASR1000 routers do CEF in hardware
      Cat4900s do IPv6 in software

      Fact is, it's generally functionality per port. Hardware is nice (FPGA is much better). The real deal is, can it do NAT? Can it do application layer packet inspection? Can it encapsulate traffic in GRE tunnels? Can it...

      Routers are the devices of a gazillion functions.
      Switches are devices which move packets from A to B.

      Devices like 6880s blur lines because they add features like NAT to a switch.

      Another great idea is... a switch typically supports a single media type like Ethernet. A router can support different physical medias and typically bunches of virtual media.

      I prefer to simply analyze devices based on the features I need and the cost per port.

    18. Re:There is a reason for this! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      As an engineer who has implemented IP in VHDL for a custom device, I can safely say that most people don't actually know what subnet mask is. They know what it look likes, but ask them to explain why we even have a subnet mask as opposed to simply using prefix length and most CCIEs will go cold on that.

    19. Re:There is a reason for this! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I train 200 people a year in networking. The first two courses (think of these as the ones you teach to simply feed the family and keep your job) is almost 2 full days of understanding binary and subnets. 30% of the people who take the course will fail the exams because they don't understand it. I spend another day or more in CCNP level training trying to teach the math right.

      You'd be utterly surprised :(

    20. Re:There is a reason for this! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I spent 4.5 days using training videos (had no idea there was such a thing as a dump) to go from "What's a Cisco?" to CCNA. It's pretty simple stuff. Never touched a Cisco either. CCNA just says "I'm ready to start now"

    21. Re:There is a reason for this! by xQx · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to take your word for it, because I did mine 3 years ago. I haven't bothered renewing it because I'm not looking for work.

      At the time, I was really surprised about how easy the questions on the exam were. The reading material and topic covered were vast, but the exam wasn't asking tricky questions. If you studied all the topics, you only needed to understand them all to be able to do well in the test. (Not like the Microsoft tests that ask obscure trivia and provide four realistic options for your selection)

      However, looking at the topics covered, it looks like what the CCNA qualification was 8 years ago is now the ICND1, or CCENT qualification.

      This doesn't seem to cover much more than networking fundamentals that IT people really should know.

      Either way, you don't have to buy routers and switches. Download a copy of GNS3 and get your hands on some Cisco IOS images. That's how I got experience with the Frame Relay stuff that was in the CCNA exam I did.

    22. Re: There is a reason for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curiously according to cisco the processor used in the routers you mentioned can handle all of the stuff you say they have ASIC for. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/solution_overview_c22-448936.html

      Other network processors like cavium's octeon and tilera's tile also handle this kind of tasks inside the processor.

    23. Re: There is a reason for this! by module0000 · · Score: 1

      Your server admin is lying about his RHCE. The RHCE should have no trouble turning a host with a dozen NICS into a L2 switch with VLANS, span ports, and adding L3 and above functionality. Your Cisco device is important, but is well understood and frankly, somewhat child's play to an RHCE.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    24. Re: There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      http://www.redhat.com/en/servi...

      The skills you assert aren't tested for. Most Linux admins I know don't know networking at all. For RHCE, you need to know how to put in settings in a server. But not what they do or what they mean. The Cisco device isn't well understood. The last RHCE I dealt with configured a duplex mismatch and blamed the Cisco for doing what he told it to do. The Cisco device is simple and understood by people who know basics of networking. But RHCEs don't need to know to pass the test, and in practice, don't know.

      Why, are you an RHCE? You sound pretty aggressively defensive.

    25. Re:There is a reason for this! by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's telling how people always ask "is it worth getting this certification" not "will I learn a lot about xxx by getting this certification". Employers now know this. This is why you shouldn't be disheartened when you get a job and find there's no money/time allocated to getting employers certified; it provides no benefits whatsoever in terms of making the employer more productive, it just gives them a slight edge should they want to subsequently leave you for an employer who still takes the certification seriously.

    26. Re:There is a reason for this! by ruir · · Score: 2

      The problem is more than "opening tickets". A sysadmin without some basic networking knowledge is a serious shortcoming.

    27. Re: There is a reason for this! by afidel · · Score: 2

      You're misreading, the QuantumFlow Processor IS the ASIC
      Further, each PPE can access hardware feature acceleration of network address and prefix lookups, hash lookups, WRED, Traffic Policers, range lookups, and TCAM for advanced classification and access-control-list (ACL) acceleration as it processes packets

      If you turn off dCEF and force all packets through the RP CPU you'd quickly bring an ASR to it's knees. By comparison the Cisco 7200 did everything in CPU, but it had much lower bounds to its capabilities.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    28. Re:There is a reason for this! by Anarchy24 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points to give you, but, thanks anyways for the insightful explanation :-)

    29. Re:There is a reason for this! by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      There is a reason CCNA qualifications are so widely sought - it teaches the fundamentals of networking that every IT professional should know.

      I guess maybe I don't know what an "IT Professional" is, but as a software architect, there is very little material covered by CCNA that is relevant to my ability to do my job. All I need are the very basics of networking, and beyond that, I just let the network admins do their jobs.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    30. Re:There is a reason for this! by bonius_rex · · Score: 1

      I took the Windows 2000 and 2003 MCSE tests. There was definitely subnetting involved. Granted, it's been 11 years, but I specifically recall things like "How many hosts can you have on network 10.10.0.0/16, what's the first, last, broadcast IP address" etc. It's not CCNA level stuff, but there's definitely more going on than just memorizing the classes. You needed to know this stuff to setup the RRAS server IIRC.

    31. Re:There is a reason for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, I installed a 4507 and was shocked the base image didn't include EIGRP. You can't run routing protocols on all L3 switches, according to Cisco.

    32. Re:There is a reason for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I just got my MCSA 2012 a couple of months ago, and there were a couple of questions that you needed to know subnetting for. However, it was such a small percentage of the test that you could get by without knowing anything about it and still pass.

    33. Re: There is a reason for this! by module0000 · · Score: 1

      Currently I hold an RHCA(which includes an RHCE). Maybe I am projecting what I think a candidate should be capable of versus the bare minimum they learn to pass the test. Taking too much for granted I suppose. I should have thought some more before making my quick reply.

      Background disclaimer: I work as an engineer to produce linux-powered networking equipment. Our RHCE's have to have a very solid grasp of networking to join our playground.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    34. Re:There is a reason for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCSE NT required me to do subnet and supernet calculations, so I am not sure what you could mean is missing there. I had to understand what a /29 is and to be able to figure out what the network, usable IPs and broadcast was for a given network mask.

    35. Re:There is a reason for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you provide a technical reason to use a subnet mask rather than a prefix length? Sure, the device itself is going to use a binary subnet mask internally. It's a string of 1s and 0s that's logically AND'd with the binary representation of the IP address. Any location with a 1 in the subnet mask will come through unchanged while anything with a 0 will be set to 0. That allows you to compare two IP addresses and see if they're in the same subnet using only a few logical CPU operations. But a prefix length provides the exact same information and a binary subnet mask can be trivially generated from a given prefix length just as easy as it can be generated from a dotted decimal format subnet mask.

      The only case where this wouldn't be true is the rare case where you have a non-contiguous subnet mask. Those are technically legal per RFC 950 but I've never seen one in the real world in close to 20 years of experience as a network engineer. I've never implemented anything in VHDL and it's possible that there are uses for non-contiguous subnets when you're working that close to the hardware that have never occurred to me. If so, you might require a format which can represent those. But for the vast majority of applications, there's no reason I see to use a subnet mask over a prefix length. If I'm missing something, please explain. I'd love to advance my knowledge.

    36. Re:There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Mask was used for the reasons you describe. Theoretically one could have discontinuous networks (I've seen some where it would have worked, but everyone involved cringed at the idea of sending a block of addresses to a subnetwork that would leave a discontinuous network, so we just forced the subnetwork to re-address). That is, except for I don't think that all RFCs are supported on all gear. So what happens if you run into something that isn't RFC 950 compliant? So, in practice, people use contiguous at all times, but the standard was built with more flexibility than the people that work on networks allow.

    37. Re: There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree that someone at the RHCE level should know at least the basics of networking. But as a networking guy, I'm often called in to clean up other's messes. And some of those messes have been very basic errors by MCSE/RHCE people, and having experience with both certs, they are passable without knowing networking, even if you'll be at a 2% disadvantage for not knowing it.

    38. Re:There is a reason for this! by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Are you a Certified Architect?

      Currently? Well that depends, some certificates claim that once you have a certification it never expires. I have a folder full of certificates I keep in a closet I guess as personal trophies, since working at some places like the DOD required I have specific certifications. Today, I'm not asked if I have a certificate because I have a resume which demonstrates functional knowledge of architecture in a vast array of environments, sizes, scales, and business models. I have 2 degrees that I don't get asked about either, because my job is not and never has been restricted to my degrees. My degrees put me on a career path and tested a base level of knowledge at the time, nothing more. Mathematics opened the door to a CS/IT career, but I'm not a mathematician. In fact the last time I ran a differential equation was in College. Liberal arts has helped with critical thinking abilities, communication skills, etc.. but what I knew when I passed those classes was not even close to what I know today.

      As I stated originally, I don't put much stock in any particular certificate unless someone lacks work experience. A certificate does not, and has never really demonstrated a persons ability to adapt and learn what's needed to perform and excel at their job. I know people who did well in a particular environment and flopped in others, and I also know people that have certificates that I would not trust to open a car door, let alone architect a solution. In other words, a certificate is not a valid measure of anything except a persons desire to take a test.

      At an entry level, sure I put some faith in knowing that a person at least took the time to take a test. I don't delude myself into believing this automatically makes a good worker or a well of knowledge..

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    39. Re:There is a reason for this! by CBravo · · Score: 1

      We use Linux on our routers and it works just fine (we have about 400Mbit traffic on our AS). Intel says Vyatta works up to 10G. No asics there (I'm not counting the network card chips).

      --
      nosig today
    40. Re:There is a reason for this! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You're conflating three different things: degrees, licensing (i.e. to be able to legally call yourself a Professional Engineer), and certification. The first two things are much more worthwhile than the third.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    41. Re:There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Back then, that was "Networking Essentials" right? I can't find much on the ancient test, without knowing the test number, and for that I'd have to dig up my ancient MCSE. I remember it being more about the server side of the network, and nothing on networking in general. You could not know what a subnet mask is, and still pass. But anyone who could easily pass without knowing what a subnet mask is, would know what a subnet mask is.

    42. Re:There is a reason for this! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I realize Vyatta can reach 10-Gigabit, but this is in a lab with idealized 1500byte or large packets, not real-world traffic which comes in a lot of shapes and sizes, especially during an attack, and then we have protocols which are highly latency sensitive or re-ordering sensitive such as VoIP, and "tricks" to try and reach 10-Gigabit throughput are compromising jitter-sensitive protocols.

      We use Linux on our routers and it works just fine (we have about 400Mbit traffic on our AS).

      How do you know for a fact that it works just fine? Are you quite certain that it really is 400Mbit, and not 800Mbit of traffic that inconsistently performing routers are quashing at peak time? :)

      Have you hooked up a Spirent avalanche to a port on the router in a lab and sent 10-Gigabits of IP datagrams formulated as 70 Byte packets with randomized payload to randomized destinations transmitted at 17.8 Million packets per second, and measured a packet loss of 0% on the next hop?

      Or, are you relying on the fact that the TCP stacks on your customers' equipment detect the increase in latency on your Vyatta router during congestion and automatically scale back their usage, causing download times to increase, while praying nobody uses Bittorrent, or gets infected and sends a UDP flood, or uses other more aggressive protocols and notices artifacts caused by being linked up through an ISP not using fully non-blocking (wirespeed) equipment?

    43. Re:There is a reason for this! by ruebarb · · Score: 1

      when I got the MSCE in the late 90's, there was a TCP/IP test - my friends recommended (correctly) that I take it first - it was the toughest but if you don't know that you're hurting on the other 5 - but that was years and years ago

      --

      ----------
      ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
    44. Re:There is a reason for this! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Network Essentials. The later MCSE dropped that test, and required a CCNA, but that later changed as well. Most server admins need to know "255.255.255.0" and nothing more.

      I find it hilarious that you thought it the hardest. I found it the easiest, and ended up moving to networks after I was done working as an MCSE for a couple years. Server admin is not nearly as interesting ans networks, especially when you work on networks with tens or hundreds of thousands of people on them. I can build Linux, and throw on any of a number of DNS servers. But it's cheaper and easier to just buy an appliance. Let someone else optimize the hardware/software. It's worth the (small) cost for that, rather than having to build and maintain servers all the time.

    45. Re:There is a reason for this! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      except your example is just the memorization part. the class A, B, C or /8 /16 /24, the primary subnets I spent many years in the Novell 4.x days with not knowing what they were and only known what they had to be in order for things to work.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    46. Re:There is a reason for this! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Since the above poster made a big deal about qualifications not mattering it is worth explaining to others why he personally has that view and how it may not be considered valid by some others. In previous discussions he lumped all three you mentioned into the "doesn't matter" category. Since he gets to tell us all that he is an Engineer without any of those three however he does have a point in his situation if not in some others. What matters is what your prospective boss is looking for, and relevant experience should trump certification anyway unless it's needed to practice.

    47. Re:There is a reason for this! by CBravo · · Score: 1

      We are a service provider and therefore create our own traffic and it is not extremely timing sensitive. We do monitor download times and they are always in acceptable limits (i.e. fast). The ports of our data centres are also monitored and spew out exactly our traffic numbers.

      The load on our routers and the memory use is extremely low. They have been tested to see what happens under certain conditions. Vyatta takes a little memory per connection and we have seen a DDoS killing us because there was no more memory (when we had a low end machine do the work: Dell 1850, 2GB) and we upgraded the machine at that point to rediculous standards. But I will say that there certainly is a place for specialized equipment.

      --
      nosig today
    48. Re:There is a reason for this! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Digital Watches, which are a pretty neat idea, were using ASICs in the 70's.

      Yes; however, these were a different kind of ASIC. The kind of ASIC you would find in a watch is not performing a complex computational task by current standards.

      You will also find certain ASICs in modern computers and servers which are part of the chipset.

      When we are concerned about the difference between an ASIC-based forwarding architecture; we are primarily interested in tasks which cannot be executed efficiently at the same capacity on a general purpose FPGA or microprocessor, not the number of units which are being manufactured.

      It turns out there are multiple different reasons ASICs become more cost-effective; when you would need a ton more general purpose processor wiring and power consumption to accomplish the same job that a well-designed application-specific processor constructed from ASICs could be more well-suited than a general purpose system using a generic computer board to complete the task, or a bunch of generic FPGAs and ICs glued together and programmed to do it in software.

  31. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are a waste of time

  32. The best certs are... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    ...the ones mentioned in the job postings you want to apply for. As for real world value (outside of getting your resume past a text filter) most have very little. The big practical certs mentioned in other comments in here are the exceptions but the vast majority are just extra revenue for the vendors.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  33. The only certifications worth anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are the upper end Cisco certs.

    All the other stuff is just fluff, and in my book, are considered tiebreakers.

    IT really depends on experience.

  34. I assume someone else took the tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always assume someone takes the tests for these things there is too much fraud and not enough trusted signing Auth to make anythign legit that is not accredited - thus a University Degree is best course.

    As for best before date: It's a lie, an assumption and actually against the law in Canada :)

    Don't know the tech , whats your f'in problem - pirate bay - grab some stolen books, videos and get coding on your own. If you do not, then you have a best before date based on your old skills and not because of age.

  35. Please don't get an MBA by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An MBA is a vehicle to convince other people that have MBAs that you believe that an MBA is necessary to work with other people that have MBAs that share in the misguided notion that having an MBA qualifies you to manage a business. Really, it is a ticket into a network of folks that believe that shortcuts and not actual work create a business.

    Most certifications are like MBAs- except that they are shortcuts for HR resume screens, who use them as an easy filter and to avoid accountability that the people that they let through are qualified... "these applicants are CERTIFIED!" ... If you have the experience and you know someone, you will get the job, if not, you're in the pool of "everyone else" that has a certification. The most important factor in getting a job is networking.

    1. Re:Please don't get an MBA by ruir · · Score: 1

      If you know someone, you can more easily get the job, but then the certs helps him convince the others. You won't be the only one knowing someone inside.

    2. Re:Please don't get an MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. The MBA is really what is wrong with IT anyway. Bean counters dictating what is best for the company is why we wind up with under-powered and over committed machines in the first place. The big advantage would be the salary bump, but you most likely will have to leave your current employer to get said salary bump.

    3. Re:Please don't get an MBA by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      True, but most fields have some kind of common methodology behind the,

      You can disagree to your hearts content how MBAs are trained to run a business. But that is how most businesses are founded and run. You want to have influence, you have to speak their language and run things in their methodology. If they want a project cost, you have to do it their way.

      You can definitely do something different and there are plenty of businesses who do different things, but that means they have to start their own thing. Eventually some of these practices might make their way into 'standard business' and into MBA folks.

      So yes, if this guy works for a firm headed by finance folks who basically run things in a standard business MBA way, then he can and should get an MBA to get things done.

  36. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    If skills not certs, what skills can you learn on your own that would best translate to a better job? Quite a few things seem like they are not things you can just set up in your basement to get real world experience.

  37. Tips the balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some things can be learned, but cannot be taught.

    Abilities and skills can be learned, attitudes cannot, or are much more difficult to learn.

    Disregarding whether a certification is worth it in terms of skill, at least it shows a willingness to continue learning. At the very least, this will tip the balance in your favour when being compared with others without a certification.

  38. Been there done that. Get very expensive TShirt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That won't work. I did it. Getting a MBA will not automatically get you into management or into the business side.

    What will happen is that after 2+ years and a ton of money, you'll be back to doing what you were doing but with very expensive letters after your name - that no one in technology really cares about. I went to a top 40 school - not good enough for a lucrative consulting gigs like the Harvard guys get.

    What I advise people who ask is first move into the business side or leadership roles - like a tech lead.

    And keep moving towards management - many companies have that kind of career path.

    As far as the MBA. Only get it if you really need it to get a job or to keep your job. And ideally have your company pay for it and allow for you to take time to take classes, work on projects, and study during business hours and even on company time.

    Then there's this advice I received from a senior VP of a very large job site (via a common friend who forwarded his email to me): "MBA degrees are worthless."

    Shit. Too late.

  39. Some suggestions by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Go to Toastmasters and get a CC ("Competent Communicator") or any of theit further awards. It'll teach you how to present and interact with others in a professional scenario.

    Pick a karate school you like and get a black belt. It'll teach you discipline and focus, and help you keep your health as you get older.

    Join the SCA and work yourself up to becoming a knight. If you take it seriously it'll teach you honor and integrity.

    Take first aid, CPR, and EMT training. Take some survival courses.

    Take MIT courses from edX or Coursera for the certificate and grade.

    1. Re:Some suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally took Toastmasters for a year, and was not that impressed. But then I am old school. My Bullshit alarms are very fine tuned.

    2. Re:Some suggestions by MTEK · · Score: 1

      Pick a karate school you like and get a black belt.

      Can I use that to upgrade my green belt in Six Sigma?

    3. Re:Some suggestions by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well if you're a member of G.I. Joe, that's pretty impressive already.

  40. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously are a bit hazy on what ethical means. To me it is ethical to kill a retarded person under certain circumstances. Society is gradually getting behind my point of view as well but at least for the moment killing a retarded person is still considered immoral. What you mean is "ALWAYS do the _moral_ thing". To sum things up, morals are the values instilled by society, ethics however are the values you aspire to.

    Personally for me it is highly ethical to lie as much as I am being lied to, especially to the people who are lying to me. Of course always considering the risk and benefit ratio. You might find that is highly immoral but I think you guessed it by now I am a very ethical person albeit not a very moral one. So stick your morals where they came out of in the first place :-)

  41. You are fine without any. by lysium · · Score: 1

    I'm your same age cohort, same specialization, same years of experience, only I have no degree and I stayed out of management.

    Certifications are for the inexperienced. My utter lack of credentials combined with my long history of being well-paid to do the work IS my meta-certification, if you get what I am saying.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  42. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me, it is ethical to kill a person who'd kill a retarded person, under any circumstance.

  43. What are you bringing the employer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently a manager and have been one several times in the past, but prefer to be an engineer and have been that many times in the past. I like getting my fingers dirty. I decided to get my PE after 15 years away from school - it's already differentiated me from others, even though it's a pretty easy exam. It seems that other people are afraid of the effort required to make the effort to get certs, degrees, qualifications, etc. They don't want to do the effort, so they denigrate anyone who attempts. Fuck them. These accomplishments are all remarkable in their own ways and help to set you apart during the HR drone process which just looks for metrics to differentiate.
    Anything that shows that you've been willing to take on additional responsibility and liability for your performance is a net positive, as far as I'm concerned. Once your resume/CV has made it past the HR worker bees the thing that I'd be looking for is willingness and desire to take responsibility for yours and others' actions, ability to manage expectations (mine and others), abilities that my group doesn't already have, problem solving in clever, novel and ethical ways, the capacity to agree and hold to a contract (i.e., you and I agreed on this or that, and then we both follow through), strength in communicating (both good and bad events), and a quiet, positive, I-can-do-this (without being pompous) attitude.

  44. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rad Hat. If you will relocate.

  45. Certs are artificial, build real demand by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    So you've realized that your skills are not in demand, so you turn to certs to boost what you don't have. Hmmm, maybe you should develop some new skills and advertise them. It's a classic capitalistic action but quite effective. I'm constantly looking for people who have good programming skills and I have a hard time finding them. A cert or two won't impress me, quite the opposite actually.

  46. If you plan on any work involving government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially DoD, look up the DoD 8570 documentation on required certifications

  47. Re:CCNA is no picnic by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I am researching taking it as I see job postings requiring them for non network admins.

    It is rediculous and overkill and nearly impossible to pass without prepping for 6 months and buying your own switches and routers as the simulators won't cover what you need to pass all for a silly assocites level.

  48. Re:Just Lie by steelfood · · Score: 1

    Lying about certs is pretty bad, since it can be verified. But if you talk and act like you know what you're doing, there are plenty of people out there who'd be willing to hire you with or without certs. A lot of managers are pretty superficial, and good presentation is more than sufficient.

    The thing is, usually, the job you get hired into won't be that demanding. A manager who can't tell know who's bullshitting and who isn't probably won't have terribly challenging work, no matter what the job descriptions say (because said manager probably pulled a bunch of buzzwords out of his ass for it anyway).

    It's not a career, but it's enough to get by. And experience has taught me most of the world really just wants to "get by." It's a sad but not unreasonable fact of life.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  49. Certs are for grunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Question: Did Steve Jobs ever have any "IT Certification" or not?

    Question: Does Bill Gates ever need any "IT Cert"?

    You may think that the questions above are trolls, rest assure, they aren't

    IT certs are for those who do the grunt works in the IT fields

    I have been in the fields for decades - and no, I don't need to boast - and the people whom I pay a lot of money for, those who have genuine new ideas and can really turn ideas into reality, I never need to know if they are "certified" or not

    As for the code monkeys, but of course, they come looking for work armed with all kinds of certs, hoping that they would land a job because of the certs, not because what they can do

    1. Re:Certs are for grunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time either of those two did anything remotely close to "IT" work? The 1980s?

    2. Re:Certs are for grunts by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      Jobs wasn't technical, he was artistic. If he needed his computer fixed, he had someone else do it.

      Gates probably screws around with a lot of IT stuff. But, even riches, fame, etc... aside, he wouldn't do IT. That's for those other guys. He was a programmer

    3. Re:Certs are for grunts by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are business men that just happened to make their fortune in IT. Ofcourse they're not going to need IT certification.

      99% of us are grunts, including you and me.
      Very few of us have that unique combination of sufficient skill and lots of luck to have a positive reputation that preceeds us.
      Pretty much all us grunts are hired going through an HR department grunt.
      The HR grunt doesn't know anything about IT, but he knows certifications.
      Certifications have value not because they represent any qualifications, but because HR grunts aren't going to be fired if they select employees based on certifications.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  50. A few suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for KPIs / LEAN / PMP / Prince2 / ITIL.

    They have many benefits besides improved chances for getting a job, not the least is setting and reaching goals.

  51. Just went through the same thing by musicon · · Score: 1

    I was laid off earlier this year, and like you, did not have any certs. From my research, the one that seems to pay off the best, and is in reasonable demand is ITIL. If you want to go more technical, look at CCNA and A+. All are fairly cheap and especially the ITIL can be fairly easy to study for and pass if you've been working in IT management for a while.

    1. Re:Just went through the same thing by ruir · · Score: 1

      I cannot the ITIL demand. I always heard of it, though it was a big deal. I had to take a mandatory ITIL certification here, and it boils down to rules written by some old timers British bureaucrats that you have to memorise. What a boatload of hype for nothing.

  52. The Problem With Certs by afabbro · · Score: 2

    The main problem with certs can be demonstrating by googling the cert title or number + "dumps". You will find the exact questions and answers for most tests. (More on "most" in a moment.) I don't mean a detailed outline - I mean the full text of the question, the possible answers, and which one is correct. Memorize the answers and you pass the cert.

    As someone who periodically participates in hiring, I don't see much value in certs. I've had the experience of people who had certs who didn't know their stuff. I've never known any employer who given a choice between someone with many years of experience and someone with a cert, would choose the latter.

    There are other problems with certs. I've always found the format is quite ridiculous. Why should I memorize things? If they test concepts, that'd be one thing, but often certs are "which of these commands is correct" kind of questions. What, am I trapped on a desert island with a datacenter to administer and no manuals?

    That said, certs can't hurt. I find them valuable to study for though less to actually take. Vendors outline everything to get a basic knowledge, and that's useful to go over. The only time I see real value in certs is

    • Your employer is a government agency or some kind of big bureaucracy and they require the cert for a position.
    • Some vendors will only extend certain partnerships ("Gold VAR" or whatever) to companies that have X number of certified technicians
    • Your company is providing services and wants to be able to say "all our techs are certified in X" for marketing purposes

    All that said...the exception to the above is the certs that do have some value. These are the certs that you have to pass a lab for: RHCE, Oracle Certified Master, Cisco's CCIE, etc. A CCIE is highly valuable - those guys bill very well.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:The Problem With Certs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the cock in your mouth.

    2. Re:The Problem With Certs by nctritech · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make much sense from a business perspective. Having certifications doesn't automatically make someone an idiot trying to compromise for their lack of knowledge and experience. Sure, it's of limited value (especially A+ and the like) but having an A+ certification doesn't negate a person's capabilities. Why would you actively avoid someone who listed the certifications they've obtained?

    3. Re:The Problem With Certs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im a Cert - an Oracle OCP. I place very little value in it.

      Almost every day I see requests from... a certain part of the world... asking for brain dumps or even offering them.

      My company places value in them tho. We are a Platinum Certified Partner or Oracle's. There is not many of those. And in order to sell and maintain some Oracle products we need certification.

      Oracle Golden Gate is a good example. We would not be allowed to sell it direct if we did not have staff certified in it.

      Exadata even more so.

  53. You aren't motivated, certs aren't going to help by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    In your case, certifications won't likely help you much.

    I would say, that since you're asking the question, you probably are in the wrong field.

    You're in a field with many bright, observant people and you haven't really bothered to pay close enough attention to the field around you but you call yourself an IS manager. I would say your problem is not certifications, its that you're just not that good or at a bear minimum, you aren't trying very hard and thats why your career is stalled.

    With 15 years 'experience' you should know the answer to this sort of generic question.

    The actually answer is 'yes, no, maybe, both, sometimes and never'. It depends on what you're trying to accomplish and who you're trying to get hired by or who you are trying to impress for a promotion or raise. You haven't bothered to consider what you're trying to accomplish but instead you've just come to slashdot expecting an easy answer. Certain companies will require certifications. Some will know that most are stupid. Certain certs are actually meaningful, and certain certs just mean you paid the right 'training provider' the right amount of money (i.e. took their training courses)

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  54. Re:Just Lie by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

    You obviously are a bit hazy on what ethical means. To me it is ethical to kill a retarded person under certain circumstances. To sum things up, morals are the values instilled by society, ethics however are the values you aspire to. Personally for me it is highly ethical to lie as much as I am being lied to, especially to the people who are lying to me. Of course always considering the risk and benefit ratio. You might find that is highly immoral but I think you guessed it by now I am a very ethical person albeit not a very moral one.

    You are neither ethical nor moral, nor are you correct on your definitions. No one believes ethics are "the values you aspire to, completely uncoupled from morality". If you aspire to have the worst moral values possible, that's not considered ethical. Only aspiring to high moral values is considered ethical.

    Aspiring to kill retarded people is not ethical, not moral, and your posturing fools no one. Frankly, you must work at an IT shop full of the lowest talent possible, because you'd never for a second get away with lying where I work. I had someone try that on an interview once: I'd ask him questions, and rather than saying "I don't know" he'd very calmly and matter of factly tell me wrong answers as though he knew them. Problem for him was, I knew the actual answers and new he was lying... we have real IT people doing tech interviews, not HR. My immediate comment in the HR meeting afterwords was that he's a liar and he should never be on our team, and he never was. You'd never be allowed in the door.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  55. Hot air by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You want a certification for a good career? Certified HVAC Technician.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  56. Are they worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So my question is: are any certifications now worth it? If so, where do I start?

    If certifications are going to get you that job you're dreaming about then... of course they're worth it. Are they of any practical value in the real world? Nope.

  57. Betteridge's law by ModernGeek · · Score: 0

    No.

    Also, you seem to have squandered all of your time at the current company you're at by not engaging in continual professional development to better yourself while working. You've been milking the job you've been working at without taking a real interest in the work you're doing, and without thinking of ways to better yourself or your company; and it appears that you have gotten what you deserved.

    Leave Information Systems and change your career, everyone will be better off for it, including you. Go back to watching football, hanging out with your friends, and eating wings on Tuesday nights; the rest of us are working.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Betteridge's law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that your dad should have shot you into a tissue instead of your poor mother. That head of yours must have HURT tearing out of that womb!

  58. Re:Been there done that. Get very expensive TShirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to be in the same boat but disagree with the conclusion. After MBA, I tried product management & engineering management but those did not make me happy. I am back to architect type roles and decent understanding of the business domain surely helps. I got my ROI in 2 years.

  59. Depends on the path you want, here are a couple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have found that even in the management role, the "grunt" certifications are still valued as the assumption is that you have a solidunderstanding of what your reports are doing (and you can jump in if necessary) - Microsoft, Cisco, etc. Virtualization certifications are big. If you are leaning at all towards security, take a look at the CISSP.

    I am seeing a lot of requests for ITIL and other frameworks. Those are generally easy (er) to come by and most don't require special classes, only that you pass the exam.

    One recommendation would be to search Monster, etc and look at jobs you would be interested in and see what they are looking for. More often than not these days there are certifications that they prefer.

  60. VCP by Buck+Feta · · Score: 1

    If you use VMware at all in your shop, push your boss to pay for your training and certs at least up to and including VCP. Without demonstrable knowledge and skill in virtualized environment administration, you will find it exceedingly difficult to find another job anywhere. The trouble is that the VCP is ridiculously expensive - so have your company pay for it. If you don't use VMware, then at least get yourself a VCA - that, you will be able to afford yourself. But shoot for the VCP.

    --
    I am Audience.
  61. Don't by iamacat · · Score: 1

    "Certified" is the keyword for recruiters to discard your resume. It means you have no experience in the subject beyond a one week course. Instead, take a real class in a subject you won't to work in and that has a reasonable carrier potential. For example, Big Data technologies such as Hadoop, Cassandra and Lucene have reasonable earning potential. Even though you are aiming to be a manager, make sure you can setup the components and run, say, simple Hadoop jobs hands on so you have a clue what you will ask other people to do. Then get join a consulting firm like Accenture or Infosys and make sure you finish an important contract with good results. You can then try to convert from a contractor to a full time employee, which is much easier than joining from outside. Or, in the worst case, you have now have a compelling resume and good references in the field. Takes patience, but no one week class is going to give you same results and spending a year or two in order to actually get good.

  62. easy decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easy certs (CCNA MCSA A+) are a no brainer. For a few hundred bucks you get certified and show your employer that you are skilled. The more difficult certs (CCNP CCIE RHCE MCSE) show you are highly skilled and demand a higher wage. Yes, I'm sure /.er's will argue about the MSCE but I studied my ass off for 5 exams for that damn thing and it was hard... and I passed so... whatever.

  63. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me, it is ethical to kill a person who'd kill a retarded person, under any circumstance.

    What if that person is also retarded?

  64. Short answer, IMO: yes by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

    I am currently doing Introduction to Functional Programming and I am very impressed on how much it has helped to get into Haskell. Earlier I've tried reading "Learn yourself a Haskell" and "Real World Haskell" but having to do excercises and labs made the difference (for me)

  65. Re:Just Lie by birukun · · Score: 1

    We let someone go based on this alone.

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
  66. Re:Just Lie by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    However, the best reason to not lie is that it is not ethical. ALWAYS do the ethical thing. Stay above the fray, tell the truth and get the certifications for real. It may take longer and be harder, but in the long run it will be worth it.

    This.

    Integrity is more important than education.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  67. Re:Just Lie by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    I think you guessed it by now I am a very ethical person albeit not a very moral one.

    Do you understand the difference between morality and ethics?

    Morality is an innate sense of what is right by ourselves and others.

    Ethics is an attempt to codify morality into an organized system of knowledge.

    If you think you're ethical but not moral, then you care more about following the rules than you do about what the rules are supposed to achieve.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  68. Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technical merits aside (some are better than others), certifications offered by vendors often allow a company to obtain a discount when purchasing equipment from said vendors.

    Its usually part of the channel incentives structure that vendors put in place to drive adoption of their products.

  69. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    dude you were great in T2.

  70. H1B and the will to work 60-80 hours a week by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    H1B and the will to work 60-80 hours a week

    1. Re:H1B and the will to work 60-80 hours a week by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When I was a video game tester for six years, I did work 60 to 80 hours per week. When I got into IT, I worked 40 hours a week and made more money. My contract doesn't allow me to work overtime.

  71. Sometimes... by Porbes · · Score: 1

    There's no one answer here. Sometimes a cert will get you past an HR screen for a job you want, in which case it pays for itself no matter the cost (though once you're past entry level, the jobs you probably really want come from people you know, not recruiters you impress). Sometimes a cert will help your employer land a contract, or get a better partner status (=discount) with a vendor, in which case it pays for itself (as long as the company pays or you get a cut). Sometimes it's a good motivator to force yourself to learn something you've been meaning to get around to trying, even if you'd be embarrassed to put the cert on your CV. Sometimes, you think one of the above applies and it doesn't. Sometimes you think one of the above applies, but you can't be sure. The rest of the time, it's not worth it.

  72. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's bad; however, let me tell you something worse.

    I have a cert, not a fake one, but a real one. Unfortunately, there's not a way (that I am sure of) for a SAIR Linux certification to be validated. Even if it were possible, since I got my cert during the time period where they were still selling tests, books, and the like but not supporting the updates of their certification databases, I'm not certain that even if a verification website existed I would be "in there".

    Sure, I could ask VUE to verify that I took the test, but the whole point of a cert is that the certifying body verifies the cert, not the third-party testing company.

    And that cert was more than just a walk in the park, back when there wasn't a test dump of nearly every certification imaginable. Yes, I'm a bit bitter. At least I didn't continue the path too deeply before I realized what was going on.

  73. Masters Degree.... by David_Hart · · Score: 2

    If you are in IT management and feel that your skills are best suited to spend the rest of your career in management, then you should work on a Masters degree (i.e. MBA or Masters in IT Management). Certifications are largely for skilled IT workers who actually do the work. Managers, on the other hand, tend to focus on strategy, keeping track of work and work assignments, reporting, etc. Usually for management positions, relevant experience covers any hands-on IT knowledge needed.

  74. Re: Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have it your way it is your pain and not mine. I suspect your social adaptation is quiet thorough then and you are undoubtedly a better citizen than I am, static, deterministic and conforming as much as I am not. Not my cup of tea really.

    Other than that I don't have to lie about any of my skills. I know my shit and what I don't know I quietly learn as needed. That is being a successful consultant, I can make the sale and deliver. Now as far as truth in advertising goes, I may have to lie about those other pesky things such as gaps in my resume why for example I spent 2 years in Costa Rica getting high instead of slaving away in a cubicle. Of course there will be something else on my resume for that time period. I don't have to lie about stupid certs btw either because frankly nobody gives a shit about them really and they are verifiable.

    So from that perspective you would never be the wiser if I came aboard on your team, in fact you would be glad I did from a technical standpoint and never question me in the first place.

    Personally I find your attitude deplorable though I doubt it would impact our hypothetical working relationship since I have been pulling this off for 20 years now and know what I can get away with and what I can't. In fact you will never find me lying about the little things it is truly the big lies that are worth it and you get away with most easily.

  75. Re:CCNA is no picnic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "redculous", "assocites" - I'd suggest investing in spelling and vocabulary books first.

  76. wat. by lucm · · Score: 1

    You must be one of those people who liked the oily, whiny wimp who played Anakin Skywalker in Star Wars episodes 2 and 3. That's like the bad boy version of Justin Bieber.

    Shame on you, and on the next three generations in your family.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  77. Re:Just Lie by lucm · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit on this. The guy was probably an asshole, or he made a comment about the size of the ass of some VIP, and someone started to look for reasons to fire him. Uncovering fake credentials is a classic move in that situation (but planting coke or kiddie porn in the guy's office is usually more expedient).

    Random certification check after the person is hired? Nah.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  78. Maybe by Aryden · · Score: 1

    It seriously depends. In my specialty, having the cert is actually the primary method for getting contracts. Most consumers of the technology I work with go directly to the source and use their "find a consultant" feature, which you can only be listed on if you are certified. With that being said, I stopped paying for certs in other things like CC**, MCSE's, etc, many years ago. Never once, have I ever been asked if I was certified in anything by anyone other than some schmuck recruiter fishing for a new resume to shop around. I would say though, there are certain gigs, like the one I am on now, that "require" a cert for this technology, but they've never asked me for it.

  79. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    Betteridge's law of headlines. No is always the answer. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  80. Not required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    been in the industry now for more than 12 years. Not done even a single certification. Just think about it,

    Interviewer: Do you have a CCNA ?
    You: Yes, I do.
    Interviewer: You're hired!

    Conversations do NOT go like the above example. Ultimately, it is your knowledge that counts. And if your resume is being weeded out because you don't have certifications, then you are probably applying to the wrong kind of companies. Look for companies that value knowledge and experience more than certification. You will be happier.

  81. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can believe it. Someone gets hired claiming they have a particular cert, but isn't capable of doing the work that such a cert is supposed to indicate they can do, so someone digs deeper and discovers the deception. Company I work for now, no way in HELL would you try to plant porn on someone else's computer, systems are too tightly controlled to do that without getting caught (and I know of at least one case at a former employer where someone tried that trick and DID get caught when they called in someone from corporate IT to investigate the case).

  82. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you reversed the definitions of moral and ethics.

    "A ethical man knows that it is wrong to cheat on his wive, a moral man doesn't cheat on his wive."

  83. Yes by will_die · · Score: 1

    I try to take two certs or something of a similar level every year.
    The reasons are:
    1) Management likes them. Having certs increases your chance of getting that interview.
    2) They force you to learn parts of the product you normally don't use. This is the main thing for me, it gets me out of the items I normally admin and that the users primarily use and forces me to learn parts of the product I would not.

    The saying goes certs will get you interviewed, experience will get you the job.

    1. Re:Yes by javakcl · · Score: 1

      This

      I have taken certs mainly to show that I continue to learn and improve myself. I may not use the knowledge I gained from getting several of the certs I hold on a daily basis, but I'd like to think that by studying for the certification exams, something stuck and that knowledge makes me somewhat better in my field. At the very least, they make you aware of things that you might not have been aware of before you read the material. As anyone in tech knows, you never stop learning.

  84. Re: CCNA is no picnic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my CCNA using Packet Tracer and a book. Not sure why you think you need more

  85. Consider by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

    Sometimes process is more important than technical competence. A scrum master certification might get you recognized for seeing the bigger picture and potentially affecting change in a team. In addition to just scrum, the PSM course also touches on TDD, definition of done and many things that tie directly into the development process.

  86. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ALWAYS do the ethical thing.

    Who are you? Jesus?

  87. Soon to be replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother. Just get a new career. If you upscale your certs they will just replace you with a H1-B.

  88. depends by Tom · · Score: 2

    So my question is: are any certifications now worth it?

    Depends on who pays for them.

    Your current employer, or the unemployment agency or someone else? Go for any and all you can get.

    You yourself? Check the job offers of jobs you care about. Make a list of the certifications that are mentioned there and check the top two or three (most mentionings). Do them if they are affordable.

    Certifications are largely a scam or a shakedown, take your pick. They teach you nothing, and they check your ability to memorize test questions more than they test your actual abilities. I've got the test papers from CISM still here, and while my 15 years of IT security experience helped me pass it almost without learning, any buffon who's never even seen a computer could've passed the test by simply learning by heart the contents of one folder.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  89. Re:Just Lie by Tom · · Score: 1

    However, the best reason to not lie is that it is not ethical. ALWAYS do the ethical thing. Stay above the fray, tell the truth and get the certifications for real. It may take longer and be harder, but in the long run it will be worth it.

    Really bad advice.

    You'll feel yourself superior and "above the fray", but in reality everyone who understands the business world better will pass you by in both pay and position.

    I say that as someone who's listened to this bad advice all his life. Your reasons for not lying or not fucking over your boss or co-workers should be practical, not philosophical. You shouldn't lie because the damage if you're found out is bigger than the advantage you gain. For certifications, in most jurisdictions a lie on the details that got you the job is sufficient grounds for legal immediate termination at the least. That looks really bad on your CV.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  90. Re:Just Lie by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    he sounds PERFECT for my old help desk job.

  91. Re: Just Lie by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    as long as you don't list that on your resume...

    Job Title: Druggy Beach Bum
    From 1-2010 to 1-2012
    Job responsiblities included scoring drugs at 4:00 AM, dodging local police, spotty diseased prostitues.

    John Mcafee, is that you?

  92. Re: CCNA is no picnic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy some 2nd hand switches off eBay.
    $40 should be enough to get a pair of managed switches.
    There is also simulator software available.

  93. It's expensive BUT... by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    ITIL certs are in great demand. A single search on Inceed has 1,600+ jobs, from $60k-$140k+. ITIL is also more policy than tech, sounds right up your ally. It's the "worldwide" standard now, ITIL policy REQUIRES my team to exist at my workplace...we do the ITSM "root cause analysis" part. Well, I'm supposed to but normally the network runs so smooth I might do 15 minutes of actual work a day, mostly I just watch primewire / neflix all night. I don't have any ITIL certs, but they ARE pretty useful but their just now showing up in the US on jobs. I can't actually name my client as I recently got in trouble from a VP for that (nice surprise there), but 1,500 feet away from me is the SABRE mainframe underground complex.

  94. The Problem With Certs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certs hurt. While conducting around 100 interviews while at Google, we never recommended anyone who listed certs on their resume be interviewed in person. Sometimes they were sent to us anyway, and every one of them bombed when given practical knowledge tests.

  95. Driving licence by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    Well, you probably have one. But if you don't, seriously, it's important even if you don't have a car.
    The reasons :
    - It's a good all-around test : smart enough to understand traffic laws, good enough motor skills, minimum amount of common sense, etc... Basically shows that you are not crippled.
    - Your employer may ask you to drive someday (buiseness trip, rental car...)

  96. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get the damn cert exams and study the answers: http://www.certificationking.com/download/CompTIA.htm

  97. Urologic and Cardiologic certification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The urologic certification ensures that you can focus on your work for longer continuous stretches of time over the day. The cardiologic certification ensures that you can focus on finishing and later occasionally maintaining large pieces of work, and keep doing so for years to come. For support work, get a hepatologic certification that will ascertain that your liver is good for decades of drowning existential crises.

  98. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by tandavanadesan · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft certified professional then?

  99. Get someone to pay for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't pay for it yourself. Also with SDN, noone should care what is a switch or a router. The networking companies are going to have their market share destroyed once the open source hardware projects start taking off. Look at facebook WEDGE.

  100. Re:Been there done that. Get very expensive TShirt by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    That won't work. I did it. Getting a MBA will not automatically get you into management or into the business side.

    What will happen is that after 2+ years and a ton of money, you'll be back to doing what you were doing but with very expensive letters after your name - that no one in technology really cares about. I went to a top 40 school - not good enough for a lucrative consulting gigs like the Harvard guys get.

    It really depends on what you want to do. yea, if you want to move back into tech you probably will get zero ROI. A key point is to look at a school's hiring results and see if the $ and companies will make it worthwhile.

    What I advise people who ask is first move into the business side or leadership roles - like a tech lead.

    And keep moving towards management - many companies have that kind of career path.

    Good advice since experience helps a lot in post-MBA hiring.

    As far as the MBA. Only get it if you really need it to get a job or to keep your job. And ideally have your company pay for it and allow for you to take time to take classes, work on projects, and study during business hours and even on company time.

    Also good advice. If your company will foot the bill that means they value the degree and saves you money.

    Then there's this advice I received from a senior VP of a very large job site (via a common friend who forwarded his email to me): "MBA degrees are worthless."

    Shit. Too late.

    That really depends on what you want to do. if you want to go back into an IT role an MBA is worthless; just as an IT degree is probably worthless if you want to do organizational development work. If you plan to switch careers then it can be helpful. It also depends on the school. There are a lot of schools offering MBAs that may have some regional recognition but not much value nationally and probably much less of a network, which is the real value of the MBA. Grades also count.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  101. Re:Just Lie by Eosi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, very bad advice. If you get yourself into a Security audit / Compliance review position, where you have to be a CISSP, CISA or CISM (as an example), and the company is breached, you can be sued in cases. Granted the company should ask for proof, and two I have been at have asked, others take you at your word (CISSP has an ethic's policy for instance). Easier to just take the test.

  102. Go for it by chiefbutz · · Score: 0

    A lot of people don't think they are worth the time or money and that they don't prove you have any sort of knowledge or skill. That can be true, but that isn't the important part. The important part is whether or not they help you get the job you want. If a manager has a certification listed as a job requirement then it is valuable to have. I say go for any certifications that pertain to the job you want. Look for postings for those jobs and see if they mention certifications. If they do, get them.

  103. Do the jobs you want require Certification? by hbruijn · · Score: 1

    What you want and think is immaterial.

    It is all about what your future employer values.

    The options are:

      - The actual certifications matter to the employer. Unlike many longer established professions such as for instance law, medicine, architecture, which by law require professional accreditation before you can practice it professionally, IT so far has few if any such legal requirements. But the trend in industry regulation and quality improvement (such as ISO 9001) makes certification of your staff an easy, objective metric to "prove" a (minimal) level of staff competency. Without certification you simply won't be considered.

    - The actual certifications don't really matter to the employer. It's about the actual skill level, but by using any number of common industry certificates in the job description you convey skill levels and areas that are important to the role. Your CV should make it glaringly obvious then that you're the right candidate.

    As the candidate you don't know beforehand which is the case... :( although you can always try to inquire beforehand.

    My personal opinion for a good number of certificates is that if you've been working with that particular technology for some time (and maybe with some self-study) you can simply show up for the exam and pass, without an expensive training beforehand. When a current employer doesn't want to pay, you can often qualify for some tax deductions when you pay for them yourself.

    Or more bluntly; if you think you're THAT good and so much better then somebody who "only" has the piece of paper, then getting the actual certificate should be trivial for you and why don't you?

    --

    If a trainstation is the place where trains stop, what is a workstation?

  104. ugh I'm in the same boat by woojo · · Score: 1
    I only have an A+ cert I got in high school, which helped me land a computer tech job when I was 17. Was it worth it then? Yep... but now?

    I got a Bachelors in Business Management and I've worked in IT in higher education for a decade. I realized something early in working with technology, programming was not my forte. I've dealt with systems design and integration, instructional technology, instructional design, and being a jack of all trades, master of none. I worked within a semi-centralized IT environment and worked collaboratively with colleagues all over campus.

    Recently a corporate shill CIO came in thanks to our VP of Business and Finance, and decided to destroy my college's IT community. The idea was to create efficiency by centralizing everything. Since the reorganization, I've seen 4 of my good friends and colleagues leave by force. I was shifted from instructional technology to client services, got my workload doubled, and received an 18% pay cut. By the way, this CIO left abruptly, merely weeks after enacting the re-org, for a higher paying job.

    Now in order to fill needs caused by the laid off and struggling institutional IT veterans, the CS manager (who has no experience managing people, probably a friend of our former CIO) hiring whatever warm body Robert Half gives them, never mind the fact that we probably have about 50% mac usage among all faculty and staff, and the RH lackeys know nothing of Macs, and admit that to support clients. In reality, after this month, the CS team will only have two veteran techs that have been there for over 3 years.

    I've been on the prowl for jobs in the area and have been looking for 6 months. I have experience managing people and projects across business units, but I'm finding roadblocks all over. I've got a year and a half to go on my masters in leadership development, and it's looking like I need to wrap that up before I can make the next step in my career.

    As far as certs go, I see ITIL all over the damn place, and am thinking if I want in on IT managment, ITIL or PMP is the way I need to go.

  105. Certs are topping. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Cert, diplomas and degrees are topping.

    If you can't - with a straight face - say: "Gigs were low at the time, I thought I might aswell take a cert, to see if I could make it." then certs won't add anything. If, however, you want to raise your marketability as a freelance or in a setting where politics count for a lot, a certification can be the little extra that gives you the edge. Just don't rest on them or boast to much about them, then you're fine.

    Perhaps a certification trail on a certain topic - SAP or Oracle - might even be a prerequisite. But then it's the equivalent of a college degree anyway. And the same rules apply for those, if perhaps on a larger scale.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  106. Re:Just Lie by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Just lie about what certs you have, in 12 years I've never had a single company ever ask me for proof of any of my dozens of certs.

    Claiming you have "dozens" merely highlights your skill here as a professional liar.

    It also makes me wonder if you did actually earn them, why the hell you even bothered.

  107. Depends on what the value statement is by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

    Do you gain an advantage when interviewing for a job?? Not with me and many others, so the value in that instance is very low. I'm more interested in how smart you are, the specific experience you have in a subject, and your ability to utilize those skills. Certification just says you can study something very well. I've known people that have studied a subject and gotten certified with no experience, someone like that is useless.

    Are you going for a job that requires it?? Some teaching and support positions require certification for public relations and marketing reasons. So in those instance, it's probably mandatory.

    Do you want to use it as a tool to work towards learning as much as you can as a subject?? It can be very helpful to an individual to independently gain skills that may or may not be available in a more formal setting, such as college or trade school, and is probably a lot cheaper. I would say that value is very high for someone that wants to use it like that.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:Depends on what the value statement is by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It may, for all I know, be useful in getting to an interview. If HR is looking for some excuse to thin the resumes, they might decide to look for certs.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  108. Re:Just Lie by nine-times · · Score: 1

    However, the best reason to not lie is that it is not ethical.

    I think the best reason is, job interviews should be as much about you testing the company as it is about the company testing you. Do I want to work for a company who will fail to select a good candidate because of some technicality? Assuming I'm a good candidate for the job, do I want to work in an atmosphere that's so bureaucratic and ineffective that the person doing the hiring isn't empowered to hire a good candidate because he lacks a meaningless certification? Not particularly.

    I can see someone objecting, "What if you're not a good candidate?" Personally, I don't want a job that I'm not able to do a good job at. That sounds like a nightmare. I could see lying if I were absolutely desperate, with starving kids, about to lose my home, and I just really wanted a job. As an employer, I'd also probably forgive a white lie from someone in that situation. But if the situation isn't dire, don't lie. It's not doing anyone any favors.

  109. Re:CCNA is no picnic by robstout · · Score: 1

    Dynamips is an opensource Cisco router emulator (need your own IOS image though). I used it for my test prep (CCNP, which is a level above CCNA). Won't help you with the switches, but it's a start.

  110. Re:Just Lie by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Random certification check after the person is hired? Nah.

    More likely is that the employee blabbed to someone and the secret got out.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  111. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2

    Definitely. If a 5-year old boy can manage it then it is worth aspiring to. I'm assuming his programming skills are thin on the ground as well.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  112. Will your employer pay for schooling? by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

    There are several traditional universities that are offering evening and/or online MBAs. If you want to stay on the management side of IT this might be a more useful track than a certification.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  113. Who do you want to work for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless of the validity of any given certification certain prospective employers require certification up front before hiring. That being said, if you are looking for work in the government sector this requirement is absolute. From what I have seen in the commercial sector most employers will hire you without the position's required certs if you prove that you can do the work. Some may put a stipulation that you acquire a certification within a set amount of time. What I do is take the tests that I can pass and prove what I can do during the interview process.

  114. Re:Just Lie by bobbied · · Score: 1

    However, the best reason to not lie is that it is not ethical.

    I could see lying if I were absolutely desperate, with starving kids, about to lose my home, and I just really wanted a job. As an employer, I'd also probably forgive a white lie from someone in that situation. But if the situation isn't dire, don't lie. It's not doing anyone any favors.

    I don't agree with your exception. Personally, I'd suggest you tell the prospective employer the truth, regardless of the situation. In the case you describe I would say something like "I don't have the certificate but I really need the job. I've done this kind of work before and think I can be useful to you right away, but I would be more than willing to obtain the certification on my own if you want."

    Personally, I would be more likely to cut somebody some slack who was up front with me and I'd respond to the above with something like "Do you think you could do it within 3 months?" If the answer was "Sure!" then barring any other candidates who where a better personality fit and assuming I thought the candidate could actually do the work, I'd be pretty likely to extend them an offer. I'd also bring them on and then offer to help pay for books, training and testing for the certifications I thought was necessary... But I'm not a bean counter MBA type who thinks all engineers are interchangeable cogs...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  115. Re:Just Lie by bobbied · · Score: 1

    You are so jaded, I feel sorry for you.

    Ethics, doing what's right, regardless of what's done to you or who isn't looking, is actually one of the few ways to maintain your humanity. If you feel that it is necessary and advisable only to be ethical because it is profitable or you will be punished if you don't, you have totally missed the point. You sir are well on your way to all that is bad and horrible because you are all about you, and will willingly trample others to get what you want.

    I implore you to not go down this road, it will destroy you and others in the end.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  116. Re:Just Lie by ohearn · · Score: 1

    I've had several ask for proof of certs. Getting caught lying on you rapplication is a sure way to not get the job or get fired even after you are in the door.

  117. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > ALWAYS do the ethical thing.

    Said Facebook... er... no.
    Said Microsoft... damn.
    Said Apple... fuuuu, not them either...

  118. I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 2

    I don't believe someone should be able to pass a RHCE or even a higher level MCSE without understanding something so basic as a netmask and broadcast address. I have seen plenty of Junior level admins stuff a /24 netmask into a /25 and have network problems that they can't explain. A "good" SA should be able to catch and correct this without need to find the network team to debug the issue for them. And yes, I have seen many MSCE holders have to traverse that path and bother their Network team for a simple SA error.

    I happened to pick the Netmask and calculation as an easy target, but there are plenty of low level concepts that I believe all SAs should know. I don't care if you can give me all 7 layers of the OSI model by rote, I care that you can at least debug your area of responsibility as a SA.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't believe someone should be able to pass a RHCE or even a higher level MCSE without understanding something so basic as a netmask and broadcast address.

      Are you saying that the tests shouldn't allow them to pas (but may do today), or that the tests don't allow them to pass without basic networking knowledge?

      I don't care if you can give me all 7 layers of the OSI model by rote, I care that you can at least debug your area of responsibility as a SA.

      There's a very large Dunning-Kruger with problem solving. Give someone a problem, and they'll treat it like their last problem, until proven otherwise. Reboot try again. I've seen server admins try that with networking gear. I've never seen it work for anything other than a home router. Or if he knows the last problem was a duplex mismatch, he'll check the duplex on every server and every switch in the network before looking at anything else. God forbid a server admin has heard of a packet capture. He'll capture everything, usually in a place that won't get what he's looking for, and then hands it to you, like he gave you the solution, and waits for you to read it to him like a bedtime story.

    2. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that the tests shouldn't allow them to pas (but may do today), or that the tests don't allow them to pass without basic networking knowledge?

      Both.

      There's a very large Dunning-Kruger with problem solving. Give someone a problem, and they'll treat it like their last problem, until proven otherwise. Reboot try again. I've seen server admins try that with networking gear. I've never seen it work for anything other than a home router. Or if he knows the last problem was a duplex mismatch, he'll check the duplex on every server and every switch in the network before looking at anything else. God forbid a server admin has heard of a packet capture. He'll capture everything, usually in a place that won't get what he's looking for, and then hands it to you, like he gave you the solution, and waits for you to read it to him like a bedtime story.

      Uh, no! If you give a person a problem to solve and they solve the problem there is no Dunning-Kruger effect to be found. I'm taking "solving" at it's literal definition, where you are actually solving the problem and not rebooting to remove a symptom of a problem as you describe.

      I would agree that people can fall into a Dunning-Kruger effect in removing symptoms, but do you believe that this is really solving a problem? Example: We may have a vended application that has a memory leak which requires a periodical reboot to correct. The solution however is in a separate ticket where we work with the vendor to actually solve the problem, often times submitting code samples for reproducing the error, and even source samples which may alleviate the problem.

      In your second example, this is a two part problem. First, have I provided enough examples for tcpdump or wireshark for them to "get it"? If not, then I share the blame until I have done my part. Sure, some people just don't get it but this is not a Dunning-Kruger problem but a refusal to learn or confusion because they lack basic conceptual knowledge.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    3. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      D-K comes from people who "solve" a problem once, so they are now experts. They don't know what they don't know, and don't know how to fix it, but managed to fix it before, so they must be experts.

    4. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You neglected my question. Does a "fix" like "reboot" solve a problem or remove a symptom? I think there is a rare exception where this can be true, but in most cases this would not be problem solving. There is surely a DK connection when a group of people claim that this is problem solving, but I would not work with that type of person for very long if other options exist, and fortunately have never been forced to do so.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    5. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You neglected my question. Does a "fix" like "reboot" solve a problem or remove a symptom?

      You are defining the problem based on the solution. You are fishing for a specific answer, rather than thinking about it. If the "problem" is that the boss can't send an email, then yes, the reboot fixes the problem. The cause of the problem is a separate thing.Of course, someone not suffering from D-K would know there's a separate "cause" that will likely recur, if not found.

    6. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I don't believe so, I was making a claim that solutions are dynamic as are problems. Your logic works only if I change "solve" to be something other than the dictionary defines the word. I was not fishing for a specific answer, I was asking if your definition of "solve" matches the dictionary.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    7. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then define it with whatever definition you like. I'm sure that I can find some way to use "solve" in a problem without curing it. I can "solve" the boss's problem of not sending email by rebooting a router and never figuring out what happened that blocked email. The problem is solved, but the cause of the problem is never known.

    8. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Solve as in the dictionary definition. I don't think I should have to quote it, but will because you don't seem to agree with the dictionary.

      solve
      sälv/
      verb
      verb: solve; 3rd person present: solves; past tense: solved; past participle: solved; gerund or present participle: solving

      find an answer to, explanation for, or means of effectively dealing with (a problem or mystery).

      Rebooting does not "solve" problems, rebooting removes a symptom. You claimed that a person solving a problem can suffer from DK syndrome, and I'm saying it's not possible using the definition of solve to have DK syndrome.

      I think I get what you meant early on, but am in disagreement with the terminology that was used. It's quite confusing that you are going to such extraordinary lengths to avoid clarifying your position with accurate terminology which would match the definition of a word.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      The CEO complains that he can't send an email. You immediately reboot the router and the problem clears. I would say that the reboot solved the problem of not sending emails. And my use fits the definition you gave.

      If you have a problem with your car. Your rings in your 1967 Shelby Cobra GT 350 are shot. While you are looking for parts, you find a crate-motor for a GT500. It's a "simple" upgrade with a new engine that's better than the previous one. So you perform an engine swap, without fixing the old one.

      Did you "solve" your problem of "bad rings" in the old engine? Your rings aren't bad anymore. But the rings in the engine that was bad are still bad.

      It's quite confusing that you are going to such extraordinary lengths to avoid clarifying your position with accurate terminology which would match the definition of a word.

      You are asserting I'm using a word wrong, when I don't believe I am. You are the one going to great lengths to maintain that solving a problem without finding the root cause isn't "solve", despite your definition clearly allowing for my use. "find an answer to, explanation for, or means of effectively dealing with (a problem or mystery)." Rebooting the router "finds an answer to" the problem of the CEO not being able to send emails, "effectively dealing with the problem."

      Yet, you keep asserting that your definition is wrong, whenever I use it to explain my use of the word.

      Why?

    10. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Where we differ is I don't believe anything was solved in your scenario. A symptom of a problem was removed, but nothing was solved. I do not accept that as a solution to a problem and would put someone to work. Making someone happy is not problem solving a technical issue, it's covering your ass and work avoidance.

      The first half of the definition is what I consider a technical solution. Solving the mystery. The means of dealing with a problem does not solve anything. Kicking the tire on a car really does not do anything, but people can be duped into thinking it does. Perhaps this is the DK effect you are referring to?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    11. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are deliberately trying to be obtuse. I read your response as "I don't believe the CEO not being able to send an email is a problem." But that you think that comes off as naive and job-ending, so you dance like a faerie around the bush, rather than saying what you mean. In Real Life, your boss (or boss's boss) having a problem *is* a problem, even if the best solution to that problem won't reveal the mystery.

      I also note you didn't respond to the car analogy. You don't need to solve the mystery of the bad piston rings to solve the issue of the car not running. Makes me think that you know you are wrong, but that you have argued so long you refuse to admit it (to yourself or me doesn't matter).

    12. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I'm not being obtuse, I don't believe you looked at the definition for that word. I stated very clearly that technical solutions are solving the mystery, not having a work around.

      What you have in quotes is a fabricated quote, I never stated that the CEO not sending mail is not a problem. I stated very clearly that the person who rebooted a router did not solve a technical problem.

      I didn't respond to your car analogy because it's a path to a solution and does not match "rebooting a router/server" in any fashion. The car analogy you know what the problem is. It could also be a final solution because you know what the problem is/was, and have a work around in place which was to replace the motor. There is no mystery in that analogy.

      So it seems that we agree on the technical merits of "solve", but disagree on whether or not "reboot the box" is actually a solution. I refuse to accept that as a solution from any SA I work with, at least until some time is spent on the mystery. On rare occasions, "reboot it" ends up being the accepted answer because the actual problem was not worth investing in the time required to actually "solve" the problem.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    13. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Reboot the engine to fix a problem inside the engine.

      You've re-defined "problem" to "technical problem" When you change the words and definitions of the words you use, just to prove yourself right, it just proves you wrong (and that you know it). The "business problem" is email doesn't work. The "business solution" is to reboot the router. The "mystery" solved is why the email didn't work. There was something wrong with the router. Problem solved. Mystery solved. That "business problems" don't exist in your world is just proof nobody should listen to you.

    14. Re:I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I never claimed I was right or wrong. I asked like 10 posts ago for your definition of solve and where or not you believed that your example of "rebooting a server" was actually a solution. You have still not answered the question. The closest you came is to provide two analogies that don't match. You have since then fabricated quotes that were never made and made plenty of accusations. All to avoid a simple goddamn question. Grats on trolling for that long, asshole.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    15. Re:I disagree by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      You are in need of medical help. Please see a psychiatrist. Your recollection doesn't match reality. I can read reality. I used your definitions. And still you disagreed. I provided a "fix" that didn't address the problem, and asked if that fixed the problem. Rather than discussing the definition of "solve" in that context, you asserted that it was unrelated enough for you to ignore without answering. Though I think you really mean that "I know I'm a lying little shit, and I can't think of a way to answer that which is consistent with my previous lies."

      You were the one trolling here. Asserting that a "business problem" isn't a problem and refusing to answer a single direct question designed to clarify the definitions.

      The car analogy you know what the problem is.

      Then the car is running rough, and you replace the engine. The car no longer runs rough. You don't know why it did. Why should you care when it runs fine now?

  119. Re:Been there done that. Made the leap. by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    That can work. Making the leap from technology leader to business leader is not easy. It is very tempting to fall back on old, reliable, technology skills like you did. Hey, you were good at that stuff so it is easy. recruiters want you for your past, but you want a different future.

    If you do an MBA you have to realize, and accept, that an MBA is not the end . It is the beginning of learning a whole new set of skills you don't have right now.

    if MBA is out, I recommend PMP and ITIL. Both applicable to both technology and business side and will help you make the leap...

  120. Re:Just Lie by nine-times · · Score: 1

    For one thing, I'll concede that I'm kind of with you in that I'm very averse to lying. In reality, there's a good chance that I would be honest and advise someone else to be honest.

    But really all I'm saying is, I could admit some kind of hypothetical situation where I'd be like, "Sure, yeah. I can understand someone lying in that situation." The hypothetical situation is that you're truly desperate for a job, you're willing to work anywhere, even a terribly bureaucratic place with people who lack the backbone to make their own decisions, but you need a job right away. And then you get a job interview where everything is going well, and you essentially have the job, and the interviewer says, "Oh, and you have this certification, right? It doesn't matter and we'll never check up on it, but my boss unfortunately will not let me hire someone without that certification under any circumstances."

    Sure, yeah. I can understand someone lying in that situation. That's not the sort of situation most of us are in most of the time.

  121. Re:Just Lie by sribe · · Score: 1

    Is it worth it to be sitting on pins and needles waiting for them to check up on you and fire you?

    You know what the worst part is? Many of those companies who didn't check that dude's certs probably also have a policy of carefully checking employee's resumes above a certain level in the company. Which means that if he does well, and gets promoted, boom he's fired because then they check all his qualifications. (I knew someone to whom exactly that happened.)

  122. Re:Just Lie by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    "No one believes ethics are "the values you aspire to, completely uncoupled from morality". "

    You are mistaken. he seems to believe that.

  123. CISA, CIPP, etc. by Dekaner · · Score: 1

    If you are interested in pursuing more of the management side vs. the technical side, consider rounding out your skill-set. Certifications such as CISA (Certified Information System Auditor) from ISACA and CIPP/IT (Certified Information Privacy Professional in IT) would provide a different perspective from what you may be used to. Both are self-study and are more practical than technical.

  124. Don't take this the wrong way but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a very difficult time believing you went from no concepts to full blown CCNA level knowledge in 4.5 days. Especially if you're talking the current iteration of the exam. There is just FAR too much information you are required to know to be able to absorb it in such a short period of time. You are required to know everything from ICND1 and ICND2 which is about ~900 pages of the driest reading material on Earth. Seriously, try to read more than a chapter without your eyes glazing over. You'll get an achievement if you can do it :D

    These topics include:

    The OSI model, per layer responsibilities, what each layer adds to the packet headers, etc.
    The TCP/IP suite.
    Switching concepts. Building a switch up from scratch. VLANs, VTP, Spanning Tree, Trunking, Port Security.
    Routing concepts. Building a router up from scratch. Rip, Single and Multi-Area OSPF, EIGRP, HSRP/VRRP, ACL's,
    Wan concepts: Point to point and Frame Relay ( Fun with DLCI ! )
    SNMP and IOS v15+ licensing
    Subnetting by hand ( Class A, B and C networks ) Be able to determine what subnet an IP belongs to given an IP and Mask only.

    You're required to know all of the above for both IPV4 and IPV6 where applicable. You are required to be able to configure everything from memory via the command line ( no gui, no SDM or Cisco Configuration Professional ) and you have to know it well enough to be able to troubleshoot it.

    You have to know details down to the nth degree. Like why is this switch the root ? Why is this port forwarding and that port blocking ? How to modify the STP parameters to change this to suit your needs. How long are the dead timers for routing protocol X ? Given this configuration for Routers 1 and 2, why are they not neighboring up ? Why can't I ping device X in network Y ?

    The CCNA is no longer entry level. ( CCENT is )

    CCNA is your small business network.
    CCNP pushes you to enterprise class networks and concepts.
    CCIE's are your network designers and top tier problem solvers.
    Cisco Architects are the PH.D's of networking.

    Again, maybe you have a crazy high IQ ( mines ~140 ) or maybe you have an Eidetic memory. If you do please accept my apologies and I formally bow to your awesomeness. However, normal folks going from absolutely no concept to passing a current CCNA exam in less than a week would be nigh impossible. It would take almost that long just to read through the material without really getting into details. Hell, just the training videos alone ( the ones I have used ) are in the 40-60 hours running time range.

    1. Re:Don't take this the wrong way but by xQx · · Score: 1

      I did the exam 3 years ago, and I completely agree with the breadth of the information you're talking about. Also, I agree with you about the Cisco training manuals.

      However, I used the trainsignal videos, which would be less than 4.5 days of video in total, and it covered everything you need to know to do the course. I have significant experience with Cisco CLI so the simulators were a breeze.

      I also found the test didn't cover the content to the n'th degree. All questions were of foundation knowledge in the subjects covered by the training materials. ie. If you read the materials once, then went and did the test, you stand a great chance of getting a pass score.

      It did not ask obscure questions, and most multiple choice answers were obviously wrong (ie. no giving the OSPF timer as a potential incorrect answer for "what is the RIP timer default value") None of the incorrect answers in the subnetting multiple choice were common mistakes by transposing a single bit - if you make a simple mistake in your binary maths, the answer you calculated was not an option.

      I think the Cisco course content is vast and difficult, the test, however is as easy as it possibly could be for that content.

      I'd never touched frame relay, ospf or VTP but trainsignal covered more than enough, and stressed the test's common questions.

      If you ignore Cisco's boring-as-hell books and subscribe to the CBTNuggets or TrainSignal/PluralSight training then spend a few hours testing yourself with the testking practice tests, it's very reasonable that someone with previous linux or networking experience could cram and pass the CCNA in a week.

  125. whichever is looked for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what certifications have been looked for on job adds and I know what ones will be looked for in the future too by my own reckonings or gambles. I suggest u do that. Watch for something that is at least mentioned in a job spec. Forget /.

  126. Re:Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right, pseudo-religious beliefs are more important than knowledge. Got it.

  127. Re: Just Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So from that perspective you would never be the wiser if I came aboard on your team, in fact you would be glad I did from a technical standpoint and never question me in the first place.

    Well you wouldn't make it on my team cause you are an egotistical asshole.

    That's part of the purpose of interviews....to weed out the dicks.

  128. Times they are a changin' by McBullseye · · Score: 1

    Full disclosure: I’m a CTO for a large state university healthcare system with a masters degree and 19 certifications. (16ish still active)

    I would counter this question with a couple more. What size of IT do you want to work in? The requirements for degrees and certifications go up as you get into larger and larger shops. Are you thinking of the future IT landscape? Like it or not the pervasiveness of the cloud will make IT more competitive in the future as organizations begin to rely more on analysts with specific skill sets (and certifications in them) and project managers while deferring operational roles to cloud providers (or reducing staff somewhat with private/hybrid clouds).

    My main point being that in the coming decade we will all need to be more competitive because there will very likely be a reduction in the necessary IT workforce. Certifications are one of the methods to achieve that.

    We are also serving multiple masters now. The days of monolithic IT departments that cut their own swath through the business are pretty much at an end. IT has to become a part of the business strategy working as a partner to increase revenue. Yes, experience will always be king on a resume. But IT departments will fall in line with the normal degree requirements and post educational requirements already existent in other departments. IT managers will be able to make the case for that occasional “special” hire. But it quickly grows very tiring fighting with HR for every open position because candidates don’t have the organizational requirements. Plus, there are enough candidates that you can afford to toss a really good resume to avoid the fight. You’re not trying to get through the HR automated filters anymore; those filters have become organizational institutions.

    Based on the background in the OP third paragraph I’d really recommend looking at project management certifications (good) and possible a masters degree (better). The PMP from the project management institute is very well respected but is based on the waterfall approach and may not be relevant to some IT shops. There are agile certifications out there as well (including one from PMI) that may be better suited and more interesting to you.

  129. There are a lot of good cert programs, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of good cert programs, but most aren't worthwhile. You need to decide 1st what job you are looking for. If you are looking for a management role technical certs aren't going to help as much as project management, an MBA or MIS. That said there is a limit to how far any of these will take. Sure they will help fill a check box, and impress the non-technical, but what you need is contacts. You need former coworkers who will recommend you to their current employer. This means you need to be a competent manager/supervisor, and well as someone enjoyable to work with. I see time and time again people getting hired because someone says yes he's a dependable guy who can do that job. This can be a problem if you've worked for a single employer with good retention.

  130. Re:Just Lie by Tom · · Score: 1

    you have totally missed the point.

    All my life, yes. The crucial point a lot of us more idealistic people miss is that all those who run countries or corporations whom we think belong into jail do not see themselves as bad people, because ethics is also subjective and personal. Those who are successful in the shark tank of the business world are so, because they've been brought up or trained themselves to the right ethics, the one where screwing over someone is right because you can convince yourself that he's weak and can use the lesson and besides it's the right of the strong people (i.e. you) to lord above his kind.

    I implore you to not go down this road, it will destroy you and others in the end.

    What's destroying humanity is good people who are unable to pick up a weapon when the bad people attack. In this the sharks are right: If you can't bite, you are prey. Sadly, too many of us have taken a deep sip from the poison well and now our children will have to fight the same fights that our grandchildren already fought, because for example we destroyed the power of the unions by not joining and not creating an IT union.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  131. Certs are a practical first step and Continuing Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certs serve a lot of practical purposes, from acting as a focused introduction, to what your interested in, to what you know something about, to "I cared enough" to put on this business suit on for this interview. Not everyone has them.. and those that don't bother.. tend to complain about them the most. Small wonder.

    Its no secret which Certs are easy to obtain or that are worthless. Some are good, some are bad, some are a waste of time.

    Choose your Certs carefully and they will show intellect and awareness of your industry.. randomly acquire a massive number that you don't keep up to date.. that says a great deal about you too.

    The benefit over a College degree is its not considered a breach of trust or responsibility to leave some off your Resume.. even if you blew the money on them and got some your a little embarrased to admit.

    As for "Which Certs do I need? To get XYZ job".. no one can predict that.. it depends on your contacts, job availability, and frankly your social and technical skills that have almost nothing to do wtih any Cert. There is no certain "Free Lunch" or "Royal Road to Geometry" my Prince.

    It is a known fact however some Certs can lead to degrees like Western Governors, you do have to study for them and they motivate you to succeed attaining them "freshens" and keeps you up to date even with those things you known but haven't had time to keep up to date with.. so they build confidence.. so in that way they are Continuing Education.

    They cost money, but nothing like the courses did or do in College, they are short commpared to a Semester of study, they are focused, they don't have an aura of "We are Perfect and your Lucky we stoop to teach a course for you low lifes.." And when you are done.. you do know something more than you did.. and you can take part of the cost off on your Taxes each year if you properly document them.

    There are Cert "Shops", Test "dumps" Cheat sheets.. but so what.. there is a much mroe rampant Industry for College Courses and University Study..

    I think its what you do with it after attaining it that matters. Do you promote it on your Resume, do you keep it up to date and current, Do you rub it in your Collegues faces and let you r Boss know every ten secondsor are you Cool about it and just stop complaining about the "worthlessness" of Certs.. I think that's more of a Social Skills problem. Being Stupid is Temporary.. Being a Moron is forever.

  132. Re:Just Lie by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Like I said, I'm sorry for you, being that jaded. Being ethical is not being weak, in fact, quite the opposite. Being ethical is a strong position because it takes courage and commitment. It's a long term strategy for success where what you are suggesting is short term profit, long term failure.

    Just "being a shark" as you put it, may look like the easy road to profit, but it's not a long term strategy. Take, for instance, selling used cars. If you look at customers as just rubes to be parted with as much money as possible, and you lie to make the sale, it will be your last sale to this customer and likely their friends. You make a short term gain over building a long term customer base where your customers return repeatedly and send their friends to do business with you. Personally, I'd rather do repeat business and get customers to recommend me to their friends over going the slimy "I'll lie to your face and you won't know it!" route to swindle them out of a few more bucks today. There are a number of car dealers I will NEVER go back to and I will encourage my friends not to go either. Sounds like some places where you will fit right in.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  133. MBA by wizzy403 · · Score: 1

    If you're going to stay on the Management track, an MBA is probably worth more than any cert. Although a PMP Cert is also pretty well respected these days, both by HR and by Management types.

  134. All of you are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OP is a manager, not in a technical role. I would much rather have a manager who knew how to manage, than a technically knowledgeable manager that was clueless about the management part.

    There is no need to get any technical certifications, unless you are looking to leave your management role and re-enter a technical career path. Instead, take some good courses on management - strategy, resource management, mentorship, performance management, financial management, etc.

    An MBA is very useful - but not necessarily for the education, but for the networking value you will gain by working closely with senior executives from other large enterprises. That's why its better to get an MBA from a reputable name-brand school, not just so it will be on your resume, but because you will have built trust relationships with these other well-placed individuals, that you can leverage to enhance your career later on. Assuming you don't piss them all off because you're a useless sponge...

  135. Re: Just Lie by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    That's not what I meant, and you know it.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  136. Re:CCNA is no picnic by ruebarb · · Score: 1

    Billy, with GNS3 and IOU integration in a Virtualbox, you can recreate enough routing and switching topologies to pass the CCNA without buying any hardware - I would argue it's much easier now than when I got my ccna (1999) and folks had to buy 2500's used for 500 bucks each to get the hands on

    of course, you could read Todd Lammle's CCNA book back then and pass it but I digress

    RB

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
  137. AWS certification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best thing you can get right now are AWS certs. Business is booming.

  138. HR weeding out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I suspect HR systems are weeding out resumes that don't have the correct alchemical formula of certifications."

    More like they are weeding out US citizens, especially those above a certain age...

  139. Because HR and Hiring Managers Filters exist by rhyous · · Score: 1

    Are any Certifications Worth Going For? Yes. Any cert if worth going for.

    Why? Because HR and Hiring Managers are filtering

    If you have 10 resumes, some with 4 years experience, and some with 4 years experience and a cert, and they want to narrow down the candidates, guess what the HR and Hiring managers are going to use? The cert will make the difference.

    Also, certs can result in higher pay when the offer comes. Again, this is often just arbitrary bias by HR and the Hiring managers.

    If you get certs in areas that you have practical experience, you will probably "really" learn and you won't be a paper cert.
    If you get a cert in an area that you don't have practical knowledge, it might be paper, but it might help show you can learn a new product you don't know.

    1. Re:Because HR and Hiring Managers Filters exist by rhyous · · Score: 1

      Any cert "IS" worth going for. Sorry for the typo.

  140. HP3000 by tmjva · · Score: 1

    The HP3000 Professional certification before I die.

    There's only one person still alive licensed to grant this certification, and he's gettin' old. (He flew P2 Neptune's for the Navy.)

    Wonder if I can get my company to foot the bill?

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  141. Wrong place to ask this... by StormyWeatherL33T · · Score: 1

    Lots of people on this site will have an opinion, but most of them are worthless.

    A better way to find out would be to scan the ads for your area and see how many people are asking for various certifications, and to ask reasonably reputable headhunters and/or hiring managers (whoever you have available) in your area to see what's in demand (assuming you want to stay in that geographical area).

    Best of luck to you.

  142. Re:Just Lie by Tom · · Score: 1

    may look like the easy road to profit, but it's not a long term strategy.

    It depends on the environment. If other people are good and willing to defend their values, the bad guys will be in trouble. But if they manage to convince the majority to be either lethargic or even respect them, then the good people are the dumb losers.

    And we are in that situation. Wake up, man! We admire rich people simply because they are rich, not for the ways they became so. We increasingly believe the war-talk of neo-con propaganda that unemployed people just need to be forced more strongly to want to work, and that benefits need to be cut because the poor are parasites. There was no blood in the streets when our governments bailed out the finance sector with so much money that it's hard to visualize while at the same time cutting budgets in education, health care and practically everything else.

    You forget that the unethical (actually, "differently ethical" is correct here, because they believe themselves to be ethical, I'm sure) people also have long-term strategies. And they're winning.

    There are a number of car dealers I will NEVER go back to

    Are they still in business? If so, your rant is meaningless.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  143. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  144. Certifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the ISACA CISM and CISA are a tremendous value to you personally and recognized by all professionally.
    http://www.isaca.org/CERTIFICATION/Pages/default.aspx

    Jeff Spivey