The measure passed by 232 votes to 184 along party lines
Yes, it's one party doing it. First they changed the rules via the FCC, and now they've made it permanent. It's the very definition of "one party doing it".
The truth is that this vote changes nothing. The FCC had already revoked most privacy protections, and this vote just prevents those rules from being reinstated.
There are three assertions in those two sentences. The first and the third are directly contradictory.
Did you actually ever read a peer reviewed article?
Jesus, I would have thought that putting the name of the peer-reviewed journal in the subject line would have been enough of an indication that I was kidding.
Do you think the lawyers reading the ACA legislation and the children reading Harry Potter are equal?
I'm pretty sure lawyers' reading skills outpace those of Harry Potter-age children.
Plus, the lawmakers are being very well-compensated to read legislation. It's like their one fucking job, you know?
If Trump and the GOP couldn't unravel the 3500 page health care law, how are they going to pull off reforming the tax code, which ran like twenty-three volumes (without addendums) back in the 1990s? That's not counting the judicial precedents which are now law. Hell, there's like several hundred pages of law that just governs the taxation issues related to owning racehorses.
I've seen IT directors who drive Teslas but who still pocket RAM sticks from the lab.
The problem is, there is zero probability that this new corporate surveillance will be aimed at IT directors.
Because if there's one thing we've learned, it's that if you are rich and you steal, it's considered, "smart". If you're making $35k/yr and you make an unauthorized copy of your tax return on a company xerox machine, you're going to get frog-marched out of the place.
Nearly right. The "South Vietnamese" government was an illegal and illegitimate device conjured up by Washington to justify its violent intervention. There was a nation called Vietnam. After international talks, an election was scheduled for Vietnam. Washington decided that the Communists were certain to win the election, so it engineered a "rebellion" by a newly-invented entity called "South Vietnam". Insofar as it ever existed, South Vietnam must have seceded from Vietnam, just as Washington maintains
Slashdot Mirror
And then run something like OpenSwan on the Linux machine? I think I can figure that out. Thanks.
I'm asking for my Windows machine.
Which VPNs are most trustworty, if any? Are they easy to turn off if I want to play an online game or something? How bad do they slow everything down?
Soylent Green is...your online history!
Ironically, the "House Freedom Caucus" supported this bill.
You said,
The summary said,
Yes, it's one party doing it. First they changed the rules via the FCC, and now they've made it permanent. It's the very definition of "one party doing it".
There are three assertions in those two sentences. The first and the third are directly contradictory.
I have no peers.
I got your dimpled balls right here.
From now on, I only trust peer-reviewed Slashdot comments.
Jesus, I would have thought that putting the name of the peer-reviewed journal in the subject line would have been enough of an indication that I was kidding.
Ah, so you've heard of me. I'm also one of the leading conservatives on slashdot and a staunch supporter of President-for-life Trump.
If climate change is real, why is there no peer-reviewed research that shows it?
Soylent Green...is cars!
Come down to Houston. I'll buy you some barbecue that will make you weep with joy.
Yes, it is. And the food is better.
South Texas is the best, though.
Turn the ISS into a Trump-branded casino. The president has the necessary expertise, and it could be a big draw.
And if nobody ends up showing up and it starts losing money, well, the President knows what to do then, too.
Except don't nobody want to go to East Texas.
How long until the first comment that says this is proof that climate change isn't real?
I'm pretty sure lawyers' reading skills outpace those of Harry Potter-age children.
Plus, the lawmakers are being very well-compensated to read legislation. It's like their one fucking job, you know?
If Trump and the GOP couldn't unravel the 3500 page health care law, how are they going to pull off reforming the tax code, which ran like twenty-three volumes (without addendums) back in the 1990s? That's not counting the judicial precedents which are now law. Hell, there's like several hundred pages of law that just governs the taxation issues related to owning racehorses.
The problem is, there is zero probability that this new corporate surveillance will be aimed at IT directors.
Because if there's one thing we've learned, it's that if you are rich and you steal, it's considered, "smart". If you're making $35k/yr and you make an unauthorized copy of your tax return on a company xerox machine, you're going to get frog-marched out of the place.
Late-stage capitalism is a cancer.
This Congress has definitely proven how good they are at writing "real laws".
Congress has important tax cuts for rich people and corporations to worry about. They have no time for your measly privacy.
And the superstars sucked into the super massive
That's a very good summary.