That distinction would be wrong to gloss over. While it is relatively easy to build a nuclear reactor (not a safe one, mind), building a nuclear weapon (and merely producing or handling weapons-grade nuclear material) requires technological and industrial resources beyond any individual. Therefore, this is not nuke material. It is at worst usable in a dirty bomb.
Something where if you take a shovel, and dig, you can dig up rocks, and other bits-- or even bury loot, or build a house out of ambient materials, and have it be persistent.
Yeah, that'd be awesome. A game where you could mine and craft all kinds of stuff... what to call it...
If the BSA comes in and says it has an affidavit from a former employee that says he was eyewitness to license violations
Until they end up in court, they might simply have an informal tip-off. The former employee might be disgruntled enough to cause some trouble, but it's another thing to sign a false affidavit, which is perjury and a felony.
The Republicans are boycotting all plans that place the slightest tax burden on rich people, hoping to chicken the administration into agreeing to its cuts to social spending. They do this because they know that while they wield enough power to obstruct the government, it's Obama's face in the news when the shit hits the fan, or the government takes ridiculous measures like this.
Now get ready as self-declared statisticians interpret and reinterpret the data to say what they want it to say. Put on some rubber boots, the bullshit is going to get knee-deep.
Who is going to build that colony? Not hundreds of humans in bulky suits who need to be supplied with oxygen, nutrients and shelter, who can work less than twelve out of twenty-four hours, and are easily injured or bored. Most of the large-scale construction (before a pressurized habitable area can even exist) must be done robotically because it's too dangerous and taxing. Figuring out how to engineer remotely guided robots and how to keep them from failing is at least as much part of these rover missions as exploring Mars.
Won't ever be. In a few decades, the dominant storage methods are more likely going to be some form of (holographic) optical memory and flash.
(Though I don't think the disc form will survive, because the surface is too exposed. Higher density will make it even less durable. It's more likely going to be embedded in sticks or cards, which are also less fragile and more compact.)
LyX already supports output to XHTML. Merely generating XHTML output and renaming the file extension to epub has a good chance of working.
Some things might have to be tweaked, however, and that would require changes to the LyX source code.
Because that one was a two-byte mistake.
This is, after all, the Daily Mail.
weapons grade or not
That distinction would be wrong to gloss over. While it is relatively easy to build a nuclear reactor (not a safe one, mind), building a nuclear weapon (and merely producing or handling weapons-grade nuclear material) requires technological and industrial resources beyond any individual. Therefore, this is not nuke material. It is at worst usable in a dirty bomb.
Who needs radioactive material to build a nuclear reactor? This is clearly no Macgyver.
It's better to beg forgiveness than ask permission, unless you're looking to stay out of jail...
Something where if you take a shovel, and dig, you can dig up rocks, and other bits-- or even bury loot, or build a house out of ambient materials, and have it be persistent.
Yeah, that'd be awesome. A game where you could mine and craft all kinds of stuff... what to call it...
The smaller the sample group, the more intelligent the average in it
So the users of IE for MacOS are both supergeniuses...
If the BSA comes in and says it has an affidavit from a former employee that says he was eyewitness to license violations
Until they end up in court, they might simply have an informal tip-off. The former employee might be disgruntled enough to cause some trouble, but it's another thing to sign a false affidavit, which is perjury and a felony.
And then what? Try to deposit it?
The Republicans are boycotting all plans that place the slightest tax burden on rich people, hoping to chicken the administration into agreeing to its cuts to social spending. They do this because they know that while they wield enough power to obstruct the government, it's Obama's face in the news when the shit hits the fan, or the government takes ridiculous measures like this.
The particulars may vary, but the essence is that you try to forbid people to have secrets from you.
Once you see it in this light, the paradoxical futility becomes clear.
mice and a supercomputer
So, what is the ultimate question?
Cue is the correct term in this context. Fail.
Now get ready as self-declared statisticians interpret and reinterpret the data to say what they want it to say. Put on some rubber boots, the bullshit is going to get knee-deep.
So either this guy is Hari Seldon and has a working theory of psychohistory, or this is mostly bullshit.
They should rename it to iPhone 6 a month after launch. A lot of people would buy it again.
intends to speed up the uranium enrichment process
Yeah, excellent job there, guys.
Wait what?
I know who James Murdoch and Rupert Murdoch are, but who's James Rupert?
Who is going to build that colony? Not hundreds of humans in bulky suits who need to be supplied with oxygen, nutrients and shelter, who can work less than twelve out of twenty-four hours, and are easily injured or bored. Most of the large-scale construction (before a pressurized habitable area can even exist) must be done robotically because it's too dangerous and taxing.
Figuring out how to engineer remotely guided robots and how to keep them from failing is at least as much part of these rover missions as exploring Mars.
"Running out of altitude" is the most awesome synonym for hitting the ground I've yet heard.
Racial recognition scanners.
Which wouldn't be all that different to what airports do now, come to think of it.
I thought every year since 1991 has been the year of the linux desktop...
... but they do hold a majority share. :-P
Won't ever be. In a few decades, the dominant storage methods are more likely going to be some form of (holographic) optical memory and flash.
(Though I don't think the disc form will survive, because the surface is too exposed. Higher density will make it even less durable. It's more likely going to be embedded in sticks or cards, which are also less fragile and more compact.)