That has yet to be decided. Sometimes the State will compell you to provide services or goods to others, even if you don't like it. I assume all those who denounced the "gay wedding cake baker" will of course denounce the websites dropping this Nazi group, too.
Free speech is protected, and you can talk all you want. When you take actions on that language, though - that becomes a felony. And then, suddenly, that speech before-hand becomes a crime because it is conspiracy. Talking with 10 people about how you'd rob a bank is not illegal, but if you then go and rob the bank - that speech is now classified as conspiracy and it becomes illegal.
Try colleges. Women are approximately 56% of university students, above their representation level in the general population. And while whites make up 75% of the US general population, they make up about 60% of college students. So being a white male means you're probably not going to make it to a university, as compared to other minority groups. At least not at the level of representation in the general population.
The Pope considered capitalism to be terrorism against humanity. And judging from the comments that follow that article, there are quite a few others who do so as well.
When you toss $4 trillion into the system just to keep the system going because it's already overvalued - you get this kind of crazy valuation. That money is going to go somewhere...
Yeah, it needs to be really plug-and-play. You plug it in, turn it on. It asks for a domain name - you can keep trying until one is available and it will "purchase" for you (advanced setting lets you enter your own DNS entries). Then you go to the next page, enter the e-mail addresses you want. Download apps to your cell phones/tablets, TSRs to your laptops allf ro syncing data and you're done. One-click configuration of Outlook and other mail clients, and host your own web mail client as well if you want...
Which industries is Trump trying to nationalize? And I haven't heard of Trump dissolving Congress and assigning all powers to his appointee on the Supreme Court...
Saw this back in 1999, when more and more VCs kept throwing good money after bad. Not making a profit, no plan how to make a profit, but hey - we can get lots of ephemeral users who will immediately flock to the next shiny thing!
It is, technically, a liability and thus shows up on the expense side of things. As your liabilities increase, they offset accrued profits of the company.
From what I read, Foxconn only gets an annual credit IF they employ a certain amount of people in the first place. So when they automate - they stop getitng credits. They don't get bilions up front, they get it paid out over years. Years in which they have to employ so many people to get the credit in the first place.
Not sure I understand the connection you're trying to draw. Are you saying that because people want to buy what they want, and if you don't sell what people want to buy, then leaving more money in the hands of people will crash the economy?
The State will also get taxes, indirectly. Those 13,000 jobs that average $54,000 a year will each pay about $2700 in State income tax. So that's about $35 million a year right there. And the State share of sales tax is 5%, so assuming 25% of that income is taxable when spent, that's another ~$9 million a year in taxes. So the State will make about $44 million a year just from the jobs alone. That should cover a fair amount of extra costs...
No, the goalposts didn't move... You didn't want to score an own goal...;) Look at the graphs on page 287. Big temp bump in the 20s and 30s, then cooling for 35 years, the a SLOW increase, but we're still well below the peak in the 20s and 30s. It fits with everything you claim. HOWEVER, look at the low temperature. It's rising much faster. Since the "global temperature" is the average of Tmax and Tmin, raising Tmin will automatically increase the average. Even if Tmax barely moves.
The graphs for Tmax show it is slower than the average - meaning we're not necessarily getting hotter, we're not getting as cold.
Slashdot Mirror
No one 'has to' sell services to people
That has yet to be decided. Sometimes the State will compell you to provide services or goods to others, even if you don't like it. I assume all those who denounced the "gay wedding cake baker" will of course denounce the websites dropping this Nazi group, too.
Hey, at least they're in good company with the Nation of Islam...
The left is much more efficient, preferring to shoot their political opponents.
Free speech is protected, and you can talk all you want. When you take actions on that language, though - that becomes a felony. And then, suddenly, that speech before-hand becomes a crime because it is conspiracy. Talking with 10 people about how you'd rob a bank is not illegal, but if you then go and rob the bank - that speech is now classified as conspiracy and it becomes illegal.
Then why did the IRS apologize for "targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names"? Just playing footsies?
Everyone - EVERYONE - should be required to watch "Blazing Saddles" every year.
Proof.
It's at least lawful when it comes to university entrance.
Try colleges. Women are approximately 56% of university students, above their representation level in the general population. And while whites make up 75% of the US general population, they make up about 60% of college students. So being a white male means you're probably not going to make it to a university, as compared to other minority groups. At least not at the level of representation in the general population.
The Pope considered capitalism to be terrorism against humanity. And judging from the comments that follow that article, there are quite a few others who do so as well.
When you toss $4 trillion into the system just to keep the system going because it's already overvalued - you get this kind of crazy valuation. That money is going to go somewhere...
There is already an app for that. You've been beat to the market, so your valuation wil be lucky to break $1 billion, let alone $100 billion...
a unicorn is a company that's valued at over $1 billion dollars, which is no small feat in today's market
Apparently, it now is...
Because they probably got the PWM code for the blue lock LED strobe just that much smoother and so a better user experience?
Yeah, it needs to be really plug-and-play. You plug it in, turn it on. It asks for a domain name - you can keep trying until one is available and it will "purchase" for you (advanced setting lets you enter your own DNS entries). Then you go to the next page, enter the e-mail addresses you want. Download apps to your cell phones/tablets, TSRs to your laptops allf ro syncing data and you're done. One-click configuration of Outlook and other mail clients, and host your own web mail client as well if you want...
Which industries is Trump trying to nationalize? And I haven't heard of Trump dissolving Congress and assigning all powers to his appointee on the Supreme Court...
Saw this back in 1999, when more and more VCs kept throwing good money after bad. Not making a profit, no plan how to make a profit, but hey - we can get lots of ephemeral users who will immediately flock to the next shiny thing!
That's a perfectly cromulent question for most /. given their closest physical contact with a lady is the dental hygenist cleaning their teeth...
It is, technically, a liability and thus shows up on the expense side of things. As your liabilities increase, they offset accrued profits of the company.
say to a room full of ADHD kids with spinners? You're fidgeting wrong....
From what I read, Foxconn only gets an annual credit IF they employ a certain amount of people in the first place. So when they automate - they stop getitng credits. They don't get bilions up front, they get it paid out over years. Years in which they have to employ so many people to get the credit in the first place.
Not sure I understand the connection you're trying to draw. Are you saying that because people want to buy what they want, and if you don't sell what people want to buy, then leaving more money in the hands of people will crash the economy?
The State will also get taxes, indirectly. Those 13,000 jobs that average $54,000 a year will each pay about $2700 in State income tax. So that's about $35 million a year right there. And the State share of sales tax is 5%, so assuming 25% of that income is taxable when spent, that's another ~$9 million a year in taxes. So the State will make about $44 million a year just from the jobs alone. That should cover a fair amount of extra costs...
No, the goalposts didn't move... You didn't want to score an own goal... ;) Look at the graphs on page 287. Big temp bump in the 20s and 30s, then cooling for 35 years, the a SLOW increase, but we're still well below the peak in the 20s and 30s. It fits with everything you claim. HOWEVER, look at the low temperature. It's rising much faster. Since the "global temperature" is the average of Tmax and Tmin, raising Tmin will automatically increase the average. Even if Tmax barely moves.
The graphs for Tmax show it is slower than the average - meaning we're not necessarily getting hotter, we're not getting as cold.
The EPA says we're essentially in lock-step with the rest of the world.