Sanders voters will bitch and moan and then vote for Hilliary.
I don't know about others, but I won't vote for a lying corporate whore. I'm leaning toward Jill Stein of the Green Party, but I may go back to the Libertarian Party.
Either way, neither Clinton nor Trump has my vote, regardless of my signature line.
I'm a one-issue voter, and that issue is not opening the seventh seal and ushering in the apocalypse.
The funny thing is that I'm also a one-issue voter, but in my case it IS ushering in the apocalypse.
Let's face it; our grand experiment with representative democracy is done. It failed. Let's just burn it to the ground, salt the ashes, and hope the cockroaches do better than we did.
I don't know for sure, but I'd guess that they have a micro-cell in the store. When your phone registers with the cell (since it's the closest VZW cell to you), Verizon sends the text to you via standard SMS.
No need to get paranoid, yet...it's not that kind of advertising.
Advertising Channels are used for discovering devices, initiating connection and broadcasting data. For instance, when you go to pair a Bluetooth keyboard or speaker with one of your devices, advertising packets can let you see the name of the device before you've paired it so you can distinguish it from all the other Bluetooth devices that are within range.
Think, "Hi, everyone out there....I'm a (device) named (name)"
Most likely, the enhancements allow for longer names or more capability descriptions.
...it just wants French users who use google.com instead of google.fr to not see personal information about French citizens...
If that's the case, then French ISPs need to force all traffic to redirect from google.com to google.fr in order to comply with French law. It's probably easier to regulate the national ISP than a local affiliate of an international corporation.
Here in the state of Ohio, a standard taxi rate is $4 for the hire plus $2 per mile. Any licensed taxi service has to abide by that rate. If I can't find out what my ride will cost before I book the trip, and without downloading an app on my phone, I'm not going to use their service. As an additional bonus, I can pay cash for a taxi.
And Google should stop using data to fine tune their advertising and instead just start charging a nominal fee for each user search. They could stop all this advertising and marketing bother and start making some real money.
The day Google starts directly charging for user searches is the day Yahoo and Bing have wet dreams about. People are too used to not paying for their searches out of their pocket. They prefer to exchange their data, even if they're not aware of it.
Maybe men legitimately don't like shows that are aimed at women, and they're more vocal about it?
I think that's a fair assessment.
Is that wrong?
I wouldn't say its wrong, but I would say its not helpful.
Are men supposed to simply sit down and keep their opinions to themselves? What's the hope here?
I'll answer these together, starting from the base assumption that men are watching these shows with their wife and/or girlfriend.
The rationale here is that you as the guy have a deep affection for the woman in your life, and want her to be happy. She enjoys watching this particular program, and for some reason she also enjoys your company. I'm sure she's made sacrifices for you, such as watching a movie or show you enjoy that she didn't care for. It's all part of the give and take of life.
Does Chrome for Android support apps and extensions?
Chrome apps and extensions are currently not supported on Chrome for Android. We have no plans to announce at this time.
The President is also the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. That means he can directly order any military officer or enlisted person.
As to the choice between Clinton and Trump, if we're going to go to hell anyway, let's just vote in Trump and get it over with. Clinton will take too long.
One was cited on the first sentence of the article..
You mean the social awkwardness associated with being discovered carrying a gun? I have two simpler and cheaper solutions.
1 - A proper holster and well-fitting clothes. As a bonus, the clothes can be worn with or without the gun.
2 - Not carrying a gun at all. While this is my personal preference, I understand that some people may not have the option, whether by occupation or paranoia.
Slashdot Mirror
...any time they begin to focus on her, Trump loudly spouts something so outrageous that they can't help but focus on him.
It's almost as if Clinton, Trump, and the media planned it that way.
Sanders voters will bitch and moan and then vote for Hilliary.
I don't know about others, but I won't vote for a lying corporate whore. I'm leaning toward Jill Stein of the Green Party, but I may go back to the Libertarian Party.
Either way, neither Clinton nor Trump has my vote, regardless of my signature line.
Many "good guys with a gun" in a chaotic situation could easily make a bad situation much, much worse.
Don't you know? There's a "good guy with a gun" tell that they all know about.
It's kinda like "gaydar"....they just know their own kind. However, they can't explain how they know.
oops, I guess something of value WAS lost here.
Carry on....
There is a certain amount of "I've got mine, fuck you" going on here.
That's about as succinct a summary of the general outlook on life here in America as I've ever seen.
when there's a choice between bad and worse, we have to choose bad.
Not necessarily true. For example, sometimes the fastest way out of a burning building is to just go through the flames.
Although in this case, to continue the burning building analogy, the flames are everywhere, and the building is just about to collapse on top of us.
I'm a one-issue voter, and that issue is not opening the seventh seal and ushering in the apocalypse.
The funny thing is that I'm also a one-issue voter, but in my case it IS ushering in the apocalypse.
Let's face it; our grand experiment with representative democracy is done. It failed. Let's just burn it to the ground, salt the ashes, and hope the cockroaches do better than we did.
I don't know for sure, but I'd guess that they have a micro-cell in the store. When your phone registers with the cell (since it's the closest VZW cell to you), Verizon sends the text to you via standard SMS.
No need to get paranoid, yet...it's not that kind of advertising.
Advertising Channels are used for discovering devices, initiating connection and broadcasting data. For instance, when you go to pair a Bluetooth keyboard or speaker with one of your devices, advertising packets can let you see the name of the device before you've paired it so you can distinguish it from all the other Bluetooth devices that are within range.
Think, "Hi, everyone out there....I'm a (device) named (name)"
Most likely, the enhancements allow for longer names or more capability descriptions.
https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/bluetooth-core-specification/technical-considerations
...it just wants French users who use google.com instead of google.fr to not see personal information about French citizens...
If that's the case, then French ISPs need to force all traffic to redirect from google.com to google.fr in order to comply with French law. It's probably easier to regulate the national ISP than a local affiliate of an international corporation.
Here in the state of Ohio, a standard taxi rate is $4 for the hire plus $2 per mile. Any licensed taxi service has to abide by that rate. If I can't find out what my ride will cost before I book the trip, and without downloading an app on my phone, I'm not going to use their service. As an additional bonus, I can pay cash for a taxi.
I don't like Clinton but at least she's got big words pandering to those concerned about dealing with global warming.
FTFY
Clinton's beating Sanders 1,769 to 1,501. That makes her the Party's choice as well.
FTFY
And Google should stop using data to fine tune their advertising and instead just start charging a nominal fee for each user search. They could stop all this advertising and marketing bother and start making some real money.
The day Google starts directly charging for user searches is the day Yahoo and Bing have wet dreams about. People are too used to not paying for their searches out of their pocket. They prefer to exchange their data, even if they're not aware of it.
To answer your questions:
Maybe men legitimately don't like shows that are aimed at women, and they're more vocal about it?
I think that's a fair assessment.
Is that wrong?
I wouldn't say its wrong, but I would say its not helpful.
Are men supposed to simply sit down and keep their opinions to themselves? What's the hope here?
I'll answer these together, starting from the base assumption that men are watching these shows with their wife and/or girlfriend.
The rationale here is that you as the guy have a deep affection for the woman in your life, and want her to be happy. She enjoys watching this particular program, and for some reason she also enjoys your company. I'm sure she's made sacrifices for you, such as watching a movie or show you enjoy that she didn't care for. It's all part of the give and take of life.
Firefox for Android supports extensions, and the top 3 extensions are privacy related:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/
Chrome for Android does NOT support extensions.
Does Chrome for Android support apps and extensions?
Chrome apps and extensions are currently not supported on Chrome for Android. We have no plans to announce at this time.
https://developer.chrome.com/multidevice/faq
I come here for information not pointless mass debating.
I'm sorry, you must have hit the wrong site.
You're at slashdot.org...pointless mass debating is the reason this site exists.
I'm afraid you don't remember correctly.
The President is also the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. That means he can directly order any military officer or enlisted person.
As to the choice between Clinton and Trump, if we're going to go to hell anyway, let's just vote in Trump and get it over with. Clinton will take too long.
So she's not evil. She's merely incompetent.
Good to know.
government officials form both parties have used private email addresses
But have they deliberately and willfully had markings stripped from classified information and transmitted it over public networks?
there is no upside for either side to drag this into court
So you're saying it's only illegal if you or I do it, but if you're high enough in the government it suddenly becomes legal?
Good to know.
The mainstream Democratic Party has devolved into what I call "Republican Lite".
It has all the central control and corporate ownership the sheeple crave,without the faux-Christian theocracy they may not like.
Again, I refer you to my signature...
So what alternatives do you suggest?
Here's one solution...http://www.homedepot.com/p/Economy-Heat-Cool-Manual-Thermostat-CT31A/100400017
A fancier option is...http://www.homedepot.com/p/Lux-Digital-Mechanical-Thermostat-with-Light-DMH110-010/204356282
I see no reason to have my thermostat connected to anything other than power and HVAC.
One was cited on the first sentence of the article..
You mean the social awkwardness associated with being discovered carrying a gun? I have two simpler and cheaper solutions.
1 - A proper holster and well-fitting clothes. As a bonus, the clothes can be worn with or without the gun.
2 - Not carrying a gun at all. While this is my personal preference, I understand that some people may not have the option, whether by occupation or paranoia.
...I'd be happy to have other choices...
Your wish is granted!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016#Major_third_parties
Otherwise, I refer you to my signature...
pull out a 12" frying pan and hit them in the face as hard as you can.
And not one of those nancy-boy aluminum and Teflon ones, either. Get yourself a cast-iron frying pan. It's much more satisfying.