That's a nice thought, but what if the physical Laws we think of as being the truth are imperfectly modeled off of the "real" world. Maybe the speed of light isn't really a limit. Or maybe your heart really does stop if you travel over 60mph on a locomotive. If this life is a simulation, we would know nothing about the "real" physics of the "real" world.
Science and philosophy haven't been the same discipline for a long, long time. It's a historical artifact, nothing more.
If it's a historical artifact, that means that science PhDs will not understand the limits of empiricism, and will disdainfully regard any knowledge outside the limited boundaries of empiricism as nonsense. Hmm, I guess you're right.
We should not ban smoking, ban junk food, or reqire drivers licenses
One of these things is not like the others. Smoking and poor driving affect other people. Junk food can only affect someone else if projectile vomiting is involved.
Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
Long time passing.
Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
Long time ago.
Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
Mommas grounded them one by one.
Oh, When will they ever learn?
Oh, When will they ever learn?
I don't see the problem. People still have to do stuff with that energy. Energy suppliers would go out of business, but things like oil will still be useful for fertilizers, plastics, or lubrication of machine parts. Trade of goods would continue, and it would be more brisk, as everyone would have limitless energy to move goods from one locale to another.
So Soviet Russia is the future a decade an a half hence? I ignored the CID, but the water quota is ridiculous. Unless we have drastically less water due to using as nuclear fusion fuel, we'll still have all the water we have now.
They do eat some dairy products from the more bovine Pokemon, and think I've seen some of the fish Pokemon for sale in markets (don't quote me). But Pokemon food is exclusively made from herbs, nuts, berries, grains, etc. and even the Pokemon with big slavering canines happily gobble up the vegan Pokemon food.
Then you won't be using The latest Firefox either so what's your beef? Also, why the heck would you want to use browser plugins that have targeted vulns?
It should prompt to update every day, regardless of whether they visit a site with flash/PDF/etc. That way the update gets applied before they "want to view content NOW". Otherwise they'll click cancel.
If your CPU heat sinks are in the largish side, take them off and store them separately. The heavy ones can damage a mobo if the computer is jerked around (like in a cargo container).
Check out the update in the summary. The challengers* get to decide if the video infringes.
* they're not really the challengers; the algorithm is challenging that your video matches their content, then gives them an option to review or remove. I seriously doubt they'll spend any time reviewing.
When a video is sent for manual review, the content owner has the option to analyze the user-uploaded video and determine whether it is a breach of copyright before the video is removed.
To further clarify: "content owner" means big media company that owns the video your video happened to get flagged as matching, not the person who posted the flagged video.
So this will never be used because the *AA would have to hire someone to be nice and okay your video (whereas the default is to remove all flagged videos).
Slashdot Mirror
That's a nice thought, but what if the physical Laws we think of as being the truth are imperfectly modeled off of the "real" world. Maybe the speed of light isn't really a limit. Or maybe your heart really does stop if you travel over 60mph on a locomotive. If this life is a simulation, we would know nothing about the "real" physics of the "real" world.
Science and philosophy haven't been the same discipline for a long, long time. It's a historical artifact, nothing more.
If it's a historical artifact, that means that science PhDs will not understand the limits of empiricism, and will disdainfully regard any knowledge outside the limited boundaries of empiricism as nonsense. Hmm, I guess you're right.
We should not ban smoking, ban junk food, or reqire drivers licenses
One of these things is not like the others. Smoking and poor driving affect other people. Junk food can only affect someone else if projectile vomiting is involved.
Antisocial person at work getting you down? Drink a beer!
I'm sure they'd love to report on this. Also local newspapers and radio.
I spent ten minutes trying to get street view to work in the iOS 6 safari browser. No success.
Biden discussed nuclear bomb making.
I gotta check this out with my iPhone! Oh, right.
Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
Long time passing.
Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
Long time ago.
Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
Mommas grounded them one by one.
Oh, When will they ever learn?
Oh, When will they ever learn?
I don't see the problem. People still have to do stuff with that energy. Energy suppliers would go out of business, but things like oil will still be useful for fertilizers, plastics, or lubrication of machine parts. Trade of goods would continue, and it would be more brisk, as everyone would have limitless energy to move goods from one locale to another.
Quick, what does this mean regarding mammoth burgers?
So Soviet Russia is the future a decade an a half hence? I ignored the CID, but the water quota is ridiculous. Unless we have drastically less water due to using as nuclear fusion fuel, we'll still have all the water we have now.
"Sweep the leg."
And some Pokemon like clafarie are overtly described as being space aliens.
They do eat some dairy products from the more bovine Pokemon, and think I've seen some of the fish Pokemon for sale in markets (don't quote me). But Pokemon food is exclusively made from herbs, nuts, berries, grains, etc. and even the Pokemon with big slavering canines happily gobble up the vegan Pokemon food.
And Goldberry. Very gentle, very powerful presence.
Forget Bilbo. Gollum skewed the hobbit life expectancy (assuming a proto-hobbit can be called a hobbit).
Then you won't be using The latest Firefox either so what's your beef? Also, why the heck would you want to use browser plugins that have targeted vulns?
It should prompt to update every day, regardless of whether they visit a site with flash/PDF/etc. That way the update gets applied before they "want to view content NOW". Otherwise they'll click cancel.
If your CPU heat sinks are in the largish side, take them off and store them separately. The heavy ones can damage a mobo if the computer is jerked around (like in a cargo container).
Deploy the Asstronauts!
Check out the update in the summary. The challengers* get to decide if the video infringes.
* they're not really the challengers; the algorithm is challenging that your video matches their content, then gives them an option to review or remove. I seriously doubt they'll spend any time reviewing.
When a video is sent for manual review, the content owner has the option to analyze the user-uploaded video and determine whether it is a breach of copyright before the video is removed.
To further clarify: "content owner" means big media company that owns the video your video happened to get flagged as matching, not the person who posted the flagged video.
So this will never be used because the *AA would have to hire someone to be nice and okay your video (whereas the default is to remove all flagged videos).
Well, I for one am voting for a third party Panda Bear.
Maybe she is dressed like a professional from the oldest profession?