The stub installer conflates "CNET" with the name of the software package, both in its file name and in its installation wizard. For projects and products that that are registered trademarks, wouldn't that constitute some sort of violation?
I'm confused. Are we supposed to go "tsk tsk" and be dismissive or be impressed that she had clear and concise specs which the vendor was able to meet?
"If you think it's nice that you can remove the DigiNotar CA, imagine a world where you couldn't, and they knew you couldn't. That's DNSSEC." -- Moxie Marlinspike
I think they have. The lesson the guys who decide which technology to use have learned is that if you invest in MS technologies and put them in your customers you'll have several good years. Then Microsoft will outdate those technologies soon and give you another round at the same consulting money.
The open source world is completely different. We stabilized on Perl^WPHP^WRuby^WNode^WEastAsia years ago and never looked back.
How old is your data? It's about 3.2% on my servers and growing. I'm going to pop open a bottle of champagne when the percentage of IPv6 users exceeds the percentage of IE6 users.
'Verizon won't roll them out to kiosks until it performs better on the market. ..'
. . . and it won't perform better on the market until agents have it in their hands to offer customers. Catch-22 anyone?
...unless Microsoft is desperate enough to pay Verizon to promote WP7. For Verizon it's not a Catch-22. It's a catch-several-million-dollars-by-doing-nothing.
60% of the market is currently XP that's a lot of people to insult.
No it's not. XP's market share has been dropping steadily for a while now. I wouldn't be surprised if that trend accelerated over the next year as companies get around to infrastructure upgrades they put off during the recession.
Why should Ford, Apple, HP, Halliburton, etc be forced to give up their legacy blocks when AT&T and Level 3 get to not only keep theirs but resell the address space?
You've missed the point. How do you properly vet the IP being compared? There are a truckload of blocks associated with the name "Cablevision". Do you block them all? What if the SWIP info says "Cablevision" but the addresses are being used by someone else (which happens a lot more than you would think)?
Slashdot Mirror
The stub installer conflates "CNET" with the name of the software package, both in its file name and in its installation wizard. For projects and products that that are registered trademarks, wouldn't that constitute some sort of violation?
Seconded. His analysis running up to 2008 was spot-on.
I'm confused. Are we supposed to go "tsk tsk" and be dismissive or be impressed that she had clear and concise specs which the vendor was able to meet?
"If you think it's nice that you can remove the DigiNotar CA, imagine a world where you couldn't, and they knew you couldn't. That's DNSSEC." -- Moxie Marlinspike
I think they have. The lesson the guys who decide which technology to use have learned is that if you invest in MS technologies and put them in your customers you'll have several good years. Then Microsoft will outdate those technologies soon and give you another round at the same consulting money.
The open source world is completely different. We stabilized on Perl^WPHP^WRuby^WNode^WEastAsia years ago and never looked back.
It hasn't stopped these guys.
How old is your data? It's about 3.2% on my servers and growing. I'm going to pop open a bottle of champagne when the percentage of IPv6 users exceeds the percentage of IE6 users.
'Verizon won't roll them out to kiosks until it performs better on the market. . .'
. . . and it won't perform better on the market until agents have it in their hands to offer customers. Catch-22 anyone?
...unless Microsoft is desperate enough to pay Verizon to promote WP7. For Verizon it's not a Catch-22. It's a catch-several-million-dollars-by-doing-nothing.
Wake me up when a worm has been discovered in the wild targeting OS X or Linux
Good morning! I remember cleaning a worm from a client's system in the early aughts; as I recall they were old news even then.
T-Mobile and Verizon are way ahead of you.
60% of the market is currently XP that's a lot of people to insult.
No it's not. XP's market share has been dropping steadily for a while now. I wouldn't be surprised if that trend accelerated over the next year as companies get around to infrastructure upgrades they put off during the recession.
Sigh. Once again:
Why should Ford, Apple, HP, Halliburton, etc be forced to give up their legacy blocks when AT&T and Level 3 get to not only keep theirs but resell the address space?
Significant digits. I has them.
QuikTrip. The device gives you coffee and a microwave sandwich while filling your gas tank, all in less than a second.
...or you can just use site (or even link) local addresses.
Unless it includes a fully functional "Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" it's destined for failure.
Apparently you haven't heard of the Interplanetary Internet.
There are 2^125 *global* addresses, you resource-hogging Earthist pig.
Wireless service especially for the police?
Already been done.
AT&T and Level 3 charge money for addresses. Why can't Nortel?
The calls themselves are STUN and SIP. FaceTime server registration is another matter apparently.
Believe it or not, people have suggested that very thing on Slashdot before.
Yes! Let's revoke blocks from AT&T and Level 3! Then we can hand out addresses to everyone that suddenly and mysteriously lost connectivity.
You've missed the point. How do you properly vet the IP being compared? There are a truckload of blocks associated with the name "Cablevision". Do you block them all? What if the SWIP info says "Cablevision" but the addresses are being used by someone else (which happens a lot more than you would think)?
I don't think this is as easy as you think. Search for "Cablevision" and you're suddenly in a maze of twisty little /24s, all alike.