"in no country, items in contracts that contradict with the existing law are tolerated. even in turkey, if you have such an item in the contract, and you dont explicitly state in an item that says "in case one of the items in this contract is contradictory with law, this will not nullify the whole contract, but just the item itself".
providing false advertising is fraud. selling it is fraud."
even being "subject to change without notice" cant cover an arse. they are still advertising those as they did earlier, so any client who got blown out due to bandwidth usage now can sue them now, since they are probably advertising the same package as of now with the same stats.
in no country, items in contracts that contradict with the existing law are tolerated. even in turkey, if you have such an item in the contract, and you dont explicitly state in an item that says "in case one of the items in this contract is contradictory with law, this will not nullify the whole contract, but just the item itself".
providing false advertising is fraud. selling it is fraud.
started wow 1 year ago. for a month or so, it was fun.
but when i hit level 20, the "go there and here for that quest and come back" concept started to wear off.
after i hit 40, this time "go to this and that dungeon with 5-20 people and such" concept started to wear off.
it was a long and boring, tedious journey from 40 to 60.
just as i hit 60, and started to grind for items that would make me able to compete fairly in pvp, the only fun left in the game, expansion came out and 10 new levels to go were added into the game.
60-70 boredom is much much longer and tedious than 30 to 60 boredom. and, when you hit level 70, you have to go through the "grind for items" boredom to get adequate itemization for being able to compete in pvp, and get into raids easily.
i admit, its boring. boring in the boredom kingdom of the bored.
im in this game for 2 things, 1 my guild that has migrated here from swg, 2, for pvp, which is the only thing fun in the game.
if blizz wants to break the cycle, they have to let go of the concept "play time" when valuing game s, but bring in "fun factor".
making me play something for months and than claiming that a game has "xxxx hours play time" does not mean shit, because i am bored through those xxxx hours.
ANY resource, cash transaction, etc are already TAXED while being used for running the internet. from electricity to any profits internet entities make.
"taxing" internet from things like email traffic, site traffic are not "taxing". it is TROLLING. like standing up on a bridge and extorting money from people passing it.
I mean, ex employees setting up new web presences and such ?
All google needs to do to make it a mutually beneficial thing is to enter cooperation with them.
remember what has made google a major player - they introduced adsense, which has accepted any web presence, any small site as partners in contrast to msn's, yahoo's advertising concepts. this gave them the entire coverage of the web.
same philosophy translated to the approach to ex employee run services would benefit google phenomenonally, as these people would probably be creating hip stuff, and hence having great reach.
those muslim kids are not doing it out of "belief" but out of brainwashing done by middle eastern sourced radical islamist movements and even middle eastern countries themselves out of hatred for jews. and thats that. no need to mention one of them goes as far as to call the israel state a state to be exterminated, and jew people as source of evil and so on. rest are not too different.
so how come that is a "belief" ? there was no "holocaust" subject or order in islam in year 580AD, neither there was anything even at the time mohammad died.
so thats a new, political thing and should not be tolerated. noone can tolerate choosing to "believe" burning of 3.5 people in furnaces after being poisoned as "nonexistent". no one.
the picture you draw is a fairy tale. exists in an ideal world. artists are still starving. the publishing companies the artists "making through" found end up as acting like existing publishing companies. and no artist made publishing company can rival the big boys, who decide what the entire earth civilization will listen to/watch. this is wrong.
"ripped off" of the 1 million $ more that they would be making in addition to the $20 million they already did. or a one to 10 or a 2 to 40. very very unfair. its outright civil to create a police state and implement controls over all pcs and internet in order to give them their "right" share.
To me, "The music industry" seems to have become the bane of civil and modern life. As if there exist no problems in the world, no wars, no poverty, no economic issues but fucking more-cash problems of the "music industry". makes one start to treat individuals involved in this "music industry" like lowlifes in everyday life.
they cant declare a fascist dictatorship because military wouldnt comply with it, hence they are creating means to FORCE you into abiding by what they say.
the reason is simple - if it is created through usage of bits and bytes, and everything is in any digital environment, it can be modified, changed, and faked.
nothing on the internet can be trusted to identify a person. nothing.
but then you would have to call the french revolutionaries a cult, who gave us the modern principles of the society, just because of their "overzealousness". But, had there not been overzealousness, the monarchy would not be ended.
Slashdot Mirror
im reposting :
"in no country, items in contracts that contradict with the existing law are tolerated. even in turkey, if you have such an item in the contract, and you dont explicitly state in an item that says "in case one of the items in this contract is contradictory with law, this will not nullify the whole contract, but just the item itself".
providing false advertising is fraud. selling it is fraud."
even being "subject to change without notice" cant cover an arse. they are still advertising those as they did earlier, so any client who got blown out due to bandwidth usage now can sue them now, since they are probably advertising the same package as of now with the same stats.
in no country, items in contracts that contradict with the existing law are tolerated. even in turkey, if you have such an item in the contract, and you dont explicitly state in an item that says "in case one of the items in this contract is contradictory with law, this will not nullify the whole contract, but just the item itself".
providing false advertising is fraud. selling it is fraud.
for deceiving advertisement & sale of products and services.
if they hadnt the capacity, they shouldnt have advertised and sold that nonexistent capacity.
started wow 1 year ago. for a month or so, it was fun.
but when i hit level 20, the "go there and here for that quest and come back" concept started to wear off.
after i hit 40, this time "go to this and that dungeon with 5-20 people and such" concept started to wear off.
it was a long and boring, tedious journey from 40 to 60.
just as i hit 60, and started to grind for items that would make me able to compete fairly in pvp, the only fun left in the game, expansion came out and 10 new levels to go were added into the game.
60-70 boredom is much much longer and tedious than 30 to 60 boredom. and, when you hit level 70, you have to go through the "grind for items" boredom to get adequate itemization for being able to compete in pvp, and get into raids easily.
i admit, its boring. boring in the boredom kingdom of the bored.
im in this game for 2 things, 1 my guild that has migrated here from swg, 2, for pvp, which is the only thing fun in the game.
if blizz wants to break the cycle, they have to let go of the concept "play time" when valuing game s, but bring in "fun factor".
making me play something for months and than claiming that a game has "xxxx hours play time" does not mean shit, because i am bored through those xxxx hours.
reasons described in the parent are the ones which push people to buying gold and powerleveling instead of playing the game.
ANY resource, cash transaction, etc are already TAXED while being used for running the internet. from electricity to any profits internet entities make.
"taxing" internet from things like email traffic, site traffic are not "taxing". it is TROLLING. like standing up on a bridge and extorting money from people passing it.
I mean, ex employees setting up new web presences and such ?
All google needs to do to make it a mutually beneficial thing is to enter cooperation with them.
remember what has made google a major player - they introduced adsense, which has accepted any web presence, any small site as partners in contrast to msn's, yahoo's advertising concepts. this gave them the entire coverage of the web.
same philosophy translated to the approach to ex employee run services would benefit google phenomenonally, as these people would probably be creating hip stuff, and hence having great reach.
its not an end, its an expansion.
the "Pick your svastika armband bin"...
If they do that, and dont make people wear svastika armbands, there is an inconsistency there.
Get real.
those muslim kids are not doing it out of "belief" but out of brainwashing done by middle eastern sourced radical islamist movements and even middle eastern countries themselves out of hatred for jews. and thats that. no need to mention one of them goes as far as to call the israel state a state to be exterminated, and jew people as source of evil and so on. rest are not too different.
so how come that is a "belief" ? there was no "holocaust" subject or order in islam in year 580AD, neither there was anything even at the time mohammad died.
so thats a new, political thing and should not be tolerated. noone can tolerate choosing to "believe" burning of 3.5 people in furnaces after being poisoned as "nonexistent". no one.
the picture you draw is a fairy tale. exists in an ideal world. artists are still starving. the publishing companies the artists "making through" found end up as acting like existing publishing companies. and no artist made publishing company can rival the big boys, who decide what the entire earth civilization will listen to/watch. this is wrong.
yea.
"ripped off" of the 1 million $ more that they would be making in addition to the $20 million they already did. or a one to 10 or a 2 to 40. very very unfair. its outright civil to create a police state and implement controls over all pcs and internet in order to give them their "right" share.
A truly wonderful occurrence as a mentally lacking persona is taking a hulking giant head on. Only that, he is no david.
and this is a chance for microsoft to clean up some of the bad karma that they have accrued over the last 25-30 years.
at least then they wouldnt be harming the progress of civilization
well. if people oust them from society, they would have to reconsider their crap.
hmmm.
like having innovation, free speech and competitio not being stifled by insane laws that are passed through music industry funding ?
like, "intellectual property" exploitation that walks in the verge of banning people from using certain words in daily speech ?
i said "everyday life", because i didnt mean it as a metaphor, i really meant i would start treating these people like shit in everyday life.
To me, "The music industry" seems to have become the bane of civil and modern life. As if there exist no problems in the world, no wars, no poverty, no economic issues but fucking more-cash problems of the "music industry". makes one start to treat individuals involved in this "music industry" like lowlifes in everyday life.
if these are good stuff or bad stuff.
these are CONTROL mechanisms. and thats that.
they cant declare a fascist dictatorship because military wouldnt comply with it, hence they are creating means to FORCE you into abiding by what they say.
who ? you know who.
"exploding debris blocking" is something that can tip balance in a game in random fashion. thats why its not there.
if you can put your case correctly and with determination, eventually you can reach the end of the tunnel.
organizations and foundations would have better chance though.
be trusted.
the reason is simple - if it is created through usage of bits and bytes, and everything is in any digital environment, it can be modified, changed, and faked.
nothing on the internet can be trusted to identify a person. nothing.
with a little tint of rousseau and bastille spirit within.
no sire. robespierre is dead for long a time now. but, he has managed to take a many aristocrat heads with him.
In front of almost all the people working in the i.t.
/.
talk about what goes around, comes around, karma and stuff like that.
they should have stomached the annoyance rather than getting shamed like this in
sue, on grounds of constitution, freedom of speech and equality. this issue spans that areas.
cult ? maybe.
but then you would have to call the french revolutionaries a cult, who gave us the modern principles of the society, just because of their "overzealousness". But, had there not been overzealousness, the monarchy would not be ended.
similar.