For ANYTHING to be omnipotent, it/he/she/they has to be INFINITE. This is a PREREQUISITE.
and not 'infinite' as in physicality either, has to be infinite in EVERY respect :
past future, timeless, dimensions, thoughts, possibilities, emptiness, fullness, colors, probabilities, things to be things that are things are yet not, things were - continue this sequence until eternity, for stuff you can conceive. yet, add stuff you cant conceive on top of that. and it still not enough.
for an infinity to be really infinite, it has to contain ALL things, ANYTHING. because, unlike math, logically here, if you get only ONE piece away from this set of infinity, the remainder is not infinite anymore.
hence, infinity contains EVERYTHING in it. me, you the monitor the speakers and the tune coming out of it, start counting and go forth until infinity so you can conceive what kind of stuff "we are".
i said WE, and WE are, because you and me and all stuff combined together are constituting this infinity that is "us".
hence, as an infinity, we just "be". from the perspective of infiniteness, infinity (that is us too), does NOT need to communicate with anyone, neither with assigned representatives or "angels" or anyhing, nor need to create any "written rules" on some piece of paper so that some pieces of it should follow,
and, totally foolishly infinity (that is us) does NOT need anybody to admire, worship or do anything to it, because infinity is ALL things that are. hence, it is beauty itself (himself/herself/ourself/themselves) too. even the worshipper is a piece of infinity, hence whatever s/he is going to do is already existent (the state of worshipping, the thought/feeling s/he generates while worshipping, in whatever amount) in infinity, hence it doesnt need it either, because it IS infinity.
actually infinity does NOT need to do nothing, does NOT need to be done nothing. infinity just exists.
ANYTHING that is needing something, or doing some sort of activity is then a part, a finite part of infinity.
you go figure.
Im using ONLY amd cpu&boards for 6 years and
on
AMD's New DRM
·
· Score: 1
the day they pull this shit is the day i switch to intel, nomatter what the cost.
i cant anyone leveraging more authority in MY pc, even if that anyone was my long dead father or mother.
you yourself probably so rationally challenged that you are not able to understand the fact that human beings, being beings of higher evolutionary stages, need MORE than foodstuff to be able to survive.
music is a major ingredient in psychological, and as a result mental, and in the ultimate end physical health of any given human being.
as an example, if there was not enough music around, or they were not able to get sufficient dosage of whatever poison in music they needed, lots of programmers would be DEAD, instead of just bald, by the age of 40, due to stress/pressure related illnesses.
All of which is irrelevant to the question of whether or not theft is justified. The alternative to growing your own food is stealing that food from others. Rights are by their very nature mutual; if you can justify stealing from others then they can just as easily justify stealing from you. By refusing to recognize property rights you condemn yourself to perpetual poverty, since no one will recognize the property rights of a known thief. (Note, too, that not so long ago stealing food could easily get you a death sentence; it makes sense when you consider that by doing so you may be condemning someone else to die in your stead.)
actually you are now
exactly
on the point i am trying to make. ill draw the picture with a perfect example :
in pre 1789 france, it was aristocrats' right by laws to preside over the populace, to be privileged, and populace had to live on their land and pay them their 'due', which amounted to almost anything you produce as a resident, just a token amount was left to you so that you wouldnt die or move away.
also, in the years leaving up to the revolution, people were stealing bread to cope up with enflation, and government at last set up potato fields that were guarded by sentries, but at night unguarded, so that populace would come and steal and so continue their lives.
lets come to the point :
definitions of "right" and "property" are not absolute. they change over time.
for example now, the majority of internet backbone are owned by private companies. they, together make up the internet. now, on grounds of "ownership", what would happen if a cartel of these had acquired the right to twist their "property" in such a way that it hampered the internet as a whole ? as you remember they tried to do that, but closely was averted. still, it is a grey area as in that they do not have full control of their property ?
what would we do then, if they had had got their way ? trash 20 years of innovation and
priceless
time, that is some asset that can not be recovered, and start laying fibers again ? in the starting stages of 21st century even ?
music is the same. as in 1789, there are laws. there are "rights", as were defined in 1789. but the overall effect of these laws and "rights" combined together in their current interpretation is hampering NOT consumers, but HUMANITY. remember that whatever we produce in terms of art affects our culture for centuries to come, or does NOT affect, if they cant find an outlet to reach the populace.
this is a matter that cant be evaluated like one evaluates local suburban home ownership rights. a suburban home owner cant affect the entire civilization, but a music cartel can.
people are just doing what they do in the wake of a minority elite oppressing them through either military force, or careful twisting of laws - they are going the route of civil disobedience. lucky that this matter is not something that requires you chain yourself somewhere, or get outside to march - you just disobey at home, and everyone is happy.
No, they should buy or grow their own materials and make their own bread, and thus compete with the cartel. The corresponding action in digital media would be to make their own copies on their own physical media (i.e. "pirate").
yea, definitely. and whilst this process is taking its duration to ripen up, poor people should die from diseases caused by weak bodies due to hunger. not to forget that a lot of youngsters' development will be hampered with lack of food in their growing period.
Of course if the cartel receives tax subsidies or favorable legislation (such as copyright or patent laws) then you're not really talking about a simple cartel, but rather a pair of criminal organizations (the cartel and the government) working together for their own benefits at everyone else's expense. In that case your only real option is to attempt to eliminate them just as you would any other criminal organizations.
please, then, by all means be my guest and "eliminate" the music cartels from creative arena. there is a reason people is pirating. if they would be eliminate"able", it would have been done a while ago.
The problem, of course, is finding a way to eliminate what essentially amount to a protection racket without bring in an even bigger racket to replace them; so far as I know this problem has yet to be solved
the problem is being or not being able to eliminate the "protection racket". and the positive part of the former sentence is nonexistent.
I can see the chairs flying around :
on
Palm to go Linux
·
· Score: 1
then if all food producers have merged into a few cartels, and then put prices on basic foodstuffs ranging from $100 to $500 per item, like a single bread, then people should just "not buy them" and starve is that it ?
fantastic logic approach to the subject. so if any sector is monopolized to the extent that 3-4 big boys dictate prices, any price goes, and noone should go pirating.
before you even go that way, music/entertainment is also a basical necessity of life.
turkish prisons are not as horrible as popular culture believes. in fact they are generally otherwise. albeit, the usual inmate-hierarchy persists. comforts are generally similar to a upper-poor class household, television, radio, beds and etc.
even many political prisoners, they are able to continue their works, writing a book, even unfortunately participating in more outlawed terrorist organization furthering, like pkk situation.
prisons where terrorist/radical political prisoners are kept, are an entirely different matter.
not before they sue saddam, iraqis. then the suing order would break down. if not broken down, suing order will go to the start of the creation, ultimately, suing all that there is and was.
because lots of funds were spent a prior to 1990s for preparing u.s. military for occasions that would necessitate an operation in the desert, mainly due to instable dictators in the region like saddam, the u.s. government was not able to spare enough resources from budget for protecting "intellectual properties" of u.s. citizens (actually only riaa members).
henceforth this resource shortage have led to the current environment in which members are forced to protect their own "intellectual property" rights with a finest of organizations, RIAA, that they founded from their own pockets, which increases the collateral damages to the participating members.
this is a state of affairs that is unacceptable. rights of the participating members of RIAA should be delivered, justice be done, reparations should be made.
henceforth RIAA should file suits against Saddam, and consequently current iraqi government, and iraqi people, and demand that a share from the proceedings of the oil pumped out of the region should be levied in taxes in order to compensate infringement of RIAA members' "intellectual property" rights.
if you have read so far, and yet you do not know RIAA, or you are new to slashdot, keep in mind that RIAA can successfully sue dead people.
next in to-sue list : aliens
in the works : lawsuits against whatever was there before the big bang that created the universe, on grounds that it/they/us/whatever have also created the concept of photons, electromagnetism, and thought, which are all utilized in excess by parties that infringe upon RIAA members' "intellectual property" rights.
Slashdot Mirror
and why is that
For ANYTHING to be omnipotent, it/he/she/they has to be INFINITE. This is a PREREQUISITE.
and not 'infinite' as in physicality either, has to be infinite in EVERY respect :
past future, timeless, dimensions, thoughts, possibilities, emptiness, fullness, colors, probabilities, things to be things that are things are yet not, things were - continue this sequence until eternity, for stuff you can conceive. yet, add stuff you cant conceive on top of that. and it still not enough.
for an infinity to be really infinite, it has to contain ALL things, ANYTHING. because, unlike math, logically here, if you get only ONE piece away from this set of infinity, the remainder is not infinite anymore.
hence, infinity contains EVERYTHING in it. me, you the monitor the speakers and the tune coming out of it, start counting and go forth until infinity so you can conceive what kind of stuff "we are".
i said WE, and WE are, because you and me and all stuff combined together are constituting this infinity that is "us".
hence, as an infinity, we just "be". from the perspective of infiniteness, infinity (that is us too), does NOT need to communicate with anyone, neither with assigned representatives or "angels" or anyhing, nor need to create any "written rules" on some piece of paper so that some pieces of it should follow,
and, totally foolishly infinity (that is us) does NOT need anybody to admire, worship or do anything to it, because infinity is ALL things that are. hence, it is beauty itself (himself/herself/ourself/themselves) too. even the worshipper is a piece of infinity, hence whatever s/he is going to do is already existent (the state of worshipping, the thought/feeling s/he generates while worshipping, in whatever amount) in infinity, hence it doesnt need it either, because it IS infinity.
actually infinity does NOT need to do nothing, does NOT need to be done nothing. infinity just exists.
ANYTHING that is needing something, or doing some sort of activity is then a part, a finite part of infinity.
you go figure.
the day they pull this shit is the day i switch to intel, nomatter what the cost.
i cant anyone leveraging more authority in MY pc, even if that anyone was my long dead father or mother.
Too !
With XP, and WAS, you mean. not with vista.
and even at times i am finding myself of trying out this wii.
The ones that are tossed around, i mean.
you yourself probably so rationally challenged that you are not able to understand the fact that human beings, being beings of higher evolutionary stages, need MORE than foodstuff to be able to survive.
music is a major ingredient in psychological, and as a result mental, and in the ultimate end physical health of any given human being.
as an example, if there was not enough music around, or they were not able to get sufficient dosage of whatever poison in music they needed, lots of programmers would be DEAD, instead of just bald, by the age of 40, due to stress/pressure related illnesses.
actually you are now
- exactly
on the point i am trying to make. ill draw the picture with a perfect example :in pre 1789 france, it was aristocrats' right by laws to preside over the populace, to be privileged, and populace had to live on their land and pay them their 'due', which amounted to almost anything you produce as a resident, just a token amount was left to you so that you wouldnt die or move away.
also, in the years leaving up to the revolution, people were stealing bread to cope up with enflation, and government at last set up potato fields that were guarded by sentries, but at night unguarded, so that populace would come and steal and so continue their lives.
lets come to the point :
definitions of "right" and "property" are not absolute. they change over time.
for example now, the majority of internet backbone are owned by private companies. they, together make up the internet. now, on grounds of "ownership", what would happen if a cartel of these had acquired the right to twist their "property" in such a way that it hampered the internet as a whole ? as you remember they tried to do that, but closely was averted. still, it is a grey area as in that they do not have full control of their property ?
what would we do then, if they had had got their way ? trash 20 years of innovation and
- priceless
time, that is some asset that can not be recovered, and start laying fibers again ? in the starting stages of 21st century even ?music is the same. as in 1789, there are laws. there are "rights", as were defined in 1789. but the overall effect of these laws and "rights" combined together in their current interpretation is hampering NOT consumers, but HUMANITY. remember that whatever we produce in terms of art affects our culture for centuries to come, or does NOT affect, if they cant find an outlet to reach the populace.
this is a matter that cant be evaluated like one evaluates local suburban home ownership rights. a suburban home owner cant affect the entire civilization, but a music cartel can.
people are just doing what they do in the wake of a minority elite oppressing them through either military force, or careful twisting of laws - they are going the route of civil disobedience. lucky that this matter is not something that requires you chain yourself somewhere, or get outside to march - you just disobey at home, and everyone is happy.
yea, definitely. and whilst this process is taking its duration to ripen up, poor people should die from diseases caused by weak bodies due to hunger. not to forget that a lot of youngsters' development will be hampered with lack of food in their growing period.
Of course if the cartel receives tax subsidies or favorable legislation (such as copyright or patent laws) then you're not really talking about a simple cartel, but rather a pair of criminal organizations (the cartel and the government) working together for their own benefits at everyone else's expense. In that case your only real option is to attempt to eliminate them just as you would any other criminal organizations.
please, then, by all means be my guest and "eliminate" the music cartels from creative arena. there is a reason people is pirating. if they would be eliminate"able", it would have been done a while ago.
The problem, of course, is finding a way to eliminate what essentially amount to a protection racket without bring in an even bigger racket to replace them; so far as I know this problem has yet to be solved
the problem is being or not being able to eliminate the "protection racket". and the positive part of the former sentence is nonexistent.
"Palm users, Palm users, Palm users"
which would effect an immediate plunge of downfall towards earth, since the developers sequence wont be echoing in space.
that will take him out of classification of evil it persona and puts him in "hazardous heavenly object" class however.
then if all food producers have merged into a few cartels, and then put prices on basic foodstuffs ranging from $100 to $500 per item, like a single bread, then people should just "not buy them" and starve is that it ?
fantastic logic approach to the subject. so if any sector is monopolized to the extent that 3-4 big boys dictate prices, any price goes, and noone should go pirating.
before you even go that way, music/entertainment is also a basical necessity of life.
just in case someone comes up unexpected ....
Anyone heard whether Steve Ballmer is thinking of taking the trip too ?
Sorry to break it to you, but forcing exorbitant prices for products that cost pitiful to produce through practical monopoly is worse.
you there in u.s. have been putting quite a fight lately in lawsuits. you are not easily intimidated and fooled as before. its becoming costly.
and china is a bigger market. country is already repressive. it wont be too hard to force down exorbitant prices to 1.5 billion people there.
tsk tsk tsk. bad americans you. no soup for you.
turkish prisons are not as horrible as popular culture believes. in fact they are generally otherwise. albeit, the usual inmate-hierarchy persists. comforts are generally similar to a upper-poor class household, television, radio, beds and etc.
even many political prisoners, they are able to continue their works, writing a book, even unfortunately participating in more outlawed terrorist organization furthering, like pkk situation.
prisons where terrorist/radical political prisoners are kept, are an entirely different matter.
appen in states"
you would be surprised at the sort of shit happening in turkey.
you said it
was it too different when yeltsin was around ?
.. I need to go and make myself a Hot jupiter.
a country.
sooner or later mobsters will show their true face and "weed out" competition.
pity on any fools who think russia is a western, modern nation.
not before they sue saddam, iraqis. then the suing order would break down. if not broken down, suing order will go to the start of the creation, ultimately, suing all that there is and was.
despite he is dead.
because lots of funds were spent a prior to 1990s for preparing u.s. military for occasions that would necessitate an operation in the desert, mainly due to instable dictators in the region like saddam, the u.s. government was not able to spare enough resources from budget for protecting "intellectual properties" of u.s. citizens (actually only riaa members).
henceforth this resource shortage have led to the current environment in which members are forced to protect their own "intellectual property" rights with a finest of organizations, RIAA, that they founded from their own pockets, which increases the collateral damages to the participating members.
this is a state of affairs that is unacceptable. rights of the participating members of RIAA should be delivered, justice be done, reparations should be made.
henceforth RIAA should file suits against Saddam, and consequently current iraqi government, and iraqi people, and demand that a share from the proceedings of the oil pumped out of the region should be levied in taxes in order to compensate infringement of RIAA members' "intellectual property" rights.
if you have read so far, and yet you do not know RIAA, or you are new to slashdot, keep in mind that RIAA can successfully sue dead people.
next in to-sue list : aliens
in the works : lawsuits against whatever was there before the big bang that created the universe, on grounds that it/they/us/whatever have also created the concept of photons, electromagnetism, and thought, which are all utilized in excess by parties that infringe upon RIAA members' "intellectual property" rights.