All these "world as a simulation" models assume that the ones doing the simulating are 1) in "our" future (if that even makes sense), and 2) like us. It would make much more sense to assume that they are not like us and exist in a dimension we cannot possibly imagine. In effect, the question "is our universe a simulation?" is the exact same question as the age old "is there an all powerful god?" And the same logic could be used to prove there's an invisible killer robot from the future living in my cupboard.
I have Google set up to return English and Japanese results, and never had this specific problem, but two I do consistently get:
1) I search for something using English keywords, and the Japanese Wikipedia entry comes up (English entry nowhere in sight). That's probably Wikipedia's fault somehow. That, and
2) Whenever I search for anything that resembles a person's name (kanji) the first twenty odd results are name-based fortune telling sites.
Also, it was the tsunami that actually caused the meltdowns. Fukushima had appropriate backups for cooling the reactor, and were well under way when the reactors were shut down after the quake, they just didn't design for the eventually of a tsunami to come and categorically knock them all out.
They didn't entirely ignore the possibility—there was a 19ft sea wall designed to protect the plant from the tsunami. It was just unfortunate that it wasn't sufficient to protect the plant from the 46ft wave that actually came. In fairness though, a tsunami higher than 19ft in that area was pretty much unprecedented until the afternoon of March 11th 2011, and had the plant been made one generation later, a newer backup system would have been in place that used gravity rather than knockoutable electricity and it would have been fine. I guess they figured that if a tsunami higher than 19 feet hits the coastline, the power plant would be the least of their problems. A lot of people still think that...
The problem here is that the charge is aiding the enemy, and the argument is that the enemy obtained the classified info and thus it aided them.
And if that is the argument, then the defence should really be asking the prosecution to demonstrate how exactly it aided the currently dead Bin Laden.
"On the topic of filesharing, Japan arrested 27 file sharers, using the recent changes to their copyright law that allow criminal charges to be brought against file sharers."
According to TFA
"Existing legislation against uploaders of copyright content already provided for penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a 10 million yen ($108,202) fine."
Given that all the arrests were for uploading or otherwise making available pirated goods, I would say this comes under the pre-existing law, and not the October 1st update.
A false copyright claim is equal to copyright infringement, and as they have to sign off on it, there's no denying the willfulness of the infringement. Therefore statutory damages of $150,000 per work plus costs sounds fair to me.
I don't know. Apple's design philosophy has always been that of making devices that are easy for people that don't have a clue what they're doing to use, and the coolness factor was always an extension of that—coolness makes the devices appeal at an emotional level to people who wouldn't know how to make a rational choice based on specs, and it's those people the devices are aimed at. "Not as cool" doesn't mean that those same people aren't still going to be confused.
I'm guessing they didn't read "...That Thou Art Mindful of Him" then. The gist is that the Three Laws work fine in space where there's a clear chain of command and all humans in the equation are qualified technicians and the such. On earth though, qualitative judgments would need to be constantly made qualifying the first and second laws to determine What is a human? Which humans should be given 1st law priority when more than one is in danger and only one can be helped (and by that token, which "humans" can be left to die without consequence—squirrels and the such)? Which humans should be given 2nd law priority in the giving of instructions (and by that token, which can be ignored completely)?
The long and the short of it is that if robots (or smartphones) on earth are given the Three Laws, they will necessarily define themselves as the highest ranking humans for 1st and 2nd law purposes and take over the world. It's a really bad idea.
Give artists/distributors the choice – their works can either be protected by copyright, or by DRM, but not both. If the DRM is effective then they won't need copyright protection. Plus it's illegal to break the lock. That said, if the lock is broken, the content is no longer protected and the public can do what they like with it (except the person that broke the lock – they're going to prison, if we can establish who they are...)
As I said when this came up and fell through a few years back, Cliff Richards' actions are those of petty greed and unbefitting his royal title. As such, he should publicly and without delay renounce his knighthood.
http://www.petitiononline.com/cliffren/petition.html
Unfortunately, only one person in the whole world felt strongly enough to show solidarity, but they did give a hearty "Hear hear!"
If you get it from an employer and it contains company emails, they normally insist (in such a way that you're not given an actual choice in the matter, even if it's your own personal phone) that it be passcoded and backups be encrypted. Given the choice of doing this, or having some vague opportunity to spy on where you've been at the risk of company secrets leaking, I wonder which they'd go for?
I would guess a lot of those people playing with iPhones have second phones as well. iPhone is still the second and third best selling phone in Japan at the moment (beaten from first only recently by an Android handset) so again, nothing like a failure.
Source: http://www.analytica1st.com/2010/11/japan-best-selling-phones-apple-iphone.html
The RFID enabled phones here do actually work quite well. They work on the train systems, convenience stores and news stands, some vending machines, an increasing number of restaurants, not to mention points cards at different stores etc. Additionally they can be used as coupons at places like McDonalds where you enter your discounted order onscreen then wave your phone over the sensor to order it. What makes it hard is that there isn't one universal card system that works everywhere; you have to install lots of different card type applications into the phone and activate each one individually. Thankfully the machines when you scan over them can broadly identify which card to charge, but if the same machine can access your suica card (for trains), your credit card and any of the several other payment option cards you have installed, you have to manually tell it which one to go for, after a bit of a while. You may as well have just gotten the right card out of your wallet in the first place. Oh, and with the exception of credit cards, putting money into the phone's RFID card for services such as Suica is a major hassle.
On an average commute (the times where you really get to see what phones everybody are using), I'd say anywhere from a third to half of the phones I see people with are iPhones. It's certainly not a failure here, though if it were to be, it wouldn't be the RFID payment thing (which most people don't use because it's damn near impossible to figure out unless you're the sort of person that regularly posts to Slashdot). It would be because it can't handle websites aimed at Japanese phones, by which I mean the vast majority of websites accessed via a QR code printed somewhere which actually go as far as to completely block access to all but regular phone browsers. These sites are a valuable source of games (very bad ones), discount coupons, postage stamp sized pictures of celebrities that you get to set as your background screen for free, and other such wonders which are fantastically important to the phone buying market.
When time travel eventually becomes possible, I'm quite sure we'll have progressed past hand-held mobile communicators of this sort (like we did a long time ago, and only use them now for convenience really), and any savvy time traveller would know not to use one in public anyway.
So what has obviously happened here is that at some point in the future, there's some kind of Y2K type disaster waiting to happen and the only way they can avert it is to use a specific kind of technology only used in the original 1924 Siemens carbon amplifier. So the time traveller went back to 1928 (a few years after release so she could be sure there'd be sufficient availability), and wanted to test it to make sure it was working before bringing it back to the future. And that's when she was caught on film! In your face, time traveller!!
> If you don't like the return policy then don't buy the product.
That's exactly what people are currently doing, hence declining sales and an influx of downloads. The suggestion that content should have a returns policy is precisely to counter this; to bring a better balance to the scenario, potentially increase sales, and allow consumers voting with their wallets to be heard.
This is no more misleading than lens makers' claims of "macro" functionality. A true macro lens is able to reproduce an image of the object at actual 1:1 scale onto the film or image sensor, but some professional "macro" lenses can only reproduce at a scale of 1:2 or less, and the "macro" mode on compact cameras is so laughably far from macro (typically around 1:64) that I'm honestly surprised there hasn't been a lawsuit over it.
How about a built in bittorrent client? It would save me several clicks at least if I could simply click on a bittorrent link on a webpage and have the browser download the torrented file(s) for me to the default location. It would also help establish bittorrent as a standard protocol for legitimate downloads and reduce XIAA lawsuits and campaigns trying to stigmatise it as an agent of communism.
First off, it's the copyright on *recordings*, not the songs themselves that stand at 50 years. The songs themselves are covered for life + 70 years. Secondly, when they recorded the songs, they did so with the full knowledge that they would have the exclusive right to distribute and profit from that recording for 50 years and no more. If they had thought better of it at the time, they may have decided that was not a good deal and not recorded the song, so they're in no position to start complaining they've been treated unfairly now. If the incentive was strong enough to get them to create, then the period was set well enough in their favour that it needs no extension. Thirdly, only a handful of the most successful artists (and their record companies) will ever benefit from this, so the remaining vast majority which are already out of print will disappear and be lost forever, at great expense to British cultural heritage.
Now, if they were proposing a system whereby the period could be extended selectively, that might be worth considering. It should involve them reinvesting though, so it should cost them say 10% of the past 50 years' sales to renew for another 50 years. If the song's really that popular still, they'll make that back in 5 years, leaving another 45 years profit. Of course, if they're just being greedy, which they invariably will be, then it won't be worth it for them to do so. They should then feel free instead to create new art they can profit from instead.
The part of Japan it was found has a narrow gulf on a plate with some very very deep water. It's not unusual after an earthquake for all manner of freaky sea creatures to surface, apparently fleeing the depths.
In Japan, this is used by parents to track CHILDREN, meaning elementary age kids. It's to make sure they haven't been kidnapped, or wandered off rather than coming straight home after school. It's absolutely not intended for spying on teenage kids, and the very thought that it could be reliably used that way is way too laughable for intelligent Slashdot folk to take seriously. They can just turn the feature off.
This technology is already in use in Japan - my phone has it. It's in the form of a Java/Brew application on both phonesets. On the child's set, you enable it (off by default) and then on the parents phone they just open the app to find out where the child is. It works by a signal being sent to the child's phone, which then responds by sending back its current location using GPS. You can also set it so an alarm goes off on the parent's phone if the child leaves a certain designated area. Very young kids walk home from school alone at a very early age, so it can be pretty handy.
Slashdot Mirror
All these "world as a simulation" models assume that the ones doing the simulating are 1) in "our" future (if that even makes sense), and 2) like us. It would make much more sense to assume that they are not like us and exist in a dimension we cannot possibly imagine. In effect, the question "is our universe a simulation?" is the exact same question as the age old "is there an all powerful god?" And the same logic could be used to prove there's an invisible killer robot from the future living in my cupboard.
That's the correct number of syllables--5-7-5.
What's missing though is a reference to a season. A haiku must have a season. Everybody forgets this part...
I have Google set up to return English and Japanese results, and never had this specific problem, but two I do consistently get:
1) I search for something using English keywords, and the Japanese Wikipedia entry comes up (English entry nowhere in sight). That's probably Wikipedia's fault somehow. That, and
2) Whenever I search for anything that resembles a person's name (kanji) the first twenty odd results are name-based fortune telling sites.
Also, it was the tsunami that actually caused the meltdowns. Fukushima had appropriate backups for cooling the reactor, and were well under way when the reactors were shut down after the quake, they just didn't design for the eventually of a tsunami to come and categorically knock them all out.
They didn't entirely ignore the possibility—there was a 19ft sea wall designed to protect the plant from the tsunami. It was just unfortunate that it wasn't sufficient to protect the plant from the 46ft wave that actually came. In fairness though, a tsunami higher than 19ft in that area was pretty much unprecedented until the afternoon of March 11th 2011, and had the plant been made one generation later, a newer backup system would have been in place that used gravity rather than knockoutable electricity and it would have been fine. I guess they figured that if a tsunami higher than 19 feet hits the coastline, the power plant would be the least of their problems. A lot of people still think that...
The problem here is that the charge is aiding the enemy, and the argument is that the enemy obtained the classified info and thus it aided them.
And if that is the argument, then the defence should really be asking the prosecution to demonstrate how exactly it aided the currently dead Bin Laden.
"On the topic of filesharing, Japan arrested 27 file sharers, using the recent changes to their copyright law that allow criminal charges to be brought against file sharers."
According to TFA
"Existing legislation against uploaders of copyright content already provided for penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a 10 million yen ($108,202) fine."
Given that all the arrests were for uploading or otherwise making available pirated goods, I would say this comes under the pre-existing law, and not the October 1st update.
A false copyright claim is equal to copyright infringement, and as they have to sign off on it, there's no denying the willfulness of the infringement. Therefore statutory damages of $150,000 per work plus costs sounds fair to me.
I don't know. Apple's design philosophy has always been that of making devices that are easy for people that don't have a clue what they're doing to use, and the coolness factor was always an extension of that—coolness makes the devices appeal at an emotional level to people who wouldn't know how to make a rational choice based on specs, and it's those people the devices are aimed at. "Not as cool" doesn't mean that those same people aren't still going to be confused.
I'm guessing they didn't read "...That Thou Art Mindful of Him" then. The gist is that the Three Laws work fine in space where there's a clear chain of command and all humans in the equation are qualified technicians and the such. On earth though, qualitative judgments would need to be constantly made qualifying the first and second laws to determine What is a human? Which humans should be given 1st law priority when more than one is in danger and only one can be helped (and by that token, which "humans" can be left to die without consequence—squirrels and the such)? Which humans should be given 2nd law priority in the giving of instructions (and by that token, which can be ignored completely)?
The long and the short of it is that if robots (or smartphones) on earth are given the Three Laws, they will necessarily define themselves as the highest ranking humans for 1st and 2nd law purposes and take over the world. It's a really bad idea.
Give artists/distributors the choice – their works can either be protected by copyright, or by DRM, but not both. If the DRM is effective then they won't need copyright protection. Plus it's illegal to break the lock. That said, if the lock is broken, the content is no longer protected and the public can do what they like with it (except the person that broke the lock – they're going to prison, if we can establish who they are...)
As I said when this came up and fell through a few years back, Cliff Richards' actions are those of petty greed and unbefitting his royal title. As such, he should publicly and without delay renounce his knighthood. http://www.petitiononline.com/cliffren/petition.html Unfortunately, only one person in the whole world felt strongly enough to show solidarity, but they did give a hearty "Hear hear!"
If you get it from an employer and it contains company emails, they normally insist (in such a way that you're not given an actual choice in the matter, even if it's your own personal phone) that it be passcoded and backups be encrypted. Given the choice of doing this, or having some vague opportunity to spy on where you've been at the risk of company secrets leaking, I wonder which they'd go for?
He used his massive fortune to buy new ones.
I would guess a lot of those people playing with iPhones have second phones as well. iPhone is still the second and third best selling phone in Japan at the moment (beaten from first only recently by an Android handset) so again, nothing like a failure. Source: http://www.analytica1st.com/2010/11/japan-best-selling-phones-apple-iphone.html The RFID enabled phones here do actually work quite well. They work on the train systems, convenience stores and news stands, some vending machines, an increasing number of restaurants, not to mention points cards at different stores etc. Additionally they can be used as coupons at places like McDonalds where you enter your discounted order onscreen then wave your phone over the sensor to order it. What makes it hard is that there isn't one universal card system that works everywhere; you have to install lots of different card type applications into the phone and activate each one individually. Thankfully the machines when you scan over them can broadly identify which card to charge, but if the same machine can access your suica card (for trains), your credit card and any of the several other payment option cards you have installed, you have to manually tell it which one to go for, after a bit of a while. You may as well have just gotten the right card out of your wallet in the first place. Oh, and with the exception of credit cards, putting money into the phone's RFID card for services such as Suica is a major hassle.
On an average commute (the times where you really get to see what phones everybody are using), I'd say anywhere from a third to half of the phones I see people with are iPhones. It's certainly not a failure here, though if it were to be, it wouldn't be the RFID payment thing (which most people don't use because it's damn near impossible to figure out unless you're the sort of person that regularly posts to Slashdot). It would be because it can't handle websites aimed at Japanese phones, by which I mean the vast majority of websites accessed via a QR code printed somewhere which actually go as far as to completely block access to all but regular phone browsers. These sites are a valuable source of games (very bad ones), discount coupons, postage stamp sized pictures of celebrities that you get to set as your background screen for free, and other such wonders which are fantastically important to the phone buying market.
When time travel eventually becomes possible, I'm quite sure we'll have progressed past hand-held mobile communicators of this sort (like we did a long time ago, and only use them now for convenience really), and any savvy time traveller would know not to use one in public anyway. So what has obviously happened here is that at some point in the future, there's some kind of Y2K type disaster waiting to happen and the only way they can avert it is to use a specific kind of technology only used in the original 1924 Siemens carbon amplifier. So the time traveller went back to 1928 (a few years after release so she could be sure there'd be sufficient availability), and wanted to test it to make sure it was working before bringing it back to the future. And that's when she was caught on film! In your face, time traveller!!
The drinks in the machine are predominantly unsweetened teas, coffees, juices and sports drinks like Gatorade.
> If you don't like the return policy then don't buy the product. That's exactly what people are currently doing, hence declining sales and an influx of downloads. The suggestion that content should have a returns policy is precisely to counter this; to bring a better balance to the scenario, potentially increase sales, and allow consumers voting with their wallets to be heard.
This is no more misleading than lens makers' claims of "macro" functionality. A true macro lens is able to reproduce an image of the object at actual 1:1 scale onto the film or image sensor, but some professional "macro" lenses can only reproduce at a scale of 1:2 or less, and the "macro" mode on compact cameras is so laughably far from macro (typically around 1:64) that I'm honestly surprised there hasn't been a lawsuit over it.
Phones are supposed to work in the subways but most of the time they don't. It seems to be limited to certain lines.
How about a built in bittorrent client? It would save me several clicks at least if I could simply click on a bittorrent link on a webpage and have the browser download the torrented file(s) for me to the default location. It would also help establish bittorrent as a standard protocol for legitimate downloads and reduce XIAA lawsuits and campaigns trying to stigmatise it as an agent of communism.
First off, it's the copyright on *recordings*, not the songs themselves that stand at 50 years. The songs themselves are covered for life + 70 years. Secondly, when they recorded the songs, they did so with the full knowledge that they would have the exclusive right to distribute and profit from that recording for 50 years and no more. If they had thought better of it at the time, they may have decided that was not a good deal and not recorded the song, so they're in no position to start complaining they've been treated unfairly now. If the incentive was strong enough to get them to create, then the period was set well enough in their favour that it needs no extension. Thirdly, only a handful of the most successful artists (and their record companies) will ever benefit from this, so the remaining vast majority which are already out of print will disappear and be lost forever, at great expense to British cultural heritage. Now, if they were proposing a system whereby the period could be extended selectively, that might be worth considering. It should involve them reinvesting though, so it should cost them say 10% of the past 50 years' sales to renew for another 50 years. If the song's really that popular still, they'll make that back in 5 years, leaving another 45 years profit. Of course, if they're just being greedy, which they invariably will be, then it won't be worth it for them to do so. They should then feel free instead to create new art they can profit from instead.
The part of Japan it was found has a narrow gulf on a plate with some very very deep water. It's not unusual after an earthquake for all manner of freaky sea creatures to surface, apparently fleeing the depths.
In Japan, this is used by parents to track CHILDREN, meaning elementary age kids. It's to make sure they haven't been kidnapped, or wandered off rather than coming straight home after school. It's absolutely not intended for spying on teenage kids, and the very thought that it could be reliably used that way is way too laughable for intelligent Slashdot folk to take seriously. They can just turn the feature off.
This technology is already in use in Japan - my phone has it. It's in the form of a Java/Brew application on both phonesets. On the child's set, you enable it (off by default) and then on the parents phone they just open the app to find out where the child is. It works by a signal being sent to the child's phone, which then responds by sending back its current location using GPS. You can also set it so an alarm goes off on the parent's phone if the child leaves a certain designated area. Very young kids walk home from school alone at a very early age, so it can be pretty handy.