Slashdot Mirror


Using Cellphones to Track Your Kids

David Pogue at the New York Times wrote this week about a new, novel use for cellphones: tracking your children. Several new ventures, including ones from names like Disney, Verizon, and Sprint, will offer web-accessible locating services by pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in their commercial devices. There's also some discussion of child-specific services, like the 'Whereifone', which is more 'Star Trek communicator' than actual cell. From the article: "To pinpoint the phone's location, you call up the Web site, enter your password, click 'locate,' and presto: an icon appears on a map -- either a street map or actual satellite photo. In the photo view, you can zoom in enough to see individual buildings. These are existing satellite photos --you won't actually see your child standing there -- but this feature is still creepy and awesome. You can even watch 'bread crumbs' appear on the map as the phone moves around (cost: one talk-time minute apiece). That could be helpful if you're trying to assist someone lost on the road, or in the kinds of emergencies encountered primarily in your nightmares."

209 comments

  1. this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this kind of thing is horrible. how is a kid supposed to be a kid if they are continually being monitored by their parents? all i can think of is how bland and boring my own childhood would have been had i been burdened by such technology.

    part of growing up is spending time away from ones parents, not being continually monitored by them.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:this is terrible by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kids are clever these days. They'll soon realize they can turn their phones off to go places parents shouldn't know about. Or let the battery drain, so they don't get blamed when they get home ("oops, I forgot to recharge it! sorry...").

      Heck, one of my friend's kid even uses an ultrasonic ringtone so his teacher at school can't tell the phone is ringing. Apparently, it's based on the fact that adults can't hear high frequencies children can. Kids are clever and have always been. If they want to do something, they will, and no amount of technology you can graft on them will change that.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:this is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apparently, it's based on the fact that adults can't hear high frequencies children can.

      I am not sure it is "fact" if I can still hear high frequencies such as the noise from CRT TV's and such and I am an adult.

    3. Re:this is terrible by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Kids are clever these days. They'll soon realize they can turn their phones off to go places parents
      > shouldn't know about. Or let the battery drain, so they don't get blamed when they get home ("oops, I
      > forgot to recharge it! sorry...").

      Not if you parents are violent, physically or emotionally. You're a kid. You haven't grown up, you don't have experience, you're totally dependent on your parents in every way, you're scared to tell anyone what's going on, and you just don't know any better.

      Roughly half the people I know, maybe somewhat more, had shit parents. I NEVER want to see such people having this sort of technological hold over their children.

      It seems to me the benefits decent parents will derive from this technology is far, far outweighed by the harm and suffering that will be inflicted by it upon the kids who have awful parents.

    4. Re:this is terrible by infolation · · Score: 1

      Children invariably find creative ways of evading their parents wishes, and are generally more technologically clued-up than their parents.

      Just as children nowadays 'learn' the vital ability to super-multitask by managing to watch TV, do homework, play video games and sms/email friends simultaneously, perhaps GPS cellphone tracking prepares them for adulthood in a world where knowing how to evade 24/7 surveillance could be a useful life-skill.

    5. Re:this is terrible by Animaether · · Score: 2, Insightful

      moreover...
      1. most phones can't reproduce the note. Oops. That's your $3 ringtone put to good use right there.
      2. so what if the teacher can't hear it? Yay for the classroom, but why not just put the thing in buzz/vibrate mode then? Then the rest of the kids in the classroom won't be annoyed by the shrill tone either.
      3. and even with that.. so now you know your phone got a new text message, or you're getting a call. Now what? You'd still have to answer it in some way, and if the teacher catches you then, you're still going to have to give up your cellphone at the teacher's desk (so I hope - you do here, NL).

      Kids aren't 'clever'. Kids are increasingly stupid if they actually buy these ringtones. And sadly, they do. But hey, it's their money.

    6. Re:this is terrible by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      It could still be fun. Just pretend you are Colonel Hogan and are trapped in a German prisoner of war camp and have to use your wits to fool the oppressive overlords and sneak out. "Hoooogaaann!"

    7. Re:this is terrible by Evilest+Doer · · Score: 1
      I am not sure it is "fact" if I can still hear high frequencies such as the noise from CRT TV's and such and I am an adult.
      He should probably have said "most adults", which is true. Of course, there are people like you who naturally have exceptional hearing, but that is the exception rather than the norm.
      --
      I feel like death on a soda cracker.
    8. Re:this is terrible by Zemran · · Score: 1

      how is a kid supposed to be a kid if they are continually being monitored by their parents?

      By turning their phone off?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    9. Re:this is terrible by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      How about just pretending your parents actually care about you and want to keep you safe? Sure these devices can be used to follow your children around and keep track of their every move. But you know, if you have open relationship with your kids you won't have to spy on them. I had just such a relationship with mine. I didn't have a curfew or a out of bounds limit ether. All I had to do was give them a reasonble idea of where I was and who I was with. They trusted me to do the right thing.

      Weather you like it or not we don't live in the 1950's anymore. Back then you could turn your children lose and expect them to be safe. Now days you have peopel out there that will rape and murder children with out even a second thought.

      We really do live in sad fucking times.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    10. Re:this is terrible by lorcha · · Score: 1

      That ringtone.

      I hate it.

      I'm 30, and you're goddamn right I can hear it.

      It sounds like that awful whine the TV makes.

      Why on earth would anybody who is capable of hearing it want to hear it?

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    11. Re:this is terrible by cryocide · · Score: 1
      Kids are clever these days. They'll soon realize they can turn their phones off to go places parents shouldn't know about. Or let the battery drain, so they don't get blamed when they get home ("oops, I forgot to recharge it! sorry...").

      Yep, and then you ground them for a week. Problem solved. Either they're grounded for turning their cell phone off, or they're grounded for letting the battery die. They can choose.
    12. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure any parent who tracked their kid would also be angry with the child for turning their cell phone off. this is hardly a solution.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    13. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      as a counter point, i think older kids need privacy and time out from under the parental thumb to help grow and mature. the very fact that you can track them at the push of a button ruins this for them.

      also, i might add that allot of parents would not be so benevolent as you with this service and would use it to catch their kids playing hooky occasionally or going out when they're supposed to be sleeping over at a friends house. a little deviancy isnt a bad thing for kids to engage in and if you raised them right they wont get into too much trouble. likewise, i dont think this device can really stop most of the real problems your kids might get into. should they encounter a rapist, you knowing where they are probably wont stop the act from happening. should they be drinking and driving the gps unit will not tell you if they are drunk. should they be doing drugs or having unsafe sex the gps unit will likely not help you determin this.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    14. Re:this is terrible by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      All very good points. Many of which I have no answers. But then if the answers where easy, being a parent would be. This needs to be treated just as anything else. It is nothing but another tool. It can be used for good or evil.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    15. Re:this is terrible by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Many phones can reproduce the sound.

      The tones are available for free from the internet. I would think you could just transfer it over on a good phone.

      Vibrate mode can still make audible noise, and with some phones, situations, you can't tell it is there.

      You can answer text messages silently, and even calls can be answered more discretely than a ring.

      The only real problem with it is that many adults can hear it.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    16. Re:this is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is a parent supposed to be a parent if they don't know where their kids are. If my children want me to be unable to check up on them, they can pay for their own phone. Even then I can just lojack their car. Today is not as simple a world as yesterday.

    17. Re:this is terrible by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      No, this is not a bad thing. In the hands of reasonable parents this should enable kids to have more freedom, if they demonstrate they can handle it. Parents can now let their kids roam about or travel to specific locations and 1) know they can contact them and 2) know they can find them. My parents let me run all over the place when I told them where I was going and when I'd be back... and when I demonstrated that I wasn't lying to them. This technology should allow the same level of freedom with better saftey in case the kid needs help, gets lost, etc. It'd be a lot better to call mom and say... hey mom I got lost or "I need a ride, check out my GPS location"... instead of "mom I'm lost and I don't know where I am."

    18. Re:this is terrible by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      My mother, a rather protective woman, once told me that when she was young there were no cell phones, and her parents pretty much had no idea what was going on when she was out of the house, and that her and her mother were probably both better off for this arrangement.

    19. Re:this is terrible by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny
      I am not sure it is "fact" if I can still hear high frequencies such as the noise from CRT TV's and such and I am an adult


      That's an urban myth! Modern TV's don't make any such noise. I'm in my 40's and I haven't heard it for years!
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    20. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      i think i went out of my way here in pointing out that it is in fact not a very useful tool. the parent that uses said tool invades the privacy of their child to little positive gain other than to discourage the most mundane of discretions. all a device such as this does is grant parents greater control over children who would likely benefit more from a bit of privacy.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    21. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      the only benefit you seem to apply to this service is that if a child is lost, the parent can help them. (to more or less quote myself from another post) this service will not let parents know if their children are abusing drugs or having unsafe sex, this service will not tell parents if their child is driving while drunk and if said child encounters a rapist or murderer odds are the parents knowing the child's location would not save the child from said person's actions. correct me if i am wrong but these seem to be the real concerns of modern parents.

      now wouldnt a cell phone from which a parent could call to or children could call from elevate the 'lost' problem without the invasion of the child's privacy? the parent who feels the need to literally track the movements of their child needs to either learn to let go a little bit and let their child grow or take a serious look at how they raised their child to behave in such a deviant manner as to make such monitoring necessary.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    22. Re:this is terrible by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Well your wrong. Nothing wrong with being wrong mind you, you just are. When your a parent come back to me in 14 years and we'll talk about it more.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    23. Re:this is terrible by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      Any parent who would not reasonably use tools available to them to enable their child to experience more of the world and demonstrate/proove their responsibility and trustworthiness is a poor excuse for a parent. Their lazy and cheap and worthy of our complete and total disdain.

    24. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      of course you could just trust them based on the same things parents have been judging kids on for hundreds of years instead of invading their privacy.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    25. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      you should substantiate your claim that i am wrong and at least make this interesting. i point out clear instances in which the device is useless, highlighting most of the chief hazards parents seem to perceive for their kids nowadays (my 35 year old brother has two of them and this is what i gather) and how the device is not very good at stopping any of them. you respond with "no you're wrong, i know everything about parenting because i've done something even animals can do well". it's kind of insulting really.

      if you're an expert on the subject, as you seem to imply, then enlighten me. if the device truely has significant use worthy of invading your child's privacy then you must be able to come up with some sort of example.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    26. Re:this is terrible by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that I will use them to invade my childs privacy. I'm just saying that you don't know what the hell you are talking about. I'm happy that your brother has 2 kids, I hope they turn out well and he never tags them.

      Guess what? My brother has a ferret. I don't know shit about ferrets and that pretty much sums it up. Your brother has kids and you don't, there for, you don't know shit ether. So when you have kids and they reach an age, in say 12 to 14 years, then you might be qualified.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    27. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      i would like to again point out that you still have yet to provide a counter point to anything i have said. all you have said so far is "i have kids so you are wrong" without addressing anything i have said or providing any real substance behind your claim that i am wrong. furthermore, i have never claimed to be an expert on children and yet you seem to imply that you are while not providing any evidence in support of this besides the point that you have kids, which as i said before, any animal can make.

      now i'm always one to allow for the fact that i could be wrong but i'll be damned before i'll except "you're wrong because i say so and i dont have to provide any proof". i've laid out my opinion supported by perfectly rational arguments and all you have done is given me childish responses. how can i even take you seriously if all you say is you're wrong because i say so? i get more rational argument out of my 7 year old nephew.

      provide me with rational argument supporting your claim and i might change my opinion but until then you are the one who is just plain wrong (and considering the fact that you have kids there is something wrong with that).

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    28. Re:this is terrible by skam240 · · Score: 1

      this comes to mind a bit late and should have been said in my other post. retards can have kids. stating you have kids as a means of establishing an expertise on child rearing is a poor, poor argument.

      i would hope that you seek to debate me along the ration lines laid out in my previous post rather than to continue to try to rationalize your arguments along these lines without even the barest logic provided in support.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  2. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes I know the use of some vendors to use cock opposed to chicken is just asking for trouble.

  3. "enter your password" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "enter your password"
    ...yeah. So all that's standing between innocent children and the depraved preying on them is their parents ability to choose a strong password (or worse, the ability of the phone companies to do the same!)

    For once, won't someone please think of the children and put a halt to these privacy invading schemes that are massively dangerous to the very children they're marketed to protect?

    (I'll let someone else bring up the "once a generation of them have lived under constant surveillance like this, they won't fight it when the government implements the same for everyone all the time" slippery slope argument.)

    1. Re:"enter your password" by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      The depraved can already tell where children are by looking with their eyes.
      They don't want your child. they want a child , so the one wandering across the road right now will do fine. They don't need to look one up on the internet. (Assuming that these wild packs of child molesters are really roaming the streets in the numbers we're led to believe in the first place - I thought it was family members who were most likely to be guilty of those sorts of crimes)

      Should we gouge out peoples eyes so they can't use them to "prey" on children?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:"enter your password" by mpe · · Score: 1

      So all that's standing between innocent children and the depraved preying on them is their parents ability to choose a strong password (or worse, the ability of the phone companies to do the same!)

      As well as anyone else able to access this data. How well is the phone company going to vet their employees?

      For once, won't someone please think of the children and put a halt to these privacy invading schemes that are massively dangerous to the very children they're marketed to protect?

      Or even attempt a reasonable cost/benefit analysis.

    3. Re:"enter your password" by dreamsmith · · Score: 1

      But strong biometrics can provide good password protection..

    4. Re:"enter your password" by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Way to form a coherent argument. First you say that pedophiles don't need to stalk specific children, because they don't care which child they abuse. Then you say that pedophiles usually abuse relatives, which directly contradicts the first thing you said.

    5. Re:"enter your password" by UnderDark · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for your low userid, I'd say "You must be new here."

    6. Re:"enter your password" by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      up till some is able to get a copy of it

    7. Re:"enter your password" by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Or even attempt a reasonable cost/benefit analysis.

      "Hey, we can make people pay for locating their kids for them!"

      "Have you done a cost/benefit analysis?"

      "Yeah, it'll cost the parents $1 per location, and its all pure profit for our benefit!"

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    8. Re:"enter your password" by FLEB · · Score: 1

      "Usually" doesn't necessarily imply "selectively". Relatives may just be closer and easier.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    9. Re:"enter your password" by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      It doesn't contradict anything.

      I think you need some help with your reading comprehension.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  4. Gotta teach them when they're young by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That there every move should, will, and is being recorded. So that when they grow up, they can each have a GPS chip implanted into their arm and feel perfectly okay with it.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  5. Isn't this like... old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telephone tracking has been introduced, like, 3 years ago in Lithuania. And hell, you probably never even heard of this country!

    1. Re:Isn't this like... old? by hazah · · Score: 1

      I'm from Latvia, you insensitive clod :). (I've been there, but I was too young to remember the trip)

  6. They already did this sort of thing by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boost Mobile has built in GPS systems in their current phones, and even have a game where you seek and locate friends with the same setup.

    Now depending on the age of the kids, the whole "YRO" aspect is kinda dubious. Considering we live in an age where kids under 14 have cellular phones, is it really so wrong for parents to want to know where they are, and for that matter, is it really an issue of "rights"? Sure, if it's being used for tracking adults, then yes, it is. But not in keeping track of kids (as opposed to what, implanting chips/RFID chips in them? At the least, this is the least intrusive).

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:They already did this sort of thing by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Considering we live in an age where kids under 14 have cellular phones, is it really so wrong for
      > parents to want to know where they are, and for that matter, is it really an issue of "rights"? Sure,
      > if it's being used for tracking adults, then yes, it is. But not in keeping track of kids (as opposed
      > to what, implanting chips/RFID chips in them? At the least, this is the least intrusive).

      What happens when the parents are abusive?

      The kid goes to see a relative or a cop or a helper or whatever, to try and get help, to tell someone, and the parents will KNOW. And maybe beat the crap out of the kid for doing it.

      Same problem with the State.

      Say you do something or make a report which threatens a major industry. There's a LOT of money at stake. The State - or rather, a bit of it, maybe a branch which regulates this industry but has basically been compromised by that industry - starts doing things which are entirely unethical to try to suppress the report - perhaps discredit the author in whatever way they can. (Bit like with Lewinsky, where the Press Office deliberately and specifically lied about her and what happened and attempted to discredit her.)

      They won't mind a bit getting hold of his position information and using it to track what he does, which journalists he visits, where his family is.

      This technology is massively open to abuse, and humans are shit. It WILL be abused, and everyone who is in a position where they may be doing something which the State will object to will KNOW it will be abused, and it will flatly discourage them from doing what ought to be done.

    2. Re:They already did this sort of thing by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      If a kid is able to sneak out on abusive parents to report them, I imagine they can sneak out without their cell phone, or do it someplace they should be anyway (e.g. School.)

      Parental controls are completely different from governmental controls. Firstly, children are by definition immature and therefore unlikely to be able to completely handle themeselves and make good decisions. This can change in the 15-18 year old range, although thats fairly unlikely, and it seems reasonable to give their parents the benefit of the doubt here. Secondly, parents are much more likely to behave beneficially toward their children than a government toward its people. Genetically we want to protect our children and try and do our best for them, while doing good in government probably comes from a higher part of the mind. Also, there is very little to be gained by abusing power in a family, when compared with what can be gained by abusing governmental power.

      With younger and younger children having cell phones, particularly these little ones that can only call 6 numbers or something like that for the younger ones, this seems like a great thing. Keeps you from having to track down which house the pack of neighborhood kids went to now, makes it easier to pick up the kids from soccer practice when it ends early, and generally gives parents better peace of mind. Seems like an overall good thing to me. Surely there will be some problems, but I'm betting we can figure them out.

      (Note: I'm not a parent, but have much younger siblings, so take my comments with a grain of salt)

    3. Re:They already did this sort of thing by chitokutai · · Score: 1

      So basically what you are saying is that this kind of technology should be ignored because of the small percentage of parents that may be abusive? I'm sorry, but ignoring positive technology just because of a small minority just doesn't make sense.

      To put it another way, this is like saying I don't think email and the internet should be created because spam is evil. Humans are crap and they will find a way to exploit the system and send me penis-enhancing emails all the time.

      This technology is actually being looked forward to by many parents in Japan because it provides them with the opportunity to help their children while NOT following them around all over the place. About 1 or 2 years ago there was a girl who was kidnapped, raped, and murdered and the criminal used the child's cellphone to send pictures of the dead body back to the parents. If only this kind of technology had existed perhaps they could have found the child before any of these horrific acts had occurred.

      I find it silly to read all these posts on slashdot saying how GPS to track children is a leash and it will be exploited. If you honestly think that big brother is everywhere and spying on you, put your tinfoil hat back on and leave this technology to people who can actually get some kind of positive benefit from it.

    4. Re:They already did this sort of thing by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Boost Mobile has built in GPS systems in their current phones, and even have a game where you seek and locate friends with the same setup.

      Virgin Mobile also has this built into their phones as well & it is turned on by default. The first thing I do is go into the settings & shut it off. That way...the only way the GPS function will work is if I call 911 for an emergency. From what I remember reading...all phones from a couple of years ago started having built-in GPS.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    5. Re:They already did this sort of thing by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      > So basically what you are saying is that this kind of technology should be ignored because of the
      > small percentage of parents that may be abusive? I'm sorry, but ignoring positive technology just
      > because of a small minority just doesn't make sense.

      This may be the crux of the matter. What proportion of parents will abuse this technology? your view it'll be a small minority. I'm much more pessimistic. About half the people I know were abused - literally - by their parents. I know very few people who had really good parents. I suspect those parents who don't abuse, but aren't actually really good, will still mis-use this technology and overly and improperly restrict the freedom of their children.

      I suspect freedom of choice is vital for the development of strength of character - which is to say, the ability to figure out what is right and wrong and sticking to what's right *because* it's right.

      If children are *prevented* from being able to decide if they're going to do something they shouldn't do, they will never learn to be able to decide not to. As adults, when they finally escape from the cage, what self-discipline will they have? how will they have ever learned to control *themselves*, when they have always been *controlled*?

  7. I am using it... by ifchairscouldtalk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to track YOUR kids!

    1. Re:I am using it... by MollyB · · Score: 1

      At least until the sun spits out a bull's eye Coronal Mass Ejection that fries nearly all of these orbiting gnats.

  8. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by skam240 · · Score: 1

    Just such a device may allow my wife and I to manage her intake of diseasèd cock; nevertheless: $0.50/ping is a good way to rack up frivolous, surveillant dollars.

    jesus christ . maybe if you'd just raise your daughter right she'd make the guys use a condom, sleep with guys selectivly and wouldnt just let them stick their "diseased cocks" in her.

    seriously, it sounds as if you're expecting your upcoming daughter to become a slut.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  9. You dont even need GPS by POPE+Mad+Mitch · · Score: 1

    This kind of service has been available for years with ordinary GSM phones, no embedded GPS system required. All of the major mobile phone networks (in the UK at least) offer commercial SMS location services, that will tell you the location and an error margin, you just have to know the phone number of the device, and supposedly have the consent of its owner. It may not be as accurate as a GPS device might be, with the accuracy ranging from a few hundred meters to a few kilometers depending on terrain, but then it doesnt require any special features like gps in the phone, which is a feature i havent heard of in this country yet.

    an example service gateway is this one, it gives plenty of info about range, pricing and restrictions. http://wiki.triangle-solutions.com/index.php/SMS_L ocation_Based_Services

    1. Re:You dont even need GPS by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't see how GPS would work even as well as the cellphone signal itself. GPS cannot blast through buildings like that cell tower 300m away can, so it doesn't work indoors. It probably won't even work from inside your pocket. From my experience it won't work if the unit is turned upside-down. It also consumes fairly substantial power.

    2. Re:You dont even need GPS by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      I think in the instances of cell phone location services, "GPS" is just a generic term for determining your location and has little to do with the actual array of military satellites in orbit. They probably just use triangulation with cell phone towers to determine your location. The technology to do this was invented long before the first GPS satellite was launched.

    3. Re:You dont even need GPS by Gnavpot · · Score: 1
      I don't see how GPS would work even as well as the cellphone signal itself. GPS cannot blast through buildings like that cell tower 300m away can, so it doesn't work indoors. It probably won't even work from inside your pocket. From my experience it won't work if the unit is turned upside-down. It also consumes fairly substantial power.

      Modern SirfIII based GPS receivers (which means almost every fairly new receiver available except the cheapest models) work quite well under difficult conditions.

      Glove compartments, pockets or bags only reduce the signal quality and thus accuracy, but you will get a position. They will work inside most buildings too. I have never seen them affected by turning them upside-down.

      But the power consumption is a real issue. A bluetooth GPS receiver will usually work 8-15 hours on a battery of the same size as a cell phone battery. I don't know how much of this is caused by the bluetooth part.
    4. Re:You dont even need GPS by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Stop putting reality in the way of a good /. arguement...

      The problems I have trying to get GPS working in the car without an external booster... takes so long to get a good lock I can be there before I get directions.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  10. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    seriously, it sounds as if you're expecting your upcoming daughter to become a slut.

    Our daughters are becoming sexualized at an increasingly younger age; what used to be sex qua liberation is quickly becoming an enslaving self-prostitution.

    You may notice an inconsistency: agitation about sex-crimes is coupled with sexualizing pre-teen-propaganda.

  11. Opening the API? by Barny · · Score: 1

    Now, we just need them to open the API so we can get a great multiplayer RTS going, a bit of 3d modeling and you can have your city as the battleground, and your friends the units, battle for control of the area!

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
    1. Re:Opening the API? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      To bad the cost is high and that will run up the data bill

  12. You know what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lil Charlie will swap over his sim card into his friends phone and leave his there... "Yes mum, I am having a sleepover at my friends house...see?" While he's have a lil liason with the opium den down the road.

    1. Re:You know what will happen... by KinkoBlast · · Score: 0

      Heh, you aren't from the United States, are you? SIMs and phones are practicaly welded together here.

      Not that it matters. We have this technology called "tables" that we can "set" stuff on when we aren't there!

  13. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is "sexualized." It's called education, something you should give to your daughter ASAP because you seem to have some problems with it.

  14. This is evil by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am afraid that the abuse of this new service will outweight its benefits.

    How many good parents are out there, and how many bad? how many parents who forbid their children perfectly normal and reasonable things?

    You know David Millar, the disputed champion of the most recent Tour de France? his father forbad him to do cycling, because he didn't want his son to be a cyclist. David had to sneak out at 1am in the morning to practise overnight.

    A friend of mine grew up with awful parents; they wouldn't let him have any freedom, see his friends, have friends over, have girlfriends, etc. He was badly repressed. He managed to work around it as best he could, by doing things secretly. Now he'd be watched, permanently, and have absolutely no way whatsoever of having freedom.

    Another friend of mine had a very violent father. He used to beat the crap out of her regularly. What would her fate now be if he could also now know exactly where she was at all times?

    How would you feel, thinking back to when you grew up, if your parents always knew exactly where you were?

    It's not even so much that you were going to do things which were "wrong" and now you can, but rather, you knew that you *could* and you chose not to. Now, you know that you CANNOT. That choice has been taken from you. You have no freedom.

    It's ironic. We're so concerned about our own freedom from the State, but apparently we're entirely happy for our kids to have no freedom from *US*.

    1. Re:This is evil by haydon4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed this could be the start of a slippery slope but there are certain ways to beat this system, such as putting the phone down and walking away.

      Any kid could simply leave the phone in his/her bedroom and still sneak out the window while any surveillant parent using only this technology would only see the location of the phone instead of acting like actual parents and personally checking up on them once in a while.

      There is a company called Digital Angel which is working on a product which is in essence an implantable GPS tracker that parents can place in their children. It is also described in certain circles as "The Mark of the Beast" because it is without exception the start of a slippery slope that as always starts out with the best of intentions.

      On the surface it looks like every responsible parents dream come true because God forbid anything happen to my child (i.e. serious injury, lost in woods, kidnapping) the chances of recovery are greatly increased without the added cost of a wide search party. However underneath there are the obvious privacy issues (IMHO children are not afforded privacy) but thinking more long range, should the situation ever arise that the people would demand greater security in the wake of, for example a series of terror attacks and a viable and inexpensive solution would be to implant the rest of the population with such tags and authorities could easily track any terror suspects in order to prevent any future attacks, but any high school sci-fi writer could see ways that this technology could lead to stripping of all personal freedoms and anonymity and lead to total authoritative domination when the government knows where you are at all times.

      Personally I don't see this cell phone as cause for panic...yet. Since this only tracks the location of the phone and if your child is anything like me, they'd forget and leave it at home all the time. Besides, popping the battery is an easy way to disable any cell phone, but I think it's important to keep a close eye on how this technology is used.

    2. Re:This is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that his son turned out to be a doper looks like Dad was right.

    3. Re:This is evil by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

      Floyd Landis is the disputed champion, not David Millar.

      David Millar is a convicted and admitted doper, who's never come close to winning the Tour. He was in the press this year because it was his first year back from his suspension.

      Landis, OTOH, grew up Mennonite, which is a bit less strict than Amish.

      Plus, given that the international Court of Arbitration of Sport, just upheld that the French lab that tested Landis' sample doesn't follow protocol (and cleared another rider of his positive test), whether Landis will lose his title is very much a question mark.

      http://www.velonews.com/race/int/articles/11366.0. html

      (Not too mention, according to the lab's own documents, Landis' sample was too contaminated to be tested in the first place.)

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    4. Re:This is evil by robogun · · Score: 1

      GP is correct insofar that Landis (not Millar as he had it) was raised strict Mennonite and was forbidden to wear shorts. He eventually moved to California to get out of his parent's umbra, train, and presumably that's where he found out about drugs.

    5. Re:This is evil by Leebert · · Score: 1

      How would you feel, thinking back to when you grew up, if your parents always knew exactly where you were?


      Up to the point where I entered college, they did. In retrospect, it's probably good they were that hard-ass about it. Though it didn't necessarily keep me from getting in trouble in places they knew I was at. But that was quite a bit less trouble than I could have gotten in if I had had total freedom, that much is certain.
    6. Re:This is evil by alais4 · · Score: 1

      The really, really horrible violent uneducated etc parents might not have the financial means to obtain this technology. But that's stereotypical, and speculation...

      we're entirely happy for our kids to have no freedom from *US*. I am, at least. Six-year-olds have no right to freedom until they grow to the age of responsibility and make reasonable decisions... I think state laws, at least, make it illegal to leave your kids at home unattended until they're 12 years old (which I find ridiculous, but anyway) so it makes sense to track them until then.

      I think people in general should have freedom from the State iff they are responsible and reasonable individuals... for those people, I agree with your conclusion that a tracking device would be a breach of privacy. But extremely young children don't count, and I opt for mother's rights here. :P

  15. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    . . .now that I have a daughter on the way, however, I have to find clever ways of curtailing décadence with a light hand.

    Dear Poor, Ignorant Bastard (my daughter is 26),

    Your daughter is going to simply arrange for her cell be where you expect it to be while hooking up with her "diseased cock" using a prepaid disposable, thus all you will be doing is impossing a financial burden on her.

    Although the experience of learning to run rings around you will have some real life value.

    Have a nice parenthood.

    KFG

  16. pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by Mirar · · Score: 1

    What GPS signal? This is a funny misconception from movies; GPS receivers do not emit a signal.

    I assume they use some other sort of uplink, SMS? Anyone knows? Is there a standard for this?

    Or are they just calling it GPS but in reality they just use the ol'e standard lobe tracking?

    (BTW, does the phone think the kid is lost forevar if the kid goes into some other kids house, a mall or a car, so the GPS receiver can't get a signal? Or do they enhance the phones with SirfIII chips that can withstand some rougher environments?)

    1. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Or are they just calling it GPS but in reality they just use the ol'e standard lobe tracking?

      I read once that laws in the US require cellular carriers to calculate handset position using the distance between the handset and three cellular base stations. I think the intention is to give positional information to emergency services. I know that a lot of emergency calls from mobile phones here in Australia often say something like oh there's a crash right in front of me, where you say? Oh about half way home, you know, near the supermarket. or something equally useless.

    2. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by mpe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read once that laws in the US require cellular carriers to calculate handset position using the distance between the handset and three cellular base stations. I think the intention is to give positional information to emergency services.

      More recently phones in the US have been required to incorporate a GPS receiver, possibly because such triangulation does not always work too well (especially with some US specific cellular systems). This information is available to the network, even if it is not accessible to the phone's user.

    3. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      Got a link? I know for a fact that none of the cell phones I have/had have a GPS receiver. Nor does the phone of anyone in my immediate family.

      I didn't find anything with google either.

      --
      Gone!
    4. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by dculberson · · Score: 1

      Here:

      http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/e911.html

          The FCC doesn't require GPS, it just requires that the carrier be able to locate phones to within a certain degree of accuracy. Most carriers have chosen to do this using GPS chips. They aren't neccessarily active all the time - only when you call 911. A modern cell phone goes into "EMERGENCY MODE" when you call 911 (at least that's my experience with two different handsets). The phone may or may not allow you to access the GPS functions outside of the emergency locator function.

          Cingular and T-Mobile do *not* put GPS chips in all their handsets, instead relying on the old cell tower triangulation method.

          So the GP wasn't quite right, but close. :-)

      -David

    5. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by Fishbulb · · Score: 1

      This is a funny misconception from movies; GPS receivers do not emit a signal.

      Um, no, but the cell phone itself is in constant communication with the cellular tower it's relayed to at the time, including such info as time/date, carrier, and phone capabilities (voice/data). So, all a carrier has to do is add a little code to the firmware of the phone to periodically send in the contents of the GPS registers. Allow access to that data through a website and viola!

    6. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by Boogaroo · · Score: 1
      Most carriers have chosen to do this using GPS chips.....Cingular and T-Mobile do *not* put GPS chips in all their handsets, instead relying on the old cell tower triangulation method.

      Verizon uses tower triangulation too. That leaves Sprint/Nextel, and Alltel and I doubt they're using real GPS either.

      That leaves either 1, 2, or none using GPS. I get this feeling that nobody's using GPS. In fact, they aren't even calling it GPS at Verizon. They're calling LBS, Location Based System. At its BEST it's only good to 50-150 meters radius. Sometimes it's worse, like a quarter mile radius.

      Also, on Verizon, the person being located gets a notification on the screen of the phone and/or a text message saying "You're being located." I've seen people come back to the store so pissed off that they can't do it without tipping off the kid(and sometimes adult) they want to track.
    7. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      More recently phones in the US have been required to incorporate a GPS receiver

      To use my garmin GPS I have to hold it away from my body, with the antenna pointing at the sky, with a least 60 degrees of clear sky visible in two axies, then it takes a couple of minutes to sync before I get a lock.

      I don't see how a cellphone, carried in a pocket or handbag, in a car or building, could give a GPS fix more than 10% of the time unless it was being carried by somebody who is aways outside.

    8. Re:pinpointing the G.P.S. signal in [device]? by dculberson · · Score: 1

      Interesting! But some carriers definitely have "real GPS" in their phones. I use Nextel and have an i870 handset, and it has to refresh the list of satellites, has suggestions on how to orient the unit to give the GPS antenna (internal) the best reception, etc. Now whether that's the data they use for the e911 service is anyone's guess. But they do specifically state that for the employee tracking tools they use utilize the GPS receivers in the handsets. (see http://www.nextel.com/en/solutions/gps/track_manag e.shtml)

  17. One more reason... by ultimad · · Score: 1

    To keep the cell switched off!

    1. Re:One more reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure.... like any kid nowadays will do that. They practically have the damn things growing from their ear. The choice is simple: they can buy their own plan (yay! learn responsibility!), or submit to tracking if they want a 'free' cell.

      If they buy their own plan, great, they can do the month-to-month thing on their own, and keep their parents' credit record out of any mess they get into.

  18. This will only track ... by Tim+Ward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... kids who want to be tracked.

    Any kid who doesn't want to be tracked has a number of options including:

    (1) Turn the phone off.

    (2) Leave the phone at home (one of my kids does this regularly when he's out of credit).

    (3) Leave the phone somewhere harmless, eg at an approved-of friend's house, whilst off doing something less harmless.

    Now, all these involve not having the phone with you, so the kid might also wish to:

    (4) Get another phone for real-life use, which you don't tell your parents about.

    Or, sometimes even cheaper, don't get a whole new phone:

    (5) Get another SIM for real-life use, which you don't tell your parents about.

    OK, so none of these work if the parent is phoning the child every five minutes and expecting them to actually answer - there's a limit to how often the child can "not hear" the ringtone, or claim that "I don't answer the phone whilst sitting on the loo", or whatever. But, as ever, such a family has people-issues to which a technological solution ain't gonna work anyway.

    1. Re:This will only track ... by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But, as ever, such a family has people-issues to which a technological solution ain't gonna work anyway>

      Yeah, technological solutions to non-technological problems just won't work as it is the wrong approach altogether. Let them fool themselves, I guess.

      There are two reasons why this tracking does more bad than good. Firstly, the parent will just follow their kid only via technology, instead of talking to the kid, learning the kid to talk about what it's doing, keeping to its boundaries, etc.

      Secondly, for the paranoia people, they parent will trust too much on the cellphone signal and if something really happens to the kid, they will found out only much and much later.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:This will only track ... by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      OK, so none of these work if the parent is phoning the child every five minutes and expecting them to actually answer

      Using your option 5) get another SIM they could have another phone and forward calls from the tracked one to it. That way they can answer the calls and appear to be somewhere they are supposed to be at the same time.

      Also I propose 6) hacking

    3. Re:This will only track ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What's a SIM?

      Oh, that must be some weird non-American thing used to allow people to use a phone with different providers. We don't do that over here. I think there's one provider that uses SIM, and it's not one of the ones planning on providing this service.

      In the US, cellphones literally have the logo of their provider on them. No, I don't mean "Nokia" - I mean my cellphone has a Sprint logo on it and only works on the Sprint network. There's no way for me to use the phone with any other Sprint account, let alone any other service provider.

      So, in the US, if you want to use another number, you have to buy a new phone. You can't transfer phones between service providers. Hell, a given phone model is frequently tied to a service provider. Cingular offers Motorola phones. Sprint uses Samsung. With Verizon you can get LG.

      Yay capitalism.

    4. Re:This will only track ... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Hehe
      Over here they have the network's logo, and they are often locked too. However, you can go to your nearest shady cellphone shop and get it unlocked for free, or a small fee. Yay not having laws dictated by the telecoms!

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    5. Re:This will only track ... by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Yay capitalism.

      Grrrr!

      That isn't capitalism! that's an ABSENCE of capitalism.

      The phone market in the UK and elsewhere is sane and normal - but it's broken in the States.

      Stop blaming the free market for a shit situation when the situation is as it is BECAUSE there ISN'T a free market.

    6. Re:This will only track ... by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      My cell has a Fido logo on it, but it doesn't mean that the hardware is incapable of working on another provider. Of course, I'd have to unlock the phone before I could do that.

    7. Re:This will only track ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are GSM service providers in the US. Cingular and T-Mobile would be the biggest, perhaps you have heard of them. Another benefit of GSM phones is you do not have to use one of the approved phones that your provider has decided on. You can buy a GSM phone that is not locked to a specific provider who has crippled the functionality. Of course this means that you pay a higher cost for your phone but you gain the freedom to determine what features your phone has.

    8. Re:This will only track ... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The vibrant mobile phone market in Europe came from having one standard (GSM) instead of several - and it wasn't the free market that made that happen.

    9. Re:This will only track ... by radtea · · Score: 1

      the parent will just follow their kid only via technology, instead of talking to the kid, learning the kid to talk about what it's doing, keeping to its boundaries, etc.

      As well as talking to your kids and actually having real interaction with them rather than treating them as a burden (watch the "back to school" commericals at the end of summer to find out how most parents feel about their kids) you can also live in a smaller community. I live in a town of about 100,000 people, and my kids can't go anywhere without someone they know being in the vicinity. It's loose enough that they have room to act like idiots and get into a certain amount of trouble, but secure enough that if anything really bad happens the odds of someone they know being nearby are really good. Being involved in your community--community theatre, sports, school stuff, etc--helps a lot as well.

      This is the way human beings who actually care about their kids behave, rather than sticking a chip in a phone and hoping that keeping an eye on a dot on a screen will substitute for genuine engagement with their children's lives.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    10. Re:This will only track ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Oh, that must be some weird non-American thing used to allow people to use a phone with different providers. We don't do that over here. I think there's one provider that uses SIM, and it's not one of the ones planning on providing this service.


      Actually, out of the "big four" - Sprint, Cingular/ATTWS, Verizon, and T-Mobile, two providers use GSM phones with SIMs - Cingular and T-Mobile. BTW, even with phones that don't have a SIM, the kid could just get another prepaid phone and forward calls to it.


      -b.

    11. Re:This will only track ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are we so concerned with kids and being tracked and the resistance movement within teenagers to their parents really knowing where they are? Most kids I knew and know didn't care as much about how their parents 'tracked' their movement or lives but cared most about why. Parents can easily gain insight into a child's life by, 1) reading a journal, 2) reading email/IM, 3) following the kids when they go out. Most parents do not do those kinds of things (unless there is an explicit reason to do so, in which case parents are often correct in their instincts) because it will violate the singular most prescient aspect of parent-child relationships: trust. You can do a lot to kid by the way of grounding and restrictions as long as they still trust you.

      Perhaps the best use of this technology would be go get one yourself and then get one for your kids and let the family track each other.

      This isn't really a technology question nor a conspiracy theory question. Over and over again in cases of tracking technology like this, we are presented with technology making us question entrenched values. As technology makes it more possible to monitor children, who are considered their parents' property until age 18, is the problem the technology or that the current social order-- giving children ultimate freedom until 18 and parent's ultimate responsibility-- may need a bit of an adjustment. Black and white polar opposites are working less and less as technology becomes more efficient.

      And as far as the conspiracy theories of entering into a surveillance society, the key is less about attacking individual technologies and sitting at a desk expounding on who is the real evil and more about enforcing accountability of those in power. There will be a day when we are all tracked constantly; it will be wonderfully efficient and a great boon to society. However, if the architecture of power is set up for oppression, the technology will appear hostile. If the architecture of power is set up for individual responsibility and social freedoms, the technology will appear enabling.

    12. Re:This will only track ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... kids who want to be tracked.

      Any kid who doesn't want to be tracked has a number of options including:


      And eventually I will figure it out.

      When I do, we start out at six weeks of grounding (from going out mainly) and work our way up from there. If that doesn't work, we'll talk about removing the doors from his/her room for zero privacy (you can get changed in the bathroom, thankyouverymuch) and removing everything including computer, television, telephone, and furniture except for the bed. If that doesn't work there's house arrest.

      Thankfully I've not had to go beyond grounding a kid due to screwing up. I cut them a LOT of slack, but the first time they screwup they know it.

      I'm beginning to think half of all parents are either retarded or simply do not care, but for the rest of us who have at least average intelligence coupled with scads more life experience this isn't rocket science. I remember sneaking out all night long and coming back drunk, and I got away with it a couple of times... until my Marine Corps father figured it out. Not fun.
    13. Re:This will only track ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't capitalism! that's an ABSENCE of capitalism.

      Huh? How is it not capitalism? The only thing keeping all of this together is my contract with my cellphone company, and their contracts with their associated cellphone manufacturers. There is no government law saying that my Cingular branded cellphone cannot be used on Verizon, Cingular simply ordered Nokia to make it that way, or they won't buy it. I didn't particularly care, so there was no sense in ordering Cingular to sell me a phone that could be used on Verizon's network. Since the vast majority of the people think like I do, Cingular gets away with it.

      Capitalism is like democracy: the majority rules the marketplace. Now bugger off and go back to buying unlocked phones off of ebay along with the rest of your niche.

    14. Re:This will only track ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      So the government tells the providers they have to lock their phones?

      "Free market" and "capitalism" aren't really synonyms. Of course, Adam Smith would say large corporations don't belong in either.

    15. Re:This will only track ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably the worst parent ever (except for your father?) - but you won't understand it until things go horribly wrong in your kid's lives (maybe not until they've grown up and need therapy for the rest of their lives)

      People like you scare me. You're just ... clueless. You have no idea.

    16. Re:This will only track ... by Koriani · · Score: 1
      Uhh - not sure which america you live in.

      Sprint doesn't use SIM cards, but other carriers do. Including the newest Cingular/AT&T merger. You can just change those between any phone built with a sim card requirement.
      In addition, Through cingular (as an example) I can get Motorola phones, Samsung phones, LG phones, and a couple of the little guys. No RAZRs 'cause they don't support sim cards - but that doens't mean a lot.

      In addition, T-Moblie uses SIM cards, and any phone that will work on one network will work on the other. And if you can't transfer a phone between sprint and verizon, someone's pulling your leg.

      No, Cingular and T-Mobile aren't on the list of the article, but they have tended to be behind the times anyway.

      Either way, its hardly 'some weird non-American' thing'.

  19. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although the experience of learning to run rings around you will have some real life value.

    Dear Gallful Cock,

    Light hand is the key composite; and I still haven't given up on pædagogy, I'm afraid.

    (I'm sorry your daughter has HSV and HPV.)

    Love, MI
  20. Countermeasures by clashdot · · Score: 1

    The only consolation is that there will be countermeasures for the kids. For a fee, the kids could subscribe to a service that fakes their position in the system. If for some reasons the networks don't come out with such a service, one workaround could be to leave the phone with a friend and forward your calls to a secondary phone. Of course, any such scheme would require some financial resources on the part of the kid.

  21. phonetrace.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always www.phonetrace.org...

    1. Re:phonetrace.org by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Just...wow. Yeah. That was bad.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    2. Re:phonetrace.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can see who is a parent and who is not by the responses on here. It is pretty simple. We want to make sure our kids are safe. Period

    3. Re:phonetrace.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn!! I can't believe I fell for that one... I even put in a friend's real phone number :( Now I gotta get that image (and that music) out of my head.

  22. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are none so blind as . . . parents.

    KFG

  23. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by skam240 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Our daughters are becoming sexualized at an increasingly younger age;"

    well for starters "our daughters" used to get married and have children at 13 years old if you read your history.

    what used to be sex qua liberation is quickly becoming an enslaving self-prostitution.

    all i can say is, no, i completely disagree. please provide some substance behind your claim.

    "You may notice an inconsistency: agitation about sex-crimes is coupled with sexualizing pre-teen-propaganda."

    i'm pretty sure peole have always been extremely concerned about sex crimes. plus i think you're spinning conspiracy theories here.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  24. way to go.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will lead to kids turning their cell phones off. So you cant reach them. Also, how bout tracking people that arent kids? Stalkers anyone? What if a pedohile tracks your kids?

    Several things to consider here. Good old fashion word of mouth restricts the information to where your kids are to you.

    Trust, build it up. But hey...trust is also a weakness...

  25. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You come over as so much of an asshole, initially I'd say you have to be religious, however on further investigation investigation it would appear you are a math geek which would infer intelligence. Perhaps you are one of the rogue intelligent people who actually vote Republican.

    Fascinating.

  26. Wonderfull idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    sounds great!

    Lets track the position of every child, im sure no-one else other than parents would find this useful (perverts) and that the windoze boxes hosting it will be perfectly secure!

  27. Big Momma by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is watching?

  28. Easy to Bypass by Killer+Eye · · Score: 2, Informative

    If a kid doesn't want to be tracked, he won't be. Star Trek has only covered this about 12 times by now...if Security can simply ask the Computer where you are, take off your communicator and leave it wherever you're "supposed" to be (like confined to quarters). A kid may do one better by removing the battery.

    Still, this is a disturbing trend. What good can come from it? Paranoid parents are paying extra for this technology to avoid potential troubles that are, let's face it, unlikely. Meanwhile, the kid gets so sick and tired of being interrogated about his every move that he decides to ditch his phone: thus robbing him of a real asset when a typical problem does occur (like car trouble in the middle of nowhere).

    --
    "Microsoft killed my company, I hold a personal grudge. I don't use Microsoft products and neither should you."-JWZ
    1. Re:Easy to Bypass by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      > If a kid doesn't want to be tracked, he won't be. Star Trek has only covered this about 12 times by
      > now...if Security can simply ask the Computer where you are, take off your communicator and leave it
      > wherever you're "supposed" to be (like confined to quarters). A kid may do one better by removing the
      > battery.

      Not if your parents are abusive and will beat the crap out of you for turning your phone off.

      These are kids - they don't have the experience, strength of character, or economic independence necessary to resist. They're scared, frightened, beaten up, living in fear and they've never known any different. When you're in the terrible state of helplessness, you're not able to resist. And if your parents tell you to keep your phone with you at all times so they always know where you are, you'll do it. And then what do you do when you want to visit a cop, or a social worker or just someone to *tell* and get help, when you know you will be beaten black and blue when you get home, because your parents will KNOW?

      The harm this technology will cause to the children with shit parents, in my mind, far outweighs the benefits it will provide to the kids with good parents.

    2. Re:Easy to Bypass by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      You keep posting this argument. Unless the kid is home-schooled, the person to talk to is a counselor, teacher, administrator, police officer, etc. at school. Or use a payphone to call an abuse prevention hotline. I don't think this tech is a good thing, but I think your position is poorly chosen.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  29. #include by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

    Every other time a story about this service comes up, someone points out that pedophiles can use it to track your children too. Hooray for modern technology!

    --
    .evom ton seod gis eht
  30. Tin foil hat for your mobile phone by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Brand new market springs to light, really, it's the latest fad to have a tiny tin foil hat on your cellphone.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:Tin foil hat for your mobile phone by Gnavpot · · Score: 1
      Brand new market springs to light, really, it's the latest fad to have a tiny tin foil hat on your cellphone.

      More real than you think.

      Tracking the GPS in a cell phone is not a new thing. 1 year ago I was searching for a good 2-way tracking solution for cell phones (like www.mologogo.com). I stumbled over several employee-tracking solutions which seemed to offer exactly what is described in the summary (no, I did not RTFA). I also stumbled over some descriptions of how to circumvent the surveillance. Wrapping the phone in tin foil was one of them.

      Apparantly, you can't just switch the phone off because the employer will be able to see that the phone was switched off. But if you wrap it in tin foil, it is not possible to tell if the loss of GPS/cell reception was intentional.
  31. Australia's had i-Kids (locked to Vodaphone) by ivi · · Score: 1


      i-Kids = GSM phone + GPS
      (but easy for kids' use)

      It would have been nice if these
      puppies were open spec'd, so that
      - like Amateur Radio's APRS -
      anyone could receive the GPS
      location "blips" (ie, Lat/Long data)
      ie, without needing to pay Vodaphone
      for a specialized service.

      Anybodu up for hacking this phone's
      GPS data comms protocol, eg, to
      free it from a single-source of
      GSM service?

  32. When by zoomshorts · · Score: 1, Troll

    When your child goes missing, for whatever reason, you will be singing a different tune.

    1. Re:When by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      > When your child goes missing, for whatever reason, you will be singing a different tune.

      Thing is, there's a lot of bad things which can happen to kids. Car accidents, illnesses, etc.

      Child abuse is way, WAAAAAAAAAY down the list. It's extremely rare, both in absolute terms and relative terms.

      If we're really concerned about the well-being of our kids and we wanted to reduce the chances of bad things happening to them, we should adopt rules like - you can't drive (too dangerous), cross roads as infrequently as possible, wash your hands twice a day, etc.

      We don't do any of this.

      It seems to me our apparent concern about child abuse is inconsistent with our actual behaviour.

    2. Re:When by nbannerman · · Score: 1

      And when the Police roll into an abandoned warehouse and find the phone, but no child...

      As has been mentioned earlier, there are numerous ways to get round this tracking feature, the easiest of which is to just throw the phone in the trash.

      I've got nothing wrong with 'thinking of the children' but lets be honest with each other; this idea has nothing to do with post-abduction rescues.

  33. Lost kids by Elentari · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "That could be helpful if you're trying to assist someone lost on the road"

    You're able to assist them, so you must be in contact with them. Therefore, you can call them and give them directions, as opposed to tracking them in this rather sinister fashion.

    If, as a parent, you find you're rarely aware of where your child is, maybe you should start to question your relationship with them. As they're evidently unable to trust you with their whereabouts, following them around isn't going to help you get along, and will only make them bitter in the future.

    The "lost child" scenario could be used to justify any level of surveillance. It automatically ensures parental support and, as most people are parents, this makes up a large proportion of the population. People should think about these kinds of things rationally, and not through such a knee-jerk, must-protect-my-young, decision. How much of your life would you allow to be videotaped for the sake of "ensuring" your kids' safety?

  34. DON'T CLICK HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a trap...

  35. Already got one by coalrestall · · Score: 1

    This technology is already in use in Japan - my phone has it. It's in the form of a Java/Brew application on both phonesets. On the child's set, you enable it (off by default) and then on the parents phone they just open the app to find out where the child is. It works by a signal being sent to the child's phone, which then responds by sending back its current location using GPS. You can also set it so an alarm goes off on the parent's phone if the child leaves a certain designated area. Very young kids walk home from school alone at a very early age, so it can be pretty handy.

    1. Re:Already got one by Joebert · · Score: 1
      It works by a signal being sent to the child's phone, which then responds by sending back its current location using GPS.

      That sounds about as effective as just calling the kid & asking them where they are.
      What's to stop them from replacing a GPS engine with a scriptable responder ? There's alot of kids out there that understand Java & even more than understand the idea of timelines & scripting.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  36. What age? And What Benefit? by gelfling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you give a phone tracking device to your.....what? 10 year old? Then that will allow to do.....what precisely? Compare that with your 16-17-18 year old whose movements you will track and that will allow.....what again? Seems to me if you have a kid who refuses to callback or answer their phone you've lost either way. And if you want to use this as a passive device to track them in spite of their own behavior, well, let's just say I'm glad I don't have to sit down with your family at dinner.

    See, let's just set aside the squishy implications of whether you think this is an ethical thing to do. That's your decision to make, not mine. Instead, as a practical matter, if your kid tells you they're at "A's" house and you doublecheck and discover they're not, then what do you do? And below a certain age if your kid is out of your sight and lying to you about it, then you have bigger problems than technology can solve, unless of course you plan on subjecting your kids to drug tests and lie detector tests the moment you drag them home. On the other hand, if your kid is almost 18, then the same behavior really says more about you as a parent and maybe your anal retentive, passive aggressive borderline paranoid martyr complex than it does about your kids.

    Let's just say that as a parent of teenagers who routinely do not like to be interrupted when they are doing exactly what they told me they were going to do, that whether I can verify where they are at all times will just make them that much less eager to talk to me and answer their phone. As I've said many many times;

    Sometimes the greatest revenge you can wreak on a control freak is to actually give them total control. It will piss them off and burn them out faster than resistance.

    1. Re:What age? And What Benefit? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Instead, as a practical matter, if your kid tells you they're at "A's" house and you doublecheck and discover they're not, then what do you do?

      How about talk to him about it to find out why he was lying, then work out a better solution to whatever problem the kid was trying to solve?

      I understand that lots of slashdotters are teenagers who (as nearly all teenagers do) resent their parents' attempts to keep them out of trouble, but I find yours a very funny comment from a parent.

      Personally, I can see this sort of service as being very useful. Not to spy on my kids, but to give them greater freedom with less hassle for me and for them. My kids don't have cellphones, so the rule is that they don't go anywhere without letting me know first and, usually, they're also required to call me when they get there. Why? So that I can find them when I need to. If they had phones, I could relax that some, because I could call them when I needed to. With a service like this, I could find them first, and then decide whether or not I needed to bother them. Given that it costs one-minute per lookup, it might be cheaper to call them, but if the service were free, I'd probably reach for the web browser first.

      Like any other technology, this one can be used or misused. Used correctly (and priced a bit lower), I can see this being a very useful tool for parents and kids both, enabling the parents to allow the kids greater freedom without abdicating responsibility.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  37. How will the system know, ... by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    ... absolutely definitively, that the enquirer on the web site really is the person authorised to know where this particular child is located?

    What with all the insecurities, such as reporting key loggers, to which computer systems are prone I might have, in a moment of total madness, installed such a system for keeping tabs on my son, but would have never ever even dreamt of setting up this sort of thing on my daughter.

    In the context of child protection this is technology gone totally mad.

    Have the perps. of this horror never heard of the word 'TRUST'?

    My life experience about trust is that it works two ways: If you don't trust people they very quickly become untrustworthy; and similarly, those who cannot trust others are themselves usually untrustworthy.

    This gadget might be handy in a work context so that the office knew where itinerant service people are situated.

  38. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by leahzero · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It saddens me that the product of the loins beneath a mind like this will some day be running around in my world. Hopefully your daughter will have some streak of willfulness or independence and defy your paranoid, degrading assumptions about her. Or perhaps she's lucky enough to have a good mother, though I don't see how one would be foolish enough to procreate with you. Please mod parent and his other posts down, they are egregiously off-topic and inflammatory.

  39. IF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When? You behave like children are disappearing left, right and center.

    Children are most likely to be abused by someone they know: A neighbor, relative or parents. There are way more cases of domestic abuse then abductions.

    Yes, there is a risk that something awful will happen to your child but it's stupid to live in fear.

  40. Well done... by Alcibaides · · Score: 1

    Well written, Mr. Pogue. I am quite impressed with the turns of phrase.

  41. My son will have fun with your daughter. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    He'll show her how to easily circumvent your surveilance, and after having his way with her, send her on to a life of daddy-hating slutitude!

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:My son will have fun with your daughter. by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 1

      [...] a life of daddy-hating slutitude!

      Actually: I've no daughters more resentful of their fathers than those who grew up under castrati.
  42. Criminals by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Oh what a boon it will be for sexual predators too... who can now hack into a system and track their prey.

    The only assurance that information will not be abused is to not collect it or allow it to be collected in the first place. Just because something CAN be done doesn't necessarily mean it should be done. The crisis of the 21st century will be privacy vs safety, because they are absolutely diametrically opposed to each other.

    Alas, the masses will keep on chanting "if you have nothing to hide"...

  43. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps you are one of the rogue intelligent people who actually vote Republican.

    Actually, AC: I rebuke the false dichotomy of Republican/Democrat. The false dichotomy of Republican/Democrat is for those "thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root."*

    No, I vote Nationalist.

    _____________
    Thoreau, Walden, 1-E.

  44. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just going on what I'm reading from you here, but... what the hell kind of traumatic incident happened to you to cause you to have such opinions? Get thee to a psychotherapist!

    Sincerely,
    AC-'cause-I-modded-in-this-thread

  45. Another "novel use"...track your spouse's vehicle by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    If you stash one of these phones behind the dash with a constant 12V supply to the charger, you can track your unwitting spouse. Combine that with your internet connected smart phone and you've got a portable homing device system without having to bother Q.

    Better make sure my wife doesn't find out about these things. :)

  46. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I vote Nationalist.

    How fervent is your nationalism? "My nation is infallible" nationalist? or is it at least marginally more reasonable than this?

  47. Overestimating is worse than underestimating by Erwos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reading these comments, you'd think these kids circumventing their GPS tracking are straight out of some orbiting Battle School (Ender's game ref!), and not the standard, mind-numbing public schools that most people subject their kids to. Never mind that _parents_ are being cast as folks with IQs lower than your standard Fox sitcom character's. I attribute this to many Slashdotters feeling that they were much smarter than their foolish parents about computers, so, obviously, said Slashdotters were much smarter about EVERYTHING.

    Will a few kids be smart enough to circumvent this, and the parents too dumb to notice? Yes. Clearly, it is not a solution for every case. But most of these supposed circumvention techniques (leave phone somewhere else, turn it off, pay someone to answer it, whatever) rely on parents being completely stupid, and not having some sort of verification method. I'm not sure if I think the entire concept of GPS tracking your kids is great (I'd like them to be able to provide their positions with their own free will via a button push), but it's not nearly as worthless and bankrupt as some Slashdotters have been ranting.

    It's disturbing as all hell to see the kind of parenting mantra that's being espoused on here: "you'll never be able to stop your kid from seeing the real world, so let them run wild at 13!" I guess it's a relief that your average Slashdotter probably won't ever have kids anyways.

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    1. Re:Overestimating is worse than underestimating by ESRB · · Score: 1

      Only one person needs to discover a method of circumvention. Then this person just needs to share how they did it.

      Think about that. Think about how it applies to more than just GPS tracking.

    2. Re:Overestimating is worse than underestimating by Erwos · · Score: 1

      Sure, assuming said circumvention method even exists, and the designers and parents are too dumb to not notice or fix it. Did you even read what I wrote?

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    3. Re:Overestimating is worse than underestimating by Mantrid42 · · Score: 1

      You only need a few kids to figure it out. Then he goes to his friends and says, "Hey, look what neat trick I figured out!"

    4. Re:Overestimating is worse than underestimating by ESRB · · Score: 1

      Nothing is perfectly secure. Nothing. And yeah, most of them probably are too dumb. At any rate, kids can be very, very clever when it comes to circumvention.

    5. Re:Overestimating is worse than underestimating by Erwos · · Score: 1

      First, your basis thesis is wrong, because a properly generated one-time pad is perfectly secure, in both a practical and theoretical sense.

      Are you saying PGP/GPG is "worthless" because it's not "perfectly secure"? The application here doesn't need to be perfectly secure. It just needs to be "secure enough".

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  48. My favorite - the Slashdot parenting advice column by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >But, as ever, such a family has people-issues to
    >which a technological solution ain't gonna work anyway.

    The "people-issues" may well be entirely those of
    the child.

    I know that given /.'s makeup slamming parents is fun,
    but individuals do have temperments. Some kids are
    just plain wild, with no fault of their parents.

    What do you do then? Your best. You may have to take
    measures that seem excessive to others - who are
    lucky enough to have kids with easy temperments, or
    who just don't care where their kids go or how they
    behave. Tough. Unless you've been the one with
    the responsibility over that child, unless you know
    intimately that child's temperment, you are in no
    position to judge.

  49. I'm thinking of getting this for my mother-in-law by husker_man · · Score: 1
    My wife and I have a family plan through Verizon, with an additional line for my mother-in-law (she lives in a different state). I am seriously thinking of getting this for my mother-in-law because of the traveling that she's done.

    Case in point: She was traveling here from Florida this past Thursday. She got off of I-10 near Beaumont, TX, and was having a very hard time getting back on (to be fair, she is well into her 70's). If she could have called us, and us being able to see where her GPS indicator was showing her to be, we could have coached her via her cellphone on how best to get back to the Interstate.

    So yes, I think it's a grand idea. If a kid gets in a jam and need some help, I don't see any reason why not to get them this type of service. It depends, though, on the type of relationship that a kid has with his parents.

  50. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, and I'm not trying to offend here as I am genuinely confused -- do you actually talk like this, or is this satire?

    --
    Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
  51. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

    Seriously, though, are you a real person?

    --
    Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
  52. Don't forget... by rbochan · · Score: 1

    ... the helmets, kneepads, and elbow pads. Might as well surround them in bubble wrap while we're at it.
    Add a permanent carry-along douche too, since we're raising a nation of pussies.

    [/end grinch]

    --
    ...Rob
    The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
  53. What scares me more than anything... by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What scares me more than the eagerness of the powers-that-be to use technology to further diminish our privacy is the willingness of the common man to use these same technologies to diminish our privacy of his own volition under the guise of love.

    --
    Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    1. Re:What scares me more than anything... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I think I need to remind you of something. The idea that your children have a right to privacy is a myth. While your children are under the age of 18 and living under your roof they have no right to privacy. You as a parent have the right to say where your child goes, who your child is with, and what your child does at all times. As a parent I have the right to search my child room, possessions, and person any time I feel is necessary.

      And contrary to popular myth no court has ever taken this right away from parents unless they felt the child was being abused.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:What scares me more than anything... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can do this. If you do it constantly, you're an idiot and will lose the kid at 18 - basically, you need to give the kid his own space as he grows up and allow him to make his own mistakes or else he will never grow up. Either that, or he'll do his growing up after 18 when he tells you to go to hell and never talk to him again.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  54. 'The State' can already track you... by Animaether · · Score: 1

    You must be new here. On this planet, I mean.

    You do realize that cellphones can already be roughly / accurately pinpointed by the emergency services, right? You do realize that although they do this when you actually make a call, that as long as your phone is on and thus registers itself to the various cell towers, somewhere, some machine knows where you are, right?

    The State (did you mean 'The Man' without saying 'The Man'?) can already track you. Leave your phone and credit cards at home, and by all means wear a disguise, take back alleys, etc. if you want it to be nigh-impossible for you to be tracked.

    1. Re:'The State' can already track you... by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      > You must be new here. On this planet, I mean.

      You may have made a good point, but I have no interest in your attitude.

  55. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Zemran · · Score: 1

    however, I have to find clever ways of curtailing décadence with a light hand.


    and then Peter Paedophile cracks your account and uses it to track her so that he can insert his desease...

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  56. Just to clarify by coalrestall · · Score: 1

    In Japan, this is used by parents to track CHILDREN, meaning elementary age kids. It's to make sure they haven't been kidnapped, or wandered off rather than coming straight home after school. It's absolutely not intended for spying on teenage kids, and the very thought that it could be reliably used that way is way too laughable for intelligent Slashdot folk to take seriously. They can just turn the feature off.

  57. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Zemran · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps she's lucky enough to have a good mother

    If so she is likely to be raised in a one parent family.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  58. I can't make us of this... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    because I refuse to buy a child a cell phone. Why should I spend $50 a month just so my kid can have an expensive toy that they will lose, break or have stolen? I finally succumbed to buying my 14 year old a cell phone. All of his friends have had them for years (so why does he need one, unless he is wandering off without his friends). It used to be easier to say no, because I didn't have or need a cell phone either. But then my silly company went and bought me one, so it became harder to tell my stepson he didn't need one. Still, I understand why he wants one at such a young age. I was an early adapter, too. I got my first cell phone at the age of only about 22. But after I got rid of that one, I didn't get another one until I was in my 30s.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:I can't make us of this... by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Some places don't have payphones everywhere, so if you need to get a taxi/call 911 your out of luck without a cell phone.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  59. A lot of this no doubt is being supplied by... by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

    ...TruePosition. I used to work there a few years ago. One of the managers in IT was a total dick (which is why I left) but the product of the company is pretty amazing stuff.

  60. Potential for abuse? by Froggy · · Score: 1

    It's dangerous to assume that any web-based service is secure. As a parent, I'm really unhappy about the idea of random strangers being able to track my children at all times. I don't think the small amount of extra security I would feel from being able to track them myself is worth that kind of risk.

    --
    It is a woman's prerogative to change other people's minds.
  61. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 1

    How fervent is your nationalism?

    As fervent as daydreaming; that sort of nationalism is what the Economist refers to as “protectionism.”
  62. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously, though, are you a real person?

    I don't know; do I pass the Turing Test?

  63. For people with no sense of direction by lorcha · · Score: 1

    My little brother (little in the birth-order sense... he's 26 years old) has the worst sense of direction. Ever. After he got his driver's license, he routinely got horribly lost. As in, not even close to his intended destination.

    The problem was, he was so lost and so clueless, he couldn't really explain to anybody where he actually was, or worse, he would think he was somewhere and be wrong. In-car GPS wasn't very common back then, and I doubt that would have helped anyway. If he couldn't figure out that a "Hospital" sign could be any hospital, not just one specific hospital (I'm driving by "XYZ Hospital" right now. Help!, but he'd really be by "ABC Hospital"), how is he going to properly enter his destination into a GPS unit?

    Something like this would have been good for him. He could call home and say, "Help, I'm fucked." and somebody could see just where on the planet earth he was actually fucked, and unfuck him.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    1. Re:For people with no sense of direction by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Or you could buy him a map? You know? Then he could learn the whole, "don't leave unless you know where you're going and how to get there" bit.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    2. Re:For people with no sense of direction by lorcha · · Score: 1

      My mom was a Realtor. We had several dozen maps. You have not identified a solution. Those with a sense of direction will never understand those without.

      Personally, I don't understand it. I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it with my own two eyes.

      The problem has been solved, incidentally. He moved to Manhattan and doesn't drive. If the subway can't get him someplace, he will never arrive there.

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  64. Then why the "preacher's daughter" stereotype? by FatSean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There ain't no rebel like a person who grew up under the thumb of an authority figure!

    --
    Blar.
  65. Tracking senior citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another use of this technology would be tracking old farts who have a tendency to get lost. My mom is 80 years old -- I want this for her. It just needs to be combined with a simple phone with large buttons.

  66. Hypocrisy at its finest by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love the blatant hypocrisy shown in the replies to date. The Slashdot Hivemind is always getting all wound up about how parents are responsible for their children, etc... etc... But when a tool that can be useful to that end is proposed... It's instantly the worst child rearing tool since the Iron Maiden.

    1. Re:Hypocrisy at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maiden!
      Maiden!
      Maiden!

    2. Re:Hypocrisy at its finest by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      I love the blatant hypocrisy shown in the replies to date. The Slashdot Hivemind is always getting all wound up about how parents are responsible for their children, etc... etc...

      The idea to be more responsible in the raising of your children. Teaching them to make better decisions on their own, so you don't have to watch them continuously. What does having your children tracked all the time teach them? Behave because I'm watching, not because it's normal? Don't think about what you're getting involved in because I'll see it and be able to find you should you get in danger?

      The problem with parents being irresponsible for their children isn't that they aren't paranoid enough, it's that they don't teach children self-reliance and nurture some sense of ethics in them, they instead let their kids run around like hooligans and do whatever they want.
  67. Independent Adults by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    This is a great way for parents to teach kids to be independent and learn on their own by second guessing their every move. Either that or they'll teach themselves how to wrap their phone in foil.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  68. Good Idea by charliebear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Freedom is great for adults, not for kids. As a parent, part of your job in raising kids is to keep them safe, and to keep them in line. A cell phone with GPS fits into my scheme of "Trust, but Verify" When the kid shows enough maturity, etc. to get a little more freedom, give them the benefit of the doubt, let them stay out later, let them stay over at a friends, but have something like this to verify they are where they SAY they are, if you are suspicious. You can't follow the kid around 24/7, and you would look like a nut to call the other parent's house every 30 minutes or so to make sure they are still in the house. (Believe me, there are other parents who, either through neglect, indifference, or whatever, let their kids and guests leave the house at all hours of the night during a sleepover) I have a GPS tracker on the car my daughter uses that you need to manually download the data, so it isn't real time, but it gives me where she drives, and what speeds she drives. We only use it to verify her story if she shows up late with some lame excuse, and was unavailable by cel phone for an extended time. Wait until you have a teen daughter, it is SCARY!!! The technology gives us the comfort level to give her MORE freedom, because we can check up on her if needed.

    1. Re:Good Idea by couchslug · · Score: 1

      You can also do neat stuff like use the info to pick her up if her car malfunctions (and send a wrecker to get it). If she gets lost, she can call you for directions. This tech has plenty of non-Gestapo uses.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to be your kid. How am I supposed to do things I wouldn't like you knowing about with this 24/7 surveillance thing around?

    3. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be nice if people would put more thought into how sexist it is that people only say it's scary to have a teen daughter...

  69. Children have been raped and murdered forever. by FatSean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You just hear about it more these days. World-wide media just dredges these horror stories up from remote locales and brings them to you.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Children have been raped and murdered forever. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      That to, but children where much safer in the '50-'70 than in the '80 and '90's. Back then people in communities watched out for each others children. There was a civil responsibility back then that you don't find today. It used to be when someone tried to snatch a child or did; the whole community would be up and arms.

      Now no one really gives a shit. Like the case of a child that was snatched a few years ago around here. It took the cops a week to find someone who had seen the whole thing. She just didn't want to get involved. If she would have come forward and said something the police might have found the child sooner. If she would have suck her head out the window yelled something the child might still be alive.

      So people that think they know what the hell they are talking about when they don't' have children need to shut the fuck up. When you have your own kids then you can talk. No one is forcing this device down your through. If you don't want to use it, don't buy it. But if it's one more tool to keep children safe then it might just be worth it.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:Children have been raped and murdered forever. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, back in the 50's people just didn't talk about it so much. There are and will always be places where people look out for each other and places where they don't. I personally think this is worthless for any sort of kidnapping - the abducter will just toss the phone at the first chance.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Children have been raped and murdered forever. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      plus back in the 50's people didnt get kickass dead milkmen refrences.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  70. Turning every parent into the POLICE STATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is one major hidden cost in these systems no parent realizes. The conditioning of your child to obey rules and never question continuous invasive surveilance, to bend over backwards and take it up the *** by the police state, and be conditioned never to stand up for their rights or freedom, but to be herded at will by command by anyone who presumes to be an authority figure. Whether this authority figure is a corrupt cop, a perverted school teacher, a gang leader, a shaggy haired band leader they look up to, a cult leader like Manson, their best friend with horrendous motives (most likely), a pimp, etc. You're basically training your kid to be a frightened scared timid trusting cow who follows, follows, follows, and obeys.

    Public schools are horrendous for this. Indoctrination with the pledge of allegance, question / response type programming, regimentation, continuous testing and therefore continuous judging, on campus police force, metal detectors, barb wire, mandatory attendance, peer pressure, etc. From day one we are taught to obey... if we cry someone stuck a bottle in our mouth to shut us up. More than likely you have pounded this into your kid their entire life. Do what they are told. No you can't have that, because I said so. Sit down and be still. Do your homework. Eat your peas. And on and on and on. You've taught and trained your kid to obey every command given to them. Have you ever taught them to say "no"? Have you ever taught them to say "you do it!"? How about "go f* yourself?" How about how to physically fight? I imagine not. How do you think they are going to react when some bully tells them to give them your car, or their money, or to get in the car with them, or to go help them do some crime?

    Eventually your kid is going to be on his own in the world no matter what with no supervision at all. And at the mercy of a viscious hustling world of corporate interests, spin, doublespeak, and out and out lies saturated in our media. You need to be teaching them basic skills... money management, how to get a job, how to cook, how to clean, how to avoid toxic products like softdrinks and junk food that will make them diabetic and fat, depressed, fatigued, and sick.

    You can follow your kid around all you want with your GPS in the cellphone or car, and live with the false sense of security you're protecting your suburbanite kid. What happens however when they run into the streetwise black kid from the ghetto who's grown up taught by his ex-con dad how to hustle all his life, sell drugs, manilipulate people based on their wants, etc. You're sheltered kid is going to be like a fat loaf of bread and the ghetto crack kid is going to be like the knife.

  71. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Isotopian · · Score: 1

    Whoosh!

    --

    It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

  72. Mobile phone walkers anyone? by Kattspya · · Score: 1

    I can see a nice new backyard industry springing up. Some enterprising children will tend other childrens phones for a small fee. While the child is out doing forbidden things his mobile will be in a safe zone on the move.

    I'm not sure what it's called in english but there should exist a service where you can bounce your calls to another phone without the caller knowing. If this is available in the USA the parents will have a very hard time finding out that their kids are not the ones carrying around the GPS transmitters.

  73. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by bkgood · · Score: 1
    Your daughter is going to simply arrange for her cell be where you expect it to be while hooking up with her "diseased cock" using a prepaid disposable, thus all you will be doing is impossing a financial burden on her.
    Which she will, inevitably, pay for with the money from the diseased cock. I can't remember if it's the terrorists or the sex offenders winning at this point.
  74. Re:Another "novel use"...track your spouse's vehic by cryocide · · Score: 1
    If you stash one of these phones behind the dash with a constant 12V supply to the charger, you can track your unwitting spouse. Combine that with your internet connected smart phone and you've got a portable homing device system without having to bother Q.

    All she has to do is drive the car to the store to get picked up for a rendezvous. Unlike kids, there's not much you can do about that. Double points if the pick-up opint is at the hardware store!

    You could use one of these phones as a low-cost "Lo-jack" device if you liked though. If you were so inclined, you could probably rig it up to a car alarm system to have it call you in an emergency.
  75. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't remember if it's the terrorists or the sex offenders winning at this point.

    Reality.

    KFG

  76. We now rejoin the debate already in progress by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  77. Why would you want a phone with a GPS? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why the hell would you even want that? And furthermore, don't these people know that GPS doesn't actually work in buildings, or near tall buildings, or in cars unless you've got an external antenna or a soft-top?

  78. Re:My favorite - the Slashdot parenting advice col by bitMonster · · Score: 1

    Well said.

    While I don't have experience with teenagers yet (my kids are 5 and under), I do realize that kids will go through different phases, some of which present big risks. A parent has to do what it takes to get through the challenging or risky phases. At some point, most kids will grow out of whatever problems they are having. Obviously (I hope) though, a parent has to try to preserve as much mutual respect, trust, and love as possible.

  79. Re:This is evil YES IT IS by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I would like to bring up a specific set of parents which would be absolutely hellish with this kind of tech.
    Evangelicals.
    I grew up with one of my parents being evangelical and the other not really wanting to argue with her.
    There is a particular oddity with this type of fundie. Unlike many other types of fundies, they believe that a big company's technology is never wrong.
    This is the same type of person who quotes some marketing gab and then when questioned says something equivelent to "I think they know better than you do".
    The same kind of person who warns someone to not fix say...a pair of glasses for chrissakes because one isn't "certified".
    Now merge that with the fundamentalist mindset.
    "Dr. James Dobson said young men being around women makes them crazed for sex and that they give birth to demon children! You are forbidden from seeing these harlots!"
    Now...do we really want this kind of person to have this type of tech? And before a rebuttal is made of "they're too stupid to learn tech". No, they are not. Evangelicals and other fundies will learn it if it is to keep their widdle children "Safe", whether physically or safe morally however they define that.

    This completely outweighs the benefits of this technology. To repeat what was said above. Shitty and insane parents happen more than kidnappings.

    --
    Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
  80. an alternative is already built in to all phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To activate it, you simply call your child and ask them where they are.

  81. "Police state?" by mbius · · Score: 1

    If parents are honest with themselves, the "invasive surveillance" is not for protecting angelic Johnny from rapists, murderers, and grizzly bears. It's for knowing the ecstasy dealers aren't his friends. People, kids included, make stupid decisions. I'll set and adjust boundaries for mine so they learn the "viscious, hustling world" is not rewarding or necessary.

    Sure there's such a thing as overparenting. But underparenting is probably worse, for the child's success and society at large.

    Your Brave New World of indoctrination has nothing to do with knowing where my kid is. I need to know because I pay the bills. Not because it gives me wealth and power. And I'm not some schmuck "presuming" to be an authority figure, I'm the real deal. It's important to teach the difference, because I'm more forgiving than the legal system.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  82. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Perhaps you are one of the rogue intelligent people who actually vote Republican.

    If intelligence is defined as being as in touch with reality, then the Republican party has all the intelligent people in America.

  83. Money money money by noidentity · · Score: 1

    "You can even watch 'bread crumbs' appear on the map as the phone moves around (cost: one talk-time minute apiece)."

    I don't know which is worse, the invasion of privacy or the insane prices these services will be sold at. Hmmm, maybe that's a good thing. Anyway, doesn't the damn phone already "check in" and report its location regularly anyway, without extra cost?

  84. Not logging yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is being recorded

    They aren't logging yet. That comes after this invasion of privacy is accepted fully... "Well, we couldn't locate her this time, but if we had just been logging her location the whole time, we would have known where she was in time to save her from a gruesome death at the hands of her pedophile kidnapper." Thennnn, they start logging. Expect some kind of "Megan's law" for mobile phone location logging. I thought they were going to push right into it with the traffic jam excuse, but it looks as though they'll go with the tried and true, "Please, think of the children!" bullshit after all.

  85. Why can't I track myself? by David+E.+Smith · · Score: 1

    Given that many cell phones out there already have GPS features built-in (for E911), why can't I just pop open my phone and get MY location via GPS? If I want to know where I am, I have to go buy a Garmin or similar GPS unit, which is a hundred bucks or more, and another gadget I have to carry around.

  86. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by koreaman · · Score: 1

    Good thing that's not the definition of intelligence.

  87. This does not track the location of your kids. by code+shady · · Score: 1

    It tracks the location of your kids phone. This is an important distinction to make. Intentionally or unintentionally, kids (and adults too) forget things.

    Heck, i could turn this to silent, hid it in a library bookshelf, and look like I've been studying for the past several hours, when in fact, I've been smoking in the boys room.

    All this does is give a false sense of security to parents who are already too "busy" with their lives to watch their kids.

    --
    Look out honey cause I'm usin' technology
    Ain't got time to make no apologies
  88. How long will you sit in front of PC? by WinKing · · Score: 1

    Although it is possible to track, where your kid goes. Is it possible to get the data whenever you wish to see? I personally think, instead of being helpful tool for parents, it will become a worry tool, if they come to know the unexpected things about their kid.

    --
    With Regards, V Raimond
  89. I prefer the collar... by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    Especially if it can deliver an electroshock, remotely triggered or automatically activated if the transmitter is turned off. Also, a collar could be equipped with a camera that would tell me not only where the little bugger is, but what he/she is smoking and who he/she is screwing too. ;-)

  90. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, AC: I rebuke the false dichotomy of Republican/Democrat....I vote Nationalist.

    A racist then.

  91. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 1

    A racist then.

    You Bolsheviki are so full of bitter gall, with your reflexive associations; think, man!
  92. Wisconsin cell tracking legislation by bmasel · · Score: 1

    State Assembly Rep Marlin Schneider has submitted legislation to limit retention and release of cellphone location data, such that the cellcos would be required to purge records when no longer needed to complete calls or 911 locate, unless the customer opts in (which would seem to exempt the parental use.

    Employers would be allowed to track only with disclosue, and only on paid time.

    The proposal's currently waiting on the legislative reference Bureau to reconcile with pre-existing law.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
  93. Re:From Bachelor to Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are probably one of the stupidest people ever to post on Slashdot. Please leave, forever.

  94. Re:My favorite - the Slashdot parenting advice col by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rubbish. Kids respond badly to bad parenting. Much of the time when you bring someone in who knows what they're doing, things settle down substantially. Virtually every exception I've ever seen has been due to either biological problems (manic depression, etc) or some kind of severe trauma inducing psychological issues that are beyond what can reasonably be handled in the home.

    But most is bad parenting.

  95. GPS tracking devices for the suspicious parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey - you can always just plop a GPS Tracking Device in your kid's car, too!