The last time I noticed somebody providing a citation for this it was something akin to 400b in liquid assets. However, what is your point? The amount of money Apple has, or does not have, is of no importance to the underlying facts and including that information does nothing to further the dialogue.
Companies will offer loss-leader products to an opening store if the store is viable enough to succeed. It is not just the store that takes a loss on some products, this is actually fairly common I understand. They do this because of the potential future sales and it is a calculated investment in future products. In this case the owners of the copyrights made a deal with Apple to allow the distribution of their products at a loss for greater potential profit in the future. The irony, yes irony, is that you are probably someone who complains when companies do not take a long-term approach and concentrate on quarterly growth.
I do not know... I play guitar better than Hendrix ever did and I certainly sing better than Dylan. I likely play guitar (or even a drum kit) better than Taylor Swift. My point is that they are not necessarily better.
Take your desire for facts, logic, or honesty and shove them up your ass! Then get yourself out of our country, we do not like your kind around here.:-)
If you label your heroin (for sale - not your personal stash) as 80% pure and sell it then you are not committing a crime greater than selling a schedule 3 drug. This is because the FDA is not in control - it is already an illegal substance. They do not regulate it for purity, they regulate it for various uses. I suspect China is similar in this.
The answer to your question is, "Yes." The answer to your silliness after your question is, "Not in any sense you are attempting to argue." A person, for example, can be a public official but we do not have a right to place a camera in their bedroom. A public company (note that not all businesses are public) can have as many secrets as they want. They can be forced to disclose evidence of wrongdoing via a warrant.
The schools taught them that? I suppose a school that teaches chemistry may teach that but I know of no Catholic school that taught kids to be bombers or suicide bombers. I am not a Catholic (or Christian) or the likes but I would prefer honesty in debates. If you have a citation, anything close will do, then that would be interesting.
They still do that in real medicine. Well, I should say, they are starting to do that again today and the people doing so are actually doctors. Google, really. I make no claim as to the validity of this practice.
For $100 you can buy either someone's prescription pills or somewhere around 12-15 bags of heroin. Pain will likely be diminished with either though the latter may be a stronger effect than the former.
Ah, I tend to forget that aspect. I have had only one major incident with attempted robbery or the likes. I am also an idiot. Hindsight is actually a good thing. I had somebody pull a gun on me and demand my money. There was no magazine in this weapon and the barrel was only large enough for BBs. I said no and kept walking. There are many reasons why this was stupid.
Vista is pretty good after SP1. I never migrated a laptop off of it which is how I noticed. It came with SP1 installed already. I had issues with the initial release (drivers and locking up) on a variety of hardware (I have an MSDN subscription) but no issues with it since SP1. 7 is much better and 8.x is just mentally handichaired.
And I suspect that those free complementary sessions include the business owner paying the employees that do the work. That is more in line with what this is about - for better or worse. I do not really have an opinion on this other than the artists should have a contract that allows them to opt out of things like this if they want but the recording labels probably did not include that in their contracts.
She should be used to getting reamed without lube.
I clicked a link and saw her picture above. So, yeah, I think I will be willing to take care of that part. You know, for the betterment of society and whatnot.
The infrastructure and applications are nothing? Why are you even on this site? The rest of us know that these are things that take work and money. You? You are just ignorant.
My state has an implied warranty law but, a car? That loses 1/3 of its value the minute it leaves the lot. They make the dealer take it back at full price??? Which states do this?
You may be willing to pay that price but some people can not afford to pay that price. I see what your opinions are and I am grateful that you have given accurate and honest answers. I am not sure that I agree with you entirely and I, too, do not know how to solve this. I do know that I can easily think of positions that people can realistically be in where they are unable to afford to pay the price of false allegations. This is mostly due to other people who can not think logically or refuse to change their minds once they are made up.
That and, well, the Constitution was a list of things the government could do. It is now interpreted as a list of things they can not do. There is a difference.
This is because people do not understand the differences between freedom and liberty. I am free to kill you. I am not at liberty to do so. You are free to speak, to say anything you want. There are somethings you are not at liberty to say. You can blame anyone you want for this but this is the way it has always been interpreted by the courts. If you want someone to blame then I would suggest starting there or accepting that the words are not always defined as what you want them to be.
Slashdot Mirror
The last time I noticed somebody providing a citation for this it was something akin to 400b in liquid assets. However, what is your point? The amount of money Apple has, or does not have, is of no importance to the underlying facts and including that information does nothing to further the dialogue.
Companies will offer loss-leader products to an opening store if the store is viable enough to succeed. It is not just the store that takes a loss on some products, this is actually fairly common I understand. They do this because of the potential future sales and it is a calculated investment in future products. In this case the owners of the copyrights made a deal with Apple to allow the distribution of their products at a loss for greater potential profit in the future. The irony, yes irony, is that you are probably someone who complains when companies do not take a long-term approach and concentrate on quarterly growth.
I do not know... I play guitar better than Hendrix ever did and I certainly sing better than Dylan. I likely play guitar (or even a drum kit) better than Taylor Swift. My point is that they are not necessarily better.
I am not sure how you got modded up but, what laws, specifically, would have prompted this change?
Take your desire for facts, logic, or honesty and shove them up your ass! Then get yourself out of our country, we do not like your kind around here. :-)
If you label your heroin (for sale - not your personal stash) as 80% pure and sell it then you are not committing a crime greater than selling a schedule 3 drug. This is because the FDA is not in control - it is already an illegal substance. They do not regulate it for purity, they regulate it for various uses. I suspect China is similar in this.
The answer to your question is, "Yes." The answer to your silliness after your question is, "Not in any sense you are attempting to argue." A person, for example, can be a public official but we do not have a right to place a camera in their bedroom. A public company (note that not all businesses are public) can have as many secrets as they want. They can be forced to disclose evidence of wrongdoing via a warrant.
The schools taught them that? I suppose a school that teaches chemistry may teach that but I know of no Catholic school that taught kids to be bombers or suicide bombers. I am not a Catholic (or Christian) or the likes but I would prefer honesty in debates. If you have a citation, anything close will do, then that would be interesting.
They still do that in real medicine. Well, I should say, they are starting to do that again today and the people doing so are actually doctors. Google, really. I make no claim as to the validity of this practice.
For $100 you can buy either someone's prescription pills or somewhere around 12-15 bags of heroin. Pain will likely be diminished with either though the latter may be a stronger effect than the former.
They would know about it before it happened.
State Agent: Do you know why we are here?
Psychic: Yes, I know. (starts to pack up desk contents)
Too funny. There is no such thing as alternative medicine. If it worked then it would just be, you know, medicine.
Ah, I tend to forget that aspect. I have had only one major incident with attempted robbery or the likes. I am also an idiot. Hindsight is actually a good thing. I had somebody pull a gun on me and demand my money. There was no magazine in this weapon and the barrel was only large enough for BBs. I said no and kept walking. There are many reasons why this was stupid.
Vista is pretty good after SP1. I never migrated a laptop off of it which is how I noticed. It came with SP1 installed already. I had issues with the initial release (drivers and locking up) on a variety of hardware (I have an MSDN subscription) but no issues with it since SP1. 7 is much better and 8.x is just mentally handichaired.
I suggest we keep them isolated but there are many people complaining about administrative custody.
Get a bigger laptop bag?
And I suspect that those free complementary sessions include the business owner paying the employees that do the work. That is more in line with what this is about - for better or worse. I do not really have an opinion on this other than the artists should have a contract that allows them to opt out of things like this if they want but the recording labels probably did not include that in their contracts.
She should be used to getting reamed without lube.
I clicked a link and saw her picture above. So, yeah, I think I will be willing to take care of that part. You know, for the betterment of society and whatnot.
The infrastructure and applications are nothing? Why are you even on this site? The rest of us know that these are things that take work and money. You? You are just ignorant.
My state has an implied warranty law but, a car? That loses 1/3 of its value the minute it leaves the lot. They make the dealer take it back at full price??? Which states do this?
He is probably a man who is okay with menstruation. I suppose that one can guess what series I am watching again.
You may be willing to pay that price but some people can not afford to pay that price. I see what your opinions are and I am grateful that you have given accurate and honest answers. I am not sure that I agree with you entirely and I, too, do not know how to solve this. I do know that I can easily think of positions that people can realistically be in where they are unable to afford to pay the price of false allegations. This is mostly due to other people who can not think logically or refuse to change their minds once they are made up.
That and, well, the Constitution was a list of things the government could do. It is now interpreted as a list of things they can not do. There is a difference.
This is because people do not understand the differences between freedom and liberty. I am free to kill you. I am not at liberty to do so. You are free to speak, to say anything you want. There are somethings you are not at liberty to say. You can blame anyone you want for this but this is the way it has always been interpreted by the courts. If you want someone to blame then I would suggest starting there or accepting that the words are not always defined as what you want them to be.
You, you, you Hitler you!