"There are many replies here that say politicians pander to the public to get elected and once they are in, they do whatever they want. This is just not true"
Yes, idiot, it is true. How could you say something so colossally stupid and expect anyone to take you seriously?
I laughed pretty hard when I saw how moronic you were, thanks for being such a retard. I enjoyed watching you make an ass of yourself, then posting some useless garbage no one will read. How do people get as dumb as you and still make it to adulthood?
Kill yourself. If for no other reason than to avoid embarrassing your family with another naive post.
As such, accepting Jesus as your personal savior is not enough for the Christian party line. You have to believe that he is three in one, that he is both fully human and fully divine, or else you're a heretic, and you're going to hell.
Or you could be a Protestant, in which case everything you said there is wrong.
Please refrain from discussing something when you have no fucking idea what you're talking about, you'll avoid saying something stupid and wrong like you did there.
"It always boggles me when people use terms like "pandering to public opinion" like it's a bad thing."
Ok I'll educate you to save you from future boggling. When Hillary (or others) are accused of "pandering to public opinion" this means they are being accused of SAYING WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO GET ELECTED, then DOING WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT. This is primarily a result of Hillary's 9and other's) past record of SAYING WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO GET ELECTED, then DOING WHATEVER THE HELL SHE WANTS.
I do not want an elected official who values getting votes over doing what is right. Hillary values getting votes over doing what is right.
Nonsense, it just means they see an opportunity to garner votes. What a politician says is about one thing these days, getting votes, with only a precious few exceptions.
So in other words, you've just said "I see what you're saying and the reasoning behind it, but rather than contribute to the solution, I'll be a bombastic, opinion spewing, curse tossing cunt, because even though I KNOW I'M RIGHT, IT'S MUCH MORE IMPORTANT TO PROVE HOW RIGHT I AM RATHER THAN ACTUALLY TAKE THE TIME AND MAKE THE EFFORT TO CONVINCE THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME.
Thank you, but you missed my point. Name calling in any guise is not being part of the solution. You can rely on the very thin defense of being "misquoted" (and, to be pedantic, I didn't quote you, so you weren't misquoted) or you can simply admit you made a bad choice.
But you won't. Your kind never admit that they messed up, they write page long diatribes about what they think while calling others ignorant or shills, or worse.
When all you had to say was "You know what, you're right, it isn't part of the solution" because while you may be right that calling someonoe ignorant is not necessarily a problem, it's also not a good thing.
"No need to define life."
What an incredibly moronic thing to say. The very substance if this debate is "what constitutes life" and YOU DISMISS THE IDEA THAT SUCH A DEFNIFITION IS NECESSARY.
"We can agree by analog" NO, WE CAN'T.
"If you agree that a bacterium has life, as I do, then we should both agree that a collection of embryonic cells have life as well."
NO, A GROUP OF EMBRYONIC CELLS IS NOT A BACTERIUM, AND VICE VERSA.
"Thanks for the ad hominem attacks, it has been a while."
If that's the sum total of your "logic" I strongly suspect it HAS NOT been a while.
Ok, what did I lie about then spunky? I'm not the one making erroneous claims of factuality in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
The funniest part about this is your assumption that science is capable of defining to a factual certainty what constitutes a "living human organism" and then attacking me for MY ignorance.
I took issue with the statement "It is a scientific fact"
I am not even a little interested in the philosophical debate you attempted to start. I am very much interested in denouncing zealots who toss about statements like "it is a scientific fact" when it is clearly not.
He's wrong. Kind of takes the sting out of a hyperbolic rant when your first sentence is a lie. ( Iknow it's just a mistake, but no one makes mistakes anymore, it's always "lies")
I beleive he said "most" and since we're being nitpicky dickheads, do you think "most" hard drives are like yours, or older, slower drives that are near his estimate?
Don't speak on ANY subject until you're less snotty.
How about you name some of those heinous crimes for us.
Honestly, how garbage like this gets modded up...
Crimes committed with your passport. What a colossally silly thing to attempt to sell to people. You're as bad as the "terrorists are everywhere" scaremongers, but at least they're mildly entertaining.
As to your posting, we both know I never said posting here was bad. I said that posting here as a pathetic replacement for real world interaction was bad. Sad that you need to make up an excuse like you've been holed up "waiting on other things" (bullshit). And I've posted, oh 6 or seven times I think. The fact that you continue to repsond to it means that particular criticism hits home. And you know it. That makes me happy, knowing I got the best of you again.
You're approaching 30 posts. Today. And that's normal for you. I guess the concept of proportionality is too much for you to grasp...
In short, you're a bigoted, homophobic, loser who takes out his anger on those who point out his flaws to him.
As to "kicking" me, that's the funniest thing I've read in months. Maybe you should focus on "kicking" your Slashdot habit you sad little fuck. What a hilarious attempt to act hard, when we both know you're a sad little powerless geek acting out. How can you kick me with your foot in your mouth?
And I'm the troll. Meanwhile, you've spent an entire day calling me a "Gay Republican pedophile". Who's the troll again? Right. I win again you fucking hypocrite.
How sad and empty is your life that you have time to spout crap like this, and TAKE IT SERIOUSLY?
God, you're such a douche, I have a hard time not feeling pity for you.
Get a life guy, or shut up. You've embarassed yourself more than you could possibly know.
I mean fuck man, you spent the whole morning jamming your idiotic opinion down our throats, only to top it off with bigotry. I don't kow what you have a against gays, but it looks exactly lkike what people do when they're secretly gay and hate others because of it. Is that why you're a homophobe? Is that why you had to slam gays so much? I really had no idea you were a gay basher until today.
Slashdot Mirror
"There are many replies here that say politicians pander to the public to get elected and once they are in, they do whatever they want. This is just not true"
A HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHA. AHHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHHA. AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
Yes, idiot, it is true. How could you say something so colossally stupid and expect anyone to take you seriously?
I laughed pretty hard when I saw how moronic you were, thanks for being such a retard. I enjoyed watching you make an ass of yourself, then posting some useless garbage no one will read. How do people get as dumb as you and still make it to adulthood?
Kill yourself. If for no other reason than to avoid embarrassing your family with another naive post.
As such, accepting Jesus as your personal savior is not enough for the Christian party line. You have to believe that he is three in one, that he is both fully human and fully divine, or else you're a heretic, and you're going to hell.
Or you could be a Protestant, in which case everything you said there is wrong.
Please refrain from discussing something when you have no fucking idea what you're talking about, you'll avoid saying something stupid and wrong like you did there.
Someone needs to kick you in the nuts. You deserve it.
"It always boggles me when people use terms like "pandering to public opinion" like it's a bad thing."
Ok I'll educate you to save you from future boggling. When Hillary (or others) are accused of "pandering to public opinion" this means they are being accused of SAYING WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO GET ELECTED, then DOING WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT. This is primarily a result of Hillary's 9and other's) past record of SAYING WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO GET ELECTED, then DOING WHATEVER THE HELL SHE WANTS.
I do not want an elected official who values getting votes over doing what is right. Hillary values getting votes over doing what is right.
You have been educated. You're welcome.
What the 60,000 of you can't start a letter writing campaign? Go door to door? Set up your own publication? BLOG?
In short, you're an idiot. And your post just proved it.
Nonsense, it just means they see an opportunity to garner votes. What a politician says is about one thing these days, getting votes, with only a precious few exceptions.
And Hillary isn't one of those exceptions.
Nice of you to admit that you didn't read the article. Which is what that was, a screaming admission of your ignorance.
So in other words, you've just said "I see what you're saying and the reasoning behind it, but rather than contribute to the solution, I'll be a bombastic, opinion spewing, curse tossing cunt, because even though I KNOW I'M RIGHT, IT'S MUCH MORE IMPORTANT TO PROVE HOW RIGHT I AM RATHER THAN ACTUALLY TAKE THE TIME AND MAKE THE EFFORT TO CONVINCE THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME.
Thank you, but you missed my point. Name calling in any guise is not being part of the solution. You can rely on the very thin defense of being "misquoted" (and, to be pedantic, I didn't quote you, so you weren't misquoted) or you can simply admit you made a bad choice. But you won't. Your kind never admit that they messed up, they write page long diatribes about what they think while calling others ignorant or shills, or worse. When all you had to say was "You know what, you're right, it isn't part of the solution" because while you may be right that calling someonoe ignorant is not necessarily a problem, it's also not a good thing.
"We can be part of the solution"
And how is calling people ignorant shills being part of the solution?
"No need to define life." What an incredibly moronic thing to say. The very substance if this debate is "what constitutes life" and YOU DISMISS THE IDEA THAT SUCH A DEFNIFITION IS NECESSARY. "We can agree by analog" NO, WE CAN'T. "If you agree that a bacterium has life, as I do, then we should both agree that a collection of embryonic cells have life as well." NO, A GROUP OF EMBRYONIC CELLS IS NOT A BACTERIUM, AND VICE VERSA. "Thanks for the ad hominem attacks, it has been a while." If that's the sum total of your "logic" I strongly suspect it HAS NOT been a while.
Ok, what did I lie about then spunky? I'm not the one making erroneous claims of factuality in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
The funniest part about this is your assumption that science is capable of defining to a factual certainty what constitutes a "living human organism" and then attacking me for MY ignorance.
"It is not a philosophical debate."
I will respond to your argument with an argument that relies on exactly the same methodology you use.
It is a philosophical debate 'cause I said so, so yes-huh. YES HUH TIMES INFINITY!!! YES HUH TIME INFINITY PLUS WHATEVER YOU SAY!!!
I took issue with the statement "It is a scientific fact"
I am not even a little interested in the philosophical debate you attempted to start. I am very much interested in denouncing zealots who toss about statements like "it is a scientific fact" when it is clearly not.
"It is scientific fact that embryos, from conception onward, are living human organisms."
Why lie? That is by no measure a "scientific fact" and you destroy any credibility you may have had by lying in such an obvious fashion.
More to the point, YOU betray your religious leanings by lying like that.
He's wrong. Kind of takes the sting out of a hyperbolic rant when your first sentence is a lie. ( Iknow it's just a mistake, but no one makes mistakes anymore, it's always "lies")
No, in this context it's the cost of prosecuting someone, which I'm certain does include a portion of the cost for the prosecuting attorney.
What you said makes no sense.
When sentencing convicted felons, does the judge give them X amount of fines and X amount of felony court costs.
I'm not disagreeing (well, yes i guess I am) but I KNOW I've seen it done, in virtually every case where there was a conviction.
I'm pretty certain you're wrong about this one.
I beleive he said "most" and since we're being nitpicky dickheads, do you think "most" hard drives are like yours, or older, slower drives that are near his estimate?
Don't speak on ANY subject until you're less snotty.
You got caught making shit up, now you're lying some more.
Not surprising considering how much lying you've done in the past, but I still lauhg at the retards who haven't figured you out yet.
Seriously, what kind of loser makes up lies about themselves to post on a web board?
How about you name some of those heinous crimes for us.
Honestly, how garbage like this gets modded up...
Crimes committed with your passport. What a colossally silly thing to attempt to sell to people. You're as bad as the "terrorists are everywhere" scaremongers, but at least they're mildly entertaining.
"when it's nothing to me."
And yet you've done it a half dozen times already.
If something is nothing, people don't spend as much time as you have proclaiming it. Meknows thou dost protest too much.
Loser.
Are you STILL at it? And here you were protesting that you had things to do and this was a "diversion".
Your life must be pretty meaningless if THAT's how you spend your spare time.
God what a loser.
As to your posting, we both know I never said posting here was bad. I said that posting here as a pathetic replacement for real world interaction was bad. Sad that you need to make up an excuse like you've been holed up "waiting on other things" (bullshit). And I've posted, oh 6 or seven times I think. The fact that you continue to repsond to it means that particular criticism hits home. And you know it. That makes me happy, knowing I got the best of you again.
You're approaching 30 posts. Today. And that's normal for you. I guess the concept of proportionality is too much for you to grasp...
In short, you're a bigoted, homophobic, loser who takes out his anger on those who point out his flaws to him.
As to "kicking" me, that's the funniest thing I've read in months. Maybe you should focus on "kicking" your Slashdot habit you sad little fuck. What a hilarious attempt to act hard, when we both know you're a sad little powerless geek acting out. How can you kick me with your foot in your mouth?
And I'm the troll. Meanwhile, you've spent an entire day calling me a "Gay Republican pedophile". Who's the troll again? Right. I win again you fucking hypocrite.
How sad and empty is your life that you have time to spout crap like this, and TAKE IT SERIOUSLY?
God, you're such a douche, I have a hard time not feeling pity for you.
Get a life guy, or shut up. You've embarassed yourself more than you could possibly know.
I mean fuck man, you spent the whole morning jamming your idiotic opinion down our throats, only to top it off with bigotry. I don't kow what you have a against gays, but it looks exactly lkike what people do when they're secretly gay and hate others because of it. Is that why you're a homophobe? Is that why you had to slam gays so much? I really had no idea you were a gay basher until today.
What a fucking loser.