Mod me 'flamebait' if you will, but you're a fucking idiot. I had to check your history just to see if you were a troll. Nope. Just a red-blooded moron.
From the slightly re-worded ann coulter quote to the overwhelming logistical failings (False dichotomy, appeal to fear, appeal to probability, appeal to the majority, ad hominem attacks, etc.) you got it all.
I'm bookmarking this for later cut-and-paste trolling. Thanks.
Two years ago, I was using a Dell laptop running ubuntu linux. I let my small, impalsyed child play a game of Tux Racer. To my horror, the laptop's battery exploded, killing my child to death in front of my eyes.
People say that linux is ready for the desktop, but when is it ready to stop killing children?
No, as the name says, Windows Is Not a (CPU) Emulator. Windows just provides the Windows API. This means that you will need an x86-compatible processor to run an x86 Windows application, for instance from Intel. The advantage is that, unlike solutions that rely on CPU emulation, Windows runs applications at full speed. Sometimes a program run under Windows will be slower than when run on a copy of OS X, but this is more due to the fact that Apple has heavily optimized parts of their code, whereas mostly Windows is not well optimized (yet). Occasionally, an app may run faster under Windows than on OS X. Most apps run at roughly the same speed.
No one is censoring him. Colbert is perfectly free to start his own online encyclopedia with its own rules the way he wants it. Save the censor term for real censorship (i.e. when the inevitable evil mod MODS ME DOWN!)
No one would be censoring you. You are perfectly free to start your own discussion website and run it the way you'd like it.
Also, a complaint about how you'll be modded down is second only to the 'typical slashbot' karma whoring technique.
Yeah, I've never heard anything good about bouncers, or met a nice one either, they seem to be on equal footing with the police, mentality-wise, and since they're "security" (note the scare quotes) their words tends to get more weight then they should.
I've heard of situations were people have tried to "take back" shows from bouncers, and streets from cops, but they always end up as some sort of shitty gang that's worse then the what was there before.
Because the parents of said kids will then instigate a suit against the 'fucking people' for harassing thier kids.
Oh, and their parents could shoot them? There's a chance isn't there?
The big failing in this 'fucking issue' is the community at large. The police even showing up is too big a response. How hard would of it even been to even pull over and even let them know that you're calling the police? The kids woulda ran, and they wouldn't have ended up in a goddamn holding cell. Hey, here's an idea, since they lived nearby, how about you TALK TO THEIR FUCKING PARENTS? Or, better yet, let them build a goddamned fort!
It seems now a days that whenever a so called "problem" shows up, people go out of their way to respond in the biggest possible way, and it ends up creating a bigger pile of bullshit to slosh through then if you dealt with it directly.
I believe it's because humans are purportedly made in god's own image, which is, of course, perfect. God's image has always been perfect, and will always be perfect. The idea of any sort of evolution suggests improvement to this design, and that idea would be treated as blasphemy. Even more, to suggest that we are decended from any sort of perjoratively percived lower life form, such as an ape or, worse, some sort or primordial ooze, would be heresy.
my question is to help me out getting to the cbs soap operas as the guiding light as the world turns ok since its computer thing looks like that i could go at start of these two soap operas and watch them when they first started on cbs tv i mean watch them over from the very start.
Wtf? On/. a post like this wouldn't even be worth a -1 Offtopic mod point.
It'd get -1 Redundant as it was actually an "Ask Slashdot" from earlier in the week.
Most books are good--if they weren't, they wouldn't be published.
I disagree. Perhaps you've been unable to frequent a bookstore as of late. Find any book by L. Ron Hubbard, open it up to any page you wish, and gasp in horror. If you still remain unconvinced I implore you to inspect the contents of any celebrity written book, and hopefully you will find one that isn't ghost-written. Also, feel free to check out any of the ego massaging political books with titles such as "Lying Liberals and the Obease Conservative that Eat Them".
Many books, and I'd say most books, are published because publishing houses need to make money, and not because the books are good, which leads me to your next comment...
You want to make money? Find an acceptable product or well known name and shove it down America's throat.
Instant cash.
Which is a sentiment I totally agree with. Harry Potter anyone? Oh, my, did I touch a nerve?...
Wow,like regular smart-asses aren't enough, I can look foward to dealing with ones that can look up an infinite amount of information instantly.
We'll see how your cybernetic brain handles a blast from my HERF gun, smartass.
Also, they talked about the so called singularity being somewhat close to wikipedia, with a great sharing of information. Does this mean pointless collective arguments about whether or not some fact is worth remembering? Can I change hack in and change your memory of the image of you mom into goaste?
Considering that the FBI only has about half that amount of agents, he'd be hard pressed to.
But I will overlook your misinformed post, and, for the sake of portraying a balanced picture of slashdot, will now take the opportunity to thank the other 28,000 slashdot posters who post factual information.
1. Intel Macs suck. Its the same OS. What difference does the hardware make? And if you've actually USED an Intel mac, you know how much amazingly faster they are than the PPC machines they replaced.
Well, some people are a little touchy about endianness among other things. It can be a little frustrating when you extoll the virtues of the PPC in the mac compared to intels 'crap', then Apple switches and you're left with your foot in your mouth.
Please direct us to the paragraph where Wikipedia policy states that the truth is democratic; because last time I checked WP policy reaffirmed that it is not.
I changed wikipedia policy to state that, but a large group of assholes kept changing it back.
Slashdot Mirror
counter-clockwise!
From the slightly re-worded ann coulter quote to the overwhelming logistical failings (False dichotomy, appeal to fear, appeal to probability, appeal to the majority, ad hominem attacks, etc.) you got it all.
I'm bookmarking this for later cut-and-paste trolling. Thanks.
And that means buttsex.
Why?
People say that linux is ready for the desktop, but when is it ready to stop killing children?
No, as the name says, Windows Is Not a (CPU) Emulator. Windows just provides the Windows API. This means that you will need an x86-compatible processor to run an x86 Windows application, for instance from Intel. The advantage is that, unlike solutions that rely on CPU emulation, Windows runs applications at full speed. Sometimes a program run under Windows will be slower than when run on a copy of OS X, but this is more due to the fact that Apple has heavily optimized parts of their code, whereas mostly Windows is not well optimized (yet). Occasionally, an app may run faster under Windows than on OS X. Most apps run at roughly the same speed.
A little slow... you must not be using an intel one.
I've never seen so many trolls in my life!
No one would be censoring you. You are perfectly free to start your own discussion website and run it the way you'd like it.
Also, a complaint about how you'll be modded down is second only to the 'typical slashbot' karma whoring technique.
I've heard of situations were people have tried to "take back" shows from bouncers, and streets from cops, but they always end up as some sort of shitty gang that's worse then the what was there before.
Oh, and their parents could shoot them? There's a chance isn't there?
The big failing in this 'fucking issue' is the community at large. The police even showing up is too big a response. How hard would of it even been to even pull over and even let them know that you're calling the police? The kids woulda ran, and they wouldn't have ended up in a goddamn holding cell. Hey, here's an idea, since they lived nearby, how about you TALK TO THEIR FUCKING PARENTS? Or, better yet, let them build a goddamned fort!
It seems now a days that whenever a so called "problem" shows up, people go out of their way to respond in the biggest possible way, and it ends up creating a bigger pile of bullshit to slosh through then if you dealt with it directly.
Oh, no! Three twelve year olds having fun! I better call the fucking cops!
The people who called in are probably chatting with those kids' parents right now about how the police over-reacted.
Change my pitch up?
It's an ego trip, man. An ego trip.
I disagree. Perhaps you've been unable to frequent a bookstore as of late. Find any book by L. Ron Hubbard, open it up to any page you wish, and gasp in horror. If you still remain unconvinced I implore you to inspect the contents of any celebrity written book, and hopefully you will find one that isn't ghost-written. Also, feel free to check out any of the ego massaging political books with titles such as "Lying Liberals and the Obease Conservative that Eat Them".
Many books, and I'd say most books, are published because publishing houses need to make money, and not because the books are good, which leads me to your next comment...
You want to make money? Find an acceptable product or well known name and shove it down America's throat. Instant cash.
Which is a sentiment I totally agree with. Harry Potter anyone? Oh, my, did I touch a nerve?...
We'll see how your cybernetic brain handles a blast from my HERF gun, smartass.
Also, they talked about the so called singularity being somewhat close to wikipedia, with a great sharing of information. Does this mean pointless collective arguments about whether or not some fact is worth remembering? Can I change hack in and change your memory of the image of you mom into goaste?
But I will overlook your misinformed post, and, for the sake of portraying a balanced picture of slashdot, will now take the opportunity to thank the other 28,000 slashdot posters who post factual information.
Well, some people are a little touchy about endianness among other things. It can be a little frustrating when you extoll the virtues of the PPC in the mac compared to intels 'crap', then Apple switches and you're left with your foot in your mouth.
I changed wikipedia policy to state that, but a large group of assholes kept changing it back.
Now I'm all for it!
An infertile couple having a biological child is like a bald man wearing a toupee. Not similar inasmuch as the result, but synonymic in intent.
I want same-sex couples to be able to have children by accident. We'll see how they like then.
Or he's trolling. Which one do you think is most likely?
The best part is that this goatse has two asses!