Slashdot Mirror


User: TaoPhoenix

TaoPhoenix's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,352
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,352

  1. Re:Police part 2 on Warrantless GPS Tracking Is Legal, Says WI Court · · Score: 1

    Not that either. "Disclosing whereabouts of officers would endanger enforcement".

    Nice pair of venting posts though.

  2. Re:Police on Warrantless GPS Tracking Is Legal, Says WI Court · · Score: 1

    Don't presume that just yet.

    We have 8 years worth of "the police can do anything - no one else can mirror their stunts."

  3. Re:Why not? on Bloggers Impacting the World of Litigation · · Score: 1

    Why is the acronym necessary at all? We're all "just posters" unless positively identified with a stronger qualification. Every post is Caveat Lector, all the way from Rick to the just-barely-wrong posts.

    It's a scary tossup between the self-deprecation, and the Freudian sight-gag. If I had to pin it down, I'd blame Nixon's "I Am Not A Crook".

  4. Re:Obligatory on Phony Wikipedia Entry Used By Worldwide Press · · Score: 1

    In Nazi Australia, the revisionist-history Samurai Shoguns offer you tea!

  5. Re: Contracts! on New Irish Internet Tax? · · Score: 1

    (Smoky Bar Table)
    "I'll see yer offer, acceptance, consideration, and raise you Capacity & Legality!"
    (/Smoky Bar Table)

    Normally those were the elements I ignored when advising bosses, but they're scarily relevant here.

  6. Re:Fooled on Duke Nukem For Never · · Score: 1

    I'll riff your theme.

    Wouldn't it be great if SOMEONE turned around and released it. The PHB types would be crushed. "We TRIED to kill it! We trashed the company! We laid off everyone. We closed the company. Now we're trying to collect our Short Sells. Where the HELL did the gamecome from???"

  7. Re: Funds! on Duke Nukem For Never · · Score: 1

    They're all out of Funds,
    and so lost without them,
    they can't even make
    a freeware Duke Nukem...

    (With apologies to the 80's)

  8. Re: Addendum on Phony Wikipedia Entry Used By Worldwide Press · · Score: 1

    (~ LayeredTone)

    Nope. No addendum for you. I already used you for 1,000 citations, in your original erroneous post, so it's now too much trouble to reverse them all.
    (/~ LayeredTone)

    More soberly, I think you yourself just proved an important part. Wiki's famous policy *politely* calls "Original Research" to give itself the authority to reverse the most outlandish rumors/gossip/mayhem. I'd really like a feature here for "MySlashdot" to RightClick/MakeTrollInvisible instead of being "held captive" with it still being present at -1. One step away from the famous bathroom posts, is the whole swath of quasi-benevolent stuff that kicks around for 7 posts until someone finally piledrives it with a +7 refutation.

    But the "honest case" means that either we drag ourselves into documenting every word ever, or sometimes we quit at the "good enough" stage, until for one particular famous case it is not Good Enough.

    Oh see, now I have to Cite something. Here's one of the piledriver ThreadEnder Informative posts below me.

    by phantomfive (622387) Alter Relationship on Thursday May 07, @12:54AM (#27855769) Homepage Journal

  9. Re:Soviet Batcave on Robots Take To the Stairs · · Score: 1

    Rule 34 FTW!

  10. Re:Drunk Robots on Robots Take To the Stairs · · Score: 1
  11. Re: RTFA on Wolfram Alpha vs. Google — Results Vary · · Score: 1

    I'll reply to you.

    I want a search engine for people who *DO* RTFA's.

    Standard engines give you SEO'd junk.

  12. Re:Look like a ... on Google Mows With Goats · · Score: 1

    If you'd said "look like a goat" you'd be at +5.

  13. Re:MultiQ posts on Why Text Messages Are Limited To 160 Characters · · Score: 1

    Or this trick:
    "1. Do you think we should discuss MS's trashing of ODF?
      2. Do you think OOXML is a viable standard?"

    Reply comes back as a single yes or no.

  14. Re:Standardization on Can the New Digital Readers Save the Newspapers? · · Score: 1

    Hardhack in Adblock!

  15. Re: Book (Not-Equal) Newspaper on Can the New Digital Readers Save the Newspapers? · · Score: 1

    Books present a coherent argument.

    Newspapers would be WAY faster if you clicked a link "to read more" rather than following from A3 to C7.

  16. Re: Tree Editions on Can the New Digital Readers Save the Newspapers? · · Score: 3, Informative

    I like my little library inprint edition. It nicely displays color and utility on my shelf.

    But newspapers are a print disaster. Floppy, yucky layouts full of miscellanea on skip-pages, sorted by day instead of topic....Then you get to throw out a metric ton each month.

    I'd seriously consider one of those readers if it kept all the dailies on tap so if you wanted to review your notes you could turn back to October 2004.

  17. Re:Accomplish on White House Joins Facebook, MySpace, Twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    NewsSnips can potentially revolutionize govt.

    Normally Govt is "closed door/access only".

    But it would be funny if they didn't lock it down to start.

    "Republicans Filibustering."

    "Republicans Still Filibustering."

  18. Re: Trolling on Disney-Hulu Deal Is Ominous For YouTube · · Score: 1

    You're playing InternetGo with him, and you can't decide whether his stonegroup or yours is the one that lives.

  19. Re: QuickPayoff on Treating the Web As an Archive · · Score: 1

    Yessiree.

    Because Today's +1Informative mods STAY even after tomorrow's "retraction article" which says "disregard yestrerday, it was all made up by the source."

    Blending content here AttemptingAWin, Rotten Tomatoes has a recap of Marvel movies. Look at the entry for Ghost Rider.

    "...like Daredevil, Ghost Rider went down as a critical dud whose respectable performance at the box office was overshadowed by the beating it took from writers"

    Really now!? So the public liked the movies, while certain pundits playing their own game were paid to kill the movie if they could?

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/xmen/news/1817540/total_recall_marvel_comics_movies_worst_to_best

    We see the Wins from short-term stylings. We need something profound that really rewards longevity.

  20. Re:In China on No Russian Operating System, At Least For Now · · Score: 1

    They feel they owe you no respect for your comment, and so I will copy it for you to eleven other sites.

  21. Re:1972 on Microchips That Shook the World · · Score: 1

    Oh my word, that was amazing.

    Can I cut your lawn now?

  22. Re:Beature Fug on Controversial Web "Framing" Makes a Comeback · · Score: 1

    So what is an unintended desirable behavior?

    Programmer & ContentGuy: "This Bug Sux!"
    Marketing PHB: "That's great for me!"

  23. Re: Domo Arigato on Parrots Can Dance · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are the Modern Web (secret secret)
    With YRO instead (secret secret)
    Housed in FBI DB's (secret secret)
    That no one else can see!

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/01/1247258

    or, +1 Chuck Finale with mockband Jeffster!

  24. Re: Orions on Klingons Cut From Final Star Trek XI Movie · · Score: 1

    I heard that they were some PHB at NBC's idea, and that they were dispensed with when possible later. ...

    I almost need a new sig. Comments like that are Quantum for me. They are either true or false, and I won't know since I don't have the time to look it up in detail.

  25. Re:Perhaps you are an avatar on Can Avatars Make Contracts? · · Score: 1

    +1 Android Sisters from Ruby the Galactic Gumshoe.