Slashdot Mirror


Google Mows With Goats

Kelson writes "Google's Mountain View headquarters has fields that need to be kept clear of fire hazards. This year instead of mowing them, they took a low-carbon approach: they hired a herd of goats to eat the grass for a week. 'It costs us about the same as mowing, and goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers,' wrote Dan Hoffman."

466 comments

  1. A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 0, Troll

    There may be an inside goat.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Wow. That might actually be worse than a GNAA troll first post.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by tsa · · Score: 1

      Wow what an amazing feat of Photoshopping.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Parent post is actually rather funny! :D

      Aside from lower CO2 emission, there will be a higher methane emission, but I'm sure that goats are still a good alternative.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by leprkhn · · Score: 1

      Silly nerd, goats don't throw chairs.

    5. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 1

      Ok all the methane comments, seriously, these Goats were not bread for google, and will not die without it, thus the methane they produce would have been produced no matter what. In other words, until they make it to my plate, they are gonna sh!t somewhere.

    6. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, they weren't bread for Google.

    7. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by Starayo · · Score: 1

      It's shopped? :O

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by doom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if people start breeding goats to act as lawnmowers, then the increased methane production needs to be thought about.

      Ditto bio-diesel vehicles... if you're a symbiotic user of waste from fast food restaurants, you're being green, if you're encouraging Big Corn to convert food into fuel for you, then you're not.

      (You want a truly green solution to the lawn mowing problem? Stop mowing lawns.)

    9. Re:A Word of Warning to Larry and Sergey ... by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 1

      You have won this round, Anonymous Coward.

      *Shakes Fist*

  2. Here we go! by Q-Hack! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Que obligitory Goatse.cx joke in 3... 2... 1...

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    1. Re:Here we go! by D+Ninja · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, please don't start that. All that stuff is just baaaaaaad.

      Alright. Sorry for the stupid joke. I'm feeling a bit sheepish now.

      Okay. Seriously. I'm done ramming these jokes down your throat.

      What? Don't be angry. You're just mad I got this in before ewe.

    2. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine beowolf cluster of it.... Wait a minute.. NO!

    3. Re:Here we go! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cue someone pointing out to you that you spelled "cue" wrong and that the other spelling is "queue" in 3...2...1...

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:Here we go! by e4g4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Qué?

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Here we go! by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      These jokes really get my goat.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cute, but every one of those is a sheep joke.

    7. Re:Here we go! by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      A Beowulf cluster of goatse...

      (Edvard Munch's "The Scream" would be a fitting reaction)

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    8. Re:Here we go! by NoStrings · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's no pulling the wool over your eyes!

    9. Re:Here we go! by zrobotics · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're going to be a grammar Nazi, at least try to be an effective one. 'Queue' means line up, cue means "An action or event that is a signal for somebody to do something". Therefore, cue is the proper term here, he just misspelled it. You, on the other hand, managed to make yourself look like a jackass. Way to go man, way to go...

    10. Re:Here we go! by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed at the shear blatentess of your puns.

    11. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Relax, he was just kidding.

    12. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tee hee!

    13. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to be a grammar Nazi, at least try to be an effective one. 'Queue' means line up, cue means "An action or event that is a signal for somebody to do something". Therefore, cue is the proper term here, he just misspelled it. You, on the other hand, managed to make yourself look like a jackass. Way to go man, way to go...

      In addition to being a jackass, the GP should hand in his geek card for not knowing the meaning of queue, as in queues and stacks.

    14. Re:Here we go! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're just going to keep milking this one, aren't we?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    15. Re:Here we go! by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      This post was brought to you by WOOSH!

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    16. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor the angora!

    17. Re:Here we go! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know exactly what a queue is. The OP had obviously just combined the two different spellings to make a nonexistent word. My purpose in mentioning the homophone, "queue," was to point out to him that "que" is not the proper way to spell either meaning of the word. To say that I don't know what it means is both presumptive and idiotic.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    18. Re:Here we go! by GuineaPigMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      They must have switched to goats after the GNU Hurd ran away...

    19. Re:Here we go! by S-100 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shoulda spelled it quewe

    20. Re:Here we go! by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      I would like to spend a couple minutes pissing in your coffee by pointing out that goats are not the same thing as sheep.

    21. Re:Here we go! by weirdo557 · · Score: 2, Funny

      it behooves us to stop making these jokes

    22. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you bleating about?

    23. Re:Here we go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apparently your command of grammar and usage isn't very good, since "Cue someone pointing out to you that you spelled "cue" wrong and that the other spelling is "queue" in 3...2...1..." means, basically, to beckon or prompt someone who is already "pointing out", etc, but you fail to mention what you'd further cue them to do.

      Proper use would be "Cue someone to point that you spelled "cue" wrong and that the other spelling is "queue" in 3...2...1...".

      HTH. HAND. Asshole.

    24. Re:Here we go! by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      *Whoosh*

    25. Re:Here we go! by Tailsfan · · Score: 1

      At least there not mowing with goatse. thats more of a donkeys thing to do. get it donkey ass...

    26. Re:Here we go! by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what a queue is. The OP had obviously just combined the two different spellings to make a nonexistent word. My purpose in mentioning the homophone, "queue," was to point out to him that "que" is not the proper way to spell either meaning of the word. To say that I don't know what it means is both presumptive and idiotic.

      Good thing he wasn't talking about the homophobe of queue. That could've gotten interesting when Jessi Jaxon and the GNAA burst into /.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    27. Re:Here we go! by mrogers · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, sooner or later that would get cheesy.

    28. Re:Here we go! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Google thinks the goats are queuet.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    29. Re:Here we go! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Que obligitory Goatse.cx joke in 3... 2... 1...

      200 cute goats and Goatse.cx? What sort of joke could you make from that?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    30. Re:Here we go! by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      You got the wrong animal there, buddy :|

  3. Whatever by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I use penguins to keep my servers cool. Seriously. It works.

    1. Re:Whatever by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, I use cats to hunt down bugs in my software.

    2. Re:Whatever by yumyum · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do you keep them from eating your mice?!

    3. Re:Whatever by TinBromide · · Score: 5, Funny

      watch dog protocols.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    4. Re:Whatever by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Funny

      Doesn't the melted chocolate make the servers sticky?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    5. Re:Whatever by mrdoogee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Awesome reference. Unfortunately the humour has been mostly lost on the Yanks.

      I likes the mint ones.

    6. Re:Whatever by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      Me too. In unrelated news, my internet/funny_images directory has no bugs in it whatsoever.

    7. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CATS: All your bugs are belong to us.

    8. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      maybe he works at some large, unnamed software company that provides enough bugs to keep the cats full ?

    9. Re:Whatever by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      I use dark sunglasses and ZZ Top.

      Reallll Cool.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    10. Re:Whatever by supermeerkat · · Score: 0

      He keeps them in their wrappers, of course.

    11. Re:Whatever by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      C:\Spot\Run?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    12. Re:Whatever by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Also, I use cats to hunt down bugs in my software.

      Chickens are better for that. I use chickens to hunt down web bugs, too.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    13. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C:\DOS>
      C:\DOS>run
      Run, DOS, Run!

    14. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not

      G:\Spot\Massage?

      Wait, that will cause them to overheat instead.

    15. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if it catches fire the'll have plenty of goat barbecue! Yummy!

    16. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much more carbon it took to move the goats to the field and then move than back than it did to just mow the field.

  4. MORE Outsourcing!! by tritonman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now they are outsourceing our jobs that usually get outsourced to illegals to animals!!

    1. Re:MORE Outsourcing!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there are some illegal immigrants that are willing to eat grass for money.

    2. Re:MORE Outsourcing!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well don't you feel like mister important now. I'm a goat and I got your job. BAAAAAHAAAHAAAHA

    3. Re:MORE Outsourcing!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd like a job securing gasoline for lawnmowers, you're welcome to sign up.

    4. Re:MORE Outsourcing!! by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      me also tambien ofended sir. porqueue?!

  5. Excuse Me But... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Excuse me but, don't goats emit carbon in the form of CO2 just by breathing - and methane by farting?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Excuse Me But... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Funny

      But, they taste better than lawnmowers...

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Excuse Me But... by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but there are other benefits aside from the obvious jokes about Goatse-eing:

      1. Milk

      2. Meat: tasty, tasty murder.

      3. Less fossil fuel burning.

      *shrug*, it's hip to be green.

    3. Re:Excuse Me But... by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but they use quite a bit of carbon making more goat mass. What do you think goats are made of?

      They just need to sequester the goats in a salt mine or something once they reach a certain size.

    4. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Net-zero carbon output. Fossil fuels release CO2 that has been trapped for quite some time. Goats are releasing CO2/methane that was recently stored as energy in grass.

    5. Re:Excuse Me But... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Goats are made of food, just like cows, chickens, sheep, and pigs :)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:Excuse Me But... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Excuse me but, don't goats emit carbon in the form of CO2 just by breathing - and methane by farting?

      All of the carbon they emit is initially gained through eating grass. If you mow with a powered machine, all of the grass's carbon will end up back in the atmosphere through decay, and you also free carbon that was trapped in liquid form (oil) to the atmosphere. The goats are carbon neutral.

      That said, I'm surprised it worked. I once got a goat to eat the grass on a hill I needed mowed, but it refused to eat the grass. It preferred pieces of metal and fence posts to grass. What it really wanted was its expensive goat chow, though. Maybe we spoiled him.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    7. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grass will be converted into carbon either way:
      Outside the goat through composting via macro-organisms or inside the goat

      Inside the goat, the energy can be captured and transformed into meat and milk.

    8. Re:Excuse Me But... by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Are you under the impression that the goats would have otherwise not breathed and farted** if they hadn't been used to trim the lawn? I assume they're being used for milk and/or hair in addition to grazing services; it'd be a waste not to. Or they could be males left over from breeding for milk-producing goats.

      ** -- Ruminant methane emissions are primarily through "belching" rather than flatus. Belching in quotes, as that's not exactly what happens; they transfer the bolus (cud) back and forth between the mouth and rumen. It is in the rumen that this methane is primarily produced, and it gets released in the mouth. Most of the remaining emissions come mainly from the decomposion of the manure. Flatus is only a small portion of their total methane emissions.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    9. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is that they emit roughly the same methane (maybe even less) as the rotting grass clippings a mower would leave behind, but exhale a tiny amount of co2 compared to a tractor burning a few days worth of a diesel. Plus they fertilize the field a little bit, whereas a mower either carries a lot of nutrients away in the form of bagged clippings, or deposits the clippings on the ground whole where they cause problems nicely digested goat poop doesn't.

      Whether that actually pencils out in reality - I have no idea.

    10. Re:Excuse Me But... by wjousts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you ever tried to milk a lawnmower?

    11. Re:Excuse Me But... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stupid shit like this makes me homicidal. Do you really think that the ~.9kg of CO2 a goat exhales per day is going to cause an eco-catastrophe? Contrast that to the gas and energy that go into an industrial lawnmower, and there is no comparison.

      Goats create CO2 as a waste product from their O2 burning lifestyles...Just like us. Where does that C come from? Goats may eat a chunk of coal every now and again, but that's not really their primary source of carbon. They get their carbon from plant matter. They eat it, digest it, and crap most of it out as fertilizer.

      That's what they call "carbon-neutral": they use "free" carbon, that isn't buried in the earth, and they produce fertilizer that increases the growth of other carbon-absorbing plants.

      As for methane, who gives a shit? It's got a short shelf-life. Methane drops out of the atmosphere in a mere decade, as opposed to C02, which can hang around forever.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    12. Re:Excuse Me But... by mariushm · · Score: 1

      They would either way, eating straw or other stuff, so why not make them do something good as long as they don't do anything besides farting and breathing?

    13. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goats don't release fossilized carbon like gasoline powered lawnmowers do. Petrocarbons are the primary worry with respect to atmospheric carbon dioxide.

    14. Re:Excuse Me But... by neoform · · Score: 0

      What about the trucks that transport the goats to the field?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    15. Re:Excuse Me But... by xgr3gx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah - curried lawnmower is awful.

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    16. Re:Excuse Me But... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      As for methane, who gives a shit? It's got a short shelf-life. Methane drops out of the atmosphere in a mere decade, as opposed to C02, which can hang around forever.

      CO2 can't hang around forever because plants absorb it like crazy and it reacts readily in high-temperature carbon-needing reactions. Of course, the only natural source of those reactions happens to be molten metal from volcanoes, which releases tons more CO2, so that's kind of moot.

    17. Re:Excuse Me But... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You sound like you have never licked a clean lawnmower...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:Excuse Me But... by Arthur+B. · · Score: 5, Funny

      I learned something today !

      My plan to make a cow-dragon is now one step closer to reality.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    19. Re:Excuse Me But... by Walkingshark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same as the trucks that transport the lawnmowers to the field.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    20. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are considered neutral. One, because they would be emitting methane anyways. Two, the decomposition of the cut grass would emit that methane as well.

    21. Re:Excuse Me But... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      It's net-zero carbon output, but not net-zero effect on global warming: methane is a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, and a number of animals do quite a bit of conversion of plant carbon to methane. This is a main reason that the meat industry has a non-negligible effect on global warming.

    22. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      This is true, unless the goats are nearby and can be walked there, or the truck is diesel and runs on biodiesel.

    23. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the lawnmowers being carried there by magical pixies?

    24. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. A better solution would be electric mower robots http://www.friendlyrobotics.com/ charged from solar (or other low/zero-carbon energy source). Or no grass at all.

    25. Re:Excuse Me But... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Informative

      That said, I'm surprised it worked. I once got a goat to eat the grass on a hill I needed mowed, but it refused to eat the grass. It preferred pieces of metal and fence posts to grass. What it really wanted was its expensive goat chow, though. Maybe we spoiled him.

      Goats are browsers, not grazers. They'll eat grass, but typically prefer only the tender bits. That said, hunger works charmingly -- if you'd held out on the kibble for a couple days, it probably would have started on the grass.

      If you really want to use ruminants to mow for you, sheep are a much better choice than goats. Though more annoying to deal with, IMO.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    26. Re:Excuse Me But... by TinBromide · · Score: 5, Funny

      it does have a fuel nipple, and you can milk anything with a nipple.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    27. Re:Excuse Me But... by shentino · · Score: 1

      We are at least talking about females I hope...

    28. Re:Excuse Me But... by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      > The goats are carbon neutral.

      What about the carbon goats emit in the form of fecal matter? And don't tell me someone pooper-scoopers the whole hill collecting all of it to turn into ethanol.
      The carbon they don't emit as feces is stored until the goat itself dies.

      So really you only gain the burning oil factor vs the lawnmowers anyway.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    29. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhhhh!!!! Don't tell the Greenies, they'll wanna ban living next. Living pollutes the Earth - Kill'em all.

      You know, it seems that Greenies seem to be forgetting that it's a cycle - Animal Poo and CO2 is good for plants it makes them grow. NASA said that the biosphere has gotten larger. You know why? More sunlight and carbon dioxide makes plants grow.

      I'm sorry if that's an "inconvenient truth" but all this make Al Gore, GE, and the Feds billions by creating a FAKE carbon economy has just got me floored. Think about this 1 Trillion in spending, 300 million Americans = what 3 million dollars per person? Where's my millions? Aren't they happy with all that money now they want cap and trade too.

    30. Re:Excuse Me But... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      In my old town in Southern Oregon, they used goats along the sides of highways to keep down the noxious weeds,and fire hazard. it was something like $2.50/goat/day. They would put up an electric fence 2 miles long along the highway, let a bunch of goats off at one end, then pick them up at the other end a few days later.. Worked pretty good.. Mowing doesn't cut some of the noxious weeds low enough to kill them off. The goats ate them down to nothing..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    31. Re:Excuse Me But... by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, it seems like the only truly "green" thing to do is simply pave over the entire property for zero carbon emission maintenance! Let's hear it for concrete and astroturf, your only rational choice for a "green" lawn! Gets rid of pesky gophers and moles once and for all! You can even park your car on it! No mowing or herbivores required!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    32. Re:Excuse Me But... by Gary+van+der+Merwe · · Score: 3, Funny

      All the RAMs have all ready been used in servers...

    33. Re:Excuse Me But... by Rip+Dick · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about CO2?

    34. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could you milk me?

    35. Re:Excuse Me But... by Foolicious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes - that's how I got my nickname: Lefty.

      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    36. Re:Excuse Me But... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it really didn't like it, and wasn't as erotic as it sounds.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    37. Re:Excuse Me But... by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      It's net-zero carbon output, but not net-zero effect on global warming: methane is a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, and a number of animals do quite a bit of conversion of plant carbon to methane. This is a main reason that the meat industry has a non-negligible effect on global warming.

      Is it clear that these goats produce any significant amount of methane? The meat industry uses cattle (not goats), specifically bred to grow quickly on god-knows-what they feed them (sure isn't anything like the vegetation around Google HQ).

    38. Re:Excuse Me But... by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but, don't goats emit carbon in the form of CO2 just by breathing - and methane by farting?

      True, but arguably in this case they'd still be doing that anyway. So they're not adding any more carbon unless grass-fed farts are somehow more carbon-rich than goat-food farts. :)

    39. Re:Excuse Me But... by mrdoogee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congratulations, you just helped me name my new band.

      Watch for the hit new album from
      "Goat Mass"
      called
      "sequestered in a salt mine"

    40. Re:Excuse Me But... by mrdoogee · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you use cows to carry the goats to the field, and you get Gorillas to herd the cattle, then winter comes and the Gorillas freeze to death.

      Circle of life.

    41. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, they taste better than lawnmowers...

      You've obviously never eaten adult goat.

    42. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to use ruminants to mow for you, sheep are a much better choice than goats.

      Not just for mowing, if you know what I mean heh heh heh.

    43. Re:Excuse Me But... by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to milk a goat?

    44. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly they do. But they are getting it from stuff that would have rotted when the grass died anyway. It would be an interesting calculation to determine whether what the goats produce is more or less than lawn mowers (goats do the job slower, but over a longer period of time), but I'm going with the goats. Plus they have the added bonus of producing something useful *and* they fertilize the lawn. Lawnmowers are putting old, stored carbon into the atmosphere, while the goats are just moving the surface stuff around.

      Of course, the ultimate is simply to get rid of grass that needs to be mowed. My lawn shrinks a little every year. Some by intended replacement of grass with ornamental rocks and low native, dry-resistant plants, some grass is lost by attrition as I fail to fertilize, water, or adequately mow it with my push-mower (then I replace the dead grass). In my yard the rule for grass is simple: "survive despite neglect" or it's gone. It gets a little closer to carbon and energy-neutral every year.

      And, no, I don't particularly care what my neighbors think of it. It isn't *that* messy anyway, just different from the usual boring, green, highly-fertilized and watered carpet. It's more like a yard-sized pseudo-natural garden requiring less maintenance every year. The birds especially seem to like it.

    45. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh wow, show casing poor reasoning skills I see.
      First the major blunder, I really don't think the methane dropping out of the atmosphere a couple years after we've fried the planet really matters. In the short term methane still contributes to the greenhouse gasses that are supposedly heating up the earth. (Not saying they aren't just that this is our current understanding.) Not only should we be cutting down our emissions of CO2 but also other gases that contribute.

      And the minor blunder: Nothing is every truly carbon neutral. Just like there is no such thing as free energy. The CO2 gets converted and used in the goats system just like it does in plants. Most of it even ends up being emitted into the air but others get buried into soil and still others fed to other animals. Nothing is carbon Neutral, it is is just a fancy word for saying we don't want to truly think about where all the carbon goes but we think it isn't doing any harm.

    46. Re:Excuse Me But... by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the gas the mowers use themselves.

    47. Re:Excuse Me But... by nscott89 · · Score: 1

      But the goats are producing those byproducts regardless of whether they are eating your grass...

    48. Re:Excuse Me But... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      4. Free Manure?

    49. Re:Excuse Me But... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Like a Roomba for your lawn. I'd buy one

    50. Re:Excuse Me But... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not just for mowing, if you know what I mean heh heh heh.

      I *do* know what you mean!

      Goat hair (mohair) is terrible for making sweaters from unless you use a breed specifically bred for the purpose, and those breeds are even worse for mowing than the meat or dairy breeds.

      I'm so glad there is someone else on slashdot who understands the advantages of sheep over goats. You've really made my day.

      [rolls eyes]

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    51. Re:Excuse Me But... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      That said, most gas mowers are horribly inefficient. I can drive for many, many kilometres with the same amount of gas I use on my small lawn.

    52. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yeah, it seems like the only truly "green" thing to do is simply pave over the entire property

      Be sure to use pervious concrete for that. Otherwise you will have a surface water runoff problem.

    53. Re:Excuse Me But... by jhkoh · · Score: 1

      Except (I would guess) that the lawnmowers are transported a shorter distance than the goats. And (I would guess) the lawnmowers can be transported by fewer trucks. But (I would hope) Google has already calculated all of this before patting themselves on the back.

    54. Re:Excuse Me But... by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

      The guy who pushes the lawn mower farts too. I'm not sure what kind of gas comes out -- and I don't want to know -- but it sure is bad for my personal atmosphere.

    55. Re:Excuse Me But... by jeffshoaf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Milk a male goat and make a friend for life!

      --
      Putting the "anal" back into "analyst"...
    56. Re:Excuse Me But... by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      Chickens work too.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    57. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Goats are browsers, not grazers."

      So that's what's in store for the next version of Chrome. Got it. (or, goat it?)

    58. Re:Excuse Me But... by luder · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you really want to use ruminants to mow for you, sheep are a much better choice than goats.

      Agreed, and then there's the associated pleasures that come with sheep, if ya know what I mean :-). Not that goats are bad, but it's a different stuff all together, though that also depends on your local climate, I guess...

    59. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure it has 5 asses.

    60. Re:Excuse Me But... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did I say that? I don't think I did. The parent was talking about CO2, so I talked about CO2. A facile statement like, "Oh noes, teh goats are going to breath us to death" deserves ridicule.

      I frankly don't have a anthropogenic climate change position; I don't think it's been discredited, and I don't think it's been proven. But if you're talking about CO2 production from a goat, vs CO2 production from an internal combustion engine, you're not making an apples to apples comparison. It's intellectually dishonest.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    61. Re:Excuse Me But... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? No they don't. Chickens can't digest cellulose, so they don't eat a large volume of plant fiber. They'll eat the seed heads, and they'll keep the bugs in check, but the only way they'll keep a lawn mowed is by tramping it down when you've got them overcrowded in an enclosure.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    62. Re:Excuse Me But... by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't be silly. Six minutes later he's back at the bar, and won't return your phone calls.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    63. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't get it. What has this anything to do with Manchester United?

    64. Re:Excuse Me But... by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

      The goats are carbon neutral.

      .... but they convert some carbon into methane, which is a much stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. I'd expect they'd still have less of an effect than lawnmowers, but has anyone actually done the math?

      --
      The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    65. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but probably not in the way you think.

    66. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CO2 is bad. There's also no data to support the common misconception that CO2 causes global warming.

      Fixed that for you.

    67. Re:Excuse Me But... by doti · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did once, when I was a child.
      Milked straight to a cup, then drank it warm.
      Delicious!

      Did the same with a cow some years later.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    68. Re:Excuse Me But... by IgLou · · Score: 1

      Ok for that comment I'm talking to the site admins to change your name to Greg Fokker.

      --

      Oops, how did this get here?
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    69. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but the grass converts CO2 to O2 just by being there and being green. So, getting rid of the grass causes more CO2 to stay in the area...

    70. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great. When can you start?

    71. Re:Excuse Me But... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      You still have to do something with the clippings, if you mulch them they are going to rot and release guess what....CO2 and methane. Its probably impractical for a device like you describe to collect all the clippings so you could then bury them, sequestering the carbon.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    72. Re:Excuse Me But... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      obama will address this by commissioning a new job position. goat fart lighter. creates jobs, saves the environment and will be damned funny to watch.

    73. Re:Excuse Me But... by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Sheep mow the grass much lower than cattle do. Not sure about goats. If they used sheep they'd have to be careful to avoid cutting the grass so short that turned brown and died. Google is in a semi-arid climate.

    74. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have nipples Greg, Could you milk me?

    75. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Why would you sequester the carbon? Grass grows, absorbs carbon. Grass gets cut, mulches, rots. Grass releases carbon. Hence, the carbon cycle. You're not *adding* additional carbon to the cycle, so it's ok.

    76. Re:Excuse Me But... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Methane might be a bit of an issue since it's quite a bit worse than CO2 as a greenhouse gas, but the CO2 was already sequestered by the grass the goats eat. So there's likely a net benefit. E.g. with a lawnmower you release CO2 trapped from eons ago, then let the grass decompose and release its CO2.

    77. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What, change his name from Horst Draper?

    78. Re:Excuse Me But... by mundanetechnomancer · · Score: 1

      they rented the goats, so the goats would have been alive and creating the methane output anyway, the goats were not created specifically for this task

    79. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I think mutton tastes a whole lot better than goat in a curry.

      That's what you meant, right?

    80. Re:Excuse Me But... by mundanetechnomancer · · Score: 2, Funny

      i would too, but i wonder if a "beware of lawnmower" sign would release you of liability if kids got in it's way

    81. Re:Excuse Me But... by earmouse · · Score: 1

      What about the fertilizer the goats will contribute?

    82. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      It has safeguards for obstacles, as well as an emergency immediate stop if it is lifted/tipped over.

    83. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ...and kindergarteners. Oh hell. Wrong forum. Sorry!

    84. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true but without Google hiring them they would eat and breath anyway. Now google using them, the world saves some fuel which would be used for mown machines.

    85. Re:Excuse Me But... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is off topic we are talking about Google not Net-Zero.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    86. Re:Excuse Me But... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's true. I'm not arguing Google actually did anything negative here. It was more pointing out that if hypothetically we all switched from mowing lawns to using goats to eat them (which likely would result in more goats being kept for that purpose), it might have negative effects. Then again, the positive effects might outweigh the negative ones.

    87. Re:Excuse Me But... by nsayer · · Score: 0

      If by "magical pixies" you really mean the gardner wheeling the mower the 15 feet from the shed to the edge of the field, then yes.

      By contrast, the goats must be either maintained on-site or transported back and forth. They cannot be stored in a shed between mowings.

    88. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      taste better than goats breath and farts?

    89. Re:Excuse Me But... by nsayer · · Score: 1

      But the trucks only have to transport the lawn mowers once, if they're stored in a shed near the field. By contrast, the goats must either be maintained on-site (which means fencing, veterinary care and lots of other stuff google is unlikely to be interested in providing), or transported back and forth when mowing is required.

      Oh, and there are such things as rechargeable battery operated mowers, by the way, just in case you're still fixated on the gasoline.

    90. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      And don't have emissions controls. Did you know a jet ski puts out more pollution in 1 hour of use than a car does over 100K miles? (This doesn't count CO2, just the pollutants that a car's emissions control system usually handles)

    91. Re:Excuse Me But... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but, don't goats emit carbon in the form of CO2 just by breathing - and methane by farting?

      None of which is "fossil carbon". They also make rather less noise than the average lawn mower (especially those with 2 stroke engines) and don't require constant human supervision. I've yet to see a lawn mower which can produce milk, meat and leather too :)

    92. Re:Excuse Me But... by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Why would you sequester the carbon?

      To make up for the carbon coming out of the tailpipe of the trucks moving the goats around, of course!

    93. Re:Excuse Me But... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      How about they just let the grass grow, dry out, get struck by lightning and cause a massive wildfire then. That won't release any `harmful and poisonous` CO2 will it.
      I'm sure Google paid a CO2 penance on the goats behalf on one of those ponzi outfits that accept `carbon credits`.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    94. Re:Excuse Me But... by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Or no grass at all.

      Nature abhors a vacuum. The only way for a patch of dirt to stay a patch of dirt is to use herbicides on it. Since the patch of dirt is going to grow things anyway, things which are far more likely than not to at least resemble grasses, you might as well plant grass on it.

      And if you really just have a patch of dirt and it is not perfectly flat, then it will erode, which causes all sorts of other problems I won't bother to detail here.

    95. Re:Excuse Me But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Of course, they are probably brought in and taken out by a truck.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    96. Re:Excuse Me But... by lupine · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the gas lawnmowers are much more polluting than the truck that hauls them.

      Gallon for gallon or, given the size of lawnmower tanks, quart for quart the 2006 lawn mower engines contribute 93 times more smog-forming emissions than 2006 cars, according to the California Air Resources Board. In California, lawn mowers provided more than 2 percent of the smog-forming pollution from all engines.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/24/us/24lawn.html

    97. Re:Excuse Me But... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and then there's the associated pleasures that come with sheep, if ya know what I mean :-).

      Please tell me you're talking about mutton!

    98. Re:Excuse Me But... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Until the farmer next door to the farmer that these goats were rented from increases the size of his heard so that he can rent out his goats too.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    99. Re:Excuse Me But... by lord_sarpedon · · Score: 1

      Here, take these pills.

      I'll come visit in a few weeks

      --
      "Strangers have the best candy" -Me
    100. Re:Excuse Me But... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    101. Re:Excuse Me But... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a TON of positive effects. No noisy lawnmowers waking me up on the weekend, no need for me to use a lawnmower, that's a big plus. It's safer, especially if you have a hilly spot of land. Lawnmowers rolling and flipping on to people is serious business, but I can't think of any way a goat rolling over due to a steep hill has ever killed anyone, or even seriously disfigured a foot. Much safer.

      The downside? Goats poop a lot, and have devil eyes.

      They do taste pretty good, though. If you cook 'em right.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    102. Re:Excuse Me But... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Goats are browsers

      So does it do better or worse than IE8 under the ACID3 test?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    103. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flatulence.... Goats produce far more methane which is worse than CO2. Goats also exhale CO2.

      The fun part will be keeping them in the field. Goats are great escape artists. Bring on the goatherds

    104. Re:Excuse Me But... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring more to the "special sauce".

    105. Re:Excuse Me But... by xelah · · Score: 1

      It's net-zero carbon output

      Grasslands can sequester carbon, IIRC by putting it in to soil. This article talks about the affect of grazing: http://www.international.inra.fr/press/positive_role_grasslands_carbon_storage . It looks like it's still a net sink, but only just and not everywhere and in every year.

    106. Re:Excuse Me But... by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      their nitrogen rich poo will burn out the gas if you let them park too long. And they will eat on occasional grass clipping.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    107. Re:Excuse Me But... by PhoenixWave · · Score: 1

      I have nipples, can you milk me?

    108. Re:Excuse Me But... by bigtangringo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uoYDsyxUi0

      I don't think they can eat exclusively grass, but they will certainly eat grass.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    109. Re:Excuse Me But... by hipifreq · · Score: 1

      Yes, goats emit CO2 just as would be emitted by lawnmowers.
      BUT
      CO2 emitted by goats is of the short carbon cycle variety: removed from and replaced to the atmosphere in a short time. No net longterm change in CO2 concentration.
      CO2 emitted by lawnmowers comes from carbon stored deep underground for millions of years.

      Just an aside, why doesn't the SUB tag work?

    110. Re:Excuse Me But... by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      True, they would have used more carbon-friendly gnus, but were afraid of RMS starting a campaign to refer to them as GNU/Google.

    111. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it disturbing that this is modded +5 informative and not +5 funny

    112. Re:Excuse Me But... by eeek77 · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. Chickens are frickin' idiots and they don't do jack except eat chicken feed and lay eggs.

      I've seen Chicken Run so I know how these things work.

    113. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope everyone is aware of how much CO2 is released in the production of cement (just search for carbon dioxide cement.) Many estimate cement accounts for 5% of all human CO2 emissions. There is research on an 'Eco' cement, lets hope if Google takes you advice they use this type.

    114. Re:Excuse Me But... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Now you know why they mentioned that the goats were cuter.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    115. Re:Excuse Me But... by Unoti · · Score: 1

      Cuter than watching goats: bikini clad lawnmower service, video here. Also keep in mind that these bikini clad chicks probably have a better greenhouse gasses footprint than the goats. Well, maybe if you don't factor in the lawnmowers they're pushing, but those are easy to miss when they're wearing bikinis...

    116. Re:Excuse Me But... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      That's only when improperly managed.

      Sheep will eat the grass lower than cattle, but only if forced to. If the pasturage is not overgrazed, there is no problem. Especially since you need to rotate pasturage anyway in order to limit parasites.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    117. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it does have a fuel nipple, and you can milk anything with a nipple.

      Since I'm in my 60s, I've often been tempted to go into OSH ask one of the young lady clerks, "Do you have 2-inch brass nipples?" or maybe just "Do you have close nipples?"

      Hey, I'm just an old fart looking for legitimate hardware items. I can't help it if you have a filthy mind.

    118. Re:Excuse Me But... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      They should have a smaller, permanent flock of goats. And google should be getting paid to feed thew goats, not the other way around.

    119. Re:Excuse Me But... by S-100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At one end of the lawn would be the goat breeding facility, run by volunteer Google staffers. At the other end of the lawn, GOATBURGERS!

    120. Re:Excuse Me But... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      no more than you do. if there impact on the environment disturbs you, you are free to eliminate your equal or greater impact by committing ritual sepuku.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    121. Re:Excuse Me But... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      and the electricity for your electric lawn mower comes from.....DING! thats right alex! a coal fired power plant!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    122. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me but, don't goats emit carbon in the form of CO2 just by breathing - and methane by farting?

      The greenhouse gases that goats emit were sequestered from the atmosphere that year, by the plants that they are eating.

      The greenhouse gases that lawnmowers emit were sequestered by plants eons ago, and is nicely sitting there minding their own business, out of our atmosphere and thus not contributing to global warming until we drill is up and put it in our engines.

    123. Re:Excuse Me But... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Thank you. you have said what i was thinking of typing out. saved my fingers. if i had not posted already here, i'd be modding you up.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    124. Re:Excuse Me But... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      so what you are saying is, if nothing is carbon neutral, eventually, without humans screwing it up (which we may or may not be doing) it would have eventually overheated and exploded anyways? well, thats good. its nice to know that all we did is break it before it wore out on its own. means we got our moneys worth.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    125. Re:Excuse Me But... by Meneguzzi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the carbon in the CO2 they emit by breathing was trapped in the grass they eat, and will eventually recirculate through plans (that another generation will eat), keeping the circle closed. When you burn gas in a lawnmower, you are releasing CO2 that was trapped for millions of years in the earth's crust, adding to the system.

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
    126. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CO2 is bad? Why on this green Earth would CO2 be a bad thing? Besides, it will help make better green stuff for the goats to eat.

    127. Re:Excuse Me But... by Radtastic · · Score: 1

      The CO2 that the goats emit is taken from the current environment, not stored C02 that has been extracted (via gasoline).

      Marin and Sonoma Counties, CA have a number of locations that do this, and there are goat farmers that lease out their flock for this purpose.

      --
      You stereotypers are all the same...
    128. Re:Excuse Me But... by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Probably not in Mountain View unless the power is coming from a long way away. Not many coal fired plants in the West.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    129. Re:Excuse Me But... by uncqual · · Score: 1

      But then to recover your investment, you have to feed the dead Gorillas to the Cows and they get Mad Gorilla disease.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    130. Re:Excuse Me But... by uncqual · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would imagine that in order to protect their jobs, the lawnmowers would actively track down the kids and destroy them - while kids don't eat much grass when they are really young, as adult goats the eat a lot more and represent serious competition.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    131. Re:Excuse Me But... by belmolis · · Score: 1

      If that is true, why were cattle herders in the 19th century American West so strongly opposed to sheep-herding? The usual reason is that the sheep leave pasture land unsuitable for grazing by cattle.

    132. Re:Excuse Me But... by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      How are sheep more annoying?

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    133. Re:Excuse Me But... by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      Because they're dumb. Of all the animals on God's green earth, sheep have one of the highest chances of winning the World's Stupidest Animal award. For instance:

      1. Sticking a sheep's lamb between her and feed.
      2. Watch as the sheep runs over the lamb in the mad scramble to get to the feed.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      For more fun, put feed inside a barn with a narrow door (i.e., human door, not a traditional barn door), and let about 20 sheep try to get through. Their trying to get through the door is reminisce of a group of people trying to see how many bodies they can fit inside a telephone box, but without that intention.

      Long and short of it: they'll do anything for food. Except not run through the electric fence. Or any fence, for that matter.

      They do make good brush cutters, though...

            --- Mr. DOS

    134. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looking forward to goat flue in mountain view, courtesy of google.

    135. Re:Excuse Me But... by kylef · · Score: 1

      As for methane, who gives a shit? It's got a short shelf-life. Methane drops out of the atmosphere in a mere decade, as opposed to C02, which can hang around forever.

      Apparently the IPCC and Kyoto disagree completely with you, possibly because methane gas is approximately 21 times more effective as a warming agent per unit than Co2, when measured over a 100-year period. If measured over a shorter period, its effects are even more pronounced.

      So it is perfectly reasonable to ask whether the methane byproducts of these goats are causing more harm than good, especially when considering that they are being marketed as a "green" solution to replace lawnmowers.

      I have also heard arguments that debunk the "fact" that ruminants are so-called "carbon-neutral" animals. In many cases the plant matter consumed and converted to methane by ruminants would instead have decayed naturally (stored mostly in topsoil) or would not have been harvested in the first place (stored mostly in living plants). In the decay scenario, a portion is released as Co2 and methane by soil bacteria, but not nearly as much as is released by ruminants and ruminant manure. And when the amount is multiplied by the methane-Co2 adjustment factor of 21, it becomes clear that ruminants are clearly NOT carbon-neutral at all, and are in fact significant contributors to greenhouse gases over a 100-year period, when compared to NO domesticated ruminants.

      As for Co2 byproducts of the goats, I concur that they are irrelevant to this debate.

    136. Re:Excuse Me But... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but, don't goats emit carbon in the form of CO2 just by breathing - and methane by farting?

      Yes, but wouldn't that CO2/methane have been emitted anyway when the grass decomposed (or burned)? It's not like the mechanical lawn mowers usually sequester the grass clippings at the bottom of the ocean or something... and it's not like the goats produce CO2/methane out of nothing, it comes from the grass.

      So I think it's a wash.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    137. Re:Excuse Me But... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They sequester more carbon than they emit. Provided they're getting bigger and fatter, of course. Then you eat them, making you bigger and fatter. When you eventually die, make sure you're buried deep enough or in a sealed box so that the decay products don't go back into the atmosphere.

      Voila, carbon negative.

    138. Re:Excuse Me But... by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I've been told by someone that a flock of sheep is often considered a poor man's harim.

      No thanks, I'll pass. I prefer my females to be of the same race.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    139. Re:Excuse Me But... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if the carbon they crap remains in the ground, or if any carbon remains in goat form, then they are carbon-negative not carbon-neutral.

    140. Re:Excuse Me But... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      anybody else used to hang in alt.pave.the.earth? "one planet, one people, one slab of asphalt".

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    141. Re:Excuse Me But... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Better than Goat Fokker. ;)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    142. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...Google could concentrate all of the extra goat farts and use them to run their on-campus bus fleet. They could even give it a slogan, "goat powered...its a real kick in the pants".

    143. Re:Excuse Me But... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Um, what? Goats aren't machinery, you don't have to store them in a shed. You just kinda leave them in the field, with maybe a barn-type structure for protection from the elements when they need it.

      Pretty sure they don't intend to only let the goats free on the lawn for two hours on Thursday afternoons.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    144. Re:Excuse Me But... by Supurcell · · Score: 1

      And that is the first and last time anyone will ever reference Krod Mandoon.

    145. Re:Excuse Me But... by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      And google should be getting paid to feed thew goats, not the other way around.

      Wait, the goats are getting paid to feed google? I knew there was a goatburger subplot in there somewhere!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    146. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gallon for gallon or, given the size of lawnmower tanks, quart for quart

      The tanks on the mowers Google would use are as large as those on most compact cars. Commercial-grade mowers are filled from a pump, not a gas can. That's assuming they wouldn't just have a small tractor with a bush hog.

      And, yes, an air-cooled V-twin with no catalytic converter is John Deere's way of saying, "Fuck you, asthmatics."

    147. Re:Excuse Me But... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      But they'll have more goats next year and they didn't have to pay for those.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    148. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just for mowing, if you know what I mean heh heh heh.

      Hence the old 50s song, "I Only Have Eyes For Ewe".

    149. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For more fun, put feed inside a barn with a narrow door (i.e., human door, not a traditional barn door), and let about 20 sheep try to get through. Their trying to get through the door is reminisce of a group of people trying to see how many bodies they can fit inside a telephone box, but without that intention.

      Apparently you've never seen Jack Russell terriers running course a'lure. They do the same thing, with six dogs trying to fit through a one-dog-sized hole.

    150. Re:Excuse Me But... by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Wait.... you just replied to yourself. Buddy you need to take it easy. These self held discussions on the merits of goat breeds are a little frightening.

    151. Re:Excuse Me But... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a TON of positive effects. No noisy lawnmowers waking me up on the weekend, no need for me to use a lawnmower, that's a big plus. It's safer, especially if you have a hilly spot of land. Lawnmowers rolling and flipping on to people is serious business, but I can't think of any way a goat rolling over due to a steep hill has ever killed anyone, or even seriously disfigured a foot. Much safer.

      The downside? Goats poop a lot, and have devil eyes.

      They do taste pretty good, though. If you cook 'em right.

      Having just watched 3 seasons worth of Weeds I now have an image in my head of an entire suburb full of identical houses, each with a couple of goats in the yard....and they all look just the same.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    152. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up here where I live, in northern Germany, you'll sometimes see people using sheep this way instead of goats.

      It's actually a traditional thing, too - the levees on the west coast (where the north sea is located) are covered in grass, and sheep have been used to keep them from overgrowing for... I don't know, ages, probably forever.

      These days, of course, they're also promoted as a "green" alternative to lawnmowing, much the same as goats apparently are there.

    153. Re:Excuse Me But... by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      But the goats are still cuter.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    154. Re:Excuse Me But... by AVee · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Like a Roomba for your lawn. I'd buy one

      Just go ahead and buy one then... It's even available from Walmart.
      Or better yet, buy the Husqvarna Automower which actually is available in a solar power version as the GP suggested. It's been around for quite a few years also, it might actually be older then the Roomba...

    155. Re:Excuse Me But... by seb249 · · Score: 1

      Have a small goat farm myself, goats are better browsers than grazers and tend to excel at clearning properties of weeds - Blackberry and that. Wouldnt use them for mowing though - always eat the stuff you dont want them to eat. To be honest goats are bastards with the fences either jumping over or pushing under - sheep in my experience are a easier.

    156. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they used the same arrangement as is used in my area for sheep, they would just put a few in a large area and leave them permanently. If you have more than a dozen or so sheep, then some shearers will shear them, and take the wool away[1].If the sheep need protection, one or two alpacas can be used. Where I am, goats are only used for extremely steep slopes and to eat weeds such as gorse or artichoke, and are often just mixed in with the sheep.

      If a sheep or goat gets injured (and someone notices), the treatment is usually either to ignore it or shoot it. You have very little ongoing cost, and use an insignificant amount of fuel. The appearance isn't as good as a mown park, but is perfectly suitable for fire breaks.Sheep are also good for mowing RadHaz zones, because they don't reflect radio, and they aren't covered by OHSW.

      [1] If you ahve enough, they might even pay you.

    157. Re:Excuse Me But... by luder · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was referring to wool and cheese.

      Wool provides a good thermal insulation, keeping you warm in the winter and fresh in the summer. I don't know if goat's fur has the same properties, but even if it does you have to kill the goat to get it. I suppose its use is also dependent on the climate you live in.

      Cheese made from sheep's milk can be really delicious and pretty valuable, on the market. Goat's cheese is good, too, but I don't think it even compares.

      Mutton would have the sheep killed, then no more ruminants to mow for you... I thought that was damn obvious, what the hell were you thinking about?!

      DigiShaman: a flock of sheep is often considered a poor man's harim.

      WTF?! You sick people! Go fix yourselves!

    158. Re:Excuse Me But... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you really want to use ruminants to mow for you, sheep are a much better choice than goats.

      That depends whether you want to have any grass left at all when they're done. The goats might leave a little behind. The sheep typically won't. They're like the nuclear weapons of anti-grass warfare.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    159. Re:Excuse Me But... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'm the original poster, and I find it disturbing that it isn't modded 100% funny too! Actually, it is modded "+3; 30% Informative; 40% Insightful; 30% funny." I'm no mathematical genius, but shouldn't that be 33% of each?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    160. Re:Excuse Me But... by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure that's *exactly* what Google intends to do. Otherwise, you have to fence the thing in and erect the barn you were talking about, and hire a Veterinarian, and lots of other stuff I'm sure Google doesn't want to do.

    161. Re:Excuse Me But... by FishAdmin · · Score: 1

      It's net-zero carbon output, but not net-zero effect on global warming:

      You still use NetZero carbon? Man, I switched to DSL Carbon years ago!

      --
      Last night I played a blank tape at full volume. The mime next door went nuts.
    162. Re:Excuse Me But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd actually seen Chicken Run, you'd know that chickens are incredibly intelligent and able to build airplanes in a very short time with only plastic models as a guide.

      My chickens are kept shackled to their runs and frisked each night for power tools.

  6. Side Effects? by mlingojones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google employees no longer have to worry about tall grass during fire drills!

    ...now, they have to worry about goat shit.

    1. Re:Side Effects? by EvilToiletPaper · · Score: 5, Informative

      Goat poo isn't as bad as cow pies or dog crap.. It's mostly small hardened pellets that deform or crumble rather than stick or squish.

    2. Re:Side Effects? by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, a friend of ours has a housetrained pygmy goat (it works surprisingly well!). Its waste looks kind of like oversized rabbit pellets.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    3. Re:Side Effects? by F34nor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Want to know something totally fucked up? Rabbits have a simple two chamber ruminant stomach so they cannot digest cellulose in one pass. hey are forced to re-eat their shit in order to fully digest it. They are copraphages or literally shit eaters. Much like Microsoft employees forced to use their own software.

    4. Re:Side Effects? by moniker127 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You really need to get outside the basement more often.

    5. Re:Side Effects? by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Also, if you don't watch they put in it may result in processing failures and death due to lack of shit consumed. Same holds true for rabbits.

    6. Re:Side Effects? by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      Goat poo isn't as bad as cow pies or dog crap.. It's mostly small hardened pellets that deform or crumble rather than stick or squish.

      Apparently goats get to enjoy a lot more Quiznos' than I do...

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    7. Re:Side Effects? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Rabbits have a simple two chamber ruminant stomach so they cannot digest cellulose in one pass

      No, that is completely wrong.

      Rabbits have a single chambered stomach, just like you do.
      Where they are different is that rabbits have an overly large cecum, where fermentation/digestion of cellulose occur. This is also exactly the way a horse digestive system works.
      You also have a cecum, just comparatively much smaller. This would also make you a ruminant by your 'understanding' of rabbits.

      Rabbits!=Ruminants!!!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    8. Re:Side Effects? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Sorry I meant not ruminants, like not a cow. Ah ha! the cecum is not part of the bovine four chamber stomach! You sir are correct!

    9. Re:Side Effects? by F34nor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got that fact in a biology class filled with hot young coeds with whom I tried to practice applied biology. Also I currently live in the Gulf and there are no basements in the country that I can detect.

  7. Robomow by ojintoad · · Score: 1

    and goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers

    I respectfully disagree.

    1. Re:Robomow by camperdave · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bikini clad girls are a lot cuter to watch than robots.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Robomow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bikini clad girls [msn.com] are a lot cuter to watch than robots.

      Bring your head over here and mow my lawn, honey.

  8. Low carbon foot print? by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Methane is a much stronger green house gas than CO2.
    On the plus side they will also "fertilize" the grass at the same time.

    The real "green" thing to do is get rid of the grass and use native plants and grasses for the landscape. That would also cut down on water use.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Low carbon foot print? by volleydan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only issue with using "native plants" is because of the reason they are using goats in the first place, keeping a place "clear of fire hazards." Native plants still produce a fire hazards thus resulting again in a need for some sort of 'mowing method'. Rocks and/or dirt would accomplish their goal and be 'environmentally friendly' however ugly.

    2. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real "green" thing to do is get rid of the grass and use native plants and grasses for the landscape. That would also cut down on water use.

      The field being mowed by goats is covered by native plants -- it's not landscaped or irrigated. In fact, before hearing about the goats I assumed this was just an empty lot owned by the city. The purpose of the mowing is just to reduce the potential for a brush fire.

      It doesn't look like Google chose goats because of lower greenhouse emissions. Do you have any back-of-the-envelope calculations that suggest the goats are significantly worse?

    3. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real "green" thing to do is get rid of the grass and use native plants and grasses for the landscape. That would also cut down on water use.

      No. The green thing to do is to pave the field with concrete & paint it green. No water use after installation.

    4. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Rei · · Score: 1

      According to the company's website, at least, the goats actually prefer a number of invasive plants, such as star thistle. They reportedly eat them first before munching on the (less nutritious) grass. They also like poison ivy -- it doesn't have the ill effects on them that it does on us.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    5. Re:Low carbon foot print? by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      yes but if there are some regulation (ie cannot be higher than X inches) they still have to mow that.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    6. Re:Low carbon foot print? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      rock and or dirt hold in too much heat and can cause erosion. Also isn't Mountain View in a wet area of California?
      I wouldn't think that it would be too much of a fire hazard. But then they could use cisterns and catch the run off from the roof and use that to water the area as well. Hey it isn't easy being green. Simple truth is that best way to be green in most of California is to leave! There is too much population for the available water, The LA basin holds in the pollution making for terrible air quality.
      Lots of places in the US with a lot more water and a much lower population density. Might I suggest the Great Lakes area or upper state NY?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could do that, or do what most people in Arizona do.

      Use gravel. Not

      No need to water the stuff, mow it, and the only real maintenance is every now and then you rake it back into place.

      Put some cacti or a palo verde out and your good to go.

    8. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Nah. Half of California should move to Salt Lake City. I think that would be a very interesting experiment.

    9. Re:Low carbon foot print? by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last year, we lost about half of our lawn to grubs (and skunks digging for grubs), and reseeded with thyme. Requires virtually no watering at all, and doesn't grow higher than ankle height, so doesn't need to be cut. It also smells better, and is a lot more comfortable on bare feet if you choose to walk around barefooted... About the only down side is that following the spring thaw, it stays brown for a little longer than grass (about 4 days longer this year), but that shouldn't be an issue at all for California.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    10. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1

      Buffalo is cool minus the snow.

    11. Re:Low carbon foot print? by rrkap · · Score: 1

      uh, it's not a lawn and they don't water it. It's a vacant field that is covered with the annual rye that covers most of California's grasslands. While it isn't native to the area, it performs a similar ecological role to the now rare native grass and probably isn't worth exterminating to replace with native grasses. Goats are a better option for fire control than mowing or discing which are the two other options.

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    12. Re:Low carbon foot print? by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Mountain View is not that wet, getting on average around 15 inches of rain per year. While I can't find Mountain View, Sunnyvale isn't that far away.

      Most of the weeds and grass grow during the winter and spring then the grass dries out and turns brown during the summer and fall, since it rarely rains between June and October.

      They used to bring in goats from time to time to mow the grass in a park next to the last place I worked, which was fairly successful, especially since the goats could easily reach many places too small for the mower to get to or with a lot of rocks.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    13. Re:Low carbon foot print? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay I stand corrected on how wet the area is. I always imagine the SF area as kind of damp and not very hot but then I have never been there. Thanks for the info.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    14. Re:Low carbon foot print? by dkf · · Score: 1

      The real "green" thing to do is get rid of the grass and use native plants and grasses for the landscape. That would also cut down on water use.

      But wouldn't necessarily get rid of the fire hazard, which is Google's primary requirement here, since the native flora of that part of California is highly flammable.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    15. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real "green" thing to do is get rid of the grass and use native plants and grasses for the landscape. That would also cut down on water use.

      That is native grass. It grows tall in March, and by May turns brown, presenting a serious fire hazard.

    16. Re:Low carbon foot print? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Altered CO2 levels and drought patterns may interfere with the natural burn cycle of nature and native plants.

      However, fires occurring more often as a result of human interference is nature's way of getting back to normal.

  9. How were they transported? by Chibi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just curious how they were transported back and forth (and how far)? I'm imagining the overall amount of fuel used would be less than using mowers, but there have been plenty of cases where good intentions didn't pay out in the end.

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    1. Re:How were they transported? by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whereas the mowers would be instantly transported to the required position using zero-carbon emission magic.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if they hired a company to mow the lawn then their would be transport cost for transporting the mowers al so.

    3. Re:How were they transported? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      No, but mowers can be kept on the premises for years, so they only need to be transported once.

    4. Re:How were they transported? by TheFlyingBuddha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except odds are some outside landscaping company normally gets hired to mow the lawn every X amount of time, and brings their equipment with them.

    5. Re:How were they transported? by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      Think of the latino children?

    6. Re:How were they transported? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Only if you buy them. Which means now instead of the CO2 of transportation you have to look at the CO2 of manufacture.

    7. Re:How were they transported? by tritonman · · Score: 0

      in addition to the fact that the mowers would be transported to the site which would cause carbon emissions, mower engines are extremely inefficient and moving the area would most likely release more carbon than transporting the goats back and forth 100 times.

    8. Re:How were they transported? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, and probably true.

    9. Re:How were they transported? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      1 or 2 commercial mowers are probably a lighter load than a herd of goats.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    10. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas the mowers would be instantly transported to the required position using zero-carbon emission magic.

      Rather, whereas mowers would require only a few small trucks and trailers. The goats must have required much much more.

    11. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant comment, sir, well played!

      After all, it would be silly to assume that the mowers would be on-site or very near the Google facilities, and that the goat farms would be dozens of miles a away.

      It would be even sillier to think that the Ford pickup used to haul a commercial mower creates far fewer carbon emmissions than the semi trailer used to haul a herd of goats.

      I know that I have a goat farm that is closer to my house than my garage, where my personal mower resides.

    12. Re:How were they transported? by Fantom42 · · Score: 1

      Whereas the mowers would be instantly transported to the required position using zero-carbon emission magic.

      The goats, however, do use magic to get there.

    13. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you're unfamiliar with our "Clean Mower" technology...

    14. Re:How were they transported? by adamchou · · Score: 1

      I'm betting that the Googleplex's garden is sufficiently large enough that they would have 1 or 2 full time gardeners instead of hiring and outside landscaping company.

    15. Re:How were they transported? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Goats can walk, silly! :-P

    16. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... there have been plenty of cases where good intentions didn't pay out in the end.

      Yeah, like the last chick I took out for dinner and a movie.

    17. Re:How were they transported? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      not really, you can haul about 10 goats in the back of a pickup truck with racks on the box, and goats are not all THAT heavy, so it would not have been that much of an load. quite honestly, i considering they stay a week, and probably are able to 'mow' the grass shorter than you normally mow with a mower of the type that would be used for this task (this is not a lawn, it is a large field, so a fairly large tractor and brush mower would be used, not a push mower) so they are transported less often, and are MUCH more fuel efficient than hauling a several ton tractor to and from the site.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    18. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is still more efficient than manufacturing hundreds of times as much equipment to store at every site...

      (Feel free to continue down this chain of reasoning until you come to the part that supports what you want to believe, and stop there)

    19. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point, but I think it's safe to assume that a lawn mower does a much better job at mowing than a goat, which would mean less mowers (or less time) to mow the same amount of grass, and less equipment means easier/more compact/ transportation, which in turn leads to less emissions overall.

      Wether or not the goats were more or less carbon producing remains to be seen, but I think I'll side with the goats as being at least slightly greener than the mowers.

    20. Re:How were they transported? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      and in the same regard, they could buy a herd of goats and have 2 fulltime shepherds instead of mowers. So, still a equal argument.

      And I think you missed the part about them enjoying the site of a bunch of goats running around.

    21. Re:How were they transported? by Technician · · Score: 1

      What I found interesting with Google being the biggest search engine is why didn't they rent prime irrigated pasture instead of hireing goats?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    22. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about US but here in eastern Europe goats are not allowed to drive pick-up trucks. So i'd guess that they eigther had to commute by jogging or "the hard way" (using public transportation).
      I hope that PETA doesn't hear about that.

    23. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herd of goats > lawnmower + operator.

    24. Re:How were they transported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas the mowers would be instantly transported to the required position using zero-carbon emission magic.

      Ha! win.

  10. Low Carbon? by SirBitBucket · · Score: 1

    Not sure about goats, but cow flatulence is a major source of methane, an even worse greenhouse gas than CO2. I guess we can't so anything right. We are doomed

    1. Re:Low Carbon? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Goats produce much less CO2 than cows. Yes, I've looked into this; we donate to Heifer International but I only donate goats (not cows) for this reason.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Low Carbon? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Well, take into account that the goats exist for more then just to eat grass. As in, if you mow with a lawn mower, you burned gasoline to power them and that is it, but goats give goats milk/meat and even perhaps help reduce US dependence on foreign oil because google is using less gas.

  11. Still less CO2 than mowers. by wiredog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or brush fires.

    1. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by diablovision · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm curious where you think the CO2 released in brush fires comes from.

      --
      120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
    2. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm curious where you think the CO2 released in brush fires comes from.

      Yeah, the most carbon neutral thing google could do with that land would be to burn it.

      --
      This is my sig.
    3. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For once, the flamebait tag is apt without being overly trollish...

    4. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, the most carbon neutral thing google could do with that land would be to burn it.

      (Score:1, Flamebait)

      Did anyone else see the humor in this?

    5. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      The fire is a chemical reaction between the grass (fuel) and air (oxidant). Unless google has developed a strain of grass that is not carbon-based or somehow remove the oxygen from the air on their campus, then a brush fire there would most certainly produce CO2.

    6. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      WHOOSH!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I bet this created SH*T LOADS of carbon...

      Google didn't use mowers to get rid of the grass, but i'll bet they'll use vehicles vacuum the ass grass (poop).

      But, those workers better be careful not to drive to fast on the assy knoll... LOL!

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    8. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by damasterwc · · Score: 1

      ... and tell me why these are modded flamebait?

    9. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only one. ;) I was hoping it was a witty moderation and not just someone being retardedly land-rights-for-gay-whales-esque.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    10. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      "Neutral", perhaps. But grazing grass-fed beef would actually be carbon-negative, to the extent that grass-fed beef displaces feedlot-raised beef in the market.

      Goats are probably not normally given feed, so they don't really qualify as carbon-negative. But if their meat is used as a substitute for some other, more carbon-intensive meat, they might be.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    11. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by wiredog · · Score: 1

      Brushfires burning the brush will release more CO2 than goats eating it.

    12. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by edsousa · · Score: 1

      Maybe from the oxygen in the atmosphere plus the carbon of the fuel, in this case the vegetation, combined in the combustion process.

    13. Re:Still less CO2 than mowers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you combine the brush fires with the goats, you get the grass cut and make dinner!

      Goat-toasties (patent pending)

  12. Meh. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    Or, rather, Meh'eh'eh'eh (for those of us who've been around goats).

    I wonder if they allow the goats near to where the workers are. Male goats are some stinky animals (and sometimes very aggressive).

    In reality, though, this is just a clever business mooove by Google. Pretty soon we're going to see targeted advertising in our fresh chevre.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  13. but produce a lot more $h17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but produce a lot more $h17

    1. Re:but produce a lot more $h17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is $h17? Grow a set and use the fucking word. Shit.

    2. Re:but produce a lot more $h17 by Ironica · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is $h17?

      Isn't it the contents of the h17 variable in a PHP script? Or something like that; I'm not a web developer, I'm just married to one.

      Granted, it'd be better to use less cryptic variable names, but as long as you document properly...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  14. wasting time... by cheap.computer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "and goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers" How much time do you spend watching lawn mowers or ..now.. goats ?

    1. Re:wasting time... by EvilToiletPaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not finding the sickly nerds in the google office cute, female google employees spend most of their day staring at muscular Miguel driving the lawn mower with his shirt off...

    2. Re:wasting time... by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yep, they have many Coca cola Light breaks every day when he's riding his mowing steed.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:wasting time... by Ironica · · Score: 4, Funny

      "and goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers"

      How much time do you spend watching lawn mowers or ..now.. goats ?

      Aren't Google employees required to spend 10% of their time staring out the window?

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    4. Re:wasting time... by Astadar · · Score: 1

      That's Diet Coke breaks(tm) for those of us on this side of the pond. :)

      Caught me off guard there thinking "That's not the way the commercials went..."

      --
      --Coming up with something clever... please wait...
  15. Already used by Mr. Scrooge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moreover, Scrooge McDuck was intelligent enough to realize in only 4 pages that the idea wasn't good: you can force a horse to a river, but you can't make it drink from it, or as in this case, to make it drink the entire river. :-)

    At least, Google is following the footsteps of the richest duck in the world.

  16. Google evil by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe google would do this, don't they know goats emit methane? It's so unhealthy for the environment. And what's worse, they keep thousands of walking carbon emitters that they call employees, and what's worse they actually pay them. Some of these do nothing all day except emit carbon. When will people wake up and realize that Google really is evil?????

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:Google evil by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Hey People emit methane too!
      (So maybe we should outlaw beans!)

    2. Re:Google evil by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hey, don't single out Google! When I worked at Yahoo! in 2006 I noticed they did the whole goat-mowing thing in the summer months as well. I imagine it's a fairly common practice here in the valley.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    3. Re:Google evil by averner · · Score: 1

      I emit methane in your general direction!

      --
      Member of the 7 Digit UID Club
    4. Re:Google evil by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The local water district does it as well. My wife and I once ran into a thousand goats while hiking in the protected watershed in the East Bay.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    5. Re:Google evil by crono_deus · · Score: 1

      Yup. And not just in the valley; Agilent up in Sonoma County does the same thing. In fact, they're in full view right now, and they're much better to look at than this Smalltalk code I'm going through...

      --
      Ne Cede Malis.
    6. Re:Google evil by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but i read that as "goatse mit methane." I don't want to think about *that* guy's emissions...

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    7. Re:Google evil by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I know you're being funny, but goats are a lot more environmentally friendly than the other alternatives. We use them in the pacific NW to clear out blackberry patches and other weeds which would otherwise take a lot of effort or chemicals to keep clear.

      And if it's done properly you get meat and milk out of the deal.

    8. Re:Google evil by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Can we outlaw people who refuse to read before posting? He just said they pay employees who emit carbon.

    9. Re:Google evil by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      don't you know swamps emit methane? OH NOES!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    10. Re:Google evil by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't single out Google! When I worked at Yahoo! in 2006[...]

      Hey, don't single out Yahoo!! The company I worked for wanted to save money on goats so they just made eating the landscaping be the "20% time project" for all employees.

      It cut down on cafeteria costs too.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Google evil by zigfreed · · Score: 1

      I can't believe google would do this, don't they know goats emit methane?

      Yes, but the goats are not likely raised to mow lawns. Its more of a productive use of livestock: eat some companies' grass instead of beating the crap out of a field and supplementing with hay. The methane is going to be there no matter what; the question is do you want mower CO2 AND methane, or just methane.

      Alternatively, you could lease the normal grazing field to some guy that wants to plow it.

      Raising animals is a pain in the ass; a lot more maintenance than lawnmowers.

    12. Re:Google evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are all over the grassy hill on the edge of the landfill/sewage plant thats right across the street from yahoo (right down the street from my office). The gvmt rents them from goats-r-us. It does make me wonder about the taco trucks I see leaving the landfill, cheap source for birria?

    13. Re:Google evil by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      If the goats are pirates, that should offset any impact they have on Global Warming.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  17. GAL DERN GOAT STOLE MY JOB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They should all just go back to goatland and stop stealing our jobs!

  18. Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So let me get this straight, not only does the owner of the goats get to feed them for free but Google will actually pay them for the right to eat their grass?

    Where can I sign up?

    1. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try here. It's a company that specializes in goat lawn mowing. They mainly use border collies to keep the goats from wandering away, but sometimes they also use electric fences and nets.

      It doesn't look like they are hiring new goatherds, but they sure seem to need a web designer, so maybe you can volunteer and have them teach you something about goat-herding in exchange.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by Boawk · · Score: 2, Funny

      where can I sign up?
      I think the google lawn is now taken care of but I'll give you a couple buck to watch you eat my lawn.

    3. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the real. Since when do people PAY to let animals graze on their land?

      I've got to say, Google's getting the short end of that stick and the goat farmer is laughing all the way to the bank.

    4. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an LLC, some insurance, buy some goats and start advertising. It's not that hard. It's called "being an entrepreneur"

    5. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      n/k. I talked to a guy in the dog herding community once. He spoke of a guy who teaches during the year, but every summer runs 300 goats (or sheep) along power lines in E. Ore and E. Washington to prevent fire damage. He'll be off the grid for 6 weeks at a time, and getting paid to raise sheep on free grass. Sounds like a hell of a deal--I wouldn't mind living under the stars for weeks at a time under the stars, raising a herd, and getting paid for it all at the same time

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    6. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by maxume · · Score: 1

      Have you done anything resembling such, so that you have some idea what you would be getting into?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by 32771 · · Score: 1

      Grass is not good for you (apart from some exceptions) - you aren't a cow.

      The idea is to drive out the grass with so called "weeds" like
      (shouldn't be a problem in a temperate climate):

      http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Urtica+dioica
      http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Aegopodium+podagraria
      http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Taraxacum+officinale
      http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Bellis+perennis
      http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Rumex+acetosa

      I have tried some but don't live on them. If you do, you might end up looking like some scrawny vegan or like some of those people who lived through the Irish famine, or if you focus too much on it, not live at all (this is just CYA for the nutcases).

      This is actually interesting. Would the aforementioned plants allow you to survive better than plain old grasses?

      Now I noticed, you have goats and live in mostly dry Mediterranean California, that is a different story all together.

      Besides, you have to look after the goats while you could be programming. Ok, a goat herder with a laptop and the dog doing the work, this may be a plan.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    8. Re:Sounds Like An Awesome Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I sign up?

      Hey ... the grass is for the goats.... oh well.. Never mind.

  19. technical possiblities by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hiring only one herd seems very un-google like. Perhaps they should have hired a second herd for from a proper RAIG (redundant array of inexpensive goats) array. Scottish researchers have already proven technologies that could be used to form a common RAIG-1 array. Simple genetic manipulation with the common Equus quagga would create a RAIG-10 (Stripped - Mirror) array.

    I would say that a RAIG-5 array would offer the best performance, but I am wholly unaware of any current methods for calculating goat parity. I also have no desire to try and troubleshoot RAIG-Controller corruption...

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:technical possiblities by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Of course they should only start out with beta-males for at least a couple of years.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:technical possiblities by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Damn me and already posting in this thread! Honorary +1 Funny.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    3. Re:technical possiblities by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      A herd is a redundant array of inexpensive goats.

      A herd is not a single goat, it is many. Once again Google is far ahead of you both from a technical standpoint and from a humor stand point.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:technical possiblities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on the pictures, it's apparent they used JBOG (Just a Bunch of Goats) to set up their array.

      Fast, easy, cheap. Not like you really need to retrieve anything from the set anyhow....

    5. Re:technical possiblities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for from a proper RAIG (redundant array of inexpensive goats) array.

      Seems like you have yourself a redundant array of inexpensive words array....

    6. Re:technical possiblities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily, the data storage capacity of a standard goat in this application is roughly 0 bytes. So if an individual goat fails out of the array, no data has been lost. There has, however, been an attendant loss of bandwidth.

      In this case I feel it's safe to say that a RAIG is overkill and you can apply a much more cost-effective JBOG solution to the problem.

    7. Re:technical possiblities by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      So, when they compared the goats to the mowers, was it RAIG against the machine?

      --
      -
  20. Better Lawn mowers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're looking for better looking lawn mowers,
    try this link ::

    (safe for work )

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19901693

  21. Wait.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    GOATS can work for Google?!?! Screw college!

  22. Slashdot now lags by 2 days by StCredZero · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Slashdot now lags by 2 days by wjousts · · Score: 1

      So why didn't you submit it to Slashdot then?

    2. Re:Slashdot now lags by 2 days by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      On reddit 2 days ago!

      That's cool and all, but who reads reddit? I have an account, but stopped checking it after about 2 weeks because it's so lame.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Slashdot now lags by 2 days by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I guess he hadn't heard yet that the new slogan was "News for Nerds... Stuff that Natters."

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    4. Re:Slashdot now lags by 2 days by mindcorrosive · · Score: 2, Funny

      "News for Herds... Stuff that Matters."

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      + 3.14 Transcendental
  23. "Cuter than lawnmowers"? by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they think goats are cuter than lawn mowers, then I think they're hiring the wrong people to mow their lawn...

    They should have just put ads out: "Wanted: cute people to mow lawns." They could arrange to get some kids dressed up like they're out of a Rockwell painting, or some tasty co-ed types... I know these aren't the usual things one looks for in a lawn mower, but if you're taking goats as the aesthetically pleasing alternative then I have to think you can do better.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:"Cuter than lawnmowers"? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Or they could just hire these people.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:"Cuter than lawnmowers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, did I see the words 'goat' and 'cute' in the same sentence?

    3. Re:"Cuter than lawnmowers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Wear high-top boots
      Step 2: Find a cute one
      Step 3: Stand on hillside and place hind legs of goat in boots
      Step 4: Lean forward to get goat to push back
      Step 5: Repeat step 4 until satisfied.

    4. Re:"Cuter than lawnmowers"? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      To each his or her own. Some people think members of the opposite sex are cute, and others think, well, maybe the goats just don't talk back, huh? Have you ever thought of it that way?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    5. Re:"Cuter than lawnmowers"? by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      A hot woman/guy mowing a dry lawn on a hot breezy day starts to look like a filthy, grass-stained lobster in short order. Even goats look better than that.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  24. Already been done by albeit+unknown · · Score: 1

    It's been done, although it was a prank by a Real Engineer, Bob Widlar. http://www.national.com/rap/Horrible/sheep.html

  25. Awesome business model by Five+Bucks! · · Score: 1

    Regardless of any questions about carbon emission of goats themselves or the transport of goats to and from different work sites, this farmer has a sweet deal!

    Feed for farm animals cost a stack of cash and this guy has turned what is normally an expense into a profit.

    So he gets food from excess goat production, valuable goats milk, and profit from selling a slightly green-washed grass control method.

    The guy's a frickin' genius.

    --
    52 52'23" W 47 32'07" N
    1. Re:Awesome business model by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      >> So he gets food from excess goat production, valuable goats milk, and profit from selling a slightly green-washed grass control method.

      Not to mention he's probably taking advantage of some tax loophole or subsidy for green initiatives. :)

      MadCow

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  26. Hardly counts as news here in CA by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Informative

    People have been using goats for vegetation control around these parts for many years--probably back to the Spanish colonial days.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:Hardly counts as news here in CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I first saw goats used for this on the Sunnyvale city garbage dump.

    2. Re:Hardly counts as news here in CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word, my mother is a manager for a park department and they have been using goats, (and cows for that matter), for all sorts of vegetation control, lawn and wild areas.

    3. Re:Hardly counts as news here in CA by darrylo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my employer's been using sheep/goats for a couple years now. Last week, a flock of sheep, shepherds, and some sheepdogs moved into the fields next to us. I imagine that they'll be munching on the grass for a few more days.

  27. Didn't Gateway do this once before? by ptelligence · · Score: 1

    With cows.

  28. First Pigeons Now Goats? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    First Google shows how to rank pages using pigeon technology. Now they're using goats?

    What are the illegal alien gardeners gonna do for work?

    Seriously, my city uses goats asw ell. We loved watchign them crawl over the hillsides to clear the brush. In California, the rain falls from November-ish to April-ish. The open fields and hilsides gets 4-6 feet of grass and weeds. If they're not cleared, they becom fire hazards for the six months of no rain. The goats do a great job clearing and fertalizing. Also, my kids love watching them.

  29. And don't forget ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    These sheep provide some dating opportunities, not otherwise available, to some of the really nerdy developers.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  30. Introductions by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Goatherd: 'n this here be Thor, the 'erd's Alpha goat.
    Larry (leans in): Why hello there, Thor! And aren't you just the cutest thing...
    Thor: BAH! (headbutts Larry and storms off.)

  31. Google??? What were you thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A search should have brought up why this is a bad decision.

    Goats eat everything! Nice...but they eat vegetation so closely to the root that it kills it. So instead of having a nice mown hillside Google may well be faced with dry dirt in the future.

    Secondly, goats are nuisance animals. They effect property damage in untold ways that range from jumping fences, cars to human-to-goat encounters.

    The best choice would have been a herd of sheep. No grass kill-off, no property damage and the only problem is that sheep won't eat everything. Thus big nasty weeds, toxic plants and such will remain untouched. The solution is that sheep will eat these bad grown-up plants as "green shoots" so early spring takes care of it, not after.

    1. Re:Google??? What were you thinking... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Turning up the soil helps loosen it and spread seeds, which keeps the vegetation healthy. Goats are a healthy animal to have wander a field once in a while.

    2. Re:Google??? What were you thinking... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      that only happens if you leave the goats in the same pasture for far longer than is intelligent. in the same scenario, sheep do the same damn thing. i've seen far to much land that looks like the surface of the moon nearly, because of overgrazing by sheep, as well as goats.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  32. All fine and dandy until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one of the goats gets the 'goat flu'!

  33. News for Herds? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nevermind the news. Google's grass is eaten by goats.

  34. Silly Google... by F34nor · · Score: 1

    you need to hire hot lawn girls instead of middle aged male migrant laborers.

  35. Boulder, CO has been doing this for ~10 years by pjp6259 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Benefits include reducing the amount of poisons (herbicides) used in sensitive areas. In addition the goats provide fertilizer and till the ground with their hooves,

    http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2008/jun/20/grazing-mowers-herd-of-goats-takes-on-the-rez/

    --
    Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  36. Fire hazards by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Native plants still produce a fire hazards ...

    Fire hazards are part of nature though. If your home or office building isn't burned down in a lightning-caused brush fire every 10 years or so, you're not doing your part for the environment. Why do you people all hate the Earth so much?

  37. A clear case of 'scapegoating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the anonymous coward said sheepishly.

  38. Second advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it leaves on the field plenty of funny little black pellets.

  39. Google increases methane production by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

    One goat at a time. :) Work it, Baby!

  40. "Cute" my ass by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My uncle used to have goats on his farm, and they were right bastards. Of course, so was he.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:"Cute" my ass by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      A goat ate my hat once.

    2. Re:"Cute" my ass by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      My uncle used to have goats on his farm, and they were right bastards. Of course, so was he.

      He's funny, but he's also insightful, mods! Goats really are infuriating creatures up close. One took a bite out of my shirt once!
      Of course, they're also delicious themselves...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:"Cute" my ass by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Jethro ? I that you ?

    4. Re:"Cute" my ass by pgn674 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and I bet the dogs were bitches, too.

    5. Re:"Cute" my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/right/tight/

  41. Goat Mowing by dbirnbau · · Score: 1

    Actually using goats is common in the SF Bay Area. In the East Bay goats are regularly used to "mow" the steep hillsides in Berkeley and Oakland where mowers can't go. This keeps fire hazards down.

  42. Chickens and Goats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's a jail I know of where they don't have money for... well, anything. The wire fence used to get cut all the time as people came in to break prisoners out. Things like guards, walls, etc... cost a lot of money and just weren't going to happen. There isn't the room in the budget--hell, the guards last got new uniforms so long ago that no one owns one, they just own the thing they can buy at the store that sort of looks like how the old guards remember the uniform looking like.

    Eventually, they solved the problem of escaping prisoners by putting chickens around the jail. The chickens go crazy whenever someone comes to bust a prisoner out, so problem solved. Officially the chickens showed up on their own (i.e. less liability and no red tape).

    Chickens or goats, the low-tech solutions are sometimes better.

  43. Ohh. hErd, not hUrd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Hurd of goats would never work.

  44. This use of goats may be fine by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Interesting

    as long that they are regularly rotated among the fields. Left to their own devices, goats (unlike other ruminants) will eat the plants clear down to the surface, often killing them.

    There is a fairly hight correlation between the introduction of mass goat-herding in an area, and the encroachment of desert 100 years later.

    1. Re:This use of goats may be fine by Edgewood · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder if you are thinking about sheep ("hooved locusts"?)

    2. Re:This use of goats may be fine by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you are thinking about sheep ("hooved locusts"?)

      Range maggots.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    3. Re:This use of goats may be fine by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Very possibly I was. For some reason I had it in my head that it was goats, but goats are not grazers as much as sheep.

    4. Re:This use of goats may be fine by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Maybe them, too, but the Sahara keeps expanding southward, in part, because of the goat-herding by people on its southern edge.

      Anyone remember the name/author of a short story in which someone decided to eliminate the problem by eliminating goats through an engineered virus ("White Plague" for goats)?

    5. Re:This use of goats may be fine by oninojudo · · Score: 1

      This is actually part of the benefit. Goats are pretty much the only way to get rid of kudzu: they'll eat it all the way down to the roots, and it doesn't come back. I wanted to hire a goat to get rid of the ivy in my yard, but couldn't find a local service.

    6. Re:This use of goats may be fine by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      both sheep and goats do this. i live where the desert encroached. this area used to be the american equivalent of African high savanna, now, its the northernmost reaches of the Chihuahuan high desert. there's photographic evidence to back me up hung all over town as well.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re:This use of goats may be fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, kangaroos are much better for keeping lawns down. They don't pull out the grass, they don't eat the other vegetation (much), are REALLY cute, etc. etc.

    8. Re:This use of goats may be fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Correlation does not imply causation"

  45. Re:A goat can be used as a browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Goats are browsers

    So I can use goat in place of a flaming fox to view webpages?

  46. mow-boys by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    "goats are a lot cuter to watch than lawn mowers"

    They clearly haven't seen the guys who mow the lawn for one of my neighbors.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:mow-boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or they're not gay.

    2. Re:mow-boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know tverbeek isn't a woman?

    3. Re:mow-boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because tverbeek posted a message on Slashdot, and EVERYONE knows that no one on Slashdot is a female...

    4. Re:mow-boys by Erikderzweite · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's weird -- your sig implies that you are not a Mac user...

    5. Re:mow-boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preferring boys over goats isn't a sign of being gay, it's a sign of being human.

  47. Goats can do what mowers can't by Edgewood · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are lots of places in the Bay Area that do this. It's much more than a sop to carbon neutrality: the goats can "mow" slopes that are far too steep and uneven to wrestle a mower across. They also make short work of areas that are filled with rocks, brush and stumps and have no objection to a dessert course of poison oak (that's a good reason not to pat them on the head, though).

    I used to watch them arrive at the Lawrence Hall of Science up in the Berkeley hills. Trailers pull up; the goat wranglers set out a low fence and then unload the goats and a few working dogs. Over the next few days the wranglers move the fenced area across the slope and the goats eat and fertilize their way across the landscape. A few days after they arrive the brush is gone and some very nasty terrain has become a fire break, with roots still in place to prevent land slides. What's not to love?

    1. Re:Goats can do what mowers can't by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      The Seattle-area city and county governments do the same thing. It is fairly popular up here.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    2. Re:Goats can do what mowers can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of places in the Bay Area that do this. It's much more than a sop to carbon neutrality: the goats can "mow" slopes that are far too steep and uneven to wrestle a mower across. They also make short work of areas that are filled with rocks, brush and stumps and have no objection to a dessert course of poison oak (that's a good reason not to pat them on the head, though).

      I used to watch them arrive at the Lawrence Hall of Science up in the Berkeley hills. Trailers pull up; the goat wranglers set out a low fence and then unload the goats and a few working dogs. Over the next few days the wranglers move the fenced area across the slope and the goats eat and fertilize their way across the landscape. A few days after they arrive the brush is gone and some very nasty terrain has become a fire break, with roots still in place to prevent land slides. What's not to love?

      OK, bravo. Now that is a good reason to mow with goats. Because the whole CO2 this is not. Methane is a far worse greenhouse gas than CO2. So as far as global warming goes this is a bad idea. The fertilizer idea isn't good either. Considering they are reducing the plant life to reduce fire hazards, presumably they don't want it growing back too fast.
      Also, as far as benefits go, if the goats are being used for something else, like milking or food. Then they have to eat anyway so in this case it is actually a saving in greenhouse gas because the CH4 would be produced from the goats regardless of mowing or not. Point being, if the goats are used only for mowing, then the people who think this is a 'green' alternative are sadly mistaken.

      As the sadly true example goes, a vegetarian in petrol guzzling 4x4 vehicle does less to contribute to global warming than a steak eater in a hybrid.

      PS: Steak rules.

  48. Not only Google by smoot123 · · Score: 1

    Not to dis Google or anything, but many people in the Bay Area hire goats for munching grass. There was a herd (probably the same one) "mowing" a hill near my office in Sunnyvale last week.

    This works well around here. Wild grass grows only from December to April, at which point it dries and turns golden brown (to goats: golden, brown and delicious.) If they eat it now, it doesn't regrow until next winter.

    1. Re:Not only Google by eh2o · · Score: 1

      Goats have a key advantage over lawnmowers in that they have no problem with steep terrain, poison oak and so on, which is of crucial importance since the famous berkeley/oakland hills firestorm of 1991. So, they are not an uncommon sight around these parts.

      Incidentally most of California's native plants and grasses were destroyed about a century+ ago when unrestricted grazing by goats and sheep was allowed. The native grass was replaced by the fast-growing stuff that dies every summer and now keeps the goats employed... in other words, the "golden hills of california" are man-made. :)

    2. Re:Not only Google by richtaur · · Score: 1

      Yup, Yahoo! did this for a long time when I was there; it was to help prevent naturally-occurring fires.

      ... But, it's Google, and anything they do belongs on the Slashdot homepage for some reason *yawn*

  49. Transportation too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget transportation costs (gas etc) between and Mountain View...

  50. Goats = Lots of Crap by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

    Google may have forgot about this part, they will get rid of all their grass but have a field full of goat crap.

    Reminds me a bit of the Simpsons episode where snakes take over the town and they find some predator of snakes to kill the snakes off only to have too many of the predator.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  51. Low carbon? How'd the goats get there? by clintp · · Score: 1

    The goats don't live at the Google site, they're brought there when the fields need trimming. I've gotta assume that they're not herded there.

    What's the fuel consumption of a large truck full of goats versus conventional lawn mowing?

    --
    Get off my lawn.
  52. Full of it by diablovision · · Score: 1

    I always knew that campus was full of shit, but I wouldn't have guessed which kind.

    How much CO2 does it take to transport the goats to and from the site? They must weigh a hell of a lot more than the grass clippings or the lawnmower equipment.

    --
    120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
    1. Re:Full of it by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in rush hour traffic, weight actually has less to do with mileage than aerodynamics. So, if you can strap all the goats into a minivan, you'd probably save gas.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  53. Goats are cute until ... by GunDawg · · Score: 1

    they are lying dead on the ground from all the poisons they ingested from the grass they ate that was sprayed with weed killers. Also, is Google planning to let people walk on the grass afterwards? Look out for the goat turds (round pellets). Should make for some good pranks, though. Boston baked beans anyone? How about some fresh brewed coffee?

  54. City of SF uses them by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    A few years back, we had a large area filled with blackberry brambles, weed trees, etc. and it was so thick and deep, no mower could possibly get through it. After a month or so of goats? Gone.

    Amazing little buggers.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  55. goat sans the se by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to tag this story "goat" (because I would like an easy way to track goat stories... like the one with the mutant spider silk milking goat created by the US Army, possible future stories about Thor's chariot, etc.) and the gorram web3.suck slashdot system keeps appending a horrible "se" at the end, and I object!

    It's not even april 1st, come on /. UI, dont goatse me! :'(

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  56. I'd love to see a goat device. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Left to their own devices, goats (unlike other ruminants) will eat the plants clear down to the surface

    They're rent-a-goats, they won't stay long enough to desertificate the area.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:I'd love to see a goat device. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I already said that, thanks very much.

  57. also... by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

    goats usually don't go awry and mow off your hands/fingers/feet/toes when you remove their safety guards. but then again you don't have to worry about stepping in a pile of lawnmower shit either...

    --
    My other sig is a knife wound.
  58. Zoning laws? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    I thought barn-yard animals had to be in specially zoned areas, particularly in the city or industrial complexes. I think out in the 'burbs, where you have residential owners, you can own them as pets, but not as livestock?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  59. Patting themselves on the back for being Green by jcochran · · Score: 1

    When in reality, most people when asked "What greenhouse gas contributes the most to the green house effect?" don't know the answer.

    Those who buy into the current panic will reflexive say "Carbon Dioxide".

    The correct answer is "Water Vapor".

    But water vapor can't be taxed and vilified. So carbon dioxide gets the blame.

    Anyone who's truly interested in Global Warming (as well as many other things) would do well to read the book "Kicking the Sacred Cow" by James P. Hogan. It's a rather interesting collection of articles on different subject. And to the best of my knowledge, very well researched.

    1. Re:Patting themselves on the back for being Green by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      Life of water vapour in the atmosphere is a few days (it condenses as RAIN)
      Life of methane in the atmosphere is a couple of years (it degrades into CO2)
      Life of CO2 in the atmosphere is a very long time,, under current global conditions.

      So carbon is rightly "vilified" because it has a much longer cycle than other "greenhouse" gases. Sorry, it's not a massive conspiracy, it's just high-school science.

  60. here's the difference: by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Goats emit previously unsequestered carbon, that is, carbon that was extracted from the atmosphere by plants. They add nothing to the total amount of carbon in the running system.

    Lawnmowers emit previously sequestered carbon, that is, carbon that was locked into the bowels of the earth aeons ago, which created the conditions necessary for mammalian life forms to exist.

    So, 2 facts only are needed to understand the whole shebang:

        1) Plants do not take carbon from the ground (they get it from the air) and

        2) All but the very richest humans die as soon as all the carbon in the ground is put back into the air.

    All this noise about "saving the earth" and "global warming" is just noise. The real issue is just a simple variant of don't shit where you eat, easily phrased as don't fart in the bathysphere.

  61. Another idea from IBM by pynguin · · Score: 1

    At the SVL lab in San Jose, IBM also has employed goats for at least 4 years (that was when I first saw them). Sure they might produce gases, but they would just be doing it somewhere else. I say employ as many goats as necessary!!!

  62. Re:Look like a ... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    If you'd said "look like a goat" you'd be at +5.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  63. Congratuations.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations! It took you 100+ comments, but you got it eventually!!

  64. No, Nerd Herd! by antdude · · Score: 1

    From Buy More!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  65. Goats for weed control by kevmeister · · Score: 1

    The use of goats for weed control is fairly common in the SF Bay Area. I often see them munching away at various hill-sides. At work (no, not Google), they have been regular visitors for years and several farmers rent out their herds for this.

    Amazingly (at least to me), I have seen a goat munching away on leaves of a tree WHILE STANDING ON A BRANCH of the tree. I have no idea how it got up there, but it seemed totally unconcerned with its location.

    --
    Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
  66. The only problem is... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... they also got free fertilizer, so that next year's meadow will grow even taller and require more goats. Bah, humbug!

    1. Re:The only problem is... by enilnomi · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that just makes next year's goats all the more tasty ;-) We've been doing this for years...come late September we trade one or two goats in exchange for having another one or two rendered, and then it's Jamaican barbeque weekend while we eat the lawn mowers.

      --
      education is no substitute for intelligence
    2. Re:The only problem is... by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      The goats can't generate fertilizer that wasn't in the system already, as the fertilizer is just the grass itself re-processed. The only extra fertilizer is that that they'll bring in in their digestive systems when they're trucked in, but this will average out against that which they take out again when they leave.

    3. Re:The only problem is... by macraig · · Score: 1

      I disagree. When the goats ruminate upon the grass, they add intellectual property value to it. That makes their poop even more valuable than the dead grass.

  67. Mow it with lasers! by Nerdposeur · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've always thought it would be cool to have a sprinkler-like system of laser beams mow the grass once a day.

    Downsides:
    1) Lawn must be perfectly flat
    2) Safety precautions needed
    3) Possible fires

    But still. Lasers, eh?

    1. Re:Mow it with lasers! by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you are too late there. Check out the patent.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  68. Psst - hey buddy - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't look now, but grass is a native plant. One that harbors native ticks (which in turn harbor native Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Lyme's disease) if you just let it grow nice and long.

  69. Don't you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh! Una cabra ha tomado mi trabajo!

  70. mmm... yummy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goat is best for biryani. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biryani. Cant resist.

  71. Agricultural tax break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're likely doing it for an agricultural tax break.

    http://www.sheepandgoat.com/articles/economics.html

  72. Cisco too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at Cisco HQ and we've got goats on the east side of Zanker between Building 1 and the VTA site just below 237. I always wondered why anyone would want them there, besides the obvious soothing impact of incessant bleating and baa-ing for someone's coding.

  73. Whereas over at slashdot... by initialE · · Score: 1

    CowboyNeal employs a hurd of gnus. There's somewhat more shit lying around, and their attitude really stinks, but hey, it gets the job done.

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  74. Not the first use of goats in California by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Caltrans, the highway agency, has been using goats to clear brush from beside freeways too. It has caused a few problems with gawkers slowing down to look at them at commute time causing massive backups, but apparently it's very economical. Cutting the stuff manually and then chipping it and hauling it away is hugely expensive, goats dispose of it in their own way and help to fertilize the ground.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  75. Can be dangerous though by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    ...two Jordanian soldiers were evacuated from [timor] with injured penises after attempting sexual intercourse with goats.

  76. took them long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people have been doing this in Mt. View forever, what took google so long?
    Better idea would have been to buy their own goats.

  77. Goats & my Pavlovian response by desinc · · Score: 1

    I saw 'Goats' in the subject and automatically hesitated pretty badly before clicking.

  78. this is why I hate Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are the lynchpin of an energy-guzzling consumer society, but they always try to give the impression that they're "green". Moreover, they're staffed so full of people who've never experienced a day outside an Ivy League college and a sterile high tech campus that the idea of using animals to keep grass in check is considered another coup for their collective genius.

    Pity they fucked up by choosing goats, but earlier posts have described the problem there. I also come from a privileged background, but in my case it's the land-owning British gentry. We have sheep as far as the eye can see, and I don't think, as yet, that we've made a press release out of the fact that we don't need to mow the fields.

    Sigh. The fact that Google is the star of the Internet really demonstrates how little there is in the way of worthy competition. They're like Microsoft until early this decade, although the then puppies nipping at its heels tried to strong-arm via the DoJ. But the only thing that actually worked was the maturing of Linux and MacOS, each of which are beginning to show the world just how mediocre Microsoft offerings are.

  79. Better idea by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    This IS google we are talking about. Why don't they just ditch gas powered mowers and use push mowers instead? They could start a fitness class called "mowing" which is kinda of like rowing except in reverse. And then they could offer this class for free to their employees as an incentive for working for such an awesome company.

  80. Tax Dodge by rlp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Makes a big part of their land agricultural (lower tax rate) rather than commercial. Not to mention the Federal Mohair subsidy.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Tax Dodge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to click "more comments" a dozen times to get this, the only insightful comment, visible. The new comment hiding ajax system sucks.

  81. Re:Low carbon? How'd the goats get there? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    not a conventional lawn. large trucks with large trailers with large tractors with large brush-mower attachments to mow these large fields they are referring to. its not your 10x15 plot of Kentucky bluegrass in front of your house, its acre upon acre of semi-native grass and weeds.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  82. All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, a job at Google that I'm qualified for!

    Oh, wait... damn! I've only got two legs!

  83. Warren Buffett adds... by Sowbug · · Score: 1
  84. add an "e" to the end of the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i misread that so bad......

  85. What's the URL? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    So what is the GoatView URL?

  86. they could actually save money AND have a green by ifeelswine · · Score: 1

    solution if they got a field full of black slaves to do it, since that country was built on the backs of slave labor anyway, why stop now??

  87. What an approach ..!! by jay_desh9 · · Score: 1

    Good one ...!!! They are well known for amazing and new approaches to the traditional problems.. :D

  88. You emit CO2 too by feiming · · Score: 0

    We all emit CO2,let's say earth by killing ourselves!

  89. I've seen better by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    I've heard of a farmer who would sell pot-bellied pigs to people as pets and then offer to take them back for free "when they got too big".

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  90. Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides cut grass (and the goats can get to grass in hilly/wooded areas where it would be very hard to get a mower/weed-eater), there is free fertiliser, and hooves aerate quite well. A suburban city near where I live does the same thing. Goats are quieter and cuter than mowers, free fertiliser, free aerating, and generally less carbon monoxide than a riding mower.

  91. VERY old idea by cheros · · Score: 1

    Over 2 decades ago I worked for a very large chemical company, and they used sheep to graze between the storage tanks.

    There were two arguments for that:

    1 - it works pretty much automatic, although you have to shield any cabling (sheep are apparently not terribly selective), and uneven terrain is not a problem. And you have to manage how many you have..
    2 - tank leaks (and a chemical environment) can yield combustible circumstances, a sheep is less likely to produce sparks than any mechanical device. Gives you a bit more time to address a problem when it shows up on the detectors.

    I don't think they were farmer for the meat, heaven knows what they ingested in the process..

    I like the idea of grazing animals, I'm not into lawns anyway (until they find animals that can graze as evenly as a mower :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  92. Been there, done that by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    For the past 7 or 8 years we've used pet guinea pigs to keep our lawns trimmed. All you need is a secure hutch to keep them in at night, and a 15-25' roll of strong 4' high mesh to temporarily fence off a section of lawn. Use a couple of clips to hold the ends together, and peg it down well if there are dogs around. We put shadecloth over the top to deter cats, and use a couple of big plastic garden pots for shelter. (Cut down the middle and placed with the cut side down.) They need water, too.

    If you use thick straw for their bedding and feed them veggie scraps from the kitchen you'll also end up with lots and lots of natural fertiliser and mulch.

    And the big bonus is that you never have to mow the lawn again. Plus you can get the kids to move the guinea pigs to a new patch.

    Just one tip: make sure all the guinea pigs are female. They seem to get along better than all males, and if you mix them you'll be renting the offspring out to the entire neigbourhood.

  93. the other, inevitable footprint by jbatista · · Score: 1

    So what low-carbon-emission tech are they going to use to get rid of the goat droppings? If they let them be there, the grass might grow back...

    --
    My sig is better than your sig.
  94. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I do agree the goats are a lot cuter than sheep.

  95. Methane by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Methane is a far worse global warming gas than is carbon...

  96. Politically Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I can use goat in place of a flaming fox to view webpages?

    They prefer to be called homosexual vulpes.

    In the case to which you mean to refer, however, it would actually be homosexual Ailurus fulgens.

    (Calling a Red Panda by its color is offensive, and Native American isn't historically/geographically correct either.
    Actually, the name Indian would work for many of them.)

  97. WTH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot believe I've gone through this entire thread without seeing a single goatse comment...