Last week Digg users said it was their free speech right to pass on the private HD DVD key - and Slashdot supported it. When a company starts giving away private information, they are only doing what Digg users insisted is fair.
See what happens when you kids get out of hand. Sites like Slashdot and Digg encourage lawlessness and now you are going to have the federal government becoming involved.
Technology only makes things more complicated and difficult to understand. You want to fix the health care system eliminate lawsuits, insurance, and government regulation.
Apple switched to Intel because of its ability to meet manufacturing demands. Why would Apple want to downsize that capability? Besides, Apple is not Google.
We all know he can afford it. He's got over $35 million. And he's willing to put the tab for health care on the American tax payers. Seems like Obama is only generous when it's not from his own pocket.
I totally agree. You bought it. Your responsible. Yesterday, half the internet was complaining that DRM limits ownership. We live in a immature society that only wants ownership for the frosting, and not the sh*t.
That giving GP a lot of credit for a higher concept. I've yet to met a GP member whom's greatest understandings are the varieties of, and methods of using, Mary Jane.
Apple has already generously moved manufacturing to other countries so the poorest of people could have jobs. If Green Peace really cared about the people of the world they'd buy TWO iPods so the poor people could get twice the wages.
Having been a musician and studied mathmatics for engineering, it seems like just a coincidence. Any reapated pattern on a musicial scale forms a melody and classic visual patterns will line up with classic musical patterns.
Its about proportions - I have learned by being a visual artist, as well. Anyone familiar with Bernoulli would see this is just a coincidence.
Would this lynch mob feel the same way if some hacker took down Digg or Slashdot? Would Slashdot, Gizmodo, and LifeHacker encourage this activity if some hacker repeatedly hacked their own sites? How about a list of social security numbers?
You guys are a bunch of immature criminal hypocrites.
It's amazing that you can post and read the definition of censorship and still can't comprehend the meaning of it when applied to politics.
How about uncensoring your bank account numbers and passwords for me.... Cause you know, all censorship of numbers - especially to protect your economic resources - is bad.
Whenever Google finds itself limited by government intervention, it should call itself Google-lite. This will allow Google to continue to do business, while maintaining its credibility by acknowledging the product being used does not carry Google's full feature set, quality, and potential.
A second action is that Google could report periodically how many search items are blocked by various governments. A large part of the insult to the user is the perception that we are receiving all thats available. If results are omitted we should be told, and the reason for their omission (in general categories).
At first Digg seemed like a great site. But The last 6 months or so it's become useless in regards to ranking. The site has obvious political leanings, and the users digg emotionally, not rationally. Every article on the front page is artificially manipulated in its presence on the home page.
The Digg social experiment proves that you need mature and sensible editors to maintain quality, objectivity and worthiness.
Slashdot Mirror
Intelligent-hybrids
Last week Digg users said it was their free speech right to pass on the private HD DVD key - and Slashdot supported it. When a company starts giving away private information, they are only doing what Digg users insisted is fair.
How in the world is it censorship to try an maintain private information? This community is hypocritical.
See what happens when you kids get out of hand. Sites like Slashdot and Digg encourage lawlessness and now you are going to have the federal government becoming involved.
The other day the internet proved ethics were meaningless when they published HD DVD key that they had no right to publish.
You are some how blaming eBay for VT!? I am astounded at your lack of reason and logic.
Technology only makes things more complicated and difficult to understand. You want to fix the health care system eliminate lawsuits, insurance, and government regulation.
Apple switched to Intel because of its ability to meet manufacturing demands. Why would Apple want to downsize that capability? Besides, Apple is not Google.
We all know he can afford it. He's got over $35 million. And he's willing to put the tab for health care on the American tax payers. Seems like Obama is only generous when it's not from his own pocket.
How do you directly support someone other than putting money in their pocket? Spoon feed them?
I totally agree. You bought it. Your responsible. Yesterday, half the internet was complaining that DRM limits ownership. We live in a immature society that only wants ownership for the frosting, and not the sh*t.
That giving GP a lot of credit for a higher concept. I've yet to met a GP member whom's greatest understandings are the varieties of, and methods of using, Mary Jane.
Apple has already generously moved manufacturing to other countries so the poorest of people could have jobs. If Green Peace really cared about the people of the world they'd buy TWO iPods so the poor people could get twice the wages.
Having been a musician and studied mathmatics for engineering, it seems like just a coincidence. Any reapated pattern on a musicial scale forms a melody and classic visual patterns will line up with classic musical patterns. Its about proportions - I have learned by being a visual artist, as well. Anyone familiar with Bernoulli would see this is just a coincidence.
You guys are a bunch of immature criminal hypocrites.
No - I want your account numbers. You have no right to keep those numbers to yourself. You are just profiting of of keeping them private.
It's amazing that you can post and read the definition of censorship and still can't comprehend the meaning of it when applied to politics.
How about uncensoring your bank account numbers and passwords for me.... Cause you know, all censorship of numbers - especially to protect your economic resources - is bad.
Any more than you wanting to keep your social security number confidential.
You alarmist and exaggeraters are ruining legitimate complaints.
In CA its against the law to put florescents in the regular trash. Those are rules made by Democrats and environmentalists.
Nick Goslingo m_content&task=view&id=7446&Itemid=31
http://ellsworthmaine.com/site/index.php?option=c
Nice fallacy, Strawman or whatever.
Whenever Google finds itself limited by government intervention, it should call itself Google-lite. This will allow Google to continue to do business, while maintaining its credibility by acknowledging the product being used does not carry Google's full feature set, quality, and potential.
A second action is that Google could report periodically how many search items are blocked by various governments. A large part of the insult to the user is the perception that we are receiving all thats available. If results are omitted we should be told, and the reason for their omission (in general categories).
At first Digg seemed like a great site. But The last 6 months or so it's become useless in regards to ranking. The site has obvious political leanings, and the users digg emotionally, not rationally. Every article on the front page is artificially manipulated in its presence on the home page.
The Digg social experiment proves that you need mature and sensible editors to maintain quality, objectivity and worthiness.
And you need to read how they dont apply to digital media.
Voting is supposed to be anonymous. Voting online can pinpoint you pretty easily. We cant have both anonymity and validation at the same time.
All you have to do is look at any kind of digital security and you can see that we will never be able to trust online results.