And what, god was supposed to have directed that company to mimic his beetle? You know, I don't usually respond to ACs but given Marco Rubio's recent comments I figured I would. Here's what he said:
I’m not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that’s a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States.
Him, you and all the people like you couldn't be more wrong. Science and mathematics has everything to do with the economic growth of the United States. How can the U.S. compete in biotechnology if what we learn in biology courses is that god created the beetle? How can we compete in oil production if all we learn is that fossils are there to fool the unbelievers and the earth is 6000 years old? Time and evolution created both: 4.54 billion years is a LONG time, animal species can change a lot over that amount of time.
Frankly, I think you people are all nuts, and I'd happily let you live in your bubble if not for the fact that you all are ruining my country. I think it's a real shame that our education system has failed so miserably to produce roughly 48% of the voting population who can't even do basic arithmetic (i.e., go read Ryan's or Romney's economic plans: they either don't add up or impossibly vague). This has nothing to with Democrat or Republican, you could have figure out who was the right person to vote for just by looking at which one could do basic arithmetic. This election, my vote went for logic and reason, and that fortunately prevailed, but only by 3.3% or so.
Actually, EPA and DOE jointly sponsor a web-site that gives you not just EPA ratings, but allows users to enter in their own ratings. Here is the link to my car:
You can see the EPA rating and the average user's rating are similar, but not exact. The more popular a car is, the more estimates there are. If you click on view individual estimates, it'll show you the locale, driving conditions, and the last time the estimate was updated. I found this site to be invaluable when trying to calculate how long it will take my hybrid to pay itself off in reduced gasoline costs. The answer, BTW, is 90-99k miles, or 5-6 years. Since the hybrid battery is warrantied for 100k miles or 8 years, it'll be fine.
On a different note, I can't help but wonder if Lucas is in poor health
He's pissed off because everyone keeps bitching at him. Nobody liked the Star Wars prequels, nobody liked Indiana Jones 4 (a.k.a. Indiana Jones and the kingdom of just how stupid do they think we are?), and Red Tails. He's declared he's going back to directing art films.
My opinion is that the Star Wars prequels not only showed that Lucas was making it up as he went along for the prequels, but in episodes 4-6 too. All that wondering about why Obi Wan would lie to Luke about Darth Vader killing his father? It's because Lucas pulled it out of his ass because he needed to make another movie after Star Wars was a hit and wanted some sort of continuity and dramatic tension to bring the characters together. Meh, he's still brilliant in terms of special effects, etc., it's just a pity he could never recognize that he should work with someone to get less silly storylines.
Did he now? I really appreciate your comment, it gives me hope! Shit, I wish I still had one of those candy colored imacs. I can still remember replacing OS 9 with os X 10.0 beta on the graphite colored imac. I remember booting X11 up in rootless mode and remarking, "this is going to put SGI out of business." Good times man, good times. Nothing like that sort of innovation going on today in the desktop-space (i.e., yeah yeah, unix had X11 for years, but what I liked about it was that I had all the power and functionality of that SGI 4 processor RISC workstation in my desktop -- just awesome).
So if you head over to macrumors.com, the posters are gleefully proclaiming the death of skeuomorphic design in iOS and OS X. This is a good thing. The leather stitching, the ridiculous animations in ical, the stupid contacts list, the game center that made me feel like I trapped in some creepy casino with chain smokers and octagenarian gambling addicts: this is all gone, and good riddance to bad rubbish. However, on the other hand, if you read this article with the following very interesting passage:
Inside Apple, tension has brewed for years over the issue. Apple iOS SVP Scott Forstall is said to push for skeuomorphic design, while industrial designer Jony Ive and other Apple higher-ups are said to oppose the direction. "You could tell who did the product based on how much glitz was in the UI," says one source intimately familiar with Apple’s design process.
After reading that, I realized that this was indeed true and in fact there has been an alternate philosphy besides the skeuomorphic design which is the "war on color" in some aspects of OS X (e.g., the flat gray scroll bars, the gray linen background for the virtual desktop manager, even the world map for changing the time zone). So, now I'm wondering if the skeuomorphic faction led by Forstall has lost the debate, was Ive and the other minimalist design people behind the "war on color" and if that's true, is that what we'll see in future versions of the OS with Ive leading the interface design? I'm not sure how I feel about that, I really don't like using an OS that is drab and boring, it's depressing (I actually liked Aqua for the most part, which was also Forstall's invention I guess). Either way, it's good to know that Apple isn't afraid of rocking the boat still. That skeuomorphic crap might have been good for increasing everyone's vocabulary with regards to interface design, but it was annoying as hell to use.
Now, if only Apple would admit they screwed up the document versioning system beyond repair and give us a proper "Save As..." since the dawn of the computer (or thereabouts) I would consider Apple as having fully realized the error of their ways and moving decidedly in a less terrible direction. But alas, Federhigi is still in charge and they haven't brought Serlet back from retirement unfortunately.
Okay so I'm blowing my mod points (sorry to the people I bumped up) but I just had to jump in here. If you want to read something by Delany, read Dhalgren. My buddy and I both read this book while in college one summer just after the spring semester ended and the town had cleared out of all the students. I had nothing to do for a week except sit around and reading this novel where time has no real common frame-of-reference. Since at the time I myself was in a situation with no fixed schedule, this gave me the most complete mind-fuck I can remember a book giving me.
Many pitchers of very cheap beer were consumed disussing this book and what precisely happened. It's crazy, but it's not so delusional as William S. Burroughs and it's intriguing enough that you keep turning pages and Delany gives you hints and pieces about what's going on as things progress but never enough to completely solve it. The ultimate question was what we ourselves would do put in this situation, in a city where time becomes confused and careers or even jobs become irrelevant. This was one of those books that teaches you something about yourself when you're a young person reading it.
Oh... and while I'm at it, here's the actual quote:
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
I hate to disappoint you, but no, it won't. There is some (shaky) evidence that conservatives tend to be much less strongly influenced by facts when dealing with political topics, and that education level does not change the outcome. Chris Mooney wrote a book about it, I haven't read it, but it seems that there isn't a silver bullet so much as a lot of studies suggesting, but not proving, the same thing.
Whatever the reason, the point is that it doesn't matter who funded it, the conservatives won't accept climate change, no matter how many facts or studies you perform. If you confront a conservative with a climate change argument, and show them this study, I guarantee that they will shift the argument to saying that Muller now says, yes there is climate change, but it isn't what caused Katrina, nor what caused the drought in the U.S., nor is what is killing polar bears. If you were to fund a massive to study to prove those things, they would shift the argument to something else.
It's utterly depressing, because it suggests that a lot of the political divide in this country is insurmountable (although it explains a lot about why we had to fight a devastating civil war in order to free slaves).
No, the GP didn't mean people who play with overclocking settings. What that user is describing is an overwhelming trend today for the software to take away manual control from the user in order to make the software accessible to a wider base of people who don't have expertise in computers because they can take advantage of the manual control. The problem is that by making things automatic you can alienate people who are more experienced with how the system works. It's a lot like the manual vs. automatic transmission argument in cars.
I'll name one example I can think of for this from OS X, but gnome (and linux in general) has suffered this as well: "Save As..." disappeared in 10.7. In the ars technica review the writer makes a strong case that the idea that the user must define when a file is saved is archaic because hard drive space is vast now and everything can be saved. However, for many of us, we use Save As for version control, or when we're just screwing around to see how things would look if we did it another way. In those cases, we don't want to save the document. The problem is compounded because the "Duplicate" feature which replaced "Save As" takes more keystrokes and is unwieldy.
I find I am spending more and more time trying to get new software to behave the way I am used to it behaving, because I don't see any real advantage in the "Usability enhancements" that developers keep pushing and it just seems like a lot of reinventing the wheel is going on. Now... get off my lawn!
Well, the only thing you convinced me of is that your sig is true, yes, you are a crackpot. This is why: A) You need to plot your data in terms of percent spending per GDP. Talking about absolute monetary value is absolutely meaningless because GDP goes up with time, and so does inflation. To put that another way, as the population grows, so does the tax receipts and so does the government providing services for that growing population. The only useful metric is therefore to normalize spending to GDP. The way you have it written is destined to show the most current president as the worst spender (gee wonder what political party you vote for?) B) Congress approves a budget, but the president proposes the budget. The reason is because the president is running the executive branch which is where most of the money is getting spent. Or why do you think we always get ready for each fiscal year by discussing "the president's budget" and whether congress will modify it?
It was in fact NOT a great quarter for Microsoft. I agree that the $6.2 billion loss on the acquisition is a red herring, but if you disregard that and look at the rest of their business, you'll find that their windows revenue declined 13% Yes, DECLINED 13%. Now, you can further write off most of that decline by saying that this is due to the reduced cost of Windows 8 that Microsoft offered to people buying Windows 7 now, but even after you do that, Windows revenue declined 1%. That's not huge, but they still DECLINED in windows sales. You know... WINDOWS... one of the two cash cows that Microsoft owns? Microsoft's core business is shrinking. If I help Microsoft stock, I'd be a bit worried. (For what it's worth, I do hold Apple stock, and I'm worried there too, Microsoft's wave has crested, Apple's is at the peak so there's nowhere to go but down, I'm just waiting for the right time to sell, it might be now.)
But don't let that stop the speculation about how "Microsoft" is doing great.
I can name regressions: 1) "Save As..." has disappeared (an option that has been present since I can remember using a computer with a "file menu"). The "duplicate" function requires more keystrokes and is irritating to use. 2) Mail.app and every app that uses text editing has a bug that when you delete a block of selected text, the text gets deleted but the selection area remains. Just to be clear here: Apple can't even get a TEXT EDITING BOX correct now. 3) The Finder doesn't actually get selected sometimes when the Exposé is activated, 4) Faux stitching in iCal and a silly looking address book, need I say more?, 5) Stupid animations that take too damn long and don't convey any useful information and are sometimes impossible to turn off (including changing pages iCal, moving files with the Finder, etc.), 6) Resuming applications whether you like it or not, regardless of what settings you have selected.
I could say more, but I'm tired of thinking about it. I will give you that Lion does have one or two nice features, but for every nice thing, there's a step back or regression as well. I even went as far as to issue a feature request for Apple to issue a firmware update for snow leopard that allows it to be installed on modern macbooks. Jobs once said something to the effect that large companies stop innovating because they are run by their marketing and sales departments. I think what we're seeing with Lion and Mountain Lion is the truth of that statement. I also don't think it's a coincidence that once Serlet, the VP of software development who was responsible in part for OS Xes 10.4-10.6, retired and now there is no more VP of software development. It's all marketing and sales now (well maybe iOS too)...
Don't use Lion, do you? It is moving very much in the direction of iOS. Read this article. It is rather inflammatory, but the guys makes an interesting point. There is no VP for OS X development listed in Apple's leadership team after Serlet left. He was the one responsible for OS X versions 10.4-10.6, which were the best ones (IMNSHO). If you spend some time talking with long time OS X users, you'll find tepid enthusiasm for 10.7 at best and worst, rabid hatred. Read the comments in this OS X hint on disabling the new autosave in os x. A lot of people don't like the changes in 10.7.
You know, I figured something out several years ago now: instead of upgrading the computer with a bigger hard drive/RAM/video card whatever some years down the line, I just "upgrade" those things when I buy the computer in the first place. So, instead of buying 1 Gb of ram, I buy 4 Gb. Granted, you do have to pay more money up front this way, but it means I also get an up-to-date machine that degrades to a not so up-to-date machine over time, instead of having a not so up-to-date machine, which becomes out-of-date machine, followed by a not so up-to-date machine again later down the road. See the difference? In one case you're ahead of the pace, in another at the pace or behind it. I'm guessing you don't save much money doing the upgrade path either because you have to buy two sets of components. Is buying the extra RAM or whatever more than twice as expensive? Usually not. I will grant you that sometimes one fails to anticipate what the requirements of the machine are going to be for the next five years or so, but that's the buyer's fault for not buying a machine that will suit their needs. It does happen, but on the odd chance, you can still upgrade things on mac laptops, I know, I've replaced two logic boards, hard drives and batteries on various old mac pro laptops over the years, but that's mostly for fun rather than for need. By the time I need to replace the components, the laptop is so old it's not worth upgrading.
It was no accident, the Shanghai index fell 64.89 points and people starting blogging that since 6/4/89 was the date of Tiananmen massacre, the stock index coincided with the date, which is a particularly infamous one. The censors then blocked those people for discussing the massacre, which is verboten. The NYT has a more in depth article. Now, the fact that the stock market fell by that exact amount by closing (see here) might be an accident, but the censors were doing exactly their job, censoring people discussing the massacre. As the NYT points out, other stock markets have been hacked and this may have be the case here as well, or some other intentional act. The Chinese government is investigating and you may rest assured that we will likely never know what they find since that would draw attention to why they were investigating in the first place.
I can confirm that the Apache OO still follows the sane way to select multiple cells unlike Libreoffice. For me, this is a "killer" feature -- I can't live without this so libreoffice has been uninstalled and OO has come back onto my desktop.
As an aside, why is it nowadays that I spend more time trying to get software to behave the way it used to behave before it was updated? I've had problems with "upgrades" of MS Office, OS X, Windows, Openoffice, gnome, kde, and even just getting e17 to work any more on my home machine is an issue. Either I'm just getting old or the productivity of software on the desktop has peaked and in the continual drive for improving things, we're just making worse software. I still upgrade, because there are often some new features that I like in the new software, but it often feels like one step forward, one step back.
I've got a great reason that I'm downloading openoffice right now for. It's this issue. In a nutshell, many moons ago Excel changed their selection rules behavior for no explicable reason and every other spreadsheet on the planet has been copying their behavior. When you call the developers on this, like the guy who submitted this bug report, the developer response is "everyone else does it this way so I won't change it". If Libreoffice is going to strive to be the best clone of Excel that it can, why would I use it? Given the choice, I'll just use Excel. Maybe the Apache version of OO.org still has some distinct behavior instead of just being a clone of something else.
One of the reasons that armies don't try building giant robots is that a two story robot like the one in the video clips present a huge target at long ranges. I forget where I heard this, but there's a reason why M1 is low and squat (8 ft tall) where some early tanks like the Sherman were taller (9 ft). But... who cares! It's remote control robots shooting at each other. How is that not cool?!
I'm watching the "From Earth to the Moon" series right now, and t made me pretty sad to see the one shuttle with its guts all removed, and the other moving in to share the same fate. I wonder if the U.S. will ever have a manned space program again. If NASA is like a lot of other government agencies, there is a large percentage of the workforce that is getting ready to retire and without a program to enable hiring younger people, I imagine that manned U.S. space flight will be done.
Sorry, I guess I read your comment as being more invective than it actually was. The point I was thinking of was that Apple ran the "Macs don't get viruses." add in 2006. That's five years ago, when there really was no widespread malware for OS X. If we're going from no viruses from 2000-2007, to a trojan on pirated software in 2008 and now a social engineering attack three years later in 2011... it's not a pace of development that I'm particularly worried about.
Does the concept of "false equivalence" mean anything to you? Yes, macs have had trojans for awhile on pirated copies of software. Yes, this is an evolution of the malware on OS X since it attempts to trick the user into installing the software. Yes, it'll probably get more complicated than this, but come on -- are you really telling me that since OS X has gotten two instances of malware, after being in use for over a decade, is the same as what has happened with windows? Really?!?
I disagree with you on one point: the real drain is not necessarily STEM OR the humanities, arts, etc., they're both losing out to business. The financial services industry now generates more profit than manufacturing. This is an industry that doesn't make anything tangible or create new ideas, it only pushes money around, supposedly more efficiently. Given that a lot businesses are run by MBAs now that don't have any deep connection with the company they are running, it is any wonder that we have things like "financial instruments" that consist of collateralized debt obligations on a series of collateralized debt obligations? (i.e., a CDO-squared is the common term). Given the financial crisis, most of these guys aren't particularly smart either. Those guys at wall street are pulling down seven, or even eight figures a year and you expect people to major in either art history or chemistry? If one knew any better, why would anyone pick a career in science or art? (Incidentally, it's tempting to say that when people who people who don't actually create anything are making much more money that people who do, it means your society is in deep trouble.)
And yes... I am a scientist. Greespun's portrayal is a little exaggerated, but there's a grain of truth in it. I personally am good enough to make a career of it, but no grad student under me has decided to pick academics as a career path after watching what I had to go through during going for tenure (something I ultimately also recognized and got a different position, one where I'm still in the hot seat, but less politics). I've also watched many, far too many of some who are my friends, go through life jumping from post-doc to post-doc because they can't even get a tenure-track position. It's depressing, or it would be, but I'm too busy trying to not fall off the merry-go-round to be overly concerned with what's happening to others.
Oh, and another thing I noticed on that chart. Look at the percentage sales for the xbox360 vs. other consoles for this year. The xbox360 is at precisely the average change in sales over the past year over all consoles. That means the kinect is not actually helping sell the xbox360, it offers precisely zero competitive advantage against other consoles. As I said in the above message, people who already owned an xbox 360 bought a kinect, and people who already were planning to buy an xbox 360 are buying a kinect, but no one is buying an xbox 360 in order to obtain a kinect, at least, no one who was thinking of buying another console.
I have some references to refute it, how about that?
Look at the hardware and software sales for 2011. Yes, xbox 360 and Kinect are doing well, a kinect game is #3 for top selling game for 2011 so far. However, it's flanked by numbers 2,3 and 4 which are all Wii games. Wii Sports has been out for what, over four years and it's STILL beating the top kinect game? Come on folks, the kinect is a nice device and MS struck a home run with it. But the top selling device in history? NO. What you're seeing is that everyone who already had an xbox 360 bought one, but its not driving xbox 360 sales the way the wii appeals to casual-gamers. It's just not happening.
Slashdot Mirror
I’m not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that’s a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States.
Him, you and all the people like you couldn't be more wrong. Science and mathematics has everything to do with the economic growth of the United States. How can the U.S. compete in biotechnology if what we learn in biology courses is that god created the beetle? How can we compete in oil production if all we learn is that fossils are there to fool the unbelievers and the earth is 6000 years old? Time and evolution created both: 4.54 billion years is a LONG time, animal species can change a lot over that amount of time.
Frankly, I think you people are all nuts, and I'd happily let you live in your bubble if not for the fact that you all are ruining my country. I think it's a real shame that our education system has failed so miserably to produce roughly 48% of the voting population who can't even do basic arithmetic (i.e., go read Ryan's or Romney's economic plans: they either don't add up or impossibly vague). This has nothing to with Democrat or Republican, you could have figure out who was the right person to vote for just by looking at which one could do basic arithmetic. This election, my vote went for logic and reason, and that fortunately prevailed, but only by 3.3% or so.
Actually, EPA and DOE jointly sponsor a web-site that gives you not just EPA ratings, but allows users to enter in their own ratings. Here is the link to my car:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=29712
You can see the EPA rating and the average user's rating are similar, but not exact. The more popular a car is, the more estimates there are. If you click on view individual estimates, it'll show you the locale, driving conditions, and the last time the estimate was updated. I found this site to be invaluable when trying to calculate how long it will take my hybrid to pay itself off in reduced gasoline costs. The answer, BTW, is 90-99k miles, or 5-6 years. Since the hybrid battery is warrantied for 100k miles or 8 years, it'll be fine.
He's pissed off because everyone keeps bitching at him. Nobody liked the Star Wars prequels, nobody liked Indiana Jones 4 (a.k.a. Indiana Jones and the kingdom of just how stupid do they think we are?), and Red Tails. He's declared he's going back to directing art films.
My opinion is that the Star Wars prequels not only showed that Lucas was making it up as he went along for the prequels, but in episodes 4-6 too. All that wondering about why Obi Wan would lie to Luke about Darth Vader killing his father? It's because Lucas pulled it out of his ass because he needed to make another movie after Star Wars was a hit and wanted some sort of continuity and dramatic tension to bring the characters together. Meh, he's still brilliant in terms of special effects, etc., it's just a pity he could never recognize that he should work with someone to get less silly storylines.
Did he now? I really appreciate your comment, it gives me hope! Shit, I wish I still had one of those candy colored imacs. I can still remember replacing OS 9 with os X 10.0 beta on the graphite colored imac. I remember booting X11 up in rootless mode and remarking, "this is going to put SGI out of business." Good times man, good times. Nothing like that sort of innovation going on today in the desktop-space (i.e., yeah yeah, unix had X11 for years, but what I liked about it was that I had all the power and functionality of that SGI 4 processor RISC workstation in my desktop -- just awesome).
After reading that, I realized that this was indeed true and in fact there has been an alternate philosphy besides the skeuomorphic design which is the "war on color" in some aspects of OS X (e.g., the flat gray scroll bars, the gray linen background for the virtual desktop manager, even the world map for changing the time zone). So, now I'm wondering if the skeuomorphic faction led by Forstall has lost the debate, was Ive and the other minimalist design people behind the "war on color" and if that's true, is that what we'll see in future versions of the OS with Ive leading the interface design? I'm not sure how I feel about that, I really don't like using an OS that is drab and boring, it's depressing (I actually liked Aqua for the most part, which was also Forstall's invention I guess). Either way, it's good to know that Apple isn't afraid of rocking the boat still. That skeuomorphic crap might have been good for increasing everyone's vocabulary with regards to interface design, but it was annoying as hell to use.
Now, if only Apple would admit they screwed up the document versioning system beyond repair and give us a proper "Save As..." since the dawn of the computer (or thereabouts) I would consider Apple as having fully realized the error of their ways and moving decidedly in a less terrible direction. But alas, Federhigi is still in charge and they haven't brought Serlet back from retirement unfortunately.
Okay so I'm blowing my mod points (sorry to the people I bumped up) but I just had to jump in here. If you want to read something by Delany, read Dhalgren. My buddy and I both read this book while in college one summer just after the spring semester ended and the town had cleared out of all the students. I had nothing to do for a week except sit around and reading this novel where time has no real common frame-of-reference. Since at the time I myself was in a situation with no fixed schedule, this gave me the most complete mind-fuck I can remember a book giving me.
Many pitchers of very cheap beer were consumed disussing this book and what precisely happened. It's crazy, but it's not so delusional as William S. Burroughs and it's intriguing enough that you keep turning pages and Delany gives you hints and pieces about what's going on as things progress but never enough to completely solve it. The ultimate question was what we ourselves would do put in this situation, in a city where time becomes confused and careers or even jobs become irrelevant. This was one of those books that teaches you something about yourself when you're a young person reading it.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
-- John Rogers.
I love this quote! But you really ought to attribute it to the correct source, which is John Rogers.
Now that carries some weight!
I hate to disappoint you, but no, it won't. There is some (shaky) evidence that conservatives tend to be much less strongly influenced by facts when dealing with political topics, and that education level does not change the outcome. Chris Mooney wrote a book about it, I haven't read it, but it seems that there isn't a silver bullet so much as a lot of studies suggesting, but not proving, the same thing.
Whatever the reason, the point is that it doesn't matter who funded it, the conservatives won't accept climate change, no matter how many facts or studies you perform. If you confront a conservative with a climate change argument, and show them this study, I guarantee that they will shift the argument to saying that Muller now says, yes there is climate change, but it isn't what caused Katrina, nor what caused the drought in the U.S., nor is what is killing polar bears. If you were to fund a massive to study to prove those things, they would shift the argument to something else.
It's utterly depressing, because it suggests that a lot of the political divide in this country is insurmountable (although it explains a lot about why we had to fight a devastating civil war in order to free slaves).
No, the GP didn't mean people who play with overclocking settings. What that user is describing is an overwhelming trend today for the software to take away manual control from the user in order to make the software accessible to a wider base of people who don't have expertise in computers because they can take advantage of the manual control. The problem is that by making things automatic you can alienate people who are more experienced with how the system works. It's a lot like the manual vs. automatic transmission argument in cars.
I'll name one example I can think of for this from OS X, but gnome (and linux in general) has suffered this as well: "Save As..." disappeared in 10.7. In the ars technica review the writer makes a strong case that the idea that the user must define when a file is saved is archaic because hard drive space is vast now and everything can be saved. However, for many of us, we use Save As for version control, or when we're just screwing around to see how things would look if we did it another way. In those cases, we don't want to save the document. The problem is compounded because the "Duplicate" feature which replaced "Save As" takes more keystrokes and is unwieldy.
I find I am spending more and more time trying to get new software to behave the way I am used to it behaving, because I don't see any real advantage in the "Usability enhancements" that developers keep pushing and it just seems like a lot of reinventing the wheel is going on. Now... get off my lawn!
Well, the only thing you convinced me of is that your sig is true, yes, you are a crackpot. This is why: A) You need to plot your data in terms of percent spending per GDP. Talking about absolute monetary value is absolutely meaningless because GDP goes up with time, and so does inflation. To put that another way, as the population grows, so does the tax receipts and so does the government providing services for that growing population. The only useful metric is therefore to normalize spending to GDP. The way you have it written is destined to show the most current president as the worst spender (gee wonder what political party you vote for?) B) Congress approves a budget, but the president proposes the budget. The reason is because the president is running the executive branch which is where most of the money is getting spent. Or why do you think we always get ready for each fiscal year by discussing "the president's budget" and whether congress will modify it?
It was in fact NOT a great quarter for Microsoft. I agree that the $6.2 billion loss on the acquisition is a red herring, but if you disregard that and look at the rest of their business, you'll find that their windows revenue declined 13% Yes, DECLINED 13%. Now, you can further write off most of that decline by saying that this is due to the reduced cost of Windows 8 that Microsoft offered to people buying Windows 7 now, but even after you do that, Windows revenue declined 1%. That's not huge, but they still DECLINED in windows sales. You know... WINDOWS... one of the two cash cows that Microsoft owns? Microsoft's core business is shrinking. If I help Microsoft stock, I'd be a bit worried. (For what it's worth, I do hold Apple stock, and I'm worried there too, Microsoft's wave has crested, Apple's is at the peak so there's nowhere to go but down, I'm just waiting for the right time to sell, it might be now.)
But don't let that stop the speculation about how "Microsoft" is doing great.
I can name regressions: 1) "Save As..." has disappeared (an option that has been present since I can remember using a computer with a "file menu"). The "duplicate" function requires more keystrokes and is irritating to use. 2) Mail.app and every app that uses text editing has a bug that when you delete a block of selected text, the text gets deleted but the selection area remains. Just to be clear here: Apple can't even get a TEXT EDITING BOX correct now. 3) The Finder doesn't actually get selected sometimes when the Exposé is activated, 4) Faux stitching in iCal and a silly looking address book, need I say more?, 5) Stupid animations that take too damn long and don't convey any useful information and are sometimes impossible to turn off (including changing pages iCal, moving files with the Finder, etc.), 6) Resuming applications whether you like it or not, regardless of what settings you have selected.
I could say more, but I'm tired of thinking about it. I will give you that Lion does have one or two nice features, but for every nice thing, there's a step back or regression as well. I even went as far as to issue a feature request for Apple to issue a firmware update for snow leopard that allows it to be installed on modern macbooks. Jobs once said something to the effect that large companies stop innovating because they are run by their marketing and sales departments. I think what we're seeing with Lion and Mountain Lion is the truth of that statement. I also don't think it's a coincidence that once Serlet, the VP of software development who was responsible in part for OS Xes 10.4-10.6, retired and now there is no more VP of software development. It's all marketing and sales now (well maybe iOS too)...
Don't use Lion, do you? It is moving very much in the direction of iOS. Read this article. It is rather inflammatory, but the guys makes an interesting point. There is no VP for OS X development listed in Apple's leadership team after Serlet left. He was the one responsible for OS X versions 10.4-10.6, which were the best ones (IMNSHO). If you spend some time talking with long time OS X users, you'll find tepid enthusiasm for 10.7 at best and worst, rabid hatred. Read the comments in this OS X hint on disabling the new autosave in os x. A lot of people don't like the changes in 10.7.
You know, I figured something out several years ago now: instead of upgrading the computer with a bigger hard drive/RAM/video card whatever some years down the line, I just "upgrade" those things when I buy the computer in the first place. So, instead of buying 1 Gb of ram, I buy 4 Gb. Granted, you do have to pay more money up front this way, but it means I also get an up-to-date machine that degrades to a not so up-to-date machine over time, instead of having a not so up-to-date machine, which becomes out-of-date machine, followed by a not so up-to-date machine again later down the road. See the difference? In one case you're ahead of the pace, in another at the pace or behind it. I'm guessing you don't save much money doing the upgrade path either because you have to buy two sets of components. Is buying the extra RAM or whatever more than twice as expensive? Usually not. I will grant you that sometimes one fails to anticipate what the requirements of the machine are going to be for the next five years or so, but that's the buyer's fault for not buying a machine that will suit their needs. It does happen, but on the odd chance, you can still upgrade things on mac laptops, I know, I've replaced two logic boards, hard drives and batteries on various old mac pro laptops over the years, but that's mostly for fun rather than for need. By the time I need to replace the components, the laptop is so old it's not worth upgrading.
It was no accident, the Shanghai index fell 64.89 points and people starting blogging that since 6/4/89 was the date of Tiananmen massacre, the stock index coincided with the date, which is a particularly infamous one. The censors then blocked those people for discussing the massacre, which is verboten. The NYT has a more in depth article. Now, the fact that the stock market fell by that exact amount by closing (see here) might be an accident, but the censors were doing exactly their job, censoring people discussing the massacre. As the NYT points out, other stock markets have been hacked and this may have be the case here as well, or some other intentional act. The Chinese government is investigating and you may rest assured that we will likely never know what they find since that would draw attention to why they were investigating in the first place.
I can confirm that the Apache OO still follows the sane way to select multiple cells unlike Libreoffice. For me, this is a "killer" feature -- I can't live without this so libreoffice has been uninstalled and OO has come back onto my desktop.
As an aside, why is it nowadays that I spend more time trying to get software to behave the way it used to behave before it was updated? I've had problems with "upgrades" of MS Office, OS X, Windows, Openoffice, gnome, kde, and even just getting e17 to work any more on my home machine is an issue. Either I'm just getting old or the productivity of software on the desktop has peaked and in the continual drive for improving things, we're just making worse software. I still upgrade, because there are often some new features that I like in the new software, but it often feels like one step forward, one step back.
I've got a great reason that I'm downloading openoffice right now for. It's this issue. In a nutshell, many moons ago Excel changed their selection rules behavior for no explicable reason and every other spreadsheet on the planet has been copying their behavior. When you call the developers on this, like the guy who submitted this bug report, the developer response is "everyone else does it this way so I won't change it". If Libreoffice is going to strive to be the best clone of Excel that it can, why would I use it? Given the choice, I'll just use Excel. Maybe the Apache version of OO.org still has some distinct behavior instead of just being a clone of something else.
One of the reasons that armies don't try building giant robots is that a two story robot like the one in the video clips present a huge target at long ranges. I forget where I heard this, but there's a reason why M1 is low and squat (8 ft tall) where some early tanks like the Sherman were taller (9 ft). But... who cares! It's remote control robots shooting at each other. How is that not cool?!
I'm watching the "From Earth to the Moon" series right now, and t made me pretty sad to see the one shuttle with its guts all removed, and the other moving in to share the same fate. I wonder if the U.S. will ever have a manned space program again. If NASA is like a lot of other government agencies, there is a large percentage of the workforce that is getting ready to retire and without a program to enable hiring younger people, I imagine that manned U.S. space flight will be done.
Sorry, I guess I read your comment as being more invective than it actually was. The point I was thinking of was that Apple ran the "Macs don't get viruses." add in 2006. That's five years ago, when there really was no widespread malware for OS X. If we're going from no viruses from 2000-2007, to a trojan on pirated software in 2008 and now a social engineering attack three years later in 2011... it's not a pace of development that I'm particularly worried about.
Does the concept of "false equivalence" mean anything to you? Yes, macs have had trojans for awhile on pirated copies of software. Yes, this is an evolution of the malware on OS X since it attempts to trick the user into installing the software. Yes, it'll probably get more complicated than this, but come on -- are you really telling me that since OS X has gotten two instances of malware, after being in use for over a decade, is the same as what has happened with windows? Really?!?
I disagree with you on one point: the real drain is not necessarily STEM OR the humanities, arts, etc., they're both losing out to business. The financial services industry now generates more profit than manufacturing. This is an industry that doesn't make anything tangible or create new ideas, it only pushes money around, supposedly more efficiently. Given that a lot businesses are run by MBAs now that don't have any deep connection with the company they are running, it is any wonder that we have things like "financial instruments" that consist of collateralized debt obligations on a series of collateralized debt obligations? (i.e., a CDO-squared is the common term). Given the financial crisis, most of these guys aren't particularly smart either. Those guys at wall street are pulling down seven, or even eight figures a year and you expect people to major in either art history or chemistry? If one knew any better, why would anyone pick a career in science or art? (Incidentally, it's tempting to say that when people who people who don't actually create anything are making much more money that people who do, it means your society is in deep trouble.)
And yes... I am a scientist. Greespun's portrayal is a little exaggerated, but there's a grain of truth in it. I personally am good enough to make a career of it, but no grad student under me has decided to pick academics as a career path after watching what I had to go through during going for tenure (something I ultimately also recognized and got a different position, one where I'm still in the hot seat, but less politics). I've also watched many, far too many of some who are my friends, go through life jumping from post-doc to post-doc because they can't even get a tenure-track position. It's depressing, or it would be, but I'm too busy trying to not fall off the merry-go-round to be overly concerned with what's happening to others.
Oh, and another thing I noticed on that chart. Look at the percentage sales for the xbox360 vs. other consoles for this year. The xbox360 is at precisely the average change in sales over the past year over all consoles. That means the kinect is not actually helping sell the xbox360, it offers precisely zero competitive advantage against other consoles. As I said in the above message, people who already owned an xbox 360 bought a kinect, and people who already were planning to buy an xbox 360 are buying a kinect, but no one is buying an xbox 360 in order to obtain a kinect, at least, no one who was thinking of buying another console.
I have some references to refute it, how about that?
Look at the hardware and software sales for 2011. Yes, xbox 360 and Kinect are doing well, a kinect game is #3 for top selling game for 2011 so far. However, it's flanked by numbers 2,3 and 4 which are all Wii games. Wii Sports has been out for what, over four years and it's STILL beating the top kinect game? Come on folks, the kinect is a nice device and MS struck a home run with it. But the top selling device in history? NO. What you're seeing is that everyone who already had an xbox 360 bought one, but its not driving xbox 360 sales the way the wii appeals to casual-gamers. It's just not happening.