I think if the likes of Facebook can get 500million+ to notice something on their website then there may be just enough ire lit under a congressman's ass.
Considering that would a couple hundred million more than the population of the entire country...
What candidates hope to get out of Iowa, mainly, seems to be being able to say they won an election, or did way better than expected (e.g. Santorum), essentially in the hopes that it will persuade...
"people to give them money" is the correct ending to that sentence.
The rule is that you have to prove your damages to be awarded them. Unless they can prove that they've been damaged, I see absolutely no reason why they should be given a penny that other industries wouldn't get under similar circumstances.
That wouldn't be hard at all. Remember, "prove" in civil cases is preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt. If you're using the software without paying for it, you'd have to be pretty good at showing that you wouldn't be able to pay for it to tilt the case back in your favor.
So, I can take the Linux kernel source and run it through a program which changes identifiers and manipulates loops so that the same effect is achieved in different "words", and gain complete rights?
Before it just meant "the Internet", this is what "cloud computing" meant. I assume the analogy was supposed to be that you have a vast number of small, basically identical water droplets that together form something different than just a giant pile of water.
No, the defense against libel would be to have it proven that what she wrote was untrue.
Except that would frequently require proving a negative. If I publicly state that you murdered a young child last year, how is it at all reasonable to require that you prove that you didn't?
You only need one of the items in the list, though. So as long as you are employed by Fox News, CNN, or MSNBC, you don't need to worry about silly things like journalistic standards.
Even your example of libel is pretty borderline. Usually, it has to be something that is a clear statement of fact. An ordinary person would not think that you are genuinely accusing him of criminal terrorist acts, or that "lied, cheated, and stole" is meant to be a specific accusation. A better example of libel would be "Obama robbed my grandfather's grocery store in 1997." That's a definitive statement of fact (a specific criminal act, in particular) that either is or is not true.
If that's true, why can I buy 100,000 battery cradles, camera add ons, cases, credit card readers, sushi makers and personal massager extensions for my iphone but there are barely any Android specific accessories besides a few cases and some carrier marketed dash/desk mounts.
I knew a few 'D' Players who were treated like they were some sort of bad ass ninjas, just because nobody in charge had any clue how to evaluate them or their work... and the few people who did realize it were less visible and thus got totally ignored.
Now I know that you're just making shit up. Everybody knows that it's the bad ass ninjas that are less (completely in-) visible.
If there's been any sort of pattern to the changes found recently, I'd be curious to read the layman's explanation of it. Last I had read, a large group of neutrinos tended to eventually become 1/3 of each kind, no matter what kind they started out as. That was several years ago, though. I haven't read about any mechanism or reason for the changing, but I'm sure I'm pretty far behind.
Yeah, that is what I meant, electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tauon neutrino. I assumed anyone reading this would understand. Thanks for clarifying.
I think if the likes of Facebook can get 500million+ to notice something on their website then there may be just enough ire lit under a congressman's ass.
Considering that would a couple hundred million more than the population of the entire country...
What candidates hope to get out of Iowa, mainly, seems to be being able to say they won an election, or did way better than expected (e.g. Santorum), essentially in the hopes that it will persuade...
"people to give them money" is the correct ending to that sentence.
The rule is that you have to prove your damages to be awarded them. Unless they can prove that they've been damaged, I see absolutely no reason why they should be given a penny that other industries wouldn't get under similar circumstances.
That wouldn't be hard at all. Remember, "prove" in civil cases is preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt. If you're using the software without paying for it, you'd have to be pretty good at showing that you wouldn't be able to pay for it to tilt the case back in your favor.
So, I can take the Linux kernel source and run it through a program which changes identifiers and manipulates loops so that the same effect is achieved in different "words", and gain complete rights?
No, that would still be a derivative work.
19-year cycle. 7 out of the 19 years have a leap month, conveniently called Adar II.
You can try to read a book. A real book. A fiction book. You will be surprised.
You're right, I could try reading a book on the bus. I don't think the person next to me would appreciate it when I vomit on them, though.
I think someone needs to re-read Leviticus. Yahweh most certainly hates homosexuals.
You know what else God most certainly hates? Shellfish. See also, Why Can't I Own a Canadian?
Which is of course, a pagan holiday, so distinctly not atheist.
How about a real atheist name?
Hogswatch.
I am pretty sure we had a professional wrestler as the govenor of another state in the last 15 years.
Jesse Ventura was the governor of Minnesota.
masturbation effects stress levels
If that happens, I'm pretty sure you're doing it wrong.
Before it just meant "the Internet", this is what "cloud computing" meant. I assume the analogy was supposed to be that you have a vast number of small, basically identical water droplets that together form something different than just a giant pile of water.
No, the defense against libel would be to have it proven that what she wrote was untrue.
Except that would frequently require proving a negative. If I publicly state that you murdered a young child last year, how is it at all reasonable to require that you prove that you didn't?
You only need one of the items in the list, though. So as long as you are employed by Fox News, CNN, or MSNBC, you don't need to worry about silly things like journalistic standards.
Even your example of libel is pretty borderline. Usually, it has to be something that is a clear statement of fact. An ordinary person would not think that you are genuinely accusing him of criminal terrorist acts, or that "lied, cheated, and stole" is meant to be a specific accusation. A better example of libel would be "Obama robbed my grandfather's grocery store in 1997." That's a definitive statement of fact (a specific criminal act, in particular) that either is or is not true.
You seem to be overlooking the fact that "grinding to a halt" is all that Congress understands these days.
For all intense purposes your saying the same thing.
Same difference.
Apple has revolutionized a myriad of industries and ushered in multiple eras of new computing paradigms.
Bingo!
Everybody knows goombas are better at predicting earthquakes.
I don't think it's that hard to predict an earthquake when you see a plumber carrying a large block with "POW" on the side coming towards you.
Tegra 3, an unreleased chip that you won't be able to actually get in a shipping product for several months at least
Hm, the calendar on my computer must be broken, since December 19th is at least several months away.
If that's true, why can I buy 100,000 battery cradles, camera add ons, cases, credit card readers, sushi makers and personal massager extensions for my iphone but there are barely any Android specific accessories besides a few cases and some carrier marketed dash/desk mounts.
Because iPhone users have more disposable income?
I knew a few 'D' Players who were treated like they were some sort of bad ass ninjas, just because nobody in charge had any clue how to evaluate them or their work... and the few people who did realize it were less visible and thus got totally ignored.
Now I know that you're just making shit up. Everybody knows that it's the bad ass ninjas that are less (completely in-) visible.
You mean the worst cold medicine ever created?
units of the standard deviation Ïf of a normal distribution
Now how'd that get in there?
Pair production? Maybe now there's an anti-Ïf floating around somewhere.
If there's been any sort of pattern to the changes found recently, I'd be curious to read the layman's explanation of it. Last I had read, a large group of neutrinos tended to eventually become 1/3 of each kind, no matter what kind they started out as. That was several years ago, though. I haven't read about any mechanism or reason for the changing, but I'm sure I'm pretty far behind.
Yeah, that is what I meant, electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tauon neutrino. I assumed anyone reading this would understand. Thanks for clarifying.