Slashdot Mirror


Christmas Always On Sunday? Researchers Propose New Calendar

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have discovered a way to make time stand still — at least when it comes to the yearly calendar. Using computer programs and mathematical formulas, an astrophysicist and an economist have created a new calendar in which each new 12-month period is identical to the one which came before, and remains that way from one year to the next in perpetuity."

725 comments

  1. Christmas by Aighearach · · Score: 2, Funny

    is not for grinches, you can't have my day off.

  2. Eff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My birthday would always be on Monday.

    1. Re:Eff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would mine. Mondays suck. My supervisor has already taken away any quality of life, now my birthday would be moved to the most suck ass day of the week. I'll keep the present system, Thank you.

    2. Re:Eff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine too, I'd rather it be on a Wednesday... because I'd likely be off of work on Thursdays and Fridays anyway. Three days off for my birthday every year would be nice.

      And what the hell?!? Only 30 days in October?? What a desecration--where the hell did Halloween go?!? It just seems wrong to make Halloween October 30th when it is traditionally the 31st. I demand that they borrow from some shitty month that has too many days. I propose February. No one will miss the extra day; it already traditionally has only 28 days normally, it'll still have two more than that and one more than if it were a leap year.

    3. Re:Eff that... by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Mine would always be Friday the 13th!

    4. Re:Eff that... by Persnickity · · Score: 1

      At least your birthday is still on the calendar... Mine disappeared.

      --
      - Persnickity
    5. Re:Eff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like somebody's got a case of the birthdays.

    6. Re:Eff that... by rubeng · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like anyone remembers being born on a particular day anyhow. As far as I know it's just a day my mom made up and had typed on a piece of paper.

      Just celebrate your birth-week, and party any day you want. Heck, I'm sick of having a January birthday no matter what day of the week it is. I've decided I'm going with half-birthdays and celebrating in July. Why should a person be cursed their whole life with crappy weather on their b-day.

    7. Re:Eff that... by x3rc3s · · Score: 1

      Mine would always be on Thanksgiving to which I also say, fuck that.

    8. Re:Eff that... by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for this as it would eliminate time zones and daylight savings.

      Plus, my birthday would forever be Friday the 13th.

    9. Re:Eff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 4th of July always being on a Wednesday - bad idea. I like the idea of knowing there will be years when I will automatically have the 4th AND 5th of July off so I can recoup from the 4th. That would NEVER happen under the new calender.

  3. Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about we work on the adoption of the metric system first. It makes more sense and means more in the long run.

    1. Re:Not a bad idea but... by sneakyimp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      mod parent up.

    2. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or star trek like translators that convert units in real time, so each of us can be maximally free to use whatever system we choose.

    3. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And then get to work about removing some redundancy with the time zones. No one needs summer time. Or normal time. Your choice as to which to remove, really.

    4. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't understand why it makes more sense... 10 is a terrible number.... 12 is better but 60 is much better.... we should scrap both systems and go to a base 12 or base 60 system.... even the Babylonians knew this.

    5. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's an old battle between anatomy (having 10 fingers) and pure mathematics (factorization).

    6. Re:Not a bad idea but... by CaptainLard · · Score: 4, Informative

      We almost got there in the late 70's. Fortunately, Reagan swooped in to save us from having to drive 370 kilosocialists from DC to NY. But you're in luck. If you really want to use the metric system exclusively in the US, just join the military ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_States )

    7. Re:Not a bad idea but... by jdpars · · Score: 0

      Messing with calendars has disastrous effects. Seriously. It's a weird thing to study, but those who do do not see good coming from making the calendar "just a little bit better."

    8. Re:Not a bad idea but... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      How about we work on the adoption of the metric system first. It makes more sense and means more in the long run.

      I thought most manufacturing already used the metric system, so what does it matter? And if you want to buy a 355 mL can of Coke instead of a 12 ounce one, more power to you ... both figures are right there on the label, so you can take your pick.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:Not a bad idea but... by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this tried a few times? Last I remember it was in the 90s sometime and it only lasted for about a day or two because the idiots couldn't figure out the conversion.
      "OMG I WTF does 3.77L translate too!?" ..."A gallon stupid!"

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    10. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we always make it on a Monday? No? That's because it would mean giving worker-drones the day off... if we put it on Sunday, they are already being allowed the weekend.

    11. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It wasn't Reagan, per se, but the fact that there is so much military hardware out there and being maintained
      already the the conversion of theses systems are darn near impossible. It's not a matter of replacing a 1/4"x20
      bolt with a "metric" equivalent measurement; all of those engineering drawings, etc, would have to be converted.
      Plus all of the supporting tooling, etc. At the time (70's) it would have been far easier to convert the world to
      U.S. standards.
      Reagan just tabled the obvious.

    12. Re:Not a bad idea but... by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1

      Binary is the way to go; it is the only irreducible base system.

    13. Re:Not a bad idea but... by icebike · · Score: 2

      Military?
      I thought they were already pretty much metric.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:Not a bad idea but... by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      3.77 litres: A bit short of a US Gallon (3.785 litres) and well short of an Imperial Gallon (4.546 litres).

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    15. Re:Not a bad idea but... by dl748 · · Score: 1

      I would totally like time and dates to also be in multiples of 10. 10 seconds in a minute, 10 minutes in a hour, so on and so forth, but that would changes what the "second" actually means.

    16. Re:Not a bad idea but... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1, Insightful

      how many mm is my 5/8" head bolt? how many meters are between my 16" on center wall studs? Why would all my roughly 1 mile apart main streets now be stuck at 2.4ish km? to me, there is just far to much that is dependent on imperial measurements that getting people to think in them is not going to happen.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    17. Re:Not a bad idea but... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone working in manufacturing (in the USA), we still regularly use *both* systems, lbs and kg, gallons and liters. It is a minor annoyance, adding work and occasionally confusion.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    18. Re:Not a bad idea but... by just_a_monkey · · Score: 1

      No need to mumble; you can spell it out. What disastrous effects are you referring to?

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    19. Re:Not a bad idea but... by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're forgetting unary. How many fingers are on a normal human hand? The answer is 1111111111.

      Unary is great for adding, you don't have to do anything at all. What's 11111+111? Just remove the '+' and you have the answer.

    20. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The thing about the metric system is that it is easy to divide and multiply by 10, so it is very attractive in theory, especially if you work in some academic realm that deals in number using "scientific notation".

      Measurements based on 12 and 16 are much more pragmatic in the every-day real world because 12 divides by 2, 3, and 4 (so halves, thirds, and quarters are nice round numbers and easy to work with) which is incredibly convenient in construction (where physically dividing a piece of lumber in those parts is common) and lots of other areas.

      Think also about when you stack a pallet of boxes. A 3 by 4 box base makes for a dozen boxes per layer. Units of dozens are great number for wholesale trading when you have to actually ship product. Try to make a stable pallet load stacked 2 by 5.

      16 of course is great because you can divide by 2, then by 2 again, and again, and again and still have nice whole numbers. And of course a hexadecimal-based world should be every geeks wet dream come true.

    21. Re:Not a bad idea but... by fnj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "how many mm is my 5/8" head bolt?" - 15.875.
      "how many meters are between my 16" on center wall studs?" - 0.4064
      "Why would all my roughly 1 mile apart main streets now be stuck at 2.4ish km?" - for the same reason all your streets which are now about 1.25ish miles apart will now be a nice round 2 km apart.
      Any other pointless questions I can help you with?
      Just how do you think every other country in the world, with a handful of exceptions, converted to metric? By JUST DOING IT, that's how. Funny. It didn't hurt any of them, or overtax people's brains there.

      Just think how superior anyone with a halfway working sense of math is going to feel for a few years until everyone gets used to the new way.

    22. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Sique · · Score: 1

      In the civilized world, a can of coke has 1/3 l (333 ml).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    23. Re:Not a bad idea but... by sd4f · · Score: 2

      no, just use the metric system.

    24. Re:Not a bad idea but... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Thinking in them would be perhaps easyer if you would not mix up 2.4km with 1.4km (1 mile).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just think how superior anyone with a halfway working sense of math is going to feel

      1 mile apart main streets now be stuck at 2.4ish km

      1.25ish miles apart will now be a nice round 2 km

    26. Re:Not a bad idea but... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Why would all my roughly 1 mile apart main streets now be stuck at 2.4ish km?

      Well, they wouldn't, actually. A mile is 1.6km, not 2.4km.

      Note that the real reason for not switching is that it doesn't really matter very much to most people. 2 liter coke. check. 12 oz cokes, check. kilo of cocaine, check. Pound of plain ground round, check....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    27. Re:Not a bad idea but... by atriusofbricia · · Score: 2

      how many mm is my 5/8" head bolt? how many meters are between my 16" on center wall studs? Why would all my roughly 1 mile apart main streets now be stuck at 2.4ish km? to me, there is just far to much that is dependent on imperial measurements that getting people to think in them is not going to happen.

      More to the point, aside from compatibility with the rest of the world (may or may not be overrated depending on situation), what does it really get us?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    28. Re:Not a bad idea but... by joggle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's funny. The military, in some ways, is the most progressive part of the American government. Where was metric first widely adopted? Where was racial integration first introduced? Where did we first phase out the use of pennies?

      Cut the politicians out of the bureaucracy and you can actually make some progress.

    29. Re:Not a bad idea but... by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 2

      How many fingers are on a normal human hand? The answer is 1111111111.

      On one (1) hand? You should see a doctor (or drink less).

    30. Re:Not a bad idea but... by westlake · · Score: 1

      How about we work on the adoption of the metric system first. It makes more sense and means more in the long run.

      In a federal republic of 50 states, a population of 312 million and a territory of 3.79 million square miles there are no compelling reasons to invest the enormous political captial required to force the abandonment of customary measures where they remain familiar, convenient and useful.

    31. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Barbarian.. here in the REAL civilized world, a glass of coke at a restaurant is about 5 Liters. usually coupled with a 3 meat patty burger covered in gobs of crap and fries dipped in salt and sugar.

      We are the the most civilized, I would strike you down but I can't reach my sword anymore and get get up from this couch.... I stab at thee with my sausage fingers....

      BRING ME MORE SUGAR AND FAT!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    32. Re:Not a bad idea but... by swalve · · Score: 1

      It actually makes the calendar just a bit worse to make life a little bit easier. I realized that I really like having Christmas and New Years on Sunday. Most importantly, having Christmas Eve off (Saturday) and the day after Christmas (holiday).

      My only quibble with the calendar is, what do you do with the extra weeks? Short of a worldwide orgy-week, I can forsee troubles with that. How do you account for business sales when they don't happen in the regular year or during a regular quarter?

    33. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would all my roughly 1 mile apart main streets now be stuck at 2.4ish km?

      A rather bizarre earthquake?

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    34. Re:Not a bad idea but... by swalve · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's not like they would outlaw using imperial units. We will still be able to keep our SAE wrenches. All that would happen is pretty much what is already happening everywhere except the nut and bolt section of the hardware store- stuff gets labeled in both until attrition kills off the imperial units.

    35. Re:Not a bad idea but... by ewieling · · Score: 1

      I expect we will soon be buying 300ml cans of Coke for the same price as we currently pay for a 12oz can. We are already metric for packages of soft drinks larger than 20oz.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    36. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Baseclass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or star trek like translators that convert units in real time, so each of us can be maximally free to use whatever system we choose.

      Apparently NASA didn't get that memo.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    37. Re:Not a bad idea but... by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      just redefine the inch to be something more friendly than 25.4mm (say, 25.6mm) the pint as half a liter the pound as half a kilo and you're there.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    38. Re:Not a bad idea but... by wkk2 · · Score: 2

      Metric won't happen without a really big stick. Fuel pumps would probably change in less than 24 hours if there was a 1% tax on sales measured in gallons.

    39. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Bad idea: we already use the metric system everywhere important. It's not going to help anything to report weather temps in Celcius or road distances in km in those countries which haven't changed, but in scientific fields, everyone already uses metric units so there's no problem.

    40. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know if it's true, but I heard once that in the 70s, the gas stations (here in the USA) tried to switch to metric, but at the same time they jacked up the prices hoping no one would notice because of the unit change to liters. People found out and got really pissed off, and the metrification movement got the blame for this and it became politically unpopular.

    41. Re:Not a bad idea but... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to mention, who is actually making progress eliminating dependence on fossil fuels?

      If we won't do it for the environment, at least we'll do it for national security...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    42. Re:Not a bad idea but... by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      The only digit in unary is 0.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    43. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The soldiers might be, but they don't build the planes, tanks, and guns.

    44. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      Just think how superior anyone with a halfway working sense of math is going to feel for a few years until everyone gets used to the new way.

      Metric makes the math easier, not harder, genius.

    45. Re:Not a bad idea but... by kheldan · · Score: 1

      How about we work on things like world peace, world hunger, world energy shortages, global climate change, global pollution, worldwide human rights, etc. before we start "fixing" something that really isn't broken in the first place? For that matter, how about we work on abolishing daylight savings time entirely as a stupid idea that just screws with people's natural sleep patterns? Seriously, I think some people come up with this shit just because they're attention whores.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    46. Re:Not a bad idea but... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it's hardly just the military. We have a huge amount of previously existing infrastructure that would have to either be torn down and replaced or cobbled together out of a mishmash of metric and customary measured components.

      The main difference is that the US by that time had a set of standards that were enforced and worked, we didn't have the advantage the Europe did of having to already redo most of the infrastructure or the advantage that the 2nd and 3rd world did of not having much previously built infrastructure.

      We have converted to metric for some things like soda and many cars are metric, but when all is said and done, for most people there just isn't much advantage to going metric.

    47. Re:Not a bad idea but... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You just answered your own question there, that's precisely why we didn't do it and why we never will. Europe converted on a nation by nation basis and in the aftermath of WWI and WWII had the option of redoing that with some consistency. The US OTOH has had a consistent, and enforced, set of units for a long, long time and those were based on the system developed by the British.

      The problem isn't overtaxing people's brains it's that everything is measured by our current system of measurements. Building materials are sold in imperial units, all our existing infrastructure uses imperial units. Building codes specify things using imperial units and it's an absolutely mind bogglingly large number of combinations to worry about.

      It's not about us being stupid, it's about us having a stable system that works and being asked to give that up for something that would result in an inferior outcome.

    48. Re:Not a bad idea but... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The appearance of the tick mark is irrelevant, so sure, go ahead and use a circle if you want. But if you're thinking of that circle as standing for "zero" then you are speaking nonsense, as any number of zeros collected together is still zero.

    49. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 1

      Nice catch.
      1 mile = 1.609 km
      2 km = 1.243 miles

      --
      And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
    50. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      You mean infrastructure like the loads and loads of bridges that need to be decommissioned and rebuilt because they're 10 or 20 years past their service life? Not all bridges can be maintained forever.

    51. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Because "That's the way we've always done it!" has always worked out for mankind in the past.

    52. Re:Not a bad idea but... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Do you think a prescription should say something like: "Take 1 every 50 kiloseconds for 2 megaseconds"? I do not think that traditional units are not going away any time soon, especially for time.

    53. Re:Not a bad idea but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Three mags of 5.56x45mm, check.

    54. Re:Not a bad idea but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      BRING ME MORE SUGAR

      Did you mean to write "high-fructose corn syrup"?

    55. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2

      Actually, unary works great with addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. Seriously. It helps legibility if you use the comma every five places, which matches the common form of unary math, the tally mark system.

      1111 * 11 = 1111 * 1 + 1111 * 1 = 1111+1111 = 111,11111 [ 4 * 2 = 8 ]
      11111 * 111 = 11111+11111+11111 = 11111,11111,11111 [ 5 * 3 = 15 ]

      1,11111 / 111 = 1001, but there are no zeroes, so = 11 [ 6 / 3 = 2 ]

      That all this works doesn't so much reflect anything magical about the unary system as it reflects the integrity of the place value system and how that system is essential to the way we learn to calculate long multiplication and long division. The only problem with it is that it doesn't do decimals. 0.1 unary = 1 * 1^(-1) = 1. This means you're stuck using fractions.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    56. Re:Not a bad idea but... by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't work full shifts outdoors.

    57. Re:Not a bad idea but... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Actually it makes it quite a bit harder when everything is measured in imperial units currently. 1 + 1 when counting inches is much easier than 2.54 + 2.54.

      All the metric units are easier as long as everything uses those metric units. when everything except the import cars are standard measurements then it's just not practical.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    58. Re:Not a bad idea but... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      sorry was thinking inches/centimeters, but the point is still valid. I should apply for a job and NASA.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    59. Re:Not a bad idea but... by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      no, just use the metric system.

      Yeah and a Metric Calendar

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    60. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... what's 1 - 1 ?

    61. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for a set of hands we have 11111111111111111111 fingers. That's a lot of fingers for a single person but just perfect for that consistently unlucky member of Yakuza.

    62. Re:Not a bad idea but... by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2

      I have a 1986 military-surplus HMMWV. The engine and transmission have metric fasteners, while the body and chassis have inch fasteners. The engine (GM 6.2 liter V8 diesel) and transmission (GM Turbo Hydramatic 400) are based on civilian designs with minor modifications, and inherited the metric fasteners from their civilian counterparts. The body and chassis are a mix of custom-designed parts and standard stuff that's common across US military vehicles (especially many electrical components which are interchangeable across a wide variety of vehicles spanning decades of service). I don't recall what sorts of fasteners are used on other driveline components like the transfer case, differentials, etc., as it's been a while since I've turned wrenches on my truck.

      My older US military vehicles use all inch fasteners. I don't have hands-on experience with US military vehicles newer than the HMMWV series, so I don't know if those use inch and/or metric fasteners. Still, I'm pretty sure that there are a lot of US military vehicles and other equipment still in service using inch fasteners.

    63. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then let those standards stay. I'm working on a standard spacing of 2.54 millimeters when doing MC work, take a wild guess where that comes from.

      The only drawback is that after a while some standards won't make sense anymore. Take the water pipes. Water pipes marked with a "1" were actually once 2.54cm wide (i.e. 1 inch) on the inside. Leading to an outside diameter of about 33 mms, dictated by the properties of the metal used for the pipe, and the requirement to withstand the water pressure reliably. After a century of metallurgy, we now have pipes with thinner walls at equal strength. Since all the screws and other plumbing equipment relies on the outside diameter (since, well, where do you attach the connectors?), this leads to a bigger inside diameter that has nothing to do with an inch anymore.

      But that wouldn't be different if we still measured pipe diameters in inches, of course.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    64. Re:Not a bad idea but... by icebike · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable for Humvee,
      What about all the aircraft, ships, tanks, heavy trucks, etc?

        It stands to reason some light trucks might have civilian parts, but one would expect the big ticket items have all been converted long ago to metric. I'm just guessing here, and lots of that equipment was designed well before the move to metric, but I seem to recall the Military was moving that direction well before the rest of the government got started.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    65. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A much more logical system.

    66. Re:Not a bad idea but... by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      how many mm is my 5/8" head bolt?

      Who cares? If we switch to metric tomorrow, your 5/8" head bolt will still be a 5/8" head bolt. You'll still use a 7/16" wrench on a common 1/4"-20 bolt. Conversely, an M3 screw is an M3 screw, even in the USA; it doesn't turn into a 7.6/64" screw when it crosses the border. Fasteners keep their original designations from the units they were designed in.

      In any case, even a US-designed and US-made engine from the last few decades may have all metric fasteners, anyway. The mid-1980s GM 6.2 liter V8 diesel engines in several of my trucks have all metric fasteners.

    67. Re:Not a bad idea but... by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me at all if newly-designed stuff is largely metric by now, but I think that we still field a lot of equipment that was designed even earlier than the HMMWV. I expect that US maintenance folks will be dragging around both inch and metric wrenches for a long time until legacy designs completely leave service and take their inch fasteners with them. A lot of military items have service lives of many decades. As I recall, it's been less than a decade since we made the last push to eliminate the 2.5-ton 6x6 trucks out of active service, which are directly descended from mid-1950s designs. Many of them were still in active service over 30 years after being manufactured. Airplanes can have even longer service lives; aren't we still flying B52 bombers that were made in the 1950s?

    68. Re:Not a bad idea but... by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      It's the same way in the electronics industry. While IC packaging is mostly hard metric now, there's still a lot of stuff in use with inch specifications (like connectors with pins on 0.050" or 0.100" spacing), or more annoyingly, inch-designed stuff specified in metric (like connectors with 1.27mm or 2.54mm pin spacing). I try to use metric as much as I can, but there's a lot of stuff in PCB manufacturing that is still conventionally specified in mils (0.001"), or even sillier units like copper thickness specified in ounces.

    69. Re:Not a bad idea but... by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, it's hardly just the military. We have a huge amount of previously existing infrastructure that would have to either be torn down and replaced or cobbled together out of a mishmash of metric and customary measured components.

      Every other country in the world has converted, and they all had a "a huge amount of previously existing infrastructure". In Australia, for instance, which converted in the 1970s, first they did "soft conversion" where instead of a pint of milk you got 560 cc. Eventually most quantities shifted to round metric equivalents. Milk, for instance is now 1/2, 1 and 2 litre cartons. In the building industry, they just went from the arcane mishmash of feet and odd fractions of an inch to millimetres. The few things where the tolerances really did matter, like screw threads, you can still get SAE standard as well as metric. Nothing was "torn down" just because it wasn't metric. Things just were replaced as they wore out. There's no Thought Police forcing everyone to purge old measures from their daily lives.

    70. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 to 20 metric years. Sounds better.

    71. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! Think of us who don't count thumbs as fingers. We'd like octal naturally.

    72. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're a weird hybrid. We use the metric system for length and sometimes for weight. We the use the imperial system for volume and sometimes for weight. It's very odd.

    73. Re:Not a bad idea but... by pmontra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The military (in any country) are driven by matters of life and death which trump merely economic matters. If the US military goes metric it's a hint that metric is superior to imperial units. I remember I read that Napoleon forced the metric system into his army because it let his artillery perform ballistic calculations faster than the enemy (*).
      It should be easy to see why using only base 10 for both counting and measuring is better than mixing base 10, base 4, base 8, base 12 and maybe a few others I miss because of ignorance (I've been living all my life in a metric country).

      (*) After a little googling I found the web page where I read that. It's about the physics of motorsport http://www.getfaster.com/Techtips/Physics6.html so it's not an authoritative source for historical matters but it's a clear example of why metric is better.
      I quote

      It is worthwhile to note, as an aside, that a great deal of the difficulty of doing calculations in the physics of racing has to do with the traditional units of feet, miles, and pounds we use. The metric system makes all such calculations vastly simpler. Napoleon Bonaparte wanted to convert the world the metric system (mostly so his own soldiers could do artillery calculations quickly in their heads) but it is still not in common use in America nearly 200 years later!

      Plenty of examples are provided there.

    74. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Standards_and_Technology

      The US Congress of 1866 legalized the use of the metric system. So eventually the USA will catch up with the rest of the world...

    75. Re:Not a bad idea but... by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      We already have!

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    76. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is completely false, 1 inch pipe still has a 1 inch interior diameter. 1 inch tubing has a 1 inch exterior diameter. This is the difference between pipes and tubes, how they are measured. Changing the interior diameter of pipes to match the easily changed mounting hardware would be insane.

    77. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Jappus · · Score: 1

      You just answered your own question there, that's precisely why we didn't do it and why we never will. Europe converted on a nation by nation basis and in the aftermath of WWI and WWII had the option of redoing that with some consistency. The US OTOH has had a consistent, and enforced, set of units for a long, long time and those were based on the system developed by the British.

      France: 1795
      Belgium: 1820
      Netherlands: 1820
      Spain: 1852
      Italy: 1861
      Romania: 1862
      Austria: 1871
      Germany: 1872
      Norway: 1875
      [...]

      Indeed, the only European countries that converted after World War 1 or 2 were Russia (1918), Greece (1959) and Ireland (1967). Do note that Greece did so 14 years after WW2 ended and Ireland a whopping 22 years.

      Nope, the Wars weren't any reason to switch, except for Russia.

    78. Re:Not a bad idea but... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like B.S. to me. I moved to the United States in 1976 and I never saw a pump measure in liters. And as for high prices, by 1979 oil was so scarce that we were actually rationing gasoline here in California ... if the last digit of your license plate was even, you could only buy gas on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, and so on. It had less to do with gas stations gauging than with an organization called OPEC. Don't believe me? Google it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    79. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then let those standards stay. I'm working on a standard spacing of 2.54 millimeters when doing MC work, take a wild guess where that comes from.

      2.54 mm is not an inch.
      25.4 on the other hand...

    80. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      http://www.mycheme.com/technicaldata/standard-pipe-sizes.html

      So I guess they must sell non-standard standard size pipes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    81. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thou_(length)

      If you take a hundred of them, you'll end up with pretty much 2.54mms. Or 0.1 inches if you prefer. It's pretty much the spacing between two pins on a breadboard. And the standard spacing for pretty much all microelectronics crap, from resistors to microcontrollers.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    82. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      1 mile is 1.609344 km. I suspect the GP confused the conversion of 8 feet to 2.4m with miles to km.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    83. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      In Australia, cans are 375 mL, and in Europe they are 330 mL.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    84. Re:Not a bad idea but... by paintballer1087 · · Score: 1

      Another monitor claimed by slashdot and a mouthful of coffee.
      20 internets to you sir!

    85. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The military (in any country) are driven by matters of life and death which trump merely economic matters. If the US military goes metric it's a hint that metric is superior to imperial units..

      "Superior" doesn't enter into it--it's because of NATO.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    86. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't heard of artificial lighting.

    87. Re:Not a bad idea but... by usuallylost · · Score: 2

      My memory is that the US failed to adopt the metric system primarily because we had such a poorly thought out and poorly implemented plan. I can remember being taught metric in elementary school and hearing about how the transition was supposed to go. Then seeing it in the real world. I can clearly remember things like my mother being pissed off because some brands of things started selling in metric units while other brands were still selling in imperial units. Since pretty much nothing had conversion markings on it, and the older generation hadn't been taught the metric system in decades, people were having a hard time telling whether item A was a better deal than item B due to unclear measuring standards. In particular I can remember my father, who was an electrical engineer and physicist, doing the math to convert between price per gallon and price per liter on gasoline. He was particularly annoyed because he kept finding instances were people were using the transition, and the fact that a large portion of the populace was ignorant of the new measures, to gouge people. In my view the real problem was that they just tried to change over. They would have been better off requiring that when you change over you provide a conversion to the old system until everyone is changed over. Go and talk to some older people who had to deal with it and don't be surprised if remembering our attempted change over brings out a string of expletives. A little bit of planning and some standards for the change over would have gone a long way toward making it a success. By the time they gave up it was because the botched job had enraged a huge chunk of the populace. One thing about elected government if they public gets pissed enough they back off. That is usually good, occasionally it is bad.

    88. Re:Not a bad idea but... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Reagan swooped in to save us from having to drive 370 kilosocialists from DC to NY.

      What the fuck do kilometres have to do with Socialism? What's so special about the obsolete and absurd American measurement system that makes you cling to it so passionately?

    89. Re:Not a bad idea but... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      The whole world uses metric. The USA are only a small portion of it. Are you saying that Americans are unable to do something that all the other countries in the world accomplished succesfully?

    90. Re:Not a bad idea but... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      It's a conspiracy of Cresent, Snap-On and Craftsman to make me buy twice as many tools.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    91. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adjust the shifts and leave the clock the fuck alone.

    92. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets you LOGIC so sorely missing in our schools.

      Johnny walks 100 yards. How many miles did Johnny walk?
      Johnny walks 100 meters. How many kilometers did Johnny walk?

      Johnny drinks 1 cup of water. How much does 1 cup of water weigh?
      Johnny drinks 100 ml of water. How much does 100 ml of water weigh?

      Johnny stacks a 5/8 in, 1/4 in, and 1 7/16 in thick pieces of plywood. What's the total height?
      Johnny stacks a 16 mm, a 6mm, and a 3 cm think piece of plywood. What's the total height?

      More questions.. How many Americans know the number of liquid ounces in a gallon? Number of cups in a gallon? Number of yards in a mile? Precious few. And we, Americans, hate the metric system? Why?

    93. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I need to work from noon and 8 hours ahead. That doesn't mean we should all redefine that as 9AM to 5PM, does it?

      What makes you and your crappy work schedule so damn special that the rest of us need to reset our clocks twice a year?

    94. Re:Not a bad idea but... by joggle · · Score: 1

      You don't need to convince me. While earning my aerospace engineering degree we were forced to use both imperial and metric units. Metric was far easier to use in many cases, especially when dealing with calculations of force and mass. The unit for mass in imperial is slugs. To see why it's so inconvenient, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_(mass)

    95. Re:Not a bad idea but... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Your roughly 1 mile apart main streets would now be roughly 1.6 km apart main streets. But does it really matter? In the UK, Milton Keynes has roughly 1 km apart main streets, and that was done long before we switched to metric, but in most of the country, the main streets tend to follow a radial pattern rather than a grid pattern, largely because the roads were there before the city, ie since the Romans built our highway network, and the city was built around a road junction.

    96. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      If it's too dark to work at 6:00 AM, why not start work at 7?

      If you say your boss wouldn't let you, how do you know?

      It seems really backward to fix scheduling problems at the level of the Congress.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    97. Re:Not a bad idea but... by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      hmmm... what's 1 - 1 ?

      The answer is:

    98. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Aryden · · Score: 1

      No, it's because of increased accuracy. We're talking about being able to do quick math on the battlefield and get measurements down to precision values that are easily understood. If I tell you to adjust your mortar .034 inches, I've made it vastly more complicated than just saying 1mm.

    99. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Aryden · · Score: 1

      .039 inches, my bad.

    100. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what, this means the decision was purely arbitrary?

    101. Re:Not a bad idea but... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Yeah, ounces per square foot, actually. I used to work in PCB fabrication myself. Hated plating then screening those heavy copper boards, like 2 oz. and above.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    102. Re:Not a bad idea but... by dokc · · Score: 1

      The few things where the tolerances really did matter, like screw threads, you can still get SAE standard as well as metric.

      Using inches (but maybe called differently e.g. zoll in Germany) for screws, screw threads and pipes is still in use in Europe.

      --
      In love, war and slashdot discussions, everything is allowed.
    103. Re:Not a bad idea but... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The clock is unimportant for outdoor work. Lots of construction workers go to Felbers (in fact most of them are in construction). In the summer, the roofers start working as soon as it's light enough to see and quit when it gets too hot, at 11:00 am to 2:00 pm depending on the weather (and usually head straight to the bar).

      DST is for us desk jockeys to get a little sun, the guys working outside get plenty.

    104. Re:Not a bad idea but... by PeterWone · · Score: 1

      You're all wrong anyway, unless your parents are also siblings. You should have eight fingers and two thumbs. Digits != fingers.

    105. Re:Not a bad idea but... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      That may be partly correct, but as I remember it the main reason for pricing gasoline in liters was that the gas pumps could only work with prices less than a dollar. Hard to charge $1.059 per gallon if your pump has only the three digits to the right of the decimal point. Hell, some pumps didn't even have a dollar sign $ on them!

    106. Re:Not a bad idea but... by quenda · · Score: 1

      Europe converted ... It's not about us being stupid, it's about us having a stable system that works and being asked to give that up for something that would result in an inferior outcome.

      Forget Europe. Look at Australia as a more comparable model, and evidence of how easy it can be. Individual Americans are not at all too stupid to adapt, but somehow there has grown a collective stupidity in American politics that makes even the most sensible change more difficult. This is the same reason you are still stuck with pennies, but have to stuff banknotes into a vending machine for lack of $1 and $2 coins.

    107. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, soldier, the military is full of politicians. What got cut out is the freedom. Adopting a rigid rank-based command system really gets things done, if you're willing to be told when to wake up, when to eat, what's for dinner, and how often to shine your shoes. As for comparing the military with civilian systems, the military is the ultimate granny-state, complete with socialized medicine and entirely supported by tax dollars. But we admire it because the culture there is one of sacrifice for common cause, and the leaders have been good men. If it would learn to get by with a smaller budget, we might still have a military in, say, 50 years.

    108. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the MORAL issues that I thank Yahweh that it drags it feet on like ADULTERY (check the UCMJ) and until recently, well, there is no need to identify that.

      ==//==

    109. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      The military has one other advantage: control over their personnel.

      Civilians need to be sold on the idea. It doesn't matter what recruits think; if the CO says to use metric, you use metric.

    110. Re:Not a bad idea but... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      We can name the months after the letters in the Metric Alphabet. I hope my birthday ends up being in Ellemenno.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    111. Re:Not a bad idea but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      how many mm is my 5/8" head bolt?

      If you'd bought a 15 mm instead, you wouldn't be confused. You are blaming the metric system for the imperial system being hard to convert.

      how many meters are between my 16" on center wall studs?

      0.4 or 0.5 m, if you had not specifically spaced them in a different spacing.

    112. Re:Not a bad idea but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So metric is inferior because others don't use it (despite the fact that when you expand the area you are looking at, more use metric than not).

    113. Re:Not a bad idea but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Cars cost more because of it (among other things), as well as costing billions in NASA math errors (and others less publicized). Familiarity and convenience will be gone in one generation or less. "Change bad" isn't a valid excuse to reject improvement.

    114. Re:Not a bad idea but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are right, we shouldn't do *anything* until all other problems on the planet are fixed. Let me know when those are all fixed so I can start sitting around reading books again. Wait, is there an exception that allows for inane posts on Slashdot while there are starving children, as long as the posts are complaints about said starving?

    115. Re:Not a bad idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, there is nothing stopping things from being such lengths in metric. If you have 50 cm square boxes, and you want a pallet which fits them 3 by 4, there's no law against having a 150 cm x 200 cm pallet. There's no law against having 300 cm boards, which can be divided by 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (amongst others) without falling down to non-round centimetre lengths.

      Statements such as 'Try to make a stable palletload stacked 2 by 5' are disingenuous, because metricness doesn't have anything to do with that scenario.

  4. In a nutshell: by White+Flame · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jan 1 = Sunday, 30 days
    Feb 1 = Tuesday, 30 days
    Mar 1 = Thursday, 31 days

    Apr 1 = Sunday, 30 days
    May 1 = Tuesday, 30 days
    Jun 1 = Thursday, 31 days ...

    Then every 5-6 years, there's a leap *week* at the end of the year after December called Xtr, so Xtr 1, 2015 through Xtr 7, 2015 would exist as valid dates (in whatever order your country uses).

    1. Re:In a nutshell: by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2

      I believe that is what the Egypt- based cultures do already. Typically they have 28 day months, with a catch-up month every 7 years when the constellations are a whole month early.

      Of course in almost all the cultures that do that the extra month is timed so that it can be a "celebration" month... Our current culture would never handle 4 whole weeks of shutdown like that.

    2. Re:In a nutshell: by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      No April Fool's Day jokes at work anymore? Rubbish!

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:In a nutshell: by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Hebrew calendar does this, on either a 17 or 22 year cycle (I can't remember which, off the top of my head).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:In a nutshell: by sjames · · Score: 2

      Our culture can't even seem to handle an entire day anymore. That's a real shame considering that it REALLY needs to take some time to reflect once in a while.

    5. Re:In a nutshell: by s0litaire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they should have called it "Smarch" instead of "Xtr"

      "Lousy Smarch Weather!!" Homer Simpson

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    6. Re:In a nutshell: by treeves · · Score: 2

      Ethiopian calendar has thirteen months, with the thirteenth month being variable length and only a week or so long, IIRC, in order to do this.
      They also are on a different year number than the Gregorian calendar, about seven years behind I believe. I went there in 2008 and found that Y2k had been the previous year in Ethiopia.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    7. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have this. It's called the "National Retailer Federation Calendar" or the "4-5-4" calendar. It's used by retailers to compare sales from one week to another week.

      Reference here:
      http://www.nrf.com/modules.php?name=Pages&sp_id=391

      It's very convenient for retailers at least. No idea why it would be a benefit to a regular person though.

    8. Re:In a nutshell: by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      Why a week every 5-6 years? Why not spread this week over multiple years, and toy with an extra day at the end of some years instead? Seriously, doing a whole week of difference every now and then seems very inconvenient. What will it be, a work week or not? Stop the economy for a week? Or if not, what month is it part of?

    9. Re:In a nutshell: by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah wait I know the answer to my why question: that was the whole point of this thing, to keep the same weekdays all the time, and that's why they can only work with extra weeks :)

      Well, the extra day could have a different name outside of the 7-day cycle :p But why bother.

    10. Re:In a nutshell: by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Xtr? What the heck kind of a month name is that? Was this made by C programmers or something?

      Call it Undecember (following the September, October, November, December pattern) or Obam (following the July, August pattern) or Jeez (following the gods pattern) or at least spell out Extra.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    11. Re:In a nutshell: by trout007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I remember a lecture where they went over why the months have the number of days they do. I'm not sure this is entirely accurate but at least it helps me remember what months have how many days.

      It was a 10 month calendar where it alternated between 31 and 30 days and started in March (Mars) which was the start of nice battle weather and ended in December and they just didn't bother counting the days in winter and waiting for spring to arrive. Eventually January and February were added to the end. to get this.

      1 March 31
      2 April 30
      3 May 31
      4 June 30
      5 Quintilis 31
      6 Sextilis 30
      7September 31
      8 October 30
      9 November 31
      10 December 30
      11 January 31
      12 February 28 basically whatever was left over.

      Notice the first 4 months are named after Gods. So when Julius Cesear came to power he renamed the 5th Month July after himself. Then they also changed the order so it started with January.
      Then Augustus came to power and took the 6th month. But he didn't want his month to be shorter so he changed it to 31 days and changed the rest of the months
      to alternate from 30 to 31.

      So that is why the months have the number of days they have.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    12. Re:In a nutshell: by fnj · · Score: 1

      So if I'm paid on salary every week, I will get an extra week's pay once every 5-6 years? I can dig this new system.

    13. Re:In a nutshell: by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 3, Informative

      They appear to have discovered the World Calendar, a calendar proposed almost a century ago. The only noticeable difference is that they shifter which month had the 31 days.

      I don't know how anyone goes about researching something new without first exploring what has been done before. It's not a great show of research prowess on their behalf.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    14. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this isn't just so we always have Cinco de Mayo on Saturday from now on?

    15. Re:In a nutshell: by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Informative

      19-year cycle. 7 out of the 19 years have a leap month, conveniently called Adar II.

    16. Re:In a nutshell: by brentrad · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you insightful if I had any mod points left. I 100% agree with you that apparently we're unable to take an entire day off as a country. I heard about all the stores opening earlier and earlier on Black Friday, and then some started opening up the middle of the day on Thanksgiving. Come on, give your poor overworked underpaid employees one damn day off to spend at home with their families! And Christmas Day, NOTHING should be open but 7-11 and a few gas stations.

    17. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a nutshell:

      Stupidest calendar ever!

    18. Re:In a nutshell: by gstrickler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Works great, except for those pesky solstices and equinoxes.

      Oh, and that leap week every 5th-6th December, is that a work week? Will New Years be 2 weeks after Christmas some years?

      And then there is that pesky problem of birthdays. If you were born on Jan 31, May 31, July 31, Aug 31, or Oct 31 (Gregorian), what is your birthdate on the new calendar? What about people born during a leap week? How do you determine their ages for legal purposes?

      When would we celebrate Halloween?

      And what about interest calculations when there is a leap week? That's gonna mess with some mortgages and other loans. They claim it solves the interest problem, but clearly it doesn't.

      As another said, "Simply adjust the earth's orbit so we have 360 days in a year". Well, actually, 364 days a year would work better. And while we're at it, adjust the moon's orbit to exactly 28 days. Those would solve the real issues and give us a truly consistent calendar. Until then, let's live with the messy calendar we have.

      As for eliminating time zones, that's an even bigger mess. At least now when you calculate that it's 1am in another time zone, you know with some level of certainty that it's not a good time to phone. Meal times, work schedules, etc would all change with what we now call "time zones", so it would be more confusing, but wouldn't eliminate time-zones at all.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    19. Re:In a nutshell: by Threni · · Score: 2

      ... And stores run by non-Christians.

    20. Re:In a nutshell: by brentrad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why should that matter? Christmas is a national holiday in the US (meaning it is defined by law as such), anyone regardless of religious preference should get the day off. (Or get paid double pay.) I'm an atheist BTW, my family never went to church, I have celebrated Christmas my entire life, and I love the holiday. Christmas is a day to get together with friends and family, enjoy the lights and trees and decorations, and exchange gifts with your loved ones.

      Contrary to what some would like you to believe, Christmas is not necessarily a "Christian" holiday to everyone.

    21. Re:In a nutshell: by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then every 5-6 years, there's a leap *week* at the end of the year after December

      Which is why everybody above about 40 degrees north would hate this calendar, and instead want the extra days at the end of June.

    22. Re:In a nutshell: by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1
      Ok, so, on which days do the solstices and equinoxes fall?
      On the current calendar they generally fall near the 21st within their respective months, every year, plus or minus about a day or two.

      It sounds like they would vary a bit more than that here.

    23. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those who were born on January, March, and May 31st will forever cease to age.

    24. Re:In a nutshell: by gstrickler · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, the World Calendar is a far better proposal than this new one. Adding Worldsday and Leapyear Day makes a better system than adding a week every 5-6 years.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    25. Re:In a nutshell: by Zawahiri · · Score: 0

      Should call it Smarch instead of Xtr.

    26. Re:In a nutshell: by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      April Fool's Day was created when Catholics and Protestants pranked each other on their respective April 1st after the Gregorian reform.
      So it would be very traditional to exploit the confusion during the change over to prank people by messing with dates/calenders. "This office will be closed from August 29th to August 29th (HH/G)".

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    27. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All well and good. But it will screw up things for astrologers big time.

    28. Re:In a nutshell: by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      And not only that, but apparently they needed computers and astronomers to come up with the "definitely not obvious" solution of "accumulate the error until it's about a week, then have an extra week."

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    29. Re:In a nutshell: by tirerim · · Score: 2

      19, actually, with leap months added in 7 of those years; the months mostly alternate 29 and 30 days to correspond to the actual moon. It's a little more complicated, though, since due to restrictions on which days of the week certain holidays can fall, the lengths of both regular years and leap years vary slightly -- they're normally 354 days and 384 days respectively, but can have a day subtracted or added.

    30. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      19-year cycle, actually

    31. Re:In a nutshell: by Viperpete · · Score: 1

      While I have read this before and do find it interesting, I grew up with a kinda rhyming mnemonic:

      Thirty days hath September
      April, June and November
      All the rest have Thirty-One
      Except February which has Twenty-Eight (or Twenty-Nine)

      Although the wiki one is a little better:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_days_hath_September

      --
      loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
    32. Re:In a nutshell: by trout007 · · Score: 1

      I suck at mnemonics.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    33. Re:In a nutshell: by repvik · · Score: 1

      Why? Adding two randomly-named weekdays instead of one week sounds awkward.

    34. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice story except for the fact that Augustus/Sextilis had 31 days long before Julius Caesar.

    35. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our current culture would never handle 4 whole weeks of shutdown like that.

      Great! The perfect opportunity to replace the culture while we're at it.

    36. Re:In a nutshell: by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      You could just add an extra sunday. What's so bad about a week with 8 days, two of which are sunday? And jews can call the first of those two sundays a saturday if they prefer.

    37. Re:In a nutshell: by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      You're right, that makes it MUCH easier to remember. Thanks!

    38. Re:In a nutshell: by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Not to mention mathematical formulas. They used computer programs and mathematical formulas, surely it has to be better.

    39. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! Daaaamn! Guess I just misinterpreted the Christ part of Christmas and the constant religious onslaught that non-Christians weather every fucking year! I'm sure that this Santa Claus guy has absolutely no religious inference and couldn't possibly be a stand in for Jesus Christ, the resurrected messiah. In fact, all these songs that are playing nonstop in retail outlets are completely secular and have no religious significance whatsoever (yes,there is irony here)!

      Oh man! What a world! I'm so glad that Christmas is (according to brentrad) a mandated day to get together with family and enjoy the lights and decorations! What fun! And EVERYONE WILL PARTICIPATE!

      Sometimes I wish I lived in East Germany circa 1982, just to get this bullshit over with. Seriously, once a society reaches the point of mob rule, one may as well just ride along and hope to one day be part of the the leading party. Fuck you Christians, Fuck you DDR, fuck you nazis. Fuck you all to hell. I hope you all die in pain.

    40. Re:In a nutshell: by aiht · · Score: 1

      Hooray! They re-invented Bresenham's line algorithm!

    41. Re:In a nutshell: by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I don't know how anyone goes about researching something new without first exploring what has been done before. It's not a great show of research prowess on their behalf.

      A month in the lab will save an hour in the library!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    42. Re:In a nutshell: by dasqua · · Score: 1

      The US needs to learn that you are meant to holiday^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hvacation, for at least 4 weeks of every year. Anything less is just slavery (and quite frankly - bad for business).

      --
      tihs isg mead fmro rcecydle tpyos
    43. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? It's already done. February's 29th may not receive a cool name but it ends up serving the very same purpose.

    44. Re:In a nutshell: by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      You're missing the upside: actually being able to get news that day.

    45. Re:In a nutshell: by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Or Decembruary.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    46. Re:In a nutshell: by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that we have the exact same rhyme in Spanish:

      Treinta días trae noviembre,
      Con abril, junio, y septiempre.
      Los demás treinta-y-uno,
      Excepto frebrero que tiene veinte-y-ocho,
      Y en año biciesto veinte-y-nueve.

      Or something like that.
                    -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    47. Re:In a nutshell: by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. You're thinking about an apple a day.

      A month in the lab saves 5 in the bush.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    48. Re:In a nutshell: by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

      Checking #6 at the second link, they're clearly using Fortran. After seeing "Xtr" used to condense "Extra", I was surprised to see "idays" and "nweeks" instead of old-timer "idys" and "iwks" in the subroutine. As a Fortran snob, I hope the poor use of indentation and lack of whitespace is simply a result of the conversion to HTML.

    49. Re:In a nutshell: by dwye · · Score: 1

      I don't know how anyone goes about researching something new without first exploring what has been done before.

      Oh, that is easy. They were lazy asses, at least this time. Hell, I've done it, myself.

      It's not a great show of research prowess on their behalf.

      Well, yeah. I only hope that they don't get their PhD from this, and that anyone involved who passed on this idea gets theirs rescinded, retroactively.

      It is also a stupid idea, given how much complaining we will be getting in a few days (and for months thereafter) about leap seconds being or not being included in the calendar.

      Anyway, as Verner Vinge pointed out in A Deepness In The Sky, in a few thousand years people will assume that their clocks are synced to the first landing of people on the primary moon of their original planet, and be confused when it turns out that it is really almost but not quite 1/2 of a standard year later (i.e., the Unix Epoch point).

    50. Re:In a nutshell: by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      So when Julius Cesear came to power he renamed the 5th Month July after himself. Then they also changed the order so it started with January.

      The Roman political calendar was shifted to begin with January 1 about a century before Julius Caesar made his calendar reforms. However, in the early years of Rome, the year did begin with March, and for most purposes in many countries, the year continued to begin in March in medieval Europe until the 1500s or 1600s (depending on the country).

      Then Augustus came to power and took the 6th month. But he didn't want his month to be shorter so he changed it to 31 days and changed the rest of the months to alternate from 30 to 31.

      Yeah, this is just a 800-year-old urban legend. August (Sextilis) had 31 days before Augustus was even born. The lengths of most of the months were set and irregular before Julius Caesar reformed the calendar:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_calendar#Debunked_theory_on_month_lengths

    51. Re:In a nutshell: by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      It's all awkward, but it's easier to hide/ignore an extra day than an extra week. We already deal with leap days. But consider the ramifications of adding an extra week to December. What does that do to interest calculations on loans?. New years will be two weeks after Christmas, what does that do to work and school schedules? how do you compare quarterly or annual income/profit when every ~22nd quarter is 14 weeks rather than 13? With a leap week, there will be ~7x as many people born during the leap week as are now born on leap day, so 7x as many people have to deal with whatever inconveniences that adds.

      For nearly all the issues they claim this proposal addresses, adding an extra week in December reintroduces the exact same problems on a larger scale. The only issue that "leap week" calendars address that the World Calendar doesn't is keeping the sabbath day every 7th day, but they also introduce their own set of problems that are at least as big as the problems they're supposed to address.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    52. Re:In a nutshell: by proici · · Score: 1
      I emailed these guys about this. The reply?

      "Go climb a tree. The World Calendar is a turkey and could never be adopted. Do your own research, buddy, before calling Professors deplorable." - Professor Richard Conn Henry

      For context, here is my email in it's entirety:

      "Gentlemen,

      Your independent research has led you to stumble upon a discovery which has previously been made by a woman named Elisabeth Achelis in 1930, when she proposed The World Calendar (Wikipedia). It is deplorable to call yourself researchers, when you clearly have not done any research on your predecessors. All you have done is repackaged a previously proposed calendar, called it "new," and slapped your names on it. To simply state that your calendar is "an improvement on the dozens of rival reform calendars proffered by individuals and institutions over the last century," is inadequate.

      While your arguments for a new calendar to ease financial calculations are valid and logical, the calendar you propose does not complete erase these anomalies. In fact, one can argue that the previously discussed World Calendar does a better job at this, since their solution to leap years is intercalary, while your solution adds a work week every 5-6 years, hence including the very same anomalies you aim to eradicate. I understand that religious types who observe the 7th day Sabbath on Saturday will not cope well with intercalary days, but you have proposed an issue, claim to have solved it, but in reality it is only shifted and not entirely fixed.

      You must understand that the problems you target have little to do with majority of the American population, but your solution effects everyone. I would imagine that anybody born on one of the days you eliminate (such as May 31) would instantly be a proponent to your system, since you have eliminated their birthday from the calendar. Perhaps the people who's new birthdays perpetually fall on a Friday or Saturday will be in favor, but citizens being told their birthday is on a Monday or Wednesday for the rest of their life will likely have a negative stance. Also, what about traditional holidays such as Halloween, which everybody knows to be on October 31, a day which no longer exists on your calendar. To the average citizen, drawbacks such as these will certainly outweigh the benefits of reduced workload for accountants and financial analysts who now only reserve their complex calculations for twice a decade.

      Finally, to advocate the population to take up universal time in their every day lives is completely insane. The benefits of universal time for international business are clear, which is why many companies who do a large volume of international business utilize universal time. There is absolutely zero benefit for the average citizen who does not associate daily with foreign time zones. Try telling a high school student that not only will their birthday forever be on a Tuesday, but now school starts at 4pm and ends at 11pm, dinner will be at 2:30am, and they must be in bed by 5am. When they ask why, tell them "to make international business less confusing and to (almost) get rid of complex financial calculations." Imagine how that kid will look at you. Now imagine forcing every parent in the country to tell their kids something similar, probably along the lines of "because an economist and an astrophysicist thought it would make life easier for bankers and corporations, and because those people have lots of money the government agreed with them."

      Please do not take this message as scathing or mean-spirited. I believe your sentiment is legitimate, but misplaced. You have my best wishes towards both of you in your respective fields, but not when it comes to calendars."

      Apparently I annoyed him so much in my second sentence he didn't bother reading the rest.

    53. Re:In a nutshell: by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I should have known that... I had to study the calendar 35 years ago for my Ner Tamid award back in Scouts. It's been years since I've thought about it, though.

      Appreciate the reminder.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    54. Re:In a nutshell: by chebucto · · Score: 1

      Actually, the World Calendar failed because of those days:

      The main opponents of The World Calendar in the 20th century were leaders of religions that worship according to a seven-day cycle. For Jews, Christians and Muslims, particular days of worship are ancient and fundamental elements of their faith. (wiki)

      This is why they've used a leap week. They explicitly say so: ... calendar reform has always failed before. The reason was that all the major proposals included breaking the seven day cycle of the week. That is completely unacceptable to humankind, and that will never happen. The HH Calendar does not break that cycle. (http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html)

      In other words, they've created a modified calendar that, if it is adopted, will be adopted for sentiments exactly opposed to the one you express.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    55. Re:In a nutshell: by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of that. And the leap week, while interesting in theory, is an even bigger problem than leap days. We either stick with what we have, or we switch to the World Calendar (despite the objections of some religious groups). This proposal doesn't actually solve any current issue other than most holidays falling on the same day every year. But the leap week reintroduces all the other problems it claims to solve. And holidays that are connected to the lunar cycle will still vary from year to year, as will the solstices and equinoxes. At least the World Calendar offers some useful improvements while only introducing an issue for those who believe that they must celebrate the sabbath every 7th day (which hasn't always been the case, calendars from the past have had non-counted days).

      Personally, I say leave it alone, what we have works. But of the alternative proposals, the World Calendar is the best.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    56. Re:In a nutshell: by petershank · · Score: 1

      Unlike in some countries, the US Constitution does not allow for National Holidays that are binding on everybody, or even binding on state governments. We have Federal Holidays, which are specifically binding only on employees of Federal agencies. Private businesses (and the State govts) are not obligated to close, or grant any sort of day off (or pay benefits) on Federal Holidays, though almost all choose to do so.

    57. Re:In a nutshell: by brentrad · · Score: 1

      You got me there - but are there any states that do NOT designate Christmas as an official holiday?

    58. Re:In a nutshell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly didn't start as a Christian holiday. They just co-opted and renamed it.

    59. Re:In a nutshell: by brentrad · · Score: 1

      Agreed, many of our Christmas traditions originally come from Pagan traditions.

    60. Re:In a nutshell: by sjames · · Score: 1

      At one time, it wasn't necessary. Businesses understood that some days were customary holidays and that it would be indecent to ignore them (with exceptions for emergency services and such).

      Now that basic decency cannot be expected anymore, we might actually need to have holidays by law with narrowly defined exceptions.

    61. Re:In a nutshell: by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1
      Just to clarify, what I meant to say was that August (Sextilis) had 31 days before Augustus even became emperor, and it was of irregular length before Augustus was born. Before Julius Caesar reformed the calendar, it had 29 days, as did many months.

      The old calendar was mostly an irregular pattern of 31 and 29 day months, excepting February. The year was way too short, resulting in an extra month added between February and March every few years "as needed." Anyhow, Julius Caesar kept most of the old irregular pattern of longer and shorter months, simply adding on days at the end of most 29-day months (making them 30 or 31) to bring the total to 365 days.

    62. Re:In a nutshell: by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Apparently I annoyed him so much in my second sentence he didn't bother reading the rest.

      Next time, don't be a dick if you want somebody to read your long e-mail.

      Please do not take this message as scathing or mean-spirited

      But it was. You could have totally worded that e-mail in a kind way that would have fostered communication. As it is, it looks like you wasted your time.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    63. Re:In a nutshell: by Threni · · Score: 1

      > And Christmas Day, NOTHING should be open but 7-11 and a few gas stations.

      I'm not in the US, and my point is partly that "the holiday around the 25th of December" is not meaningful to most of the people on the planet. Also, even in those countries where it is, many people still have to work. I'm pretty glad that nurses, police etc are still available to keep society going on that day.

  5. Again? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    But that trick never works!

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Again? by ecotax · · Score: 1

      This time it can't possibly go wrong, with such a beautiful website!

      --
      "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
    2. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently I'm not the only one who thought at first I had been sent to timecube.com

    3. Re:Again? by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Hum... Needs more cowbell.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  6. nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    NERDS!!!!

    1. Re:nerds by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Do we mod parent insightful?

  7. An extra week in December? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They deal with the non-integer number of days in a year by occasionally adding an extra week in December. So on some years you may experience the 36th of December.

    1. Re:An extra week in December? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I can hear it now, "is this year ever going to eeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd?!"

      Not only the non-integer days in a year, they're mostly making up for their round number months not quite matching, otherwise they would only need an extra week every ~ 30 years

    2. Re:An extra week in December? by icebike · · Score: 1

      They deal with the non-integer number of days in a year by occasionally adding an extra week in December. So on some years you may experience the 36th of December.

      Which of course implies a greater degree of imprecision for the other 4 years. If you chop days out of years 1 thru 4 so as to have 7 days to tack onto every 5th, it sort of seems counter productive as far as keeping things in sync with the solar system.

      Its sort of a sign of the arrogance of mankind that they are willing to say screw the facts, lets make it easier to count on our fingers.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:An extra week in December? by pclminion · · Score: 2

      Its sort of a sign of the arrogance of mankind that they are willing to say screw the facts, lets make it easier to count on our fingers.

      Indeed, using complicated calendars is the only way to show appropriate deference to the universe. Seriously, what?

    4. Re:An extra week in December? by swalve · · Score: 1

      It isn't about keeping things in sync with the solar system, as we now have better ways of measuring that. Now the calendar just needs to be a way to make sure we know when to pay our bills.

    5. Re:An extra week in December? by similar_name · · Score: 1

      I'm not for changing the calendar but I think in serious consideration would start with having 13 moonths.

    6. Re:An extra week in December? by butlerm · · Score: 1

      The main problem with having thirteen months is that it is not evenly divisible into halves, quarters, thirds, etc. That results in scheduling difficulties for a lot of things.

      That is probably a livable deficiency, given the other advantages though. It is much cleaner than having intercalary weeks every so many years. The proposal referred to in the original post is a scheduling, accounting, budgeting, and billing disaster.

  8. Please god when can we switch to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the metric system and end daylight savings time? PLEASE!!!

  9. This idea brought to you by ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ocean Marketing.

    1. Re:This idea brought to you by ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FU, this calendar is going to be a hit at SSXW. You child.

  10. Lunar anyone? by hal2814 · · Score: 0

    Or we could just use a lunar calendar instead of a solar one and not have to worry about crap like leap years.

    1. Re:Lunar anyone? by nwf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or we could just use a lunar calendar instead of a solar one and not have to worry about crap like leap years.

      Except August will eventually be winter in the Northern Hemisphere. People like things happening in the same seasons.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:Lunar anyone? by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Or we could, you know, leave it the fsck alone.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    3. Re:Lunar anyone? by jtalle · · Score: 1

      Actually, do thirteen months of 28 days each, balancing it back out again.

      Then the full moon will be on the same day, making it simpler to barricade against Lycans.

  11. Way too much free time. by pro151 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    On their hands and not enough important problems in the world to occupy their pointy little heads.

  12. Everything would be on the same day every year... by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... except equinoxes and solstices...

  13. Just one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their proposed calendar has 4 quarters each of 91 days (30 + 30 +_31).

    Problem 4 x 91 = 364, not 365! There is a day missing.

    183 years later and Christmas will be 6 months adrift.

    That is not a calendar. That is an attempt at a calendar, just like the other calendars his article was rubbishing.

    #fail.

    1. Re:Just one problem by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      There's a leap week built in for that.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Just one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a leap week built in for that.

      So the point is : why keep a perfectly working calendar thats accurate to 1 day in 3000 years for one in which we have to introduce a leap week every couple of years.
      I guess that people never learn the old adage "don't fix what works". If you try you almost always end up with something that works like shit. Thats a lesson the IT industry should take to heart.

    3. Re:Just one problem by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      We add a leap day about every 4 years in the current one, so it's not perfectly working by that metric to start with.

    4. Re:Just one problem by lc_overlord · · Score: 1

      So the point is : why keep a perfectly working calendar thats accurate to 1 day in 3000 years for one in which we have to introduce a leap week every couple of years.

      Yea, why not.
      Though why stop there when you can just label the days 1-365, add a leap day every 4 years as usual and then just split the days up in chunks of 25 days and give them new names, then organize new weeks with 10 days in them of which 3 are weekend days, two in the end and one in the fourth day, .
      And yea the weekdays need new names as well, we are keeping fridays cause i like fridays, but it's now on day 8, also thursday, cause it's named after thor and who can argue with the god of thunder.
      Sundays, mondays and thuresdays are definitely gone, humpday need to be given a suggestive name and finally one of the days need to be named after the currently hottest girl at the time of it's adoption, i vote for Bianca Beauchamp.
      The whole thing gets reset every day 1, so all the weekdays end up at the same place every time.
      however 365 isn't evenly divisible by 25, so this means that the 15:th month is tiny (only 15-16 days), but it's the holiday month after all in where you place Christmas (or at least a version of it) on day 9 which is coincidentally right on the start of a weekend (you could even make it a 3 day weekend) it's Christmas after all.

      --
      - "There is nothing quite like an ineffective solution to an nonexistant problem"
    5. Re:Just one problem by swalve · · Score: 1

      Because I don't want to wait another 2500 years for February 30th. Duh.

    6. Re:Just one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash - short of shifting the earth's orbit, the calendar CAN'T work perfectly, by any metric; the astronomical year simply isn't a comfortably precise number of days long. But the current system IS "good enough" - about as close to accurate as we need to get whilst keeping future dates easily predictable. It's not about to change because yet another whack-job thinks they've come up with something "better".

    7. Re:Just one problem by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      I didn't claim it could. And I didn't claim the current one isn't good enough.

      I just disputed the claim that the current one is "perfectly working" and "accurate to 1 day in 3000 years" given we have to add a day about every 4 years to it too.

      And you don't have to shift the Earth's orbit, you could just as well change the Earth's rotation. Not that I claimed we should care about doing either.

  14. And you thought Y2K bug was bad by GeneralTurgidson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have fun reprogramming everything, developers!

    1. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean, "make money reprogramming everything." I wouldn't be surprised if the IT Consulting industry was behind this idea. Checking code for Y2K was big bucks . . . let's add a leap week, and break some more stuff intentionally!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't bother me. I keep all my (modern) dates in unixtime and localize them at the edges only, by a call to something I don't maintain.

    3. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun reprogramming everything, developers!

      It's a JOBS PROGRAM! (sponsored by the douches in the White House and Congress)

    4. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      It's great because the more stuff we break generally, the more kludges and patches will be needed to fix them, and the more unnecessary work there will be to do.

      This CREATES JOBS people, and as EVERYONE knows by now, that is always the prime directive. Forget how happy people are, or metrics based on pointless things like efficiency and standards. More jobs (i.e. more employment) are all we need to make the world go round.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    5. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Not just that, but for at least a century you'll need to be able to accept and convert historical (Georgian) dates and post-Reform dates and transitional dates for people who learnt to convert their historical dates (eg, date-of-birth) to the new system.

      Makes Y2K look like a cakewalk.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    6. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by dasqua · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good thing to me. Last time was definitely fun.

      --
      tihs isg mead fmro rcecydle tpyos
    7. Re:And you thought Y2K bug was bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still have a bit of time to make sure you're counting in 64 bits everywhere: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem .

  15. Each 12-month period is not identical by rminsk · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...have created a new calendar in which each new 12-month period is identical to the one which came before, and remains that way from one year to the next in perpetuity.

    and then later in the article

    This adjustment was necessary in order to deal with the same knotty problem that makes designing an effective and practical new calendar such a challenge: the fact that each Earth year is 365.2422 days long. Hanke and Henry deal with those extra “pieces” of days by dropping leap years entirely in favor of an extra week added at the end of December every five or six years.

    So it does not remain consistant from one year to the next.

    1. Re:Each 12-month period is not identical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not abolish months and weeks entirely? There is no basis to justify them.
      There is a basis for years and for days. (Or even for seconds.) That's it.
      So we go with that.
      One number represents the year, one the current time of year (from 0.0 to 1.0, or with any arbitrary multiplier), and one the current time of day (ditto). No need for seconds.

      We could even use the time of galactic rotation instead of the year. That would be really cool.

    2. Re:Each 12-month period is not identical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, each 12-month period IS identical. It's just that occasionally there's an extra week between those 12-month periods.

  16. Uhhh... yeah.... by supersat · · Score: 2
    First they say:

    "Our calendar would simplify financial calculations and eliminate what we call the 'rip off' factor," explains Hanke. "Determining how much interest accrues on mortgages, bonds, forward rate agreements, swaps and others, day counts are required. Our current calendar is full of anomalies that have led to the establishment of a wide range of conventions that attempt to simplify interest calculations. Our proposed permanent calendar has a predictable 91-day quarterly pattern of two months of 30 days and a third month of 31 days, which does away with the need for artificial day count conventions."

    But then they go on to say:

    Hanke and Henry deal with those extra âoepiecesâ of days by dropping leap years entirely in favor of an extra week added at the end of December every five or six years. This brings the calendar in sync with the seasonal changes as the Earth circles the sun.

    Sounds like they're just shifting the complexity.

    1. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by pclminion · · Score: 2

      Why is it complex? Just pretend the extra week didn't happen (in effect, we all go on vacation that week).

    2. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they're just shifting the complexity.

      They wouldn't eliminate it, but they do reduce the problems they identify.

      But it turns "when is the summer solstice" into a complicated question.

    3. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by Thing+1 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like they're just shifting the complexity.

      Exactly! The complexity of the solution is dependent on the complexity of the problem. Therefore, if the solution is simpler than the problem, there will be edge cases that are unaccounted for, and the solution will fail in areas. The solution to the calendar year depends on the complexity of the revolution versus the rotation, and no amount of attempts to simplify a fractional response will result in an integer response. (Not completely obligatory xkcd...)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    4. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by ericvids · · Score: 1

      Just don't complain if you can't do your grocery shopping that whole week.

      --
      Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
    5. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by swalve · · Score: 1

      No more complicated than it is now: figure out when the solstice will be, map it to a date and time. Instead of shifting + or - a day here or there, it will be + or - three days. Seems like a good tradeoff for the other simplicity.

    6. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, a lot more people make big bucks off of Christmas than the solstices.

    7. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      I think that after a few cycles of that, most people will figure to buy their booze and food the week before the "leap week."

      And those that don't will thin away the population accordingly.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    8. Re:Uhhh... yeah.... by dwye · · Score: 1

      Except that financial instruments (which have the rip-off factor mentioned) work every day of every month of every year. And if you don't think so, try telling your loan shark that you don't owe the vigorish (sp?) on your outstanding because it is leap week, and see how your arms or legs like his response.

  17. isn't this old news? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Didn't Isaac Asimov propose something like this thirty or forty years ago? I have a vague memory that there was a "year day" and "century day" that wasn't a day of the week.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:isn't this old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This (or some very similar) was already proposed in the 19th century as the "international calender" with an "international day" which was not a day of the week.

    2. Re:isn't this old news? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      In fact, the question would be what did he need computer simulations for?

    3. Re:isn't this old news? by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      To fool the 5% of people who think computers are mysterious oracles with all the answers?

    4. Re:isn't this old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This (or some[thing] very similar) was already proposed in the 19th century as the "international calender" with an "international day" which was not a day of the week.

      My previous remark was inaccurate (ok, it was just wrong, but I read a book about this over 30 years ago): I was mixing up the positivist calender which was proposed by Auguste Compte in 1849 and the international fixed calendar which was proposed by Moses B. Cotsworth in 1923 and was inspired by the positivist calendar.

    5. Re:isn't this old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "World Day Calendar" [http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/worldcalendar.html] that does the same thing... Unfortunately, there are many Christians who would have a problem with this. The article mentions that the 4th commandment says to keep the sabbath and many think that means that we have to have 7 day weeks... You are not going to get those folks on-board with any plan that breaks this "rule".

    6. Re:isn't this old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha 5%, more like 99%. We are the !%!

    7. Re:isn't this old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every few hundred megaseconds someone proposes a calendar mod. The proposal is ignored by everyone, because all calendars are mostly arbitrary, with the non-arbitrary parts designed to serve totally arbitrary goals.

    8. Re:isn't this old news? by jjsimp · · Score: 1

      I really like the IFC. Although, but would rather have the leap day be added to New Years Day. So, every four years New years day would be two days long. Move Sunday back to be the last day of the week. I still don't understand Sunday as the first day.

    9. Re:isn't this old news? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I think you were typing too fast there, there's a digit missing in front of the 5. Probably an 8 or even a 9, I would say. Next time, before clicking "Submit", make sure to read the preview first.

  18. But... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Halloween is gone. On the plus side, it appears that they've managed to get a lot of the drinking holidays on the weekend.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  19. What, ANOTHER "leap week" calendar? by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Informative

    There have been many calendar-reform systems proposed, and "leap-weeks" are a common solution. Wikipedia has an article on leap week calendars and lists five advantages and three disadvantages. It, in turn, points to a web page about leap week calendars that details nine of them.

    Henry's own web page doesn't mention the existence of other leap week calendars. It merely says the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar is better than the Gregorian calendar, not why it is better than the nine other leap week calendars. And it doesn't seem to present any particular plan for getting it adopted, beyond saying "It CAN be done, folks, and the decision is YOURS, not mine. Each of you," and the proof that it's feasible is that his mother has adapted to quoting Celsius temperatures. But what's needed is not a better calendar, but a better plan than anyone has heretofore come up with for getting it adopted.

    1. Re:What, ANOTHER "leap week" calendar? by Faffe · · Score: 1

      But what's needed is not a better calendar

      Full stop

    2. Re:What, ANOTHER "leap week" calendar? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      It merely says the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar is better than the Gregorian calendar, not why it is better than the nine other leap week calendars.

      Actually, the Hanke-Henry thing is the McLenon Reformed Weekly Calendar, which is one of the nine mentioned in your link.

      Note question 11 on the second link provided in the summary....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  20. 13 Months? by hawks5999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've thought that 13 months with 4 weeks each would be so much better. Every year is missing a "day" but it could just be a New Year's Day holiday. The benefit of having a day always being a date would make so many things so much easier. Is humanity past fearing the number 13 so much that we could have a rational calendar?

    1. Re:13 Months? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The benefit of having a day always being a date would make so many things so much easier.

      But your suggestion doesn't actually solve that problem. If January 1 was a Sunday this year, it will be a Monday next year under your system. Unless you are planning to make the 365th day of the year to be the same day of the week as the previous day (i.e. the year ends with two Saturdays in a row)

    2. Re:13 Months? by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

      The last day/first day is not a traditional day. It's an annual day called "festivus" or similar and followed by Jan 1 on Monday (or Sunday - however that shakes out)

    3. Re:13 Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Causing the weeks to have uneven lengths would be unacceptable to people who honor monotheistic days of rest (either you waited an extra day to celebrate it again, or you did it on the "wrong day"), there would be significant push back on that idea.

    4. Re:13 Months? by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Why do we even need months?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    5. Re:13 Months? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the weather is really lousy in Smarch(bonus points for the reference)

    6. Re:13 Months? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      The extra day wouldn't be a part of any week. It wouldn't be a Sunday, Monday, or any other day of the week. It'd just be its own day. The calendar would go:

      • Friday, December 27th, 2011
      • Saturday, December 28th, 2011
      • Year Day, 2011
      • Sunday, January 1st, 2012
    7. Re:13 Months? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Better would be to keep the weeks as is for the religious purpose, but align the year to always begin on a Sunday. When the year start skews too far, reset it by a full week.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    8. Re:13 Months? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      That would be unacceptable to anybody who celebrates a Sabbath on a certain day of the week on every 7th day. Either they must wait 8 days (sin!) or they must do it on the wrong day of the week (sin!). In other words you cannot break the relationship between the weeks and the week days. That's why this calendar was designed the way it was, it preserves the relationship that every 7th day is the same day of the week as before. An alternative that breaks that relationship would be flat-out offensive to millions of people.

    9. Re:13 Months? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Just take the extra day each year as another day of rest. Is God going to be pissed that you rested too much?

    10. Re:13 Months? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      You do realize you just described the exact scheme proposed by the article, right?

    11. Re:13 Months? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      The last day/first day is not a traditional day.

      Which is the problem: the whole point of leap week calendars is to push calendar reform that starts each year on the same day without running into resistance from major world religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, and Judaism) that are attached to a seven-day weeks with no breaks in between and which would presumably be unwilling to adopt a calendar for business purposes which caused their regular observances to rotate around the general week (though similar rotation already occurs with regard to the Gregorian calendar for significant annual observances of the same religions, including the religion that instituted that calendar.)

    12. Re:13 Months? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      That would be unacceptable to anybody who celebrates a Sabbath on a certain day of the week on every 7th day.

      That's the commonly-stated motivation for leap week calendars, but, you know, Christians, Muslims, and Jews all have a number of important holy days that drift around the Gregorian calendar as it is. I doubt that they'd have any trouble continuing to observe their seven-day cycle of regular observations if the unit-above-day of the secular calendar didn't align with it -- if workplaces were flexible enough in scheduling to accommodate employees religious obligations.

      I think that leap week supporters mostly are wrong that the main barrier to calendar reform which is convenient for other reasons is that breaking the week is unacceptable to some major religions. The real barrier to calendar reforms of the type they propose is that no one real sees enough benefit from any proposed reform to justify the one-time cost from losing familiarity. If anything, leap weeks make it worse, because the extra week is a bigger burden than most of the burdens that calendar reformers seek to mitigate.

    13. Re:13 Months? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Indeed, causing the days of the week to rotate would wreak havoc. Suppose that this year, the Sabbath day falls on calendar Wednesday due to weekday rotation. Now, all the observant employees at your company will be out of the office every Wednesday, the entire year. And there's still the weekend, so that means religious folks only work 4 days a week, and non-religious folks work 5 days a week. Suppose you try to fix this by forcing the religious guys to work on Saturdays, so they only get two days off, like everyone else -- only now, they don't get a two day weekend, they get two days off non-adjacent to each other. They would never have two days (a typical weekend) off in a row for years at a time! Both situations are untenable.

    14. Re:13 Months? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      That's the commonly-stated motivation for leap week calendars, but, you know, Christians, Muslims, and Jews all have a number of important holy days that drift around the Gregorian calendar as it is. I doubt that they'd have any trouble continuing to observe their seven-day cycle of regular observations if the unit-above-day of the secular calendar didn't align with it -- if workplaces were flexible enough in scheduling to accommodate employees religious obligations.

      The holidays you refer to happen once per year. What we're talking about here, is having a large fraction of your workforce essentially permanently on a different schedule. For decency's sake, you want to give people a two day weekend, not two days non-adjacent to each other throughout the week. That means that, in practice, the religious folks will be taking off TWO days during the regular work week, and working on weekends when the other half of the office is not present. So you spend 40% of your time with an incomplete contingent in the office. That's completely nuts.

    15. Re:13 Months? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Why do we even need months?

      To honor the Gods!
      Janus, Mars, Aphrodite, Maia, and Juno would be offended if you did not acknowledge them every year.
      You'd also besmirch the memory of Julius Caesar and his grand-nephew Augustus.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    16. Re:13 Months? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The holidays you refer to happen once per year.

      This are more than one of them, but true.

      What we're talking about here, is having a large fraction of your workforce essentially permanently on a different schedule.

      Assuming that you have a unit like the week that isn't 7 days, its a schedule that has required days off that rotates around the new week, sure. So?

      For decency's sake, you want to give people a two day weekend, not two days non-adjacent to each other throughout the week.

      Whether that's true or not really depends on what the alternative reform does to the week. The whole point of a leap-weak calendar is to serve some other calendar reform objective while preserving a continuous 7-day week. You seem to presume that the alternative reform keeps a 7-day week but has intercalary days that push it off the existing continuous week schedule. That's one possibility, but not the only one.

      That means that, in practice, the religious folks will be taking off TWO days during the regular work week, and working on weekends when the other half of the office is not present. So you spend 40% of your time with an incomplete contingent in the office.

      I'm not sure how you get 40%. The situation you describe (the "religious folks" taking two days off during the regular work week and working on the 2-day weekend) actually has 4 out of 7 days at less-than-full staffing (2 non-weekend days and 2 weekend days) -- or 57% of the time -- if you assume that all the "religious folks" are taking the same two days off. If, say, you have religious observers with three different weekly days of observance none of which are on a weekend (as you would have with Friday, Saturday, and Sunday observers if the traditional Saturday fell anywhere from the new Tuesday to the new Thursday), you'd have 5 of 7 or 71%, even just to accommodate the day of observance (adding the second adjacent day doesn't change this number at all.)

      Of course neither of those are the average, and they only apply to out-of-synch seven-day weeks with a standard two-day "weekend" and an offset two-day weekend for observers, which is hardly the only plausible non-leap-week calendar reform scenario.

    17. Re:13 Months? by revealingheart · · Score: 1

      Mod parent insightful. Sadly this is the main reason why a 13 month calendar, with 4 weeks per month wouldn't be adopted.

      I had thought of a system (probably not unique) of using the above, and changing the name of days, ranging from 1 to 7day, with 8day added at the end of the last week of the year, and 9day added on leap years. So 1day would always be at the beginning of the month; on the 8th; 15th; and 22nd. You would always know what day of the week it is based on the day of the month.

      Today's date would be 2011-13-26, with a symbol added at the end to denote the new date format during the transition period. New Year's Eve would be on the 29th.

      The main downside I can think of is that there would be potential confusion if you had two date formats for a long period of time, so would require a large number of countries to change to the new format at the same time; and that there would be a considerable amount of resistance to change.

      It's a format designed for practical use with how we work with a 7-day system; however, it's incompatible with the needs of those who depend upon a fixed day system, and changes to the idea would make the format less appealing; which is a shame, really.

    18. Re:13 Months? by JackPepper · · Score: 1

      I agree about the 13 month calendar. The last month should be 29 days. Leap years the last month should be 30 days. It's fairly easy to remember and there would be no fudging of the days. Plus the computer algorithms would be fairly straight forward.

      Surprisingly, there would be a lot of people bitching about not getting 3 paychecks in one month. Interest on loans would be more understandable to the common man.

    19. Re:13 Months? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      We have months as a approximation of the moon's orbital period. That was important information of much of human history, but not so important for most of us nowadays.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    20. Re:13 Months? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      Indeed, causing the days of the week to rotate would wreak havoc. Suppose that this year, the Sabbath day falls on calendar Wednesday due to weekday rotation. Now, all the observant employees at your company will be out of the office every Wednesday, the entire year.

      You are aware that not all religious groups that have a day of observance that is fixed with regard to the week of the Gregorian calendar have it fixed on the same day as all other religious groups that have such a weekly observance, right?

      And you know that not all religious groups that have an approximately-weekly day of observance have one that is fixed with regard to the Gregorian calendar weeks to start with, right?

      "Religious" includes more than "mainstream Christian".

    21. Re:13 Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So nobody has to work that day. What happens to all the people on life support in the hospital? What happens when your festivus pole catches fire and you try to call the fire department and they are not on the job ... because this day cannot be counted by their employer. And how does the mortgage company account for the interest due to investors on your home loan for this day?

    22. Re:13 Months? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That would mean the week starts with a sunday (and also the year).

      In most parts of the world weeks start with the monday ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:13 Months? by wbean · · Score: 1

      But in the Gregorian calendar the 13th falls on a Friday more often than on any other day of the week. (You can confirm this by checking the entire 400-year cycle. It's a small difference but Friday wins out.)

    24. Re:13 Months? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Is humanity past fearing the number 13 so much that we could have a rational calendar?

      I've long thought that since we invented 0, we should be fearing 12 instead...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    25. Re:13 Months? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      No point for Google reference. Even though I saw the episode, I had to look up the link, so mod me down, o wise ones.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    26. Re:13 Months? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's a sin to accept physics. Which is okay to us physicists, because "sins" aren't.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    27. Re:13 Months? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      You know that's not the reason we have a 12-month calendar, right? We used to have fewer months, but the Roman emperors kept adding new ones to puff up their egos a little more. We just ran out of emperors before we hit 13.

      Lunar calendars (28-day cycle, based on the moon rather than the sun like Gregorian calendars) have been used pretty frequently throughout human history. It's just Solar calendars line up better with the definition of a year. Personally, I like the lunar myself.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    28. Re:13 Months? by gti_guy · · Score: 1

      It *was* better. The ancient Nordic & Celtic "Earth Goddess" (aka "pagan" cultures used this "Lunar Month Calendar" -- al 13 months. When these cultures were conquered, the number 13 was demonized as unlucky since it coincided with womens natural cycle. Therefore the calendar was changed to lop off a month and days were awkwardly shifted around to a 12 month calendar. So rather tha go back to a natural solution, we want to perpetuate a 12 month calendar???

    29. Re:13 Months? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Most parts of the world don't use a 13-month calendar either. It seems an odd thing to draw the line at what day the week starts on because that would be too much change to get used to.

    30. Re:13 Months? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Hah, you used technology to be efficient instead of wasting your life memorizing useless shit, what a loser :P

    31. Re:13 Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the West has an irrational fear of thirteen. Chinese-influenced countries have an irrational fear of four. You'd hit both cultures that way.

      Let the reign of terror begin!

    32. Re:13 Months? by swalve · · Score: 1

      If the common man can't figure out APR/365*days*balance, he won't figure this out either.

    33. Re:13 Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So nobody has to work that day. What happens to all the people on life support in the hospital?

      What happens to them on normal sundays? Ie "the day of rest".

    34. Re:13 Months? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Why can't they have two consecutive Sabbaths? Surely the Lord would be mightlily pleased if he were to be celebrated two days in a row?

    35. Re:13 Months? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      And he didn't even need computers or mathematical formulas! Wow, we have a genius in our midst!

    36. Re:13 Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the bible. God is very easily pissed.

    37. Re:13 Months? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. The only advantage of the proposed HH calendar is that any given date falls on the same day of the week, every year. Hell, if you're going to change it you may as well make it as useful as possible. The 28-day-per-month calendar gives that benefit every month, and gives us an extra-special New Year's Day as a bonus. And we don't have to remember which months have 30 days and which ones have 31.

      But why stop there? What's with this nutty 7-day week fetish? Let's switch to a regimen of 36 10-day weeks, grouped into six months of six weeks each. That leaves a dangling extra half week, but that's easier to deal with than the extra week every 5 (or sometimes 6) years proposed by HH. Just have a leap week every other year. And give every other leap week an extra day. Simple.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    38. Re:13 Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and the world ends every Sunday too.

    39. Re:13 Months? by quenda · · Score: 1

      That would be unacceptable to anybody who celebrates a Sabbath on a certain day of the week on every 7th day.

      I suppose by that logic such a person would be unable to travel around the world, thus losing or gaining a day. Maybe they get around it by believing in a flat earth, like the guys who wrote those laws.
      How else do they cope?

  21. On Monday please? by Milharis · · Score: 2

    Can I have it on Monday rather please?

    1. Re:On Monday please? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Can I have it on Monday rather please?

      That's the new term for 'GMT+24'.

  22. Obligatory by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    Lousy Smarch weather.

  23. Simpler solution. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slow (or speed) the Earth's revolution around the Sun until it takes 360 (or 372) days. Problem solved.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Simpler solution. by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Once we have a working space elevator, we can attach a mass driver to the end to do precisely that. Until then we need a stop gap solution. (Tongue in cheek).

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:Simpler solution. by mikeroySoft · · Score: 1

      How about simply 13 months with 28 days each, plus an extra day every year?

    3. Re:Simpler solution. by houghi · · Score: 0

      256 would be more logical. Or 1000 if you like the metric system.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Simpler solution. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      Pffft. Altering the Earth's orbit sounds way, way simpler. Just put some GIANT rocket engines on the equator, point up, and fire them up once a day - leading or trailing to slow or speed the planet's movement around the Sun - and Bob's your uncle. I think it saw this on Futurama...

      Any astrophysicists care to weigh in the maths?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:Simpler solution. by pclminion · · Score: 2

      To first approximation, Earth would be moving 1.5% faster (actually, not quite that much because it would have a smaller orbit, but close enough). Momentum is conserved, and it is linear in both mass and velocity, therefore, to change Earth's velocity by 1.5% through propulsive means, we would need to shoot away 1.5% of Earth's mass in the form of rocket exhaust. That's one hundred million trillion tons of propellant. Removing 1.5% of Earth's mass would also shrink the Earth, causing tectonic disasters and altering the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. Additionally, there would now be one hundred million trillion tons of propellant floating around the inner solar system. We'd probably collide with it regularly, suffering severe impact damage.

    6. Re:Simpler solution. by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Or 1000 if you like playing with dry ice.

      Fixed...

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    7. Re:Simpler solution. by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      Lousy Smarch weather!

    8. Re:Simpler solution. by swalve · · Score: 1

      That would be one HELL of a 4th of July party though.

    9. Re:Simpler solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to adjust the orbit. Just define 1day= 24 hours 20 minutes 58.128 seconds, and you're there.
      Who cares about synchronizing days with the sun being up or not - we're the Slashdot Crowd
      the only light we need is the light from our CRT/LCD/LED displays

    10. Re:Simpler solution. by quenda · · Score: 1

      Slow (or speed) the Earth's revolution around the Sun until it takes 360 (or 372) days. Problem solved.

      There is always some idiot suggesting an over-engineered impractical solution.
      Why move the orbit when it would be so much easier to slow (or speed) the Earth's rotation about its own axis, and achieve the same end.
      The day would be slightly longer, but since hours and minutes would be replaced by millidays, nobody will notice.

    11. Re:Simpler solution. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Slow (or speed) the Earth's revolution around the Sun until it takes 360 (or 372) days. Problem solved.

      There is always some idiot suggesting an over-engineered impractical solution.

      Hmm... See subject, see proposal, see Irony

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    12. Re:Simpler solution. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Lighten up, Francis.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  24. What about Wednesdays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about all of the poor schmucks whose birthday always winds up on a Wednesday, every year, for the rest of their lives?

    1. Re:What about Wednesdays? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Or disappears completely?!?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:What about Wednesdays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the same thing that happens to leapyear babies now leap week babies get fewer birthdays though.

    3. Re:What about Wednesdays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or thursdays :( I never could get the hang of thursdays

    4. Re:What about Wednesdays? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      That one's also solved. From TFA:

      "One time throughout the world, one date throughout the world," they write, in a January 2012 Global Asia article about their proposals.

      The full quote, not included in TFA is "One time throughout the world, one date throughout the world, one birthday throughout the world."

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:What about Wednesdays? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Or the poor schmucks whose birthday is during 'xtra'?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  25. This fails to improve anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the new calendar is identical every year... except that, every five or six years, there is a one-week long Mini-Month"

    That's not identical every year. That's pretty stupid, actually, and would cause more problems than dealing with moving holidays. There are currently zero computers that currently are set up to deal with an extra "Mini-month" at an irregular interval. e.g. Payroll systems that pay on the 15th and end of the month would need to be changed and have a custom amount for that period. They compare it to the Y2K situation, but it's not analogous; this is not adding two digits to the year, this is a fundamental change in how dates are stored and calculated. They're trying to add an occasional Smarch to the calendar, no one wants it.

    Also, it would suck if your birthday was permanently on a Monday.

    "Christmas Day will always fall on a Sunday, which will be pleasing to Christians,
    but, will also be pleasing to companies who currently lose up to two weeks of work to the Christmas/New Year's annual mess."

    No, that would suck for everyone who works. I don't know why they think it would be pleasing for Christians, that doesn't make the least bit of sense.

    The entire proposal is just a crackpot dreaming, it fails to be more convenient, his reasoning of the "benefits" is mostly nonsensical.

  26. Copy of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Error establishing a database connection

  27. Same issue as with QWERY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something that's sub-optimal (whether calendars or keyboard layouts) not only has to be shown as lacking, but a better option needs to be found that everyone agrees upon - which would realistically take way more work than is worth it.

  28. The new calendar can get in line.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... behind global metrification.

  29. I have an improved version of the JH calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've corrected the Hopkins' calendar so that

    - people and companies won't have to remember, and make plans for the upcoming "leap week"
    - annual time series data will not require a massive correction factor to account for "leap week" years
    - equinoxes and solstices will not drift over each 5-6 year period.

    I'm calling it "The Calendar We Already Have Today". The unveiling will be in Nice, France (next May, although there may be some confusion about the exact date).

    1. Re:I have an improved version of the JH calendar by zevans · · Score: 1

      Nice? Shurely "Nicaea?"

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
  30. Just get rid of months by Skapare · · Score: 2

    We don't need months. Just use quarters and call them seasons. Months were traditionally periods of lunar cycles, and aside from certain religious calendars, is really no well aligned with lunar cycles at all. Fundamentally, we just don't need them.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Just get rid of months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. Christmas on the 359th.
      Though we'd still need leap years.

    2. Re:Just get rid of months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get paid monthly, and so do lots of other people. Many contracts are renewed monthly. Etc, etc. I guess you could change it to 4-week intervals, mind you.

  31. It's more than just a date, it drops timezones by darronb · · Score: 2

    The site is talking about dropping timezones and adopting Universal Time everywhere. (Claiming only people in the middle of the Pacific would be particularly troubled by this)

    Wow.

    1. Re:It's more than just a date, it drops timezones by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      The site is talking about dropping timezones and adopting Universal Time everywhere. (Claiming only people in the middle of the Pacific would be particularly troubled by this)

      Wow.

      Generally speaking, he'd be correct. There'd be a short period of mental adjustment (such as working an 11-to-7 or 3-to-12 instead of a 9-to-5), but for the most part you'd quickly figure out when to be asleep and when to be awake.

      Even if you start work on one date and finish on the next, it's not really a big deal - there's already plenty of people who do that. (Any job that closes after midnight does this all the time.)

    2. Re:It's more than just a date, it drops timezones by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, he'd be correct.

      Were you around for the previous /. discussion on this? There is no benefit to changing to getting rid of timezones. You go from having to remember what timezone Chicago is in, to having to remember what time they eat lunch in Chicago.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    3. Re:It's more than just a date, it drops timezones by darronb · · Score: 1

      I really hate timezones. Still, you're right that the alternative is probably worse.

      I suppose the alternative is to move everybody to a hollow sphere with an artificial sun in the middle.

  32. Time Zones... by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 4, Informative

    Eh, not bad at first glance, but I can't be on board with zapping time zones. As someone who deals with international locations across the globe every single day, its a ton easier to find out "oh, they're 8 hours behind us" vs "Hmm, its 0900 Global. We just had lunch... what are they doing in New York at this time? Its 0900 there too - I think its still dark, but I don't know if its close to dawn or if they just woke up."

    Sounds good in theory, but god it would suck.

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
    1. Re:Time Zones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, not bad at first glance, but I can't be on board with zapping time zones. As someone who deals with international locations across the globe every single day, its a ton easier to find out "oh, they're 8 hours behind us" vs "Hmm, its 0900 Global. We just had lunch... what are they doing in New York at this time? Its 0900 there too - I think its still dark, but I don't know if its close to dawn or if they just woke up."

      Sounds good in theory, but god it would suck.

      Yes, it would suck, but the real reason it would suck is because Economics (and Employers) "keep forgetting" that biologics are only good for 16 hours at a stretch. Actually, they don't forget, they just wish the biologics would behave more like drones. This "calendar" is crap.

      Try this one (for Washington, DC 2011) ... http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/phase/tpac2011/toward/DC001-2011.html

    2. Re:Time Zones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who deals with international locations every day, I think you're off your rocker. This whole premise always gets repeated every time the subject comes up, but you're trading additional complications in calculations that require specificity for convenience in imprecise conversions.

      Trying to string together information in local times is so much more obnoxious. In either case, you have to know that California is 8 hours behind London, but instead of doing math about train departure times and station transfers and whether you remembered to adjust your watch (or that your cell phone did in fact update as it was supposed to), you just have to remember the "8 hours" part. No confusion in communications, no complicated math. You just need the differential.

      Lunch is not exactly at noon everywhere, nor does the day length remain constant throughout the year, so trying to anchor the clock to variable times is pointless. Locking the clock everywhere and adjusting local schedules accordingly would make business and travel substantially less complicated. If everyone communicated in GST, life would be radically simpler.

    3. Re:Time Zones... by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With most cities daylight hours aren't actually enough anyway. A large enough percentage of the population works non-standard schedules that you need their specific waking/working hours.

      Same for business. Lots of cities have restrictions on activities during the day and only take deliveries overnight.

      As people move more and more to a non-farming schedule timezones become less relevant because "daylight hours" simply don't matter. Knowing that they are available from 17:00 to 9:00 is enough. You don't need to take their 12:00pm to 4:00am then convert to your local time.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    4. Re:Time Zones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ridiculous. Is your argument that you can no longer put a numerical value to a location on earth because both have the same "time"? And that you can't deduce another persons apparent "lunch" time with this number?
      Not everyone has lunch at a specific time of day either.

  33. Birthday Jinx by acjacinto · · Score: 2

    Should we feel sorry for people born on "Friday the 13th" of January, April, July and October?

    1. Re:Birthday Jinx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, that was the only thing that had me onboard with the whole idea (October 13th).

    2. Re:Birthday Jinx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. I've got a friend born on April 20th. Look up that day and the day before in Wikipedia to get an idea of how much fun his birthdays have been.

    3. Re:Birthday Jinx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I would be glad if my birthday always fell on a Friday the 13th... especially if it was in October.

  34. Holocene Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we used the Holocene calendar as part of a reform, I'd be pleased even if only because it is religion independent.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar

  35. Socialist pig! by RobinEggs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about we work on the adoption of the metric system first.

    Never gonna happen. There are too many politically conservative idiots, like my mom, who believe attempts at converting to metric represent a "socialist" conspiracy, and almost literally scream at any attempt to remove Imperial units in favor of metric.

    Socialist? The fucking metric system? Seriously?

    The government already tried to phase in metric sometime in the 1970s, if I recall, emphasizing it in schools and installing additional signage on highways with metric speeds and distances. People responded to this with caterwauling and by shooting the road signs into tatters. Dave Barry summed up the final results the best:

    Thus the metric system did not really catch on in the States, unless you count the increasing popularity of the nine-millimeter bullet.

    1. Re:Socialist pig! by slash.dt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never gonna happen. There are too many politically conservative idiots, like my mom, who believe attempts at converting to metric represent a "socialist" conspiracy, and almost literally scream at any attempt to remove Imperial units in favor of metric. Socialist? The fucking metric system? Seriously?

      How about approaching it by telling those same people that using Imperial units is propagating the British rule over America and until it is dropped, the US will never be truely free?

    2. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your parents may claim as much as they want. But the only confusing and absofuckinglutely useless system is the US customary system. Face it : the world is metric and so should be the USA. Inch, miles, feet, oz, liquid oz, Fahrenheit...etc. Just ridiculous.

    3. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The metric system is not SOCIALIST. It's GAY. Get your facts straight.,

    4. Re:Socialist pig! by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      There are too many politically conservative idiots, like my mom, who believe attempts at converting to metric represent a "socialist" conspiracy, and almost literally scream at any attempt to remove Imperial units in favor of metric.

      Which makes it all the more amusing they constantly refer to the American Standard system as "Imperial".

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:Socialist pig! by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      How about approaching it by telling those same people that using Imperial units is propagating the British rule over America and until it is dropped, the US will never be truely free?

      Americans seem to dislike the French more than the British. :)

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    6. Re:Socialist pig! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see, you define conservative as "idiot" then? That must save a lot of time in political arguments!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Socialist pig! by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      You put it on *road signs*? UK here; all commerce, retail, and pretty much everything else is done in metric. Roadsigns are done in miles.

      All the plus, none of the fuss.

    8. Re:Socialist pig! by wiedzmin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I propose that Slashdot generates statistics of exactly how many posts it takes for every topic to turn into political, racial or Apple bashing.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    9. Re:Socialist pig! by Thing+1 · · Score: 2

      The (American) Imperial March is now in my head, thanks. :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    10. Re:Socialist pig! by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      Dave Barry has the best quotes...
      XD

    11. Re:Socialist pig! by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the world is metric and so should be the USA. Inch, miles, feet, oz, liquid oz, Fahrenheit...etc. Just ridiculous.

      The world apart from the USA isn't metric; go live in the UK a while and see units what they measure road distance in, and what unit of volume they use to measure beer at the pub. Ask them how much they weigh too: they'll give you a number of rocks as their unit of weight.

    12. Re:Socialist pig! by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      The US is already on the metric system, it's just that most people never noticed. All packaged goods in the US are labeled in US and metric, our cars support MPH & KPH, our Liquor is is sold in 750ml, 1l and 1.75l bottles. All of our electronic fuel pumps and odometers can be switched between US & metric. Oh, we still use mile markers on the interstate, and we pretend we're still using non-metric measurements of oz, pound, gallon, inch, foot, mile, but in reality, everything is made and sold in metric quantities, and dual labeled with the more familiar measurements.

      Most of the country is still in denial about it, and computers have helped keep it relatively hidden, but we're on the metric system whether we realize it or not.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    13. Re:Socialist pig! by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

      If you want to push the metric system, start with the meteorologists, weather broadcasts and such. If people are eased into thinking of the temperature in metric the other systems will be that much easier.

      I'm all for the US changing to metric but in a trade off, I think a push should be made by the few left hand drive countries to convert over to right hand drive as it's used by a large majority of the world. They money savings by the auto industry would be huge.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    14. Re:Socialist pig! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      "I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and universally admitted a principle that I hardly think any gentleman will deny it." - John Stuart Mill

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    15. Re:Socialist pig! by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0

      What a little world you must live in to think that.

      Go into a suburb that has high illiteracy ... and census the number of republicans.

    16. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the reactions to the Euro-conversion in the area of the monetary union. Lots of right-wing parties where founded across the whole area and suddenly the major concern of those parties where "cultural purity", immigration and anti-Muslim sentiment, instead of the EU monetary union. They naturally run in the EU parliament elections, get their seats and collect the over 7k EUR plus expenses for working in the very system their so much "hate." All this for a change of measurement unit and easier travel and cross border commerce.

    17. Re:Socialist pig! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's one, you moronic libertarian sand-nigger Apple fanboi. ~

    18. Re:Socialist pig! by russotto · · Score: 2

      we pretend we're still using non-metric measurements of oz, pound, gallon, inch, foot, mile, but in reality, everything is made and sold in metric quantities, and dual labeled with the more familiar measurements

      Nonsense. A can of Coke in the US is 12oz; it's the 355ml which is the secondary label. Milk is packaged and sold in customary units; again, it's the metric unit which is the secondary label. Gasoline is sold exclusively in customary units. True, liquor is metric (though we confuse things by calling 750ml a "fifth"; it's a little short), but beer is customary. For length, lumber is made and sold in customary units. Fasteners are made and sold in both. For weight, everything (except cocaine) we buy by weight is sold by the pound; it's often labeled in kg, but that's secondary.

      It's true that our units are all referenced to metric standards, but that's not the same as saying we use the metric system.

    19. Re:Socialist pig! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Well, considering the actual definition of 'conservative' (being against change) and the current status quo ('royally fucked up'), it's not an entirely unreasonable equivalence relation...

    20. Re:Socialist pig! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Or I could go into a trailer park and end up with a different result. Did you have a point besides "lol niggers"?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    21. Re:Socialist pig! by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > If you want to push the metric system, start with the meteorologists, weather broadcasts and such.
      > If people are eased into thinking of the temperature in metric the other systems will be that much easier.

      Good god, temperature is the *worst* part of the metric system. I mean, WTF. How often does anybody genuinely *care* that the freezing point of distilled water at sea level is exactly zero degrees, and the boiling point of the same is exactly 100? When was the last time somebody making a cup of tea put a thermometer into the tea kettle to measure the water's temperature as it approached 100C?

      For answering the specific question, "How hot (or cold) is it outside?" Fahrenheit is damn near perfect. 0F isn't just cold... it's the point where it genuinely starts to become *dangerously* cold. Likewise, 100F isn't just "hot" -- it's the point where it becomes *dangerously* hot. The temperature at which puddles turn into ice, and your lips crack from wind, can vary by several real-world degrees... but 0F is always going to be really, really, bitterly cold, and 100F is approximately the point where people start throwing up and passing out from heatstroke. In weather terms, 0C is almost meaningless... it might feel bitterly cold, or (in Antarctica during the summer, where it's basically a cold desert with minimal humidity) it might be warm enough to go outside wearing shorts (for a few minutes, anyway) -- at least, if there's no major wind chill.

    22. Re:Socialist pig! by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      A 12 oz can of Coke is 355ml, a more precise measurement. And 12oz cans, 20oz bottles, and the rare 8oz can/bottle are the only remaining english sizes of soft drinks, most are .5l, 1l, 1.5l, 2l, and 3l sizes now. Automobiles don't use SAE nut and bolt sizes anymore, they use metric. You can remain in denial, but we have been assimilated into the metric system.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    23. Re:Socialist pig! by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Except that the US doesn't use Imperial units. An Imperial gallon is about 1.21 US gallons

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_units#Volume

    24. Re:Socialist pig! by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      The point being that there are far more stupid democrats than stupid republicans. And frankly, I take offence at your implication that dumb suburbs are necessarily filled with blacks. Yes there's a little more blacks on the East Coast in these kinds of places, but finding one filled with white Europeans is not that big a problem even there. At the West coast, well, there's the whole menu : you want masses of illiterate blacks, whites, latinos ? All are available, often with a side of chinese in there somewhere. I'm sure I've hardly covered all the glorious variation these subsidized deathtraps the democrats built in our cities have.

      These places are universally democrat (because republicans get beaten up as soon as this become common knowledge), by al reasonable measures are stupid, and they've got huge numbers.

      So the initial assertion is perfectly true : dumb democrats far outnumber dumb republicans. And whilst I'm not making the claim that trailer parks are much better, those people can actually read. A significant part of the people in there have held engineering and other jobs for years on end, if not decades. Yes we all know you do not approve of them. They're not nearly as stupid as you imply though.

      I have no clue about averages, but I have not failed to notice that there never are people from these urban deserts present in the polls democrats use for their "average intelligence" counts (putting aside the obvious conflict of interest these polls have in the first place). All the polls I've seen only prove that "college students actually score -slightly*- higher than the general public on academic tests"

      * slightly ? Yes, in fact it's quite shameful how low the difference is imho.

    25. Re:Socialist pig! by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

      The metric system hasn't caught on, so Americans still use inches as their measurement. But, how big is an inch? Turns out there until 1959 there was no standard for the British units. Finally it was in 1959, the inch was defined to be 2.54cm. So you can measure everything in footsies if you want, you're still using metric system as your standard.

      By contrast, the SI units have fundamental standards that rely on things that are tied to the universe we live in: The meter is "the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1299,792,458 of a second," and a second is "the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyper-fine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom."

      You can refuse to use metric system all you want, if your standard is defined as the metric system then you are using the metric system.

    26. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the freedom fries tendencies in America would have been taken more seriously if they also got rid of the Statue of Liberty and that flag based on the three colors of the French revolution.

    27. Re:Socialist pig! by repvik · · Score: 1

      You drive on the wrong side of the road. How messed up is that?

    28. Re:Socialist pig! by repvik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously... The UK isn't part of the world. They even drive on the wrong side of the road. You can't trust a system that is that much fucked up ;-)

    29. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm of an age where I was taught the imperial system at school.
      When I started work it was a bit of a shock as we used metric for everything.
      One job I hated was translating the sets of Boeing Cockpit drawings into usable 'stuff'.

      We'd get 747 cockpit drawings that had no dimentsions on them. It was all to scale but the scale was in inches.
      I suppose it did me some good as I'm happy with both sorts.
      be it cutting a 3/8in x 40tpi ME threrad on my 50yr old imperial lathe or tinkering with my 1972 Honda CB750 (metric).

      Yeah we use a mess of units here in the UK.
      Pints Yep
      Miles Yep

      But everything else is metric.
      When I go to the US I feel like stepping back into the dark ages.
      You lot over the pond need to get on message. The world is already or going metric. IF you don't then you will cement your place in history as a nation of luddites.
       

    30. Re:Socialist pig! by RoLi · · Score: 2

      Good god, temperature is the *worst* part of the metric system. I mean, WTF. How often does anybody genuinely *care* that the freezing point of distilled water at sea level is exactly zero degrees, and the boiling point of the same is exactly 100?

      It's the other way around. When snow does not melt on the grass but turns into a morass on the street - I know it's about -1 to +1 C. In other words I can use nature as a thermometer because nature consists of a lot of water.

    31. Re:Socialist pig! by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. If you don't drive on the left and you are right handed, your sword arm is on the wrong side to protect you from any vagabonds coming the other way.

      Also, Ettore Bugatti's cars were always right hand drive. If the greatest ever car maker thought people should drive on the left, who are we to argue.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    32. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are too many politically conservative idiots, like my mom, who believe attempts at converting to metric represent a "socialist" conspiracy, and almost literally scream at any attempt to remove Imperial units in favor of metric."

      Your mom has some very interesting ideas. Does she have a mailing list I could subscribe to?

    33. Re:Socialist pig! by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      wow - you found all the examples!

      --
      This is blinging
    34. Re:Socialist pig! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Good god, temperature is the *worst* part of the metric system. I mean, WTF. How often does anybody genuinely *care* that the freezing point of distilled water at sea level is exactly zero degrees, and the boiling point of the same is exactly 100? When was the last time somebody making a cup of tea put a thermometer into the tea kettle to measure the water's temperature as it approached 100C?

      Anyone who's cooking or doing any other temperature-critical work (chemistry, etc) where you need to measure the temperature. If it's just weather, you can feel how cold/hot it is, and you get used to temp in deg C pretty quickly once you stop trying to convert to F every time you hear it. It's like travelling to another country and getting used to the currency. Temp is actually the easiest conversion to make. If you Americans could get with the program I wouldn't have the hassle of when my wife looks up a recipe online and finds an American recipe with temp in F with quantities in ounces, and asks me to convert it to metric to suit our oven and measuring cups.

    35. Re:Socialist pig! by Jappus · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you're driving any vehicle at all, be it a car, motorcycle, bicycle, boat, aeroplane or whatever -- and even if you intend to walk anywhere, most people should care about when exactly water usually freezes, instead of where the stable point of brine is.

      If I tell a European that it's going to be 0C and raining/snowing outside today, they will think twice before attempting anything of the above. Calibrating your scale to something that covers 2/3rd of the globe all the time and the other third very nearly most of the time is just a very sane approach to things.

    36. Re:Socialist pig! by xaxa · · Score: 1

      A 12 oz can of Coke is 355ml, a more precise measurement.

      Sounds like a measurement in ounces to me. Here in the UK some milk is sold as "2.27 Litres". That's 4 pints, whatever you call it. (Other companies label their milk as "2 Litres". Having competing products in different but similar volumes is unfair to consumers, and has been illegal for many centuries for some things, like bread, but apparently for milk it's traditional...)

      A can of cola here is 330ml. That's a metric measurement. It may well be a preferred number in some way.

    37. Re:Socialist pig! by xaxa · · Score: 2

      British roads (and railways) are funded, designed and constructed in millimetres. Both are only signed in Imperial. The design standards even state things like positioning a new road sign 300m from a hazard and labelling it "300 yards", presumably with the intention to change it, eventually.

      Beer and cider in pubs is sold in multiples of a half-pint, but in shops it must be labelled in mL, common sizes are 568mL (1pt), and 500mL.
      Wine in pubs is metric (some multiple of 25mL, I can't remember exactly -- 175mL, I think). Same for spirits.

      Humans in casual conversation are weighed in stone; but at the gym, doctors, hospital, for a safety harness, etc -- anything serious -- it's kg.

    38. Re:Socialist pig! by Serpents · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the following footnote from "Good Omens" By Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman:

      *NOTE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AND AMERICANS: One shilling = Five Pee. It helps to understand the antique finances of the Witchfinder Army if you know the original British monetary system: Two farthings = One Ha'penny. Two ha'pennies = One Penny. Three pennies = A Thrupenny Bit. Two Thrupences = A Sixpence. Two Sixpences = One Shilling, or Bob. Two Bob = A Florin. One Florin and One Sixpence = Half a Crown. Four Half Crowns = Ten Bob Note. Two Ten Bob Notes = One Pound (or 240 pennies). One Pound and One Shilling = One Guinea. The British resisted decimalized currency for a long time because they thought it was too complicated."

    39. Re:Socialist pig! by xaxa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For answering the specific question, "How hot (or cold) is it outside?" Fahrenheit is damn near perfect. 0F isn't just cold... it's the point where it genuinely starts to become *dangerously* cold.

      No, Fahrenheit is just what you're used to. 0F is no more "the point" than 5F, -5F, 3.42F, etc.

      In weather terms, 0C is almost meaningless...

      Well, it means water will freeze. There's quite a lot of it outside, it freezing marks an important change in the weather as far as I'm concerned.

    40. Re:Socialist pig! by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      The US customary units differ from the imperial units anyway. Imperial gallon is 4.54 L (based on volume of 10 pounds of water), US gallon is 3.785 L (defined as 231 cubic inches). Even the ratios of fl oz to cups and pints is different. 1 imperial pint = 2 Imp. cups = 20 Imp. fl oz ~= 568 mL, 1 US pint = 2 US cups = 16 US fl oz ~= 473 mL.

      The FDA also already defines metricated units for use on food labelling, so that on nutrition labels where fl oz are stated, that really means 30 mL exactly, and similarly for teaspoon (5 mL) and tablespoon (15 mL).

      Although the international inch, foot, yard and mile are all the same in every day usage, the US also has the special survey foot and mile.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    41. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government already tried to phase in metric sometime in the 1970s, if I recall, emphasizing it in schools and installing additional signage on highways with metric speeds and distances. People responded to this with caterwauling and by shooting the road signs into tatters. Dave Barry summed up the final results the best:

      One isolated Interstate highway in the southwestern United States continues to be signed in metric units - Interstate 19, and has been since 1980.

    42. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never gonna happen. There are too many politically conservative idiots, like my mom, who believe attempts at converting to metric represent a "socialist" conspiracy,

      I was about to say that. I remember the phrase, "...what, are you Communist?", being bandied about.

    43. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unit of volume they use to measure beer at the pub

      They don;t measure the beer in "pints", they order it in pints. They will however just get a 570ml glass...

    44. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lumber is made and sold in customary units

      Is it? I thought they were sold in in bullshit units that have no proper relation to the label, since a 4 by 6 is just what happens to be left over of a formerly 4" by 6" piece of wood after some kind of processing.

    45. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0C == freezing
      -5C == light jacket
      -10C == warm jacket
      -20C == bitterly cold (hat/mitts, scarf, etc., cold getting dangerous, close enough to 0F that the difference doesn't matter)
      -30C == freakishly and dangerously cold (15 minutes without earmuffs/hat == frostbite)
      -35C == coldest I've ever been in (before wind-chill factor). It wasn't pleasant.

      Going the other way

      10C == cool
      15C == below room temperature, but not that bad. A nice spring/fall day.
      18C-22C == room temperature. "Standard" is centered around 20C, but people have different tastes
      25C == warm summer day
      30C == hot summer day
      >30C == how much hotter doesn't really matter. It's uncomfortable unless you're at the beach.
      >40C == Saudi Arabia

      It's no worse than Fahrenheit and it's a lot easier to keep track of than some crazy-assed system that grades from 32 as the freezing point. And contrary to your claim, how close you are to freezing (on either side) is a critical parameter worth having as a calibration point. I'm in Canada. Trust me. It matters A LOT when traveling or doing anything outside. You know that if you're within 2 degrees on either side that you can expect freezing or melted patches on the road that could cause problems ("black ice"), or that if it snows the snow will be particularly slippery and the precipitation could go either way.

      You're right that going all the way to 100 is pointless. Most people experience no more than +-40C.

    46. Re:Socialist pig! by alcourt · · Score: 1

      So my butcher is lying when they label my roast as 4.34 pounds and no other unit for weight given?

      --
      "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend unto the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire
    47. Re:Socialist pig! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You're throwing a lot of assertions my way. Lots of assertions. No backup.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    48. Re:Socialist pig! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I can prove that I'm tougher than the Europeans. They start throwing up and passing out from heat when it's only 35-40 degrees. I can handle 95-105.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    49. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We drive on the "wrong" side of the road, eh?

      Let me ask you a question: what are 90% of people? No, not straight, I mean something else... yes, that's right, right-handed.

      If you're right-handed, like most people, and you're in a right-hand-drive (or as I like to call it, correct-hand-drive) car, which hand do you have to take off the wheel to mess with the stereo, the heater controls, or the gears*? Yes, that's right, your left or weaker hand.

      If you're right-handed, like most people, and you're in a left-hand-drive (wrong-hand-drive) car, which hand do you have to take off the wheel? Your right, or stronger, hand.

      This makes for a measurable difference in car accident statistics. Go and look it up if you don't believe me.

      * unless you're driving a retardomatic, like most Yanks...

    50. Re:Socialist pig! by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Well, Americans are regarded as "Imperialists" for as long as I can remember. And the USA are sometimes referred to as "The Empire".

    51. Re:Socialist pig! by dwye · · Score: 1

      I propose that Slashdot generates statistics of exactly how many posts it takes for every topic to turn into political, racial or Apple bashing.

      No, it would be too easy for a meme to develop (like "First Post!") that every thread gets turned as soon as possible.

      You Commie-loving, Apple-using (or abusing, as you happen to be), honky (or chink, jap, abo, coon, or whatever), you.

      Now the INVERSE metric, how resistant a thread was, could help things.

    52. Re:Socialist pig! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      It's the other way around. When snow does not melt on the grass but turns into a morass on the street - I know it's about -1 to +1 C. In other words I can use nature as a thermometer because nature consists of a lot of water.

      Umm, so what? The point of temperature measurement for most people is to tell them something useful about what to expect, not for them to derive abstract numbers from phenomena.

      My goal in having a temperature scale (outside of a lab or something) is so that someone can say, "It's X degrees," and I know whether to put on my light coat or my heavy one and things like that. If I can look outside and see that it's about freezing, I know which coat to put on. (What number that corresponds to in some abstract scale is beside the point.) In that context, the temperature scale is useless, because I can directly observe the information I need.

      I'm not a huge defender of Fahrenheit, but arguing for Celsius simply because you might be able to say, "Wow -- it's +/- 1 degree out!" on a few random days seems to me a pretty ridiculous reason to choose a temperature scale.

    53. Re:Socialist pig! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      I'm not a huge defender of Fahrenheit, but...

      For answering the specific question, "How hot (or cold) is it outside?" Fahrenheit is damn near perfect. 0F isn't just cold... it's the point where it genuinely starts to become *dangerously* cold.

      No, Fahrenheit is just what you're used to. 0F is no more "the point" than 5F, -5F, 3.42F, etc.

      Correct. But 0 F is much closer to the mark than 32 F, which is a temperature that most people can still do a good deal of work outside without worrying about frostbite and things like that. Except in unusual circumstances, extended human outdoor activity generally starts getting significantly harder (and requires more care) somewhere around -10F to +10F. 0 F is a reasonable approximation.

      In weather terms, 0C is almost meaningless...

      Well, it means water will freeze. There's quite a lot of it outside, it freezing marks an important change in the weather as far as I'm concerned.

      Again, you're absolutely right. From a meteorological standpoint, 0 C makes a lot of sense as an important number. From a human standpoint trying to do things outdoors, it also is significant, but so are many other temperatures. 37 degrees C is pretty significant too, because temperatures above that tend to signal when humans' cooling systems fail. Body temperature is almost exactly 100 F.

      As an abstract measure, Celsius makes sense. I do see the GP's point about the "human-ness" of the Fahrenheit scale, though.

    54. Re:Socialist pig! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      * unless you're driving a retardomatic, like most Yanks...

      It's not just us, the Japanese are also big fans of the automatic transmission.

      However, it probably won't be that long until manuals are completely obsolete, now that DSG transmissions have bested them in both performance (shifting speed) and fuel economy. The only thing manuals have in favor of them over the DSG is a lower price (and higher fun factor of course).

    55. Re:Socialist pig! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Your post shows exactly why it really isn't important or useful for countries to convert to metric. As long as the people who do useful things use metric for their work (like in building the roads, or measuring weight at the hospital), it really doesn't matter what the common people use. It's much the same over here in the USA; people who lay out CPU chips, for example, certainly don't use customary units.

    56. Re:Socialist pig! by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The UK is the last hold-out of the imperial system in Europe, and even there, there are only a very few things that are still done in imperial units. Beer is one, in a pub it must be sold as 1/3 of a pint or multiples of 1/2 pint, if it is on tap, but if it is sold in a bottle or can, it will be in ml. Every other drink is sold in ml. Every other liquid is sold in m^3, litres or ml. Road signs for motor vehicles show distances in miles or yards and speeds in mph. Anything for pedestrians or cyclists is generally in meters and km. When a road is being built, the engineers use metric units to measure things. Anything sold by weight is required to be sold in grammes, kg etc, it is illegal to use imperial units. You are allowed show the imperial equivalent less prominently than the metric measurement, but most retailers don't. Cannabis is apparently sold in fractions of an ounce, but they are breaking more serious laws than the weights and measures act.

      So there are only two areas where metric is not used in the UK. Beer sold on tap in a pub, and road signs and speed limits for motor vehicles.

    57. Re:Socialist pig! by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Around 1/3 of the worlds population lives in countries where they drive on the left, most notably India, the second largest country in the world with around 1bn people. Ireland looked at the possibility of changing to driving on the right a few years back. The conclusion was that it would cost a lot of money and there would be no benefits from doing so.

    58. Re:Socialist pig! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget measuring human weight in rocks. It might not be used in an official capacity or in retail business, but that doesn't make it any less valid. You also forgot cannabis sales as you mentioned before, so that's four areas (three legal). :-)

    59. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "stupid" not "illiterate." Ignorance is curable, stupidity is forever.

    60. Re:Socialist pig! by xaxa · · Score: 1

      There have occasionally been problems because the engineers aren't as familiar with the units as they might be. "Max Load: 1000kg" -- it's useful to have some concept of how much that is to spot obvious mistakes.

      Other problems result from the confusion of having two sets of conflicting units. For example, I think the NHS have removed all weighing scales from hospitals that could be set to measure in Imperial units. There was a risk that a scale might be set to pounds (perhaps by a patient more familiar with pounds), giving a reading of, say, "110", as written down by a nurse. The pharmacist would think that was 110kg, which could easily lead to an overdose. 50kg (110lb) and 110kg are both reasonable weights for a person, so the pharmacist might not notice a problem.
      (Here again, if the nurse was more familiar with kilograms she'd know that 110kg = obese, and might see the mistake herself.)

    61. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize the Japanese, one of the more technologically advanced countries, adopted the British system?

      I sure hope you don't own any tech coming from Japan, being on /. and all.

    62. Re:Socialist pig! by lgw · · Score: 1

      The current staus quo is better than most of history, and better than it would be if we implemented most ideas that look good on paper.

      Most engineers are conservative (in their domain) because a healthy skepticism towards new ideas maximizes progress, through avoiding waste and malinvestment. New ideas are exicitng, appealing, and almost always wrong.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    63. Re:Socialist pig! by careysub · · Score: 1

      The current staus quo is better than most of history, and better than it would be if we implemented most ideas that look good on paper.... New ideas are exicitng, appealing, and almost always wrong.

      Since you are commenting on a sub-thread about metrification, are you asserting that this new-fangled metric thing is one of those unproven and thus most likely bad ideas? In this case the evidence that it really is a good idea seems overwhelming - it is in use by >95% of the world's population, and by science everywhere.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    64. Re:Socialist pig! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Your monetary system seems to be metric

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    65. Re:Socialist pig! by seantide · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think beer should always be sold by the pint. Not the short crap we get, pints. Real pints.

      Keep the metric system away from my beer.

    66. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biggest preference for Fahrenheit is the accuracy it provides. Most people can feel 2 degrees Fahrenheit of difference, but the difference would be lumped into 1 Celsius degree. Because of its accuracy, people rarely deal with fractions of decimals of a degree. It's also nice to have virtually all outdoor temperatures as a two-digit unsigned number.

    67. Re:Socialist pig! by Taevin · · Score: 1

      Correct. But 0 F is much closer to the mark than 32 F, which is a temperature that most people can still do a good deal of work outside without worrying about frostbite and things like that. Except in unusual circumstances, extended human outdoor activity generally starts getting significantly harder (and requires more care) somewhere around -10F to +10F. 0 F is a reasonable approximation.

      So just note your dangerously cold mark as -20 C (-4 F) and be done with it. I hear this all the time when people learn that I use the metric system internally even though I'm an American. They're usually sympathetic saying something like "yeah the metric system makes a lot of sense, but I could never switch for temperatures" and this baffles me. Metric is easier IMO. 0 is (literally) freezing cold, 10 is cool, 20 is comfortable, 30 is hot, 40 is dangerously hot if you don't know what you're doing. People on Slashdot always bring up 0 F >= T <= 32 F but this maps pretty well to -10 C and -20 C as well. But really, 32 F is still a risk for hypothermia and frostbite if you're not already taking precautions so what's the difference?

    68. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 – 8 May 1873) was a British philosopher, economist and civil servant.

      First, read and comprehend his years of life and country of origin. Then, contemplate the likelihood that he was referring to modern-day members of the Republican Party of the United States of America.

    69. Re:Socialist pig! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Is it? I thought they were sold in in bullshit units that have no proper relation to the label, since a 4 by 6 is just what happens to be left over of a formerly 4" by 6" piece of wood after some kind of processing.

      They're bullshit units, but bullshit conventional units. A 4 by 6 is 3.5" by 5.5"; I don't believe it's true any more that the rough-cut piece it came from was 4" by 6". The length of a 4 by 6 is in conventional units without the bullshit.

    70. Re:Socialist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose that Slashdot generates statistics of exactly how many posts it takes for every topic to turn into political, racial or Apple bashing.

      THAT reply resulted in a gen-you-wine LOL

      Well done

      Spot on

    71. Re:Socialist pig! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If every idiot is a conservative, and "normal" people are evenly divided, then conservatives are, on average, stupider than everyone else. And I note you are complaining but not actually disagreeing.

  36. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thought of going through every program looking for date logic that needs a total re-write yet AGAIN would be enough to make me change careers and take up tree farming.

    There are billions of programs that need fixing, and every single one of them would need fixing by hand. There is no quick fix for date calculations and validations of dates, to say nothing of the mess that would be made of historical records and current contracts. Another monstrous boondoggle for no gain but a lot of pain.

    Look, just as no one uses the metric system because of the inertia involved, no one would use this system either. We've solved all the major problems with the current system, there are no serious problems left that can't be solved with a 4 line rhyme, and a $2.95 calendar.
    We all know its a goofie calendar and we've all made our peace with it, and there is nothing significant to be gained by messing with it.

    How DARE the earth not revolve around the sun in even multiples of is revolution upon its axis!.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  37. Fix the real problem... by linatux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Simply adjust the earth's orbit so we have exactly 360 days on a year!

    1. Re:Fix the real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, why don't we just change the gravitational constant?

    2. Re:Fix the real problem... by Hentes · · Score: 2

      That would cause some nasty global warming. How about slowing its spin?

    3. Re:Fix the real problem... by storkus · · Score: 1

      Courtesy of the original Men in Black:

      Jay: Zed, don't you guys ever get any sleep around here?

      Zed: The twins keep us on Centaurian time, standard thirty-seven hour day. Give it a few months. You'll get used to it... or you'll have a psychotic episode.

    4. Re:Fix the real problem... by mister_playboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The moon is doing that for us, at a rate of 15 microseconds per year... you'll just have to be patient. ;)

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:Fix the real problem... by edesio · · Score: 1

      Better make it 364 (52 * 7) days.

    6. Re:Fix the real problem... by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      A benefit that they are advocating is that it is religiously unobjectionable because it respect the Sabbath. So they'd want to adjust the orbit to 357, 364, or 371 days. Given Global Warming, we might want to move further away from the sun. So 371.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    7. Re:Fix the real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would increase gravity on the equator, and even worse, it would change the direction of gravity if you are not on the equator....

    8. Re:Fix the real problem... by pbjones · · Score: 3, Funny

      that's what 'wind farms' are for. One day they will reverse the power and the fans will slow the earth so that time will be adjusted for commercial interests, and not the public good. sorry, my tin foil hat slipped off.

      --
      There was an unknown error in the submission.
    9. Re:Fix the real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The amount by which the Earth's orbital radius would need to be reduced to reach an integral 365 days would be only about .03%, which I believe would increase insolation by about .07%. I'm not sure but I think that may be a negligible amount.To get to a neater 360 days however would required a .9% distance reduction for an increase in insolation of 1.8%, which is probably big enough to be noticeable.

      I reckon adjusting the day's length would have more drawbacks than adjusting year length. But we can't know, until we conduct the experiment.

    10. Re:Fix the real problem... by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      Can we make the days about 26 hours long while we're at it? I could use a couple more hours of sleep each day. :)

  38. Even the Mayans can do better! by Ichoran · · Score: 2

    This is just horrible--breaks nearly every convention in order to fix a nearly trivial bit of mathematics, while introducing significant errors in the process? Yay!

    Why should months start of different days of the week? Make them all 28 days long, and you have room for a 13th month.

    While we're at it, why don't we go back to the Mayan Haab' calendar. It's more accurate than Gregorian; the only problem is that it shifts a tiny bit from year to year. If you don't like your months drifting, you can fix it by extending Wayeb' by a day every time it gets more than half a day ahead.

  39. no authority by dltaylor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who, in the modern world, has George Carlin's ("I have as much authority as the pope; just fewer people believe it.") moxie to force a calendar change? The Muslim, probably conservative Jewish, and other lunar calendar followers aren't going to change (what if THEY all got together and proposed a "universal" calendar?). Americans still aren't rational enough to switch to the metric system of measurement, so they're going to use a more-rational calendar than their current?

    1. Re:no authority by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Somehow almost the entire world changed to metric, by who's authority?

      It is just a matter of creating something better, and people will adopt. The problem with calendars is that doesn't seem to be anything better than what we have. Different, yes, but other calendars just have a different set of problems, they don't really improve what we use.

    2. Re:no authority by dwye · · Score: 1

      > Americans still aren't rational enough to switch to the metric system of measurement,

      Since the Customary units are all officially defined in terms of metric units, your statement is clear evidence of your greater lack of rationality. That we Americans do not choose to apply criminal penalties to using units with historical precedence in favor of those without any such, seems MORE rational to me, if less dictatorial.

  40. Time Changes in Middle of Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a citation: "a "9-to-5" job is defined as a 14:00-to-22:00 (14 o'clock to 22 o'clock) job."

    This means those of us in CA, OR, WA will have a work day going from 1700 to 0100. Yes, I can see how having the date change in the middle of business hours makes everything so much simpler.

    1. Re:Time Changes in Middle of Day by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can see how having the date change in the middle of business hours makes everything so much simpler.

      As someone who works at a job where we often close after midnight; so what?
      The only problem the date change ever causes for us is that some software vendors (I'm looking at you Intuit) don't take the possibility into account. If this change happened, they'd have to have their software take date changing workdays into account and it'd become a complete non-issue.

  41. It would cause other problems by Froggels · · Score: 2

    Such a calendar scheme would have some interesting repercussions for countries such as Germany. Germans do not get Monday off of work if the 25th of December falls on a Saturday. which means that they could also forget about ever getting the first of January or several other holidays off if such a calendar system were to cause current holidays to fall on weekends. Perhaps they would have to adopt the Anglo-Saxon practice of taking a following Monday/Tuesday off which would essentially end up shifting entire holidays by two days in their perspective?

    1. Re:It would cause other problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone not go to work on the 27th?
      Don't post without thinking.

  42. Christmas on Sunday by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    Made the following Monday probably the worst case of "the Mondays" ever...

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:Christmas on Sunday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Worst idea ever.

      The only sensible way to do this is to have Boxing Day on Friday. (Because where I live, we get New Year's Day off, so that would make a three-day weekend.)

  43. Okay, All Those Want.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..their birthday to NEVER fall on Saturday (the optimum night for a party), raise your hands.

    Anyone? No one? Yeah, that's what I thought...

  44. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just an attempt head off the Mayan calendar collapse of the Earth.

  45. While we are at it... by ccguy · · Score: 1

    If we are going to mess with the calendar no less then let's start with the basics. The day has a length that is related to a significant event so we can leave it as it is.

    But do we really want 7 day weeks? I think this needs some thought....:-)

    1. Re:While we are at it... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Even divisors of 365 besides the obvious are 5 and 73. So, 73 5-day weeks. I say 3 days of work and the standard 2-day weekend!

      Or 13 months of 28-day (7-day week) months, with one day left over for New Year's, which they can adjust the length of as needed every year.

    2. Re:While we are at it... by swalve · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure your New Year's Day is going to be 24 hours long, just like the rest of them.

    3. Re:While we are at it... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure your New Year's Day is going to be 24 hours long, just like the rest of them.

      The idea would be to make that last day the day where those fractional seconds are accounted for.

    4. Re:While we are at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even divisors of 365 besides the obvious are 5 and 73. So, 73 5-day weeks. I say 3 days of work and the standard 2-day weekend!

      Discordian calendar

      In short: 73 5-day weeks. And 5 73-day seasons. And an extra St. Tib's Day every 4 year.

      $ ddate
      Today is Boomtime, the 70th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3177

  46. Would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monday Night Football still be on Mondays?

  47. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, just as no one uses the metric system because of the inertia involved

    Look, just as no one exists outside the United States inside your mind...

  48. The government isn't willing to force it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And that is what it takes. The government loves metric, all government contracts are done in metric (like surveying and so on, something I worked in for a time). However they won't ram it down people's throats which is what you have to do. People will whine and bitch. Hell my grandpa STILL whines and bitches sometimes. He's Canadian and over 80 years old so he remembers when Canada was on the Imperial system. He still uses it often when talking about various things.

    I also can understand people's resistance, to an extent, because for normal activities it isn't helpful. Metric really only starts to show you how cool it is when you do things like inter-unit conversions. Things like "How much energy will I need to boil a liter of water?" and so on. For every day use, all you need is to have a sense of how much a unit is. Buying meat is no harder or easier in pounds or kilograms, you just need to have a sense for how much each is so you can ask for an appropriate amount.

    Thus it remains a hard sell, and so the government has to force it if they want to make it happen. At a federal level, that is pretty well impossible.

    1. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by next_ghost · · Score: 5, Informative

      For every day use, all you need is to have a sense of how much a unit is.

      Here's a handy guide.

    2. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was in grade school during the push in the 70's. It was great. They taught us all the metric system (which made science classes in later school a piece of cake compared to my kids trying to learn metrics) and went on and on about how everything would change, but perhaps we'd keep using miles as a concession to some of the stubborn folks.

      Sooooo much more useful than just "energy to boil water" - how many people easily remember how many teaspoons in a tablespoon, cups in a pint, feet/yards in a mile...

      In the end, all we got out of it was 2-litre soda... (though at the time I was in Michigan, so it was 2-litre pop...)

    3. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As someone who's grown up with the metric system (Europe), I can assure you that it works just fine for 'normal activities' :) I think in the end it's just a matter of getting used to it. And frankly, I do understand why people resist it, because people who didn't grow up with either system are probably never going to get 'used to' the other system and be able to easily use it for everyday things.. that will have to come with the next generation of people that grow up with it

      I was in my teens when my country switched form their native currency to Euros, and I still catch myself translating prices to the old currency in my head on occasion, to get a better sense of prices. Having to do that for all sorts of measurements would be hugely annoying I can imagine.

    4. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      This also hits, in a round about way, on why I'll never understand the "Metric is superior because it is more accurate!" thing.

      The sole advantage for metric, for regular people and day to day use, is unit convertibility. Even that is only an advantage for the case you gave. That in the end is why there is no push from the public, and in general counter push, in switching. It gains them next to nothing and costs them plenty. So why do it?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    5. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by iroll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just out of curiosity, are you Canadian? And was Canada surveyed entirely using metes and bounds? Because I suppose I could see an SI conversion being made with that sort of system.

      While the US government also specifies most things in SI (and in fact, SI is the law of the land), surveying will probably be the last bastion of the old Customary system.

      The PLSS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Land_Survey_System) was an extremely forward-looking and rational surveying system for its era, and almost the entire continental US uses it. All real estate, all farm and ranch development, all city and suburb development follows the grid established by the PLSS. County maps in most of the midwest look like a checkerboard because of it. In Phoenix, for example, all of the streets are laid on the original survey lines. This grid is so firmly established as a part of our economy and legal system, that there's not a snowball's chance in hell of it being switched to SI in my lifetime, and I'm a rather young man.

      Even if GPS uses SI internally, it's hardly any effort for a computer to make the conversion for its human user. It would, however, be an exercise in masochism to require surveyors and the government land offices to stop using increments and fractions of 1 mile and pretend that the grid is actually based on increments of 1609 meters.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    6. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by jbabco · · Score: 1

      He's Canadian and over 80 years old so he remembers when Canada was on the Imperial system.

      You make it sound like Canadian metrication is some distant memory. I'm 39 and I remember Imperial quite well from the late 70's.

    7. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sooooo much more useful than just "energy to boil water" - how many people easily remember how many teaspoons in a tablespoon, cups in a pint, feet/yards in a mile...

      Most people these days don't cook (unless it's a frozen meal that you put in a microwave), so converting between units of measure isn't something people have to do much any more. And when would anyone convert feet/yards to miles? All they need to know is how many miles it is to their destination; they're not going to convert that to feet.

    8. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In Phoenix, for example, all of the streets are laid on the original survey lines.

      I don't think so. How do you explain the bend on all the streets between Baseline and US60? Or worse, the complete lack of straight roads in most of northern Scottsdale? Unless you're talking about Phoenix proper, and not the metro area cities.

    9. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by iroll · · Score: 2

      Neighborhood streets, such as those between Baseline and the 60, are typically bent around for traffic calming. Cul de sacs are drawn in because people like living on cul de sacs; within a subdivision, there are a lot of considerations other than map simplicity. Obviously there is some deviation for geography (mountains, for example), and the highways cut across lines in many places. North Scottsdale has a lot of geography.

      All of the *major* streets and most of the minor ones, from Litchfield Park to Apache Junction, and from Queen Creek to the top of Peoria, are on a grid. In Phoenix proper, there's 8 "streets" to a mile (e.g. 40th to 48th), which is why most of the major North-South street numbers are multiples of 8.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    10. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't helpful for normal activities? I digress. See this:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Omh8Ito-05M

    11. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Neighborhood streets, such as those between Baseline and the 60, are typically bent around for traffic calming.

      Nope, look at a map. North of the 60, all the streets in Tempe and Mesa are straight, and run along a north-south line. South of Baseline, in Chandler/Gilbert, the same streets are also straight, and run along a north-south line. But those N-S lines are not the same between those two regions, there's a small deviation, for every single north-south road.

    12. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having spent a bit of time in Canada, I know what you mean. All the older folk still prefer Imperial units.

      HOWEVER, in the U.S., it's a government 'of the people, by the people and for the people'. Government cannot shove anything down our throat, and it is not their place to attempt to do so.

      I have nothing against the metric system, but people know what they know and stick with what works for them.

    13. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by iroll · · Score: 2

      Exactly what kind of standards do you think street-straightness is held to? ;-)

      Picture this: there's a grid of lines covering this state. The lines are 6 miles apart (north-south, east-west). The north-south divisions are called townships, the east-west divisions are called ranges. Each of these squares is divided into 36 sections (square miles, 640 acres). Each of these sections is divided into quarter (160 acre) and 'quarter of quarter' (40 acre) sections, and so on. This is why "40 acres" is/was such a fundamental number for agriculture.

      But here's the thing:
        - This grid is laying on a round surface.
        - This grid was laid out in the middle of a desert in the 1870s.
        - Our roads are pretty darned wide, and weren't always connected.

      There are places where the township, range, and section lines from one 6x6 square don't exactly jibe with the next one. This is a function of the lower accuracy of early techniques* and of fitting a square grid to a circle, and still keeping "roughly" mile-wide sections. Actually, if you look at a big survey map, you'll see that a lot of the sections are (gasp) not quite equal to 1 mile; they could be +/- about 20% in extreme cases.

      And can you imagine being the guy in the 1940s or 50s who was connecting Broadway (Phx) to Broadway (Tempe) to Broadway (Mesa) and having them all line up perfectly? The cities all grew up independently, and there's no telling how wide they had built the street, or whether they had it right on the line or slightly off to the side. And when you expand it, do you condemn land on the north or the south? And does every town do the same thing?

      So yes, you are correct--it's not a perfect grid. There's lots of other deviations, too. But the basic plan is on the PLSS grid, and it is coherent over distances of tens of miles. Trust me on this! I've worked in a surveyors office!

      *In some places, these lines were drawn by tying a handkerchief to one of the spokes on a wagon, driving west (following a compass), counting the turns of the wheel, and kicking out a milestone after a set number of revolutions. It was hot, hard, lonely work, and the whiskey the surveyor was drinking probably meant that his counting skills deteriorated over the course of the day.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    14. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by gman003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it could be done if it was done unit-by-unit. Start with volume - we already buy 2 liter sodas, replacing the lingering pint, quart and gallon items shouldn't be hard.

      Then, distance. Most people use it in terms of speed - miles per hour - to stay within (or mostly within) speed limits. Simply change all the limits to metric, the other uses of the mile will follow.

      Temperature will be the hardest, since there's few personal reasons to switch. Save it for last, so you can make the argument that "this is the last one holding us back".

      Remember, the US has been teaching kids metric for decades. Most of my generation would be fine with metrication. It would take some getting used to, but we know the theory at least, even if I don't know how to estimate in it well. It's just the older generations that are more reluctant, that are holding us back. Once the baby boomers start dying off, I bet we'll see quite a bit of progress being made on this front.

    15. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I was just wondering why there's that particular aberration, when for the most part, the streets in the PHX metro area are all very, very regular and don't have aberrations like that.

      Now, can you explain why Mill Ave doesn't conform to the grid? :-) It really sticks out like a sore thumb. (We won't get into how the Tempe government has totally ruined the downtown Mill Ave area over the last 5 or so years...)

      And whose bright idea was Grand Ave?

    16. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by russotto · · Score: 1

      Nope, look at a map. North of the 60, all the streets in Tempe and Mesa are straight, and run along a north-south line. South of Baseline, in Chandler/Gilbert, the same streets are also straight, and run along a north-south line. But those N-S lines are not the same between those two regions, there's a small deviation, for every single north-south road.

      Baseline Road is called that because it lies on a baseline for surveying. So the parts south and the parts north were surveyed separately. Imposing a rectangular grid on a spherical surface accounts for the deviation; for them to meet at township boundaries, the north-south divisions would have had to be meridians, and they're not.

    17. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by iroll · · Score: 1

      OK man, you got me curious---so here you go:

      http://www.geocommunicator.gov/blmMap/MapLSIS.jsp

      I was hoping to find a plugin for google earth (that didn't require purchase), but this will do. It's direct from BLM.

      Unclick all of the options on the right-hand panel except for PLSS and Base Map (World Street Map ESRI).

      Mouse over Phoenix, drag it to the center of the pane, and zoom in slowly with your scroll wheel--one click at a time. At first, it'll just be a map, but when you get close enough, things will pop up in this order:

        - First you'll see a few cryptic "5E" and "5N" numbers sprinkled on the state. You'll have a hard time finding it at this level, but the origin for the grid is somewhere out by Gila Bend. Those number are referring to townships and ranges (so 5E is the line 30 miles east of the origin).

      - One more click down, the township/range grid will appear.

      - Three more clicks down the section (1 mile squared) lines will appear. Note the disconnects; things are pretty regular inside of a township, but the range lines in particular have some deviations.

      - One more click in and you'll see that Baseline Rd lies on a township line. In fact, the line between 1N and 1S.... which is why it's called Baseline! It's one of the axes. There is a slight disconnect between the ranges. At this zoom you can also see the sixteen 40-acre chunks that make up a section.

        - One more click in and you can see the section numbers. At this level you can really see the way the roads are laid out--and how they conform to the grid, for the most part. Mill is a weird one! Notice that the Union Pacific Railroad lies on the section line nearest Mill; Mill itself is approximately (but not exactly) 1/4 mile away. Following the Phoenix numbering system, it would be 66th st.

        - Pan over to Grand Ave. Look at that abomination! It lies directly diagonal across the sections, connecting corners =) It's friggin' awful now, but it was originally just US 60, and was mostly just running diagonal across a bunch of farms.

      Farms are one of the main reasons Phoenix is laid out so neatly. In the west, farmland generally has property lines that lie nicely on the grid, and so local roads start on the grid and are just converted into the city roads as the farms are overtaken.

      Highways, in particular, are the most likely to lie *off* the grid (although many of them follow it, at least for some lengths). This is because many of the routes were developed across open cattle ranges where the property lines were many (tens of) miles apart. Additionally, there weren't really any fences until well after the turn of the 20th century, so the long-haul routes grew up more organically than the more organized roads in farming areas.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    18. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole basis of The United States is a government that does not have the authority to ram things down peoples throats. If you believe a government should be able to do that then you are simply wrong. The federal government has the authority to set the standards for "weights and measures" but not dictate what units a city has to put on its road signs.

    19. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC as I have mod points.
      A practical example: A lodger friend in Budapest in the late 70's worked for an import/export agency, dealing with fabrics. Her knowledge of imperial measurements and the calculations required to convert sq feet/yards for bolts of cloth, mass, currency (guineas, 1 pounds, 20 shillings and 12 pence - ha'pennies and farthings) to metric equivalents was absolutely astounding. The fact that she was able to multiply/divide fractions of fractions was mesmerising while she was damning the whole imperial system.
      We (in Australia) were just finishing the conversion process at the time, so I too was familiar with a lot of these conversion methods. In the end, Metric wins easily. No more do I need to consider even if for a brief moment if 3/16ths is larger or smaller than 1/4 or 2/5ths. Or fuel consumption vs distance consumption, or arcane measures of chains, rods, poles and perches, acres and everything else that makes that hodgepodge of arithmetic I learned at school.
      We too were very upset about this. After all, Australia isn't anywhere near anybody else and apart from confusing everybody, no-one cared if we exported iron ore in tonnes or tons or wool and wheat in bales or kilograms. It wasn't done overnight. More like a decade and maybe 2 generations afterwards for the change to metric to become commonplace and in every day parlance.

      The advantages are huge. Building materials are easier to calculate and order, tools are a snap (no more Witworth etc), fuel consumption is just that, temperature makes more sense (water boils at 100 and freezes at 0) and converting from big to small is just moving a decimal point. BTW How many feet in a mile? I've forgotten.
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the US is one of the last nations holding to their version of imperial measurements. This isn't good in the long run.

    20. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      The US survey foot differs from the regular foot by about 610 nm, and the US survey mile by about 3.2 mm (~ 1/8 in). That difference multiplies to about 1 foot over a distance of 95 miles, or about 27 feet over the 2600 mile distance from San Francisco to New York.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    21. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by rust627 · · Score: 1

      In Phoenix proper, there's 8 "streets" to a mile (e.g. 40th to 48th), which is why most of the major North-South street numbers are multiples of 8.

      how convenient

      1 mile = 1.6 Km so the streets are 200 metres apart

      this makes it easier , now you can make all your new street numbers in full base 10 instead of base 8
      5 streets are a Kilometre

      --
      da da da dum indeed.
    22. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by chill · · Score: 1

      And here is the correct solution to the problem.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    23. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by stderr_dk · · Score: 1

      Buying meat is no harder or easier in pounds or kilograms, you just need to have a sense for how much each is so you can ask for an appropriate amount.

      I.e. a "Quarter pounder" or a "Royale with cheese".

      --
      alias sudo="echo make it yourself #" ; # https://pipedot.org/~stderr & http://soylentnews.org/~stderr
    24. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by John+Marter · · Score: 1

      Replying to this to undo the slip up when trying to moderate it. I didn't mean to hit overrated.

    25. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by dkf · · Score: 1

      I think it could be done if it was done unit-by-unit. Start with volume - we already buy 2 liter sodas, replacing the lingering pint, quart and gallon items shouldn't be hard.

      Then, distance. Most people use it in terms of speed - miles per hour - to stay within (or mostly within) speed limits. Simply change all the limits to metric, the other uses of the mile will follow.

      Temperature will be the hardest, since there's few personal reasons to switch. Save it for last, so you can make the argument that "this is the last one holding us back".

      Experience from the partially-metricated UK is that temperature is actually easier — ensure that everyone's thermometers have both scales and persuade weather forecasts to make the celsius scale the "main one" (I don't suggest you use use kelvin though) — and that volumes and distances are harder because they're embedded in a lot more physical devices. Changing the distance measure means changing a lot of roadsigns and cars. Changing volume measurements impacts on many industries.

      Currently, the UK is almost entirely celsius-based for temperature, and has most of the changes for volume measurement done with a couple of exceptions, namely milk and alcoholic drinks; I have no idea why milk is taking so long to transition, but with alcohol it's to do with some extremely tough laws on weights and measures in the area. There's absolutely no plan in the UK to change distance measures at the scale of a mile and above (NB: our cars mostly have dual-scale speedometers) but smaller measures are mostly metric now.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    26. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Very interesting! Thanks for the link!

    27. Re:The government isn't willing to force it by hutsell · · Score: 1

      ... I also can understand people's resistance, to an extent, because for normal activities it isn't helpful. Metric really only starts to show you how cool it is when you do things like inter-unit conversions. ...

      Fwiw, the following is a practical guide I created for myself as a quick fix to deal with metric measurements for nontechnical daily situations
      when I smugly wandered into a metric society totally unprepared: (Of course, the conversions works in both directions.)

      Distance: A Mile, about 2 Kilometers; an Inch, about 2 Centimeters; the Yard and Meter, about the same. Weight: One Pound, about 2 Kilograms. Liquid: A Quart, about a Liter. A Gallon, about 4 Liters. Pressure: 2 Kg/Cm, about 2 Bar or 28 psi. (An automobile would be a little more than 2 Kg/Cm per 1 Tire.) Temperature: An approximated 2 to 1 ratio also, but 32 has to be added after doubling to Fahrenheit or subtracted before halving to Celsius.

      Granted, it could cause those inclined to be obsessed with the details to cringe a little about the accuracy; keep in mind, although it was only meant to be a temporary solution, tweaking the accuracy becomes surprisingly easy to do over time. It ended up being my way to adapt and accept the change--if it would have ever occurred.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  49. Oh, come on. by mbone · · Score: 1

    They eliminate leap days in favor of an intercalary "leap week" every five or six years, and have the gall to say that they have a "stable calendar that is absolutely identical from year to year."

    Well, except for the intercalary week. That couldn't cause any confusion now, could it ?

    And, just to make sure they are really ignored, they call for the whole planet to go on UTC. If they had any guts, they would have said TAI. At least that would get
    rid of leap seconds.

  50. I was with them until by martas · · Score: 1

    this part: "In addition to advocating the adoption of this new calendar, Hanke and Henry encourage the abolition of world time zones and the adoption of “Universal Time” (formerly known as Greenwich Mean Time) in order to synchronize dates and times worldwide, streamlining international business."

    1. Re:I was with them until by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Why did that change your mind?

      It's a different issue entirely, granted, but speaking as someone who has worked for a company not based in the same timezone as myself for 8+ years, it really needs to be done.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    2. Re:I was with them until by lgw · · Score: 1

      It servers no purpose. You still need to know how many hours apart the other worksite is so you can scedule meeting when both of you are awake, and it makes it harder to work that out. At least now you can find that "hmm, 5pm here is 8am there, well, developers there won't be available, but managers might be". Trying to otherwise figure out that 5pm there is early morning would be a royal pain.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:I was with them until by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      You look at their Exchange/Google/whatever shared calendars and schedule the meetings accordingly, because the software will have daytime/in-office hours highlighted for you.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    4. Re:I was with them until by devilspgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately people are a lot dumber than you'd expect. A surprising high number of otherwise intelligent technical folks don't know what timezone they're located in at all (although they usually can figure out what state they're in or they can tell me the current time and I can figure it out -- Or just assume EST, since most everyone else knows they're not the only timezone in North America)

      Even when working with specific individuals on a regular basis, timezones confuse them. One day they'll schedule a meeting at 2pm their time and email me about it, the next time they'll mean 2pm my time. Then to improve things they'll fire up Outlook and invite me to a meeting, but instead of using Outlook's timezone functionality they'll schedule it at 2pm meaning 2pm my time, which Outlook converts into my timezone automatically giving me a meeting at 12pm.

      Oh and to make it more annoying, my current contract has a habit of adding a time-zone: field on internal notes discussing customer communication, but it's +/- the number of hours from their timezone (which is +0100) rather than basing it on GMT/UTC.

      Now try it with daylight savings time when you have different regions changing on different weeks. Imagine trying to figure out when a conference call will happen when you have participants in California, Phoenix and someone in Germany? Sadly, not a made up example. (For those who don't see the difficulty in this, Phoenix doesn't observe DST, California and Germany do but starting/ending on different weeks of the year, so you can't even rely on adding or subtracting the number of timezones)

      How about when you call a toll-free 1-800 number in the US or Canada and are told their hours are 8:30am-4pm and to call back then, followed by a click. Now what?

      Either way people will need to figure out schedules are different depending on region, but at least if we ditch timezones and all talk about the same clock, we won't have to first guess at the other person's mindset, location AND local legislation to determine what they mean by "2pm"

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    5. Re:I was with them until by pz · · Score: 1

      I've faced almost identical problems (save for my coordinating locations are in Califorina, Texas, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Greece). The solution is easy: use Google. Type "current time in $CITYNAME, $COUNTRYNAME" (without the quotation marks, and instantiating the variables) and above the first hit, the current, correct local time is displayed. And then always express time local to the writer (as in, "Next Thursday, 2pm, Los Angeles time").

      Of course, that doesn't help with the problems in Outlook.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    6. Re:I was with them until by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Nice one, thanks for pointing it out.

      By the way, it seems that you don't need "current" and "in", and country is optional (it'll pick the more popular search if ambiguous). So e.g. "time vancouver" gives you the one in BC.

    7. Re:I was with them until by adamchou · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, this doesn't help in the GP problem when you are scheduling an appointment 3 weeks in advance and DST in California is sometime this week and DST in Germany is a couple of weeks after and you're living in Phoenix

    8. Re:I was with them until by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      I live in Japan.
      My mother lives in New York.

      I had the following conversation with her:
      "Hi!"
      "Mom, do you know what time it is here?"
      "no?"
      "it's 3am, and I have to get up for work in 3 hours."
      "oh sorry, when is a good time to call?"
      "around 7am-9am your time on weekdays"
      "ok sorry! talk to you soon"

      Next day...

      "Hi!"
      "Mom, do you know what time it is here?"
      "no?"
      "it's 3am, and I have to get up for work in 3 hours."

      She no longer has my phone number.

    9. Re:I was with them until by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain, but probably less than 1% of the world population regularly has meetings with people in several different time zones.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:I was with them until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to have a phone that can set a schedule to turn off the phone function during sleeping hours. When the morning alarm sounds the phone function is turned back on.

      Even better; during sleeping hours the phone doesn't ring but callers get an answerphone message saying "The person you have called has their phone set to Do Not Disturb. Press 1 to leave a message or if there is an emergency press 3 to call them now."

    11. Re:I was with them until by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much my point. Figuring out the current time is easy, figuring out future times is more complicated. Having to re-confirm every time with timezone information is even more annoying.

      Oh and if someone says a meeting is at 2pm PST in July, do they mean MST or MDT? How do you handle it when they don't know the difference?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    12. Re:I was with them until by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, BlackBerry has something like this.

      You can have it change modes or disable radios only when it's 1) between certain hours, and 2) on the charger. It's a great combination because it allows you to always receive calls when you're awake, but not over night once you hit the sack without doing anything more than plugging your phone in, plus you can still charge during the day if needed.

      Not worth carrying a BlackBerry just for this, but if you already have one, the capability is there.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    13. Re:I was with them until by devilspgd · · Score: 2

      Not just meetings, even just phoning your insurance company at 3pm and being told to call back between 9am and 4pm would be a lot more convenient.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    14. Re:I was with them until by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you're not trying to connect with someone in a different time zone, why care about the issue at all? Systems need be practical, not just whatever seems simple on paper.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:I was with them until by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Because most people care more about knowing what time of day it is. If I read, "Harry Potter's alarm went off at 8:00" I immediately know it is morning. 4:00 is painfully early. These are things people actually care about. That is, these are things I care about. I don't want to have to learn that 3:00 is the new 10:00, the times will lose their meanings.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:I was with them until by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ok, I'm not sure I've ever done that.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:I was with them until by lgw · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what I've been saying? I'm pretty sure it is.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:I was with them until by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, because time has meaning to people in the form of "time of day," not in the form of "exact same time on the other side of the planet," that's what we use GMT for, and people who are more interested in the exact time use GMT (except your coworkers, apparently).

      People like to know that 10:00AM is in the morning, and 1:00PM is in the afternoon.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:I was with them until by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Or just pull an Apple. First it greets me by name, then a few seconds later into the call "Please call back during business hours", with no clue what those hours might be, or even what days they're open.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  51. Asimov's The Last Trump by mbone · · Score: 1

    As good an explanation as any for this reform.

  52. Universal Time time zones by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Universal Time time zones??
    Local time is easier for people to work with and easier on people traveling as well.

    1. Re:Universal Time time zones by fnj · · Score: 1

      Oh come now. How can anything be easier than every place on earth having exactly the same time. You say, "I'll call you at 1900 on Saturday after you get back to France" rather than "I'll call you at 7pm on Saturday after you get back to France - let's see - that would be ... uh ... um ... ah ... what's that your time?" And no constant resetting your watch when traveling.

  53. Months will always be imperfect by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We just need to accept that unlike some measurements, which we can make fairly arbitrary and thus set to whatever we like, days and years are things dictated by the Earth's movement and thus don't work out nicely. Doesn't matter what we'd like it to be, it is what it is. The fact of the matter is that the Earth doesn't have an integer number of rotations in the amount of time it takes to go around the sun.

    Given that, it doesn't make much sense to fuck with the calendar. Yes there's a lot of silliness, like February being so short. However since any changes we make are still going to make things imperfect, let's just not bother. What we have works, even if it isn't perfect. That's life.

    1. Re:Months will always be imperfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact of the matter is that the Earth doesn't have an integer number of rotations in the amount of time it takes to go around the sun.

      So I guess the real solution then is to get millions of robots to fire their gases straight up at one point and move the planet into an orbit with integral number of days to orbit the sun?

    2. Re:Months will always be imperfect by daisybelle · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the earth's orbit is elliptical, so that summer (in the southern hemisphere, ie February) really is about three days shorter than winter. The earth is closer to the sun at this time - as a kid I figured that it made sense that it was hotter then!

      --
      "You only get ONE LIFE." Richard Rahl, Faith of the Fallen - Terry Goodkind
  54. RE: Binary is the way to go.... by tenex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, you're right. In binary I can count to 1023 on my fingers and 1,048,575 if I use my toes...

  55. Says you.... by RobinEggs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Binary is the way to go; it is the only irreducible base system.

    Pfffft....maybe if you're an ignorant plebe. You'd be amazed what I can do with my unary counting system. It beats binary hands down.

    Look at that, it's one o'clock again. Time for another beer. You know, just one....

    1. Re:Says you.... by steelfood · · Score: 2

      Time for another beer.

      Are you sure that's not the urinary system you're counting on?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  56. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

    Look, just as no one uses the metric system because of the inertia involved

    Look, just as no one exists outside the United States inside your mind...

    Also, nobody works in science or engineering fields.

  57. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by icebike · · Score: 2

    No one uses metric Time or Dates is what I meant to say. see here: http://zapatopi.net/metrictime/

    Hell, even the French rejected it and it was a French invention.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  58. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by treeves · · Score: 2

    But they're not on the same day every year now, so not a big deal.
    Oh, and Easter wouldn't be on the same day every year either, due to the moon.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  59. Go one better ... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If youre going to have Christmas on Sunday, make every day a Saturday.
    Nobody gets the "lunch-bag letdown" of disappointment Christmas day.
    No big post-Christmas debts for stuff that broke within hours.
    No going to work - ever - unless you work on Saturdays.
    No having to take the garbage out Sunday night for Monday morning ... ummm ... on second thought, that kind of stinks ...

    Conclusion?

    Don't you DARE! You already screwed it up enough messing with Daylight Savings Time!

    1. Re:Go one better ... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      cool with me. Our company observes weekend holidays on the closest business day (sat = fri, sun = mon) and if you have a job that requires weekend and holiday work like you get paid double for working the ACTUAL day to holiday pay for the observed days.

      The first part is standard fare for anyone who uses the federal holiday schedule i believe.

    2. Re:Go one better ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These folks are generally opposed to DST as well. They're in favor of moving to a UTC based time scale and eliminate time zones too.

  60. I'm surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one here mentioned stardates.

  61. I need your TPS report don't the leap week cover by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I need your TPS report don't the leap week cover sheet.

  62. *twitch* *twitch* by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Time libraries are bad enough that my eye ticks whenever I have to do developing with them. Now we want to ADD complexity to the equation?

    There ain't enough alcohol in the world.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  63. unary, indeed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5! Excellent system!

    1. Re:unary, indeed! by Destoo · · Score: 1

      > +1! Excellent System!

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  64. You idea is much to sensible by wonderboss · · Score: 1

    to ever be adopted.

    We could over come the fear of 13 by having a 14 month year with the extra month
    containing only 1 or 2 days - following the leap year pattern. The 14th month would
    always be a holiday as you suggest. Giving everyone an extra holiday every
    four years would probably be enough motivation to get it adopted.

    --
    more cowbell
  65. Thursday would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If retail had those 3 days after, they'd be happy.

  66. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll be on the same Day, but not on the same date.... think about it.

  67. Decimal hours, minutes and seconds. by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    I propose we also start using decimal hours, minutes and seconds. Lets have 10 hours of 100 minutes of 100 seconds each. That would make the second only a little bit shorter than the current second. It would greatly simplify all calculations involving hours, minutes and seconds.

    1. Re:Decimal hours, minutes and seconds. by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      Keep the second the same and ignore the sun. If you are going to ignore 96% of the planet, you might as well go the whole hog and have a day that is 27 Hours, 42 minutes and 40 seconds long. It would suit me anyway. (My natural diurnal cycle is closer to that than 24.)

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  68. We need a 13 month year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about you make 13 months each with 28 days.

    28 is a multiple of 7, so every day of the week falls on exactly the same 4 days, every month of the year.

    This however only adds up to 364.

    Make the 365th day, or 0th day, 'new years day'. It has no 'day of the week' assigned to it, and therefore is a holiday.

    For leap years, every four years or so, new years becomes a two day holiday.

  69. 13x28 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we are going to do this, a 13 month schedule with 4x7 months gets you to 364. By the way, the damned moon does that. "MONths" isn't coincidentally spelled that way. If you are going to do this, do it right. Add a month called "pax" or some other PC thing, and go from there. Like it has been said; adoption adoption adoption. Remember "Internet time" from Swatch in 2000?

  70. every geek has thought about this by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    my homebrew:

    10 months (metric nod), 36 days each. each week is 6 days, so there's always 6 weeks in every month. And you get these 10 months of perfect 6x6 squares. Bingo!

    A leap week of 5 (or 6) days at year's end.

    A work week is 4 days, with 2 days off. Fuck the Abrahamic Religions and their 7 day weeks. Yes, I know, for saying that I just went from one in a trillion chance of being adopted to one in a quadrillion.

    When given a choice between tradition and intelligence, humanity always goes with tradition, no matter how stupid.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  71. Well... by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    ...since they add a week every "5 or 6 years" I don't really see any particular advantage to this method vs. the one we have now. Sorry, not very compelling to me... Ferretman

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  72. Why? by Marble68 · · Score: 1

    After Dec. 21st of this year it seem pretty moot...

    --
    /me sips his coffee and ponders a new sig...
  73. The Onion outdid Dave Barry on this one ... by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    I'd say he was beaten out for most thought-provoking coverage of this phenomenon. But I don't think anyone's ever topped his take on a peculiar kind of coffee.

    1. Re:The Onion outdid Dave Barry on this one ... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Yes, the concept is the same, with The Onion providing a full article instead of a one-liner.

      thanks for the link to the coffee article.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  74. Pon farr? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pon_farr

    So this creates a calendaring system to get laid every 5-6 years????

  75. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by sd4f · · Score: 2

    I would so mod this up if i had the points.

  76. base 12 or 60? S non-binary. by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Why not base 64 or 16?

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  77. The Shire Calendar by wfmcwalter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The most elegant solution to the calendar I've seen is JRR Tolkien's (yes, him) Shire Calendar:

    • It's fully conformant with the astronomical realities (no magical even-divisions or date fudging necessary)
    • There are still 12 months (so no weird decimal months, no 34th of Thermidor bollocks). You can stick with the familiar month names (rather than Tolkien's Hobbity ones)
    • Each month is 30 days long (simplifying accounting, pay calculations, holiday accrual etc.). No pointless variation, no mnemonics.
    • Year on year, a given month always begins with the same day of the week. Even for leap years. So if you were born on a Tuesday, your birthday will always be Tuesday.
    • The clever part (which allows all the other stuff to happen) is there is a winter festival holiday (2 days) and a summer festival holiday (3 days normally, 4 in leap years). These aren't week days and aren't in a month - they're special. So e.g. Christmas doesn't change between sometimes being in the weekend, or adjacent to the weekend, or midweek - Christmas is always in the same place. I know I always get disoriented around Christmas - Christmas already seems like a special day which doesn't resemble a Thursday or a Sunday or whatever - the Shire Calendar is just a realistic expression that it's not a weekday, and that it shouldn't be regarded as one. And the first day back at work after Christmas is always a Monday.
    • The winter and summer festivals are pretty consonant with common practice in many countries anyway. Move Christmas into the yule holiday (Jesus wasn't born in December anyway, so it's no less Biblically correct than current practice). Many countries have a midsummer festival or summer bank holiday and US independence day can be celebrated then.
    • You only need one printed calendar (not the 14 different types we currently need) - you just score off the leap year or not.
    • Its easy to fix the locations of other festivals, like Thanksgiving, and then you get a perfectly consistent gap between e.g. Thanksgiving and Christmas
    • From a software perspective it's a wash - 2 more mini-months need to be handled, but less bother with differently lengthed months and much easier day-of-the-week calculations.
    --
    ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
    1. Re:The Shire Calendar by dabblah · · Score: 1

      You beat me to the punch on this. I am actually shocked that the shire calendar was so low on the list responses...

      I see stuff like the OP and think I could have just stayed in academia. If someone at John's Hopkins can get any kind of publication value out of something this pointless, I could have made a nice career there... Ah well. Money called...

    2. Re:The Shire Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the concept of a variable-length holiday at the end of the year is originally Mayan, but too lazy to verify myself.

  78. 13-Month Perpetual Calendar Better? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

    I always liked the New Earth Calendar: 13 identical months that start on the same day of week, Monday, and have the same number of days, and are all 4 weeks long. (With a leap week to keep days and dates synchronized)

    The calendar in this article still has months that vary, start on different days, and really isn't significantly better than what we have now.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  79. Or maybe they're aping the BMJ by DoctorFrog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The British Medical Journals do a spoofy article around Christmas every year, in which they pick an absurd subject and whomp up serious-looking studies on them. They do it at Christmas I guess because April 1st is just so obvious.

    Examples include

    "Longevity of screenwriters who win an academy award: longitudinal study" BMJ 2001;323:1491,

    "Ice cream evoked headaches (ICE-H) study: randomised trial of accelerated versus cautious ice cream eating regimen" BMJ 2002;325:1445,

    "How long did their hearts go on? A Titanic study" BMJ 2003;327:1457,

    "The case of the disappearing teaspoons: longitudinal cohort study of the displacement of teaspoons in an Australian research institute" BMJ 2005;331:1498.

    This article would fit right in to that tradition.

    1. Re:Or maybe they're aping the BMJ by pro151 · · Score: 0

      Possibly but I doubt it. The British have a wonderfully dry and droll sense of humor. I think these nit-wits are dead serious.

  80. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 1

    We can just use the definition of Bede (in 725) which states: "The Sunday following the full Moon which falls on or after the equinox will give the lawful Easter." The current date of easter is fixed to the calendar in the western tradition (so far as I know; wiki has an extensive discussion of it for the curious), but that definition seems simple, succinct, and perfectly amenable to the new calendar (in which all the equinoxes and cross-quarter days, so far as I've seen by testing a couple, drift up to about seven days after their usual Gregorian ones, and then sync back up after a year with an extra week). Since the solar equinoxes drift around anyway, this seems reasonable.

  81. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 2

    Dude, finger binary rules. All we need is Vi Hart to do one of her super-cute videos about how awesome it is, and the revolution will be underway.

  82. Not a good idea by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    So they are saying that the USA should not only use different units of weight, length, temperature etc from most of the rest of the planet but you should use a different calendar from us all as well.
    At least when the revolutionary French tried it, they invented different names for the days and months.

    This amazingly stupid idea is unlikely to catch on globally. If the USA decides to use something else different from what normal humans use, please make up 7 new day names and 12 new month ones and keep a conversion table handy for dealing with the 96% of the human race outside your borders.

    The use of a standard time happens a little already. I understand that international air travel uses GMT0 (also called UCT) and everyone ought to know their offset. I can't see it catching on in your country though. Some of your compatriots are not aware that there is anywhere else to be offset from...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Not a good idea by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A) The rest of the world changed to metric. They went to something different, not the US*

      B) the US isn't proposing this, it's just some researchers writing a paper.

      C) we are well aware of the rest of the world. HOWEVER du to a geographic location and size, knowledge of GMT for most peopel is really a waste. They would never have a need to use it.

      So stop thinking like a racist idiot.

      *Yes, we should go metric. You can thank Reagan and Neo Cons for killing that program.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Not a good idea by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      You may be aware of the 96% outside your country, but you are on Slashdot and may be as typical of your society as I may be of mine.

      I remember a press report 11 years ago where GWB was unable to name the president of Pakistan. The article commented that some US experts had opined that this would actually increase the number of people voting for him. Didn't one of your prospective candidates this time show that he thought Africa is a country? Again, I doubt you think this. Some of your compatriots do. ( I am sure there will be some here too but they may be a lower %.)

      Having opinions about certain cultures does not necessarily mean racism. Do not mix up culture and ethnicity. They are separate.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  83. 3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ummm... According to the guide, a two-liter bottle holds three liters.

  84. I cry dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the JHU site says, "December 27, 2011 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE", the website has been active since at least February 4, 2005:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20050204225524/http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html

    Of course, back then Xtra was called Newton and appeared in between June and July rather than between December and January.

    Are we sure this story wasn't covered sometime in the last 7 years?

  85. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by Thing+1 · · Score: 2

    Males can go to 2 MB; 8 if you count the other dangling participles (as if).

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  86. leave it alone by bhenson · · Score: 1

    why mess with something that works. Leave well enough alone.

  87. OH MY EXCEL !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My excel files will turn to shit.... it will be worst that switching to OOXML format.

  88. Lol by Wovel · · Score: 1

    It all kind of falls apart with the leap week. This will never be adopted. Adoption would require the support of at least one country incapable of grasping the metric system.

  89. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by Longjmp · · Score: 2

    Only in theory. In real life you would be slapped if you count to "4" (dec)

    --
    There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
  90. Disconnect the definition of year from physics by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    The entire premise is wrong, they will always end up with a system that has to be corrected because the physical system is not perfectly aligned (so more than 365 days in a year, etc.)

    How about abolishing the entire 'natural year' structure altogether then, if they wanted something that wouldn't change?

    What year is it? Who cares! Use precise seconds to construct minutes and hours, count the days, use 10 days per week, 10 weeks per months and 10 months per year - done.

    No more year based calendar.
    No more 'once a revolution around the sun' birthday celebrations.
    No more 'leap' anything if the duration of second is defined just as duration of number of periods of the radiation.

    Of-course this calendar would be disconnected from physical manifestation of natural phenomena like seasons and nobody would understand or use it, but the calculations would be as easy as pie.

    1. Re:Disconnect the definition of year from physics by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You think too small.

      Just adjust the earths orbit so it's a perfect 12 month year.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. In other news.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    The calendar will also be in Esperanto.

    and Microsoft will have problems with it, randomly resetting computers time and dates. Again

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  92. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by cjb658 · · Score: 1

    So if you're using your right hand, how to you say 2?

  93. 1 step forward 2700 steps back by kulervo · · Score: 1

    This idea is similar to the old Roman Calendar from 700 B.C., so why is it a step forward? Intercalary days? Arbitrary decision about how often we adjust the calendar by a week? Days that aren't part of any month? This is madness (THIS IS SPARTA-era esque.) Seriously, this is very similar to the Numa Calendar from Ancient Rome. What would we do with the birthdays of people born during the intercalary days? Would that be a holiday period? And all this to deal with the fact that calculations of interest are complicated for some people? And that they apparently do not like the Calendar printing industry and feel no one should buy kitten calendars....

  94. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by pz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Um, you might want to check that. Equinoxes (and solstices) mostly are. The only variability is because the terrestrial orbit is about 1/4 day longer than an integral number of days, but the effects of that are kept to a minimum due to leap years. We have an approximately astronomical calendar.

    That the 7-day social cycle doesn't fit into the 365 day calendar is the source of most of the perceived and actual variation in dates (eg, American Thanksgiving is always a Thursday, President's Day is always a Monday, etc., which means those dates will never be the same from one year to the next), in addition to events which are determined by lunar cycle (like Easter, Passover, or Ramadan) which also doesn't neatly fit the terrestrial orbital period.

    But as for equinoxes and solstices, they're mostly stable, varying by date only between two neighboring days. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equinox .

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  95. Are we ants? by pbjones · · Score: 1

    change the calendar for economic interests, change the time for economic interests? OFFS! are we ants? we (usually) spend more time away from work than working, so why show work interests stuff up the rest of our lives?

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:Are we ants? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      in short, yes. most americans don't even know why we have seasons (true fact), but showing up on time for "work" (=farmville) sure seems really important.

      so why not admit it officially?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  96. The Shire Calendar to the Rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://shire-reckoning.com/calendar.html

    This is straight from the appendices of the Lord of the Rings - In other words, 99.99% of slashdotters already have a copy of the Shire calendar on hand.

    Note that the leap year holiday Overlithe lands on the middle of the summer solstice, not in February.

  97. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Funny

    At best men get 2MB. Women can do 4MB if it's cold out.

    Besides it was a man who said "640K ought to be enough for anybody". Compensation anyone? ;-)

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  98. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think a "fixed" calendar would have thought of that..and leap year. there is no need for it.
      crazy world.

  99. I don't know... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    I still think thirteen 28 day months and leave in February 29th every four years makes more sense. Plus, we already have a name for the new month, Smarch!

  100. Re:3L 2L by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was thinking the same thing. I never bought 3L bottles anyway, they went flat before I could finish them.

    Now that I think about it, we already use metric for lots of stuff like colas and water (most are now metric, litres, half litres, 2 litres) Many can foods are done in metric (they have to have both by law anyway). Even car speedos are required to have metric. I love cruising the highway at 120kph. (and so does my lawyer). All medicine is metric. All science is supposed to be in metric (oops NASA!).

    If you want to get us Americans to use metric, all you have to do is require the most important thing we deal with to become metric: gasoline purchases. Everything else will follow. Gas is the most important thing to us, it is what we spend half our income on, and what we bitch about the price of most. As to temperatures, I really don't see C being that much better than F (the degrees are too fat in C) but that isn't that hard to get used to. Rate cars only by litres per 100k, and change the laws so it has to be sold by the litre, and within 10 years, problem solved. Besides, the old die hards that insist on using Imperial...well, they don't die that hard, and they are getting older.

    Speaking of metric, I have noticed that different European countries use metric differently as well. Some will list a 6+ ft item as 2m, some will call it 2000mm. Yes, it is the same thing, but each country seems to have a preference for the default.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  101. it's easier to work out local times by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    it's easier to work out local times like when local places are open or at least get a easy general idea.

  102. Throw it all out the window!v by Amyntas · · Score: 1

    I vote we remove the calender all together.

    Screw it.

    I only buy calenders to have a sexy girl cover the empty space on the wall.

    While we are at it, we can turn our 12 and 24 hour rotary dials into a partitioned dial with a light portion and a dark portion.
    The light part would say, 'I'm awake,' and the dark would say, 'I'm sleeping,' and both portions would be adjustable to suit one's lifestyle.
    This could easily be adapted into a watch that simply changes color via an LCD display, or some sort of over-complicated shutter system.

    I also vote the government issue us free 18 inch ( or larger ) digital picture frames to fill the new free space on the wall with cycling pictures of beautiful women.

    ----

    On a different note, why not be creative?

    A *year* would consist of five months and have nothing to do with orbit. The length of the month would scale in such a fashion that the length of the previous month, multiplied by two, subtract half the original length would give the length in days of the month to follow. This would essentially solve the problem of aging past 30.
    X*2-(0.5*X)
    The first year would be 403 days if you started with a 31 day month. Reasonable. The following year would have 3043 days, and the year after that you'd be over half way through your life.

    This system would also make it much easier to draw time-lines for those idiotic school projects.

  103. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Huh? Each Solstice is on its own day, half a year apart on either side. They're not on the "same" day.

    Unless you're saying that the events are on the days that they are on. For instance, today is on the same day as today, regardless of what date you assign it. ("A rose by any other name...")

    (tongue firmly in-cheek)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  104. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by dcollins · · Score: 1

    No one uses Time Cube is what I meant to say. see here: http://www.timecube.com/

    Hell, even the Americans rejected it and it was a American invention.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  105. Re:3L 2L by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What people here neglect to mention is that for a lot of things, like bolts or screws and a million other things, there really aren't good conversions available at all.

    Take an example 1/4" = 0.635 cm, it's a hell of a lot easier (and cheaper) to make something 1/4th of the length of something else, versus 127/200th of some standard length.

    Even in Europe, ostensibly metric, they haven't really made this transition at all.

  106. How do you remember which years have an xtr week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least with the present calendar I can remember when February has a leap day. With the new calendar I'd be hard pressed to know when an xtr week was needed.

    Who wants to have dates fall on the same day of the week each year? Variety is the spice of life.

  107. Re: a bad idea but... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    Christ, you can't get Americans to use a globally standard single-unit measuring system in the same number base they learned to count in (and identical to the counting system they use already for currency and anything digital), but you expect them to learn a new metric system and a new base system?

    Good luck, Mr. Coward, good luck.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  108. It's not political by pigwiggle · · Score: 1

    you simple minded twat - it's inertia. There are lots of things that are already expressed in metric units. Things with relatively quick turnover, i.e. food and whatnot. Things with a bit longer lifespan have been slower to convert. Like cars. Albeit most cars on the road today will have all metric fasteners and so forth. Take a look at your lugs? Then there are things with a very long lifetime. Like your house. Imagine you had to replace a floor and the only dimensioned subflooring you could get was metric, while your floor joists were set otherwise? You would either have seams falling between joists, or you would have to rip and waste some portion of the subflooring.

    --
    46 & 2
  109. we're plenty rational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just not decimal.

  110. Solstice by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    No worse than converting lunar calendar holidays like Easter each year. And unlike Easter, most people won't care about the solstice. They mention that farmers will want a yearly "agrarian" calendar to show season-starts each year. Astronomers, fishermen, and the like would use the same calendar.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  111. beer bottles too by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I see some foreign beers in 11.2oz bottles, and that number only makes sense as the customary equivalent of a third of a liter, with the label reworded for the US market.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  112. BOOOORING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's continue to simplify everything to reach that ultimate BORING existence.

    SIN

  113. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    Hopefully not every year, this stupid idea of believing in imaginary space jews should die real soon. Then we can go back to calling it the summer/winter solstice (depending on hemisphere) instead of "christmas"

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  114. Metonic cycle: 7 mo. every 19 yr. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    235 lunar months happens to be very close to 19 solar years (a pattern known as the Metonic cycle)
    19 * 12 = 228, 7 months are added to reach 235, in years 3,6,8,11,14,17 and 19 to be particular.
    Each month is 29 or 30 days, including the leap month.

    Info:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_calendar
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metonic_cycle

    The Gregorian calendar has a leap day, the Hebrew calendar has a leap month, the calendar in TFA is somewhere inbetween with a leap week.
    Perhaps various existing calendar systems can provide lessons on how to implement the system proposed in TFA.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  115. Boring!!!!!!!!!! by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    What about boredom? Seriously the same calendar every year, forever think about it! You save on buying new calendar but you be bored to death in five years.

  116. that doesn't make sense to me either. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Not sure about the calendar, but the time of day adjustment definitely doesn't make sense to me.
    Timezone conversion is a problem, but night/day not matching local time is another problem.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:that doesn't make sense to me either. by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      If we just all agree to start work at 9:00 UTC and end at 17:00 UTC, there's no problem. OK, so what if most of your day is in the dark? Since the advent of electricity, that should no longer be a problem. We solved that issue well over a century ago, why do so many people insist on living in the past?

    2. Re:that doesn't make sense to me either. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      let's not gratuitously ignore nature, OK?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  117. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

    Wow, you're right. In binary I can count to 1023 on my fingers and 1,048,575 if I use my toes...

    Don't you mean that in binary you can count to 1111111111 on your fingers, and 11111111111111111111 if you include your toes?

    --
    This is an ex-parrot!
  118. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but it is prone to misunderstandings. Last time I ordered four beers for me and my buddies, we were thrown out.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  119. Oops by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Oops, about 1.2 US gallons.

  120. Re:3L 2L by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Then keep the imperial gauges for bolts and screws. Europe did so, too, so why not? You can still buy "inched" screws and bolts here, even though nobody remembers a time when we measured things "imperially". Plumbing is almost entirely on the inch standard.

    Nobody really bothers "changing" that. What for? The plans and blueprints are computer made, so who cares what unit they draw in, and the people actually building it don't measure, they use it. Besides, the conversion isn't that hard. 2.5cm/inch is plenty close to reality for most real world applications where measuring error almost invariably trumps an error margin of 0.04cm/inch.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  121. Where's my f*#%&$ birthday? by DubThree · · Score: 1

    My birthday is May 31 which is eliminated from this calendar. I could just shift it to June 1 or I could count the days from the first day of the year and use that. Oh, and I would feel bad for all of those kids born on Xtr 1-7. What a joke.

  122. Four-quarters plan by Animats · · Score: 1

    It's a classic four-quarters calendar, but with a leap week every six years or so, rather than a leap day every 4 years.

    The new thing is that weeks stay in sync, which matters to some religious types.

  123. I don't see how this is "new". by idbeholda · · Score: 1

    The researchers are essentially replacing the leap year with a leap week. This is essentially the same concept the Mayans used with their calendar, so it's not exactly revolutionary. On the gripping hand, I propose we make use of a completely new calender designed purposely to usher in a new era of madness, but to also serve as an effective barrier of understanding and reason between generations and species. Here is my proposal:

    Rounding up from .2495756, we'll say that each earth year is approximately 365.25 days per year. How do we get rid of the leap year, you ask? Quite easy, we'll just get rid of that pesky fraction by multiplying by 4. Now we have 1461 days. In order to make sure that each month has the same number of days, we'll simply multiply the number of days by 4, and divide by 12. This ensures that each month consists of 487 days. Some would say that this is too long and/or complex to be feasible, but we'll merely dismiss their complaints, wailing, and gnashing of teeth with the wave of the hand. This first version of a calendar is "The Short Year".

    To facilitate ease of use with astronomical calculations, we can create a "Long Year" in which each month consists of 1461 days, or 4 Gregorian Years. The total number of days in a "Long Year" will consist of 17532 days, or 48 Gregorian Years. Both of these newly proposed calendards of mine present several advantages over the inefficent, short-sighted calendars crafted by heathen and barbarian cultures of aeons past. We'll start with The Short Year first.

    The first, and foremost of these is that there would be no leap hour, day, week, or year. Everything is consolidated into a single calendar of grotesque efficiency. The Short Year calendar pretty much guarantees that you'll have two birthdays per month. Since each month consists of a prime number of days (487), this also reduces the need to split up a month by the concept of "weeks". Two inefficient concepts are now eliminated.

    Moving along to The Long Year, the major advantage of having a calendar of this length is that the average life expectancy of a human in developed nations is approximately 75 years. This ensures that most people will never have the misfortune or inconvenience of buying a second calendar. Also, given that The Long Year consists of 17532, there should be plenty of days for future holidays, that way, nobody gets offended because of overlapping festivities.

  124. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously haven't worked with many date/time libraries. Almost all of them today support conversions to different calendars for internationalization purposes. All that would be needed would be to add the new universal calendar to those libraries and then have society slowly adopt it over time.

  125. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by redalien · · Score: 1

    Have you even read TFA? This proposes changing to a 364 day calendar with a leap week.

  126. Re:3L 2L by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

    0.04cm/inch ? That error margin would make screws and bolts completely unusable. They just wouldn't fit with 1/10th of that error.

  127. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by icebike · · Score: 1

    I've both written and published such libraries. I know full well the scope of the problem. And it's far bigger than you imagine.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  128. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The solution we actually use in Europe for this enigmatic problem is almost magic, so you may want to read it twice to catch the finesse: We use the metric system for both the screw and the bolt!

  129. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in europe we use 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 etc mm/cm/whatever.

    0.635 cm is for catering to imperialists.

  130. Re:3L 2L by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Again, the bolts and screws are available in both standards. What I meant is that when you're measuring a length of cable or plumbing pipe, an error margin of a few fractions of a millimeter don't matter.

    As Mr. Anonymous above said, use the same standard for screws and bolts. Why not have both for the transition? Oh the horror of having to actually read what's on the label...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  131. Excellent summary! by glwtta · · Score: 1

    Using computer programs and mathematical formulas

    How informative, and here I thought they would use sheet music and baking recipes.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  132. Re:3L 2L by aiht · · Score: 1

    I think maybe you haven't thought through that example enough.
    Exactly what inch-long object do you suppose they use when making a 1/4" object? Last time I checked, screws and bolts (for example) were not manufactured by carefully halving and re-halving other, larger, screws and bolts.
    You could even call it 0.00347222222 fathoms - and manufacturing one would still be exactly the same process, with exactly the same amount of material required, and exactly the same cost.

  133. Re:3L 2L by Splab · · Score: 1

    Are you seriously suggesting that the bolts yanks use are created to a 1/1000th of a cm perfection?

    Screws, plugs and nails are messured in cm (actually mm); only bolts (and then only some) are meassured in inches and I suspect it might be because manufactors are shipping to the entire world and most places can live with the conversion from Inches to cm, but not the other way...

  134. Re:3L 2L by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Take an example 1/4" = 0.635 cm, it's a hell of a lot easier (and cheaper) to make something 1/4th of the length of something else, versus 127/200th of some standard length.

    I'm brought up the metric way and I wouldn't ditch that system. It makes more scientific sense. My impression though is that the imperial system makes more applied sense.

    A few years ago I built my own British car. For historical reasons -I take- a mix of metric and imperial system is used in my car and I had to buy a set of imperial system keys. Surprisingly I ended up using almost all keys of the imperial system set.

    I have a long experience in wondering why people even bother to make 9, 11, 12, 14, 16 and 18 mm keys. One almost never uses these but invariable they all come in the most basic key sets.

    So metrics is fine but imperial system shouldn't be discarded too quickly. I expect it to remain among us for time to come.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  135. Still broken by greentshirt · · Score: 1

    If you're going to do something as audacious as change the calendar that most of the world has adopted, and claim your system does away with all the hassle and uncertainty of the current system, you should come up with something that doesn't require the following small print "The following extra week will be added at the end of December, every 5 or 6 years". Seriously, if you're going to become hyper-rational about the year, just redefine everything - days, months, years, hours, minutes, seconds, etc. Do the math to make everything fit into nice and neat blocks of 10. Otherwise, stfu and keep the broken system which is broken due to backwards compatibility.

  136. Much easier mnemonic by fleeped · · Score: 1

    without the interesting history tidbit: knuckles mnemonic

  137. American living in Europe by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    I am an American... and strange one... I can perform ASE/Imperial/Metric conversions subconsciously without a problem and have never really had an issue using one or the other. I find myself playing video games at times and hearing my wife ask me how many milliliters 1.5 cups is when she's baking from one of my recipes. We don't own any cup measures.

    The problem is... while metric is obviously mathematically easier since you can easily think "100cm is a meter and 1000 meters is a kilometer and therefore 100,000 cm is a kilometer" instead of "There are 3 feet in a yard and there are 5280 feet in a mile and therefore there is 1760 yards in a mile." people still need a calculator to handle the math because multiplying 5 by 100,000 is too complex for the average person. Yes... really.

    Americans are actually better in arithmetic because of the screwed up ASE system of measurement.

    P.S. - We do not use Imperial measure in the U.S., we use ASE. There is a discrepancy between the two systems with regards to measurement of liquid volume. This is because, when you transport a gallon of wine from England to Boston using a barrel on a wooden sailing ship, some of the wine evaporates and the English would not accept less money for delivering less wine. Therefore, 1 U.S. gallon is approximately 0.832 imperial gallons.

    1. Re:American living in Europe by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      while metric is obviously mathematically easier since you can easily think "100cm is a meter and 1000 meters is a kilometer and therefore 100,000 cm is a kilometer"

      So, when was the last time it mattered to you that there were 100,000 cm in a km?

      Or 1760 yards in a mile, for that matter?

      For the most part, this sort of thing is an issue for people in third grade, maybe. In the real world, the things we measure in miles (or km) aren't things we're interested in measuring in inches (or cm).

      Ditto tons/megagrams (and why don't the metric people use megagrams? why call them "metric tons" when the Mg is a perfectly valid metric unit?) vs. ounces/grams...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  138. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Matje · · Score: 1

    care to explain?

  139. Re:3L 2L by Malvineous · · Score: 1

    I don't understand your point - the metric system doesn't stop you from making something 1/4 the length of something else...

    Of course when you're comparing measurements I find metric much easier. I've always wondered how Americans can remember whether 37/93rds of an inch is larger or smaller than 14/57ths of an inch, but for me comparing 623 millimetres to 1.01cm (1010 millimetres) not only makes the comparison easy, but I get an intuitive feel that one is a little over a third larger than the other.

    But then I guess the difference here isn't metric vs imperial, it's more that imperial seems to prefer fractions, whereas metric favours a decimal number. You never write 1/2cm, always 0.5cm or 500mm.

  140. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guide doesn't specifically say that a 2 liter bottle holds 3 liters. Ron Paul doesn't hold 75 liters, He has a volume of 75 liters. A 2 liter bottle have a volume of close to 3 liters.

  141. Good and bad points by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    The fact that paper records are utter crap to begin with and all survey information should be computerized anyway, it doesn't matter what system the measurement was made in the first place, a user should be able to click and choose which unit of measurement they would prefer to see... even if it's the Ramses II cubit (the cubit changed over time).

    Of course, in Europe, we still use inches quite bit... the difference is, we don't purchase a 2x4 anymore, we purchase as 38x89 instead. The discrepancy in the conversion is that the metric conversion measures the wood after it's been dried and planed where the U.S. version measure before hand.

    I have seen carpenters measuring using the width of their thumbs which is actually where inches come from in the first place.

    For most other things, the imperial system is pretty much dead. On my recent trips to England... I have seen that with the exception of the ever-important pint, they have also made the change over to metric.

    But as I said, you have good and bad points. There's absolutely no reason that in a world such as ours, we'd have to depend on a given measurement unit. Hell, I don't see any reason programs like AutoCad for example couldn't be changed to allow you to specify new measurement schemes as well. For example, if you were to design a solar sail, you might design it using metric since a full sized sail would be many meters wide and high. Though a proper solar sail would likely be produced by "knitting" a sheet of carbon atoms. Therefore, when passing the design to manufacturing, it might make sense to supply the measurements relative to the width of a carbon atom. Like 9.8123 billion carbon atoms in length and 82.995 billion carbon atoms in width and 1 carbon atom in depth. Just make a screen in the software which allows you to define your own measurement system and how to display it.

  142. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly is TimeCube about? Every time I try to even begin to read that site I go temporarily blind - is there a wikipedia article that explains what that fruit loop is trying to say is so great about it?

  143. Calendar is biblical = credibility zero by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    I clicked through TFA to the website about the calendar. Apparently the most important feature (at least, the only one mentioned on the homepage) is the fact that the calendar meets biblical requirements.

    If that's the way they feel, their credibility is zero. No need to look any further...

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Calendar is biblical = credibility zero by qxcv · · Score: 1

      From that website:

      the HH Permanent Calendar Fully Respects the Fourth Commandment of the Bible

      The fourth commandment being

      Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work. But the seventh day is the Sabbath in honor of the Lord thy G*d;
      on it thou shalt not do any work, neither thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant nor thy maidservant,
      nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates;
      For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.

      This makes me sad. Very sad.

      --
      "The most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough." -- Eric S. Raymond
  144. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Converting to metric would of course include facing out imperial bolts.

  145. A decimal system would work better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have nine months with 40-day weeks and the tenth month is always 5 or 6 days depending on whether it is a leap year.

    January - 40 days (4 weeks)
    February - ditto
    March - ditto
    April - ditto
    May - ditto
    June - ditto
    July - ditto
    August - ditto
    September - ditto
    December - 5 or 6 days (mini week - holiday break)

    Each week would have a weekend and a mid-week break:

    Sunday - weekend
    Moonday - weekend
    Mercuday - 1st working day
    Venusday - 2nd working day
    Earthday - 3rd working day
    Marsday - 4th working day
    Jupitday - mid-week break
    Saturday - 5th working day
    Uranday - 6th working day
    Neptuday - 7th working day

    One drawback would be the division of the seasons. They would no longer be on 3-month boundaries.

  146. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. It's this little thing we like to call "a joke". You might notice a couple more in there if you look veeeeery carefully.

  147. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Ja'Achan · · Score: 1

    You obviously haven't worked with many date/time libraries.

    And neither do most of the existing programs out there.

  148. Less free days off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's say Christmas will always be on a sunday. Thats a normal day off.
    But if Christmas days vary each year (like on a wednesday) you'd have more off: the holiday day + the weekends.

  149. Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    I worked this out some time ago. And my approach is MUCH better. Seriously. Take a look. Benefits: Benefits include every month starts with Monday; Pay periods are normalized; billing periods are normalized; the ridiculous and confusing spattering of celebrations all over the calender are eliminated; bills would always be due the same date and day; the 11th would always be Thursday (as every date would always be the same day of the week think of the implications no more figuring that nonsense out!); Your birthday would always be the same day; no more celebrations that wander around the calender; a vastly improved sense of what day and/or date it is, because (for example) there are only four Mondays in the month, and if you know it’s Monday, you probably know what date it is; and if you know the date, it’s always the same day anyway, so you would know the day right off.

    I'm not the first to take a swing at this, either -- and almost every attempt I've looked at is better than what these academics made. IMHO, of course. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by loupgarou21 · · Score: 2

      why does no one ever think of a calendar with 13, 28 day months? Everyone tries to cram it all into 12 months for some reason. My calendar gives you 364 days in a year, which would still need to be corrected by a single non-month day (or have the day tacked onto one of the months.) That makes 4, 7 day weeks to a month.

      If you keep that extra day apart from other months, it could be a permanent holiday, we'll call it splorchday or something equally silly.

    2. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by chill · · Score: 1

      Good luck convincing the fundies to adopt a pagan lunar calendar.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You mean besides the one they already use?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by chill · · Score: 1

      Yeah. :-) As long as it really isn't in-their-face obvious, they can play "out of sight, out of mind".

      Happy Woden's Day!

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      why does no one ever think of a calendar with 13, 28 day months?

      Because those months would differ fairly significantly in weather from the traditional months, I'm guessing. The more familiar the "new" months are, perhaps the easier they are to accept?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    6. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      call it a Jewish lunar calendar full of Old Testament goodness.

    7. Re:Sorry, but MY calendar is WAY better by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      If you keep that extra day apart from other months, it could be a permanent holiday, we'll call it splorchday or something equally silly.

      I'm a fan of using Overlithe, as should most people here.

  150. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Then we can go back to calling it Saturnalia

    FTFY

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  151. Re:3L 2L by Altrag · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but its just as easy to make a 6mm something.

    Yes you end up with two standards that way for a period but who cares? People can already differentiate between a 1/4" wrench with a 5/16" wrench.. adding a 6mm wrench in there is only one extra step.. and you usually know ahead of time whether you're working in metric or imperial so its rare that you screw up (and even then, it only really matters in excessively precise work -- that 0.35mm isn't terribly noticeable in most areas).

    Oh and I'm Canadian. I deal with this all the time. You get used to having an extra system in the same way you get used to having two alphabets (upper- and lower-case), the already multituninous units of measure (inches, feet, miles, football fields, librariest of congress, whatever).

    That said, its a slow transistion. We've been legally a metric country since I think early 80s (too lazy to look it up;) A long time anyway).

    Anything that goes against peoples' long-held biases like that tend to take 3-4 generations to completely sink in as those who are too old to change their bias get replaced with younger generations that can be taught the new system without running against pre-existing bias.

  152. That is a dumb calendar, here's a better one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget all the real issues of changing the calendar for a sec.

    First of all make the month match it's namesake... the moon, have 13 months all with 28 days.
    This gives 364 days, that leaves approximately 1.25 days per year. That day can be outside the normal calendar and be a world wide holiday. Every 4 years you get 2 days at the end of the year, except every 100th year where you just get 1 day off. Sound familiar?

    Pros:
    Every month has exactly 4 weeks and every week starts on the same day.
    You could use the moon to tell which week it is.

    Cons:
    There are 13 months so the year can't be broken into quarters by month just by weeks (13 weeks)

  153. Re:One of the last bastions of the imperial system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an observation from 'Down Under' I wish to thank the USA for being one the last bastions of the British Imperial System. Australia may still have the Queen of England as our head of state, but we don't have the continual daily reminder of our subservience to England by using the Imperial System.

  154. Every year is the same ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except when it isn't. Let me guess, an economics expert was involved in this brainwave. Am I right or am I right?

  155. 1/4 easier? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It's so much easier to imagine or calculate a size if you don't have to remember all the unique multiplicators all the time. 12 inches in a foot, 3 inches in a yard, make up your mind and use multiplicator, like the decimal system does.

    If you think that all it takes is a few multiplicators, think again when it comes to cubic inches, cubic feet, cubic yards and all that. Most Americans don't have the brains to do that and have to resort to the decimal equivalent of the contents of an Olympic size swimming pool. Hows that for a compromise?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  156. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take an example 1/4" = 0.635 cm, it's a hell of a lot easier (and cheaper) to make something 1/4th of the length of something else, versus 127/200th of some standard length.

    How the hell did garbage as this get moderated up? Yes, it is pure garbage.

    1/4 x is better than 0.13489zz12389. Wut? I bet you can as easily change the sizes of screws to 1/4 (1/2) of 1 cm. Your Inch is not a god-given basic item of the universe, it is totally arbitrary, you just defined that arbitrary value to 1 and, no surprise, it then is easy to put a nametag on 1/2 or 1/8.

    Even further (and here comes the true stupidity of parent's post): It is as easy to drill a hole (screw) with the width of 1/4 inch with a tool that is made for that as the width of 1/4 inch. If I have a drill that is 0.82342 cm I can easily drill a hole that is that wide (or make screws or whatever).

    And IF you want to make something 1/4 of the size of a standard length, why not make a standard length that has the most advantages (for example metric) over another standard length (whatever crap you use now)?

    The parent does not contain anything worth modding up so I politely ask everyone who did mod that garbage above up to refrain from modding in the future.

  157. Re:3L 2L by dasqua · · Score: 1

    More likely Europe simply tolerates imperial because its useful for some things or its just plain down to interoperability. In Australia I have no trouble communicating in both. It just comes down to context. eg a discussion about someone's height in cm or feet as well as cm or metres. Building measurements in metres or millimetres.

    Anything important is done in metric. I've never heard anyone actually talk in furlongs or chains etc. If you're seriously into imperial you wouldn't talk of distances in hundreds of miles for example

    As for bolts - its only because you're so caught up in fractions of inches that there is even an issue. My lathe certainly can't tell the difference...

    YMMV :)

    --
    tihs isg mead fmro rcecydle tpyos
  158. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can make something a 1/4 length of something else regardless of the units used to measure the item - I don't really understand your argument..

  159. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, just as no one uses the metric system because of the inertia involved, no one would use this system either.

    Except, you know, the vast, vast majority of the worlds population save three or four hold-outs including Burma and the United States...

  160. Re:3L 2L by nitio · · Score: 1
    Well, I use metric and I believe it to be the only truth (aside from Math), but when you read this definition one 1 metre (sorry US):

    Length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299792458 of a second (17th CGPM)

    versus the definition one 1 inch

    From July 1, 1959, the United States and countries of the British Commonwealth defined the length of the international yard to be exactly 0.9144 metres.Consequently, the international inch is defined as exactly 25.4 millimetres.

    makes you understand why some people prefer to use a system where "it's the lenght on a man's thumb!" (sure, may not be true but whatever)

    Also, in Brazil and I believe most of Europe, who cares about pumbling? They're still using inches, heck, I don't even have a unit of measure for them - I just ask for a size x bolt/pipe or whatever. I believe this holds true everywhere else. You just know the size you want but do not care about the lenght and the UOM.

    Disclaimer: everything off of wikipedia. take it with a grain of salt

    --
    http://stoploudness.org/
  161. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by the+monolith · · Score: 1

    Proposed Time Rhyme:

    March, June, December,
    Please to remember:
    31 Days are their alot.
    Of all else
    30 are got.

    Beware your days,
    Run, be merry without rest.
    The Reaper will ignore the list,
    Man's crude toy,
    With a counting none resist.

    ... now, what's my percentage of calendar sales?

  162. Re:3L 2L by Jappus · · Score: 1

    Even in Europe, ostensibly metric, they haven't really made this transition at all.

    Well, Europe also likes to export to and import from countries using the imperial system. One country in particular, to be precise. A country where most people are very peculiar about using the metric system or doing the conversion themselves. So it has to be done for them or after you got stuff from them -- and for some goods it's even easier to just produce/use things in round numbers from their system to begin with.

    Reminds one of the old adage about the prophet and mountain. :)

  163. a very, very, very, very, very, very good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have 12 months a year, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, 60 minutes an hour, 60 seconds a minute. All of them trouble somebody.

    A week is roughly a quarter of a moon cycle, which we won't follow anymore, with exceptions. But why should we keep 7 days a week then? For religious reasons? Oh, that makes sense, fiddling with the year to disjoin moon from date for economical reasons and fixing the week for religious reasons.

    Which makes 12 months per year nonsense, as that follows the moon as well - which the FAQ of HH calendary points out by telling the need for farmers to keep the old calendary next to the new one.

    So there are the number of months at stake, the days of a week. Why would we need to keep 24 hours, 60 minutes, 60 seconds then? 10 hours a day, 100 minutes per hour, 100 seconds per minute have roughly the same time span as today. We don't need to adjust the duration of the second as we are used to differing positions of the sun per day during a year.

    So why not make a deep cut?

    cb

  164. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, in Europe we use metric bolts and screws, so no conversion is necessary.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_metric_screw_thread

    Only a few times I have come across an imperial screw. I just replaced them with metric ones to make the whole system coherent. The only place in Europe where I have seen a mix of imperial and metric screws everywhere is UK. I am from Eastern Europe, which uses only metric bolts, since the Soviet Union standards were all metric.

  165. Re:3L 2L by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Was thinking the same thing. I never bought 3L bottles anyway, they went flat before I could finish them.

    I assume it's a joke. Are 3L bottles more easily available, marked "50% extra free!" for example?

    If you want to get us Americans to use metric, all you have to do is require the most important thing we deal with to become metric: gasoline purchases. Everything else will follow.

    That hasn't quite worked in the UK. Road signs and beer/cider sale are still in miles, miles per hour, yards and pints (and half pints).

    Petrol has been sold in litres for a long time (20 years?), but my dad fills a 60L tank with 55L of petrol, costing £1.29/L, total £70.95, then converts that to gallons (approximately), then divides how far the odometer reads (in miles) by that, to get miles per gallon. I think you'd need to convert the odometer too, and probably the road signs.

    (The UK has a very vocal minority of anti-metric people, who are frenzied by the right-wing anti-Europe press. Some industries benefit from this, since any proposed laws to force fairer consumer labelling of products are shot down. Since some point in the 1970s education has been entirely metric, it really is just the old people claiming inches and pounds are somehow "British" and worth preserving for tradition's sake.)

  166. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by dintech · · Score: 3

    Ooops, you'll hit a problem when you get to 4 (00100).

  167. Re:3L 2L by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

    All medicine is metric

    Except blood pressure, which is still measured in mmHg (millimetres of mercury) instead of hPa (hectopascals).

    require the most important thing we deal with to become metric: gasoline purchases. Everything else will follow.

    Ask the English how that worked out for them. They buy petrol by the litre, but measure speed and distances in miles, and fuel economy in miles per (Imperial) gallon.

    --
    By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
  168. Of course it works fine by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It just doesn't work better. That's the problem. You let me talk to a scientist or engineer and I can easily explain why they'd care about metric, and they'll be convinced in minutes it is better for them (not that they don't use it anyhow, just as an example). However a regular person? Not so much. It doesn't improve their ability to do the things they need to do. All the nifty inter-unit conversion shit is lost on them.

  169. Re:3L 2L by rust627 · · Score: 2

    "What people here neglect to mention is that for a lot of things, like bolts or screws and a million other things, there really aren't good conversions available at all."

    What most Americans arguing against metric neglect to mention is that there is already a metric system for bolts, screws, and a million other things, working perfectly, you don't need to convert things that are working, just start new with metric equivalent as you start to build new gear.

    A Gearbox is built with SAE Bolts ?, keep building it. When you come to build the next generation of gearbox with a fresh design and fresh castings , 'Upgrade' to metric measurements and bolts etc....Its not rocket surgery.
    This means you have a transition period of 10m to 15 years and before you know it you are all converted.
    It should not be that hard, America has outsourced most of its manufacturing to asia (who are already metric to cope with the outsourced manufacturing from europe and Australia), so there really isn't that much to convert within the country.

    Every Japanese/korean/european car coming into your country is built using the (standard for the rest of the world) metric bolts, nuts etc.
    yes you can use a 1/2 inch spanner on that bolt, the rest of the worlds uses a 13mm spanner. 9/16 ? 14 mm
    In Australia I use metric tools as standard choice for most thing only reaching for one of the 2 or 3 different Imperial sets for older equipment (or some things built in or specifically for the USA)

    And while I think about it, can someone explain to me why an american mile is different to a mile anywhere else in the world ?

    --
    da da da dum indeed.
  170. Go binary by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Instead of metric, why not adapt a new binary or hexadecimal system, that would be most computer friendly, and divide a day into 65536 equal parts, and group them into 64 'seconds', then 64 'minutes' and 16 'hours' in a day. Or make it 32 'hours' if we want finer instead of coarser 'seconds'. Only problem - there is no getting around the 365 days, since that's the time required for the earth's revolution around the sun. Unless of course, we stop defining a year as per that amount, and arbitarily make it 256 days, w/ 8 months of 32 days each.

    That's just for time, which is the most difficult to align, but aside from that, length and mass can be redefined to new binary based standards.

  171. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    "have society slowly adopt it over time" is the part of your plan that's impossible. You can't have some people using a calendar in which September has 30 days and others using one in which it has 31 days. That would be a train wreck. Probably literally. The Julian and Gregorian calendars coexisted, but that was in a world without instantaneous global communication and commerce.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  172. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too bad Wikipedia isn't searchable, so you could answer this question yourself.

    Do you go blind every time learning something requires a little bit of effort?

  173. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We just don't use 1/4" bolts at all. It's M6 all the way, they conveniently fit into a 6mm hole, which is really convenient, because we also have metric drills.

  174. Much simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply start every January 1st on a Sunday ('New Sunday') - the year then always ends on a Sunday as well ('Old Sunday') - so you'll have a 3-day weekend at the end/beginning of a year 'Saturday-Old Sunday-New Sunday' - enough for some good new year celebrations. For leap years: every 28th of February is on a Tuesday - in leap years there will be an extra Tuesday on the 29th: 'Leap Tuesday' - so once every 4 years (roughly) you'll have an extra long working week. Simple and no need for an 'Xtr' week...

  175. Re:3L 2L by quenda · · Score: 1

    all you have to do is require the most important thing we deal with to become metric: gasoline purchases.

    I read that this happened in the US when gasoline hit $1/gallon, but they eventually went back to imperial again. An urban legend?

  176. good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good example: Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

    A plan like this would leave billions of people stuck with Sunday-Thursday birthdays, never knowing the joy of a birthday landing on a Friday or Saturday.

  177. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You spend half your income on gasoline? that really sucks man... I spend a much bigger portion on housing than gas... like 4x as much...

  178. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Leap weeks?

    Almost sounds like this guy is just from another culture and simply dressed up an old idea in a lot of astrophysics and called it "invention".

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  179. Re:3L 2L by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    I thought that even American cars used mainly metric bolts. Back in the 90s, when I actually worked on cars, we found that 3/4 of the bolts were indeed metric, excepting some dash screws, leftover common parts from over the years, and minor stuff. Fortunately, many were 14mm, and a 9/16" is just a hair sloppy on that, close enough for all but torqued bolts. Maybe they switched back to Imperial, I don't know, but then it was more metric than standard.

    And as for Eurpean useage, we get stuff from Europe all the time (import equipment) and it is all in metric. It is just a matter of making new stuff metric, and making Imperial stuff to maintain the old stuff. screws, bolts, spacing, all in even metric. And these are primarily Belgian designs built in Moldova, so it spans the continent.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  180. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even in Europe, ostensibly metric, they haven't really made this transition at all.

    You never were in Europe I guess. I have never seen a non metric screw/bolt in my engineering practise (in your case any german would use a M6 screw). And even in private I only once buyed two imperial nuts for an old couch and to get them I had to go in a specialised hardware shop and pay the same price as for a full box of metric nuts. The only case were imperial threads (non UTS btw) are used is for pipes, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_standard_pipe_thread .

    And your example is bogus anyway, yeah if you use a base unit that is definde to be exactly 25.4 mm you get in all kinds of trouble. In metric units we simply use the mm as basic unit for anything on this scale (the mm is also the default unit in mechanical engineering for this reason). And a 1/4 m = 250 mm, or 1/4 mm = 250 micrometer. So where is your problem?

  181. this kind of crap by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    belongs in 1960s science fiction. (oh, wait.. it is already there)

    not. gonna. happen.

    better chance of the whole world agreeing on one single common language than implementing this complete nonsense on a global scale.

  182. DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet they are willing to force something as pointless and cumbersome as "daylight savings" time, and come back years later to dick with it again, changing the arbitrary pivot point to a brand new arbitrary pivot point.

    And yes, it is force whenever and wherever government is present. Put it this way: would the scheme ever have been "adopted" if government wasn't involved? Of course not. The people who wanted to get up and hour early to go to work would have, and the people who didn't wouldn't have.

  183. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is XKCD we're talking about though, so you may have to use a broader definition of "joke" than is generally understood.

  184. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, yes. Forgot about the "naughty bits".

  185. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by mcgrew · · Score: 0

    "Imaginary space Jew"? What's next, a GNAA troll? Why do you athiest zealots insist on bringing religion into every damned topic no matter how unwarranted? And what's worse, you injected anti semitism into it.

    Nice. What annoys me about this is you're making my athiest and agnostic friends look bad with your hateful diatribes against Jews and the religious (whether Jew, Muslim, or Bhuddist).

  186. Great, it will take microsoft 20 years of patches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the date to get it right. Even then it won't work right until Windows v10.

  187. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we can go back to calling it Festivus

    FTFY

    FTFY^2

  188. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by everett · · Score: 1

    I believe GP was referring to the worship of Jesus, a specific jew who in the christian mythos lives in "heaven above" aka outer space. Nothing about this implies anything negative about Jews or the Jewish faith, can you point out the antisemitism? I guess maybe the value judgement that belief in Jesus as a divine being is "stupid", but that's a pretty common belief amongst the non-religious and hardly restricted to Semitic faiths

    --
    Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
  189. Re:3L 2L by marga · · Score: 1

    > Take an example 1/4" = 0.635 cm, it's a hell of a lot easier
    > (and cheaper) to make something 1/4th of the length of
    > something else, versus 127/200th of some standard length.

    This is ridiculous. It's not cheaper or easier, it's just that that was what was there before.

    There are inch-screws and millimetric screws. In millimetric screws you have, for example, a 6mm one. You wouldn't have a 6.35 mm one, that's stupid.

    The same goes with everything else. The fact that certain things are measured as 1 inch, 1/2 inch, 1/4 inch is just a convenience, there's nothing magical in these numbers. They could perfectly be rounded to 2cm, 1cm, 1/2 cm or whatever is handy for each use.

    --
    Margarita Manterola.
  190. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by pz · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the fellow I was replying to asserted that equinoxes and solstices are variable on the current calendar, which they really aren't.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  191. Naw - oct 32 == dec 25 no longer works by Wizardess · · Score: 0

    This destroys an important feature of a somewhat humorous observation relating two dates celebrating more or less opposite things, at least for Christians. You'd no longer be able to declare that Halloween and Christmas were the same thing, 031 == 25, after all. {^_^}

  192. Re:Again: Y2K in a bigger way by marga · · Score: 1

    Not every program should be fixed by hand.

    People who rely on libraries shouldn't need to touch anything, except update their libraries.

    This would quickly identify good programmers from bad programmers.

    In any case, this ain't going to happen. Not a chance. Who would want their birthday always on the same day? Is there any benefit from such a stupid (and old) suggestion?

    --
    Margarita Manterola.
  193. At first they seemed intelligent... by proici · · Score: 1
    and seemed to propose rational reasons for their new calendar. At the end of the article, however, you realize they are absolutely batshit crazy:

    "In addition to advocating the adoption of this new calendar, Hanke and Henry encourage the abolition of world time zones and the adoption of “Universal Time” (formerly known as Greenwich Mean Time) in order to synchronize dates and times worldwide, streamlining international business."

    This site has already discussed ad nausea many reasons why universal time is a terrible idea, so I am surprised that after scanning the comments I had not seen anyone mention this.

    You must be absolutely batshit crazy to advocate New York City's work day starting at 2pm and ending at 10pm, and people eating dinner at "midnight" although it's not really the middle of the night.

    Finally, seeing as how their "research" has led them to "discover" a "new" calendar, which is nearly identical to the world calendar proposed in 1930 (thanks GreatBunzinni for pointing this out), I hope they are chastised for this. They are labeled as "researchers" and then proposed a "new" idea without first doing research to see it has been proposed before, and cap it off by advocating a universal time zone. If I were Johns Hopkins University, I would immediately distance myself as far as possible from these schmucks.

    /rant

    1. Re:At first they seemed intelligent... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      absolutely batshit crazy to advocate New York City's work day starting at 2pm

      no you don't. In fact, people would get used to it pretty quickly.

      Also, you should probably read what they wrote. Frankly, you are embarrassing yourself.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:At first they seemed intelligent... by proici · · Score: 1

      What benefit does UTC provide the average citizen, who doesn't deal with foreign time zones on a regular basis? There is none. Multinational corporations that benefit from UTC use it already. One could argue that the new system is similarly universal, as the day is structured in the same manner no matter where you are on the planet.

      And, I have read what these guys have written, both on their website and in this article. Their "holier than thou" attitude towards similar calendars and the current system is a major turn off. Furthermore, when I emailed them my concerns (because their emails are publicly posted under that article), Professor Henry told me to "go climb a tree." For someone who is trying to win public favor towards his brilliant new idea, he is certainly going about it the wrong way.

  194. Variety is a good thing! by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    I don't want Christmas or my birthday or any other day to fall on the same day of the week forever!

    All the benefits these guys claim are about productivity or efficiency or financial savings. Those are not the most important things in life. I wonder, do these guys eat the same thing on the same day of the week, and take their vacations in the same place every year?

    These guys aren't being realistic. Y2K was bad enough--imagine reprogramming all the software in the world to use a completely new calendar! There'd be a whole new industry for temporary date-conversion software, because people would have to convert between them until the whole world was adjusted. Not to mention, how do you get the entire world to agree on ANYTHING nowadays? There is no authority with the power and influence the pope once had, and with globalization, a change in one place can't just trickle down eventually, or spread with colonization.

    And they want everyone to use UTC too. Thanks, but I don't want to advance to the next day at effectively 8 pm.

    These guys are out of touch with the real people in the real world. Life isn't all about numbers.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  195. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

    ... except equinoxes and solstices...

    I think that's a serious weakness of the Hanke-Henry proposal

    I am working on a piece of fiction set in an alternate reality that uses a calendar based on the Earth's orbit: Jan 1 is always on Perihelion Day (varies from Jan 2 to Jan 4 in current calendar); Mar 15 is always on First Equinox Day; etc. The advantage is that each calendar day is always tied to a specific spot in the Earth's orbit (within 1 degree). This makes it much easier to estimate delivery times of interplanetary trade ships, etc. On a local level, it makes it easier for farmers, including solar power farms, to predict future activities.

    Additionally, this fictional calendar uses the year that the first light from the Crab Nebula supernova was seen as year one (1054 CE). It is thought that this will make it easier to handle certain communication issues during first contact situations, but it also completely secularizes the common calendar, reducing one source of friction in a world plagued with religious intolerance and terrorism.

    For anyone interested, The Prologue of the story, Artie Wood and his Electric Flying Machine, has a bit more about this. Scroll down to the "About Time" section.

    --
    Will
  196. Re:3L 2L by SpeZek · · Score: 1

    Wait, why is it easier to measure 1/4 of a unit than 63.5 units?

  197. Re:3L 2L by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    Take an example 1/4" = 0.635 cm, it's a hell of a lot easier (and cheaper) to make something 1/4th of the length of something else, versus 127/200th of some standard length.

    I assure you that milling machines don't care if you do your math in base-pi as long as you program them in their native units.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  198. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, just add mentos. That will generate the 3L.

  199. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    They're usually on the same DATE not DAY. This new calendar would change what date they're on. Why were you modded up?

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  200. Got a decimal calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that would make things a lot easier. How about a decimal day? The whole 24 hour thing is a PITA and even more so when you're dealing with morons who can't count past 12 and need to figure out which half they're in by adding AM and PM in the time :P

  201. A better calendar reform by Snarfangel · · Score: 1

    This will be buried at the end of 600 comments, but hey, I might as well throw in my two cents.

    Make the calendar:

    Five days per week.
    Six weeks per month.
    Three months per quarter.
    Four quarters per year, plus one five-day week at the end of the year.
    Add a leap day to the end of every fourth year, except years divisible by 128. In other words, 128 years would be exactly 46751 days, and each year would average out to 365.2421875 days.

    Then start the year at the autumnal equinox (in the northern hemisphere). The seasons would roughly align with the quarters. Of course, the phases of the moon would fall out of synch, but 30 days is pretty close to a lunar cycle. You can have the quarters of Fall, Winter, Spring, and Summer, with each quarter divided into Early, Mid, and Late.

    For example, the months would be:
    Early Fall, Mid Fall, Late Fall
    Early Winter, Mid Winter, Late Winter
    Early Spring Mid Spring, Late Spring
    Early Summer, Mid Summer, Late Summer.

    And no one will ever read this, but here is a little ditty:

    The First of Autumn, to make it clear
    Is the first day of the year.
    Every week has just five days
    Six weeks per month, plus one that stays.
    Thirty days hath Mid Winter
    And all the months that you remember.
    Fall and Winter, Spring and Summer
    The seasons are just four in number.
    At years end, across the nation
    Add a week of celebration.
    Every four years, you may note
    Add another day to vote.
    Except for the years 1-2-8
    Don't leap ahead, and you'll stay straight.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  202. er... seriously though.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who gives a shit ?

  203. Re:3L 2L by stderr_dk · · Score: 1

    but for me comparing 623 millimetres to 1.01m (1010 millimetres) not only makes the comparison easy, but I get an intuitive feel that one is a little over a third larger than the other.

    FTFY.

    But then I guess the difference here isn't metric vs imperial, it's more that imperial seems to prefer fractions, whereas metric favours a decimal number. You never write 1/2cm, always 0.5cm or 5mm.

    FTFY too...

    --
    alias sudo="echo make it yourself #" ; # https://pipedot.org/~stderr & http://soylentnews.org/~stderr
  204. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    But as for equinoxes and solstices, they're mostly stable, varying by date only between two neighboring days. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equinox.

    And the proposed revision to the calendar would change that. From TFA:

    Hanke and Henry deal with those extra “pieces” of days by dropping leap years entirely in favor of an extra week added at the end of December every five or six years.

    So the date on which a solstice or equinox occurs would move over a range of up to six calendar dates over the course of one calendar cycle of 6 years. Most calendar years would be exactly 364 days long, with one that's 371 days long every 5 or 6 years (on average, every 5.635 years).

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  205. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed the point. Under the Gregorian calendar, solstices and equinoxes vary only by a day because the leap day every four years stabilizes them. If you instead do leap weeks (which will obviously be less frequent than leap days), solstices and equinoxes will drift more and then suddenly get yanked back into place by the leap week.

  206. Yes by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Even if they don't change the calendar, please make xmas on the last Sunday of the month. It makes scheduling easier. Since it isn't that actually birthdate, and only a celebration, then changing the day should not matter. Sorry, I didn't mean to mix logic with a belief system.

    Also, make Halloween the last Saturday of October.

    Both cases would make everyone's life easier.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  207. This looks like a solution in search of a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article: Note: the “Extra-Week Years” are every year in which the Gregorian calendar begins or ends on a Thursday.

    If the new calendar still needs the old calendar...then why do we need the new calendar?

  208. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by redalien · · Score: 1

    Ah, sorry, the new commenting system still confuses me after years, I didn't see the parent to your comment, only the grandparent.

  209. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Equinoxes and solstices WOULD shift in the new calendar. This calendar simply starts January 1 earlier each year until enough days are missing to add an extra week.

    December 21 old style will shift over time to December 22, 23, 24, etc. until the calendar gets enough out of sync to add the extra week. The solstice would still occur at the same date (old style), so it would shift in the new style calendar.

    People would play games with the money for the leap week. You'd get an extra 7 days on your monthly rent payment on leap week years. You'd have to stretch your paycheck one week longer during the holidays those years. Just think of all the financial shenanigans that can be played with the leap weeks.

  210. Even better idea by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

    "With computer programs and mathematical formulas" I found an idea of thirteen months, each four weeks = 28 days. Thus every MONTH would be like the previous, would begin with monday etc. One thing more: we add one day to celebrate year change (or what ever) and that day is part of no week or month. 13*28+1 = 365. Since we cannot change world rotation, we must yet add one day on leap years.

  211. Already been done. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    I made a calendar almost exactly like this in the fifth grade.

    I think this one has about as much chance of getting adopted as mine did.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  212. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Sorry man, Saturnalia both predates Festivus by millennia, and it had orgies. Clearly Saturnalia is the one to shoot for. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  213. Not technically correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there are three countries that still use the Imperial system. If one is the US, I'll let you guess what the other two are. Go ahead...

  214. Re:3L 2L by seantide · · Score: 1

    If you want to get us Americans to use metric, all you have to do is require the most important thing we deal with to become metric: gasoline purchases. Everything else will follow. Gas is the most important thing to us, it is what we spend half our income on, and what we bitch about the price of most.

    That's actually a neat idea. I think grocery stores could push it more than they do as well.

    However, where do you get that we spend half our income on gas? Even when I made $30K and less my gas bill wasn't remotely close to that with 10K miles per year.

    Anyone else here spend that much on gas? Sorry to derail the thread, but A) this is slashdot and B) that kinda made me curious. :)

  215. Re:3L 2L by seantide · · Score: 1

    The American mile is different? The American mile is 5280 feet, and that was a unit created by English Parliment in 1593. What are you thinking of? Examples?

  216. No Months. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agree. We can skip Months, Weeks and named Days. And simply call it Day 1-356.

    Workdays can be adjusted to fit the needs of the work, and the needs of the workers.

    (If we want to be nifty, we count backwards from 356, like many sports.
      And those silly 10.. 9... ...1.. 'Happy new year' countdowns makes some sense)

  217. Communist Plot? by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

    Why does this whole thing remind me of some wild eyed cold war idea gone wrong... or may an old Negativland song. "Do you know how many time zones there are in the Soviet Union?" "ELEVEN!"

  218. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 2m or 2000mm thing is more of a precision thing. Extension cords are usually marked 2 meter, while for example timber for construction is marked 200cm. The cord might be 1,95 meter and no one will bitch about it, but if you have a 195cm piece of roofing timber while you specifically needed 200cm is annoying.

  219. Why not throw out the Gregorian calendar concept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In response to this modification of a crappy calendar, I propose my own creation:

    Faithful Calendar - Part 1

    This simple "lunisolar" calendar is devised to:

    -Align several existing solar and lunar calendars
    -Align seasons with calendars
    -Affix the day of each month to a given week day
    -Affix moving holidays, such as Easter and Thanksgiving
    -Resolve inconsistant billing and pay cycles

    Given:

    -Solar year = 365.242199 days
    -Leap year every four years (with exceptions) to compensate for the .242199 days
    -Lunar month = 29.53059 days
    -Week = 7 days

    The Faithful Calendar consists of 13 months, each containing 28 days. Since 13*28=364, we reserve 1 day as New Year's Day. New Year's day would not be a weekday, nor a weekend, but simply a universal holiday. New Year's day would fall on the Gregorian December 21st - The (approximate) Winter solastice. This would mean that New Year's day would mark the start of Winter.

    Since 28 is divisible by 7, the day of the week would be fixed. Therefore the first day of each month would be the equivalent of Sunday and the last day of each month would be the equivalent of Saturday. This system honors those that respect the Sabbath on either day as New Year's day will fall between them. For those that observe Christmas, Festivus, Holiday (FSM) or other similar holidays, New Year's day would also be those days too. You may incredulously ask, "Move Christmas?" but keep in mind that the feast date of the Annuciation of the Incarnation (Mary's virginal conception of Jesus) is normally celebrated on March 25th, but is sometimes moved on the Gregorian Calendar to avoid a conflict with Easter Week.

    Consider the Hebrew Calendar which is Lunisolar. For those that observe Hanukkah, which is celebrated across eight days starting on the 25th day of Kislev of the Hebrew Calendar, New Year's day provides the eigth day for the feast.

    Consider the Hijri (Islamic) Calendar, which is Lunar. It is typically 354 or 355 days long, is not sychronized with the seasons, and drifts from the solar Gregorian Calendar by 11 or 12 days yearly. The seasonal relation repeats approximately every 33 Islamic years. Typically, the Hijri Calendar lasts for 12 lunar months. However, in order to keep the Hajj (Pilgramage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia) within a Solar season, the calandar contains provisions for a 13th leap (intercalary) month. This situation is very similar to the Chinese calendar and the solution will apply to both.

    To keep the Faithful Calendar aligned with the Lunar cycle, (28*13+1+Leap=365.242199) (29.53059*12=354.36708), the alignment of the two systems will be denoted by naming each year of the 33 solar year cycle. There will be a lunar alignment celebration every 391 solar years (365.242199*391 = 142809.699809 vs. 354.36708*403 = 142809.93324).

  220. A little late in the year for this proposal... by grot · · Score: 1

    What day will April 1 fall on? 'Cause I'm pretty sure it's not today.

  221. Faithful Calendar - Part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the Faithful Calendar consists of 13 months, Sideral Zodiac Symbols may be used in the naming of the months. They are as follows:

    Capricorn (Gregorian Dec 21st), Aquarius, Pisces, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpius, Ophiuchus, Sagittarius

    The days of the week will be named after the planets of the Solar system as follows:

    Sunday -> Mercury (1st ,8th ,15th ,22nd)
    Monday -> Venus (2nd, 9th, 16th ,23rd)
    Tuesday -> Mars (3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th)
    Wednesday -> Jupiter (4th, 11th, 18th, 25th)
    Thursday -> Saturn (5th, 12th, 19th, 26th)
    Friday -> Uranis (6th, 13th, 20th, 27th)
    Saturday -> Neptune (7th, 14th, 21st, 28th)

    This is in order from the planet closest to the Sun (Sol) to the farthest. Earth is missing from this arrangement, and will be assigned to the Faithful Calendar New Year's day. Likewise, Leap day will be known as Pluto and will be observed on the day following Earth day. The reason for renaming the days and months is to teach children about astronomy. This throws out conventions naming months after Ceasars (Julius and Augustus) and updates the nomenclature of astronomical bodies (Sun-day, Moon-day,... Saturn-day).

    Advantages to the Faithful Calendar are as follows:

    -Women's menstrual cycles will be more predictable by men, possibly saving lives.
    -Accounting and billing will be easier and more accurate since each month would consist of the same number of days.
    -People who are paid twice per month and those who are paid every other week would align.
    -Yearly reciepts would inflate by 8.3% without changing rates. Corporations and landlords will love this one.
    -Holidays that jump around various calendars will become fixed. This would make Thanksgiving predictable (Saturn, Ophiuchus 19th) and Easter more predictable.
    -Programmers will appreciate the simplicity of the Faithful Calendar when implementing software.
    -People may actually learn some Astronomy (not to be confused with Astrology).
    -There would be alignment and reconciliation of several calendars.
    -We could collectively forget how many days has September, April, June, and November.

    While we are at it, since we are measuring time with a calendar, we also need to consider other measurements of time. A Faithful clock would:

    -Note the time in 24 hours (No AM or PM).
    -Support circadian rhythm time adjustments in lieu of "daylight savings" time.
    -Local time will be derived from the International Dateline, not GMT.

  222. Weather in Centigrade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that Centigrade is better than Fahrenheit for weather:

    0 degrees: Wear a jacket.
    10 degrees: Wear a sweater.
    20 degrees: Wear shirtsleeves.
    30 degrees: Wear nothing.

  223. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blah blah blah orgies. Blah blah blah. :)

    Good point! You win. :-)

  224. A new calendar is no cure by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    The Gregorian Calendar is only one calendar in use. It is also joined by the lunar calendars and the Orthodox (Russian / Greek) calendars and the myriads of manufacturing calendars. A manufacturing calendar is calculated taking into account legal holidays.

    The Muslim, calendar, as I understand it, is lunar based, and has no leap year. Over time the months drift from season to season. It is a sensable way to manage dates. I could live with any Calendar that was not necessarily Lunar based. That means, eliminating the Gregorian Calendar too, as Easter, Monday is lunar based.

    .

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  225. Re:3L 2L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, NASA didn't screw the pooch, some programmer at Lockheed Martin did (and NASA then didn't catch it).

  226. So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you are really saying is that a civilization capable of removing 1.5% of their planet's mass to speed up it's velocity is incapable of dealing with a bunch of extra space rocks?

    1. Re:So in other words... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      What you are really saying is that a civilization capable of removing 1.5% of their planet's mass to speed up it's velocity is incapable of dealing with a bunch of extra space rocks?

      Through what magical feat of physics do you suggest they "deal" with the space rock? Momentum, momentum. Once again, conservation of momentum. Whether you collide with the debris or deflect it while it's far away, the momentum still transfers and the planet moves back into a higher orbit again.

  227. Re:3L 2L by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    No, that is the international mile. The US mile is 5280 feet and 1/8 of an inch. Because it was defined before the invention of accuracy. Each mile is thus 8 furlongs, each furlong being 40 poles (or ten chains), each pole being 16 feet 6 inches, each foot being 12 inches, each inch being 3 barleycorns (presumably not genetically modified). Simples!

  228. Re:3L 2L by Malvineous · · Score: 1

    Ha wow, well I blame trying to think in inches for that one ;-)

  229. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another culture you say? You got that right. Antichrist is what Antichrist does and altering calendars is one of them.

    23 “Thus he said: ‘As for the fourth beast,

          there shall be a fourth kingdom on earth,
          which shall be different from all the kingdoms,
    and it shall devour the whole earth,
          and trample it down, and break it to pieces.
    24 As for the ten horns,
    out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise,
          and another shall arise after them;
    he shall be different from the former ones,
          and shall put down three kings.
    25 He shall speak words against the Most High,
          and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, [you know, like Westboro Baptist Church, to the delight of the "enlightened and educated" everywhere.]
          and shall think to change the times and the law;
    and they shall be given into his hand
          for a time, times, and half a time.

    All the "enlightened and educated" people here have NO CHOICE but to worship this one.

    ==//==

  230. Re:3L 2L by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

    No you don't. Walk into a hardware store once. You use the imperial system. Seriously. Go and check.

    For pipes too, and cables (steel cables for construction). You're a bit less likely to see this in a hardware store, but a sufficiently large one should still have these kinds of things.

  231. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, I believe my GP means that equinoxes and solstices will not be on the same days in the new calendar!

  232. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    Ooops, you'll hit a problem when you get to 4 (00100).

    Only if you're one of those freaks that starts counting with their thumb. The problem comes at 2 for the rest of the civilized world.

    You don't hold your thumb up when you are miming to someone that you want one of something you use your index finger, so why do you start counting with your thumb? It makes no sense consistency wise.

  233. Irony by quenda · · Score: 1

    Hmm... See subject, see proposal, see Irony

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
    “any definition of irony... must include this, that the surface meaning and the underlying meaning of what is said are not the same."

    See also.

    1. Re:Irony by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      There are many definitions of irony, not all associated with humor. Yours assumes a base too narrow. From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony:

      Literature. a.) A technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated.

      Ironic literature exploits, in addition to the rhetorical figure, such devices as character development, situation, and plot to stress the paradoxical nature of reality or the contrast between an ideal and actual condition, set of circumstances, etc., frequently in such a way as to stress the absurdity present in the contradiction between substance and form. (enbolden mine)

      In this case, I suggested a "simple" solution in the Subject only to then detail altering the Earth's orbit around the Sun which is, of course, not simple. I also offered it as a simpler solution than the "simple" suggestion of the Summary to alter the calendar "using computer programs and mathematical formulas" - which would actually be much simpler, though neither would, in practice, be simple. There might have been a little sarcasm thrown in.

      So, ya, I know what irony means. Oh, and my wife was an English teacher...

      Then there's this alternate definition: "—adj: of, resembling, or containing iron" which, of course, the Earth does. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  234. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by dintech · · Score: 1

    It may be inconsistent but I'm prepared to go to war with your country over thumb-first counting. Burn inifidels!

  235. Who pays them ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of scientists are those guys ?? Amongst other things:
    - They process leap years by adding an "extra" mini month every (more or less) 6 years (Actually they give a fortran routine to determine which years contain this "Xtr" month. A fortran routine man!! Those guys are up-to-date :-D)...What a mess for everyone it was supposed to simplify life of !!
    - They wnat to implement a universal time, and do not even care of the fact date changes for some people when the sun is overhead (Who cares about someone living in Pacific ?).
    - They validate they stuff by invoking some not broken rules of the Bible (as convinced atheist this is the final argument...).

    A simple reading of their FAQ (http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/calendar.html) will show how stupid this proposal is. As a french guy, it is reassuring to see we are not the only country paying taxes for some stupid guys "thinking" about useless stupid stuff.

  236. And this would be useful... how, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To keep dates on the same weekdays, they'd like to abandon the idea of years of consistent length (and that are, as close as they can get, a genuine astronomical year long). And the benefit of that is...?

    Call me an old fogy, but given a choice, I'd rather have a year that's actually a year. I can see value in that.

    Plus, as I can actually walk and chew gum at the same time, I find no difficulty in coping with trivia such as Christmas falling on different days of the week.

  237. Read the fine print: Not a new calendar! by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 1

    In the PDF you'll see that the leap week they propose is based on the current Gregorian calendar

    "Note: the “Extra-Week Years” are every year in which the Gregorian calendar begins or ends on a Thursday:
              2015, 2020, 2026, 2032, 2037, 2043, 2048, 2054, 2060, 2065, 2071, 2076, 2082, 2088,
              2093, 2099, 2105, 2111, 2116, 2122, 2128, 2133, 2139, 2144, 2150, 2156, 2161, 2167 "

    I.e. in order to use this calendar you would still have to maintain the current calendar in parallel, so you gain the "benefit" of having to work with two different calendar systems. :-(

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  238. Computer programs and mathematical formulas for... by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    ...nothing really new:

    to name a few.

  239. right-wing fascists versus time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do you right-wing fascists have such a strong tendency to want to screw with how time is kept?

    go back to the romans - julius and augustus ceasar each screwed up the calendar by adding months for themselves; eventually making the seventh month (september) into the ninth month, so on down the line to the tenth month (december) becoming the twelfth.

    more recently was josef stalin doing pretty much exactly what you are proposing, and changing the structure of the weeks. he did it to keep the factories running around the clock, what is your profit motive?

    even more recently was the turkmenistan dictator saparmurat niyazov, who garnered attention for naming months and days after his family members. will your lord and savior change dates to be named after himself?

  240. Re: Binary is the way to go.... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    It may be inconsistent but I'm prepared to go to war with your country over thumb-first counting. Burn inifidels!

    I have just one thing to say: 2 you and the swine humping oxen you rode in on!

    Oh here, let me translate: 4 off heathen!

  241. Re:Everything would be on the same day every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He shall speak words against the Most High

    Oh noes, the Antichrist is going to speak against the vice chairman of the EU Commission! Our bureaucracy responsible for common foreign and security policy is under threat at the end of the world!

  242. Re:3L 2L by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    I've heard this before, the whole "when I convert without any other changes, it isn't a round number." But how do you represent a 5mm screw in Imperial? 0.196850394 inches? Well, that's proof (based on your statements) that inches are inferior.

  243. Are you high? by Niscenus · · Score: 1

    This doesn't work, someone does this already and have been doing it for over 5772 years. Most people with this mind set never consider this...the Moon doesn't actually have 28 days to its cycle. If you doubt that, look at a calendar that shows the moon phases. If the Moon had a 28 day cycle with four distinct phases, the new Moon would be on the same week day (28/4=7) every time. It's rare if it hits the same day consecutively.

    --
    "Yeah...it was the numbers that were irrational, not the murderous cult of vegetarians...." -- Hippasus of Metapontum
  244. Re:3L 2L by seantide · · Score: 1

    Where do you get that the US mile is 5280 plus 1/8 inch?

    I looked this up at the standard bureau and it just was 5280.

  245. Re:One of the last bastions of the imperial system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we have the Queen of Australia as our head of state. It just happens that that person is also the Queen of England.

    The positions (among others) were split up aways back, and in theory they could be held by separate people at some point (presuming that the republicists don't somehow manage to get their way beforehand).

  246. There's an easier way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just make New Years day a standalone day out side of any sinlge week or month (make it 2 days on leap years) Then you would have a 364 +1(or 2) day calendar year which would be exactly 52 weeks.

    So Sunday Dec 31, then new years day then Monday Jan 1

  247. But Sunday isn't the first day of the week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    13.) Why 2012 January 1? and 2017 January 1?

    Because in both the current Gregorian Calendar, and in the new HH calendar, that day is a Sunday (the start of a 7-day cycle, which we call a "week.")

    Where did this idea come from that a week starts on a Sunday? Not in my world, and not, I suspect, in a lot of other people's world. Sunday is part of the weekEND. I'm surprised they came up with this too, seeing as they're so keen to keep bible people happy.