Slashdot Mirror


Will Windows 8 Be Ready For Release In 2012?

MrSeb writes with an excerpt from an Extreme Tech article on the Windows 8 release timeline: "...A Microsoft vice president announced that the Windows 8 beta would begin in late February 2012. The beta will be feature-complete and will allow developers to begin listing their apps in the Store. The timing of the beta is curious, and ultimately quite telling. ... The first public build of Windows 8 ... emerged in mid-September 2011; by the time the beta rolls around, it will have been ruminating for more than five months. If we follow the timeline forward — it took 10 months for Windows 7 to go from beta to public release — then it's possible that Windows 8 might arrive just in time for Black Friday 2012, or perhaps not in 2012 at all. Will its late arrival affect its chances of cutting out a swath of the tablet market from Apple and Android? Or will Windows 8 be different enough that it will do well, no matter when it arrives?" In related news, an anonymous reader notes that IDC predicts Windows 8 will be irrelevant to the traditional PC market.

504 comments

  1. Cyber Monday at IDC! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news, an anonymous reader notes that IDC predicts Windows 8 will be irrelevant to the traditional PC market.

    Yeah but have you seen how cheap the report is from IDC? It's a mere $3,500.00 which is a steal considering I just shelled out twelve and a half large for their forecast on computing devices. My god, the forecast I bought was a piddly 27 page PDF while this Windows 8 report is a weighty tome totaling 17 pages in girth and might even result in a printed copy that that I can set on my desk and hold down with a real human skull paperweight completely encrusted with diamonds. At this price, I am buying one copy for every member of my extended family -- these things will make great stocking stuffers next to moon rocks, 1913 Liberty Nickels and the keys to each person's personalized yacht. Of course he tweeted the meat and potatoes of this report -- they're practically GIVING it away on their site already! Be sure to stock up on these before they sell out!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      You seem kinda riled up about this. Like you actually did buy an IDC report once ...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news.

      A new release of Windows is going to be released later than originally planned.

      This is really turning out to be a slow news day, isn't it?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, we haven't seen any reports about a new Firefox version yet, so it can't be that slow...

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a new Firefox version? Why didn't someone tell me?

    5. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Aryden · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Retarded"

    6. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Funny

      We were waiting on Duke Nukem Fo...

      er, oops. Sorry about that.

    7. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Funny

      What and idiot.

    8. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      For all intense purposes your saying the same thing.

    9. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's December 20th. Sorry, but a 6-week cycle is not that terrible for a browser. And frankly, the nightlies of Firefox 11 install any addons, you just have to click in one box if it is probably not compatible.

    10. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Funny

      A total looser!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    11. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Rary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, it's even better than that. A new release of Windows might be released later than originally planned, according to random speculation from someone completely unrelated to the Windows development team or even Microsoft.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    12. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      For all intensive purposes your saying the same thing.

      Moron.

    13. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /sarcasm Uh, hate to break it to you, but Amazon if fucking you for over for $8000

      Exact same PDF
      $4,500
      http://www.giiresearch.com/report/id216661-worldwide-client-device-leasing-financing-2011.html /end-sarcasm Only an idiot^H^H^H^H^H sucker would spend more then $100 for this info.

    14. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

      Uh... it's all "intents" and purposes.

    15. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I hope you bought the extended service plan for your sarcasm detector

    16. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope you bought the extended service plan for your sarcasm detector

    17. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll try that once it's finished starting up!

    18. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      Uh... it's all "intents" and purposes.

      C-C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    19. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      For all intense purposes your saying the same thing.

      Same difference.

    20. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      There were three versions released in the time it took you to post your comment. Oops there goes another one.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    21. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear this almost every day at work... the same guy that tells us for all intensive purposes also told us about killing two stones, burying his grave, and escape goats.

    22. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Funny

      I used to work with someone who'd say "six of one, a dozen of the other."

    23. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that "whoosh" sound is really loud.

    24. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by jefe7777 · · Score: 2

      lmao. "escape goats"

      "HEEEYA!!!! Faster varmint!!!!"

    25. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Compulawyer · · Score: 2

      For all intensive purposes your saying the same thing.

      Moron.

      Don't you mean "you're" instead of "your" ?

      Maroon.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    26. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      unfortunately we only have herd left to make jokes about and that may not be for much longer they have released public betas and Debian and Gentoo are working on ports of it, what will we mock then?

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    27. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      Ahem, dunno how to say this without coming over all nit picky so forgive me, I'm not usually like this but need some "interesting" mod points :-)
      The phase "scapegoat" has mutated from the term "escape goat" in biblical times and referred to one of two goats sent for sacrifice which was allowed to get away: http://www.keyway.ca/htm2004/20040924.htm

    28. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by schroedingers_hat · · Score: 1

      Episode 3. Because episodic content will allow us to have shorter games more often.

    29. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As opposed to what? An Apple product given hype long before it is even publicly described but shipping "on time"/aka about a month after whenever they get around to publically announce it? MS is hugely more open early on in the process but it means that they have little idea when things will ship because they are still getting/accepting feature requests, no where near zero bug bounce etc (some would say they never get there :-)) for a long time after people start hyping their new product. Apple just doesn't tell you anything until they are ready (or it leaks). Google just throws crap up and if people like it they keep it (after years of "Beta" I'm looking at you GMail), if they don't they get rid of it.

      My guess: Win will own the corporate tablet market 80+%. Maybe ~25% of tablet/netbook type devices people buy for home use since people will feel "more comfortable" buying something they know will work with the programs they are used to. Funny thing for home use for a lot of people: even though it is their personal computer they still in my experience, base a part of the decision on "will it do the stuff I do at work?" which for most people means windows. They might dual boot but few people go completely Windowsless.

    30. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      My wife's coworker insisted on saying "nip it in the butt".

    31. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In other news, a broken clock is right twice a day.

    32. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 5, Funny

      For all intensive purposes your saying the same thing.

      Moron.

      Don't you mean "you're" instead of "your" ?

      Maroon.

      Irregardless we know what he mean's

    33. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we haven't seen any reports about a new Firefox version yet, so it can't be that slow...

      Try restarting Firefox. That works for me every time.

    34. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      Too late, there's already a newer version available.

    35. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

      Irregardless we know what he mean's

      Cromulently put.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    36. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Maybe "your" the moron...

    37. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      That may have been me. I say that periodically. The point being, the two things are not the same at all, but those who don't bother to pay attention will just make up whatever values they want. Someone in your conversation was confused, but since I wasn't there, I can't tell who.

    38. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by stewbacca · · Score: 2

      The phase "scapegoat" has mutated from the term "escape goat" in biblical times and referred to one of two goats sent for sacrifice which was allowed to get away: http://www.keyway.ca/htm2004/20040924.htm

      supposively

    39. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      For all intense purposes your saying the same thing.

      Same difference.

      I could care less.

    40. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Dishevel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately I am no longer waiting for Duke Nukem Forever.
      Unfortunately I own it.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    41. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I still work with a guy who refuses to stop saying " I have an ideal."

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    42. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Half of one, six dozen of the other.

    43. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      For all intents and purposes you're saying the same thing.

      Genius.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    44. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      I could care less.

      This is the one that really bugs me. Professional broadcasters say it on the air for christ's sake.

      Navigate the Caring Continuum...

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    45. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

      In a few years you'll be saying the same thing about W8.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    46. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Canazza · · Score: 1

      it's the sound of the fleeing escape goat

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    47. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by ocdscouter · · Score: 2

      You seem kinda riled up about this. Like you actually did buy an IDC report once ...

      I *DID* buy an IDC report once, you insensitive clod!

    48. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by pheonix7117 · · Score: 1

      For all intents and purposes you're saying the same thing.

      There, fixed that for you.

    49. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares. I'm still telling people not use Windows7.

    50. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "for all intents and purposes"

      It seems some of us can't catch all errors of grammar and usage as they occur.

    51. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moran.

      Moran.

    52. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was my take. "W7 took X units-of-time, and W8 may take X+Y!"

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    53. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      For all intestinal purposes, this comment makes me [sic].

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    54. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      How do we know it wasn't the one who had to take the punishment for the other?

    55. Re:Cyber Monday at IDC! by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Grate. How about you fix all the other intentional grammer mistakes to?

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  2. Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    Still dont understand why they put the windows concept in a separate app, and converted most of the OS to a single app on screen format

    1. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a data-centric UI v. a function-centric UI. The premise is to put what the user needs most right in front of him quickly. Mail, meetings, weather, contacts, etc. can be readily accessible with minimal effort.

      The idea is that most people might not even end up needing to use the desktop.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Windows 8 by adonoman · · Score: 1

      They didn't - it's just a full-screen start menu that happens to be able to run apps.

    3. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 2

      But, are the users who prefer to have say, a PDF or browser window taking up one half of the desktop and say VS taking up the other half, reading reference material and trying it out practically
      Or VLC(or any other video player) and a web browser open side by side,etc
      or even a web browser and a chat client
      a real minority?

    4. Re:Windows 8 by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      How is displaying something on the screen not using the desktop?

      This whole Windows 8 thing is giving me a bad feeling. I think it's gonna flop hard. Windows 7 is great, other than the fatal flaw of /Windows/WinSXS, but Windows 8 seems like a a major step backwards. I want a mobile interface on my phone, not on my desktop.

      Maybe they should call it Windows Me Too! Both because it's a lame copy of an iPad, and it will be the sequel to WinME.

    5. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They can certainly do all of that in Windows 8.

      Are you under the impression that they can't?

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    6. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      You aren't getting it.

      Windows 8 is a super-set of Windows 7, with some really amazing advances on the desktop side (from a vastly improved Task Manager to impoved large disk management, to faster boot times, faster/better file copies, etc).

      Metro apps are a bonus. Everything that ran on Win7 will run on Win8.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    8. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Thats a new and interesting perspective
      Unfortunately metro apps dont really agree

    9. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That was what my (admittedly short) experience with Win 8 seemed to saw
      Unless I moved apps to the desktop app, I was unable to have more than 1 onscreen at a time. Had to swap the whole app in and out of view
      Perhaps I'll try it out again

    10. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      s/saw/say

    11. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail, meetings, weather, contacts, etc. can be readily accessible with minimal effort.

      Yay. More distraction from actual work. The last thing in the world my employees will be allowed to use is a version of windows that shoves non-task-at-hand data in their face everytime they need to use the start menu to open a calculator or notepad. We'll be sticking with Windows 7 thank you very much.

      The moderators are most definitely basement dwellers today.

    12. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like SpryGuy said, you aren't getting it.

      In Windows, the desktop is actually an app in and of itself. When explorer.exe is first run, it loads the desktop (all icons that go on it) and the taskbar. If you never run Explorer, you'll never get the desktop. It's the same thing here; a person doesn't actually have to run Explorer, and if they don't, then the desktop will never load. The first UI the user will see will be the Metro UI, not Explorer.

      Now, the second a person runs a traditional windowed application, the desktop will load as well for UI consistency, and all applications (graphically) will be contained within that layer. However, not every windowed application has to be paired with the desktop. If you run the task manager, for instance, it will float above everything else even if you switch back to the Metro UI or use a Metro application.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    13. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please explain how you can make file copies better.

    14. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that doesn't matter. What matters is when Windows 9 comes out, with no support for Windows 7 apps, instead requiring us to use tablet-style Metro apps, and Windows 8 is discontinued, we'll all be boned and locked into using a shitty giant-buttons designed-for-fingers OS with a locked down app store and Windows as we know it will be dead.

    15. Re:Windows 8 by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      "Metro apps are a bonus."

      A bonus? O RLY?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    16. Re:Windows 8 by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Please explain how you can make file copies better.

      I seem to remember reading that Windows 8 removed that stupid 'preparing to copy' thing which wastes a ton of time completely failing to work out how much time the copy is going to take so it can put up the progress bar for you?

      Either way, it could hardly be worse than file copies in Vista, where copying a 2MB file could take five minutes.

    17. Re:Windows 8 by jackbird · · Score: 2

      Ever copied a bunch of files at once on Windows?

    18. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Windows 8 has essentially integrated Teracopy into the OS

    19. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol that sounds horrible.

    20. Re:Windows 8 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the metro interface you can have windows side by side: http://youtu.be/p92QfWOw88I?t=2m04s

      Now, this apparently only works for higher resolution monitors (although a simple registry hack removes this restriction), so maybe that was why you couldn't do it.

      However, this is beside the point that any user can go on the desktop and run any number of apps side by side (PDF, browser, VS, VLC, or otherwise).

    21. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are regular Windows desktop apps (just like now, including every Windows app out tehre).

      And there are new "Metro" apps, which are targeted at touch-tablet devices... but can run on desktop systems.

      Metro apps can run one or two on a screen at once. They're full screen (like iPad apps), but you can "dock" two of them side-by-side as well. They're designed for tablets though. You CAN run them on a desktop, and I'm sure there will ultimately be many "Metro" apps people will want to run on Desktops... ... but most desktop people will stay in desktop. I knwo they've called it an "App", but that's just a silly way to think of it. You sit at the desktop just like you do now in Win7. Instead of the small Start Menu, you have a big Start Screen. Hit escape and you're back on the desktop just like with the Start Menu. You still have the task bar for windows apps, and you can flip full-screen metro apps in if you like and cycle through them (or switch to them with Task Manager).

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    22. Re:Windows 8 by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That only applies to Metro apps. All apps that aren't written for Metro open under the Desktop. Some apps work in both modes, like IE.

    23. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So many words that can be summed up as "complete unadulterated clusterfuck".

      Pass the popcorn.

    24. Re:Windows 8 by ProppaT · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Windows 9 is going to be everything and nothing at once. They're stripping the kernel to its core and use it as the basis for all their products. Desktop OS, mobile OS, Xbox, set top boxes, etc. It's going to be a great thing for MS because they'll be able to focus on improving a unified core. Basically, they're trying to do with Windows what everyone has been doing with Linux for years, make it something that's easily scalable and customizable across a family of products.

      It's going to save MS a ton of money and allow them to focus on keeping their products secure and fast instead of constantly having to patch crappy modules of code that have been carried over for a decade. Microsoft is a lot smarter than people give them credit for, they're just such a huge entity that it takes a while for their plans to build inertia.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    25. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      That's what you guys said about Office 2007, and that actually turned out well in hindsight.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    26. Re:Windows 8 by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I had to look up Teracopy.

      From their site: TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed...

      If your statement is true about Windows integrating that program, I find it sad that a company with the resources of Microsoft is incapable of producing a basic utility like that on their own and must buy it from another company.

    27. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      That's what you guys said about Office 2007, and that actually turned out well in hindsight.

      You lost me somewhere. What does the usability of Office have to do with Windows 8? I.e., if Office 2007 is great does that mean Windows 8 will be great? If Office 2007 sucks, does that mean Windows 8 will suck? I'm not seeing the correlation.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    28. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This time around you guys actually have superior competition though.
      /popcorn passed

    29. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Everything you wanted to know about Windows 8 file copy enhancements:

      Improving our file management basics: copy, move, rename, and delete: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/08/23/improving-our-file-management-basics-copy-move-rename-and-delete.aspx

      Designing the Windows 8 file name collision experience: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/08/26/designing-the-windows-8-file-name-collision-experience.aspx

      Building robust USB 3.0 support: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/08/22/building-robust-usb-3-0-support.aspx

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    30. Re:Windows 8 by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 is a super-set of Windows 7...

      No it isn't. For one thing, Windows 7 had a nicely usable UI. Windows 8 doesn't have that.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    31. Re:Windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I don't think it has any purpose to the main reason I use Windows. Steam. I may as well have the Steam My Library list set as my desktop. I don't have e-mail setup (I'd get it from the gmail web app anyway...), there's no Outlook or Office installed to track meetings. For my Contacts, I have to revert back to the Steam Friends list. Otherwise, I use my android phone for all the non-gamers I talk to on a regular basis.

      So Windows 8 offers me... weather? Wait, I have that on my phone too. I'm not seeing the point to Metro.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    32. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      Say's who? The Win8 UI isn't complete yet.

      But it basically has the same UI as Win7 with the exception of the start menu becoming the start screen. And the Start Screen is perfectly usable in the Metro world. Most of the concern is about the jarring switch between start-screen and desktop, along with mouse/keyboard usability.

      However, for most scenarios, the new system already works as well as the old, and in those areas it doesn't, I'm sure work is being done to address those issues. I'll reserve judgement on that until the beta is released (I know there's already been some updates due to developer feedback already, but other aspects have more to do with retraining muscle-memory than being "bad").

      Never mind that over time (or especially on tablets), most apps will be available in Metro versions and you won't have to "switch back and forth" between two expereinces. And "Desktop only" users will likely have a way to work where the start-screen doesn't interrupt them and they don't have to look at Metro screens if they dont' want to.

      So I reject your claim that Windows 8 doesn't have a nicely usable UI. It seems false just on the face of it.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    33. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 4, Informative

      I meant "The features of teracopy"
      The program has existed since Vista atleast (maybe earlier)
      features such as queuing copies, not running 2 simultaneous operations from the same disk if one is maxing out the read speed, an adjustable buffer, failing from a copy gracefully, pause and resume function, identifying if the source and destination are the same or different device,etc
      were never in Windows

    34. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, kind of like how ACDsee manages name conflicts while copying picture files. Thanks.

    35. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You get lost easily.

      He's simply showing that these same things were said about Office 2007, and turned out not to be true, so all these same hysterical rantings of doom and gloom are likely to not be true about Windows 8 as well (using history as a guide).

      Was that really that difficult to follow??

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    36. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 2

      The same approach was taken to redoing the UI in Office that was taken here with Windows 8, with the exception that a backwards compatibility layer had to be retained on x86. Regardless, some major usability research went into ensuring that users wouldn't be put off by the change and that users could actually be more productive with it.

      Microsoft has some of the best user experience research teams in the country. Given the approach with Metro UI (consolidated functions, rather than individual functions that produce their own data), I'm expecting it to help people be more productive in the long run, even if there's some initial apprehension in the short term. The same thing happened with Office 2007 when this exact methodology was followed (consolidating functions, researching user apprehension as well as usability).

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    37. Re:Windows 8 by mbkennel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Windows 9 is going to be everything and nothing at once. They're stripping the kernel to its core and use it as the basis for all their products. Desktop OS, mobile OS, Xbox, set top boxes, etc. It's going to be a great thing for MS because they'll be able to focus on improving a unified core. Basically, they're trying to do with Windows what everyone has been doing with Linux for years, make it something that's easily scalable and customizable across a family of products.

      It's going to save MS a ton of money and allow them to focus on keeping their products secure and fast instead of constantly having to patch crappy modules of code that have been carried over for a decade"

      How is that going to work? They'll be supporting the New, Really new We Mean It This Time This Is The Shiznit API and all the old ones starting from WFC, J++, silverlight, some of the .net, etc etc rot but still need to be patched.

      How much of the support problems are from the kernel and how much from the huge layers of stuff on top?

    38. Re:Windows 8 by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      But it basically has the same UI as Win7 with the exception of the start menu becoming the start screen.

      Right. And the start screen is an unusable piece of shit on anything that isn't a touch screen device. Which is why the idiot at Microsoft who decided to force Win8 users to put up with it should be sent to a class where they have the concept of "different UIs work better for different input devices" drilled into them until they can't ever forget it again.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    39. Re:Windows 8 by Tom · · Score: 1

      No, it's design-by-management. I have a 30" screen. Try to explain to me why I should follow a tablet paradigm. I can tell you already that my answer to 60% of your attempts will be "but I already have an iPad for that".

      I want to be able to have traditional windows. I have background tasks running that I can easily monitor this way. I have browser window and coding environment side-by-side. I can drag a commandline into view, or have my TODO list or calendar visible in the corner.

      No way their new GUI can be even halfway configurable enough to let me do the same things.

      True, I barely use the desktop the way most windows users do. I don't need it to hold all the application launcher icons I don't want to dig out of the 7th submenu of "Start" all the time, because I have a dock and Quicksilver to do that for me. I don't need it as a temporary document storage, either.

      But I need my deskspace, even if I don't need the desktop-as-a-folder nonsense.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    40. Re:Windows 8 by tbannist · · Score: 1

      I think I've heard that before, isn't that what they told me about Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7 and Windows 8?

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    41. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't meant they bought Teracopy. He was using an analogy.

    42. Re:Windows 8 by tbannist · · Score: 1

      It did?

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    43. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You get lost easily.

      An ad hominem. *yawn*

      He's simply showing that these same things were said about Office 2007, and turned out not to be true, so all these same hysterical rantings of doom and gloom are likely to not be true about Windows 8 as well (using history as a guide).

      In no way does the former imply the latter. That you think it does speaks volumes. Furthermore, many people dislike Office 2007/2010 still so you are being very presumptuous in your argument. Here.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    44. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Windows 8 offers you roaming profiles, single-signon, profiles on a USB-key, dramatically faster boot times and resume times, lower power useage, higher security, better modern device support (USB 3.x, very large drives)...

      Metro as a UI offers tablet users a better touch-friendly experience, as well as a "unified' UI look and feel across Microsoft Phones, Tablets, Desktops, and XBox.

      Anything you can do in Win7, you will continue to be able to do in Win8.

      Win8 will also enable usable Tablet form-factors.

      The Metro apps shipped with the current Win8 developer preview are just little "demo" apps, written by MS Interns over a weekend. They do not show the full range of capabilities of Metro apps. Over time, you can imagine all of MS Office, and a ton of games, will be offered as metro style apps. So you'll have more than just "weather" and "stock" apps, if that's what you're concerned about. And Metro apps are sandboxed in a way that makes them very secure.

      Windows 8 is offering a lot, but I think most people are getting completely distracted by the Start Screen, an unfinished UI, and a hand-full of simple "demo" apps... it'll be more obvious I think once the beta is released. Then we'll have a better handle on the strengths and weaknesses.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    45. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Okay, you're just not very good at following obvious Enlgish sentences then. Because You keep saying things that make no sense.

      First, the other poster made a perfectly clear statement of comparison, which you then bizarrely twisted in weird ways that made no sense... and then claimed to be lost.

      Then you make a statement that I somehow think what that poster said is true and that that "speaks volumes", when all I did was point out to you the very obvious thing that person was saying (making no judgements otherwise) and questioning how you could misunderstand something so simple and clear.

      It's clear you have an agenda to push, and you're twisting everything around to serve that agenda, and aren't really interested in actual communication.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    46. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are quite small improvements. Not enough to warrant a new version. Maybe microsoft is following firefox's version numbering for windows?

    47. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 0

      You're being trolled hardcore.

      Quit replying to him and he'll get bored. Trust me on this. All toddlers act this way.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    48. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Untrue. it's perfectly usable. Right now they're missing some mouse gestures (to be added), but there's a ton of keyboard support, and MOST things you could do with the start menu you can do with the start screen (plus many other things in addition).

      The expereince is "visually jarring" right now, true. But that doesnt' mean "unusable". It means it takes some getting used to.

      There are a few tasks that take more steps than "the old way" and I'm sure those will be refined. But the claim that it's Unusable" is just rubbish, and clearly untrue.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    49. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      He wasn't drawing conclusions about the quality of UX of Windows 8 from that of Office 2007. He was drawing conclusions about the reactions of a major paradigm shift in UI (from Win7 to Win8, like that of Office 2003 to Office 2007).

      My English is fine. Yours clearly needs work on the whole reading-comprehension part.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    50. Re:Windows 8 by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 is a super-set of Windows 7, with some really amazing advances on the desktop side (from a vastly improved Task Manager to impoved large disk management, to faster boot times, faster/better file copies, etc).

      Meh. To me those seem only like tweaks which could be as well included in a Service Pack. Some bigger and interesting suggestions:

      • an actually scalable GUI (you know how making fonts larger breaks things currently)
      • a package manager (no more "installshield wizard" stuff) and update facility for third party apps
      • ability to move windows installation to another computer without the driver setup going crazy
      • getting finally rid of the swap system
    51. Re:Windows 8 by scottbomb · · Score: 1

      " Instead of the small Start Menu, you have a big Start Screen"

      THAT is the most annoying part and if it stays, I'll never use Win 8. When I click my start menu (and I guess, according to MS, I'm one of those rare "old fuddy duddies" who still uses it) I do NOT want it taking over the entire damned screen. When I went from Win 95 to XP, I completely re-configured the start menu to work like it did in 95. I couldn't do this with Win 7, but it's start menu was easier to work with than the default in XP so I got used to it. But at least It still doesn't take over the whole flippin' screen.

      This is why I'm dual-booting Xubuntu now. When the day finally comes that Win 7 is put out to pasture (not likely for at least a decade) I'll have an alternative that I already know how to use.

    52. Re:Windows 8 by wanzeo · · Score: 1

      I actually like the traditional windows interface. I think it makes sense to have one small button for a large pop-up start menu, and I like having the task manager at the bottom of the screen which is the furthest away from my natural line of sight. I use KDE for the same reason, the UI decisions seem to be backed by more than just a need to look newer than the last version.

    53. Re:Windows 8 by Truekaiser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      so.. in other words. everything a *nix based os has had for years. why do i get the feeling microsoft is like a horse in a race wearing a dunce cap?

    54. Re:Windows 8 by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I tried it, and found it unusable. So have many others. With all due respect, I think we know what the hell we're talking about. If your new UI doesn't work well for most people who try it out, you are doing it horribly wrong.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    55. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, some major usability research went into ensuring that users wouldn't be put off by the change and that users could actually be more productive with it.

      Microsoft has some of the best user experience research teams in the country. Given the approach with Metro UI (consolidated functions, rather than individual functions that produce their own data), I'm expecting it to help people be more productive in the long run, even if there's some initial apprehension in the short term. The same thing happened with Office 2007 when this exact methodology was followed (consolidating functions, researching user apprehension as well as usability).

      How much of this "research" has been published, peer reviewed, is consistently repeatable and has been independently verified by more published peer reviewed empirical data? Any of this "research" that hasn't is essentially hand-waving.

    56. Re:Windows 8 by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you configured it to work like it did in 95, then you should have no problems with it taking over your screen

    57. Re:Windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 offers you roaming profiles, single-signon, profiles on a USB-key, dramatically faster boot times and resume times, lower power useage, higher security, better modern device support (USB 3.x, very large drives)...

      Roaming profiles have been a part of NT for as long as I can remember... I never use them then (but I have played) and I will continue to not use them for my PC Game Console.
      Single Sign-on ... available in XP. I could log in to all the apps that supported it when I had my XP build, including Sharepoint. But I guarantee I won't link my Steam to my Windows User ID, and without Office/Outlook... what's the point?
      Profiles on USB Key ... not sure about the point of this. I wouldn't install Steam to my profile keyring, and loading up my game on another PC will just fuck up my settings.
      "Faster" stuff (lumped together...): Sure... we'll see.
      "Security": Pretty vague, but you mention sandboxes. The only thing that matters. We'll see how that works out.
      My current Windows install support USB 3... I used it for backup a few times.

      So, new from that list: App sandboxing, which I've yet to see work, and can only imagine how my old apps will handle that.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    58. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >> The idea is that most people might not even end up needing to use the desktop.

      It's also a great employee evaluation tool. Give people Windows 8. If they never need to use the desktop and spend all their time in the metro interface, you know they're useless and can be safely fired. :)

    59. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      He was relating all the "crying wolf" over the change (and the non-issue it was on release) to your "crying wolf" over the start screen. The point he's making is that you were wrong then, so there's certainly no guarentee you're right now.

      You really should go back to class.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    60. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      Those are just improvements in one area. And they're not trivial.

      There are improvements like this all over the product.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    61. Re:Windows 8 by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      In Windows, the desktop is actually an app in and of itself. When explorer.exe is first run, it loads the desktop (all icons that go on it) and the taskbar. If you never run Explorer, you'll never get the desktop. It's the same thing here; a person doesn't actually have to run Explorer, and if they don't, then the desktop will never load. The first UI the user will see will be the Metro UI, not Explorer.

      Sounds sort of Windows 3ish.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    62. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I'm glad you're so open minded about it.

      I'll agree that it's jarring right now. But if you actually take the time to get used to it, it's not that bad. But there are still some significant issues I have with it, that I hope get addressed in the Beta (or before GA at any rate).

      I think it says a lot that you wasted the time to configure your XP start menu to look like 95's. That's just... I dunno. Weird.

      I used to spend a lot of time micro-managing the start menu in XP. It was a pain, but I could get it the way I wanted. In Win7 I was initially put of that you couldn't do this any more... but after using it, I realized I didn't need to any more.

      The Start Screen is much like that. It's different. I have some muscle-memory that is having difficulty adjusting to a few things. I've had to "re-think" a few of the ways I used to do things, but with a few exeptions, most things are better now.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    63. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't worked with Microsoft products have you?

    64. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 2

      2010 does suck though
      The file menu takes up the entire screen for one

    65. Re:Windows 8 by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 will be widely accepted by all the sheeples of the world, because they won't have much choice when it's released. They'll buy a new pc, and they'll get used to it. Much like people did with Office 2007 and the damn ribbon. Die, Ribbon, Die.

      Sorry, I've entered homicidal rage from trying to figure out how to write some vbscript for excel 2010, because my boss doesn't think our PHP/MySql Website is good enough yet.

    66. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everything that ran on Windows 95 will run on Win8". Fixed that for you

      Gotta admit that MS has done a pretty good job at keeping old programs running and bending over backwards for the user

    67. Re:Windows 8 by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Either way, it could hardly be worse than file copies in Vista, where copying a 2MB file could take five minutes.

      You think that's bad, you try copying a 17 megabyte file on my freelance gig Mac...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    68. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      Well, there's also the whole "Roaming profiles" thing throug the cloud, the "Windows Live ID" sign-on that enables it, the ability to keep your profile on a USB Key... allowing your Windows experience to be independent of the actual physical hardware you log into... That's big.

      The inclusion of Hyper-V is also interesting, as is Native support for ISOs and VHDs. The ability to reset/reinstall windows with a click, without losing your data... "refresh". Improved shadow-copy and backup/restore.

      There's lots of stuff in there that, taken together, makes for a good Windows 8 improvement, irrespective of the additional tablet and Metro functionality.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    69. Re:Windows 8 by bell.colin · · Score: 1

      "...Microsoft is incapable of producing a basic utility like that on their own and must buy it from another company."

      Where do you think all of Microsoft's products came from in the first place?

      DOS: MS Bought it
      Original Windows interface: MS Bought out the company that made the DOS shell for it.
      SQL: MS paid Sybase for it.
      MS TCP/IP: MS got it from BSD

      MS Hasn't really created anything, they have acquired it from somewhere else.

    70. Re:Windows 8 by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Those are quite small improvements. Not enough to warrant a new version. Maybe microsoft is following firefox's version numbering for windows?

      They could number the next version of Windows with a 98 - that would put them in front of Firefox AND Google and Apple combined!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    71. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the roaming profiles and single sign-on features.

      Log in with your windows live ID, and you pull your stuff from the cloud. So you can log on to your parent's machine and have all YOUR stuff there. Or bring it with you on a USB Key. Basically it de-couples your experience from the specific hardware. And some level of this stuff was available previously, but it usually required a Domain Controller and IT Department to set up. This is for consumers, made easy and made central ... not just something you can sorta kinda do if you're motivated enough.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    72. Re:Windows 8 by tepples · · Score: 1

      There was initial confusion about whether Windows 8 for ARM would include the Desktop at all.

    73. Re:Windows 8 by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      And this is why Microsoft is the winner in the Enterprise space. Enterprise customers like consistency.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    74. Re:Windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      And if we don't have a Live ID (and never intend on getting one?)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    75. Re:Windows 8 by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Everything that ran on Win7 will run on Win8 on x86 computers. Win8 will run on ARM chips, but only Metro app will work there.

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    76. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 0

      His statement is implying

      I wasn't implying that, actually. I was merely stating the trend while later backing it up with the fact that the methodology used for the two platforms is the same. Therefore, since the methodology was successful with one platform, it can be assumed with a reasonable degree of reliability that it will be successful with another similar platform.

      This is, after all, how a process is applied. If it works in one place, it is likely to work in other similar circumstances. Therefore, it isn't actually absurd.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    77. Re:Windows 8 by scot4875 · · Score: 0

      It was an analogy of the initial reactions to the UIs, not the UIs themselves. Not difficult stuff.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    78. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      Don't knock it 'til you've tried it. I've turned a tablet running Windows 8 (the developer preview) into a production unit at home. In terms of usability, so far it flows quite nicely.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    79. Re:Windows 8 by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      "Collision experience" is yet another term that does not need to exist.

      I'll be really impressed if the OS will do nothing if the new file overwriting the old one is binary equal.

    80. Re:Windows 8 by PaladinAlpha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sandboxed HTML5+Javascript sounds blazing fast.

    81. Re:Windows 8 by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      If people still have to explain this stuff on a daily basis, I think Microsoft isn't doing something right with their promotion campaign.

    82. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 0

      It was an analogy of the initial reactions to the UIs, not the UIs themselves. Not difficult stuff.

      And the point was that it added absolutely nothing to the debate. Basically he's saying that $ARBITRARY_PROGRAM survived a ux paradigm shift therefore $IMPLICATION applies to windows 8. That's equivalent to saying if I toss 10 heads in a row a tails is more likely the next time around. That fails the most fundamental tests of critical thinking. My respect for the slashdot groupthink has taken a nosedive today. I'm sorry but you guys are a bunch of idiots.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    83. Re:Windows 8 by lgw · · Score: 1

      But it basically has the same UI as Win7 with the exception of the start menu becoming the start screen

      So my fine wine is bacially the same with the exception of the raw sewage added? I don't want a phone UI for my dual 24-inch monitors and mouse. Not even the tinyest hint of it. Telling me it's OK is like telling a VI use that EMACS is OK - the only proper reponse is a hidden goatse link.

      If I can diable everything "Metro", then fine, whatever. Otherwise, if Vista was the Zune of OSs, this will be the Kin of OSs.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    84. Re:Windows 8 by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Isn't the proper nomencalture "ME2"? All it needs is Bob and Clippy "integrated" so you cat remove them to make it the ideal OS.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    85. Re:Windows 8 by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The idea is that most people might not even end up needing to use the desktop.

      Apple figured this out a long time ago but all you naysayers on here just called it "an oversized iPhone that doesn't make phone calls".

    86. Re:Windows 8 by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I hope Windows 8 is at least interesting. Win 7 is good because it works like Win XP should have worked 10 years ago, instead of having to wait years for usable service packs, and still be stuck with the goofy Fisher-Price interface. Win 7 fixed all that, but now just feels long in the tooth. Maybe MS can actually innovate for once (at the UI level, that is) and not just make something different to be different.

    87. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We'll have to agree to disagree then. I'm sorry to say it, but those improvements you posted fit better in a service pack than a whole new version. They are quite minor. Preemptive multitasking vs cooperative multitasking (3.x -> 95) was a leap. Proper multiuser support (9.x -> XP) was a leap for consumers. This stuff you point out here, not really...

    88. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahahahahahaha...dude, please for the love of God put the kool-aid down. Don't forget to wipe some of that dribble off your chin. It kind of looks like bullshit.

    89. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      It's an optional feature.

      And since a live id is just an email address... not sure why you wouldn't want one. But hey, if you choose not to have one, no problem. You'll just give up the feature that allows you to store your profile in the cloud and log in with the same ID on multiple PCs.... and you're no worse off than you are now.

      But seriously, it's not like it's difficult to sign up for one. Or costly. Or... anything. But if you want Microsofts consumer "Cloud" services, just sign up. Takes a few seconds.

      If you don't want Amazon.com's cloud services, don't sign up for those either. Or Apple's. Or Google's.

      I'm not sure what your issue is.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    90. Re:Windows 8 by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Please explain how you can make file copies better.

      For one, start by telling the user that there's not enough space on the target volume BEFORE starting the copy. Let users copy a file from one location to another while it is in use. Give realistic feedback about how much time is remaining. That's just three off the top of my head.

    91. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      If that were ALL there were, you MIGHT have a point (but only barely). Taken in aggregate with all the changes and additions though, I don't see how you can possibly support your notion that Windows 8 is nothing more than a "service pack". Kernel enhnacements, boot enhancements, file system enhancements, UI enhancements, plus the whole Metro/WinRT/Touch stuff, roaming profiles, cloud storage and access integration, and on and on... certainly sounds like a major version update to me.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    92. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      You love just beating to death how you completely misinterpreted the original statement, don't you? You want to make sure everyone is absolutely aware of just how much you're not getting it, don't you?

      Please stop.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    93. Re:Windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Can I use my Google email to log in? Does Microsoft leave that open enough that Amazon or Google could allow that?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    94. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 0

      The original statement was wrong and no matter how much you and that other moron gcnaddict want to pretend otherwise, it is wrong. It's so wrong that in the immortal words of Richard Feynman it's "not even wrong" because in order to be wrong you would have to at least have a clue what you are talking about. I get it you like Windows and you will say anything it takes to show how much a fanboy you are even resorting to overt intellectual dishonesty. Fine. So be it. I get it. I also get that this is small shit. Maybe you just lie to yourself about windows and nothing else. If so good for you. Not great but at least good. However, if you have this much trouble with basic discernment in other areas of your life that you do in something like this then you have bigger problems than trying to convince me that basic precepts of logic and common sense don't apply.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    95. Re:Windows 8 by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Thank You.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    96. Re:Windows 8 by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Unless I moved apps to the desktop app, I was unable to have more than 1 onscreen at a time.

      *Slams head repeatedly into desk* You realize that was intentional. Right? You think there's some developer up there giggling and saying "Silly me, look I made an oopsie?"

    97. Re:Windows 8 by ianare · · Score: 1

      When the day finally comes that Win 7 is put out to pasture (not likely for at least a decade) I'll have an alternative that I already know how to use.

      ... or until XFCE goes the way of Gnome and KDE.

      Change, it happens.

    98. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking stupid? He has no point. Whether a ui paradigm change will be accepted presently or in the future has no relation to whether some other ui change was accepted in the past on a different product. You could draw an equal comparison by saying that the ui change for some other product led to a mass defection therefore it is possible that windows 8's change will lead to the same thing. Both possible are still just as equal as they were so by pointing to office 2007 you have not added any additional data to the question at all. You people fail on the most fundamental level of critical thinking of all. Assuming that superficially similar situations automatically correlate and add information. They don't. Period. I get it you are trying to stump for Windows but at least think about what I'm saying.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    99. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some stuff reminds me of Ubuntu...

    100. Re:Windows 8 by karmarep · · Score: 1

      On the Windows 7 site, there were over 500 gadgets a year ago.

      "The Windows Live Gallery has been retired. In order to focus support on the much richer set of opportunities available for the newest version of Windows, Microsoft no longer supports uploading new gadgets. However, some of the most popular and highest-rated gadgets are still available on this page."
      http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/downloads/personalize/gadgets

      It looks like they are lubing us up for "Metro" by removing features from win 7. I know many of the gadgets were/are memory pigs but taking away features from a current operating system to force users to pine for the same functionality in Win8 is greed and... probably smart considering what I have seen of Win 8 so far..

    101. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even *read* the list of features which were just listed? No, you didn't. You just ignored it and used it as a chance to get in a snide remark about how you think Windows sucks.

    102. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the only things you listed not already in windows 7 in some form is metro/winrt. (touch stuff is there) And enchantments are, well, enhancements. Stuff that can be pushed in a service pack..

      Metro/winrt are bad ideas, seriously. To be more precise, too-late ideas. Apple and Google already got it covered. MS is just hoping its traditional retailers will push w8 as much as they did PCs in the PC era.

      If I was microsoft, I would focus on what they do good. And chasing Apple or Google isn't their strong point apparently.

    103. Re:Windows 8 by PhrstBrn · · Score: 2

      Yeah seriously. Many times have I copied two folders on top of each other, knowing ahead of time that both sets contain duplicates in the other set, and have to click that dialog box to overwrite/ignore what are essentially copies of the same exact file. Why Windows can't just decide for you is beyond me.

      I guess technically they could have different permissions, maybe? But Windows could always check their permissions against each other to make sure they were the same before deciding to ignore the file.

    104. Re:Windows 8 by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      Erh.... Windows is system. And windowing environment is since Windows 7 again a separate software, since on project MinWin they did separate WDM and many others from NT operating system (Actually vice versa, they cut NT operating system depencies to layers on it). So that is how they got NT slimmed back to few megabytes and much stable than what it was earlier when even some parts of the IE were integrated to NT servers.

      Did you know that Unix systems the user interface is separated software from the operating system?
      Linux operating system does not actually even have a user interface, you use other software for that like Bash and hardware.

      Microsoft is doing smart move here. But the bad side effect is that now the metro can be a default one.

    105. Re:Windows 8 by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      Are you refering to KDE concept to Activities?
      Idea is that only important data and applications are shown to the user.

    106. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      You can use ANY email address.

      I used to use a gmail address as my windows live ID.

      I switched to a @live.com address so I'd also have integrated hotmail email and contacts, but that's not required by any stretch of the imagination.

      You can use a local ISP email address too (POP3).

      So short answer: Yes, you can use your google email to log in. You just specify that as your Windows Live ID when you sign up.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    107. Re:Windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Does it use Microsoft servers to validate my ID or can I have it use Steam servers to validate. Can I have it use my own server? That was the question... not if I can use my email as my ID.

      I don't want a Windows Live account.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    108. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are correct. Here's what changed: People initially reacted badly to both Office 2007 and Vista. The viable alternatives for either were either non existent or too expensive for it to show in marketshare (Well OSX has more to do with Apple's aim at the high margin market. Saying plain expensive is unfair.). This time around, windows 8 has competition and competition that has already beat microsoft's offerings in other markets. Namely smartphones. So the OP's presumption that somehow consumers will swallow the initial backlash cause of previous unrelated situations is pretty wrong.

    109. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      I think you have a grossly different (and twisted) definition of the word 'unusable'.

      You're also judging the current developer preview as if it were the end release. It was made clear the UI isn't complete.

      It's perfectly usable. It's not as efficient and it's more annoying, but that doesn't make it "unusable". So no, I don't think you know what the hell you're talking about.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    110. Re:Windows 8 by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      Oh, my, my..... Those are almost identical what KDE did to plasma notification center a two or three years ago.... and to rename dialog over a year ago....

      So Microsoft again copied from KDE what they do.

    111. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      If you don't want a Windows Live Account (again, you've given zero justification for such a rigid insistence), then you won't get this feature. And you'll be no worse off than before.

      If you want this feature, then get a Windows live ID, and stop bitching and whining and moaning over nothing.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    112. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Your interpretation and comprehension is wrong, an dno matter how much you try and insist otherwise, it will remain wrong. You willfully (purposefully?) twisted what was said to fullfil your preconceived prejudices, and continue to do so, over and over. Your grasp of the English language is bizarrely shallow. Strange that everyone else 'got' it, except you. And even when corrrected, you keep insisting your original misinterpretation of the statement (and continuing with subsequent statements) is the only one that can, should, or ever apply.

      You're. Just. Not. Getting. It.

      So just let it go.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    113. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're just taking notes from the Gnome folks.........

    114. Re:Windows 8 by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      I wish. Tried playing the "Myst" series lately? A virtual machine running Win95 is pretty much the only way.

    115. Re:Windows 8 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is no call for snarky head-desking. He didn't say it was intentional, he said it was stupid. Well, that's not what he said, as I recall, but that's what I got out of it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    116. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      So just let it go.

      As long as you insist on disengaging your brain when it comes to your fanboy precious I will not let it go.

      Your interpretation and comprehension is wrong

      No it is not. No matter how many times you try to explain yourself out of it the fact is that when the potential success of the new windows 8 interface was challenged you didn't calmly explain why the challengers were wrong, you went straight for the "But but but...office 2007". What you are not getting is that whether office succeeded or didn't has no bearing on whether windows 8 will succeed or not. Let's assume that your backpedaling is valid and you simply meant to point out that a product with a radically new ui can maintain mainstream acceptance. First of all the changes to office 2007 pale in comparison to the changes between windows 7 and Metro as is on windows 8 so the comparison isn't even valid anyway. Furthermore, many products have failed after making fundamental interface changes so you haven't added anything to the discussion anyway so by all rights you should have been modded redundant and moved on. So however you want to twist it, you know you are wrong and your logic fails. But you get to think you scored points for your objet de desire so I guess that's what makes you happy. Enjoy.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    117. Re:Windows 8 by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      I have a 30" screen. Try to explain to me why I should follow a tablet paradigm.

      Exactly. I have two 24" widescreen monitors. Right now I have 14 windows open that I can see a corner of. With one click I can bring a window to the forefront. I don't have to hunt for a window in the task bar. And BTW, my task bar is on the right which has 44 windows in it.

      I'm thinking that the desktop will be dumbed-down to the least common denominator to accommodate smaller devices.

    118. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Windows Unity?

    119. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. So you tried a pre-alpha experimental UI and you didn't like it. Boo-hoo-hoo.

    120. Re:Windows 8 by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Uhh...Yes the file menu does take over the window and that is the best freaking feature I have ever seen. It turns file into a management console for your documents, making it easy to fine and use the stuff you want to access for document->world operations.

    121. Re:Windows 8 by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Unusable means "I find this overly difficult to use." On a larger scale, it means "Many (or most) people find this overly difficult to use."

      Contrary to popular belief, UI design is an art. Not a science. I find the start screen to be unusable on a normal PC. So do most people who have weighed in on it, and we are perfectly qualified to judge what we do or do not find usable. I'm pretty sure that's a good indication that the UI needs serious reworking, not a few tweaks between now and release.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    122. Re:Windows 8 by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Considering the fact that there are NO technical issues with having multiple independant windows on the screen at a single point, why would MS make the Metro UI in the way they have now instead of apps just using the fullscreen mode in normal windows (like some apps already do, games and browsers (F11),etc)
      Wouldnt it have been better to have Metro apps running in self contained "windows" which you could maximise/fullscreen as you wanted

    123. Re:Windows 8 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Telling me it's OK is like telling a VI use that EMACS is OK

      Emacs actually has a VI mode. Does Metro have a "classic" mode?

    124. Re:Windows 8 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      the ability to keep your profile on a USB Key... allowing your Windows experience to be independent of the actual physical hardware you log into...

      I don't believe that having the same profile will ever allow your Windows experience to be independent of the actual physical hardware. Does using a 17" monitor provide the same experience as a 25" monitor?

    125. Re:Windows 8 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Using Excel as a replacement for a database? Hmm. . . perhaps not the best idea.

    126. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had it on a computer when a Microsoft evangelist friend was over for a party a few months ago and I let him have a go of Windows 8 for the first time for about 20 minutes by himself and there was silence from him. He quietly rejoined the party after trying out the next iteration of his lifeblood. He hasn't mentioned the OS since.

      The strongest point, that I've heard, from most proponents of Windows is that you can patch/configure it to make the Start Menu just like in Windows 7. Sounds like an exciting release!

    127. Re:Windows 8 by Omestes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay, I've read every single post of yours in this discussion up to this point, and have one question: Are you indeed a Microsoft employee, or an employee of a PR firm talking on behalf of Microsoft? Please be honest. I won't think less of you if you just come clean, I'd actually think more of you.

      I ask this because there is no way in hell any person on this planet could fine absolutely no fault with a product, especially one that introduces completely new UX principles, and changes the long term functionality of an old system. Most OS X (or Windows, or iOS, or Android, or Linux flavor) fanboys can at least list one or two gripes about their pet platform. You, on the other hand (correct me if I'm wrong), think that Win 8 is the second coming of Christ, and Metro will wash away all of our sins.

      You have to eventually (outside of not being paid to) realize that various UX schemes world for various people and various tasks better than other schemes. While Metro might be nice for some people, and some uses (information consumers), it somewhat fails in other areas, and for other users. I played with the dev preview, and will not be purchasing it. This isn't an objective judgement on its intrinsic merits, but rather an observation that it completely fails for my own personal way of doing things, and clashes with my subjective aesthetic considerations. Further, its functions would be redundant for its role on my desktop PC, since I already use my phone and tablet for the tasks that it seems to think that I find important. I find touch UIs to be great, on touch screens, and I might even try a W8 tablet someday (when my forthcoming Transformer dies) Again (to avoid trolling), this is purely subjective.

      There are obvious failings in Win 8, or at least from a standard usability context. These failings might be mitigated by great implementation, or decent added functionality. But from this point of view I don't see this. I haven't seen anything in Win 8 (outside of under the hood stuff, which isn't really all that innovative or as much improvement to make me want to put up with the other changes) that really makes me want to switch from Win 7. I was genuinely excited by Win 7, and lived though all the hassle of the dev preview and beta just because it was that much better than Vista (or any other version of Windows). Windows 7 fits my workflow perfectly, and if something isn't broke I see no reason to fix it.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    128. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw the pics on copy, move, rename, and delete I thought I was looking at KDE for a sec. The bulk collision stuff look are new though, seems like MS took it a step further

    129. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ask this because there is no way in hell any person on this planet could fine absolutely no fault with a product,

      Nice attempt to twist the OPs comment. He/She has not claimed that there is no fault in Windows 7/8/9/10. In fact nobody has claimed that in this entire comment thread. But continue combating straw-man arguments. You're good at that.

    130. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG Windows 8's new UI does not address every single use-case. Holy fuck ! How long have you known this? Jesus.. somebody call someone and get this out to the general population.. this must get out there !!

    131. Re:Windows 8 by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      So however you want to twist it, you know you are wrong and your logic fails. But you get to think you scored points for your objet de desire so I guess that's what makes you happy. Enjoy.

      Right.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    132. Re:Windows 8 by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you found some literature appropriate to your level. Now do us all a favor by eating your own butt cheeks until you bleed to death.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    133. Re:Windows 8 by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 or Windows 9? Does this mean that Windows will be moving to a microkernel model, whereby they'll have a minimal microkernel that will be virtually frozen, and only the upper layers will undergo updates w/ every Windows version? One thing they might do - just like guys like Norton - sell only 3-yearly subscriptions instead of the product, and require customers to renew for a nominal fee. That will keep their cash flow alive, not force customers to migrate w/ what is already good enough, and not put resources into developing completely new versions that nobody wants. That will allow them to have a tablet module for tablets, a desktop model for desktops and so on.

    134. Re:Windows 8 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      For the life of me, I can't tell if you are serious, or being extremely sarcastic.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    135. Re:Windows 8 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      I don't want to "Get used to"

      I want to do work. And every single second I spend trying to pretend that my computer is my smartphone wastes my time. Most things I could do with the start menu can be done with the start screen? Windows 8 FTF

      ] Seriously, if Microsoft can't get a UI right after all these years?

      I'm just not sure if you are a shill or a troll.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    136. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with you. No matter how improved Windows 8 is in the kernel/low level subsystems, if Microsoft have made the 100s of millions who use the system on conventional desktop PCs jump through hoops, to use a poorer version of their current desktop environment, then Windows 8 could become "another Vista" for that section of the market.

      I've tried the developer preview myself, and can only agree with everyone else - currently for use on a desktop PC it's basically broken.

      Microsoft should IMHO put in a install time option, that for desktop users, lets you make Win 8 operate like Win 7, with direct access to the desktop from logon in GINA.

      Mike Diack

    137. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. To me those seem only like tweaks which could be as well included in a Service Pack. Some bigger and interesting suggestions:

      • an actually scalable GUI (you know how making fonts larger breaks things currently)

      resolution independence in Windows 7 works pretty well for me (running at 120%), the only issues are with applications that implement their own UI in a non-standard way.

      Actually I am trying to convince my father to switch from Windows xp to Windows 7 for that very reason - his Windows XP with large fonts but everything else small just looks terrible and is imo relatively hard to use (if you need larger fonts, chances are you need larger buttons, ... as well).

    138. Re:Windows 8 by gmueckl · · Score: 2

      No. Have you ever tried to do anything on a Windows desktop with your finger instead of a mouse? It sucks. Full-screen only (or very, very limited window management) is a sane choice for touch only devices where you can't hit targets (or move them) precisely enough.

      --
      http://www.moonlight3d.eu/
    139. Re:Windows 8 by gmueckl · · Score: 1

      Silently skipping the copying of equal files is only valid of the file metadata is equal and would not be modified by the operation. File copying adjusts creation/modification times, so for that reason alone the user needs to be prompted.

      --
      http://www.moonlight3d.eu/
    140. Re:Windows 8 by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Reading through all the OPs comments I can't find him finding a single fault in Win 8. Sure, he never went out and said "Windows 8 is perfect", but by not listing a single fault, and trying to negate every single fault that others here have brought up sort of points towards that conclusion. Eventually a rational person is going to have to cede points to detractors, at least on subjective ground, the OP has consistently failed to do so. Further up the discusion some dismissed the Metro menu as being subjectively sub-par, the OP dismissed this. How does one dismiss a subjective judgment?

      Me: "I don't like vanilla ice cream."
      OP: "You are wrong, vanilla ice cream is obviously the greatest thing in the world, you just have to get used to it."
      Me: "Purple carpeting doesn't match my sofa"
      OP: "Purple is currently a pre-beta, so every once of dissatisfaction you may find with it will be eliminated, beta, and release, purple will match every other color in existence."
      Me: "I don't like Elton John."
      OP: "But beneath the surface he has the organs of a shining God, so you are wrong"
      Me: "I see no reason to buy a new house, I just bought one and like it"
      OP: "Your house is vastly inferiour to the same model of house painted a new color, no windows, with a doorbell that plays the best of MC Hammer."
      Me: "..."
      OP: "pwned!"

      I really need more coffee. Sorry.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    141. Re:Windows 8 by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      Actually every single one of his 332 comments are pro-MS. So, something is wrong there.

    142. Re:Windows 8 by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Define "most people who have weighed in on it"... because I doubt you have any data to back up that statement.

      And define "overly difficult to use". What exactly is difficult? Being a jarring or unexpected visual is not "difficult to use". You tap the windows key and type to find things. You tap the windows key and click on an app to start it. You scroll left and right. I'm still trying to fathom what you find "difficult" in any of this.

      It's DIFFERENT. And yes, if you try to do things the exact same way on a system that is different, you're going to be frustrated and angry. But that's not a problem with the system, necessarily.

      But all the functionality is there, and the vast majority of it is available to you in the same, or fewer, keystrokes and/or clicks. A FEW things are not optimized, and a very FEW things aren't present or require a different strategy with this pre-release, non-final UI. There are also several things you can do now that you couldn't do before.

      Any time anything changes, there is always this HUGE outcry. Usually it settles down once people wrap their heads around the changes and realise they're not nearly as horrible as they initially thought they were. If only people were more constructive in their feedback, rather than just "THIS SUCKS I'M NOT USING IT"... everything would be better.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    143. Re:Windows 8 by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Well, you can create a live ID using your Gmail address. I've had my ID tied to several email addresses over the years, none of them anything to do with MS.

    144. Re:Windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Except that the live ID verifies with a Microsoft Live server you mean? What I was asking is if I could setup single sign-on to validate my ID with a third party like Google/Amazon/Steam.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    145. Re:Windows 8 by spiralx · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing not from what I've read. You need a Microsoft Live ID to sign into Microsoft Live and use their services :)

    146. Re:Windows 8 by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what I was going to say but you beat me to it. They say that shit every time. I've stopped buying the bullshit. (But do really love Windows 7 except for the WinSXS problem.)

    147. Re:Windows 8 by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Yah, but isn't that Apple's fault? If I recall correctly, Myst is all a QuickTime app, or some Apple software of some kind?

  3. Not in 2012 for me by GeneralTurgidson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ill be waiting for SP1. Server 2008 R2 has shown (at least to me) that Microsoft is trying to make server tasks more accessible at the cost of options and tweaking. Instead of having a nice GUI with lots of options, it's a purdy GUI with few options and the rest buried in some power shell syntax. Server 8 doesn't look like its helping their case.

    1. Re:Not in 2012 for me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll be waiting for Windows 9 after this iOS mimicry flops. This could end up being the worst mistake yet, ME and Vista could both look like minor failures in comparison.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Not in 2012 for me by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Instead of having a nice GUI with lots of options, it's a purdy GUI with few options and the rest buried in some power shell syntax.

      So... they're making it more like Linux?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Not in 2012 for me by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Ill be waiting for SP1.

      I'm trying to remember the last Windows version that didn't require waiting until at least SP1 to be worth using.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Not in 2012 for me by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      I'll be waiting for SP1.

      But they will release something on schedule. As the day approaches, its features will be trimmed to meet the schedule, as usual. The promised features will come in SP1 and some of them might even work reliably by then (Quality is job 1.1), while security will come in SP2 or SP3. Fool people once, shame on you. Fool people dozens of times, and you must be Microsoft.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    5. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the Windows Phone interface on the desktop is quaint. It's an interesting replacement for the start menu... but at the end of the day, that's all it is. I've been working with Win8 as a sort of free windows licence for a VM I run, and as soon as you use a traditional app, it kicks you back to the desktop and acts like Win7. It's one of those things that management is mandating to push... I guess they have an app store?, but at the end of the day all the new interface really is, is a full screen start menu.
       
      It's really, really snappy on Virtual Box though. Goddamn.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    6. Re:Not in 2012 for me by KlomDark · · Score: 0

      I'll be waiting for Windows 9 after this iOS mimicry flops. This could end up being the worst mistake yet, ME and Vista could both look like minor failures in comparison.

      This!

    7. Re:Not in 2012 for me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually yes, since server 2008 they've moved to a CLI-before-GUI system, where all tasks can be performed from the CLI and the GUI only handles a subset of them, as in Linux. This is good since everything now becomes scriptable, the GUI becomes optional, and you don't need a full virtual desktop to get things done remotely.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Old school Windows server admins are going to need to learn to adapt or become quickly irrelevant. Microsoft finally understands that very large server environments need to have a proper shell environment to make mass server administration easier. And they've made the 80% of tasks you'll be doing day to day accessible through the GUI, which makes the GUI actually usable now (Remember pre-Exchange 2007 Server Management pack? It sucked).

    9. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Windows Phone interface on the desktop is quaint.

      After using it on an Acer tablet in CompUSA recently, I'd say "quaint" isn't really the word I'd use. Absolute fucking funk-d-fied shit is much more apt. It's freaking terrible. Even on the tablet, the full screen "Start" menu was a worthless abomination. It's a clusterfuck mess, half icons/half widgets/all shit. It isn't mouse friendly at all and any program not specifically compiled for windows 8 scrolls like ass. The abrupt transition from Metro to classic desktop is about as bad as goind from SPB shell to the craptastic underpinnings of windows mobile of old. And we see how well that worked out.

    10. Re:Not in 2012 for me by masternerdguy · · Score: 1

      It better be ready in 2012. I'm already stockpiling soda and snacks for the flamewars.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    11. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too!!!

    12. Re:Not in 2012 for me by mlts · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forwards to Windows Server 8, assuming that they get the deduplication in the next revision of NTFS down pat. Especially for disk volumes that have virtual machine images on them.

      As for the client version of 8, the ability to run the whole OS from a USB flash drive and then yank the drive when done as a way of checking for viruses and rootkits on machines periodically will be an ability worth having.

    13. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      You're making a judgement based on a developer preview pre-beta, where the UI isn't finishe... That includes the mouse/keyboard access. I'd say the problem is your expectations and interpretations, not Windows 8.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    14. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      You don't remember Windows 7?? Come on, man, it wasn't THAT long ago! Have you been checked for Altzheimers?

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    15. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'd say your problem is that you're probably one of the hired "sponsors" that Soulskill was bragging about bringing to the site. Take your astroturf and fuck off.

    16. Re:Not in 2012 for me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I was running Win7 since the prerelease versions on my gaming desktop, no problems, even after I upgraded to the final release and then SP1.

      I would say 98SE but I guess that doesn't count :-P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    17. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      Instead of having a nice GUI with lots of options, it's a purdy GUI with few options and the rest buried in some power shell syntax.

      That's funny. I really never thought I'd see someone on Slashdot complain about a CLI being more useful than a GUI.

      I can certainly relate. Windows has been so GUI-centric for so long that suddenly finding the CLI more functional than the GUI is downright strange. Moving from Exchange 2003 to 2007 was a very jarring experience for me.

      However... Now that I'm actually learning PowerShell, I have to say that it's pretty damn nice. The added flexibility and control is amazing. And it enables all kinds of scripting and automation.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    18. Re:Not in 2012 for me by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You don't remember Windows 7?? Come on, man, it wasn't THAT long ago!

      Windows 7 was just a service pack for Vista that removed most of the suck.

    19. Re:Not in 2012 for me by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      You're making a judgement based on a developer preview pre-beta, where the UI isn't finishe

      Er, part of the point of delivering pre-release builds is to gather usability comments. GP comment while a bit harsh seems in line with this. As things develop (har har), maybe opinions will change.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    20. Re:Not in 2012 for me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, also, MS has caught onto the game, they ship a ceremonial SP1 within a few months of launch now.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    21. Re:Not in 2012 for me by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I know. Isn't it a lot easier to please people who have lower expectations? It so frustrating when they get to try stuff, and then expect it to be at all appealing. What to they think this demo stuff is for, anyway?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    22. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't remember Windows 7??

      Windows 7 is Windows Vista SP1. So, yeah, MS is still on the same track...

    23. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Spad · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even better, the GUIs for things like Exchange 2010 allow you to view the CLI commands being used for any of the changes you make, so that you can easily script them, rather than having to try and work out which particular command and property name that checkbox needs.

    24. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Microlith · · Score: 1

      So in other words, they've come full circle and have implemented something that works like, but is wholly incompatible with, that which they have fought so hard against.

    25. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh. Windows 7.

    26. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like smit in AIX? Better 20 years late then never I suppose.

    27. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look it's this troll again.

    28. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      They've already stated parts that aren't finished, they've already showed UI improvements (that aren't in the develper preview)... the fact that the UI isn't finished (let alone polished) is well known...

      The point of a 'developer preview' is mainly to get developers hands on the APIs and jump-start application development and the learning curve. Yes, they're getting UI feedback as well, but there's a long list of "known issues" and one of them is mouse navigation isn't complete. That's why the preview was handed out to developers on touch-tablets. While devleopers can (and did) install on dozens of other form factors in order to give feedback, that build was not optimized around the desktop keyboard/mouse experience. It was optimized to give Developers experience with WinRT and Metro and Touch.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    29. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      Um... no. Sorry. Not even.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    30. Re:Not in 2012 for me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      They've even been adding POSIX compliance:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Services_for_Unix

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    31. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's old is now new: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_AIX_SMIT

      It seems as though Microsoft is actually getting the hint from their users and other OSes after all of these years.

    32. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Ruie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Those who do not understand UNIX are doomed to reimplement it, poorly."

    33. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      You might want to adjust your tin-hat. Not everyone who has experiences different than yours is some sort of hired hit-man out to try and mislead people or "shape opinion". There's no astroturf here, and no need for so much tin-foil on your part.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    34. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone who has experiences different than yours is some sort of hired hit-man out to try and mislead people or "shape opinion".

      He didn't say "everyone". If the shoe fits...

    35. Re:Not in 2012 for me by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Does any of what you said here conflict with the GGP's experience with the Acer tablet in Compusa? I just read over his post again and he seemed to be specifically speaking of his experience as it related to that particular device. He says it sucks. Is he lying?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    36. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Tom · · Score: 1

      That would be 3.11 - they didn't do service packs until NT.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    37. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, totally.

      (Excellent counterpoint, moron.)

    38. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      The point is, the shoe DOESN'T fit. Duh.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    39. Re:Not in 2012 for me by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      Even better, the GUIs for things like Exchange 2010 allow you to view the CLI commands being used for any of the changes you make, so that you can easily script them, rather than having to try and work out which particular command and property name that checkbox needs.

      Holy SMIT! (Everything old is new again.)

      Annnnd now I feel old.

    40. Re:Not in 2012 for me by tepples · · Score: 1

      From the article you linked: "It is set to be deprecated after the release of Windows 8." Microsoft is taking out SUA because if you have something in CurrentVersion\Run or Programs\Startup that uses SUA, boot takes longer.

    41. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are either a troll to generate clicks or a complete fucking retard.

    42. Re:Not in 2012 for me by mrsmiggs · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows you wait for Service Pack 3 nowadays and frankly I don't really feel safe until number 4 is out the door!

    43. Re:Not in 2012 for me by master_p · · Score: 1

      I'll be waiting for Windows 9

      I'll be waiting for Windows X.

    44. Re:Not in 2012 for me by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 was just a service pack for Vista that removed most of the suck.

      Um... no. Sorry. Not even.

      I have to agree, ...most of the suck is still there.

    45. Re:Not in 2012 for me by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      SfU is not part of windows, so it's not "adding" POSIX compliance. It is the same as the MKS toolkit or Cygwin. Windows NT has POSIX compliance, but it's POSIX v1, which is useless; v2 is what you want if you want to actually build vaguely contemporary code.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:Not in 2012 for me by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      Can you copy a text based config file from one server to another? That's really handy when standing up a new server.

    47. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to being factually incorrect, your comment comes across as someone who hates Windows and will not be satisfied, ever. Witness all the pro *nix comments in this thread.

      I too can carry on forever about the various operating systems I've used in the past and how great they were. Languages too. It's always a limited perspective.

    48. Re:Not in 2012 for me by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      Just because all cars have four wheels an engine and a steering wheel, doesn't mean they're all the same. Learn to look beyond superficial similarities. But that would require you to obtain some form of knowledge.

    49. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. He is lying. He did not try Windows 8 as he claimed. He tried an un-released un-finished un-tested version of Windows.

      I downloaded a nightly build of a Linux distro the other day. Kept on crashing every 5 minutes. Therefore Linux is a piece of shit.

      (Although to be fair, even release builds of Linux do that, so Linux really *is* a piece of crap)

      It would be interesting to know how much you get paid to be an anti-ms troll though. Its hard because there are so many competitors.. :( any help?

    50. Re:Not in 2012 for me by formfeed · · Score: 1

      Instead of having a nice GUI with lots of options, it's a purdy GUI with few options and the rest buried in some power shell syntax.

      So... they're making it more like Linux?

      Unity at last...

    51. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      And I'm making a judgement based on previous experience in Windows. You might not like my failure to embrace W8 with ethe religious frevor that you do, but it has been my experience that teaches me to not only distrust Microsoft, but obvious shills who promise us how great things will be.

      The old Peanut's running gag about Charlie brown, Lucy, and the football is a nice little parable about fool me once, shame on you, fool me again, shame on me".

      Maybe I'll use W8 some day. I doubt it, since now that I don't have to support Windows based computers and their job security features. I've switched to OSX and Linux except for one MS laptop. Be that as it may, I'll only make the switch if there is a good reason to - like it actually works. You my not think that the debacle of Vista is a reason to distrust future decisions, but what I do know is that the company that will put out W8 was capable of producing Vista. You may think I'm bing dense, but some of us just call that prudent.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    52. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      "You might want to adjust your tin-hat."

      When you are losing arguments, always resort to insults.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    53. Re:Not in 2012 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol...hysterical. UNIX is dead, son. Windows won a long time ago.

    54. Re:Not in 2012 for me by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

      And I'd say your problem is that you're probably one of the hired "sponsors" that Soulskill was bragging about bringing to the site. Take your astroturf and fuck off.

      You do understand how Slashdot UIDs are generated, right?

      I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that someone who registered his account in the last millennium is probably not part of a diabolical marketing campaign. Unless you're telling us you believe Microsoft was planning their weblog astroturf strategy for the Windows 8 release a decade ahead of time?

      It's Microsoft we're talking about, not the Bene Gesserit.

      --

      Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  4. It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "traditional market" is a combination of consumers and bulk business users. The consumer market doesn't use XP much any more (outside of the Asian pirate community). The businesses still stuck on XP are slowly migrating as their old hardware dies, or switching to other devices ... BUT ... (there's always a "but") Windows 8 fulfills Microsoft's goal of moving back to a more frequent release model, thereby enabling them to EOL earlier versions quicker.

    They don't want a repeat of XP, where an old OS cannibalizes future sales, ever again. You'll see annual "new versions", same as the iPhone (Balmer steals another Apple trick).

    1. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Dinghy · · Score: 2

      XP didn't cannibalize Vista sales. Vista didn't sell because it was crap at release. If people were forced to choose between going from XP to Vista, or going from XP to OSX or Linux, Microsoft would have been even worse off. That's why Microsoft kept extending support.

    2. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The consumer market doesn't use XP much any more (outside of the Asian pirate community). .

      Are you serious?

    3. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with this "more frequent release" model is that it is going to push businesses to some other OS. The company I work for should have just about completed the process of preparing to migrate to Windows 7 by the time Windows 8 comes out. This is a result of having to ensure that everything that is essential to business operations will work on Windows 7 before starting to roll it out. They do not want to be in the position of having to support multiple versions of the OS depending on what software the users need. In addition, because of regulatory requirements it is not practical to just upgrade the software to a version that is compatible with the new OS version.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Aryden · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work for one of the larger corporations world wide. Our company standard OS is XP... They have no plans to upgrade to 7 any time soon.

    5. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Troll

      And if MS _really_ cared about making money, they would sell you a dam valid XP key ONLINE for $20, but they are too busy trying to push their new crap for $100+ ($100 for OEM, $150 for Retail). Consumers (and businesses) are basically telling Microsoft "FUCK. YOU." -- We _want_ an OS that will last 5 - 10 years, AND we don't want to pay an arm AND a leg just for upgrades.
      i.e.
      _When_ will we get the "promised" new Cairo File System ala WinFS? Oh wait, never.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairo_(operating_system)

    6. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by lsolano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Vista didn't sell because it was crap at release.

      It was a crap at release. It was a crap 6 months later. It was a crap 1 year later. It is still a crap and it will be until the end of time.

      Worst OS ever released. I mean it. Even worse than Windows ME.

    7. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      Then they are idiots or they don't lease desktops.

    8. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by sdnoob · · Score: 1

      they better at least have a *plan* even if implementation hasn't started yet....

      doomsday (which is april 8th, 2014, btw) is not *that* far off, especially for a 'larger corporation' that has no current plan at all..... are all your IT guys gonna retire before then or something, so they consider it SEP?

    9. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft will be happy to sell companies "extended support contracts" for Win7 when it's officially out of the rotation. Same with Win8 and Win9, etc., a few years later ... just lather-rinse-repeat.

      It's about making money, not what's best for the customer. And you have to be joking about people migrating - if they didn't when Vista came out, they won't. The linux desktop is a total fubar (latest examples are the mass migration going on from Ubuntu to Mint. My own latest experience is upgrading opensuse to 12.1 - my wi-fi is broken again, my "linux supported printer" still isn't, neither is my camcorder, it ATE almost a decade of email - an unforgiveable sin, dual monitors not supported any more, etc.) There will NEVER be a "year of the linux desktop". End of story. People will switch to a BSD-based desktop first (hint: it's called OSX).

    10. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      hey better at least have a *plan* even if implementation hasn't started yet....

      doomsday (which is april 8th, 2014, btw) is not *that* far off, especially for a 'larger corporation' that has no current plan at all..... are all your IT guys gonna retire before then or something, so they consider it SEP?

      They'll ask for a government bail-out "for all new IT infrastructure", funnel the $$$ to their buddies and large bonuses to themselves for "dealing with the crisis of their own making", and laugh at the 99%.

      So yes, it is SEP (Somebody Else's Problem) == Yours and Mine.

      Let them go bust instead. The long-term pain of bail-outs isn't worth the short-term reprieve.

    11. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Why would they sell you an XP key for $20 when they can force you to spend several times as much?

      BTW - just because XP won't be supported any more doesn't mean that the bits won't continue to work. Any attempt to put a back-door time-bomb kill-switch in it would result in massive lawsuits.

    12. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by joeyspqr · · Score: 2

      this, a thousand times this.

      We'll be lucky to be halfway off XP on the desktop by 2013. Between user resistance, licensing restrictions, compliance requirements, tight replacement budgets, and vendors dragging their feet, I'll be supporting thousands of XP installs until 2014.

      --
      +1 fashionably cynical
    13. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. XP at work... and at home.

    14. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      The "traditional market" still uses a lot of Windows XP, which still has 60%+ of the Windows Desktop market share. Windows Vista peaked out at around 10%, which most all converted to Win7, which has thus far gotten around 25-30% but still pales in comparison to Windows XP.

      Microsoft has, nonetheless, trumpeted both Vista and Win7 has having record sales. However, that neglects to take into account the licenses that were purchased for mere "downgrading" to WinXP, or the multiple licenses people may have purchased for the same computer to get the version of Windows most useful for them (especially with Win7 where more and more OEMS are going to Windows 7 Starter as the default version).

      The only people who got Vista were those that bought new computers with it. Mostly the same with Win7, though a lot of Vista users upgraded to Win7 as well. Microsoft cut off the path for WinXP users to upgrade directly to Win7, so WinXP users didn't do it.

      Expect the same shenanigans with Win8, which will sell extremely poor but Microsoft will make it look like a gold rush nonetheless.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    15. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you're buying it regardless, so I'm sure they don't care.

    16. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Kjella · · Score: 2

      The problem with this "more frequent release" model is that it is going to push businesses to some other OS. The company I work for should have just about completed the process of preparing to migrate to Windows 7 by the time Windows 8 comes out.

      Oh please, enough with the FUD. Microsoft guarantees a minimum 10 years of support on professional/enterprise versions. Check it out, extended support will end in 2020. What else are they going to move to that offers longer support? If your answer to that is "Linux, because they have the source code and can support it forever" you've been listening too much to RMS.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    17. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... that it is going to push businesses to some other OS.

      Wasn't "Other OS" removed by Sony?
      *ducks*

    18. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The back-door kill-switch just involves shutting down the activation servers. It won't kill XP systems on day one, but it will put a timer on them since the systems would never be able to be reinstalled again.

    19. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      At that point, Microsoft will have violated their announcement a decade ago about releasing signing keys for XP when they no longer have activation servers. Then everyone who still has XP can sue them for a full refund, plus damages.

      Besides, it's not like you *need* a key to run XP. After all, you won't be hitting Microsoft for updates, right?

    20. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The company I work for should have just about completed the process of preparing to migrate to Windows 7 by the time Windows 8 comes out.

      Oh please, enough with the FUD. Microsoft guarantees a minimum 10 years of support on professional/enterprise versions.

      It's not FUD just because you don't understand the argument. When the new Windows comes out, developers begin to target the new windows, and you have to upgrade. The same is true of any other operating system; OSX is notable in that minor releases add new functionality, and cost money, so if you don't keep paying then you wind up not being able to run contemporary software even on the same major version! And in Ubuntu-land, people tend to stop making PPAs for the old versions once the new versions go final.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      why would it push business anywhere?

      If MS started breaking backwards compatibility every year you MIGHT have an issue because upgrades to vendor based 3rd party software become painful, however, if MS designs it correctly, new API features can be back ported to older versions of windows to provide current 3rd party software the ability to run on the last two or three versions....Depending on the API and implementation, MS might need to do some graceful downgrading of user experience in their API for the sake of the ISV development process if there was some sort of core OS feature that could not be updated with the APIs.

    22. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      too bad for their users.

    23. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Because businesses are not going to be too happy to update to an already obsolete OS. My company started working on upgrading to Windows 7 almost as soon as it released. We will probably be rolling it out right about the time that Windows 8 comes out. It is not going to go over well with management that the new OS we will be rolling out is already replaced.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    24. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are assuming way too much.

      First, and this is just an example, but people said the same thing about IE 6. The migration process to newer stuff was S-L-O-W to be sure but it is happening big time.

      Second, if you discount Vista, the service life of XP is/was nearly 10 years which is historically anomalous for almost any piece of software. You want 10 year lifespans for each windows version?? Uh, no.

      Third, how often is the "more frequent release" cycle? I've never heard any specific number, just that MS wants it to be less than 10 years. That's hardly threatening to anyone! For many systems I've used the goal was 1 release per year even if the vendor didn't actually quite achieve that. Again, does not sound like a big problem. If it is more frequent than that then what usually happens is that the vendors don't really expect everyone to adopt every release, at the time it is released. Leapfrogging releases during upgrades becomes routine.

    25. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      The linux desktop is a total fubar (latest examples are the mass migration going on from Ubuntu to Mint.

      Then why are they switching to a Linux desktop?

    26. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Any attempt to put a back-door time-bomb kill-switch in it would result in massive lawsuits.

      Yes, but does your average script kiddie operate under such constraints? The bits will continue to work until the malware hits. What do you do then if Microsoft no longer supports XP?

    27. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me?

      That is pretty standard....and again....IF MS PROVIDES SERVICE PACK UPDATES that keep enterprise customers up to date enough to run apps built on the latest platform then there is no "issue" for business users with a faster release cycle.

    28. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      If the linux desktops were so great, everyone would be using them, instead of < 1%. The fact that even people like me, who have been using linux for more than a decade, are fed up with having to distro-hop is a symptom of how bad the situation is. They are not switching *to* a linux desktop - they're switching *from* Ubuntu - some are switching to Mint, some to other distros, some abandoning linux to go to the *BSDs, or back to Windows, or on to OSX.

      The linux desktop is a joke. My laptop is a good example - wifi is once again broken, graphics was broken until I fixed things by booting into single user - console only mode (good luck getting the average consumer to do that), my "linux supported" printer doesn't work, and a bunch of other problems. It's simply never going to be ready for prime time because even now, in so many ways, it's less user-friendly than Windows9x, never mind XP or OSX or Win7. Stuff just doesn't work, and upgrades break things on a regular basis.

      Until people admit that there is no financial model that will work to fix this problem (no thanks to the GPL), and pulls an Apple and develops a desktop that can be sold at a profit per unit to consumers (probably atop FreeBSD, same as Apple did), it won't change. Look at the only real consumer success for linux - Android. It completely hides linux, and it could just as easily have been built atop one of the BSDs.

    29. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Who cares about script kiddies with pirated software? If you have a legit copy of XP, Microsoft cannot legally "kill" it. Ever. Even if a future EULA update says otherwise.

      3rd parties will continue to offer protection for XP well after April 2014, because it's money in their pocket, and there's nothing Microsoft can do. There's nothing to prevent someone coming out with software to run XP and ensure that system binaries and other essential files cannot be altered, over-written, or accessed in unusual ways. This wouldn't be a conventional hypervisor, so Microsoft can stuff any complaints.

    30. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I don't recall Microsoft ever making that announcement, and you still need the key because XP starts locking down without it.

    31. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I do. And I'm sure others do to. And no, you don't need "the key" - XP is easy enough to crack if they try to shut it down after the support term is over (and at that point, it would be legal to use the cracks if you have a legit copy).

      XP is going to be around for years to come ...

    32. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Citation please on the promise of releasing the keys.

      Suggestion a crack is a legitimate solution is ridiculous.

    33. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Go look for it yourself. It may no longer be available on the web (these things aren't "written in stone", as you well know), but I remember it, and I'm sure that a few others do to.

      As for the use of a crack to re-enable a legitimate copy of XP if Microsoft attempts to de-activate it, it's perfectly legitimate. The only entity with standing to complain would be Microsoft, and they would have to admit that they violated the law when they remotely shut down the software (which was illegal even pre-DMCA, based on the l'Oreal case).

      So yes, XP will be around, and legal, well after April 8th, 2014.

    34. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      3rd parties will continue to offer protection for XP well after April 2014, because it's money in their pocket, and there's nothing Microsoft can do.

      How well will 3rd parties be able to protect XP without having the source code?

    35. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You don't need the source code, any more than you need it to attack XP.

      The simplest is to make sure that binaries are not altered while running.

      The next form of protection is parameter verification against known flaws. Just replace the jmp to the code to be protected with a jmp to your own verification routine, which itself then either calls the original function, or sanitizes the parameters and then calls the original function, or, if it's not possible to clean it up, generates an error.

      You certainly don't need the source code to do this, any more than the virus writers do to write their own code that does the same, but inserts their own routines instead. Even a stripped binary can be worked on.

    36. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      You don't need the source code, any more than you need it to attack XP.

      You don't need a glazier to break a window, but you need one to repair/replace it.

    37. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You don't need the source code, any more than you need it to attack XP.

      You don't need a glazier to break a window, but you need one to repair/replace it.

      Since when? Home Depot is proof that any dufus can replace a window pane.

    38. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But can any doofus make a window pane?

    39. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Your example was completely silly, and you know it. Programmers have always been able to alter the functionality of programs w/o needing the source code (even binaries that have had their symbol table stripped from them). It doesn't take more than a debugger and the ability to read assembler. And yes, I've done it, and no, I didn't have the source.

    40. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I suspect the WINE people would disagree.

    41. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      WINE is trying to do something different. They have to recreate the whole series of APIs, not just protect an existing instance of code.

      It's the difference between building a house from scratch, including having to make the bricks, drywall, and nails yourself, and just doing some quick fixes to bring things back the way they were.

    42. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      What if you need more than quick fixes? As the man you so cavalierly insult in your signature would say, there is no substitute for source.

    43. Re:It's because of those XP EOL users by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      [rant]

      RMS hasn't written any useful code any time this century - he wouldn't know what to do with it if you GAVE him the source, except to try to farm it out to someone else, like he's been doing for years and years.

      The fact is that RMS has no street cred any more to anyone who does a bit of digging. It's why years ago he had to abandon emacs, and "bless" xemacs code as the new codebase, same thing with gcc and egcs. He goes on and on about how programmers can earn a living by writing open source code, but he himself can't. He's just a parasite. And he's jealous of anyone who writes closed source (even if they also work on open source), going so far as to urge people in his speeches to stick it to devs by pirating their work "because they deserve it."

      Citing RMS is like citing any other nutty zealot. But don't take my word for it - research it. Check out his FUD against linux and how android is risky because linux uses the gpl, just not his business-unfriendly gpl3 (which if linux HAD been switched to, would have been immediately abandoned for a bsd-based host os, but the smelly freetard can't see it).

      [/rant] Seriously, do some research. The guy is worse than useless - he does way more harm than good nowadays.

  5. To be honest it's horrible by tankadin · · Score: 0

    Please leave Windows 8 to trained proffessionals and do not try it at home.

    The whole touchscreen related madness is very counterproductive in work environment.

    1. Re:To be honest it's horrible by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Why must MS take this path? They have a perfectly usable GUI right now...and I do not want the Apple or Minority Report approach to computing.

      Yes, touch screens are fun, no, any large amount of typing on a touch screen is murder on one's hands. I do not want a VS 2014 with integrated touch screen capabilities.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    2. Re:To be honest it's horrible by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Obvious counter-example: the preview release of visual studio that is included in the win8 dev preview ISO isn't a metro app. I think you're just stating the obvious. There's a lot of stuff which doesn't need a full-featured metro counterpart. That's perfectly okay.

  6. Phone UI Hell by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who would have guessed that phones would completely be the thing to mangle and ruin PC user interfaces... It's crazy but I've come full circle to thinking KDE4 might actually be the only sane desktop team left. Unless they're planning on turning it into a tablet/phone UI as well.

    1. Re:Phone UI Hell by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      XFCE and LXDE are also still in the sane camp.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Phone UI Hell by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Even unity which everyone hates for some reason is better than Win8

    3. Re:Phone UI Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean, still stuck in the 90s copying Windows 95?

    4. Re:Phone UI Hell by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      You mean, still stuck in the 90s copying Windows 95?

      And what's wrong with that? All the Windows 7 interface gives you is Windows 95 with a few fancy animations and a completely fscked-up start menu, and the Windows 95 interface is vastly better than a phone UI on a desktop PC.

    5. Re:Phone UI Hell by masternerdguy · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe the 90s interface is fundamentally good, and one of the best interfaces ever devised by man? I think it is. I know that people like to talk about how LCARS inspired phone interfaces and stuff, but to be honest I've always thought LCARS was a bad interface model, and so are the interfaces it seems to have inspired.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    6. Re:Phone UI Hell by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Windows 95's worst problems weren't the UI.

      The UI was quite nice, actually. Especially coming from Windows 3.1/3.11 and never having touched NT4.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    7. Re:Phone UI Hell by Tom · · Score: 1

      Just because MS is doing its usual dance of stupidity again?

      I can't complain about OS X Lion, nor have I seen a tendency in any other OS to enforce a tablet paradigm on non-tablet users. The geniuses in Redmond are the only ones who think that because they missed the tablet train, they now have to tablet-everything.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:Phone UI Hell by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Hey the Win7 start menu is great, I wish all OSes had something like it. You just type to search instead of having to navigate a big tree of submenus. Most Linux DEs have some kind of app search (like Gnome 2's Alt-F2), that's the closest thing they have to it, although Gnome 3 is coming out with a Win7-like menu.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:Phone UI Hell by FrozenFOXX · · Score: 1

      Hey the Win7 start menu is great, I wish all OSes had something like it. You just type to search instead of having to navigate a big tree of submenus. Most Linux DEs have some kind of app search (like Gnome 2's Alt-F2), that's the closest thing they have to it, although Gnome 3 is coming out with a Win7-like menu.

      KDE4's default kickoff launcher and Lancelot launchers have done this since 4.0. Hit the hotkey combo for the kicker or click on it and start typing.

      Personally I find KDE4's default launcher the best when I need to use a launcher. Reason why is because for the life of me I can't figure out how in the hell Win7's launcher hierarchy is done. I'm sure it probably makes sense to someone, just not me. KDE's makes a lot of sense to me, so when I DON'T know what I want I can explore what's installed quickly. When I DO know what I want, I just type. Simple, clean, effective, and flexibile.

      --
      "Just a fox, a whisper."
    10. Re:Phone UI Hell by antdude · · Score: 1

      I waited for KDE 4 to be better, but I still don't like it (v4.4.3 from stable Debian). I still prefer KDE v3.5.10. I read about Trinity, but will it be popular and supported? For now, I will use Gnome v2.3.0 (did not like v3). Sheesh, a lot of these newer GUI sucks. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    11. Re:Phone UI Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do have a UI for tablets (http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Active), though both UIs are kept a safe (or would it be sane?) distance away from each other, AFAIK.

    12. Re:Phone UI Hell by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      I 100% agree. Those are still great desktops as well.

    13. Re:Phone UI Hell by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      "Stuck in the 90's" isn't a valid excuse for scrapping something that works very well. Windows 95 had its share of problems, but the UI wasn't one of them.

    14. Re:Phone UI Hell by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Hey the Win7 start menu is great, I wish all OSes had something like it. You just type to search instead of having to navigate a big tree of submenus.

      If I wanted to type to start programs, I'd use a command line. You have to type to start programs in Windows 7 because the new start menu sucks so much ass.

    15. Re:Phone UI Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      First, Microsoft tried to build a phone UI using a desktop interface. It flopped. Since that didn't work, they've decided to implement a phone interface for their desktop UI... I predict floppage 2.0

      In defense of MS, they're just copying Apple (again) who also seem to have this bad idea. Maybe it was something that Jobs thought up in a pain-killer induced haze, but a phone UI on a desktop is just as wrong as the whole "my phone has a start menu" thing.

    16. Re:Phone UI Hell by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing about Lion is if you ignore the tablet influenced features, you forget they are there and just don't use them. I'm with you. Something tells me Microsoft will get this part all wrong in their effort to jump on the tablet bandwagon (2 years late).

    17. Re:Phone UI Hell by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand KDE, it already is a tablet/phone UI. They just did it in a sane way so that it didn't break the desktop.

    18. Re:Phone UI Hell by Tom · · Score: 1

      That "something" is called "experience from previous cases". They've never gotten anything right on the first try, so why should this be any different?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    19. Re:Phone UI Hell by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      KDE has has a tablet style interface since before Unity/Gnome 3, it's just disabled by default.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  7. Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Will its late arrival affect its chances of cutting out a swath of the tablet market from Apple and Android? Or will Windows 8 be different enough that it will do well, no matter when it arrives?"

    Wow, look at the assumptions inherent in that.

    Reality check: Windows 8 tablets would flop if they were released today, and they will also flop if they are released in late 2012. So this doesn't "affect the chances" at all.

    Similarly, Windows Phone is fucked too.

    This space has room for at most two competitors, and those two are already established. Blackberry, WebOS, Symbian, and Windows Phone all didn't have a chair when the music stopped, sorry. Nothing more to see here, folks, move along.

    1. Re:Nope! by Defenestrar · · Score: 0

      I would suggest that there could be a huge market for tablet devices which utilize native handwriting recognition and run industry standard software* (Excel, Word, etc...). Multiply by 10 if said device also can handle remote desktop with any of the previous three versions of the OS.

      Who'd want to run a blackberry or iphone while on the go when they can instead be at their desk's computer?

      IMHO *Software synonyms: programs, executables, applications. Synonyms may be abbreviated in written (not spoken) English with a period such as: "prog.", "exe.", or "app."; truncated forms such as "app" designate the software as either grammatically incorrect or as an inherently ironic representation of a truncated element of software development - a collection of a few subroutines instead of a full suite.

    2. Re:Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply cause industry standard software of the past wasn't designed with touch UIs in mind. Handwriting recognition is cool and all, but you still have menus and small buttons and right click and stuff like that which will make working the desktop model on the tablet a horrible experience. iOS and Android clearly both have the advantage over any PC era software that would justify a legacy desktop.

    3. Re:Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Synonyms may be abbreviated in written (not spoken) English with a period such as: "prog.", "exe.", or "app.";

      The thing I hate most about pedants is that they're wrong.

      English is a natural language, as opposed to, for example, Esperanto, Loglan, or C++, which are formal languages. The difference between the two is that with natural languages, rules follow usage, and with formal languages, the spec defines the rules and usage follows the rules. While the rules of English may have once required that all shortened forms of words be truncated with a period (although I'm skeptical even of that), it has certainly not been common usage to require one for some hundreds of years. The delimiting period isn't entirely deprecated, as the word "thou" is, for example, but it is optional.

    4. Re:Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL retard.

    5. Re:Nope! by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point about the UI, but presumably you'll have a stylus for handwriting recognition and presumably that stylus can achieve far better position resolution than stubby fingers - at least as good as a mouse I'd suspect. Also, Office has already been moving toward context specific menus, I bet it's not that much further to make the office circle (previously the File menu) into a tap and rotate for your standard menus while the context specific can pop up when useful.

      I really like the idea of having a stylus for interaction and text entry. It really annoys me that just because Jobs didn't like it then an entire industry and generation seem ready to throw out the oldest form of recording information - we'll just use silicon (or graphene) tablets instead of clay ones. I'm not arguing for buggy whips either; a stylus is a far more precise tool than a finger - the decision to abandon them is like giving up calculators for slide-rules (or pens for finger paint). While a slide rule can put a man on the moon, a calculator can do it better, faster, and cheaper (and if someone thinks calculators are more expensive than some stick with scratch marks, then they've never been shopping for a precision engineering slide rule which might be 6 feet in length).

  8. Traditional PC market by Machtyn · · Score: 2

    Well, of course, it will be irrelevant to the traditional market. Most of us have barely upgraded, businesses are barely turning the corner off of WinXP, and, from what I've observed, this is marketed for the mobile arena. I could be wrong on that last point, but that is my perception.

    1. Re:Traditional PC market by jd · · Score: 1

      Nonono. It will be irrelevant in the traditional market because the world ends in December 2012 and SP1, the first working version, won't be out before 2013.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  9. Win8 is a non-event by vinn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Three things:

    1. Everyone knows that every other release of Windows is good (Win 3.1, 98, XP, 7) and every other one sucks (Win 3.0, 95, ME, Vista.) No enterprise is going to jump on this release.
    2. Enterprises are in various states of completing their transition to Win 7. Very few enterprises are going to begin another rip and replace cycle next year, so no one is going to jump on this release.
    3. Everything in the press has stated how Microsoft has taken a different direction for this user interface (but lately admitting the old one is still there.) No enterprise is going to jump on this release.

    With regards to tablets and phones.. I really don't care what OS mine runs other than I want to to work exactly the way I want it to work. I doubt Win8 will.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're missing NT 3.51, NT 4, Win 2000.
      Without Windows 2000, XP would have been a driver fiasco like Vista was.

    2. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Enterprises are in various states of completing their transition to Win 7. Very few enterprises are going to begin another rip and replace cycle next year,

      Hell yes. We've barely started transition to Win7/Server 2008 and it's mostly through attrition. If it ain't broke, etc. Tell them we'll have to churn this year on 7 and then churn again next year on 8, and you'll have desktop admins quitting wholesale. Even in this economy.

      Besides which, 8 is a real departure from 7, (or is an additional gui on top of the old gui that's a real departure, how ever you want to count it) and it has always taken M$ at least one major release to fix a major departure. (And one service pack after that major release before it becomes useful to serious users.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Win8 is a non-event by makubesu · · Score: 1

      Points 2 and 3 maybe, but 1? Do you think companies make decisions by reading tea leaves? Do they only upgrade their servers when a black cat crosses their paths? Pure superstition.

    4. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm still using XP at work. I've heard rumblings that we'll eventually upgrade to 7. Considering the past track record, we MIGHT go from 7 to 9. W8 isn't even a remote possibility.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    5. Re:Win8 is a non-event by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      and it has always taken M$

      I sense bias. :)

      at least one major release to fix a major departure.

      Windows 7 had an SP before it was "useful to serious users?"

    6. Re:Win8 is a non-event by pclminion · · Score: 2

      1. Everyone knows that every other release of Windows is good (Win 3.1, 98, XP, 7) and every other one sucks (Win 3.0, 95, ME, Vista.) No enterprise is going to jump on this release.

      Oh quit it with this superstitious "every other release" bullshit. The fact is, 3.0, 95, and Vista were all releases which introduced new technology into core parts of the OS. Those releases certainly had major problems because of that. But because of their position in a sequence? Are you for real?

    7. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Nimey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're wrong on Win95. 95 was a revelation when it was released; a much better user interface than 3.1 and preemptive multitasking, and more stable (given good drivers) than 3.1, plus built-in TCP/IP. Sucked that they didn't give OSR2 as a free upgrade (or indeed at all except to OEMs) so that we could have had FAT32 sooner.

      98 sucked when it came out, so you're wrong there as well. 98SE was pretty awesome in its day, though.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd still run win2k if I could... but certain hardware restrictions prevent this.

    9. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really mean WinNT 3.5, SP1, 2, and 3 - right?

    10. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Windows 3.1 was good, but Windows 95 sucked? Yeah, right.

    11. Re:Win8 is a non-event by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course.

      Because certain releases introduced problems, customers told management to "Fix it or Else" and then management emphasized "remove the suckage" for the next version, and they were rewarded with sales & happy customers. Then with happy customers, the development team got the leeway to introduce new major technology for the following release. Goto 1.

    12. Re:Win8 is a non-event by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that every other release of Windows is good

      Looking for patterns that aren't there. You missed 3.11. Windows 95 was fine. 98 wasn't a substantial improvement. And as another person pointed out, you ignored the NT line entirely.

    13. Re:Win8 is a non-event by amliebsch · · Score: 2

      Numerology is deceptively powerful to the simple-minded.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    14. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 was an exception, being essentially a service pack on Vista. I suspect the name change was to distance themselves from a name that people had come to associate with failure.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:Win8 is a non-event by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Many people consider Windows 7 to really be a re-branded version of Vista SP1 that you had to pay for. There's a compelling argument to be made that there's enough similarity that the two are no more different than Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2 and that the naming schemes are arbitrary marketing decisions.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    16. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      > Considering the past track record, we MIGHT go from 7 to 9. W8 isn't even a remote possibility.

      ...or from XP to 9. But that's fine, because there will be a lot of early adopters, and they'll debug W8 and find most of the usability issues that will hopefully be fixed by the time we're ready to give 9 a try. It's all good.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    17. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      >>and it has always taken M$

      > I sense bias. :)

      It's such an accepted shortcut for "Microsoft" that I don't even think about it anymore. Everyone knows what one means by "M$" in the context of the computer industry.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dos 1 crap
      Dos 2 ok...
      Dos 3 crap
      Dos 3.1 ok..
      Dos 4.0 ok (mixed reviews).
      Dos 5.0 crap
      Dos 6.0 ok
      Dos 6.1 crap
      Dos 6.1.2 ok...

      It takes MS a version usually to work the kinks out. Even with the NT stuff 'wait for sp1'. Ms has followed this pattern or about 30 years. Its not 'superstitious'. MS just jacks up about every other version... We got used to it.

      Hell Vista was such a screw up they rebooted in the middle (remember longhorn). It took them until after sp1 and a few mid 'hotfixes' to get it to act normally.

    19. Re:Win8 is a non-event by mbkennel · · Score: 2

      The main UI innovation of Win95 was to copy NextSTEP, except not quite right. It is foolish to have the 'kill window' button too close to any other button. Kill should be on one side (e.g. right), and other functions on the left.

      Nextstep: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3b/NeXTSTEP_desktop.jpg

      Win95: http://theoligarch.com/images/win95.gif

      In both looks and basic functionality for a desktop OS, NeXTSTEP is still more "right" than anything else. Even MacOSX screwed up and most apps have red(kill) next to yellow and green basically copying Win95.

      NeXTSTEP with the MacOSX dock (which is clearly an evolution of the NeXT dock) would still be quite excellent.

    20. Re:Win8 is a non-event by vinn · · Score: 1

      This is a desktop OS, not a server OS. And yes, 3.11 was good, I used it a lot. 95 was ok, but lots of things were pretty quirky when it was released. We all liked using it, and mostly forgave the quirks compared to DOS, but we never knew how much better it could be until 98 was released.

      --
      ----- obSig
    21. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also missing probably the best windows version: 2000 (with the service packs)

    22. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Except I've used a NeXTstep type user interface (Window Maker) and it sucks rocks compared to Win95.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    23. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP still was a driver fiasco. And a RAM nightmare.

    24. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      M$ always means Michael $chumacher to the Formula One community though.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    25. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Yep, the API versions 3.0, 4.0 (95), 5.0 (ME), and 6.0 (Vista) had a LOT of transition pain, where old applications and drivers didn't work.
      3.1, 4.X (98), 5.X (XP) and 6.1 (Seven) were a lot more stable and standardized.

      The only question in my mind for if Eight will end up popular or not is if it will be API version 6.2, or 7.0 (or skips to 8.0 for marketing reasons... in which case it'll be the worst ever.) That is, will you need new drivers for all your hardware? Will some old business apps break?

    26. Re:Win8 is a non-event by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      You missed Windows 2000.

    27. Re:Win8 is a non-event by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. Just on the basis of the touch screen interface alone, I imagine that it will be very popular with the consumer market, and IT people everywhere will avoid it like the Black Plague.

      Should be entertaining to see the clashes between the people who want their Windows 8 tablets supported on the company network, and IT's unwillingness to allow any mission critical apps anywhere near it.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    28. Re:Win8 is a non-event by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      GP is correct, though. If you were actually around when Windows 95 was released, it was a huge win and everyone was excited about it. There were some problems bridging your workload over from Windows 3.1, but even so, everyone felt like it was a huge step forward (unlike, say, Vista).

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    29. Re:Win8 is a non-event by bartoku · · Score: 1

      and every other one sucks (Win 3.0, 95, ME, Vista.)

      Huh I always liked Windows 95, no way I was going back to Windows 3.1 from Windows 95.
      Never used Windows 3.0, had Windows 2000 when Windows ME was being peddled, and Vista never got much use, nor gave me much trouble.

      I am not convinced the Star Trek Movie release sequence can be applied to Windows yet, at least not without blurring some things to make it fit.

      But I think your other points stand, enterprise will probably not mess with Windows 8.
      Well unless the old UI can be flipped on easily and everything else just fits like Windows 7, then it may at least not be a "downgrade to XP from Vista" situation again and Windows 8 will silently replace Windows 7 as new hardware is installed.
      But how likely is that?

    30. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were you smoking? DOS 4 *was* crap and DOS 5 was great. 6 was better, but 5 was the best at that point. 4 was utter rubbish, though.

    31. Re:Win8 is a non-event by exomondo · · Score: 1

      There's a compelling argument to be made that there's enough similarity that the two are no more different than Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2 and that the naming schemes are arbitrary marketing decisions.

      And what is that compelling argument?

    32. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Um, well, they look identical except Windows 7 works?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    33. Re:Win8 is a non-event by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One problem with your idea is that Win95 is actually four different operating systems. Windows 95, OSR1 (OEM-only release), OSR2, and OSR2.5 or whatever. There was an OSR3 alpha (had it) but then we got Win98 beta instead. And frankly, the other problem is that Win95 was a huge step forward by any reasonable measurement.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Win8 is a non-event by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Forget UI innovation, the main innovation of Windows 95 over Win3.1 is that it worked most of the time, and that you could occasionally kill a program without getting a free reboot.

      I agree with you that NeXTStep still has one of the best interfaces of all time. Hell, even OSX blew it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:Win8 is a non-event by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Um, well, they look identical except Windows 7 works?

      If you distribute Windows XP with the 'Classic' theme enabled you could say the same thing about it and Windows 95, but of course that would mean ignoring the actual differences that go beyond the immediately cosmetic (well actually 7 doesn't have that sidebar that Vista had so even there that's a pretty obvious difference).

    36. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      It's not just an "every other version" thing. Versions of windows that introduce huge changes generally come with a side serving of massive incompatibility and instability. Versions of windows that make subtle refinements and UI changes generally have good compatibility and stability. Win 8 is introducing a huge change to the way Windows works, so we can assume that it will generally suck. Windows 9 will look a lot like win8 but will be refined and work well.

    37. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Nimey · · Score: 1

      OSR1 was actually Win95a, which was a freely-downloadable patch that anyone could get. OSR2 (Win95b) was OEM-only, as was OSR 2.5 (Win95c).

      OSR2 was probably the best release, in part because it was the last one without Internet Explorer built in.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    38. Re:Win8 is a non-event by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft just does it for the money, is it really bias?

    39. Re:Win8 is a non-event by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It is foolish to have the 'kill window' button too close to any other button. Kill should be on one side (e.g. right), and other functions on the left.

      This is my main beef with the Windows interface (Mac OSX as well). The UI is decent enough in general on Win7. It's not perfect, there is no such thing as a UI that is perfect for everyone. But those damn titlebar buttons, they got them very nearly right in Win3 and promptly fucked them up in Win95 and every iteration since.

      I'm mostly on KDE4 these days, and the very first thing I did was change the title bar buttons to minimize+maximize on the left, title in the middle and close on the right, I removed everything else. Other than that and sloppy focus+no window raise on focus change, I mostly left the Windows-clone default setup alone since it works perfectly fine for me.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    40. Re:Win8 is a non-event by tbannist · · Score: 1

      I don't know how about Steve Ballmer saying saying that Windows 7 would be Vista just a whole lot better? Or PC World publishing an article indicating that the early releases of Windows 7 were nearly identical to Windows Vista in not just appearance, but also performance and behavior.

      I'm not sure what you don't get about the fact that it's a lot easier to change the name of a product than it is to build a new operating system. Vista isn't the same O/S as XP which wasn't the same operating system as Windows 95 because they're fundamentally different in how they operate. Windows 7 and Vista? Fundamentally the same.

      And anyone who doesn't think Windows has a marketing driven naming scheme isn't paying attention.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    41. Re:Win8 is a non-event by exomondo · · Score: 1

      It's absolutely no different to Windows 95 -> 98 or Windows 2000 -> XP. I'm not sure what you think you've uncovered here that's so special.

    42. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, I'm the one who was accused of bias for using "M$" as shorthand for "Microsoft", and I have to say, doesn't everyone do it for the money, or the things that money can accomplish?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    43. Re:Win8 is a non-event by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Go back up the thread and re-read it. I don't have the patience to explain it to someone who can't be bothered to pay attention.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    44. Re:Win8 is a non-event by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I don't have the patience to explain it to someone who can't be bothered to pay attention.

      Well actually either you think you've discovered something unique about the Vista/7 release not present in 95/95, 2000/XP, etc... suggesting you haven't been paying attention or you are indeed trying to explain this to people that haven't been 'bothered to pay attention' for the past 18 or so years in which the same pattern exists with Windows releases.

    45. Re:Win8 is a non-event by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Stallman?

    46. Re:Win8 is a non-event by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Acknowledged. Except for him?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    47. Re:Win8 is a non-event by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I was playing around with an old Windows 2000 system last weekend. Sadly there seems to be quite a bit of software now that will no longer run on it. RIP Win2k.

    48. Re:Win8 is a non-event by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ISTR an OSR2.1 as well, my memory of the whole era is hazy. Nobody really wants to remember the times they've spent generating blue screeens.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:Win8 is a non-event by Nimey · · Score: 1

      2.5 might have been 2.1 with USB support. Don't remember exactly.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  10. more importantly... by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do we care?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:more importantly... by Mojo66 · · Score: 1

      I don't.

    2. Re:more importantly... by calzakk · · Score: 1

      I do.

    3. Re:more importantly... by Nationless · · Score: 2

      I don't.

      Why?

      The only reason I felt (keyword felt) the need to upgrade to 7 was because XP/2K (yes.. some of my boxes ran 2k) were getting too old for my liking. Windows 7 is not by any stretch of imagination old so I do not FEEL the need. This is something which will dictate a lot of consumers interest in buying it. In addition there is no game-changing upgrade which invites you in. With 7/Vista it was DirectX 11 which, frankly, has not been showing itself for the majority of time.

    4. Re:more importantly... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > The only reason I felt (keyword felt) the need to upgrade to 7 was because XP/2K (yes.. some of my boxes ran 2k) were getting too old for my liking.

      Really? I upgraded one (1) of my boxes to Windows 7 for one and only one reason -- to run more than 4 Gbytes memory, because I do a lot of memory intensive work on that machine. The rest? XP is fine. M$ no longer doing updates? Don' care. I'll upgrade when it becomes an issue. Probably to Windows 9 SP1. (Yes, I did say "nine".)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:more importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not a single fuck was given that day.

    6. Re:more importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only to the point that when my boss, or anyone else asks, if they should be using Windows 8 I can tell them no.

    7. Re:more importantly... by Nationless · · Score: 1

      Well that's curious because I ran > 4 gigs of ram on my 64bit version of XP just fine for graphics rendering. The 64 bit version can use up to 128 gigs.

    8. Re:more importantly... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well that's curious because I ran > 4 gigs of ram on my 64bit version of XP just fine for graphics rendering. The 64 bit version can use up to 128 gigs.

      Good point, I was being sloppy. I had a 32 bit version of Windows XP running on my computer. 32 bit XP was common, 64 bit XP was rare and initially problematic.

      At the point where I needed more than 3.8 gigs (or whatever the magic number was) I couldn't buy any kind of XP anymore, (due to the fact that XP was no longer for sale) and I certainly wasn't going to spend hard earned cash on Vista. So I waited another month and picked up Windows 7 64 bit. So since the transition couldn't be from XP_32 to XP_64, it had to be XP_32 to Win7_64. Which kind of goes along with the original theme of using an operating system until there is an overriding reason to change. ("Overriding" *not* meaning "a new version has come out". Oooh, shiny!)

      Incidentally, my current PC was first purchased just before the turn of the century. Everything has been replaced at least once except the floppy (which I never use) and the case itself, which basically never wears out. Think about that next time you drop another grand on yet another minisculely improved imac.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    9. Re:more importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot, you don't care about anything relevant and nothing relevant cares about you.

  11. Depends by lennier1 · · Score: 0

    If they want to continue to turn it into a Vista-like turd they may as well start shipping it now.

  12. Estimated release date by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    December 22, 2012. Unless there is no end of the world the previous day, in that case could be delayed,

    1. Re:Estimated release date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be a quick "boom" end of the world.

      The poles are just going to start shifting more quickly leading to an eventual reversal. We know for a fact this happens every so often, coinciding with the Earth's orbit crossing to the other side of the galaxy's central orbit plane.

      We will probably see accelerated climate change but it's not world ending. It might be massively disruptive if the magnetic shift happens quickly but more likely it will be gradual over several decades or even hundreds of years.

    2. Re:Estimated release date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the date I assume imperial control of this star system is December 23, 2012. Prophecies of my ascent to power, while well-meaning, have neglected to account for various relativistic effects which actually push my date of ascension a further 31 hours into the future, making it the 23rd. I forgive you your mistake.

    3. Re:Estimated release date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was it that Bill Gates is reputed to have said on the lead up to a delayed Windows 95 release ?

      "Windows 95 _will_ be out before Christmas, but we may have to delay December by a couple of months."

    4. Re:Estimated release date by formfeed · · Score: 1

      December 22, 2012. Unless there is no end of the world the previous day, in that case could be delayed,

      No, the other way around: December 21, 2012 is when the nuclear power plants will try to upgrade to Windows 8. The Mayans foresaw this.

  13. Windows 8 by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

    They are trying to get into the mobile market with Windows 8, so I'm not surprised they are trying to release it ASAP. They want all the tablet manufacturers to be like, oohhhh Windows on a tablet, and it's UI isn't total crap on a touchscreen (the new home interface is suppose to be really nice for touchscreens).

    Windows 8 will also have the metro apps, which I assume they will try to get developers to think about touchscreen devices (huge buttons, simple UI, gestures) more.

    They are also going to port it to ARM, so that they can get into embedded devices too (tablets, smartphones, etc.).

    Tablets could be x86 or ARM, and as you can see ARM is currently winning (iPad/2 anyone?)

  14. It's all clear now... by catbertscousin · · Score: 2

    No wonder the Mayans thought the world would end in 2012. Either that or their calendar software wasn't Win8 compatible.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  15. Metro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft’s promise that Metro will be just as navigable with a mouse/keyboard as with fingers/stylus

    And that sums it all up: the mouse/keyboard (artists' brush) will have no advantage over fingers (finger-painting). Mouse/keyboard being "dumbed down" to the fingerpaint experience. No classic Win7 interface = no Win8 for me.

  16. late arrival? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > Will its late arrival affect its chances of cutting out a swath of the tablet market from Apple and Android?

    I don't think so. I think it'll be the inability to get any serious work done without a keyboard and a mouse that will affect its chances much more than a few months difference either way on release.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:late arrival? by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      I think it'll be the inability to get any serious work done without a keyboard and a mouse that will affect its chances much more than a few months difference either way on release.

      And how is that any different from any other tablet OS?

    2. Re:late arrival? by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      I do lots of serious work on my Windows 7 tablet PC... albeit with a stylus and not my finger. Windows 8 will have support for a stylus so I anticipate being able to get a lot done on it.

    3. Re:late arrival? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you, but I do useful work daily on Android. I can do all correspondence, most reports, do command line work on *NIX boxes, from the Android environment. Even give presentations from my Android phone with the proper HDMI cable. It's nice not having to carry a laptop around. Many of my work associates manage to get work done just fine on their iPads.

      I admit, for a small part of the time, I'm remotely logged into a Windows 7 box, because some things still only run on Windows. Which is a pain in the behind, as Windows doesn't work at all well with a touch interface, going back to my original point.

      What iOS and Android have that Microsoft does not, is a touch-only paradigm that actually works. It's not at all apparent even now that Microsoft gets what a touch-only interface really means. It does *not* mean a set of cabalistic gestures that imitate the actions of a 3 button mouse so they don't have to re-think the gui. (Every other M$ attempt at a touch interface except Surface, which would have been great, if they had actually made it available.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:late arrival? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Really? I own a Windows 7 (Pro) tablet PC and fought with the accessibility tools that they have misnamed "touch support" for awhile, really trying to figure out how to do real work, and finally gave up. How masochistic do you have to be? Access now is by keyboard and mouse only, until I can install a real touch based OS on it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:late arrival? by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      I told you; I use a stylus. I write things. I draw things. There's a lot of work to be done on pen and paper that I can do with stylus and tablet. Touch support isn't the greatest in windows 7 but it's certainly not awful. Jump lists are very touch friendly, so is the the new jumbo sized start menu. Menus can be maximized and maximized and docked without touching the controls in the top left. Flick shortcuts to copy/paste and navigate the browser are something that I miss on my iPad. My model even has multitouch support, so I can pinch to zoom websites, use two fingers to scroll, one finger to highlight, press and hold to right click. Wasn't a bad experience at all in my opinion.

  17. Mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's been placed in the Windows Mantra this time?

    Windows isn't done,
    until xxx won't run!

    1. Re:Mantra by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Who's been placed in the Windows Mantra this time?

      With the new 'secure boot', Windows 8 ain't done until Linux won't run...

    2. Re:Mantra by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      That notion has been thoroughly debunked already. Let it go.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    3. Re:Mantra by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      That notion has been thoroughly debunked already. Let it go.

      Troll rating: 4/10

    4. Re:Mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it hasn't. If boxen builders choose to select these mobos and not give out the keys to distros, Linux will not be allowed to be installed on said machine. Putting this decision in the hands of those building the gear, when it's in their interests to do what MS want, is not a sensible situation. No box builder is going to risk their "loyalty discounts" for their OEM windows.

    5. Re:Mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butthurt rating: 11/10

    6. Re:Mantra by exomondo · · Score: 1

      No it hasn't. If boxen builders choose to select these mobos and not give out the keys to distros, Linux will not be allowed to be installed on said machine.

      Choose what mobos? Ones that have secure boot and don't allow it to be disabled? Who's making those?

      No box builder is going to risk their "loyalty discounts" for their OEM windows.

      Then why aren't they locking down BIOSes to prevent Linux from running now?

    7. Re:Mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butthurt rating: 11/10

      WIN!

    8. Re:Mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux runs on Windows? I know the open source community is entirely based on copying existing successful proprietary software but cmon..

  18. I remember a rumor about Xbox games being playable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Windows 8. Sounded like extreme bullshit to me. I figure something was discussed about merging the Games for Windows Live and Xbox Live pools with regard to achievements, social networking, multiplayer gaming, or pricing, and the blogs read way too much into it.

    But has anything more come out on this since then?

  19. I Really Don't Fucking Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, I'm just sitting here naked listening to Hüsker Dü songs that I can find on youtube. Hüsker Dü's worst song has more merit than everything microshit ever produced.
    Of course I'm drunk; do you think I let profound shit like this ever get out when I'm sober?

  20. Because we all know the *really* important thing by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Is the price of the paper and not information asymmetry.

     

    --
    Deleted
  21. Re:You will be in a FEMA CAMP in 2012 by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

    Unless you move to the Pacific Northwest - they seceded right? Although isn't the date off, I thought that was later in a different future? Unless you're not talking about human augmentation and instead are referencing the popular misconceptions about the Mayan calendar... although in that case I think people who didn't wait for SP1 might be able to get Windows 8 with an early release before the end of time. Perhaps some clarification is in order, I think I want to answer to your point, but I can't find it.

  22. Nonono by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's Windows Phone - on your desktop. Like who wouldn't want that?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Nonono by pclminion · · Score: 0

      It's Windows Phone - on your desktop. Like who wouldn't want that?

      Right. There's no market for larger form-factor, touch based devices with multitudes of self-contained applications. No market at all. We all know how fucking dismal iPad2 sales have been, right?

    2. Re:Nonono by omnichad · · Score: 2

      In their defense, they aren't the only one doing stupid things like that. OS X now has an app launcher screen that's literally no different than the way the apps are displayed on an iPhone screen. It's useless.

    3. Re:Nonono by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      They also added "full screen mode" to desktop apps, to mimic the iPad/iPhone full-screen apps.

      It's not like Microsoft invented the notion of making their desktop OS more "phone/tablet-like"... Apple started it first.

      The only real difference is that Microsofts tablet offering will be able to run desktop apps (at least if it's an Intel-powered tablet) and will be running basically the same OS on both form-factors, while Apple has two discrete platforms (iOS and OS X). But even there you can clearly see that the future is iOS and OS X is winding down.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    4. Re:Nonono by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Forgot about that feature as soon as I could. It basically disables all but the primary screen when you use it. WHY???!?!?!?!

    5. Re:Nonono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full screen apps are nice on small screens, ie. when I'm using my 13" macbook air it gives me a lot more screen real estate to use. The fact that the fullscreen app behaves like a virtual desktop is also nice :)

      As for the above comment about windows 8 being for windows phone what lion is for ios; it isn't (imo). You have to consider that OS X and iOS has the "same" kernel, but they have different API's. Because touch and mouse are two different methods of interaction. Windows 8 comes with a taste of indecisiveness to it. In Windows 8 you can create Metro apps, using the Metro API's, or you can create win32-apps using the legacy win32 API. As it seems to me it will be harder to port an application written for Metro to win32 than it is porting an iOS application to OS X.

      The other sad thing with Windows 8 is that it will allow pc-manufacturers continue to churn out crap (try to find a 15" with a decent resolution and price, they're all (almost) 1368x720 (so they can call it "HD")), but now they'll put a touch screen on it, and people will buy it before they realise they don't want to sit around poking their screen, and that their arm gets tired.

    6. Re:Nonono by SpryGuy · · Score: 0

      As it seems to me it will be harder to port an application written for Metro to win32 than it is porting an iOS application to OS X.

      I think in reality most porting attempts will go the OTHER way.

      And Windows 8 actually pushes devices to use higher than 1378x720 (in order to get the dual-docking Metro apps feature).

      For the record, my Win7 laptop has a 15.4" screen that is 1920x1080... same resolution as that on my 23" desktop monitor.

      My interest in Microsoft's plans are more along the line of "how easy will it be to write a single app that runs on Windows Phone 8, Windows 8, and XBox v.Next?" That'll be interesting to watch play out.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    7. Re:Nonono by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Here, here. I don't think even the newest Mac convert coming from iOS land uses Launchpad. It is semi useful for people who can't find their apps (in the apps folder, or by using spotlight, derp), in that it will show you every app that is on your computer. I actually bought something from the App store and couldn't find it (couldn't remember what it was called). Ok, that's a stretch, but true story...

    8. Re:Nonono by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      WHY???!?!?!?!

      Because for years newbs and Windows switchers have complained about the multiple window metaphor and lack of full screen mode?

    9. Re:Nonono by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The WHY is about why do they disable the other screens? It's just a stupid texture pattern instead of a useful window for browsing the web, watching video, or just freaking displaying your wallpaper.

    10. Re:Nonono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i.e. Apple's "At Ease" all over again!

  23. Astroturfing at its best by mangu · · Score: 1

    really amazing advances

    vastly improved

    faster boot times

    faster/better file copies

    For a system that won't be in beta until next year, you are quite positive. Were these the same predictions you made before Vista went into beta? Just curious.

    1. Re:Astroturfing at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not in beta yet, but there is a stripped down 'developer preview' that I have used. I don't like the new start-screen, but if there's a toggle for that, it might end up being a good OS.

    2. Re:Astroturfing at its best by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      You can see and experience all those things I listed today in the existing developer preview. The Beta will be out in a few months with a more polished UI on top of the improved guts and plumbing. I'm simply reserving judgement on UI aspects at this point, but the underpinnings seem pretty solid, with some pretty dramatic improvements over Windows 7 in there.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    3. Re:Astroturfing at its best by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      there is a stripped down 'developer preview' that I have used

      The "stripped down" part is probably why it is so much faster at everything.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  24. Nope! by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The AC is right ('twasn't me). We need one Cathedral (iOS) and one Bazaar (Android) and that's all. There's only two seats at this table and they're both taken.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  25. Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    windows 8 = Microsoft BOB

    1. Re:Bob by jenn_13 · · Score: 1

      So, windows 8 will inspire a new WORST FONT EVER?

  26. Office by tekrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this is the Microsoft I'm familiar with, it'll probably be: "Windows isn't done 'till Office won't run." I mean, we are talking about an entity that cannot keep interfaces consistent across divisions of the same company.

    I am forced to work with Outlook 2007 under Windows XP. What a nightmare. Copy/Paste doesn't even work consistently within the application itself. Sometimes you'll copy text out of a message and paste into a reply of the same thread, and either the OS or the App will add extra returns and spaces/tabs for no apparent reason. Annoying.

    Worse still is Outlook's annoying habit of "are you sure" for EVERYTHING. Find an email with an attachment, open it, close the email. Windows/Outlook asks "Save changes to attachment?" NO. All I did was OPEN it, I didn't change squat! Why the app can't figure this out is a MAJOR FAILURE of Q/A.

    So trust me, it'll be Office that breaks under Win8. Or something else critical. Or maybe it'll be by design so that everyone that "upgrades" to Win8 will be forced to buy new copies of Office.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, quit crying about Office 2007 already. I also have Office 2007 installed on XP at work, and I don't have any of these bullshit problems you mention. Copy and paste works fine. The save dialogue pops up when you try to close the email because it wants to clear the temporary file that it created because you were too fucking lazy to save the file out of your email (email is not a file system, so quit using it as one). Can I get a +4 Interesting now for cancelling out your annecdote?

    2. Re:Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the change to the document is the printer. The document was created with a different printer than the one you use.

    3. Re:Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am forced to work with Outlook 2007 under Windows XP. What a nightmare. Copy/Paste doesn't even work consistently within the application itself. Sometimes you'll copy text out of a message and paste into a reply of the same thread, and either the OS or the App will add extra returns and spaces/tabs for no apparent reason. Annoying.

      There are some options that may fix that... 'Suppress Extra Line Breaks' and something else that controls when they end up in the message.

  27. enterprise? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    Where does this term come from? I mean, are we talking about a business/institution here or what? I think it just means some large group of computers that some small set of professionals are responsible for maintaining...but at other times "enterprise" is used to actually refer to the overlying business structure. In that case, shouldn't we be referring to "the business" and not "the enterprise"?

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:enterprise? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      The term "Enterprise" with regards to Microsoft?

      It refers to the cream of the crop, in terms of software. The software that has no built-in limitations (market segmentation), and typically a fair number of advanced features. In my experience, Microsoft rarely offers anything above Enterprise...I'm having trouble think of an example. This tier of the software is typically used for companies in excess of 10,000 employees or when you are really going overboard with clustering / redundancies / data mining.

      The word itself?

      enÂterÂprise noun \Ëen-tÉ(TM)(r)-ËOEprÄz\

      Definition of ENTERPRISE

      1
      : a project or undertaking that is especially difficult, complicated, or risky
      2
      : readiness to engage in daring or difficult action : initiative
      3
      a : a unit of economic organization or activity; especially : a business organization
      b : a systematic purposeful activity
        See enterprise defined for English-language learners Â
      See enterprise defined for kids Â
      Examples of ENTERPRISE

      Moving the drilling rig offshore was a costly enterprise.
      Agriculture is the main economic enterprise among these people.
      When he purchased the company it was a thriving commercial enterprise.
      He was criticized for his lack of enterprise in dealing with the crisis.
      Origin of ENTERPRISE

      Middle English, from Anglo-French, from entreprendre to undertake, from entre- inter- + prendre to take â" more at prize
      First Known Use: 15th century

      So, it's usually a synonym for "business" or "venture," but in MS nomenclature it has a connotation for a very large business (lots of money, 99.999999999999% up-time, multiple offices in multiple countries). It's the business equivalent of the consumer tier called Ultimate. Now that I think about it, Windows 7 is the only product I know of that has both an Enterprise and Ultimate edition.

      Windows 7 Enterprise
      This edition targets the enterprise segment of the market and is sold through volume licensing to companies which have a Software Assurance contract with Microsoft.[1] Additional features include support for Multilingual User Interface (MUI) packages, BitLocker Drive Encryption, and UNIX application support.[1] Not available through retail or OEM channels, this edition is distributed through Microsoft Software Assurance (SA).[1] As a result it includes several SA-only benefits, including a license allowing the operating of diskless nodes (diskless PCs), the running of multiple virtual machines, and activation via VLK.[12] Like Professional, Microsoft will support this edition until 2020.

      Windows 7 Ultimate
      Windows 7 Ultimate contains all of the same features as Windows 7 Enterprise, but unlike the Enterprise edition, it is available to home users on an individual license basis.[1] Windows 7 Home Premium and Windows 7 Professional users are able to upgrade to Windows 7 Ultimate for a fee using Windows Anytime Upgrade if they wish to do so.[1] Unlike Windows Vista Ultimate, the Windows 7 Ultimate edition does not include the Windows Ultimate Extras feature or any exclusive features as Microsoft had stated.[1] However, even though it is the consumer equivalent to Enterprise, like Home Premium, Microsoft will only support Ultimate until 2015.[13]

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    2. Re:enterprise? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I think it just means some large group of computers that some small set of professionals are responsible for maintaining...but at other times "enterprise" is used to actually refer to the overlying business structure. In that case, shouldn't we be referring to "the business" and not "the enterprise"?

      "Business" can also refer to revenue-producing work, e.g. a salesperson who is responsible for "bringing in new business" isn't doing mergers and acquisitions. A large company might also be divided into several "businesses,"as in "HP's printer business" -- also known as "business lines" or "business units" -- so referring to "the business" in that sense could be ambiguous. When you refer to "the enterprise," on the other hand, you're specifically talking about HP as a whole company, the sum total of its workforce, assets, revenues, and expenditures.

      Typically when you refer to a business as "an enterprise," it implies that the business is large enough to have a significant workforce and management structure; you sometimes hear about "small enterprises," but typically a sole proprietorship or a one-off retail store is not referred to as an enterprise.

      So in that sense, "enterprise software" refers to software that's designed to support the functions of a large business organization. It supports lots of users and it integrates with the other kinds of systems enterprises usually want, either directly or via middleware.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  28. Windows 8 is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Windows 8 is a fucking joke, that metro interface is the most retarded thing I've ever seen.

    I hope they fail big time this time.

  29. you've got that backwards by tverbeek · · Score: 2

    "Or will Windows 8 be different enough that it will do well, no matter when it arrives?"

    I think Windows 8 will be different enough that it will do badly, no matter when it arrives.

    A huge population of computer users do not want "new and different". This is a large part of why Windows XP has remain entrenched for so long, not just in businesses but also in people's homes. I made a point of replacing my parents' aging XP computer with a new one while XP was still available because I knew they'd hate learning whatever changes there were in Vista. On the other hand, now that XP is no longer a realistic option for new systems, I'll be watching the release date of Win8, so I can get them their next computer with Win7 on it, because it'll be less drastic a change than Windows 8 would be. I'd even undertake the effort of switching them to OS X or Linux before I'd try to switch them to Win8. (It's the same reason I find people familiar with ye olde MS Office tend to prefer switching to Open/LibreOffice rather than to MS Office 2007/2010.)

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:you've got that backwards by tbannist · · Score: 1

      From what people are saying this will be different enough that it slaps people in the face with "different" when they start it up. Since Windows 95, the Windows UI has been fairly consistent. I'd say you're probably right, the new "full screen start menu" will have to be truly amazing and useful or it will be DOA.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    2. Re:you've got that backwards by exomondo · · Score: 1

      If you've used the developer preview you can see that if you're not interested in Metro-style apps then the only real difference is the start menu, which is the Metro-style launcher. Using Office or Photoshop or any traditional Windows app on Win8 is no different to Windows 7.
      The major differences are the changes for touch and tablets, but if the users are not - as you say - interested in "new and different" then they won't be using any of that stuff anyway.

    3. Re:you've got that backwards by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I looked at the developer preview long enough to get frustrated that I couldn't figure out how to do some really obvious and simple tasks. That's all the time most users will want to spend on it.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:you've got that backwards by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I looked at the developer preview long enough to get frustrated that I couldn't figure out how to do some really obvious and simple tasks. That's all the time most users will want to spend on it.

      What couldn't you figure out?

    5. Re:you've got that backwards by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I don't recall. Once I reach the "fuck this" point with something, I don't dwell on it. I'll deal with Win8 only when/if I have to.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  30. How often are MS releases on time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times was Vista delayed. Then when it finally came out it sucked.

    Seems to me that MS has a pattern of saying "wait, don't go with the competition! The *new improve* MS whatever will be out in six months, and will have all these awesome features!"

    Then there is a delay, then another delay, then features are pulled, then more features are pulled. When the product is finally released, it completely sucks, but MS promises to have everything fixed in the next service pack, then SP2, then SP3 . . .

  31. Already done by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    I thought that was the purpose of the start menu... and desktop icons... and the system tray... and the quick launch bar... and desktop widgets...

    1. Re:Already done by gcnaddict · · Score: 2

      Right. See the inconsistency?

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Already done by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Where you see inconsistency, another person sees customization.

      What if you want to be a desktop icon user where every square inch of your desktop is organized into a pile of messy icons (but you know where every single app is...)
      What if you want to be able to launch everything form a simple "text field" that you only need to type a name to get your app...
      What if you want to be able to pin every application you use on a regular basis...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, it's already been done. Desktop widgets have been able to duplicate this presentation method, and behave essentially like mobile apps as well, but can be used as a quick indicator panel from which to manage data in a simple way, and also to launch a full app that expands on the functionality of the widget.

  32. You're joking me, no? by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me just try that out - hold on;

    Me: What could be a huge market for tablet devices which utilize native handwriting recognition and run industry standard software?
    Siri: I found 7 industry standards... 3 of them are not far from you: [...]

    Me: No, no, Siri, listen, I need a huge market for tablet devices which utilize native handrwriting recognition!
    Siri: The Ojibwa and Tuskarora Iroquois are recognized Native American tribes near your location.

    Me: Siri, are you dumb? I am looking for a huge market for tablet devices which utilize native handrwriting recognition!
    Siri: I found 5 markets for tablets are near your location. Tap the one you want directions to:

    1. Re:You're joking me, no? by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      R.O.F.L. I wish I could mod this post. I salute you Sir, Darth, or whatever honored title you prefer.

    2. Re:You're joking me, no? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure "Darth" is the honored title....

    3. Re:You're joking me, no? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Jesus, next you'll tell me Siri can't locate abortion clinics!

      Oh, wait ...

      http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2011/12/01/siri-total-misogynist/

  33. Microsoft is releasing too many OS versions by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    MS's primary selling point is consistency. These OS's are breaking it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  34. Metro = Bob? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Yes, Windows 8 is a superset of Windows 7, in much the same way that a computer with MS Bob was a superset of Windows 3.1. After installing Bob you could still run all of your old Windows apps, but they didn't integrate with the Bob environment, effectively undermining whatever (alleged) benefit that environment gave the machine.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  35. Shipping on devices by Fall - Book it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Book it.

  36. I'll pass on it! by wfstanle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With their (MS) history of every other version flavor of Windows having problems, I'll wait for the successor to Win 8. Consider the history...

    Win 95 - Win 98
    Win NT - Win 2000
    Win Me - Win XP
    Win Vista - Win 7

    Granted, the second one of each pair had problems but not nearly as much problems as the first. Is there a pattern here?

  37. Windows for free? by BlueCoder · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering if Microsoft is contemplating giving windows away more or less free and then locking down the platform and go for an app store model where they take a cut of the software pie. A more secure DRM'd platform... Certainly takes away most of the threat of viruses and trojans and that could be used to sell the idea to the public.

  38. Re:I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What on earth are you doing thats taking you so long?

  39. When "intensive purposes" is right by tepples · · Score: 1

    It is indeed "intents" except when someone is making a pun on intensive properties, such as discussions about GDP of a market vs. GDP per capita or number of open WLAN APs vs. percentage of open APs.

  40. Windows is like Star Trek by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

    Windows is like Star Trek movies.

    Only every other version is worth your time. Windows 7 was good therefore Window 8 will be rubbish.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  41. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found it really disturbing that MS wants to be like Apple and shit OS's by the dozen, who cares about windows 8? Seriously.

    Most companies will adopt windows 7 as the next "XP" meaning, for at least 5 or 6 years if not more than that. Windows 8, 9 10,fuck.

    That's like Mcdonal changing it's fries, NO.

  42. I know when Win 8 will be ready for release! by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    Q: When will Windows 8 be released?
    A: About six months before it's ready.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  43. Re:You will be in a FEMA CAMP in 2012 by brentrad · · Score: 1

    Glenn Beck, is that you?

  44. Gorilla arm by tepples · · Score: 1

    larger form-factor, touch based devices

    When these larger form factors extend into a physical size three to four times that of the iPad, from 1024x768 up to 1920x1080, we're looking at gorilla arm syndrome.

  45. M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How old are you, again?

  46. Mojave was Vista SP1 by tepples · · Score: 1

    No, Mojave was Windows Vista SP1. Windows 7 is SP3.

  47. and that will kill Enterprise sales / steam / open by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and that will kill Enterprise sales / steam / open source apps on windows and make lunix big.

  48. Ubuntu has Xfce, you know by tepples · · Score: 1

    The linux desktop is a total fubar (latest examples are the mass migration going on from Ubuntu to Mint.

    Why wipe and install Mint when you can just sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop?

    1. Re:Ubuntu has Xfce, you know by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Don't ask me - ask the > 10,000 people per week who are switching from Ubuntu to Mint :-)

      I'm "sort of tempted" to give it a try myself ... "just cuz". Who knows?

  49. Push Win 8 to 2013! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Delay the "sucking sound"!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  50. LCARS screen layout by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't see what's so bad about the layout of LCARS, at least the variant shown here. I see a taskbar down the far left, an "Elbo" strip dividing app-wide controls from the document, a toolbar inside the Elbo, a document below the Elbo, and a tab list to the left of the document. The only improvement I'd make is to swipe the Elbo's corner to show or hide the taskbar, as seen on some of the existing screenshots that show only the app and document areas. It's really not too much of a jump from a traditional tabbed-document-interface GUI. I can draw you a mockup of what an LCARS-style UI might look like using a more this-century color scheme.

    1. Re:LCARS screen layout by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can draw you a mockup of what an LCARS-style UI might look like using a more this-century color scheme.

      In this century there would be an LCARS module for fetching color schemes from kuler.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Right on time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8 will be released precisely on time.

    Just a bit past 10 AM EST on the morning of Decembre 23rd 2012.

    The only individual who will notice is a slashdot contributor with no windows in his Mom's basement.

  52. Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still playing my games on XP, cause I haven't found a reason to "upgrade". And for everything serious, Windows is the wrong OS anyway. For that, there's Linux & co.
    Plus, for the n00bs who prefer to stay dumb and ignorant, OS X is the better toy^Wos anyway nowadays.

    There just is no point in getting a new Windows, is there?
    (No "But Windows 7 now is nearly just as fast as XP again!" is not an argument. And "Its window manager improved so much." is a silly point for Linux users with their Compiz & co. Other than that I haven't seen any relevant differences when I tried it.)

  53. we should care? why?

  54. Just ordered a Samsung Series 7 Slate for that by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    Yep... my Christmas gift from my family to me is a Samsung Series 7 Slate. I even bought it from the Microsoft online store (best price by a fairly large percentage oddly enough) and am anxious to receive it once my dad reships it to me from the states.

    Who would want it is a good question.

    1) People who like iPad but can't find anything useful to do with it.
    2) People who like iPad but have to carry an iPad AND a laptop to be productive. Now we can carry a tablet and a dock
    3) People who don't like being DRM'd to death by Apple and Google.
    4) People who like to do things like programming and can't on their other tablets... unless you're going to write lame ass HTML5 and EcmaScript apps.
    5) People who want to run a full version of Chrome or Opera on their tablets instead of the clunky ass Android or iOS browsers.
    6) People who like to be able to choose their hardware features and pay for them... or people who want to be able to upgrade the disk space without buying a new tablet. What I like most about the windows 8 tablet is that using an inductive charger attachment, I can leave my tablet in my backpack when I get to the office and simply lay the backpack on my desk and using Intel Wireless Display and Bluetooth, just push a button, connect to the tablet and have a 24" Windows desktop on a machine suitable to write video codecs on (which is what I'll use it for) and be ready to go.

    Windows 8 will be the first operating system to fully replace the desktop and tablet operating systems with one which does both. If you consider that iOS is entirely capable of running almost all OS X apps Apple could do it to, but they would damage their store based business model completely if for example you could just use uTorrent or any other service to get media on your device. Not to mention that with a Sandy Bridge Core i5, I can rip a DVD with an external DVD drive to my tablet at about 12x using QuickSync... sure the quality is crap compared to x264, but that's not the point.

    The only things missing from the Samsung Series 7 Slate are :
        1) USB 3 :( that was a lame move... the dock has gigabit ethernet though and for what I need, it'll make up for it
        2) Internal inductive charging. Will have to rig a charger for that
        3) Upgradable RAM.. they actually soldered the 4GB of RAM to the motherboard, but since Windows 8 seems to use much less RAM than Windows 7 (using it now), that shouldn't be a problem.

    And ideally, the #1 feature upgrade this device could have is :
        Make it the size of a phone instead of a tablet. Then I can have a single device which does everything instead of having a phone, a tablet and a PC.

    1. Re:Just ordered a Samsung Series 7 Slate for that by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If you got paid for this I hope they discounted for lateness and lack of clue.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Just ordered a Samsung Series 7 Slate for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha i should have seen a response like that coming. but you asked who would want it... obviously it would be people like me. And since it was my Christmas present to myself... and I've waited about 14 years for this... having worked on some of the earliest linux tablets back then with Nokia, Intel and Sony Ericsson... I'm pretty f-ing excited it is finally happening.

    3. Re:Just ordered a Samsung Series 7 Slate for that by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I asked who would want Windows Phone on a desktop. You gave me the exact opposite thing: You like Windows 7 on a tablet.

      Now look that that thing: Samsung Series 7 Slate. $1099 asking price. Good selection of I/O slots. Better than average video. Pen. 3.5 hours battery life.

      If you really want Windows 7 in a tablet, then this thing with 3x the battery life would be a dream machine. I wonder what it weighs.

      So you could have 2 iPads, 6 Kindle Fires, 12 Novo7's, or this. And you like this. Good for you.

      You're a corner case. Fringe. Out of the mainstream. Most of us don't like Windows so much that we're going to let it get in the way of all this new good stuff. And especially not enough to tether to a wall every 4 hours. For what this costs I could get an Android tablet for all the kids that are currently stealing my Asus Transformer, and have $400 left to buy apps. And I have Citrix, Onlive gaming and various other things, so it doesn't do anything I can't do better from my Android tablet that cost less than half as much. I can wifi tether to my phone, access my citrix, open Outlook Excel Word and Powerpoint just like I was at my desk - and put it on the conference room bigscreen over HDMI in 1080 res.

      When Microsoft could prevent people from having cool new stuff by managing their partners you might have had a point. But you can only hold back the tide for so long. Eventually, the tide wins.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  55. This article title... by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    Will Windows 8 Be Ready For Release In 2012?

    I dunno, don't ask me! I'm here to ask that, not have it asked to me.

    Not writing your article title as a question already makes it ten times more informative.

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  56. Irrelevant, unlike other things... by godefroi · · Score: 1

    In related news, an anonymous reader notes that IDC predicts Windows 8 will be irrelevant to the traditional PC market.

    Unlike the latest release of random Linux/BSD distro XYZ, which is totally relevant in the market.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)