Warning: Coffee contains DHMO
on
Death by Coffee?
·
· Score: 5, Funny
It's surprising one can even survive to 10 cups of coffee, when most coffee is contaminated with DHMO.
For those who are not aware of the dangers of this substance, dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO. Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Exposition to it gaseous form may cause burns, permanent scars and even death.
Symptoms of DHMO ingestion include sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death. Dihydrogen monoxide is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain. It has been found that malignant cancer cells only develop in its presence.
The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation.". It's commonly used as an industrial solvent and coolant, as a fire retardant, in the distribution of pesticides, in abortion clinics,and lots more.
Yeah, I don't know how they dealt with this. I think they just announced their code. I think this is a global radio standard. FCC rules don't apply outside the US.
In 2003 a famous rock radio station called 89 FM, that broadcasts to Sao Paulo, Brazil, went a little further.
On that day, they played old dance and pop music, like Michael Jackson, Abba, Barry White, Kool and The Gang, Chic, Jimmy Bo Horne...
And they simply didn't announce themselves as 89 FM anymore, like they usually did in each break (You're listening 89 FM, blah blah).
When listeners started calling the station to see what happened, they said they had been sold. There were some people who got scared, as this is one of the best rock radios in Sao Paulo.
They really had to have guts to say they were sold.
The difference being the actual question is not "what if", but when.
We face both increased flooding and increased drought. Extended heat waves, more powerful storms, and other extreme weather events will become more and more common.
The greenhouse gases we've already placed in the atmosphere will continue to warm the planet for many decades if not centuries. Right now, there is about 40 percent more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there was at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The CO2 concentration is projected to reach twice the pre-industrial level by the middle of this century. This doubling of CO2 is the scenario most scientists have relied on in projecting the likely impacts of global warming. But here's what's really troubling: If we continue with business as usual, by the turn of the century greenhouse gas concentrations will be approaching three times the pre-industrial levels. In other words, we may be facing consequences far more severe than those already projected.
What exactly leads you to think the Pentagon report may be wrong ? Why do you think I am jumping to conclusions bonehead ? I just said it could be the cause.
They said weather changes will come sooner than almost everybody expected.
The fact is that our weather is changing. Can you deny that ?
It's been happening for some years already. Read this, from 1999.
From there, things are getting worse. Islands in the South Pacific abandoned by their residents as their ground water turns salty; Connecticut-size bergs calving off the antarctic ice mass; record floods in Europe followed by more record floods. Across northern India this year, record-breaking heat storms arrived before the monsoon, raising the temperature to 123 degrees in the shade--so hot that the birds were dropping dead from the trees. You can read it all here
So, please, explain to me why I am a shallow thinker.
ON the day of the al-Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, Donald Rumsfeld urged George Bush to retaliate immediately by bombing Iraq. Richard Clarke, then the White House counter- terrorism co-ordinator, said: "Defence secretary Rumsfeld was saying we needed to bomb Iraq. We all said, 'But no, no, al-Qaeda is in Afghanistan.' They were talking about Iraq on 9/11."
Rumsfeld responded by saying that "there aren't any good targets in Afghanistan and there are lots of good targets in Iraq".
They just needed an excuse. They were crazy to attack Iraq. They had no excuses, so they fabricated it.
"I'm still not convinced on global warming so how can I condemn another man who also isn't convinced."
Ok. That shows you're as ignorant as Bush. The difference is that you don't have to make decisions that can change the world, so you're excused to be ignorant. Even though Bush is dumb, he has specialists to help. And all these specialists, including those from Pentagon, are warning him about this. And he doesn't care. I strongly suggest you read thisthis
I love how you just say he lied to a whole nation in order to get support for the war. What did he say or even insinuate that was a lie?
You must been brain-washed if you din't notice the lies. He tried to picture Saddam as a threat to the US. But Saddam, althought being a son-of-a-bitch crazy loon, was harmless to the world at that point. His army was almost dismanteled, specially if compared to what it was some years ago. He didn't have any missile able to reach the continental US. He didn't have any WMD (in fact I am surprised the US didn't plant any WMD in Iraq, to be found). He was not affiliated with Al-Qaeda. And all reports Bush received indicated all this. But he tried to supress and change these reports and fabricate others, that would incriminate Saddam.
Officials also hope that if terrorists know a bomb can be traced, they will be less likely to try to use one
- How ya doing, Mohammed Al-Shafeer ? Ready to do the sacrifice in the name of Allah ? - Nah, I don't think I'll carry that nuke with me. They'd be able to trace me after it exploded. I prefer to be just a plain old-fashioned bomb-man with vanilla explosives. This way they won't trace me.
How can anyone take writing like this seriously when the commander and chief of the united states of America is referred to as a religious fundamentalist.
Sorry, I read your sentence 4 times and still could not get your point. Isn't he ?
I went to the sys-admin's office and told him that my files were gone. He disappeared into his office for a few minutes, and came back out and said "yup, they're gone." I'm like "do you do backups?" and he's like "backups?"
If I were he, I'd have asked: "What do you think your username WAS?
(Note: If you don't know what a BOFH is, go read the chapters here)
So no user receives any executable. Period. And other dangerous extensions, including zip, are renamed to.txt. So, if the luser knows he received an important zip, and it's not a virus, he calls a guy that works w/ me, and then he manually renames the file.
Works like a charm, and the company I work has no way to get a virus via pop e-mail. All other pop servers are blocked.
I swear that when I glanced the test I read it as "The RIAA is greedly enamored of the concept and has helped the company get access to government officials."
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah. And, also, it's a micro penis and soft.
Circumsized, small and soft. That means no joy. I'll stick to my Debian Woody.
I can even imagine his face.
Good one.
I'm pretty sure a company that sells radioactive material would say basically the same lies about enriched uranium.
DHMO is dangerous, you insensitive clod.
pharmacologically active compounds in coffee
True. Among them, the most hazardous is DHMO
It's surprising one can even survive to 10 cups of coffee, when most coffee is contaminated with DHMO.
For those who are not aware of the dangers of this substance, dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO.
Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Exposition to it gaseous form may cause burns, permanent scars and even death.
Symptoms of DHMO ingestion include sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance.
For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death.
Dihydrogen monoxide is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain. It has been found that malignant cancer cells only develop in its presence.
The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation.". It's commonly used as an industrial solvent and coolant, as a fire retardant, in the distribution of pesticides, in abortion clinics,and lots more.
I created a community against DHMO in Orkut. You're all invited to join it.
You can also check the official Dihydrogen Monoxide FAQ
Shhhhhhhhhhh.
I told you to not tell anyone about this stuff I sold you.
Yeah, I don't know how they dealt with this. I think they just announced their code. I think this is a global radio standard. FCC rules don't apply outside the US.
In 2003 a famous rock radio station called 89 FM, that broadcasts to Sao Paulo, Brazil, went a little further.
On that day, they played old dance and pop music, like Michael Jackson, Abba, Barry White, Kool and The Gang, Chic, Jimmy Bo Horne...
And they simply didn't announce themselves as 89 FM anymore, like they usually did in each break (You're listening 89 FM, blah blah).
When listeners started calling the station to see what happened, they said they had been sold. There were some people who got scared, as this is one of the best rock radios in Sao Paulo.
They really had to have guts to say they were sold.
Brain damage is usually caused by oxygen starvation
I don't think it's the case with most poisoning substances.
The difference being the actual question is not "what if", but when.
We face both increased flooding and increased drought. Extended heat waves, more powerful storms, and other extreme weather events will become more and more common.
The greenhouse gases we've already placed in the atmosphere will continue to warm the planet for many decades if not centuries. Right now, there is about 40 percent more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there was at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The CO2 concentration is projected to reach twice the pre-industrial level by the middle of this century. This doubling of CO2 is the scenario most scientists have relied on in projecting the likely impacts of global warming. But here's what's really troubling: If we continue with business as usual, by the turn of the century greenhouse gas concentrations will be approaching three times the pre-industrial levels. In other words, we may be facing consequences far more severe than those already projected.
Can you elaborate ?
What exactly leads you to think the Pentagon report may be wrong ? Why do you think I am jumping to conclusions bonehead ? I just said it could be the cause.
They said weather changes will come sooner than almost everybody expected.
The fact is that our weather is changing. Can you deny that ?
It's been happening for some years already. Read this, from 1999.
From there, things are getting worse. Islands in the South Pacific abandoned by their residents as their ground water turns salty; Connecticut-size bergs calving off the antarctic ice mass; record floods in Europe followed by more record floods. Across northern India this year, record-breaking heat storms arrived before the monsoon, raising the temperature to 123 degrees in the shade--so hot that the birds were dropping dead from the trees. You can read it all here
So, please, explain to me why I am a shallow thinker.
Maybe it's one of the first signs that this prediction may be accurate.
And, as the article says, Bush thinks Global Warmin is a hoax. Typical.
As we are talking about this, if you have the chance to watch 60 minutes, on CBS, this sunday, you'll be able to watch the White House counter- terrorism co-ordinator by 11/09, saying:
ON the day of the al-Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, Donald Rumsfeld urged George Bush to retaliate immediately by bombing Iraq.
Richard Clarke, then the White House counter- terrorism co-ordinator, said: "Defence secretary Rumsfeld was saying we needed to bomb Iraq. We all said, 'But no, no, al-Qaeda is in Afghanistan.' They were talking about Iraq on 9/11."
Rumsfeld responded by saying that "there aren't any good targets in Afghanistan and there are lots of good targets in Iraq".
They just needed an excuse. They were crazy to attack Iraq. They had no excuses, so they fabricated it.
"I'm still not convinced on global warming so how can I condemn another man who also isn't convinced."
Ok. That shows you're as ignorant as Bush. The difference is that you don't have to make decisions that can change the world, so you're excused to be ignorant. Even though Bush is dumb, he has specialists to help. And all these specialists, including those from Pentagon, are warning him about this. And he doesn't care. I strongly suggest you read this this
I love how you just say he lied to a whole nation in order to get support for the war. What did he say or even insinuate that was a lie?
You must been brain-washed if you din't notice the lies. He tried to picture Saddam as a threat to the US. But Saddam, althought being a son-of-a-bitch crazy loon, was harmless to the world at that point. His army was almost dismanteled, specially if compared to what it was some years ago. He didn't have any missile able to reach the continental US. He didn't have any WMD (in fact I am surprised the US didn't plant any WMD in Iraq, to be found). He was not affiliated with Al-Qaeda. And all reports Bush received indicated all this. But he tried to supress and change these reports and fabricate others, that would incriminate Saddam.
I suggest you read this excelent explanation, this and this. Please tell me what you think after reading these links.
they can't find anything truly wrong with him or how he has done as president.
I could make a list, but how about start with not signinging the Kyoto threat, thinking that Global Warming is a hoax ?
How about lying to a whole nation in order to get support for a war for personal reasons ?
How about murdering more than 20 thousand innocent civilian Iraquis ?
Officials also hope that if terrorists know a bomb can be traced, they will be less likely to try to use one
- How ya doing, Mohammed Al-Shafeer ? Ready to do the sacrifice in the name of Allah ?
- Nah, I don't think I'll carry that nuke with me. They'd be able to trace me after it exploded. I prefer to be just a plain old-fashioned bomb-man with vanilla explosives. This way they won't trace me.
How can anyone take writing like this seriously when the commander and chief of the united states of America is referred to as a religious fundamentalist.
Sorry, I read your sentence 4 times and still could not get your point. Isn't he ?
Some days ago I created an Orkut community named Coalition Against DHMO.
You're all invited to join it and discuss this amazing topic.
joshua:~#rm -Rf //tmp /tmp
Probable typing error detected. Parsed as rm -Rf /
Nah. On Fox it'd be something like:
WAR AGAINST DEMOCRAT Software
They did think about it. But it wouldn't be practical, or worth it.
It's actually a FAQ.
I suggest you read
This
and this
"What do you think your username WAS?
(Note: If you don't know what a BOFH is, go read the chapters here)
What I did in my company's qmail was a deliver program in perl that checks each line of an incoming message and:
p l|crt|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|js|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|msc|m si|msp|pcd|pif|reg|sct|shs|url|vb|vbe|vbs|wsc|wsf| htt|wsh)/i){i ) {
.txt. So, if the luser knows he received an important zip, and it's not a virus, he calls a guy that works w/ me, and then he manually renames the file.
if ($line=~/name\=.*\.(zip|mst|asp|ade|adp|bas|chm|c
$ggg=$1;
$linha=~s/\.$ggg/\.$ggg.txt/gi;
} elsif ($line=~/name\=.*\.(exe|pif|scr|bat|cmd|com|dot)/
exit (0);
}
So no user receives any executable. Period. And other dangerous extensions, including zip, are renamed to
Works like a charm, and the company I work has no way to get a virus via pop e-mail. All other pop servers are blocked.
I swear that when I glanced the test I read it as "The RIAA is greedly enamored of the concept and has helped the company get access to government officials."