Aussie aren't like that... We all agree we can settle this over a drink, a blu, and it'll come out in the wash. That leave only one idea to argue over.
Eh, I think that that reasoning is only used because people generally are incapable of thinking of anyone other than themselves or immediate associations.
The reality is the laws are implemented to decrease emergency services having to collect your stupid body.
You are mistaking voluntary community cooperation with structured "community" action. It would also seem the from your post that the "free market" has to be a financial transaction to stave off the 'communism' tag.
Not so.
The free market could be funded by multiple mediums of value, of which money can be one. (Oh dear, I am expecting that you understand that money is simply a medium for the value on which people place upon purchasable items... trouble cometh!) If two or more people agree that a particular medium is suitable for a transaction, what business is it of anyone outside or perpendicular to the transaction how it is conducted? This kind of transaction is more closely aligned with an anarchist economy (capitalism without the protection of government) than communism. You can't get more free than anarchy. (It is just that anarchy is difficult for some to justify morally.)
You have your philosophies reversed. It is closed source that has the characteristics of communism: Lack of individuality, centrally coordinated, forced definitions of contribution, inflexibility and inability of the commoner to make changes to the laws by which they are governed unless they toe the party line.
Your last sentence assumes that both named elite refuse the option of payment. Add to the end of your sentence "...pay with the medium of most value to you?" Of course that would have answered your question.
Really? After you replied I couldnt see why I had replied to you as you clearly said that aforementioned websites didnt have either visual or bandwidth pollution. I suspect I was replying to someone else but mixed myself up.
heh, I think I must have mis-replied... I don't remember this conversation... but then that doesn't exclude its existence. I've had a interesting week.
You seem to be assuming that because these things exist everyone will be trying/wanting to get rid of these things. From what I have seen, most people are bewildered why I want to get rid of flash. Average people like flash... and think it is fair that what they are reading on the net should be blocked by a huge blinking ad.
Slashdot Mirror
Aussie aren't like that... We all agree we can settle this over a drink, a blu, and it'll come out in the wash. That leave only one idea to argue over.
Not in Australia, it would be a huge improvement.
A conscious being who exists outside what we recognise as the universe?
They like holidaying in New Zealand?
5 is right out?
Cash?! All these years of handing in my card and I could have been getting paid!
Practically or virtually? ... on second thoughts I don't want to know.
But women think they are.... so you have to take care feeding them so that they aren't skin and bones *without them noticing*
When this Coolidge fellow was around?
That is a great Idea! Then you will also be burning more energy just like in a workout! You could be just exercising by sitting there!
Thank you.
Eh, I think that that reasoning is only used because people generally are incapable of thinking of anyone other than themselves or immediate associations.
The reality is the laws are implemented to decrease emergency services having to collect your stupid body.
shame the ones I know dont dress like they do. Lowest common denominator -- what ever gets them by.
You are mistaking voluntary community cooperation with structured "community" action. It would also seem the from your post that the "free market" has to be a financial transaction to stave off the 'communism' tag.
Not so.
The free market could be funded by multiple mediums of value, of which money can be one. (Oh dear, I am expecting that you understand that money is simply a medium for the value on which people place upon purchasable items... trouble cometh!) If two or more people agree that a particular medium is suitable for a transaction, what business is it of anyone outside or perpendicular to the transaction how it is conducted? This kind of transaction is more closely aligned with an anarchist economy (capitalism without the protection of government) than communism. You can't get more free than anarchy. (It is just that anarchy is difficult for some to justify morally.)
You have your philosophies reversed. It is closed source that has the characteristics of communism: Lack of individuality, centrally coordinated, forced definitions of contribution, inflexibility and inability of the commoner to make changes to the laws by which they are governed unless they toe the party line.
Your last sentence assumes that both named elite refuse the option of payment. Add to the end of your sentence "...pay with the medium of most value to you?" Of course that would have answered your question.
Agreed... but still Microsoft won't play fairly... Oh. heh.
The third in a series?
Why did they take it out?
Bloke, the internet was designed for communication... not for being bludgeoned to death!
Really? After you replied I couldnt see why I had replied to you as you clearly said that aforementioned websites didnt have either visual or bandwidth pollution. I suspect I was replying to someone else but mixed myself up.
heh, I think I must have mis-replied... I don't remember this conversation... but then that doesn't exclude its existence. I've had a interesting week.
Most customers I know buy things.
You seem to be assuming that because these things exist everyone will be trying/wanting to get rid of these things. From what I have seen, most people are bewildered why I want to get rid of flash. Average people like flash... and think it is fair that what they are reading on the net should be blocked by a huge blinking ad.
Id say it is done out of habit, Microsofts that is...
I love linux, but Id much prefer my military to be running open-bsd, plan 9, or a mix of all three.
There is a worm that can infect Windows, random OS and Unix-based systems all equally effectively?
Im going to flip a coin to decide if it was Windows that got infected, or other OS. Head for Windows, Tails for other OS....