1) He jumped bail in the UK. He will be tried and almost certainly convicted in the UK on that charge because he is guilty.
2) He won't be deported to Sweden because they dropped the charges because the victims wanted to get on with their lives..
3) After he serves his time in the U.K. he may be rendered to the US for questioning and possible prosecution. for conspiracy and espionage charges.
Cut prisoners off from normal, well-adjusted people as much as possible.
You mean their gang member friends and enabling and criminal family and friends who smuggle them drugs, cell phones, etc? You don't know shit about jails and prisons
Pre-emptive Strike: Your own racism is showing. YOU are the only one who said that and that is because you believe "blacks are all criminals"
You are probably one of the idiots who knows nothing about criminals and criminal psychology, like the people who decided that criminals have low self-esteem and wasted money on self-esteem programs but never did any actual research and when the research was done it was found that the vase majority of criminals have high self-esteem and believe the laws shouldn't apply to them and they were perfectly justified for doing the crimes that got them sentenced.
Well, if the criminals and their criminal visitors would not commit crimes by trying to criminally smuggle in banned and illegal items then this would be happening. Stop blaming the jail and start blaming the criminals for the consequences of their own actions.
You were incarcerated as punishment. That means you look access to things like cell phones. Cell phones are used to continue criminal activity from within jail and prison.
If you wanted to keep your finances squared away, you should have thought of that before your felony. If you had the ability to take care of your finances without earning a living, then you should have provided someone a power of attorney or hired an accountant to take care of it for you.
By the way, what exactly did you do to keep your finances squared away? Were you continuing to engage in criminal activity to put money in the bank to pay bills?
All you have done is convince me you should be back behind bars because you broke the law while you were being punished for breaking the law.
Having read this and the the source article, it is obvious the articles are trying to hide the fact that China and India are the major contributors to the increase and that U.S. coal is no where near the player it is portrayed to be. The author of the article is writing propaganda to push an agenda instead of being a journalist and presenting the true facts.
No lawyer in his right mind would take the case. Go look what one at what one agrees to when one is accepted and agrees to attend. She received due process under her agreement.
Who knows? This is the same kind of research that declared a quarter of all female college students are raped and came up with that by defining a random drunken hookup as rape.
You mean a group of people with a specific characteristic are subject to attack based that same characteristic? Shocking! It is all just grievance studies, in this case, they have extrapolated high profile people to the whole of twitter to come up with a fake statistic. This is called sample selection bias.
Oh, I didn't realize that caring for a toddler was such a hardship that comparing it to running the risk of being killed or permanently maimed was a valid comparison. Are you a troll or just an asshole?
I can;make a good case for it not being illegal, starting with the fact that it is his property which is sitting on his property and he knows what the contents will do. If a criminal wants to trespass and commit theft then that criminal is responsible for what happens next. One may as well say the owner of a car stolen by an unlicensed minor is guilty of allowing the minor to drive said car or saying the original owner of a stolen gun used to shoot someone has broken the law.
The law states that one cannot benefit from one's criminal actions. If the perpetrator were to sue, the perpetrator would be confessing to theft, possibly grand theft, and any attendant crimes and would then have to go before a jury and say "I am a shitball thief who stole a booby-trapped package and I want you to reward me for my criminal behavior so you can be my next victim!" and, in the unlikely event the perp wins, Rober can counter sue for theft and intentional infliction of emotional distress and get all that money back.
Slashdot Mirror
So, you are saying it would be OK to break into your house to look for evidence of a crime as long as a journalist does it, yes?
Attempting to crack it, even claiming to be attempting to crack it is actions in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Assange had no good reason. He simply wanted to avoid investigation for rape in Sweden.
1) He jumped bail in the UK. He will be tried and almost certainly convicted in the UK on that charge because he is guilty.
2) He won't be deported to Sweden because they dropped the charges because the victims wanted to get on with their lives..
3) After he serves his time in the U.K. he may be rendered to the US for questioning and possible prosecution. for conspiracy and espionage charges.
Assange is an arrogant, narcissistic asshole who deliberately offended his hosts by going against their wishes and rules. Be a dick, get kicked.
I really have no idea what they expected from a raping piecing of shit like Assange so this should have happened back in 2012.
I've been reading science fiction and fantasy novels, watching scifi and fantasy movies and TV shows (especially all things Star Trek) my entire life,
I notice you haven't read anything about criminology, crime, criminals, or criminal psychology. You are the poster child for Dunning-Kruger.
You are a joke.
Cut prisoners off from normal, well-adjusted people as much as possible.
You mean their gang member friends and enabling and criminal family and friends who smuggle them drugs, cell phones, etc? You don't know shit about jails and prisons
Pre-emptive Strike: Your own racism is showing. YOU are the only one who said that and that is because you believe "blacks are all criminals"
You are probably one of the idiots who knows nothing about criminals and criminal psychology, like the people who decided that criminals have low self-esteem and wasted money on self-esteem programs but never did any actual research and when the research was done it was found that the vase majority of criminals have high self-esteem and believe the laws shouldn't apply to them and they were perfectly justified for doing the crimes that got them sentenced.
Mean? Blame the people who smuggle in drugs, cell phones, etc.
Well, if the criminals and their criminal visitors would not commit crimes by trying to criminally smuggle in banned and illegal items then this would be happening. Stop blaming the jail and start blaming the criminals for the consequences of their own actions.
Except no one is forced to work in prison and prisoners get paid with room and board deducted from their pay. You are an ignorant fool.
You don't know shit about jail, do you, boy?
This armed robber should be sitting in jail instead and if he didn't agree to the monitor, he would be sitting in jail.
They can always sit in jail.
Bullshit.
You were incarcerated as punishment. That means you look access to things like cell phones. Cell phones are used to continue criminal activity from within jail and prison.
If you wanted to keep your finances squared away, you should have thought of that before your felony. If you had the ability to take care of your finances without earning a living, then you should have provided someone a power of attorney or hired an accountant to take care of it for you.
By the way, what exactly did you do to keep your finances squared away? Were you continuing to engage in criminal activity to put money in the bank to pay bills?
All you have done is convince me you should be back behind bars because you broke the law while you were being punished for breaking the law.
Having read this and the the source article, it is obvious the articles are trying to hide the fact that China and India are the major contributors to the increase and that U.S. coal is no where near the player it is portrayed to be. The author of the article is writing propaganda to push an agenda instead of being a journalist and presenting the true facts.
How much are the oil workers paid and in what currency?
How much do the government officials pocket and in what currency?
No lawyer in his right mind would take the case. Go look what one at what one agrees to when one is accepted and agrees to attend. She received due process under her agreement.
Next question.
Who knows? This is the same kind of research that declared a quarter of all female college students are raped and came up with that by defining a random drunken hookup as rape.
Oh, they compared it to the happy joy joy world where no one is ever insulted at all. That is their control group.
You mean a group of people with a specific characteristic are subject to attack based that same characteristic? Shocking! It is all just grievance studies, in this case, they have extrapolated high profile people to the whole of twitter to come up with a fake statistic. This is called sample selection bias.
Oh, I didn't realize that caring for a toddler was such a hardship that comparing it to running the risk of being killed or permanently maimed was a valid comparison. Are you a troll or just an asshole?
I can ;make a good case for it not being illegal, starting with the fact that it is his property which is sitting on his property and he knows what the contents will do. If a criminal wants to trespass and commit theft then that criminal is responsible for what happens next. One may as well say the owner of a car stolen by an unlicensed minor is guilty of allowing the minor to drive said car or saying the original owner of a stolen gun used to shoot someone has broken the law.
The law states that one cannot benefit from one's criminal actions. If the perpetrator were to sue, the perpetrator would be confessing to theft, possibly grand theft, and any attendant crimes and would then have to go before a jury and say "I am a shitball thief who stole a booby-trapped package and I want you to reward me for my criminal behavior so you can be my next victim!" and, in the unlikely event the perp wins, Rober can counter sue for theft and intentional infliction of emotional distress and get all that money back.
Nope. This is all about SJW. You can tell from the wording.