even if you're logged out, they can still track you and link the presented anonymous usage data back to your account and store it linked to your account.
as someone who "wore the hat of a webmaster" you certainly don't understand the technology much.
weird that they still put the "designed in california by apple" on all their products if they really aren't designed there...
even weirder watching all those cars that pulled into the lot at 1 infinite loop every single day across the street from my old apartment where i lived from 2004-2006. it must have taken a few thousand people to come up with a "seamless integration" marketing strategy.
why don't you take personal responsibility for your actions?
you cower in the shadows of others. what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
you spend your days in a fantasy land addressing yourself relative TO ME. PRETENDING TO BE ME. i spend my days actually BEING me. do you NEED to be me? OR, do you simply NEED to NOT BE YOURSELF?
you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.
still not willing to take responsibility for your lies? only able to feebly welcome me to present myself to you, but not provide an address for me to do so? you're an ignorant hypocrite.
you're completely worthless. YOU make everything about me BY DENYING THE EXISTENCE OF YOURSELF.
you're certainly right about your being irrelevant. i'm sure your mother would be proud you deny your existence through your refusal of embracing it.
unable to block a user they have claimed to have identified? relying on IP addresses for their bans? although this very internet web site chat message board uses the same measure to attempt to silence its users, the reliance on a "one IP address = one person" myth is ignorantly lazy at best, and uselessly pathetic regardless.
if you can't enable heuristics to stop vandalism and protect the content which serves as your only product, THEN YOU DON'T BELONG IN THE INDUSTRY.
you spend your days in a fantasy land pretending to be me. i spend my days actually being me. do you NEED to be me? OR, do you simply NEED to NOT BE YOURSELF?
you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.
you've created multiple accounts in my name. you shout that you share my voice because your own voice is WORTHLESS. you're an ignorant hypocrite.
"MichaelKristopeit175" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity.
to the individual responsible: i assume you welcome death. present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
"MichaelKristopeit172" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity.
to the individual responsible: present yourself to me, admit what you've done; and i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
granted, i wouldn't want to admit that i was you either.
the precision is limited by the joints in the cube... if you are eliminating the physical act of manipulating the cube, then yes, you could solve in under 1 seconds, but i highly doubt a machine could physically solve a randomized cube in under 1 second including analyzing and computing time. a custom cube with custom bearings and springs might help to get the time lower, but then you're not really solving a rubik's cube.
the problem is the qualifier "CAN make"... the precondition being only certain subsets of 5 and 6 moves can be made in 1 second. the moves necessary to solve the cube will not always fall within those subsets.
i can solve any cube in under 3 minutes and that's fast enough for me.
i recently hired an IT staff that outsources their job responsibilities to online chat message boards. has anyone else had experience in replacing such a staff?
why would you quote the word "mistakes" implying that they aren't mistakes, yet in doing so, continue to push the terminology you understand to be incorrect?
they aren't mistakes. the replication process is obviously dynamic based on other factors.
if there was only a market for one customer to buy one disc, then that customer would have to pay for the entire infrastructure. a single disk is potentially worth millions.
the individual with an internet connection did not do the job for free... they required computers and network access. a worldwide high-speed network is not trivial... only utilizing it as a customer is.
why did you put a question mark at the end of your last statement? because it might not be the "fact" you're presenting it as?
Slashdot Mirror
you're an idiot.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.
completely pathetic.
as someone who "wore the hat of a webmaster" you certainly don't understand the technology much.
you're an idiot
even weirder watching all those cars that pulled into the lot at 1 infinite loop every single day across the street from my old apartment where i lived from 2004-2006. it must have taken a few thousand people to come up with a "seamless integration" marketing strategy.
slashdot = stagnated.
you cower in the shadows of others. what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
you spend your days in a fantasy land addressing yourself relative TO ME. PRETENDING TO BE ME. i spend my days actually BEING me. do you NEED to be me? OR, do you simply NEED to NOT BE YOURSELF?
you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.
still not willing to take responsibility for your lies? only able to feebly welcome me to present myself to you, but not provide an address for me to do so? you're an ignorant hypocrite.
you're completely worthless. YOU make everything about me BY DENYING THE EXISTENCE OF YOURSELF.
you're certainly right about your being irrelevant. i'm sure your mother would be proud you deny your existence through your refusal of embracing it.
you are NOTHING.
if you can't enable heuristics to stop vandalism and protect the content which serves as your only product, THEN YOU DON'T BELONG IN THE INDUSTRY.
you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.
you've created multiple accounts in my name. you shout that you share my voice because your own voice is WORTHLESS. you're an ignorant hypocrite.
"MichaelKristopeit175" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity.
to the individual responsible: i assume you welcome death. present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
why not replace the stickers with small color displays that adjust themselves in 5ms?
to the individual responsible: present yourself to me, admit what you've done; and i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
granted, i wouldn't want to admit that i was you either.
you ARE completely pathetic.
the precision is limited by the joints in the cube... if you are eliminating the physical act of manipulating the cube, then yes, you could solve in under 1 seconds, but i highly doubt a machine could physically solve a randomized cube in under 1 second including analyzing and computing time. a custom cube with custom bearings and springs might help to get the time lower, but then you're not really solving a rubik's cube.
i can solve any cube in under 3 minutes and that's fast enough for me.
i live at 4513 brittany ct. eau claire, wi 54701.
cower more, feeb
you're completely pathetic.
i recently hired an IT staff that outsources their job responsibilities to online chat message boards. has anyone else had experience in replacing such a staff?
what are you afraid of?
slashdot = stagnated.
you're an idiot.
ur mum's face should kill yourself.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
not willing to continue your charade anymore?
YOU'RE completely pathetic.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic. how about i kill you?
you're completely pathetic.
they aren't mistakes. the replication process is obviously dynamic based on other factors.
i am at 4513 brittany ct. in eau claire, wi.
you are cowering.
what specifically makes you cower?
what makes you believe anyone couldn't hat their own kind? what else is there to that? who told you that?
you're an idiot.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
testing security infrastructure for consenting users
the individual with an internet connection did not do the job for free... they required computers and network access. a worldwide high-speed network is not trivial... only utilizing it as a customer is.
why did you put a question mark at the end of your last statement? because it might not be the "fact" you're presenting it as?