To the technologically illiterate, a router is probably the most high-tech thing in their house (as far as they know) and protects them from tha net hakkerzz.
You seem to overlook the idea that the physically-weak may offer something else to the species that makes them "fit". Evolutionary fitness is not always just brute strength.
Since I am not an expert I am not going to state any opinion on tax rate numbers, but there is more to that prosperity than just corporate tax rates. The damage done by WWII left the US in a great position to use the manufacturing infrastructure advantage we had built up for the war effort.
I believe one problem with this is that South Korea is somewhat dependent on the US, and if SK sidesteps US sanctions against NK it would adversely affect them much more than any gains from working with NK... economically, at least.
You're assuming that the majority object to people coming in. That does not appear to be the case, though that is a reversal from just a few decades ago and it could switch back to being the majority opinion in the future.
In the first set of examples (and possibly religion), they are making choices based on that support that can affect the lives of other people. Skin color is not a choice and someone's race does not affect you in any real way. I don't know about sexuality, since I don't know what makes someone non-straight.
"In general, do you feel that the laws covering the sales of firearms should be made more strict, less strict, or kept as they are?" 47% - more strict 52% - less strict (or kept as they are)
That's a very misleading representation of the data on that page. You were not using the most recent poll in the list, and lumping together 13% "less strict" with %38 "kept as now", which are not the same thing. The most recent was 60% "more" and only 5% "keep same".
I don't think Russia necessarily wants Republicans, they want chaos: to make us look weak. If Trump is president with a GOP House & Dem Senate there would be a lot of bitching and blaming, but very little actually getting done. That would make the US government look ineffective and petty.
As someone above pointed out, a collection of facts doesn't fall under copyright. Of course IANAL, so I can't say this falls under that with any legal certainty, but it's not so simple.
I'm actually surprised that there's a market for cheap golf balls given how much disposable income you need to have to play golf these days. You need to belong to a country club, buy thousands of dollars worth of equipment
Not really: you can buy relatively good clubs (non-pro of course) for a few hundred dollars, and there are plenty of golf courses that don't require club membership. You can play a round for less than $50 on some decent courses. They're not quite PGA-level, but then again if you aren't going to spend a ton of money you probably aren't at the skill level that would require.
Perhaps they want to secure the traffic with something better than HTTPS. Of course, I'd then have to ask why it's on a mobile device at all if it really needs that kind of protection.
To the technologically illiterate, a router is probably the most high-tech thing in their house (as far as they know) and protects them from tha net hakkerzz.
You seem to overlook the idea that the physically-weak may offer something else to the species that makes them "fit". Evolutionary fitness is not always just brute strength.
Since I am not an expert I am not going to state any opinion on tax rate numbers, but there is more to that prosperity than just corporate tax rates. The damage done by WWII left the US in a great position to use the manufacturing infrastructure advantage we had built up for the war effort.
My kingdom for a mod point!
Not liking something that is happening in your own country does not mean you think other countries would automatically be better.
I believe one problem with this is that South Korea is somewhat dependent on the US, and if SK sidesteps US sanctions against NK it would adversely affect them much more than any gains from working with NK... economically, at least.
It's possible one phone could be in the DB multiple times for multiple crimes committed by one person.
"The left" is not one monolithic set of identical opinions. Neither is "the right".
You're assuming that the majority object to people coming in. That does not appear to be the case, though that is a reversal from just a few decades ago and it could switch back to being the majority opinion in the future.
In the first set of examples (and possibly religion), they are making choices based on that support that can affect the lives of other people. Skin color is not a choice and someone's race does not affect you in any real way. I don't know about sexuality, since I don't know what makes someone non-straight.
Just reading from your link,
"In general, do you feel that the laws covering the sales of firearms should be made more strict, less strict, or kept as they are?"
47% - more strict
52% - less strict (or kept as they are)
That's a very misleading representation of the data on that page. You were not using the most recent poll in the list, and lumping together 13% "less strict" with %38 "kept as now", which are not the same thing. The most recent was 60% "more" and only 5% "keep same".
I don't think Russia necessarily wants Republicans, they want chaos: to make us look weak. If Trump is president with a GOP House & Dem Senate there would be a lot of bitching and blaming, but very little actually getting done. That would make the US government look ineffective and petty.
You're not going to shoot anyone like that. They'll shoot you while you're looking at your facebook app for instructions
That's the only part of the post you're going to call out as unrealistic?
Oh. Another idiot. What about the ones others took, without you being aware
If someone else took the picture and the victim is unaware, the target probably doesn't have a copy to upload preemptively.
But it's a problem if it's illegal to point out to your neighbor that their windows have no locks on them.
I've also read quite a bit about nuclear and biological weapons...
If you read that and then promptly created some biological weapons, it definitely DOES prove intent.
Sic transit gloria mundi.
I didn't know Gloria was sick!
As someone above pointed out, a collection of facts doesn't fall under copyright. Of course IANAL, so I can't say this falls under that with any legal certainty, but it's not so simple.
The Republicans in the House of Representatives and their party leader, Trump.
I'm actually surprised that there's a market for cheap golf balls given how much disposable income you need to have to play golf these days. You need to belong to a country club, buy thousands of dollars worth of equipment
Not really: you can buy relatively good clubs (non-pro of course) for a few hundred dollars, and there are plenty of golf courses that don't require club membership. You can play a round for less than $50 on some decent courses. They're not quite PGA-level, but then again if you aren't going to spend a ton of money you probably aren't at the skill level that would require.
Then they should have rewritten the sentence so that there was no chance of ambiguity.
Perhaps they want to secure the traffic with something better than HTTPS. Of course, I'd then have to ask why it's on a mobile device at all if it really needs that kind of protection.
National security does not justify whatever they want to do.
But 9/11! We need to be protected!
Except, you know, all the people who HAVE actually looked for voter fraud and have found nothing that would affect a result.
Crap, I accidentally modded this incorrectly.