Then again, if all the browsers perform the same according to any arbitary test, you can trust those features working the same way in your proprietary webapp.
On the other hand, one of the sites on the list was an actual child porn site that Nikki himself had reported to the police about a year ago. So it seems that the police just can't be bothered to actually do anything productive about them.
The discussion deserved to be modbombed. It's yet another argument on the internet the has nothing to do with the Iraq war, yet it degenerated into a "Bu$h sucks" shouting contest. Take your dickwaving somewhere else.
Okay, listen to me then, 23 kg and counting. Eat less, exercise more. Eat smaller portions, eat light snacks between those smaller meals and start running, cycling or swimming. It doesn't have to take more than 30-60 minutes. And in that 30-60 minutes, you are away from you fridge, so yay times 2.
Try to learn to eat more slowly and to not pile up the food on the plate. Don't put food on top of other food. Or eat a soup, you cannot pile soup. For dessert, have a fruit, but don't eat it right away. Eat it an hour after the main meal. The goal is not to wait until you are hungry until you eat a meal. If you're not hungry, you're less likely to overindulge.
Keep a record of your progress. Buy a scale and weigh yourself, say, every tuesday morning and write the result down. Don't take "official" measurements on other days, as your weight can fluctuate several pounds during the week.
And the most important thing: Do not quit. Just because you ate one meal at McDonalds doesn't mean you failed and have to quit. In fact, eat something unhealthy as a cheat meal once a week. One bag of candy cannot fatten you more than it weighs, and even 1:1 requires 100% efficiency. That's a physical fact.
Stop making excuses. It's not glandular, you're not big boned, it's not the sprawl. Don't put more food in your mouth than you need and you won't get fat.
So slow-paced strategy and puzzle games (like Civilization and Mine sweeper) have good gameplay, while action games, like Super Mario Bros or Gradius or, to a bt lesser extent, Pac-Man have bad gameplay.
That really doesn't fit into "The people I know who played Pac-Man despise modern games for lack of gameplay."
Please elaborate. How does Pac-Man have better gameplay than modern games? Can you give me some examples of good gameplay in Pac-Man and bad gameplay in some modern games.
Because franky I don't even understand what gameplay means. Over the years I've heard it's something that the modern games always seem to lack and old games have.
This post is not sarcasm. Someone define gameplay for me.
PCs have been able to do that for a long time, but "regular users" haven't been compiling any software recently. And consoles with internet access and browsers are hardly new.
Yes, but the PS3 is a static platform. You make a distro/installation that works on one PS3 and it works on all of them. People don't have to compile anything.
Slashdot Mirror
Then again, if all the browsers perform the same according to any arbitary test, you can trust those features working the same way in your proprietary webapp.
On the other hand, one of the sites on the list was an actual child porn site that Nikki himself had reported to the police about a year ago. So it seems that the police just can't be bothered to actually do anything productive about them.
Well, except contacting the local authorities...
The discussion deserved to be modbombed. It's yet another argument on the internet the has nothing to do with the Iraq war, yet it degenerated into a "Bu$h sucks" shouting contest. Take your dickwaving somewhere else.
Re: Iraq
u r dum.
Dumbass
LOL, Bu$h is stupid.
Wow, that was really edgy.
Stop browsing Slashdot and get back to work, you lazy fuck.
Well, it's a ballbark figure. The point was that you do not need to move at all, you just need metabolism, to burn calories.
Sure, moving helps in more ways than one, but it is not absolutely necessary to burn calories.
Well then you are not eating enough! "Eat less" does not equal "starve yourself."
You burn about 2000 kilocalories per day just by existing.
I doubt that anybody is forcing you to order the biggest portion of the most fattening food, then forcing you to eat the plate clean.
But I guess I can add "My friends pressure me to being fat" to the list of excuses I've heard.
Okay, listen to me then, 23 kg and counting. Eat less, exercise more. Eat smaller portions, eat light snacks between those smaller meals and start running, cycling or swimming. It doesn't have to take more than 30-60 minutes. And in that 30-60 minutes, you are away from you fridge, so yay times 2.
Try to learn to eat more slowly and to not pile up the food on the plate. Don't put food on top of other food. Or eat a soup, you cannot pile soup. For dessert, have a fruit, but don't eat it right away. Eat it an hour after the main meal. The goal is not to wait until you are hungry until you eat a meal. If you're not hungry, you're less likely to overindulge.
Keep a record of your progress. Buy a scale and weigh yourself, say, every tuesday morning and write the result down. Don't take "official" measurements on other days, as your weight can fluctuate several pounds during the week.
And the most important thing: Do not quit. Just because you ate one meal at McDonalds doesn't mean you failed and have to quit. In fact, eat something unhealthy as a cheat meal once a week. One bag of candy cannot fatten you more than it weighs, and even 1:1 requires 100% efficiency. That's a physical fact.
Stop making excuses. It's not glandular, you're not big boned, it's not the sprawl. Don't put more food in your mouth than you need and you won't get fat.
hahahaha you're still a moron
So slow-paced strategy and puzzle games (like Civilization and Mine sweeper) have good gameplay, while action games, like Super Mario Bros or Gradius or, to a bt lesser extent, Pac-Man have bad gameplay.
That really doesn't fit into "The people I know who played Pac-Man despise modern games for lack of gameplay."
Please elaborate. How does Pac-Man have better gameplay than modern games? Can you give me some examples of good gameplay in Pac-Man and bad gameplay in some modern games.
Because franky I don't even understand what gameplay means. Over the years I've heard it's something that the modern games always seem to lack and old games have.
This post is not sarcasm. Someone define gameplay for me.
Hey, It's a car analogy!
I don't carry around any live CDs.
PCs have been able to do that for a long time, but "regular users" haven't been compiling any software recently. And consoles with internet access and browsers are hardly new.
Yes, but the PS3 is a static platform. You make a distro/installation that works on one PS3 and it works on all of them. People don't have to compile anything.
Fuck Jack Thompson. He uses everything a part of his anti-video game rhetoric.
Hey, you got the joke!
WOW, You're the coolest guy I've ever seen on the internet!
It's a god damn video game console! Why do you care whether other people buy it or not?
What do you mean "truly innovative?"
Final Fantasy is the one RPG series where the combat and character development has never been the same twice.