Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson To Face Contempt Charge

Gamasutra has the story (by way of the currently-down GamePolitics) that Jack Thompson could be facing a contempt charge over his antics during the Bully fiasco. From the article: "According to the report, the contempt of court request could find Thompson facing jail time, though it is more likely that 'fines, judicial admonishment or censure' would result from this most recent turn of events. The report also notes that attorneys representing the Philadelphia law firm Blank-Rome have filed a 'Petition for Order to Show Cause,' which requires Thompson to illustrate to a judge why he should not be held in contempt."

239 comments

  1. Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know people have the right to freedom of speech, but I wish he'd use his right to remain silent for once!

    1. Re:Rights by IcyNeko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yes Oh yes oh yes! Jail that tard.

    2. Re:Rights by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck. I just looked it up. Looks like its still legal in some states to wear mating chipmonks on your head. Come on people, have a heart. Lets all chip in an buy this guy a decent du.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    3. Re:Rights by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      I speak for the millions of gamers out there when I say - PLEASE drop the bar of soap while you are in the prison shower Jack Arse Thompson!

      _________

      "If idiots were not important, then why the hell do we have them?!"

  2. Is it just me? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guy has some issues. Problably from playing too many games as a kid.

    --
    "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    1. Re:Is it just me? by rjung2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      "This guy has some issues. Problably from playing too many games as a kid."

      I think his problems come from not playing enough games as a kid, actually.

    2. Re:Is it just me? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 5, Funny

      HA! From another article linked from the orignal article...

      He also commented in the course of his email to GamePolitics: "When kids start showing up in ERs with slingshot wounds at the hands of Bully enthusiasts, don't blame me."

      I play D&D and I can tell you... slingshots do crap damage!

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    3. Re:Is it just me? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny
      I play D&D and I can tell you... slingshots do crap damage!

      Yes, but level 0 children only get 2d2-1 hit points. (No idea really, just making this up - for the one purist who actually knows how many hit points level 0 children get.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Is it just me? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Depends if you give full HP for the first 4 levels (house rule)

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:Is it just me? by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 3, Funny
      I play D&D and I can tell you... slingshots do crap damage!


      Yes, but level 0 children only get 2d2-1 hit points. (No idea really, just making this up - for the one purist who actually knows how many hit points level 0 children get.)


      They may have low hit points, but they have extremely high stamina and charisma.
      --
      You will be baked, and there will be cake.
    6. Re:Is it just me? by wgaryhas · · Score: 5, Informative

      1d4 + 0 to -3 (depending how much their constitution is reduced for their age)

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    7. Re:Is it just me? by Nimey · · Score: 5, Funny

      He probably had to play with himself a lot.

      Hmm.

      Every time you masturbate, Jack Thompson sues another game publisher. Please, think of the publishers.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Is it just me? by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please, think of the publishers.

      But publishers make me horny! What am I to do?!

    9. Re:Is it just me? by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm, whats that noise? A slightly thunderous applause sounding as if just over the horizon...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Is it just me? by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah. Level 0 NPCs with a class get an automatic max roll on that class' appropriate hit die. Level 0 NPCs without a class get 6 HP (default hit die is 1d6). Yes, this does mean that a non-classed NPC will have more HP than a level 0 or 1 magic user, but them's the breaks.

      At least, that's how it work at my table.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    11. Re:Is it just me? by hclyff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now that you mention it, I think maybe Tim Buckley had it right...

      http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/comic.php?d=20050 808

    12. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jaczsyn?

    13. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...they have extremely high stamina and charisma.

      Ewwwwww...!

    14. Re:Is it just me? by ral8158 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or, y'know, constitution. Which is directly directly directly related to how much HP they have. And they don't have much HP. So they... don't really have stamina.

    15. Re:Is it just me? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Not the vorpal kind! ...they can qualify as a slashing weapon...

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    16. Re:Is it just me? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      "It's as if millions of gamers all laughed out loud at once and then said 'ha-ha'."

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    17. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as a non-classed NPC (nor a level 0 of any kind) in 3rd edition D&D. If they're not appropriate for anything else, they're a Commoner.

    18. Re:Is it just me? by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      with a minimum of 1 hp

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    19. Re:Is it just me? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      WotC is the Great Satan of the gaming world, and 3rd edition is for pansies.

      Real hack-n-slashers play AD&D 2nd ed.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    20. Re:Is it just me? by Miniluv · · Score: 1

      Right after candy time their AC also drops precipitously. You just have to be patient and wait for the approach of naptime when they slow down and your THAC0 will allow you to hit them.

    21. Re:Is it just me? by optkk · · Score: 1

      Real hack-n-slashers play AD&D 2nd ed.

      Real hack-n-slashers play home brews!

    22. Re:Is it just me? by wgaryhas · · Score: 2, Informative
      I got stuck thinking about this, here is a more detailed list

      for a child -6 to constitution score (I think) so range between 1d4-5 to 1d4 + 1
      • 85.30% 1 HP
      • 9.38% 2 HP
      • 4.05% 3 HP
      • 1.16% 4 HP
      • 0.12% 5 HP
      • average: 1.21 HP
      for a youth -4 to constitution score (I think) so range between 1d4-5 to 1d4 + 2
      • 69.79% 1 HP
      • 15.51% 2 HP
      • 9.38% 3 HP
      • 4.05% 4 HP
      • 1.16% 5 HP
      • 0.12% 6 HP
      • average: 1.52 HP
      for a juvenile -2 to constitution score (I think) so range between 1d4-4 to 1d4 + 3
      • 50.00% 1 HP
      • 19.79% 2 HP
      • 12.62% 3 HP
      • 9.38% 4 HP
      • 4.05% 5 HP
      • 1.16% 6 HP
      • 0.12% 7 HP
      • average: 1.92 HP
      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    23. Re:Is it just me? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      huh?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    24. Re:Is it just me? by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0

      I always thought people have problems because they didn't get superhero underwear when they were a kid.

      --

      Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    25. Re:Is it just me? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah extremely high stamina, but charisma, kids? Generally the porblem with their stamina is their lack of charisma; do you have any idea how many questions a sugar-rushed three year old can ask in five minutes?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:Is it just me? by asylumx · · Score: 2, Funny

      You want slashdot readers to become celibate?

    27. Re:Is it just me? by Hinhule · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pong can cause these things.

    28. Re:Is it just me? by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

      Real roleplayers play Mage 2nd Ed, and pity the hack-and-slashers !

      --
      >|<*:=
    29. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.00% Your chance of getting laid.

    30. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1st level commoners still get max HP for their first hit die, I believe.

      It's 4 - CON.

    31. Re:Is it just me? by Deef · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I play D&D too, and I can tell you... how much damage they do depends a great deal on what you choose to launch with them. (Suggestions: ink, flour, glue, oil, holy water, acid, caltrops, alchemist's fire, thunderstones, poison darts, scorpions, etc.) Add rapid shot and multishot, and it starts to get to be some serious damage. The weapon requires a bit of creativity, but I think hearing the GM say "you're launching WHAT at the monster?!?" makes it totally worth it. :-)

    32. Re:Is it just me? by the_weasel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless he rolls a 20, of course.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    33. Re:Is it just me? by MMMDI · · Score: 1

      2d2? Wouldn't that be in line with flipping two coins?

    34. Re:Is it just me? by MORB · · Score: 1

      +5 Informative on a post explaining how much HP a children would have in D&D, which is a reply to a mildly joke vaguely related to the subject at hand (which is Jack Thompson getting his ass handed to him by the justice system)?

      Only on Slashdot.

    35. Re:Is it just me? by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      hey, she could make saving throws couldn't she?

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    36. Re:Is it just me? by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      yes but I believe it is common to look down on the pathetic trading card gamers. . . Not that I support either side.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    37. Re:Is it just me? by SCPRedMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With their hands, yes.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    38. Re:Is it just me? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Mage is easy, you get magic.

      Hunter is where it's at.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    39. Re:Is it just me? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      and the best roleplayers use fighting fantasy.....

    40. Re:Is it just me? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, children are born with a big pile of CHA and it decreases as they age. Well, for some of them, anyway. Otherwise that squalling, stinking pile of blankets would never make it through its first month.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:Is it just me? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, a coin is a D2, although I have seen some (old) games that have cardboard markers include a punch-out D2.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re:Is it just me? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      ...when they slow down and your THAC0 will allow you to hit them.
      Been a while since we've played, has it?
    43. Re:Is it just me? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Every time you masturbate, Jack Thompson sues another game publisher. Please, think of the publishers.

      Well, at least Take-Two could solve that problem easily. So could Blizzard, for that matter - Night Elves are yummy :).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    44. Re:Is it just me? by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but level 0 children only get 2d2-1 hit points. (No idea really, just making this up - for the one purist who actually knows how many hit points level 0 children get.)

      In 3.5, level 1 Commoner (adult) gets 1d4 hit points. A slingshot makes 1d3 points of damage (1d4 if used by an adult), so a very lucky kid can take 4 hits before dying, but can die from the first and is likely to die at the second hit.

      Of course this all assumes that the kid is really a kid and not a skull child or some other hideous monster in disguise. And there's nothing quite like when the sunlight suddenly gets blocked by a shadow, allowing you to see that the theird markings on the kid you've been making fun of for the past half an hour are really scales, and then noticing that the shadow that's getting bigger all the time really looks like a pair of giant wings ;)...

      And the sad thing is that I've never played the game, but just read the rulebooks for kicks ;(.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    45. Re:Is it just me? by brouski · · Score: 2, Funny
      And we all know what a low score in constitution Jack Thompson has.

      The circle completes...

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    46. Re:Is it just me? by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

      Easy ? Hah ! As the CoEx says: "Paradox picks off the careless ones".

      --
      >|<*:=
    47. Re:Is it just me? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's called "a disturbance in the farce."

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    48. Re:Is it just me? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the "laugh out loud" at work. If I had mod points, you would be getting some...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    49. Re:Is it just me? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      "The gamer is trying to seduce you. Roll for a save on Wisdom."

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    50. Re:Is it just me? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      Yes, but level 0 children only get 2d2-1 hit points.

      LOL, I'm only catching this now, but... is there a d2 die? Is it a coin? LOL, I've only been playing D&D once a week for the last 6 months and I've only gone through parts of the player handbook (3.0 edt). So, I don't know if there's a 'true' d2 die or not.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  3. Wow. He has officially flipped. by MuckSavage · · Score: 5, Informative

    In an email to GamePolitics, Thompson has responded to this request, writing, "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."


    Jesus.

    1. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Jesus."

      Nope, don't think even Jesus can save him.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by kinglink · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to quote that because it sounds like he's a bad super villian, or a horrible hero saying stuff like that. He makes Static Shock look like a good idea for "super hero".

      Hell, isn't this just another threat? I have used this type of phrase before, but it's usually when every single fact backs me up and usually it's one of those times I'll flame back someone who's completely made fun of me, and willing to scorch the earth. But who actually attacked Jacko? Who made him look stupid in public except himself.

      I nominate Thompson, to be known as Wacko Jacko, giving Michael Jackson a rest from the nom de plume. He certainly has the insanity to go the distance.

      In other news Jack Thompson is crying bloody murder about the fact Bully allows the main protagnist to kiss boys. Because of this he thinks it has to be a Mature game now? I really think someone has to put his foot down and say "stop bothering us". It can be the press, the public, the politicians, the courts, or the companies. Hopefully this is the first step.

    3. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by drzhivago · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sounds to me like he's been playing too many violent video games.

    4. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      There's a guy out there who made a few hilarious short parodies called "Metal Gear Awesome," and "Awesome the Hedgehog."

      I think he could do a terrific Jack Thompsome.

    5. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by notea42 · · Score: 1

      I read this post and thought you were making up a quote to be funny. Then I read TFA. I wonder if such an e-mail can be submitted as evidence at his contempt hearing?

    6. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You want to play hardball...?

      No, Jack, I don't. It's a violent sport which, through the constant throwing of small but unyielding missiles toward children, and supplying them with large club-like weapons, would only inspire mild-mannered old me to become a crazed bat-wielding psychopath who goes on a rampage through my school.

    7. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by nuzak · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You're at the brink..."

      The brink? The brink?? The brink of what?!?!

      Curse you Jack, for keeping me in suspense! Come rant some more! Please?!?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    8. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Even if he wasn't he couldn't--and wouldn't if he has a brain--save Jack Thompson.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    9. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I can't see how it could be relevant. Contempt of court usually means the judge said either "Do X" or "Don't do X", and then the person did the contrary in violation of the order. For lawyers, it is more challenging to come up with an excuse why, because they are supposed to know the law (pleading ignorance of the law or the meaning of the order is a weak defense when the lawyer could have asked the judge for clarification). Maybe if the judge said to Thompson: "Don't be crazy"? :-)

      In that respect, though, I wonder if Thompson could "plead insanity" to a contempt charge, in which case his thinly veiled threats to others could be relevant after all :-) :-)

    10. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 4, Interesting
      IANAL, but I can't see how it could be relevant. Contempt of court usually means the judge said either "Do X" or "Don't do X", and then the person did the contrary in violation of the order.

      Well, there's a sort of Zeroth "Don't Do X" Law in any courtroom: Don't go off on a foaming-at-the-mouth rant about the judge's decisions/competence/parentage, or your whiny ass is headed to jail.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    11. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a violent sport which, through the constant throwing of small but unyielding missiles toward children, and supplying them with large club-like weapons

      That's not cricket! Oh... wait, actually it is.

    12. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      NB: the message was not TO GamePolitics, since they're not involved in the proceedings. They just got hold of a copy.

    13. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by jasonditz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somebody's got to, either Jesus can do it, or Gabe and Tycho can do it. So long as Jack repents.

    14. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by TomTraynor · · Score: 1

      We now know who was the ghost writer of SCOs press releases and who was the mentor of the former Iraqi information minister.

      The guy needs to take some serious meds, look around and then admit that he lost. Both sides presented what they consider to be facts to an impartial arbiter of fact (judge). The judge made a decision and Thompson lost. If he was worried about our children...

      1. Watch TV sometimes, the images are quite graphic.
      2. Go to the library and check out the books there, they are even more graphic and some may (horrors) have nudity and sex.

      --
      Panic now, beat the rush!
    15. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The brink of...wossname..., you know - just general brinky-ness.

    16. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Beeswarm · · Score: 1

      They got hold of a copy because Jack seems to think it's a good idea to CC every news outlet he can think of, and Gamepolitics.com is one of the few that actually reports on what he does. Never mind that the entire comments section for any story about him is just dozens of users calling him a tool.

    17. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by EotB · · Score: 1

      You are at the brink. It is dark. You may be eaten by a Grue.

    18. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by gzearfoss · · Score: 1
      Nope, don't think even Jesus can save him.


      Even if he rolls a natural 20?
    19. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Jesus could probably save him, as long as he had help from his best friend Santa.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    20. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Nah, it would take Brian Boitano to save the day ('cause that's what Brian Boitano'd do.)

    21. Re:Wow. He has officially flipped. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      There's no question that even the Bible would have a higher rating that Bully. Who's out there protecting kids from it's dangerous influences?

  4. I dislike him as much as the next guy... by faloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The report also notes that attorneys representing the Philadelphia law firm Blank-Rome have filed a 'Petition for Order to Show Cause,' which requires Thompson to illustrate to a judge why he should not be held in contempt."

    But can someone more legally inclined tell me why his response shouldn't be "because I'm innocent until proven guilty"?

    It sounds like they've issued a petition to force Thompson to show he did no wrong.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not a lawyer (won't use the abbreviation, because it's gross), but a "contempt finding" is a separate matter from a criminal conviction. Basically, as a means to allow courts to "take care of their business", judges are given wide lattitude in punishments they can use to keep people in line while they're in the courtroom. All that is necessary is that a judge issue a finding of "contempt of court" and he can issue a variety of usually-lower-grade (compared to criminal convictions) punishments. Now, you can certainly say it's wrong that judges should have this power, but as it stands, most contempt findings don't need a jury trial, so to ask that, he'd be asking to overturn quite a bit of tradition.

    2. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      Because the *full* term is "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law." The judge is giving him a chance to defend himself. If he fails to the judge can find him guilty, as contempt is pretty much offending the judge.

      From what I've heard his response comes down to "if you put me in jail you'll pay" which is pretty much more contempt of court. I get the feeling he's going to jail.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    3. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Babbster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, it depends on the exact reasoning behind the petition, which the referenced news bite (can't call it an article) admits it doesn't have. For example, if I walk into court and call the judge a flaming asshole, I can be held in contempt of court and put in jail. There's no necessity for my guilt to be proven further because what I did was right there in court and on the record. The same might apply to a situation where a lawyer is under a "gag order" and goes on TV in defiance of the order. That lawyer can be held in contempt and, again, there's no trial involved once the violation of the judge's order is in evidence. Such situations can still be eligible for appeal, but a trial per se isn't necessary for the judge to make the initial decision.

      Again, I don't know the details of this specific claim, but there's a reason why many (most?) lawyers want to be judges. A lot of power comes with the robe, even in this age of "mandatory minimums" and the like.

    4. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My legal education is a bit fuzzy but your last sentence hits the nail on the head. The petition does exactly what the article states: Thompson has to tell the judge why he shouldn't be held in contempt for doing whatever it is the court told him not to do.

      I haven't read the details but for the sake of argument let's say that the judge told both parties they couldn't do media interviews. Jack then turns around and does an interview with a family-friendly web site. That would be a contempt of court issue. The law firm is now trying to force Jack to explain why he shouldn't face whatever penalty the court said it would impose if either party talked to the media.

      This is different from whether Jack has been shown to be guilty. In essence, the law firm is telling the court, "Jack did what you told him not to do. I want you to force him to tell you why he shouldn't suffer the penalty."

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      I really hope Jack finally gets disbarred for this.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    6. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that wording I have to agree with you... On the other hand, we do have an appeals system, perhaps this Petition is sort of an appeal for someone who's in contempt of court. Ie: Jack has already been proven guilty, and now he needs to prove the court was wrong and he was actually, innocent. Sounds like he might need the Chewbacca Defense.

    7. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're asking for too much.

    8. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And if contempt of court were a criminal offense, you'd be on the right track. Basically, the judge is asking Thompson to demonstrate that his actions were appropriate in, or relevant to the case. Most likely, Jack will either, a) claim he didn't break any rules, which the record refutes, or b) respond with a vituperative rant, which won't address any of the issues but will give the court a good reason to hold him in contempt.

    9. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Now, you can certainly say it's wrong that judges should have this power

      Wrong? More like horrifying.

      Non-elected position having no checks and balances? Gee, where have we heard this before?

    10. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Careful -- he might just decide that politics is more up his alley and actually get something accomplished.

      On the other hand, his colorful outbursts would see greater public exposure...

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    11. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Informative

      But it does have checks and balances. There are other judges, and panels of judges, that can, and do on occasion, overturn a contempt citation from another judge. That said, the laws governing the powers of a sitting judge in his courtroom were set by the legislators and the Constitutuon of the United States.

    12. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He tried that when he ran for Florida State Attorney General against Janet Reno and lost. He then tried to get Ms. Reno to admit she was a lesbian being blackmailed by the mob. He failed. He accused her of it (being a lesbian that was being blackmailed by the mob) anyway.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    13. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by c_forq · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a check and balance system: appeals courts, superior courts, and supreme courts. Now the structure varies state to state, but every state has an system to appeal cases and charges.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    14. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Nimey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you going to scream about activist judges?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    15. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by DDX_2002 · · Score: 4, Informative
      It would be pretty sad if judges DIDN'T have the power to take immediate action against parties to litigation they're hearing and their counsel. Most every system of justice recognizes that courts have the inherent power to control their own processes.

      There are plenty of checks and balances, most notably that the normal citizen going about his business is never in a position to be bound by the order so he can't be in contempt of it. If you're subject to the court's order, you're either a party, or one of the parties' lawyers, or a third party that has been dragged in to this mess. Third parties generally don't get orders made against them without the right to appear and argue why the order should or shouldn't go. Usually, people get added to these things when it's a question of implementation of orders made against/between parties - the court orders A to do X for B, but C actually holds the money and isn't doing jack squat without an order requiring them to.

      You do occasionally get John Doe orders against any and all people currently illegally occupying a property, or whatever, but they're not especially common outside the labour context and environmental protests.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
    16. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by bunions · · Score: 1

      Oh calm down. The penalties for contempt are typically just a talking-to and a slap on the wrist. I'm not aware of any pattern of abuse, either current or historical. If you are, please share with the class.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    17. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good example may be:

      You are playing in a basketball game. You continue to pester the referee over calls the referee is making. The ref finally gets annoyed and sites you with a technical foul (and a free throw for the other team).

    18. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Non-elected position having no checks and balances? Gee, where have we heard this before?

      Hmmm. In my state, the state judges are elected. (Here is some explanation of how that came about.)

      If I were disturbed by check & balance issue, though, it's not clear to me how a lack of check and balances for a judicial power should make me feel better than those who live in states where the judges are appointed, though.

    19. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by spiritraveller · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, this is not a criminal charge we're talking about, so the burden of proof is different. There's no right to a jury trial, et cetera.

      But it's important to point out that the determination is made by the judge. So far, the lawyers have filed a petition for order to show cause, and that's it.

      The judge has not signed an order to show cause. So we don't even know if he's inclined to agree that Mr. Thompson's actions are contemptuous.

    20. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by capologist · · Score: 1
      But can someone more legally inclined tell me why his response shouldn't be "because I'm innocent until proven guilty"?


      He isn't being asked to provide evidence that he didn't do what he's accused of doing. There is nothing to "prove" here, as there is no dispute over the facts of what he did. He's simply being given an opportunity to provide a justification for his contemptuous behavior toward the judge.
    21. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by hmccabe · · Score: 1

      Not a lawyer (won't use the abbreviation, because it's gross)

      I agree with your points regarding law, which I know nothing about, but what's so gross about IANAL? Is it because it contains the letters A-N-A-L, in that order? If so, how do you refer to Panama's famous waterway?

    22. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      It's not just that, it's that it makes a statement: IANAL = "I anal."

      Now imagine saying it as if the second word is a verb.

      Think about it.*

      *This post is intended only as an expression of personal preference and not a condemnation or praise of any particular lifestyle.

    23. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Lawyer or anal, you're fscked either way. :-P

      --
      home
    24. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by nomadic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Non-elected position having no checks and balances? Gee, where have we heard this before?

      a) The judge in this case has been elected.
      b) The "check" on this is immediate appeal to an appellate court, which frequently throw out contempt findings.
      c) Judges in Florida can be impeached; another check.

    25. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Tinman_au · · Score: 1

      When the guy says stuff like "You did not see the game, you don't even know what it was you saw." to the judge, I'm pretty sure he's a tad contemptuous of the court in actuality (I guess the case needs to be run to prove it legally, until then it's probably "alleged" or something). God knows what else he said, he seems to have a pretty bad case of runoffthemouth disease and says much without thinking. "Jackisms" (those "whacky" things Jack says) can be hours worth of endless amusmement.

    26. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the details but for the sake of argument let's say that the judge told both parties they couldn't do media interviews. Jack then turns around and does an interview with a family-friendly web site. That would be a contempt of court issue.

      Can one be held in contempt for actions taken outside the court after the case has been decided? Isn't that a First Amendment problem? I can understand restricing the behavior, and even perhaps the speech, of litigants during a proceeding, but I can't see how a judge can restrict your speech rights beyond that.

      This is obviously all theoretical since the article, if one can call it that, provides no clue as to what Take-Two's lawyers have requested.

    27. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      The funniest part is that by revealing it, he would have removed any ability of the mob to blackmail her anyways.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    28. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by asuffield · · Score: 2, Informative
      But can someone more legally inclined tell me why his response shouldn't be "because I'm innocent until proven guilty"?


      While "innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental component of any sane legal system, it's not the only such component. Another closely related one is called "prima facie" evidence. This is evidence that by itself proves guilt if no proper rebuttal is forthcoming from the other party. Once prima facie evidence has been supplied by the plaintiff, the defendant *has* been proven guilty if they cannot rebut it.

      While I can't find a copy of this petition to read, it seems likely that it is of the form: "Thompson did these things: [quote from the court record]. This is prima facie evidence of contempt". At this point, it is indeed Thompson's task to show he did no wrong - if he cannot rebut such evidence, then he's guilty. There's no need for a trial to establish whether or not part of the court record is true (the court presumes that it knows what happened in its own courtroom). The judge will review the petition, and if he agrees that it is prima facie evidence, then the only bit left is for Thompson to defend himself.
    29. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "and he can issue a variety of usually-lower-grade (compared to criminal convictions)"

      Like indefinite detention in prison? Yeah, that's lower-grade.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    30. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Jack's an assclown. He's done some fullblown stuff, but I'm pretty sure a judge can't disbar a lawyer - that's a function of the Bar association (though they don't much like him either - and the feeling is mutual).

    31. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use IMNAL and be happy.

    32. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by mstone · · Score: 2, Informative

      ---- But can someone more legally inclined tell me why his response shouldn't be "because I'm innocent until proven guilty"?

      Because the motion in question basically says, "here's what we consider to be proof that he's guilty." Now it's Jack's turn to present his side of the story.

      The law is an adversarial process. The courts define 'truth' as being any statement both sides agree to allow into the record (though technically they use the word 'facts' rather than 'truth'). Then the judge's decision has to follow logically from 'the facts' and the law.

      Both sides in a case have the power to present any facts they want to have put in the record, and both sides have the power to shoot holes in any facts that the other side has put forward for consideration. First one side makes a motion, then the second side gets to make a response. Then the first side gets to state its argument again, taking the response into account, and finally the other side gets to make a second response. Then the judge decides what facts will go into the record, and everyone moves on to the next issue.

      In this instance, Take-Two's lawyers have presented a motion that says, "Jack has acted in contempt of court, for these reasons," and now it's Jack's turn to poke holes in their argument.

      ---- It sounds like they've issued a petition to force Thompson to show he did no wrong.

      Courts don't deal in notions like 'did no wrong'. They deal in dates, times, statements on record, and the law. Jack can respond by saying, "I never said that at all, and here's proof," or, "Take-Two took my statement out of context, and in-context it shows no contempt for the court," or he can admit to making the statements and argue about the rules of when judges are allowed to impose penalties for contempt. In fact, he can do all three at the same time. It's called 'arguing in the alternative'.

      Regardless, though, this isn't about forcing Jack to prove his innocence. This is just Take-Two presenting an idea to the court, and the court giving Jack a chance to tear down as much of their argument as he can.

      That's how the law works.

    33. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      but there's a reason why many (most?) lawyers want to be judges. A lot of power comes with the robe

      Not to mention the kickbacks from your old lawyer buddies who are always grateful if a case can be made to take longer than it strictly needs (and thereby get to charge their clients more).

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    34. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      JT was under a gag order not to reveal any details of the gameplay, I assume in order to protect Take-Two's earnings from early release of gameplay information (not a lawyer or businessman, so this is a guess). However, in subsequent (public) applications to the court JT mentioned several things specifically within the game that he objected to, thereby violating the gag order. Blank-Rome assumes the judge was so busy laughing JT out of court that he didn't notice that he was in contempt, so they submitted it after the case was finished.

      Regardless of the trial being over or not, JT was still under that gag not to release information until after the release date and he violated it. It's picking hairs but under the letter of the law perfectly viable. The standard procedure for dealing with it is fines and a ticking off, but can extend to jail-time if the judge decides it.

      JT's response is that the judge violated that gag order himself (despite not being under it), and also the judge is a big poopy-head and was very mean to him during the trial. Finally, obviously not content with the original slightly dubious contempt of court, he decided to go right ahead and tell the judge he wasn't fit to do his job.

      I'm looking forward to the inevitable backhanded bitch-slap which is going to entail from this.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    35. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then, canal would be 'C' anal, and you would inadvertently admit your preference for watching a specific category of porn. *gasp!*

    36. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Not a lawyer (won't use the abbreviation, because it's gross)
      So, YANAL?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, I don't know the details of this specific claim, but there's a reason why many (most?) lawyers want to be judges. A lot of power comes with the robe, even in this age of "mandatory minimums" and the like.

      Judge: A law student who marks his own papers. - H.L. Mencken

    38. Re:I dislike him as much as the next guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a lawyer (won't use the abbreviation, because it's gross)
      IANALWUTABIG.

  5. Prison Sodomy! by Fuckin+ROBOTS! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Huzzah for the overcrowded US Prison System! JT is certain to have his hoop stretched to an uncomfortable size 9 by someone who was imprisoned for Grand Theft Auto!

    --
    You see 'em? They're EVERYWHERE!
  6. Joe Pesci by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want Joe Pesci to play Thompson in the upcoming movie, "Game Wars".

    Can you imagine Pesci saying, "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

    1. Re:Joe Pesci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you imagine Pesci saying, "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

      You have no chance to survive make your time.

    2. Re:Joe Pesci by rts008 · · Score: 1

      LOL! BTW- Damn you!- now I have that "clip" playing on a loop in my head-everyone is looking at me strangely as I sit here giggling like a school girl-Thanks!
      Oh s*it- Boss coming in now *opens fake spreadsheet*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    3. Re:Joe Pesci by nuzak · · Score: 1

      I dunno, when you really want a hellfire and damnation rant, you gotta go to the master: Al Pacino.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:Joe Pesci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no, James Gandolfini, ala Tony Soprano.

  7. One can't help but think by Kelz · · Score: 1

    That he is the most brilliant guerrila marketeer the world has ever seen. A crazed laywer making claims about things he knows nothing about, all in the name of protecting the children. Its like trying to get the KKK to vocally vote for your opposition!

  8. Disbarring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why hasn't this mental midget been disbarred yet?

    1. Re:Disbarring? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The court is waiting for the Mad Hatter to return from his tea break and the Red Queen is still sharpening her axe to take his head it off.

  9. This is an outrage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the thanks he gets for looking out for the children.

    Something has to be done about these judges.

    1. Re:This is an outrage by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Not. Jacks. Job. Thank you very fucking much. Bye.

    2. Re:This is an outrage by Quaz+and+Wally · · Score: 1

      I can understand that you feel children shouldn't be playing games like GTA and maybe Bully, I don't know what's in it yet besides bullies and boys kissing. But two things...

      It doesn't matter if you're trying to put a criminal in jail or sue the family who broke his leg while he tried to break in, you don't get to take over the court. If Jack Thompson can't make a case without threatening, making blind accusations, and harrassing, then he should very well be held in contempt.

      Also, it's not Take Two's fault that children are playing these games any more than it is the movie industries fault that children are watching R-rated movies or pornography. It doesn't matter how much you bubble up a kid, if you don't educate him and monitor his TV/internet/video game/whatever time, it's not anyone's fault but yours if he learns about killing and thinks it's a good idea.

      But seriously, Jack Thompson is a mad man. I once thought that maybe there was some essence of good in him, that perhaps there was something more behind him than just video game hating and that he was trying to better our community. But then I did some research and found out he'll disregard your thoughts, intelligence, comments, and presence the moment he finds out you're affiliated to video games at the slightest. He will not only pass off what you're saying as insignificant, he'll insult and threaten you for it as well. Just look up some of his encounters with some writers, or my favorites, with VGCats and Penny Arcade.

    3. Re:This is an outrage by Izhido · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he has good intentions. He just took all this videogame-violence-thing a bit too far. And he became basically mad in the process, without he recognizing it. Happens to a lot of people.

  10. Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > In an email to GamePolitics, Thompson has responded to this request, writing, "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

    "You don't know the history of barratry! I do! You're just being glib!"

    Since "jump the couch" is taken by Hollywood UFO-cultists, I hereby declare that Jack Thompson has officially "thrown the chair".

    1. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Steve Blamer owns that one.

      "Stole the car", perhaps?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about "drank the coffee".

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >Sorry, Steve Blamer owns that one.

      I thought that was Bobby Knight, a man who has done more damage to team sports than any other human being.
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    4. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 1

      I hereby declare that Jack Thompson has officially "thrown the chair".

      I realize this is /. so it's probably not well known in this community, Texas Tech basketball coach Bob Knight has already laid claim to "thrown the chair." ;)

      --
      Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
    5. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I think the correct term is:

      "beat the hoe"

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    6. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Associate · · Score: 1

      Trimed the hedge?

      I like this game.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    7. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Whacked the mole?

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    8. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've narrowed my vote down to either

      "killed the hooker"
      "kissed the Bully"

    9. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by binarysins · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because Gary Gygax used the analogy of a chair during his interview about roleplaying games on 60 minutes - he said you could sit on it or hit someone over the head with it, but that didn't mean that chairs should be banned.

    10. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Toaded the wet sprocket.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      How about "drank the coffee".

      Rather hot coffee, I suspect.
    12. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Nanpa · · Score: 0

      But sitting on a chair can increase the rate of childhood obesity... WONT SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!

    13. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by wheany · · Score: 1

      Hey, you got the joke!

    14. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      Rather hot coffee, I suspect.

      He should have drank the cold coffee. It has a special trace program to help us bring him back to reality.
    15. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      "Back to reality" implies that he's been there in the past.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    16. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1
      He should have drank the cold coffee. It has a special trace program to help us bring him back to reality.


      No, that's the antifreeze.
      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    17. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Elminst · · Score: 1

      Walked the ocean?

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    18. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by mink · · Score: 1

      Been through the desert on a horse with no name?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    19. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by Elminst · · Score: 1

      That was America, not Toad the Wet Sprocket. So your post makes no sense.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    20. Re:Come out of the closet, Jack Thompson. by mink · · Score: 1

      My point was to make no sense. The posts in the chain all were euphemistic to me, so I though I would add something that only when looked at the really wrong way could be euphemistic. Sorry I came out of left field like that.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  11. For the love of christ by Hubbell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never before have I advocated a severe beating for another person until I discovered who Jack Thompson was.

    1. Re:For the love of christ by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Never before have I advocated a severe beating for another person until I discovered who Jack Thompson was"

      See??! Jack Thompson was right.... look what video games are doing to you.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:For the love of christ by AceCaseOR · · Score: 4, Funny

      For the sake of irony, it should be with a baseball bat.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:For the love of christ by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      Even better irony would be beating him to death with a box set of Bully + all the GTA games.

    4. Re:For the love of christ by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1
      See??! Jack Thompson was right.... look what video games are doing to you.

      Yes, I'm forever scarred from all those Holey Moley games.
    5. Re:For the love of christ by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

      For the sake of irony I'd suggest an iron.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:For the love of christ by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      An metal baseball bat, perhaps?

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    7. Re:For the love of christ by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      Ten thousand balls, when all you need is a bat...

      isn't it ironic, don't ya think?

    8. Re:For the love of christ by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ten thousand disappointing situations, when all you need is an actual irony...

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    9. Re:For the love of christ by DittoBox · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. We want sling-shots. That way we keep the irony contemporary with his current tripe.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    10. Re:For the love of christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont blame me, i voted for Thom Jackson..

  12. Tagging Beta: Neener neener neener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I have to say.

  13. How to make JT blow his top by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Tell him about the red hot gay action to be had in Bully.

    1. Re:How to make JT blow his top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is 'blow his top' the best choice of words for that particular scene? :P that he swings *that* way is news to me.

    2. Re:How to make JT blow his top by Iriel · · Score: 1

      Good ol' Jackie T hasn't wasted any time on that. He's advocating a change in rating from T to MA because that shouldn't be portrayed as normal compared to hetero-teenage kissing.

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
  14. I want to play hardball! by RyatNrrd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but it was banned due to violent content.

  15. Sweet, Sweet Irony by Brigade · · Score: 1


    Rockstar releases this: http://www.joystiq.com/2006/10/22/boy-on-boy-kissi ng-in-bully/

    Jack goes to jail for making a ruckuss about 'Bully'
    Rockstar bribes warden of Jail, installs cameras and arranges 'special accomodations' for dear ol' Jack.

    Jack gets to spend some quality time with some new friends (Read: Bullies)

    Rockstar includes some great vid captures of Jack in their new game .. (just innocent boys experimenting in their element)

    1. Re:Sweet, Sweet Irony by Jimbot256 · · Score: 1

      http://www.gamespot.com/news/6160340.html

      "Dear Ms. Vance," Thompson wrote, "We just found gay sexual content in Bully, as Jimmy Hopkins makes out with another male student. Good luck with your 'Teen' rating now, Patty."

      Yeah, this guy sure will make a good defense for his contempt hearing. Acting like a whiney, 14 year old and all. Hell, he should play this game more often. With his maturity level, I'm sure he'll be able to connect with the characters in this game quite easily. But perhaps a game like Barney's Hide and Seek would better suit his maturity level?

    2. Re:Sweet, Sweet Irony by mink · · Score: 1

      Brother, are you referring to a bit of the old ultra-violence or the in-out, in-out? Either way, I think it sounds real horrorshow.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  16. This guy clearly....... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Funny

    .... Needs some hot coffee.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:This guy clearly....... by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

      This guy clearly needs some hot coffee

      No, that lawsuit has already been done. We'll need some other way to keep him occupied.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    2. Re:This guy clearly....... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      .... Needs some hot coffee. ... from McDonalds' Drive-Thru.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  17. Know who you're dealing with by ENOENT · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Wikipedia:

    "In sending documents to opponents, Thompson would frequently attach a photocopy of his driver's license, with a photo of Batman pasted over his own, just to make sure they knew who they were dealing with."

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    1. Re:Know who you're dealing with by DrXym · · Score: 0, Troll
      "In sending documents to opponents, Thompson would frequently attach a photocopy of his driver's license, with a photo of Batman pasted over his own, just to make sure they knew who they were dealing with."

      Is that Batman or batshit?

    2. Re:Know who you're dealing with by eddy · · Score: 1

      So he's a known copyright-infringer?

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    3. Re:Know who you're dealing with by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only an article on someone like Jack Thompson could make me even consider the idea that that wasn't the result of a page vandalism.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Know who you're dealing with by Chryana · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, I tried to mod you funny and I selected troll by accident. I'm just posting so that my moderation will be canceled. Moderators, feel free to ignore me, or mark me offtopic :(

    5. Re:Know who you're dealing with by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I tried to mod you funny and I selected troll by accident. I'm just posting so that my moderation will be canceled. Moderators, feel free to ignore me, or mark me offtopic :(
      Mod parent as funny! Oh, wait...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  18. THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack Thompson seriously had this coming. Good riddance.

  19. Wow. He has officially busted his pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In an email to GamePolitics, Thompson has responded to this request, writing, "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

    Who knew that the Hulk was a lawyer?

  20. Jack Thompson works for Take 2...... by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    His guerilla maketing campaign for Bully has been nothing short of brilliant. Thanks to Jack, Bully has been at the top of the headlines for weeks and weeks prior to its release.

    Well done, I say.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    1. Re:Jack Thompson works for Take 2...... by shigelojoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Now that I think about it, I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case. Take a controversial public figure, pay him to do what he's famous for, and set up a false conflict. Gamers will flock to your product out of spite for your 'enemy', and anyone who's convinced by his rhetoric wouldn't be buying your games in the first place. Genius!

      Well, except for the judicial system wanting your head on a pike after they find out you've been using the courtroom as a PR outlet. Nothing a few campaign contributions wouldn't fix, though...

  21. I wan a Jack Thompson video game by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

    ...I've been waiting for one, thinking that someone would at least make a simple mod using Jack Thompson graphics to beat upon. Heck, after looking at his quoted e-mail, maybe he should be the main character!

    Seriously, a Jack Thompson game would be hilarious. It could have characters like judges, geeks, thinkofthechildren, something to really disturb others by showing "the truth of it all" ;)

  22. Someone fed the mogwi after midnight by Son.Of.Dad · · Score: 0

    Wow. This guys has a true niche in crazy, eh?

    Those semantics take me back to another talking head, making ultimatums: "If I don't raise $600M, a 900 foot Jesus will kill me!!!"

    Give this man a coke and a smile, ASAP!

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damn fool about it.
  23. The judge didn't say this - Take-Two did. by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA. This wasn't the judge telling Jack the Dripper to show cause that he shouldn't be thrown in the slammer for contempt. This was Take-Two Games's lawyers filing a motion to ASK the judge to do that. IMHO, it's a bit tacky, but then this *is* Jack Thompson they're asking it about, so he's not in any position to take the high road here.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:The judge didn't say this - Take-Two did. by is+as+us+Infinite · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are technically correct. However, Take-Two is just pointing out to the judge where Jack had been in contempt and the judge missed it. To continue the GP's example, just because the judge happened not see the media interview that Jack took part of during the trial doesn't make Jack any less in contempt-of-court. It just means that the judge happened to be watching a different channel that night (or maybe the interview didn't air until later, for example.)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. . . . . . . .
    2. Re:The judge didn't say this - Take-Two did. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      However, Take-Two is just pointing out to the judge where Jack had been in contempt and the judge missed it.

      IANAL, but: Thats not how the system works, it is not the responsibility of the courts to police court orders. No action can be taken unless someone complains to the court. So the court is not only allowed, it is part of the normal and required procedure.

      There are two kinds of contempt that might be involved here, the first is disobeying a court order, the second is the litteral meaning of 'disrespect'. It looks as if the behavior complained of is disobeying a court order, a contempt hearing for disrespect is very rare, for disrespect outside the court even rarer. But it can happen and some of the statements made are certainly grounds.

      In particular threatening the court with a lawsuit for finding against you is a very serious issue, particularly if you are a lawyer and thus an officer of the court. I don't like hearing about threats to bring civil rights cases against courts for finding against a plaintif.

      A court does not have the power to disbar a lawyer but they can censure, fine or imprison them and any finding of that kind can be reported to the state bar for further action.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:The judge didn't say this - Take-Two did. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      This wasn't the judge telling Jack the Dripper to...
      "Jack the Dripper" is Kevorkian.

  24. Oh, this it too funny by dthree · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In an email to GamePolitics, Thompson has responded to this request, writing, "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

    Does he think Blank-Rome is some kind of hick law firm in a backwater town? I seriously doubt they are underestimating what Thompson can "unleash" at any given time. How many different ways does everyone have to tell this guy to STFU?
    --
    "I forgot my mantra."
  25. This isn't the judge, it's Take-Two requesting it by billstewart · · Score: 1

    RTFA. This isn't the judge telling Thompson to prove he's not in contempt, it's Take-Two's lawyers filing a motion to ask the judge to do that. A vituperative rant at Take-Two (not at the judge) would be perfectly appropriate at this point, if it were anyone other than Jack, but what we got instead was a wimpy quasi-threatening vituperative rant instead of a better-thought-out rant along the lines of "See, Judge, this just shows what bullies those eeeevilllll gamerrrrzzzz are!" Plaintiffs and defendants can contemn each other all they want, as long as they don't contemn the judge or the court.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  26. It gets *even* *weirder* ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to an article at GamePolitics.com, Thompson has apparently announced his intention to run for Eleventh Judicial Circuit Judge in Miami in 2008.

    My, what a busy fellow.

    I expect the next move in his cunning plan, after 2008, is to get his name officially changed to "Jack Dredd".

  27. RTFA - This was the lawyers, not the judge by billstewart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This wasn't the judge accusing Thompson of contempt of court - this was Take-Two's lawyers asking the the judge to do that. They rattled Jack's cage, and he snarled at them. If they thought there was any realistic chance of the judge taking them up on it, it *would* have been hardball; the much more normal thing for them to have done would be to file some motion about frivilous lawsuits and ask the judge to award them legal costs. If Jack were a brighter guy, he'd have filed some response about "See, Judge, this just shows what Bullies these gamerszzzz are, and why they're a threat to society", but no, he's just snarling.


    (I wanted to write "no, he's just snarling like the shark he jumped" or something along those lines, but you can only twist a metaphor so far, given that sharks don't actually snarl....)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:RTFA - This was the lawyers, not the judge by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

      Or jump for that matter. Sorry if I missed the sarcasm.

  28. Anyone else getting the idea that.. by DeadboltX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jack Thompson must have had some severely traumatizing experience with video games as a child.

    Maybe he had a brother that played too much pacman, chowed down on some pills and then ate his mother.

    1. Re:Anyone else getting the idea that.. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe he had a brother that played too much pacman, chowed down on some pills and then ate his mother.

      It's her own fault for putting a blue sheet over her head...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Anyone else getting the idea that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind the violent video games, that kid needs an appointment with freud!

    3. Re:Anyone else getting the idea that.. by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Jack Thompson must have had some severely traumatizing experience with video games as a child.

      Maybe he had a brother that played too much pacman, chowed down on some pills and then ate his mother.


      Possibly, but while most of us were playing Pac Man, Mr. Thompson was already busy going after rap music.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  29. i am locution - and bored by hxnwix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

    That's pretty contemptible remark there, bully boy. You know, the judge didn't even make his last ruling with prejudice. I think that the next time you are struck down, you won't even be appealing to him anymore. Sure, you'll be able make all the noise you want, but he won't hear you!

    One really shouldn't be playing brinksmanship when he has so many holes in case. But really, on the hole, I think this judge is feeling pretty good. Eh hole? Hahahah. Yeah Jack, I'm flaming you. Burn in hell.

  30. GGG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mistaken Jack for John and I'm like this guy could face A LOT more charges if he lived in the US :P

    Oh well time to pull up so good old GGG porn and relax :)

  31. So... beautiful... by Pancake+Bandit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the greatest thing I have ever read on slashdot. I have been waiting for years to see him get what's coming to him.

  32. He looks like a crazy old Jon Stewart by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    In a white wig, LOL

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  33. Big Smile! by dapsychous · · Score: 1

    Why is it that merely reading a single headline can bring a BIG smile to my face. I don't hate this man, but I seriously believe that he is nothing more than a publicity whore.

    If anyone is interested, here is an open letter I wrote to Jack Thompson a few months ago. It pretty much sums up my opinion on this man. Yes, I know it's MySpace, but I'm cheap and it's free.

    If we give him a peanut and ignore him will he go away?

    1. Re:Big Smile! by Couchmanx · · Score: 1

      I agree with your blog. I've grown up with video games all my life. They haven't driven me to violence, it was the bullies in school that driven me to violence. The only time I have used violence was to defend myself, never to intentionally harm someone.

      Jack Thompson would be made a hero if he would drop the whole video game issue and took up the Bully issue in our schools today. (not the game, real bullies).

      In my opinion "boys will be boys" as an excuse for bullies should never be aloud because those "boys" know what they were doing and why.

      Just thought I'd put in my 2 cents.

      Couchmanx

      --
      If it takes effort to do, let someone else do it.
    2. Re:Big Smile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, I know it's MySpace, but I'm cheap and it's free.

      googlepages ftw?
      nearlyfreespeech.net?
      *any half-decent blog site*
      *your /. journal space*
      *!my-space*
    3. Re:Big Smile! by dapsychous · · Score: 1

      good to know... I'll look into those. I didn't even know slashdot had a journal space. Hmm... Stupid new-ness

    4. Re:Big Smile! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Jack Thompson would be made a hero if he would drop the whole video game issue and took up the Bully issue in our schools today.

      This is what I've often though when seeing people rant about how popular media is warping the children.

      If people cared even half as much about the REAL violence, bulling and intimidation that we ALL KNOW goes on in schools - and of course the quality of the education on offer - as they apparently do about on-screen or in-game content then the world would be a much better place for all of us. And that's something that applies globally.

      Apparently, Jack doesn't care as much about the self-perpetuating and much more destructive real violence, bullying and intimidation that goes on in schools (which has been the norm since long before videogames existed) as he does about seeing the the same thing in videogames. Of course, I'm sure he stands to make much more money through all the free publicity surrounding his demonizing of video games than he would do standing up for the rights of children to be free from violence and harrasment (in a place they are forced to go to).

      Given the previous encounters between Jack and Rockstar, I can't help but think Rockstar may have thought more about what they were doing in releasing Bully then might initially be apparent.

    5. Re:Big Smile! by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 1

      IMO we should give him several of those metal "peanuts" from close range at extremely high velocity.

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
  34. Jack's a retard by milkman479 · · Score: 1

    I emailed Jack once to tell him he is a moron. He replied back with his resume. He is clearly not a credible threat to anything but himself. If you'd like to email him, send a note to his ironic email:

    jackpeace@comcast.net

  35. Re:The full quote. by cno3 · · Score: 1

    Thompson continued, "Who you think I am? I kill all you f***in' assholes. I take you all to f***in' hell! You need an army you hear! An army to kill me!"

  36. Jack is just the latest in a long line of haters by BrianRagle · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson makes for a curiously good study of the psychology of other such "crusaders for the children", and there have been many in history. Starting with Meletus, who prosecuted Socrates for being ""a doer of evil, who corrupts the youth; and who does not believe in the gods of the state, but has other new divinities of his own" we can trace multiple examples of those who sought to place themselves in a position of youth advocate, if only to bolster their own narrow ideology of what young people should be taught. Religion has certainly always played a large hand in such crusades, as shown by some of the more spectacular witch trials in which supposedly afflicted children were the primary evidence and witnesses for prosecution. In the last century, we see striking examples in the early days of rock and roll in which a young Ronald Reagan is found wondering "are these people just showing their individuality, or is it possible that there is a plot involved?"

    Along this vein of standing against that which is popular among youth yet deemed subversive by older, establishment types, their value can be found in actually helping to further that which they stand against. Jack Thompson doesn't like violent video games. Thus, his cause and his rallying cry against them only serve to bring more attention to those games by society in general and youth in particular who find yet another way to piss off their parents.

  37. Smells Like Irony by Romicron · · Score: 1
    "One big difference between [Take Two Interactive CEO] Mr. Eibeler and me is that I'm not going to jail." - Jack Thompson

    Taken from http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorn ey)

    Sweet, sweet justice.

  38. Justice by mentaldrano · · Score: 1

    Don't throw the justice tag around so lightly! Why would putting Jack Thompson in jail be just? How would it help undo the damage he has done? It is perhaps ironic that his use of the legal system has come back to bite him, but it is in no way just.

    Really, the justice system is grossly misnamed. A sincere public apology followed by twenty years of advocating on the side of the games industry AGAINST such bullshit would probably be just, but that will never happen.

    1. Re:Justice by Reverend528 · · Score: 1
      How would it help undo the damage he has done?

      What damage? It's not like he's really accomplished anything other than wasting everyone's time.

    2. Re:Justice by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > Why would putting Jack Thompson in jail be just? How would it help undo the damage he has done?

      Well, putting JT in jail (in this case) would be a response to his doing something that earned him contempt of court, so it would be quite just to punish him for that. For the greater question, it's not relevant whether that would undo anything in the past, since it wouldn't be punishment for what he's done in the past, it's punishment for earning contempt of the court.

      > It is perhaps ironic that his use of the legal system has come back to bite him, but it is in no way just.

      Again, the contempt charge doesn't stem from his use of the legal system up to now, it stems from his actions in contempt in this case. Ironic it is, but there's no reason to assume it's unjust. It would only be unjust if he didn't do anything to earn contempt of court.

      Again to address the larger question, it would be just if his actions in court meant that nobody takes him seriously any more, and this decision will take away from his credibility. That's entirely just, in this case.

      Virg

  39. He probably bought... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Funny

    And actually tried to play "E.T." on the 2600 when he was a kid.

    Atari! What hath thou wrought?!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  40. as far as I'm concerned by alizard · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson should serve out any contempt of court sentence as a prisoner at a CIA detention facility in Uzbekistan with a "return not required" sign around his neck.

  41. Like there's any doubt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She and Hillary are making a horror-porn.

  42. But Jacky did it by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    RTFP. Jack disobeyed a court order, and Take-Two's lawyers are pointing it out to the judge and telling the judge to ask him why he did what he did.

  43. K to the A by DragonTHC · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma Karma CHAMELEON!!!

    Jack Thompson, if you act like a knob, someone's gonna turn you.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  44. Are they able to by phorm · · Score: 1

    Yank his license to practice law? From past history I'd assume that JT will become combative, rather than apologize... so can they please pull it then?

    1. Re:Are they able to by damsa · · Score: 1

      Courts do not repeal licenses to practice law, that honor is decided by the State Bar Association. Also people making the decision in the state bar are not elected by the public they are elected by bar association members. However the contempt charge can be used as evidence of a lawyer unfit to practice law.

  45. Hate him? by phorm · · Score: 1

    You don't have to hate the man to hate the ignorance which he represents.

  46. So, ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the folks who were saying it was a travesty of justice that he even managed to get his case heard? His case appears to be about dead, and now the other side is moving for sanctions against him...

    Perhaps all the people who called the judge a moron should eat a bit of crow?

    1. Re:So, ummm... by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      I admit to having some egg on my face in that regard, but that's not even the best of it, IMHO. His response to being held in contempt of court was to tell the judge and the court that they had no idea on how to interpret law. He also said that the motion was "slithering in bad faith goo".

      It's like this guy is on a different page of reality to the rest of us, the page where lawyers defend assault charges by punching the judge in the face.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  47. HAHA!!! by Lactoso · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see this forever immortalized as a legal judgement in caselaw as "JACK THOMPSON PWNED!!"

  48. Poetic Justice, Round 2 by foamrotreturns · · Score: 1

    Man, what a day! First, Amazon gets bitch-slapped by IBM with a ridiculous patent violation similar to the one that they used to enforce their own ridiculous patents, and now Jack Thompson shows contempt for the court system, and is subsequently held in contempt of court? I can almost taste the sweetness.

  49. no soap on a rope for j00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish him some well deserved leisure time with Bubba.

  50. Mr Thompson and Blue Nuns by Zwicky · · Score: 1
    Sort of off-topic, but I saw Jack Thompson on a Channel 4 television show just the other week - Real Blue Nuns (hmmm... bluue nu-uuns). Up until then, I hadn't seen him in anything but images online. As such, I hadn't heard him speak either, and I was quite surprised by how relatively well composed he was. I wasn't, however, surprised by his views ('sin' this, 'sin' that - "yeh, whatever... let's get back to the nun's gettin' it on, shall we...").

    What with the way we've heard him conduct himself in court proceedings, I was expecting him to be all up in arms about it like some crazy religious preacher man. Hm, maybe he was having a good day. Whatever, I think the next game I write will be a GTA play-alike with a Hot Convent mod which will unlock all manner of delicious sex acts, graphically depicting them in detail whenever Father Emilio - the main character - gets jiggy with the pious hot babes.

    On a serious note, it was probably not a good idea to give him yet more media exposure. And, to veer this ramble back onto something resembling the topic, IMHO it's a good thing that Take-Two Interactive have called for this. Judging by the following quote (and pretty much anything else he's ever uttered) this guy really needs bringing down a peg or six.

    "You want to play hardball...? You want to try to throw me in jail? You have no idea what you are unleashing in doing this. You're at the brink..."

    --
    "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  51. Re:This isn't the judge, it's Take-Two requesting by kjart · · Score: 1

    Plaintiffs and defendants can contemn each other all they want, as long as they don't contemn the judge or the court.

    You seem to enjoy saying RTFA. From Jack:

    If this court in any fashion proceeds toward issuing a show cause order, given its utter baselessness and the bad faith goo in which it slithers, then Thompson will add whatever judge should do so as a defendant in the aforementioned federal civil rights action...

    I dont know if that legally applies, but that sounds like fightin' words to me.

  52. Re:The full quote. by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    "you know who the fuck I am? I'm the mawfuckin Thompsonnaut!" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Juggernaut_Bitch! !

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  53. frame him by British · · Score: 1

    If someone was enterprising at Take 2, they would procure a "leaked" memo thanking Jack Thompson for manipulating the court system for free PR. Jack Thompson would of course deny it, but that would just make it look more legitimate. Result: he would be discredited forever. Take 2 would be applauded for such a crazy viral marketing campaign. :)

  54. Brink.. by Mr.Madsen · · Score: 1

    You know.. ehm..

    From http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bri nk/

    2. brink
    An alternate form of alcohol consumption which places alcohol directly into the blood stream, thus requiring only a minimal amount of alcohol consumption to become drunk. A common form of brinking is done using a device, preferably a water bottle, some lube and a brave third party. The third party simply places the lubed-up water bottle full of alcohol into the brinkers anus and squeezes, causing a plethora of alcohol to enter the bloodstream and allowing the brinker to become rather drunk in the process.

    "Yo Andrew, if your not doing anything tonight, do you wanna brink?"

  55. Re:The full quote. by somersault · · Score: 1

    Ah the beautiful irony.. I'd love to see what all the moronic parents who believe Thompson's thinking think of him after he flips and it's all over the news...

    He maybe needs to relieve some stress by playing a bit of GTA. I'm gonna have to call myself Jack Thompson in the online play on GTA 4 :p

    --
    which is totally what she said
  56. Funny incident... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
    Never really follows this, but after the /. article, I read the wiki entry on Thompson.
    Thompson gave Reno a letter at a campaign event requesting that she check a box to indicate whether she was homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. Thompson said that Reno then put her hand on his shoulder and responded, Im only interested in virile men. Thats why Im not attracted to you.[8] He filed a police report accusing her of battery for touching him. In response, Reno asked Florida governor Bob Martinez to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate.[9] The special prosecutor rejected the charge and concluded that Thompson did it as a political ploy. Reno was ultimately re-elected with 69% of the vote. Thompson repeated allegations that Reno was a lesbian when she was nominated as U.S. Attorney General, leading one of her supporters, lieutenant governor Buddy MacKay, to dismiss him as a kook.
    Great comback, Janet! :)
    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  57. Thompsons mail? from Fark by iostream.h by Upphew · · Score: 0

    John B. Thompson, Attorney at Law

    October 13, 2006

    Judge Ronald Friedman
    Dade County Courthouse
    Miami, Florida 33130

    Re: Bully

    Dear Judge Friedman:

    Now that you have consigned innumerable children to skull fractures, eye injuries from slingshots, and beatings with baseball bats, without a hearing as to the danger, let me tell you a few things, with all respect for your office and with no respect for the arbitrary way in which you handled this matter. I can handle an adverse ruling by a judge. I've had plenty of those in my lifetime, and that's fine. But the way you conducted yourself today helps explain why a great Dade County Judge, the late Rhea Pincus Grossman, could not abide you. She was not the only one:

    1. Well into this case, you told Take-Two to produce "a tape of the game so you could watch it." Video games don't come on tapes, Judge, and you don't watch them. You interactively play them, which is why they are so behavior modifying. You, the player/protagonist, enter into the violence and do it, but you didn't even want to hear testimony about that. You are not an expert in bullying or virtual reality, and I had an expert in both, and you never heard from them because you did not want to hear from them. Dr. Provenzo could have explained why interactive consumption of this very violence is so dangerous, as opposed to passively consumed violence on television, but he was not allowed to testify because he was prevented from seeing the evidence.

    You were very nice to my other expert, Miami Police Chief Ken Harms, and then made it certain that your courtroom would not be graced with his real expertise. I would have preferred less courtesy and more due process, and so would the victims that are on the way.

    2. Take-Two's lawyer, Rebecca Ward, ...in your courtroom when she told you that a "Teen" rating is an age restriction at the point of sale. That is an utter fabrication, and you are on notice that it is an utter fabrication. Ms. Ward is very good at fabricating things for a client that routinely engages in criminal conduct, and you bought all this hook, line, and sinker. Take-Two has been adjudicated by the federal government to have engaged in fraud and deception about game content, and you took their unchallenged word of these two video gamers in your chambers that the game was what they said it was.

    3. You assured us, in your courtroom two days ago, that you would view the playing of Bully to its conclusion. That is what you promised on the record. You did not keep your promise. The transcript of that bizarre exercise will show that you asked Take-Two reps "How does the game end?" You never saw the ending. What you took was testimony from two employees of Take-Two/Rockstar, who were not under oath, and without affording me any opportunity to question them. This was an ex parte proceeding that I was forced to watch, nearly gagging on the denial of due process that it constituted. In thirty years of practicing law, it is the oddest thing I have ever seen, and the most judicially arbitrary thing I have ever seen.

    But it is not the oddest thing Take-Two has done. They had these little contrived, controlled viewings of the game for people in the media, but even the BBC figured out how violent the game was, despite the sham.

    What you conducted in your chambers, Judge, was the equivalent of Iran leading UN weapons inspectors around the country taking them to places where the illegal activity was not occurring.

    You would not abide argument today, because the Miami Herald was there, that Take-Two had in fact released this game to the mass media, which waived its privilege as to producing it to me. You did not allow a hearing to occur because the media there would have seen how you railroaded this entire matter--at the expense of children's safety.

    4. You said after being shown what Take-Two wanted you to see that "I've seen worse." Judge, that is not the issue. The issue is whether this game, played by ten-y