Domain: 209.85.135.104
Stories and comments across the archive that link to 209.85.135.104.
Comments · 29
-
My new ringtone!
-
Re:Already slashdotted...
Here's a link to Google's cache of the article.
-
Re:on-orbit assembly, finally
At risk of replying to my own post, following the links right through to a far more detailed article reveals that Mars was specifically mentioned by the Director of the Space Research Institute but left out of the article linked in the summary. The above article is a much more informative and interesting read on the plans for the Russian space industry.
-
Ah, Russian translationsThis article's translation seemed relatively good compared to what I've seen, and I was starting to think they've finally been able to improve the translation process by at least ensuring complete sentences. Then I clicked on the linked story about the Black hole against collider:
Eight babies mastered statistics on the neutron estrelles found mountains, Russian scientists fired newspaper for scientists, black holes and opened a few of its secrets, and probably pozhalev that, once again gathered to destroy the Earth.. The first four news - the truth, whether fifth - the court will decide.
Now I'm wondering whether the original article's translation was just a fluke of good luck, or if actually the errors are coincidentally all adding in the same direction to produce a nearly grammatically correct article about something completely different than what we think it is about. For all we non-Russians know, "orbital construction plant" could be a mistranslation of "crop circle maker".
-
Re:Multi-threaded qsort() anyone?
You mean something like parallel_sort in libstdc++, since GCC 4.3.0?
One of several parallelised standard algorithms. -
Re:Just prooves - your data is worth more ...That's their PR slant. Their bulletin (GNU's Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 12) tells a different story:
Note that the library license actually represents a strategic retreat. We would prefer to insist as much as possible that programs based on GNU software must themselves be free. However, in the case of libraries, we found that insisting they be used only in free software appeared to discourage use of the libraries rather than encouraging free applications.
-
Re:Matters entirely on the industry.I agree with the spirit of your post.
As someone who works in web development with Java, I'd disagree with your rating of tech concepts, tho:- pointers: you should keep track of your references in Java
;-) - memory management: check Internet for bug reports of memory leaks in major vendors' J2EE servers
- stacks, linked lists: Java (now) has the useful Collections API built-in. You still need to understand data structures (and threading - and, since the WeakHashMap, memory management concepts) to use it properly. For example, data for a drop-down menu on a web page would probably come from a List type in the popular J2EE frameworks: the developer may find it more useful to build the list in a TreeSet and then "export" this to a List for use by the framework...
My "conversion" course had many students who initially knew next to nothing about computers. We went from Java (Basics) to C++ (Algorithms and Data Structures), used C and shell commands in our Operating Systems course (I can't imagine how someone would be allowed to use Java to teach Operating Systems!). There was a big drop-out rate in initial stages; at the course's end, some of the "green" students were doing better all-round than the technophiles. - pointers: you should keep track of your references in Java
-
Re:Now, for the most useful one
Here's a good story from 335 years ago.
-
Re:not intelligent enough...
Here's a really good story from European history that could be characterised as a war of religion
:-) -
Re:Sign the damn installer (Windows)Certification isn't just about paying $100, it's about meeting a standard. Here's an html version of the MS doc saying what a package must be/do to be certifiable (as 'twere).
I've had to deal with crappy installers (I've created a few of them...) and know that it's much easier to deal with a good one, especially when supporting a large number of machines. That bit of certification can help give a sysadmin confidence that this installation isn't going to be a PITA when it comes to upgrading/removing/conflicts/reboots over a large number of machines.
Does that help at all?
-
Old news, if you got it....
-
Re:What about osdev?By jonwil (467024) The #1 reason I want something like EFI is to eliminate the world of proprietary bootloaders/selection mechanisms for good. Essentially the BIOS would be the one that displays the list of boot options.
Unfortunatly no vendor that supports EFI (including all Linux distros I have seen) gets it totally right (where any boot time configuration options are handled through EFI and not through another bootloader)
Well, EFI may not be the best way to get away from proprietary stuff. It seems that EFI explicitly vacilitates such behaviour by hardware manufacturers:
Interview with Ronald G. Minnich (Google cache) What are your thoughts on the Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI)?
I have spoken with the EFI authors at length. They make no secret of the fact that a "core value" of EFI is the preservation of intellectual property related to chipset programming and internal architecture. To put it another way, EFI is dedicated to the preservation of "Hard" hardware (as defined above), and the provision of binary interfaces and subsystems to BIOS vendors and others.
It is not really possible to build a full open-source BIOS if EFI is involved. The Tiano system, which Intel claims is an open source BIOS, can not be used to build a BIOS unless it is attached to proprietary, binary-only BIOS code provided by a vendor.
Another important thing to realize about EFI is that it also contemplates enabling chipset features that will trap certain OS operations to an EFI-based control system running in System Management Mode. In other words, under EFI, there is no guarantee that the OS owns the platform.
Accesses to IDE I/O addresses, or certain memory addresses, can be trapped to EFI code and potentially examined and modified or aborted. Many see this as an effort to build a "DRM BIOS".
I am not sure what the real intent of this design is, but is is a real concern in secure environments (such as those found in governments, banks, and large search engine companies). A number of vendors and users have told me that they are not sure they can ship an EFI system they are willing to trust in a secure environment. -
Re:Agreement useless to users?It goes a bit deeper than that.
The real situation is:
3. Now everyone who wants to do business in those unfortunate countries where software is patentable must get a deal with Microsoft.
As was recently pointed out in this article, which didn't get a very good reception (in my opinion, simply because the author tried to say too much):- LG has signed up to Microsoft's licensing scheme.
- Microsoft's plethora of patents and licence deals (whatever the opinions of PHB's or suits, and let's not get into APIs yet) mean that it's difficult (maybe illegal if you're not careful) to be non-MS in corporate America (they'll get bulk licenses for their own products and patent license money for competitors')
- Microsoft doesn't care if people aren't running Windows at home (this is the bit that people didn't get - because the author didn't quite put it like that. He focussed on MS's grip on American business and vaguely talked about home users becoming empowered)
:-)
But here are some things worth considering:- People can now do many of the things they could only do on PC on other devices
- Microsoft have been promising - and working on - other devices for years
- And have begun selling hardware
- The next cool thing probably won't be by Microsoft either
- But even if it runs Linux, they'll get their tax
- At least, within "those unfortunate countries where software is patentable"
- The US Government will go to great lengths to support Microsoft's efforts in the other countries; its citizens' pension funds depend on it
- What Microsoft has best succeeded at is amassing money. It hse been able to make vast profits through its bulk deals and is ubiquitous in offices.
- Microsoft realise that home users need to be treated differently to businesses; it's expensive to collect money from individuals
- Technology is a more efficient instrument for collecting money from individuals than law
;-)
-
It's not all about selection
The really interesting thing for me is the feedback mechanism that tells genes what traits might be useful in your children: Epigenetics
-
And the winner is...
... Going to be a flywheel. While it might not be the most "practical" solution, you just KNOW the DoD would be all over it, because it would mean discs spinning super fast strapped to soldiers' backs -- I repeat, DISCS SPINNING SUPER FAST. (For the benefit of those in management, I've prepared a preliminary sketch). Remember, this is the same DoD whose idea for an "indigo night light" is radioactive decay.
Seriously, though, of course, the level of maturity the DoD wants from its "battery pack" is worth way more than $1,000,000 on the open market. For the first one. However, I'm sure whatever Acme Co. first comes to market with this stuff would be more than willing to accept the DoD's $1 million, since that only leaves $30+ million (but $1 million less!) to recoup in development costs. (My figure of $31+ million annual budget comes from this document (PDF - html version -- of course, that's a figure that hasn't been enough to produce something meeting the DoD's needs, so obviously we're being optimistic. But you know what, let's double that $30 million - no, make it $90 million a year in battery research. We could win... 1 ... MILLION ... dollars.)
--
The free market is not the solution to every problem that has a free market solution. -
I presume it also reduces Déja Vu experiencesI'm not surprised that the drug described in the 60 Minutes show had similar effects; it's the same drug!
FTFA (first sentence in second paragraph):
In a new study, published in the Journal of Psychiatric Research, the drug propranolol is used along with therapy to "dampen" memories of trauma victims.
Here's a Slashdot discussion on it from Jan 2006
And here's the most useful post from that discussion -
Re:Non-Word version
Or here.
-
Re:"Obvious" results?
Damn are you on the money. Thanks.
Marshall Phelps - senate testimony on patents http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/mphelps/0
7 -26-05PatentTestimony.mspxMarshall Phelps - Novell http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/06/microsoft
_ novell_analysis/page2.htmlMarshall Phelps - Sun Microsystems Cached
Marshall Phelps - Precursor to Novell/Microsoft http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/03/25/ec_erects
_ toll_booth/Marshall Phelps - on the register http://www.google.com/search?&q=Marshall+Phelps+s
i te%3Atheregister.co.ukMarshall Phelps - on slashdot http://www.google.com/search?&q=Marshall+Phelps+s
i te%3Aslashdot.orgMarshall Phelps - on IBM.com http://www.google.com/search?&q=Marshall+Phelps+s
i te%3Aibm.comMarshall Phelps and Richard Stallman in the same search http://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Marshall+Phelp
s %22+%22Richard+Stallman%22Reminds me of that Stephen King flick, Needful Things.
-
The myspace page on google cache
Google Cache have the version with the hotlinked picture if anyone want to see how it looked
http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:http://www.my space.com/johnmccain -
Google cache
-
hummm cache of article not up
-
Further information on the "crack"I took a look at the Google Cache of the article, and it would appear this is old news. This is the collision attack first found back in February 2005, which requires fewer than 2^69 operations, rather than the 2^80 operations a brute force approach would need (see Wikipedia and Bruce Schneider's Blog). According to Wikipedia, this was later improved so that fewer than 2^63 operations were needed.
In other words, this attack is 2^17, or 131,072 times faster than brute forcing the hash, and from what I've read, this is considered pretty impressive stuff. That said, crypto researchers have known for a while that SHA-1 is on its last legs. From Schneider's blog in February, 2005: Jon Callas, PGP's CTO, put it best: "It's time to walk, but not run, to the fire exits. You don't see smoke, but the fire alarms have gone off." That's basically what I said last August. So there's nothing much to see here, except a sensationalist newspaper article. This has almost certainly been reported before on Slashdot two years ago, so this story probably counts as a dupe. -
Re:How is this provocative ?
Need sources? Need proof how the govt "envisions the use of nuclear weapons to deter terrorists from using weapons of mass destruction against the United States"? Don't see why this is provocative? And as far as religion is concerned... oh well never mind.
-
Re:Stupid-ass QuestionIf you're writing an app for Windows, what is the alternative to using the Windows API? How could Microsoft develop Windows applications without using the Windows API? Well consider reading about Windows NT, Secret APIs and the Consequences (Google Cache). There is a private hidden API under the Win32 API calls. For example, NtCreateProcess is the internal function used by the CreateProcess function. The Win32 API only exposes a small subset of the available API functions in Windows. From the article: (..) when Microsoft released Internet Information Server (IIS), it significantly outperformed Netscape Server on the NT Platform. Microsoft insisted that its developers had not had any additional acceess to information than had Netscape developers. Yet after careful review, Netscape developers were able to utilize previously undisclosed information about NT in their own products. Future releases of Netscape Server were competitive with IIS in subsequent testing. If you write programs using a documented API, the programs run slower. The second quote illustrates that Microsoft uses the hidden APIs to make their applications the best in any particular market: Microsoft can write application code that can run optimally on an operating system, has advance knowledge about future releases, knows which programming method to choose over another, and can tweak the OS code prior to final relase to advantage3 its own applications. If you perform the costly task of reverse-engineering the hidden APIs in order to compete with Microsoft, they change those hidden APIs to favor their products. If the product becomes popular or makes money, Microsoft can make a faster competing product using the real system calls, or they can change the real NT system calls out from under your product at the next release of NT. In either case, Microsoft can cause their competing product to inherit your market.
-
Re:60's tech, experience, and low wages
-
Re:Anybody got an RFID detector?
In the Dutch/German C'T magazine there have been schematics on how to build a detector to find ISO 14443 tags (which is what these passports are). Also, you can find another way to protect yourself against these sort of attacks here:
http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:HuNI-ek20WkJ: www.cs.vu.nl/~melanie/rfid_guardian/papers/acisp.0 5.pdf+rfid+vu&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&lr=lang_nl|lang_e n|lang_de
They also link to the RFID detector in the C'T magazine (first reference). -
They will use this for any reason whatsoever
They say " pedestrians could also be asked to give prints if they are suspected to have committed an offence".
Considering that anyone can be suspected of anything, this opens the gates for totally random fingerprinting in the street. We already have random checks and detentions for the flimsiest of reasons. Consider the 34 year old woman labeled a terrorist for walking along a cycle path, the stopping and searching of an 11 year old girl near an RAF base, "the detention of a 21 year old student for taking pictures of the M3 motorway for a web-design company", the ejection of an 82 year old man at the 2005 Labour Party conference, and the detention of an 80-year-old man carrying an anti-Blair placard, for example. If you refuse, the precedents set by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Terrorism Act 2000, and Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 would ensure it unlikely you'd get off scott-free but instead become more of a suspect.
Still, I'm not going to do anything about it other than complain about it online, as is my wont. In another 50 years when I'm eating my Soylent Green in my 29th-floor bugged apartment, I can pull out ruffled print-outs of Web pages like these, and think back to a time when at least my bowel movements weren't RFID tagged and scanned for prohibited substances.
Basically, the British government is corrupt to the core and bordering on fascist. But.. what government isn't these days? -
Re:My take...
That's just plain wrong. They use some current, sure, but it's nowhere near "almost as much power in stand-by as when it's on". Get an ammeter and measure a few appliances yourself.
Well, I may have exaggerated a bit, but my advice still stands. Avoid stand-by power.
I suggest these sites for your information: One, Two, Three. -
Re:It seems the article has been taken down.
Here's the Google Cache.
Personally, I don't find the article particularly convincing. But then again, psychology (or in this case a combination of genetics and psychology) isn't an exact science so I'm not surprised it survived as long as it did without anyone questioning it's merits.