Domain: cvedetails.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to cvedetails.com.
Comments · 233
-
Re:You're an idiot
Heck, 2017 was a great year for Linux, only 400 security bugs.. lol
You do know that if you are basing security on the number of bugs in CVE: Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 combined to have more 400 bugs combined in 2017. That doesn't include all other versions of Windows like Server 2012 (235), Server 2016(252), Win 7(229)
,etc. But please feel free to laugh at Microsoft. -
Re:You're an idiot
Because linking to the hundreds of daily linux forum posts complaining about Linux bugs will get you a -1, Troll.
Heck, 2017 was a great year for Linux, only 400 security bugs.. lol
https://www.cvedetails.com/pro...
Anyone got fired yet?
-
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
I told you -1 won't work
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivi -
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could ga -
Re:ION
https://www.cvedetails.com/vul...
Sure thing there buddy-boy!
You believe every sales-y whitepaper you read?
-
Re:Windows security?
Mean while Linux keeps adding hundreds of security bugs each year. 2017 was a bumper year with 450 vulnerabilities. Anyone got fired yet? And that's just the kernel, with all the junk they ship with a distribution we're looking at several thousand bugs.. hahaha
-
Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ...
-
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could ga -
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could ga -
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could ga -
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain -
Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode with me_cleaner, Blackhat Dec 2017 Intel ME presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 7.2-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode, use me_cleanerme_cleaner with -S option to set the HAP bit, see me_cleaner: HAP AltMeDisable bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented HAP mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
me_cleaner: Set HAP AltMeDisable bit with -S option
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacke -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Blackhat Dec 2017 presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 9.0-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Blackhat Dec 2017 presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 9.0-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Blackhat Dec 2017 presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 9.0-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Blackhat Dec 2017 presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 9.0-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Blackhat Dec 2017 presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 9.0-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Blackhat Dec 2017 presentation, Intel ME CVEs (CVSS Scored 9.0-10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links. Disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0)Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP mode.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EFF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0), how to disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode.Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EEF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0), how to disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode.Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EEF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018/01/01 - Added 14 Useful Links, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0), how to disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode.Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EEF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Services Firmware -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018 Jan - Added 14 Useful Links, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0), how to disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode.Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EEF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Se -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018 Jan - Added 14 Useful Links, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0), how to disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode.Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EEF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Se -
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Obligatory:Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2018)
Change log:
2018 Jan - Added 14 Useful Links, Intel CPU CVE links (CVE-2017-5689 CVSS Score 10.0), how to disable Intel ME 11 via undocumented NSA "High Assurance Platform" mode.Intel CPU Backdoor Report
The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:
TL;DR version
Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.
The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.
30C3 Intel ME live hack:
[Video] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
@21:43, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.[Quotes] Vortrag:
"the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker"."We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."
Backdoor removal:
The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.2017 Dec Update:
Intel ME on recent CPUs may be disabled by enabling the undocumented NSA HAP bit.Decoding Intel backdoors:
The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).
Useful links (Added 2018 Jan 1):
Disabling Intel ME 11 via undocumented mode (NSA High Assurance Platform mode)
Blackhat 2017: How To Hack A Turned Off Computer Or Running Unsigned Code In Intel Management Engine
EEF: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it
Sakaki's EFI Install Guide/Disabling the Intel Management Engine
Intel ME bug storm: Hardware vendors race to identify and provide updates for dangerous Intel flaws.
CVE-2017-5689: An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs
CVE-2017-5705: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware
CVE-2017-5706: Multiple buffer overflows in kernel in Intel Server Platform Se -
Re:don;t buy nvidia
Which is incredibly scary given all those exploits of graphics card drivers that exist right?
.... *crickets* -
Re: Details?
Yeah, because Adobe PDF Reader has never been compromised.
Extra irony points for posting a PDF link in a thread about not clicking random links that could infest your computer with malware.
-
Re:Yes but no.
-
OK, fine, where can I download Edge for Linux?
... yeah, that's what I thought. They can't fully secure a browser on 1 platform but they're going to call out a browser that runs on no less than 5 platforms? Amateurs.
https://www.cvedetails.com/vul... -
Re:Really?
Did they stop having security flaws with IE 7? 8? Edge? Office? Sharepoint? Exchange? Skype? (continue listing all of Microsofts products...)
You want to talk ignorance and then act like there hasn't been ample evidence of bugs from Microsoft Products in the last 16 years...
Ok how many exploits have been found in Chrome, Firefox, Linux, or any other product not from Microsoft? So far Chrome has 9 pages worth!
It's not reported here because we love Linux and Google is cool and we hate Microsoft. I do say this not as a troll but fact with the audience and who selects stories here. My point is most complex software has flaws. Stuff written in C/C++ has lots too as bounds checking and code execution around a buffer overflow were common and both Windows and Unix historically had these problems. Though by default the C libraries in both platforms now prevent this or try to mitigate.
Microsoft has a security buddy now for each product which analyzes and gives project managers security details which is how how Microsoft products changed after the 2005 memo. It's why Vista got those annoying UAC prompts and why later webpages made for IE 6 started to have trouble rendering in later versions.
-
Re:Why?
If you try to open a file that has no associated application, Windows suggests you go to the Windows Store to download an app to open it.
Regardless of this, there is already other media plays preinstalled in Windows 10. Windows Media Player wasn't the only one.
It wasn't just a shell linking audio and video codecs to a UI, it was an attack vector that has been exploited in the past with malicious media files. Files that aren't supposed to be executable.
Here's a list of 52 known vulnerabilities https://www.cvedetails.com/vul...
Some of them are remote code execution just by visiting a website: "The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if Windows Media Player opens specially crafted media content that is hosted on a malicious website" -
Struts 2, OGNL: insecure by design
Anybody using struts should immediately be shoot in the head. The remote arbitrary code execution occurrence rate is far too high. Insecure by design (OGNL and other shits, I am looking at you!)
-
Re:At least they're being honest now.
Your calculation is also misleading. It's quite possible that a Windows CVE spans a number of Windows versions which would lead to counting the same CVE by up to 5 times. I'm willing to bet that the number of unique Windows CVEs is about a third the number that you arrived at.
Very true, but the premise of my argument was in the previous sentence. So sorry I included that last line. My argument required no calculations.
To return the point of discussion, I suggest you scroll to the bottom of https://www.cvedetails.com/top... where you'll see the list of Total Number Of Vulnerabilities Of Top 50 Products By Vendor for 2017. I don't know how cvedetails.com does its math (nor do I know why they break down Windows by version, but not Android, etc.). Maybe they're also double-counting CVEs that span multiple Windows versions. Maybe they're doing the same with Android, macOS, etc. It's still an interesting set of data to discuss.
Anyway, if I wanted to make a serious argument about this I'd do some real research into the data, the methodology of the data source(s), and clearly document my own methodology. I sure as hell wouldn't use data from a single web site whose reliability is a complete unknown to me.
-
Re:At least they're being honest now.
Why would you add them up across Windows7, 8, etc.? Just to get a bigger number by counting the same vulnerability multiple times?
With that logic, you'd be counting each Android vulnerability once for each Android build it occurs in.Um, gee... where do I start? I mean really, do you see Android (or any non-Microsoft product) broken down by version in that list? It seems to me that for a (lowercase) apples-to-apples comparison, adding up the counts for every version of Windows would be the only fair way to compare it to any OS (or Kernel) which isn't listed with a similar version-by-version breakdown.
In any case, the total number of CVEs for Windows in the top 10 had little to do with the premise of my post, which was a rebuttal to an intentionally misleading post that tried to back up the ridiculous claim that "[a]t the moment, the security of Microsoft products is vastly superior to that of Google and Apple" by posting a part of an all-time list of vulnerabilities (which conveniently only includes one Microsoft product in the top 10). Well, the moment that I'm living in resides firmly in 2017. Once again, the 2017 list is here: https://www.cvedetails.com/top...
I have no idea if cvedetails.com's numbers are in any way reliable. lucm cited them as "proof" of how fuckin'A-awesome Microsoft is these days, so it seemed fair to turn their source around to disprove the original, ridiculous, premise.
But hey, since the OP's bon mot was obliquely attacking a specific vendor, not a product... let's assume cvedetails.com's numbers are somewhat accurate, and scroll to the bottom of https://www.cvedetails.com/top... that lucm originally linked to, where you'll see this juicy heading:
Total Number Of Vulnerabilities Of Top 50 Products By Vendor
There's a pretty bar chart there, but here is the sorted data list:
#1 Microsoft 8528
#2 Apple 5135
#3 Adobe 4167
#4 Mozilla 3279
#5 Google 2708
#6 2279 Oracle
#7 1930 Linux
#8 1373 SUN
#9 1022 Debian
#10 855 Canonical
#11 784 Novell
#12 560 PHP
#13 466 Wireshark
#14 452 Cisco
#15 430 Fedoraproject
#16 426 Redhat
#17 364 Imagemagick -
Re:At least they're being honest now.
Why would you add them up across Windows7, 8, etc.? Just to get a bigger number by counting the same vulnerability multiple times?
With that logic, you'd be counting each Android vulnerability once for each Android build it occurs in.Um, gee... where do I start? I mean really, do you see Android (or any non-Microsoft product) broken down by version in that list? It seems to me that for a (lowercase) apples-to-apples comparison, adding up the counts for every version of Windows would be the only fair way to compare it to any OS (or Kernel) which isn't listed with a similar version-by-version breakdown.
In any case, the total number of CVEs for Windows in the top 10 had little to do with the premise of my post, which was a rebuttal to an intentionally misleading post that tried to back up the ridiculous claim that "[a]t the moment, the security of Microsoft products is vastly superior to that of Google and Apple" by posting a part of an all-time list of vulnerabilities (which conveniently only includes one Microsoft product in the top 10). Well, the moment that I'm living in resides firmly in 2017. Once again, the 2017 list is here: https://www.cvedetails.com/top...
I have no idea if cvedetails.com's numbers are in any way reliable. lucm cited them as "proof" of how fuckin'A-awesome Microsoft is these days, so it seemed fair to turn their source around to disprove the original, ridiculous, premise.
But hey, since the OP's bon mot was obliquely attacking a specific vendor, not a product... let's assume cvedetails.com's numbers are somewhat accurate, and scroll to the bottom of https://www.cvedetails.com/top... that lucm originally linked to, where you'll see this juicy heading:
Total Number Of Vulnerabilities Of Top 50 Products By Vendor
There's a pretty bar chart there, but here is the sorted data list:
#1 Microsoft 8528
#2 Apple 5135
#3 Adobe 4167
#4 Mozilla 3279
#5 Google 2708
#6 2279 Oracle
#7 1930 Linux
#8 1373 SUN
#9 1022 Debian
#10 855 Canonical
#11 784 Novell
#12 560 PHP
#13 466 Wireshark
#14 452 Cisco
#15 430 Fedoraproject
#16 426 Redhat
#17 364 Imagemagick -
Re:At least they're being honest now.
Okay, since we're talking about recent history ("at the moment", as you said), how about we have a look at recent CVE "scores", not the all-time list that you pasted in?
Here's the top of the "winners" list for 2017:
1 Android Google OS 564
2 Linux Kernel Linux OS 366
3 Imagemagick Imagemagick Application 303
4 Iphone Os Apple OS 290
5 Mac Os X Apple OS 210
6 Windows 10 Microsoft OS 195
7 Windows Server 2008 Microsoft OS 187
8 Windows Server 2016 Microsoft OS 183
9 Windows Server 2012 Microsoft OS 176
10 Windows 7 Microsoft OS 174But just for fun let's see #11:
11 Windows 8.1 Microsoft OS 167
(on the "all-time" list you pasted in, #11 would have been Internet Explorer)source:
https://www.cvedetails.com/top...Aha! You're right, "it's not 1999" any more (in 1999, Microsoft occupied only 4 of the top 10 spots).
So let's see now... if you add up all the CVEs for all Microsoft products in the top 10 (everyone else seems to want to pretend Windows 8.1 never existed, so let's go with that), Microsoft scores a dazzling 915 CVEs so far 2017.
Your calculation is also misleading. It's quite possible that a Windows CVE spans a number of Windows versions which would lead to counting the same CVE by up to 5 times. I'm willing to bet that the number of unique Windows CVEs is about a third the number that you arrived at.
-
Re:At least they're being honest now.
Okay, since we're talking about recent history ("at the moment", as you said), how about we have a look at recent CVE "scores", not the all-time list that you pasted in?
Here's the top of the "winners" list for 2017:
1 Android Google OS 564
2 Linux Kernel Linux OS 366
3 Imagemagick Imagemagick Application 303
4 Iphone Os Apple OS 290
5 Mac Os X Apple OS 210
6 Windows 10 Microsoft OS 195
7 Windows Server 2008 Microsoft OS 187
8 Windows Server 2016 Microsoft OS 183
9 Windows Server 2012 Microsoft OS 176
10 Windows 7 Microsoft OS 174But just for fun let's see #11:
11 Windows 8.1 Microsoft OS 167
(on the "all-time" list you pasted in, #11 would have been Internet Explorer)source:
https://www.cvedetails.com/top...Aha! You're right, "it's not 1999" any more (in 1999, Microsoft occupied only 4 of the top 10 spots).
So let's see now... if you add up all the CVEs for all Microsoft products in the top 10 (everyone else seems to want to pretend Windows 8.1 never existed, so let's go with that), Microsoft scores a dazzling 915 CVEs so far 2017.
-
Re:At least they're being honest now.
top 10 products with highest number of CVE:
1 Linux Kernel Linux OS 1930
2 Mac Os X Apple OS 1890
3 Chrome Google Application 1453
4 Firefox Mozilla Application 1438
5 Iphone Os Apple OS 1274
6 Android Google OS 1255
7 Flash Player Adobe Application 1035
8 Debian Linux Debian OS 1022
9 Windows Server 2008 Microsoft OS 956
10 Safari Apple Application -
Re:Absolutely baffling
Sorry, yes, it does other things too, and quite well. It's great for example at delivering viruses to users, simply by the mail arriving in the mailbox [1], yes, a remote exploit for a mailer. This [2] shit [3] still [4] continues [5]. What is is meant to be good at? If you're about to say calendar, sorry, mine's full fixing problems where MS is the SPOF.
1: http://www.securityfocus.com/a...
2: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
3: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
4: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
5: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve... -
Re:Absolutely baffling
Sorry, yes, it does other things too, and quite well. It's great for example at delivering viruses to users, simply by the mail arriving in the mailbox [1], yes, a remote exploit for a mailer. This [2] shit [3] still [4] continues [5]. What is is meant to be good at? If you're about to say calendar, sorry, mine's full fixing problems where MS is the SPOF.
1: http://www.securityfocus.com/a...
2: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
3: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
4: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
5: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve... -
Re:Absolutely baffling
Sorry, yes, it does other things too, and quite well. It's great for example at delivering viruses to users, simply by the mail arriving in the mailbox [1], yes, a remote exploit for a mailer. This [2] shit [3] still [4] continues [5]. What is is meant to be good at? If you're about to say calendar, sorry, mine's full fixing problems where MS is the SPOF.
1: http://www.securityfocus.com/a...
2: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
3: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
4: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
5: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve... -
Re:Absolutely baffling
Sorry, yes, it does other things too, and quite well. It's great for example at delivering viruses to users, simply by the mail arriving in the mailbox [1], yes, a remote exploit for a mailer. This [2] shit [3] still [4] continues [5]. What is is meant to be good at? If you're about to say calendar, sorry, mine's full fixing problems where MS is the SPOF.
1: http://www.securityfocus.com/a...
2: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
3: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
4: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
5: https://www.cvedetails.com/cve... -
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Microsoft has been compartmentalizing and hardening Windows for over a decade now. This is the result of hard work rather than blind luck.
A broken clock is right once a day. No doubt there's been a lot of hard work put in to try to protect against such attacks, but given that there's over 50 Windows 10 bugs with a CVE score of 9.3, the fact that this vulnerabilities doesn't work yet* is blind luck.
* I say yet precisely because most of the various mitigations have turned into fully-bypassable with high, if not 100%, probability for most vulnerabilities. So, maybe Windows 10 will be lucky on this one.
-
Re:Bullshit slashvertisement
The first four bugs there wouldn't have been prevented by rewriting in Rust. They're logic errors (which happen in every language). That is the biggest downside or Rust: people think they will be secure by using it, leading to turning off their security brain.
Here's a good current security vulnerability in Linux that has a score of 10 on the first page:
https://www.cvedetails.com/cve...
"The mq_notify function in the Linux kernel through 4.11.9 does not set the sock pointer to NULL upon entry into the retry logic. During a user-space close of a Netlink socket, it allows attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free) or possibly have unspecified other impact."
This is a classic "use-after-free" bug which is common in C/C++ but which can not occur in a secure language like Rust.
If you browse the historic Linux security vulnerability database, you'll find plenty of these types of vulnerabilities scattered everywhere.
-
Re:Bullshit slashvertisement
Hire competent C developers and you should be good to go. Hire dumb-asses and sure the future doesn't look bright.
A competent C developer will make only a very small number of mistakes per N lines of code, so that's a good thing.
Of course, it only takes a single tiny mistake to produce potentially devastating consequences, so unless every single one of your C developers is not just good, but infallible, then by hiring "only" competent C programmers you are guaranteeing that your software will include a security hole, sooner or later.
The problem with infallible C programmers is that they do not exist. The problem with competent C programmers is that there are only a limited number of them around, and it's not always easy to tell up front the competent C programmers from the seemingly-competent ones. Not to mention that every competent C programmer started out as a less-than-competent C programmer; if companies hired only competent C programmers, there would not be any competent C programmers since nobody would be able to make a living as a C programmer during the first N years of their programming career.
Since the whole point of computers is to automate processes to make them quicker, easier, and less susceptible to human error, why would you not want to automate the creation of secure software, to the extent it is practical to do so?
The linux kernel is in its 3rd decade, as most gnu/bsd tools and all of that is written in plain C. They are good and safe.
Why do you think the Linux kernel is good and safe? It has suffered from many security holes in the past, and will probably suffer from more in the future. There are almost certainly multiple gaping security holes in the Linux kernel right now, just waiting to be discovered and exploited. And this is despite it being written by competent guys.
Imagine how much more robust the Linux kernel would be if the competent guys were also using a language that caught more of their mistakes at compile-time, rather than leaving them to be discovered by testers, users or hackers at some later date. Dunno if Rust is the language to do that, but it's hard to see how automatic coding-error detection wouldn't be a big improvement over the status quo.
-
Re:Bullshit slashvertisement
The linux kernel is in its 3rd decade, as most gnu/bsd tools and all of that is written in plain C. They are good and safe.
Really? Are you sure?
-
Re:Obvious solution:
It's a widely propagated myth by Linux evangelists, but in fact, all stats show that Linux kernel is far more vulnerable and unsecure as compared to Windows, including various Windows components/services (but excluding software like Internet Exploder). If you include software (such as IE) which is hardly used, then sure, Windows might come to more vulnerabilities.
And what's more, Microsoft patch vulnerabilities far faster (within a couple of month), compared to Linux, which may take up to 2 years before releasing a patch.
I don't mean to rub it in, but it's quite remarkable that if we only count the Linux KERNEL (not including any of the distro's and other Linux OS components) between 2009 and 2017, had 1402 vulnerabilities; while Windows 7 (inc all components) had 792 vulnerabilities - i.e. 77% more vulnerabilities in Linux kernel compared to the entire Win7 OS!
-
Re:Obvious solution:
It's a widely propagated myth by Linux evangelists, but in fact, all stats show that Linux kernel is far more vulnerable and unsecure as compared to Windows, including various Windows components/services (but excluding software like Internet Exploder). If you include software (such as IE) which is hardly used, then sure, Windows might come to more vulnerabilities.
And what's more, Microsoft patch vulnerabilities far faster (within a couple of month), compared to Linux, which may take up to 2 years before releasing a patch.
I don't mean to rub it in, but it's quite remarkable that if we only count the Linux KERNEL (not including any of the distro's and other Linux OS components) between 2009 and 2017, had 1402 vulnerabilities; while Windows 7 (inc all components) had 792 vulnerabilities - i.e. 77% more vulnerabilities in Linux kernel compared to the entire Win7 OS!