Slashdot Mirror
Domain: egomania.nu
Stories and comments across the archive that link to egomania.nu.
Comments · 9
-
Re:Location of the implants"He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name." [Rev 13:16-17, NIV]
Everyone knows that refers to Bill Gates. The mark on the right hand is Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and the mark on the forehead came from pounding it on the keyboard.
-
Heed this -- it predicts the Apocalypse - 666
The device computes the time when the Anti-Christ will be born and when he will declare himself. The recently-discovered strange letters detected appeared to be W, H, G, and III. An article discussing this may be found at
http://egomania.nu/gates.html -
Bill Gates is the Devil
On a side note: always wondered about making a program to compute all the possible combinations of the Jewish alphabet that adds up to 666 (filtering out all the nonsense ones of course). Someone must have done this somewhere already.
This has already been done - for english at least. Check out http://egomania.nu/gates.html for the details that show Bill Gates is the devil. Or wait until Vista comes out and check
Start Button
/ Control Panel
/ Security Center
/ My RFID Implant -
That's an easy challange!From:
http://www.zejn.si/~natan/666.htmlWarning! Bill Gates (the president of the Microsoft) may be the next antichrist:Revelation 13:18 says:
'Bill Gates 666' in Google gives me 129,000 matches. Of course it's using Ascii, not Hebrew letters as it should be. Another great Gates/Anti-Christ page is (even has that old Excel '95 easter egg:
"Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666."
The real name of the Bill Gates is William Henry Gates III. Nowadays he is known as Bill Gates (III), where "III" means the order of third (3rd). By converting the letters of his name to the ASCII-values (which are used in computers) you will get the following:
B I L L G A T E S 3
66 + 73 + 76 + 76 + 71 + 65 + 84 + 69 + 83 + 3 = 666
M S - D O S 6 . 2 1
77+83+45+68+79+83+32+54+46+50+49 = 666
W I N D O W S 9 5
87+73+78+68+79+87+83+57+53+1 = 666
http://egomania.nu/gates.html
What Slashdotter doesn't know this by heart? -
Re:Pulled from the Ass
-----
I find it very difficult to imagine someone sitting down and trying to figure out how they can convey the message that "big corporations are evil" or whatever else
-----
It's not just in games. You've seen the Gates of Hell, haven't you?
The site says that it doesn't work on Excel97 but I'm pretty sure that it does. -
Re:They're all "technical evangelists"
More than half the guys list their positions as "technical evangelist."
At what point did Microsoft become a religeon? I have never liked their usage of the word "evangelist" in job titles. At some point they're going to cross the line and send someone to my house to knock on my door with something they call a "bible" (it'll probably be blue, cryptic and the book won't open properly). But all kidding aside, IMO, that's kinda wierd. I always laughed at those web sites about how Bill Gates was the devil. But they chose the words, not me! -
Re:Just a question about translations...That proves it, we are different; I use qmail and emacs and am still a TR advocating independent Baptist. Oh I use vi for speed sometimes, but serious work is easiest for me in emacs.
I will agree my statements were sweeping generalizations about the DSS, but fairness dictates pointing out your statementmost KJV proponents also don't know history, science, or any number of other things. If you aren't just another ignorant fundamentalist, please, by all means, answer at least *some* of these questions
Which does seem to engage in sweeping generalizations as well.
I don't believe I used Riplinger as a reference point in our discussions or indeed in this thread at all. I tend not to use her (I've read her, true) since I find her book to be extremely poorly edited and more than a tad sensationalist. Her "the symbol for the NKJV is 666" seems to be like the folks who manage to force 666 into any number of odd places, which to me seems a bit like tinfoil hat time. I do think there are some valid points in her book and in other books you don't agree with, but I don't consider any of them flawless. I did use some concepts that they summarize things with, but when communicating concepts in sound bites, I used oversimplifications to convey a point. However that is inaccurate, and I must agree with your points that doing so was an error on my part, which I do regret.
Again in balance, your statements against the KJV position were also sound bite type responses, particularly since your reading in the subject has excluded the more reputable holders of those opinions.
I don't like reading books online either, but I have a duplexer for my printer which makes it more possible to handle small to medium tomes.
An offtopic question (you can always answer using my email) if you don't mind: coming from a TR/Baptist background, what led you to accept the oral tradition concept of Eastern Orthodox? And a second, what's the delta between the RCC and the EO on Marian doctrine? -
The Beast working in ITJust at the begining of the article we read:
"The Beast is here and it knows all about you. Satan must be here - and working in IT."
I really could't resist to think about some guy who's name's ASCII codes add to the number of of the Beast:
BILLGATESIII
66 + 73 + 76 + 76 + 71 + 65 + 84 + 69 + 83 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 666
If you want more examples go here.
And if you take it too seriously visit this site. -
M$ is $atan...
Clearly the good Lawd had goofed in not illuminating the good Pastor with this site: