Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Launches 'Channel 9' Blog

Decaffeinated Jedi writes "As reported by News.com, Microsoft quietly launched Channel 9, a blog/discussion forum aimed at improving communication with outside developers, on Tuesday. Named for the audio channel that many airlines use to let passengers listen in on crew conversations during flight, Channel 9's creators state the following in a welcoming message: 'Five of us in Redmond are crazy enough to think we just might learn something from getting to know each other...Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'"

311 comments

  1. Outer space strikes back by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny


    Microsoft are going to ditch the NT mega-kernel and use Plan 9 instead. These are the first tentative steps in the migration from the huge monolithic NT ring-main to the elegance that is Plan 9. [deep voice] From the people who brought you Unix, PLAN 9 [/voice] Da da daaaaaaah bom-bom bom-bom bom-booom

    Simon :-)

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Outer space strikes back by inertia187 · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the site: Just to warn you, this site will be on /. very shortly. Prepare for the flames that are sure to follow. Too bad the place will likely suck for a couple days, as I think this site might be a good idea.

      How cute, they think it will only suck for a couple days.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    2. Re:Outer space strikes back by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Microsoft needs women. I repeat, Microsoft needs women!".

      --
      Sig it.
    3. Re:Outer space strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft *IS*, not Microsoft are.

    4. Re:Outer space strikes back by ATomkins · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK (at least), corporations are referred to in the plural sense. It's perfectly acceptable to say "Microsoft are...". If you think that's wrong, remember, they invented the language.

    5. Re:Outer space strikes back by hdparm · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's probably correct. I reckon we'll need couple of days to logon in significant numbers, to make it cool site.

    6. Re:Outer space strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations are afforded the same rights and status as an individual.

      Only in fucked up, inbred, backwater countries like the U.S. The rest of us are sane.

    7. Re:Outer space strikes back by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1
      No it doesn't it needs borgs. Because if that forum gets going which I know it won't, they are going to have tons of email about all their stupid bugs in all the programs they make and the idiotic limitations built in to some of their stupid programs.

      This forum is going to go the way of BOB. (If anyone actually remembers that...)

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
    8. Re:Outer space strikes back by BlankTim · · Score: 0, Troll

      No. That's not at all true.

      Here in the US corporations have MORE rights and superior status than the individual.

      It's okay if you want to bash the US, but at least get your facts straight.

      --
      Just once, I'd like it if someone called me "Sir".
      Without adding, "You're creating a scene."
  2. Ladies and Gentlemen by Lasuuco+Tulkas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I give you 7 of 9

    1. Re:Ladies and Gentlemen by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn, she's definitely gained a few pounds...

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Ladies and Gentlemen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not in the right places, either.

    3. Re:Ladies and Gentlemen by irokitt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why am I not surprised that the page you linked to didn't look right in Firefox?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    4. Re:Ladies and Gentlemen by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

      So that's the guy standing up in this picture! (note the url)

    5. Re:Ladies and Gentlemen by beuges · · Score: 1

      i honestly dont know wtf you're talking about, the page looks perfect in fireBIRD... in fact i've just compared firebirds rendition with IE6's and they're exactly the same unless the mozilla team is adding bugs as they release new versions? how ironic

    6. Re:Ladies and Gentlemen by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      It looks fine in Mozilla 1.7.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
  3. Whoa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The videos of the Scottich guy going off on double spacing after a period... just made my day.

    1. Re:Whoa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Clicky.

      I love how he says "typewriters".

  4. Quietly launched, huh? by MukiMuki · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not sure just how quiet it can be now that it's being seen by MILLIONS OF USERS EVERY MINUTE.

  5. Tora! Tora! Tora! by Rexburg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does registration require removing my shoes?

    --

    ---------
    Launch all sig
  6. In Other News... by ravenspear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    United claims prior art and sues Bill for defamation of character.

  7. Thank you by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'

    I would not fly a constantly crashing plane anymore.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
    1. Re:Thank you by xlyz · · Score: 1


      Blue Sky of Death?

    2. Re:Thank you by neko9 · · Score: 1

      just turn off autopilot! no wait... or turn on?

    3. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would not fly a constantly crashing plane anymore. "

      I thought this was Windows, not MacOS 9

    4. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'

      But if you touch the controls, we'll sue you under the EULA.

    5. Re:Thank you by Guppy06 · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're misreading the statement. They mean "Please! For the love of God! Does anybody know how to fly this thing!?"

    6. Re:Thank you by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 0, Troll
      Just double click on the Microsoft Airpilot Joystick Application, then double click on the Microsoft Airpilot Joystick Application Menu. Then right click on the Microsoft Joystick Application Elevation Lifter.

      It's not highlighted? Click on Microstof Airpilot Application Help......click on search, type in "Microsoft Joystick Application Elevation Lifter not highlighted". Then you find:

      Just double click on the Microsoft Airpilot Joystick Application, then double click on the Microsoft Airpilot Joystick Application Menu. Then right click on the Microsoft Joystick Application Elevation Lifter.

      Uh...oh....Good-Bye Microsoft Application Cruel World of Impossibly Long and Boring Names for Every Little Thing!

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
  8. First Headline by Bobdoer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The most important operating system is not Windows.
    Finally Microsoft figured it out.

    1. Re:First Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They claim it isn't a marketting ploy, but right here, they paraphrase The Cluetrain Manifesto calling it the Channel 9 Doctrine. What a transparent grab for positive press. If they really wanted to "Learn by listening. When our customers speak, learn from them. Don't get defensive, don't argue for the sake of argument. Listen and take what benefits you to heart." Microsoft would have fixed the glaring security holes that the open source community has been pointing out for years a very long time ago. Instead, they keep opening up new ones.

    2. Re:First Headline by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If they really wanted to... Microsoft would have fixed the glaring security holes that the open source community has been pointing out for years a very long time ago

      Which is funny because at the same time they are talking about listening, they are also working on the next service pack for their flagship product, and the whole service pack is focussed on nothing but security. But of course, you won't count that since it would get in the way of your complaining.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    3. Re:First Headline by Frymaster · · Score: 0
      Microsoft would have fixed the glaring security holes that the open source community has been pointing out for years a very long time ago

      well at least they've picked up one thing from the open source community: developer blogs... which have been around so long in the foss world that we still call them "usenet".

    4. Re:First Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole service pack is focussed on nothing but security.

      And, of course, ripping off tabbed browsing and pop up blockers.

      How fucking innovative.

      Nice try, troll.

    5. Re:First Headline by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      And, of course, ripping off tabbed browsing and pop up blockers.

      Is referring to me as a "troll" supposed to make it less obvious that you're trolling? In particular, that your claiming that it includes tabbed browsing, which isn't even true.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    6. Re:First Headline by doublem · · Score: 1

      Which Opera was the first to implment I might add.

      Same with Mouse Gestures.

      Now you know how the Opera users felt when Mozilla stole the idea of tabbed browsing.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    7. Re:First Headline by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      And, of course, ripping off tabbed browsing and pop up blockers.

      How fucking innovative.


      You're kidding, IE now has tabs and popup blocking? I thought popup blocking ran counter to their ideas about marketing and ads..?

    8. Re:First Headline by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      If they really wanted to "Learn by listening. When our customers speak, learn from them. Don't get defensive, don't argue for the sake of argument. Listen and take what benefits you to heart." Microsoft would have fixed the glaring security holes that the open source community has been pointing out for years a very long time ago.

      Little mental exercise, Venn diagram:
      Draw "Microsoft customers"
      Now draw "the open source community"

      The (really, really small) size of that overlap represents the degree to which your comment relates to their quote.

    9. Re:First Headline by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      And, of course, ripping off tabbed browsing and pop up blockers.

      If they didn't do this, you'd be bitching about how stupid they were for not having incorporated these great features that the open-source-community has.

      There are plenty of legitimate complaints you could make about Microsoft. This is not one of them.

  9. As if I don't have enough to read up on by The_Rippa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I spend enough of the day on slashdot and fark.

    I don't have time to listen to Codekeeper Willie talk about typesetting and anthropology.

    1. Re:As if I don't have enough to read up on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really liked that guy.

    2. Re:As if I don't have enough to read up on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sup white man!
      I have your job now!

      -- love from India

  10. Uh-oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane

    Cue 'If Microsoft ran an airline' jokes in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

    1. Re:Uh-oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Cue 'If Microsoft ran an airline' jokes in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

      Glad to oblige...
      UNIX Airways
      Everyone brings one piece of the plane along when the come to the
      airport. They all go out on the runway and put the plane together piece
      by piece, arguing non-stop about what kind of plane they are supposed to
      be building.

      Air DOS
      Everybody pushes the airplane until it glides, then they jump on
      and let the plane coast untill it hits the ground again. They the push
      again, jump on again, and so on...

      Mac Airlines
      All the stewards, captains, baggage handlers, and ticket agents
      look and act exactly the same. Every time you ask questions about details,
      you are gently but firmly told that you don't need to know, don't want to
      know, and everything will be done for you without your ever haveing to
      know, so just shut up.

      Windows Air
      The terminal is pretty and colorful, with friendly stewards, easy
      baggage check and boarding, and a smooth take-off. After about 10 minutes
      in the air, the plane explodes with no waring whatsoever.

      WindowsNT Air Just like Windows Air, but costs
      more, uses much bigger planes, and takes out all the other aircraft within
      a 40-mile radius when it explodes.

      Linux Air
      Disgruntled employees of all the other OS airlines decide to start
      their own airline. They build the planes, ticket counters, and pave the
      runways themselve. They charge a small fee to cover the cost of printing
      the ticket, but you can also download and print the ticket yourself. When
      you board the plane, you are given a seat, four bolts, a wrench and a copy
      of the seat-HOWTO.html. Once settled, the fully adjustable seat is very
      comfortable, the plan leaves and arrives on time without a single problem,
      the in-flight meal is wonderful. You try to tell customers of the other
      airlines about the great trip, but all they can say is "You had to do what
      with the seat?"
    2. Re:Uh-oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like

      Linux Air
      Disgruntled employees of all the other OS airlines decide to start their own airline. They build the planes, ticket counters, and pave the runways themselves. Then they all have a huge argument with each other about what to call the airport, and lots of them storm off in a huff.

      The remaining people charge a small fee to cover the cost of printing the ticket, but you can also download and print the ticket yourself. If you can get the printer to work. The head of the airline posts a big article on his website about how difficult it is to get the printer to work.

      When you board the plane, you are given a seat, four bolts, a wrench and a copy of the seat-HOWTO.html. The seat-HOWTO.html is slightly out of date and seems to be for a different type of seat. You need to upgrade the plane's engines and hire two new cabin crew to get the seat to install at all. Once you've done this, the seat occasionally changes colour and the supplied headphones don't work. The person sitting next to you refuses to help you fix your headlines and instead swears viciously at you because this is your first flight on the airline. The switch to summon the cabin crew is broken - or maybe wasn't even installed at all.

      Once in the air, the four different pilots all try to get the plane to fly in different directions, while conducting a loud argument over the plane's PA system. The in-flight movie doesn't play, as it is for the wrong sort of plane. The guy across the aisle from you thinks he might be able to get the movie to work, and starts taking the wing off in order to do so.

      When you eventually reach some destination, you find all the WindowsAir passengers were there several years before you.

    3. Re:Uh-oh.. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      (Golf clap.)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  11. Re:What Happens.. by mtenhagen · · Score: 1

    Yes we do, everything microsoft does has a bad side.

    So: "This is all marketing fud, microsoft is trying to look like a good guy so they can take over the world"

    The good side should'nt be mentioned ofcourse.

    --
    200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
  12. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Mr. Balmer speaking: by st964p62 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Proceed to put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye...

  13. Not surprising... by thesolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me preface this by saying that I'm not trying to sound snide or rude. That said, there are several things on the page that don't display properly in browsers other than WinIE, like Opera & Firefox, such as the top bar of the poll on the right. Fix that, and maybe I'll consider going back. Until then, not worth my time.

    1. Re:Not surprising... by codemachine · · Score: 1

      Since it is running on IIS they have to use .asp and probably some custom software. If it were any other company, they could've used an already existing php forum to do this, but I'm betting that wasn't an option for their web admins.

      Regardless, this could actually be a useful site. I hope people don't flame it into submission after this slashdot posting.

    2. Re:Not surprising... by estes_grover · · Score: 2

      That said, there are several things on the page that don't display properly in browsers other than WinIE, like Opera & Firefox...
      That's right. I just went to the site with Firefox and firewall mentions that WMP wants to load. I say no thank you at which point browswer locks up solid. Not nice.

    3. Re:Not surprising... by thesolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since it is running on IIS they have to use .asp and probably some custom software.

      The back-end language & web server shouldn't matter. You should still be able to generate a standards-compliant page that looks great in modern browsers. Instead, their front page has 366 errors on it.

      Now, I'm not one of those people who insists every page has to validate, but this is just sloppy. MSDN, not just Channel 9, reeks of it, too. I suppose one could argue that you can't blame them, as they are Microsoft, so of course they're going to code to their browser, but I don't buy that argument.

    4. Re:Not surprising... by cb8100 · · Score: 1

      Odd. My Firefox 0.8 didn't lock up when I said not to install the crap.

      On an "on-topic" note, perhaps we should register and meet with Microsoft's web developers so we can "understand" why they made their "blog" as inaccessible as it is.

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    5. Re:Not surprising... by thesolo · · Score: 1

      Very odd, my copy of Firefox didn't lock up at all. It's even funnier when I try visiting that page with Firefox in Linux; clicking on any of those embedded videos takes me to Microsoft's WMP download page. :)

    6. Re:Not surprising... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      That's some fugly HTML. I like the nested P, DIV and TABLE tags... eww.

      There are a lot of errors (not just MSIE specific attributes,which I can't expect MS not to use), but quite a bit of those validation errors are "rules" that are not really necessary.

      For example, while ALT tags are good, they are really not necessary for spacer images, purely eye candy elements, etc. I'm big on HTML standards, but you just don't need ALT tags on every image...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    7. Re:Not surprising... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Safari just zapped me with 9 error windows about WMP, even through I have WMP installed and configured.

      Why does a blog need WMP plug-ins?

    8. Re:Not surprising... by codemachine · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, Slashdot has over 500 errors on the current frontpage. However it does look good in any browser, unlike this site.

      Still, Slashdot's HTML is pretty aweful. They are coding to the browsers instead of the standards just as much as MS is - they've just chosen more than one browser.

    9. Re:Not surprising... by MoronGames · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Instead, their front page has 366 errors [w3.org] on it."

      They probably use FontPage. Coincidence? I think not!

      --
      hey!
    10. Re:Not surprising... by thesolo · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, but please note that I never said anything about slashdot having well-formed HTML :)

    11. Re:Not surprising... by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I love when you try to start a movie (using FireWhatever of course), it asks if you want to install and run the controls. If has the most deliciously ironic sentence:
      Caution: Microsoft Corporation asserts that this content is safe. You should only install/view this content if you trust Microsoft Corporation to make that assertion

      OK- who among you really answered Yes to that? I mean, if Microsoft said it's safe then it must be, right?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.

      :wq!

    12. Re:Not surprising... by gorre · · Score: 1

      In Firefox with the mplayer plugin I get three videos playing at once when I load the page, and it's just a babble. I wonder if I can set it up to play videos when I click them or something...

      --
      "Madness is something rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule." -- Nietzsche
    13. Re:Not surprising... by t1m0r4n · · Score: 1

      > Since it is running on IIS they have to use .asp
      > and probably some custom software.

      Channel 9

    14. Re:Not surprising... by t1m0r4n · · Score: 1

      Oops, should have used Preview.

      Anyway, peek at the HTML source of the page and all your questions will be answered.

      name="GENERATOR" Content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1

      name="CODE_LANGUAGE" Content="C#"

      MS_POSITIONING="GridLayout"

      ect...

    15. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screen readers and text-based browsers will often use the name of the image if there is no alt tag. If an image is unimportant, you should use alt="" to show that.

    16. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the problem:

      I'm not able to use Channel9 to communicate because I'm getting the following error:

      "The file "wmpplugin.exe" is of type
      application/x-msdownload (Binare Executable), and
      Mozilla does not know how to handle this file type.
      This file is located at:
      http://download.microsoft.com/..... etc.

      I'm running SuSE Linux 8.1 with Mozilla as my browser.

      No, I'm not trying to be smart-alecky, nor do I have an 'agenda', I'm just hoping to converse and I'm prevented from doing so by the site.

      Just wondering whether they can handle this problem...

    17. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you wouldn't think the same if you were on slow dialup.

      Just because YOU can see a use for them doesnt mean they are useless.

      I haven't even mentionewd the uses for blind people.

    18. Re:Not surprising... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I learned to do web development on dialup, actually. If I have to use some 1 pixel gif as a spacer, what benefit (either for a slow browser or a blind person) is an alt tag? None.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    19. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned to do web development... If I have to use some 1 pixel gif as a spacer

      Then you never learned how to code a web page.
      It's that simple.
      Go back to school.

    20. Re:Not surprising... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has over 500 errors on the current frontpage. However it does look good in any browser, unlike this site.

      Oh really?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    21. Re:Not surprising... by zmonteca · · Score: 1

      couldn't agree more. I can't deal with it when developers think IE is the only browser out there.

    22. Re:Not surprising... by werve · · Score: 1

      For example, while ALT tags are good, they are really not necessary for spacer images, purely eye candy elements, etc. I'm big on HTML standards, but you just don't need ALT tags on every image...

      Alt tags are required by certain HTML standards, such as XHTML 1.0 - so if you are being compliant then you don't have a choice. One of the reasons ALT tags are important, even on spacers, is that visually impaired users may rely on them because they can't see the images themselves.

    23. Re:Not surprising... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      It's indicative of how preconceived notions will set the audience you select and what you will end up hearing.

      It reminds me of management choosing employee feedback teams comprised of the sweetest smiling sheep in the organization. They never select the hairy old ogres complaining by the watercooler with blood-stained axes to grind? No, no, no....

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    24. Re:Not surprising... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1
      I'll agree that Slashdot's HTML is aweful, but some of the errors on Channel 9 are *very* obviously browser specific:
      Line 14, column 22: there is no attribute "MS_POSITIONING" (explain...).

      <body MS_POSITIONING="GridLayout">
      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    25. Re:Not surprising... by merlin_jim · · Score: 1
      The grandparent was complaining about non-viewable pages in browsers other than WinIE

      Since it is running on IIS they have to use .asp and probably some custom software.

      Lots of factual errors with the above statement and what it implies:

      • IIS does not require .asp; that just happens to be the built in scripting language. I'm running JRUN (jsp / servlet container) on IIS on my laptop right now.
      • ASP does not automatically mean custom software. There's lots of great stuff out there for the diligent googler.
      • ASP does not force WinIE compliance. Nowhere anywhere in the ASP language is there any mechanism for outputting HTML tags as seperate from other output; therefore the HTML compliance is completely the responsibility of the programmer. Platform has nothing to do with it.


      Just because it runs on IIS doesn't mean its not viewable in other browsers. There is nothing special in IIS to prevent other users from using the website; there are some peculiarities in their implementation of the HTTP/1.1 protocol which allow websites to load faster in WinIE because they broke the protocol for that special case, but the HTML is not forced into any particular mode.

      Now, ASP.NET utilizing server-side controls is a bit different; but even there, it's supposed to degrade gracefully. That is, controls that render to the client as javascript in WinIE may require a round trip to the server in other browsers, but their behaviour will remain the same.
      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    26. Re:Not surprising... by katarac · · Score: 1
      hairy old ogres
      Hey, not all Linux users are that old.
    27. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, this one's pretty fucking confusing:

      Line 13, column 7: end tag for element "HEAD" which is not open (explain...).

      When the HEAD very obviously IS present and open by the time the end tag comes along. WTF?

    28. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not just the appearance. The pages are designed in such a way as to be unusable. On Mozilla, I see no way to edit a wiki page, because apparently the controls I need are to the left of the viewable region. Maybe they will fix it, but for now the site is not worth a visit.

    29. Re:Not surprising... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      If you were doing precise HTML layouts in 1997 without ever pulling this trick, then I am rather impressed, troll.

      Even now, CSS isn't perfect if you need to be cross browser/platform. Shaddup.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  14. Great metaphor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's "developer community" is insulated from the actual developers by a locked, reinforced door.



    In contrast, the Linux "developer community" actually storms the cabin wielding box cutters!

  15. Hey Peter! by Mr+Z · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, someome please tell me I'm not the only one who heard Lawrence's voice from Office Space, yelling "Hey Peter! Check out Channel 9! Breast exam!"

    --Joe
    1. Re:Hey Peter! by ENOENT · · Score: 1

      I heard it, too.

      I'm sure that this is part of MSFT's bid to dominate the online pr0n field.

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    2. Re:Hey Peter! by arglesnaf · · Score: 1


      Hey Mr. Z, check out this developer profile on Channel 9!

  16. Common practice? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I thought it was common practice not to release the transcripts of disasters to the public.

  17. Fly the Plane, huh... by rawbytes · · Score: 1

    "Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane."

    sounds like an invitation for more terrorist attacks.

  18. Will be as entertaining as the Beatles Lyric by bstadil · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Will you forgive me?

    Mmm yes

    Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine

    Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine

    Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine

    Number nine, number nine, number...

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  19. BeOS icon! by oscast · · Score: 1

    What's with the BeOS person icon in the upper left hand corner?

  20. The top video by Zegnar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That 'Bill Hill' guy is very charismatic...

    Two points: 1: I really like to see this sorta thing from big companies, gives them a personal touch. That's why Google is so good - not afraid to be more personal and real.

    Also, M$ must be sucking bandwidth streaming those videos to every slashprole. :) Every byte helps up their server bill (Anyone got any info on how much bandwidth microsoft/msdn.com uses? And what it's hosted on?)

    1. Re:The top video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's hosted on a distributed network of zombie windows machines

  21. Use of weblogs as a collaborative technology by hyperherod · · Score: 1

    With two weeks to go until the deadline of my dissertation, finally I find proof that weblogs actually do have a use for professional organisations. The last place I thought I'd find it was from Microsoft!

    1. Re:Use of weblogs as a collaborative technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dissertation is for a PhD. Thesis is for as Masters degree. Your paper is for a BS. Don't bs us.

    2. Re:Use of weblogs as a collaborative technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another thing......the only reference you have that are worthy come from IEEE. The rest is garbage and not worth looking at.

      Get a clue and use CiteSeer.

    3. Re:Use of weblogs as a collaborative technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe in your world but he's in the U.K, and a final B.S or B.Sc paper is generally called a dissertation.

  22. the irony of this by dr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When listening to Channel 9 on United, you aren't actually listening to the internal cockpit communications you are listening to the cockpit's communications with the terminal and centre controllers. And that's where the irony is; the controllers are telling the pilot(s) where to go and what altitude to fly at, etc, that is, ATC has the real control of how things pan out. So while you might be helping to fly the plane [into the ground] you really have no say in how the plane gets to it's destination. And, furthermore, the real irony is that all this communication and procedures that the passenger is listening to is something that basically hasn't changed in the past several decades.

    Maybe you have to be a pilot to fully understand what I mean.
    -dr

    1. Re:the irony of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, according to the Federal Aviation Regulations, the pilot has 100% control.

    2. Re:the irony of this by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you have to be a pilot to fully understand what I mean.

      No, I'm willing to bet that being a pilot in this case merely serves to overanalyze throwaway lines to the point of them not meaning anything any more.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:the irony of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only for some stuff. Then theres ATC and the friendly (?) dispatcher.

    4. Re:the irony of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And, furthermore, the real irony is that all this communication and procedures that the passenger is listening to is something that basically hasn't changed in the past several decades."

      What's the irony? Do we have the 'if it works, fix it till its broke' mentality?

    5. Re:the irony of this by jubitzu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you must be a vfr pilot

    6. Re:the irony of this by doublem · · Score: 1

      So while you might be helping to fly the plane [into the ground] you really have no say in how the plane gets to it's destination

      You know, this makes perfect sense.

      Because Microsoft does want to tell Linux users where to go and what to do.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  23. Improve communication? by Bitseeker · · Score: 1, Funny

    a blog/discussion forum aimed at improving communication with outside developers

    What they're really saying: "Hey guys, we need to innovate. Come on in and help us innovate something. If you tell us what to do, then you'll better like what we license and charge you for."

  24. They're all "technical evangelists" by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 5, Insightful
    More than half the guys list their positions as "technical evangelist."

    If you want to reach more folks: Can we instead talk to a developer who wants to talk about the best way of doing things, rather than someone whose job is to come up with problems where MS is the solution?

    1. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by m_pll · · Score: 1
      If you want to reach more folks: Can we instead talk to a developer who wants to talk about the best way of doing things, rather than someone whose job is to come up with problems where MS is the solution?

      http://blogs.msdn.com. Here you can find blogs from developers, tester, program managers, even MS job recruiters.

      90% of these blogs are mostly junk (in my opinion) but a few are worth reading.

    2. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Myko · · Score: 1

      Have you been through the site? When did Bill Hill turn into an evangelist? Just because the site is run by evangelists does not mean its sole purpose is to market MS solutions. Developers on the whole are not as expressive or inventive at communicating as evangelist types are. There are exceptions, but those developers are too good of coders and I want them spending their time coding MS software instead of running a web site.

    3. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by acousticiris · · Score: 1

      More than half the guys list their positions as "technical evangelist."

      At what point did Microsoft become a religeon? I have never liked their usage of the word "evangelist" in job titles. At some point they're going to cross the line and send someone to my house to knock on my door with something they call a "bible" (it'll probably be blue, cryptic and the book won't open properly). But all kidding aside, IMO, that's kinda wierd. I always laughed at those web sites about how Bill Gates was the devil. But they chose the words, not me!

      --
      "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
      "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
    4. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft IS a religion. Talk to any MS employee and sooner or later you realize that. They all have that cult mentality.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the term evangelist was first invented by Apple. It's now standard across the industry, virtually all big tech companies have "evangelists". If you want to accuse Microsoft of being a religion, you need to look to the whole industry.

      Microsoft bashers: your prompt for comments about copying Apple above.

    6. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll do even best; I'll comment about copying Apple when it WASN'T a good idea.

      It wasn't.

      There, done, I commented. Anyone care to add anything?

    7. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 2, Informative
      but a few are worth reading

      Especially Raymond Chen's. Not only is it interesting, but it fits quite well the original request for "a developer who wants to talk about the best way of doing things".
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    8. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by jcwynholds · · Score: 2, Troll

      The sad fact surrounding this post is that MS is not trying to reach folks, it's probably a site devoted to try to pull the linux on desktop people back to windows. See the fancy Wiki? See the link to developers? A clever impersonation of the open development model, when in fact it's the same bottom line.

      The funny part about channel9.msdn.com is that it outlines why security will never be M$'s forte. The development cycle (which they partially outline) doesn't give enough freedom for fixing of bugs and complete testing before release, which is why security holes will continue to haunt M$ like a raging case of herpes. No OS is free from security holes, but when live systems are at risk for months with no patches, the opportunity cost of loss becomes a real factor.

      Which comes back to the 'technical evangelists.' The site is aimed at providing 'customer satisfaction,' obviously. Their hoping that pissed customers will watch some movies and forget that the latest virus/worm/trojan/malware is crippling their network. So M$ has hired some evangilists to talk people down (after reinstall after reinstall) and convince everyone that M$ has a real commitment to making good software. Ha ha.

    9. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Can we instead talk to a developer who wants to talk about the best way of doing things, rather than someone whose job is to come up with problems where MS is the solution?

      Are you actually familiar with the job description of the title? It might be a position of advocating external standards (i.e., HTML) internally, thinking all day of Microsoft products that can be improved with it. If so, they would be the right people to talk to.

    10. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Mekkis · · Score: 1

      Way-ell, PRAISE THE LOWERED!! It's about tahm that them nerds up at Mahcro$oft done learned about the WORD OF THE LOWERED!! (canigettahalleluja?) In all seriousness, I find this pretty disturbing on any front on which one would care to address this. If this signifies that Micro$oft is giving up the pretense that it hasn't become part of American mass media by now openly espousing "Christian Values" that American mass media rams so forcibly down the world's collective gullets- so much so that Micro$oft is willing to put the term "evangelist" into its job title... Either that or Micro$oft EULAs have now attained the status of religious texts, and the lawyers in charge of maintaining them are now considered classes of priests who enforce said canons. I: In the beginning, there was the word, and the word was Gates. Then on the First Day, Gates moved upon the face of the monitors and said: "Let there be OS!", and saw that the MS-DOS was good. II: On the second day, Gates created the GUI and said "There are no other GUIs but mine (and that bastard Steve Jobs is nothing but a cut-rate deity not worthy of worship - any who believe in him are to be cast down and forgotten. And don't get me started on that Linus guy...)" and saw that the GUI was good. ...and so on it goes until Gates gives Moses the EULA upon Mount Sinai, saying: I: THOU SHALT NOT HAVE ANY OS BUT THAT MADE BY MICRO$OFT, AND THOU SHALT PAY FOR THAT WHICH YOU USE. II: THOU SHALT NOT MAKE UNTO THEE ANY UNAUTHORIZED COPIES OF MICRO$OFT PRODUCTS, OR LIKENESS OF THE PRODUCTS ON HARD COPIES OR DIGITALLY, OR LOAN THEM TO THY NEIGHBORS, OR PROVIDE MICRO$OFT PRODUCTS FREELY TO THE MASSES UPON THE INTERNET. III: THOU SHALT NOT BOW THYSELF DOWN TO OTHER OPERATING SYSTEMS, NOR USE THEM, FOR I, THE LORD THY GATES AM A JEALOUS GOD VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS ON THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD GENERATION OF THOSE WHO USE ANYTHING BUT MICRO$OFT PRODUCTS. IV: THOU SHALT NOT COPY, THOU MUST PAY! V: DID YOU HEAR ME NOT? THOU SHALT N O T C O P Y! VI: *snarl grumble* I AM THE LORD, THY GATES! HARKEN UNTO ME! I SAID: THOU SHALT NOT COPY, THOU MUST PAY! VII: THOU SHALT STRIKE DOWN THE UNHOLY, THEM THAT USE THE LINUX OR THE MACINTOSH, FOR THEY MOCK THE LORD THY GATES AND COST HIM HIS HOLY FINANCE. And so on and so on, until the Lord Gates did force upon the masses the Holy Lawsuit, and the Sacred Digital Signature, and all was good, and the masses did worship. *sigh*

    11. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the term evangelist was first invented by Apple
      Actually, I think that's a term IBM was using in the OS/2 2.x days, before external evangelists became "Team OS/2."
    12. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      90% of these blogs are mostly junk


      Including Slashdot. I remember when it used to be good. Oh well.

    13. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by spongman · · Score: 1
      there are many more interesting blogs from technical people at microsoft. most of the ones I read are members of the Longhorn, .NET or Visual Studio teams:
    14. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all like Slashdot or Linux in general then?

    15. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't OS/2 2.0 released in 1992? The first Apple Evangelist was Guy Kawasaki, way back in 1983.

    16. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by Jeremy+Wright · · Score: 1

      You guys do realise that many, many Tech companies use the term Evangelist, right? Even MySQL AB has an Evangelist on staff. It was started by Apple back in the 80s.

      See: http://jobsearch.monster.com/jobsearch.asp?q=evang elist&sort=rv&vw=b&cy=US&re=14&brd=1%2C1862%2C1863

    17. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      More than half the guys list their positions as "technical evangelist."

      If you want to reach more folks: Can we instead talk to a developer who wants to talk about the best way of doing things, rather than someone whose job is to come up with problems where MS is the solution?


      I've met lots of Microsoft evangelists in the past. My company is a gold partner and EAP so we get tons of opportunities to do so. They are developers, and they are concerned with the best way of doing things. Their job seems to be more about vendor-unspecific wide technology adoption than particular Microsoft slanted adoption.

      It goes without saying that these people got their positions by being very passionate about Microsoft products and technologies; I'm not arguing that. What I'm saying is that their passion is not limited to Microsoft products and technologies, and it would be uncharitable to assume that they have the rather unethical position of inventing problems for Microsoft products.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    18. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by killjoe · · Score: 1

      " Not at all like Slashdot or Linux in general then?"

      Actually it's not. The crucial difference is that MS is a corporation whereas OSS is a movement. Most movements are cult like in the sense that they are based on shared ideals and values.

      I find it odd that a corporation has cult like following while I don't find anything odd about the open source movement having cult like qualities.

      Bill Gates is apparently a very prophetic figure to inspire such a cult of personality.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    19. Re:They're all "technical evangelists" by dustmite · · Score: 1

      So this is your last post then, is it? I mean, obviously you won't be hanging around this site anymore if you think it isn't good.

  25. I hate this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    'Five of us in Redmond are crazy enough to think we just might learn something from getting to know each other...Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'

    This sort of "gee whiz we're just regular guys, we're going to let you peek under the tent" sort or pr-marketing speak rings so false and just raises my BS detectors to max.

    I spent years dealing with Apple's evangelists and while they'd do this sort of thing occasionally usually they were smart enough enough to treat their developers as being vaguely intelligent

    1. Re:I hate this ... by Openstandards.net · · Score: 2, Funny
      'Five of us in Redmond are crazy enough to think we just might learn something from getting to know each other...Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'

      PULL THE NOSE UP! PULL THE NOSE UP! WE'RE GONNA CRASH!!!! NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

      Segment fault at <a very personal memory address>

    2. Re:I hate this ... by Queuetue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you notice #s 6 and 7 on thier "channel 9 doctrine"?

      6. Don't shock the system. Lasting change only happens in baby steps.
      7. Know when to turn the mic off. There are some topics which will only result in problems when you discuss them. This has nothing to do with censorship, but with working within the reality of the system that exists in our world today. You will not change anything by taking on legal or financial issues, you will only shock the system, spook the passengers, and create a negative situation.

    3. Re:I hate this ... by mhotas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at first glance, this "site" is far more about soft-selling .NET and Longhorn rather than responding to users.

    4. Re:I hate this ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what I thought at first, too -- an orchestrated PR effort -- but honestly, that site is too badly done. There's no way this is an official MS project.

  26. Technical evangelist ? by Ploum · · Score: 1

    Someone can explain what is a "Technical evangelist" or a "longhorn evangelist" ?

    Are they really paid to sing all the day : "Microsoft is good and they are friendly" ?

    1. Re:Technical evangelist ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wouldn't a longhorn evangelist be a lady who enjoys large equipment?

    2. Re:Technical evangelist ? by Jonathan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are they really paid to sing all the day : "Microsoft is good and they are friendly" ?

      Yes, that's basically what they do. Plus they try to convince people that their platform is cool and cutting-edge. Basically what every Linux user does for free (although often not very well). But to be fair, Apple's the one that started it as a paid position, and others besides (such as Be) did the same thing, so it isn't like Microsoft is doing something singularly evil in this regard.

    3. Re:Technical evangelist ? by gglaze · · Score: 1

      I have not worked for Microsoft, but here is my understanding:

      The Technical Evangelist role essentially involves two major parts - one is kind of what you are describing - reaching out to the developer and IT communities through training and public announcement events, such as PDC, MSDN local events, etc.;

      the other is working directly with paying customers (small to large business) to implement custom systems on Microsoft technology, often including a lot of study and/or small-group training on how to apply best practices of MS development to those projects;

    4. Re:Technical evangelist ? by Jeremy+Wright · · Score: 1

      What a TE does: 1. "Evangelize" what the world wants to developers. World wants standards in browsers? You can bet the TE's know this (I know many of them, they do). You can bet they're telling the teams (they are). You can bet the teams are listening (they are). The IE Dev Lead actually blogs, you might want to read it. 2. Communicate with the world. This is what Channel9 is. The realization that current communication is too canned. They're trying to be honest here by just having sit-downs with folk. You dont' have to like it, but it's 100 times better than anything MS has done before. 3. Communicate with partners and ISV's. Very little of this has anything to do with religion, 'trying to convince people', etc.

  27. Great idea! by cpu_fusion · · Score: 1

    ... worked for Nixon!

  28. Scorchio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fallejeha fallejehe fallejehe, Chris Waddle

    Boutros boutros ghali

    (Or do you mean a different Channel 9?)

    1. Re:Scorchio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Executione criminale socialiste met el Presidente et Gary Barlow!

      Apolagista terrorista.

    2. Re:Scorchio! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      Best. Fast Show Reference. Ever.

    3. Re:Scorchio! by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      Wha? Meteorologicos exterior! Sminky pinky...

    4. Re:Scorchio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pis. Andszit. Thethe the-the-thethe metrologicos mit Paula: family show!

  29. Orkut? by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

    This looks a lot like some internal Orkut knockoff. Sad.

  30. Don't bother visiting with Firefox by lazuli42 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here's a few things I noticed after spending about three minutes on the site.

    1. The site doesn't present well in Firebird 0.8. The fonts are tiny and distorted.
    2. Many of the quotes on the page are, at best, sycophantic. "Great job Bill!" gushes one 'impartial developer'.
    3. Voting for the third option in the poll (this site sucks, but I'll be back later to see how it develops) causes Firebird 0.8. to immediately exit.

      Bleagh...
    --

    "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

    1. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by Zegnar · · Score: 5, Informative

      1.Works fine here in Firefox.
      2.That quote refers to Bill Hill, not Gates.
      3.And no, it doesn't. Update to a decent build.

      If there's one thing people hate, it's when you solve their problems, eh.

    2. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by irokitt · · Score: 1

      I'm using FireFox, and it was screwy for me too. Are you using a nightly?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it 'screwy' but the fonts definitely need some work to be visible. I'm using Moz 1.7 and it's barely readable.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    4. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      1. looks horrible(well, nice if you don't try to do any READING of the tiny fonts).

      and the site seems geared more towards "hey look at our faces" than anything else.

      It's not like even the pilot in an airplane has any say on in where the plane is headed and if some passanger tries to make a change of plans his a criminal.
      .

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by PTDC · · Score: 1

      It mostly works in firefox here, I'm unable to edit the wiki. Well I can edit it, I just can't save any changes.

    6. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      Firefox .8, no nightly, just the last big release on winxp pro. If I right-click the Channel 9 link and choose 'open link in new tab' firefox dies. I get 'not responding' from task mgr and my only choice is to kill firefox.

      I can't get far enough to figure out what's happening, but it appears to try to open another browser window, like one of those horrible full-screen flash ads, but I don't have flash installed.

      I give up, maybe it's slashdotted.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    7. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by lazuli42 · · Score: 1

      1. You must be very forgiving. It looks like crap in my 0.8 Firefox browser on Windows 2000.
      2. My mistake, I was assuming it was directed towards You Know Who.
      3. Well, it's good that it works in Firefox for you, but I tried visiting the site again and I had a lockup issue.

      --

      "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

    8. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      opening a new tab and typing the url in manually sorta works. The site will open, but firefox seems to choke on the video's for a little bit. It does load that way, but then I get to see all the other errors, great.

      That online users avatar list is going to get REAL big REAL soon. Do you think a few thousand /.'ers logging in at the same time might cause a problem? We should test it out for them.

      And yes, I am talking to myself.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    9. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's one thing people hate, it's when you solve their problems, eh.

      <The Book>"...what they really couldn't stand was a smartass."</The Book>

    10. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by Keeper · · Score: 1

      1. It looks almost exactly the same in Firebird for me as it does for IE. Which is to say it looks like crap. But to be fair, it looks like crap in both browsers and not just Firebird.

      3. No crash here. Though I find it interesting that you would blame the site for crashing the browser instead of a bug in the browser...

    11. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by skraps · · Score: 1
      Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox (Score:-1, Flamebait)
      by I'm Don Giovanni (598558) on Tuesday April 06, @09:35PM (#8788210)
      It couldn't possibly be that Firefox sucks, could it?

      How exactly is this flamebait? Seems like a reasonable question to me.
      If Firefox was a decent browser, it wouldn't "immediately exit" regardless of what content it was served. At least IE has the courtesy of presenting a box with error info.

      --
      Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
    12. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have Firebird 0.7. The fonts work fine for me. You know you can adjust them with mouse gestures.

      In any case, I didn't go any further in the site. I didn't have the right plugins. For some reason I was expecting a blog, what I got instead was a colorful MTV-wannabe multimedia web site. I guess it's technically a blog, but it's certainly not my idea of a blog.

    13. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      Was the third option: "Close Firebird"?

    14. Re:Don't bother visiting with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine in Firefox. But then again, I don't hate Microsoft. I wonder if there's a correlation.

  31. This might be sincere... by Spoing · · Score: 1
    ...though, it's just as likely a marketing ploy. After all, Microsoft is not a young company anymore;

    1. "Fellas, we've been looking over your TPS reports, and it's obvious that someone has to deal with the customer -- you know, the folks that aren't us. A few of them have this funny idea they can make software without us. We've decided that someone is you...over here...should do something, something important and somehow sensitive. You are sensitive, aren't you? Do something with this 'hip' [fingers quoting in air] 'baloaagging' [fingers in air again] we've heard about and show the human side of us, OK? Thanks! Is Tuesday too soon?"

    Who can tell with Microsoft?

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  32. Spooky. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Channel 9? The funny thing is Channel 9 television in Australia merged with MSN to become NineMSN. It seems that Microsoft have this weird nine fetish.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Spooky. by irokitt · · Score: 1

      There were 9 ring-wraiths. Anyone else got some evil references to the number 9?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Spooky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upside-down 6, where's the third one, where's the third one?????

    3. Re:Spooky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 9th circle of hell is Treachery.

  33. Miguel De Icaza is all over Open Channel Nine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    PS: Isn't he gay??

  34. Video Blog by niai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The videos are much more interested to watch than the text is to read. I get a much better feel about what the person is saying through expression, tone, etc. It's obviously more natural to get information from someone in this way than through text.

    1. Re:Video Blog by niai · · Score: 1

      You also cannot spell words wrong on video, but can look much more like an idiot.

    2. Re:Video Blog by Ploum · · Score: 1

      you are very lucky... There's no way for me to see the video under Linux.

      (but it's normal.. The page itself doesn't render perfectly. Just take a very brief look at the code :

      body MS_POSITIONING="GridLayout"
      form name="Form1" method="post" action="Default.aspx" id="Form1"
      input type="hidden" name="__VIEWSTATE" value="dDw4ODMzMTM3NjU7dDw7bDxpPDM+Oz47bDx0PDtsPGk 8MT47PjtsPHQ8O2w8aTwwPjs+O2w8dDw7bDxpPDM+Oz47bDx0P DtsPGk8MD47PjtsPHQ8O2w8aTwwPjtpPDQ+O2k8OD47aTwxMD4 7aTwxND47aTwyMD47PjtsPHQ8cDxsPGhyZWY7aW5uZXJodG1sO
      z47bDwvO0hvbWUgOz4+Ozs+O3Q8cDxsPGhyZWY7aW5uZXJod G1
      sOz47bDwvbG9naW4uYXNweD9SZXR1cm5Vcmw9L0RlZmF1bHQ uY
      XNweDtMb2dpbiA7Pj47Oz47dDxwPGw8aHJlZjtpbm5lcmh0b Ww
      7PjtsPC9Vc2VyL0NyZWF0ZVVzZXIuYXNweD9SZXR1cm5Vcmw 9L
      0RlZmF1bHQuYXNweDtSZWdpc3RlciA7Pj47Oz47dDxwPGw8a HJ
      lZjtpbm5lcmh0bWw7PjtsPC9Vc2VyL0ZvcnVtTWVtYmVycy5 hc
      3B4O01lbWJlciBMaXN0IDs+Pjs7Pjt0PHA8bDxocmVmO2lub mV
      yaHRtbDs+O2w8L2xhbmd1YWdlcy9lbi1lbi9kb2NzL2ZhcS5 hc
      3B4O0ZhcSA7Pj47Oz47dDxwPGw8aHJlZjtpbm5lcmh0bWw7P jt
      sPC9yc3MuYXNweDtcPGltZyBib3JkZXI9IjAiIHNyYz0iL1R oZ
      W1lcy9kZWZhdWx0L2ltYWdlcy94bWwuZ2lmIlw+Oz4+Ozs+O z4
      +Oz4+Oz4+Oz4+Oz4+Oz4+Oz55AAmDo19e1NZP3aqW4orTLKp cA
      g=="

      Mmmm.... this is so cute ! With standards attributes like "MS_POSITIONING"

    3. Re:Video Blog by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      you are very lucky... There's no way for me to see the video under Linux.

      Try mplayerplug-in or konqueror.

      The whole thing works fine in moz here. Vids and all.

    4. Re:Video Blog by Joe+MacDonald · · Score: 1

      Except that the required codec to view them is Microsoft's own and even using it on Linux (without being the proud owner of some version of Windows too) is legally questionable, is it not? Hell, maybe it's legally questionable to use it on Linux even if you do own Windows and have a reasonable reason to already have the required dll because the ones mplayer uses are modified.

      It seems to me that whether you can see the videos or not is irrelevant. The issue is whether you're legally allowed to see the videos, and it seems to me that you're not.

      --
      -Joe
    5. Re:Video Blog by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      I suspect your problem is whether you are philosphically allowed to view this site. Removing your Linux zealot goggles might help.

    6. Re:Video Blog by Joe+MacDonald · · Score: 1
      :-)

      I'm hardly a linux zealot, I'm just saying that it's best to not think too hard about what's going on over at Channel9 since it's obvious right from the get-go that there's either (a) an overabundance of cluelessness (they've chosen a presentation format they aren't aware isn't available to everyone) or (b) there's a low-grade hostility already present toward anyone who isn't already a windows user. (Meaning they really don't want to hear from anyone who isn't using windows by making a website that can only be viewed properly while using Windows).

      Okay, I'll be fair. Maybe I am a zealot. After all, I took one look at the site, saw huge empty squares all over it that were meant to be the content, realized that I'd need to go get a different operating system to properly view the content and decided they probably weren't interested in what I had to say. Yep, that probably makes me a fanatically committed person.

      --
      -Joe
    7. Re:Video Blog by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Heh, I viewed it on Windows box with no soundcard, had to tell it "no, I don't want a Media Player download". I think the videos are overkill, simple text would suffice, or at least offer it as an alternative to the video. Still it's an interesting development for a normally uncommunicative corporation...

  35. This will piss somebody off but... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 0, Troll
    '...Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'

    Gotta ask, "where's Al Queda when you need 'em"?

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  36. My favorite part by mrlpz · · Score: 1

    Is the disclaimer listed as a "doctrine"...."this is not a marketing or lead generation tool".....yeah, right...

  37. That site is crap! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a crappy site. It doesn't render properly with Mozilla/Firefox and as soon I went to the page, I was hit with a bunch of ActiveX controls trying to run. No thanks. Maybe if they want to try to interest other developers in MS, they should NOT REQUIRE MS stuff. The main page has more then 300 HTML errors according to W3C. Come on now. It is not hard to make a little HTML, honest! There is no coding involved. Oh, and this site is .Net. You can see what great standards compliant HTML MS's Web Forms spit out.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    1. Re:That site is crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      you're complaining about a site's html validation on slashdot???

      talk about throwing stones in glass houses.

    2. Re:That site is crap! by estes_grover · · Score: 1

      What a crappy site. It doesn't render properly with Mozilla/Firefox and as soon I went to the page, I was hit with a bunch of ActiveX controls trying to run. No thanks.

      Same here....this stuff tried to load:
      The new DLLs have been loaded:
      C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\STRMDLL.DLL
      C:\WINDOWS \SYSTEM\DRMCLIEN.DLL
      C:\PROGRAM FILES\WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER\NPDSPLAY.DLL
      I said no thanks and Firefox locked up real good.

    3. Re:That site is crap! by codemachine · · Score: 1

      The slashdot frontpage has 510 when I ran it through there.

      Of course slashdot doesn't look like ass when viewed in any major browser, whereas msdn looks pretty aweful in anything but IE.

    4. Re:That site is crap! by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

      378 by my count, although Slashdot (520) doesn't seem to have much to brag about either.

    5. Re:That site is crap! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I gotta agree.

      The idea is nice -- allow feedback from gurus directly to your dev people. Damn good idea, one of the nicest things about open source.

      That site, however, is *awful*. I don't think I've been on a website that is quite that atrocious for a long time.

      I'm using FireSomething with the font size jacked up, and believe me, that site does not cope well.

    6. Re:That site is crap! by easyfrag · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I middle-clicked the link in Firefox to open it up in a new tab and the browser crashed. Now I know Firefox is still beta but I have never seen it choke on a webpage before, kinda fitting that it would be from a MS site aimed at developers. I guess I'll wait until Channel 9.3

    7. Re:That site is crap! by kylef · · Score: 1
      I middle-clicked the link in Firefox to open it up in a new tab and the browser crashed.

      Hmm... and this is the web site's fault? Sounds like your browser might not be very robust to me...

    8. Re:That site is crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The should have used this instead Cocoon

      Cocoon unlike .NET gets it right.

  38. Boutrous boutrous gali by Timbo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Daviid: Quando es il dejeuner que la nyktos?
    La Rutha: O no. Aga non es functivo, ma microsoftos destructivos la dejeuner.
    Daviid: De nada. Mater que pater beefsteak cuisinarti tel para.
    Lizabet: El parenticos favoritos!
    Alberto: Scorchio!

  39. Help them fly the plane? by nysus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who does Microsoft thing they are appealing to? A bunch of 10 year olds? I'd be a little concerned about the conversation going on inside the cockpit. "Ever seen a grown man naked?"

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    1. Re:Help them fly the plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardy fuckin har! Nice one matey!

    2. Re:Help them fly the plane? by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1
      Ha Ha Ha!

      Yeah what's with that idiotic robot lego toy guy in the corner? LOL

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
  40. EULA requires neural implant DRM dongle by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would try to come up with a name for it that is an acronym for "Borg," but I'm feeling really tired this afternoon.

    1. Re:EULA requires neural implant DRM dongle by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Bineural Ocular Rights Gizmo.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  41. Watch out! by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane."

    AAAAHHHHHHH! Watch out for that giant freaking penguin that's about to eat the plane!!!!

    Aw, hell. It's too late anyway.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  42. and equation for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DRM dongle(in ass)= party all night

  43. Named for by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    the audio channel that many airlines use to let passengers listen in on crew conversations during flight, Channel 9's creators state the following...

    Damn...Here I was thinking I'll get to see some Cubs games on MSN.

    --
    What?
  44. wiki error by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

    Man I was just going to valdalize the wiki but it gave me this error:

    We apologize, but an unknown error has occured in the forums. This error has been logged.

    1. Re:wiki error by sharph · · Score: 1

      Don't vandalize wikis. I know microsoft is evil and plan 9 sounds like the dumbest thing ever, but hey, if they want to hang out and play developer involvement, why not let em?

  45. kcts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't MS from the Seattle area?? And isn't channel 9 KCTS?

    So Lindows can't have that name because it's too similar to Windows. But MS can start a "channel 9" when "channel 9" in Seattle == KCTS in everybody's* mind.

    * at least in Seattle. Perhaps disallow MS to use "channel 9" in the Seattle area?

  46. stupid required subject by codefungus · · Score: 1

    HAHAHA
    Microsoft is so stupid. Video? What kind of...

    "Hey uh. Those linux guys..."
    "Community?"
    "Yeah boss. See they talk and ..."
    "Let's get one of those. We still have those video guys around?"
    "Yeah boss. I think they got moved to the ..."
    "Ok. Have them make a community."
    "Ok boss"

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
  47. The Other Channel 9 by mercuryresearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I realize the the CB craze pre-dates most slashdot subscribers (and perhaps technical evangelists)...

    On CB radios, channel 9 is the channel used for emergencies. Pretty interesting double entendre.

    1. Re:The Other Channel 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whaddya mean pre-dates? I still have a CB! And I used channel 9 to get myself out of a totalled wreck!

    2. Re:The Other Channel 9 by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat shocked that I had to scroll this far down before someone pointed this out. Slashdotters these days, I tell ya....

      Good work pointing this out Mercury, it was the first thing the popped into my head when I read this.

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
  48. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five of us in Redmond are crazy...

    Don't forget Steve "Developers Developers Developers Developers Developers Developers Developers Developers" Ballmer.

    And William "$ $ $ $" Gates.

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! omg!! w00000t!!!

  49. Next Stop by F.O.Dobbs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Straight into the ground. Let's see what this baby can do!

  50. Top 5 things you don't want to hear on channel 9 by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny
    Named for the audio channel that many airlines use to let passengers listen in on crew conversations during flight, Channel 9

    I don't know if I would want to listen in on the crew.

    5. Hey dude, got anything to eat? I've really got the muchies right now.
    4. Do you smell that? <sniff> <sniff> It's like a burning smell...
    3. Dallas Tower, we have a flameout on starboard engine 2.
    2. Jesus H. Cripes, Climb! Climb!
    And the number one thing you don't want to hear on channel 9:
    1. Our Father who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name...

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  51. Recommended Flight Plan by psbrogna · · Score: 1

    "Flight MSFT0009, this is the tower speaking. You are instructed to land the plane at Terminal G, have your passengers deplane and allow them to transfer to an alternate flight. The FAA has deemed your aircraft a threat to public safety and grounded till futher notice. Tower out."

  52. But that's their trademark by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

    ...just like you can't view MSNBC material unless you are running Windows or Macintosh - even if your browser is streamlined, and uses the MPlayer plugin that lets you view WMP. A subtle little marketing ploy that I hope will eventually make it into another anti-trust suit.

  53. There's a good side? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. When you find it, let us know. The rest of us gave up the moment we discovered that we have to be IE-using Windoze-lovers to even view the site properly.

  54. Free Long Distance to India? by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    We get to listen to the developers? Hopefully, we will get to listen to the guys who are really writing the software these days. That means my classmates will be able to talk to their classmates in Hyderabad, India, who are busy replacing workers in Redmond. Five years and growning. Use Microsoft and help Bill make money for these guys, but mostly himself. It's the American thing to do!

    Or you could do the evil commie thing and keep your money to yourself and help people all around the world by using free software. Hire that uneployed IT guy on your block and help a programmer make a living. You won't be sorry you did.

    Yep, that business about closed source helping programmers make money WAS A LIE. If 70 billion dollars in the bank, pema-temps and H1B slaves were not evidence enough of where this "Intelectual Property" BS was going, Hyperbad should be.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Free Long Distance to India? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      That means my classmates will be able to talk to their classmates in Hyderabad, India, who are busy replacing workers in Redmond. Five years and growning. Use Microsoft and help Bill make money for these guys, but mostly himself. It's the American thing to do!

      Or you could do the evil commie thing and keep your money to yourself and help people all around the world by using free software. Hire that uneployed IT guy on your block and help a programmer make a living. You won't be sorry you did.


      Sir, had I not already posted in this discussion I would mod you a troll.

      Outsourcing and free software have nothing to do with each other.

      There are outsourcing shops for both open source and closed source projects. AFAIK, there's no conclusive evidence that one is more prevalent than the other. It may shock you to learn however that Linux was developped by a European! Maybe we should all stop using it, we wouldn't want them to be succesful.

      It may also shock you to learn that China, an "evil commie" nation, is considering a country-wide open source operating system rather than Microsoft. Considering this information, would it then be more ethical to use Windows for everything?

      Or maybe, just maybe, I should choose the right tool for the right job, and as long as my decision doesn't help anyone actually murder anyone else, I should consider it an ethical decision?

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    2. Re:Free Long Distance to India? by pballsim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure how you got interesting.

      1. Bill Gates has been losing money. He is only worth 47 billion. If anybody remembers he was worth almost 90 billion a few years ago. He donates his money to his foundation, which frankly, is one of the best foundations.

      2. Microsoft is hiring in the US, and aren't out-sourcing. However, IBM is laying off people left and right in the US to be replaced by Indian developers. But that's okay.

      3. Microsoft hires a lot of Indian people and brings them to the US, along with people from Japan and China. A lot of them get their green cards and all of the US works pay taxes to the US government.

      3. 70 billion? Actually less than that.

      4. If you want to talk to the developers you can send them e-mails. Heck I'll respond =) but I won't be of any use for Windows.

    3. Re:Free Long Distance to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      For example, in this recent post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD, and more FUD. This guy is like the Monty Python SPAM skit, but with FUD and more FUD instead of canned meat. Amazed

  55. xpunkx by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1

    Check out the avatar for xpunkx. How long before Ashcroft scrambles to cover it up?

  56. Who's writing the transcript for the video? by jrutley · · Score: 1

    (for those of us who are not running Windows, Mac, or Solaris?) Maybe I'll see if WMP works through Wine.

  57. Wow. Windows developers have got no soul... by Queuetue · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm reading these people's posts, and ... I know that slashdotters can be pretty dumb, and many of us are the type to get wedgies in high school, but we don't project a face that's that lame, do we? Geeks without the rebel in them are just ... dorks.

    Even our windows supporters are way more hardcore than those dweebs.

    1. Re:Wow. Windows developers have got no soul... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember that most of MS coders have been in the same situatioan as you, they are geeks too. Now you are pulling wedgies on them. Shame on you. Where's the empathy?

    2. Re:Wow. Windows developers have got no soul... by HarryCaul · · Score: 1

      And geeks with "rebel" in them are fooling noone but themselves.

    3. Re:Wow. Windows developers have got no soul... by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      And geeks with "rebel" in them are fooling noone but themselves

      interesting. open question.. does it have to be the extreme?

      rebel or sheep?

      I think it does. grandparent is closer to torvalds/jobs (rebel), parent seems to be closer to a closed-minded office drone (sheep).

      Me, I like the ones who get stuff done in a new way. Not by rehashing others' ideas a la Gates, but those who truly pull something out of their *ss and make it shine.

    4. Re:Wow. Windows developers have got no soul... by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      I'm reading these people's posts, and ... I know that slashdotters can be pretty dumb, and many of us are the type to get wedgies in high school, but we don't project a face that's that lame, do we?

      "Lame" feels like a soothing balm after a bunch of posts complaining the the Microsoft weblog on MSDN doesn't render correctly in Firebird/Firefox* version 0.something, or that it's not Standards Compliant, or that it uses ActiveX, modded up to 5. Wow, that's pretty Interesting. A Microsoft site that blatantly caters to ninety-something-percent of people, who use a Microsoft browser. How horrible.

      Some days I feel like I only read Slashdot comments to remind myself that being a geek does not mean you're smart.

      * - As a sidenote, I'm using Mozilla 1.5 right now, and the page looks fine to me.

    5. Re:Wow. Windows developers have got no soul... by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about rendering, btw - the problems viewing with gecko were fixed that first night that the slashdot post went up - there were problems, but I think they fixed them fairly quickly.

      Now, the site is still ugly as sin, but I think that was intentional, and most of my sites are, too. :)

  58. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the funniest thing I've ever read. Keep up the good work!

  59. Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit..... by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 0

    And help us fly the plane into the ground.

  60. Blog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, for a moment there, I thought it said BORG. Especially with the Bill Gates/ Borg icon going with the story...

  61. Inspiration from comedy? by darth_silliarse · · Score: 1

    I hope Microsoft aren't taking inspiration from the British comedy show "The Fast Show"'s 'Channel 9' sketches.... :o)

    For those of you who are wondering what I'm on about... see here, and here, and here, and here, and here....... Scorchio!

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
  62. Huh? by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Huh? Is this a joke or something? Well, if it is a joke, I just don't get it. Oh.. wait, is this a joke about Microsoft? Perhaps about Windows? Wait, that might be it. Windows crashing right? Is that the joke? Are you saying Windows crashes a lot and making a joke about that? Oh, yeah, wow. That is funny. Wow. Good stuff. I'd mod you up if I could because I wouldn't have thought of something that funny. No, my humor is much more dull than jokes about Microsoft Windows crashing. Heh. I probably would have made some dumb joke about a blue screen. Not very original. But, wow, a joke about it crashing is much funnier.

    Thank you so much.

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
    1. Re:Huh? by tunabomber · · Score: 3, Informative

      Principal Skinner: Do I detect a hint of sarcasm?
      Professor Frinke: Are you kidding? ! This sarcasm detector is off the charts!
      CBG: Oh, a sarcasm detector- that's a *real* useful invention.

      device explodes

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stewie: "That's right. I went there."

  63. Re:Top 5 things you don't want to hear on channel by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    My top five:

    5) I am Mohamed, we are hijacking the plane
    4) I am Marwan, we are hijacking the plane
    3) I am Hani, we are hijacking the plane
    2) I am Ziad, we are hijacking the plane
    1) Allah Ahkbar

    For those who don't know, these are the four ring leaders on each flight. Never forget what they have done. Never again!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  64. Channneel Naaaain! by Turmio · · Score: 3, Funny
    -Bono Estente
    -Bono Estente
    -Hetthethethetettethehehtehtehtehte Microsoft owns you.
    -Sminkkipinkkibangbang Bill Gates.
    (Hey, it's British humour!)
  65. MOD PARENT -1, MENTALLY DISABLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two points:

    1) Microsoft has more bandwidth than Jesus. This is nothing to them. Your recursive wget bash script hammering their server from your DSL line will not even make them blink.
    2) Spell it "M$" and you instantly lose all credibility.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT -1, MENTALLY DISABLED by Zegnar · · Score: 1

      Haha, yes, I concede. I spelled it 'M$' in a moment of idiocy.

      If I could mod discussions I had posted in I'd mod ya up...

  66. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bill just cracks me up. He brings joy to a designer's heart..."

    Ok... breathe... don't troll. Don't troll...

    I suppose even M$ employees are afraid of Indi...I'm trying not to, honest!

  67. Reel cool guys. by sharph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, they are reel cool.

    http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID= 13

    I recognize half those things (perticularly the CPU fan and the soda can "graveyard") as part of my life at some point in time, and I'm sure other /.ers can as well. Like I said, these guys are reel cool.

  68. Five of us in Redmond... by multi+io · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...don't know NNTP :)

    Seriously, couldn't this have been handled by an additional group in the microsoft.* usenet hierarchy? Including automatic replication to servers all over the world -- for free...

    1. Re:Five of us in Redmond... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because NNTP just works so well at replicating streaming video. Not.

    2. Re:Five of us in Redmond... by samael · · Score: 1

      Because NNTP _is_ the most common way of communicating nowadays.

    3. Re:Five of us in Redmond... by Jeremy+Wright · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's just what NNTP is for. Video blogging. Gotcha. Go home. All blogs, all of /. and most websites could also be disseminated via NNTP. Hell, they could be distributed by carrier pigeon. That'd be fun. "You've got mail, *squawk*"

  69. bill hill in slow-mo by kguilber · · Score: 0

    Wow, you gotta play the first video on that page in slow speed (right click on it, goto play speed -> Slow). Makes him sound drunk.

  70. I haven't been on plane with "Channel 9" in years by wsanders · · Score: 1

    It's been years since I've been on a plane that allowed ATC on the inflight audio system. Although in some airlines it's at the discretion of the pilot nobody does it anymore for "security" reasons.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  71. I smell a problem with this... by krray · · Score: 1

    Being from Chicago -- and happy that I can typically watch Chicago's very own ... Channel 9 (WGN) ... I have to say the first thing that I thought of was what is Microsoft doing with WGN? ...yeah, this note has been sent off to their legal department... :)

    1. Re:I smell a problem with this... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      happy that I can typically watch Chicago's very own ... Channel 9 (WGN)

      And you can see it in many other areas of the country where WGN is carried on the local cable, ala Ted Turner's "SuperStation" format. But while Ted might have the Braves, he'll never have the Cubs!!!

      Go WGN!!! Go Cubbies!!!!

      --
      That is all.
  72. Bah, I meant to add: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah -- just a note: I meant to say being that I can typically watch Channel 9 *NATIONALLY* as WGN is re-broadcast across many cable and satellite subscriptions for viewing anywhere...

  73. Re:Hosted on [was "The top video"] by KermitAndLadyHoliday · · Score: 0

    And what it's hosted on?

    According to Netcraft, it's IIS/6:
    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=microsoft .com

  74. Reminds me of a cartoon (A Far Side one?)... by patmc · · Score: 1

    "...have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane."

    Member: Wow, we sure are way up high, how come all we can see is white?

    Pilot: Sonny, that is because we are flying so high we are inside the clouds.

    Member: Hey, what is that little black speck, I think it looks like a penguin.

    Pilot: Don't be silly, for one, penguins don't fly, and there certainly aren't any penguins where we are...entire mountain side of penguins completely fills cockpit window...oh shit...

    1. Re:Reminds me of a cartoon (A Far Side one?)... by patmc · · Score: 3, Funny

      found it: Famous Last Words

    2. Re:Reminds me of a cartoon (A Far Side one?)... by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      Gary Larson signed the top-right corner, so yes, it's a Farside.

      S

  75. Re:Hosted on [was "The top video"] by KermitAndLadyHoliday · · Score: 0

    Excuse me, served by IIS 6, hosted on Windows Server 2003.

  76. I think it's a good idea. by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Now all those MS fanboys here have a place to go to worship their favorite corporation and to talk shit about slashdot. Not that there is any shortage of web sites for MS fanboys congratate but this was has the patina of official corporate backing.

    If this web site reduces the "why is slashdot always bashing poor old MS" posts by 10% I'd say it's a good thing.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  77. User IDs by The+Monster · · Score: 2, Funny
    I give you 7 of 9
    I don't know. 939 might be even funnier
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:User IDs by irokitt · · Score: 1

      "a Working Stiff located in the Channel9 Witness Protection Program."

      Wait, is that a pro-Linux or pro-Microsoft statement? If Channel9 is doing the protecting, that goes to say they are protecting this person from, um, us?

      In other words, I'm thinking maybe this guy went to the dark side....

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  78. the other MS Blog site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I submitted this as a story (wasn't accepted) a few months ago; Microsoft seems to be targeting young developers and Xbox users over at Thespoke. I forgot the details and such but there were a couple of postings at google news. None of the usual razzle dazzle that MS makes when they launch something. Not yet at least.

  79. oh I don't know .... by taniwha · · Score: 1
    but honestly, that site is too badly done. There's no way this is an official MS project.

    It just takes someone finding one of those guy's photos in a stock photo album somewhere ....

  80. Wrong Analogy by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    They got their analogy wrong. Aircraft engineers/mechanics would be more like it.

  81. Re:I haven't been on plane with "Channel 9" in yea by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's just one airline that offers it, United Airlines. It is at pilot's discretion.

    --
    End of Line.
  82. I'll stick with by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

    I'll stick with planet.debian.net. The people aggregated there have to deal with the the public and software at the same time. There's people working on the installer, the GUI people, and an embedded guy. Every one of these people actually maintains software for the Debian project, not just someone who's paid to be a "Technical Evangelist."

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  83. Re:Ok here is a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, at least its more than what you're getting.

  84. WOW. SIMPLY WOW. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0, Troll
    Microsoft is the BEST at Marketing and Bullshit. Everyone can LEARN from them. They created this site to look like a bunch of open, cool, hip coders. This is onlt the TIP of their attack on open source. Step one was confuse Open Source with "Shared Source". Next was image, make their coders look "kewl". What's next?

    I want to puke. Can't they spend more effort cleaning their code base and fixing bugs? If they did that I would actually start buying their shit.

  85. SET PHASERS TO IGNORE! by Progman3K · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, right... Like if MS isn't late AGAIN with the whole concept of blogs!

    *sigh* What's next? A patent?

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  86. Next News Item... by holzp · · Score: 1

    M$oft sues /. over a DoS attack.

  87. You hypocritical prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot renders like shit using Firefox .8 You still appear to show up here.

    Unlike most I actually did go to the MSDN site and it renders a hell of a lot better than /.

  88. What are the black squares supposed to be? by chickenrob · · Score: 1

    in opera all I see where it looks like the articles are supposed to be is a black square that does nothing when clicked... I gues if they limit the article viewing to people content with their product already, they don't have to worry about any negative opinions on the articles...

    --
    People say my sig is the best thing about me.
    1. Re:What are the black squares supposed to be? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Those black squares are actually MS Windows Media players. The site tries to loaded DRM ActiveX crap, if you let it load, they you can click play on the little MS "media" players button to hear some dude talk

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  89. Ha! by SeaDour · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How funny that they chose a commercial airliner as an analogy to their new "outreach" program -- I mean, you certainly wouldn't expect the pilots of an aircraft to be taking input from the passengers on how to fly the plane, would you? Exactly. Neither does Microsoft.

  90. Into the Nearest Building, No Doubt by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    > Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and
    > help us fly the plane.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  91. Firefox crashed by Fnyar · · Score: 1

    Splendid. Firefox crashed immediately after loading the site. Maybe they shouldn't have so many media player plugins running on their front page.

    1. Re:Firefox crashed by xortw · · Score: 1

      It is some kind of protection form firefox. /me also can't get to this site ;-)

  92. Didn't work in Safari...Go Figure by eroyce · · Score: 1

    So I thought I'd try viewing page with a real standards based browser (as opposed to IE, yes Firefox is great, but someone already mentioned the troubles with that so I'm trying something else), and guess what, site locked down with some message about WMP having issues and crashing. Just great, I use an Apple browser and MS still does their best to crash my system. I should have expected as much from M$.

  93. woot! by bprime · · Score: 1, Funny

    Finally, I've got a low user ID at a respected Tech site! wait...

  94. Since I won't log in and can't ask. by NullProg · · Score: 0, Troll

    Riddle me this Microsoft.

    - What problem does .NET solve? Why can't I still use the feature rich Win32 API going forward?

    - SOAP/XML is open. Why are you obfuscating your implementation?

    - As Win32 developer, are you moving to a subscription model for Windows? How does that benefit me? Will users have to click on some security OK button for the programs I write?

    -Is Microsoft willing to concede the enterprise database environment running on linux clusters to Oracle and DB2? Where is SqlServer on Linux clusters? I'd like to code for generic database access. It's what the client wants, not what I or Microsoft wants.

    -As a computer programmer (embedded windows/linux/ARM etc), I'd like Microsoft to mean cross-platform to be across cpu's/OS's. Not WinX cross platform. It's stupid, it's misleading and it's downright false advertising. When are you going to update the NT Posix subsystem?

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  95. Its a trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ::click a dee click click::

    "I find microsoft products to be less robust and not as flexable as unix based systems. Even apple has moved to such a platform. Why can't microsoft provide analogues to these tools and systems?" (post) ::Jack booted thugs storm a small apartment and a man is drug kicking and screaming into the night.::

  96. Please tell me the airline... by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I can pick another. For some strange reason I just don't want my flight from Atlanta to Phoenix "blue-screening".

    Uhm, ok so my reasoning isn't so strange.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  97. Re:Top 5 things you don't want to hear on channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) Allah Ahkbar

    That one would have been funny/insightful if the rest of your post didn't sound so psychotic. Of course technicly you are correct. We should never allow our government to permit men like those into our borders ever again.

  98. Why the hell do I Need WMP for? by Pepebuho · · Score: 1

    I do not have Windows Media Player installed because I hate its DRM. I do not agree to have a program that can erase my files if it wants to, therefore I do not install sucky WMP. Therefore, why is Channel 9 FORCING ME to install WMP?

  99. Wow, Microsoft discovered blogs by R3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Questions that arose after a brief visit to Ch.9:

    1. Why would I "help them fly the plane?"
    2. Why would I contribute *anything* to Microsoft(positive/negative comment, let alone code) - so they could turn around and eihter sell it or maybe even use it against me?
    3. How much are Bill Hill and the rest of Microsoft alumni paid for their blog appearances and patronizing comments like "The most important operating system is not Windows"? (coming from a guy on Microsoft's payroll, this comes across as almost hypocritical)
    4. What's up with dorky one-size-too small gray golf shirts?

    Seriously, what is the point of Channel 9?

    Oh yeah, and BeOS called and it wants its color scheme back.

  100. Channel 9 for EMERGENCIES ;) by MrChuck · · Score: 1
    So on CB radio, channel 9 is reserved for emergencies only. Such as:
    There are hordes of people and reports that more are about start using Open Source!!

    Man the catapults! Gather the pitchforks! The hords are coming!

  101. Chanel 9? Scorchio! by vherva · · Score: 1

    Fast Show anyone?

    For those who do not know: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/fastshow/characters/ch anel9.shtml

    --
    -- v --
    1. Re:Chanel 9? Scorchio! by turgid · · Score: 1

      Apologista terrorista!

  102. Except that MS isn't laying people off by melted · · Score: 1

    They're even hiring, right now, here in the US. If you're good you can apply, too. India is mainly for expansion and sustained engineering so far. I know of only two moderately large pieces of code that are being developed by MS India, but then again, MS has done this since fuck knows when. These two pieces of code weren't technically "outsourced", because they were _started_ over there. Do you know that the first versions of DirectX were developed in Israel? There's also MS Research division in China. You sure can pick a few REALLY bright folks out of 1.5 billion people, and you'd be stupid if you didn't. And MS is not stupid. Arrogant? Yes. Heavy? Yes. Relentless? Yes. Stupid? No.

    It's not like I support mindless outsourcing, either. But Microsoft is one of the few companies that are doing this the right way, without fucking their employees or treating them like dirt. Why? I think they recognize the fact that software development is HARD and they can't afford shooting themselves in the foot by sacrificing this country's IT talent for some abstract "shareholder value". After all, a significant percent of those shareholders are MS employees.

    And let me remind you folks. They're hiring. If you're GOOD, send them a resume. Get free coke, good job and more freedom than you know what to do with.

    1. Re:Except that MS isn't laying people off by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      freedom to oppress others is a wasted freedom, no matter how much sugar/caffeine is included in the mix.

  103. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/the plane/Death Star/
    s/getting to know/Soul Domination/g
    s/learn something/Repress Dissent/
    s/cockpit/lava pit/

  104. What is going on ? by dunstan · · Score: 1

    I have Firefox configured to go out on port 80 via proxomitron - and my laptop is configured with a personal firewall which alerts whenever connections are being made outside its ruleset.

    For some reason browsing this site causes Firefox to go out directly on port 80 rather than honouring the proxy configured in it. What on earth could be causing this?

    Dunstan

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
  105. Ugh, look at the rss feed: by duncangough · · Score: 1, Insightful
    wrong, wrong, wrong:

    <SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Lucida Console'"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN>

  106. "Named for the audio channel...." I'm sorry? by quakeroatz · · Score: 2, Informative

    David Becker is another clueless reporter. Channel 9 is a signalling and emergency channel used by all users of VHF/UHF/CB. It has nothing specific to do with planes or airlines. -SIGH- It's a channel anyone can use, so it assumes open use, possibly collaboration.

    Do reporters actually check on facts there days? Or just write the first thing that comes to their head after leaving the airport.

  107. Scary by sbrown123 · · Score: 2, Funny


    'Five of us in Redmond are crazy enough to think ...Join in, and have a look inside our cockpit and help us fly the plane.'"


    The Fav Five want me to join them in their cock pit? No, I wont do it!!!

  108. Firefox Works Fine by Jeremy+Wright · · Score: 1

    Firefox works just fine. Sure, some minor bugs (font size on the left, and videos autoplay), but the devs are working on it. This is day 1 of the site (well, 2 now). I love the "it's not hard to make HTML, there is no coding involved" statement. Classic.

    1. Re:Firefox Works Fine by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Since when did ActiveX work under Linux and Mac? The fonts are unreadably small under Firfox even under MS Windows, and some of the tables on the left are garbaled. I don't understand how someone can not even make a simple HTML document and check it in two browsers. It takes all of 3 seconds to fire up Firefox and see if it works. Oh, and if someone is thinking of puting ActiveX on their site, just don't. There is no need for that single platform crap. Use Macromedia Flash(tm) if you have the urge to put something "exciting" on the page.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  109. Let me see if I get this right... by nenolod · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bill is now posting his life story on the internet for all to read?! So when is it going to come out that he knocked up some chick at SCO? :)

  110. Clue for you. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Outsourcing and free software have nothing to do with each other.

    I agree. "Outsourcing" where you ship the work someplace else and tell others that they can't do what you do is a closed source thing. It's the logical extension of the NDA mindset but it is meaningless in the free software world.

    It may shock you to learn however that Linux was developped by a European! Maybe we should all stop using it, we wouldn't want them to be succesful.

    No, you'd have to live in a cave to not know that Linux is from Finland. That's great, as are contributions from everywhere else.

    What's not so great and what's very unAmerican is the business model that some US software makers have adopted. They promoted themselves by promissing money in exchange for software rights. "Work for me, promise not to help anyone else, sign this NDA and I'll pay you like no one else will," they told developers. It was a lie and outsourcing of those jobs shows how big a lie it was. Where's the money now? More importantly, the secrecy and assinine attitude of "you can't do what I can and must do as I say," is very unAmerican. The USA is supposed to be about limitless opportunity and the liberation that brings. Ousourcing will not bring sucess abroad, it will bring control and slavery. Anyone who signs up with Microsoft and other NDA pushers, loses.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Clue for you. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I disagree that the USA is supposed to be about limitless opportunity and the liberation that brings.

      America is about free, open markets, free speech, and self-regulated rulership. Unfortunately, in an age of globalization, for as long as there is a significant part of the world that is economically poor, where the standard of living that the American dollar (and the economy powering it) is significantly higher than is available locally, a completely open market is devastating to the American workforce. I do not believe that Microsoft, or indeed anyone operating under an NDA, is necessarily driving this; had the IT industry started and stayed open, the situation would still be the same.

      The problem is that skilled labor from the international market is significantly cheaper than from the American market. The cause is uneven economic playing fields, not NDAs. The solution is to even the playing field; unfortunately, the best way to do that is to allow the outsourcing to continue. We pour enough money and knowledge into these economies and they'll bootstrap themselves up to a fair level, and the problem will take care of itself.

      In the meantime, however, it's going to suck to be a skilled worker in America.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    2. Re:Clue for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a fantastic offtopic "M$" flamebait twit. You keep surprising everyone here. You don't even know how to write code - you're just a hardware monkey. So how exactly does your "advice" come in handy in this context?

    3. Re:Clue for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      For example, in this recent post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD, and more FUD. This guy is like the Monty Python SPAM skit, but with FUD and more FUD instead of canned meat. Amazed

  111. MS isn't laying people off? by twitter · · Score: 1
    No? Ask the people who developed M$ Office for Mac. The layoffs will come, if they are not already here. Asside from standard abuse, forcing you to surrenderyour ideas and promise to not help anyone else ever again, Microsoft has abused it's "non-core" workforce relentlessly. Read up some about perma-temps, a practice Microsoft helped to invent. These are people who make things work for Microsoft, and they get to live off unemployment for a good part of the year. A company that would create a whole subclass of employees rather than simply grow and hire more people is abusive enough to fire current employees the second they realize it's cheaper to get the work done abroad.

    In the end, I expect Microsoft to look like SCO.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:MS isn't laying people off? by melted · · Score: 1

      Mac Office folks have just released a new version. What should I ask them again? And yeah, non-core workforce ("contingent staff") is hired and fired when necessary. That's why it's "non-core". When there's not enough resources to do things on their own, MS hires contractors. Some of them end up working for MS for more than a year, some get hired after a year long employment, most get fired when they're done with the work assigned to them though. This is nothing new or "evil" for that matter. Heck, MS still employs US contractors even though they're a heck of a lot more expensive than a regular permanent employee. I'd expect all the contractors to be gone before layoffs begin (and IF they begin).

    2. Re:MS isn't laying people off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up twit. you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

    3. Re:MS isn't laying people off? by pod · · Score: 1

      Contractors are not 'more expensive' than regular employees. If they were MS would hire employees. MS (and other companies) use contractors because they cost pretty much the same as an employee (after a 12 month contract they most certainly do), they get laid off with no consequences (contract over, you're gone), they bring in new ideas and work ethic (most contractors _I_ know work pretty damn hard during their billable hours), and they're a nice flexible workforce. Remember, as an employee you only see a portion of your cost reflected in the monthly paycheque.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    4. Re:MS isn't laying people off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      For example, in this recent post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD, and more FUD. This guy is like the Monty Python SPAM skit, but with FUD and more FUD instead of canned meat. Amazed

  112. wind blows in the left seat? i don't think so. by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    point of order here:

    it's that on 'channel 9' one can only hear the copit and tower dialog, NOT be a contributor to that dialog.

  113. Yeah, right by melted · · Score: 1

    I KNOW they cost more. Yes, they work hard, but they cost about 15-20% more of what an employee would cost, all things considered.

  114. Sanitation expert, and a maintenance engineer... by mojoNYC · · Score: 1
    Garbageman, a janitor, and you my dear,

    A software evangelist, my oh my,

    you ain't nuthin' but a waitress in the sky!

    -(unauthorized riff on) the Replacements