Slashdot Mirror


RFID Injection Required for Datacenter Access

user24 writes "Security focus reports that RFID injections are now required for access to the datacenter of a Cincinnati company. From the article 'In the past, employees accessed the room with an RFID tag which hung from their keychains, however under the new regulations an implantable, glass encapsulated RFID tag from VeriChip must be injected into the bicep to gain access ... although the company does not require the microchips be implanted to maintain employment.'"

551 comments

  1. Comrades... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and the Comrades marched rank and file into their working facility, while the Big Brother telescreen carefully scanned each implanted chip...

    1. Re:Comrades... by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 1



      ...and they continued to work on the The Manchurian Candidate Project...

    2. Re:Comrades... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shenanigans.

      I saw a representative from this company on Fox News yesterday (he was the IT manager) and he explicitly stated that participation was voluntary. Two employees had the implant, one of those was the CEO. The fellow being interviewed carried his RFID on his keychain.

  2. A milestone by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this the first time civilians have been required to do thing type of thing? I guess its no longer science fiction.

    1. Re:A milestone by servognome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is this the first time civilians have been required to do thing type of thing?

      Lots of stuff has been done to monitor civilian employees: Drug testing, email snooping, time card punching, video monitoring, background/credit checks, etc.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A milestone?

      Well, it's more mill than mile.

    3. Re:A milestone by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, there were those number tattoos in the Nazi slave labor camps...

      --
      This space available.
    4. Re:A milestone by strider44 · · Score: 0, Troll

      My god! A serious case of Godwin's Law takes hold after only 20 mins! I wonder what the record for Slashdot is?

    5. Re:A milestone by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Somewhat ironic I think.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    6. Re:A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Arbeit Macht Frei" - Words on the gate of the Auschwitz.

    7. Re:A milestone by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Godwin's Law does not apply when there is a legitimate historical reference to Nazis. I'd say this one actually is a proper and on-topic reference, as there aren't many other cases of forced permanent identification or serialization. I can think of plenty of "mode of dress" and uniform enforcements, but no other examples of permanent body modifications that mark specific individuals.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:A milestone by timeOday · · Score: 1

      So? The Nazi tatoos happen to be relevant to RFID implantation. Godwin's "Law", on the other hand, is not. In fact it's utterly pointless.

    9. Re:A milestone by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jafafa's Law: Anyone who tries through reflexive and thoughtless exclamation to inhibit the very valid practice of comparing for the purpose of gaining perspective a behavior to known extremes is a fucking putz.

      (I admit it's not very catchy.)

      --
      This space available.
    10. Re:A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck godwin and the glass eyed parrots he flew in on

    11. Re:A milestone by Chineseyes · · Score: 0

      Short answer NO

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    12. Re:A milestone by teslafreak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "there aren't many other cases of forced permanent identification"

      And there isn't one here.

      It says right on the story that it is NOT required to stay employed. If you don't like the idea, don't do it.

    13. Re:A milestone by fungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slaves and criminals were marked with red hot iron before. It happened in America and elsewhere. If that's not forced permanent identification, I wonder what is.

      http://www.ralphmag.org/slave2.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branding_(law)

    14. Re:A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, he was obviously referring to somewhat more modern times. Second, those are also wonderful examples of just how creepy this is.

    15. Re:A milestone by mboverload · · Score: 1

      > It says right on the story that it is NOT required to stay employed. If you don't like the idea, don't do it.

      And if the Jews didn't want to be marked, why didn't they just kill themselves?

      Great logic you got going on there, scotty.

    16. Re:A milestone by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And there isn't one here.

      It says right on the story that it is NOT required to stay employed. If you don't like the idea, don't do it.

      Wrong. TFA specifically states:

      In the past, employees accessed the room with an RFID tag which hung from their keychains, however under the new regulations an implantable, glass encapsulated RFID tag from VeriChip must be injected into the bicep to gain access, a release from spychips.com said on Thursday.

      Although the company does not require the microchips be implanted to maintain employment, anyone without one will not be able to access the datacenter, according to a Register article.

      Thus, *IF* you work in that datacenter, then you *MUST* get an RFID chip in the bicep. *IF* you refuse the chip, then you *CANNOT* enter the datacenter -- and thus, how do you do your job?

      Perhaps the company will be able to re-position people who adamantly refuse to be chipped. However, my suspicion is that:

      1) The company isn't big enough to have so many such possible positions available (just look at their "About Us" page -- doesn't this look rather low-grade and unprofessional?), and

      2) Every employee will go along with it anyway, like a bunch of goddamn cattle being taken to slaughter. *Especially* if the people working there are willingly working for what is a surveillance company...
    17. Re:A milestone by Minwee · · Score: 1
      How about a more general form, like "The Internet is Full of Wankers"?

      That one always works for me.

    18. Re:A milestone by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      Have I missed part of TFA where it states how this implant is actually *permanent*? I don't see why it couldn't be removed almost as easily as it's implanted.

      The apparent ease with which these tags can be skimmed and cloned would be a greater concern to me, personally, as it means implementing an expensive, mildly painful, invasive (which means a non-zero risk of complications, even if small) prodecure, all for what is actually a non-gain in security. Doesn't sound like even remotely a worthwhile trade-off to me.

    19. Re:A milestone by lasindi · · Score: 1

      Is this the first time civilians have been required to do thing type of thing?

      It's not required. Don't like it? Don't work there. If enough people simply refuse to put up with this, no employers will use RFIDs on their employees because no one will be willing to work for them. That's what the free labor market is all about.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
    20. Re:A milestone by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      It only says you need it implanted to ENTER, but if you live in there you're fine...

    21. Re:A milestone by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I can think of plenty of "mode of dress" and uniform enforcements, but no other examples of permanent body modifications that mark specific individuals.

      There are any number of military units where specific tattoos are virtually mandatory -- i.e. not in the regulations, but you are made to know you should get it. And of course, street gangs, possibly university fraternities (Yale's "Skull & Bones" requires a brand if one can believe the movie The Skulls, though probably you can't). Of course, one might mention circumcision, both male and female; African tribes that insert plates to distend the lips, the Burmese tribe that puts more and more rings on their women's necks to stretch them. Anyway, the chip can be easily removed, not that I advocate the idea, just to point out it's not permanent.

    22. Re:A milestone by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      . If enough people simply refuse to put up with this, no employers will use RFIDs on their employees because no one will be willing to work for them.

      Seeing as this is a video surveillance company, it'd be hard for staff to claim a moral objection to the practice. (Though they might still not want to have needles stuck into them.)

    23. Re:A milestone by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      And there isn't one here. It says right on the story that it is NOT required to stay employed. If you don't like the idea, don't do it

      I never said it was. Dammit, I knew somebody was going to go back to the article rather than accepting that a thread can mutate into a similar but different discussion. Yes, you are correct. The article does not say that. Now, in *this* thread we are discussing citizens and mandatory identifying marks required by an authority.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    24. Re:A milestone by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Perhaps I worded it poorly... none of those mark *specific* individuals, i.e., function as identity that can be referenced per person a la a serial number (thus my use of the term "serialization"). Lots of group tattoos and marks that show affiliation, and several non-permanent things like dog tags that are worn, but I can't offhand think of anything like dog tags or drivers licenses (i.e., specific identity) that are forcibly and permanently marked upon an individual's body other than the Nazi tattoos.

      Maybe there are, but none of the replies have been specific to more than just a group.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    25. Re:A milestone by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      none of those mark *specific* individuals

      OK, I understand what you mean now. Basically, marking a "specific" individual as a security feature is pretty stupid, as any applied marker (tattoo, brand, etc) can be more or less easily forged, as TFA points out in this case. More secure is to use biometrics, retina or fingerprint scans, voice, etc. Though these can be defeated too. RF chips are just a cheapskate way to try to implement biometrics. Good for keeping track of livestock and pets, less so for people.

    26. Re:A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... There's circumcision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision/).

    27. Re:A milestone by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      So that comparison seems apt to you? You don't think it overstates the case just a tad?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    28. Re:A milestone by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      No, not the first time. Just the first time with new tech. You can do just as well with a tattoo needle.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    29. Re:A milestone by buraianto · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you loose a pass card anyone who finds it and has the ability can clone it. With an implantable chip you can't lose it. Cloning it would require the participation of the owner. Or, should I say the person, since they are pretty much owned by their company. :P

    30. Re:A milestone by buraianto · · Score: 1

      Lose a pass card. Lose a pass card.

    31. Re:A milestone by lasindi · · Score: 1

      Seeing as this is a video surveillance company, it'd be hard for staff to claim a moral objection to the practice.

      Okay then. My point here is that not everyone (or even necessarily a majority) of the general population shares the anti-surveillance sentiments of the majority of Slashdotters. Some people simply don't care that much about being tracked as they move about their workplace; otherwise this company wouldn't exist because A) they couldn't sell their products and B) they couldn't implant RFIDs on their employees.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
    32. Re:A milestone by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But RFID doesn not require the participation of the owner. That stranger who just jostled you in the subway now has your RFID code (You can make RFID readers *small*) Now a)You don't know the code has been stolen (vs having your passcard lost or stolen) and b)When you do discover the code as been stolen, changing your own code is a *lot* more hassle than issuing a new passcard.

      These things could be negated by RFID chips with rolling codes or read/write ability but these are not commonly available in the glass capsule RFID chips. I'd give good odds that this company is not pushing the boudaries either and has the standard one-id versions.

      Bear in mind that RFID devices are operating on the limits of what power can be obtained from a fairly weak power source in the first place. Any extra complexity has a real impact on the operational range.

      Rich

    33. Re:A milestone by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      "I can't offhand think of anything like dog tags or drivers licenses (i.e., specific identity) that are forcibly and permanently marked upon an individual's body other than the Nazi tattoos."

      Well, artificially I can't think of any others. But nature does a pretty good job of that already. (Fingerprints, DNA, retinal pattern, etc.) But then biometrics are known to be unreliable and are generally flawed in that they once your biometrics information is known/hacked, you can't change it.

      I find the whole field of biometrics intersting but fundamentally flawed when it comes to security. How can an unchangeable identifier that acts as both username and password, that is visible in general without you knowing (e.g., fingerprints are everywhere), ever be made secure? The RFID tag can at least be changed so it's one up on that, but it can be read and duplicated easily. Redundancy seems the answer. Passcards, usernames, passwords, perhaps biometrics. I guess inconvenience becomse the main factor then.

    34. Re:A milestone by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The Number of the Beast? Probably not, though the reference is obscure enough to mean most nearly anything. (Still, the implication was that it would be the number of the owner [i.e., the Beast] rather than of the owned.)

      Stock registries? You may think that there's a large difference between people and cattle, but the corporations don't, even if most people within the corporations do.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    35. Re:A milestone by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      My question is: What happens when the glass capsule inside the guy's skin breaks? Doesnt it hurt to have a small capsule of glass under your skin? Is it possible for someone to be allergic to the glass, or in the case of breakage, to have an immune reaction to the stuff inside the glass?

      --
      SRSLY.
    36. Re:A milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if people who have acces to daca centers can be considerd as mere civilians.
      besides now you'll have fancy technology implanted just like carter tealc daniel and jhon cryton!

    37. Re:A milestone by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The solution is to realize that ANY automated security measure can be broken so you make your security strong enough to deter most attackers, use actual people if you need more than that, and accept that you can STILL be broken into if someone really, really wants to.

      Like the lock on your house. It might be a decent one but if a pro wants in, he'll get in.

    38. Re:A milestone by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You used the word putz. Referring to whale penises is always catchy.

    39. Re:A milestone by Sven+The+Space+Monke · · Score: 1

      In a situation where an employee is allergic to glass, then I would imagine the Americans with Disabilities Act would come in to play. Any dime-school lawyer should be able to make a convincing case. As for breakage, your bicep should be filled with enough squishy stuff to absorb any shock. It would be possible to hit it hard enough, or in just the right way to cause it to break. In that situation, you better be within 10 seconds of a hospital.

      --
      A man who can't pronouce "nuclear arsenal" shouldn't have one -sig ends here.
    40. Re:A milestone by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Is it possible for someone to be allergic to the glass, or in the case of breakage, to have an immune reaction to the stuff inside the glass?

      Allergic to glass? Never heard that one... I suspect it'd be a bit like being allergic to water though. Glass is rather inert.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    41. Re:A milestone by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You used the word putz. Referring to whale penises is always catchy.

      Quit being a dork.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    42. Re:A milestone by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Well put, you ridiculous choad.

      Check the dictionary.com definition for that. It's hilarious and strangely fascinating at the same time.

    43. Re:A milestone by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The glass ID tag is extremely small. Glass is actually pretty strong also. Combine these two and you'll have something that's pretty hard to break (I actually carry one in my wallet for no particular reason other than it's cool to show people sometimes).

      I understand that it's not painful and "disappears" once organs rearrange to accomodate the new entity. Allergy is extremely unlikely (though probably not impossible). I'd be more concerned about lack of proper sterile procedures.

      Once again, I'll throw out a plug for my old company which has some very useful info for those who would like to find out more about RFID: http://www.intersoft-us.com/

      Rich

    44. Re:A milestone by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Now a)You don't know the code has been stolen (vs having your passcard lost or stolen)

      As opposed to them doing the exact same read with the RFID passcard in your pocket? It seems that all the arguments over implantation are regarding RFID and irrelevant to the actual question of whether implantation is more secure than an identical RFID solution on a keychain or in a credit card form factor.

  3. From TFA by daverabbitz · · Score: 1, Informative

    ompany requires RFID injection
    Published: 2006-02-10

    Click here for Core Impact!
    Two employees have been injected with RFID chips this week as part of a new requirement to access their company's datacenter.

    Cincinnati based surveillance company CityWatcher.com created the policy with the hopes of increasing security in the datacenter where video surveillance tapes are stored. In the past, employees accessed the room with an RFID tag which hung from their keychains, however under the new regulations an implantable, glass encapsulated RFID tag from VeriChip must be injected into the bicep to gain access, a release from spychips.com said on Thursday.

    Although the company does not require the microchips be implanted to maintain employment, anyone without one will not be able to access the datacenter, according to a Register article.

    Ironically, the extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release.

    Posted by: Peter Laborge

    BTW fp.

    --
    What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
    1. Re:From TFA by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Although the company does not require the microchips be implanted to maintain employment, anyone without one will not be able to access the datacenter

      And anyone who requires access to the datacenter to do their job, such as operators and sysadmins, cannot DO their job unless they get the implant. And if they cannot do the job, how are they expected to maintain employment?

      I suppose the official reason for termination would be "uncooperative attitude." Certainly not "he refused to get chipped." Or maybe the company will concentrate on ways to make the employee so miserable, he just quits. Problem solved.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:From TFA by slashname3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication.

      To say nothing of employee's arms being taken and used to gain access. Just need to have a large plastic bags to put the body part in to keep it from leaking all over the hacker. Gives a whole new meaning to the term hacker.

      I wonder if these are the same implants they use on dogs. If they are it's no wonder they are insecure. And I don't see how this improves security much if any. It would be better to have a two man rule enforced by the access system, using two factor authentication, and have cameras monitoring the access into the cages. Securing a data center is not that difficult. It can be costly.

      One last thought, what does the company do if those implanted leave or are fired? Pay out the insurance premium for dismemberment when they remove the arm of the employee? I guess you know you are being fired when the security guard shows up at your desk with a box for your stuff and a hacksaw to revoke your access.

    3. Re:From TFA by puddingpimp · · Score: 1

      Seems fair enough to me, I for one welcome our new RFID-implant wielding overlords.

    4. Re:From TFA by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One last thought, what does the company do if those implanted leave or are fired?

      Maybe revoke the authorization for that particular RFID device?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    5. Re:From TFA by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Umm, mark that RFID tag as completely ineligable to return. If it does show up, lock down the building and call 911.

    6. Re:From TFA by YGingras · · Score: 4, Funny

      And anyone who requires access to the datacenter to do their job, such as operators and sysadmins, cannot DO their job unless they get the implant. And if they cannot do the job, how are they expected to maintain employment?

      They have no problem to do their job without physical access, they installed telnet on all the servers.

    7. Re:From TFA by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe revoke the authorization for that particular RFID device?

      So all this does is eliminate cases of lost access cards? No improvement to security with this. But I think in most company hand books the employee is required to return all company property as well as access cards, IDs, keys.

      So how many jobs can you have where they require RFID chips before you trip the airport detectors? "BEEP", "Empty your pockets sir." "Already did, its the RFID tags in my arm, I have had a lot of contracting jobs the past year." "I don't believe that sir, take off your belt." "Already did, and my shoes too. Its the RFID tags." "Step over here sir." (Snap of latex glove....)

    8. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Company requires RFID injection
      Published: 2006-02-10

      Click here for Core Impact!
      Two employees have been injected with RFID chips this week as part of a new requirement to access their company's datacenter.

      Cincinnati based surveillance company CityWatcher.com created the policy with the hopes of increasing security in the datacenter where video surveillance tapes are stored....


      So they admit that they HOPE this will help.
    9. Re:From TFA by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      The chips are cloneable, so there is ot much in the way of security enhancements there ... plus, its to access the video tapes from their surveillance system. Guess they're not too confident in their video-tape surveillance system. Seems to me it would have been better to just upgrade to DVRs like any modern survaillance system. You can store a year's sound and video from 8 cameras in a box on a 4x250 gig raid. Once a year, swap out the drives for new ones. Do you have ANY idea how much space a year's worth of video tapes takes up?

    10. Re:From TFA by Namlak · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the company will concentrate on ways to make the employee so miserable, he just quits. Problem solved.

      Just a little thing they like to call "fix the glitch".

    11. Re:From TFA by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Do you have ANY idea how much space a year's worth of video tapes takes up?
      I was curious and bored, so I did the math...

      A VHS tape is 7.375 inches long x 4.0625 inches wide x 1 inch thick. Each tape can hold up to 36 hours of footage on a special security time-lapse VCR. Let's be conservative and say that you'll run the cameras into a quad split, enabling you to record four cameras per tape. That means you need two tapes to store 36 hours of footage from eight cameras.

      The number of hours in a year varies. There are, on average, about 365 1/4 days per year (one leap year after every four). Each day is 24 hours, or 8,766 hours per year. You need twice as many hours of tape, since you're running two tapes for your cameras, or 17,532 hours. That works out to 487 tapes over the year.

      Returning to our VHS tape dimensions, each tape is 29.96 cubic inches. Therefore, 487 tapes will take 14,591 cubic inches, or 8.44 cubic feet for one year's worth of tapes.

      Disclaimer: I don't profess to have any competency in math. I barely passed Trigonometry, after being removed from the Pre-Calculus class on the Honors track. Therefore, it's more than likely I flubbed up somewhere. Don't rely on these numbers for anything important, like constructing a multi-million $CURRENCY datacenter. Thank you.

    12. Re:From TFA by KaiLoi · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has had an RFID tag for about a year.... yay! I'm finally the overlord of someone!

    13. Re:From TFA by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      And anyone who requires access to the datacenter to do their job, such as operators and sysadmins, cannot DO their job unless they get the implant. And if they cannot do the job, how are they expected to maintain employment?

      Obviously they would offer them a transfer to another department that doesn't require such sensitive access rights, and a pay cut to go with the "lower" position (regardless of the actual change in workload/expertise needed at the new position).

      oh, and they also get a big red sad face on their permanent record instead of a gold star.

    14. Re:From TFA by lkcl · · Score: 1

      it's okay: that's what ssh tunnels are for.

    15. Re:From TFA by puddingpimp · · Score: 0

      > Speaking as someone who has had an RFID tag for about a year.... yay! I'm finally the overlord of someone! But is it implanted?

    16. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      telnet over a one-time padded tunnel is quite secure, btw. Much better than ssh.

    17. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A funny story I have to tell you:

      A while back, when I was a student, they started implementing a keyless assess scheme for some labs on campus. I am not even sure if that was an RFID device, but it was just a little dongle that you would touch to the lock, and the door would open.

      Anyways, it was hella funny when those 'tags' started setting off the library anti-theft door scanners...

    18. Re:From TFA by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Making work hell to cause someone to quit is called constructive dismissal, and is illegal in most jurisdictions that I know of.

    19. Re:From TFA by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A VHS tape is 7.375 inches long x 4.0625 inches wide x 1 inch thick. Each tape can hold up to 36 hours of footage on a special security time-lapse VCR. Let's be conservative and say that you'll run the cameras into a quad split, enabling you to record four cameras per tape. That means you need two tapes to store 36 hours of footage from eight cameras.
      Sorry, but most of the images from those tapes run through time-lapse vcrs don't stand up in court. Heck, they aren't even useful enough to identify the SEX of the person in many cases, the image quality is so poor. They're the absolute crap. Poor resolution, and no audio, and even with image enhancement you can't tell squat. Running the cameras on quad split, as yu call it, is worse - the image resolution is only 160x120. Time-lapse that, and you're REALLY screwed.

      I know because I spent 2 years developing a replacement for them to be marketed locally - DVRs that record up to 64 channels of live audio and video at up to 30 fps. And those give you pictures, unenhanced, that the cops CAN use. I was at a customers' on Friday - someone had stolen a mirror from a car in the parking lot. So, thanks to continuous (not time-lapse) coverage, he had the thiefs face, his cars make and model and color (a lot of those time-lapses are monochrome), etc. So, hit the print button and there's your guy. MUCH better.

      Even in 2-hour mode, with no time-lapse, a VCR isn't going to give you the same 705x480 recording from 1 camera, never mind 8, 16, 32, or 64, and it won't be nearly as searchable.

      So, to do something remotely equivalent to a DVR for 8 camersa would require 12 tapes per day x 8 (1 per camera) x 30 days per month - in just 1 month you will have gone through 288 tapes. Now, instead of 8 cameras, make it 64. 2,304 tapes per month, plus you have to manually load, unload, label, log, and manually walk them to storage. If it takes 2 minutes to do each one, this will require 2 people, 24 hours a day (because 1 person, at 2 minutes per, would need a minimum of 128 minutes an hour, not counting pee and lunch breaks). The tapes can't be the dollar-store variety either, so even at $2/tape, your tape budget alone is $4,608, plus the cost of 2 employees x 3 shifts x 7 days ... even at minimum wage, they would be more expensive than just buying a couple of terrabyes of cheap raid (6 x 300 gig == 1 month storage for 64 cameras at 25 fps, for under a grand.)

      Plus, you can't just stack these tapes one on top of the other to the ceiling - you have to shelve them. That takes space, and climate control. 1 year's worth of tapes (27,648 tapes) takes up a LOT of room, compared to 72 hard disks, that can all fit in a single fireproof storage cabinet.

      And if you want to be doubly secure, you can mirror the hd offsite every day and still be well within your budget. A days recordings fit in your pocket on a single hd, or you can even send them over the net in real time for critical stuff. Try doing that with tape.

    20. Re:From TFA by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And anyone who requires access to the datacenter to do their job, such as operators and sysadmins, cannot DO their job unless they get the implant. And if they cannot do the job, how are they expected to maintain employment?

      I'm sure the company has other jobs which the people are qualified for and do not involve access to the datacenter. Only two employees got the chip, so surely there are available job positions which don't involve getting chipped.

      I suppose the official reason for termination would be "uncooperative attitude." Certainly not "he refused to get chipped." Or maybe the company will concentrate on ways to make the employee so miserable, he just quits. Problem solved.

      I doubt it. In either of those two situations the company would likely be responsible for paying unemployment compensation and/or severance pay. It seems like a much better solution for the company to just give the person an alternative job.

      Sure, the person might wind up getting passed over for the next promotion, but if the company is smart that's about the extent of it.

    21. Re:From TFA by sabre86 · · Score: 1

      You're going to need 3 people, by your numbers. 128 min /2 people/hr = 64 min/person/hr > 1 person/hr. Since you need more than an hours worth of time person for two people, you're going to need 3.

    22. Re:From TFA by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Require your employees to inject some chip to permanentally identify them before doing in depth research about them. Seriously, cloning the RFID chips was one of the first things that came to mind. You might as well use several levels of biometrics.

    23. Re:From TFA by pushf+popf · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I suppose the official reason for termination would be "uncooperative attitude." Certainly not "he refused to get chipped." Or maybe the company will concentrate on ways to make the employee so miserable, he just quits. Problem solved.

      When I was young and dumb, I was forced out of a job in exactly that way (made me so miserable, I quit). It turns out that's very common in some companies and keeps their unemployment insurance rates low.

      Later on, I learned that it was also illegal (at least here), although by that time I had lost interest in doing anything about it.

      I would also expect that being microchipped would have the Chritians up in arms over "The Mark of the Beast" (can't blame them on this one), and Jews (and possibly others) have a prohibition on body modification.

      I'm pretty much astonsished that anybody would actually require this, and given the bizzareness of the requirement, would be more likely to suspect that this is a troll

    24. Re:From TFA by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "To say nothing of employee's arms being taken and used to gain access."

      I hear this already happened. There was this guy I heard about, see, who met this nice looking woman in a bar. She invited him up to her room, spiked his drink with some kind of knock-out agent. When he woke up, he was in a bathtub full of ice and his arm was gone.

      (Yes, I'm joking.)

    25. Re:From TFA by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      I hear this already happened. There was this guy I heard about, see, who met this nice looking woman in a bar. She invited him up to her room, spiked his drink with some kind of knock-out agent. When he woke up, he was in a bathtub full of ice and his arm was gone.

      And the guy in the room next door was missing an arm and a kidney.

    26. Re:From TFA by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      That's one of the reasons why people are going all-digital.

      mp4 / h264 gives a good image and sound, random access, quick search, compact storage, easy backup in real time, remote viewing, simplified printing and emailing of the videos or pics, and no more "Mr. Roboto" bad '70s disco flashbacks like you get viewing timelapse tapes.

  4. Didn't you just post this? by ThoreauHD · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You guys needa start looking at yoru own stories, because I swear I read this yesterday.

    1. Re:Didn't you just post this? by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you check the article IDs? Each article admitted to /. is required to have an attached ID.

  5. The solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:The solution... by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ugh. I hate that site. Besides the fact that the IT section is full of spam telling me how I can work from home and make 3 million dollars a year, the site seems like it's always having troubles. I get runtime errors constantly while working on my resume. To hell with monster.com. Craigslist rules.

    2. Re:The solution... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Ugh. I hate that site."

      Me too. Those cables are way overpriced. :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:The solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? How the hell is this flamebait?

    4. Re:The solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For people in the uk reed.co.uk is a very nice site.

  6. Yeah that was ironical. by mfh · · Score: 4, Funny
    Rumour has it that a certain data center will be sued shortly for creating a hostile work environment. There's a few ways to slice this one:
    • employees will strongly dislike geeks from Slashdot following them around with RFID readers
    • employees will strongly dislike nosy reporters trying to get stupid interviews about what it felt like to have an RFID tag implanted (ie: "So what did it feel like when the cold steel of that needle intersected your unwilling arm, ma'am?"
    • employees will detest their weekly security update shots, along with subsequent track marks


    And then there is the whole magic marker circumvention method that is soon to be discovered (possibly within this thread).

    Oh wait...

    FTA: Ironically, the extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication.

    Yeah... I can't wait for the Diebold spin on this story.
    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Yeah that was ironical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about switching to biometrics instead? Having the chip injected doesn't change how it works.

      Why not just make them shove the cards up their behinds? That seems just as likely to prevent casual
      use or theft.

    2. Re:Yeah that was ironical. by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny
      • Employees were fed up of being charged for an extra 'phantom' tube of tomato puree every time they went grocery shopping
      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  7. Hey, doesn't anyone remember... by martinultima · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in the good old days, we used to just use duct tape and superglue to keep people from messing with our machines! (And I guess OpenBSD doesn't hurt either... ;-)

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  8. I think I'll prestate the sentiments of Slashdot. by captnitro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aw, hell no.

  9. I especially like... by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    the part about the VeriChip being sucsceptible to scanning and cloning.

    At least, it doesn't need to be cut out to be used by a sufficiently motivated attacker.

    1. Re:I especially like... by netwiz · · Score: 1

      Well, the same could be said about most ID badges that have some form of electronic identifier in them. Motorola makes the kit we use at the office. Pretty standard tech, and both systems can be defeated with directional antennas and patience. The only thing the implantation buys you is a slightly greater chance of getting hacked, as the employee will always have the badge on them, leaving them open to scanning just about any time.

    2. Re:I especially like... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is why I keep pressing my employer to not adopt RFID badges, and keep either the magnetic swipes or move to 2D barcodes. I have an inherent distrust of anything wireless, which is why I still have cables running from my mouse and keyboard, refuse to use Bluetooth, and use wireless only when I have to and even then almost exclusively in Linux (though with WPA/WPA2 and a nice, long, random shared key, it's not so bad). My current record in a lab for cracking 128-bit WEP is about 14 minutes, start to finish.

      Paranoid? Yeah, a bit. But then I've never had to worry much about someone intercepting my phone calls or passwords over the air.

      On the main topic, if no one is going to be fired for refusing, but part of their job is working on equipment in the datacenter, what happens?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:I especially like... by broller · · Score: 5, Funny

      So are you entering passwords or making phone calls with your mouse? I wasn't clear on that point.

    4. Re:I especially like... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      At least, it doesn't need to be cut out to be used by a sufficiently motivated attacker.

      No, but if you ever leave your job it needs to be cut out by a suitably skilled surgeon; leaving the bloody mess, the days/weeks of painful injury to the arm and then finally... a fucking scar!

      Actually, if they install it incorrectly they need to cut it out. If it moves, they need to cut it out. If it breaks down they need to cut it out. The list goes on.

      I wonder if WorkCover will compensate me for the "injury" sustained as a direct result of the installation of the device... oh, and also the injury sustained as a result of its removal. Those things occurred as a direct result of carrying out my job!

      I have seen the scars where other similarly sized implants have been removed from people, and it's not pretty. If the implant is installed incorrectly then it's even worse.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    5. Re:I especially like... by afidel · · Score: 1

      2D barcodes can be read optically and the technology to read magstripes is all but omnipresent. What you should be using is smartcards =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:I especially like... by radish · · Score: 1

      I can understand (not agree with, but understand) your paranoia when it comes to wireless data comms. But how on earth is an RF tag less secure than a mag stripe? A mag card can be cloned with a $50 card writer, a barcode with a photocopier. RFID is (currently) not so easy to clone and the equipment nowhere near as easy to find.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:I especially like... by MntlChaos · · Score: 1
      But how on earth is an RF tag less secure than a mag stripe?

      You need to physically hold the mag stripe to scan it to clone it. Not so for the RFID tag.
    8. Re:I especially like... by bigberk · · Score: 1

      Sidechannel attacks on smart cards, differential power analysis etc... none of this shit is secure, sorry.

    9. Re:I especially like... by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difference between mag stripe cards and RFID chips is that mag stripe cards cannot be read remotely. Your door access card is fairly safe, as long as you don't allow it to leave your possesion and don't run it through "strange" readers.

      Regardless of manufacturer's claims of "short ranges", hackers have successfully read RFID tags at distances of up to 69 feet. That means a van stopped near the office building's door could pick up a card being energized by the door's reader.

      Smartcards are definitely the route to take for "difficulty in cloning."

      --
      John
    10. Re:I especially like... by jcr · · Score: 1

      You know, people who know what they're doing employ real live security guards and introduce everyone who works in the facility to the guards, so that any random person with a badge can't just waltz right in. I've worked in places where they couldn't afford a guard on every door, so we had to both present a mag-stripe badge through a reader, and know a six-digit code that matched our badge to get in.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:I especially like... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      One thing I've seen used is RFID ID cards, for the purpose of clocking in/out and buying lunch (Credit system). Ro get into the datacentre you had to touch-in with your ID card, retina scan, walk past a receptionist, retina scan again, and then to get into the server room itself you touched in, retina scanned, and then handprint verified before you got into the 'airlock'. Inside the airlock, same again.

      Nothing injected, no real privacy concerns. The tag on the card only transmits an ID, the security database is needed for actual identification.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    12. Re:I especially like... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see that, but cost is an issue. Magstripe cards cost a couple of bucks; smartcards cost $15 or more plus the additional technologies involved, and across 15,000 employees, that becomes a major expenditure.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    13. Re:I especially like... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      We have a policy that covers accessing the various locations of the facility, and technically forbids piggybacking. When it's someone I work with, I'm generally fine with allowing access to the person if I've not been told that they were not supposed to be there, so long as he has his badge with him. This has created some friction with a colleague with whom I used to be on good terms; he forgot his badge and I refused to let him in, telling him to go to the Command Center to get a temp badge like policy requires (no one goes anywhere without a badge). He tried to get me to relent, and I wouldn't. I ended up getting commended for this by the facilities manager.

      Similar appreciation has been expressed because I stop anyone I don't know from entering doors where I'm not sure if they're allowed. I generally allow them to badge through first, verifying access. When people are around that I don't recognize but don't seem to be interested in going through the doors, I will open the door only enough for me to comfortably slip through (about two feet) and let it close rapidly behind me, paying attention to whether any hands slip through. If someone does want to get in, I will offer to go and find that person, but the visitor must remain outside of secure areas until I have found the person they seek.

      There's been talk of overhauling the security system. I'm hoping that they don't plan on getting proximity readers, but that seems to be popular.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    14. Re:I especially like... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I'm not as worried about the mouse, but there are times when it can hypothetically be used, such as when providing entropy to key-generating software, to reduce the complexity of a key crack attempt. Likely? No, it's not. I have probably a one in a billion chance of getting such attention in my life. But it still makes me uneasy, so I don't use it.

      Besides, corded mice don't get dead batteries.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    15. Re:I especially like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, corded mice don't get dead batteries.
      That's not paranoia, it's frugality. You're either backtracking or rationalizing.

      it can hypothetically be used, such as when providing entropy to key-generating software, to reduce the complexity of a key crack attempt

      So in other words, your answer was "entering passwords." Interesting.

    16. Re:I especially like... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      True. Then the bar code could be tattooed onto some place easy for the bar code reader to scan, like, say, the right hand, or possibly he forehead....

      I suppose that with the right inks that wouldn't even be particularly obvious. Possibly only emits IR under UV excitation.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:I especially like... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      So are you entering passwords or making phone calls with your mouse?

      Actually, several online banks are useing mouse entry of passwords as a way of thwarting key loggers.

      Try ING Direct, for example. They have fields where you type in your account number and a piece of personal info (ex: birth year), and then the pin entry is separate. For the pin entry, in order to circumvent key loggging, they show you a virtual keypad, and each digit on the keypad has a random letter assigned to it (ie: the letters are different every time you reload). They require you to either type the letters corresponding to you pin, or use your mouse to click the digits on the virtual keypad.

      HSBC is another one...in order to get into the section where you transfer money in and out of the account, you have an additional password, and they have a virtual keyboard on screen, and for this you are REQUIRED to use your mouse to click the letters of your 2nd password.

    18. Re:I especially like... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Read the post I just made about banks using mouse entry of password:
      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=177104&cid= 14705154

    19. Re:I especially like... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Call it rationalizing, then, because it's a secondary reason. I admit that I've been tempted by the latest versions of Logitech's wireless mice, especially after spending two hours rerunning all the cables around my desk.

      And my answer was not "entering passwords," as that's a separate step. There's a difference between gathering entropy and selecting a password. Technically, they're similar, but they are not exactly the same.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  10. this is interesting... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release.

    hahaha! Now implanting RFID tags is somewhat scary. How do you get it out without taking out a chunk of your biceps?

    1. Re:this is interesting... by Emor+dNilapasi · · Score: 1

      You don't. Removal requires (minor) surgery. Yum. See http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1756587,00.as p

    2. Re:this is interesting... by netwiz · · Score: 1

      And will the company cover the costs of extraction if you're separated from them in any way (fired, RIF, you quit, etc.) I can just imagine some poor dead schmuck's widow getting a bill for a $300 implantable RFID...

    3. Re:this is interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm approaching two dozen RFID chips in my biceps, and let me tell you -- the chicks dig it!

    4. Re:this is interesting... by njh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is possible to destroy the chip whilst it is in your arm, using something like a blast of suitable frequency microwaves.

      In any case, this sounds like fake-security. What reason would having an RFID tag attached to a person would make this more secure than just carrying a card. It's probably more an attempt to watch where employees go or something.

    5. Re:this is interesting... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Because ID cards can be stolen without drawing much attention. Stealing someone's implanted RFID tag would result in a would-be intruder getting a lot of unwanted attention.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    6. Re:this is interesting... by name773 · · Score: 1

      you can definitely destroy it while it's in someone's arm. collateral (sp?) damage is the only problem.

    7. Re:this is interesting... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      All they have to do is steat the radio signals.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    8. Re:this is interesting... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      But be sure to let us know if someone's removal surgery produces any devices which resemble insects.

    9. Re:this is interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pound of flesh, no more, no less.

    10. Re:this is interesting... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      stealing someones card would require that person to be careless or inattentive, cloning their RFID implant would require sitting next to them on the bus or walking past them as they approached the door. with a preset system you could even just walk a little quicker than them approaching the building, your electronic RFID reader/spoofer would copy the data off their RFID card as you walk past them and replay it to open the door once you get there.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:this is interesting... by fafalone · · Score: 1

      I'm approaching two dozen RFID chips in my biceps, and let me tell you -- the chicks dig it!

      I always wondered what happens when you cross a nerd and a heroin junkie.

    12. Re:this is interesting... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Sounds painful. I know I wouldn't want chicks trying to dig RFID chips out of my biceps.

    13. Re:this is interesting... by njh · · Score: 1

      well yes... one could incinerate the arm, for example. I was pondering something that destroyed the electronics but had no effect on the surrounding tissue. Considering how easy it is to destroy electronics using a suitably crafted emp I was thinking of a device that could be placed in a car outside the company and destroy all the rfids as they walk past.

    14. Re:this is interesting... by name773 · · Score: 1

      check out the wikipedia entry on rfid near the bottom, they have something on disabling them. i don't know anything about this stuff though

  11. does not require the microchips be implanted by still_sick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mmmm-hmmm...

    They won't require you to implant the chip to keep your job. But how long can you keep your job if you can't access the datacenter?

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They won't require you to implant the chip to keep your job. But how long can you keep your job if you can't access the datacenter?

      Depends on how good you are at hacking the datacenters firewall so you can get in to do your work.

    2. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      They won't require you to implant the chip to keep your job. But how long can you keep your job if you can't access the datacenter?

      Well I am keeping my fucking job - I refused to be implanted with anything for my employer. When they fire my ass for refusing to have body modifications (which, funnily enough, they expressly forbid in my contract of employment) I'll be taking the $100M compensation for unfair dismissal payout.

      They can't possibly force this - let-alone implement it. It breaks all the fundamental human rights laws.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    3. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by shawb · · Score: 1

      They will probably find another related job which does not require datacenter access for those employees who refuse the chip. However, any future employees would need to get the chip to get the job. Firing existing employees for refusal to get implanted would, IMO, be much more draconian and lawsuit-prone than not hiring someone for said refusal. Although this could get them in trouble for violating various disabilities acts if a person refuses due to a medical or psychological condition; I could see the implant contraindicated for people suffering from extreme hemophilia: The needles used for implants are huge, about 12gauge. For comparison that is about as big as the wire used in a standard chain link fence. And I'd imagine this would put undue stress on a potential employee with a clinically diagnosed phobia of needles.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    4. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      this could get them in trouble for violating various disabilities acts
       
      And religious discrimination too. Book of Revelations, "mark of the beast" and all that sort of thing.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    5. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure. They are bankrolling our congresscritters and our king after all. If they can require drug tests and DNA sampling, what's to stop them from requiring the mark of the beast (ie., RFID chips)?

    6. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by jambarama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah so everyone gives in and gets injected. What happens when someone LOSES their job? Surgery to remove the RFID chip? Reimplant everyone else with a new chip? It just doesn't seem workable.

    7. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by eurleif · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would assume each chip is given a unique ID. When an employee quits/is fired, the ID is removed from the scanner's list of people to let in.

    8. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by Baricom · · Score: 1

      I don't think these are the mark of the beast. Those come during the Tribulation, which many (but not all) Biblical scholars believe comes after the Rapture. It is possible, however, that the mark will be RFID implants. It's just not these implants.

      I still would quit my job if I was required to get chipped. I would cite privacy reasons and a fear of big needles.

    9. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by jcr · · Score: 1

      Oh, didn't you get the memo? The rapture already happened. Hardly anyone noticed, since there were only a couple of dozen actual Christians.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Drug tests and DNA samples can be taken non-intrusively.

      Chipping someone is a body modification that leaves a scar, and an even bigger one when you leave the company; do you really want to leave that chip in there forever even though it's "deactivated"? They will have a much harder time getting that past the hippies and the tin foil hat brigade.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    11. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      At this point, I'd never apply for the job in the first place. If this hits mainstream media, they're probably going to have a huge shortage of applicants very soon. (Unless they're weirdos who *want* RFID chips implanted in them.

    12. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      When they fire my ass for refusing to have body modifications (which, funnily enough, they expressly forbid in my contract of employment) I'll be taking the $100M compensation for unfair dismissal payout.

      You must be paid an awful lot if your employment contract is worth $100 million.

    13. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that helps when the box you're trying to fix needs to have its power supply replaced.

    14. Re: does not require the microchips be implanted by juan2074 · · Score: 1
      Where in the Bible is the Rapture mentioned exactly?
      Seriously, I have not seen it.

      But Revelation does mention Christians being beheaded.

  12. uh, no. by netwiz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Isn't this illegal? I was under the impression that forced surgery as a requirement for employment was against OSHA. Maybe I'm wrong. Altho, if you're in a right-to-work state, I can't see why they can't force this on workers. If you agree to it in a contract, well, you had your opportunity to decide against it.

    At the same time, where does this take us? More importantly, what new kinds of abuse will this bring about? I'm a bit spooked.

    1. Re:uh, no. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Troll
      Isn't this illegal? I was under the impression that forced surgery as a requirement for employment...

      Did you read the story? Obviously not. Because according to the story, it's not required to maintain employment. Of course Slashdot left that part out, knowing full well that 90% of the readers will be like you and jump to a conclusion, having not read the story...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:uh, no. by netwiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they didn't leave it out, and I did read the article. My comment was a question of the logical extention of this policy. More to the point, if they're only going to allow access to RFID-enabled employees, doesn't it seem kinda necessary that either 1) you will be implanted if your responsibilities include accessing the video library, or 2) you're going to lose that responsibility. I can't see the latter being a positive career move.

    3. Re:uh, no. by SagSaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Altho, if you're in a right-to-work state, I can't see why they can't force this on workers. If you agree to it in a contract, well, you had your opportunity to decide against it.

      IANAL, but "right-to-work" only means that a state's employment laws don't allow an employer to require that some/all employee's join the union. Even in a right-to-work state, a contract doesn't let an employer off the hook for unsafe working conditions.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    4. Re:uh, no. by netwiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, but what's the metric here? "Unsafeness?" How "unsafe" is getting an RFID implant? Is it then safe to assume that if something was sufficiently risk-free, that a potential employer could get away with making the employee submit to their wishes? How far might that go? And most importantly, who's deciding what's unsafe, and where's their money come from?

    5. Re:uh, no. by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny
      Because according to the story, it's not required to maintain employment.
      Of course it isn't... although we do appreciate good team players. And none of our other employees seem to mind. And frankly we're a little insulted by the implicit accusation that we'd ever abuse this power. It's not like you have something to hide... do you? Well, anyways, it's not a requirement, so here's the key to your new office. Go ahead and move the brooms and mops over to one side.
    6. Re:uh, no. by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      Okay, but what's the metric here?

      I don't know. My point was simply that the parent comment's assertion that right-to-work laws somehow give employees the ability to bargin away their right to a safe workplace, thus leading to a situation of "get chipped or don't work" that wouldn't be present in the absence of right-to-work laws.

      If implanting an RFID tag under an employee's skin doesn't fall under workplace safety laws, then the entire argument doesn't matter at all.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    7. Re:uh, no. by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      At least I still have my stapler...

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    8. Re:uh, no. by netwiz · · Score: 1

      My point was simply that the parent comment's assertion that right-to-work laws somehow give employees the ability to bargin away their right to a safe workplace

      Ah, but there's the rub, eh? They might not today, but those laws are created by legislators that get influenced by paid lobbyists, and corporations have a habit of spending money to influence government. I know this is a "slippery slope," but the possibility needs to be addressed.

    9. Re:uh, no. by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      The problem won't be maintaining employment. The problem is in ten years time when they want a new employee and they favor the employees that will have a chip to the point where it is an unwritten requirement.

      For instance, I answered an employment ad in the newspaper a few weeks ago. They sent me a pack to fill out to see if I would be suitable for an interview. This pack contained three forms for me to sign so they could access my credit record, criminal record, and previous employment records. The pack also asked me in five separate instances to declare any health condition, past or present. I went to the privacy commission who pointed me towards the privacy officer of the company who explained that the access was required for work at the company as it involved money and the occasional lifting of heavy objects.

      Thats all well and fine, but why do they need to have access to these things before the interview? Why do none of these forms have an end date? What do past health issues have to do with any employment I take?
       
      Asking about health problems in an interview for employment is illegal in New Zealand but it appears that, in an interview for an interview, it is not. In the end, I said that I wouldn't be requesting an interview as I didn't want to work for a company that required access to all my supposedly private information (permanantley) to just get an interview.

      I have no doubt that if I had returned the forms without signing them I would never have got to the interview stage to start with. I have no doubt that if I had received an interview but failed to get the job then those legally accessed records would have been kept.

      This is the sort of under the radar dealing that can lead to all people having to wear RFID tags, just so they can be employed. And once enough people have them, we all get used to it and its all right, no harm done. New Zealand has already embarked on a spate of social engineering through the media that currently paints me as child molesting/killer, smelly, unattractive, drunk, bad driver, racist, culture killing, drug using, unintelligent, sexist, woman bashing, unfit to be a father, and a worthless burden on society (Due to being a white smoking male). I don't want them to be able to the stores I go to, etc....Our governments are supposed to serve us, not use social engineering to further their ends and why a business (an entity without morals) should be allowed to track me in any way whatsoever is beyond me. There has to be trust, without it we are less than we were.

      OK, that was a little of topic. I must be in spiel mode.

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
    10. Re:uh, no. by netwiz · · Score: 1

      Asking about health problems in an interview for employment is illegal in New Zealand but it appears that, in an interview for an interview, it is not.

      If this is really illegal in your home country, alert the authorities. Be warned, though, that this might get your name on someone's blacklist.

      Ultimately, we must all be willing to die on that hill if we're to effect change.

    11. Re:uh, no. by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      Already did. They said that asking health questions in an interview (where it is job unrelated (not eyesight for pilots)) is illegal but since I wasn't in an interview this wasn't. As I am able to simply refuse to sign the forms, or answer the questions, without pressure (someone sitting there asking me to) then there isn't a clear illegality.

      In another unrelated event I was in a computer hardware shop "Super Cheap PC" (http://supercheappc.biz/site/) that refused to sell someone three hard drives because they wouldn't give their name, address, phone number and email. He walked out. Thats what started me thinking about how much information we give away.

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
    12. Re:uh, no. by dinog · · Score: 1
      No, of course we aren't going to fire you! (If we did, you could sue us, and collect unemployment.) Instead, we will simply tell you that since you are now taking less responsibility and doing less work, there will be an associated reduction in your pay. Let's see, you were making about $20/hour, but now you'll only get $5.35/hour, and of course we'll have to eliminate your health insurance, tuition reimbursement, amd also the company will no longer match your 401k contributions. Your job is safe with us! Oh, and by the way, since you won't be working on anything sensitive, you'll also loose your desk. You can report to work at the maintinance room tomorrow morning to be trained on the mop and broom. Since this is such a sudden change, we'll also have to adjust your hours. How does 10pm - 6am Tuesday through Sunday sound ?

      Aside from that, I've always wondered about certain security firms that pay their employees fairly low wages. It doesn't seem like that instills much loyalty, and an unloyal person with the appropriate badge AND insider knowledge is far worse for security than a lost badge.

      Dean G.

    13. Re:uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not like you have something to hide... do you? Well, anyways, it's not a requirement, so here's the key to your new office. Go ahead and move the brooms and mops over to one side.

      Well, okaay, but if this happens again I'm going to burn the building down.

    14. Re:uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean we get monday off? Sweet.

    15. Re:uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, of course we aren't going to fire you! (If we did, you could sue us, and collect unemployment.) Instead, we will simply tell you that since you are now taking less responsibility and doing less work, there will be an associated reduction in your pay. Let's see, you were making about $20/hour, but now you'll only get $5.35/hour, and of course we'll have to eliminate your health insurance, tuition reimbursement, amd also the company will no longer match your 401k contributions.

      Any of which individually would be considered "good cause" for quitting, and still getting unemployment compensation.

    16. Re:uh, no. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      In the end, I said that I wouldn't be requesting an interview as I didn't want to work for a company that required access to all my supposedly private information (permanantley) to just get an interview.

      This is the sort of under the radar dealing that can lead to all people having to wear RFID tags, just so they can be employed.

      Obviously not. Many people, just like you, will refuse and find another job.

      Implanted RFID tags aren't useful enough to companies, and they're too highly despised by workers, that there won't be at least some which don't require their employees to wear them. The only way that everyone is going to wear them is if the government *does* get involved, not if they stay out of things.

  13. Spell Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cincinnati.

    1. Re:Spell Check? by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It does not surprise me at all that this is in Cincinnati, which has a horrible anti-worker culture. Employees are considered far less valuable than office fixtures, pay is below the national average in all industries, and flexible time is a foreign concept. Most employers there resent the emancipation proclaimation. Without it, they wouldn't have to pay the drones at all. This attitude has even spilled over to the sports teams, who have lost a lot more often than they have won over the years due to skinflint ownership.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    2. Re:Spell Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Huh?

      I would LOVE to see you back up some of your claims: Employees considered less valuable than office fixtures? Pay below national average? Flexible time a foreign concept? Most employers resenting the emancipation proclaimation???

      How this got marked Interesting is beyond me! Having worked as both an employer and an empolyee in Cincinnati, I find this total garbage. Pay below the national average? Let's see, I had job offers in Cincinnati and in Silicon Valley for tech jobs, and EVERY Cincinnati offer beat EVERY California offer by a wide margin, despite the cost of living being a fraction in Cincinnati. Pay worked out to be approximately 40% more in Cincinnati, when factoring in the cost of living.

      And employers resenting the emancipation proclaimation???? Let's see... Cincinnati is in a NORTHERN state (duh, Ohio borders Canada), which was known as the slave freedom capital of the US. In fact, Cincinnati has the *Nation's* Museum dedicated to freeing the slaves (funded in great part by the PEOPLE of Cincinnati).

      Bengals were 11-5. So Cincinnati Employers must be racists? huh??? How you can extend sports results to a general statement about the city's employers (notably P&G, GE Aircraft Engines, Cintas, Kroger, Federated) is beyond me!

      Perhaps you'd see things differently if you removed your head from your arse.

    3. Re:Spell Check? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      New Hire: And, the benefits package"?

      CEO: *HWhat* benefits paykage?

      New Hire: Ess-skyuuz, me, suh, have you evuh heard of the Imasipayshu
      Proklumayshu?

      CEO (Gruff, fidgeting): ***III*** don't lissun to hip-hop... Now TAKE this job and this green glass capsule and SHOVE it. Here's your AT-RFID chip. Got see the insertion specialist..

      New Hire: Hwuss dat? Am I gohn get gayn-green in ma ass?

      CEO: No, it's medically and technically certified. It's the wave of the future (and my stocks will grow an ASSload): Ass-Trackin' RearFinder/Intrusion Detection. We can track yo ass day or night......

      ========
      Now, the boss really has a hand in/up your ass. You screw up, your ass really IS glass...

      At least now, when someone wands your ass up close, it means what want a piece of your ass, but not the way you think. Sometimes, traditions CAN change...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:Spell Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How this got marked Interesting is beyond me! Having worked as both an employer and an empolyee in Cincinnati, I find this total garbage. Pay below the national average? Let's see, I had job offers in Cincinnati and in Silicon Valley for tech jobs, and EVERY Cincinnati offer beat EVERY California offer by a wide margin, despite the cost of living being a fraction in Cincinnati. Pay worked out to be approximately 40% more in Cincinnati, when factoring in the cost of living.


      You're full of shit. I've lived here for years and one of our major problems (aside from the crime issue within city limits) has been keeping quality personnel. Yes the cost of living here is lower than average, but the salary averages here are also lower. I've worked in Boston, Phoenix, Bothell, and Hartford. Cincinnati pretty much sucks (yes, that's taking into consideration cost of living). The corporate mindset here is from the 70's. I've spoken to a few P&G buddies and their stories of woe are hysterical. How General Electric stays in business is beyond me. (They'd better hope military spending doesn't go down!)

      Cincinnati is all about old money and lack of innovation.. which is why I'm about to egress the situation here. Have a great time when the next riots hit!
    5. Re:Spell Check? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1
      Can you name a city that has two police unions: One for white cops and another for black cops? I can. Cincinnati, Ohio.

      White cops are in the FOP, but because of institutional racism black cops had to form their own union, The Sentinels. The divide between the two is so great that each endorsed a different candidate for mayor in the last election. Cincinnati Sucks! If you don't get that, you are either at the top of the food chain exploiting people, delusional, or such a homer that you think where you are is the center of the universe.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  14. Maybe they're right by HeavensBlade23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this what the Christians have been saying was going to happen for the past 20 years now? Of course, it's not the governing that's forcing the chips on people, but it's only a matter of time.

    1. Re:Maybe they're right by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, sorta; one idea is that the mark of the beast could be an implantable device. But to qualify as the mark of the beast it would need to be in the right hand or forehead, you'd have to have one to be able to buy or sell anything, and you'd have to sell your soul to the devil when you accepted it.

    2. Re:Maybe they're right by symbolset · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a Visa card?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Maybe they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a point of information, the actual reference is from the book of Revelations.
      Revelations 13:11-18:
        11Then I saw another beast, coming out of the earth. He had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon. 12He exercised all the authority of the first beast on his behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed. 13And he performed great and miraculous signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth in full view of men. 14Because of the signs he was given power to do on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth. He ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. 15He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
        18This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.

      I was a Christian for many years, and if I learned nothing it's that there is a LOT of disagreement about the interpretation of Revelations. More disagreement than any other part of the Bible (and there's plenty of disagreement about other parts). Some thought Hitler was on of the beasts mentioned. Others may try to map it to other world leaders, while still others think it's much more metaphorical and does not really map to people/groups = beasts.
      But, those who do think that "the end is near" due to some sort of interpretation that maps Revelation to modern occurances tend to be kind of crackpots (IMHO), that is ultra-conservative Jerry Folwell or Pat Robertson types. Often this is used as motivation to believe or believe more strongly in Christianity.

    4. Re:Maybe they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's only bad when accepting it as part of employment conditions at Microsoft?

    5. Re:Maybe they're right by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What makes you think there has to be some sort of distinction between a company or coroporation, and a modern government?

      What's the difference, really? A government is a corporation of a sort: there to make money and power while giving the perception (as much as possible) of viable services. If the shit hits the fan on a global or national scale, there will be many corporations with resources which the government doesn't have. Really, the main distinction is that the government has guns - and there are many corporations which have quite a few of those.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    6. Re:Maybe they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mouse is in my right hand, and my monitor is shining on my forehead. Does that count?

    7. Re:Maybe they're right by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's not the governing that's forcing the chips on people, but it's only a matter of time.

      Where have you been? Corporations are calling the shots - and look at the companies site:

      http://www.citywatcher.com/

      They are in the business of spying on the public at large, for a fee. That scares me even more; it sets up the economic incentive to turn people in for the most minor crimes and maybe more laws. It only makes sense, it looks as if either Big Brother or some other fantasy dystopia is coming sooner than we hoped.

    8. Re:Maybe they're right by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a believer but this stuff is scary! Luckily an RFID with the same number in everyone is useless as RFID :)

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    9. Re:Maybe they're right by Dunkirk · · Score: 1

      Twenty years? Try about 2000. BUT! It's only now that we have the technology to put some "thing" in the hand or forehead that could be used to "buy or sell." And, if you've been paying attention to this sort of thing, you would see that there's been a lot of activity on this front over the past few years that hasn't made mainstream media, or Slashdot either, for that matter. All the pieces are in place, but I personally don't believe that identification will be the avenue where it becomes commonplace. I think there will be too much resistance to a government-sponsored move to this sort of thing. I could rightly claim that it violates my freedom of religion. No, I think it's all about credit fraud.

      Think about it. We're already to a point with credit cards that, in some places, you can just tap the machine with your card, and get authorization. If someone steals your card, they don't even have to sign anything now. (And not that this was a deterent anyway, but that's another web page.) But the point is that we're removing any vestiges of a two-factor system of authentication. Once this is gone, and credit fraud rises commesurately with it, the credit companies are going to demand to go back to a second "factor," and this will be the obvious technology to do that with. In fact, they'll say, it's two factors in one, and just as fast as the previous system. And then what started out as a good idea will then become legislated. Like the DMCA.

      Well, anyway. Just one person's opinion.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    10. Re:Maybe they're right by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      You forgot a couple zeroes on your year-estimate there. ;)

    11. Re:Maybe they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, unfortunately it's a pretty thorough misinterpretation of Jewish symbolism by /some/ Christians.

      The mark on the head and the hand refers to having the mark in your thoughts and your deeds.

    12. Re:Maybe they're right by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      What makes you think there has to be some sort of distinction between a company or coroporation, and a modern government?

      Governments tend to have much less competition. Really that's about it, though. Both can be seen as voluntary - I could move to another country (or even out onto the high seas), and I can change my employer/vendors/etc., but changing employers is something that I've actually done a lot of times, changing my country is not.

      Really, the main distinction is that the government has guns - and there are many corporations which have quite a few of those.

      The real power of the government nowadays isn't so much the guns as it is the information - and corporations have quite a bit of that.

    13. Re:Maybe they're right by aallan · · Score: 1

      That needs to be in the forehead, or the left hand, like this guy...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    14. Re:Maybe they're right by Gnight · · Score: 1
      A government is a corporation of a sort: there to make money and power...

      I think you mean spend money.
    15. Re:Maybe they're right by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      New Testament - Revelations - the Mark of the Beast.
      Try this for size - google for these three words: digital angel track

    16. Re:Maybe they're right by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No. Governments make money. They consume wealth, but they *make* money. And they forbid anyone else making money. At least they used to, until trading stamps became popular in the 1950's. Now they only seem to forbid calling what you make money, rather than coupons, or forging it (i.e., imitation).

      WRT: "forbid anyone else making money": Even before 1950 banks were allowed to lend more money than they had on deposit. (1/2 again as much? I forget.) Of course, they don't check this carefully, so banks sometimes lend many times as much as they have on deposit. This occasionally gets them in trouble. And credit cards have essentially lifted the government's ability to print official currency, since more and more money only exists in electronic form. One may speculate that our entire economic system may be in an extremely unstable "equilibrium", but I don't know of any proof, one way or the other. (The closest I can think of, Enron, didn't collapse the economy, though it bankrupted thousands of people and severely injured at least hundreds of thousands, if not millions. This would seem to indicate that the system is much more stable than I would have guessed.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:Maybe they're right by sinucus · · Score: 1

      It all depends on what you call the devil, right? Don't we all call Microsoft the devil? If MS started implanting RFID chips to get into THEIR datacenter would that be the true mark of the beast?

  15. Well, it's Slashdot by 1310nm · · Score: 5, Funny

    It might actually double the victim's bicep circumference.

    1. Re:Well, it's Slashdot by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1
      It might actually double the victim's bicep circumference.

      Damn, that's got to be some tiny implant!

    2. Re:Well, it's Slashdot by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      Or it might just get lost in a sea of flab. How good of an insulator is fat?

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
    3. Re:Well, it's Slashdot by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      So what if you implant it somewhere with a little less, umm, circumference than a bicep? Will that double?

      New spamming tactic: Get Yer Remotely Readable Implant Here! Transmit Yer Vital Statistics to Women up to 69 Feet Away! Double your...aww, nevermind

  16. Don't panic by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    This is just one private company making an internal policy change. If it was a government doing it there would be cause to worry.

    1. Re:Don't panic by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      If it was a government doing it there would be cause to
      worry.
      Are you kidding? Some federal chucklehead is going to read this and think "cool beans, I bet we can get a shitload of funding to implement this."

      I mean seriously... If you work for the CIA, you're not allowed to tell anyone where you really work. You think they wouldn't implement something like this and then tell everyone to STFU about it?
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Don't panic by cunamara · · Score: 1

      Precedent is a dangerous thing, and this is precedent.

    3. Re:Don't panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear what you're saying, but an overwhelming majority of agency officers are overt, and even many of the blackest of black in the clasdestine service can become overt upon resignation/retirement. The longer you're in the easier it becomes because you've likely been declared to a number of foreign services anyway. Cover is an offensive tool, not defensive mechanism.

    4. Re:Don't panic by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Nope, then it would be too late to worry.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    5. Re:Don't panic by Somegeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the CIA is going to want thier agents permanantly broacasting a message that says 'hey I work for the CIA' to anybody that has the desire and technology to listen.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    6. Re:Don't panic by bigpat · · Score: 1

      I don't think the CIA is going to want thier agents permanantly broacasting a message that says 'hey I work for the CIA' to anybody that has the desire and technology to listen.

      Interesting, clearly this presents a national security reason everyone should be tagged. Otherwise it will be too easy to pick out the government agents.

  17. What about the transhumanists? by Cybert14 · · Score: 1

    Kevin Warwick used an implantable RFID chip as an example of early transhumanist technology. I'm sure a lot of Slashdot eagerly awaits transhumanism.

    1. Re:What about the transhumanists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Kevin Warwick is a cunt. If I put a TV in the oven, am I a Transovenist?

    2. Re:What about the transhumanists? by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Transhumanism, no; Post-human Singularity, yes.

      Mandatory tracking chips are double-plus ungood as long as we've still got our evolutionary baggage working against us. It'll be a few decades before we can necessarily remove the evil primate bits out of our old bio-brains, and have enough intelligence to understand the (un)intended consequences to what we think of this improved "humanity".

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:What about the transhumanists? by Cybert14 · · Score: 1

      I talked a bit with Tyler Emerson at the singinst.org about this. I think we can augment ourselves even as we work the other way to build a posthuman from scratch.

      Good job nearing the $100k challenge, guys.

    4. Re:What about the transhumanists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're posting drivel like that on Slashdot on a Saturday night, I'm pretty sure you're not a Transcuntalist.

    5. Re:What about the transhumanists? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      It ain't transhumanism until I can make a pun about the "USB human interface device" driver.

    6. Re:What about the transhumanists? by Ian_FBNS · · Score: 1

      "what about the transhumanists?" - we are quietly amused. Just wait till you see the luddites react when we we get a ten foot killer robot that we can be uploaded into... :)

    7. Re:What about the transhumanists? by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Man do you ever think small. Go Metric (at the least). A ten meter killer body, now thats worth something. Personally I reckon humanoid forms are overrated. I'll take a 10 Km (a side) cube any day.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    8. Re:What about the transhumanists? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Then you'll be on the wrong end of my D-Gun, Core scum!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:What about the transhumanists? by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      And you think so 3-dimensional. I'll take a hypercube...

    10. Re:What about the transhumanists? by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Funny


      And you think so 3-dimensional. I'll take a hypercube...


      You gotta be careful with those. You think refolding a roadmap is tricky...

      I refolded my hypercube in the wrong order and ended up in Poughkeepsie in 1878. That was embarrassing.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    11. Re:What about the transhumanists? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      For the Arm! Preserve our humanity!

      --
      SRSLY.
  18. I'm sorry... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    ... but, no.

    Unless and until the pointy hair managers can guarantee that the RFID tag that they force me to implant in my body will never be used for purposes other than those which I agree to, I will refuse to succumb to their idioitic desires for control of my body.

    Before you ask, any company those does this to its employees, is a company I would never even consider working for.

    1. Re:I'm sorry... by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      You would allow them to do that off a guarentee.
      That's pretty trusting of you.
      I'm not sure how valid it is to go by that, considering that non-fiction works are no longer fact checked,
      Banks are putting rfid tags into credit/atm cards and allowing unsigned purchases under a certain amount,
      AND a number of companies have been busted for patent infringements recently.
      It sounds to me like a lot of the things you used to be able to trust are turning around and kicking people in the head.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    2. Re:I'm sorry... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Before you ask, any company those does this to its employees, is a company I would never even consider working for.

      Its funny. I have a friend with a touch of obsessive compulsive disorder. About three years ago he resigned from a job at one of the less well regarded employers in town on the grounds that under new security requirements he would have had to give them his fingerprints.

      I told him he was mad, that giving people your fingerprints is worth it for having a job. Now he is still out of work and I am imagining myself in his position. There is just no way I would allow people to implant me with this stuff. William Gibson writes about this kind of thing but I didn't expect to see it too soon.

      Maybe the implant will have "loyalty" functions for people who leave without giving notice.

    3. Re:I'm sorry... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe the implant will have "loyalty" functions for people who leave without giving notice.

      Leave the spin at the door and just call it a "killswitch."

    4. Re:I'm sorry... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Maybe the implant will have "loyalty" functions for people who leave without giving notice.

      Hehe, like exploding in your arm and giving you an aneurysm?

      Admittedly easy to pick up in an autopsy, but interesting from a tin-foil hat standpoint.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    5. Re:I'm sorry... by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      I read his comment as meaning "verifiable guarantee" rather than "personal assurance".

      Big difference in the two. The latter can be assumed to be given, the former... not so much.

    6. Re:I'm sorry... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      You would allow them to do that off a guarentee. That's pretty trusting of you.

      You're right. It was late when I wrote that and I didn't think it through completely.

      Now that I have had the time to think about it more, my response would change to NFW.

  19. Did you read the story? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Informative
    Shouldn't be legal to require this...

    The story reads that it's not required to maintain employment. But, then again, most jobs in the US are "at will" anyway...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Did you read the story? by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is why unemployment laws allow people to quit and still claim unemployment if the conditions of their employment change, instead of if they just get layed off. Because, then no one would be laid off. The company would just make people they don't want anymore, for example, work for minimum wage cleaning toilets for 5 hours a week, 3 am to 4 am, with no benefits.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    2. Re:Did you read the story? by dotmax · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what the effective difference is. One may reasonably presume that access to the secure data center is a requirement of certain jobs. One may further presume that the ability to perform certain jobs, such as those requiring access to the secure data center, will be necessary requirements for promotion and advancement.

      Ergo, while one may not be required to have a transponder as a condition of employment, it will almost certainly be a requirement for advancement. Requiring an unnecessary medical procedure for professional advancement seems pretty coercive to me, prima facie.

      Somewhat more speculative: Given the standards and criterea for things workplace sexual harrasment and hostile work environments, i think the company is hanging it's willie waay out there and will likely have it cut off. It should be easy to prove defacto compulsion after one or two performance reveiw cycles.

      Simalarly speculative is the obvious prediction that there will be the multi billion dollar damage award to the first employee to suffer having his arm cut off (or simply cut open) by someone seeking unauthorized access to the facility. A clever employee could probably sue right now and bankrupt the company.

  20. I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by scotty1024 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But now they want to chip us like dogs too?

    What's next, kibble in the break room vending machines?

    1. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      But now they want to chip us like dogs too?

      What's next, kibble in the break room vending machines?


      You mean you get kibble in the break room? Were lucky if the VPs leave a few crumbs.....

    2. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not such a bad idea. The treats I use to reward my dog are currently worth more than the stock options my employer uses to reward me.

    3. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Or how about those electronic collars that shock a dog by remote control? Your master can zap you whenever you need "correction"...

    4. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by photoflyer · · Score: 1

      It's called Soylent Green.

    5. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, kibble in the break room vending machines?

      Next? I see you have never eaten out of a breakroom vending machine.

    6. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, that's what that stuff is.

    7. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Well, if you don't like it, you can apply for an "elite" job at a place like Google, with round upon round of interviews, trick questions, quizzes on everything from grade school to graduate school, psycho evaluation, IQ test, blood test, physical endurance test, gene test, hand-eye coordination test. Your credentials will be verified by 5 independent and competing with each other companies, and if their reports do not match each other, you will be rejected.

      So "if you have what it takes" you can have a job for a human. Otherwise...say hello to your kibble bowl fucker. Ahahaha.. you deserve it.

    8. Re:I always knew Management worked us like dogs... by aeoo · · Score: 1

      oops... my sarcasm end tag got chewed up by Slashdot. :) I hope people can understand it was a tongue-in-cheek post.

  21. Why? by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not understanding the point here. If you inject the RFID chip, you can theoretically track your users wherever they go. But you can't ensure that access isn't being granted to someone who has an RFID chip in their wallet. You are making it slightly harder to steal the data, but you're not making it any harder to clone the chip.

    What's the security benefit to injected RFID?

    BTW, this is the original article.

    1. Re:Why? by Maximalist · · Score: 1

      Great analysis. This is stupid half-thought-through security theater. I wonder what numbskull consultant gave them that idea, and how many thousands of dollars the company spent for it...

    2. Re:Why? by netwiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not even really improving the security at all. Most of these types of devices get a short burst of RF at the reader which serves two purposes, one to provide raw power for the device (a la crystal radios), and one to signal the device to request it's ID. The device gets just enough power from the input signal to do a lookup and squirt back it's code just before it dies. The trick is, so long as you're willing to wait for someone to use the door, a directional antenna will pick up the conversation nicely. Once you've got a sample of the door's signal (they broadcast continuously), you can use the same directional to trigger the victim's ID unit remotely. Since normal badged users won't have the badge on them at all times, you couldn't get the code by following them in public. The RFID guy on the other hand, well, he's a different story. you could snag codes from him all day by just hanging nearby as he goes in/out of stores, Wal-Mart, etc.

      So in the end, the RFID makes things worse by imcreasing the level of access to the device itself.

    3. Re:Why? by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What's the security benefit to injected RFID?"

      It probably gets the CIO a bonus. That's the way these things work in corporations. It has nothing to do with whether it's effective or not. It benefits the ruling class and you have no need to know why or how. Do it or hit the road.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuz, dude, it's freaking Neuromancer-level awesome, dude.

      Look, you're a pissant IT guy at some pissant Cincinatti company. You're not exactly impressing the ladies, you know. Now, you walk into a bar: "[sniiiiff] Yyyyep, well, got this ol' microchip implanted in my body...yyyeah, I'm practically a cyborg. You, ah, you ever made it with a cyborg, baby?"

    5. Re:Why? by jerryasher · · Score: 1

      People laugh at me when I tell them about my "resume theory of management", which is that you are doing something stupid because some manager somewhere gets to put on his resume "implemented $5,000,000 system that does X!", and next year they get to say, "implemented $1,000,000 cost savings system".

    6. Re:Why? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Informative

      >What's the security benefit to injected RFID?

      If your threat model is someone walking into the data center with a lost/stolen/borrowed badge then requiring them to be injected does address the threat. But then so would issuing tokens in the form factor of a ring, except for the "borrowed" token problem.

      So, if you don't know that RFID chips can be cloned, if you don't know that they transmit the same number every time they're pinged, if you don't know that they can be read remotely and cloned at leisure, and if you have contempt for your employees and are oblivious to human rights, you might come up with a requirement for injected RFID.

      I sincerely hope that whoever came up with this isn't one of my colleagues in security consulting.

    7. Re:Why? by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot about the "guy that owns this company knows the guy at the RFID tracking system company"
      angle entirely.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    8. Re:Why? by njyoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In other words, a more casual thief who knows little to nothing about RFID. He has to know how to clone it and your average thieve doesn't know how to do that. I love it when so-called "security experts" overlook the obvious because they think that security risk asessment means assuming that they must assume all of their attackers are very sophisticated.

      Of course, being ignorant of RFID, you also didn't know that there are cryptographic forms of RFID. These don't transmit the same number every time they're pinged. So, of course, you have no idea what you're talking about. Using non-off-the-shelf and/or expensive technology which takes a great degree of sophistication to develop, you can crack after many hours of computation.

      But hey, you're the security expert, this is probably all trivial with the latest RFID cracking and cloning devices you can buy at Wal-Mart.

      Now the real question is, does VeriChip use cryptography? I know the answer, but it's clear you didn't even bother to check before making your generalizations.

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except obviously you don't realize that RFID chips can contain a private key, and answer questions from the door other device with a signed answer. This makes it impossible to clone one of these chips without brute force hacking it, assuming it will securely keep its private key. Snooping on one of these guys won't help you at all.

    10. Re:Why? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Bingo. As a middle manager the only way you can move up is to be responsible for more and more money. As a middle manager it never pays to save money, in fact it can hurt your career. They quickly get in the habit of buying the most expensive solution possible and when it doesn't work they blame the consultants they paid 500 dollars an hour for and fire five people. If they listened to the grunts on the ground they would have saved a ton of money and it would have acutually worked.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The tags work at 134 kHz; a directional antenna would be about the same size as Manhattan. But yes, the read range goes up when another reader powers the tag.

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's called man in the middle attack, and is VERY easy to do:

      Normally: door reader - chip in arm

      you make it:

      door reader - hacker chip - radio - radio - hacker reader @Walmart - chip in arm of employee shopping @ Walmart

      You talk to the door, and forward everything to the legitimate chip elsewhere ;)

    13. Re:Why? by sfurious · · Score: 1

      We're talking a datacentre. I'd be interested to know what proportion of datacentre break-ins are to steal equipment, and what proportion are to steal/modify data. The latter is likely to involve a fair degree of sophistication.

    14. Re:Why? by queazocotal · · Score: 1
      There are dumb tags, that just spit out their serial number on being powered.

      Then, you can spend the extra $2/tag or so, and get ones with internal writable storage, and SHA or other hashing algorithms in.

      Personally - I'd be quite happy with an implanted tag - as long as I was able to turn off and on the contained authorisation tokens (those with the correct keys would be able to delete, but not enable tokens), and could add new ones of my own, for car, laptop, phone, ...

      Unfortunately, the standards for this are not there yet.

      Not to mention I'd want full medical cover, and life insurance of say $10M, for any complications due to the tag.

    15. Re:Why? by makomk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except obviously you don't realize that RFID chips can contain a private key, and answer questions from the door other device with a signed answer. This makes it impossible to clone one of these chips without brute force hacking it, assuming it will securely keep its private key. Snooping on one of these guys won't help you at all.

      Who says you need to clone it? Just have (say) a babe in a bar next to the chipped person with a hidden device imitating the door reader, and someone at the door with a device imitating the chip, linked with mobile phones (or other communication device). Door sends challenge to chip-imitator, it's transmitted over to the real chip, which sends a correct response back. Response is returned to chip-imitator, transmitted to door, and you're in.

      Besides, it looks like these chps *might* be just simple IDs (cryptography is more expensive - needs more on-board hardware, and more power, which isn't easy since the power has to be transmitted wirelessly).

    16. Re:Why? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "So, if you don't know that RFID chips can be cloned"

      What about RFID chips that use a coded response based on a key that the interrogator sends? Then the RFID is not merely a value that can be read, but a device with complex behavior. Presumably using a brute-force method of giving it all possible inputs would take hundreds of years, or the device would detect this and permanently deactivate itself (it has no real-time clock so it can't merely timeout).

    17. Re:Why? by jdludlow · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on everything except the "human rights" part. This is not even remotely a human rights issue. It's a company making a stupid decision. Employees don't like it, they quit, they bring their talent to a different corporation. The market takes care of this.

    18. Re:Why? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That implies that they aren't read with a directional signal. Which makes things easier.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re:Why? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Door sends challenge to chip-imitator, it's transmitted over to the real chip, which sends a correct response back. Response is returned to chip-imitator, transmitted to door, and you're in.

      That wouldn't work with the passive ones. They burst, then listen. There is a small guardband, but if your induced delay is more than 40 ms or so, the system I worked with wouldn't hear the response. It is not correct to say that they are transmitting all the time. They are pulsing constantly. If the system is designed for tight security, they won't accept an answer multiple cycles later than the question was asked. Though, the system I worked with didn't care a bit about security, so everything was transmitted in the clear and the response could be delayed and the system wouldn't care in the least. But you'd still have to synchronize the response with the pulsing of the reader.

    20. Re:Why? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But you can't ensure that access isn't being granted to someone who has an RFID chip in their wallet.

      You could make a dual-mode chip that sensed electrical signals and transmitted some data about the electricity via RFID. So, all you have to do it slightly electrocute the employee when he grabs an electrode on the access verification station and read the signal propagation characteristics from the RFID chip and model it against natural capacitance/body mass index of the employee. That might take more power inside the RFID chip, so you should probably power it with a radioisotope thermal generator to be sure.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  22. Religious Objection by Shky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could someone object on the basis of religious discrimination if they believe that RFID implants constitute the "Mark of the Beast"?

    --
    CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    1. Re:Religious Objection by Bodysurf · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "Could someone object on the basis of religious discrimination if they believe that RFID implants constitute the "Mark of the Beast"?"

      I would imagine it would be just like the article stated: They can't/won't force you, but if you refuse, you don't get acccess to the datacenter. Just like the Mark of the Beast "... no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or name of the beast, or the number of his name."

    2. Re:Religious Objection by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not that I'm typically very religious or anything but:

      It seems to me that it would be a little hard to claim that this, or a good many of the other things that people have pointed too, constitutes the mark of the beast.

      1. It is in the bicep region, not the forehead or right hand;
      2. It is not a name nor the number 666
      From the book of revelations:

      13:16 He causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slave, to be given marks on their right hands, or on their foreheads;

      13:17 and that no one would be able to buy or to sell, unless he has that mark, the name of the beast or the number of his name.

      I'm not sure what edition the above is from but it is plain English and close enough for this discussion.

      13:18 Here is wisdom. He who has understanding, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six hundred sixty-six.

      On a side note: always wondered about making a program to compute all the possible combinations of the Jewish alphabet that adds up to 666 (filtering out all the nonsense ones of course). Someone must have done this somewhere already.

      Merlin.

    3. Re:Religious Objection by Shky · · Score: 1

      I totally get what you're saying--that they can't fire you--but if your job involved the datacenter, and they move you elsewhere based on your objection, you could essentially be forced to quit. If your new position is something you did not join the company to do, and you don't like it, you're not going to want to stay. And if you seriously object to this (my post was modded funny, and it was meant mostly in jest, but some could really have a problem with it) then you might be inclined to take legal action, wanting to keep your original position.

      --
      CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    4. Re:Religious Objection by bblboy54 · · Score: 1

      "He who has understanding, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six hundred sixty-six."

      The first requirement is to have understanding. We cant say at this point that we have FULL understanding of what is in that chip. Every UPC code on products today contain three sixes. Looking at a bar code, there is a set of longer bars at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end which are not represented by the numbers marked. It is the same pattern on all UPC codes and, the binary representation of this number is "6" ... No one really knows why the number 6 was chosen to represent the beginning and ends of number sets, but it was and does put us close the mark of the beast.
      Is this RFID or the UPC codes the mark... I doubt it... but someone will have to look at all possible ways of having some type of a code in the RFID, which we dont yet know. Anyway you look at it, it's bringing us alot close to the mark.

    5. Re:Religious Objection by vux984 · · Score: 1

      It is in the bicep region, not the forehead or right hand;

      Note to Satan, avoid foreheads or right hands. The left hand, biceps, or chin are all good canditates - any suspician that it might be the mark of the beast can be easily "proved" to be otherwise this way.

      It is not a name nor the number 666

      Note to Satan, send flowers to John - he's really got them fixated on the sixes, but we could totally slide this in by using sevens. Hey, have you heard about those new fangled RFIDs? You can even read them by remote!!

    6. Re:Religious Objection by Aqws · · Score: 1

      Sorda wierd, I think the Mark of the Beast can be 666 or 616. Go figure. Something I'll think about at 6:16.

    7. Re:Religious Objection by thehickcoder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OT but,

      Since the book of Revelation is in the New Testament not the Old Testament, it doesn't make sense to think 666 is as a hebrew number. Instead, you should picture it as a roman numeral, in which case it is the roman equivalent if 54321 (500+100+50+10+5+1) or DCLXVI.

    8. Re:Religious Objection by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you think about it, Satan wouldn't have any need to be subtle about it. People will know it matches up with Revelation. They simply won't care because they don't believe the prophecy in the first place --- and perhaps they'll be so hostile to the idea of God that they'll gladly take a mark that shows that hostility. There's no need at all for the meaning to be obfuscated.

    9. Re:Religious Objection by Sterling2p · · Score: 1
      I've also thought about the idea of 666 being the roman numberal equivilant ( DCLXVI ) as someone else posted.

      We have to contend with Rev 13:13 as well. Where the beast performs great miracles, and causes fire to come down to earth in view of men. Also, this beast is the second one. The one before is the beast out of the Sea and before that we have the dragon. So you may want to call it the third beast.

      All this stuff seems to be bringing us closer, but we are not quite there with this news story, IMHO.

    10. Re:Religious Objection by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      666 (or more accurately 616) is the hebrew numerological code for the name of the Roman emperor Nero. Nothing more, nothing less. Look it up. Revelations was about Nero persecuting the Christians, nothing more.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    11. Re:Religious Objection by phauxfinnish · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a side note: always wondered about making a program to compute all the possible combinations of the Jewish alphabet that adds up to 666 (filtering out all the nonsense ones of course). Someone must have done this somewhere already.

      Why the Jewish alphabet? The Revelation was written in Greek.

    12. Re:Religious Objection by phauxfinnish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, but I have to call bullshit on the barcode/666 thing. We'll let this article on Snopes take care of that.

      Contrary to popular myth, no bar code includes the number 666. This belief arose because the number six is represented by a pattern similar to that of the guard bars used to mark the beginning, middle, and end of every bar code. Since the guard bars always appear three times in a given bar code, people who mistakenly read them as sixes claimed that the pattern 6-6-6 was embedded in every bar code. However, if you look closely at the '6' in a bar code, you will see that there is a wide white bar either to the left or the right of its pattern (depending upon where within the bar code the number is positioned), which is not the case with the guard bars.

      Not only are the guard bars not used as digits, if they were they would not be proper 6's anyway. The whitespace in barcodes is not insignficant.

    13. Re:Religious Objection by teknickle · · Score: 1

      I did a quick google on it.
      You are off a bit.
      The original writings were in Aramaic, not Hebrew.
      Nero was already dead when that text was written.
      (and I did also read of 'mark of the beast' being the image of Nero on coins....but WTF does that have to do with 'back of hand' or 'forehead').

      I also found references to a 606. Maybe my NewBalance shoes is what is being refered to?

      There is just SO MUCH info out there (and 98% of it is bullshit) it is hard to sift through. You could spend years of your life digging through this and still come to no firm conclusion.

      In the end, it is solely a MATTER of FAITH. How much do you believe in the research of XXX or ZZZ when you do not have the original works in your possession or the knowledge of the dead Aramaic language to translate.

      Like evolution, this is not just about science; every step cannot be verified or proved. Most is left to trust (aka faith).

      (ok, just to pre-empt the BS lines from carbon dating...I was a nat-sci undergrad and know damn well that C-13 levels decaying to C-12 rely upon the HUGE ASSUMPTION that current present levels of C13/C12 were at the same levels of today. IMPOSSIBLE to know. And forget geological dating. It is for reference points and cannot be used to prove or disprove carbon dating..)

    14. Re:Religious Objection by bigberk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who needs a religious grounds? I object on the basis of you being fscking insane to wanna stick me with a computer chip. You nutcase... can I keep working here without being poked? No, alright fsck you i'm outta here

    15. Re:Religious Objection by extra+the+woos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a Christian so here's my input.

      This isn't the same as the mark of the beast, however it DOES prove that indeed there is no new idea under the sun :)

      Anyway, I don't think the mark of the beast is something physical (i mean how could they control your thoughts right)... Instead I believe it means that it is in their minds (what they think) and in their hands (what they do, their actions)...

      So the world will think and do a certain way, after the beast... my input lol

      Still, this is an interesting thing for employee rights in that it brings up a: how far will it go? question.

      --
      replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    16. Re:Religious Objection by rosaliepizza · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the mark of the beast is a "mark" of allegiance and worship of the Antichrist. And it is a rejection of a holy God. To receive the mark of the beast you must FIRST worship the beast. Look at the following verses: "If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark. . . " Rev. 14:9 " . . . who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark. . . " Rev. 14:11 " . . .which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image." Rev. 16:2 " . . . them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. . ." Rev. 19:20 " . . . which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his . . ." Rev. 20:4 I have recently studied this subject and it seens to me accepting an implant has nothing to do with taking mark of the beast. A good study on this subject available here. http://www.av1611.org/666/biochip.html

    17. Re:Religious Objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I just calculated it.

      Since w is 01110111 in binary and you add up the ones you get 6, www = 666

      At least i'm safe on bittorrent

    18. Re:Religious Objection by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      The particular number 666 is probably not literal. In mythology and apocaliptic literature, numbers are often meant to have a more figurative significance. You'll notice the large number occurances of the numbers 7, 6, 12, and 40 in the pentatuch and babylonian mythology. You'll also note that in other numbering system, the number would appear differantly. I don't know how they counted in that area at that time, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't the decimal system.

      As far as the right hand or forehead. That could be figurative too (although it's quite less likely). I'm not a Bible Scholar though, much less an expert on the Revelation, so I'll stop while I'm ahead.

    19. Re:Religious Objection by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      A number of religions prohibit body modification---Orthodox Judaism is one. The idea is twofold, and as with everyting else in this religion I am oversimplifying:
      • Your body is a gift to you from G-d and mutilating it betrays him
      • When the Messiah comes you will be resurrected bodily and live forever. Whatever you have done to your body in this life is forever.

      Forcing employees to imbed this device in their bodies is body modification. A few extremely important points:

      • Once you have died no invasive procedure may be done on your body, even to the extent that a breathing tube is not removed: it is clipped off at the lips. Digging this chip out with a needle after I have died constituted an invasive procedure so if I die while employed by these assholes, I die with a body defiled by this device.
      • A defiled body may not be buried in a Jewish cemetary.

      It may be worth mentioning another group who forced Jews to mutilate their bodies with identifying information--tattooed serial numbers, in this case. I suspect that a Labor Review Board would look unfavorably on such similarities.

      This isn't just a Jewish thing: Christians also believe in bodily resurrection on the return of the Christ. The Apostles' and Nicene Creeds, recited frequently in Christian churches, make specific references to "the resurrection of the body" and "the resurrection of the dead." I am less familiar with other religions, but I believe sects of Islam has similar restrictions on body modification, as does the Hindu faith.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    20. Re:Religious Objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on how you parse the pronouns. Note that there are two different individuals referred to using "he/him" in verses 16 and 17, the Beast and the markee. The "He" at the start of verse 16 is clearly the Beast; the "he" in verse 17 ("... unless he has that mark") is clearly the markee. But who does the "his" at the end of 17 refer to? The Beast is certainly the common reading, but if instead you read that as referring to the markee, then these verses could easily be read as a prophesy of injectable rfid technology.

      That also changes the interpretation of verse 18 -- it's not that every person has a 666 marked on them, but rather that every person has a unique identifier (the number of his name) marked on them, and the Beast is the one whose unique identifier is 666.

    21. Re:Religious Objection by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I mean this in the least flamish possible way: you Jews are weird. I already know Christians are weird, since I grew up surrounded by them, but the more I learn about the Jews, the more I am amazed at the strangeness.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    22. Re:Religious Objection by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

      One needs to take care reading apocolyptic texts with out an awareness of the symbolism. The number 6 is a human number...as opposed to 7, the day of the Lord. The number is repeated (666) because in Revelation text leading to this point introduces an "anti-trinity" of sorts.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    23. Re:Religious Objection by xz0565 · · Score: 1

      the bible should not be taken literally. imho, the right hand may symbolise actions which are deemed correct or moral in society. the forhead would probably have something to do with the brain and descision making. so you would make descisions and perform actions that the 'beast' wants you to

    24. Re:Religious Objection by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Funny you quoted this. I see this as an accurate prophecy, actually. Prophecies, in my opinion, should not be read literally. The meaning is that the beast will tag people and only allow those who are tagged to participate in commerce. This has already happened to a large degree.

      For the record, I do not associate with any religion. But I find that one quote to be quite meaningful and relevant in today's tag-happy world.

    25. Re:Religious Objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crazy -- so no dental fillings allowed, huh? Certainly no heart bypass surgery, or organ transplantation, or artificial hip replacement, or, well, most surgery. I'd be basically blind now without implanted artificial lenses.

      Wait a second... no circumcision either?
      Now I'm just confused.

      Are you sure about these rules? Who exactly follows these?

    26. Re:Religious Objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No -- you're comparing orthodox Jews (small subset -- like Amish or something like that) to the crazy shit that Christians do all over the country. There are *far* more evangelicals (believing that the bible is literal fact! You ever read that thing?) than orthodox Jews, and even the regular non-evangelical Christians go to church and think they're eating the actual flesh and blood of Jesus. You know any mainstream Jews who do anything that weird?

      Jewish rules about what you can eat, etc. are pretty darn tame compared with claiming that, once a week, you are actually eating the flesh and drinking the actual blood of a man who died two thousand years ago.

      Whatever you grew up with just feels less crazy, but that doesn't make it so.... I was raised Roman Catholic, but now I can step back and look at it objectively. Whoa.

    27. Re:Religious Objection by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You're making a basic logical fallacy - my statement that Jews are weird stands alone, but you're attempting to put it in a context that wasn't there, and then arguing from that context.

      I think Christians are all weird, as well, so don't get too excited.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    28. Re:Religious Objection by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It's a prophesy in the sense that Orwell's 1984 was a prophesy. Not necessarily in any other. Both were mythologized histories, and, being mythologized, became more eternal predictions based around human nature.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    29. Re:Religious Objection by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Thus it is clear that the "Beast" referred to is none other than Money, the current soberquiet of Mammon.

      And if you worship money, it will lead you to reject God. (Seems to fit so far.) That makes credit cards a reasonably apt first trial at a "number of the beast", but eventually Money will decide to go for an all out marking.

      ---- I don't say the above seriously, but it does rather fit.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    30. Re:Religious Objection by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      The part about your hand or forehead refers to the ancient Jewish tradition of wearing tefillin (little boxes with scrolls of Sh'ma in them, attached to you by leather straps) on the hand and forehead. The writer of Revelations was probably referring to Christians and/or Hebrews wearing the Mark of the Beast instead of their tefillin.

    31. Re:Religious Objection by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Okay, first "right hand" doesn't always mean "thing with 5 digits that is at the distal end of an arm." Lots of things have "right hand" sides. Like this page for instance. Also you're forgetting that 666 is from a bogus translation, and the actual writting has it as 616.

      Of course overly literal and dubious translations is du rigur when it comes to religious prophesies. So I'm sure your counter argument would work against the bible thumpers.

    32. Re:Religious Objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      666 is no longer alone...

      He's getting out the marrow in your backbone.


      Peter Gabriel/Genesis/"Supper's Ready"

    33. Re:Religious Objection by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Of course. But that's how all successful prophecies are formed, in my opinion. They are formed through some extremely deep insight into human nature and the prevalent psychodynamics of the time. In other words, a good prophet, be it Orwell, Buddha, ARI, or Jesus is not really guessing. A prophecy can still miss the mark (even if it wasn't a guess). As I see it, most of the time the point of prophecy is to serve as a warning, so the intent is for it not to happen. But that's just me. :)

    34. Re:Religious Objection by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      look at the great seal on the back of any dollar bill

      1000's place:

      600

      100's place:

      60

      10's place:

      6

      Six hundred, three score, and six.

  23. Escalation by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Funny

    So much for Evil Guy yanking out an eye or cutting off a hand so that he can fake access. Now he has to take the whole arm...

    Seriously, if he wants in that bad I'd rather he just beat me up and take my keys.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Escalation by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't worry, nobody is going to take your arm (it's too large to carry.) The chip is not that deep, so a small incision with a sharp boxcutter will allow the attacker to pull the capsule out. He only may need to explore a bit (with that knife) around the needle scar :-( Chances are very good that you will survive, especially if the attacker knows how to avoid major blood vessels, and if the knife is clean, and if you don't need that arm that much. Just choose your attackers carefully and check their medical diplomas before they do it to you.

    2. Re:Escalation by jonwil · · Score: 1

      More than likely, the bad guy is going to want to kill you or at least injure you big time to prevent you from being able to call the cops or security or whoever before he can get into the building.

    3. Re:Escalation by tftp · · Score: 1

      The professionals - like industrial spies, for example - don't kill without a reason. A good knock on the head starts the process, then a rag goes into victim's mouth, some rope around arms and legs, then the knife work - and after he is done the victim will be left tied up, gagged and bleeding freely. That victim is not likely to call the police, not for many hours (and he'd better be found by someone, or else he can die from blood loss and exposure if tied well.)

  24. That is FUCKED up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just surprised it's being used sooner for a data center, rather than a requirement to receive government tax refunds and social services, or own property.

    I guess we'll just have to wait a few months...

  25. Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by Statecraftsman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So when you decide to leave your emplyoyer do they take it out free of charge? I hope so.

    If not, you're likely to be tracked not just by your employer but by anyone else with an RFID scanner. There really ought to be an activator button or device that needs to be pressed or broadcasting to make such a device safe for the implanted.

    1. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell could your employer track you away from the office? RFIDs have a VERY limited range. It's not like he's going to be able to use a satellite to track you as you go about your daily life. And as long as you're on the clock and on the premises, you bet your bippy he's got the right to know where you are and what you're doing.

      But you won't come in Monday morning after a weekend of partying and have your boss say, "Hey Statecraftsman, we see you went to four gay bars this weekend! That's not good for our company's image, so you're fired! Take your lumbar roll and get out!"

      Put down the paranoia and step away from the keyboard.

    2. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the RFID implant doesn't have an off button, I can just see it now.
      Instead of tinfoil hats, people will be wearing tinfoil armbands.

    3. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      HA HA HA! And here you all thought the tin foil hats were just silly and non-functional! So next time you see someone with foil wrapped around their bodies you know where they work.

    4. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is. It's activated by sticking your middle finger up at the reader/PHB.

    5. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So when you decide to leave your emplyoyer do they take
      > it out free of charge? I hope so.

      I hope not. I hope this NEVER takes off.

      Getting back to your point though, what if the company goes bankrupt?

    6. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by JambisJubilee · · Score: 1

      There really ought to be an activator button or device that needs to be pressed or broadcasting to make such a device safe for the implanted.

      flex

    7. Re:Chipped by your boss ?= chipped for life by Don_dumb · · Score: 1
      If not, you're likely to be tracked not just by your employer but by anyone else with an RFID scanner.

      Yep, so the company thinks it gets better security, but in fact it is actually compromising the security of its staff.
      Just go around the town with a reciever and you could quickly work out who works for this company and who has access to the datacenter. If this place does something so important that they think this bionic 'enhancement' is justified. Then they shouldn't be broadcasting their staff for everyone to find.
      Most espionage is simple, you find someone who works for company/government X and either bribe or blackmail them. This makes the former part a piece of piss.

      Whatever happened to simple checks and balances, many employees auditing and accounting for many other employees. Or is this a way to justify layoffs for the auditing staff?
      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  26. Re:chunk of bicep by teknickle · · Score: 1

    uh, dude.
    This is slashdot. Average bicep here is only 6" in circumference.
    I am assuming minimal bicep could be removed to get to the bone, let alone RFID chip.

    As a side effect, leave the RFID implant as a cosmetic augmentation.
    Hey, can they implant these in 'other' regions?

  27. Fuck em, quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working for such anal retentive boneheads has gotta suck anyways. Refuse to be owned by the man. Fuck em and quit.

  28. This will only last about as long as by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will only last about as long as the Sony rootkit-like DRM lasted. It now has public attention, and when it is pointed out that the scheme has enough security holes in it to act as a noodle strainer, the number of people who will actually allow the implant will be zero, meaning there will be no one to do any maintenance in the datacenter, and thus the rules will have to be changed.

    For less than they paid for the RFID system, they could have hired someone to log people in and out of the data center. Additionally, I question the validity of a system that restricts access to only those with an implant during disaster situations (fire, flood, and worse) where access rights and needs are rather different than in normal situations.

    Good security costs a lot of money, and you cannot replace the human element in the security chain. The RFID schemes won't prevent anyone following an authorized person into the data center, unless there is physical restrictions that would make working in the data center dangerous during emergencies. In this case, the $10/hour guard is more flexible and cheaper than the high-tech answer, and more respectful of humans in general... or at least I think so

    1. Re:This will only last about as long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know; they had people using RFID tags around their necks before the injection; there's no fundamental change in technology and therefore security problems.

      If people didn't have a problem wearing them round their necks, they shouldn't have a problem having them injected - at least from a security/technology viewpoint.

    2. Re:This will only last about as long as by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      unless there is physical restrictions that would make working in the data center dangerous during emergencies.

      Many datacenters have mantraps installed that permit only one person in at a time to prevent drafting. For emergencies there are doors that will open allowing rapid egress of the facility bypassing the man traps normally used to leave and enter the facility.

      The security team that thought implanting an rfid tag into the employees provided an increased level of security should be fired. About the best that can be claimed for this is elimination of lost access cards.

    3. Re:This will only last about as long as by njyoder · · Score: 1

      For less than they paid for the RFID system, they could have hired someone to log people in and out of the data center.

      So, you know the costs of RFID systems and have done a cost-analysis? Show it to me. RFID means a couple of thousand dollars for the intial equipment and a few bucks per implant. Sounds pretty damn cheap to me.

      Additionally, I question the validity of a system that restricts access to only those with an implant during disaster situations (fire, flood, and worse) where access rights and needs are rather different than in normal situations.

      Ever heard of the concept of a lock working only one way? I have doors in my house that do that. You can open from one side without a lock, but not the other. Surely such an electronic equivalent would require Space Age technology worth BILLIONS!

      Good security costs a lot of money, and you cannot replace the human element in the security chain.

      And here you are, suggesting that we go the discounted method. Not the they're removing the human element from the entire security chain.

      The RFID schemes won't prevent anyone following an authorized person into the data center, unless there is physical restrictions that would make working in the data center dangerous during emergencies.

      Uh, how about the person noticing that some other random person is following them in? Or are these people blind and deaf? Sorry, didn't want to make assumptions about disabilities. And what the hell does following someone in have to do with emergencies?

      In this case, the $10/hour guard is more flexible and cheaper than the high-tech answer, and more respectful of humans in general... or at least I think so

      What happened to good security costs money? That's what they pay a higher level mcdonalds worker. Do you really want such an incompetent moron guarding everything? One who could be easily tricked, mind you.

    4. Re:This will only last about as long as by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      Amen. You can throw all the high tech crap at a datacenter you want; the fact is the single most secure way of controlling access is a large, heavy, locked door that can only be unlocked by a guy who actually recognizes the techs who work at the datacenter (it's a special form of biometrics, kids, at which humans have evolved to be rather adept).

      What's that you say? Your turnover is too high for the security personnel to recognize the techs? Well, then you need to find a way to make working for you attractive enough to keep turnover down, because high turnover ALWAYS causes problems for security.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    5. Re:This will only last about as long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of the concept of a lock working only one way? I have doors in my house that do that. You can open from one side without a lock, but not the other.

      He was talking about access rights, not egress rights. Doors that work only one way have nothing to do with this. That said, there can be override systems for emergencies just as with other secure doors.

    6. Re:This will only last about as long as by njyoder · · Score: 1

      In an emergency people would let eachother out anyway, so it's kind of a silly point to make. It's not like someone would be an asshole and not leave the door open. And as you said, there are override systems. I'm pretty sure that they're legally required to have fire escape plans anyway.

      Oh and it is an issue of egress rights. You design the door layouts so that if you can get into a given room, there's always and exit route that doesn't require any keys (the other side of the doors). So even if someone lets you in through say, doors A, B, and C, you can always exit the building through C, B, and A (opposite order).

    7. Re:This will only last about as long as by jc42 · · Score: 1

      This will only last about as long as the Sony rootkit-like DRM lasted.

      There have been a few reports that hardly anyone who bought those Sony CDs has done anything about delousing their computers. The main reason is that most of the public hasn't heard about it. Sony may have lost a handful of sales to people like /. readers, but it actually hasn't affected them much. And I haven't seen any followup stating that Sony has stopped putting their DRM stuff on new CDs.

      This is only important if your clients/customers are technically knowledgeable on the topic. So it may be significant for a security-related company, whose employees might be expected to understand the issues. But anything like these, aimed at the general public, will likely get pushback only from geeks like us.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    8. Re:This will only last about as long as by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it'll probably last until some employee tests HIV positive.

      This might not take long, considering the nature of your typical "security" firm.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    9. Re:This will only last about as long as by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if I were the individual, and I cared about the security, I'd keep it wrapped in foil except when I intended to use it. I'm not very likely to do that to my biceps. (OTOH, were I employed there, and they did this to me, I'd stop being very interested in their security, and be much more interested in my own.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. Just a marketing gimmick by cyberjessy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To me this sounds more like a marketing ploy. So that they could go to potential clients and say, "Look we are so secure and futuristic that we need embedded chips in humans to access our critical datacenter!". Client is left stunned.

    IANA American, but I hope that the goverment would do something if this was forced on the employees working in the datacenter. After all, what can this achieve which cannot be done with a retinal scan, RFID tag combo? If the criminal can pass the retinal scan, can't he also pluck the RFID from the employee and stick into his arm?

    Huh..... I would hate it if someone said they are gonna put a chip inside my body. Wait till someone gets hurt and the company gets sued for a million dollars.

    --
    Life is just a conviction.
    1. Re:Just a marketing gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me this sounds more like a marketing ploy. So that they could go to potential clients and say, "Look we are so secure and futuristic that we need embedded chips in humans to access our critical datacenter!"

      I used to work for a company that did exactly that - they built up an expensive-looking network control room just to "impress" clients.

      Nevermind that:

      (1) The handprint scanner on the front door was unreliable, so operators tended to use the back door (which they then left unlocked).

      (2) If they did lock the back door, the walls could be climbed over. You just had to stand on an adjacent desk and you could crawl up into the ceiling space, dropping down anywhere you wanted inside the "secure" room.

      (3) There was a motion sensor on the inside of the door to unlock it whenever anyone was about to exit. We eventually figured out that you could also trigger the sensor by pushing a piece of paper under the door and waving it around.

      (4) The computers *outside* the network room were on the same subnet as those inside. There was no difference in the logical security between the computer on the secretary's desk - and the ones behind the hand scanner.

      Needless to say, they are no longer in business.

  30. Heh. by soupdevil · · Score: 4, Funny

    The joke's on them. Geeks don't HAVE biceps.

    1. Re:Heh. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I've been sitting here thinking, "Bicep? That's a muscle, isn't it?"

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  31. Re:I think I'll prestate the sentiments of Slashdo by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Funny

    " must be injected into the bicep"

    I think most slashdotters will have a problem there.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  32. Wait, the bicep? by LeddRokkenstud · · Score: 0

    Why the bicep? Wouldn't it be easier to put it elsewhere?

    1. Re:Wait, the bicep? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I would be hard pressed to decide whether I was going to quit, or force them to put it in my asscheek.

      --
      This space available.
    2. Re:Wait, the bicep? by wildblue7272 · · Score: 1

      "or force them to put it in my asscheek." Well, you would have more fun than the average employee trying to get the chip close enough to the reader to gain access.

    3. Re:Wait, the bicep? by ender- · · Score: 1

      Well, you would have more fun than the average employee trying to get the chip close enough to the reader to gain access.

      Been there, done that! We had a security system with RFID cards. Everyone would just put them in their wallet. The readers near the doors were low enough that you didn't have to take out or wallet or anything. Everyone just backed their ass up to the reader and the door would unlock.

      We called it the "Identi-fart" security system. :)

      Just sayin' is all...

    4. Re:Wait, the bicep? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      I would be hard pressed to decide whether I was going to quit, or force them to put it in my asscheek.

      So when you quit that job they would get their pound of flesh? Or would that be several pounds of flesh?

      And most of your co-workers won't like using the reader after you go through.

  33. What part don't they get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fsck you, your mother and your little dog too.

  34. You should see... by CyberSnyder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...the "injection" required to gain access while in prison.

  35. Resistence is futile by LemonFire · · Score: 1

    Resistence is futile, prepare to be assimilated...

    What is next? Embedded computers that control and monitor where we go and what we do?
    This may sound like paranoia but the problem with these type of changes is that they are so gradual that we don't realize what we have lost till its too late.

  36. How to get yourself targeted by hackers. by Associate · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Do something that most people find offensive.
    Step 2: Require Step 1.

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  37. Panic! by mfh · · Score: 1

    This is just one private company making an internal policy change. If it was a government doing it there would be cause to worry.

    Yeah!! No government would ever dream of hurting us!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  38. Sounds expensive. by deep44 · · Score: 1

    I'd be interested in seeing the business case for moving forward with something like this. Seems like there would be more cost-effective alternatives, expecially since this is essentially "unproven" technology when it comes to physical security.

    I'm just speculating, but this sounds like a decision that was made at the executive level rather than a decision made by a security professional.

    1. Re:Sounds expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the company's website:
      We are a Microsoft solution provider and offer network security services ranging from a brief two hour security assessment to providing a comprehensive strategy to get secure and remain secure.
      Well, we can rule out the "security professional"..
  39. Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the clever management at CityWatcher.com think of the posibility that someone would kill one of their employees to get the RFID? If there's a will, there's a way.

    1. Re:Paranoia by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Or just read the contents of the chip remotely. I mean, that is what RFID chips are designed to do...

  40. Why not biometrics? by yorktown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder why the company doesn't use a biometric entry system that uses fingerprints or retinal scans for security? People are less likely to object to thumbprint scan than minor surgery. And it's probably more secure, given that RFID can be cloned.

    1. Re:Why not biometrics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 insightful

    2. Re:Why not biometrics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone want an RFID chip implanted in their EYE?!? Oh well, I'm sure they won't mind. What's the ROI?
      (Sorry, I'm just imitating insane business people.)

  41. Re:chunk of bicep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll probably find that the average bicep here has an 18 inch circumference and very little muscle. Slashdotters also have man breasts, which they sometimes attempt to titty fuck. Back injuries usually result.

  42. Bright side of working from home by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If you are your own boss YOU get to decide if you need to be RFID'd in the bicep before entering your datacenter/living-room/home-office.

    TAKE THAT pointy-haired-bosses!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  43. RFIDs by suso · · Score: 1

    No, I meant with RFIDs.

    1. Re:RFIDs by Takumi2501 · · Score: 1

      ...Which is...?

      --
      Sent from my computer.
      Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
  44. I'm probably going to get modded as a troll, but.. by damneinstien · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It now has public attention

    I don't think we can call this public attention. Seriously, if our attention actually mattered in changing any policy, don't you think Microsoft would have been extinct by now and that DRM and other things like [insert what Slashdot users think is evil here] would be under public scrutiny? The cliched Joe Sixpack will probably never hear of this; heck, I don't think Joe Sixpack knows what RFID is.

  45. Typo by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Funny

    That was supposed to read, FTA: Ironically, the extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Captain Obvious, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication.

    Seriously, which genius thought putting a remotely readable barcode in an employees arm was ever going to be secure? Must the IT world really repeat the mistakes of the 80's garage door opener industry??

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a distinct difference between this and a garage door opener:

      The garage door opener only transmits when you press the remote's button.
      The RFID tag transmits any time a certain frequency signal is received.

      The difference here is that you can control when your signal is transmitted to be skimmed. Of course, I think placing an external button on the RFID might be even more objectionable.

      Also, I'd like to add the "low hanging fruit" thread to this dicussion. This company isn't trying to be impenetrable; they just want to be more difficult than its worth to break in. The RFID chips (are supposed to) make it such a pain to break in that no one bothers.

      The problem with this theory, of course, is that the proof-of-concept hackers see this as the most rewarding target, and that the evil hacker usually believes that the sweetest fruit tends to be higher on the tree in general. Also, if the door is always listening and doesn't report failed authentications, then crackers can sit there and try all kinds of RFID signals (which is what some people did with garage door receivers).

      Just my 2 cents...

  46. A coincidence ... I think not ! by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    Soon the total comments on this Slashdot article will read "666 of Total#". Too conincidental. We have a problem!

  47. In Soviet Russia, RFID chips employ YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    In Soviet Russia, RFID chips employ YOU!

  48. The mark of the beast. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1
    Revelation Chapter 13

    16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

    17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    I'm not a religious nut, but injected RFID? That's scary!

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:The mark of the beast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not a religious nut, why did you quote the King James version?

    2. Re:The mark of the beast. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      The KJV is in the public domain, in the US at least. It is easy to find it online to copy and paste from. Newer versions are still copyrighted. I don't think they are available online.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:The mark of the beast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not a religious nut, then how do you interpret a mark and a number to refer to RFID chips? I doubt you drew that conclusion by your own research. I however am a religious nut and I can tell you that the number is symbolic, as is the mark.

    4. Re:The mark of the beast. by blake6489 · · Score: 1

      couldnt agree more

    5. Re:The mark of the beast. by mrpeebles · · Score: 1

      I have heard, though, that there are a significant number of fundamentalist Christians who do believe in a literal "Mark of the Beast". (Heck, the left behind series has a literal mark.) This issue could make some strange bedfellows, eh...

  49. The bicep?!! by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    But my hat only works on my head!

    Curse you!

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  50. "The Mark"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    won't be removable/destroyable.

    It's probably another step towards the Mark, but that's going to happen in God's timing whether we cry "ahhhh this technology resembles what the Mark may be like" or not.

    It's not the technology that's evil, people, it's that the Mark will show you are allied with God's enemy.

    1. Re:"The Mark"... by bjason82 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well said you Anonymous Coward, I feel the same way about the whole looming "New World Order," "police state" thing we're headed for. Unfortunately, this whole implantable Identification is going to be just how the antichrist weeds out all the defiant christians. Those who do not submit to the "mark of the beast" will be martyred. I believe if this is to happen within our lifetime it will occur in less than a few decades, maybe even one decade.

    2. Re:"The Mark"... by teknickle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Implants aren't anything new. This is just a documented case of RFID and forced human adoption.

      I started to track some of this a few years ago. I lost a lot of the paper articles, but maintained a bunch of html links (many became dead links for one reason or another).

      We have been monitored a long time and for many different reasons. The public is mostly ignorant, AS THEY SHOULD BE. Could someone explain to me why we would want everyone to know that our governments have monitoring in place? It isn't something that could ever openly be acknowledged. Kind of like not letting Germans know that enigma was broken during WWII (good thing we got ahold of one of the machines)

      I am not much of a Conspiracy Theorist (at least now anyway). I realize that it is necessary for a global society in the state that we are in to monitor and track. There is extreme good that can come of it, and extreme evil.

      But I digress. I don't think that this instance is a notable trend towards NWO. I am MORE CONCERNED about the recent mass hiring of IT by the FBI to help develop the centralized database tracking system as part of the new national ID program. Ok, NOW you can be worried.

    3. Re:"The Mark"... by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We have been monitored a long time and for many different reasons. The public is mostly ignorant, AS THEY SHOULD BE. Could someone explain to me why we would want everyone to know that our governments have monitoring in place? It isn't something that could ever openly be acknowledged.

      Everyone should know so that they can act appropriately. For instance, what's the point in voting when Diebold will just hand the election to the highest bidder?

      The monitoring should go both ways. Elected officials should be monitored 24/7, audio and video, and these feeds should be made available to the public for their amusement and also to ensure that we know when they're talking to Diebold, or Enron, or Halliburton, ad nauseum. This would go a long way towards eliminating corruption--which is of course why they'll never go for it.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  51. Sounds like a publicity ploy by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We all know that this won't increase security, but now this surveillance company can use this in all their advertising and PR. "Sure, you can go with the other company but they arent half as serious as we are. We put bloody implants into our employess! That's serious!"

    Its harmless except for Joe and Jane Datacenter who have to go in for some minor surgery on the weekend to keep their jobs. I hope this "Golden Casino" mentality stops right here after these people get exposed for the dumbasses that they are. Hell, even in the article they did not know the weaknesses of RFID authentication.

    I woulndt doubt if this was 100% publicity stunt. I wonder how many people even have to access the datacenter. Depending on the company size it could just be one or two people. Of course all the executives, security, etc will have the old keycards that will work just fine.

    1. Re:Sounds like a publicity ploy by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

      but now this surveillance company can use this in all their advertising and PR...I hope this "Golden Casino" mentality stops right

      I question how effective this advertising and PR really is if you can't remember the name is GoldenPalace.Com!

      Just in case you've forgotten the golf tournament streaker or the Virgin Mary grilled cheese, you can see them here

      -JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    2. Re:Sounds like a publicity ploy by jcr · · Score: 1

      "Sure, you can go with the other company but they arent half as serious as we are. We put bloody implants into our employess! That's serious!"

      Well, YYMV, but I'd far rather go with a vendor whose employees don't have a reason to hate them. Angry data center personnel in charge of data that I might have a fiduciary duty to keep private doesn't seem like a very clever plan IMNSHO.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  52. First Tin Foil Hats... by MioTheGreat · · Score: 1

    Now we'll all need tin-foil T-shirts.

    1. Re:First Tin Foil Hats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a selection of wearable sheilding, try
      http://www.lessemf.com/personal.html

  53. I have a saw, oh i hAve A liTtle saW by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    So I cut the damn thing out while torturing the pin codes out of them. Sheesh morons.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  54. Conspiracy by Millenniumman · · Score: 0, Troll

    I made these RFID chips for this company. They move to your brain, and then take control of your mind. They'll allow Microsoft to enslave us all. This company is doing this because Darth Gates has offered to spare the CEOs in exchange for it.

    --
    Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  55. Micro-chipping is what's done to dogs. by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    And _I_ don't want a dog running my banks data-center.

  56. Request for Comments (was Re:A milestone) by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    An extension of Godwin's Law called the "Milestone Law" for message boards should be considered that says:

    "if Godwin's Law is cited in response to a Nazi/Hitler reference, the thread should be considered to be automatically over"

    1. Re:Request for Comments (was Re:A milestone) by CrazyDuke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That is a flawed law, as it assumes Godwin's Law is always correctly applied. The choice use of "should" in this case, where "sometimes" or "most of the time" would be better for clairifying the statement, indicates a kind of emotional sence of justice, rather than a logical conclusion.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  57. all i can say is by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

    fuck that! Seriously, I'd be off to a new job in a heartbeat. Granted I don't work with IT though so I wouldn't care.

    --
    Gone!
  58. Doncha just love where society is heading? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    We're all slaves.

  59. Re:chunk of bicep by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    What if they would require an MRI later in life?

    According to this article, http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1756587,00.as p
    removal is minor surgery which to me means scar tissue.

    So next, you quit or get fired, you have this invasive RFID chip in your person and your next company requires the same BS implant.
    Does one keep accumulating RFID's or scar tissue?

    What's wrong with retinal scans?

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  60. Another Beast by skayell · · Score: 1

    Cthulu doesn't like implanted chips either...

    1. Re:Another Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... they give him indigestion!

  61. Glass??? by NothingMore · · Score: 1

    What if the glass breaks while its in your body? Even though the particals would be really small they might be able to go into the blood stream if they are near enough to a vain.

  62. Okay, maybe the middle finger then? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    I was just enjoying the thought of mooning them every day.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:Okay, maybe the middle finger then? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      I was just enjoying the thought of mooning them every day.

      But could you put up with all the sexual harrasment suits?

  63. Never mind access, by jd · · Score: 1

    What about Excell?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  64. Gee, what a surprise by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 1
    A company that profits on fear and paranoia CityWatcher is publicising their insane internal security system to increase fear and paranoia and thus their sales.

    In case anybody didn't check, this is a company that sells security cameras that can be remotely monitored over the Internet for cities who want to keep a close eye on their residents...

  65. I disagree! by rk · · Score: 1

    "(I admit it's not very catchy.)"

    I dunno... I think it's got a great beat and you can dance to it. I give it an 84!

  66. How do Janitors, Cops. etc. get in? by scruffy · · Score: 1
    Do the janitors need an implant?

    What if police, firemen, ambulance, etc. need to get in? Bash the door down with an axe?

    1. Re:How do Janitors, Cops. etc. get in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do emergency personnel normally gain access when the doors are locked?

      Jesus people.

    2. Re:How do Janitors, Cops. etc. get in? by afidel · · Score: 1

      The first rule of running a datacenter, never EVER let janitors/cleaning people in. EVER. Don't even think about it. They WILL unplug a server to use the outlet or run the floor cleaner full of water over the raised floor flooding gallons of water into the space underneath. Those are both real world examples and why the rule exists.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:How do Janitors, Cops. etc. get in? by teknickle · · Score: 1

      No joke.
      A couple years ago the office floors were contracted to be refinished.
      I had new PC boxes get waxed to the floor with some loose documentation that had fallen off a desk.
      Not only did they botch up the offices, but security let them into the datacenter and they waxed over the anti-static floor tiles that 'looked dull'.

    4. Re:How do Janitors, Cops. etc. get in? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      I did floor work for about a year and a half before college.

      The only time my company EVER waxed something to the floor was because we warned the company/store 48 hours in advance that "We aren't a moving company, only leave permanent fixtures on the floor." because we were ALWAYS given a time limit that never, EVER fit the right cure time.. only with tornado fans.

      Inevitably, managers always ignored us. We would move the most damaging things (cardboard, wood, etc)... but in order to get the wax off, you literally have to flood it with extremely noxious, extremely corrosive stripping fluid. I swear, I've lost brain cells to stripping wax in small rooms.

      One time, we were given 3 days to strip a 75,000 square foot store. They hadn't actually wanted to pay for a flooring contractor for 7 years, so the wax was literally half an inch thick. For weeks afterwords, we were removing wax from under shelves because we had to shovel it off.

      So you can't really blame the cleaners, blame your boss - You can't hurry good work.

    5. Re:How do Janitors, Cops. etc. get in? by teknickle · · Score: 1

      No, it was the fault of the refinishers.
      There was stuff slopped up on the walls (including the fabric walls of cubicles) and the server room was not to be touched.
      Part of it was done (and you could clearly see stroke patterns of a mop).
      In fact, they left 2/3 the floor in the server room untouched.

  67. Wait, isn't this worse security? by Rakishi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ironically, the extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release.

    So before I needed to get close to an object (whatever had the rfid tag) which under normal circumstances an employee would not be carried around (say they were going home or something) or could have it in a reader blocking case. Now, I simply need to get close to an employ anywhere at any time to copy their data.

    Fucking brilliant, now I can steal their tag without anyone ever knowing, whereas before they'd know it was gone in a reasonable amount of time (I'd have to steal the physical object most likely).

    1. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by prurientknave · · Score: 1

      Well since that IS a problem we'll just have to keep the employees in a restricted safe area, a work camp if you will. and then they can do all of their shopping and recreational activities there from the company store at whatever prices the company sets, providing whatever amenities the company feels like. All this under the bastion of security.
       
      I'm loving this century mom and dad! thanks for nothing!

    2. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by njyoder · · Score: 1

      So before I needed to get close to an object (whatever had the rfid tag) which under normal circumstances an employee would not be carried around (say they were going home or something)

      Who doesn't carry their keychain around all of the time that they're out of the house? The only time people take off their keychains is usually if they're AT home. An attacker stealing RFID is unlikely to want to or even gain an advantage by following them into their home. Besides, if you can get into their home, they're screwed in a variety of ways.

      With an RFID keychain, you have the disadvantage of mistakenly taking it off somewhere and leaving it unattended. That's a weakness that an implant addresses.

      could have it in a reader blocking case.

      How many people actually put a block around their keychain?

      Now, I simply need to get close to an employ anywhere at any time to copy their data.

      That's an advantage, not a disadvantage. If an employee takes their keychain off and leave it unattended, that's a vulnerability.

      Fucking brilliant, now I can steal their tag without anyone ever knowing, whereas before they'd know it was gone in a reasonable amount of time (I'd have to steal the physical object most likely).

      HHAHAHAHA. Way to contradict yourself. With the non-implant version, they have to physically steal it, but with the implant version, they don't? That doesn't make any sense; it's the same technology. If you can steal it by coming near them and recording the transaction (and this can be done easily with all but the public key crypto forms which require you being near the 'official' reader), then it applies in both cases. Same technology. ...you didn't think this through, did you?

    3. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me, having never read the article, that the real reason they are doing this is not to cut down on high-tech criminals who want to gain access, but to put an end to employees' borrowing of others' cards, so they have an accurate record of who was in the datacenter.

    4. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by eholdgold · · Score: 1

      If only the chip could encrypt itself using the DNA of host person. Then you won't have to worry about security devices. Plus I want an added feature that I must be happy - or the door to work won't let me in! This will prevent me from working when I am sickly & more importantly - no one can cut my arm off and use it to open the security door. I may not have a bicep - but I really need both arms. You'll just have to keep track of your DNA. How hard can that be? Take a bag with you to the barber... Next thing you know - before you can read the news at http://www-cnn.com/ you must pass a security scan.

    5. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me, having never read the article, that the real reason they are doing this is not to cut down on high-tech criminals who want to gain access, but to put an end to employees' borrowing of others' cards, so they have an accurate record of who was in the datacenter.

      Good point, didn't think of this actually. I assume they have other ways to restrict access into the center itself, and tracking is important even against criminal activity (why is Bob going into places he has no need to go into).

    6. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't carry their keychain around all of the time that they're out of the house?

      If I was going out (buy groceries, meet with friends) I would probably avoid taking any un-needed keys or items.

      With an RFID keychain, you have the disadvantage of mistakenly taking it off somewhere and leaving it unattended. That's a weakness that an implant addresses.

      A very unlikely scenario, why would someone who finds it want to break into your data center and pretend to be an employee whose identify they do not know. All this before the company is alerted to the loss and disabled the key in question. A more likely scenario, but still unlikely, scenario is some sort of planned theft of the key.

      That's an advantage, not a disadvantage. If an employee takes their keychain off and leave it unattended, that's a vulnerability.

      They have to either leave it somewhere or have it stolen, in both cases the key can be disabled as soon as they employee realizes what happened. In this case neither of those has to happen; it is much easier and likely to get near someone than it is for them to leave their key unattended or to steal it from them.

      How many people actually put a block around their keychain?

      It seems trivial to build one into the keychain, something that you can't do with an implant.

      HHAHAHAHA. Way to contradict yourself. With the non-implant version, they have to physically steal it, but with the implant version, they don't? That doesn't make any sense; it's the same technology. If you can steal it by coming near them and recording the transaction (and this can be done easily with all but the public key crypto forms which require you being near the 'official' reader), then it applies in both cases. Same technology. ...you didn't think this through, did you?

      I already mentioned that it relatively trivial to block the tag when not needed. If this is currently implemented or not doesn't matter, since it is probably much cheaper to do (and teach employees) than an implant. Heck, you may even be able to get the thing to auto-disable itself when you leave the premises and require a manual re-enabling (turn a ring or something) once you enter them again.

      I do have to admit your reply was funny, you go on about all of this and yet don't even get the most trivial hole in what I said (someone else did). Of course, that would require thinking about why they use this stuff (I didn't think too much about this given it's Slashdot and all) and you seem to be unable to perform such abstract thought.

    7. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by njyoder · · Score: 1

      If I was going out (buy groceries, meet with friends) I would probably avoid taking any un-needed keys or items.

      That's pretty optimistic given that the whole purpose of an implant is to prevent employee screwups like that. Oh and screw ups happen, A LOT.

      Not that it matters much, since they'll be spending a long time outside carrying it around because it's not like they make constant trips home. With the generation 1 RFID devices, which VeriChip is, all you have to do is walk by them while they have it on their keychain. Snap! You've gotten it.

      A very unlikely scenario, why would someone who finds it want to break into your data center and pretend to be an employee whose identify they do not know.

      Why would someone who happens to run across a guy with an implant want to break into your data center? BECAUSE THEY'RE FOLLOWING YOU. The same applies to both implants and non-implants. Exercise some critical thought here.

      You think the idea of employees sharing keys is some great idea you didn't think of? Ok, why would they share keys? The only reason is if they forgot to bring it. Then, duh, that means sometimes they wear it around where they aren't supposed.

      You seem to also forget that there is more than the main entrance to protect. There are different protected areas within a company. Employee A, with acess to a highly protected area, leaves his key lying around by accident. Employee B snags it, uses it and returns it. This is ignoring the added possibility of cloning.

      All this before the company is alerted to the loss and disabled the key in question.

      Before they're alerted that someone stood near a key for 3 seconds? How long before someone would use a key if they stole it anyway?

      A more likely scenario, but still unlikely, scenario is some sort of planned theft of the key.

      Theft is not needed for cloning, genius. If theft of the key was an issue, it would be one that would be thwarted by an implant. Remember, the only way to steal an implanted key is to CLONE it. If we are dealing with people who can clone, then none of what you say matters for non-implants.

      It seems trivial to build one into the keychain, something that you can't do with an implant.

      Trivial and yet not used. As you already conceded, people don't do well when handling keys, they forget to bring them. They also forget to cover them up. Honestly, how many regular people do you think abide by best practices? They have to remember to do it all the time, even if they choose to do it. It effectively reduces it to a keycard, in any case. Plus someone could always monitor the signals when it's used.

      I already mentioned that it relatively trivial to block the tag when not needed.

      It's also trivial to screw up and not use one.

      Heck, you may even be able to get the thing to auto-disable itself when you leave the premises and require a manual re-enabling (turn a ring or something) once you enter them again.

      Heck, you could even use a keycard!

      I do have to admit your reply was funny, you go on about all of this and yet don't even get the most trivial hole in what I said (someone else did).

      Oh I forgot, the unlikely scenario of employees willingly swapping keys, which doesn't actually present a security risk unless you take into account my asessment.

      Of course, that would require thinking about why they use this stuff (I didn't think too much about this given it's Slashdot and all) and you seem to be unable to perform such abstract thought.

      Does "abstract" mean "retarded" in this case? Aside from assuming that employees abide by best secrity practices, you also neglected that there isn't necessarily one level of access for the entire building.

      Remember, it only takes one to get into the building. And you're, by default, assuming that they have RFID cloning technology. This is also ignoring that you've effectively reduced it to a keycard.

    8. Re:Wait, isn't this worse security? by aaronl · · Score: 1

      You can do the same thing with a camera and recorder, plus you get usable evidence about the person(s) entering the area. You can just use a keypad or card swipe and have the same security as with this asinine implant, plus you don't endanger the employees health as a direct result of your "security" requirement.

      These areas already require bypasses in the event of an emergency. Fire and medical personnel need a way to get access. *They* wouldn't be foolish enough to let some nutjob implant them with something.

  68. Don't Give In by Mr+Bubble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is way over the line and a dangerous precedent. The employees at this company must refuse and they must take this to court. If they acquiesce, it will establish a precedent and other companies will see that people are willing to allow corporations to do this shit and it will spread. Once it's common in corporate security environments, the government will start requiring it. This is bad news. The company doesn't own my body. They can stick the tag up their ass.

    --
    "The world is a construct of forceful imagination. Those who don't know walk around in the reailties of those who do"
    1. Re:Don't Give In by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1
      They can stick the tag up their ass.

      More likely, it's going to be up ours, if this isn't resisted fiercely, right now.

  69. Big Brother by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...and the Comrades marched rank and file into their working facility, while the Big Brother telescreen carefully scanned each implanted chip...

    It's a video surveillance company. You work in the data center, you become Big Brother.

    1. Re:Big Brother by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's a video surveillance company. You work in the data center, you become Big Brother.

      Remember what our hero did for a living in Nineteen Eighty-Four? He worked at the Ministry of Truth, editing old news articles and throwing inconvenient facts about the past down the memory hole.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  70. It's the End of the World by dawhippersnapper · · Score: 2, Funny

    As we know it!

    I feel fine.

    --
    Freedom is fragile and must be protected. To sacrifice it, even as a temporary measure, is to betray it.
  71. Honestly .... by taniwha · · Score: 4, Funny
    evil guys just have to get more inventive

    Many years ago I found myself in a turf war with the 'operators' who looked after our mainframe .... in their view system programmers weren't allowed to touch the hardware ... anyway as a response we instituted a physical penetration analysis of the machine room .... the number of different ways in we found was in the mid teens - some involved children (or small adults) climbing thru ducts or thru the windows we gave people their printouts through, others involved finding ways in under the false floor (there were several) - but the one that took the cake was when we noticed that all the hinges on each and every door to the room was on the outside ... anyone could show up at any time and steal the doors

    1. Re:Honestly .... by jcr · · Score: 1

      anyone could show up at any time and steal the doors

      Just removing all the doors and putting them in neat stack in the operations manager's office is a good way to make a point.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Honestly .... by glens · · Score: 1

      > but the one that took the cake was when we noticed that all the
      > hinges on each and every door to the room was on the outside ...
      > anyone could show up at any time and steal the doors

      Only if they were residential-grade doors/hinges. Commercial-grade stuff (most usually) has hinges with protrusions/sockets so that even if the pin is removed (if it's not locked in place!), the door will still not come out of the opening unless/until the latch is released.

    3. Re:Honestly .... by taniwha · · Score: 1

      in this case the hinges were easily removable by anyone with a hammer and nail

    4. Re:Honestly .... by taniwha · · Score: 1

      and yes something like that was our original plan .... except that the machine room was heavily airconditioned and we didn't want to trash our mainframe (this was back in the day when memory cost ~$1M/megabyte)

  72. Re:chunk of bicep by shawb · · Score: 1

    Assuming the chips and readers are compatible, you could easilly use an existing chip with your next employer. If not, well I would sure hate to be a consultant or temp. This technology really doesn't seem that it will be any more capable of allowing an employer to monitor employees than a current RFID badge or key card is. The biggest advantage is probably that the employee no longer has to worry about leaving their keys somewhere and being locked out. I suppose it would make physical theft of badges a bit more noticeable, and detection of an intrusion or potential intrusion seems to be the main benefit of any physical security system I have seen. Even an unpickable lock wouldn't prevent someone from cutting a hole in a wall to gain access, but that leaves a pretty big indicator that security was breached. On the downside, a duplicated RFID chip would be more difficult to notice than on a badge as the person trying to break in would have to also duplicate the badge to a decent extent if there is a chance that someone else will see them using it. while an implanted RFID chip wouldn't actually even have to be implanted as the location of the implant is covered with clothing in most situations where this chip would be required.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  73. Be well! by Kamineko · · Score: 2, Funny

    Be well, Warden William Smithers!

    - Yeah, you too!

  74. Frog in boiling water by Belseth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the gradual change that scares me. First it starts with things that people can justify easily until it seems like a normal part of life then how can you object to something so harmless. Besides it's for our own good. How long will it be before you need an implanted chip to use a fire arm? They are already pushing for chip activated pistols that would need a ring or wristband to be used. Next step would be implants. Who could object? How long before drivers licenses require inplant chips? No time soon but eventually. Indentity thieft may make people even demand it. Remember driving isn't a right. You want to do it you abide by the rules. How about credit cards? Banks loosing money to thieft may start pushing for chips to combat thieves. You want a credit card you get a chip. May be not for fifty years but I think such things are the future. DNA identity systems may make the credit card version unnessaccary but then we are constantly having our DNA checked. A job can require DNA scanners for identification but what is to stop the same machines from checking for genetic desease? Suddenly to keep health costs down companies start laying off high risk employees. All such systems are dangerous and will be abused. The real reason is never for your benefit and in the end will take away our rights.

    1. Re:Frog in boiling water by satcomdaddy1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taking the "frog in water" tack a step further, let's assume that the RFID chip is currently the same size as the one I just put in my dog. (About the size of a grain of rice, they tell me.) This is probably far too large/intrusive to put in the hand(for Revelations to come to fruition). With the advent on nanotechnology, there is no doubt that these can be made not only smaller in the future, but they also can be made of a 'non-rejectable' material so that the body wouldn't force it out thru the skin. Now let's take it out of the bicep, which has relatively little range of movement. If it were restricted to the upper arm, the reader/receiver would have to be at a certain height, relative to the "average" bicep height. This wouldn't last for long. It needs to be given a more full range of motion, so that employers/sellers/buyers/governments could put the receiver anywhere. What's a place on the body with a great range of motion, could reach either side of a door, capable of going high/low/everywhere? The hand, you say? What a novel concept! This is not a great leap to tie the necessity of having a chip implanted for work to requiring permanent identification for the conduct of everyday life, and as a side note, coming close enough to a 2000 year old prophecy(that I believe, BTW) to allow 'him who has understanding' to 'reckon'.

    2. Re:Frog in boiling water by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      You know the neat thing? Wether you believe in the religion or not they even knew this to be a bad idea *thousands* of years ago. That it will be used for Bad Things. Just goes to show that ancient people were not stupid and could foresee what certain things would mean just as well as we can.

      Sorta says something about modern people who think this is really neato and institute it at thier company.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    3. Re:Frog in boiling water by Eminence · · Score: 2, Interesting
      BTW, this gradual change did start with the need to prove someone's identity - with the advent of transportation people venturing outside their village needed to be identified by people other than their family and neighbors. This is the reason for paper documents which now more and more take the shape of a plastic card.

      It seems that a reliable method of establishing someone's identity is indeed necessary for a modern society to function. The problem is how to achieve this goal while limiting the probability of all the Orwellian scenarios occurring. So far on sites like /. I've heard mostly outcry for RFID chips, which is understandable, outcry about biometrics (like the mass-fingerprinting of everyone crossing the US border), which is understandable and all other kinds of outcry but no proposals of solutions.

      I would argue that the real question here is not this or that technical solution but the ethics of those operating them, not the tools but the hand that holds them. The most horrible totalitarian regimes were built without any RFIDs or nothing we consider today advanced technology. True, the more advanced the technology the more damage can be done with them - that's why we should worry more whether as civilization we are becoming more ethically mature with time at least as fast as we are more technologically capable.

    4. Re:Frog in boiling water by cpghost · · Score: 1

      we are becoming more ethically mature with time

      Well, I'm not sure we do. History bears many examples of societies that were highly ethical, just to suddenly (within a few years) fall into deepest babarian behavior. It seems that technological growth is a strictly monotoneously increasing function, but ethical maturity does have its ups and downs.

      Now what would happen if a mature society with high-tech surveilliance devices like RFID implants and ... who knows ... though regulation/control gizmos, suddenly turns bad? It happend before, let's not forget it. With all such surveilliance technology in place, will that society every be able to resist dictatorship and restore freedom later?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  75. Company Go-fers? by txsable · · Score: 1

    My first thought after RTFA (well, second after "not only no, but hell no") was that the two poor suckers who allowed the implants before the story was written will become the company go-fers.

    "Hey, dude. I can't get into the data center. Go get this tape for me."

  76. Does this deter theft? by pastpolls · · Score: 1

    Now, instead of steaing a badge and learning some codes, a person will have to kidnap an employee and "remove" their arm... or just dig the impant out with a knife.

  77. MOD PARENT UP INSIGHTFUL by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
    So before I needed to get close to an object (whatever had the rfid tag) which under normal circumstances an employee would not be carried around (say they were going home or something) or could have it in a reader blocking case. Now, I simply need to get close to an employ anywhere at any time to copy their data.

    Yep.

  78. Re:I think I'll prestate the sentiments of Slashdo by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes, like finding our biceps ;-)

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  79. Implant safety... by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    My first thought was, what happens if I'm in an accident that produces a crushing trauma on the glass implant? How big is it, and how big will be the glass shards in my bloodstream?
    Second - NO medical procedure is without risk - if you break the skin, you're breaching the body's number one immune system defense.
    Any form of encryption/DRM/security numbering scheme has a shelf life - as technology gets faster, mathematicians get smarter, etc, even if the hack that the article mentions is defeated, another hack will be only a matter of time...what's the average lifespan of DRM on music? About a week or a day? A few hours?

    You wanna stick a security number in my body? I'll do it for you...

    Tell me the number, I'll stick it in my brain. I'll use my digital output devices (hands) to type it in to a keypad every time I need it.
    And if it gets hacked, you can give me a new one to install. No problem.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    1. Re:Implant safety... by Lehk228 · · Score: 0

      RFID will not likely ever become true authentication, in order to power enough transistors to do the math for encryption they would burn your arm with the transmission, since RFID works using the energy of the scanning signal to power the reply.

      no matter how good we maketransistors, ones powered by a radio pulse will be easilly beaten out by ones powered by a small Li-Ion or Li Polymer battery.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Implant safety... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is not even close to true. Tags that offer cryptographic security--not always good cryptographic security, but better than the VeriChip--are on the market now. The tags cannot be cloned without major effort. The VeriChip simply isn't one of them.

  80. I remember when Asbestos was just good insulation by GoMMiX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now people are required to inject glass capsules into their arms to enter a facility?

    Now we know asbestos kills.

    What will be said of placing RFID tags into our bodies 50 years from now.

    Some risks are worth taking, there is no question. For me, this is not one of them.

  81. Biceps? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously don't want geeks. No self respecting geek would have biceps!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Biceps? by kfg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No self respecting geek would have biceps!

      Dolph Ludgren. Masters in Chemical Engineering.

      Go tell him he has no self respect. It should be fun to watch.

      KFG

    2. Re:Biceps? by TheWingThing · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are injecting into the right hand, you fool. Not the left hand.

    3. Re:Biceps? by DrMcCoy · · Score: 1

      I'm left-handed, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Biceps? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they use vertical mice.

    5. Re:Biceps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin Grevioux (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0340485/) (writer and performer in Underworld), graduated from Howard University in Washington, D.C. with a degree in Microbiology and then a Masters in Genetic Engineering.

    6. Re:Biceps? by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      No, your career chip is embedded in your right hand.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    7. Re:Biceps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you'd think with all that easy access to porn at least we'd have some on one side.

    8. Re:Biceps? by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

      13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.


      The bicep is close enough to this to give me pause. I would *never* consent to anything like that. I am not necessarily a believer, but I'm not going to take any chances.

      Besides, I don't believe in recreational surgery.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    9. Re:Biceps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it is Howard "University". The equivalent to the eighth grade.

  82. It's actually the TRICEP..and here's a pic by teknickle · · Score: 1
  83. proof that language creates reality by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    Until this point, the use of the word "hack" in reference to breaking into a computer system was strictly an abstract concept. "Hack" is not something one could be imagined doing with a pringles can. A machete however...

  84. What are the names of the employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know who's house to burn to the ground as thanks when my employer tries to have me "chipped" in a few years.

  85. Uhh... by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

    If they need implant these thingies in your bicep, how exactly do they get these thingies out?

    Personally, I like the Total Recall exit-the-nose method. Just not sure how it would end up in the nose.

  86. Full of holes? by gswallow · · Score: 1

    RFID, SHMAR FID.

    I just keep the keycode to our server room door pinned in the business side of my skivvies. Believe me, *nobody* wants to confront that security challenge.

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
  87. increased risk to employees by bitingduck · · Score: 1

    To say nothing of employee's arms being taken and used to gain access. Just need to have a large plastic bags to put the body part in to keep it from leaking all over the hacker.

    Who needs the arm? If the contents of the data center are really that valuable then some bad guy will just shoot the guy with the chip and pry the chip out with a knife. They don't need to carry the arm around.

    All the chip does is increase the risk to the employee's safety. Where previously you could beat him up and take his card/wallet, now they need to pry the chip out of his arm, which is probably most easily done when he's unconscious or dead.

    1. Re:increased risk to employees by jcr · · Score: 1

      And of course, it only takes one case of an employee being assaulted to steal the chip, before the company would be slapped with a judgement that would put them out of business.

      I can imagine some pretentious little git trying this, but any company large enough to actually employ a general counsel would quickly dismiss any manager crazy enough to suggest this.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:increased risk to employees by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason they would take the whole arm is that it would probably be difficult to dig around in the arm to find the implant. Much quicker to just use a hacksaw and take the arm. Plus they might damage the RFID chip while trying to extract it.

      The whole idea is about as silly as it can be. While it sounds hi-tech and probably would impress most managers it does nothing NOTHING to improve security.

      Although it might be good to use as a method to tag point haired bosses so we can track their movement through the various companies during their careers.

    3. Re:increased risk to employees by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Although it might be good to use as a method to tag point haired bosses so we can track their movement through the various companies during their careers.

      That's not bad...

      You can already use rfid badges/implants/hairpieces/whatevers to make something like the "Marauder's Map" from Harry Potter. Just expand it to a worldwide thing, and stick to the implants/hairpieces to just get PHBs.

  88. Burn it down? by brxndxn · · Score: 1

    At least a disgruntled employee can burn the entire data center down without an implanted RFID chip...

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  89. Some Advise... by the_flyswatter · · Score: 1

    I'd think it's time for a NEW JOB! There's security... and there's stupidity... and that place has firmly reached stupidity.

  90. End of world? by rshands · · Score: 1

    Not the end yet, but were getting there. Take a look at Rev. 13 11-18 11Then I saw another beast rising out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb and it spoke like a dragon. 12It exercises all the authority of the first beast in its presence,[c] and makes the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose mortal wound was healed. 13It performs great signs, even making fire come down from heaven to earth in front of people, 14and by the signs that it is allowed to work in the presence of[d] the beast it deceives those who dwell on earth, telling them to make an image for the beast that was wounded by the sword and yet lived. 15And it was allowed to give breath to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast might even speak and might cause those who would not worship the image of the beast to be slain. 16Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave,[e] to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, 17so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. 18This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666. rs

  91. Did anyone actually follow the links? by crazypolak · · Score: 1

    You people, follow the stupid links. /. sotry => Register article => CASPIAN homepage => Spychips.com

    has anyone ever heards of these websites? Furthermore, if one were to actually look at the original article, one would see that it consists of nothing but heresay. There are no links to press releases from citywatcher.com about this new policy, for example. There are no interviews with the people whow ere actually "injected" with RFID chips. All that the original article talks about is simply some network admin who claims his company has implemented this new policy. What utter crap.

    1. Re:Did anyone actually follow the links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a press release with other quotes from the company here: http://cincinnati.dbusinessnews.com/shownews.php?n ewsid=61044&type_news=latest/

      It's unbelievable, but true. The facts check out.

  92. Does not prevent access from attack... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    This is no different then using biometrics to secure the door, and there is a huge flaw in that. If a group of people attack an installation that uses biometrics (or in this case RFID), all this means is that they attack/kill/capture a guard/other who has access to the area and uses their handprint, eyes, or in this case arm with the RFID chip to open the door. The same will go for key cards, the tactics change very little, the armed group finds and kills the first guard they can find and if they can do so without that guard getting out an alarm, they will usually have at least several minutes before their presence will even be known.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  93. Guarantee it yourself... by $ASANY · · Score: 1
    Any medical X-ray will fry the chip. It's likely that the scatter from a dental X-ray would as well. So get thee to the doctor, and see what happens when the management encounters an unexpected failure. Bound to happen. Frequently. It can't be abused if it isn't working.

    This is going to be one of those LF tags, not the 900 MHz passive tags more commonly used, because fluids block those pretty well. Those LF tags are used to track livestock and help figure out who a lost pet belongs to. Reliability there is pretty decent, although livestock dosen't get exposed to the same EMR we humans get.

    I doubt this is really workable.

  94. Stop looking for excuses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's pathetic that when something like this is foist upon people, I read whiney comments like "but couldn't I object on religious reasons?" Fuck that! Here's how its done: You stand up and you say "NO I WILL NOT!". Yes, you could lose your job. Yes, you like your job, as it pays for your geeky bloody ipod and other whatnot. Yes, it pays for the roof over your head. But consider this: (yes, american-centric example, deal with it) What if the founding fathers said "but can't we object to the tax on blah blah reasons? I don't want to lose the revenue... or that tea... it might make our lives difficult!" They stood up and said NO MORE! and that is what you better start doing before you become any more of a slave than you already are! And before you even start with the "but they were wealthy and became presidents and blah blah" you better read your history. Most of the signers of the declaration of independence lost their fortunes, homes, business, jobs, friends, and most of them lost family members. Sometimes you have to pay the price to stay free!

  95. Paranoid? by runlvl0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I have an inherent distrust of anything wireless, which is why I still have cables running from my mouse and keyboard, refuse to use Bluetooth, and use wireless only when I have to and even then almost exclusively in Linux (though with WPA/WPA2 and a nice, long, random shared key, it's not so bad). My current record in a lab for cracking 128-bit WEP is about 14 minutes, start to finish. Paranoid?


    Paranoid? Not until you do all of your computing inside a Faraday cage. Until then, you're just a TEMPEST in a teapot.
    --

    Carthago delenda est!
    1. Re:Paranoid? by matt4077 · · Score: 1

      Actually, a teapot could make a rather nice Faraday cage.

  96. What's the big deal? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    It's not really a security threat: after the employee leaves the company, or if you suspect he's been "compromised," just pop him in the walk-in microwave in the canteen for a minute or so to disable the chip. As a bonus, you might just scramble his neurons so he can't walk away with trade secrets.

  97. Also used on hurricane corpses by bigberk · · Score: 1

    I've seen some press releases about the company that develops this VeriChip product including this weird one about how the implantable chip was used tag corpses after the gulf hurricanes. This kind of medical identification I can understand, but to allow yourself (as a living human) to have this injected into yourself? Are people that desperate to keep jobs in America?

  98. Some use crypto; VeriChip,which doesnt,was cracked by njyoder · · Score: 2, Informative

    VeriChip has been cracked. That's only because it didn't use cryptography. JHU researchers have cracked the Exxon Mobil Speedpass [research link] cryptographic RFID devices using brute force. It took 15 mintes per key, but this required 16 $200 FPGAs ($3200) working in parallel.

    Ignoring the time taken to reverse engineer the protocol, it also requires extra equipment to do the analysis for the actual reverse engineering. To my knowledge, no code has been published publically.

    At this point in time, it seems that cryptographic RFID devices, despite being cryptographically weak, are pretty secure from a practical standpoint due to a level of sophistication require to execute attacks currently.

    Plus I must wonder a) how close you have to be to read/activate VeriChip devices and b) if the readers are inside of a faraday cage when they enter the facility. At the very least, this will remove the possiblity of using lost keys or ones that were left lying around unattended.

  99. I hear the datacenter techs are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wearing tinfoil cufflinks

  100. BULLSHIT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:BULLSHIT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is information about CityWatcher and a photo of the guy quoted in the story here: http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?A ID=/20050925/NEWS01/509250409/-1/CINCI/

      There's a press release quoting one of the other guys in that photo here:
      http://cincinnati.dbusinessnews.com/shownews.php?n ewsid=61044&type_news=latest/

      The doctor mentioned in the press release is an authorized Verichip minion:
      https://authctr.4verichip.com/ph_brow.asp?sortby=p r_city&ph_state=*/

  101. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Spychips book http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1595550208/sr=8-1 /qid=1139498540/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-5929623-2290305?_ encoding=UTF8/ references a patent application for a deep organ implant complete with an electric cattle prod device and a microphone. The inventor talks about using them on "corporate campuses."

    Resume:

    Other information: Team player, mindless suck up, pre-chipped (VeriChip and deep organ)

  102. Re:YES.... by dhanes · · Score: 1

    Dood, jeez my kneez. While you may have some valid points there, is there something I can do or something I can give you to help you calm down? I'm afraid that you are going to pop that aneurism, and that's just a mess here that I don't want to help clean up.

    --
    Wait, What?
  103. Creepy by peterfa · · Score: 1
    This is creepy, for starters. My real point is that couldn't you just:
    1. record the signal that activates the chip.
    2. Drug one of the guys and drag him in a secluded room somewhere, or incomapasitate him in some means.
    3. Play that signal back and record what his chip respons with.
    4. Play that signal back to the machine when it sends its signal that you recorded in the first place.
    Viola, access granted.

    Or a nice EMP, which wouldn't be too hard for things this small, and just disable all those chips and be a real pain in the arse?

  104. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    I think you're confused.

    Glass IS an insulator.... but entirely different than asbestos. It is used to REPLACE asbestos.

  105. Imperfection of the devil? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's the imperfection of the devil or the imperfection of god ;)
    Don't tell me everything is running candy-dandy uh ..

    although, why do you need to look closely to it?

    If people see a sign in it will be related with a certain feeling (superstitious) a sign is just a sign; even if you look from closely - it represents what you like it to represent... If I don't like a certain sign because of my believe or feeling on my body, I pretty please like to keep that decision on me.

    It's 8am .. I am reading slashdot .. instead of sleeping .. ugh ..

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  106. I hope it's not passive... by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    Unless heathcare gets cheaper it would not be wise to keep implanting new chips:

    All you need is some innocent bystander standing in front of the building entrance with a distrupter. Better yet, some automated device... Now that would give new meaning to a 'DoS' attack.

    Imagine that--"Honey I could go to work today cause I couldn't get in..." Not good business-wise.

  107. Others? by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Are they intending to chip the janitorial staff as well? What about management, security, etc? Do they get chipped as well?

  108. Feedback page! by jacklebot · · Score: 1

    It would seem as if they have a feedback page. Let's tell this great company what we think of them, guys!!!
    http://citywatcher.com/cwpage.asp?pagename=contact .asp

  109. LETS LEAVE THEM FEEDBACK:--) by jacklebot · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the all caps, but I thought everone would want to leave the company doing this a nice 'thank you' letter for helping destroy society. Here is the address to their feeback page. Feel sorry for the low-paid worker that has to sift through this. Though, if we send enough, someone with a tie and bloated salary may get wind of it, at least.

    http://citywatcher.com/cwpage.asp?pagename=contact .asp

  110. I would do it. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    If the company abuses it and it becomes a privacy concern, hey... I have a pocket knife.

  111. mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Revelations 13:16
    He also forced everyone, small nad great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

    While it might be possible to call an rfid chip a "number", this thing is installed in the calf. So I wouldn't exaclty call this the mark of the beast

  112. The chip should be embedded in your ass. by charliesmagic · · Score: 1

    The McVeigh Posterior Postulate

    "Sit here for entry scan"

    You had Poached Eggs for breakfast.

    You spend too much time in the bathroom.

    You get too many hard-ons.

    Etc.

  113. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by GoMMiX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am not confused.

    My reference to asbestos, once used as insulation in homes/buildings, was to note the now well known effects of cancer caused by asbestos.

    Perhaps in light of this information, my previous post will seem more complete.

  114. Tinfoil pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a new development, the company is now also requiring that the employees wear tinfoil pants when they are NOT in their workplace. This is required to secure the implant chips from unauthorized access. Some of the less geeky geeks are complaining that this seriously interferes with their sexlife. The company however claims that they would not hire such unqualified people in the first place, and having a sex life or a high level of personal hygiene that would prevent the person from wearing tinfoil pants at all non-work ours, would mean that their employment would need to be reconsidered. Access to unsecured non-tinfoiled biceps will not be allowed in the company.

  115. Hoax. by jcr · · Score: 1

    This is either a hoax, or this company's general counsel got his law degree from a mail-order vendor.

    For the record, the appropriate response to a requirement of this kind is to walk out, make a picket sign, and call every reporter in your town. For good measure, see how many of the "mark of the beast" believers you can get to show up.

    If that doesn't shame them into giving up this asinine idea, sue for emotional distress.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  116. Ok, I'm 99% sure this is a gag. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Their website says:

    Social Mission

      To operate the company in a way that actively recognizes the central role that business plays in society by initiating innovative ways to improve the quality of life locally, nationally and internationally, in all communities we serve.

    Central to the mission of CityWatcher.com is the belief that all three parts must thrive equally in a manner that commands deep respect for individuals in and outside the company and supports the community.


    Sorry, but chipping your employees the same way you do to a pet or your livestock just doesn't gybe with "respect for individuals".

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  117. Thank IBM! by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

    You can thank IBM for some public awareness of RFID systems from their new series of Helpdesk commericial advertisements.

    You know the one, with the desk in the middle of the road that stops a truck, "The Boxes told me you were lost!", blah, blah...

    That's sufficiently creepy that more than one non-techie friend commented to me about it, with the general attitude of "Hmmm, I didn't know they could do that. Chalk up another one for Big Brother."

    So, thank IBM for the public awareness campaign, and for having put it in a (no doubt unintentionally) scary way.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  118. Are the VPs exempt? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    The article says that only 2 employees have been chipped. What about management? The VP and his tour of VIPs that want to see the datacenter? The guys with the guns that keep out the people who don't have the implants? The giant killer robots sent to penetrate the datacenter? I don't for a minute believe that only two people have access, it's too easy for both those people to be unavailable when the company needs to get someone inside.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  119. Liability? What if the thing has side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I sure hope this compnay has talked to its lawyers. What if the things gives you bad unknown side effects, either physiological or psycological? I almost hope the two people who have had the implants fall seriously ill.

    What if the side effects show up years after you have left the company's employ?

    Shaheed

  120. Just say "NO" by Symbiot · · Score: 1

    Each person who agrees to this reinforces it and causes the pressure on the rest of us to do the same to increase. People have a moral obligation to refuse to do this stuff because when they don't they drag the rest of us that much closer to slavery right along with them. Seriously people, say "no" now when all you stand to lose is your job.

  121. Sounds like an opportunity by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If most of the employers in a town suck, you can do quite well by being the one place that doesn't. Grab the 20-percenters from every other IT outfit in town.

    I did a bunch of interviews to pick out a developer for a customer of mine in Denver once. We weren't offering a whole lot of money, but just the fact that we were doing something moderately interesting attracted an amazing level of quality among the applicants I saw.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  122. BIG-GAS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why are violations of civil rights only bad if a government does it?

    I should think that infringements are a problem in and of themselves and not dependent on the entity doing the infringement, whether government, company, school, individual or religion.

  123. Interresting Question by aepervius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went to their web site and many time they repeat the word "secure". Now granted this could be marketing bunk destined to pointy haired boss, but a passive RFID tag without private key cannot be qualified as secure even remotely. So I will stand on a leg and state that the GP is wrong and the Parent post is right, you cannot so easily copy the tag.
    Veri Chip
    Veri Guard Brochure


    What is quite frightening is that they purport on site tracking up to 15 foot (5 meter!). This is WAAAY beyond the distance the RFID-CHip-are-ok-sleep-safely-it-won't-be-abused-p eople purport is short. For me 1 foot is short. With 5 meters/15 feet readability, then you can REALLY immagine implementing a reader everywhere and fully track a population (in a firm/company/city/country).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Interresting Question by cgenman · · Score: 1

      It's a marketing ploy. (thank you, nephew post) Passive, static RFID. Easy to clone, unless they've upgraded recently.

      But even if it wasn't, why implant it? Theoretically that should prevent someone from stealing someone else's wallet and getting in, but you shouldn't be allowing access to people without proper ID anyway. I pose the question genuinely... what's the advantage?

      Also, with wireless devices, there is no fixed range. If you're going to make a wireless RFID reader, you might as well give it a wide range. Any range you may care to get can be had with a sufficiently high send signal and a sufficiently good receiving antenna (or array). If it is one foot it might as well be 50. The 15 foot range might help you hide the equipment, might let them put it behind walls to make it less succeptable to attack. It might also be covering for certain angles through the body where the RF would have a hard time penetrating. They might just want to sell a more expensive antenna array, or expect the signal to get fainter as the system ages. Having a smaller range makes reading harder, but for the kind of cash you're talking in industrial espionage, you should have no problem.

  124. VERY FISHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    i saw some user comments about this same issue on another site...he brings up great points:
    Did anyone read the source material? The only evidence comes from a press release of SpyChips.com, an anti-RFID group. Their source? A network administrator at CityWatcher.com. Not exactly stellar reporting, i.e. confirmation of sources. Pay close attention to the list of recommended books at the end of the press release. The last one is ?The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance?. In other words, SpyChips.com is a front for people who think RFID is the mark of the beast.
    this makes perfect sense...a group of paranoid radicals fabricating some story about a surveillence company (citywatch.com) to get thousands of people angry enough to shut them down for something they didn't do
    1. Re:VERY FISHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google and weep:

      ahref=http://cincinnati.dbusinessnews.com/shownews .php?nrel=url2html-4716http://cincinnati.dbusiness news.com/shownews.php?n ewsid=61044&type_news=latest/ [dbusinessnews.com]

      There are even pics of these guys floating around.

      I was rooting for your theory, but this is true.

  125. Clonable? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1
    Anybody who actually wants to know whether Verichip uses the cheap send-a-number approach or the more expensive challenge/response is welcome to read Jonathan Westerhues's Verichip examination.

    Activists have pointed out another detail that raises a question. What if the employee needs an MRI? The implant is not necessarily unsafe but the directions do say not to put it in an MRI unless the patient is conscious to report burning or "unusual sensations". Any doctors want to comment on how often you do MRI's on unconscious people? Is it not a problem in practice?

  126. Borg Nanoprobes ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they make those rfids small enough you'll sprout extensions in no time!

  127. Re:I think I'll prestate the sentiments of Slashdo by Detritus · · Score: 1
    Q: How would you like to have an RFID chip implanted in your bicep?

    A: How would you like to have 158 grains of lead implanted in your skull?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  128. Re:Hate to say it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, the physical/martial geek speaketh. Please, tell me all about swords and chokeholds and 1RMs. I'll just be resting my eyes.

  129. here the hills ring with freedom by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
    ...I hope that the goverment would do something if this was forced on the employees working in the datacenter
    This is the USA, the land of the free. No one would ever or could ever force this or any other condition of employment on citizens. We will always have the freedom to starve to death instead. All other "freedoms" were concocted by activist judges who hate America.
  130. Broken glass inside my arm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... could not even begin to compare to the pain I've just experienced by reading your horribly mangled post. You deserve worse.

  131. Here's why they REALLY suggesting implants by badzilla · · Score: 1

    Implanting people like this is not really sustainable. There are the practical difficulties of sticking things in and out of people plus for many it will just be a flat-out perpetual refusal, job or no job.

    But then when a "much more reasonable" alternative is presented, for example palm-vein biometric scan, then they hope people will go "oh great, tht's much better than having something stuck in my arm, yes sirr I'll enroll for that."

    Plus the short-term publicity for the datacenter company.

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  132. Re:chunk of bicep by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    I doubt the chip would be reusable employer to employer just like current badges are incompatible say between ADP and the CDC. If the chip would be the employee's SSN, that would be the next dumbest thing aside from being an implant.

    I imagine that upon termination, the employer would ask the employee into a room, strap them down, say "this won't hurt a bit", and pull out a Matrix type contraption for extracting bugs, and yank away.

    However, a reusable RFID number does make the most sense. The MRI is the scary part.

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  133. can you imagine... by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    if these things every did leed to some kind of "problem" in the subject.. And not just a simple "dam, these things give you cancer" type problem, but things like (as has been sugested), "the bastard cut my arm of because i couldnt give him my tag"

    My god i'd not want to be on the wrong end of that lawsuit...

  134. Stupid attempt at a joke by damneinstien · · Score: 1

    You must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot; no-one reads the story

  135. Re:A Kilometerstone by Lectrik · · Score: 1
    Slaves and criminals were marked with red hot iron before. It happened in America and elsewhere. If that's not forced permanent identification, I wonder what is.


    Yes, but that's only a forced permenant identification as belonging to a certain group. I'd imagine the implanted RFID is unique to each employee. It seems much more like being branded/tatooed... only with your name and list of criminal offences burnt/inked into your skin as well.

    And just wait until they start setting off the anti-theft detectors in every store they visit :)
    --
    --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
  136. Two phrases by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    The two phrases most often overheard in that datacenter:

    You're a chip off the old block.
    You must have a chip on your shoulder.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  137. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, Big Brother is YOU!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

      On Endemol's TV, you watch Big Brother!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  138. Not Management by fwitness · · Score: 1

    Management just finds a chipped employee and drags him up by the scruff, the slams him up to the reader.

    --
    -- I have fans? Wow.
  139. RFID tags? I'd settle for a decent lock... by exKingZog · · Score: 1

    ...on my 'data centre'. The current one would break to a moderately-forceful kick, and the partition walls are so thin you could probably push a finger through one of them anyway. Ah, the joys of working in the small business sector...

    --
    "If he were a plant, people would roll him up and smoke him."
  140. Re:I'm probably going to get modded as a troll, bu by ktakki · · Score: 1
    The cliched Joe Sixpack will probably never hear of this; heck, I don't think Joe Sixpack knows what RFID is.

    Well, if Joe Sixpack has bought a new car within the past five years, he will. Maybe he won't know it as RFID per se, but he'll know that his car key is "chipped", and getting a duplicate costs $80 instead of $1.50.

    And if Mr. Sixpack is a Wal*Mart employee, like 1.3 million other Americans, he'll even know RFID by name; it's used on pallets as inventory control.

    Eventually, RFID will become as ubiquitous as bar codes.

    k.
    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  141. Maybe not such a milestone by jc42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this the first time civilians have been required to do thing type of thing?

    This may not be exactly the same thing, but it's somewhat of a precedent: A few years ago, after a mammogram, my wife had a biopsy to check out something "suspicious". It turned out to be nothing important, though.

    Some time later, she had another x-ray at a different place, and she saw that the image had a visible object at the site of the biopsy. She was told that it was a small piece of plastic left behind during the biopsy procedure, and that this was a fairly common thing. Sort of a "We were here" tag.

    Whether it's an RFID chip we don't know. But at least some medical people are already implanting small "innocuous" things without mentioning it to the patient. And there have been stories of medical uses of RFID chips to help avoid the common problem of misidentifying a patient.

    It's easy to put such things together. If you've had any "penetrative" medical work done in the past few years, there's a good chance that you're carrying an RFID chip now.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:Maybe not such a milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I find your problem troubling. So that the /. community may be of assistance out please post pictures of your wife's breasts. Pictures of both are needed since one will the control. Posting them on USENET is cool too. =)

    2. Re:Maybe not such a milestone by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WTF? Who moderated this "troll"?

      I almost didn't read it when I noticed the -1.

      Maybe the meta-mods will catch it, or maybe not.

      Actually, using a second breast as a control for the other may not be all that great an idea. Usually they are slightly different in size and shape, as are most men's testes. And both breasts get exposed to anything in the blood stream.

      What you obviously want is a second woman who is a match for the first in as many ways as possible. Then you compare all four breasts.

      Lessee what sort of mod this gets ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Maybe not such a milestone by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      I'm ready and willing to conduct as many examinations as possible.

    4. Re:Maybe not such a milestone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I find your problem troubling. So that the /. community may be of assistance out please post pictures of your wife's breasts. Pictures of both are needed since one will the control.

      Are you SURE you want to see that?

      Remember the old joke: What does a 50 year old woman have between her breasts that a 20 year old woman doesn't have?

      A: Her navel

  142. RFID Club membership by Acid-Duck · · Score: 1

    Something simillar to this was already done over a year ago at a club for example [cnn.com]. Old news

    1. Re:RFID Club membership by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
      Thank you for the interesting article on a bar in Barcelona that implants these into their "VIP" customers (http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/10/05/spark.baja beach/). I'm confused though by the statement of the doctor who removed the RFID device from the reporter, that "it is very soft". Contrast that to the statement in an earlier CNN article (http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/sp ain.club/index.html) that states that the device is "made of glass", as does this Slashdot article.
      Although the microchip was visible on the X-ray, it was impossible to pinpoint the exact location in my arm as it was nowhere near the point of insertion.

      Finding it involved surgery at the clinic and a severe dose of post-Baja regret. One night out in Barcelona has permanently seared into my upper left arm.

      While splayed out on an operating table -- once again anaesthetized -- Andersson removed the chip using a high-tech sensor X-ray and two monitors to guide her to it.

      The missing microchip was finally located -- more than a centimeter away from where it was inserted.

      Andersson later explained that it was so difficult to remove because it was so small and soft.

      "It is very soft. I understand why we had a problem finding it. You couldn't feel it and I couldn't feel it. The smaller they are, the more difficult they are to get out."
  143. Wow! Talk about "Vendor Lock-In"! by pushf+popf · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine trying to tell the employees

    "We've got Good News and Bad News. The Bad news is that we got 10% off from another vendor if we agree to switch to their new iris verifier. The good news is that we're going to cover 50% of the cost of having a surgeon remove the old implant, and that very few of you will have permanent damage"

    Unless they're paying a fortune (maybe 10x-20x the going rate) for salaries, I can't imagine any self-respecting geek allowing personal hardware modification (chip implant) at the request of an employer. Personally, I'd tell them to talk to my lawyer, and if that cost me data-center access or my job, I'd tell them to talk to my lawyer again.

    Some religions prohibit body-modifications so it should make a facinating test case.

  144. Re:I think I'll prestate the sentiments of Slashdo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's spelled biceps in the plural and the singular: one bicpes, two biceps...

  145. mod parent up -- ROTFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't comment... too busy laughing

  146. Another way to look at it by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    If you take your datacenter employees to the park and they run off chasing squirrels and later turn up at the pound, then the staff will scan their chip and be able to return them to you.

    Personally, I'd tell them to kiss my fat butt. They could implant an RFID chip in my arm when they pry the empty Sig/Sauer P229 out of my cold, dead hands.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  147. how much does it cost ? by J4nus_slashdotter · · Score: 1

    What's about the price of the RFID chip and the human intervention ? I think that it must be really expensive.. Isn't the biometry safer for a lower price ?

  148. anatomical nitpick by DrRobin · · Score: 1

    Although the cited article states that the devices are implanted in the biceps, the original press release says that it is in the triceps. Also, the company web site describes the implantation as "just under the skin" (subcutaneously, i.e."sub-Q") rather than in the muscle (intramuscularly, i.e. "IM"). Triceps would make more sense if you need to get close to a wall-mounted reader. Sub-Q location would also be less painful and less dangerous, e.g. in case of infection. Just to show one can be just as geeky about wetware issues. For /.-ers not up on their anatomy, see the wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triceps
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biceps_brachii

  149. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by jc42 · · Score: 1

    My reference to asbestos ... was to note the now well known effects of cancer caused by asbestos.

    Actually, this has been pretty well understood since at least the 1930's. There are papers on the asbestos-cancer link in major medical journals back then. Google found them for me with a single try. (Homework problem: Guess the keywords. ;-)

    The use of asbestos in construction for half a century afterwards is one of the many textbook examples of why we need government regulation of industry. A lot of corporate management is quite willing to endanger their employees' and customers' lives for a small per-sale profit. Despite the knowledge of asbestos's dangers, many companies only stopped using it when threatened with serious criminal penalties.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  150. Time to look for a nother place of employment by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I know personally i wouldnt stick around. even if i didnt need access to the datacenter.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  151. zapper by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

    Implanted? It wasn't mandatory. But if one has, what about that RFID-zapper? Use it near the affected person's arm and voila.

  152. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by Mathness · · Score: 1

    What will be said of placing RFID tags into our bodies 50 years from now.

    My Personal and Happy Thought Modifier does not allow me to anwer that. Furthermore My Personal and Perky Surveillance Monitor have reported you, please proceed to the nearest My Personal and Fantastic Behavior Modifier booth for reeducation.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  153. Nein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your link not withstanding (the image has no background), when I travelled in Germany (in 1978, admittedly a long time ago), I saw "Arbeit Macht Frei" in the camp gate at Dachau. (I didn't go to Auschwitz, which I think is actually in Poland, yes?)

    1. Re:Nein by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      The image in the link is from Dachau. The proportions of the gate are identical, but it's the guard tower directly ahead and the maintenance building (a museum now) on the right in the background that really give it away. I compared it with the photos I took during my visit to Dachau last year, and it's definitely the same place.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:Nein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently it was present at more than one camp.

      Link

  154. Not insignificant at all by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    The whitespace is what the barcode reader "reads", not the black part. Laser reflection and all that jazz.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  155. Won't that MRI hurt as it flies out. by su-geek · · Score: 1

    That company is silly, now those people cannot get an MRI if they needed one without having the silly thing removed. Besides that we don't know if the chip will migrate, or be pulled out by the magnetic field from an MRI. Bad company, bad sheep that work for them getting chipped.

  156. The glass is probably sufficiently inert, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a major concern with any small object like this is the possibility it will work its way loose from the muscle. Then these things have a tendency to find their way into the heart.

  157. Religious Motivations for Story Originators by miller60 · · Score: 1
    There's already been much discussion of religious concerns about RFID, but it should be noted that the researchers from SpyChips.com that discovered the Cincinnati company's use of RFID have religious motivations. The press release from SypChips notes this:

    "Albrecht and McIntyre, who are Christians, also have religious concerns about RFID chip implants. In their latest book, "The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance," the pair explain how plans by global corporations and government entities to broadly deploy RFID could usher in a world that bears a striking resemblance to the one predicted in Revelation, the last book of the Bible."

    If the facts are accurate - and no one seems to be disputing them as yet - then their motivations aside, they've provided an important service to privacy watchers. It's interesting to see Christian activists approaching the issue with fact-based investigative reporting rather then just Scripture.

  158. it's official by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

    The grays are taking over our nation's datacenters. Dispatch a unit of MIBs to Cincinnati, and step on it!

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  159. The singular is "biceps" by 503 · · Score: 1

    There is no such word as "bicep". The singular is "biceps" and the plural is either "biceps" or the rarely used "bicepses".

    1. Re:The singular is "biceps" by achesterase · · Score: 1

      Yeah and while we're at it, the term "biceps" is ambiguous, since you have "biceps muscles" in both your arms and legs (M. biceps brachii caput longum et brevis and M. biceps femoris caput longum et brevis).

    2. Re:The singular is "biceps" by achesterase · · Score: 1

      Sorry, brevis should be breve. Damn latin declinations. ;-)

  160. Just like in the Simpsons... by nonlnear · · Score: 1
    when Homer worked as a greeter at Sprawl-Mart (Not a parody of Wal-Mart).

    All the old employees had taken their compliance chips out years ago, but they stayed (apparently) docile. Then at night they would steal everything that wasn't nailed down.

    --
    argumentum ad fallacium: Fallacy of defining a fallacy which allows one to dismiss the argument in question.
  161. Porque... by advs89 · · Score: 0

    Well, before, someone could either steal the physical chip (er, um, TAG) OR clone it wirelessly... but now they have to clone it wirelessly since it is injected. So it eliminates the possibility of stealing it, yielding it slightly more secure.

    --
    Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
  162. A Line by Tom · · Score: 1

    That's where I draw a line: Bodily harm, no matter how small. Any company that requires that employees change their body or mind has crossed the line between employer and slave-owner.

    Wake up, you stupid jerks. It's just a job. It's not life, and less and less people define themselves via their jobs. 500 years ago, when you were asked who you are you'd say "the miller" or something like that. Over the past 10 years I've noticed that more and more people don't respond with their job title when asked who they are outside of business context.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  163. This would be usefull by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    This would be usefull as an alternative for the PASS card that most Americans will eventually have to get.

    Oh, no ulterior motive, it is simply easier that way. You see, if you have the chip, you won't need a safety check.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  164. 2-factor by Midnight+Warrior · · Score: 1

    As the cloning discussions reveal, this one-factor authentication is too weak. Two Factor Authenticaion is the solution to this. It's the constant trade-off between security and convenience. This company neglects the convenience factor without improving the security factor. Obviously, the public outcry will change their mind, if their employee's opinions haven't already. Besides, all they are storing are video camera footage tapes. Obviously, they want to be able to prove whether or not there has been tampering. So work on methods to detect tampering and just make it reasonably difficult to get physical access to the vault. Someone really needs to read some Bruce Schneier books.

  165. Violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Forcing people to do this is a blatent violation of constitution rights. Read the First Amendment.

  166. Re:How long are these left in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they remove them when you go home at night? How about if you leave the company? Can the police read them? Advertisers when you go to the mall? Are there any privacy safeguards?

  167. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by iamnafets · · Score: 1

    You may change your mind when you can't get a job to feed your family.

  168. How would these things interact with an MRI? by Jeremy+Singer · · Score: 1

    Just wondering. Every once in a while, people become ill or injured and need to be scanned by an MRI machine. These have big magnetic fields that can turn small pieces of metal into dangerous projectiles.

  169. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a test

  170. Seriously, what's next? by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    Say in the near future the SOCTUS says this is legal, so what's next? As the technology gets smaller and smaller how about:

    - a built-in GPS receiver to track your moves 24/7, transfering said info back to the boss anytime you walk by a company RFID scanner. Jogging two hours a day gets you break on the health insurance while three hours a day on the couch gets you canned.

    - monitoring your BAC (blood alcohol count), sending the on duty report to the boss and your company selling all the data to your insurance company or the State Police. Substitute the BAC for THC or anything else.

    - Stores install RFID sensors at the checkout line so they can record your in-arm RFID and tie it to the credit/debit card you just paid with. Now since some stores are using LCD price signs, in theory, they could make price adjustments just for you according to your wealth, debt load, credit or anything else that let's them charge more.

    Pretty outrageous ideas? Thirty years ago the whole idea of implanted tracking devices in humans would've been labelled evil or a Communist plot. RFIDs don't bother me, they're just a tool. What bothers me is what an army of PHBs will do with the data.

    Long story short: RFIDs would be great if we could guarantee people's privacy. Of course we can't so IMO their use will only leave to revolt.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  171. It's not more secure... and it's hideous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, if they have a problem with people trading badges, etc. then the solution is to FIRE the people trading or sharing badges. Add a few cameras to cover all the areas of the DC and you're done. Once you catch the first bozo, and fire it - then that problem pretty much goes away for a while.

    If you really want two person authentication which isn't invasive, then add a keycard with a hirsch scramblepad and make everyone pick a decent 4 or 5 digit code (the obvious BS ones excepted of course). It works like this: Geek approaches and waves card, Hirsch pad then beeps - geek presses the start button on the pad, and then the pad scrambles the location of the digits... Geek enters the code, and if it matches, the door opens. If not, then the laser canons come out of the ceiling or something like that...

    but this bit where you get implanted or you don't get in and can't do your job is bullshit. It's not like it's a safety issue where the company says you have to wear a heat resistant suit to do your job - this is some fucken bullshit that they're trying to stuff inside of your body! Nope, never gonna happen with me.

    In fact if I worked there and they tried that with me, I'd sue the shit out of them for creating a hostile working environment, endangering my health, and violating my religious freedom (I'm Jewish, and getting a tattoo means I can't get buried in a Jewish cemetery... I suspect that an RFID tag would be considered the same as a tattoo to my Rabbi...). And let's consider the fact that once it's in my arm I can be tracked on and off the premises by any manner of person (including the nefarious types).

    I'm not putting my fingerprints into anything, scanning my retina or iris, or allowing myself to be mapped in any damn way. Give me a card, let me remember a PIN - that's it. It's good enough - hell, at least as good as some piece of crap RFID tag is...

    NOW is the time to rise up and say "FUCK YOU" in the loudest possible terms to anyone trying to pull this shit. Join CASPIAN (www.nocards.org) and fight for your rights to privacy.

  172. kind of like by Pooldraft · · Score: 1

    Police Departments don't have quotas but if you want to be promoted you better met some requirements(aka promotion quotas). I am sure the company will let you be employed there if you don't what the implant but if you want to go anywhere in the company (i.e promotion) then you would most likely need an implant. Good Luck. I would chill for a bit and try to find another job. One day RFID's implants will be like drug tests, everywhere. Money, Profit, MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE

  173. Getting Mugged gets a whole new meaning by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    Getting mugged here gets a whole new meaning, as now you're going to have the great back-alley forced surgery. I'd rather they just take my damn keys. It's bad enough they're already skinning my fingers, stealing my retinas, and hair.
    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  174. Finally! by xant · · Score: 1

    Here, at last, is something useful that crazy fundamentalist christians could be doing: protesting this ridiculously insecure waste of time.

    Can we get someone to tell Pat Robertson about this?

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  175. Real security would be: by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    4 factor security:

    1) Retina scan
    2) Password Entry
    3) 1024 bit authentication smartcard
    4) Big Frank, if I don't know ya, you don't get in.

  176. No matter by voxel · · Score: 1

    No matter how much you like to think you are Big Brother, there is always a bigger brother watching.

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
    1. Re:No matter by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 0

      But you can make him stop if you cry "Uncle!".

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  177. I smell Bull$*^! by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    This story has got to be bunk... this company requires implants to access their data? Yeah, and when one infection occures from this device - lawsuit city.

    There are SO many other forms of security already in place that can prevent unauthorized access to datacenters - this one is actually not that secure!

    biometric scanners (iris and palm), ID badge access that is checked by a security guard, pin + rsa keyfob generated password, and an "airlock" type room between public and secure areas that weighs the person entering. It would be almost impossible to dupe this setup... in any event it would be MUCH more difficult to duplicate than to skim and reproduce the rfid chip.

    And if security is your top priority - injecting microchips into your people and letting them walk around with private keys in their arm isn't a good practice.

  178. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by Forbman · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is the asbestos (ok, particular kind of) *FIBERS* that are small enough that they can pass through cell walls and because they're inert, aren't really picked up by the immune system beforehand, either. Because they're so small, yet still glass (i.e., sharp), they then cause mechanical damage at the nanoscopic scale.

    There is nothing to suggest that a macroscopic blob of glass will cause any problems whatsoever. Look at how long glass lasts in the environment, for example. It does not break down due to chemical actions (unless it's raining hydrofluoric acid).

  179. Who is in control? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    If the sentient individual is in charge of it's own destiny, then it's transhumanism. If it's being enslaved by someone else, it's something much less desireable.

    This "seems" to be an in-between case...but with very disturbing overtones of the "something else".

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  180. I have done it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merlin, re:

    "always wondered about making a program to compute all the possible combinations of the Jewish alphabet that adds up to 666 (filtering out all the nonsense ones of course). Someone must have done this somewhere already."

    Yes, I just finished it! Let's see, the name of Satan is spelled out, umm, okay, first letter is a "J" ... here comes the second letter, hmmm, an "E" ... let's see -- HOLY SHIT!

    The name of the beast who is numbered 666 is:

    "JESUS CHRIST"

  181. Degrees of seperation... by zakkie · · Score: 1

    OK, someone want to do a check to see how many degrees of seperation there are between this company and someone high-up in the Bush Administration? I'd bet on a clear chain of no more than 3 nodes between these guys and someone in Bush's circle or possibly in the FBI or so... I'd do it but I'm busy :P

  182. Bill Gates is the Devil by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    On a side note: always wondered about making a program to compute all the possible combinations of the Jewish alphabet that adds up to 666 (filtering out all the nonsense ones of course). Someone must have done this somewhere already.

    This has already been done - for english at least. Check out http://egomania.nu/gates.html for the details that show Bill Gates is the devil. Or wait until Vista comes out and check
    Start Button
    / Control Panel
        / Security Center
            / My RFID Implant

  183. Re:I think I'll prestate the sentiments of Slashdo by beuges · · Score: 1

    dude, i'd think the bicep would be one of the best developed muscles on the average slashdotter's body :p

  184. Particularly mean. by Mr.Spaz · · Score: 1

    It seems to me it would be possible to build a device capable of overloading the tag with RF, causing it to overheat or pop. If you felt like being particularly nasty, you could just point the antenna at these poor fools and leave a broken, burned piece of glass in their arm. Probably not any sort of life-threatening injury, but certainly painful.

  185. Security Flaw (Cloning) by joepeg · · Score: 1

    Cloning it would require the participation of the owner

    From TFA:

    "Ironically, the extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant's authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release."

    So, yes the person would need to be in the proximity, but apparently they would only need to walk by you and your scanner/cloning device.

    Which brings up another question: How do they plan to upgrade the already implanted devices? It appears additional surgery is necessary for these models. Obviously, they will need to move to a remotely upgradable model. That way, the devil can administer these devices directly from hell. I don't really believe in the devil, but this does make me sick. 666!

    --

    ZEN is a prime number in base-36

  186. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Glass is a horrible insulator. Ever put your hand on a single pane window in the dead of winter?

  187. I call: BS !!! by jwd-oh · · Score: 1

    The source of this article is from an anti-RFID group. Security focus needs to do some fact checking. Maybe Slashdot, too. Did anyone call City Watcher to verify the facts?

  188. Not only creepy, but stupid by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    • RFID's can be cloned
    • Implanting them vs. carrying them only helps to prevent loss or theft (not a problem if you keep close tabs on them to begin with)
    • Upgrading them or revoking them now requires a surgical procedure
    • You're opening yourself up to a huge variety of liability issues (what happens if Joe Data develops an infection from the surgery or some study comes out saying implanted RFID's cause cancer--lawsuit city, that's what),

    All that just for a false sense of security? Who on earth would want to hire a company this stupid?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  189. ^^ MOD PARENT TROLL ^^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent seems to read a lot of media buzz and FUD about Cincinnati, and never have actually visited.

    I have never worked for an inconsiderate company, in 3 Cincinnati jobs. (though one of my previous companies was sold to 3M, which is moving them to China, and supposedly laying everyone off)

    The riots "as seen on TV" were a result of problems between police and gangs, and the apparent racial bias of the shooter/shootee. It had nothing to do with businesses.

    Cincinnati is in Ohio, which was never a slave state. We fought on the side of the North.

    Baseball bad-press is a result of quotes taken out of context from an owner who preferrs sailor-style language. (baseball-style?) I've heard she was once actually rather well-loved in the baseball community. I've noticed people seem to derive a lot of opinion from age/physical appearance, which is sad. Besides which, winning/losing streaks are completely offtopic.

    1. Re:^^ MOD PARENT TROLL ^^ by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      For your information, I live in Covington Kentucky, a suburb of Cincinnati. I have first hand experience. If you were going to give America a high colonic, Cincinnati is where you would put the hose.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  190. Re:I remember when Asbestos was just good insulati by GoMMiX · · Score: 1

    That, good sir, is an act of desperation I could not conceive.

    It's an alarming though, though, that should such practices become commonplace -- one might find themself making just that decision.

    Which is exactly why now is the perfect time to say hell no to crap like this.

    Another comedic, though not really, thought that comes from this are all the movies where a bad guy pulls someones eye out for a retnal scan. Perhaps the new Sci-Fi flicks will include people having their arms ripped off to pass through RFID scans.

  191. Implantable RFID chip by Commander+Olav · · Score: 0

    RFID Security Scan: Looks like Mr. Jones has been drikning and having sex with prostitutes again.