Domain: gop.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to gop.com.
Comments · 70
-
Gang sites are easy to find
Here's an easy-to-find one:
http://gop.com/
Let's get the cops over to their crib right away! -
Re:He just took the lead in it's creation you jackHere is, incidentally, the actual quote: During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.
And you're the idiot. Eisenhower, for example, while president, took the initative in creating the interstate highway system, but he didn't invent roads. Gore, while Senator, took the initative in creating ARPAnet and expanding it from a government project to the real world.(1) Hillary, while first lady, took the initative in creating a national health care system, and she isn't a doctor and didn't invent medicine.
Creation doesn't mean invention, and what's more, 'taking the initative in creation' doesn't even mean 'creation', so you're like two steps away from truthfulness. I can take the initiative to do something by standing up and getting others to do it. Senators, obviously, cannot do everything, so they tell others what to do. That is why he said he 'took initative' instead of saying he actually did it. It was, instead, done in a lab, at his direction. (Granted, his rather indirect direction. He said 'Hey, you got a bunch of computers talking to each other? Here's some more money, keep spending it on that.'.)
No one in the universe parses 'When I was in a political office, I took the the initiative in creating X' as saying 'I invented X' unless they're delibrately trying to misparse it. Politicians take initiative by championing bills.
What's more, they use that exact terminology all the time. That is, in fact, what the damn word 'initiative' means in politics. Witness Bush's 'American Competitiveness Initiative' and 'Helping America's Youth Initiative'. How is he going to help American's youth? Why, via legislation. I quote the GOP: Hughes has served as an adviser to President Bush on many foreignpolicy fronts and took a special interest in the status of women in Afghanistan, leading the President's initiative to free Afghan women from the Taliban. Holy shit. The president is wandering around freeing women in Afghanistan?
Or is Gore 'taking' the initiative somehow different from Bush possessing the initiative? What grammar silliness are you going to try to weasel through there?
The Republicans had a theme in the 2000 election that Gore lied all the time, and this is just one of their most absurd twists of his statements. (This theme is really ironic in the face of who we got instead, Mr. let's-pretend-they-have-WMD.)
1) And, in what continues to baffle me, everyone knows he was a damn champion of this. The entire fucking first term of Clinton was filled with Hillary yammering about national health care, and Gore yammering about, wait for it, The Information Superhighway. Granted, he was talking about earlier, when he was in the Senate, but if there's any politican anyone alive during the early 90s should link to the internet, it's Gore.
-
Re:One more irreverent comment
I thought that Wilson said the yellow cake claim was not true
Correct.
the white house came around and admitted the fameous "16 words" in the state of the union were in fact not true
Source? I remember them saying they shouldn't have put it in the address, but no statement that I'm aware of retracted the statement as untrue.
[me:]every independant investigation thrown at it, both in England and the US
The GOP has a page with a good summary on how Joe Wilson lied. The Washington Post also has some more.
I thought Clarke didn't make just "gossipy" claims, but very disturbing ones such as how he couldn't even get an audience with Rice, et al.
The end of that sentence undermines the beginning.
The leak on the NSA is viewed differently because of the disturbing notion that the government is now spying on the "free press" in a manner that brings facist or communist regimes to mind.
Or you and me private citizens. Anonymous sources are the tools of a kangaroo court, which is much of what the media runs these days.
And the NSA program is nothing I see a problem with. While one can wonder what such a vague term as "domestic spying" means, the actual program and what is going on is nothing I've seen a problem with.
but Reagan and Michael Deaver showed a long time ago that the medium controls the message, not the substance of the message.
I'm not saying people can't be duped. I'm saying if people are duped its their fault becuase the truth is usually very accessible. If not the truth than proper principles that help one decide the right thing to do with little information.
entitlement reform just won't happen until those programs actually crash and burn
*Sigh* but one can always hope. Looking at GM and how they are litterally knocking on the door of bankruptcy for what they pay out in pensions, I can't imagine what will happen when the US government goes bankrupt also. I imagine the furor we saw when people only suspected they would be shortchanged would be a hundred fold more sevier when they are faced with a real loss of everything. -
Re:One more irreverent comment
I thought that Wilson said the yellow cake claim was not true
Correct.
the white house came around and admitted the fameous "16 words" in the state of the union were in fact not true
Source? I remember them saying they shouldn't have put it in the address, but no statement that I'm aware of retracted the statement as untrue.
[me:]every independant investigation thrown at it, both in England and the US
The GOP has a page with a good summary on how Joe Wilson lied. The Washington Post also has some more.
I thought Clarke didn't make just "gossipy" claims, but very disturbing ones such as how he couldn't even get an audience with Rice, et al.
The end of that sentence undermines the beginning.
The leak on the NSA is viewed differently because of the disturbing notion that the government is now spying on the "free press" in a manner that brings facist or communist regimes to mind.
Or you and me private citizens. Anonymous sources are the tools of a kangaroo court, which is much of what the media runs these days.
And the NSA program is nothing I see a problem with. While one can wonder what such a vague term as "domestic spying" means, the actual program and what is going on is nothing I've seen a problem with.
but Reagan and Michael Deaver showed a long time ago that the medium controls the message, not the substance of the message.
I'm not saying people can't be duped. I'm saying if people are duped its their fault becuase the truth is usually very accessible. If not the truth than proper principles that help one decide the right thing to do with little information.
entitlement reform just won't happen until those programs actually crash and burn
*Sigh* but one can always hope. Looking at GM and how they are litterally knocking on the door of bankruptcy for what they pay out in pensions, I can't imagine what will happen when the US government goes bankrupt also. I imagine the furor we saw when people only suspected they would be shortchanged would be a hundred fold more sevier when they are faced with a real loss of everything. -
Stop whining - indeed.Let me give you a piece of advice. Regardless of whether you believe that's true, never never mention those reasons in a discussion with strangers. It will only have two effects: getting the people who agree with you more pointlessly agitated, and making the people who disagree with you think you're a nutjob. It will not win anyone over. Whether you are right or wrong is immaterial.
Something many people here and in other predominantly-left forums seem to be missing is that many Americans truly, honestly believed that Bush was the better candidate. I doubt that your average Republican voted for Bush any more automatically than the typical Democrat voted for Kerry, and yet everyone seems to think that only Republicans were partisan voters. Well, guess what: there are sheep on both sides of the fence. Singling out one group of them will only alienate the bloc of voters you should be trying to persuade.
I voted for Bush for various reasons, but I would probably stand alongside you if a recall vote were held today. The time for partisan sniping is over. We need to work together if we want to make a difference.
As a side note to fellow Republicans, his closing advice is just as valid for us. Contact the RNC and make your opinion known. Write to your representatives and senate and let them know that you disagree with executive branch policies. This is your party: step up and take charge of it.
-
Re:.us domain?
"If aliens would like to see webpage of WHOLE earth's goverment, where would they go?"
GOP.com, of course. -
Voting with your dollars; Duverger's law
We live in a capitalist society, and in that kind of society products and services and provided by companies based on the greatest demand.
The analogy between demand and votes, often called voting with one's dollar, is a common rhetorical device. Besides, apathetic American voters elected the Republican and Democratic legislators who enacted the anticircumvention provisions of the DMCA by voice vote, putting us into this mess in the first place.
When your right to vote gets taken away because your black, or your right to drive gets taken away because you're a woman, then you can start complaining.
My right to vote, and the right of everybody else who doesn't agree with the platform of the GOP or the ASS to vote, is already taken away under the equilibrium of Duverger's Law, which applies to all first-past-the-post election systems.
-
Re:You got it wrong...
"Gringo" has a pejorative element to it. You know this as well as I do.
Bullshit! Maybe in Mexico there is a little negativity to the word but in the good old USA there is not. How else can you explain people naming their restaurant Gringo's Restuarant? If the word "Gringo" was racist like you claim don't you think that the number of google hits would equal Nigger's Restaurant?I'd say you're the one who's using "weasel words" here as a way to veil your hatred.
Hey, you don't know me, how dare you accuse me of "hatred"? At least I am not afraid to let people know who I am instead of cowardly hiding behind some pseudonym like your chicken-shit ass!And if you don't feel like you can participate in civil discourse without bigoted terms, then you're the one who should leave
Let's compare Slashdot user ID's - I have been here a lot longer than you and I will probably be here when you are long gone. I am quite capable of civil discourse but I will call out IDIOTS when I spot them, and you have proven that you are a first-class idiot!I'm sure Latino-nationalist hate sites like Voz De Aztlan or MEChA would love to hear from you.
This confirms it, you are an idiot deluxe!
First of all, those are CHICANO groups, LATINO is a "weasel word" created by the great WHITE fathers in Washington D.C. that is used to lump together different Spanish-speaking groups into one group for statistical purposes. Calling groups as different as Chicanos and Cubanos with the word Latino is like saying that someone from England and someone from Germany are the same because they are both White Europeans.
I'm sure that that people from those countries will vehemently deny that that is true, so why is it OK to respect THEIR cultural differences while WHITE-washing (pun intended) differences between MY culture and other Spanish-speaking cultures?
Second, Voz de Aztlan and MEChA are NOT hate groups! Find me an official US Government webpage that says they are and that US citizens will be prosecuted for contributing to those groups like they can for contributing to groups like the Irish Republican Army. You can't because that webpage does not exist!
If anything, you are the one that is a racist by denying me and my fellow Chicanos the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you want to find a bigot all you have to do is look in the mirror, pendejo!
Maybe if you stopped reading Mein Kampf and Republican Party propaganda long enough to look around and see what is really going on you will quit accusing people of being "bigoted" when in reality they are not... -
Re:A matter of pride
-
Re:Can they levy a tax on spammers?
Technically Ed Gillespie is the Head of the republican party. The President is the Senior elected official of our government and he happens to be a member of the GOP.
-
Re:Whaaaa?
George W Bush might have had more opportunties because of his familiy, but he still had to do the work.
He might have gotten into the college he did because of his family, but he graduated based on his own work.
Although there are discredited claims from some partisan Democrats that they helped George Bush get into the Guard, and some people will never believe the facts:However, the Dallas Morning News, which also looked into Bush's military record, reported that while Bush's unit in Texas had a waiting list for many spots, he was accepted because he was one of a handful of applicants willing and qualified to spend more than a year in active training flying F-102 jets.
... at the end of the day, even if against the evidence he was helped into the Guard, it was George Bush that learned how to fly, graduated from pilot school, and flew fighter jets, not his father or friends.
It was George W Bush that beat the incumbant Governor of Texas, Anne Richards, not George H W Bush.
It was George W Bush that edged out the internet genius Al Gore to become President of the United States by winning the only thing that counts under the Constitution: the winning vote in the electoral college. That he did it by the rare, but still legitimate, accomplishment of winning the electoral college vote with a minority of the popular vote just makes it more interesting. And what contributed to his victory was beating Al Gore in the 2000 debates.
No talent or accomplishments huh? Riiiiight.
Like I said, Harvard MBA, fighter pilot, Governor, POTUS. The man must be a LUSER. You should do so poorly.
-
Re:And this is an issue because?
Um. No. Sen. Kerry is opposed to tax reform. He wants to raise taxes. Maybe that's where you got mixed up.
So do you, personally, make more than $100,000/year? Because if you don't (and I damn sure don't), than saying "Kerry is going to raise taxes!!" is pretty stupid. Yes, John Kerry that horrible, evil, man wants to roll back the Bush government's huge giveaway to the elite. Cry me a river. I think Mike Dell and Mike Eisnier can afford to pay a bit more.In case you didn't notice the USA now has the single biggest deficit it has ever had in its entire history. *Someone* has to pay for that, or do you think (as Bush seems to) that the magic money fairy is going to just make the debt vanish? Deficit spending is like using a credit card, you get instant gratification, then pay through the nose later on. Someone's got to pay, and the elite have more money than I do, so let them pay for Bush's war.
Sen. Kerry wants to keep Social Security as it is; President Bush wants to introduce privatization initiatives.
I think a more accurate term is "corporatization". Considering the fantastic record the stock market has given lately (Worldcom, Enron, Haliburton, Disney, etc) I'd rather that my social security money stayed *far* away from it. Additionally, due to the various brokerage fees any corporatization of social security amounts to nothing more or less than a huge giveaway to the brokers. No wonder they all surport corporatizing social security...Sen. Kerry wants to make health insurance a federal entitlement; President Bush wants to cut health care and health insurance costs instead.
Yup, what a horrible idea, how *dare* Mr. Kerry suggest that the working poor should get health care. I mean, if there were socialized medicine that means we couldn't choose our doctors, completely unlike the situation today where our HMO's tell us what doctors we can see. Besides, if the HMO's went out of business the doctors would have to decide for themselves what treatment to give a patient, and we all know that greedy insurance companies are much better judges of health treatments than doctors are.Less sarcastically, are you aware of the fact that here in the US we spend around $4,500 per capita on health care. In Canada they spend around $2,500 per capita. In Japan (where they also have socialized medicine) its only around $2,000 per capita. The USA has the absolute highest per capita health care expenditures on the planet, and yet has the third lowest average life expectancy of any first world nation (only Ireland and Portugal rank lower). My point here is that the fabeled "efficiency" of corporatized medicine doesn't seem to be apparent in the real world. We spend more money, and have shorter lives, and you want me to think that that's a good thing?
There are important differences. These are just a few. Read the platforms.
Yup. There are, and I prefer Kerry. He's far from my first choice, and I see him as being only marginally better than Bush, but I do see him as being the better choice. As far as platforms go, I think that you'd rather that people *didn't* read the Republican platform, that thing's scary. They carefully showed their moderates at the convention, but the fanatics wrote the platform, and it shows. I notice that you don't really seem to want people to read it (since you didn't supply a linke) so I thought I'd like to the Republican platform. For your viewing pleasure, here's the Democratic party platform so people can compare and contrast. I couldn't find an HTML copy of the Republican platform, so I had to link to that PDF.You'll notice, as you read the Democratic platform that eating Christian babies, raising taxes on everyone, forcing streights to become gay, and surrendering to Osama are not actually part of the Democratic platform. Funny how reality doesn't really match what Rush says, isn't it?
-
Re:The reason I chose the PC over Apple...I think there very well is a firm dividing line between forced and unforced interactions.
In real life, there is no such thing as an unforced interaction. But that's a subtle argument, and I don't have the time. It's much easier to demonstrate that there is no simple line between harmful and benign actions.
- Throwing a knife = harm.
Throwing a napkin = no harm.
Spewing sarin = harm.
Spewing asbestos = ???
Spewing carbon monoxide = ???
Spewing peanut oil = ???
Spewing hydrogen dioxide = no harm
Filling in those "???" is HARD.
In between the two extremes, the courts would have to decide, JUST AS THEY DO NOW.
"Just as they do now?" What they do now is interpret a volume of governmentally-authored law that is vast beyond human comprehension. The Libertarian Party wishes do away with the majority of those laws, so the courts could no longer behave as they do today. If each court individiually decided what level of force was unacceptable, the result would be unfairness, whimsy, and trial-by-popularity.
Of course, the public will only stand up for such quasi-anarchy for so long. They will demand order, and it will be supplied either by a newly-reinvigorated government, or a collusion of corporate interests assuming the powers of statehood.
to any other party just as validly by simply substituting "LP" for the other parties name.
No, it doesn't work for the two major parties. They don't have a simplistic statement of principles. Their positions are more complex and realistic, because their activities actually matter in the real world.
Well, the Democratic Party is fundamentally nonsensical.
Nowhere on Democrats.org or GOP.com is there a statement of fundamental philosophy which exposes them to such easy ridicule as the LP's site. You can't really attack the two major parties on the strength of their ideals, because they have no strong ideals.
Why not, instead of dressing up name calling in big words to sound intelligent, you just say you think they suck?
They don't suck. I love the LP. I'm a big supporter of their widely-maligned narcotics decriminalization platform, for example. I truely view them as pushing the USA in a good direction, even though it'd be stupid to go as far in that direction as they claim to want. Since they will never, ever get the power to go that far, their long-term desires are irrelevant. Fanatics can be useful.
The overriding fact is that "Libertarian" societies have existed numerous times throughout history, and in each, the people have exercised their individual rights to chose a stronger government. "Libertarian utopias" are doomed to brevity. -
Turnabout is fair play
So a few weeks ago the Republican National Committee comes out with Kerryopoly, apparently criticizing John Kerry for being rich. Yes, that's right, republicans criticizing someone for being rich. The response? Contractopoly from the Centre for American Progress, where you get to collect no-bid Iraqi rebuilding contracts. There's an expression to do with pointing out the splinter in your neighbour's eye while not noticing the plank in your own, I think it might apply here.
-
Republican guards?
The so feared Republican Guards just disappeared.
Some wish they would...
What if Iraqi people were able to sort out Saddam Hussein themselves?
They weren't able to do so for decades.
-
Re:Your Poll
You have made some good clearly stated points and I believe I have as well. This has been a good debate, but we see things from a different perspective. I will make one final comment though.
It's too bad you didn't ask the same before believing the Iraq Weapons claims.
Actually I was against the war from the beginning. I felt that Iraq was not a real threat even if he did have WMDs, though I still do not doubt that Bush felt he was. I also felt that we were going into Afghanastan without enough proof. As it turns out we were right about Bin Ladin, and I am certainly glad that Sadam is out of power whether our war was justified or not.
Believe me I am not a Bush supporter. I just don't see a viable alternative. As for Kerry's voting record there is a nice chart here. The article is of course BIAS, but then again every article about politics is Bias. The chart is good though. For a source with far better source quoting try here If you can get past the fact that it is the GOP website. Finally for a completely unbiased look here is a link to his voting record. I notice quite a few instances where he was not voting. I have also read Kerry's website extensively and though I find him MUCH more tolerable than Howard Dean, I still wish there was a viable third candidate. -
Re:FP for Bush!
http://www.gop.com/default.aspx Sign up right at the top.
-
Re:Another cruel regime?
-
Re:Regan the democrat....
...funding was continued by another Democratic leader called George Bush.
I do not think that word means what you think it means. -
Re:Reverse discrimination
Im a young male puertorican in college and i agree with you 100% percent. Its unfortunate that the argument we share would have us branded as Uncle Toms by our own people.
Nahh, we call you "Tio Taco"...One of my life goals is to find like-minded people and help spread this message.
A few links to help you (visit in order so as not to confuse your tender young mind): Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, Storm Front, and Odin's Lounge.
Good luck in your quest to find "like-minded" individuals. They probably will kick you out of the organization as soon as you tell you are Puerto Rican...
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!