Slashdot Mirror


Gangs on the Internet

mikesd81 writes "Apparently street gangs have gotten Web-savvy. Web Bangers are posting potentially incriminating photos and taunts on their websites. Police departments suddenly faced with gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites. The director of the National Gang Crime Research Center has stated "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.' Knox said it's important for police to learn how to read between the lines on gang Web sites and blogs. Just as time on the streets has given gang investigators the ability to read the hieroglyphics of wall graffiti, time on the Web helps them understand arcane Web clues. Gang identifiers, such as tattoos, graffiti tags, colors and clothing often are embedded in each site."

402 comments

  1. I know what to do... by MrChom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Publish a Grand Theft Auto MMORPG and use google adsense to advertise it on gang blogs...take real world crime into virtual space....and make money....wonderful.

    1. Re:I know what to do... by Scrapey · · Score: 1

      Yes and then add Jack Thompson into the mix. Hot Coffee AND Myspace. I can see the headlines now...

    2. Re:I know what to do... by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      Publish a Grand Theft Auto MMORPG and use google adsense to advertise it on gang blogs...take real world crime into virtual space....and make money....wonderful.

      and in that MMORPG there will surely arise an insufferable lawyer who complains that the real world has become a gateway to video game violence.

    3. Re:I know what to do... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm going to start a GTA LARP just to mess with these kids heads.

    4. Re:I know what to do... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i could have sworn that one of the expected games for xbox360 was a online multiplayer gang warfare game.

      but all i got to go on is a promo video a person had gotten on a magazine dvd...

      but from the looks of it you could steal cars, tune cars, and have your "friends" pile in to do drive-by shootings...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    5. Re:I know what to do... by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      Just wait, someday a presidential candidate will run under the premise that they can get all street gang members to become addicted to the internet, so much so that they only kill things online in games, thus making our streets safer.

    6. Re:I know what to do... by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      The population of griefers will go up a hundredfold!

    7. Re:I know what to do... by HuckleCom · · Score: 0

      Genius! Instead of REALLY killing eachother they can duke it out over the "internets" and gain status!

      Oh wait... then the aimbots will start coming...

      Before you know it, they'll be killing eachother in real life over using an aimbot in the game;

      But at least it won't be over territory :)

    8. Re:I know what to do... by Chris+whatever · · Score: 1

      i remember an epsiode of Star trek where two civilisation killed each other virtually and people went to a disintegrator when their region was touched virtually by ennemy fire.

      maybe they should also try this option and just killed themselves instead,,after a while they'll realize it's pointless

    9. Re:I know what to do... by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      my question is WTF do witches and devil worshippers have to do with Al-Quada and violent gangs?

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  2. Gangsters use MySpace by aymanh · · Score: 5, Funny
    The tendency for gang members to brag about their exploits on Web pages such as the popular networking site Myspace.com has in some cases helped investigators make arrests.
    Are you telling me that future versions of GTA will involve browsing and posting to MySpace?!

    Nooooo!
    --
    python>>> q="'";s='q="%c";s=%c%s%c;print s%%(q,q,s,q)';print s%(q,q,s,q)
    1. Re:Gangsters use MySpace by James+McGuigan · · Score: 3, Funny

      It would be more like eXistenZ, posting to your blog from within a MMORPG subgame of GTA running on a virtual linux machine, that is being simulated within the holodeck of the Starship Enterprise that in turn is...

  3. Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who was the geek that started this whole thing? Gangs on the Web? What kind of world are we living in?

    1. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      myspace hardly requires any leet geek skills... this is just a sign that the web has got dumb enough for dumb people to use it.

    2. Re:Seriously... by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      this is just a sign that the web has got dumb enough for dumb people to use it


      People have been complaining about dumb people using the internet ever since AOL started giving their users access to it.

      (i would hardly be surprised if the guys that created Darpanet were the first to get concerned about dumb people accessing the would be Internet when universities started giving students access to it)
    3. Re:Seriously... by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      >>this is just a sign that the web has got dumb enough for dumb people to use it

      >People have been complaining about dumb people using the internet ever since AOL started giving their users access to it. ...and if you read the posts from august 93, then the early geocities boards, and then your l33t-filled myspace pages you can see two things:

      a)the decline in intelligence in online user-generated content

      b)that the people bitching about AOL were spot-on.

  4. 1337 gangsta... by a_greer2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got a bewolf cluster of guns, cross me and I will pop a cap in your boxen!

    1. Re:1337 gangsta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Surely it's time to bust out some MC Plus+

      I got mad hoes and I got mad bitches
      I'm coding in C and I branch with switches
      Java programming and C++
      I program high homie, pass the dutch

    2. Re:1337 gangsta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah they'll probably code in Eubonicode

    3. Re:1337 gangsta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! I just replaced the capacitors, when those popped. Please don't, sir!

  5. Oh no! by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long until gangbangr.com 2.0 websites talking about the gangosphere?

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  6. Gangster Help Wanted Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looking for a G with html and 187 skillz

    1. Re:Gangster Help Wanted Ad by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and in the same newspaper:

      In other news, a cyber turf war was sparked today when the MySpace Crips DDOSed the Geocities Bloods. The Bloods retaliated by hacking the Crips website to say "Eastside is t3h sUx0r"...

    2. Re:Gangster Help Wanted Ad by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      I don't know about this HTML thing, but this gang tried to recruit me once because I was pretty good with a bo staff...

      --
      I got nothin'
    3. Re:Gangster Help Wanted Ad by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      So you have good bo-staff skills. What about your numchucks skill? Or your bow hunting skill?

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  7. those evil Wiccans by coshx · · Score: 5, Funny

    In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida [sic], witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.

    I'm sorry, but comparing witches to Al-Quaeda is a bit of an ad absurdum. We all know witches are more powerful, which is why we dealt with these terrorists in the 1600's, and did not not deal with the latter terrorists in the 1980's when we could have.

    1. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Here's our (wiccans) language, understand this and maybe you'll realize why most people dont understand us (including law enforcement and our government!)

      The Wiccan Rede

      (Full Version)

      Bide within the Law you must, in perfect Love and perfect Trust.
          Live you must and let to live, fairly take and fairly give.

      For tread the Circle thrice about to keep unwelcome spirits out.
          To bind the spell well every time, let the spell be said in rhyme.

      Light of eye and soft of touch, speak you little, listen much.
          Honor the Old Ones in deed and name,
        let love and light be our guides again.

      Deosil go by the waxing moon, chanting out the joyful tune.
          Widdershins go when the moon doth wane,
        and the werewolf howls by the dread wolfsbane.

      When the Lady's moon is new, kiss the hand to Her times two.
          When the moon rides at Her peak then your heart's desire seek.

      Heed the North winds mighty gale, lock the door and trim the sail.
          When the Wind blows from the East, expect the new and set the feast.

      When the wind comes from the South, love will kiss you on the mouth.
          When the wind whispers from the West, all hearts will find peace and rest.

      Nine woods in the Cauldron go, burn them fast and burn them slow.
          Birch in the fire goes to represent what the Lady knows.

      Oak in the forest towers with might, in the fire it brings the God's
        insight.Rowan is a tree of power causing life and magick to flower.

      Willows at the waterside stand ready to help us to the Summerland.
          Hawthorn is burned to purify and to draw faerie to your eye.

      Hazel-the tree of wisdom and learning adds its strength to the bright fire burning.
          White are the flowers of Apple tree that brings us fruits of fertility.

      Grapes grow upon the vine giving us both joy and wine.
          Fir does mark the evergreen to represent immortality seen.

      Elder is the Lady's tree burn it not or cursed you'll be.
          Four times the Major Sabbats mark in the light and in the dark.

      As the old year starts to wane the new begins, it's now Samhain.
          When the time for Imbolc shows watch for flowers through the snows.

      When the wheel begins to turn soon the Beltane fires will burn.
        As the wheel turns to Lamas night power is brought to magick rite.

      Four times the Minor Sabbats fall use the Sun to mark them all.
          When the wheel has turned to Yule light the log the Horned One rules.

      In the spring, when night equals day time for Ostara to come our way.
          When the Sun has reached it's height time for Oak and Holly to fight.

      Harvesting comes to one and all when the Autumn Equinox does fall.
          Heed the flower, bush, and tree by the Lady blessed you'll be.

      Where the rippling waters go cast a stone, the truth you'll know.
          When you have and hold a need, harken not to others greed.

      With a fool no season spend or be counted as his friend.
          Merry Meet and Merry Part bright the cheeks and warm the heart.

      Mind the Three-fold Laws you should three times bad and three times good.
          When misfortune is enow wear the star upon your brow.

      Be true in love this you must do unless your love is false to you.

      These Eight words the Rede fulfill:

      "An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will"

    2. Re:those evil Wiccans by pieterh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, obviously after the War on Terrr, we can expect a War on Witches (with televised burnings on Fox News), followed by a War on Evil (and I know my neighbour must be a devil worshipper), followed by a War on Youth, after which there will be no-one left to consume drugs, giving us a neat conclusion to the War on Drugs.

      When all those wars are complete, we can expect a War on Wars, which will involve the peaceful use of tactical nuclear weaponry on all those who remain after the subcultures have been eliminated.

      When it comes down to basics, humanity is just too unreliable and messy to be trusted with its own fate.

    3. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And for those who might not get what that's saying.. look at the last line "An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will".

      Basically a wiccan must do good things all the time. If a wiccan does something harmful (to someone else or themselves) they were have that harmful energy return three-fold. It's kind of like Karma but it's even more powerful because its three-fold.

      Harming anyone is a big no-no, if a wiccan harms anyone they are not a true wiccan (and that includes themselves not just others), they can't do "spells" on other people without the person asking first, etc.

      And they don't push their beleifs on anyone, in fact most people might actually know a wiccan or work with one without even realizing it.

    4. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      For tread the Circle thrice about to keep unwelcome spirits out.


      My dog does that one before she lays down. She also drags her ass on the ground for no apparent reason; is that a Wiccan thing?

    5. Re:those evil Wiccans by kjorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Round where I live we still have to deal with witches and their pagan rituals.

      Here is a recient story (last week) of a witch torturing her lover and dumping his body in the sea.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cornwall/5150 954.stm

      She was caught texting messages to her (dead) lovers other girlfriend, using his mobile...or something equally hi-tec and complicated.

      cool huh?

    6. Re:those evil Wiccans by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Round where I live we still have to deal with witches and their pagan rituals.

      Well, I lived in Cornwall (Connor Downs to be precise) for about 10 years, and saw no evidence of any witchcraft or related activities.

      Then again, I spent a fair amount of my time either drunk or stoned...

    7. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us know when you turn 17 and decide wicca was a bunch of bullshit.

    8. Re:those evil Wiccans by ajs · · Score: 1
      yadda, yadda, peace and love, yadda ...in fact most people might actually know a wiccan or work with one without even realizing it.

      They're trying to take our guns!

      Appologies to The Colbert Report.
    9. Re:those evil Wiccans by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it means that your dog has worms. Get it to a vet.

      --
      The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

      - Douglas Adams

    10. Re:those evil Wiccans by jcostantino · · Score: 1

      Regarding the scooting - You need to "express the anal glands" which is the foulest thing I have ever had to do. Google it to find out what it is and use your imagination to guess how much filth comes out of a 9 year old dog that has never had it done.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    11. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sorry, but comparing witches to Al-Quaeda is a bit of an ad absurdum.

      Or you could take it the other way: the guy was going for a wide variety of "subcultures" as possible

    12. Re:those evil Wiccans by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm sorry, but comparing witches to Al-Quaeda is a bit of an ad absurdum. We all know witches are more powerful, which is why we dealt with these terrorists in the 1600's, and did not not deal with the latter terrorists in the 1980's when we could have.
      The witchhunts weren't anything to do with witches, it was all pretty much Christians killing Christians.

      It was a sweet deal, if you think about it... want someone's land? Turn them in for "witchcraft" and you and the government get to split their assets after they're roasted. Angry at a woman for rejecting your advances? No worries, she'll probably have a freckle - oops, I mean "devil's mark" - one can blame the world's problems on, and up in smoke she goes. Afraid of your wife because she knows how to read better than you do? Poof, and you get to look for someone younger and stupider next time.

      400 years ago it was "witches." 50 years ago it was "communists." These days it's those darn "terr'rists." People will always find a way to persecute other peoople they don't like for whatever reason.
    13. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA

      First of all, she murdered him because he was leaving her. It wasn't as part of a ritual.

      Secondly, it doesn't say anywhere that she was a wiccan - just that he was.

      Even if she is a wiccan, it's no different to the numerous christians who commit murder despite the 'thou shall not kill' commandment.

    14. Re:those evil Wiccans by fader · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's kind of like Karma but it's even more powerful because its three-fold.

      *snort*

      Log in if you're going to post gems like these -- I want a name to quote this with. It's priceless.

      --
      - fader
    15. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, and Islam is a religion of peace. Just cause they SAY they are peaceful, doesn't mean they all are. Most of them seem like vindictive/scorned women.

    16. Re:those evil Wiccans by saboola · · Score: 1

      Yoda?

    17. Re:those evil Wiccans by sidfaiwu · · Score: 1

      Strange, but all the wiccans I've met, save one, are neither vindictive nor scorned. One is a good friend of mine. Like just about any community of sufficient size, there are many good wiccans and some bad ones. That is, of course, unless the communities stated purpose is evil. The KKK and terrorist groups come to mind.

    18. Re:those evil Wiccans by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Yes. We had to do this for my dog once. Vile indeed.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    19. Re:those evil Wiccans by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for giving me this lovely mental image for the rest of the day. If I wasn't so nice I'd post a picture of goatse for you.

      *pushing food away*

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    20. Re:those evil Wiccans by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

      Your dog drags her arse on the ground because it itches and it itches because she has worms.
      Take her to the vet, she's probably over due for vaccies anyway..

    21. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...the Horned One rules..."

      the new Dodge Ram?

    22. Re:those evil Wiccans by carn1fex · · Score: 2, Funny
      I agree! Poor wiccans, what harm can they do? It should have read something like this:

      "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, DDR players, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language."

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

    23. Re:those evil Wiccans by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Well said. Supposedly the witch hunts also went after people who practiced herbalism (and competed with doctors aka "barbers"), odd old lonely woman who kept cats as pets (plus you could take their land afterwards), and anyone who practiced a form of Christianity that veered from dogma (i.e. Cathars). Even printing a bible in English could get you burned alive (John Hus).

      The period of the Spanish Inquisition resembled the petty snitching that took place in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union. People would make false accusations just to settle scores or grab someone's property.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    24. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida [sic] ... Al-Quaeda ....

      Not to be pedantic (well, yes, to be pedantic), but 'Qaida' is a perfectly fine transliteration of the term. If you want to be a bit more precise, I'd use 'al-Qa'idah,' but 'al-Qaeda,' 'al-Qaida' and 'al-Qa'ida' are virtually standardized in Western usage. 'al-Quaeda' is an outlier, and I'm not sure what transliteration system was used to come up with it, if any. I have seen it in a number of British newspaper articles, but it's a definite minority opinion, and really should be disfavored.

      In written Arabic, the term is 'qaf-'alif-'ayn-dal-ta' marbuta' (qa'dH, where the 'H' is unvoiced). In pronounciation, it's something like 'KHAA-(glottal stop+i)-dah', in which the first consonant is a strongly plosive and gutteral 'kh'. Since it's rather difficult to properly pronounce Arabic in conversational English (hell, it's difficult to pronounce Arabic at all, properly or improperly!), 'ka'ida' and 'kai-da' are close alternatives, with the first being closer. Pronounciations like 'kay-da,' 'kway-da,' 'key-da' and 'kwee-da' are right out.

      In any case, please don't follow the NYT convention of capitalizing the definitive article; 'al-' is standard usage.

      Damned witches.

      -tWB

    25. Re:those evil Wiccans by FroMan · · Score: 1

      War on Witches, I don't think so.

      It'd be War on Tarot.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    26. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes better watch out for the evil KKK cause they have a stranglehold on political power and the backing of the media. that's why blacks have to drink from different fountains than whites and must ride in the back of the bus. bad old whitey! Too bad we couldn't have a government that tramples on our rights in the name of some mythical equality.

    27. Re:those evil Wiccans by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      When all those wars are complete, we can expect a War on Wars, which will involve the peaceful use of tactical nuclear weaponry on all those who remain after the subcultures have been eliminated.

      Hmm, are we going to recycle that one and call it the Lukewarm War?

      Honestly, I think the War on Terror was the best one invented. No real enemies, no borders, no timeframe, but I would guess that w/o any signal in the news (a real terror attack) the noise will overtake it, and we will have to go back to the old real enemy with borders and a specific agenda. Ambient paranoia usually does not last for very long for the majority of the population, and in time they will get frustrated with having their privacy, security, and freedoms hindered without any new perceived threats to them.

    28. Re:those evil Wiccans by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Funny, all the Wiccans I know are big old earth mommas that dress in all black, wear cystal necklaces, and smell funny... And they usually have names like Gwendolyn or Genevive and drive VW Jettas...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    29. Re:those evil Wiccans by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      "Round where I live we still have to deal with witches and their pagan rituals. Here is a recient story (last week) of a witch torturing her lover and dumping his body in the sea."

      Maybe she played too much D&D.

    30. Re:those evil Wiccans by Twylite · · Score: 1

      Witch hunts since the colonisation of North America have mostly been about subjugation of women.

      Is she trying to have her own opinions with her husband's permission? Must be a witch. Husband sleeping with a younger, prettier woman? Couldn't be him! She must be a witch. Woman trying to read or get an edumacation? Unnatural I tell you! Must be a witch! Widow without a husband or children being an economic burden on the town? Well she must be a witch -- Godly people have children you know.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    31. Re:those evil Wiccans by hrrY · · Score: 1

      Actually your dog does that because she needs her glands(anal) popped, you could bring her to a groomer(a good one) and they will do it. Think of it like colonoscopy for dogs:D

    32. Re:those evil Wiccans by sidfaiwu · · Score: 1

      Your description still doesn't match the ones I know. Maybe it's that not every member of a group matches the stereotype people apply to members of that group.

    33. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Round where I live we still have to deal with witches and their pagan rituals.
      Here is a recient story (last week) of a witch torturing her lover and dumping his body in the sea.


      This is not "interesting", its a "troll" and should be modded as such. If these people met via Christian church instead of the pagan community, nobody would be going on about "those murdering Christians" would they?

    34. Re:those evil Wiccans by j79zlr · · Score: 1

      Witches might not exist, but terrorists do. You probably think the government blew up the twin towers though....

      --
      I'm not not licking toads.
    35. Re:those evil Wiccans by skarphace · · Score: 1
      Ambient paranoia usually does not last for very long for the majority of the population, and in time they will get frustrated with having their privacy, security, and freedoms hindered without any new perceived threats to them.
      ahahahahaha... good one!
      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    36. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Witches might not exist, but terrorists do. You probably think the government blew up the twin towers though....

      Oh, the irony. Have you, by any chance, heard the phrase "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"? I'm guessing not.

    37. Re:those evil Wiccans by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you forgot to add "Won't somebody think of the children" in your post... Oh and also "If you aren't a terrorist, you have nothing to hide"..

      Now that's a good little cattle, go back to chewing your cud in the field... Try not to think about anything too hard...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    38. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep telling youself witches don't exist, even as you continue to read a post that was written by one.

    39. Re:those evil Wiccans by fatboy · · Score: 1

      400 years ago it was "witches." 50 years ago it was "communists." These days it's those darn "terr'rists." People will always find a way to persecute other peoople they don't like for whatever reason.

      So those darn "terr'rists" are just like witches. Tell that to these peoples' families.

      --
      --fatboy
    40. Re:those evil Wiccans by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're talking to a member of one of those victim's families, and I'm not talking about the actual terrorists. I'm talking about everyone who gets mislabelled a "terrorist" by a frightened public who wants to do away with them. I've been called a "terrorist" for attending peaceful protests. People nowadays are constantly called terrorists for having the wrong name, accent, skin color, or political view.

      Sure, there were people calling themselves "witches" in the 1600s. There were also real practicing Communists in the 1950s, and there are actual terrorists in the world now. But how many non-witches were burned at the stake? How many innocent people had their lives ruined by being accused of Communism during the McCarthy era? And how many people are now called "terrorists" for looking or thinking differently than you?

      Nothing justifies taking a word that scares the majority, and using it as a blanket term to describe anyone you hate/fear/disagree with, and to ultimately effect their dissappearance.

    41. Re:those evil Wiccans by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's possible, but also remember dogs scent glands are around that area. Often the dominate dog will drag it's ass along it's home to leave it's mark there. The same way male dogs pee all over the place, female dogs often drag.

      --
      I like muppets.
    42. Re:those evil Wiccans by salmon_austin · · Score: 1

      Some dogs also get a very itchy ass because their scent glands are filled up. My dog has to get his scent glands cleaned out every vet visit. He definately doesn't have worms, he's just prone to it (been tested many times).

    43. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough I just read a book that briefly touches on the witches and trials. While this far after the event we cannot be certain it appears as though contamination of grain with ergot may have had a key role in the witch trials throughtout history.

      Check out "Magical Mushrooms, Mischivious Molds" By George W. Hudler, Proffesor of Plant Pathology.

    44. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was Goatse the first google hit on "express anal glands? :-)

    45. Re:those evil Wiccans by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      On a serious note, its rather insulting. Most witches are really peace loving people that just operate on the fringe of society, mainly due to misunderstanding.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    46. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been called a "terrorist" for attending peaceful protests.


      Well, that certainly seems uncalled for.

      Nothing justifies taking a word that scares the majority, and using it as a blanket term to describe anyone you hate/fear/disagree with, and to ultimately effect their dissappearance.


      Given that you're apparently still around, and posting on Slashdot, I'd say these two statements seem to be at odds with one another.

      Unless, of course, you expect your disappearance to be "effected" soon as a result of your being labelled a "terrorist."

      Hyperbolize much?
    47. Re:those evil Wiccans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      This nasty-ass process is referred to as "expressing the anal glands".

    48. Re:those evil Wiccans by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Nothing justifies taking a word that scares the majority, and using it as a blanket term to describe anyone you hate/fear/disagree with, and to ultimately effect their dissappearance.

      Name to me some people that have been "disappeared" that were not actively engaged in a conspiracy to cause harm to others and was the direct result of racism.

      Really, I would like to know about their case.

      I see a lot of people claiming the term "terrorist" is misused to infringe a minority of peoples' rights, however I know of no actual infringements.

      I may simply not be paying attention, please show me actual cases.

      --
      --fatboy
  8. Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How did Wicca get lumped into a sentence with these other three groups?
        Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here. We don't go on Crusades to conquer someone else's Holy Land...

  9. you have to be able to know their own language by Threni · · Score: 1

    Well, either that or just don't visit the websites.

  10. Myspace idiot gangsters by bobthesloth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interesting stuff. Targetting the idiots who are lower rank in gangs seems like a really good idea, given some of the spectacularily stupid stuff people admit on the internet. Can't help but feel this won't catch any of the serious gangsters though.

    1. Re:Myspace idiot gangsters by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

      Do what works with the Mafia. Collect evidence from the injudicious Internet posts of low-level members, bring them in, get a couple to squeal, build cases, find RICO predicates, and bust the higher-ups. Will it eradicate the gangs completely? No. But it will get a couple of the worst leaders in prison for a while.

    2. Re:Myspace idiot gangsters by mink · · Score: 1

      Small problem. Some of our worst gangs are run from inside the prisions. Better just to execute them if you actually want to stop them from continuing to run the shows.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  11. Personal Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got shot for wearing that Windows teal blue shade.... possibly may not have been gang related however.

  12. "Your arm is missing!" by 10Ghz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Web Bangers are posting potentially incriminating photos and taunts on their websites."

    You don't frighten us, Crips pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottom, sons of a silly person. I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second time-a!

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  13. nothing to see here by lavaface · · Score: 1
    come on people, move along [brandishes knife]

    nah . . . it's not quite the same.

  14. Web-savvy? by techservlib · · Score: 1

    Silly journalist: publishing 'potentially incriminating photos and taunts' is hardly savvy, even if it via a new medium

    1. Re:Web-savvy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      even if it via a new medium

      You can hardly say it's "new". You can more accuratly say these gangs are 10years behind in time.

      So we can thus conclude that in 10 years, these "gangsters" will be

      • Arrested
      • Dead
      • Having pseudo-intelligent conversations over the internet after being exposed to information
      • Found back their "roots" and gained interest in moving to their origins
      • Got flamed too hard and started a better life after humiliation due to internet vigilantism
      • Rich by selling internet porn, both violent and/or erotic.
  15. Tagging by writermike · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, so this is why there's so much "tagging" on the Internets nowadays.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  16. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by mdobossy · · Score: 3, Funny

    No no no...

    They mean the kind of witches with wart covered noses, flying brooms, and bubbling cauldrons..

  17. Witches? by ben0207 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language."

    Witches? Devil-worshippers?

    Is this from the Nation Gun Crime Research Centre or the Ordo Hereticus?

    --
    cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    1. Re:Witches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is this from the Nation Gun Crime Research Centre or the Ordo Hereticus?
      No, it is from the National Gang Crime Research Center.
    2. Re:Witches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some groups of witches and devil worshippers are involved in various types of crime, drug traffick etc. Not all witches add the "and harm none" to "Do thy will".

    3. Re:Witches? by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

      They seem to be focusing on groups that seem scary but in actuality are unlikely to harm Mr. or Mrs. Escalade or Jimmy lunch box. I think this is the group where they put all the lame cops, kind of like bands put the lame guy on bass.

    4. Re:Witches? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't understand the language of this subculture.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  18. It's not so much about being an idiot, but egos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious gangsters have egos too, and I'll bet you there are plenty of them that can't resist a brag here and there.

  19. Just means... by x1n933k · · Score: 1
    This just means more "security" lists. A few years later when these guys and gals try and buy a house or move out of state they'll be nailed for being a security risk.

    As for Witches--its a good way to share a love potion or where to get oraganic eyes of newt.

    [J]

    1. Re:Just means... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Aren't all "eyes of newt" organic? You know, being the eyes... of a newt... and stuff...

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    2. Re:Just means... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you won't be getting Soil Association approval if you keep using Optrex on your factory-farmed newts.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  20. You ALMOST had me by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    You almost made sense, Mr. NGCRC. Until the line In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.

    Then I knew you're a loonie.

    Witches? Hello? Could you join us in the 21st century? If people want to believe in witchcraft, so be it. It's not like they mount their brooms and fly off to some mountain anymore. That's the fad of the past, it's been over for like 400 years by now.

    No wonder that they spend their time puzzling what those tags could mean. I mean, if you can't get a clue after 400 years when it's hit you with a broomstick... MAN, some people are slow!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:You ALMOST had me by geoffspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're so naive.

      Everyone knows that devil worship and witchcraft increase by orders of magnitude every time a new Harry Potter book or movie is released. Why do you hate Jesus?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:You ALMOST had me by tomcres · · Score: 1
      Ah, but "the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist" (The Usual Suspects).

      Obviously, you've never been out on Halloween.. those witches are EVERYWHERE I tell you!

      Come to think of it, why don't we throw in Nazis, too, so we can stay compliant with Godwin's Law.

    3. Re:You ALMOST had me by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      How could I ever hate my only son?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:You ALMOST had me by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      > Witches? Hello? Could you join us in the 21st century?

      Wiccians are reconised by the US military (1,800 registered). Well up until the point when they die then they refuse to allow them to place thier symbol on the headstones.

      Its not completly a thing of the past, about 65 years or there abouts (I'm not wiccan, so someone feel free to correct me).

      Also cited as the fastest growing religon in the USA.

      Although why they got lumped with nutjobs who do cause damage is beyond me, as it is a peaceful religon (do no harm, and whatnot). Although I am sure we will have a Satan worshipper on explaining they are peaceful too? :) I don't know enough about that religon to comment.

    5. Re:You ALMOST had me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when you've only got a handful of members, it's quite easy to increase your membership by a few hundred percent. That'd be rather impossible for most major religions.

    6. Re:You ALMOST had me by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Actually witches are making a comeback - they prefer the term wicca. Based on Pagan rituals (which is a load of bollocks on its own), I have met people calling themselved witches and warlocks (of course, I live in the UK - or loon island).

    7. Re:You ALMOST had me by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of Wiccans (is it spelled Wiccians? I honestly don't know).

      I know a few, and they usually don't react kindly to being called "witches". The term has a 'slightly' negative tint to it. And I'm quite sure that in this context it was meant as the kind that rides on brooms, does the MacBeth'ian cauldron brewing and all the mumbo jumbo the average unclued person thinks of when they hear 'witch'.

      I also know a few Satanists and their insistance that they don't believe in God. Then I usually ask them what they need Satan for if they don't believe in his adversary. Fun thing to discuss, fills evenings.

      It's actually interesting to see that Satanists usually are quite a bit more level headed when it comes to discussing religion than their 'good' counterparts. Kinda makes you wonder who're the 'good guys' in that 'battle'.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:You ALMOST had me by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Just under 2 million (average estimate). Hardly call that a handful.

    9. Re:You ALMOST had me by daperdan · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate Jesus? I don't hate Jesus. I love him and he loves me. I'm smart though. I make him wear a condom.

    10. Re:You ALMOST had me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Love Jesus, hate cheeses.

    11. Re:You ALMOST had me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wiccans do use cauldrons and talk macbeth'ian.. it sets the mood and whatnot. We don't ride brooms but we do use them to sweep away bad energy and whatnot when casting a circle.

    12. Re:You ALMOST had me by Presidential · · Score: 1
      Everyone knows that devil worship and witchcraft increase by orders of magnitude every time a new Harry Potter book or movie is released. Why do you hate Jesus?


      For me, it's because Jesus and Pedro are the two dudes at Chipotle that just can't roll a tight burrito. Loose burritos lead to messes. Messes lead to stained shirts. Stained shirts lead to hate.

      --
      Whenever Mrs. Fitch breaks wind, we beat the dog.
  21. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by linvir · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, if you're such a peaceful bunch, you've got nothing to fear from their god, now have you?

  22. Hmm. Gangs on the web? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    Made me immediately think of the gang from Clockwork Orange.

    "That was a real kick and good for laughs and lashings of the old ultraviolence. "

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  23. Secret handshakes... by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 5, Funny
    Knox and others fear gangs are using the Internet to recruit new members, who can be influenced by the secret handshakes
    Secret handshakes?
    Seriously...secret handshakes?
    That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
    "Yeah man...those 18th street guys are badass. They have secret handshakes and everything..."
    --
    The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    1. Re:Secret handshakes... by tomcres · · Score: 1

      Gangs... freemasons... same difference! :D

    2. Re:Secret handshakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah,

      "Serious Yorkshire mafia, they even do secret handshakes with their feet."

      Yes, it's a quote.

    3. Re:Secret handshakes... by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Knox and others fear gangs are using the Internet to recruit new members, who can be influenced by the secret handshakes

      You mean stuff like 'HELO', 'GET', and 'POST' secured by SSL.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    4. Re:Secret handshakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and to get into the secret hideout you need to use the secret port knock.

    5. Re:Secret handshakes... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Look out for the Jones Stret boys.. they just got decoder rings!!

    6. Re:Secret handshakes... by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, I get the wonderful privilege of working around gang members every day. And, pathetic as it sounds, they do indeed have secret handshakes along with gang signs, insignia, etc.

      Hard to believe, but these pathetic creatures actually think anyone outside of their shitty neighborhoods gives a rat's ass about their symbols. They don't even realize that, even in their shitty neighborhood, their gang won't even be remembered in 20 years. But that's how things seem to people whose "world" doesn't extend more than a couple of blocks and whose "future" extends only through tonight.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Secret handshakes... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      More like ACK and SYN.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  24. On YouTube. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have actually seen footage on youtube of crime being showed of as if it is something to be proud of.
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=bMJjIFZYq3I
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=bhNuETvjakw
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=w2G_PwKwK7Y

    1. Re:On YouTube. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I'm sure American cops are worried about the Ali G's of the Netherlands...

  25. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anivair · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am not a witch. They dressed me like this. The mentality of someone (associated with the police) who compares terrirists to witches and devil worshipers cares me terribly. Leave the devil worshipers and witches alone and go after territorists and street gangs, eh? To count that's two groups that are actually dangerous and two groups whose existance is clearly protected by the costitution. I now return you to your regularly scheduled geekery.

  26. They aren't career criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're losers. They have big mouths and that's one of the main ways the cops catch them. We had a major crime with no clues but the cop on the radio wasn't worried because as he said: "The perpetrator will brag to someone."

    The guy who wrote Freakonomics pointed out that most drug dealers live with their mothers because they don't make enough money to move out on their own.

    1. Re:They aren't career criminals by shotgunefx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not because they can't afford to, it's because they can't budget and most are their own best customers.

      When I was a teen, hung on kind of a rough corner. More than a few of the kids were dealers. Mostly pot (though most of them graduated later on to actual harmful drugs). Besides smoking most of their stash, they'd do stupid things like blow money on other drugs or buy Don Perignon, etc.

      Two of my friends wanted me to go into "business" with them selling weed. It would have been a pretty sweat deal actually as I really wouldn't have to do much of anything except put up a small amount of cash at the beginning and then just manage the money after and have no liability.

      I was tempted, but that's not my thing so I declined, but I did the math on it before saying not, it would have been around $3500 profit a week.

      By rights, most of them should own houses.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    2. Re:They aren't career criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they live with their mothers becuase they don't make enough money to move out on their own, yet they "pimp their rides", probably spending (in one year) as much as you make in two years on an old beat up 1982 cutlass supreme, bottles of expensive alcoholic beverages, clothes, etc.

      I think the reason they don't move out on their own is because, and this is just a hunch, no bank or realator in their right mind would accept 100+k (for a 1 bedroom condo) in CASH from some punk who just walked in off of the street. It's not like the movies folks. You can't just walk in with a bag full of 100 dollar bills, drop it on the table and say "i want a house". I guarantee that the feds will be there before you take 2 steps towards the door, asking where you go the money from. Don't even say they should try getting a loan, especially with no verifiable place of employment or source of income.

      And have a PERSONAL bank account to which they deposit thousands in CASH in regularly? pffft. This is why money laundering is so important.. and most drug dealers (not kingpins, drug dealers) either don't understand that, or do understand it and start up some bullshit business like a recording label.

    3. Re:They aren't career criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's not because they can't afford to, it's because they can't budget and most are their own best customers.

      You should read the referenced chapter in Freakonomics. It's based on studies and statistics and tracing the money flows, not anecdotes, and the conclusion is that most drug dealers at the street level don't make very much money because it's the next layer up that makes it all, allowing the street dealers to keep just enough to keep them interested.

    4. Re:They aren't career criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an episode of the Trailer Park Boys.

      Did these "two friends" happen to be named Ricky and Julian?

    5. Re:They aren't career criminals by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Huge difference between weed distribution (you'd have already been "management tracked" it sounds like) and crack slinging. You would have been excersising market power due to your potential customers limited access to the markets and your assymetric information (where to buy cheap weed). Crack dealing is competitive and those at the top of the game make bank (so lots of people are willing to tolerate poor working conditions for the shot at getting to the top). Not really that different than all the associates at an investment bank, law firm, or big 5 accounting firm busting their butt 100/hrs a week for pay that covers expenses and school bills but not a whole lot more, for the shoot at making partner (where you will be set for life).

      This grad student spent a ton of time studying a gang in Chicago and the treasurer sent him all the books, the average dealer in their gang was making something like $2.65/hr.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    6. Re:They aren't career criminals by LiquidRaptor · · Score: 1

      It's based on ONE group of dealers. In addition, while I agree with a lot of whats in Freakanomics, there is a lot where he simply ignores stuff that may upset his delicate balance of factors.

    7. Re:They aren't career criminals by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Youd have to be dealing multiple pounds a week to make $3500 profit. Anyone who thinks there is big money in drug dealing - espeically street dealing - has never done it. And most weed dealers have nothing to do with gangs and are not badass.
      Dont get into dealing drugs its not worth it. Now growing on the otherhand...

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    8. Re:They aren't career criminals by froschmann · · Score: 1

      Sell a pound by the gram and you'll get a bit under 9 grand. There is also usually a pretty good markup (the grower gets 10-20%), so if you get half of the profit you are doing pretty well...

    9. Re:They aren't career criminals by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      Would have been, but like I said, it was tempting money for a 17yr old. (This was 16yrs ago)

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  27. Shocking by linvir · · Score: 5, Funny
    In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs
    They left out communists and paedophiles! The fools!
    1. Re:Shocking by myspys · · Score: 1

      god, will someone think of the children!?

    2. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also left out: Polititions and CEO's....

    3. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...not in that way... sicko.

    4. Re:Shocking by Flashpot · · Score: 1

      ...and Linux crunchies!

      --
      That which does not kill her only prolongs my agony.
    5. Re:Shocking by jafac · · Score: 1

      Not to mention those scary Freemasons.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  28. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

    Hahahahahah. Good one.

    --
    Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  29. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    She turned me into a newt!

  30. Awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is terrible. Clearly, the Internet must be banned.

  31. Gangs on tha internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, mikesd81, you got it all wrong. You meant to say:

    "Apparently street gangs have gotten Web-savvy in all flavas. Web Hustla is post'n potentially weed-smokin' photos n taunts on they websites. Police departments suddenly faced gangs is look'n fo` help on tha gangs own easy-to-find Web sites. The director of tha National Gizzay Crime Research Cracka has stated "In gangsta ta understand any subcultizzles be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippa or gangs, you have ta be able ta know they own language fo' sheezy. Knox said its important fo` po-po ta learn how ta read between tha lines on giznang Web sites n blogs ta help you tap dat ass. J-to-tha-izzust as tizzle on tha streets has given G-to-tha-izzang investizzles tha ability ta read tha hierizzles of wizzle graffiti, tizzy on tha Web helps tizzy understand arcane Web clues . Nigga get shut up or get wet up. G-to-tha-izzang motherfucka such as tattoos, graffiti tizzags, colors n cloth'n often is embedded in each site."

    (Thanks to gizoogle!)

  32. The THE opportunity for spotty and smelling nerds! by lonesometrainer · · Score: 1


    Go and easily be part of one of the coolest gangs in your town... You'll have a GF (yeah, a *real* one, not a real-doll) a convertible, some guns, everyone's gonna treat you respectful...

    Go and f*cking build a website, the stuff you do best :-)

  33. "Web Bangers" by szembek · · Score: 1

    hmmm.... that sounds like it has different connotations

    --
    nothing
  34. hidden messages like this ? by OriginalCopy · · Score: 1

    01001001001001110110110001101100001000000110011001 11010101100011011010110110100100100000011010110110 10010110110001101100001000000111100101100001001000 00011101110110100101110100011010000010000001101101 01111001001000000110001101101000011000010110100101 110010

    1. Re:hidden messages like this ? by friedman101 · · Score: 1

      No I will not make out with you

    2. Re:hidden messages like this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      01100001011011000110110000100000011110010110111101 11010101110010001000000110001001100001011100110110 01010010000001100001011100100110010100100000011000 10011001010110110001101111011011100110011100100000 0111010001101111001000000111010101110011

  35. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Well, if you're such a peaceful bunch, you've got nothing to fear from their god, now have you?


    Somehow I think, whether or not he need fear the God, he'd be smart in this day and age to fear the God's followers.....
  36. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Trem · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their god isn't the problem, it's the fanatical followers who feel that despite worshiping a peaceful, loving god they can still be violent and hateful.

  37. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, Please. The article did not say "Wicca." It said "witches." Give it up.

    The "Witches are Happy Peaceful People" diatribe is even slighthly more annoying then the "Hackers are Happy Curious People" screed. Both words mean something else in popular parlance, and that's all there is to it. I have more sympathy for the "hackers-are-good" crowd, because they legitimately lost their word to a media gone suddenly cyber-melodramtic, but the Buckland and Gardner crew deliberately took an already negatively charged word, stuck it up there with all the other chips on their shoulders, and tried to win it back -- in the most irritating and condescending way possible -- from all us ignorant "mundanes." Sure, good luck with that...

    Oh, yeah, about those Crusades: many, many, centuries ago, my li'l crystal polisher. Better analogy would have been, "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here. We don't crash airplanes into someone else's building in the name of our goddess..."

    oooooh, i'm gonna get modded down so-o-o-o-o fast.....!

  38. Broken Windows Gang by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    I am starting the 'Broken Windows' Gang on the internet.

    The gang's activities will primarily consist of breaking Windows, online and off.

    No pre-requisites for joining except for 1337 hacking sk177z and good aim.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Broken Windows Gang by rbarreira · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny, I work at Microsoft and a window in my office got broken today (yes, there were jokes about it)...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Broken Windows Gang by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny, I work at Microsoft and a window in my office got broken today (yes, there were jokes about it)...

      That is funny.

      Did you put up a blue tarp to cover the screen?

      Press any key to continue.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Broken Windows Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the Any Key?

    4. Re:Broken Windows Gang by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Where's the Any Key?

      It's right there...next to the 'EXECUTE' button.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:Broken Windows Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you work on Vista?

      Was it made by a flying chair? :-)

    6. Re:Broken Windows Gang by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Nope, not even in Redmond... MBS

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  39. yet more proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that criminals are stupid.

    publish photos of crimes, smart.... taking photos of crimes, retarted.

    I knew deep down that anyone in a gang was the bottom level of stupid. And the biggest fun is knowing that one bright person can take out the toughest gang easily and without effort one by one.

    A sniper with a good scope and a 30-06 rifle can pick off gang members so that the toughest gang on the planet would be terrified little school girls.

    Maybe they should make it a season in august, free for 30 days you can kill all the gang members you want above the age of 16.

    Fucking stupid gutter idiots of the planet.

    -- damn bitch you stupid fly! let me pull up to dat bumper and smack that monkey!

    1. Re:yet more proof by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure "easily and without effort" is hyperbole, but as one prison guard/weekend warrior I knew put it:
      "War on Drugs - The dealers around here all wear red bandannas, and don't let anyone else wear them. If it was a real war, it would be over in 15 minutes - me 20, gang 0!"
                This guy used to show up for basic weapons qualification on rifle ranges I was adminning, fire 38 rounds, put the M-16 down with 2 rounds left, and insist on sticking with a score of 38 out of a possible 40. He never missed, that I saw, but didn't want a bunch of eagle eye scores on his military record, because if he ever had to shoot in a prison hostage situation or something, he was worried about some lawyer getting that record and grilling him about why he didn't just shoot the shiv out of someone's hand at 800 meters.
                Even so, it would be harder than he or you make it sound. Gangs usually have a few older members who know how to keep a lower profile. There's a hard core that often includes some people who are military or police trained, access to some long range weapons of their own (even if it's likely to be single shot stuff) and often some sort of compartmentalization or cell-like structure, so the outer layer of street punks couldn't identify the whole core even if they wanted to. Don't mistake the dumb, cheap and expendable outer layers for the whole problem.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  40. Dial 100 for assistance by kkiller · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://nickciske.com/tools/binary.php

    Balmer!

  41. Bad Grammer by protobion · · Score: 3, Funny

    Police departments suddenly faced gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites.
    What the hell does that mean?

    --
    Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    1. Re:Bad Grammer by RealGrouchy · · Score: 0

      Oh, good; I'm not alone.

      As a grammar Nahtzee, I'm utterly incapable of reading further until I understand the meaning of the sentence I'm reading. ...much less RTFA.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:Bad Grammer by silverbax · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Isn't obvious it is? Editing Slashdot now Yoda is.

    3. Re:Bad Grammer by farker+haiku · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Seriously.. I had to reread that sentence half a dozen times before I tagged the article lousyeditor. And uh, grammer? As in grammar?

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    4. Re:Bad Grammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your gangs are belong to us....

    5. Re:Bad Grammer by Don853 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I was wondering how far down I'd have to go through the comments before someone else said that

    6. Re:Bad Grammer by sprudel · · Score: 2, Funny

      It looks like some kind of hidden message, possibly about freemasonry.

    7. Re:Bad Grammer by jahudabudy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Duh, as in "one who gramms".

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    8. Re:Bad Grammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Police departments suddenly faced gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites.
      What the hell does that mean?

      Why was this modded "funny"?

      Can somebody please explain to me why more care can't be taken to make sure that these summaries are actually comprehensible?

      Screw-ups like this mean that 10s of thousands of people will waste their time re-reading and re-reading the sentence trying to figure it out.

      The purpose of posting is to communicate, isn't it? Why post at all if you don't really care about communicating clearly?

      And how does this whole sad state of affairs end up being "funny" to some people?

  42. witch hunts? by m874t232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If public web sites help the police track down perpertrators of illegal activities, that's a good thing. But I worry about statements like these:

    "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language," Knox said.

    Devil worship and witchcraft aren't illegal in the US and are rarely linked to illegal activities; the police has no business getting involved in that "subculture" at all.

    Furthermore, even when it comes to al Quaeda and gangs, they should be careful: after all, if we can get al Quaeda and gangs to limit their activities to free speech on the Internet, then that's a good thing. We should encourage these groups to use the Internet, not drive them away.

    1. Re:witch hunts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The police officer didn't say "involved", he said "understand". Having understanding of cultures is an important part of effective policing and ensures that those in authority at least try to comprehend the morals and practices of different cultures. This leads to better policing when they are called upon to investigate an incident that is directly or indirectly related to a particular culture. Saying that the police should try to understand devil worshippers doesn't necessarily mean they are trying to stop / disrupt / destroy them.

    2. Re:witch hunts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... but why put one neutral group in with several very negitive groups?
      Why lump witches with terrorists, devil worshipers and gangs?
      if they had put in some other group there like say nerds then you might feel differently.
      What if he said Terrorists, hippies, devil worships and gangs?
      Why have one non-violent group lumped in with gangs and terrorists?

    3. Re:witch hunts? by m874t232 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:witch hunts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps to show the diversity of the types of group used in the example, and demonstrate that one type of minority isn't being singled out?

    5. Re:witch hunts? by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Good point! I'm convinced.

    6. Re:witch hunts? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Devil worship and witchcraft aren't illegal in the US and are rarely linked to illegal activities; the police has no business getting involved in that "subculture" at all.

      Being a member of a gang nor a member of al-Quaida is illegal either.

      But hey, both are criminals because they distribute the government's illegal drugs for them, right?

    7. Re:witch hunts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you weren't watching cartoons during the 80s. The Witch/Satanism Scare reached such ridiculous proportions that for a while, the commercials for Lucky Charms cereal changed their tagline from "they're magically delicious" to "marshmallowy delicious."

    8. Re:witch hunts? by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      If you had ever spent any time as a toad, you wouldn't be so quick to dismiss witchcraft like that!

    9. Re:witch hunts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you got confused about the context. Take a f*cking second to expand anonymous posts to see messages in context before responding!

  43. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by the_womble · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Witches !- Wicca. Traditionally in Europe it meant devil worshippers and possible followers of some fairly nasty practices. It also covers African witchcraft which frequently involves murder. You may wish to dissociate Wicca from that. Fair enough. However it is not reasonable for you to expect to redefine the meanings of the words involved in line with your beliefs. Wicca is essentially a modern invention (not one I have much sympathy with but that should not matter to you) and I would need a lot of convincing that it has any meaningful links to either ancient paganism or most old traditions of witchcraft so I do not see any reason to re-define the word witchcraft in line with Wicca. Ancient pagans fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them. If you claim any link with them you can not then disclaim their bad side.

  44. Coming this Fall . . . by SvetBeard · · Score: 5, Funny

    A new addition to the Law and Order family: Law and Order: Gangs Unit. Watch Ice T surf myspace for an hour. Every mouse click is accompanied by a "Doom Doom."
    It's must see TV!

    1. Re:Coming this Fall . . . by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      Dick Wolf is just turning these shows out like it was nothing. I liked the episode where Ice T's browser locked up and he had to get an IT expert in there to back him up. Then they both had to testify in court. Good writing.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    2. Re:Coming this Fall . . . by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      That would be a hit considering they give Ice T the best dialogue on the show. One line I remember in an episode where a pedophile arranges to meet an underage boy in a coffee shop but have the police lying in wait instead:

      Ice T: Condoms, wine coolers, what, are you gettin' freaky with the Hamburglar?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Coming this Fall . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is offtopic, but does anyone else find the irony of Ice-T playing a police officer nearly unbearable?

    4. Re:Coming this Fall . . . by mink · · Score: 1

      He played a Police Officer way back in New Jack City (1991). Or are you making a reference to his musical accomplishments?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  45. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

    If you look at the article, the poster isn't comparing witches to Al-Quaeda at all. Just because he uses them in the same group doesn't mean he's saying witches are like Al-Quaeda. He's merely listing them as a subculture, which they (you) are. I don't have a negative connotation of the word subculture. I am part of many subcultures. Doesn't automatically mean I fly planes into buildings or bathe in fish blood or eat only vegetables.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  46. Bragging on the internet is pretty bad, but... by sprudel · · Score: 1

    To make things worse, they probably didn't pay for their copy of Dreamweaver either...

    1. Re:Bragging on the internet is pretty bad, but... by warrigal · · Score: 1

      Dreamweaver? No... more likely Front Page. If you're gunna break the rules you might as well go the whole hog.

  47. Coolest link at bottom by meburke · · Score: 1

    I had a link at the bottom that said:

    "Gangs of America - Browse a huge selection. Find exactly what you want today."

    It was sponsored by eBay.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  48. So with all the turf wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is it safe to say these gangs don't believe in Net Neutrality?

    *rimshot*

    Thank you! And you! And especially you ma'am, front row, with the teardrop and spiderweb tattoos!

    I be in da hood all week yo.

  49. Please, for the love of all that is holy by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    Create a "Legal" topic.

    This no more belongs in YRO than would an article about the latest Linux kernel release.

  50. Amish by suso · · Score: 1

    How long until the Amish get a website? Oh wait.

    1. Re:Amish by Howler · · Score: 1

      Thine site is meager, but whos is thou laughing at now!

      http://www.amish.com/

    2. Re:Amish by 70Bang · · Score: 1



      Apparently, you don't come from Amish country.

      There are Amish who will ride in someone else's car to a job (which may or may not use tech; some assembly line in the case of the former, housing construction, the latter). Some own cell phones but give them to a neighbor to charge them.

      and: the practice of rumspringa. The author of that page may be familiar some Amish, but not all. What that page doesn't say is you cannot become a member of the Amish church until you are an adult (usually twenty-one). As result, teens aren't members. Part of their maturing process places them in the world and in the world. This is counter to a lot of non-Amish beliefs which tell you to be in the world but not of the world. The kids may have cars, parked next to the barn, jobs, drink, have sex, etc. I know of guys who used to wait for the new girls, just because they had a particular fondness for them.

      Once the kids get to be of age, they're expected to make a choice. Most join the church, but there are plenty which have seen the English world and don't go back. Not all make the decision at the specific time (taking a bit longer) but generally see the light after awhile.

      But they do produce good craftsmanship. I have an exquisite Amish desk which took almost four of us to take it off of the truck wrapped up in the garage.

      Oh, and there's a group which appears on Bob & Tom routinely known as The Electric Amish.


  51. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

    Jehova is not peaceful and loving. He says so himself.

  52. Re:Coolest link at bottom by meburke · · Score: 1

    I reloaded the page and it got cooler. It said:

    "Gang Violence - Browse a huge selection. Find exactly what you want today."

    But then I reloaded again and it only said:

    "Books - Browse a huge selection. Find exactly what you want today."

    Not always cool, I guess.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  53. Re:Al Queda, witches--WTF?! by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I expect that comment to get quite a bit of..feedback.
    But it was the director of the National Gang Crime Research Center who said it,
    so direct all complaints thataway. I don't even practice Wicca, and find that
    sort of uninformed lumping-together fucking disgusting.

    And devil-worshippers? There aren't really many devil-worshippers, apart from
    various criminally insane cases. If he meant Satanism, it's more of an
    ego-centric religion. I got the impression that director has lived a very
    sheltered life.

  54. Even E-bay is in on it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Google adsense listings from TFA: Google sponsored links

    Gangs of America - Nace profiles the rise of corporate power & the disabling of democracy www.bkconnection.com

    Real Time Financial News - Newswires, Stock News, Earnings Filter by Sources & Categories www.knobias.com

    Gang violence - Browse a huge selection now. Find exactly what you want today. www.eBay.com

  55. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by killjoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't think he was talking about the crusades. I think he was talking about the modern day occupation of jerusalem, and the numerous other holy sites for both shia and sunni in Iraq.

    And really lets be honest here, GW said on more then one occation that god told him to invade iraq and that god speaks through him. A huge majority of the republicans who support this war support it because they believe that it's a part of biblical prophesy. There is a very large movement of evangelical xtians who believe that they have to help the jews occupy all the holy lands so that jesus can come, save them and kill the jews.

    For the record I believe that all religious people are crazy and dangerous. Without exception. Any of them can crack at any time. Who knows what their god is going to tell them next.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  56. Re: The 'Crusade' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Matilda was referring to the current Bush & Blair tag team match against the Muslim's holy land.

  57. Time to Update NWA's Straight Outta Compton by hahiss · · Score: 1


    Life ain't nothin' but packets and money.

    --
    "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
  58. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by plumby · · Score: 2, Informative
    Oh, yeah, about those Crusades: many, many, centuries ago, my li'l crystal polisher.
    OK, I'll bite.

    On Sunday, Bush warned Americans that "this crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take awhile." I'll leave it up to you to decide whether Bush really does want a Christian war in the Middle East or whether he's just stupid and ignorant.
  59. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Amouth · · Score: 1

    "fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them"

    Replace slaves with captives held without reason or trial

    and how is this diffrent than the current US Administration?

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  60. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by everett · · Score: 1

    GP was talking about the Arabs, not the Jews.

    --
    Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
  61. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    I got better...

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  62. Article translation by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    For all the gang-bangers that read /.

    I found the translator at http://www.psyclops.com/translator/.

    Gangs Use Internet to Showcase Exploits

    Jul 6, 4:08 PM (ET)

    By ANDREW GLAZER

    LOS ANGELES (AP) - Some of da country's most notorious street gangs has gotten Web-savvy, showcasin' illegal exploits, makin' threats, 'n honorin' killed 'n jailed members on digital turf.

    Crips, Bloods, MS-13, 18th Street 'n others has staked claims on various corners of cyberspace n' shit. "Web bangers" be postin' potentially incriminatin' photos of members holdin' guns, messages tauntin' otha gangs 'n boasts of illegal exploits on personal Web sites 'n social networkin' sites.

    "I'm just bein' real 'n Ah ain't gots nothin' to hide," said Kristopha "Kasper" Flowers, 30, a professed memba of da 18th Street gang wid facial tattoos of "18" 'n "666." Da main 18th Street gang Web site has a link to "Kaspers World."

    Gangs once only roamed da streets of big ass cities but now can be found in 2,500 U.S, man. communities, accordin' to da FBI, man. Police departments suddenly faced wid da unwelcome arrivals be lookin' fo help anywhere they can get it, includin' da gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites.

    George W, man. Knox, director of da National Gang Crime Research Center, said tha dude has trained hundreds of police officials in how to cull intelligence on gang membership, rivalries, territory 'n lingo from these Web pages.

    "In orda to understand any subculture, be dat shit al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, yo' ass has to be able to know they own language," Knox said.

    Da tendency fo gang members to brag about they exploits on Web pages such as da popular networkin' site Myspace.com has in some cases helped investigators make arrests.

    Chicago police recently arrested a teenaga accused of sprayin' tha dude's gang nickname on a church by tracin' da monika to tha dude's Myspace.com account n' shit. Tha dude's online profile included tha dude's address, photo 'n real name.

    A Northern California judge ruled earlia dis month dat two teens charged wid beatin' a boy into a coma could be tried as adults afta prosecutors showed photographs of da two from Myspace.com, know what I'm sayin'? In da images, they flashed da hand signs of a local gang.

    (AP) Kristopha "Kasper" Flowers, 30, works on a tattoo Tuesday, June 20, 2006, in da Hollywood section...
    Full Image

    Myspace.com representatives could not be reached fo comment.

    Deputy Tom Ferguson of da Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department's gang investigation unit has identified a numba of graffiti writers who posted to a public Web site photos of themselves in front of they work.

    "Maybe they think we don't look at it," Ferguson said n' shit. "But we're out there gleanin' information on them."

    Knox said it be important fo police to learn how to read between da lines on gang Web sites 'n blogs n' shit. Just as time on da streets has given gang investigators da ability to read da hieroglyphics of wall graffiti, time on da Web helps 'em understand arcane Web clues, man. Gang identifiers, such as tattoos, graffiti tags, colors 'n clothin' often be embedded in each site.

    " Yo' ass can study gang blogs and, an hour or two into it, pick up on subtle word choices," Knox said n' shit. "These be holy words to them."

    Knox 'n others fear gangs be usin' da Internet to recruit new members, who can be influenced by da secret handshakes, clothin' 'n slang of gang cultures.

    "There may be a lot of wannabes out there," said Kenneth Davis, a school resource offica fo da Yonkers Police Department in New York 'n an expert on gang graffiti 'n Web sites.

    Flowers, a Hollywood tattoo artist who says tha dude has sworn off violence, said tha dude gets e-mails from wannabe gangbangers from far reaches of da Web but usually does not respond.

    "If Ah do, Ah tell 'em to get a life 'n do yo' own thin' 'n don't try to be part of somethin' else," tha dude said.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  63. Previous post is goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:Previous post is goatse.cx by s4ck · · Score: 1
      damn.. tsk...

      i read your post 2 sec too late...
      my eyes. my EYES! they are burning.

    2. Re:Previous post is goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah. Don't try to tell us you've never seen goatse before. Grow a thicker skin, you sissie!

  64. DKP? by hpavc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are there any good gangs in my timezone that use DKP?

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    1. Re:DKP? by lordcat · · Score: 1

      YOU GET SHOT BY A COP! MINUS 50 DKP! YOU GET SEEN ON A SECURITY CAMERA! MINUS 50 DKP! IF YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT! MINUS 50 DKP! IT'S REALLY FUCKING SIMPLE! YOU ALL STAND RIGHT HERE OR YOU GET MINUS 50 DKP! ANYONE GETS CAPPED AND THEY GET MINUS 50 DKP! NOW I WANT YOU TO DPS THE NEIGHBORHOOD REALLY FUCKING SLOWLY... AND BY FUCKING SLOWLY I MEAN FUCKING SLOWLY!

    2. Re:DKP? by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      I must be out of it... I had to hit Google to figure out that didn't mean "Donkey Kong Patrol" or some such.

      And, yes, a giant ape throwing barrels would probably keep the kids off my lawn!

    3. Re:DKP? by mink · · Score: 1

      Out in Columbus Ohio for a few years someone was tagging "Bowser" in several places, mixed in with the other more mundane tags.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  65. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Those who reject the path to enlightenment must be destroyed. Hallowed are the Ori.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  66. al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs? Apparently none of the losers in law enforcement have gotten saavy to the fact that we are no longer living in the 12th century.

  67. Twinka Tink by macwarriorny · · Score: 1
    "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida [sic], witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.'
    God save us from Samantha Stephens.
    --
    Life is such a sweet insanity. The more you learn, the less you know.
  68. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Don853 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll leave it up to you to decide whether Bush really does want a Christian war in the Middle East or whether he's just stupid and ignorant.

    Where's the "all of the above" circle?

  69. get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The police doesn't have the time or resources to "understand subcultures" just so that they are prepared for investigating hypothetical crimes, and they don't bother "understanding" every single subculture in this society.

    When they try to "understand" a subculture, it's because they think that there is police work to be done. And if they do so in the absence of any recognized crime, that's getting pretty close to police harrassment.

    If you don't understand of what the implications are of a police officer naming some organizations in the same breath with al Quaida and gangs, you are terribly naive.

    1. Re:get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police are criticised when they don't make efforts to understand subcultures and to police within them effectively, but any efforts to do so are viewed as "harrassment"? I think that's an over-reaction. Personally, I think you could be reading too much into the proximity of groups in the sentence. The US government and Al-quaida are often mentioned in the same sentence, but rarely are they considered to be on the same moral level.

    2. Re:get real by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Not "same sentence" - "same clause".

      "The US government hates Al Quaida" = same sentence

      "The US government and terrorists hate gays" = same clause

      And no - they are *not* often mentioned in the same clause.

  70. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    Redefining the meanings of words? These are meanings of "witch" in America -

    broom-riding hag with magical powers who eats children
    ordinary women murdered by Christians hundreds of years ago
    fat chicks who aren't slutty enough for goth

    The irony is that a cop is a bigger threat to our safety than any self-ascribed "witch".

  71. Bad Spelling by Frightening · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It means you're on Slashdot. And it's grammar not grammer, you clown. (no offense of course)

  72. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why did this get modded Troll? He's right on.

  73. better analogy? by Dr_Bootygrabber · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Oh, yeah, about those Crusades: many, many, centuries ago, my li'l crystal polisher. Better analogy would have been, "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here. We don't crash airplanes into someone else's building in the name of our goddess..." oooooh, i'm gonna get modded down so-o-o-o-o fast.....!' how's this one: ""Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here; we don't spend billions of dollars to shelter thousands of child molesters from justice" or "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here; we don't tell an entire continent riddled with HIV to not use condoms" or ""Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here; we don't take taxpayers money and give it to fundamentalists" or "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here; we don't gloat over the destruction of a city saying they had it coming for being wicked" or "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here; we don't think the world is going to end any minute in a blazing mess of fire but that's ok cause Jesus is going to miracle me up to the sky before I can get crisped" or "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here; at least we understand that Jesus was a liberal Jew who had much more in common with Abby Hoffman than G.W.Bush" this is pretty fun actually! I love the "modded down" part too. The "wow, playing the persecuted christian card is so politically incorrect" is awesome! Do it again!

    1. Re:better analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here. We don't bomb abortion clinics..."

      more please!

    2. Re:better analogy? by misterfett · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Take a look: That is the longest run on sentence most slashdotters have probably seen in their lives.

      Okay, I am done being a grammar nazi. It would be nice for you to answer a few questions, though: What group pays money to protect sex offenders? Not Christians, I assure you. Telling africans not to use condoms? No, not that either. Many churches donate money to medical research facilities and mission trips to Africa, where the teachings of Christ discourage promiscuity - the number one cause of the spread of AIDS and HIV. No one is asking the government to give to fundamentalists, most Christians I know give their own money to churches in addition to paying taxes, and spend money they sometimes don't have sending their kids to Christian schools. Lastly, according to the interpretation of Revelation that I believe, the apocalypse will not involve the destruction of earth: the "falling stars" refer to nuclear war that will kill one third of the population, and many other things will happen leading up to the return of Christ. The Earth never gets destroyed.

      What kind of witch are you, anyway? The religion most people will assume you are referring to involves the worship of Satan, evil spirits, and blood the sacrifice of living things. The only other wiccanism I know of is a cult invented in the 20th century: If you're one of them, I congratulate you. You are part of a religion younger than your parents.

      Many who hate Christ point to the crusades as their reasoning, ignoring the fact that the crusades were not condoned by scripture. The pope got antsy and made a power grab, using the illiteracy and ignorance of the populace (and the lack of a translated bible) to control them by playing "God says".

      This is my first slashdot post: I've been a reader for more than a year, ignoring comments by atheists and the like about fundamentalism in schools because they have a point: It's unconstitutional to push your views on someone else. I've noticed that a California courts ruling to allow two weeks of muslim teaching in a public middle school has gone comletely unnoticed by the liberal media... I cannot help but wonder if that would be the case against Christianity.

      This is not a flame, it is merely a factual correction. Lies and dishonesty make me vey angry, and in addition to being incoherent, none of what you said was true.

      Here's the part that'll get me modded down by supporters of "free speech": Jesus loves everyone. No matter what you've done, he will accept and forgive you. Bin Laden can go to heaven, although he is a very, very bad man. Billy Graham could go to hell if he hadn't accepted Jesus as his saviour. Since this is slashdot, I'll spare you all the rest of the sermon and refer you to my email address if you want to know more about Jesus. misterfett (at) gmail (dot) com.

    3. Re:better analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, are we thinking of the same Christianity? The one I'm thinking of protects priests who molest children and has a pope who says that condoms don't prevent the spread of STD, so you shouldn't use them.

    4. Re:better analogy? by misterfett · · Score: 1

      Thad'd be catholics, anonymous. So no, we're not thinking of the same Christianity. By the way, it's a fact that condoms do no prevent the spread of STDs effectively. There is, however, a nearly sure-fire way to prevent STDs, but no one likes it: Don't have sex with more than one partner. Is you're partner clean? You? If the answer to both questions is yes, get married and live happily ever after.

    5. Re:better analogy? by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

      I don't hate Christ. I think he could have been portrayed more accurately and we could all use a good dose of reality to go with all of the fantasy surrounding him. What I hate are people who use anger and fear to justify their own prejudices in the name of jesus. They apparently forget that their own bible tells them not to judge and condemn, That job is for their God to deal with. The book we call the bible was edited by a cluster of men in the 4th century who were more interested in maintaining control over vast numbers of people and even vaster fortunes than in actually getting the truth down on paper for all time. Christians, I think, need to seek out the real truth about who they worship. It is no longer feasible to blindly follow a book that has such a questionable past. It should be the responsibility of every religion to to seek out the real truth of their beliefs.

    6. Re:better analogy? by misterfett · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry if you saw my post as an attack on someone else's faith. I was merely correcting the statements they made about mine.

      4th century control group, eh? Has someone been reading too much davinci code? That book was six loads of bull spit. (Yes, I said I wasn't catholic. I'm sticking to that. However, they wrote a really great page on how ignorant Dan Brown is.)

    7. Re:better analogy? by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

      The DaVinci code was for the most part factual in it's accounts of who did what back then to make the bible what it is today. Maybe you need to learn to read. It was all about power and control back then and it still is today.

    8. Re:better analogy? by misterfett · · Score: 0

      Weren't satisfied with my last source of information? Try this one.

      Hey, it's only slashdot. I wouldn't give two cents for my karma rating. Where's your information? Really, I want to know. Please enlighten me on how "factual" and "objecive" the Da Vinci lie is.

    9. Re:better analogy? by Dr_Bootygrabber · · Score: 0

      "It would be nice for you to answer a few questions, though: What group pays money to protect sex offenders? Not Christians, I assure you."

      The Catholic Church has paid out billions of dollars in hush money to keep thousands of priests who molested thousands upon thousands of children from being prosecuted like a child molester should be. They have even used the first amendment to deny law enforcement access to incriminating information. Are you denying that the Vatican has given shelter to the men who committed these crimes, or that the crimes were committed in the first place? Are Catholics not Christians? If not, why? Why is your particular song played on the piano that is the bible any more valid than that of the Catholics? Or Branch Davidians? Or Ukrainian Orthodox? Or Southern Tongue-Speakin Snake-Jugglers?

      "Telling africans not to use condoms? No, not that either. Many churches donate money to medical research facilities and mission trips to Africa, where the teachings of Christ discourage promiscuity - the number one cause of the spread of AIDS and HIV"

      Again, of course I refer to the largest and most powerful group of Jesus followers on Earth, the Catholic church, who have been very vocal about how condoms are bad and evil and not approved of by Jesus, Mary and The Holy Ghost. The uneducated masses of HIV-riddled Africa hold the Pope in high enough esteem to be adverse to condoms yet not quite high enough esteem to buy the "just stop your evil promiscuity" sermon. Condoms are far and away the quickest, easiest and most realistic means of stemming the spread of AIDS and other STDs. Spending dime one on "abstinence programs" while people are dying left and right is a slap in the face to humanity.

      "No one is asking the government to give to fundamentalists, most Christians I know give their own money to churches in addition to paying taxes, and spend money they sometimes don't have sending their kids to Christian schools."

      Exactly; no one is asking the Bush admin to give public money to fundamentalist Christians via "Faith-Based Initiatives", but they do anyway. Big shocker there.

      "Lastly, according to the interpretation of Revelation that I believe, the apocalypse will not involve the destruction of earth: the "falling stars" refer to nuclear war that will kill one third of the population, and many other things will happen leading up to the return of Christ. The Earth never gets destroyed."

      I could throw a rock down south and find a life-long bible scholar who thinks otherwise. Why is your interpretation of the bible any more correct? What about Christian Identity white racists, who claim the bible says that white people are the true lost children of Isreal and blacks and jews are "of the devil"? Why are you right and all the other flavors of bible thumpers wrong?With every nutcase and his second cousin running around waving the bible as justification for thier megalomainia and thirst to control people, how can you expect any thinking person to take it seriously?

      "What kind of witch are you, anyway? The religion most people will assume you are referring to involves the worship of Satan, evil spirits, and blood the sacrifice of living things. The only other wiccanism I know of is a cult invented in the 20th century: If you're one of them, I congratulate you. You are part of a religion younger than your parents"

      Ah yes, of course; anyone not subscribing to your particular biblical spin is IN LEAGUE WITH LUCIFER! I'm not a witch as far as I'm concerned. I'm not Wiccan either. I don't subject myself to any organized religion. I'll sit and marvel at the sunset, but I won't cheapen that wonder by attributing it to the work of some anthropomorhpized super spook. I believe that all matter is supernaturally interconnected, but I'm not arrogant enough to claim to know how and why, nor shallow enough to expect answers to be found in an ambiguous rehash of commonplace fairy tales such as your bible.

      "Many who hate Christ point to the cr

    10. Re:better analogy? by misterfett · · Score: 0

      Bravo! Excellent response, you re-opened every gap in the argument I tried to close. I could spend ten or so minutes patching the holes in the wall you just skillfully made, but you'd just tear it down again. Before this turns into a flamewar (those are ugly), lets just leave it at this. If you really want to continue this type of discussion, you know my email address.

    11. Re:better analogy? by Dr_Bootygrabber · · Score: 0

      touche'

      we shall agree to disagree.

      cheers!

  74. "mikesd81 writes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont you mean mikesd81 COPIES!

    At least give the real author proper credit because I fuckign tell you what, just putting quotes aroudn something does not make it any less plpagerized!

  75. They say I worship the devil. by Lummoxx · · Score: 1

    They must be stupid or blind.
    I'm just a rock and roll rebel.
    A rock and roll rebel.
    I'm just a rock and roll rebel.

    -apologies to Ozzy

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.

  76. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1
    Oh, Please. The article did not say "Wicca." It said "witches." Give it up.
    And if the article said "Christians" instead of specifying "Catholics," would that be fine by you?
  77. I thought they already had this... by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 1

    I thought they already were doing something like this on the Internet. Isn't this more or less what MySpace is, anyway?

  78. No. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Round where I live we still have to deal with witches and their pagan rituals. Here is a recient story (last week) of a witch torturing her lover and dumping his body in the sea.
    That's not a pagan ritual, that's what they call "murder." If these people met via Christian church instead of the pagan community, nobody would be going on about "those murdering Christians" would they? *sigh*
    1. Re:No. by kjorn · · Score: 1

      I don't really care what you think. :-P I posted it cos it's interesting.

    2. Re:No. by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      If you don't care why are you arguing about it?

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
  79. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That also sounds alot like Christians in the past as well.

  80. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except it is well established that athiests are just as likely to do the same things. There has been plenty of war, torture etc for communism. Some people seem to think that if you do it for evolution instead of religion, you are more sane and acceptable. Those people get modded troll.

  81. Not a gang but.. by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was actually a video of a guy (supposed rapper from philly) named Joey Jihad (don't ask.. I don't know either) posted on youtube a while ago. Long story short, a few of the street thugs standing on the corner told waved him down out of his car, had him come over and start freestyling on camera, then one ran up and knocked him out (sucker punched).. then stole his car.

    The video was posted online. The guy who sucker punched Jihad is now dead.

    Moral of the story: People do stupid shit and post it on the internet hoping to gain popularity. Those same acts, which may have gone unpunished, cost them a great deal in the long run because they want the world to see how much of a "badass" they are (see high school fight clubs, the "stop snitchin" dvd, etc.). Some are lucky enough to get jail time while others lose their lives.

    Oh, I managed to find a google video link of the incident:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2928058868 256701199

    1. Re:Not a gang but.. by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here is the person identified on the tape as sucker punching Jihad:

      http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/inquirer/sports/14 401704.htm?source=rss&channel=inquirer_sports

      I personally don't think a sucker punch is worth someone's life, but that's me.. and I'm not "from the streets". :|

    2. Re:Not a gang but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole story is a myth--that boxer didnt sucker punch the rapper. Was someone else entirely.

  82. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And don't forget thst the lands of the crusades were Christian first and only Moslem second. The crusades were in direct response to arab expansionism and agression. Anyone who says otherwise needs an education.

    And witches are just wonderful, a selfish religion based on selfish desires (magic).

  83. Neds! by tiluki · · Score: 1

    Trying to "read between the lines" of some of the Ned sites (Scottish youth subculture) isn't exactly hard - you only have to decypher what they're actually trying to write in the first place!

    See: http://www.glasgowsurvival.co.uk/reviews/reviews.h tml [WARNING - maybe not best to view at work, or if you have an abhorence of complete numpties]

    "Pure mental!" as they say. Yes... right...

  84. Don Perignon 1982 by rjdegraaf · · Score: 1
    Besides smoking most of their stash, they'd do stupid things like blow money on other drugs or buy Don Perignon, etc.

    A Don Perignon from 1982 isn't that bad.

    1. Re:Don Perignon 1982 by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      I wasn't berating their decision based on tastes, rather that it was just for the bling factor (though it wasn't called bling back then, man I'm getting old LOL) they'd also start it up and follow it up with Budweiser. So it was basically just to blow money and try and look cool while doing it.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    2. Re:Don Perignon 1982 by 10Ghz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I believe the word is "Nigger Rich"

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:Don Perignon 1982 by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how my comment is "flamebait". The phrase I mentioned is real and it describes the lifestyle (using money to buy useless luxuries instead of real assets) perfectly.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Don Perignon 1982 by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      It's one of those loaded terms that you can't throw around, unless of course your black , which for all I know you could be :) , without getting people all worked up.

      Though for my friends, "Wigger Rich" would probably be more fitting. ;)

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    5. Re:Don Perignon 1982 by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      "It's one of those loaded terms that you can't throw around, unless of course your black"

      Yes, it's a loaded term, but it's also a real phrase. It's not my fault that the phrase has racist roots to it, fact remains that it's a real, honest-to-god phrase that is used to descibe the lifestyle.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    6. Re:Don Perignon 1982 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Dom Perignon. And a bottle from 1982 has a 99% chance of being undrinkable at this point.

  85. Yeah, I can just see it by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Funny

    GTA: Web Banger

    In which you play the role of a pale pimple-faced nerd with an inhaler, posing as a big bad nigga online. Spend days photoshopping a grand theft auto or grafitti, instead of actually doing it. Brag about your bad-mofo inner-city gangsta exploits, from the safety of your parents' basement in the suburbs. Spend hours playing CS and GTA while listening to wannabe wigger rappers, as material for those bad-mofo gangsta stories. Throw in some porn late at night, after your parents went to sleep, as material for some gangland rape story. Spend a couple of days trying to get the Audigy 2 you got for your birthday to make you sound like a bad-mofo gangsta on voice chat, then give up and revert to typing pseudo-ebonics. Etc.

    Yup, the high-tech law-breakin' game of the future. I can just see it.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Yeah, I can just see it by IAmTheDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And this is bad how? Seems like the exact opposite of what everyone on capital hill is crying about. Want to shoot people, sleep with hookers, steal cars, paint grafiti, run from the law? No reason to do it in real life when you can do it virtually, and remain within the limits of the real law.

      I see no problem with games being an outlet for a life that a person would otherwise shy away from. Nothing wrong with make-believe.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    2. Re:Yeah, I can just see it by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was bad to play games. Sure, knock yourself out. Play GTA or CS or whatever keeps you happy.

      What I _do_ ridicule are the posers pretending they're something they're really not. And not in a game, but mis-representing their sorry _RL_ ass as being some big bad nigga mofo or whatever else. You know, the "Pretty Fly For A White Guy" kinda poser given online anonymity. I find them funny.

      And I'll bet that at least half the supposed gangstas on MySpace are just that: some pasty white kid pretending to be a big bad nigga from the worst side of town.

      What I'm really making fun of there isn't games, but this kind of posers. The whole "yeah, let's make the next GTA about this kind of wannabe pseudo-gangstas" isn't really about games, it's just for sarcasm sake.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:Yeah, I can just see it by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then everyone will complain about violence in video games causing violence in the real world. All those gang members will be corrupted by the video game and go out and join a gang!

    4. Re:Yeah, I can just see it by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      No reason to do it in real life when you can do it virtually, and remain within the limits of the real law.

      Where have you been? They want to make virtually doing crime within the current limits of the real law illegal as well.

      You can't fill real prisons with virtual criminals, now can you?

    5. Re:Yeah, I can just see it by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      What I _do_ ridicule are the posers pretending they're something they're really not.

      Word to your nerd, G.

      (Am I the man yet, dog?)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:Yeah, I can just see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U da man.

  86. Wannabes? by Datalanche · · Score: 1

    I'm glad that this has led to arrests of some really bad people, but I bet for the most part a bunch of would be 1337 g@ngs+@z are the only ones doing this. For whatever idiotic reason, there's a lot of kids who wanna be in some stupid gang, so hey! Make your own on the internets! It's kinda like most of the XxSuIC1D3GuR1xX types out there... mostly a cry for attention, than anything else.

  87. They all hate Teh Jebus! by FatSean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Says alot about the mindset of this guy...he lumps in un-popular religions with groups who actually set out to hurt people.

    --
    Blar.
  88. Gangs of Bathurst? by SteveWhitty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The other day I was driving through Bathurst and saw "CRIP 4 LIFE" spray-painted on a mailbox.

    Seemed a bit pathetic at first, really, some kid from small town Canada pretending he's a member of a gang he probably saw on TV and thought looked cool. But I have to wonder if these sites aren't more of a recruitment tool than anything else, an attempt to start branches of these gangs in places where they would normally would have no reach.

    Having small local gangs with national and international affiliations would be useful if you needed out-of-town locations for smuggling, safe-houses, grow-ops...

  89. That cop just watched 'Dragnet' too many times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People
    Against
    Goodness
    And
    Normalcy

    Time to get your goatskin leggings and take lots of drugs like every good pagan!

  90. Are Witches and Devil Worshippers Being Hunted by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    Why did the officer include witches and devil worshippers with gangs and Al Qieda? I've yet to hear about witches and devil worshippers killing people in the streets or flying planes into buildings. Weird.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Are Witches and Devil Worshippers Being Hunted by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1
      I've yet to hear about witches and devil worshippers killing people in the streets or flying planes into buildings.
      I probably shouldn't be telling you this, but witches actually tried that last gimmick. The best we could do was flying broomsticks into buildings, but it turns out it doesn't do much damage unless you have one hell of a good-quality broomstick.
  91. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by BitterOak · · Score: 1
    Ancient pagans fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them. If you claim any link with them you can not then disclaim their bad side.

    You could say the same about Christians, if you study your history. Remember the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, slave owners in America and elsewhere? Does that mean that someone who claims to be a Christian today supports all of these activities?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  92. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Johnny5000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them"

    Replace slaves with captives held without reason or trial

    and how is this diffrent than the current US Administration?


    Replace "wars" with "grandpa," "slaves" with "naps" and "slaughtered civilians" with "baked cookies"
    and how is that different from my grandma?

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  93. Is "devil worship" making a comeback? by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

    In the late eighties, I was called into the principal's office and accused of devil worship by my math teacher (Church of Christ) and principal (Seventh Day Adventist.) Grown people of average sanity considered it a real threat back then. Are we stupid again?

    --

    Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    1. Re:Is "devil worship" making a comeback? by narcc · · Score: 1

      No, we're not stupid 'again' -- we have always been stupid. :)

      Some religious intolerance for you:
      The poor little witch
      The nervous witch

  94. duh by darth_linux · · Score: 0

    I go to my gang's websitehttp://www.slashdot.org/ all the time.

    --
    Power to the Penguin!
  95. If you a bitch and you wanna step by haagmm · · Score: 3, Funny

    against these CS Gangsters it EOF

  96. MOD UP PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to see the GP's answer to the effin' question.

  97. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Exocrist · · Score: 1

    Isn't it the same god?

  98. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by tidewaterblues · · Score: 1

    You need get you head our of your ass and be more appreciative of the religious biases of this country, my friend. You would not, I believe, be talking this way if the author had mentioned Jews or Hindus in the same light. Witches (Wicca) and devil-worshipers (I assume he means either Lucifarians or Satanists here) are well-established religions with long histories and complex traditions and all have exactly as much right to dignity as Christians, Jews, and all of the other "main stream" religions.

    I wish people would try to feel a little more empathy once and a while. Just move to a nation where your particular faith (or lack there of, since tolerence inclueds athests and agnostics too) is looked down upon--and I guarentee there is at least one--and see how it feels.

    The fact that the parent brings up hackers is irrelvent in this case, because being a Hacker is the same as being a person who pratices a particular trade, it has nothing at all to do with your belief structures (although, I will not deny that Hackers may share semi-uniform values) and only serves to distort the point.

    --


    ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
  99. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You still believe in a lie, though...a huge one in fact. Wiccans think they can cast spells. In addition, their religion is based on the inane beliefs of ancestral agricultural societies and likely founded on an equal degree of ignorance as any religion.

    I can see why you posted that anonymously, anyone who claims to be a "Wiccan" tends to either be a dumbass goth or a teenager who's seen too many episodes of Buffy. No reasonably intelligent person would claim to be a practitioner of that nonsense.

  100. Organized crime by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Every time I read about this scum I recall the saying of Marx that the government is just another gang of organized armed people. End of allusion.

    It works the best when it is much stronger than the other gangs. Mussolini eliminated Cosa Nostra in Italy so it had to move to US. Stalin almost liquidated organized crime.

    I frankly do not know how people justify popularizaion and glamourization of gangs.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  101. A witch! A witch! by jrmiller84 · · Score: 1

    I like how they threw in witches and devil worshippers. They could have just as easily said drug cartels or mobs but chose two peaceful subcultures. Sure every bunch has their bad apples but over all you never hear of witches or devil worshippers killing a little kid for his iPod. I was raised by a very open minded family and my father was sometimes accused of being a "devil worshipper" by many of my religious peers families due to his belief in some of the satanic churches ideals. He never practiced Satanism, he merely believed in a few of their principals. He was never a violent person and on that note this article hit a sore spot for me. The satanic church itself is not about violence at all, it is more about embracing lifes pleasures. Ok, I'm getting off topic. Violent gangs are bad and don't incriminate other subcultures in the process if you don't know what you're talking about.


    Bedevere: Exactly. So, logically...
    Villager: If... she... weighs... the same as a duck... she's made of wood.
    Bedevere: And therefore?
    Villager: A witch!
    Crowd: A witch! A witch!...

    --
    I will forever be a student.
  102. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by v1980z · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah, about those Crusades: many, many, centuries ago, my li'l crystal polisher. Better analogy would have been, "Hello... peaceful earth-based religion here. We don't crash airplanes into someone else's building in the name of our goddess..." he probably means the war on muslims which -yes, is about oil and money- but then again all crusades were about money

  103. You laugh but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Columbine killers were active in cyberspace and had a website talking about what they had planned on doing. No reason street gangs or terrorists should be that much different. Why do you think that send tapes to Al Jezeera or graffitti walls?


    I'm not certain if there have been lawsuits because of it, nobody had reason to expect or believe something like that would actually happen. It's terrible to look back and see that they were blogging about killing their classmates for months before and then went ahead and did it. You'd like to think that your neighbors would be in touch enough with their kids to pick up on that kind of behavior and deal with it before it becomes an actual problem.


    Basically, kids are parentless more today than probably ever before, between broken families and parents both working just to break even. If you can't confide in an adult that takes you seriously and you've got some emotional problems what do you do? Is that why people get involved with drugs? You setup your myspace and talk about anti-social stuff? You get involved with something to try and totally consume your life? (Ever notice how some kids seem to be really really really big fans of certain types of music? I'm not going to say it's unhealthy to dress like your music idols but at some point it's not exactly the most healthy thing to do, The Cure is just a band, I like Disintegration too but it's just music, or maybe it's Marilyn Manson with the younger set these days) A lot of that behavior is simply rebellion for the sake of rebelling and shocking people and getting attention, kids do that. but There is at least one major example of kids blogging about killing and then doing it... That's not to say that kids blogging is bad or all myspace users are little killers waiting to happen by any stretch. More than a few people with extreme anti-social problems have kept diaries though, no reason not to expect to see them or parts of them online now.


    Now the flip side is probably a lot more people have written about killing in a diary than have actually done it and you have to somehow vet through that and people are actually allowed to be odd in this country, there is nothing wrong with being wiccan. The world is different though, if kids are putting vidoes of their cruelty on the web or blogging about violence (scrap booking is what it's called) or what have you, someone should step in. It's ironic to me that it's the police that are actually picking up on this, I'd expect them to be last on the list of people who'd "get it" (although these particular cops don't seem to get it all the way) Maybe I'm older, but if the Crips are blogging and there is information that helps clean up the streets then I'm all about the FBI and police getting all over that, further if there are 200 kids in my city that are keeping diaries about killing people and only one really might do it, I have no problem with the others being addressed and at least having some rational adult check in on each one of those kids. If it's only 1/10,000 that is actually a real problem, that seems like a better lead than taking off my shoes at the airport to look for bombs.

  104. I'm just sittin... by Churla · · Score: 1

    I'm just sittin at my terminal, sippin on my bawlz and juice...
    With my mind on my webpage, and my webpage on my mind...

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  105. There are ways of telling.... by bohemian72 · · Score: 1
    The director of the National Gang Crime Research Center has stated "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.'
    So...if the suspect weighs the same as a duck.....he or she is made of wood.....therefore A GANG MEMBER!!!!! Burn him or her!
    --
    The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
  106. al Quaeda, witches, devil-worshippers and gangs? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, does this guy have an ax to grind. What does an imaginary network of terrorists, practitioners of a polytheistic nature religion, angst-filled teenagers, and small cliques of violent street thugs have in common? None of them are a threat to society but provide a convenient fantasy for people obsessed with some silly notion of an epic battle of Good versus Evil. People like this scare me more than a few scattered street gangs.

  107. They forgot about Dre by minus9 · · Score: 1


    Who's the man with the masterplan?

    A nigga witta motherfuckin' Dell.

    1. Re:They forgot about Dre by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

      Ain't nuthin but a web thang,Baby 2 blogged out niggaz, so we're crazy MySpace is the label that pays me Unflamable, So please don't try to flame me

  108. Witch hunt by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    The director of the National Gang Crime Research Center has stated "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language."

    I almost dread to ask, but what is the director of such an organisation doing prying into the private lives of practicing Pagans and Wiccans? I can't believe how misunderstood this religion is. If you substituted any other typically nonviolent religious group, such as Christians or Jews, I'm sure they wouldn't be lumped in with gangs quite so quickly.

  109. Web Bangers? by bk4u · · Score: 1
    Web Bangers are posting potentially incriminating photos and taunts on their websites.

    Funny, I always thought web bangers were something completely different

    --
    Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
  110. Only one step above... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donought eating swinemen.

    Only thing worse than a stupid gangbanger is a fucking cop.

    "Wachu want piggy piggy?"

  111. Tit for tat by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    In this country we still have to deal with fundi Christians and their crazy rituals: Andrea Yates

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  112. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Gryle · · Score: 1

    To borrow the bumper sticker: "I love God. It's His fan club I'm not crazy about."

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  113. You've got it backwards by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    It should read: Web-savvy kids have joined the gangs.

  114. What does this mean? by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Police departments suddenly faced gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites."
    What does this mean?
    What the heck does this mean?
    I don't even know what the heck this means.
    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:What does this mean? by kdemetter · · Score: 1


      it helps if you break it up
      - Gangs are looking for help on the gang's own easy to find websites
      - the police suddenly realize this .

    2. Re:What does this mean? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the entire article, did you? The way to understand the police is given right there. I quote:

      "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language," Knox said.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:What does this mean? by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      That was my favorite quote of the whole article. If the Myspace Ganstas are as "hardcore" as the emo witches and goth satanists than I strongly suspect the police are being led on a wild goose chase.

    4. Re:What does this mean? by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      The cops are their own gang.

    5. Re:What does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, CowboyNeal has had too much of caffine.

      This sentence can be 'corrected' in different ways:

      1. Police departments suddenly faced gangs which are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites.
      2. Police departments' "suddenly faced gangs" are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites. (eh?)
      3. Suddenly, "police departments faced" gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites.(Har har)
      4. Police departments suddenly facing gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites.

      Take your pick.

    6. Re:What does this mean? by johansalk · · Score: 1

      I think it's about police departments, gangs, and websites.

    7. Re:What does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You didn't read the entire article, did you? The way to understand the police is given right there.
      What does understanding the police have to do with anything. The sentence in question was pure gibberish. It cannot be parsed as anything resembling a sentence in the English language.
    8. Re:What does this mean? by chicagotypewriter · · Score: 1

      lisa: but who will police the police?
      homer: ...the coast guard?

  115. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by iainl · · Score: 2, Informative

    "long histories and complex traditions"? The Church of Satan dates back to April 30, 1966. That's oh so very long indeed.

    While we're at it, every "pagan" I've ever met follows a fairly recently concocted hodgepodge of dozens of individual, mutually contradictory bits of pre-Christian religions, along with a healthy dose of made-up nonsense. "Wicca" dates back to the 1920s, at best.

    So yeah, I look down on it.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  116. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Bush really wanted a Christian War in the Middle East, you all would be dead.

  117. Gang Hacking by AMDfreak · · Score: 1

    You have been hacked by . All your street belong to us!

    1. Re:Gang Hacking by AMDfreak · · Score: 1

      Bah I can't type today. Corrected for hilarity: You have been hacked by (insert gang name here). All your street are belong to us!

  118. devil worshippers and witch? by kokojie · · Score: 0

    I can understand the police want to keep an eye on al-qaeda or gangs, but devil worshippers and witches? why is the police concerned with them?

  119. most surprising part about the article by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    is that excite.com is still around

  120. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    You would not, I believe, be talking this way if the author had mentioned Jews or Hindus in the same light

    I would if, as a Jew, he referred to himself as a "Goblin," or as a Hindu, referred to himself as an "Ogre." I'm not disparaging the religions, I'm mocking the pagans' predilection for describing themselves with the same term as a fairytale boogeyman and then moaning about how they're so misunderstood. Words have meaning.

    I wish people would try to feel a little more empathy once and a while.

    I'd say I'm about as empathetic as one can be on the topic. In fact, I'm pretty sure I've forogotten more about Wicca and "neo-paganism" than you'll ever know. The truth is that so much of the angst and anxiety and "Help! Help! I'm being Oppressed!" -edness that the movement feels is self-inflicted. Wiccans are not going to let anyone pry the "witch" moniker from them anytime soon because it is their link to their own "holocaust" of the Salem Witch Trials etc. "Never More The Burning Times!" and all that rot. Of course, there is nothing but the most tenuous, spurious of connections between the craft as concocted by Buckland and Gardner and Starhawk et. al. and whatever it was that "witches" were burned for hundreds of years ago, but, hey, it's Christians oppressing women, so let's milk it, kk?

    well-established religions with long histories

    Again, I got nothing against Wicca. But long-established? Compared to Judaism? Islam? It's as modern as Mormonism and Scientology. Not that being a "new" religion is a bad thing, but let's call a spade a spade.

  121. Smells like Christian spirit by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs

    And those Necromancers and Daedra worshippers! Kill 'em all!

    ObGrrr: Grrrrr!

    Sorry. Too much Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion for me.

  122. My IT Gang is Recruiting by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Yo! I'm startn' an IT gang. Yah, you got that right bitch. I'm gonna put a cap in yo ass if you're not puttin' comments in yo code. You think I'm shitt'n you? I'm pimp'n a 3 terabyte database beeotch! We're gonna lay it down for the candy asses down in accounting. They think they can say no to my bad ass chrome trimmed workstation request? They be mutha f*ing fools!

    Props to my homeys at Oracle! *pours a diet coke on a dead server*

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  123. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

    wow, there goes my thought that geeks were open minded... you're a bunch of intolerant people as much as anybody else. Live and let live. Everybody has the right to believe in whatever they feel is true. All this argument has left me with the impression that /.ters are as retrograde as the next person.

  124. Re:POOR Grammar by Johnny5000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ok, in addition to your misspelling of the word grammar, I'd like to point out that the phrase "Bad grammar" is POOR grammar! If you're going to critique someone else's English, at least get it right yourself.

    The difference is, we still know that they meant "grammar" instead of "grammer" and "poor" instead of "bad."
    The sentence still made logical sense, even if it used poor grammar and spelling.

    I still have no idea what was meant by:
    "Police departments suddenly faced gangs are looking for help on the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites. "

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  125. There's one tiny technical detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to be able to make $3500 every week.

    I've had many people brag to me about the money they make per week. They can even show me the big pay checks. They can almost never show me a year's worth though.

    Sales is like that. There are one or two people who can make big money week after week and they get rich. For every one of those people there are a hundred other wannabes. They may have one or two good weeks but they don't last long in the business.

    My sister-in-law sells Mary Kay. Her house is twice as big as mine. She always has the 'pink Caddy' (it hasn't actually been pink Caddies for a while). How many people do you know who do that well selling Mary Kay.

    I used to know a guy who actually made a really good living selling vaccuum cleaners door-to-door. As far as I could tell though he was the only one in the whole company who did that though.

    You might be one of those who could make big money selling drugs. In that case, you could probably do just as well selling realestate and it's a lot safer.

    1. Re:There's one tiny technical detail by mlush · · Score: 1
      You might be one of those who could make big money selling drugs. In that case, you could probably do just as well selling realestate and it's a lot safer.

      Hmm I could make more money selling realestate, but I think I'll carry on selling crack to toddlers, at least I get to keep my self respect

  126. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Johnny5000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While we're at it, every "pagan" I've ever met follows a fairly recently concocted hodgepodge of dozens of individual, mutually contradictory bits of pre-Christian religions, along with a healthy dose of made-up nonsense. "Wicca" dates back to the 1920s, at best.

    So yeah, I look down on it.


    Does it make much difference if something was completely made-up out of thin air 50 or 100 years ago, or thousands of years ago?

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  127. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by daperdan · · Score: 1

    Fear not God. Fear the IPU

  128. Re:POOR Grammar by freakmn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm sorry, but to be politically correct, you must call it "Underprivileged Grammar." If you're going to critique someone else's English, at least get it right yourself.

    --
    warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  129. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Tony · · Score: 2

    Some people seem to think that if you do it for evolution instead of religion, you are more sane and acceptable.

    Fuckin' A right, Mister! All those wars in the name of evolution, all that slaughter in the name of natural selection, that was for progress! I'm killin' this cross-wearer for Darwin, gene-damnit!

    After that, I'm going to have a little holy feast in the name of physics.

    Then I'm going to start the astronomy crusades! ay-ay-ay-ay-ay-ay! (That's my war cry. Scary, isn't it? It's scientifically calculated to incite fear in the brain of the anti-knowledge heathen.)

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  130. eBay ad by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    The best part of the article was the ad at the bottom:

    Gang violence - Browse a huge selection now. Find exactly what you want today. www.eBay.com

    You can get anything on eBay!

  131. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by the_womble · · Score: 1
    and how is this diffrent than the current US Administration?

    I never said it was.

    The GP essentially says other religions do all the bad stuff, Wicca does not. My point is that the ancient religions on which Wicca claims to be based did do the bad stuff.

    Incidentally atheists do the bad stuff as well (Pol Pot for example). Just about any group of people of sufficient size will produce mass murderers, war-mongers etc.

  132. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    And if the article said "Christians" instead of specifying "Catholics," would that be fine by you?

    What?!

    Where are "Christians" or "Catholics" mentioned anywhere in the article?

  133. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, then.

    "Al-Quaida, gangs, and new-ish religions."

    Better?

  134. actually, there were witches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Historians are finding that there was actually something to the witch trials. These were not merely scapegoating and political persecutions but a targetting of an agrarian witch cult.

    This has nothing to do with modern wiccans and that ooky spooky gobblydygook, but an old balkan folk religion that Carlo Ginzburg identifies with the Benandanti.

    It is rather interesting stuff, the best text to read on it is "Ecstasies, deciphering the witches sabbath". In this text he associates these agrarian cults with animistic religions that may be a holdover from the scythian and other steppes fairing people.

    In the end this may be another interesting link of the west to persian religions.

    However..and unfortunately... unlike communists and gangstas... the christians seemed to have successfully killed all the benendanti. Hence we no longer have witches. Whitch kinda sucks (like this pun).

    Wish this could get modded up but no one will read it. Damn.

  135. bumper stickers by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    "Dear Lord, protect me from your followers"

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  136. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1
    Where are "Christians" or "Catholics" mentioned anywhere in the article?
    Nowhere, I'm making a point. Not all Christians are Catholics, just as not all witches are Wiccan. "Witches" is a blanket term with many, many subcategories, of which "wiccan" is only one. Catholics are to Christians as Wiccans are to witches, a fact which your OP misses by lumping it all under Wicca and the Buckland and Gardner crew.
  137. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Witches !- Wicca. Traditionally in Europe it meant devil worshippers...

    Umm... not to piss in your cornflakes, but "Wicca" is an Old English word meaning a male witch. It was used in 10th century inquisitional tract "Halitgar's Latin Penitential" to refer to the Pagan priesthood of England. The "devil worship" thing is only "traditional" amoungst the Levintine religions and others influenced by them. Granted, they are presently the dominant perveyers of misinformation on the subject world wide, but hey, we all know that the victors write the history, and rarely do they get it right. You are correct that "Witches != Wicca", because the plural is "Wiccan". Wikipedia has a decent article on it, and it's been thoroughly vetted. Have fun doing your homework...

  138. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Both words mean something else in popular parlance, and that's all there is to it.
    "Witches" in common parlance refers to mythological people who sign a compact with the Christian Satan. Seeing as these people do not exist, it seems pretty ridiculous to talk about them. Furthermore, the Christian notion that there are a significant number of devil-worshippers who are in league with him to oppose the works of Christ is equally ludicrous. To talk of these groups as threats is to reveal one's ignorance. He might as well speak about the dangers of roaming Lilu.
    --
    English is easier said than done.
  139. Links, yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.expage.com/page/amorderey - Latin King Nation (PEOPLES)
    http://www.angelfire.com/folk/gangstaz/ - Gangsta Disciples (FOLKS)
    http://www.angelfire.com/il/ViceLord/ - Vice Lords (PEOPLES)

    These are the major chicago based gangs. These claim to be offical nation sites, and it looks like the people that built them are members, or at least know the creeds and rules of the gangs. Most gang researchers and gang taskforce members will know the creeds of the gangs, so its not like any of that is secret.

  140. Change a few words and obviously by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    Lets see, you said:

      "Ancient pagans fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them. If you claim any link with them you can not then disclaim their bad side."

    If we change a few words:

      "Ancient (or Medieval if you prefer) Christians, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought that god was backing them. If you claim any link with them you can not then disclaim their bad side."

    Amazing how people don't see the logic of their arguement cuts both ways...

    1. Re:Change a few words and obviously by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Amazing how people can reply to a post without reading the context.

      I was refuting a post that said that Wicca was peaceful and did not do such things unlike other religions.

      You clearly did not read my post properly, or its parent at all, before replying

    2. Re:Change a few words and obviously by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

      Context is what you read. If you are goinhg to be a bigot and slander a group of people, you are a bigot who slanders a group of people. Most Catholics today would say that slavery, rape, and pillage are bad things. Most Germans today would say Gassing people for religon, and trying to take over the world by killing anyone who opposes them is are bad things.

      The implication of the statement you made is that if you are currently a part of group X, which has dony Y bad things in the past, you must own up to Y - and are likely guilty of Y yourself (and should be proud of it). I thinks that's a bit of a slanderous posting.

      It is not fair for the sons to carry the sins of the father. Further, in the case of Witches - it was not so much what you said was true, more that the witches got burned for political reasons and financial reasons. E.g. Babe has land you want & a wart - burn her and split the land with the church. Witch says that Jesus was not god, only a good person - drown her and take the spoils. And so forth.

  141. What it said before a line was deleted. by MrMonty · · Score: 1

    "Police departments suddenly faced with the unwelcome arrivals are looking for help anywhere they can get it, including the gangs' own easy-to-find Web sites"

    Monty

  142. new onling gang slang by flipmack · · Score: 1

    - instead of "where you from?!?!" it's now "A/S/L???"

    - 10/100 LAN connections are now referred to as "dimebags"

    - gang snipers are now eBay snipers

    - drive-by shootings are a thing of the past...online gangs now raid opposing online gang territory by wardriving

    - warez start coming in from Colombia

    I can really think of a lot more, but the caffeine hasn't kicked in yet...and I should probably get to work!

    --
    semper ubi sub ubi
  143. After the war on terror? by the+web · · Score: 1

    What is this "after the war on terror" you speak of? I thought this is the perpetual war of 1984?
    All that happens is that the definition of what "terror" means changes, the war on terror continues, the cycle of fear perpetuates, the vassals leige, the 'barbarians' are kept from collusion. America folds into a world government comprised of corporations soon after. None of this three continent crap that Georgey was talking about. Don't you love America?

    Man, did that joke turn sour fast or what?

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  144. How about acting dignified in the first place? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    You know, I'd have more respect for Wicca if it wasn't just an attention-whoring device. In other words, if you want respect, how about respecting yourself first? Because all that trolling for attention strikes me as pretty much forfeiting any claim to respect.

    I have nothing against new religions (because that's what it is), but some are at least decent about it. Wicca is little more than trolling for attention. It's just a sad collection of just enough satan-worship trappings, conotations and words (including claiming the word "witch") to bait half the Christians in town. It's something that's not even designed as a religion, but as a means to shock, annoy and irritate people. It's not a religion, it's just one of the many sub-cultures built around trolling for attention.

    And if that wasn't enough, add some more annoyance factor in the form of pretending it has some right... nay, _duty_... to redefine words and complain about everyone using that word as what it meant all along. Let's also throw some of the lamest guilt-tripping attempts in the mix, while we're at it.

    You want to be treated in a dignified way? Start by acting dignified. If you choose to adher to a group that's just one of the many emo attention-whoring groups, you've already told the world how much you respect yourself. Expect that to be pretty much the high water mark. Few people will show you much more respect than that.

    You want to be treated as a religion? Then how about acting like a serious religion, instead of all that actively trolling for attention? You don't see, say, the Asatru (an actual old "pagan" religion, or at least based on one) shoving themselves in the public eye and posing as victims all the time, do you? In fact, unless you happen to stumble upon the word, you might not even know that they exist at all. Did you know that the word "Hell" comes from their "Hel"? Yet you don't see the Asatru taking every occurence of the word "Hell" as some invitation to educate the masses about their religion, do you? Now compare it to Wicca taking every single occurence of the word "witch" as an opportunity to troll for attention and pose as some oppressed victim.

    In other words: grow up, get a life, realize that there's more to life than shocking the neighbours, etc. _Then_ you'll get respect.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:How about acting dignified in the first place? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      How exactly does someone expressing their wiccan faith "bait half the christians in town?" Perhaps these "christians" should worry more about their own faith than the faith of other people - it's obviously a pretty effin' weak and worthless "faith" if it's so very threatened by someone else practicing his/her own. I'd show these so-called christians much more respect if they'd get over the asinine persecuted majority complex and address the log in their own eye.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:How about acting dignified in the first place? by meltedeyes · · Score: 2, Informative

      I semi agree to most of what you said. I know a few Wiccans that are serious about their religion. What you describe is more the fluff bunny aspect, which admittidly, alot of Wiccnas are. I couldn't stand Wiccans for a long time because of that attitude and all the ones I had met were like that. Attention garning idiots. Then I actually met some that were serious about it. They didn't talk about it, groan in disgust at any mention of the Burning Times, don't wear tons of silver jewelry (if any at all), and didn't even let me know that they were pagan untill I called them out on it. As to the Asatru, you are correct, we don't.

    3. Re:How about acting dignified in the first place? by miyako · · Score: 1

      While I don't entirely deny the points you made, I also think that it's not entirely fair. There are a lot of people who act the way you have described, and I agree that it is loathsome. I don't think that it's fair to generalize to the entire Wiccan population though.
      There are a lot of Wiccans out there who have what I like to call the "oppression complex"; though it's not entirely unique to Wiccans either. Pretty much every group of people- especially once the size of the group reaches some critical mass- has people who act like that.
      There are a lot of Wiccans who dislike people using the term "Witch" to refer to Wiccans for the reasons you've outlined. At the same time though, let's not pretend that there are not other groups that take on some name that is traditionally a derogetory term with a perhaps unrelated meaning and use it as a symbol of pride (how many slashdotters proudly refer to themeselves as geeks? what about western anime fans adopting the term otaku? what about the use of the word "cunt" as a word of empowerment in some femininst circles? what about the adoption of the word "nigger" among african americans? I could go on).
      As for the debate about Wicca being a new vs an old religion; I think you will find very few serious and knowledgeable practicioners who claim that Wicca is older than perhaps 1900 or so- most people would say it was invented by Gardner circa 1950 although you will occasionally see the argument that many of the ideas that were adopted by wicca originated in the 20's with a paper by an anthropologist named Margret Murray called "The Witch Cult of Western Europe" (inscidentally, I belieive this is where a great deal of the erroneous information within the Wiccan community comes from), or that it began first with the OTO and was developed by Gardner in collaboration with Alister Crowley.
      Most Wiccans recognize Wicca as a new religion, and don't try to pretend that it's more than an attempt to create a modern belief system which is based off of bits of pieces of numerous older belief system.
      Most of the problem I think arises from the fact that Wicca is perhaps the largest- certainly the most well known- of the neopagan religions. It is taboo enough to attract rebellious teens and attention whores, popular enough that said people will have heard about it and be able to find information (and misinformation) about it, and misunderstood enough that, by and large, the average person is unable to tell the rebellious attention whoring people who misunderstand it why exactly they are full of it.
      Of course, these people aren't representitive of the entire community. As with many communities that have a high porportion of such people, those people go on making asses of themselves while everyone else ignores them and gets on with their own lives.
      In short, there is nothing wrong with Wicca as a religion, and nothing wrong with people who practice Wicca. There are a lot of people who act as you describe, and rightfully need to ignored or set strait. Generalizing all Wiccans as acting like those people you described, or generalizing Wicca itself as something which leads to or encourages such behavior however is as misinformed as the people you are critisizing.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    4. Re:How about acting dignified in the first place? by meltedeyes · · Score: 1

      I must say, you phrased it better than i did, plus I don't disagree with anything you said.

  145. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by fakedupe · · Score: 1

    Ancient pagans fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them. If you claim any link with them you can not then disclaim their bad side.

    How is that different than many organized religions?

  146. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by everett · · Score: 1

    Yep, funny isn't it. I believe the only difference is that the Quran (Koran, whatever.) is the word of god as told to the prophet Muhammed as opposed to the word of god as given to Moses.

    I could be wrong, theologians feel free to correct me.

    --
    Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
  147. Clueless pet owner thing. by Medievalist · · Score: 1
    My dog ... drags her ass on the ground for no apparent reason; is that a Wiccan thing?
    No, that's plugged anal glands. Or possibly worms. Either way you need to get that looked at.
  148. from the 18 street site by thundergeek · · Score: 1

    "Please note that this website does NOT send out unsolicited emails."

    Spammers are below gangs on the malicious tree? Don't know why, but this made me laugh.

  149. Gang sites are easy to find by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    Here's an easy-to-find one:

    http://gop.com/

    Let's get the cops over to their crib right away!

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  150. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by guanno · · Score: 1
  151. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, it is not your call to call the question of whether Wicca has a right to associate itself with pre-Christian pagans based upon your evaluation of the situation. The mere fact that practictioners anywhere say "in ancient times the religion of our forebears was suppressed by others, now we reclaim it, however imperfectly it has passed down to us" puts them on a rather high moral ground. You can ridicule them all you want for their failings, for the fact that much of their practice they had to reconstruct instead of having the luxury of open transmission through the ages like Christianity had, but they DO identify their faith with the witches of yore, and moreover believe that the same spiritual sources of knowledge that informed their forebears are still active and teaching today... the idea of an "original teaching" or "one true prophet" from which all true believe must descend is not present in all religions, you know.

    So... the fragmentary and borrowed nature of the actual practice of Wiccans (not to mention fanciful and/or unproven history... what religion isn't chock full of that anyway?) not being an obstacle to their moral right to claim connection with witches of the past, the question goes to their right to ask for a redefinition of the term from its general usage. To that, they have every right to try to "clear their name". In common parlance in many parts of the world, people will call someone who gets an advantage over them in a financial transaction a jew. Or a thief a gypsy. Do you also advocate that, because this has been going on for so long, there's no need for a redefinition now, and those who ask for it are silly whiners? Probably not, because you likely won't dispute the "authenticity" of Jewishness today. But I assert it is the same thing with the Wiccans.

    Bear in mind also that "witch" is an English term... not a "European" one. Other languages used other words for their notion of devil worshippers, which did NOT reference any actual category of people, which witches definately were at some point before the meaning was derogatorily changed.

  152. You forgot by plopez · · Score: 1

    400 years ago it was "witches." 50 years ago it was "communists." These days it's those darn "terr'rists." People will always find a way to persecute other peoople they don't like for whatever reason.

    Liberals, Democrats, anyone who believes in civil rights, free thinkers, scientists, academics, homosexuals, anyone who questions 'The Decider', anyone who does not agree with one party rule, goes to the wrong church of their choice, anyone not happy to suck up to corporations, does not believe in the New Mercantilism, who is not a jingosit but a true patriot, who does not want a American Empire, disagrees with the neo-cons, anyone who doesn't believe in greed (and it's demon spawn, 'Prosperity Christianity'), does not want a crusade of any sort and a host of others. America is getting scarier by the minute...

    Damn I'm getting cranky...

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  153. It was only a matter of time by hrrY · · Score: 1

    Strange, but this sort of thing is what builds a bridge to help close the digital divide, In it's own way it is actually encouraging. This is the sort of outlet that *could* help people learn about things outside of an environment that fosters a violent, repressed way of life and ultimately change the street. I deeply believe that this sets a new precedent in the hood, think about it, if these kids are even making a concerted effort at putting together a website(for better or worse)by default an active learning process is taking place that makes them more aware of things outside of "bangin", rivals, cheddar(cash), chickens(girls),etc that are embraced in those circles. A banger that has the aptitude to learn and experiment; holds the promise to a better tomorrow where people don't need to be in gangs anymore and where the hood is no longer a hood, but a *neighbor*hood.

    "When a battle comes up, give me 2 thumbs up..." --Big L(RIP)

  154. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Not all Christians are Catholics, just as not all witches are Wiccan

    Currently. But once upon a time (pre-Reformation for the Christians, earlier in the 20th Century for Witches) they were.

    The apostles "invented" Christianity/The Catholic Church, if you will, and then various Methodist, Baptist, Adventists, Mormons, etc. splintered off. Buckland and Gardner and their peers invented modern witchcraft/Wicca, and all the Norse, Faerie, Seax, Egyptian, Native American, Urban Solitary, and other sects followed, distinguishing themselves from Wicca like a Methodist might distinguish himself from a Catholic.

    Of course, the law enforcement official in the article should have said "neo-pagan," but that doesn't sound so nearly as sinister as "witch."

    Which is the point I'm trying to make.

  155. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by lahvak · · Score: 1

    While we're at it, every "pagan" I've ever met follows a fairly recently concocted hodgepodge of dozens of individual, mutually contradictory bits of pre-Christian religions

    Not that I have any sympathy for Wicca, but how is that different from Christianity?

    --
    AccountKiller
  156. nice to know the spokesperson was well educated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I like how an article on internet gangs mentions al-qaida and devil worshippers, and then tars witches with the same brush. I know quite a few witches - and they'd me mortified to think that in this day-and-age people can be so confused and think that they're remotely bad or scary. It's also debateable whether devil worshippers even exist, -so it's a little worrying that the head of the national gang crime research centre doesn't actually know which groups are a threat to society, let alone whether they exist or not!

  157. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    Still, not all groups who call themselves "witches" existing today have anything to do with Buckland, Gardner, or Wicca. Some consider themselves directly related, some tenuously, and some actively distance themselves from them. Some witches, to be blunt, never had anything to do with Wicca and might slap you for saying so. That is the point I was trying to make. You can't lump all modern "witches" under "Wicca" any more than you can lump all modern "Christians" (which include Protestants, Anglicans, the Amish, Calvinists, Rosicrucians, and many other non-Catholic followers of Christian-based faiths) under today's Catholic Pope.

    And the term "neo-pagan" should definitely not have been used. Neo-pagan is an even broader term than "witch," including far too many subsets and religions to begin to catalog in a Slashdot post.

  158. Re:Fuck this new-age bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How about I post a link to some fucking Dianetics?


    Your comment might just be removed.
  159. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the funniest shit I've heard in years.

  160. Great... by hendrickx · · Score: 1

    Now Witches are lumped in with not only Devil Worshippers, but Gangs and Al-Quaida. http://www.religoustolerance.org/

  161. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1
    How did Wicca get lumped into a sentence with these other three groups?
    Someone just watched The Craft one too many times.
  162. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by fubarific · · Score: 1

    Well golly gee, isn't this obvious? Now we have a fool proof plan to find all the members of Al Queda!

    Clearly Al Queda members are witches, and we all know that witches burn. But why do witches burn? Because they're made out of wood! Now to figure out if we have apprehended an Al Queda member we won't build a bridge out of them, instead we will find out if they float! Now of course throwing a potential Al Queda member into the pond won't work well either, instead we should find something else that floats to weigh against the potential Al Queda member...

    Bread? No...
    Soap? No...
    Very Small Rocks? No...

    A Duck!

    So therefore, if a person weighs the same as a duck, they're made of wood... and therefore, A WITCH! (BURN THEM! BURN THEM ALL!) Oh and a member of Al Queda

  163. I liked the part about by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

    the Gangs that use Sharepoint to keep track of who has which corner.

  164. wouldn't be the first time by esocid · · Score: 1

    No one has probably heard of this in the US but there is a website by neo-nazis that posts photos, addressed, and phone numbers of "antifascist activists" called www.redwatch.info There was a story recently about a man in Warsaw who was beaten and stabbed by some skinheads who got his info off of the website. Pretty messed up.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  165. Wicca stole my bike! by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

    en tea

  166. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Reapy · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I don't see this guy ripping on the diamond engagment ring.

  167. gangs and witches by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I looked up this organization's site, and just sent a formally indignant email to the SOB, asking why he hadn't included millinarians or other fundamentalist Christians, and told him, in so many words, that this was a blatently bigoted statement, and that I would post this to enough other sites, to suggest that he could not ignore this, and demanded a public retraction, putting Witches in with gangs.

    For the real Satanists (not the stupid kids who want to freak out their parents), sorry, you can try to explain to him the difference between the Christian's version of Satanism and yours. I doubt he's capable of understanding, though....

                    mark

  168. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    But do you weigh less than a duck?

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  169. Re:al Quaeda, witches, devil-worshippers and gangs by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    Wow, does this guy have an ax to grind. What does an imaginary network of terrorists, practitioners of a polytheistic nature religion, angst-filled teenagers, and small cliques of violent street thugs have in common?

    What do they have in common? No more and no less than the police officer in TFA stated: They are unique subcultures with unique slang, argot, terminology, etc... Understanding the same takes time and effort.
     
    (Though the usual Slashdot handwaving panic mongers have spent no time trying to read and understand what TFA said - instead (and as usual) jumping to conclusions about what they think he said and meant.)
     
     
    None of them are a threat to society but provide a convenient fantasy for people obsessed with some silly notion of an epic battle of Good versus Evil.

    Try living in an area dominated by gang bangers and wannabees and your attitude will change abruptly I warrant.
     
     
    People like this scare me more than a few scattered street gangs.

    Street gangs are niether few nor scattered - but the handwavers and head-in-the-sand types prefer to believe their fantasies over reality.
  170. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    "Witches" in common parlance refers to mythological people who sign a compact with the Christian Satan.

    Umm... what?

    "Witches" in common parlance refers to female magic-users, traditionally dressed in black with pointy hat, cauldron and magical flying broomstick. It's not Satanism and it's not Wicca; think Snow White's stepmother, or the Wicked Witch of the West. Lots of cackling. Double double toil and trouble.

    Satan doesn't enter into it. That's a completely different horror story.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  171. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Yay!

    I love Bush Administration Mad Libs!

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  172. Witch Taunts by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    "I'll get you and your little dog, Toto, too!"

    "Surrender Dorothy" (sky tagging)

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  173. Here's a link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.xv3gang.com/

    Maybe /. can "burn" their server??? ;-)

    Bye,

  174. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Maybe you should attack his argument instead of attacking him directly? You know, prove him wrong? Yeah, I didn't think so. Put up or shut up.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  175. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

    Blame the language. You (singular) and You (plural) are the same words. I didn't mean to attack him in particular. Maybe I should have said it in a clearer way.

  176. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    Christianity (excluding Catholicism) isn't contradictory, if you understand it. It branched off from Judaism, obviously, but there's a lot of discussion in the New Testament about how you can be Christian without being Jewish (there was initially some confusion about this). Most of the hodge-podge traditions thrown in from other religions are things like holidays (e.g. Christmas and Easter) and are completely unimportant theologically.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  177. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As someone who studied the witch hunts in early modern Europe, I can tell you that there was almost no evidence of devil worship found, nor any "nasty" practices. Instead, followers of traditional, grass roots faiths - and especially those practicing herbal medicine - where tried and hastily convicted at the behest of the church to ensure its dominance. Estimates range between a few hundred thousand all the way to a million (pick a happy medium) women AND men being killed for following local customs, superstitions, and beliefs. In a few cases, false claims were brought about for financial benefit.

    Take one look at Malleus Maleficarum and that pretty much gives you an idea why so many so-called "witches" confessed.

    "Ancient Pagans" is a loose term describing any number of people and I doubt that's what the parent was referring to. Rather, it reeks of panicky paranoia - if the gangs don't get us, the witches and terrorists (read: non-christians) will!

  178. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Does it make much difference if something was completely made-up out of thin air 50 or 100 years ago, or thousands of years ago?

    Well, it's hard to know with any certainty what happened thousands of years ago. However, we can be absolutely certain that they just made up a load of crap within the past 100 or so because we still have living people around who witnessed those events. E.G. there are many former contemporaries of L. Ron Hubbard around who can talk about his motivations in founding his religion (hint: shift-4, US keyboard layout).

  179. Re:al Quaeda, witches, devil-worshippers and gangs by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    What do they have in common? No more and no less than the police officer in TFA stated: They are unique subcultures with unique slang, argot, terminology, etc... Understanding the same takes time and effort.

    (Though the usual Slashdot handwaving panic mongers have spent no time trying to read and understand what TFA said - instead (and as usual) jumping to conclusions about what they think he said and meant.)

    When one lists things together, one often implies an association. In this case, it certainly is not intended to show contrast. I know that in the mind of an average American, the terms “witch” and “devil-worshipper” have negative connotations. As does, of course, the other two. However, in reality, the former pair in this case are absolutely benign and pose no detrement to society. The disapproval is purely subjective and almost always misinformed. And if you do the research, you find that al Quaeda is a fantasy, one that was created by a government witness in early 2001 in a trial against extremists. This term is only a modern replacement for the Evil Soviet Empire. Now, as for gangs.

    Street gangs are niether few nor scattered—but the handwavers and head-in-the-sand types prefer to believe their fantasies over reality.

    Read my statement carefully. I said “threat to society,” which differs from threat to you or your community. Gangs depend utterly on our society for their survival, and their goal is not to bring that society down. (I challenge you to find a gang banger who has the goal of overthrowing our govnernment and destroying our culture.) If you are wondering why, consider laws banning the use of recreational drugs. Outlawing goods the general population demands always brings rise to illicit trade, such as with prohibition and mafias. Our socieity simultaneously outlaws drugs, enforces the ban, then demands those very same drugs. It is this schizophrenic behavior that contributes directly to the formation of gangs, as the presence of a sufficiently large demand produces a supply. When you look at it this way, you find that gangs thrive on the current state of society and would certainly have no interest in posing a threat to it.

  180. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1

    Ancient pagans fought wars, took slaves and slaughtered civilians and in all that thought the gods were backing them.

    That sounds more like the work of the Christians to me. Crusades anyone?

    Come to think of it, I think Dubya seems to think that God is on his side. Too bad the muslims feel the same way!

    Anyone who thinks that God is on their side is dangerous.

  181. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    Not really, unless you count all those Wiccans/pagans/etc. who repeatedly insist that their religions are thousands of years old. That really gets tiresome.

  182. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1

    ...Or my favorite: "Jesus loves you. Everyone else thinks you're an asshole."

  183. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

    Most of the hodge-podge traditions thrown in from other religions are things like holidays (e.g. Christmas and Easter) and are completely unimportant theologically.

    The hodge-podge traditions like:
    being born of a virgin?
    that this birth was visited by magi bearing gifts?
    having 12 followers?
    performing miracles?
    a last supper of wine and bread?
    dying for the sins of humanity?
    being buried in a cave?
    rising after death?
    coming back to lead in the final battle vs evil?

    All of these things are found in pre-Christian religions, especially those following Osiris, Dionysus, and Mithras.

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  184. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by killjoe · · Score: 1

    "why did this get modded Troll? He's right on."

    There are a lot of republicans here. They tend to mod down anybody who disagrees with them. But yes every word was true. Bush has said on many occations that god told him to invade iraq.

    I read an interesting article the other day about an xtian movement which basically believes that if you pray hard enough then you become an instrument of god and that everything you say or do is god acting through you. In other words you can never do wrong because it's actually god doing it and he is just using you as a tool. This why Bush one said "I trust the god speaks through me". Yes that's a real quote google it.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  185. irresponsible and unprofessional by bugi · · Score: 1
    The director of the National Gang Crime Research Center has stated "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.'
    What a nice demonstration of ignorance and intolerance. To lump the christian boogeymen in with (semi-)organized criminals is irresponsible and unprofessional. Oooh, be afraid of the boogeyman, oooh oooh ooh. Boo!
  186. pseudo-anthropology by bugi · · Score: 1
    The director of the National Gang Crime Research Center has stated "In order to understand any subculture, be it al-Qaida, witches, devil worshippers or gangs, you have to be able to know their own language.'
    This sort of pseudo-anthropology is leading us down a sad road.
  187. Ads at the bottom of the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Google sponsored links
    Gang violence - Browse a huge selection now. Find exactly what you want today.
    www.eBay.com
    You really CAN buy anything through eBay...
  188. Re:al Quaeda, witches, devil-worshippers and gangs by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    When one lists things together, one often implies an association. In this case, it certainly is not intended to show contrast.

    You are utterly correct. And in this instance the association is "subcultures with unique argot" - not "subcultures that threaten society".
     
    Read my statement carefully. I said "threat to society," which differs from threat to you or your community.

    And my community - and others threatened by gangs are not part of society?
     
     
    If you are wondering why, consider laws banning the use of recreational drugs. Outlawing goods the general population demands always brings rise to illicit trade, such as with prohibition and mafias. Our socieity simultaneously outlaws drugs, enforces the ban, then demands those very same drugs. It is this schizophrenic behavior that contributes directly to the formation of gangs, as the presence of a sufficiently large demand produces a supply.

    A more stunning bit of ignorance I have never encountered. Gangs predate the drug issue in America by a wide margin - and even today gangs are not solely about drugs. Many aren't about drugs at all. (Though the uniformed may believe otherwise.)
  189. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    If you are talking about Judeo-Christianity, then it wasn't made up thousands of years ago. The religion has evolved over time and was not just "made up". Thousands of years of study and writings, and introspection, and events, and established institutions.

    Compared to most other religions, it has withstood the test of time. It has indeed survived and has millions, if not billions, of followers. This is indeed what tends to separate "pagan" from "mainstream" religions.

    I think that is what you were referring to.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  190. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Does it make much difference if something was completely made-up out of thin air 50 or 100 years ago, or thousands of years ago?

    L. Ron Hubbard.

  191. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by the_womble · · Score: 1
    How is that different than many organized religions?


    I never said it was, I was replying to the GP which claimed that Wicca was different and more peaceful.


    I made this very clear in my post. You clearly neither read my post of the parent post before replying.

  192. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by the_womble · · Score: 1

    Is it really too much for people like you to read posts in full before replying? Or to read the parent post and get an idea of the context? No, its write first and think afterwards.

  193. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by the_womble · · Score: 1

    Whether Wicca has genuine connections with ancient paganism or not (I do not think it has), its followers believe it has. They can not claim the connection and at the same time disclaim the bad bits of the connection.

  194. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by iainl · · Score: 1
    Does it make much difference if something was completely made-up out of thin air 50 or 100 years ago, or thousands of years ago?


    Only if they then whine about how superior their religion is, because it's older and more traditional.

    I've no problem with people having faith, only making demonstrably false claims. Christians striving to be good people, like their religion says they should be is a good thing. Fundamentalists telling me that I'm lying when I say that the fossil record doesn't support the idea of Man and Woman being brought to life at 9 AM on October the 23rd, 4004 BC is rather less good.
    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  195. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by mink · · Score: 1

    Out of curiosity, what about a person who has decided to take up worshipping members of the Grrek pantheon? Is that not a thousands of year old religion?
    What about Hindus (technically pagans to christians) who claim their scripture was given over 5000 years ago?

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  196. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by mink · · Score: 1

    You left out the Headology.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  197. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    Hindus don't often outright refer to themselves as pagans. That's not their identity. They're Hindus, and they call themselves that. As for people worshipping the Greek gods, chances are damn good that they're not doing it in the same way or by the same traditions that the Ancient Greeks did. In any case, I was specifically referring to people that identify themselves as "pagan", the large number of which are actually following a rather new religion that borrows gods or superficial aspects from ancient religions.

  198. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by mink · · Score: 1

    Ok. So for someone to claim to be following an old religion and not some new fangled thing, they need to worship in the old ways. Then there are currently few if any Christians who can seriously claim to be anything but a fairly new fad religion as well. Or am I not getting your viewpoint?

    My use of "pagan" in relation to non Christian religions is because of how Christians around me have used it. They have always, in my experience, used it to mean "any religion not following Christ". Since the discussion and original topic uses somewhat vague terms is it any wonder we are having such a discussion over the meaning of words.

    For a really mind bending example of how grey a domain we are wandering into, look at Hare Krishnas. They are a fairly new organized religion, but worship as scripture claiming to be thousands of years old describes. Are they new and not worth any consideration or old and worth taking seriously? Where does this put the way Christian sects have evolved?

    Am I reading to much into your original post?

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  199. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1
    Am I reading to much into your original post?

    Probably. I'm referring to pagans who call themselves pagans, ie. some Wiccans, neo-druids and such. They use the "fact" that their religion is ancient to add credibility to it, either to make themselves look less silly or to recruit people. Faith is faith, you've got it or you don't, and coming up with excuses for it just proves that you don't.

    It just annoys me. It makes them seem somewhat like they're attention whores / sheep / etc.
  200. Re:Al Queda, witches, devil worshippers, and gangs by boingo82 · · Score: 1
    So I'm not the only one who thinks it's incredibly dangerous to tell people to listen to the voices in their heads.

    Especially when those voices have a history of telling people to: kill their own child, kill large numbers of other people, etc, in the name of "God".

    Anytime I meet anyone who claims to have regular conversations with God, I am scared of them. Because if they flip their lid one day, and the voices are no longer telling them to be good and just, they will still believe them and do their bidding.

    IMO, we should be teaching people that if you have gods speaking to you, you should seek immediate help.

    --
    As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!