Slashdot Mirror


Offshored Identity Theft

Travoltus writes "The threat of increased misuse of consumer personal data by offshore criminals was first made publicly known with the UCSF Pakistani medical transcriber scandal. Then, in a logical progression of events, it was discovered that foreign criminal interests were offering money to offshored call center workers to surrender consumer data. Now that threat has been realized: Offshored call center staffers at Mphasis BPO have allegedly stolen £200,000 using United States customers' personal information. It is believed that Indian police reacted swiftly to catch the thieves, but only £12,000 has been recovered so far, and it is not really known who orchestrated this theft or where the rest of that money is now. It is also unknown as of yet how much of a mess this has created for the U.S. citizens who were victimized. Let's hope that the people whose information was stolen don't have to go through what other identity theft victims have to endure, to clean up their good name."

292 comments

  1. So much for outsorucing by CokoBWare · · Score: 0

    I guess this says a harder look will be given to outsourcing before actually sending work overseas.

  2. I don't get it by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is identity theft by foreigners considered more scary that identity theft by Americans. I'd bet you $100 that the vast, vast, vast majority of credit card fraud on Americans is committed by their fellow countrymen[0].

    [0] Or women.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:I don't get it by gonk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is hard to enforce U.S. law on foreigners.

      robert

    2. Re:I don't get it by elhondo · · Score: 1

      I think it's a bigger deal because of the law enforcement that we have to deter this sort of thing. Even though it's a problem here, it's a problem that our government is working on. That may not be the case in a foreign country.

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah? Well it's pretty hard to enforce international law on the US.

    4. Re:I don't get it by cthulhuology · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Identity theft by foreign thieves is scarier because the US legal system and police systems alone aren't sufficient to track them down. International crime has jurisdictional issues, and you have no guarantee that the authorities in whatever country you're dealing with will cooperate, or even have the means to do so. This isn't an "outsourcing is bad because foreigners can't be trusted" problem, it is a "outsourceing is bad because the same rules that protect US customers need not apply". Anything that makes getting away with identity theft easier / harder to prosecute makes the situation worse.

    5. Re:I don't get it by gowen · · Score: 5, Informative
      But the Indian police have already arrested the perpetrators. If you want to extradite them, I'm sure the Indian authorities will be glad to let you have them (seriously, it's probably more hassle than its worth to process them themselves, with the US peering over their shoulders.)From TFA
      "Distressing as this incident has been, it is a sad but realistic fact that no system can be 100 percent foolproof. The deterrence of prompt action is, therefore, critical," Karnik noted. "In this context, the proactive efficiency and the prompt success of the police reinforces the reputation of India as a country with a strong legal and enforcement framework."
      Contrary to some people's opinion, the world outside the US is not a lawless desert.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    6. Re:I don't get it by will_die · · Score: 1

      I don't consider the story to be that the info was stolen by foreigners but that it was an organized setup and operated as such.
      With it being done this way it should of been made a story(not on /.) no matter where it happened.

    7. Re:I don't get it by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      So, is identity theft and/or fraud not a crime in these countries? If not, then why on earth are businesses offshoring this sort of work there? If so, then what's the problem? Either way, they'll be treated as the criminals they are.

    8. Re:I don't get it by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So you think that the Indian authorities would be soft on this sort of crime because the victims aren't Indian citizens? Please.

      If anything - and I speak with a great deal of personal knowledge about the country having travelled there many times - they're probably more vigilant about crimes against westerners than they are about crime in general.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:I don't get it by neoThoth · · Score: 1

      Not if they are smart. Not that all criminals are genius, far from it. But even an idiot knows that getting caught is a factor. Now if you live in Nigeria what are the chances that someone making a complaint will get a warrant issued for your arrest. And if the warrant were issued Big F'n Deal! Try serving an arrest warrant in Nigeria issued from the US. NOT GONNA HAPPEN. So it is a big deal when the crime is occuring from other countries because we can arrest any nimrod who abuses access here (see the UCSB story of the girl who stole her prof's identity!)

    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the Indian authorities will be glad to let you have them

      I don't what you're smoking, but most countries do not willingly extradite criminals, espically if the criminal is a citizen of that country.

      And contrary to most Americans beliefs, most of the world hates the US, and isn't likey to expect them to give fair treatment to their citizens.

    11. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. America tries hard to enforce U.S. law on foreigners. Americans are foreigners. Maybe you meant non-americans! (posted by a Brit).

    12. Re:I don't get it by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      How the heck are you modded as Flamebait? If anything you should be +3, Informative, at the very least.

      The crux of the matter is that the problems people see in outsourcing lies in their belief that they cannot extend the laws and regulations here to other countries, and thereby punish them. Many posts here point to how it's easier to keep tabs on employees if they're close-by.

      However, the world is not lawless. India has its laws too. And the criminals, as the parent mentioned, were prosecuted. The US does not have to police the world and every offshore company to ensure that people aren't screwing them over.

      There's a deep sense of paranoia in the US. I can only blame Bernays and his uncle Freud for such irrational behavior.

    13. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the US legal system and police systems alone aren't sufficient to track them down
      One could say the same about an enormous amount of crime within the US. What's the detection/conviction rate for burglaries in NYC these days? About 15%.
    14. Re:I don't get it by mslinux · · Score: 0

      W can do anything ;)

    15. Re:I don't get it by Threni · · Score: 1

      DVD Jon, Welsh cannabis importer Howard Marks and many, many others from around the world would have to disagree with you there, I'm afraid!

    16. Re:I don't get it by gowen · · Score: 5, Informative
      I don't what you're smoking, but most countries do not willingly extradite criminals
      What am I smoking? Why, its a rolled up copy of the US-India extradition treaty which contains the extremely salient phrase
      "Extradition shall be granted for an extraditable offense regardless of where the act or acts constituting the offense were committed."
      which applies to almost any crime for with a sentence longer than a year.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    17. Re:I don't get it by TheGrapeApe · · Score: 1
      Is it "more scary"? I don't really think so, but that's not really the point of the article either.

      It does, however, make very eminent the issue of unscrupulous "bad citizen" corporations sending private information of good citizens overseas where they have no control over it or legal recourse for that matter.

      We slashdotters "told you so", so it makes the story more ironic as well.

    18. Re:I don't get it by khallow · · Score: 1
      If anything - and I speak with a great deal of personal knowledge about the country having travelled there many times - they're probably more vigilant about crimes against westerners than they are about crime in general.

      I don't see your point. A western tourist or businessperson mugged in the neighborhood can put a lot more heat on a police force than some vague group of people who may never set foot in India.

    19. Re:I don't get it by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The question isn't whether identity theft and/or fraud is illegal (though that may be a problem here), but the matter of enforcement as a deterent. Frankly, it's a lot easier to get away with crimes when they cross national borders. Don't steal too much at a time and you'll probably be safe.

    20. Re:I don't get it by dmarx · · Score: 1

      Because, as stated in the article, it is more difficult to apprehend the offenders when they live in foreign countries.

      --
      "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    21. Re:I don't get it by khallow · · Score: 1
      Contrary to some people's opinion, the world outside the US is not a lawless desert.

      The original poster was just stating a fact. If a criminal who is a UK citizen flees to the UK (a law abiding country), it's still much harder to find them and extradite them than if they remained in the US. And frankly IMHO, the only reason this crime was prosecuted was because it harmed greatly the reputation of the Indian firm running the call center.

      Having said that, the problems mentioned here didn't magically appear just because this information got moved to India. I recall hearing anecdotal evidence about similar theft and fraud (often by gangs and other organized crime groups) at a US bank's US-based credit card system. There the primary goal appeared to be keeping the crime out of the papers with reduction of such crime coming in second.

    22. Re:I don't get it by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that their wouldn't be pressure on the police force from politicians concerned about the negative impact of such incidents?

      I think - actually, I know - that they'd be very concerned about the potential for lost jobs if these incidents weren't properly dealt with as well as the potential bad publicity that they bring.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    23. Re:I don't get it by smitke · · Score: 1

      Nice to know that India would extradite spammers since that offense seems to have a 9 year prison sentence

    24. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd bet you $100 that the vast, vast, vast majority of credit card fraud" Since I took your bet and lost. Can I have your bank account, name, address, SS#, Mother's Maiden, so i can deposit your winnings. :)

    25. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, that's one country. How about the others?

    26. Re:I don't get it by Senobyzal · · Score: 1
      Right; the authorities there like foreign investment, especially western investment, and I'm sure they're savvy enough to realize that a few well-publicized cases like this might be enough to make a company considering outsourcing to Bangalore or another popular destination have second thoughts.

      That's why a lot of popular tourist destinations crack down on crime against visitors while essentially tolerating crime against their own citizens. It's all about the money, and who has it.

    27. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is identity theft by foreigners considered more scary that identity theft by Americans? Because with airfare and all it costs a lot more to track a foreigner down and shoot them.

    28. Re:I don't get it by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      >>Nice to know that India would extradite spammers since that offense seems to have a 9 year prison sentence

      Making it even easier to get into the US than an H1-B.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    29. Re:I don't get it by mutterc · · Score: 1

      You forget - businesses have no good reason to care whether identity theft and/or fraud is illegal in the target countries. If it's cheaper to move operations there (the best you could hope for is that company might consider losses due to activities that aren't illegal in the target country), the company must more operations there, for the short-term good of the shareholders.

    30. Re:I don't get it by gnuman99 · · Score: 3, Informative
      And this is funny/flaimbait/troll how? US did not sign onto the International Court just because of this reason!! "This is a body based in The Hague where unaccountable judges and prosecutors could pull our troops, our diplomats up for trial," Bush said in his first campaign debate.

      Now, US is threatening other countries to cut aid if they don't exempt US citizens. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A132 57-2004Nov25.html

      I guess it is OK for the US to jail citizens of other coutries WITHOUT a trial http://www.notinourname.net/restrictions/prez-powe rs-16apr04.htm, but it is not OK for others to put Americans on trial...

      Saying this is not right must be a troll?

    31. Re:I don't get it by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      What I don't get is that none seems to have noticed this story is a dupe:

      Indian Call Center Employees Hack US Bank Accounts Posted by CowboyNeal on Friday April 08, @05:49PM
      from the easy-money dept.>
      The Ascended One writes "Call center employees working for an Indian software company, MSource, supposedly used confidential client information to transfer client funds to themselves. The alleged perpetrators used the personal information of four NY-based clients to transfer ~$350,000 (Rs. 1.5 crores) in their names, a large sum in Indian currency. They were caught after the victims alerted the bank officials in the US, who then traced the crime to the Indian city of Pune. While the name of the bank has not been revealed, the article indicates that the bank in question is Citibank."
      This story links to a Times of India story which is rather more detailed than the Yahoo one in today's regurgitation.
    32. Re:I don't get it by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      spammers since that offense seems to have a 9 year prison sentence

      Unfortunately, I doubt he'll serve any of it, it's been suspended while he appeals, and seeing as he's earned millions from his spamming, he can afford to appeal forever. If finally he does do some time, it'll be like Martha Stewart, a few month's stress-free low-security then out on probation.

    33. Re:I don't get it by khallow · · Score: 1
      What makes you think that their wouldn't be pressure on the police force from politicians concerned about the negative impact of such incidents?

      Reading the article, I see that you are correct here. The local call center business in question has a strong stake in getting this cleared up. So yes, there's a strong negative impact here. Ie, it's not the typical internet fraud (ie, no credible institution can be blamed) since you have a business that was the source of the leak.

    34. Re:I don't get it by jan7da · · Score: 0

      Xenophobic Americans. Thanks to globalization, they lose jobs, and now come with all sorts of silly propaganda to disrepute developing nations. Hipocratic Americans. Reputation of India and China didnt not come into their mind, when they wanted their markets. After coming to America, I have been victim of spam, phishing, tele-fraud, identity theft. Never heard of them in India. The worst I hate is coutesy calls, was forced to disconnect my land-line. After using debit cards in india, I thought using debit cards is as safe as credit cards, not in america. Most americans do not have a clue that the credit card charges made as charity/deals were being processed in Canada. While american govt finds it costly to investigate $100 fraud on credit cards (may be outsource investigations to other countries). While almost all do not have a clue as to what some of those charges on credit card mean. -jan PS: I thought american-slashdotters are smart of america, cant believe that they would prefer to live in a illusionary world, deny any minimal understanding of economics and common sense. Now, i know what i can expect from not-so-smart-americans. Becomin victim of propaganda once and twice could be understandable, but this rhetoric propaganda, oozing with prejudice and gratutious display of chstupidity doesnt suit a forum like slashdot. Probably no one told you the jobloss in non-america, due to american MNCs. Loss of economies, by forcing developing nations to open up for powerfull MNCs. We were told about the benefits of globalization by america, and now you guys are closing ur markets. sick.

    35. Re:I don't get it by gowen · · Score: 1

      Well, let me explain, as I posted the original. I labeled it "troll", because if I hadn't, it would've been modded a (-1 Troll) or (-1 Flamebait) almost immediately. The only way to trick the dumber mods, who have no tolerance for my (legitimate) attack on the US's stance on the International Court, was to pretend it was a joke.

      Thus, it got to +5, where more people could see it.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  3. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    We cant trust foreigners... They have militaries.

    Luckily we have one also.

  4. Nothing for you to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please fill in you credit card number, social security number, date of birth, mother's maiden name and your password to all you most important information below:

    1. Re:Nothing for you to see here by maotx · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  5. Thought I remembered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liked the comment so much, you posted it twice.

    1. Re:Thought I remembered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need this.

  6. It's been said before... by VanillaBabies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The worst part about stuff like this is that the system is set up in favor of the person stealing the information. There are what seems to be very few safeguards to prevent the theft of someone's information. However, when it's time to clean up the mess, those responsible for it, including companies that were mishandling the information, are nowhere to be found. Thus leaving the victim to spend excessive amounts of time and money clearing their "good" name. Just proves the only person watching out for you is yourself, so be careful who you trust.

    1. Re:It's been said before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't really care about identity theft If some one steals my identity and trashes it I'll just go and steal a new one :)
      Seems to be an easy thing to do.

    2. Re:It's been said before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is TRUE. ...and has been discussed many times befor on /. It has been pointed out as well that there is some tradeoff of privacy against comfort. As long as the rate of theft does not exceed a reasonable amount (as percieved by CC companies) there is no reason to change the system. Let's hope that cases like this will change their attitude. And for those who didn't get it:"It's not about race, origin or legal system, it's about CRAPPY system."

    3. Re:It's been said before... by deKernel · · Score: 1

      I hear you on this one. Last time I heard, it was estimated to take 800 hours for an individual to fully repair all damage from an identity theft.

    4. Re:It's been said before... by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is TRUE. ...and has been discussed many times befor on /. It has been pointed out as well that there is some tradeoff of privacy against comfort. As long as the rate of theft does not exceed a reasonable amount (as percieved by CC companies) there is no reason to change the system. Let's hope that cases like this will change their attitude. And for those who didn't get it:"It's not about race, origin or legal system, it's about CRAPPY system."

      They will make changes only when the burden of proof for a debt is placed squarely on them. Having mother's maiden name and SSN must NOT constitute any form of proof. Note that that proof must also be required before they may post any disparaging information to a credit agency. Further, credit agencies reporting unchecked disparaging information must be held strictly liable for libel. While malice can't be shown there, given the increasing liklihood of identity theft, negligence certainly is there.

      You can bet they would magically become much more careful once they write off a few hundred million as uncollectable for lack of proof.

  7. Slashdot's got its dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely we can be allowed to have ours

  8. Ownership Society by bigtallmofo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is one of the biggest problems that I see with our apparently inevitable slide toward an ownership society.

    The plan as I read it is to offshore everything with the thought that we'll still own the capital and intellectual property that people who do the actual work will be dependent on. I think incidents like this shine a spotlight on why this kind of thing won't work in the long term. What happens when the people who do the actual work (and that you're throwing the equivalent of scraps to) decide they don't like your arrangement? They change the rules (example: steal people's identities) and you have little recourse since you don't actually do anything and are wholly dependent on them.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Ownership Society by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The plan as I read it is to offshore everything with the thought that we'll still own the capital and intellectual property that people who do the actual work will be dependent on. I think incidents like this shine a spotlight on why this kind of thing won't work in the long term. What happens when the people who do the actual work (and that you're throwing the equivalent of scraps to) decide they don't like your arrangement?

      That's not the only thing wrong with the "ownership society".

      Even if it works, the overseas revolt you describe never happens, and money flows into the country, the percentage of Americans who will actually benefit from this arrangement is extremely tiny. The rest of us will be SOL.

      Here is more CATO drivel from the link you posted:
      The United States today has the most widespread property ownership in history. This year an all-time high of 68.6 percent of American households own their own homes. Even more significantly, increasing numbers of Americans are becoming capitalists--people who own a share of productive businesses through stocks or mutual funds. About half of American households qualify as stockholding in some form. That's up from 32 percent in 1989 and only 19 percent in 1983, a remarkable change in just 20 years. That means almost half of Americans directly benefited from the enormous market appreciation between 1982 and 2000 and are prepared to see their wealth increase again when the current stock market slump ends.
      Notice how he fails to mention how much these half of Americans "directly benefited" from appreciation of securities. This is an example of lying with statistics- and it isn't a distortion, it's an outright lie. Instead of what percentage of individuals own stock, the relevant statistic is what percentage of stock is owned by whom. The percentage of households "owning stock in some form" is meaningless in this context. It includes everyone who has a 401k, every dentist and granny who owns 60 shares of IBM. In terms of total market capitalization the "half of American households" alluded to above owns an extremely small fraction of all stock, and generally most people invest no more than they can afford to gamble with. The vast majority of stock is held by the lucky few who can afford to pay for all this propaganda.
    2. Re:Ownership Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah,

      A choice quote from "ownership society":

      "To escape poverty you need assets"

      The author of that "Ownership society" does not appear to own any intelligence

  9. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by CleverNickedName · · Score: 3, Informative

    The parent is the first dupe post I've seen on Slashdot. Will it get another +5 Insightful? Only time will tell.

    Best of luck, Dancin_Santa. :)

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  10. slightly ridiculous by egyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Putting the focus on the fact that the thieves were working in outsourced operations is beside the point. The necessary assumption for this story to make sense, is that these off-shore workers steal more money from Americans than other Americans do. While I don't have statistics in front of me, I highly doubt that the off-shore theft problem is even comparable to in-house work. Big deal, some people stole a relatively small sum of money... it's only news because those "evil Indians" are taking all our jobs and are now stealing our money too!

    1. Re:slightly ridiculous by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Why is it a "necessary assumption" for this "story to make sense" that off-shore workers are stealing MORE money from Americans than Americans are stealing?

      Let's assume that Americans steal a billion dollars a year from other Americans in identity theft. Under your theory, it's would not be news that Indians are "only" stealing a million a year. Heck, under your theory, it wouldn't be news if Indians were "only" stealing $999,999,999 a year. Exactly how does THAT make sense?!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:slightly ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big deal, some people stole a relatively small sum of money...

      Heh, want to do me a favor and send me a "relatively small" sum of money? About $377,880 should do (:

    3. Re:slightly ridiculous by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, it's not 'slightly ridiculous'. It's a new wrinkle in the identity theft schema.

      People know about id theft here, and try to combat it in their personal dealings. And some people don't trust offshore companies, so they don't deal with them. One less avenue for your information to be screwed with.

      Now, the homegrown companies you deal with and trust are making that decision for you. Releasing your info offshore, and you have no knowledge of it, and can't prevent it. And can't fight back.

      Is offshore ID theft a big problem? No, not yet. Much smaller in terms of actual losses. But it is a whole other way to get screwed over.

    4. Re:slightly ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a troll. This is only a troll. If you are offended by trolls, you may be considered racist. Trolls are people too, and deserve all rights granted to any other person.

      How do you expect foreign shops to out-steal Americans? If there's one thing we've learned, it's that the Bush administration can out-steal just about everyone.

    5. Re:slightly ridiculous by deepestblue · · Score: 1
      And some people don't trust offshore companies, so they don't deal with them.

      Riiiight. And why so? Perhaps because they think Americans are inherently more trustworthy? That's what the GP said.

    6. Re:slightly ridiculous by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Riiiight. And why so? Perhaps because they think Americans are inherently more trustworthy? That's what the GP said.

      No, I'm not saying that. But like it or not, some people do have a distrust of companies in certain areas, and with certain bits of personal data. Even here...how many times, when the subject of allofmp3.com comes up, do people say they wouldn't trust their credit card data with them, simply because it is in Russia.

      Would you send your personal data to some unknown company in Bangladesh, Romania, or Pakistan? No, you wouldn't. But western companies are doing that for you. You may never know if and when they did. And you have little recourse when things go tits up.

  11. American identity thieves protest... by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Funny

    "They took er jerrrrbs!"

    Though, this time it's not as simple as preventing the future from happening.

    1. Re:American identity thieves protest... by RandoFernando · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Back to the pile!!!"

  12. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow - someone redundant'd themselves. Amazing that he still got a second +5 Insightful.

    I wonder if he wrote the original or he just picked it up from another web site?

  13. Slowday at /. by naveenkumar.s · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This topic was discussed extensively (of course, with flames). Should be a slow day.

  14. Its the LAW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real reason for not wanting my personal information to leave this country is that I have more faith in the laws of my country to be able adequately deter & punish the folks who commit these sorts of crimes. I don't think that non-US citizens are any more or less good people, but they may have less of a deterrent to do the right thing.

    1. Re:Its the LAW! by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...and the fact is, we already have so little control over our personal information, that I have to concur with the assertion.

      Is it nationalist or racist? I don't know really. I just don't want all of my information out of control. It shouldn't be legal to sell personal information in the first place. "Credit history" and like information has become a very abused business and falls neatly within the predictions of disaster by the people who protested this system decades ago. Has it improved our lives? Our economy? Anything?

      It made rich people richer and citizens into 'consumers.'

    2. Re:Its the LAW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... they may have less of a deterrent to do the right thing.

      Making sure people have a huge deterrant to do the right thing is what made America great.
      That, and the substantial incentive to do the wrong thing.

  15. why its an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The matter is simple. Sure, there is millions of usd changing hands in ID theft cases in the US daily, perpetrated by US citizens. Why is that less of an issue? Because there exist no legal barriers o jump to prosecute native citizens. To go after, arrest, and convict the perpetrators in Pakistan or India requires a joint effort of multiple governments, something that takes vastly more time and effort than just having a local justice write you up a warrant and being done with it.

  16. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Informative

    it probably isn't the first, I recall seeing similar thing before couple of times. Usually though at least people have the courtesy to not copypaste directly.

    anyways.. this is proof of that you could do a slashdot karma-collecting machine quite easily, you would look for similar words in the story text and then automatically repost comments from previous stories that seem like they could be a fit. the discussion is usually general enough and the mods on enough crack to not notice if there's some small thing that goes wrong.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  17. They stole what? by JonToycrafter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "stolen £200,000 using United States customers' personal information"

    £200,000?! I smell a rat. What kind of Americans keep that much British money around?

    1. Re:They stole what? by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      *What kind of Americans keep that much British money around?*

      anyone who wants his money to keep it's value...

      but anyways, the real reason for £ is that it's a UK.yahoo story.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:They stole what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of Americans keep that much British money around?

      We call them "colonials". They let us know when the minutemen are stirring ...

  18. Joining in the party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whatever you tink about Lou Dobbs, it's very irresponsible to just dismiss him as a racist.

    Even "nationalist" is nonsense, he's merely pointing out one of the problems with unresitriced and unbalanced "unfair" trade. Now, you could argue this is a good thing, and we could point out the problems and have a discussion. But by labeling him a racist, the only thing you're trying to do is to "shut down" any arguments by coming up with ridiculous ad hominem attacks.

    I'm an immigrant to this country, and I'm not a fan of outsourcing. I'm all for other immigrants from all over the world to continue coming here and contributing their talents to our local economies, but there is a problem when now people don't even want to become US residents, because they jobs are being drained away from here. We're about to face a serious crisis, when our technological workforce is being decimated by these companies. And there's nothing racist in pointing that out, nothing.

    As for security, I don't think most if any people here are saying that a particular nationality is less trustworthy. But you'd be a fool if you don't recognize that some of the safety mechanism we enjoy in this country, are not as robust or even exist in other parts of the less developed world. As we deal with the poorest of nations, with our sensitive data, we have to be *extremely* careful. Already, there have been incidents of bribing by local crime syndicates in some of these countries to obtain data to steal identities. Can that happen in the US? Of course! But the question is, where is it more likely, and what are the protections we need to employ in these situations.

    There's a rich discussion to be had on this topic, but please, try to come up with something better than "they're racist".

  19. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by griffm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I concur. There are bad people everywhere. However, if the countries which host these offshore efforts do not respond to the criminal activities at least as well as the US (which shouldn't be too hard in my mind) then they will lose the ability to either gain or maintain business. Also, consumer choice may have an effect over the long term (similar to the "look for the union label" or the boycott of manufacturers that use child labor/sweat shops). I have no doubt the absence of offshore labor could become a marketing tool in the near future.

  20. The old saw still applies by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer."

    Closer, in the instant case, meaning the same continent or at least someplace where we can capture and prosecute the fsckers.

    1. Re:The old saw still applies by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative
      at least someplace where we can capture and prosecute the fsckers.
      They've been caught. There's an extradition treaty in place. There's no will to extradite because, in the grand scheme of things, a theft of $400,000 is not worth the paperwork. The Indians will punish them, and I can guarantee to you the conditions in Indian prisons make US prisons look like holiday camps.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  21. that ain't gonna work by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You forgot to offer chocolate for it...

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  22. Just can't stop myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take a hike pal. American Capitalism did exactly the same things to 3rd world Latin American countries if not worse than what Lou Dobbs describes as happening to "Americans" (Read aging white urban professional crowd). His incessent rant about illegal aliens is pathetic. Illegal aliens (mostly mexicans) are everywhere. They do all menial work. Instead of crediting them for doing these jobs, he is trying to make them untouchables. He never presents the other side of the coin and he is a journalist. I dont see why the person who called him a racist should!

    If you are willing to lick shoes to immigrate to America and others are not, thats your problem. (You wearing an american flag for a tshirt doesnt change the fact that you jumped through hoops to achieve immigrant status and everyone knows it.) Whether you like it or not, outsourcing will stay, because thats the way capitalism works. If you dont like it, go back to where you came from - you might find a job. Your opinion doesnt matter unless you are ultra rich.

    Finally: Welcome to America. Land of Opportunity. And Lou Dobbs is a pretty pathetic attempt at covering up racism.

    1. Re:Just can't stop myself by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      interesting rant from an anonymous coward. Interesting, but unsubstantial. Yes, there are hard working immigrants who do everything they can to make it here, however there are different cultures around the world. The way you treat money, life, etc is not the same in different states, let alone different countries. Deal with it

    2. Re:Just can't stop myself by lantenon · · Score: 1

      "Take a hike pal."
      "(Read aging white urban professional crowd)"
      "If you are willing to lick shoes to immigrate to America"
      "you jumped through hoops to achieve immigrant status and everyone knows it."
      "If you dont like it, go back to where you came from"


      Wow. He presents a valid argument, you do a bunch of namecalling in response. Bravo, dipshit -- took some balls to post that AC.

  23. Whoe's responsible? by cpn2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think a good deterrant to these things would be to make the company who owns this data take responsibility if it gets in the wrong hands. While this does not solve the problem, companies will be more wary of who they do business with if their neck is on the line, it wont simply be a question of awarding work to the lowest bidder.
    While offshoring of these type of jobs may be inevitable, I would expect companies to be damn sure of what they are doing if they are handing my personal details to a third party, especially one outside the US

    While dealing with identity theft happening within the US is bad enough, it would be a nighmare trying to sort this out when it happens overseas.
    This does not mean that people outside the US are any more (or less) dishonest than within. But when you try to track down criminals in another country you are essentially at the mercy of the police in that place, and there may be no way of compelling them to help ... i.e you are essentially at their mercy.

    --
    All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be ... Dark side of the moon
    1. Re:Whoe's responsible? by AlanS2002 · · Score: 0

      if anything this highlights why it is best to give your credit card details to as few companies as possible and where possible get them to bill you.

      --
      Not all conservatives are stupid,
      but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
      - Hume
    2. Re:Whoe's responsible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about using a spell checker so your wonderfully unique bright snowflake ideas come across with more dignity and intelligence. Have some damn pride.

      SpellBound - spell checking for Mozilla/Firefox.

    3. Re:Whoe's responsible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a good deterrant to these things would be to make the company who owns this data take responsibility if it gets in the wrong hands

      Civil lawsuits against these corporations are no good, because by the time the news hits the public the corporate insiders have all cashed out. There needs to "HIPAA-esque" privacy laws with criminal penalties for this kind of mishandling.

    4. Re:Whoe's responsible? by Joules+Burn · · Score: 1

      This is my sentiment as well. They collect data on you because it's worth money to them, they then send it overseas, because it's worth more money to them. When they then lose your data to persons unknown they say "Oops, my bad, hope it doesn't cost you too much, hehe, but we're not responsible for your losses, even though we were in charge of the information we required you to give.", because it's worth money to them. If they had to pay for there own mistakes in full, as in reimbursing ALL customer losses. I believe they'd be a bit more vigilent in protecting their CUSTOMERS data or they'd go out of business, and rightly so.

  24. But think of the savings! by JonTurner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's all that matters to upper management -- savings. Now, with many offshoring efforts only yielding 10 or 15% savings, what does an event like this do? It blows any potential savings, resulting in a net loss. Nice going, Mr. Shiny Hair And Teeth Strategic-Thinker!

    Now, this question is directed at those big-shot CIOs who troll here, let me ask you something (feel free to reply as ACs). How much money does something like *this* cost your precious bottom line? And when it happens again, then what? What could possibly happen that would make you think "Gee, maybe our technical staff shouldn't live on the other side of the world and work for somebody else (including our competition)?" Or does that even matter?

    Yeah, yeah, I know... Fugeddaboutit, it's purely rhetorical. I realize that employment horizon of the corporate ruling class is only as far ahead as their golden parachute payout. I'm sure you'll find a way to blame these failures on somebody else, Mr. Executive, and your replacement can implement a new strategy for cleaning up the mess.

    1. Re:But think of the savings! by shyampandit · · Score: 1

      Well first of all the saving are much more that 10-15%, more around 60-70% atleast. Anyway bad people are there in the US too, so you cant really say you will 'save' that much on fraud by not outsourcing...

    2. Re:But think of the savings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! That hurts my feelings!

    3. Re:But think of the savings! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Forecasting catastrophes is for losers or weathermen. The "winners" pay little attention to portents of doom or loss. This is especially important and true, when you have all that financial chicanery going on ... which is effectively a massive con game.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  25. That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't trust foreigners?

    What about all the call center workers who DIDN'T steal identities? What's this irrational fear of everyone and everything foreign? Yes there are bad individuals out there? You want to categorize an entire people based on actions of a few?

    Not everyone is evil, there is the police that apparently managed to catch this guys. What about them? No credit for what they did?

    What about identity theft carried out in america by americans?

    So far there are two cases of identity theft via outsourcing .. and you've convicted all foreign workers as thieves and miscreants.

    1. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My aim was certainly not to give the impression that I distrust people outside the United States but rather to discuss the idea of the purported plan for an "ownership society" within the U.S. of:

      1. US Workers do menial labor
      2. US outsources menial labor
      3. US Workers do skilled labor
      4. US outsources skilled labor
      5. US Workers own everything and do no labor
      6. US outsources all labor

      What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?

      I think incidents like this are tiny examples of what's to come.

      --
      I'm a big tall mofo.
    2. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?

      I think incidents like this are tiny examples of what's to come.


      Exactly. It's already been proven in Argentina after the financial collapse there (brought about by too much outsourcing and too many large tax breaks given to foreign big business by President Menos, btw). One evening, all the foreign multinationals, including the banks, emptied their safes, chained the doors, and fled the country under cover of darkness. The next morning, the workers showed up to work and found they were all out of jobs. After sitting around moping for a while, they said "screw it", kicked the doors of the now-vacant factories down, started up the machines, and continued producing their product. They pay themselves all an equal wage, out of the profits. They call it fabrica ocupada, "occupied factory". Please note that Argentina was very prosperous, comparable to Canada or Australia.


      Now the old owners have found out that the workers are able to cut prices on their products (while still maintaining quality), because the wages of the owners and the management perqs -- golf trips, planes and whatnot are actually the biggest wasteful overhead -- and demand possession of their abandoned factories back in order to stop the "people" from competing with them (they still make their goods elsewhere and ship them into Argentina).

    3. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?
      You bomb the living fuck out of them.
    4. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

      people use their "constitutional" right to shoot anyone on sight.

    5. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by homer_s · · Score: 1

      What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?

      What do you think the military is for?

    6. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?
      Hint, the US spends a lot on it's military, and considering the geographic location of the USA, territorial defence doesn't really justify that large an investment.
      Draw your own conclusions from here...
    7. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Argentina was very prosperous, comparable to Canada or Australia.


      Argentina was prosperous in the 1920s, but after that it has always been an "upper middle class" third-world nation at best.


      And the rest of your comment is a "Marxist Polyanna" type of thing, something you must have cut-and-pasted from some play for kids in Stalinist Russia. What really happened in Argentina was that the country held its currency so overvalued for so long that eventually all its foreign currency reserves were gone and the country started defaulting in its payments.

      Argentina, for the last 30 years or so, since Juan Peron last became president, has been a total example of fiscal irresponsibility. In some provinces 40% of the people were employed by the state. You can't pay so many people doing non-productive jobs without taxing the rest of the people 100% of their income.


      The result was an inflation that eventually topped 200% in a month and the economic problems that get partially controlled from time to time only to rise again a couple of years later.

    8. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the rest of your comment is a "Marxist Polyanna" type of thing, something you must have cut-and-pasted from some play for kids in Stalinist Russia.

      The result was an inflation that eventually topped 200% in a month

      Of course the real answer is that both of you are correct. The inflation did go out of control, The laborers did in fact restart the abandoned factories. The latter did help to contain the former: the worker-owned factories paid lower wages (remember, these were people who now had zero income, and a low wage is better than zero) and produced less expensive goods, countering inflation, much as Wal-Mart has done in the US (without being worker-owned).

    9. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Tuirn · · Score: 1

      I understand what you are saying, but I think you are missing a bigger picture.

      7. Smart people in these other countries we outsourced to create "intellectual property" equal to or exceeding us.
      8. They use their "new" skilled workers (trained for jobs we outsourced).
      9. They profit.

      --
      Klein bottle for rent - inquire within.
    10. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Gulik · · Score: 1

      What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?

      You will note that there are no current plans to outsource the military.

    11. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, huge numbers of parts for military equipment are sourced from abroad...

    12. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll Here, Can you say 'military contractor'? Check your troop's 'helpers' in Afghanistan,Iraq, etc for outsourcing. The Romans never had it so good...

    13. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Gulik · · Score: 1

      My post was about 85% quip, but still:

      Parts, yes, and as another poster mentioned, there are some independent contractors. However, if every last one of those suppliers and contractors decided that they were taking their marbles and going home, that doesn't remove from the US the ability to park an aircraft carrier in somebody's harbor until such time as the contract was honored.

      Or, taking the hypothetical case further, if (for example) a military supplier in China decided to break a contract with the US military, don't you suppose that this would (pretty accurately) be described as a threat to national security? Here's your Fox News soundbite: "Foreign Nuclear Power Threatens to Cripple US Military".

    14. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      After asking them to build some bombers for you?

    15. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by wingsofchai · · Score: 1

      Warning! Troll Follows! But remember, the U.S. Military will always be here to enforce that piece of paper!

      --
      Reading at high threshold levels is group-think.
    16. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?

      The US dollar implodes and becomes a black hole, that's what!

      Seriously. In investor's terms, the US Government holds a $7 trillion "short position" against the dollar. In a very real sense, the US Government is betting that the dollar will fall.

      The ONLY way the US national debt can be managed is with inflation - a lot of it.

      If by some Act of God the dollar actually increased in value, the US Government (and citizens) would be absolutely screwed, since the debt would be even heavier and unmanageable than it already is.

    17. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by UltimateRobotLover · · Score: 1

      Do they get to save money by doing away with all that pesky "health and safety" legislation?

    18. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if the corporate masters are bringing THAT to the table. If anything, the new Argentinian companies are following higher standards than before -- it's THEIR OWN ASSES ON THE LINE.

    19. Re:That makes very little sense, if any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see - American living standards seem great for the next 10 years as WalMart shoppers are happy. Then we have a lower standard of living all of the sudden.

      Tax Base dwindles then Politicians think of how to get us back. It will be interesting.

  26. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure location matters. If your employees are nearby, you can keep tabs on them. You might even be able to directly affect their morale in a positive manner.

    Either way, you can keep better control of things.

    Also, culture is relevant in these matters. Some countries have traditions of institutionalized graft. To casually gloss over such differences is the real racist notion here.

    What you are promoting is pretty much equivalent to the notion that if you speak slow enough everyone will understand english.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  27. Pakistani criminals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    "The threat of increased misuse of consumer personal data by offshore criminals was first made publicly known with the UCSF Pakistani medical transcriber scandal"

    As a Pakistani, I am somewhat offended by the incorrect assumption made here. The medical transcriber was not paid for her work. She then "threatened" to release the medical data of various patients. Desperate mesure for sure, but she really didn't have much recourse. She couldn't take them to small claims court in Pakistan or something like that. Does this make her a "criminal" as suggested by the story? I hardly think so.

    1. Re:Pakistani criminals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last i heard blackmail was a crime...

    2. Re:Pakistani criminals? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's extortion, not blackmail.

      Even though this specific case of extortion involves private information threating to be made public, it's not blackmail, as the person being extorted is not the one towards who the information is damaging...they'd just be hurt because the release of the information would result in a PR nightmare, not because the public would know the content of the information.

      I.e., if you're being blackmailed, you don't want the information out at all, whereas in this case they simple didn't want themselves traced to any leak, and could care less if people got the information from someone else. Hence it's a different kind of extortion, not blackmail.

      However, many kinds of 'extortion' are legal. It depends one whether or not she had the legal right to release the information. Assuming there are no data privacy laws, the only thing forbidding it would be her contract, and the company broke the contract already by refusing to pay her, so she's certainly not obligated to follow it.

      In fact, refusing to hold up your end of the contract when the other party refuses to hold up theirs only makes sense.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:Pakistani criminals? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Even when there will be injured parties without influence over the actions of the contract participants?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    4. Re:Pakistani criminals? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I don't know what you mean by 'even'. Do you mean, you think that makes it illegal? Not as far as I know.

      It is somewhat extreme and should obviously be a last resort, though.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Pakistani criminals? by Duhavid · · Score: 1
      From your original post:

      In fact, refusing to hold up your end of the contract when the other party refuses to hold up theirs only makes sense


      That was my context, sorry for being confusing.

      So, even when 3rd parties to the contract, that have no real ability to affect the behaviour of the parties to the contract, will be harmed, you have the "right" ( for lack of a better word just now ) to refuse to hold up your end of the contract?

      I was intending to enter into a question of legal / illegal, I was looking into it as a right / wrong, immoral / moral, ethical / unethical kind of question.
      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    6. Re:Pakistani criminals? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Ah, okay.

      I don't see anything morally wrong with threatening to release the data.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  28. Lot of fuss over nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see the problem. If your identity gets stolen and your credit rating gets shot-to-hell, just steal the identity of someone else.

    Anonymous Cowards have no fear of identity theft.

  29. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by neoThoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the issue underscored here is risk vs. reward. For someone in the US 30,000 USD isn't *that* much, not enough for many of us to risk jail time. That amount barely covers a years salary for many and I'd say for most reading this site it is way less then a years salary. If you're making $2.00/hr that is a LOT of money. Now we are talking almost a DECADE of salary.

  30. Sounds familiar by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Informative
    This story sounded strangely familiar so I did a quick check and sure enough this previous story covers essentially the same information.

    Maybe it's not the same story but both stories originate from Pune, India and both deal with employees of a call center transferring money in the amount of Rs 1.5 crore.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, man, you ruined it! We were just getting to the part where someone points out that the amount of money stolen is really a lot more money in India than in the U.S. and that's why the theft happened. Then someone writes back and tells the original poster that he's a racist.

      That was my favorite part!

  31. Canada thinks so about inforation sent to US by anandpur · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    May be offtopic
    The United States is willing to review a British Columbia report that concludes the U.S. Patriot Act has the power to eyeball private information about Canadians,
    http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2004/10/29/6923 05-cp.html

  32. It's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny how the nazi anti outsourcing and anti free trade crowd used to rant about a foreign worker's plight and conditions (and therefore we supposedly shouldn't have free trade for their sake), but now when then argument has failed due to the obvious lies it carried .. they have switched to saying foreigners are evil, don't deserve work even if they can do it cheaper, and should starve and die .. cause hey one or two of them might even be terrorists.

  33. Welcome by AlanS2002 · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new identity thieving overlords.

    --
    Not all conservatives are stupid,
    but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
    - Hume
  34. Those of us who invest by wiredog · · Score: 1

    and are betting that the dollar will continue to slide. Pounds and Euros have been a goo investment over the past couple of years.

    1. Re:Those of us who invest by timbloid · · Score: 1

      >> Pounds and Euros have been a goo investment over the past couple of years.

      Thanks for the advice!!

      I have now put all my money in goo!

      Oh...hang on... ;-)

    2. Re:Those of us who invest by wiredog · · Score: 1
      Goo is always a goo, er, umm, good investment.

      Preview is my freind. FRIEND! Sorry.

  35. Easy fix, legal liability by micron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a remedy for handling this in the future for US citizens. We need to push our legislators to enforce it, which is obviously hard to do.

    US Corporations are legally (criminally and civily) liable for the accuracy and protection of data that they collect on US Citizens.

    This then needs to be negotiated into international treaties.

    This would make a given company think twice about what information it really needs to be collecting, and how it will be protected. If the company wishes to outsource work, fine, that needs to be disclosed, and the company still remains liable for the protection of that data.

    There need to be laws, and the laws must have teeth. This is a "service" that companies are carrying out "in the public trush." They need to be penalized for violations.

    1. Re:Easy fix, legal liability by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      US Corporations are legally (criminally and civily) liable for the accuracy and protection of data that they collect on US Citizens.

      Well, these are US companies who are doing the outsourcing. They are already responsible and need to be held liable under the rules they are already subject to. When companies that outsource and end up with breaches start getting sued, they'll either have to stop out-sourcing or put better controls on things.

      This then needs to be negotiated into international treaties.

      What? Sign more treaties extending jurisdiction of US laws to yet more countries? Yeah, that's what's needed. Make sure the copyright police can go anyplace and all non Americans get more bitter and resentful, good plan.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Easy fix, legal liability by micron · · Score: 1

      You are correct in that US companies are already outsourcing, and they are already responsible and need to be held liable under the rules they are already subject to.

      The problem is that we think that they should be held liable, and we think that they are already responsible.

      For a proof of this theory, try getting inaccurate data removed from your credit report. Darn near impossible without a lawyer getting involved. The reporting companies. If they were liable for mis information, I would imagine that data would be a heck of a lot easier to get corrected, due to a certainty of loss in court.

      Why does this need to be negotiated into international treaties? Simple, and it is not about extending the jurisdiction of US laws.

      If a company is going to be permitted to outsource your personal information to a country, then I as a consumer want to be sure that the country my data is in has some notion of criminal inforcement for theft and fraud related to my personal information. We have similar policies in place for defense department work today.

      Personally, I would like to see a law that states that I own my personal information, and I alone get to dictate how it is distributed and used. I think that this is a basic human right.

    3. Re:Easy fix, legal liability by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      If a company is going to be permitted to outsource your personal information to a country, then I as a consumer want to be sure that the country my data is in has some notion of criminal inforcement for theft and fraud related to my personal information. We have similar policies in place for defense department work today.

      I think that is better served by restricting where and under what circumstances data can be exported to, otherwise every time a company tries to outsource to a new country, you're going to have to renogotiate trade agreements with that country and have them make their citizens subject to the US stipulations.

      And, as a Canadian whose data can be subjected to your Patriot act if a parent company is American and the data travels that way (despite my countries privacy laws), I feel your pain.

      But making me subject to your laws or making some guy in India subject to your laws is the same thing -- it's crap. Projecting US laws and policy onto the entire world is not the solution, and it's not welcome.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Easy fix, legal liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Corporations are legally (criminally and civily) liable for the accuracy and protection of data that they collect on US Citizens.

      You need to add that contracting out does not remove liability.

      That is is the case for HIPAA. If a business covered by HIPAA contracts out some work covered by HIPAA, then the contractee is (somewhat) responsible for the errors/mistakes/misuse of the contractor.

    5. Re:Easy fix, legal liability by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would corporations pass that law?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    6. Re:Easy fix, legal liability by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      For a proof of this theory, try getting inaccurate data removed from your credit report. Darn near impossible without a lawyer getting involved. The reporting companies. If they were liable for mis information, I would imagine that data would be a heck of a lot easier to get corrected, due to a certainty of loss in court.

      BTDT. Send a dispute to the 3 credit agencies (Experian, Transunion, Equifax) and wait for about a month. If it's legit, it will generally be removed. If you have proof of its falsity, send a copy of that too.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  36. Mod parent up by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 1

    because I can't

    --
    wot no sig
  37. How does outsourcing save money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from www.telediscount.co.uk - calls to India are 15p/minute.

    Assuming that they get a good deal, and only pay half that, 7p/min...

    Now, 7p * 60 min = £4.20/hr ... for that, you could pay your worker in the UK.

    This doesn't even take into account the time you're kept on hold (which, in my experience, is often several times the length of the actual call), the costs of networking all your customer data there and back, or the increased call length due to poor phone line quality (as provided by Rice Krispies Telecom)

    1. Re:How does outsourcing save money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies use VoIP not long-distance. You don't pay 7p/min to access an Indian website, do you? Well, England has a basket-case system where you do actually pay per hour for internet connectivity - but corporations pay a fixed amount. Besides, no brit will work for 4.20/hr in the graveyard shift, at least, not the ones responsible enough to show up for work when their boyfriend makes a surprise visit in his birthday suit.

      - Yankee.

    2. Re:How does outsourcing save money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, VOIP call quality is *really* overrated. Lousy line quality has to be one of my biggest call centre gripes (up there with being stuck in The Queue From Hell, outgoing call centres generally, autodiallers specifically, people who can't pronounce and/or spell my name, and phone menus designed to represent the kind of calls they'd like to recieve, rather than the actual call you're making)

      Oh, and while I'm at it, perhaps banks could consider opening more than half a day at the weekend? That way, I wouldn't really care if the call centre was on Mars. But I suppose it would be an unacceptable drain on their billion pound profit margins.

  38. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Washington DC area metro system recently went to electronic cards for paying for using their parking garages. The all of a suddent realized that low paid workers that have large ammounts of money passing through their hands on a daily basis are a bad risk in terms of theft of said money.

    Comment maid by other people: "No shit, Sherlock." and "Duh!"

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  39. Could explain a few things... by hnile_jablko · · Score: 1

    ....why i am wanted in Karachi, Brisbane and Lagos.

  40. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by will_die · · Score: 2, Informative

    FYI, Lou Dobbs was called a racist by Al Franken for using the term, better close your eyes, "illegal alien".
    Another group of people are mad at him for writting "People who come to the US with H-1B and L1 visas don't pay any taxes, and they return home with all the money they earned here. They are all cheap foreign labor."
    If you think thoses are racist terms then don't click on the link to slashdot.

  41. Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter where people are located. What matters is that you have trustworthy people handling your business. And, you know what? Untrustworthy people are everywhere. I, for one, do not buy into this Lou Dobbs racist/nationalist claptrap that says that we can't trust foreigners. I'm one of the biggest foreigners around, if you consider all the places I have to travel to that I'm not actually a citizen of. Hey, bad people are in India. And in the U.S. And in Europe. And in Asia. Oh my god! They are everywhere! Luckily, the bad people are outnumbered by the good. I can just take a look at my lists and figure that one out.

  42. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok It looks like the stories a dupe but the comment too!...
    or is it just coincidence that

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050411/152/fg2a3.html

    "Police said the employees allegedly stole customers' personal account information and transferred just under £200,000 to fake accounts in Pune. Sanjay Jadhav, the assistant commissioner of police, said about one million rupees (£12,000) of the fraud money has already been recovered. The call centre workers left their jobs last December."

    and http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msi d-1070986,curpg-1.cms
    "PUNE: Cyber crime has moved to the next level in Pune. Close on the heels of the Webcam Kulkarni scandal, in which a tenant secretly filmed girl students staying in his hostel using hidden cameras, the Pune police have unearthed a major siphoning racket involving former and serving callcentre employees.

    They allegedly transferred a total of Rs 1.5 crore (US $3.5 lakh) from a multinational bank into their own accounts, opened under fictitious names. The money was used to splurge on luxuries like cars and mobile phones.

    Twelve people, including the alleged mastermind, have been arrested. The police are trying to determine the extent of the scam and whether the accused committed such crimes earlier.

    Addressing a press conference on Wednesday, police commissioner D.N. Jadhav said, "This is a rare case in which criminals have exploited the weaknesses in high-end technology." "

    or has D.N jadhav been exceptionally busy.

    Its not been said in this version of the story but in the "original" citybank was mentioned.

  43. Offshoring is good for everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See -- even criminals benefit from offshoring!

  44. Yes it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And MphasiS is the parent company of MsourcE (company from the previous article).

    MphasiS buys out MsourcE

  45. Corporate Liability? by reovirus1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder how long before class action lawsuits arise out of this. It seems reasonable to assume that outsourcing and offshoring of this sensitive personal information would be a risky practice and could even border on negligence.

    1. Re:Corporate Liability? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      This is why we need to immediately pass laws about this.

      Hopefully some sort of tort reform so it's harder to sue these honest, hardworking companies!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  46. One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    liability. Oh wait, that would mean trial lawyers extracting outrageous settlements from sincere and honest corporations. Call Congress!

  47. I have had it!! by Danuvius · · Score: 1
    Offshored Identity Theft
    Globalisation has gone too far!
    --
    Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    1. Re:I have had it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Globalisation has gone too far!

      Well .. if it didnt go far, it would be called "localization".

    2. Re:I have had it!! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Globalisation has gone too far!

      Darn, and I thought it was Globalization that was the problem ...

      Z - the end of our world.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:I have had it!! by Danuvius · · Score: 1

      It's in the English language, not in American. ;-)

      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
  48. Where are all the lawsuits ? by farzadb82 · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised that there haven't (atleast to my knowledge) been any lawsuits on this matter. From what I can tell, non of the companies that have offshored their business have had their customers sign some sort of release waiver.

    I for one know that if I ended up in such a situation, without the knowledge that my private information was being handled by a 3rd party and that I suffered losses as a result I would sue the ass of that company!

    Maybe until this sort of thing starts to happen we won't see much change in this area.

  49. Own *REAL* Stuff by mslinux · · Score: 1

    Stuff that cannot be easily stolen via some simple data transfer or bit level copy over a network.

    For example, own gold, silver, Real Estate, Automobiles, etc. Pay for these things... do not use credit cards, only use cash. Place the titles/proof of ownership in a safety deposit box at the bank and give your lawyer and next of kin copies as well. Now, let's see some foreign guy steal your ID... who cares?

    1. Re:Own *REAL* Stuff by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hahah, good luck getting a even a mediocre job without showing some ID, and probably being subject to a credit check. So I'd agree with you that it would be great to live that way, except we don't have a free society in which to do it.

    2. Re:Own *REAL* Stuff by El · · Score: 1

      For example, own... Real Estate, Automobiles, etc. Pay for these things... do not use credit cards, only use cash. Yeah, right. How many houses have you bought lately for cash only? How many cars have you owned whose market value even kept up with inflation? Have you ever tried rent a car (or anything else) for cash only? And where do you intend to keep that gold and silver where it can't be taken from you at gunpoint? Point is, you're screwed if you don't have a credit history, and even if you never use credit, how does that keep someone else from getting credit in your name using information stolen from the DMV, your employer, or your doctor?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  50. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by bombadillo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not about trustworthy people. You will find those anywhere. It's about the people who now have access to our personal data being outside of our Legal and Law enforcement system. In the UK they have a data protection act which restricts personal data from going outside their country. The U.S. would be wise to adopt such a policy. One would think it would be a no brainer these days with our talk of being tough on terrorists. In light of recent news of our borders being porous and our domestic response teams being ill prepared. It really makes me wonder if we are really still that concerned about domestic terrorism.

  51. 20-30% by immediate family members by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Sources say that somewhere between a quarter and third of illegal credit is done by spouses or parents of underage children(*).

    (*) DOB not verified in many credit card applications, so its easy to get cards in children's name.

  52. Who was the person who orchestrated this by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

    I don't usually wear a tin foil hat but this is just too ripe to ignore. All that is mentioned is that the person who started this is unknown. I would not put it beyond some American or American orginization who is looking for a way out of all of this outsourcing. If it was an American orginization they could also put the blame on some one else cou-Terrorists-gh and benefit that way as well. But for now I'll take the tinfoil hat off and wait to see who the major news corportations blame for stealing the money.

  53. Indian thieves steal American thieves jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On behalf of American Identity Thieves Workers Union I would like to strongly protest against this clear
    loss of jobs of American people!

    Indian identity thieves steal our, American thieves jobs and endanger our true American way of life!

    I honestly believe that our government should do something about it!

  54. Credit report access by mixy1plik · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We need better access to our credit reports. FOR STARTERS. I'm entitled to ONE free report PER YEAR but I have to write 3-4 seperate letters, mail them, and wait? This is unacceptable. We should have FULL access to our credit reports from all the bureaus for free. I don't want to line Suze Orman's pockets and shell out $50 every time I want my reports from all the bureaus. Identity thieves move fast, and we move slow. This is really frustrating. I'm in the process of buying a house, and I'm fiercely protective about my credit being checked as it lowers it a few points every time. (Another thing I think is stupid.)

    We need more control over our own credit reports, since advancing our lives is completely dependent on them.

    1. Re:Credit report access by digger3001 · · Score: 1
      Due to a Federal law that was passed called the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) people in the United States are now entitled to one free credit report annually from each agency.

      See Check Your Credit Report Online 100% For Free Thanks To A Federal Law for more information and where to go online to get it.

    2. Re:Credit report access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *> fiercely protective about my credit being checked as it lowers it a few points every time. (Another thing I think is stupid.)

      Just a brief point. That measure is there in an attempt to prevent fraud. As an identity gets used for fraudulant loans, credit cards etc it becomes progressively less valuable as the credit score goes down.

    3. Re:Credit report access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent said:

      I'm entitled to ONE free report PER YEAR but I have to write 3-4 seperate letters, mail them, and wait? This is unacceptable.

      You said:

      Due to a Federal law that was passed called the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) people in the United States are now entitled to one free credit report annually from each agency.

      See anything similar?

    4. Re:Credit report access by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Not yet, if you live on the East Coast, due to the ridiculous staggered rollout.

  55. Isn't it obvious?? by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    When you support off shoring you support terrorists. Insert sarcastic tone where you feel it is necessary.

    --
    this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
  56. China by Lifewish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IIRC, it's very very hard for foreign companies to get Chinese companies prosecuted. India may be very law-abiding; be aware that that isn't a universal trait.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    1. Re:China by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Who mentioned China? The story summary didn't and neither did anyone in this thread until you.

      Heck, if you're going to bring China into this, why not bring up Switzerland? Swiss companies are pretty well protected by Swiss law, so aren't they a danger too? Heck, why stop there? What about the danger Freedonia poses?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:China by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      Switzerland does not have a reputation for protecting its citizens at the expense of international law and foreign countries. China, unfortunately, does. The appropriate anecdote (probably apocryphal) is that of the factory owner visiting his China branch, taking a wrong turning and finding an exact duplicate of his factory on the other side of the mountain.

      The question I was responding to was "why should outsourcing to foreign parts be considered more dangerous than outsourcing to local companies?" I was providing China as a counterexample.

      As far as I know, there is no recorded instance of Freedonia playing silly buggers with foreigners' stuff, so it's probably OK to outsource to.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    3. Re:China by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Again, I'll ask you, how is China at all relevant to this particular story? It's about an incident that took place - and which was quickly dealt with in the appropriate manner - in India. The only one talking about China here is you.

      Hiding your backdoor xenophobia - sorry, that's what it looks like from where I'm standing - by saying that you were simply "providing China as a counterexample" is ridiculous. It's the kind of tangential and tenuous link that has sheriff departments in the US excusing their locking up of law-abiding citizens for using uncommon but legal tender as terrorism-related vigilance.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    4. Re:China by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      Actually, as far as this particular thread of conversation is concerned, India is no more relevant than China. Below is a summary of what seems to be the indicative lines in the grandparent posts (YMMV):

      ----
      Why is identity theft by foreigners considered more scary that identity theft by Americans? - Gowen

      It is hard to enforce U.S. law on foreigners. - robert

      So you think that the Indian authorities would be soft on this sort of crime because the victims aren't Indian citizens? Please. - WIAKywbfatw

      India may be very law-abiding; be aware that that isn't a universal trait. - Lifewish
      ----

      You'll notice that India was brought back into the conversation by yourself as an example of the law-abidingness of some foreign parts, an anecdote which you seemed to be trying to extend to foreign parts in general (apologies if I misinterpreted). China was brought into the conversation by myself as the counterexample to the implied statement "It's generally safe to outsource to foreign countries".

      I'm pretty sure I'm not xenophobic as, of my friends, one is half-Malay and half-Chinese, another two are Chinese born and bred, and one is apparently from somewhere in the region of Thailand (I've never asked but her accent matches).

      However, I'm aware that attitudes differ between countries. It is wise to be careful where you outsource to as it may be somewhere with a different attitude to, say, ripping off your data than the US or EU. India seems safe; China may not be.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    5. Re:China by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      India seems safe; China may not be.

      I guess I'm still not making myself clear: who's talking about outsourcing to China?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    6. Re:China by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      As I pointed out, no-one involved in this particular discussion, apart from your good self, was talking about outsourcing to India. We were, if I understand correctly, talking about outsourcing in general. As outsourcing to China is a subclass of outsourcing in general, I considered it a valid example to bring up.

      Obviously you considered outsourcing to India to be a valid example to bring up, but if you read back you'll see that the first few posts in this thread do not reference any particular country, but talk about outsourcing in general. In fact, your response to Robert's one-liner "It is hard to enforce U.S. law on foreigners" is, viewed in this light, completely irrelevant.

      You responded with "So you think that the Indian authorities would be soft on this sort of crime because the victims aren't Indian citizens? Please. If anything - and I speak with a great deal of personal knowledge about the country having travelled there many times - they're probably more vigilant about crimes against westerners than they are about crime in general." You will note that your response has nothing whatsoever to do with the difficulty or otherwise of enforcing US law on foreigners.

      I'm not arguing with your personal knowledge of India cos you almost certainly know more about that area of the world than me. Actually, there are things preserved in the Arctic permafrost that know more about India than me. But, speaking as a Cambridge-trained debater, my comment was at least as relevant as yours, and your unwarranted accusations of racism are, well, unwarranted.

      Hope that clears things up.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    7. Re:China by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      As I pointed out, no-one involved in this particular discussion, apart from your good self, was talking about outsourcing to India.

      Sorry to rain on your parade but the article is about an incident that took place in India. If that's not people other than myself talking about outsourcing to India then what is it?

      Again, as for my initial comment which you consider irrelevant, it was intended to point out to a poster who was concerned about justice being done that justice was being done, albeit by the relevant Indian authorities rather than their US counterparts. Frankly, I don't see any light in which it could be considered irrelevant at all, but I guess that's a matter of opinion, isn't it?

      By the way, the "[W]ho's talking about outsourcing to China?" in my previous post was a question asking for examples of companies who are currently outsourcing to China or even considering it. After all, if it's not being done by anyone then bringing China into the discussion would seem to me to be a moot point. I don't know of any company that currently outsources this sort of data handling to China but perhaps you do: if so, could you please enlighten me?

      As for xenophobia you'll notice that I qualified my remarks by saying "sorry, that's what it looks like from where I'm standing", which was my way of saying "hey, you may not have meant it this way, but that's what it's going to look like to some people" but in not so many words. If that caused you any offense then you have my apologies.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    8. Re:China by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      Sorry to rain on your parade but the article is about an incident that took place in India. If that's not people other than myself talking about outsourcing to India then what is it?

      That's why I used the phrase "particular discussion" - the discussion that these points arose in rather than the article itself. It is of course possible to have a discussion that covers wider issues than the article itself, even on slashdot :P

      Again, as for my initial comment which you consider irrelevant, it was intended to point out to a poster who was concerned about justice being done that justice was being done, albeit by the relevant Indian authorities rather than their US counterparts.

      I don't consider it irrelevant, sorry if I gave that impression. I was just making the point that, if we're throwing anecdotal evidence into the melting pot, mentioning China is just as valid as mentioning India - neither country was explicitly or implicitly mentioned in the question you were responding to.

      By the way, the "[W]ho's talking about outsourcing to China?" in my previous post was a question asking for examples of companies who are currently outsourcing to China or even considering it.

      Ah, mea culpa, I misinterpreted it as a derogatory "where the heck did China come into it?". China is apparently due to be the next big outsourcing location, so the many horror stories are definitely something to worry about. (The last link isn't strictly related to outsourcing, but the same problems apply)

      As for xenophobia you'll notice that I qualified my remarks by saying "sorry, that's what it looks like from where I'm standing", which was my way of saying "hey, you may not have meant it this way, but that's what it's going to look like to some people" but in not so many words.

      Ah, thanks for the warning. I hadn't really considered the possibility it might be taken that way. Seems that too long in a sufficiently multicultural society tends to desensitise you to people's sensitivity.

      Thanks for a good debate :)

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  57. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else reading this thread has an impression of d*j* vu????

  58. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    It's not so much about nationalist or racist concerns. This is about security. Yes, there are untrustworthy people everywhere, but there are more security concerns when companies outsource data overseas. Companies may lose control of their data and become powerless to stop it. Some countries may not have identity theft laws or worse be in collusion with criminals. Those who do may not have the resources to fight it. In the US, identity theft has only recently become recognized as a crime and law enforcement resources alerted to it. While the sky is not falling, it is one thing to consider when outsourcing data overseas.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  59. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by ImaLamer · · Score: 0

    All I'm going to say is that last time this was brought up I said that it doesn't matter if they are foreigners or not, they could be prisoners.

    The idea is that given the inequity between the two peoples some are going to take from the people with more. Plus you add in that we are in fact the foreigners to them...

    How many people have screamed or yelled at a Indian phone worker simply because they couldn't understand the person on the other end? That has to get around, eventually you feel like those people have it coming to them. Just makes it easier considering you are stealing 50 years salary!

  60. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    All I'm going to say is that last time this was brought up I said that it doesn't matter if they are foreigners or not, they could be prisoners.

    What I mean by that is; we've employed prisoners in the past to do these same jobs. What bothers me is that I'd take the job and so would my fellow countrymen. Why do criminials and foreign workers always get this job?

  61. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by MyTwoCentsWorth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You forget one detail - the poorer the country, the bigger the value that USD 100 has. Most americans would not risk their freedom for 10,000 USD, but for somebody in a poor country that is enough to retire on... so people are more tempted.

    It is an inevitable consequence of exporting jobs to lower-paid workers - the temptation to steal is much greater.

    Have fun posting.

  62. As though Americans are angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wording of this story suggests that the poster intends to malign Indians, rather than encourage healthy discussion on social issues. Why does slashdot encourage these racists?

  63. Punishment by Cowboy+Bill · · Score: 1

    The best way to deter Indian criminals is to put them in Federal pound me in the ass prison! Of course there might be some international treaties involved. But one passing mention during employee training sessions about one of those Tejas prisons will turn most geek/call center humanoid blood cold everytime they think of stealing!!

    --
    --> Your Wisecrack Here
  64. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Kewjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you always enjoy copying and pasting your own comments from previous articles? Post from 4 days ago

  65. Build factories when it starts to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?

    Well, first of all .. there is no immediate end to cheap labor. What I mean is, there are BILLIONS of poor people who will do work.

    Once every human is rich, fat, and lazy and doesn't want to work, yes, then maybe we'll have a problem. But hopefully by then we'll have robots, highly automated farming and mining, or something doing the work.

    Maybe in the distant future someday the concept of working for money to survive will be considered ancient to humans.

    Personally I don't see everyone in the world becoming rich as a problem or threat.

    And yes, the world contains more than enough resources to feed everyone and for everyone to have a good lifestyle.

    And for those worried about population (though in my view having more humans isnt bad), richer people don't really have population growth.

    As for resources and energy .. (the earth itself is 30% iron or something if thats relevant and we have unlimited energy from fusion .. or geothermal (how much heat is in the 6000 mile diameter earth core), or other alternatives)). The harnessed energy can be used in automated farming. This is assuming we don't become space faring.

    1. Re:Build factories when it starts to happen by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *Once every human is rich, fat, and lazy and doesn't want to work, yes, then maybe we'll have a problem. But hopefully by then we'll have robots, highly automated farming and mining, or something doing the work.*

      the point isn't really that - the point is that once you've outsourced everything including science(and no longer are dominant even in knoweledge and skills) and only thing that says that you own that stuff in those colonies is a piece of paper... why the hell would they give a damn about that piece of paper anymore, when you're not giving them anything back for their services anymore?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  66. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Comment maid?


    Is that someone who comes in and tries to clean up all the dirty words around here?

  67. Outsourcing bites back by Aumaden · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Despite what some have said, this isn't about foreigners being untrustworthy. This is about good ol' fashioned greed.

    Imagine US call center workers... Let's say they make ~$35K/year.

    How much do they need to be offered before they'll break the law? 2x salary? 3x? more? Remember, the workers are withing US jurisdiction and will probably be identified. It needs to be enough money to "get away." Let's say 3x salary.

    $105K (3x salary) is almost 30 percent of what the thieves stole.

    Now, export that job to someone getting paid $8K/year and it not only makes it cheaper for the company outsourcing the work, it also makes it cheaper for the thieves. 3x salary would only be 6% of the take.

    And, it may not even require that much money. Being overseas places the call center staff well out of US jurisdiction. Unless the offense is something particularly vile, nations (US included) will generally protect their own.

    1. Re:Outsourcing bites back by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      While it takes less money to entice criminals there, it also takes less money for a victim to pressure the police to "prioritize" the case.

      When's the last time you know of someone who had a few thousand stolen being given priority police attention in the US? It generally gets swept under the rug and insurance pays for it, raising everyone's premiums (hence, we all pay for the crime). Whereas, in a poorer country, while insurance stills pays for it, the theft would be considered substantial. Moreover, you can pad the constable another couple thousand and the case will probably be escalated to the federal bureau with the full attention of everyone.

    2. Re:Outsourcing bites back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Imagine US call center workers... Let's say they make ~$35K/year."

      Ha! Thats a good one. I worked in upper level call cetner tech support for Cingular Wireless during the period they made the largest all cash transaction i history (ATT buyout) and I made $19,000 a year....and that was after 2 years.

    3. Re:Outsourcing bites back by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you're assuming the country has an infrastructure for actually tracing/tracking someone

  68. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by modernbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I agree that there are bad people everywhere I believe that sensitive data should not be sent out of this country. SSN is an example of something that is used for to many things. I think having tax returns processed oversea's is a really bad idea. Relying on other countries police forces to secure our private data is stupid! I think in time we will all find that all this outsourcing is going to change our way of life for the worse.

  69. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said that before. Shut up and sit down already.

  70. Let the market decide by weave · · Score: 1
    I realize there are bad people everywhere, and I also realize Indian police are cracking down on this. It still makes me nervous that the outsourced data and theft is outside the U.S. legal system and recourses to the vicitims is about nil.

    So with that in mind, when is some credit card company and bank going to advertise that they guarantee all your data will remain within the U.S. and not be outsourced?

    Someone does that, I'll switch to them. I don't care if their rates are not as competitive. I'll pay extra for the peace of mind.

  71. But at least... by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    ...s/he got the spammer grammar right:-)

    " Please fill in you credit card number..."

  72. Any-shored Identity Theft by tschluter · · Score: 1

    All your personal information are belong to us. [It was real tempting to post as "Anonymous Coward."]

  73. Lou Dobbs for President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lou is the only person in news or politics today with enough guts to call out U.S. politicians and corporations for giving away our economy to foreign interests. Call him what you want, but he is right about this issue.

    The idiots running this country today are making a huge cash grab at the expense of the middle class. They have their golden parachutes. Thay don't care about the long-term damage that they are doing to the middle-class.

  74. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well going by the summary, in this case the authorities did act swiftly, so it looks like India is a Good country and the story's emphasis on the location is mostly due to xenophobia.

    BTW, here in Canada, we're very weary of companies who outsource some of their information processing to USA. US has very little privacy laws and worse, it has the PATRIOT ACT, so we'd rather spend more money and keep our info away from USA where it can be easily and legally bought by large corporations or copied by the government.

  75. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somtimes you got to crack a few eggs to make an omelet. Damn liberals!

  76. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hey, bad people are in India. And in the U.S. And in Europe. And in Asia. Oh my god! They are everywhere!

    That's so Polyanna it almost makes me picture you with pig tails. ;) In the countries you listed 30 or 40 grand is a lot of money. Enough to buy influence with regional authorities who might decide to drag their feet for a piece of the action. Pretty soon the local governments are sidelining their income with identity theft.

    This is only the beginning of problems and these people were a bunch of low-level amateurs. Once foreign governments figure out how to monetize that information then you're really going to see some serious shit.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  77. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Pieroxy · · Score: 1, Informative

    People who come to the US with H-1B [slashdot.org] and L1 visas don't pay any taxes

    Not only is this stupid and racist, it is most of all untrue. Maybe I should claim back all that f***ing money I send to US gov and California State.

  78. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Luckily, the bad people are outnumbered by the good.

    Not really. You give most people the opportunity to acquire ill-gotten gains without risk and give them a reason to rationalize it, they will commit the crime 8 times out of 10.

  79. This Just Goes to Show by dmarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You get what you pay for.
    Do you honestly think that somebody could actually go unpunished doing what the Pakistani woman did with confidential medical records in the US? Offshoring has turned into a race to the bottom. I think that companies that put their customers' information at risk by sending it to places with lax privacy laws should be subject to a tax of 50% of their total earnings. The funds of this tax will be used to help ID theft vitctims get their lives back together.

    --
    "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    1. Re:This Just Goes to Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along the same lines; america provides huge tax breaks to business's in general. The idea being that with more cach onhand these companies can hire more people and spend more money in the local economy.

      I propose that offshorers lose these tax protections across the aboard. That would put a stop to this overnight.

  80. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Daedala · · Score: 1

    The problem with your statement is that the U.S. does a crap job of responding to criminal identity theft.

    --
    What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
  81. I used to be an H1-B and I paid taxes & SS by crovira · · Score: 2, Informative

    what's more, until I got a green card, I had no hope of ever seeing any of that money back should I need it.

    WTF is this goober talking about? The only way you get to send money home without paying taxes is if you're paid under the table. And that's usually crap jobs doing crap for crappy people.

    If you have an H1-B (or any other kind of visa) you can't slip under the radar and expect to get away with it.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:I used to be an H1-B and I paid taxes & SS by will_die · · Score: 1

      According to the people who claim this it is really easy to legally not pay taxes as a H1-B, this has been discussed for a while.
      Basic process:
      You hire into a company.
      That company sub-contracts you out.
      sub-contract company pays your company, in your country of origin.
      Your company then provides housing and an amount of spending cash. All of this is tax free.

  82. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    > I'm one of the biggest foreigners around

    Have you tried Jenny Craig?

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  83. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by dmarx · · Score: 1
    In the UK they have a data protection act which restricts personal data from going outside their country. The U.S. would be wise to adopt such a policy.

    Well, there are some foreign countries that have decent protection laws against stuff like this (like, I'm guessing, the UK). Companies shouldn't be penalized for using data services there. Rather, I think that penalities should only apply when a company sends its customers' data to countries with lax personal data protection. The penality I propose is a 50% tax on their earnings, used to help victims of ID theft.

    --
    "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
  84. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    WTF do you mean by "East Indian"? The country's name is India, for chrissakes, not East India. There is no country or specific entity on earth known as "East India".

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. The usage is East India is offending. There is nothign like East India, Red india or West India!

    2. Re:WTF? by gwayne · · Score: 1

      I think East Indian is U.S. reference to a native of India, as opposed to Native American or American Indian, which are commonly referred to as Indians (thanks to Christopher Columbus) in the U.S. It is not intended to be derrogatory, but merely a qualifier.

  85. No, no, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The correct response, in keeping with the dupe, is thus:-

    May I suggest you lay off the Big Macs and Whoppers for a while then?

  86. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK they have a data protection act which restricts personal data from going outside their country

    wrong

    and there isn't a damm thing you can do about it (unless you are ultra rich and close enough of your accounts so they actually care)

  87. Eating next season's seed corn. by JonTurner · · Score: 4, Informative

    Easy one first:
    >>bad people are there in the US too,
    Yes, and since they're in the US, in the employment of US companies, they may be easily and switftly prosecuted and stolen money may more easily be recovered. This is not the case in a country strattling the first-world/third-world fence. Hiring a lawyer to represent a foreign company on the other side of the world isn't easy, cheap or effective.

    Now, the other point.
    >>saving are much more that 10-15%, more around 60-70% atleast.

    70%? No way, no how. Don't believe everything the marketing weasels tell you -- they're salesmen who get paid for getting your CIO to sign a contract, delivering results is somebody else's job and by that time the salesmen are long gone.

    According to the big consulting firms, a very-well-executed offshore program *may* return 40% savings. In the case of a particular Fortune 100 with which I'm familiar a forecast (and we know how accurate those figures are) savings of 30% *may* only *potentially* be realized after the "startup" phase (i.e. first couple of years) during which there are no savings whatsoever because permanent staff must be pulled off assignments to train the replacement workers, startup/training costs are factored, software licensing costs are added (~4000 per seat at my shop) during the 1st year the offshore staff isn't handling all the support tasks (permanent staff is kept as "3rd/4th line backup", offshore "scouts" are flown to US to gather information, meetings to assess the effort are conducted, reviews of metrics, etc. etc.

    In other words, some companies are spending A LOT more up front to offshore, with the hopes that somewhere down the line, years from now, when the permanent staff is fired, the company might save a few bucks. That's if everything goes perfectly, which it won't.

    So far, many companies are just spending more and crossing their fingers, hoping the consulting companies deliver on promises.

    How can they get by with this? Startup costs for offshoring efforts are put into a different slot by the accountants than operational costs which tends to mask the real spendings and underline the "savings." So it looks like a win-win situation which in fact it's a washout over a three or five year span.

    1. Re:Eating next season's seed corn. by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      What hurts even worse, is the realization that
      the money that corporate employees invest in
      their 401K plans (aka "International High Growth")
      has been used to start up many of these off-shore
      out-sourcing companies. Their own retirement funds
      have been used to strip away their employment.

      This is exactly the situation I found myself in
      while working for an IT contracting firm based
      in Houston, TX. They had exactly two 401K invest-
      ment strategies set up -- a nearly zero growth
      bond fund and 3 (porportedly) different overseas
      stock growth funds. Each of the stock funds made
      investments in their Indian subsidiary start-up.

      A large part of the whole inducement to companies
      to offer 401K plans is the leverage either (1)
      short term interest-free capital (from their
      employees), or (2) use the 401K as an investment
      vehicle for the corporation. Many smaller companies'
      only 401K investment is a strategy to purchase
      needed equipment, or their building. Often this
      is hidden as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Doctors'
      and dentists' corporations 401K investments are
      frequently exposed when malpractice suits force
      their companies to dissolve.

      Another advantage of off-shore out-sourcing is
      the very favorable conditions established by
      the USA government to bring in lower cost labor
      as either (1) from their foreign subsidiary (L1-A
      visas) or from their foreign contractor (H1-B visas).
      In spite of the economic slowdown that started in
      2000, the number of L1-A and H1-B visas issued
      have gone up dramatically since that time. It is
      no coincidence that, in spite of 9-11-2001, the
      influx of illegal aliens has nearly doubled.

      Little enforcement of the law against employers,
      and even less enforcement of the law against illegal
      aliens, have had the broader impact of driving
      wages lower in the USA. The illegal aliens aren't
      just working in menial jobs Americans cannot afford
      at the wages offered, but also construction, IT,
      TSA screeners and baggage handlers, and even
      contracting work on US military bases and nuclear
      power plants. Fake ID's and identity theft doesn't
      stop with merely CC transactions.

      In a few short years, there will be little left
      of the middle class in the USA, and unlike the
      1930's-1940's, there will not be a social safety
      net left in existance, if the neo-cons have their
      way.

  88. This is SPAM, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    The referenced site is selling "Identity-theft Survival Kits".

    You don't need any kit to recover from identity theft: you need only paper, pen, envelopes, lots of stamps and the addresses of the major credit bureaus.

  89. We won't own any more than we do now by crovira · · Score: 1

    and if you are rich now (What the fuck are you doing wasting your time on /. when you could be doing some thing useful like [bond]coupon clipping?) you are going to do okay (maybe) but if you owe any money, on a mortgage or on a car or a credit card or... you are so fucked.

    99% of us aren't independantly wealthy. Hell we aren't making over $200K/year (okay, some of us are for now but it doesn't last worth a damn. One year, rich, the next year, unfunded) and all that does is give you access to more credit than you could ever repay.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  90. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter where people are located. What matters is that you have trustworthy people handling your business. And, you know what? Untrustworthy people are everywhere.

    Well, I think it matters. Different foreign countries have varying degrees of lawlessness and corruption. And Pakistan is one of the leading exporters of international terrorism. So, your stolen money may very well be funding terrorist groups.

    Hey, bad people are in India. And in the U.S. And in Europe. And in Asia. Oh my god! They are everywhere!

    Ye olde 'moral-equivalence' bullshit. You need to look at the degree of mass corruption of a society. Despite the histrionics of the far left, the rule of law still applies in the US and Europe. Not really so, the other places you mention.

  91. So remember this when by rainmayun · · Score: 1

    you buy an airplane ticket on US Airways. They just outsourced their call-center operations.

  92. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of misinformed crap from someone who apparently is still bitching about political correctness (but only when it's a liberal that is offended).

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  93. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by oldbenway · · Score: 0

    I don't think it's doubting the honesty of foreigners, just expressing concern over the difficulty of catching/prosecuting international criminals.

  94. You got it wrong... by mangu · · Score: 1

    The true criminals where the Gringos that outsourced the transcribing job to a Pakistani, knowing that she would have no legal means to demand the just payment for her work. From her point of view, the medical records had been abandoned by their former owners, I suppose, so the laws about abandoned property should apply. I don't know what are such laws in Pakistan, but "finders keepers" is the norm in most places.

    1. Re:You got it wrong... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      First of all, "girngo" is a racist term, and I ask that you refrain from using it here, as with any other racist term.

      Second, are you seriously suggesting that a cancer patient in San Francisco had abandoned her medical information and right to privacy because a subcontractor of a subcontracter refused to pay the Pakistani transcriber? That makes no sense.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:You got it wrong... by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      First of all, "girngo" is a racist term, and I ask that you refrain from using it here, as with any other racist term.
      Nope, in Mexico a "gringo" is anyone from U.S., so a African-American is also considered a "gringo". Race is not a factor.

      Anyway, who appointed you to the Slashdot language police? I would rather have people that speak honestly, that way you can size up their true nature. It is hard to do that when they use weasel words (like Republicans who insist that "pro-life" does not mean "anti-capital punishment").

      The internet is a big place, if you don't like frank language you are free to go somewhere else other than Slashdot...
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    3. Re:You got it wrong... by mangu · · Score: 1
      "girngo" is a racist term


      First of all, it's Gringo, not "Girngo". And, as someone remarked above, it's not racist at all, it isn't even pejorative. "Gringo" is a word that denotes someone from the USA much better than "American". The name "America" was first used by Americo Vespucci's mapmaker to denote what is now Brazil. The name "North America" came much later. People from North America insisting on calling themselves "Americans" is like people from West Virginia insisting that their state is the true "Virginia" and the other one should be called "East Virginia".


      But that wasn't the point of my post. I wanted to point out to USians how racist this whole story is. There was one victim of a crime, who had been stolen the payment for her work. There wasn't much she could do about it, because the criminals were in another country. And then, people from the same country as the criminals try to portray everyone in the victim's country as suspects. Which is the worse crime, stealing someone's address and Social Security number, which one can get freely from so many sources, or stealing someone's earned wages?

    4. Re:You got it wrong... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      "Gringo" has a pejorative element to it. You know this as well as I do. I'd say you're the one who's using "weasel words" here as a way to veil your hatred. And if you don't feel like you can participate in civil discourse without bigoted terms, then you're the one who should leave - I'm sure Latino-nationalist hate sites like Voz De Aztlan or MEChA would love to hear from you.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    5. Re:You got it wrong... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      But that wasn't the point of my post. I wanted to point out to USians how racist this whole story is. There was one victim of a crime, who had been stolen the payment for her work. There wasn't much she could do about it, because the criminals were in another country.

      Yeaaaah, okay... setting the wayback machine to two posts ago, you said:

      The true criminals where the Gringos that outsourced the transcribing job to a Pakistani, knowing that she would have no legal means to demand the just payment for her work. From her point of view, the medical records had been abandoned by their former owners, I suppose, so the laws about abandoned property should apply.

      Nice way to (a) cry racism while turning a blind eye to your own, and (b) completely avoid the points I made in my post. The "one victim" you refer to was criminal as well, stealing and threatening to publish the medical info of many people who had done her absolutely no wrong... but I suppose that's okay with you, somehow, because all those people are "the gringos."

      I suggest you investigate your own hypocracy before ferreting out everyone else's.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    6. Re:You got it wrong... by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      "Gringo" has a pejorative element to it. You know this as well as I do.
      Bullshit! Maybe in Mexico there is a little negativity to the word but in the good old USA there is not. How else can you explain people naming their restaurant Gringo's Restuarant? If the word "Gringo" was racist like you claim don't you think that the number of google hits would equal Nigger's Restaurant?
      I'd say you're the one who's using "weasel words" here as a way to veil your hatred.
      Hey, you don't know me, how dare you accuse me of "hatred"? At least I am not afraid to let people know who I am instead of cowardly hiding behind some pseudonym like your chicken-shit ass!
      And if you don't feel like you can participate in civil discourse without bigoted terms, then you're the one who should leave
      Let's compare Slashdot user ID's - I have been here a lot longer than you and I will probably be here when you are long gone. I am quite capable of civil discourse but I will call out IDIOTS when I spot them, and you have proven that you are a first-class idiot!
      I'm sure Latino-nationalist hate sites like Voz De Aztlan or MEChA would love to hear from you.
      This confirms it, you are an idiot deluxe!

      First of all, those are CHICANO groups, LATINO is a "weasel word" created by the great WHITE fathers in Washington D.C. that is used to lump together different Spanish-speaking groups into one group for statistical purposes. Calling groups as different as Chicanos and Cubanos with the word Latino is like saying that someone from England and someone from Germany are the same because they are both White Europeans.

      I'm sure that that people from those countries will vehemently deny that that is true, so why is it OK to respect THEIR cultural differences while WHITE-washing (pun intended) differences between MY culture and other Spanish-speaking cultures?

      Second, Voz de Aztlan and MEChA are NOT hate groups! Find me an official US Government webpage that says they are and that US citizens will be prosecuted for contributing to those groups like they can for contributing to groups like the Irish Republican Army. You can't because that webpage does not exist!

      If anything, you are the one that is a racist by denying me and my fellow Chicanos the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you want to find a bigot all you have to do is look in the mirror, pendejo!

      Maybe if you stopped reading Mein Kampf and Republican Party propaganda long enough to look around and see what is really going on you will quit accusing people of being "bigoted" when in reality they are not...
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    7. Re:You got it wrong... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my point. You've got an emormous blind spot in which you hide your own racism. Voz de Aztlan isn't a hate group? Guess you haven't read all the blatant anti-Semitism on their website... or maybe you just don't care.

      First of all, those are CHICANO groups, LATINO is a "weasel word" created by the great WHITE fathers in Washington D.C. that is used to lump together different Spanish-speaking groups into one group for statistical purposes. Calling groups as different as Chicanos and Cubanos with the word Latino is like saying that someone from England and someone from Germany are the same because they are both White Europeans. Seriously, do you actually read your own posts? In one sentence you blast the "WHITE fathers" in Washington, and in the next one, you tell me how using the term Latino is bad, analagous to grouping German and English descendents under the term... white.

      I suppose if you're going to carry around as much hate as you do while accusing everyone else of it, you need to cultivate a pretty extreme level of hypocracy to keep a straight face while doing it.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    8. Re:You got it wrong... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      You know, your post was just so rich, I have to address the other "points" as well...

      Bullshit! Maybe in Mexico there is a little negativity to the word

      So you admit, "gringo" is a pejorative term. Thanks.

      Hey, you don't know me, how dare you accuse me of "hatred"? At least I am not afraid to let people know who I am instead of cowardly hiding behind some pseudonym like your chicken-shit ass!

      I'm accusing you a hatred because you knowingly use pejorative terms to refer to another people. It's that simple.

      Let's compare Slashdot user ID's - I have been here a lot longer than you and I will probably be here when you are long gone. I am quite capable of civil discourse but I will call out IDIOTS when I spot them, and you have proven that you are a first-class idiot!

      Wow, a low Slashdot ID is some kind of intellectual or civil qualification? I think most people here would find that concept more than a little amusing.

      First of all, those are CHICANO groups, LATINO is a "weasel word" created by the great WHITE fathers in Washington D.C. that is used to lump together different Spanish-speaking groups into one group for statistical purposes. Calling groups as different as Chicanos and Cubanos with the word Latino is like saying that someone from England and someone from Germany are the same because they are both White Europeans.

      "Latino" is somehow a disagreeable word for you due to its ethnic generality, yet you feel comfortable using terms like "gringo" and "white." Interesting. And to echo you, "Who made you the Slashdot language police?"

      Second, Voz de Aztlan and MEChA are NOT hate groups!

      Here's Voz de Aztlan: Anti-semitism and embracing terrorism and hate. And here's the MEChA "El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán," which among other things claims that the southwestern US "belongs... not to the foreign Europeans," and declares, "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada." Care to translate that for us - and explain how it's not racist?

      Find me an official US Government webpage that says they are and that US citizens will be prosecuted for contributing to those groups like they can for contributing to groups like the Irish Republican Army. You can't because that webpage does not exist!

      Wow, you mean that if the US Government doesn't have a group listed as a hate group on a web page, it isn't a hate group? Quite a lot of respect you've suddenly gained for the "WHITE fathers" in Washington.

      If anything, you are the one that is a racist by denying me and my fellow Chicanos the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you want to find a bigot all you have to do is look in the mirror, pendejo!

      How am I infringing your "right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?" By disagreeing with you?

      Maybe if you stopped reading Mein Kampf and Republican Party propaganda long enough to look around and see what is really going on you will quit accusing people of being "bigoted" when in reality they are not...

      I've never read "Mein Kampf" nor do I support the Republican Party; nor have I said anything racist here. But I suppose that didn't stop you from tossing out allegations and stereotypes.

      To sum up: I suggest you work on your critical thinking skills, as well as your tolerance for other people, and take a good long look in the mirror to see who the real racist and hypocrite is. And, by the way, by mentioning "Mein Kampf," you have triggered Godwin's Law. Buh-bye.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    9. Re:You got it wrong... by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      "Latino" is somehow a disagreeable word for you due to its ethnic generality, yet you feel comfortable using terms like "gringo" and "white."
      White is not a pejorative term, it is an adjective. White people exist, how can it be a perjorative when it is a descriptive term? I guess it is when you are as ashamed of your background as you seem to be...

      I on the other hand am proud of who I am, a Chicano. By calling me Latino you are insulting me. You claim "Gringo" is a prejorative term yet you don't acknowledge that Latino is? Talk about a lack of critical thinking skills!
      Here's Voz de Aztlan: Anti-semitism and embracing terrorism and hate. And here's the MEChA "El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán," which among other things claims that the southwestern US "belongs... not to the foreign Europeans," and declares, "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada." Care to translate that for us - and explain how it's not racist?
      Too easy, you marry a Chicano you become Raza. If I marry a White girl that does not automatically make me White. Who are the real racists, the Chicanos who are proud of who we are and thus want to keep our own culture intact, or the Whites who insist that we buy into THEIR culture (aka the Melting Pot)?
      I nor do I support the Republican Party
      If you walk like a duck and quack like a duck you probably are a duck. I don't see the Democrats making a big deal about me wanting to be Chicano but for some reason it seems to bother Republicans to no end!
      And, by the way, by mentioning "Mein Kampf," you have triggered Godwin's Law. Buh-bye.
      As far as Godwin's Law goes you are dead wrong! Anyway, since you apparently are not open minded enough to have an honest debate and too racistly anti-Chicano to bother with, it is obvious that I have been trolled by a master baiter!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
  95. You Get What You Pay by $criptah · · Score: 1

    It is impossible to get cheap good stuff. Period. Everything of quality costs money in this world. Take a look at everything from cars to clothing: once quality starts to rise, so does the price. "Cheap" Hondas are no longer cheap (but reliable). I pay a bit more for good service from Speakeasy because I enjoy fast ticket resolution (if problems exists) and talking to Bobs, Marrys and Johns from the United States.

    If customers are willing to accpet cheaper goods, they should be willing to accept lower quality. Period. People do not shop at Wal-Mart becuase they have excellent customer service or high quality goods. People shop there because of low prices. Quality vs. price.... The choice is yours.

  96. Outsource the Military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jee. I hope we don't start outsorucing the military. Then we are in big trouble.

    1. Re:Outsource the Military by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      How many of those GPS-guided bombs use all-American-made components do you figure?

      Sure, some guy in Kentucky probably puts the bombs together, but the metal probably comes from Asia, and the chips almost certainly do. The explosives probably are synthesized in the US using feedstocks manufactured overseas.

      The US could do a lot of damange to Asia in general in a war, but they could not fight a protracted war against all of Asia due to an inability to resupply.

      The US was a WWII powerhouse since it had its own oil, steel, manufacturing, etc. Britain ran into trouble since they imported everything, and U-boats made a mess of their supply lines. They were also close to the front lines and were bombed into the stone age (at least factories were).

      The US can pick on an isolated country or two, but right now it can't take on half of the world. Nor should it try to do so.

      The issues raised here are serious ones - the US needs to invest internally if it wants to remain a world power. The solution to the problem isn't building bombs - it is building factories or at least R&D labs...

  97. Signed up for online banking lately? by crovira · · Score: 1

    Ever read the EULA 'shirk'-wrapped piece of butt-wipe that you have to go through in order to use it?

    Did you just click through in order to get to the software?

    Are you sure it was just some provisions on the software. How about not holding the bank responsable for identity theft related problems...? For all you know, you've already bent over and told 'em to start fuckin...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Signed up for online banking lately? by farzadb82 · · Score: 1
      A few points (Please note IANAL and YMMV):

      1. You are assuming that the person is using Internet banking. Believe it or not, a majority of people do not use internet banking (slashdot users do not count) and therefore its a moot point. Also, I did check out my bank's (Bank of America) EULA and from what I read, nowhere in there did they say that I have to waived any rights based on losses that I may incur due to their negligence.

      2. I'm making a more general statment here and not just talking about banks. For example, if my benefits administrator incurred theft of my identity they too would be liable under the HIPPA act, unless I have authorized that third party to manage my information.

  98. Who exactly should be punished? by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Say my visa company is broken into and my personal info (ssn, mothers madien name, etc.) is copied by the perps in say India. Now, a year or so later, some dork in Easter Europe is using my personal information to get credit cards, home loans, whatever. How do I know that the personal information compromised through my visa company was used to assume my identity? It could have just as easily been someone who patiently taped together my shreaded documents or some other company with my personal information that was compromised.

    Because so many people have my, and other peoples personal information, the burden of proof for many of these cases is pretty high. In many (most?) cases, it's prohibitively high.

    --
    -- john
  99. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Pretending that every culture has the same general view of privacy rights is high ignorance.

    Pakistan is a country in which "honor killings" are socially acceptable.

    It's not a question of "bad people" being everywhere - it's a question of the definition of "good."

    In most countries - feeding your family by any available means is a moral trait - The means are irrelevent so long as you stand a better than average chance of remaining free to feed them next week.

    That calculation varies from country to country and it has little to do with "bad" and "good".

    We live in a country in which the quality of life has benefitted from the slavery and exploitation of people in the rest of the world.

    Having killed the Indians for their Land, we enslaved the africans for their muscles, now we corrupt the arab world for their oil, bankrupted eastern europe by sabatoging their oil pipeline, and exploited children in china to make Nike shoes to say nothing of the environment.

    At some point the chickens come home to roost.

    AIK

  100. Infosec needs to be taken seriously. by btarval · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's exactly spot on. To which needs to be added that Identify Theft won't be taken seriously until it impacts our members of Congress.

    If someone were to start publishing all the SSN's, Date of Births, Credit Info, Biometric Info, Mental Health records of not just the members of Congress, but also their families, then (and only then) might they possibly rethink that centralized databases are a stupid solution. I say possibly, because the current legal market around database information is quite huge.

    I say possibly, because the only tool they have is passing laws. Unfortunately, this is a case where you need the right technology, otherwise the existing information will always be abused.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  101. You should worry about debts run up in YOUR name. by crovira · · Score: 1

    Because YOU'LL have to pay them back.

    ID theft is bad enough (believe me, I know first hand,) in one country with one set of laws and one court system.

    Trying to clear up foreign debts may be beyond the ability of anyone. And with the bankruptcy laws being tightened, you may get served with papers from Lower Slobbovia that you knew nothing about and that will have you reaching for a tall glass of 'Kool-Aid.'

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  102. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but there's a lot less perceived risk if you are in India and are stealing from people in America 10,000 miles away. This fact could lead to the corruption of people that would normally be deterred by the risk of incarceration for their actions.

  103. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

    Hard to imagine that needed saying - all this morality gobblidy gook - of course its about relative risk/reward.

    AIK

  104. By the way ,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is believed that East Indian police reacted

    There is only one India and that is in the eastern hemisphere, so there really is no need to say "East Indian".

  105. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

    The point is - if the criminals are in the US, it's much easier to go after them. If they are abroad, good luck. Considering that most thirdworld nation's judicial systems are powered by bribes, prosecuting them is much more difficult.

  106. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

    The key to getting more karma is just to post sooner. The higher the post the more likely a moderator will see it and add a point or two. posts at the end of a thread are less likely to get seen.

  107. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an H1B worker and I pay taxes and SS and so on! So where did you get this from that H1B workers don't have to pay taxes? I would love to reclaim all the money I paid to the federal government as I don't agree with all the things they spend it for. That's also one of the reasons why I'll probably return home after my 6 years, I would be ashamed to be a citizen of that country! BTW, my home country is neither an asian nor an african country and it isn't Russia or the Ukraine either in case you wonder.

  108. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately people have so few original ideas, that if one idea was accepted into the discussions only once, and then one had to improve it before using it again, nobody would have anymore anything left to say. But the same thing happens everywhere, not just in Slashdot.

    So let's just keep repeating ourselves, just like I'm doing right now. :-)

  109. Hm... by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Yeah, but it's not like you can exactly boycott some of these companies. If your company's HMO happens to used an outsourced medical transcription outfit, not much you can do about it even if you were made aware of it. If your hospital or bank use one, it's unlikely that they would even disclose that information to you, even if you tried to pry it out of them. For that matter, how many of the companies that don't outsource that kind of work employ background checks or demand security clearances? None, I'd be willing to bet...

    I really wouldn't expect this story to affect anyone's bottom line at all.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  110. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh get the fuck off your high horse. You do know that sheriffs in US are elected? And they need campaign funds? Contributed by people who will have future influence on them?

    Read my lips: US is one of the worst Western countries for protecting your information and just as bad as the rest for prosecuting rich criminals.

  111. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow that's good thinking!! Now, what you gonna do with all that karma? Sell it on Ebay? Put it on your resume? "Qualifications: Slashdot karma: excellent++"? Or do you use it to pick up chicks? "If you show me yours I'll show you my 4-digit karma..."?

  112. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Some countries have traditions of institutionalized graft.

    Got news for you. ALL countries have traditions of institutionalized graft. Some are just more affordable to the general public. Others will only occur in the famous "smoke filled room"...out of sight out of mind.

    --
    What?
  113. East India? by aalu.paneer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    East Indian police

    What is East Indian? Is there a Red Indian police? West Indian police? Who wrote this? Do people still live in world of "East Indian"? Wake up and learn respect.

    --
    where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
  114. Re:You should worry about debts run up in YOUR nam by mslinux · · Score: 1

    Wrong! You're not responsible for fraud that someone else has commited in your name.

  115. Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian-GlobalWork. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sure location matters. If your employees are nearby, you can keep tabs on them. You might even be able to directly affect their morale in a positive manner."

    Well there goes telecommuting.

  116. It wasn't stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DHS has to get their info somehow. What could be a better way? No silly court orders needed. Everything, including your medical info is out there now. You no longer have any idea why you didn't get that job, or you were turned down for that loan or life insurance, why you can't board the plane. How are you going to find out?... unless you hack their system and chack internal memos? The process has now been hosed. Information could possibly surpass weapons as the world's most profitable contraband. Let's see the dogs sniff that out.

  117. Death of IP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course there's no such thing as "IP", and there are those willing to undermine anything having to do with IP.*

    *Just imagine a similiar movement with physical goods.

  118. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foreigners may be trustworthy, but if they are out of reach you have no recourse against the UN-trustworthy variety.

  119. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Politburo · · Score: 1

    Low paid workers have always dealt with a lot of money. The thing is, when they're doing that here in the US, they are accountable. They have to submit their SSN to get paid for the job, they most likely have an address and phone number on file, etc. If you're $1,000 short from register 5 and Joe was working that register, it's not too difficult to track him down if he wants to remain a member of society. It's that fear that keeps people from stealing.

    In another country, this accountability may not exist. Police are easily bribed or do not care about the problems of another country. It may be easier to get jobs under an assumed identity, etc.

    In any case, I would imagine that the switch to electronic payment was not for security, but for speed, convenience, and the ability to cut the workforce, thus saving money.

  120. Keep your own information secure *first*... by atomic_toaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And then worry about international identity theft.

    I can understand being worried that your personal information ends up being sent outside of your country of citizenship as an effect of outsourcing. It doesn't really matter where it's shipped to, as soon as it crosses the border, it becomes that much harder to catch and prosecute.

    The thing is, if people want something badly enough, they will put up with the risk of identity theft. And some people just don't care enough or know enough to take simple precautions. I'll give you an example. I work for a Canadian company that takes orders from both Canada and the United States. We do not take orders through our email, because we do not have any kind of security with regards to our email system. When we contact clients, we specifically say not to email us credit card numbers, expiry dates, or other sensitive information. This isn't in the fine print, either, it's right in the body of the message! Yet people email us that kind of information all the time. And although an American tracing identity theft to Canada is probably a hell of a lot easier than tracing it to India, and our laws are similar in many respects, we are still accross a border. As such it would be significantly more difficult to trace and prosecute an offence committed in Canada from the States.

    Identity theft, nationally or internationally, will not stop until people start taking personal responsibility for their information as much as possible. It's like locking your door whenever you leave the house -- a determined theif is not going to be deterred by a lock when there is a window that can be smashed. Locks are just there to keep honest people honest. At least protect yourself against crimes of opportunity.

    1. Re:Keep your own information secure *first*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but don't forget mucho rubbish is sent overseas for recycling.

      I bet johnny garbage-picker is more than happy to pick up a penny per bank statement bonus from lo-end datacollaters in downtown Lagos, Manilla or *insert third world shithole of choice*

      I would.

  121. Indians do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indians buy more gold per capita as a form of personal savings than anyone else. Maybe they know something.

  122. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by mavenguy · · Score: 1

    Actually this sounds like the perfect way to respond to a dupe.

  123. Could this be a result of.... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Could this be an indirect result of all our companies outsourcing their work to other call centers around the world? I tend to think that if our personal information is sent to other parts of the world, we put ourselves at serious risk of having our information stolen. We get transferred to India, and other places that will ask us for credit card numbers, phone numbers, addresses, etc., and they store that information there. Anyone just has to offer enough money to someone in that country, working at that call center or tech support place, and they've got the info they wish to have.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  124. Easy Solution to this problem!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsource the law enforcement!

  125. Re:You should worry about debts run up in YOUR nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice idea, but you are not a lawyer.

  126. technological solution to identity theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on the situation, it is possible to design a system where most of the employees of the offshore organization do not have access to the sensitive data.

    Will give you an example of a system that is currently working:

    - customer can use web interface to order service, of course all the personal information is encrypted and never exposed to any CSRs.
    - customer calls and orders some service. CSRs take all the non-sensitive information and are transferred to an interface where you punch in sensitive information from your phone e.g. credit card number. Only thing CSRs get once this operation is complete is some authorization token that they can use to complete the transaction.

    - the problem is that in their need to search for cheapest offshore service companies sometime choose the lowest bidder or do not audit the offshore operations (or as you saw in the story there are number of indirections).

  127. £200,000 by ogewo · · Score: 1

    My solution is just not to have £200,000.

  128. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by mutterc · · Score: 1
    You forget, corporations own the U.S. government.

    Laws requiring data protection, or restricting offshoring in any way, hurt the Bottom Line, so they will never be allowed to pass.

  129. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Catbeller · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Post your link to the source of this "news". I can't find it on Google. Link not to a rightist blogger or Freerepublic, but a to a transcript of the comment, WITH CONTEXT, or at least an article from a credible news source referring to this. No, Rush is not acceptable. And he does not provide transcripts, anyway.

    And as for Dobbs, he has indeed jumped onto the rightist train and is riding for the sunset, so his attitude as a "journalist" is indeed up for comment. He's dropped the mask of a reporter and has become a right-wing agitator. So it goes.

    At Daily Kos or Talking Points Memo or even Buzzflash, the answer to the Drudge, they exhaustively document and link each reference to an actual news article from a credible source. "Everybody knows" is not credible as a source.

    This "Franken is calling names" stinks of the old Orwellian trick of smearing the enemy with that which your side is most certainly guilty. If you know you can be called on your actions, make a lot of noise establishing "controversey" about those who will call you out, to diminish their stature. Slash, smear, distort, MAKE NOISE, and the enemy's best efforts to expose your actions can be at best summed up as calling the kettle black by those whose knowledge of the discussion is not exactly exhaustive.

    Air America Radio,, with Franken as midday host, has done more to clean the rightist clocks in one year than the entire Democratic party has done in twenty.

  130. Credit reports online, for free. by douglips · · Score: 1

    That one free report per year PER AGENCY is available online, no writing letters and waiting. So, you can go to the website once every 4 months and get a report from one of the agencies for free.

    Available in the west and midwest for now, by September it will be available throughout the US.

    Linkage:
    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/

  131. You get what you pay for! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all very interesting, workers in another country, that have very oppressing poverty, are given access to very private and personal information of the citizens of a very wealthy nation. In addition, the workers really have no reason to like the wealthy nation, because the impression they have is the nation exports war and exploitation. Duh!

    I also read this article: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/23/17 45219&tid=158&tid=103&tid=17

    Cendant just outsourced their programmers who worked at Galileo to India. I don't have all the details but I do know that most of those programmers were walked out. It's safe to say that the workers in India will now have access to 25% of all PNR's generated in the United States and about 30% of the international market. So the next time terrorists strike at the airlines they could know exactly who's on board. Their names and addresses and credit card numbers etc. etc.

  132. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by griffm · · Score: 1

    I agree with that as well, which is why I stated that it shouldn't be difficult for host countries to do at least as good of a job. In fact, anything except for outright support would probably be good enough. Nevertheless, there are plenty of places where the government itself has more important things to do than worry about its citizens cheating Americans.

    I am the victim of identity theft and would have had more problems had a nice clerk at Sears not questioned the fact that someone needed to apply for a card and then buy three laptops and four video cameras in Florida when their home address was Maryland. Now I pay for a fraud watch service and can no longer apply for quick credit (which I seldom did anyway and much of the fraud could be eliminated if there were no such thing as "quick credit").

    I have little doubt the my problem can be traced back to a wonderful institution of higher learning that demanded we put our entire SSN on course assignements and used it openly as a student ID #.

  133. The new world by heroine · · Score: 1

    If you put money in a bank you have to face it. Your personal information is being stored in either Bangalore or Beijing and subject to the laws of those countries.

    We all know it but we still act suprised whenever identity theft happens and it ends up unpunished because India and China don't have the same notion of private property that we have.

  134. Outsource slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was posted right here on slashdot a few days back. It's the same damn story. Is slashdot being sponsored by an anti-outsourcing lobby to tarnish India's image?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/08/0612 45 &tid=98&tid=172

    This can be considered an example of how outsourcing could improve things. Although slashdot hasn't outsourced it's editing, we still get duplicate news stories posted here. Outsourcing the slashdot editors could only improve the quality of slashdot.

  135. Innapropriate to Outsource by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    I feel medical transcription is innapropriate to outsource, onshore or offshore.

    This is extremely private information and at the gastly prices we pay to get medical care in the US, at the very least afford to pay a typist within their clinic/hospital.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  136. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you go back to your sewer, curry.

  137. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And as for Dobbs, he has indeed jumped onto the rightist train and is riding for the sunset, so his attitude as a "journalist" is indeed up for comment. He's dropped the mask of a reporter and has become a right-wing agitator. So it goes.


    Funny, I thought it was the right wing in this country that was into "free trade" and "globalization". Dobbs is clearly opposed to these. He is clearly not a "rightist" in the American sense of the word.
  138. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    I didn't know France was a sewer. Plus, I don't even know what you mean by 'curry'.

    But I did know AC was not that smart.

  139. What if someone does not care about good credit? by sustik · · Score: 1

    I wondered what happens if someone is rich enough to: own their home (no mortgage and will never need one), they never need loans or pay credit card interest? A person like that should just make sure that the thief is not stealing from them and that does not seem to hard to do (e.g a credit card charge can be disputed and there will be no valid signature meaning that the merchant got cheated not you).

    Will bad credit influance you in any other way but preventing getting loans mortgages? Will it really affect medical insurance, employment, school admission, your family?

  140. Dupe by northcat · · Score: 1

    This story is a dupe. (Yes, these are the same story. If you visit the links you 'll know)

  141. Re:You should worry about debts run up in YOUR nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wrong! You're not responsible for fraud that someone else has commited in your name.

    Yes, but you first must PROVE that it was somebody else. That's the hard part.

  142. you don't get it by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    It's not about right and wrong. It's about power and sovereignty.

    1. Re:you don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And arrogance, don't forget that little bit.

  143. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by will_die · · Score: 1

    So a site whoes comment when some US contractors were killed was to call them "mercenaries" and people could just "Screw them" is a credible news source?

  144. I Get It by Cheirdal · · Score: 1

    It's a lot easier to perpetrate identity theft against Americans via Indian call centers than it is in the U.S. Also if the people providing the data are paid a substantial amount of money for it, that's more likely to mean something in an impoverished nation like India than it does in the U.S. Why does crime exist in the U.S.? By and large its based on socio-economic factors and someone wanting to improve their station in life. That's why you're a lot more likely to see someone without a job robbing a liquor store as opposed to than the manager of a bank. Now look at places like India where the vast majority of the population of nearly 1 billion people live in abject poverty. Getting thousands of dollars in one fell swoop would certainly mean more in a third world country under these conditions. It doesn't mean that Indians are more likely to commit crimes but it does mean that there are a LOT more people living under the socio-economic factors that lead to most of the crime in the U.S. That along with the fact that India is NOT under U.S. jurisdiction (regardless of extradition agreements) and its in the same part of the world as Pakistan and Afghanistan (where enemies of the of United States exist in abundance)and you've got a very bad mixture of elements ready to combine. Personally, I think it should be against federal law to send the personal data of U.S. citizens abroad. If you agree with me then you can look up your representatives here http://www.webslingerz.com/jhoffman/congress-email .html and write them telling them what you think.

  145. Stealing vs borroing on your behalf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's scarier about this is that money was transferred from actual bank accounts owned by these individuals. So, they may not have to clear up their credit report, instead they have to deal with their retirement savings disappearing. Instead of just explaining why there is a faulty line on their credit report to a bank officer to get a mortgage, they'd have to find someplace else to come up with the down payment. UGH.

    Makes me want to remove all my money from compaines who use offshore call centers, and into the local credit union where it is "safe" -- or at least, insured by FDIC.

  146. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about racism. But the statement about *legal* H-1B visas immigrants don't pay taxes is pure BS!!! I have paid taxes ever since I got into this country. I was on a F-1, and then H-1B. And I don't get any tax ride-off that the citizens do. In fact, I don't know a single legal immigrant on H-1B who is not paying more taxes than Americans every freaking year. And there are usually no complaints because we know how much of a previlage it is to live in this country. That doesn't mean that people can just wantonly lie about us and use us as scapegoats for their own incompetance and laziness.

    If he knows a tax loop-hole that I don't know about please Fvcking tell me, cuz I would love to know. Also, I've paid Social Security for 8 years now, without qualifying for any of the benefits!!!! That actually pisses me off more than Lou Dobb's statement.

  147. Re:Indian, Pakistani, Ukrainian, Nigerian by will_die · · Score: 1

    It may be wrong, but a quick search on H1-B sites should how it could legally be done, but how is it racist?

  148. did u know... by aneroid · · Score: 1
    There are what seems to be very few safeguards to prevent the theft of someone's information.
    very true.
    ...including companies that were mishandling the information
    as far as mis-handling of personal information is concerned, the credit card company is to blame. when u call and "verify" ur personal info, u're asked for name, phone num, *last 4 digits of ur SSN*, etc. well, the associate handling the call sees alot more than u know. ALL the information u've given the company is available. eg. ur SSN...the full thing. u're given the impression the handler doesn't know, but they do. even in a situation where it's not required to see/know all that info, it's all available "by default". there's no requirement to wait for a specific situation before accessing details. it's already there. it's like this at all call centres.

    hence, it can't really be logged (it is audio-visually recorded but there's nothing not-allowed about accessed info). guess what they do log...sales pitches. probably so that the company can catch ppl falsely signing up customers for programs/offers OR tell the customer he/she did say yes to an offer so all charges are valid.

    ppl who've been around longer and have had time to "bond" with the parent (cc) company's ppl usually have skills/info they shouldn't have. things like that should remain with the parent company...regardless of the location of either of them.

    i'm sure there's some fine print somewhere that says signing up for a card gives them the right to do almost anything with ur data short of public announcements.

    tip: fees are waived/reduced only if u ask for it ;-)
    1. Re:did u know... by vivtho · · Score: 1

      The organization I work for (A Major US ISP) makes it a policy that no associate on calls can access your entire credit card number, or your entire SSN. The only information available to them is the last four digits.

    2. Re:did u know... by aneroid · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, most outsourcing credit card companies (biggest ones included) don't bother with that. entire credit card number is always available, so is the entire SSN. last 4 digits is only what's asked, it's always available in it's entirety.