Slashdot Mirror

Just want to add that Mr. Ageh probably remembers encyclopedias on dozens of disks in a changer, "tech" that was supposed to be the future. We know how that panned out. My experience tells me he is right on the money.

For those asking for citation, The first link is the WAAS (windows as as service is the microsoft name) information for businesses, IIRC business deployment is scheduled for first deployment with retail deployment afterwards. WAAS will follow the same model as office 365, it'll likely start as an optional subscription for a year or two before the only option will be the monthly subscription just like office 2019 is the last standalone version after only a few years of 365 existing.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...

The microsoft windows 365 plan, like office 365 will be the first step in the shift:

https://wccftech.com/microsoft...

Other sources without looking too hard:

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella reportedly told financial analysts at the Build conference in the spring, "We are moving from a product that is perpetual to one that is always up to date. In the past we've always had revenue per license. Going forward we'll have revenue per device, and we'll have revenue per device gross margin."

https://www.informationweek.co...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/g...
https://blog.juriba.com/window...

As you'll note in the links most of the information is in the financial press that the bulk of the public doesn't pay attention to, but what Microsoft promises wall street will occur.

Indeed. It's rumored that Microsoft skipped Windows 9 because of potential compatibility issues.
https://www.informationweek.co...?

When have 2nd amendment proponents ever done anything to protect people's privacy rights? I don't see them protesting data collection

Actually, gun rights proponents are almost certainly the most successful lobbyists against data collection in modern America, which, depending on your views, may not be a good thing.

Mind you, it’s their own privacy that they’re interested in protecting, but they’ve lobbied Congress so we’ll that it’s currently illegal for the US government to create or maintain databases of gun owners, historical gun purchases, or even the guns themselves, despite massive efforts by people on the other side of those debates to collect exactly that information. And even the paltry records that do exist (i.e. records from private gun stores that went out of business), are not allowed to be computerized. If you’d like more information, it’s easy to come by because the ways that the ATF has been hamstrung by the NRA get re-reported every time there’s another major shooting. And it’s not just at the national level either. Gun enthusiasts are quite active in protesting locally as well.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news... (paywalled)
https://www.informationweek.co...
http://www.heraldtribune.com/n...
https://www.usatoday.com/story...

I do agree with the overarching point you were trying to get at, but that particular argument you used to make your point was an extraordinarily poor choice.

So unless you buy the enterprise edition of Windows (Cost: $84 per PC, per year, minimum 5 licenses), or are attending a university that will enable you to obtain the Education edition on windows (Cost: averages about $9,970 per year) you can't even do what you suggest. Windows explicitly ignores the settings that turns this functionality off.

Actually the reason you can't really control Windows is because Windows is proprietary software. No amount of registry changes, config file changes, or changing one's practices with Windows will place Windows under the user's control. That's the same for any variant of Windows no matter how much one pays or if the software bears the name "enterprise".

Microsoft has a universal backdoor in Windows. Even disconnecting the Windows computer from the network won't place that computer under the owner's control. What the article complains about isn't new: tricking and forcibly pushing users into switching to Windows 10, privacy controls that ignore the user's settings and rat on the user regardless, and dropping support for processors Microsoft doesn't want to support instead of letting the users do the work are all part of the same theme—this is what non-free software can do.

Nonfree software didn't recently "add spying/telemetry/etc". The malware was a part of nonfree OSes (such as Windows, iOS, MacOS) for a long time in both the OS and various apps. Here are a few examples concerning Windows: the backdoor in Windows by which Microsoft can impose any change it wants and when this was used, and who can forget Microsoft's choice to trick or force Windows 7 and Vista users into Windows 10 "upgrades". Since that software was nonfree even technical users and developers couldn't legally remove the malware and distribute the improved malware-free variant to help others.

When it came to spying, Windows 10 gave users a UI that apparently deceived them into believing that the user had a say in how much their OS ratted them out. Windows 10 shipped with bad defaults for preserving user's privacy and continued "talking to Microsoft" (as Condé Nast put it) "even if a user turn[ed] off its Bing search and Cortana features, and activate[ed] the privacy-protection settings" (quoting the GNU Project). So now Microsoft assures Windows users things are better, but one has to wonder for whom and what users are legally allowed to do if they discover the proprietor's words aren't how the software behaves.

if I am going to be buying a chipset then who do I buy it from if I want to talk with my wallet? Aren't Intel and AMD pretty much the only games in town?

Regrettably the alternative is quite expensive. IBM's Power8 chip is the open-source hardware alternative.

The Talos would be an example of a libre computer using this hardware.

The GNU Project told us about Microsoft malware long ago, including what is accurately listed "Microsoft Windows has a universal back door through which any change whatsoever can be imposed on the users" pointing to a mainstream media news reference from 2007 and another link indicating when this was used, and a pointer to a Condé Nast article talking about the (apparently ongoing) forced Windows Updates. Microsoft is also the first PRISM partner with the NSA joining on September 11, 2007, according to an internal NSA document so they have quite a long history of being untrustworthy but the underlying power they're leveraging comes from proprietary software.

Other proprietors are no more trustworthy. Apple didn't fix an intentional back door for 4 years, Apple didn't fix an iTunes backdoor through which others could have gained control of systems running the software. Apple joined PRISM in October 2012. Other proprietors with names you know (Yahoo, Facebook, Google, YouTube, etc.) joined in between the Microsoft and Apple partnerships.

The theme remains the same: it doesn't matter who the proprietor is (Microsoft in this case), proprietary software is always untrustworthy and this doesn't change even after applying lots of updates from the proprietor. Just because a new version is out, or a patch released does not mean the back door is shut or that you can verify their work (or even get someone more technically skilled to verify it on your behalf).

Now we have more confirmation of how the threats come from other directions, not just the proprietor, and that the threat is more organized than we commonly knew. Evidence like this immediately advances the discussion beyond the distraction of calling someone a 'tinfoil hat wearer' or other such nonsense, as did the Snowden documents. And WikiLeaks maintains their perfect record for authenticity in their publications—as far as we can tell these documents are what WikiLeaks claims they are. Proprietary software is always a threat. Software freedom is no guarantee of safety, but you're better off having software you can inspect, run, share, and modify (AKA control) than not. You simply can't trust proprietors to do right by you and all computer users deserve software freedom.

In fact, to enhance upon my reply from a few minutes ago, it appears that in 2006, Delta outsourced its IT operations to IBM [1]. It was a seven year agreement, so I don't know who does it now. But I doubt it's Delta.

Assuming this is still the situation: I don't know on what continent Delta's IT people are stationed at this point, but that's hardly the issue. The issue is, wherever they are, they aren't competently managing Delta's IT infrastructure. They had a similarly airline-grounding outage in August, about six months ago.

If management were able to recognize the value of investment in IT, they could have taken steps over the years to develop a system that isn't this fragile. Presumably, back in 2006, when they went into bankruptcy, someone convinced them that IT wasn't a "core competency" because it would save the airline a bunch of money to outsource it. Since then, they've been accumulating tech debt because nobody at HQ actually owns IT anymore... they think it's just a service that they pay for. It doesn't appear to be working out for them.

[1] http://www.informationweek.com...?

In fact, to enhance upon my reply from a few minutes ago, it appears that in 2006, Delta outsourced its IT operations to IBM [1]. It was a seven year agreement, so I don't know who does it now. But I doubt it's Delta.

Assuming this is still the situation: I don't know on what continent Delta's IT people are stationed at this point, but that's hardly the issue. The issue is, wherever they are, they aren't competently managing Delta's IT infrastructure. They had a similarly airline-grounding outage in August, about six months ago.

If management were able to recognize the value of investment in IT, they could have taken steps over the years to develop a system that isn't this fragile. Presumably, back in 2006, when they went into bankruptcy, someone convinced them that IT wasn't a "core competency" because it would save the airline a bunch of money to outsource it. Since then, they've been accumulating tech debt because nobody at HQ actually owns IT anymore... they think it's just a service that they pay for. It doesn't appear to be working out for them.

[1] http://www.informationweek.com...?

Waterproofing is for two reasons:
1) Have you not noticed how every phone has a moisture detection strip inside? They're the ones denying warranty claims and getting class action lawsuits settled against them ($53M) for not covering phones that sustained water damage.

2) Have you ever taken electronics outside on a hot humid day when the electronics are cold from air conditioning? That can condense a LOT of water inside some very sensitive areas.

It seems to me that the real problem is the low quality output of the Hollywood studios, combined with their monopoly on the US market.
In Europe you often see films from many different countries/cultures, in the US, its ALL Hollywood monoculture output only.
Everything Hollywood make is totally formulaic and predictable, and the plot has become irrelevant to the eye-candy. Go back to the black and white movies of the 40's/50's. Maltese Falcon, Casablanca, Gone With The Wind etc. Amazing, engaging, intelligent stories.
Now all we get is just endless hybrids of one of 7 or so standard moralized storylines,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
and a bunch of CGI effects. The result is entirely predictable, unimaginative and only truly engaging to people with an IQ of about 80 at most.
Presumably because that's what the studios now believe is the lowest cost/least effort approach needed in order to make something that will probably be profitable, rather than actually good.
Its gotten so bad that a high percentage of American masses seriously think Hollywood Physics is how things actually work in real life.
http://www.informationweek.com...?

Spam Will Be 'Solved' In 2 Years -- Bill Gates, 2004

If only he'd put a number on a maximum number of emails sent per spammer. 640,000 SPAMs should be enough for anyone!

"Two years from now, spam will be solved," -- Bill Gates, 2004 http://www.informationweek.com...?

Why would any company want C leadership these days, when C Programming Language's Tiobe Rating [has] Drop[ped] To Lowest Level in decades? Surely some Python or even a modern Perl leadership would be far superior.

If your business model is such that you can't monitor everything, then YOU NEED TO FIX your business model.

Spoken like someone who truly believes the content industry's demands should dictate everyone's rights, and that Big Brother should see to it that those rights are upheld, and too bad for anyone else. Never mind that this makes things like YouTube, with its sheer mass of footage uploaded every second, virtually unviable. And never mind that things like YouTube might be more valuable, both objectively and subjectively, than the content industry's feelings and profit margins.

I wonder at what point people will say "enough is enough" and stop allowing the content industry to attack virtually everything they deem slightly injurious to their profits, most of which don't even make it to the actual creators anyway. As-is, copyright is already causing more trouble than it's worth - even economically, fair use profits are greater than those brought in by copyright, and that says nothing of the value of freedom of speech, innovation that is hobbled by over-protection, and the cultural aspects by being able to actually use copyrighted material as it was designed in the Constitution, e.g. a time-limited monopoly with "time" being a relatively short period as opposed to this "80+ years after the last author dies" crap. And most certainly not dictated by the lifetime of the author, as copyright was never intended to allow people to begin rent-taking from it. Copyright was intended as a deliberate, temporary lien on the people's rights to encourage works to be developed, not a title to a pile of words, pictures or videos onto the end of time, or at least long after anyone who cares are nothing but a pile of rotten bones.

Piracy is a direct result of this gross overreach. While some complain of content being "stolen," few realize that the content providers are pretty much thieves themselves, both from the creators and the general public. The middle-men - the publishing and distribution companies - will do everything in their power to force their business model down society's throat.

So. Fuck that. You want everything monitored? Go to Russia, they're implementing just that.

All of these packages I've talked about are Windows based, so unless a hospital were to develop their own stuff (using Linux or whatever), their hands are somewhat tied. From what I've told, the cause of the big technology gap is the CDC and AMA approval process; by the time a new piece of software passes through certification, it's already out-dated.

Yes, all the EMR vendors use Windows so we're stuck there, but no, the CDC and the AMA do not approve software. CMS (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Security (???)) gives guidelines about how to go about looking for certified EHRs. A quasi governmental body called CCHIT used to certify EHRs but they've given up on that.

And there is no real 'technology gap' in modern EHRs. They are large, complicated programs so, like other large, complicated programs they tend to be conservative in how they are constructed and they are, of course, a bit of a kludge. But they run on modern hardware, use modern databases and have pretty good performance if they are set up right.

They are giant pains-in-the-ass as far as clinical staff is concerned but that is because the Powers That Be have decided it's OK for highly paid, busy professionals to be secretaries and data entry clerks. Until we get over that paradigm, this won't change much.

(1) Disney didn't actually replace the workers with H1-B workers; they replaced an internal department with an outsourced department consisting onf a third party company, which happens to have a lot of H1-B workers.

If Disney did not have to resort to hiring H1-B works to fill their labor needs, then it begs the question why the third party staffing company needs H1-B visas to fill their staffing needs? The local labor pool obviously has enough qualified candidates for Disney, but the third-party company can't find anyone? Did the third party company try to recruit talent from Disney, since that is an obvious pool of talent to hire from? Please, I'm begging the question here.

(2) In many cases, the labor being replaced is not actually all that skilled. The U.S. education system isn't what it used to be, and the graduates aren't what they used to be, back when they were getting through their degree programs on academic scholarships, rather than student loans. A lot of this has to do with the U.S. workers having experience, but not degrees, since they were in many cases sniped out of degree programs by companies in the .bomb era who needed cubicle warmers to prove to their VCs that they were hitting their hiring targets. Now we have an non-degreed generation, which gets us to the third part.

Um, if the labor isn't "skilled" then there is no need for H1-B visas since any Tom, Dick or Harry should be able to do the job? Oh, but these are "skilled" jobs in that the person between the chair and the keyboard needs to have a brain and has to be able to solve problems, and not just pick pictures on the cash register and make change. Setting your prejudices aside, the Disney jobs required skills, and based on the written accounts, the employees were reasonably good at their jobs. They were not the dregs of the .bomb bubble.

(3) A lot of these people are greying. That's a kind way of saying that they are expensive, compared to new graduates. Usually, that's couched as "culture fit", but what it really means is that CEOs tend to prefer people younger than themselves be working for them, because it's cheaper, and in many cases, you can hire better quality: they may have gone through a crappy degree program, but at least they didn't leave a crappy degree program after two years to become a cubicle warmer for some company that later tanked, going down with all hands.

Again, with the prejudice. The research disagrees with your statement, see Why older employees are more productive than young colleagues. The fact that you mention that "younger" means "cheaper" doesn't take into account that the H1-B visa holders are suppose to be "skilled", and therefor should not be "younger" and "cheaper". And in my experience is that outsourcing companies add more "cubicle warmers" than remove. Often, if the work is not explicitly agreed to then it will not be done. This is in stark contrast to your in-house IT department which often just do the extra work while complaining under their breath.

So in combo, that pretty much covers why they want H1-B's, and why the outsourcing companies are able to do for Disney what Disney wants done, cheaper than an in house IT department would be able to do it.

As for outsourcing your IT work, see Why IT Outsourcing Often Fails. For a company that is 24/7/365 not controlling critical IT infrastructure could be a fatal mistake. All it takes is one major outage to give your company a black-eye that takes years to recover. It is a penny-wise, pound-foolish decision.

Even if, in general, Apple and Google are competitors in many sectors, they certainly aren't here because Apple doesn't have a competing search product. Of course, when you search on the iPhone is has to go somewhere (Bing? Yahoo!) and those queries are worth money, so it's good sense to come to a revenue-sharing arrangement. That's not collusion or conspiracy, it's just a regular business deal for something of value that another party cannot produce on their own.

By comparison, Apple cannot fab their own SOCs so they buy them from Samsung, for billions of dollars yearly. Those two are also competitors (and legal adversaries) in many sectors distinct from chip supply. That's not "collusion" either -- it's the fact that a large business has many interests and generally can keep them separated so each part of the company can function.

I guess you're modded up because you sound interesting, but really? I'm not trying to be insulting but do you know what you are talking about?

This article is a little old but AWS really is that far ahead of everyone else.

Plus, in terms of services and features, AWS is also ahead.

Now where Azure has benefit is if you're an MS shop and you want to just outsource your entire backoffice. But if you're developing....AWS has a lot more features than Azure, if you know what you're doing. No, you can't throw together a .NET wizard-based project, but if you're using an open source stack, or more of a LAMP-like MVC environment (python, rubyonrails, etc) then AWS throws so many tools for you to use (RDS, Dynamo, S3, etc) then its hard to see how you DON'T think AWS is a good environment for developers.

And what do you mean by "Platform Issues"?

And actually, all the enterprise developers I've worked with are looking more at AWS than Azure (not that I'm some sort of worldwide development expert or anything).

I never said that they can only be robbed physically, even though it still is the most popular method.

It is not:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business...
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-serv...
http://www.informationweek.com...? (note that the stats are from 2006)

. Also, you said this:

Yes, real banks get robbed, but that takes some real time and effort and most of the time the robbers get caught. In contrast, the risk-to-reward ratio for virtual currency is so unbalanced that it's a natural target with minimal risks. No bullets flying around, no get-away cars, no bank guards, no logistics about hauling the cash away, no dye-packets to worry about. It's like a crime made in heaven.

Note how you the contrast you present completely focuses on the physical nature. Had you have said that banks have better digital security than some crappy Bitcoin-exchange there would have been no issue. To say that you didn't imply that the 'real time and effort' had to do with 'bullets flying around, get-away cars, bank guards, hauling the cash away, dye-packets' is simply disingenuous.

The difference is that regardless of how the bank is robbed, I'll still get my money back.

This is still irrelevant to this thread, as I pointed out before.

Virtual currencies do have some serious, unavoidable problems inherent

Nobody in this thread has said otherwise (although the 'unavoidable' part of it is debatable). You don't seem to be very good at discussing. You shouldn't just randomly insert new subtopics and pretend they are a reply to what the other party said.

Why did Red Hat adopt SystemD? Red Hat makes money supporting Red Hat Linux. SystemD requires a lot of support. Adopting SystemD causes Red Hat to make more money.

Since Red Hat is the dominant provider of Linux, other distributions were forced to adopt SystemD, also.

There is some conflict of interest. A long time ago, Red Hat gave Linus Torvalds Red Hat stock.

Red Hat's decision gives short-term gain. Over the long term, adopting software that is not finished is destructive toward the entire Linux community, and the entire world.

Microsoft Windows will die. Microsoft Windows has a universal back door through which any change whatsoever can be imposed on the users. Windows is spyware.

The world needs a standard operating system. Maybe ReactOS will be the future?

Only 4 years, not 18+, but still a good story. At University of North Carolina they took an inventory of their servers and realized they couldn't find one. Eventually by following cables they discovered that it had been sealed up behind a new wall, four years previously. The server had been chugging along with no problems during that that whole time.

http://www.informationweek.com/server-54-where-are-you/d/d-id/1010340?

PostgreSQL is impressive, especially now that software companies are becoming more and more abusive.

Adobe software becomes inoperative if you don't let it contact Adobe every time you start a program.

Microsoft's Software is Malware: Microsoft Windows has a universal back door through which any change whatsoever can be imposed on the users.

No, but he and someone else are working to improve it a little, IIRC

OTOH, this guy maintains it

I'm giving up mod points to reply here but the articles linked to above provide no evidence of the claims made by the parent.

CapS said:

As for Google never filing a non-defensive patent lawsuit, that's not true. A quick Duck Duck Go search reveals this:

http://www.informationweek.com...

Did you even bother to look at the article you linked to? It says:

Google, believing that litigation was imminent, responded by asking the court to issue a declaratory judgment that it is not infringing Netlist's patent and that Netlist's patent isn't valid.

That is pretty much the exact opposite of an offensive patent suit.

Then CapS said:

And there are plenty of examples of Google trolling other companies with patents as well:

http://blog.splitwise.com/2013...

In this article Google applied for a patent and then, horrors, asked a company that was in the same field to get on board a patent reform initiative. Applying for patents and advocating for patent reform is not the same thing as being a patent troll. In the patent frenzied world of 2013, Google had to acquire patents to defend themselves. It was part of the cost of doing business in the tech arena. You have provided ZERO evidence that Google has switched gears and started to file offensive patent suits. If there are plenty of examples of Google trolling other companies with patents then please provide a link to at least one such case otherwise you are just full of shenanigans.

As you said, Google didn't have a large patent war chest until recently. This explains why they couldn't go on the offensive: they would have gotten eaten alive.

Now that they've purchased a patent portfolio, they're like every other company: protect your IP at all costs. Google is no different than Apple, Microsoft, or Samsung. In fact they need to protect their IP or risk losing it.

As for Google never filing a non-defensive patent lawsuit, that's not true. A quick Duck Duck Go search reveals this:

http://www.informationweek.com...

And there are plenty of examples of Google trolling other companies with patents as well:

http://blog.splitwise.com/2013...

Google should stay on the list, for sure.

Well, since the FAA has regulated RC aircraft and manned aircraft for years, and now congress wants them to regulate drones, perhaps someone gave a definition for drone.

https://rcflightline.com/drone...
http://www.informationweek.com...
http://boards.straightdope.com...

That last link has a quotation from an actual bill that congress passed
https://www.modelaircraft.org/...

http://www.informationweek.com/it-life/11-programming-languages-that-lost-their-mojo/d/d-id/1321678?f_src=informationweek_informationweek_mostpopular_fornewsletters&_mc=NL_IWK_EDT_IWK_daily_20150822&cid=NL_IWK_EDT_IWK_daily_20150822&elq=70d72d20140f4602a92820472e5c17fa&elqCampaignId=16221&elqaid=62985&elqat=1&elqTrackId=35c8af5f447d4d2a8f19ad601c98a3be/

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!! !

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!! !!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!! !!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!

Check out the new WINDOWS 10!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!!

Its Windows 10!!!!!!!!!!!

It has a shiny new logo!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has 7 facts!!!!!

Its Windows!!!!!!!!

Its free!!!!!!!!

It LAUNCHES TODAY!!!!!!!!!!

OMG, WINDOWS 10!!!!!!