Domain: launchpad.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to launchpad.net.
Comments · 1,183
-
Re:What kind of encryption did the FBI break?
How does that "Rubberhose filesystem" protect you from a rubberhose attack? Once they see the random stuff on your harddisk they may decide to "rubberhose" you till you provide the key.
You want real plausible deniability you do something like this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/148440
Basically once significant numbers of normal people have encrypted partitions or containers on their computers but aren't using them, then only does it become reasonable to say "Huh? What are you talking about?". Otherwise any sign of crypto programs or related stuff means you can get the "rubberhose". -
Re:Oh the horror!
As an aside, I realize you are speaking in general terms, and you may already be aware of this, but one can indeed watch stuff from Netflix on a Linux desktop, at least if it's Ubuntu. See compholio.com and
https://launchpad.net/~ehoover/+archive/compholio/Works fine on my Ubuntu 13.04 64-bit desktop, anyway. Before I had to watch from within an XP VM under VirtualBox, which does work, just with less screen space available, leastways how I set it up. Don't know if it will work on your laptop's distro, tho. I've also used the compholio setup on 12.10 and 12.04.
-
Re:Well I might try Flash free browsing again..
it has been able to play h.264 since firefox 14. just build it with --enable-gstreamer. (this is easy to do if you run gentoo. most major distros have a bug open asking them to enable the gstreamer support. eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843583 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1051559 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682917 )
--
my name is ssam and i have been flash free for 5 months -
Whither ACPI: EC Buffer Is Not Empty?
It'd be nice if they'd build in the patch for bugs like this, which have gone on in multiple distro kernels for years: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/578506?comments=all
-
Re:So when is it finished ?
Software is engineering, so when will they solve the problem ? at what point do they say "finished" ?
It is finished once bug number one has been resolved.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 -
Re:Everything he mentions could happen on Linux
Mkay...just a quick google
Here's a bug from 2008 in which an upgrade toasted some Perl stuff. Oddly enough, it seems to show up in a 2012 post as wellNow then, that said. Yes, maintainers make mistakes just like MegaCorp$. Linux is not infallible. Some distros suck worse at things than others. I'm glad there are many. There is only one Apple OS and only one Windows OS. If either of those suck, you're really out of luck. You cannot "switch" to a different, yet compatible, system. With Linux you can. In the end, I'll take wrestling with busted packages on Linux any day. On other platforms is usually shut-up and reinstall. Thankfully, it's not as common as the rpmhell back in the 90s.
Sad example. A bug with a distribution upgrade 5 years ago is not an "apt-get upgrade" issue. Not to mention the one from 2012 looks more like someone dicking around with the perl libraries and it broke when upgrading their distro.
By all means, keep grasping at straws. Linux does have its issues, the vast majority of which are on the backend and out of sight for users. There is no perfect OS, but to try and compare it to the shitfest that is windows and it's upgrades..... sorry no. You're way off course.
-
Re:Everything he mentions could happen on Linux
Citation needed. I can't remember the last 'apt-get upgrade' that broke something on my system. Not sure it's ever even happened to me.
Mkay...just a quick google
Here's a bug from 2008 in which an upgrade toasted some Perl stuff. Oddly enough, it seems to show up in a 2012 post as wellNow then, that said. Yes, maintainers make mistakes just like MegaCorp$. Linux is not infallible. Some distros suck worse at things than others. I'm glad there are many. There is only one Apple OS and only one Windows OS. If either of those suck, you're really out of luck. You cannot "switch" to a different, yet compatible, system. With Linux you can. In the end, I'll take wrestling with busted packages on Linux any day. On other platforms is usually shut-up and reinstall. Thankfully, it's not as common as the rpmhell back in the 90s.
-
Re:Microsoft removed the biggest anti-Linux argume
I have seen these types of messages on both Fusion (Fedora based), Mint and plain old Ubuntu. All supposedly noob friendly distros
The main issue is when you upgrade to a completely new version (like Ubuntu 10.10 to 12) which rarely works flawlessly.
If you want more factual info just look at bug pages like:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager
And reports like: http://fusionlinux.org/2011/03/17/fusion-linux-update-breakage/
or http://geslinux.blogspot.com/2012/07/fedora-17-gpg-key-retrieval-failed.html -
Re:mixed feelings
The last three points mostly go away if you use Rubber as your front end to LaTeX. They are still there, you just don't see them nearly as much.
-
Re:Disk encryption
The problem is that you're using LVM. ZFS can do this just fine (unless you're using windows).
You didn't say what you're using, but the Ubuntu PPA is here.
Generic source at http://zfsonlinux.org/ -
Re:Fix Akonadi, Nepomuk, etc.
KDE4 is very good on the desktop, solid for me since 4.2, but this bug locks up my netbook so I use XFCE4 on that.
"Philip Mukovac (yofel) wrote on 2012-10-19:
This is the fault of the opendesktop plugin, once you remove it from the config files page one can be opened fine" -
Re:TrueCrypt?
If a popular OS/distro encrypts a container file by default, that interrogation method becomes less effective.
Hence the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/148440
It could be layered - for instance the entire drive can be optionally encrypted. But the container file is always created and encrypted by default (unless you specifically deselect it).
-
Re:Fix Akonadi, Nepomuk, etc.
Never liked Kmail, Thunderbird all the way (Claws was like my fav ever, The Bat!, but lacked the polish). The great thing about Thunderbird is that it works on every OS. KDE4 is very good on the desktop, solid for me since 4.2, but this bug locks up my netbook so I use XFCE4 on that. With the Unity spyware scandal, KDE has never had a better opportunity to win back market share.
Phillip.
-
Re:I hearby volunteer ...
Splendid! Your offer is graciously accepted!
Please download all of these and then... well... I guess... just have them? -
Re:Not entirely the wrong choice though
Wayland actually [i]has[/i] gotten quite far, though. It's still not ready for widespread use, but there is a lot that goes into a display server, and most of that is in Wayland currently. Mir, on the other hand, is nowhere near that. Just look at the to-do list for Mir. Mir doesn't even have basic things like resizing windows or any form of window decorations yet.
-
Re:Terrible news from the Soviets at Canonical
On what basis ? X was originally created by MIT in the early 80's since then there has a been litterally dozens of implementations
,every single Unix shipped it's own (usually proprietary since the MIT license allows proprietary forks) X implementation. Even in the Linux world there are TWO X versions - XFree86 was the one of choice for distro's for a decade and a half, before a fork - x.org largely motivated by a change in the XFree86 license became the new preferred one in around 2005.I'd call no (at least thet I'm aware of) successful competing standards (on the Linux desktop) a monopoly
;) Regardless of the number of successful implementations of that standard!Compete ? Sure, but cooperate is better. Every other "competing" item on your list cooperates with the others, gnome and KDE has agreed on a standard for dozens of things, hence we have dbus, the
.desktop file standard etc. etc. etc. The word that used to be popular to describe how we do things was coopetition - we cooperated AND compete, because we aren't trying to win, we're just trying to inspire each other to do better.Whilst my memory is hazy, the creation of freedesktop.org and LSB was down to lack of cooperation due to competition back in the early days. I might be wrong but I vaguely remember there being issues copy and pasting between KDE and GNOME way back when
.. Mir might go the way of Fresco, bring something new to light or just turn in to another implementation of X, who knows, but they are adding a compatibility layer, they're opening the spec up, it sounds like they're doing everything they can to cooperate but sometimes you need to break compatibility to go forwards.You don't think you should verify something that important before betting on it ? I didn't either - but I'm not going to assume until I know. Canonical has done non-free stuff before after all.
GPL 3, currently
.. but I did make some assumptions :)Fact is - I agree with your basic precept - if Canonical wants to try this, that's their right. I think it's incredibly stupid of them but if I'm proven wrong, that's fine too. However, a valid conclusion does not mean your premisses aren't based on made up and incorrect facts - so now, you know better
:DMaybe
:D -
Re:So now it's...
Licences:
GNU GPL v3, GNU LGPL v3, MIT / X / Expat Licence, Other/Open Source
(Boost Software License - Version 1.0) -
Re:finally, a tablet that will be welcome here
Thankfully the snooping is going to remain optional (although still opt-out rather than opt-in). I've still got it turned off on my desktop, but reading documents like this (specifically the Data and metrics passed to the Smart Scopes service section) are a little reassuring, in that you can see that the developers are thinking about how to take only the data they need and are trying to protect it. I particularly like their (far-off) plans for sending location information: they won't send your exact co-ordinates like Google or Apple does - they'll round them off to maybe a 10km square because that level of location accuracy is probably not needed for the search. There's also a friendlier summary of the spec available.
That said, while this kind of fuck up is still happening, I'm going to keep online search off, despite being tempted by functionality like its iView (Aussie Hulu) support.
I too hope that you don't need an Ubuntu One account to use the tablet...
-
Re:Ubuntu switching to KDE
I bet Ubuntu could recreate their Unity interface in Plasma/Qt easily enough.
They already did (at least the port to Qt part), it was their version of Unity for low-end devices and graphics cards that do not support 3D acceleration on GNU/Linux, and it was called Unity2D.
Unfortunately they ditched it and are going to use LLVMpipe to make the full Unity work with the low-end/non-3D-supporting devices instead. It's easier to support a single codebase, I suppose. However, this does show that you're correct: Unity can (and has) been re-created using Qt.
-
Re:I'd call that "fried"
Apparently, you CAN recover if your device is bricked by this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1040557/comments/23
-
Re:A little bias in the article
Don't worry you can still blame Microsoft like this guy did:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1040557/comments/55 -
Re:hi10p multithreading
or you use the packages from https://launchpad.net/~wsnipex/+archive/xbmc-xvba-frodo (Frodo stable)
or
https://launchpad.net/~wsnipex/+archive/xbmc-xvba (tested Git builds)both do already include the hi10p multithreading patch
-
Re:hi10p multithreading
or you use the packages from https://launchpad.net/~wsnipex/+archive/xbmc-xvba-frodo (Frodo stable)
or
https://launchpad.net/~wsnipex/+archive/xbmc-xvba (tested Git builds)both do already include the hi10p multithreading patch
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Re:Ubuntu LTS
For almost 2 years I'll been volunteering for a branch of Freegeek and in that tyme I've installed Ubuntu 10.04 on hundreds of PCs and most of the installs have been fine. So I don't know where you get LTS hasn't worked out well or that Ubuntu's quality is crap. You may not like the DE, Canonical, or how Ubuntu is run but that's different than saying the distro is crap.
Here's a list of bugs that I've personally experienced starting with jaunty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/369822
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/449783
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/504403
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/504947
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/501692
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/422536
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/561049
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/561040
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/561046
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579300
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdigest-sha1-perl/+bug/993648Here's a list of hardware I own on which sound input worked in older versions of ubuntu, but is broken in oneiric:
HP Compaq DC5800 Microtower Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33GHz 2GB 160GB DVD-Rom
1.7 GHz AMD Sempron, 512 MB ram, 38 GB hdd
HP XW4400 Workstation Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 1.86GHz 250GB 1GB CD-RW/ DVD
HP Compaq D330 uT Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHZ 80GB HDD 1GB DDR Desktop PCI'm glad you're having such good luck with the quality of ubuntu. I'm not.
-
Great
Now broken code will get release much faster!
Tell me, have they ever addressed the LDAP bug that's been sitting in a queue for 2+ years. I mean, it's not like anybody would want to use LDAP or anything...google "gsettings LDAP ubuntu"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/974938
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsettings-desktop-schemas/+bug/873403Last I checked 2 months ago, this same shit happens on a fully up to date 12.04 machine and the first reports were rolling in back in 2011 about this issue.
It's a joke distro.
-
Great
Now broken code will get release much faster!
Tell me, have they ever addressed the LDAP bug that's been sitting in a queue for 2+ years. I mean, it's not like anybody would want to use LDAP or anything...google "gsettings LDAP ubuntu"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/974938
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsettings-desktop-schemas/+bug/873403Last I checked 2 months ago, this same shit happens on a fully up to date 12.04 machine and the first reports were rolling in back in 2011 about this issue.
It's a joke distro.
-
Re:Decade old GNOME bug not fixed
For something that's more completely considered a bug, check the long and sorry history of bug 108951. Only about 6 years old, but one of the more irritating ones. Sad to see such an issue bounced from distro to project to DE and back again, then finally closed because the feature it affects is removed.
-
Re:Decade old GNOME bug not fixed
For something that's more completely considered a bug, check the long and sorry history of bug 108951. Only about 6 years old, but one of the more irritating ones. Sad to see such an issue bounced from distro to project to DE and back again, then finally closed because the feature it affects is removed.
-
Re:5 more years
Since we're complaining about old bugs, I have the stupid udisk floppy bug. I need floppies to transfer stuff to this antique laptop I'm fooling around with, and guess what? Most every linux distro has had this ridiculous bug in udisk for YEARS: Freedesktop entry ; also at Ubuntu's Launchpad
Basically, udisk stupidly force-umounts floppies the instant they're mounted, so you can't "mount
/media/floppy" and use it. Ever. It's fixed in the new codebase, udisk2, but the bug in udisk1 (which many distros, including mine will be using for the near future as udisk2 works in a whole different way) is unfixed. (Apparently it appeared because somebody couldn't figure out how to avoid a delay when booting, as udisk searched for a nonexistant floppy drive on systems without one. So he solved it in a way that BROKE. ALL. FLOPPY. DISKS.)Not only that, but one developer actually acknowledged that it's broken, then told people affected by the bug that "floppies are rare, so I don't care," and marked the fucking bug as "WORKSFORME" (!!) because it doesn't affect the entirely seperate udisk2 codebase.
Which is some of the stupidest shit I've ever seen. WONTFIX, while it is the douchiest tag, would be more appropriate since he flat-out admits it doesn't work. I think the udisk devs are hoping to beat ffmpeg out for "biggest dickhead developers." (They have a lot of ground to make up, though. Heh.)
Fortunately, I use the command line and can issue a "udisk --mount /dev/fd0" instead as a workaround, but all integrated desktop floppy handling is borked for the time being by a years-old bug. I love linux, and this kind of shit really holds it back, IMO. -
Re:Time to ask some hard questions
How can I now trust symantic to find a zero day and protect my systems when they have been unable to find things like red october and flame for years
You can't. The "Detect Malware Problem" is harder than the Halting Problem (which is unsolvable in the general case). You can use heuristics for specific cases and typical cases but you are not going to defeat a competent determined attacker.
I don't bother running AV on my machine because the AV makers are more likely to screw up my machine than a virus is (they seem to screw up every 2 years or so). Slashdotters have flamed me and accused me of being stupid, but it works for me. I configure my browsers (and other network apps) to run different user accounts, so if my Slashdot browser gets pwned the malware still needs a privilege escalation exploit to affect my banking browsers and other stuff. And I never log in using the user accounts that my browsers run as (they are like the "nobody" account in unix- you can hide accounts in windows so they don't show up on the login screen). I can upload stuff to VirusTotal if I'm suspicious of it. I don't download and install stuff very often, so why pay the AV resource cost every day, and also risk the AV screwing up your machine? The stuff that's not found by VirusTotal is still not going to be found if I installed AV on my machine with all the costs and risks.
This approach is not suitable for normal users of course, there are many inconveniences for example the browser can't update itself automatically - doesn't have the permissions.
We're still in the dark ages of security. Lots of people here think too highly of Unix/Linux. The standard Unix security model isn't that great. With what we know in modern times, OS and application sandboxing could be a lot better. In some ways the mobile OSes are ahead of the Desktop ones in this area.
Even getting the application to _propose_ its desired sandbox upfront is better than the AV approach ( as I've proposed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/156693 ). A sandbox is like "solving" the halting problem by forcing the program to halt after a time limit. Basically you can easily solve the halting problem if the operating system forces the program to declare upfront how much time it wants! An application that asks for too much becomes suspicious. You can have 3rd parties audit the sandbox request and approve+sign it.
If I were a malware author I think that sort of thing would make my life more difficult than the current AV concept. Of course if I were a malware author I might write my malware in stuff like perl, ruby and python - just to see how the AV makers cope with TIMTOWTDI taken to the extreme
:). -
Re:what?
I'm in Beersheba, Israel. We're in the Middle East, but we are a technology center. In the two national computer chains, all the affordable motherboards use a LAN which is not supported in any contemporary Linux distro:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/927782This is representative of the market in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. I don't know about South and Central America. I understand from the replies here that North America currently has budget motherboards using supported NICs, or at least did when most people posting here last built a system. Note that these boards started becoming ubiquitous here at about summertime, and they now saturate the market.
-
Re:What?
It looks like the bug has already been filed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/927782 -
Re:Next up, grep and find
Can't wait until Ubuntu starts altering grep and find to start using libcurl to report search terms to amazon. Maybe even return ads to a new IO stream: stdadvert.
Then keep your eye on Bug #1055766
-
Re:It's a very sad thing to admit, but
I think the Pocl project disagrees with you on "won't be seeing any open source OpenCL". GPU-accelerated OpenCL is a sadder story. Also, the Parallella computer with its Epiphany coprocessors should have open source OpenCL acceleration, but will take a while longer for public availability. Of course, both of these are off topic for the original question of supported GPUs in current laptops.
-
Re:It's a very sad thing to admit, but
I honestly have to agree with the ease of setting up Bumblebee. When I bought my current laptop online, it was advertised as nVidia graphics, and nowhere did it mention intel... so I was disappointed (and quite confused) to find X using the intel driver. I had never heard of this Optimus thing, and 5 minutes later, I had bumblebee installed, and running.
-
Re:Multiple Profiles are More Functional
The -a option right now is:
-a or --debugger-args Specify arguments for debugger
And doesn't seem to have any effect for me. If I remember correctly, -a used to be to select the running process instance in the past, but even back then it never worked for me either. The relevant bug report from 2006 about the profile mess.
-
Why should I trust you?
It seems you have a habit to make underlying security changes to apt-key net-update that make it easy for adversaries to own Ubuntu machines through redirection attacks and forged keys:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1013681
This talk goes back to last year.
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Sep/221
I cannot remember the corresponding bug report, but it disappeared (as well as an article on Slashdot last year about it, if anyone remembers).Yet, when Microsoft has forged certificates or gaping holes, it's a huge deal. I got out of Ubuntu on my systems and servers after this stuff started appearing, and apparently, the core security of Ubuntu is flawed.
Why should I trust your distro my systems when Debian doesn't suffer from these vulnerabilities, from which Ubuntu is based?
-
What is Linux Mint?
Linux Mint is a distribution of Linux that is based off of Ubuntu. Like Ubuntu, it uses Debian packages.
When Ubuntu made the decision to make a new desktop environment ("Unity") and the GNOME project made the decision to make a new desktop environment ("GNOME Shell"), Linux Mint in turn made the decision to support those of us who loved GNOME 2. We have two options: MATE and Cinnamon. Both are well-supported by Linux Mint (and in fact primary development on both is by Linux Mint guys).
MATE is simply a fork of GNOME 2. For reasons that are not clear to me, GNOME 2 and GNOME 3 cannot co-exist on the same system... something about library conflicts. (Doesn't Linux have library versioning that should make it possible to avoid these conflicts? Eh, moving on.) The MATE project did a mass rename on everything in GNOME ("libgnome" -> "libmate", etc.) so MATE can co-exist on the same system with GNOME 3. So, those of us who loved the smooth polish that came from man-decades of development in GNOME can still use it.
But MATE isn't the future. From what I have heard, the library underpinnings of GNOME 3 really have improved over GNOME 2, and the new technology is a step up. Who wants to be locked into a frozen clone of GNOME 2 forever? Thus, Cinnamon. Cinnamon is a project to build on top of GNOME 3 and provide a user experience similar to GNOME 2. New plugins, new themes, etc. all go together to make a very usable desktop; but GNOME 3 apps will work seamlessly with it.
Many disgruntled Ubuntu users have abandoned Ubuntu for Linux Mint. Mint is now the top Linux distribution on distrowatch.com; I'm not sure it was even in the top ten before the whole Unity/GNOME Shell fiasco, but now it's number one.
A comment I have seen multiple times on Slashdot from different people: the Linux Mint guys are focused on making their users happy, rather than making something new. Where the GNOME Shell guys promise a "consistent and recognisable visual identity", and Mark Shuttleworth (the head Ubuntu guy) said "This is not a democracy. [...] we are not voting on design decisions.", the Linux Mint guys promise that you will "Love your Linux, Feel at Home, Get things Done!"
Linux Mint has always focused on making a beautiful system that is out-of-the-box usable. Now they are one of the top choices for people who have rejected Unity and GNOME Shell.
For me, the most important part of the announcement is that they have the password keeper working right now. I'm using Linux Mint on a laptop at work, and I can't connect to Windows shares; I'm hoping the new updates will sort that out for me.
Since this is based on Debian packages, I can probably just update in place without needing to do a full re-install.
P.S. One of my biggest complaints about GNOME 3 is that I can no longer take sit a Windows user down and just say "it works pretty much like what you are used to". You may like GNOME Shell and you may think it is better, but you cannot argue that it is very different, and it would take a bit of training before a guest could use it. Linux Mint, on the other hand, works a lot like pre-Windows 8 versions of Windows; with a little customization and theming I'll bet you could fool people into thinking it was actually Windows XP.
Likewise with Unity, it is pretty different from Windows. But it's very similar to the Mac, so maybe users familiar with the Mac can use it?
-
Re:Can someone explain
As I mentioned, if you run the browser as a different (even more restricted) user, the damage is usually limited, unless the malware uses a privilege escalation exploit. So even if you have javascript enabled, you could still be OK.
From a Computer Science perspective the AV vendors are attempting something "harder" than solving the Halting Problem. They are not always able to have the full inputs or the full description of the program, and "harm"/"evilness" sometimes is harder to define.
Halting Problem: given a program and its inputs figure out whether it will halt or run forever.
Malware detection problem: given part of a program, and part of the inputs figure out whether it will cause significant harm.Hence I prefer sandboxing, or running stuff with more limited privileges. Which is a bit like solving the Halting Problem by setting a limit on how long the program can run, no matter what it tries to do.
Of course in the real world, heuristics are sometimes good enough. But when the malware authors also have access to VirusTotal and AV software in general, they can ensure that their stuff passes all the tests.
I believe Android and other systems require the program to specify up front what privileges they want (and presumably then enforce it with sandboxing). I've proposed something similar before to Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/156693
Requiring new programs to state what privileges they need (before deciding whether to run them or not) would be way better than the AV approach. Makes it easier to judge whether they will do something fishy or not - a screensaver is normally not likely to need network access.
-
Re:No
Looks like you may need newer versions of the "samba4" and "samba4-clients" packages?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/887537