Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Linux-Friendly Motherboard Manufacturers?

dotancohen writes "I am tasked with building a few Linux machines for a small office. However, many the currently available motherboards seem to be Linux-hostile. For instance, in addition to the whole UEFI issue, my last install was a three-day affair due to the motherboard reporting a Linux-supported ethernet device (the common RTL8168) while it was actually using a GbE Ethernet device that does not work with the legacy drivers and didn't even work with a test Windows 7 install until the driver disk was installed. There are no current hardware compatibility lists for Debian or Ubuntu and I've received from Asus and Gigabyte the expected reply: No official Linux support, install Windows for best experience. I even turned to the two large local computer vendors, asking if they could provide Linux-compatible machines ready to go, but neither of them would be of any help. What globally-available motherboards or motherboard manufacturers can you recommend today?"

352 comments

  1. Raspberry Pi by recoiledsnake · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard the Raspberry Pi is very Linux compatible, in fact it doesn't even run Windows.

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Raspberry Pi by tonywestonuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Commenting to remove crap moderation! Pfff....Slashdot, why cant I change my mind!

    2. Re:Raspberry Pi by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Informative

      "I am tasked with building a few Linux machines for a small office." I'm not sure how much your labor is worth but you can buy a built server on the cheap ($599).

      http://www.dell.com/ca/business/p/poweredge-t110-2/pd

      Operating System

              Microsoft® Windows® Small Business Server 2011
              Microsoft® Windows Server® 2008 Foundation R2 SP1
              Microsoft® Windows Server® 2008 SP2, x86/x64 (x64 includes Hyper-V)
              Microsoft® Windows Server® 2008 R2 SP1, x64 (includes Hyper-V v2)
              Novell® SUSE® Linux® Enterprise Server
              Red Hat® Enterprise Linux®

    3. Re:Raspberry Pi by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "...my last install was a three-day affair due to the motherboard reporting a Linux-supported ethernet device (the common RTL8168) while it was actually using a GbE Ethernet device that does not work with the legacy drivers"

      So how much money did this journey save the company? Just slap in an intel card and be done with it for f's sake! Then it will support proper VLANs, jumbo frames and probably just work smoother than some cheap onboard NIC anyways.

    4. Re:Raspberry Pi by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...or just buy from a Linux vendor.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Raspberry Pi by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Theyre also several times their component cost, and horribly cost-ineffective if you are throwing OSX out the window.

      Intel chipsets tend to be supported very well. Generally if you want to know compatibility, dont look @ "is this motherboard supported", just look at whether:
        * The northbridge is supported
        * The southbridge is supported
        * The NICs are supported

      Generally Intel stuff is VERY well supported, and GENERALLY year-old chips are supported fairly well. Try to stay away from brand new stuff unless youve done the research to make sure the kernel supports it. Googling something like "Linux support RTL8187" or "linux support P77" should give you some ideas. I wouldnt sweat it too much tho, just pilot one machine and if it goes well roll the config out.

      Im not super clear on why UEFI would cause a big issue for a Linux install, but I also havent paid that much attention to it. I have an ASUS UEFI mobo, and I believe it had an option to pretend to be a normal BIOS or something, though Im using Win8 and havent really messed with it.

    6. Re:Raspberry Pi by mspohr · · Score: 0

      Except Macs have odd keyboards that are missing keys such as PgUp, PgDn, Home, End, Del/Backspace and have a special "flower power" key which does nothing on Linux.
      Note: I know that you can remap the keyboard and use special keyboard key combinations for these missing keys but this does not substitute for having an actual key.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re:Raspberry Pi by ls671 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because it is a well known fact that forces recrut on /. to pilot drone. You can't change your mind after firing at something. Hence, it is part of the training.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    8. Re:Raspberry Pi by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depends weather or not the keyboard has a numeric pad.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Raspberry Pi by mspohr · · Score: 3, Funny

      On rainy days, they don't work well.
      In the sun, much better.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    10. Re:Raspberry Pi by gradinaruvasile · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also, look out for the audio codecs. Some dont work well with older kernels and ALSA. I have a Gigabyte F2A85X-D3H mobo with A8-5500 APU and i run Debian Testing on it. The stock 3.2 kernel gives an oops at startup and i have no sound. The 3.6 kernel however works just fine. And check the video drivers availability and stability if the board/CPU/APU has built in graphics. For example. Intel has the "best" open source driver support in theory. In practice, for the moment the latest Intel video card drivers are not good (the good stuff is in the latest dev versions and takes quite a bit of time until they trickle down in the stable kernels used by distributions).

    11. Re:Raspberry Pi by RenHoek · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought it was because we Slashdotters are known to never make mistaks.

    12. Re:Raspberry Pi by tobiasly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure how much your labor is worth but you can buy a built server on the cheap ($599).

      Plus you'll be supporting a vendor who "officially" supports Linux. It looks like Dell has their motherboards custom-made by Intel, which is another open-source-friendly company.

      If Asus and Gigabyte don't want your money, then don't give it to them.

    13. Re:Raspberry Pi by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Awww, cutest spelling error observation ever.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    14. Re:Raspberry Pi by aergern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop being a troll. You know full and well that Linux is the server of choice for most large sites. Moron.

      --
      Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    15. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're already talking about Linux you chucklefuck.

    16. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      So how much money did this journey save the company?

      Submitter here. The three-day affair was my mother-in-law's machine, not a work machine. I agree that just throwing the motherboard in the trash and starting over with a known-good board would have been better, but the fact remains that there are no known-good boards anymore. Hence, this Ask Slashdot question.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    17. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      ...or just install a real OS.

      I know that you're trolling, but there is definitely a push to just 'install Windows' due to the lack of a viable motherboard. If I were a weaker man, and there are plenty of weaker men, installing Windows would be the 'solution'.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    18. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stop being a troll. You know full and well that Linux is the server of choice for most large sites. Moron.

      Actually, these are desktop machines for a small office. Windows is a viable choice, if one can consider the Windows ecosystem viable. At least all the software that we will be using is in fact available for Windows.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    19. Re:Raspberry Pi by JustOK · · Score: 2

      I'd hate to rain on your parade and steal your thunder, but if you search the cloud, many more will will spring up.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    20. Re:Raspberry Pi by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Only if you use one of those ridiculous "condensed" keyboards. The only issue I've ever had is when actually using OS X where the modifier keys for some common actions are inconsistent with other OSes so that it's not possible to get a perfect remapping of common keystrokes.

      Moreover, one of the nice things about desktop computers (clearly the context being discussed) is that it's *really* easy to replace the keyboard, in fact considering the crappy $5 versions that ship with pretty much every computer on the planet that should be one of the very first things done by anyone who spends more than a few minutes a day typing.

      Note that I'm not actually advocating getting a Mac desktop unless you actually want OS X, just saying your argument against them is spurious. Laptops on the other hand - well Apple does make some fine hardware, if you don't mind the wonky condensed keyboard.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    21. Re:Raspberry Pi by tlambert · · Score: 0

      It's only on 64 bit installs, and only because Linux use UEFI differently than all other operating systems.

      The UEFI problems are well known to be a problem in the reference UEFI implementation not mapping a region of a statically linked library used in the UEFI implementation as being part of runtime services rather than boot services.

      When 64 bit Linux *stupidly* shuts down the boot services, it unloads a number of pages of memory that would be used by runtime services. Then it calls into the runtime services to remap the memory map so that the Linux reorganization of RAM is known to the runtime services, and the machine crashes. Anyone with a JTAG who tried to track the problem down would have seen this.

      I said "stupidly" because it's a few pages of memory they get by shutting down the runtime services, and it's only done in 64 bit mode, which means instead of gigs of RAM minus a few pages, you get a crash. The pages don't matter in the larger scheme of things.

      This is also only a problem if you insist on using 64 bit Linux, which means you can't use Flash, Skype, or anything else that's 32 bit only, and your Linux ends up less compatible with all the content on the Internet than it usually is.

      The fix is a couple line patch to disable turning off the boot services. And then to stop bitching that everyone copied the bug in the initial reference implementation, and refuses to patch their UEFI implementation to update it because of the cost and security issues that would raise.

    22. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      "I am tasked with building a few Linux machines for a small office." I'm not sure how much your labor is worth but you can buy a built server on the cheap ($599).

      http://www.dell.com/ca/business/p/poweredge-t110-2/pd

      Thanks. I should have mentioned that these will be desktop workstations, not servers. The company servers are actually on Amazon Web Services (EC2) and let me take this opportunity to say how happy I am with that decision!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    23. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 2

      ...or just buy from a Linux vendor.

      ...which don't seem to exist locally. The national LUG couldn't even suggest a local vendor from which to buy Linux-friendly parts.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    24. Re:Raspberry Pi by ezakimak · · Score: 2

      This is also only a problem if you insist on using 64 bit Linux, which means you can't use Flash, Skype, or anything else that's 32 bit only, and your Linux ends up less compatible with all the content on the Internet than it usually is.

      I dunno what distros have this limitation. At least gentoo installs as multilib by default allowing 32bit apps to run just fine. There are also 32bit library wrappers allowing 64bit browsers to use 32bit plugins. This has been true for years.

    25. Re:Raspberry Pi by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Strange, I use 64 bit Linux pretty much exclusively and use quite a lot of 32 bit software, including Flash.

    26. Re:Raspberry Pi by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Considering that this is a nerd site, calling someone out for illiteracy (or at least, aliteracy) is warranted, especially if done humorously. Educated people don't have trouble with homophones. If you don't know the difference between weather and whether you're probably a high school dropout, how much credence can you give to the ignorant in a forum such as this?

    27. Re:Raspberry Pi by webmistressrachel · · Score: 2

      I'm glad this is the case. However, I must admit that I'm not immune to pressing the keys too lightly and not checking - that's forgivable (but embarrassing), I think... but homophones are so easy, I completely agree their.... (sic)...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    28. Re:Raspberry Pi by Draknor · · Score: 1, Redundant

      If I were a weaker man, and there are plenty of weaker men, installing Windows would be the 'solution'.

      So just to clarify, you are not a "weaker man" because you are choosing a tool that is more difficult to acquire & has no official support... for what purpose again?

      Without knowing more about what the ultimate goal is, it seems like you are just being pig-headed & stubborn, pushing your own personal agenda / Windows vendetta over the priorities of The Company.

      Is the goal of The Company to be a linux shop?
      Or is it merely to have a working desktop environment to do their traditional office tasks (email, calendar, word processing, spreadsheets, and presentations)? If the latter, and you are advocating for linux workstations -- what's your justification? Lower cost of acquisition or lower total-cost-of-ownership (TCO)?
      If you have calculated a lower TCO, are you including a fair & reasonable support cost for each option (esp if these are not tech-savvy office people)? If you are just doing this as a favor -- what happens to that TCO if you get hit by a bus and they have to hire/contract a 3rd party linux admin?

      Not trying to say going linux on the desktop is wrong, by any stretch -- just that you should clarify the ultimate goals & priorities, and pick the right tool based on that. I would posit THAT is the sign of a stronger man - the right tool for the job.

    29. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think GP just has lots of trouble installing the ia32 libs that are available in lots of common Linux distros.

    30. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    31. Re:Raspberry Pi by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      So? It's not the 1860's.

      You simply don't need to be held hostage by an antebellum mentality here in the 21st century.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    32. Re:Raspberry Pi by Depili · · Score: 2

      Best to just get the motherboard straight from intel, comes with NICs with great support, chipsets with great support, supported integrated graphics etc :)

    33. Re:Raspberry Pi by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They will provide warranty support for hardware issues.

      Been there. Done that.

      They were not in the least bit phased by the fact that my machine was running Linux.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    34. Re:Raspberry Pi by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      You joke but unless he buys a prebuilt from someone like System76 that is pretty much it, by the time anything makes it to the compatible hardware list its not being sold in retail any longer. I'd tell him to buy Intel but hell not even that is a safe bet anymore as Intel has put out a few based on PowerVR that aren't compatible.

      So the only real choice is to buy prebuilt or just roll the dice, nothing else you can do really. if it were me given this task i would probably be looking at some socket AM3 boards, they can be found pretty cheap and last I checked the FOSS drivers supported the 7xx chipsets that most of the AM3 boards use. Also you can get really nice AMD quads dirt cheap right now so it would also cut down on the cost of the final build while still giving them plenty of power.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    35. Re:Raspberry Pi by Smallpond · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Intel has stopped giving out information on memory management configuration like EDAC, and is pushing EFI BIOS control. If you want to own your PC instead of licensing it from Intel it's better to use an AMD processor. Intel NICs are still good though.

    36. Re:Raspberry Pi by styrotech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's an odd post. You seem to have all kinds of in depth knowledge about UEFI boot processes, how Linux screws it up, and how to patch it etc.

      But then you don't seem to know some really mundane easy stuff like: Flash actually works just fine* on a 64bit Linux system.

      * By that I mean as well as it does on a 32bit Linux system at least.

    37. Re:Raspberry Pi by kthreadd · · Score: 1
    38. Re:Raspberry Pi by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      and how much support do you think apple will provide to set up and run a non macOS operating system (i.e. linux)? hmmm??? zilch. zero. nada.

      True. But it's also true that they don't actively hinder such things either, and how well Linux works on any given Mac depends entirely on how well Linux supports the chipsets its hardware happens to use. As it happens, I am running Linux on a MacBook, and it's working just fine.

      And really, it's no less Linux support than you get from most computer manufacturers.

    39. Re:Raspberry Pi by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just the old tradition of Microsoft being the evil behemoth and open source being the tool of little man to fight the giants, thus seen as a holy thing.

    40. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? I don't use Macs but I've heard Apple uses UEFI to block other operating systems on their devices.

    41. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So just to clarify, you are not a "weaker man" because you are choosing a tool that is more difficult to acquire & has no official support... for what purpose again?

      Pretty much for KDE and X mouse pasting. There are some mouse pasting solutions for Windows, but none are as good as X. Furthermore, I rely very heavily on many of KDE's small but useful features, such as Keep on Top functionality, the wonderful panel configuration, and some other small features. They add up.

      Without knowing more about what the ultimate goal is, it seems like you are just being pig-headed & stubborn, pushing your own personal agenda / Windows vendetta over the priorities of The Company.

      Not at all. Everyone already has a Windows computer and now that a new office is opening some people want to use the features that they see me using. This is a case of people wanting to use specific features that they cannot get on Windows, not of some fosstard pushing his ideology on others. Its not even about the cost or security of Windows.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    42. Re:Raspberry Pi by kesuki · · Score: 1

      linux is quite prevalent on smartphones. the difference, is that phone vendors make money selling android and everything 'just works' except for malware using fake icons to pretend to be popular software from google. and while the contract says they don't provide av software as part of your using a smartphone, if you don't give root there is very few apps that can do more than be a nusiance.

    43. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, rihgt.

    44. Re:Raspberry Pi by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      But don't SUSE and RHEL require sever contracts to get updates? that would probably make going the server route not a good deal.

      I still think the best bet would be to go AMD AM3, you can get a complete 6 core kit for $260 after MIR and if you can get by with a dual or quad you can shave another $70 or so off that. The board is using the 760 chipset, that is a Radeon 3000 which I'm pretty sure is well supported under the FOSS drivers and I've used these board before and it uses a combo of EFI and BIOS so you don't have to worry about a locked UEFI.

      I tried looking for 760 drivers specifically but it looks like its baked in to Ubuntu and most of the popular distros and since the chipset is 4 years old it should be well supported. I'd say its the best bet, supports plenty of RAM, plenty of SATA drives, and it'll run anything from a dual to an octocore so there is plenty of upgrade potential here but with the X6 chips so cheap I'd probably go with the X6, after all when not in use it'll drop the power and speed of half the cores so its like having a fast triple core and when they do need the extra cycles you'll have 6 cores to call on.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    45. Re:Raspberry Pi by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If that is the case I would go with Win 7 Pro, its easy to lock down with GPOs, has XP Mode for any legacy software, and is supported until Apr 2020 so by the time it goes out of support the system will be ready for retirement as well.

      I don't know how things are where you are but here with my SMBs I tend to plan the systems for about 7 years of use, ever since Intel and AMD went multicore you really don't need to turn over systems that often. Heck I have plenty of SMB customers on first gen Phenom X3s and X4s and they are quite happy with the performance, the only thing I had to do was move them to Win 7 from XP and they are happy as clams.

      That said if the customer insisted on Linux? I'd probably go with a prebuilt from System76, its the path with the least margin for errors. it'll already be installed, already be set up, just put in whatever software they need that doesn't come with a default install and bob's your uncle.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    46. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      8168 is a GbE chip.

      *8139* is the legacy, shitty 100baseT.

      OP is not qualified.

    47. Re:Raspberry Pi by davydagger · · Score: 1

      If it runs on red hat and suse, it will run on other distros

      most drivers are baked into the kernel.

      despite the FUD, most drivers get passed around the mainstream distro world quick.,

      wait despite the FUD, its you again, go figure.

      Slow day at work Mr Ballmer?

    48. Re:Raspberry Pi by davydagger · · Score: 1

      not only is it supported, intel releases factory FOSS drivers, for everything, including their graphics chips.

    49. Re:Raspberry Pi by davydagger · · Score: 1

      "This is also only a problem if you insist on using 64 bit Linux, which means you can't use Flash, Skype, or anything else that's 32 bit only, and your Linux ends up less compatible with all the content on the Internet than it usually is."

      Sweet lord.

      1. flash is NOT 32 bit only. there is a pretty official 64 bit build.
      http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Internet/HTTP-WWW-/Adobe-Flash-Player-for-64-bit-Linux-42958.shtml

      2. As far as skype and other 32 bit binary only applications, they run pretty fine with multilib. Even microsoft 32bit windows apps work pretty good with wine in 64 bit.

      All distros you would have heard about have multilib packages for x86 that will automaticly pull 32 bit dependencies for 32 bit binaries.

    50. Re:Raspberry Pi by anaanma · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, diving down into the dell options shows only 'no operating system' from the lower starting pont and clicking on RHEL shows an OS matrix that doesn't include linux.

      Has anyone purchased one of these and setup linux? What was the configuration?

    51. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think mcgrew is homophobic.

    52. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, dude, Linux tries to shut down UEFI Boot Services because:
      a) The spec says that Boot Services MUST NOT be required after control is handed to the operating system.
      b) The reference UEFI implementation is (for some reason) really, really, complicated. Boot Services are the *largest* part of that code. Shutting down Boot Services *significantly* reduces the attack surface presented by UEFI code.

      See this talk for a bit of a primer on UEFI and its terribleness:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2aq5M3Q76U

      For reference, the guy giving the talk is the fellow who worked to get Linux working correctly with UEFI (this includes Secure Boot support.). His blog is here: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/

    53. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux on many workplaces(specifically ones software developers) can save you and lots of time and money with enhanced productivity thanks to the superior UNIX IDE.

      Many of my go-to tools are available on windows, true, only quite worse integrated. I introduced vim+cscope and git to our company and everyone loves me now. We were paying real money for substandard pro tools. Some still have problems editing on vim, but what's cool is that one doesn't actually need to. After seeing that moving to Linux, which is a growing platform in our field is starting to look more and more appealing.

      If your computers have enough power I'd recommend using it on a Windows VM, though. Hardware support on Linux is lousy. And it is not all the fault of the hardware vendors

      I use OpenBSD at home but I have a Linux dual boot for my hobby Android development every distro I have tried has problems with misconfigured pulseaudio, non-working wireless, undetected proprietary drivers(not that I wouldn't disable them on a computer I own), and lately-less-but-still-some repository meltdowns -- often different issues for each distro.

      If I install easy-peasy Linux Mint 12 I expect that Mint 14 will be better than the previous version, not worse and have me setting up and recompiling drivers from some seedy Taiwan vendor's sources. After many bad experiences I can understand some people's animosity towards Linux but the benefits outweigh the shortcomings most of the time as long as you are paid to solve them.

      I do believe OpenBSD is readier for my desktop, though. OpenBSD is slower and lacks many advanced features but I've never experienced continuous driver and hardware daemon configuration regressions like in Linux. In a fresh OpenBSD install I can install xombrero, type in youtube and I can trust something will come out from the speakers.

    54. Re:Raspberry Pi by Pav · · Score: 1

      You're sidestepping the actual issue with your "right tool for the right job" argument, but I'd argue that it's his decision as the companies representative (for better or worse), and I can easily think of scenarios where it would be the right tool (eg. jobs involving lots of cut/pasting... mouse pasting is just better, writing documents with a longer lifetime - MS Office is famously terrible at opening old documents). If he wants to install Linux/*BSD/ReactOS/Android then anything that gets in his way is anticompetative and by definition immoral and worthy of some kind of fight... which is the whole reason for this thread.

    55. Re:Raspberry Pi by rklrkl · · Score: 2

      We use beefier PowerEdges at work and one major thing I like about them is that - like the t110-2 you linked to - you can order them with no OS! If you're intending to run Linux and don't need hand-holding, installing the OS yourself is a good idea. The only thing to be wary about PowerEdges is that I've never known any of them to be silent.

      Now you might get lucky and the t110-2 is quiet or silent, but whenever I see "server" and "Dell" together, it's an excuse to have the noisiest system fans in the universe, since they're expecting you to put them in a server room and not in an office (open plan or otherwise).

    56. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC so I don't lose my mod points.

      Folks, all you gotta do is order the Dell with NO operating system, then install whatever you want.

      1. Go to the Dell Website and start the usual "build my machine" process.

      2. Select RHEL. Their Website will automatically warn you if any hardware isn't guaranteed for use with your choice of OS (Linux, in this case).

      3. Once you have everything tweaked and happy, as the final step, delete the RHEL and select "No Operating System."

    57. Re:Raspberry Pi by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      open source being the tool of little man to fight the giants, thus seen as a holy thing.

      If it's a holy thing, shouldn't painful martyrdom encourage it? That's what the Romans found happened with the early Christians.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    58. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you don't know the difference between weather and whether you're probably a high school dropout, how much credence can you give to the ignorant in a forum such as this?"

      The above should be two sentences. "If you don't know the difference between weather and whether you're probably a high school dropout. How much credence can you give to the ignorant in a forum such as this?"

      My dad taught English :P

    59. Re:Raspberry Pi by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      Its funny you mention this because I remember a fork of open PowerVR drives and playing quake3 under linux many many moons ago. Though they could be buggy sometimes.

      I loved my Kyro video card ;p

    60. Re:Raspberry Pi by falconwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except Macs have odd keyboards that are missing keys such as PgUp, PgDn, Home, End, Del/Backspace and have a special "flower power" key which does nothing on Linux.

      Reading this I glanced down at my keyboard, I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro, and what do I see? I see Page Up, Page Down, Home, End, and Delete, which is Backspace on Linux and Windows PCs, keys. Now if I hold "fn" while pressing Delete I get the normal Delete. I dual-boot my MacBook, Snow Leopard and Ubuntu 12.04 and I've used the "flower power" when booted into Ubuntu. Without remapping the keyboard. I have not had a problem doing in Ubuntu what I do in Snow Leopard.

      Falcon

    61. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard you are a fucking dumbass.

    62. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of Windows 8, Windows is no longer a viable choice. We will continue to use Windows 7 for a while, but we are actively evaluating our choices with Linux. It is quite evident that even Windows 9 will be quite broken due to Microsoft following the Apple model.

    63. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you use the word "local", you should mention that you're in Israel. With Slashdot based in the US, most readers will probably assume that you are also in the US.

      dom

    64. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice that you want a local supplier, but have carefully arranged to not specify your locale (in the several posts you've made mentioning locality or on your Slashdot profile, which made it easy to see whether you'd mentioned a locality at any point). Given this, I assume you are in Antarctica. Asking Google for help ("linux desktop computer vendor") my first two hits are:
      * http://linuxpreloaded.com/
      * http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/the-top-five-linux-desktop-vendors/9313

      I didn't scroll down far enough on Linux Preloaded to see if there was an Antarctican flag on one of the entries, but maybe there is. Also, SJVN's article is a little dated, bu the overlap with the first few vendors at Linux Preloaded bodes well...

    65. Re:Raspberry Pi by guises · · Score: 1

      If you want a real answer: it's because the ability to use and then recycle mod points is tantamount to allowing mods to limitlessly influence a discussion.

    66. Re:Raspberry Pi by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Why, are the British making them now?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    67. Re:Raspberry Pi by Lennie · · Score: 1

      It isn't stupid, it is just buggy firmware. That's what is stupid.

      Anyway... I use 64-bit Flash on Linux.

      Actually, I don't think I have any 32-bit software installed on this 64-bit Linux machine.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    68. Re:Raspberry Pi by Lennie · · Score: 1

      I would also recommend this more up to date talk embedded in this podcast which talks about how the use of GRUB2/GPLv3 is OK now and how different Linux distributions plan to handle secure boot (you should also download the slides):

      http://faif.us/cast/2012/sep/27/0x32/

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    69. Re:Raspberry Pi by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "Pretty much for KDE and X mouse pasting. There are some mouse pasting solutions for Windows, but none are as good as X. Furthermore, I rely very heavily on many of KDE's small but useful features, such as Keep on Top functionality, the wonderful panel configuration, and some other small features. They add up."

      i love the non-focus stealing and to have more than one app on the screen and being able to scroll each one by mousing over it and not having to click on it to make it the active app.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    70. Re:Raspberry Pi by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "Amazon Web Services (EC2) "

      whaaat?? those tax avoiders???

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    71. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HD3000 is broke now. Ubuntu revved the xorg from 1.2 to 1.3 and busted the drivers. AMD claims they will not make any further updates. It's Ubuntu 12.4 or broken DRI.

    72. Re:Raspberry Pi by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      You heard wrong.

      Triple-booting OS X, Ubuntu and Windows 7 on a Mac Mini here. There's no secret Evil Apple chip in their machines. I'm not drinking any kool-aid, but at the same time, don't drink the stink-water and assume the worst just because it's Apple (booga-booga!)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    73. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, to use linux i should be sure to use out of date, old hardware and stay away from the most recent and powerful hardware? now you know why few common people actually use Linux.

    74. Re:Raspberry Pi by tlambert · · Score: 1

      It isn't stupid, it is just buggy firmware. That's what is stupid.

      Anyway... I use 64-bit Flash on Linux.

      Actually, I don't think I have any 32-bit software installed on this 64-bit Linux machine.

      You don't use it on Amazon, Google Play, our YouTube protected content. Flash Access isn't built into Flash, it's a plugin to the Flash plugin.

      And you're right, it's "just buggy firmware", but unless you are running a post-July version of the H2O UEFI/BIOS implementation, you can't shut down the boot time services.

    75. Re:Raspberry Pi by mspohr · · Score: 1

      You must have an old MacBook since all the new ones are missing these keys. Only the "extended" keyboards have them. Glad to hear that you are running Ubuntu without problems. I know that there arre workarounds for the missing keys and you can remap things but it is frustrating to have to deal with this otherwise nice hardware.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    76. Re:Raspberry Pi by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Get over yourself. Bugs should be fixed, especially BIOS bugs. Can't run Flash or Skype? Are you fucking kidding me?

    77. Re:Raspberry Pi by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Ahh, yes, such a pleasing decision. Now your company has no expectation of privacy, any prosecutor can write a warrant without so much as a judge's approval to sift through your company's data, at will. No longer your property, so you have no expectation of privacy, that's the prevailing legal interpretation today.

    78. Re:Raspberry Pi by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      And there's the 8139C+ which is an 8168 with its performance improvements, that runs at 100Mbps.

    79. Re:Raspberry Pi by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      OpenBSD is getting faster all the time. And the "it just works" mentality continues to make it a pleasure to use. At some point you'll see KMS X driver support, and it will be a serious desktop contender.

    80. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use win7 pro at work every day. It's still as flukey, squirrelly, and unstable as win98. the only thing they got past was the BSOD. Now it just just locks up as if resources are gone and the cpu is crunching an endless loop.

    81. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fn keys all still work, but they are no longer labeled on newer Macs.

    82. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Raspberry Pi is too weak then take the AppleTV. It's really a neat device

    83. Re:Raspberry Pi by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh the fun of laughing at the FOSSies, whose logic make the Mad Hatter look sane. I point out a cheap system and it MUST be FUD, I point out that both RHEL and SUSE require server contracts and it MUST be FUD, why anything that doesn't say "Nothing ever breaks and RMS' farts fix the ozone layer" MUST be FUD, because all you can do is guzzle koolaid.

      Oh one thing I WILL point out I was wrong about, even a 4 year old chipset won't save you, see the post below you where someone who has the Radeon 3000 points out that its broken from Ubuntu 12.4 on with a "will not fix" label attached. So yet again i'm right, yet again you're crazy, yet again your "product" shits itself and dies, even on old hardware....why am I not even surprised anymore? Your product makes the Yugo look like a benz and the only one who gives a shit anymore are the crazies like yourself. Enjoy your 1% loonie, hell I'd rather taken the mess that is Win 8 over that trainwreck.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    84. Re:Raspberry Pi by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Really? I have over 100 in the field right now, not a single problem. if I was called into your place the first thing I'd do is see WTF the admin did when it comes to GPOs, as one thing that has been true for over a decade is that Windows has VERY powerful GPOs and if you just go in and start flipping shit without any thought to the ramifications of changes? Well you can totally break the OS.

      This of course isn't saying anything bad about Windows, after all the Linux guys brag all day long about how powerful the CLI is even though it has zero mechanisms for stopping a bad admin from breaking the OS with a bad command, but its one of those things that you really do need to know WTF you are doing before you go mucking about. I have been called into businesses having similar problems in the past and it always traced back to some BOFH that locked down the system so damned tight half the software he installed didn't have the permissions required to run fully, then he'd put in some nasty AV like Norton or McCrappy and try to lock the fuck out of that too, and pretty soon you ended up with a mess.

      In the right hands a hammer can be used as part of a toolkit to build a beautiful home, but if handed to a chimp that is then let loose in a bomb factory? you really shouldn't be surprised if shit blows up, just saying.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    85. Re:Raspberry Pi by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      You must have an old MacBook since all the new ones are missing these keys. Only the "extended" keyboards have them. Glad to hear that you are running Ubuntu without problems. I know that there arre workarounds for the missing keys and you can remap things but it is frustrating to have to deal with this otherwise nice hardware.

      Unfortunately it is old, it's a Santa Rosa 3,1 MBP. Released in July 2007, so it's more than 5 years old. But it still works fine. Of course I wanted to get a 17" MBP with a Retina display, however Apple dropped the 17" models. The 15" model has too small a display for the high resolution the Retina can display clearly. The only good is plugging in a large monitor capable of high resolution, which can be done with the 17" models. Actually I'm looking for a high res monitor, at least 24", with an IPS panel to plug into my laptop.

      And my new desktop. It too is 5 years old but whereas my MBP has a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo the desktop is a 2.4GHz Quad Core. In the MBP I have a 750GB HDD, and it's almost full. The desktop has 2 HDDs. The first one is 160GB and is for the OS, also Ubuntu 12.04. However I plan on installing other distros in virtual machines on the first drive. The second drive is a 3TB drive and is for user files. For backups I use external HDDs, the latest one also being 3TB. The MBP is maxed out at 2GB RAM versus 4GB which I can double in the desktop.

      Falcon

    86. Re:Raspberry Pi by davydagger · · Score: 1

      "Oh the fun of laughing at the FOSSies, whose logic make the Mad Hatter look sane."

      look who's talking

      " I point out that both RHEL and SUSE require server contracts and it MUST be FUD"
      irrelivant point, implying that RHEL and SUSE are the only options, where free as in beer ubuntu/mint would work just as well, if not better for the situation at hand.

      "So yet again i'm right"

      again, your wrong. just like when you said "mint fucked up sound and wireless", when both are handled by the kernel and work well..

      better than windows actually.

      "Your product makes the Yugo look like a benz and the only one who gives a shit anymore are the crazies like yourself. Enjoy your 1% loonie, hell I'd rather taken the mess that is Win 8 over that trainwreck."

      Your product looks like failed interfaces form 1996, enjoy AOL 2.0 brownshirt.

      Guess which operating system is first to implment the latest technology.

      Guess which operating system runs on the worlds most powerful computers.

      Guess which operating system runs on IBM mainframes.

      Guess what kernel is rock solid in every field it plays on?

      have fun with a slow burn to oblivion.

    87. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I notice that you want a local supplier, but have carefully arranged to not specify your locale (in the several posts you've made mentioning locality or on your Slashdot profile, which made it easy to see whether you'd mentioned a locality at any point). Given this, I assume you are in Antarctica.

      I live in Beersheba, Israel. I didn't mention it because at the time of posting I thought that they problem of no current Linux-friendly motherboards was not restricted to my locale (even if the situation in North America is different) so I didn't want to throw a red herring into the mix.

      With the help of some helpful posts here, I have found Intel motherboards locally. Problem solved, Ask Slashdot to the rescue.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    88. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      When you use the word "local", you should mention that you're in Israel. With Slashdot based in the US, most readers will probably assume that you are also in the US.

      dom

      Thanks. I didn't mention it because at the time of posting I was under the impression that the problem was not restricted to Israel and I didn't want to introduce a red herring for the trolls. Actually, with the help of some posts I've since found Intel boards available locally.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    89. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I do understand that Windows 7 is a decent OS. The origin of the issue is that some other users saw my KDE setup and they want KDE and X mouse pasting, not specifically Linux. Little things like window-on-top, mouse pasting, the terrific KDE panel, etc. There exist Windows alternatives, but none are as easy to use as real KDE on X.

      Of course, they could live without that stuff and just use Windows. But that is another point. The issue here is that there are no viable motherboards on which to run Linux today, for whatever reason that one might want to run Linux. Of course I have a plan B (and plan C) for the office, but as a Linux user at home as well (where I won't move to Windows) the situation worries me.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    90. Re:Raspberry Pi by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the AMD with an AM3 board. I helped my daughter build a Phenom Black quad core for her birthday 3 or 4 years ago and she still uses it for her primary illustration/art/project machine in University now. I would love to rebuild one of those for myself actually, although the APU is more what I want at this point, which uses a different socket.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    91. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CentOS?

    92. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youre a Red Sea pedestrian!

    93. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Youre a Red Sea pedestrian!

      Of all the words of affection and derision that I've been called, I've yet to be called that! I love it, but the woman who transposed the last two consonants of my name has got you beat! Yes, she called me a donut.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    94. Re:Raspberry Pi by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      ...or just install a real OS.

      I know that you're trolling, but there is definitely a push to just 'install Windows' due to the lack of a viable motherboard. If I were a weaker man, and there are plenty of weaker men, installing Windows would be the 'solution'.

      For many small businesses, installing Windows would indeed be a fine solution. I like tilting at windmills as much as the next guy, but sometimes the "solution" is to fix or replace the damn tool and get back to business, not start a side project designing a new tool.

      About 2006, I interviewed with a small manufacturing company once where the president was quite proud of their "can do" approach to solving problems. Why, their mechanical engineers and drafters even designed and wrote their own drafting program! Sure, it still had some bugs, and some things take a bit longer in their homebrewed system, but it was worth it to have complete control over the whole process. It only took them 9-12 months to get the system up and (mostly) going, too! And most capable drafters only took a few months to get up to speed and learn the workarounds needed to become productive. This was a company that cut and welded sheets of steel, not some corner-case where an off-the-shelf system would have been inadequate.

      I politely declined their below-average salary.

    95. Re:Raspberry Pi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you for a sane anecdote, as opposed to the raving that some OS-religious people have been spewing!

      The company happens to be in the terrific situation of not being in a rush to push this out, and the users want something better than what they have. I agree that "at all costs" is not the way to move a company to Linux desktops. In this case, it really is win-win for both the company and the users to migrate some of the workforce who request it to KDE.

      I guess you are right, this is sort of a side-project, but it is a company-sponsored side project which will likely save more money than it costs, and the cost is so minimal that it really isn't an issue (nor the goal) either way.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    96. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use OpenBSD at home but I have a Linux dual boot for my hobby Android development every distro I have tried has problems with misconfigured pulseaudio, non-working wireless, undetected proprietary drivers(not that I wouldn't disable them on a computer I own), and lately-less-but-still-some repository meltdowns -- often different issues for each distro.

      I haven't had nonworking hardware in Linux for years. This is complete FUD.

  2. Intel? by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aren't just plain Intel boards, with Intel NICs and Intel HD graphics supposed to be 'out of the box' open source friendly?

    1. Re:Intel? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or just search Google. The reviews on sites like Newegg or Amazon might also indicate Linux friendliness or just the general level of quality. Then there are sites like Phoronix.

      In other words: Just search Google. It's not 1996.

      Someone mentioned System76. There's also Zareason.

      Once again: Just search Google. It's not 1996.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Intel? by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I normally end up with an Asus workstation board with an Intel NIC chipset and it's always worked out fine.. and your point is well taken. I vetted it through Google (and Newegg's customer feedback) before pulling the trigger.

    3. Re:Intel? by Sparticus789 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My office exclusively uses Intel motherboards (for SecureBIOS) and I have yet to have any compatibility issues with Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, RHEL5, and CentOS.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    4. Re:Intel? by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Actually, in 1996 you would have gotten good results for this question from Google. Sure it was an infant, but guess who used it and what they ran it on? Linux was there too.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Intel? by Jmc23 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Back in 1996 it was extremely simple to search for motherboard reviews and compatability. It's now 2012 and the web is overrun with crappy sites and crappy reviews. Smart people would rather get direct answers from 'qualified' people then wade through piles of garbage, it's not like it's 1996!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    6. Re:Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Aren't just plain Intel boards, with Intel NICs and Intel HD graphics supposed to be 'out of the box' open source friendly?

      Given that we always first bring up new boards and silicon with an in-house linux build, yes.

    7. Re:Intel? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You're not going to flamebait by posting something people agree with.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Smart people would also know how to spell "than".

    9. Re:Intel? by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

      I agree! Having worked at Intel for a few years, I can tell you that all Intel *server* mobos are thoroughly tested with Linux. Can;t swear to the same thing for desktop mobos, but any Intel server mobo should work perfectly.

    10. Re:Intel? by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have yet to see an Intel board cause any real problems beyond "this driver has issues" sort of stuff that you might get with anything. I think once I had to install a kernel with NOAPIC set for some obscure reason, years ago.

      --
      "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
    11. Re:Intel? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Caution. "Just Google search" can cause an ugly problem of cyclic recurrence. How?

      Many times my searches result in some obscure forum where desired content is only mentioned. And when I question about where to look for the content, someone speaks (and generally in a arrogant manner) "search on Google". But what is the point of search on Google if you already have arrived in the forum exactly as result from seeking on google?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    12. Re:Intel? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      pretty much anything runs "out of the box" though yes if you want decent graphic speed and 3d with ati or nvidia you do have to install a driver ... + few people really care about the whole political whoo ha, they just want shit that works.

    13. Re:Intel? by dotancohen · · Score: 0

      I've searched google and I've consulted the national LUG. Importing a motherboard is prohibitively expensive, and importing a ready computer is ridiculous. Our national computer stores are mostly stocked with Asus and Gigabyte boards, and both those companies are now Linux-hostile. I would love to find any specific board that is known to work (for now), but also I would like to know which manufactures I could trust for now and in the reasonable future. System76 and Zareason are not motherboard manufacturers.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    14. Re:Intel? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I normally end up with an Asus workstation board with an Intel NIC chipset and it's always worked out fine.. and your point is well taken. I vetted it through Google (and Newegg's customer feedback) before pulling the trigger.

      I've never had a problem with an Intel chipset, but as mentioned in the OP I've had issues with the LAN drivers. Also, UEFI is a potential stumbling block.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    15. Re:Intel? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, finally an informative answer! I will see from where I might acquire an Intel motherboard locally. I don't think that I've ever come across an Intel board to be honest, so I have a suspicion that they are not sold here.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    16. Re:Intel? by Sparticus789 · · Score: 2

      My office exclusively uses Intel motherboards (for SecureBIOS) and I my extreme lack of knowledge coupled with my inability to use Google have prevented us from using Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, RHEL5, and CentOS. I recommend you buy a Gateway 2000 PC with Windows 98 installed, because you can never go wrong with a classic. Plus the cow pattern is so pretty!

      Better?

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    17. Re:Intel? by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

      The driver issues I have encountered are not OS problems, but firmware problems. A certain Intel Motherboard (DZ77BH-55K) has some RAM issues. You can only use specific brands/types of RAM in a dual-channel configuration. It's a very strange problem, as two types of RAM from the same manufacturer will fail to work. After firmware, I tried tweaking the voltages to no avail. I'm still waiting for a firmware update to allow for 4 RAM sticks instead of 2.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    18. Re:Intel? by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

      See my other comment about one Intel motherboard that has RAM issues. I would avoid that one if you plan on using more than 2 RAM slots.

      For the motherboards, they do have them on Newegg for sale. I find it much easier to purchase the CPU/MB combos on there because you will know the MB has the correct slot. The Intel brands are a bit more expensive than your generic Sparkle (or other knock-off type), but they are worth the money. Better to spend an extra $20 than to have to replace motherboards every 2 years because you went for an off-brand.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    19. Re:Intel? by tokul · · Score: 1

      In other words: Just search Google.

      That's a very dangerous suggestion. If user accidentally uses google as search engine and searches for google, Internet will explode.

    20. Re:Intel? by MrNemesis · · Score: 2

      This. In my, admittedly limited, hardware building experience intel boards are not only very open source friendly, but come with the best documentation and least-flaky BIOSes. And of course their SATA controllers and NICs are class leaders.

      I've built a few NAS/NAS + HTPC mITX units using two of Intel's newer boards, running either debian stable or testing, and found both of these to be excellently supported OotB:
      http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/motherboards/desktop-motherboards/desktop-board-dh77df.html.html
      http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/motherboards/server-motherboards/server-board-s1200kp.html

      And that's even with my beloved M1015 HBA's, which I've had problems with on some older AMD boards (almost certainly down to poor testing on LSI's side).

      I've not done any testing of features like suspend/hibernate since these are targeting "low power always on", and the onboard graphics don't quite match up to 23.97fps at times*. My only regret about choosing the "server" S1200KP board for my NAS is that it doesn't come with mSATA or eSATA ports.

      In the mITX arena, almost everyone else seems to use the ubiquitous (and ubiquitously crap) Realtek chips, so it's worth buying Intel for that reason alone. Recently Asus have made a point of using Intel NICs in their higher-end mATX and ATX boards but for small linux builds intel is the only game in town. My two pence.

      * If you're really set on a good HTPC experience with e.g. linux+XBMC I would still recommend an ASRock Vision 3D with an nVidia card in it. They're ludicrously overpriced but tiny and silent and the SB models at least work perfectly with linux.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    21. Re:Intel? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Google didn't go live until 1998. It wasn't an infant in 1996, it was a zygote. It was an infant in 1998.

      You might have gotten ok results from infoseek or Excite in 1996, but unless you were at Brin's university, Google was unavailable.

    22. Re:Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are very common, but not amongst enthusiasts. you probably just never noticed them. rarely will you find a component store that doesnt carry them. they sell on newegg at decent prices. ugly blue box.

      get z77 chipset for latest and greatest at roughly same price, unless you wanna go sock2011 and i would recommend a c6xx chipset over x79 for perf/compatibility. also there are some models with issues so read reviews.

    23. Re:Intel? by jedidiah · · Score: 3

      Nonsense. A number of people have noted that various Asus and Gigabyte boards are quite well supported. They have also provided 3rd party sources. I have a couple of Gigabyte boards of my own that I'm very satisfied with.

      You might have to do a little homework first but that's hardly a great burden considering that you're obviously building a machine from PARTS.

      This whole thing boils down to "I am shopping for motherboards but I am a helpless ninny".

      Ready made systems are specifically marketed for people that are unwilling or unable to do the modern equivalent of cracking open a magazine like Consumer Reports.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Intel? by wallyhall · · Score: 1
      Obligatory IT crowd reference.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdjRwpYM-Kw

      --
      I think therefore I am... a Linux geek.
    25. Re:Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is than, not then. And what the hell does 1996 have to with anything? I have Pentium 1 laptops that have no problem running Linux.

    26. Re:Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "compatibility".

    27. Re:Intel? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I wish that I could order from Newegg, but due to thieves in customs I must purchase locally. On my last trip to the US I did stock up on hardware!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    28. Re:Intel? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I will be buying the processor that fits whatever motherboard is worthy, not the other way around this time.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    29. Re:Intel? by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      Have you tried asking intel if there are any resellers in your country?
      http://locate.intel.com/
      https://www-ssl.intel.com/p/en_UK/techprovider/contentns?docid=483949#

    30. Re:Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd recommend ThinkPenguin. Nobody else is paying attention to the availability of drivers and mainline kernel support (and/or other major projects). System76 and ZaReason have shipped crap in the past that has stopped working and will continue to do so. There no different from Dell or any other company which fails to understand the value in ensuring the sources are available and supported in the mainline kernel/and/or other major projects.

    31. Re:Intel? by davydagger · · Score: 1

      +1

      I've had two desktops from parts, both based around asus motherboards, with outstanding support for all perephials

    32. Re:Intel? by davydagger · · Score: 1

      http://phoronix.com /fin

    33. Re:Intel? by davydagger · · Score: 1

      as long as your not gaming, nouveau works pretty well, and its ABI stable with a 1.0 version, that was hit this year.

    34. Re:Intel? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yes it does, on my electronics workbench computer I normally run win7, but I have debian + xfce installed, and use it frequently, a year later I went to install TV time which does not like the nouveau driver... that was the first time I noticed I did not install the nvidia blob

    35. Re:Intel? by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      Aren't just plain Intel boards, with Intel NICs and Intel HD graphics supposed to be 'out of the box' open source friendly?

      Almost. For example, try finding a functional, freely-available linux graphics driver for a D2700MUD motherboard!

      I bought two of these for use as workstations but I never checked the graphics chip, assuming, as the OP says, that Intel graphics are Linux-friendly.

      For now, until I can get a mature driver, I have to use these boards in VESA mode.

    36. Re:Intel? by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Intel motherboards are mostly manufactured by Foxconn (Hon Hai). And many other brands, too. What is more important is which chipset, how good is the supporting infrastructure, and many boards use better capacitors and chips and so forth, these days. Buying something that is super-cheap and comes with low quality components is a mistake if you want longevity. But that isn't tied to the brand name, not really...

    37. Re:Intel? by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Uhh, reviews?

      No, if you have questions about ethernet or other devices, you look at the PCI device IDs and revisions and compare them to the supported ones in your drivers. And you look for other people and see what kernel versions they successfully run on the same model motherboard.

      People are constantly supporting newer hardware in open source systems, but yeah you might have to wait a month to turn up that brand new intel chipset or whatever. Big deal. If you don't want to rely on bleeding edge hardware support, don't buy brand new designs.

    38. Re:Intel? by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

      Ah, yeah. Frankly I've learned over the years that the best thing to do is buy standard commercial models of machines from large OEM/integrators like Dell. They do have their occasional problems but they put a lot more good engineering into a system overall than trying to build out of pieces parts, and the prices these days are about the same. Systems tend to be faster, better integrated, just all around a better value. The days of home building are sadly past (or maybe not so sadly).

      --
      "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
    39. Re:Intel? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I have since found an Intel reseller. And I will be sure to let them know that it is due to Linux support that I am buying Intel.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    40. Re:Intel? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. A number of people have noted that various Asus and Gigabyte boards are quite well supported. They have also provided 3rd party sources. I have a couple of Gigabyte boards of my own that I'm very satisfied with.

      You might have to do a little homework first but that's hardly a great burden considering that you're obviously building a machine from PARTS.

      This whole thing boils down to "I am shopping for motherboards but I am a helpless ninny".

      Ready made systems are specifically marketed for people that are unwilling or unable to do the modern equivalent of cracking open a magazine like Consumer Reports.

      Over the last few years, I've routinely discouraged people from building their own computers. Usually because I worry that they will be coming back to me to support them when they erase their video drivers or can't connect to their neighbor's WiFi. It's much easier for me, (and more humane for them) to just tell them to go to Dell and see what's on sale.

      Especially in a business environment, buying something that has been integrated at the vendor, and backed with a warranty is worth more than the $50 they might save or the 10% increase in . Yeah, for a special-purpose box it still makes sense to piece something together, but for an office machine, cherry picking components to get the best "bang for the buck"; 3.0GHz vs. 3.2GHz, Radeon 3300 vs. ATI blah blah blah, it just doesn't matter. It will run a word processor and e-mail, and they can browse the web and print. Computers have long since become just another office machine like a copier or a telephone.

      The fact that the OP is even asking this question for a machine he's turning loose into a business environment makes me question his sanity. If it's for a normal office: don't buy parts, buy computers. If it's for a uniquely tech-savvy, Linux-friendly office: you shouldn't need to ask the question, you should know what works and what doesn't.

  3. system 76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have heard good things about system 76

    1. Re:system 76 by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      I have heard good things about GCC's ability to compile an updated driver.

  4. Hardware to support software? by schneidafunk · · Score: 2

    Isn't the software suppose to support the hardware?

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Hardware to support software? by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When vendors don't publish drivers or specs how is that supposed to happen?

      Hardware is dime a dozen these days. If I can't run the OS I want on it, I will not buy it.

    2. Re:Hardware to support software? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Yes, but more often than not the best (or only) way to get the drivers that allows software to support hardware is from the hardware vendor itself.

    3. Re:Hardware to support software? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Other way around. What's the point of hardware except to support software? I don't do anything with just hardware.

    4. Re:Hardware to support software? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Isn't the software suppose to support the hardware?

      Isn't the husband supposed to support the wife?

      I think that this is a two-way street.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Hardware to support software? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, that's backwards. What is hardware's ONLY purpose? Running software. Hardware's ONLY purpose is supporting software.

    6. Re:Hardware to support software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not married, eh?

    7. Re:Hardware to support software? by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      No. The best way to get a better driver for an open source system is typically to update your god damn driver from the newer kernel which probably already supports the newer variation of the chip. Vendor drivers? usually total junk.

  5. MS controls the purse strings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft demands it, motherboard makers will fall in line in order to stay in business.

    This probably also signals the beginning of the end of Microsoft.

    Mighty empires always fall.

    1. Re:MS controls the purse strings by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Microsoft demands it, motherboard makers will fall in line in order to stay in business.

      This probably also signals the beginning of the end of Microsoft.

      Mighty empires always fall.

      There's wholesale motherboards and retail motherboards. Wholesale motherboards are mostly destined for name-brand computers where MS-Windows will be pre-bundled.

      However, when you buy retail, I'd venture that a lot of those motherboards have to be Linux-friendly, because Windows doesn't come "free" with them the way it does with mass-market computers and therefore I'd expect a much higher percentage of such motherboards to be destined for non-Windows machines, and since I have grave doubts about them becoming Apple machines, that leaves Linux as pretty much the largest market left.

      In any event, so far Asus, Shuttle, MSI and BioStar have all worked fairly well for me. Occasionally an integrated peripheral will be problematic, but as far as it goes, I really wouldn't expect top-of-the-line integrated peripheral support from a retail mobo even on Windows. Especially considering what the Windows device driver development process has become.

    2. Re:MS controls the purse strings by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Blah, blah, blah. You're an idiot.

  6. Easy by kimvette · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have yet to try a motherboard which is not Linux-friendly in recent years. Every single server board I have ever tried has worked flawlessly. Every true hardware RAID controller (be it integrated or PCI-X, PCI-E, or PCI) has been supported natively, and software/hybrid/fakeraid controllers have always been supported in JBOD mode. Integrated Intel or Matrox video works fine.

    Workstation/desktop boards? Aside from bluetooth, wifi, or weird video chipsets, they are supported fine. Ethernet ports used to require some tweaking (especially for Marvell controllers) but even those enjoy good support. If you want a good, fast board check out the GA-Z77X-UD5H-WB

    As far as UEFI is concerned - if you run 32-bit RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux, you won't be able to boot the 32-bit disc with UEFI enabled, but why would you forgo the flat memory space of a 64-bit board now that RAM is dirt cheap? Boot 64-bit disc and it works just fine. I have UEFI enabed on my GA-Z77X-UD5H-WB and it is fully supported out of the box by OpenSUSE and both Centos and RHEL 6.3. It's more work to get full support in Linux, actually, because the Linux install Just Works(TM). To boot Windows 7, I had to make a Windows 7 USB key. It booted 64-bit Linux just fine.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Easy by blackC0pter · · Score: 1

      This is spot on with my experience building servers running linux. I haven't found a manufacturer that doesn't support linux straight out of the box without loading any special drivers (unlike windows server installations that usually cannot find my raid drivers) assuming I use a newer version of ubuntu server. But in the end, I tend to lean more towards IAAS and PAAS since it just makes things easier to get up and running and less maintenance.

    2. Re:Easy by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Two years ago I build my current desktop, and everything worked fine. This summer I built the mother-in-law's home system and had a terrible time with the 1000 MBit ethernet controller as the driver has not yet been including in the Linux kernel, and to make it worse the board was reporting a different controller whose driver was in the kernel!

      I know that there are Gigabyte *77* boards available locally, I will look at those. Thank you very much.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Easy by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      An unsupported non-exotic wired network controller just sounds plain odd. Linux has supported wired NICs very well for a very long time and even come with support for rather exotic high speed network interfaces.

      Alternatively, you could just use a $10 PCI card.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Easy by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The motherboard didn't even have a PCI slot (ASUS P8H61-M LX) and not a single local vendor had a PCI-E network card. I could have ordered one for more money than the motherboard cost.

      I know how unusual it is to even imagine that the NIC would not be supported at least in some legacy 10 MBit mode, alas it was not. For some reason the driver is still not in the mainline kernel, see here:
      http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/alx

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Easy by davydagger · · Score: 1

      its not like they don't exist

      https://www.google.com/search?q=PCI-E+gigabit+ethernet&hl=en&sa=G&tbo=u&source=univ&tbm=shop&ei=BzbeUPmDOu6M0QGBpIGgCg&ved=0CEgQsxg

    6. Re:Easy by kimvette · · Score: 1

      It's more work to get full support in Linux, actually

      D'oh! That was supposed to be It's more work to get full support in Windows, actually. Linux is pretty much plug & play.
      Sorry about that.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:Easy by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I actually could not get one locally for any reasonable price.

      However, that is a red herring. The fact is that the motherboard in question, nor any other commonly-available budget motherboards, currently work with Linux out of the box.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:Easy by davydagger · · Score: 1

      "The fact is that the motherboard in question, nor any other commonly-available budget motherboards, currently work with Linux out of the box."

      the fact is that most motherboards DO work with linux out of the box, as do most laptops.

      In fact I actually did an "lspci" to find a simiar Gigabit ethernet chip on my mobo. This is the machine, and interface I am connecting to the internet to post this.
      "Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B "

      Not just to talk about my personal hardware, I also carry around a linux live OS in my pocket everywhere. Guess what? wired ethernet works on all of them, and its rare when sound and wireless doesn't work.

      I've yet to come across a machine that won't load wired ethernet off my live os. I wasn't aware this was even a problem in the post kernel 2.6 era.

      I've also yet to come across a machine that needed either sound or wireless drivers that has been made newer than 2005.

      Your case from my experiance is a one in a thousand exception. All my machines come from commonly available parts. To include a mini-itx budget AMD A350-APU motherboard, I never had trouble with any wired ethernet card since trying to get community drivers for intel cards with kernel 2.2.

      It sounds like you got a fluke. I don't know how you are talking about "common motherboards" like you've tried more than one.

    9. Re:Easy by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      That looks to be the same ethernet controller as on the problematic Asus board, actually. I was therefore avoiding that NIC and any motherboard that ships with it. Which distro are you on? Debian-based?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  7. If you have to ask... by MrSavage · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...whether a motherboard is Linux friendly on Slashdot, I would put down your hammer and step away from the computer you are trying to build.

  8. Just do a little research. by dills · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all about chipsets. Figure out what chipset a given motherboard has, do a few googles, and you'll likely have your answers.

    I have no problem with either of the manufacturers that you mentioned. Were you perhaps trying to do an AMD solution? I'd just stick with Intel chips and chipsets at this point in the game.

    1. Re:Just do a little research. by ruir · · Score: 1

      I second this. If you want to use vmware, XEN, KVM, or god forbids, Hyper-V, youd better choose Intel rather than AMD.

    2. Re:Just do a little research. by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      I've bought about 2 dozen Asus AMD motherboards, and they all work fine in Linux.

      dotancohen is just too lazy to do a little research, so instead he's looking for the impossible: a hardware manufacturer that needs to sell millions of units, but no matter how in demand a chipset or feature is, will refuse to release the product without Linux drivers.. a manufacturer who would turn away 95% of his customers (by not releasing a product) because 2% of them won't be able to use it.

    3. Re:Just do a little research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How come?

      From my research AMD appears to support virtualization on most of their hardware, while Intel hold these features back on some of their hardware.

    4. Re:Just do a little research. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't so much the chipset, but the onboard peripherals such as the NIC. Yes, I have had quite a hard time with an onboard NIC, and the board didn't even have a PCI slot to put a network card into.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Just do a little research. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that I follow you. My last Asus motherboard install (about four months ago) did not support Linux due to the NIC reporting as the wrong model, and the right model's driver is not included in the mainline kernel. None of the currently available motherboards make the NIC model available before purchase (after purchase I can simply run lspci) and I know that the issue exists.

      Furthermore, I'm asking about which motherboard manufacturers are Linux friendly as all the major manufacturers seem to be hostile. The landscape has been swept from under our feet in the past year (1000 MBit ethernet NIS, UEFI, etc.) and finding Linux-compatible equipment is becoming problematic. Our experience from years past is no longer valid.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    6. Re:Just do a little research. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      It's all about chipsets.

      I've been building my own systems for a decade but I know surprisingly little about chipsets. A few days ago for my next rig I tried to find out what the best AMD and Intel chipsets currently are... and after 2 hours of googling I gave up. There's no way to tell a 2010 review from a current one, a shill from an amateur. Even wikipedia is mostly useless as to their capabilities. So, please, enlighten me.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    7. Re:Just do a little research. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Why is that ? I use Linux but I need to run a few CPU intensive image processing progs in VirtualBox. I have a 3-year old AMD mobo and it's like waddling in mollasses. What systems run VirtualBox the fastest ?!? I tried to google that a few days ago without success.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    8. Re:Just do a little research. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      ...the plot thickens.

      We've got quite an incompetent box builder here. Not only is he experiencing all sorts of rather bizarre problems. He also didn't bother to put any expansion options into this custom build of his.

      You really have to go out of your way to avoid having some sort of expansion card available. Even low profile boards have expansion cards on them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Just do a little research. by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      My last Asus motherboard install (about four months ago) did not support Linux due to the NIC reporting as the wrong model,

      So return the MB and get a refund. I wouldn't have spent more than 30 minutes on it, after seeing the specs were wrong. I've built about 5 dozen computers.. I have NEVER had that happen. So just return it.. it's not a widespread issue.

      None of the currently available motherboards make the NIC model available before purchase

      Here, I don't know what you are talking about. Granted it's been almost a week since I built my last computer, but the manufacturers websites haven't changed that much.

      http://www.asus.com/
      http://us.msi.com/
      http://www.biostar-usa.com/app/en-us/index.php
      http://www.supermicro.com/index_home.cfm

      Yep.. all of them list the NIC card in the MB specs.

      If you're that lazy, why the fuck are you bothering me.

    10. Re:Just do a little research. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The motherboard that was purchased had no PCI slot, why deride me for that fact:
      http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/P8H61M_LX_R20/

      Deride Asus instead. In fact, that is the whole point of this thread: If Asus can no longer be trusted, which motherboard manufacturers can?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    11. Re:Just do a little research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck doesn't have a spare e1000e lying around nowadays?

    12. Re:Just do a little research. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It seems that you were just rather unlucky. Linux driver support these days is more rich than ever and a NIC should be a simple thing to have a driver for.

    13. Re:Just do a little research. by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      Are you fucking serious? It has 4 PCIe slots!!!!!!!!!

      You're looking for a MB with a PCI slot in 2012??????

      A gb nic w/ a pcie slot is $10.

      You obviously have no idea wtf you are doing.

    14. Re:Just do a little research. by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      OMG.. I just noticed you posted what the actual board was in another thread. You said it had a RL8168 nic and the manual clearly says it's its an rl81111
      http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/LGA1155/P8H61-M_LX_R2.0/E7241_P8H61-M_LX_R2_Series.pdf

      And that manual was uploaded in June.

      So you're obviously completely incompetent and full of shit.

    15. Re:Just do a little research. by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      No, not unlucky.. just incompetent. The board he says he purchased says in the manual that it has an RL8111E/RL8111F nic. and in the summary he says it's a 8168. No idea where he got that from, and then he turns around and blames Asus.
      http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/LGA1155/P8H61-M_LX_R2.0/E7241_P8H61-M_LX_R2_Series.pdf

      He also says he couldn't attach a nic because the board does not have a PCI slot, just 4 PCIe slots.
      http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/P8H61M_LX_R20/#overview

    16. Re:Just do a little research. by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      SVM enabled in your BIOS?

    17. Re:Just do a little research. by ruir · · Score: 1

      It is well known Virtualization Technology (VT) processor extensions work far better in Intel processors than AMD ones...

    18. Re:Just do a little research. by ruir · · Score: 1

      And yeah, some PCs you have to enable them.

    19. Re:Just do a little research. by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      8168 and 8111 are different versions of the same chip that use the same driver. You just need a newer version of the driver for the 8111, because it's basically a newer revision of the 8168. Not exactly hard to figure out.

    20. Re:Just do a little research. by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Return the motherboard? Why not just update your kernel so that you get a driver that supports the newer chip?

    21. Re:Just do a little research. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Look here:
      http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/P8H61M_LX_R20/#specifications
      http://il.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4143#sp

      They will tell you that the board uses an "Atheros GbE LAN chip (10/100/1000 Mbit)" but they don't mention which driver it uses. Specifically, they won't mention "does not support legacy drivers".

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    22. Re:Just do a little research. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      No, not unlucky.. just incompetent. The board he says he purchased says in the manual that it has an RL8111E/RL8111F nic. and in the summary he says it's a 8168. No idea where he got that from, and then he turns around and blames Asus.

      $ sudo lshw -C network
          *-network
                    description: Ethernet interface
                    product: RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller
                    vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

      In any case, the crux of the issue is that the NIC in question does not work on any available Linux distro out of the box. Sure, I do happen to be competent enough to find X, compile Y, install Z, or swap component N. That is not the point, though. I turned to the Ask Slashdot community asking which motherboards don't need X found, or Y compiled, or Z installed, or N swapped. Because the next guy might not be as competent as you or I.

      I'm really not looking for workarounds for any particular install. I'm looking for manufacturers to trust and to recommend.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    23. Re:Just do a little research. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      8168 and 8111 are different versions of the same chip that use the same driver. You just need a newer version of the driver for the 8111, because it's basically a newer revision of the 8168. Not exactly hard to figure out.

      Right, but it doesn't work out of the box. You and I are competent enough to handle that situation, but surely you don't expect the casual user to start downloading and compiling software on another computer just to install his OS, or even know how to figure out where the issue is.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  9. Pick motherboard candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Find a few candidates based on your desired CPU, reviews, and other features. Then check their reviews on Newegg.
    http://www.newegg.com/Motherboards/Category/ID-20

  10. dont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy per built workstations from eBay. Dell precision usually works out well

  11. Supermicro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Supermicro is a good option.

    1. Re:SuperMicro by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. We've had great luck with them, and saved _stupid_ amounts of money. Using them allowed us to ditch our fiber channel, and move all of our DB's to 1TB raid 10 SSD systems, and still save 20 grand.

  12. use a system vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    System76.com have already done the research for you.

    Or, more general vendors such as Dell, super micro, IBM, etc. all sell Linux specific models.

    1. Re:use a system vendor by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      Or just keep your kernel up-to-date and don't depend on your 2 year old distribution CD to come with the latest drivers. Open source kernels are typically very good at supporting new hardware. Sometimes you have to wait 12 months for someone to get a stable driver for some really new shit. Otherwise, you just have to install some NEW software to use your NEW hardware.

  13. This MB worked by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just built an HTPC and this is what I used for my mb/cpu

    MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 mATX FM2 A75 DDR3 1PCI-E16 2PCI-E1 1PCI SATA3 HDMI DVI USB3.0 Motherboard
    AMD A8-5600K APU Quad Core Processor Socket FM2 3.2GHZ 4MB 100W Retail Box

    works fine here right out of the box with no BIOS settings. I have Linux Mint 14 Mate running on it. The only issue I had was getting audio over HDMI but for some reason downloading and installing the AMD propitiatory drivers wouldn't install Catalyst. I had to go and install the CCC through the package manager. Reboot and audio over HDMI worked.

    If you want to stick to the open source drivers and want to have sound over HDMI (if it doesn't work) try this

    Edit to /etc/default/grub and add

    radeon.audio=1

    to

    GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"

    To make it look like this
    GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash radeon.audio=1"

    Haven't tried it with my HTPC but did it with my sons laptop. Also with the laptop I had to disable two settings in the BIOS and create an EFI partition but the install of Linux Mint 14 KDE went smoothly an games seem to be running good with the open source drivers.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:This MB worked by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      You also get video over HDMI with this setup?

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    2. Re:This MB worked by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I will take a look at that board and at other MSI boards.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:This MB worked by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Yes video with sound but like I posted there was some weird issues with these driver http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx not installing properly. When I tired to open catalyst it said it wasn't installed so I was a bit confused. So I went into package manager and installed the catalyst drivers again. It went through the install and after a reboot the sound over HDMI worked. Also if I installed the driver from the repos first sound still wouldn't work I did however had issues with Mint 13 XFCE. I also tried Kubuntu and installed drivers from restricted driver which work fine but I didn't like the KDE interface..

      Now should add installing the AMD drivers from AMD site on the laptop borked KDE but using the opensource ones with the change to Grub worked good, I just didn't feel like trying to the the AMD ones doing.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  14. Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by agoliveira · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/ shows desktops and servers classified by vendor, distro, etc

    --
    Scientia est Potentia
    1. Re:Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I have already tried that. The list is completely out of date and only seems to list full systems. Try searching for Asus or Gigabyte and see that there are no results.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by agoliveira · · Score: 2

      Canonical only certifies hardware that's sent by vendors and they usually send complete systems. There is a tab above called Component Catalog http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/catalog/ it does not have complete motherboards tough but discrete components.

      --
      Scientia est Potentia
    3. Re:Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by LourensV · · Score: 2

      I'm typing this on a Dell Latitude E6410, which is on that list (albeit with nVidia graphics I think, but Intel support is better, right? That's why I ordered it, anyway). When I first got this machine, it was also on the list, but Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (the most recent LTS) wouldn't even boot on it, just gave a black screen. Apparently there were multiple issues with the Intel graphics drivers, with both the E6410 and the E6510. Now it did seem that Canonical was giving those bugs some attention, but it still took many months for them to be fixed for most users. Then there was one last patch and it started working for me as well...until the next (ordinary, stable) update which broke it again. I ended up running 11.04 with a backported kernel that I didn't dare upgrade.

      Then the touchpad (ALPS, not Synaptic) wasn't recognised as a touchpad, which they "solved" with a patch that sent a magic command combo to the device to switch it into imPS/2 mode. Result: scrolling worked, but it's still not recognised as a touchpad, and you still cannot configure it as such.

      So yes, Canonical has a list, but I'd interpret that as "we'll try a bit harder to fix these machines, but they're otherwise just as broken as everything else", not as "tested and working".

      Generally speaking, I'm seeing a lot of comments saying that there are no issues with server hardware. The OP didn't mention it, but it seems he/she was asking for desktop hardware, whose most critical functionality is (non-trivial) graphics hardware and, if it's a laptop, wifi. In my experience those things remain difficult for modern Linux kernels, especially on new hardware (i.e. anything you bought in the last year, maybe two), and there doesn't seem to be much progress either. As others have said though, Intel hardware seems to be your best bet.

    4. Re:Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by agoliveira · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, what's on that list was (and still is) fully tested. If you check the page for the E6410, you see that the machine was tested with 10.04.4 64bit provided by Dell which means probably was tweaked for this machine and stock Ubuntu 11.10. Below on the page you will see also the details of the hardware (it says the model tested used nvidia graphics).
      Full disclaimer: I do work for Canonical but not for the testing team. What I can say for what I see and hear is they do test machines according to what is described on this list.

      --
      Scientia est Potentia
    5. Re:Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a crap list. The reason is Canonical will certify just about anything so long as there are drivers and such. But if you want real support and not "support" you got to make sure the drivers for all the chipsets are in the mainline kernel and/or other major projects. The full code needs to be available too. Not just half of it. I'm looking at you AMD (ATI) and NVIDIA and Intel (for wifi chips), etc.

    6. Re:Canonical does have a compatible/certified list by gagol · · Score: 1

      To remember the god ole days, nothing live the wayback machine. I checked, it is not our collective memory: what used to be an oasis of OSS/tech news have become an ocean of "FRIST POST RULZ!"...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  15. What? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 3, Interesting

    due to the motherboard reporting a Linux-supported ethernet device (the common RTL8168) while it was actually using a GbE Ethernet device that does not work with the legacy drivers and didn't even work with a test Windows 7 install until the driver disk was installed.

    Model and manufacturer, please! Sounds like bullshit to me.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:What? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Dell to me... unless you're talking about not working without drivers under windows 7, then it sounds like every motherboard I've had experience with :)

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:What? by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1

      Maybe the MAC was wired to a buggy PHY. It would be veeeeery surprising for lspci to show a different device than what is really there, though it isn't impossible.

    3. Re:What? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Submitter here.
      Asus P8H61-M LX

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:What? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      yeah, I had an ASUS UEFI board and I couldn't get Xen to boot without disabling the 1394 controller, and some other stuff I don't recall at the moment. I replaced it with an MSI which was nice but it had bad caps. I recently switched to ASRock, which is really nice, though Xen does have a UEFI problem with e820 memory maps and dom0 allocation at the moment. Except ASRock just got bought by ASUS. Argh.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:what? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The problem is not the chipset, but rather the peripherals. Specifically, the NIC. Also, UEFI may be problematic.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    6. Re:what? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I havent ran into a nic that didnt work in linux in over a decade, again where are they getting this crazy garbage from? a back alley in Wuhan?

    7. Re:What? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The first hit for that + Linux on Google is a pdf document at the Asus site that seems to indicate what boards are and are not supported by Linux.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:What? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The first hit for that + Linux on Google is a pdf document at the Asus site that seems to indicate what boards are and are not supported by Linux.

      That is the case probably due to my efforts with this board several months ago. At the time, this was not the case.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    9. Re:what? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I havent ran into a nic that didnt work in linux in over a decade, again where are they getting this crazy garbage from? a back alley in Wuhan?

      Wouldn't surprise me. Here is the piece of garbage, if you're interested:
      http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/P8H61M_LX_R20/

      Note that there isn't even a PCI slot to plug a different network card into!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    10. Re:What? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Submitter here.
      Asus P8H61-M LX

      This board is supported by a vendor driver (open source, maintained by Realtek itself, just isn't in mainline). Your "complaint" is suspiciously similar to one described at http://askubuntu.com/questions/157969/dhcp-not-working-on-new-install/159031#159031 , what makes me question its authenticity.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    11. Re:what? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Realdreck? Are you kidding? Ever had a gigabit Realdreck that gets stuck at 100 Mbit and won't switch to gigabit even with a reboot - you have to remove power completely? I have. Ever have a Realdreck that, at completely random intervals, locks up not only itself but the entire operating system? I have.

      As for Via, only good for landfill.

    12. Re:What? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was me on the askubuntu forums.

      As you've noticed, the driver is not in the mainline kernel. I am specifically looking for a motherboard with is supported out of the box by modern Linux distros.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    13. Re:What? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was me on the askubuntu forums.

      Really? That was posted half a year ago! If there was a problem then, it's long gone. Why post it now?

      As you've noticed, the driver is not in the mainline kernel. I am specifically looking for a motherboard with is supported out of the box by modern Linux distros.

      Just because it's not in mainline, does not mean that you can't use it. There is nothing special about vendor-supported drivers, at worst you can complain about lack of package management support, so you have to run vendor-provided driver build procedure after kernel updates. Ubuntu has infrastructure for such drivers, so the soultion would be to ask someone to maintain the package -- you did not ask Realtek and Canonical, did you?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    14. Re:What? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      At the time, I was hoping to never have to touch it again! But now half a year later I see that all the motherboards are using that NIC. I was quiet when I should have moved then, so now I'm paying for it.

      I will file an issue on the Canonical issue tracker about it, as I should have done months ago. Thanks.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    15. Re:What? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      It looks like the bug has already been filed:
      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/927782

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    16. Re:What? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Then why are you posting this here?

      There is a driver.
      It is not in Linux mainline and not in Ubuntu by default.
      Vendor-supplied source works on Ubuntu, and you can use it in your boards as long as you won't update the kernel without also installing the driver for it.
      Ubuntu will release a package soon if Linux mainline won't get it first.

      What else so you want, ponies?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    17. Re:What? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Then why are you posting this here?

      There is a driver.
      It is not in Linux mainline and not in Ubuntu by default.
      Vendor-supplied source works on Ubuntu, and you can use it in your boards as long as you won't update the kernel without also installing the driver for it.
      Ubuntu will release a package soon if Linux mainline won't get it first.

      What else so you want, ponies?

      I'm posting because there currently is no budget motherboard available that a simple user can purchase which will work with a contemporary Linux distro without downloading X, compiling Y, installing Z, etc. out of the box. You and I can work around this no problem, but the problem exists for the majority of users.

      Do you not see that as a problem?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    18. Re:what? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      I havent ran into a nic that didnt work in linux in over a decade, again where are they getting this crazy garbage from? a back alley in Wuhan?

      Wouldn't surprise me. Here is the piece of garbage, if you're interested:
      http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/P8H61M_LX_R20/

      Note that there isn't even a PCI slot to plug a different network card into!

      PCI slots have been legacy for what, 5 years now? Look for a PCI-E or USB Ethernet adapter.

    19. Re:what? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I have recently ordered a PCI-E NIC to put away for when I'll need it, but they are not generally available here. I really could not find one. I did find a USB ethernet adaptor that required a 2.4 kernel and would not work on anything newer, but I intend to find a newer one and keep it in my toolbox as well.

      But that does not address the issue of no contemporary budget motherboard today being supported / supporting any contemporary Linux distro. Sure there are workarounds and fixes, but the real problem needs to be addressed.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    20. Re:what? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      I have recently ordered a PCI-E NIC to put away for when I'll need it, but they are not generally available here. I really could not find one. I did find a USB ethernet adaptor that required a 2.4 kernel and would not work on anything newer, but I intend to find a newer one and keep it in my toolbox as well.

      But that does not address the issue of no contemporary budget motherboard today being supported / supporting any contemporary Linux distro. Sure there are workarounds and fixes, but the real problem needs to be addressed.

      I'm not sure of your claim that no contemporary budget motherboard is being supported, but I really don't know as I haven't been shopping for one in a couple of years. Actually, I've never had a problem with Linux supporting the hardware on any of the 5-6 different machines of different ages that I've installed on in the past 18 months, so your experience is somewhat surprising to me.

      Could it be that the motherboard in question is using very new parts? The page on Asus's website that you linked before states it supports Windows 8, which makes me think that maybe the chipsets are quite new. I've had good luck with both Asus and MSI boards in the past; is it possible that selecting a board 6 or 9 months old would give a better result?

      What part of the world are you in? I'm in the US, so I could pick up a PCI-E NIC from probably 4 different shops in my city of 75k population, but I probably would order it from Amazon or Newegg anyway. I'm cheap like that... :)

    21. Re:what? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I'm in Beersheba, Israel. We're in the Middle East, but we are a technology center. In the two national computer chains, all the affordable motherboards use a LAN which is not supported in any contemporary Linux distro:
      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/927782

      This is representative of the market in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. I don't know about South and Central America. I understand from the replies here that North America currently has budget motherboards using supported NICs, or at least did when most people posting here last built a system. Note that these boards started becoming ubiquitous here at about summertime, and they now saturate the market.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  16. These guys make/sell linux comp hardware by zoktar · · Score: 1

    only vendor i know https://www.system76.com/

  17. It's about components on the board by DrHappyAngry · · Score: 1

    You really need to look past the motherboard as a whole and more at the components that make it up. Going all Intel should give you a really compatible set up. You do have to really read the specs to find out which NIC(s) the board uses, but an intel one should work great. I have had a bit of a caveat with some distros like centos on the newer intel NICs. There's an alternate driver called e1000e that will work stably with those. Distros that use newer kernels, like ubuntu should default to the e1000e driver on those, though. The problem I had with the older 1000e driver was the interface would lock up after a few days, but it was certainly good enough to get online and do initial setup and add the repo where I could get the e1000e driver.

    1. Re:It's about components on the board by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You should really be getting intel NICs pretty much no matter what. Dell sells them as an additional cost for a reason. The reason being broadcom sucks.

  18. Try MSI's Mainboards... by Eyeballs · · Score: 1

    They _come_ with a Linux distro called 'Winki 3'.
    For an example, see: http://us.msi.com/product/mb/Z77A-G45-Thunderbolt.html

  19. I switched to Intel boards by swb · · Score: 2

    I've used Tyan (although my last one was a dual P3), Gigabyte and Asus and I finally just switched to Intel boards, primarily to not have to ever use a Realtek (aka Realdreck) ethernet chipset again.

    My Gigabyte and Asus boards used Realtek ethernet chipsets and they were total shit, both at the hardware level and at the software level. I ended up buying Intel cards and disabling/uninstalling the Realtek shit as much as possible.

    Now I just buy Intel boards and get a decent Intel NIC, although Intel can be a PITA about releasing server OS drivers for what they call "consumer" NICs. The side benefit has been less weird shit and documentation in better English.

    Intel boards may not be great "values" (relative to maximum features or overclockability) but they have always been super stable and worked right.

    1. Re:I switched to Intel boards by thanosv · · Score: 1

      thanks SWB - this is good advice

    2. Re:I switched to Intel boards by fnj · · Score: 1

      Realdreck, the bain of my existence as far back as I have clear memory. I also only consider Intel motherboards, primarily for just that reason.

    3. Re:I switched to Intel boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had similar problems with a Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 revision 2.1 motherboard that has an integrated Realtek 8111D Gb Ethernet port. At the time when I built it, I had a dual boot system with Win XP Pro and LinuxMint 10 Gnome 64-bit. It had some weird problem when booting from one operating system to another where the Ethernet port would stop working. Only by shutting down the operating system, and then un-plugging the power cable from the power supply for sixty seconds, plugging it back in, and then booting into the OS that is wanted, would the Ethernet port work. Didn't matter which OS was booted first. I tried several different versions of the Windows driver for the Realtek port to no effect. Never tinkered on the Linux side, as I wasn't sure what to do with it besides trying a newer version which was not available at the time.

      It implies there is some firmware settings in the Realtek chipset that either get scrambled, or don't want to work with a different operating system until you clear out the firmware by completely removing power to the system. Could be hardware or software problems. I have no idea. At the time I never could find any concrete information about this.

      My solution was to buy an Intel Gb Ethernet PCIx card. Problem solved. Although I question the need for an Intel Ethernet card as opposed to another brand that works correctly with Linux. I bought it specifically for the TCP offload engine so minimal CPU cycles are used with network data transfers. Great for Windows OS's, which I'm using Win XP Pro to game, on so makes sense. But in hindsight, it turns out that the TCP offload engine is not supported in Linux.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_offload_engine

      So perhaps a less expensive, but correctly working in Linux Ethernet port or card would make sense? Unless of course the reason for everyone recommending Intel Ethernet cards are that all the basic Ethernet features do work correctly in Linux?

    4. Re:I switched to Intel boards by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

      TCP offload engine...for gaming? It's for high-speed file transfer on 1 and 10GbE TCP usage, iSCSI performance mostly. At a few hundred Kbps, or even 10Mbps, it is 100% wholly irrelevant. The goal of these technologies is to keep the CPU from being saturated at thousands of Mbps. Oh, and by the way, gaming traffic is often UDP.

    5. Re:I switched to Intel boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replying to my original post above:

      It works for gaming to, or any other data transfer. Opening the device manager in Win XP Pro the options for my Intel Gb Ethernet card are:

      IPv4 Checksum offload
      TCP Checksum offload (IPv4)
      UDP Checksum offload (IPv4)

      I have an older single core AMD Athlon CPU computer that for years used a Realtek PCI Ethernet card (D-Link DFE-530TX+). Online gaming with Battlefield 1942 was always jerky like it was skipping frames. Particularly with certain players that I'm sure were using cheat hacks to send more packets than necessary to lag other players. And changing the graphics resolution and details to lower levels didn't help.

      Swapping out the network card for an Intel version and enabling the offload engine made the game play smoothly. As the prior Realtek Ethernet card was using too much CPU to process the network requests/data transfers, thus lagging the game. I also noticed that data transfers over the LAN used much less CPU.

  20. Save yourself some trouble... by dclozier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have found that building such systems myself will end up costing a bit more because I cherry pick better components all around when less powerful options would have sufficed. If this is for an office setup and you're the one that's going to end up doing support for them then you'll want to know what's inside. If you can afford it though it would be better to pass this support issue over to someone else that's already doing desktop linux like System76 - Desktops.

    1. Re:Save yourself some trouble... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately importing a System76 machine is prohibitively expensive. I do need to build my own box, which is usually not a problem but we happen to be in a 'dark age' of Linux support from motherboard manufacturers right now.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  21. how? by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

    How did you succeed in finding incompatible hardware?
    I recently built an FM2 system around an Abit F2A85X-UP4 without any issues.
    Flawless migration from my previous box (ga-ma770-ds3 & AMD 9550).
    Open source radeon video driver w/ 3D accelleration.
    No chips that are not working.

    1. Re:how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abit? Lol dead for years. You meant Gigabyte.

    2. Re:how? by Lluc · · Score: 1

      Abit still exists??? I remember them from back in the 440BX days with the original P3 CPUs, but I haven't heard that name in ages!

  22. Asus works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have built several Linux boxes over the years and had no problem with ASUS. Raspberry Pi is cheap but sloooow.

  23. Re:Fuck off by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    So you're saying that Windows 8 is fast enough to get the First Post every time? Are you sure you don't work for Microsoft marketing?

  24. Buy pre-installed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not buy Linux pre-installed on a machine? Dell, HP, System76 and a number of other places sell Linux pre-installed. Sometimes the cost is slightly higher, but i think it is probably worth it considering all the time you are apparently spending trying to get generic solutions working.

  25. try google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'linux friendly motherboards'

  26. Op is just being lazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what I found without looking too hard:

    http://www.asus.com/Static_WebPage/OS_Compatibility/
    http://www.ecs.com.tw/extra/event/intel/program0508.html ..and pretty much any Intel OEM/retail board will do you fine too.

    Generally speaking (and I'm sure there's exceptions to this that others will point out), when it comes to the integrated NIC if you stick to something that uses an Intel PHY you should be fine. Not only do they perform better than most Realtek PHY's but they're better supported by most distros too.

    1. Re:Op is just being lazy... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I specifically asked Asus support for such a list and they could not furbish one. Terrific!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  27. Result of Linus middle finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what we get for being hostile to the hardware manufactures themselves. There is really no technical reason why hardware makers wouldn't write linux drivers for all their equipment. The motherboard has little to do with this problem and more the chipsets they choose. Virtually every linux install I do has problems like this many of which require bizarre setting changes...don't even get me going on audio.

    This is the result of open source ideology. I don't need open source drivers for my sound card. I just need a driver. And there is no reason that a driver written for 2.2 shouldn't work with 1000000.2. If someone takes the time to write an open source version of the driver great, but why won't the zeolots let me the end user decide how I feel about open source vs closed on "my" hardware.

    Can we not create a translation layer that could bind to closed source drivers? If the open source drivers have to come with a map to each function so be it. And honestly the driver just needs to work for a few years. If I was running a company with super low margins I just wouldn't want to take on the extra liability of having source code out there for people to crap on. Can we not create a Linux driver SDK like Windows has. MS for all their faults is much nicer to people spending real money making hardware. Heck if we wrote and maintained frameworks for these companies they might actually prefer Linux as most of the work had been done for them.

    There is no reason why Linux should always be the last to get good support for new things like Thunderbolt etc.

    1. Re:Result of Linus middle finger by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Thunderbolt SUCKS right now. Its incredibly overpriced and there are precious few companies making the stuff. Thunderbolt is stillborn.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Result of Linus middle finger by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Closed drivers have many disadvantages, and many of us are unwilling to accept those disadvantages...
      Off the top of my head:

      Only supports the architecture it was built for (eg lots of older hardware wouldn't be usable on 64bit systems, and would be unusable on ARM, MIPS or whatever other architectures may exist in the future). Open drivers can be recompiled for other architectures, which allows me to use all manner of USB devices on a Linux/ARM system for instance.
      Maintaining a stable driver ABI means making choices, which in the future will turn to limitations and impede progress... MS have been forced to change the driver ABI several times, and it resulted in older hardware which no longer worked at all, and all manner of other problems (see vista).
      Binary drivers for Linux only help Linux, they don't help any other OS while permissively licensed open drivers can easily be ported or studied.
      You cannot easily debug or modify binary drivers, windows has long been plagued with crashes caused by faulty drivers, and there are plenty of enthusiasts who like to tweak things to improve performance - doing so would be much easier with source code.
      The paranoid among us may even want to review what the drivers are doing, rather than rely on a black box supplied by someone else.

      Besides, why shouldn't manufacturers open up specs and/or release open drivers? They are selling hardware, not software, and the more people who are able to use their hardware the more they will sell.

      The top and bottom of it is that many of us simply wouldn't want to put up with the problems windows experiences as a result of closed drivers, and thus make an active conscious decision to choose hardware which has open drivers and avoid anything that relies on closed ones.

      I wonder how many sales companies have lost to this, not only do i only ever buy hardware which has open drivers but anyone who asks my opinion is also steered towards such hardware.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Result of Linus middle finger by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      thunderbolt will probably be the next firewire. Technically its better than USB3 (just like firewire was better than USB2) but used almost exclusively on Macs late to be supported by other OS like Microsoft and Linux. A few other devices such as video cameras which will come with thunderbolt but will have usb as well anyway and will be ignored by the rest of the universe except for a few external hard drive manufactures that will charge more for models that have it than ones that don't.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    4. Re:Result of Linus middle finger by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      In most cases, there's no good reason that hardware manufacturers can't publish documentation and let the community fend for itself. Something that "just needs to work for a few years" is really not good enough.

      Thunderbolt is not a great example for your screed. It's subject to very limited availability. Even if I were a happy Apple user, I would have trouble getting it in my preferred form factor (a real PC).

      On the other hand, Linux does get support for serious peripherals and has for quite awhile things. Stuff like fiber channel and infiniband are well supported in Linux already.

      Linux users will likely be experimenting with Thunderbolt before it's widely used (assuming it is ever widely used) on PCs.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  28. Make a Windows system your bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I mean is that once you've found a decent vendor for your motherboard, you are going to have to flash the BIOS to the latest version, verify that all the pieces of the motherboard work, etc. Sometimes these processes are difficult to do on Linux.

    Make 1 system a standalone Windows 7 box (don't use 8 unless you are nuts). Really, you are dedicating a hard drive to install Windows 7 onto. Load all your update files, test apps, etc. here and verify that each mobo is brought up to a consistent spec.

    Checklists are your friend

    Doing this will help you harmonize (or homogenize) your environment and make sure that hardware works independent from software issues.

    1. Re:Make a Windows system your bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or alternatively, make one system a dual-boot with a small partition for testing drivers etc. Make the default boot the Linux partition of course.

  29. Not able to find complete systems? by gQuigs · · Score: 1

    Dell will sell you Ubuntu machines preloaded (give them a call, ignore their website). I personally like System76 and ZaReason, but there are many others..
    http://linuxpreloaded.com/

  30. Any Intel Z77 motherboard by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Phoronix, the Intel DZ77GA-70K and the ECS Golden Board Z77H2-A2X are fine for Linux. It is implied that almost any motherboard with the Intel Z77 chip set should be OK for linux. They did a longer follow-up review on the ECS Z77H2-A2X Ultimate Golden Edition Extreme with linux.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  31. Off the shelf dell desktops? by L473ncy · · Score: 1

    My school uses off the shelf Vostro desktops with Xeon processors. They run CentOS no problem.

  32. Suggest you find a better local shop by Tim+Ward · · Score: 1

    My local shop would build me what I asked them to, and it would work.

    They've got people who know what each week's new motherboards can and can't do - there's no way I could keep up with that.

    Of course manually built-to-order is slightly more expensive than buying commodity-boxes-designed-for-Windows off the shelf, but sometimes you get what you pay for.

    1. Re:Suggest you find a better local shop by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I second this. A local clone manufacturer has invaluable experience in this matter. I know I did when I built systems for a living. We can't all be expected to keep up with what's new, but someone who does it day in and day out is going to give you some really good information.

    2. Re:Suggest you find a better local shop by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I have tried. Nobody here knows what Linux is, probably because they will pirate Windows for you right in the store.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  33. hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Intel branded boards seem like a reasonably good bet to work. If this is for an office you won't care about the lack of overclocking features.

    1. Re:hmm by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I haven't come across an Intel branded board, ever, but I will try to shop around and see if they are available.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:hmm by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      You might also want to try Super-micro boards. We use them exclusively for our servers which are all Linux. They feed a lot of the Appliance vendors their chassis and MB's so tend to be very Linux aware in what they build, even on their bleeding edge chipsets. I've found Asus to be kinda twitchy these last few years. Also straight Intel boards will rarely do you wrong, like the above folks have said.

    3. Re:hmm by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I wish that I could order from Newegg, but due to thieves in customs I must purchase locally.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:hmm by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I will take a look at Super-micro. I have now found an Intel board distributor locally too, so that may be my first choice.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  34. AVADirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to check out avadirect.com. I bought my last laptop from them a couple of years ago with Ubuntu installed. They have a DIY area, and I suspect they'd help you figure out what will work.

  35. Test and/or compromise by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    For years I've been using Asus motherboards and have never had any major problems. Perhaps some of the reasons for this are that I never go for the flagship models and/or the latest chipsets, never expect everything to work and am always willing to compromise. By the latter I mean in particular that I often end up adding things like sound cards when the Linux kernel I'm using (usually not the latest version) doesn't include support for the one on the motherboard. Graphics cards? Never expect too much or buy separately.

    For business solutions that I will be purchasing in bulk, always test first: you may be surprised how well it works, and if not at least you'll learn what to avoid. Just don't take too long testing, because products often disappear from the market before you know it (especially the cheaper boards).

    Reviews? I usually don't bother, but I don't think that makes me lazy, since I figure there's usually not a lot to choose from anyway. If I was always to limit myself only to those motherboards that were 100% compatible, that would probably limit my choice too much. It's worth more to me to be able to select what I want based on the hardware specifications alone (the most important ones; not all the bells and whistles).

  36. Re: Search Google? by GrantRobertson · · Score: 1

    Pardon me, but you do not "search" Google. You use Google to do a search.

    It's like saying, "I need some groceries, so I am going to drive to my car."

    And the other responses are correct. SEO and fraudulent reviews didn't exist in 1996. I can no longer count all the times all the reviews for a product said it was good, until just about the time the one I bought started F'ing up. Then suddenly all the reviews are bad. In some ways the internet is worse than the wild west because in the wild west you didn't have ten-thousand people lying to you and trying to steal your money, all at the same time.

  37. Asus P8H77 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Built a couple of Ubuntu 10.04 systems with an Asus P8H77-I ($99), using the on-board graphics. Works great, no BS

    1. Re:Asus P8H77 by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I have that board and the Z77 variant. Both run Ubuntu 12.04 LTS flawlessly, save for Bluetooth. I even pulled the OS drive out of one and popped it in the other and it worked just fine.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Asus P8H77 by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thanks. My last install was with an Asus P8H61-M LX, and the onboard NIC required a driver that is not in the mainline kernel. Worse, it was self-reporting as a NIC that is supported, so finding the problem was very difficult. I had completely discounted Asus but I will take another look at the board that you mention.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  38. System 76 by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I've never purchased from them, but they're the first ones I thought of:

    https://www.system76.com/

  39. Re:Fuck off by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 2

    I think you confuse Linux with Ubuntu.

  40. What works for Hackintosh... by thanosv · · Score: 1

    What works for a Hackintosh will usually work well for Linux. Check http://tonymacx86.blogspot.com/search/label/CustoMac. These builds have been well tested and I've used them for Ubuntu successfully.

  41. Re: Search Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be the case for the phrase "search for Google". Saying "search Google" would mean that Google is what you're searching through, not what you're searching for.

  42. what? by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how the hell do you make such a huge mountain out of a molehill?

    AMD, Intel, Nvidia, Realtech, VIA

    all have been supported in linux as system chipsets for a long fucking time, where the hell are you getting these crackhead mobos you speak of?

  43. Re:Fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Looks like 2011 was the year of the Linux desktop.

  44. If the Nic is the problem? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 0

    Then why not get a cheap $10 standalone Nic card and just nmot use the one built into the mobo?
    You can easily find linux compatible cards.

  45. There are many vendors with Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have tested Asus Maximus V Gene and it works perfect. Same goes for Gigabyte Ga-970A-UD3, Sapphire PURE Black 990FX. Read about ZaReason Zima 930, ThinkPenguin, Diablotek U310-BB, System76.

  46. You sign the vendor's non-disclosure agreement ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    When vendors don't publish drivers or specs how is that supposed to happen?

    You sign the vendor's non-disclosure agreement and then they provide the specs. So in a way this is a "cost" of being open source, some won't buy into your model. Everything has a cost.

    FWIW, as many others have commented, I've been buying Intel motherboards and NICs for over a decade and I've never had a problem.

  47. Re:You sign the vendor's non-disclosure agreement by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    That is what I do for the most part.
    Even put an intel nic into my AM3+ build. But that is because I had a nice quad port server nic laying around at work and no use for it. Yes, I had them sell it to me. For $10.

  48. Never had a problem with MSI by dbhost · · Score: 1

    I have been using MSI motherboards since the late 90s with never a single problem. I am presently putting together a cluster based on MSI 970A-G46 9 AM3+ motherboards, quad core Phenom processors etc... CentOS 6.3 is perfectly happy with it... Not sure what distro you are using, but it sounds more like the Linux version you are using isn't supporting current hardware, instead of non standard hardware... I've been known to be wrong before though.

  49. Asus boards seem to be Linux frendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Asus P8Z77 WS, 100% working with Linux out of the box and has a TPM
    socket and supports secure boot and installing your own secure boot signing credentials.

    1. Re:Asus boards seem to be Linux frendly by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      My Asus P8H67M-Pro is the first UEFI board I've ever had. It's run every distro I ever threw at it; SUSE, Mint, Debian, etc. You may need to disable AHCI and ACPI during install.

  50. get the driver from Realtek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This chip has been used in a lot of AMD motherboards for several years now. You get the driver from Realtek, at http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=5&PFid=5&Level=5&Conn=4&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false#2. Follow the instructions in the README.

    I don't know about other versions of Linux but this has been screwed up in Ubuntu for a long time now. The kernel detects this device as another type of ethernet controller and loads the wrong module. And periodically, Ubuntu updates overwrite the driver and you have to re-install the one from Realtek.

    You probably would have found this yourself had you googled "rtl8168 driver linux".

  51. Re:I hate jews by dotancohen · · Score: 0

    ashkenazi jews are the scum of the earth and need to be brutally exterminated. I would personally like to also be involved in their extermination.

    Thank you, that was very insightful. Would you suggest gas showers right as we get off the train, or is it better to work us to death first? Would you suggest shooting rockets at Jewish cities, or getting the bombs right on the bus?

    I appreciate your contribution to the conversation.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  52. SuperMicro by hackus · · Score: 1

    Built systems with their E5 series motherboards (i.e.X9DA) that made my HP vendor cry in the corner asking for his mama.

    Must have saved like close to 20 grand by whiteboxing a system spec I slotted from HP for 60 Grand.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  53. Re:The problem isn't the systemboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, you misunderstood OPs requirements. He wants to run Linux, not Windows.

  54. Coreboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May I suggest this page http://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Motherboards

    A supported motherboard can even run with an open source BIOS.

    Pretty good bet, they'll be Linux compatible.

  55. Re: Search Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not searching through Google, you're using Google to search through the internet.

  56. Check these first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try searching these sites for possibilities.
    As with Linux + Hardware, your mileage may vary...

    http://www.linux-drivers.org/

    http://linuxhcl.com/

  57. Just got unlucky + dumb, $20 NIC by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't sweat it. In my experience, there's rarely a problem. Since everything "just works" 99.5% of the time, I don't even spend time checking unless it's a $600 RAID card. (The top shelf stuff has always been compatible, but worth checking before spending $600 on a card.) It's probably more costly to spend time worrying about it than the $0-$25 it would have cost to put in another NIC card. That was the real problem- the OP choose to spend 3 days instead of just grabbing a different NIC from his parts box or, if gigabit was required, running to Walmart and dropping $22.

  58. servers are b0ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well .. if it's " building a few Linux machines for a small office" you definitely want a firewall inbetween there.
    no need to build your own.
    just get a laptop / ultrabook /netbook whatever they call them all-in-ones nowadays with two nETWORK-iNTERFACE-cARDS (nic)
    like this: http://www.asus.com/Eee/Eee_PC/Eee_PC_1015PE_Seashell/#specifications
    chances are that you'll arelready have a a wifi connection available to your run-of-the-mill ISP, so
    just NAT (name address translation) the wired gigabit LAN to the wifi.
    unless of course your internet connection is actually faster then "n" speed wireless.
    then again to be ON topic, find a good (smelly hairry beared) programmer and tell you'll provide
    NO shampoo, NO laundry and hardware in question that needs to be opensourced ... shouldnt be a problem : P

  59. Obligatory by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Pardon me, but you do not "search" Google. You use Google to do a search.

    In Soviet Russia, Google searches YOU!

    [Sorry, you asked for it.]

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re: Obligatory by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

      Actually Google searches most everybody. Thats kind of their busness model isn't it? Its just that in the Soviet when you get searched it will cost you to get it back.

    2. Re: Obligatory by GrantRobertson · · Score: 1

      Darn! You beat me to it.

  60. Re: Search Google? by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're going to be particular, you are searching through Google's index of the Internet. It isn't like every search you make results in a bunch of requests to all the websites to see if it matches your query.

  61. ASUS by grink · · Score: 2

    I've had several ASUS motherboards that work fine. My current one is the M5A97 R2.0 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_AM3Plus/M5A97_R20/).

  62. Ctrl-F "Ubuntu" in the customer reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I'm going to build a linux PC (often), I go to the motherboards section on newegg (you may have a different tech savvy retailer but that's mine), tab open the boards that meet the specs, then open the reviews section where users post reviews and ctrl-F "ubuntu" or "linux". There is almost always a nice comment in the reviews for one or two of the boards by a customer who said they booted straight from the install cd and had perfect driver support or something along those lines. So far so good. I have also a had a few friends make HTPC's as their intro to linux and have no snags copying this trick to select compatible hardware esp. motherboards.

  63. linux just runs by Vince6791 · · Score: 1

    A few month's ago I build myself an amd machine and purchased an asrock icafe 870 r2.0 because it was cheap and because it ran my phenom iix6 processor. The windows 7 and 8 both 64-bit had trouble running on this board even with MS south bridge drivers or from AMD, it kept on freezing constantly. But with any linux distros(opensuse, ubuntu, mint, fedora) it ran excellent, no issues. I later decided to go into the motherboard bios and change the storage settings from IDE compatibility to SATA mode only and reinstall windows 7 and weeks later windows 8 with the latest amd south bridge drivers, now there were no issues on both of these MS OS's. I think the open source generic drivers for linux except for video(some amd) work much better out of the box than windows. If intel and amd cpu internal specifications are available freely to developers why not gpu's? Are they afraid somebody will create their own modified directx api for linux?

  64. We use Supermicro by oilyfishhead · · Score: 1

    We build all of our servers with Supermicro boards (X8 annd X9 series). They all work fine with Fedora, CentOS, and RHEL 6. www.germane.com

    1. Re:We use Supermicro by Skapare · · Score: 2

      They also work with Debian, Slackware, and Ubuntu (as long as you're not working with too old a kernel).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  65. Out the bad motherboard maker by Skapare · · Score: 1

    When some motherboard maker is doing stuff like reporting device types all wrong, they need to be outed.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  66. Intel Boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Good performance
    - BIOS usually OK
    - Overclocking not too good though
    - No crappy components

    Money usually buys you good stuff.

  67. MSI by tramp · · Score: 1

    So far I have not encountered any difficulties installing Ubuntu on MSI motherboards and they are not very expensive either. Of course YMMV.

  68. BackBlaze uses the SuperMicro MBD-X8SIL-F ... by RealGene · · Score: 1

    with an Intel i3 540 3.06 Ghz CPU running 64-bit Debian 5.
    I think they use that mobo because it has lots of SATA ports.

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  69. Gigabyte by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    Regardless of their "official"position, my experience with Linux on Gigabyte boards is excellent, especially the midrange to higher-end boards. One machine that I build 12 yrs ago on a gigabyte board is still running an insurance office, it was a dual-socket Gigabyte P3 board with 2 gigs ram.

    Their BIOS setup at least on the server boards is very friendly with Linux

    --
    C|N>K
  70. Intel! Period. by fnj · · Score: 1

    Bingo. There is no reason to even look at anything beyond Intel motherboards unless you are a glutton for punishment. Voice of long experience here. Never the slightest problem with Intel, the prices are right, very reliable, and excellent BIOS features.

  71. Try Asus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've built several machines throughout the years with asus motherboards.

    NIC and sound cards always work, 100%, first time, with built in drivers. Other motherboard features work %100 with these mobos. To include 5.1 and 7.1 surround sound (know you don't care about that).

    captcha: firstly

  72. Go to the mobo's manufacturer site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to the motherboard's page sometimes help since there maybe review, cooments or even a driver download that leads to Linux drivers

  73. Ubuntu Hardware Support page by gbobeck · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu has a few pages which outline supported hardware and certified computers.

    https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport

    --
    Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  74. SuperMicro for motherboards with GNU/Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Responses like "No official Linux support, install Windows for best experience" is what keeps the majority of motherboard vendors from being taken seriously for the datacenter/server market. The problem with asking which specific motherboards are GNU/Linux friendly or keeping a hardware compatibility list is the speed of turn over of motherboards. Just because the motherboard model ending in "-A" is GNU/Linux friendly doesn't mean the model ending in "-B" or "-C" will be. Similarly, if "v1" of a motherboard is GNU/Linux friendly, then "v1.1" or "v2" might not be. So, it is preferable to just have a GNU/Linux friendly motherboard company like SuperMicro. We have never gotten a reply like "install Windows for best experience" from SuperMicro.

  75. ASUS is *not* Linux friendly. by jvonk · · Score: 2

    I've bought about 2 dozen Asus AMD motherboards, and they all work fine in Linux.

    Consider yourself fortunate.

    ASUS doesn't consider Linux support a priority, and goes out of their way to stymie support for their motherboards. Note that there is *still* no resolution for this issue: the current patch is a hack that "kind of" works, which is the best that can be expected without a datasheet.

    Typical motherboard tech specs don't list the SMBus/IO chipsets. So, if you want to ensure your motherboard will have support in Linux, you have to do ridiculous thngs like going online and searching for a high-res photo of the motherboard and hoping you can read the designation screenprinted on the chip (and then checking support status on the lm-sensors site). Or you could try to contact sales support with your technical questions, but that's just *painful*.

    So, while it is ASUS' right to restrict their market however they like (including blocking Linux support for their motherboards), it is important to ensure the Linux using subset of the population is aware of ASUS' stance on Linux support—ASUS does not care about your ability to use Linux on their hardware.

    1. Re:ASUS is *not* Linux friendly. by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      FWIW I've had good luck with Asus, for both servers and desktops. Over a dozen Linux systems built using Asus motherboards so far. Guess I just haven't hit any of the ones with problematic chips on them.

  76. Come to think about the RTL8168 by davydagger · · Score: 1

    "my last install was a three-day affair due to the motherboard reporting a Linux-supported ethernet device (the common RTL8168) while it was actually using a GbE Ethernet device that does not work with the legacy drivers"
    After a little bit in this thread, I did a lspci, and I found I have this card.

    I am posting this on a gigabit RTL8111/8168B card

    works flawlessly on both mint and arch. a few years of rock solid GBit service

  77. ZaReason or ThinkPenquin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to cut out some of the hassle, try ordering from either of those companies as they both strive to make the best GNU/Linux-compatible devices on the market currently (IMHO).

  78. not intel soon if there plans to build in cpu in t by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    not Intel soon if there plans to build in cpu in to them with no sockets does not change.

  79. Supermicro, asus, etc by dtdmrr · · Score: 2

    I agree, I've had the best experiences with supermicro. Their OS compatability list is more than sufficient (they don't list Debian, but they cover enough distros that it doesn't matter). For one recent purchase, the list was sufficiently detailed to indicate that a motherboard I'd selected was compatible with FreeBSD 9.0, except the raid controller, which was supported by 8.2 (the driver missed the release window for the 9.0 kernel, but was trivial to compile). Aside from having to compile that one driver, I've never had any compatibility troubles with their motherboards with either Linux or BSD (haven't tried windows). I've also never had one fail (having used a few dozen over the last decade), so can't really comment on their warranty services.
    For workstations, I mostly use Asus boards. They tend to have more bells and whistles and also have worked really well for me. I have used Intel boards, and can confirm they are also great but generally fall behind Asus and Supermicro on one end or the other (particularly considering their prices).
    Except for laptops and smaller, I generally only buy boards that supprt ECC, that probably weeds out most of the crappy stuff on the market.

    As for EFI, I haven't used it on a server or workstation yet, but I have used it on a laptop with an older bios that doesn't have the secure booting crap, or at least it's not enabled. From what I've seen its an ugly mess. Some cool ideas, but really lacking solid userfriendly tools. If you do a fresh install, it might not be too bad. I've only play with converting legacy bios installations to UEFI with and without GPT. For the most part, you can't configure/install the key components for EFI booting on a running system that was booted in legacy mode. The machines I've played with only support net booting with legacy bios (I typically net boot for installs and repair).
    Converting a linux install without rewriting the entire disk is actually not too dificult, if you do it just right. However, don't try it unless you are comfortable with loosing the data on the disk. Windows seems to be a lot more finicky about EFI. For one, it will only boot with GPT partition tables (my bios and the linux kernel don't seem to mind using either GPT or legacy tables). Can't say I care enough about windows to have put in the effort to get the conversion to work.
    Anyway, EFI is still surmountable, but life is easier if you avoid it and get a friendly board that still supports legacy booting.

  80. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got like 20 Asus cheapo pcs sitting here all running linux. Just go into the BIOS and set the boot device to the first drive instead of uefi or whatever the fuck it defaults to. Seriously bro, the on board nic works fine...here is the model.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883220219

    Fuck man...just get away from the keyboard...MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE!

  81. zotac mini ITX boards by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

    We use with rather acceptable results zotac (see zotacusa.com) Mini-ITX boards

    an Atom Ion2 board will be enough for most randome office work
    and an I7 with an Nvidia GT640 will serve quite well as an high end dual full HD dev machine (or gaming console :-))
    And the price/size ratio is quite nice.

    For a "pure dev" machine you can up power from the atom config and down price from the I7 using a GT430 + I3 the 430 can be avaiable as an embedded option and helps you get a nice quite machine, but you'll get only 20 fps or so on dual screen games... wich might be enough ....

    Of course using Nvidia boards means having decent perf on the proprietary closed source driver, but it's non free...
    or using the nouveau driver wich has it's set of limitations....
    For our specific usage it's currently the only effective solution, for most people there are many other GPU's options...
    (compatible with the same Zotacs boards)...

    1. Re:zotac mini ITX boards by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Nuther vote for zotac. sane bios virtualizaion ON, VMware64 boots/instals vanilla whack/whack/whack on the enter (wireless not supported) U12.03 LTS installs/ Centos 6.2 as well. great bang for the buck for a booksize package.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  82. What's the Application - desktop, server or other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I build and run servers for a living. Many of the boxes I get are gently used servers or retail motherboards. The server boards are usually the least of my problems, because the things that need to be compatible are fewer - disks, memory, and network. Crappy video is OK if it works. Sound doesn't matter. It's always better if I update the BIOS to a known good (recent) level before starting. I know of one OEM who shipped us Supermicro boards with CentOS installed as the default OS. They worked great.

    Desktop systems are more of a problem, due to the need for high quality video and sound and possibly other hardware. I have had better luck with Ubuntu on laptop/desktop systems than with CentOS.

    Intel board weirdness/compatibility - One really weird thing that I ran into recently was an Intel DH61WW desktop board. It was set to boot Gentoo from a flash drive, but would not find the USB stick about one out of ten tries. Intel only supports certain boards for the server channel and the desktop channel - I could not get drivers for this same board in Windows Server 2008, so I popped in a $15 TRENDnet nic and it worked fine. Only a good solution if you have the free slots.

  83. Asus P8Z68-V LX works fine for me by rklrkl · · Score: 2

    I've got a couple of PCs with the Asus P8Z68-V LX running 64-bit CentOS 6.3 and/or Ubuntu 12.04 without any issues at all. Newegg has them for $80 and they support 32GB RAM, SATA 3, USB 3 and have decent onboard graphics (with plenty of slots for beefier cards). I don't see anything in this price range that a) works 100% with Linux and b) has good specs like this MB.

    One nice thing - the BIOS is dead easy to upgrade - none of this Windows-only (or DOS-on-a-floppy!) rubbish: there's a built in filestore navigator in the BIOS and it picks up a .ROM file off a USB stick without any problems. And, yes, Asus do BIOS updates even for MBs like these which aren't that new or anywhere near the top of their range.

    It should be noted that it's an LGA 1155/Z68 MB, which may or may not work with Ivy Bridge CPUs (I used a "lowly" i7 2600 Sandy Bridge in mine). I'm sure there must be an Asus equivalent to this MB that does.

    1. Re:Asus P8Z68-V LX works fine for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had good luck with Ubuntu on Asus motherboards. Asus has a list of Linux compatible motherboards on its website: http://usa.asus.com/Static_WebPage/OS_Compatibility/

  84. Apparently the MacBook Air is good enough for by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Linus.
    http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/19/an-interview-with-millenium-technology-prize-finalist-linus-torvalds/

    I like my MacBook Pro. What I don't like is that Apple dropped the 17" MacBook Pro from the line-up. That's what mine is and it's about tyme I get a new one. But unfortunately the biggest MacBook Pro now is only 15". Now why would Apple put a retina display on a 15" laptop but not a 17"? Using as high a resolution as that on a small display is stupid, just how many people can distinguish the details on such a small display?

    Falcon

  85. "Flash works fine on 64 bit Linux" - NOT by tlambert · · Score: 1, Troll

    You appear to be unaware of the details of protected content vis-a-vis Flash; I shall try to lay it out for you:

    Protected content sold by Amazon, and also by Google Play, is protected via Adobe Flash Access.

    Adobe Flash Access relies on a unique machine identifier to implement the key escrow in order to lock your content to the download machine so that it can not be re-uploaded in a digital form without having to use the analog hole in order to degrade the content.

    The way it obtains this unique machine identifier is by synthesis of a lot of different machine information via libhal (a library with an associated daemon, intended as a Hardware Abstration Layer). As you can easily see here: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/hal libhal has been deprecated since May of 2008, yet Adobe chose to require it anyway.

    This four-year-out-of-date library is not installed by default on Ubuntu systems, and doesn't give the answers Adobe Flash Access wants in order to be able to successfully run on 64 bit systems. Even when hacked up, there are typically symptoms during video playback, such as the video playing fine up to the first commercial break, and then after the commercial, the audio continues working, but the video is nothing but a black screen.

    These problems do not occur on a 32 bit Linux, as they do on a 64 bit Linux running 32 bit software. The need to support multiple Linux platforms, combines with the Jan 31st 2012 rollout of the new version of Adobe Flash Access protection on content by Amazon no doubt influenced the decision, announced Feb 20 2012, to drop Adobe Flash Support for Linux outside official Google Chrome builds: http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html

    Now that you have the context, do my earlier comments on 64bit vs. 32 bit make more sense?

  86. ASUS Linux "compability list" by X.25 · · Score: 2

    I might be late with this, but if you are considering ASUS motherboards, this can help:

    http://www.asus.com/websites/global/aboutasus/OS/Linux.pdf

  87. So fuckin' what? by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

    so, you had a new realtek GbE chip that wasn't yet supported by the old realtek driver? so what? copy a new kernel, done deal dude. not rocket science. it's not like this hasn't been the case since for, oh, i dunno, EVERY TIME THE PCI DEVICE ID CHANGES ON SOME NEW ON-BOARD CHIP?

  88. Look dude, I'm the one who tracked down the bug. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Look dude, I'm the one who tracked down the bug. I'm the one who reported it to all the UEFI BIOS vendors, and as far as I know, H2O is the only company which has fixed their implementation to list the code and data tagging to place that static library into the runtime services region rather than the boot time services so that it's not reclaimed out from under the runtime services by an aggressive OS page reclaim.

    I know the specification, and I know that the implementation doesn't match the specification for almost every UEFI implementation out there. I know about the talks on attack surface, but that's not going to fix the F-ed up BIOS in hardware that's already out there, and motherboard vendors generally don't ship BIOS updates unless they pay the contracted BIOS company to do the work, and they only do that for problems which can't be worked around in software.

    For the (majority) busted UEFI implementations, the workaround of delaying the reclaim of the pages until the memory call has been made leaves the attack surface open. Not delaying the reclaim of the pages doesn't close the attack window, it just moves it into whatever crap the OS has loaded into those pages rather than whatever crap that UEFI had there before the boot time services were terminated.

    That aside, regardless of whether the busted UEFI leaves the attack surface there, the point is that, like POSIX conformance testing, when the spec and the code disagree, the code wins. Period.

    This is the same problem the ACPI implementation has been suffering from for years: The vendor can make it totally correct according to the specification, or they can make it possible to continue booting unmodified Microsoft Windows distributions. The result is that the ACPI implementation never gets totally technically correct.

    You can keep modding my posts down because you don't like their content, but it won't make the content untrue, or make that truth any less inconvenient for people like the OP who had problems getting Linux running on their UEFI based grey boxes they were trying to build themselves.

    I've told the OP where to put the workaround in Linux, and I've told the OP where the bug lives in the UEFI implementation (good luck getting the vendor to fix that just for Linux, unless there's an offer to pay their BIOS vendor contract costs for doing the work, or an offer to buy a large enough number of units in a single order with the sale condition on getting the fix.

    It'd be nice if the vendors fixed the bug so Linux didn't have to work around it, and it's also be nice for Linux if nVidia and ATI released the sources to the hardware acceleration portions of their drivers too, but that's just not going to happen without some serious $ changing hands.

    I guarantee you that the bug report I filed with Apple (one of the vendors with a broken UEFI from using the broken Intel reference implementation) has been P3'ed as a "nice to have", and then moved to a component where it's not visible to most Apple engineers who could actually fix the problem, if they had a bug report to hang the fix on.

  89. Re:Fuck off by chriscappuccio · · Score: 1

    So, Ubuntu is the Amazon advertising tool. Linux is just a kernel. Run OpenBSD, it's better anyways.

  90. Gigabyte Mobos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have built several Ubuntu 12.04 Servers with GA-X79S-UP5-WIFI. They always boot first try, every time. Put two together and had them on the network in 1 hr. Can go as big as you need, but may be a bit much for lower end systems.
    http://www.gigabyte.us/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4287#ov

  91. Which manufacturer has invested? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    By use of the word 'friendly' I think what the OP is looking for is a manufacturer who have invested in linux and early on.
    Perhaps a dev working on kernel patches, something like that.

    Linux Foundation Platinum members: HP, Fujitsu, IBM (IBM), Intel (INTC), NEC, Oracle (ORCL), Qualcomm (QCOM), Samsung.

  92. LOL do it the lazy way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are too silly to research, then just buy something and see if it works. Return and repeat the process. Somewhere in there you'll learn to search the internet and use linux.

  93. Linux Mobos: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi dotancohen

    I just recently built a new pc
    acquired through my local mom n pop pc store.
    I too asked for no UEFI or
    at least no Secure Boot.
    He researched it and found
    the asus M5A78L-M LX Plus mobo, with
    the AMD FX4100 quad core processor.
    It uses the plain old school bios.
    None of this new M$ lock out bull sh-t!
    You can do 2, 4, 6, or 8 core as needed.

    So far, alls well with it.
    I run Ubu, and so far no hickups.
    Give this combo a try.
    I believe that youll do fine with it.

    Al D.

  94. try buying a server board by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

    Actually buy a server board, if your building a server. A quick search on newegg for "UEFI" under server boards came back to 0 results. This is because most servers are *nix based. The manufactures will not build them to require UEFI until you can install Linux on them. On principle, if your building a server build a server. Not a PC that your calling a server.