Slashdot Mirror

I looked at Jawa report and the first blog entry is "Kosfest--"We Hate America!"". Oh okay, the "they hate America" imbecile crowd then. But hey, nevermind that, maybe they're still a "news site", let's give them a chance and see their news, whoa, on their first page, next thing I see, they have this photo of weeping men and they request captions by saying "Caption this photo of Islamofascists realizing that Rusty was there, and they failed to kill him." http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/177712.php What bullshit. News site? Fucking bullshit. This is not a news site, this is a scum site. Scum beyond imagination.

Talking to yourself, idiot? Fuck you and every other liberal moron on the planet, and your muslim masters you piece of shit. The only thing I want to do with you and your kind is to watch until you stop kicking, and considering how fast society is falling apart and the government is losing control of the country because of political greed and corruption in both parties, I won't have long to wait. There'll be war in America soon, and your kind are gutless cowards, so enjoy your privileged life of blissful stupidity while you can, because the ride will be over soon, and your muslim friends will be strapping suicide vests on you, if we don't get you first. You're screwed, but then, you picked the team you wanted to play on.

You're thinking of HSTR - and no, no one really uses it anymore. In looking around I was amazed to see that the working group even thought far enough ahead to start planning a gigabit spec. I havent seen a concentrator/MAU (right word?) in years, though. Any QoS features that were implemented in Token Ring are pretty much duplicated in 802.1p and other (proprietary) layer 2 QoS/CoS protocols.

Rings themselves are still used, just in other topologies. You may still see some FDDI here and there, and many cable companies use RPR/DTP/SRP to deliver digital cable and broadband access at the same time in their cores.

Either way, I'm sure the pointy haired boss doesn't miss it.

a country such as the US or EU which has basic respect for the rules of war (eg, the Geneva Convention)
Haha where have you been hiding?

Mmm...wanna bet? Happens in Chicago, etc as well. I have heard, anecdotally, from a reporter that anonymous accusations happens about 10,000 time a day in the US and law enforcement resources are being tied up, because these are usually couched as "suspicious activity" reports, and there are rules about handling them when there are enough of them. That "not using a shopping cart" was considered evidence of potential massive shoplifting. and the two officers were not charged with working out too long or spending money on dry cleaning...they were charge with theft of public funds.

If the victim is not in a political or financial position to defend themself, unlike as they were in the New Jersey cases, the result can be that the victim is unemployable at best and homeless or imprisoned at worst.

This was a minor problem, in the days before interlinked databases and federated text mining. Technology has turned this into a major problem, because the unclean data points these sorts of actions generate pollute far more databases than the call records of local police, often ending up in NCLC, Choicepoint, Equifax and Axciom (among others) databases as well.

You can assert it's beside the point, until you have been one of the victims. Then it hits home; its more like identity theft, except its rape, not theft, in a very real sense. Not a minor crime at all.

When you add in the fact it is a weapon used against whistleblowers and others (like law enforcement officers) that attempt to report crimes or enforce laws, it becomes a major issue indeed.

Now lets kick it up a notch. I have heard that the Democrats are setting up a potential voter database for text mining (CSPAN, last week) similar to the ones the Republicans used in 2004.
http://ifk-johnkerry.blogspot.com/2004/12/more-pai nful-lessons-from-2004.html

Which means that, in 2007-2008 Two parties, who, AT EVERY LEVEL, tend to fight as dirty as possible, are going to have microfocused databases on potential swing votors...and swing influencers. The mind boggles what sorts of, umm, interesting, scenarios of innuendos, accusations, blackmail, favors and threats might pop out as the race heats up. I mean, we are two years away from that New Jersey race, the DNC database isn't set up yet, and we are already seeing this.

Now add in potential donors, such as the chinese fundraising scandal (Huang, Ickes, etc) a few years ago,(http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=john+Hua ng+ickes+clinton&btnG=Google+Search) the fact that the CPC/PRC will be about a year away from collapsing internally (http://simonworld.mu.nu/archives/150816.php), rising American protectionism and isolationism like the DPW issue, and the ADVISE system adding blog entries to the suspicous activity database http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0209/p01s02-uspo.htm land we pretty much have a perfect storm brewing both in China and America. The damage to America's reputation frow DPW was bad enough...this could be far worse.

I hope you can come up with a better line of justification of your reasoning than just simply stating your conclusion. If you feel this is the wrong way to approach it (which, incidently, I would agree, except I see no other solution), how would you suggest handling the problem? There is a clear and present danger to both real people and the public welfare.

"ITunes is one way to bring fresh eyeballs to the network, he said, in particular the younger demo that uses video iPods."

Don't you find it especially intimidating TV execs when they refer to people as eyeballs?

They are thughs? all of them?, without a doubt? says who ?

Why don't we kill them all and let some kind of higher being sort it out then ?

Much evidence point to the fact that most GB detainees were taken in because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Sure, some of them probably are thugs, but the *point* of due process for everyone is to sort the guilty from the innocent. Since the Army did not follow any kind of due process they have a huge PR problem on their hand whereby they either declare everyone guilty without proper trial (since they don't have proper evidence) or they must admit they don't have much evidence and release a lot of detainee eventually.

Of course there are those who believe that it is better to indict and lock up a few innocent people (even perhaps many innocent people) in order to make sure the guilty don't escape.

In this case those very same people should have no objections when American hostages are taken in Iraq and elsewhere and executed. After all a few of them are bound to be CIA agents (i.e. "terrorists"), right?

Brazilian -> brazillion, i.e., a lot

The notion that somebody out there with the looks of Angelina Jolie is blogging away merrily is... Well, keep fantasizing.

Oh, but I beg to differ...

http://www.notadesperatehousewife.mu.nu/

This is but one of many, and (be still, my heart!) they tend to be overwhelmingly conservative.

It's Every Video Game You've Ever Played, from Ace-of-Spades.

Sgrena claimed the soldiers fired 300-400 bullets into the car. Here are pictures of the car.

Here and here.

Look at how "badly" her car was "shot up" and decide for yourself if this "journalist" is a lying sack of shit for saying that the car was shot at 300 or 400 times.

Now, use the information you have just learned to judge her credibility as a whole.

Here.

This self-avowed communist is so full of shit her eyeballs are solid brown.

I've turned in rental cars in worse shape and not been charged extra for damage.

It was Lenin who said that and he actually didn't say it. It was invented by the John Birch Society to describe Ronald Regan.

Source

There is much more evidence that Lenin referred to them instead as "Deaf Mutes" which is much less of a marketable term for the anti-communists to use in describing how communists view their dupes.

Article that Makes Reference to the Deaf Mutes Quote. This quote was also referenced by Theodore Radzinsky in his Stalin Biography as being authentic.

"The so-called cultural element of Western Eurpoe and America are incapable of comprehening the present state of affairs and the actual balance of forces; these elements must be regarded as deaf-mutes and treated accordingly....

(The Lufkin News, King Featurers Syndicate, Inc., 31 July 1962, p. 4, as quoted by the Freeman Report, 30 Sept. 1973, p. 8).

That's a "trusted" source, I guess.

But JawaOnline uses "hate speech", according to Google News.

Go ahead, mod this down. But Google News accepts as "news" a site that all but cheers on misogynistic honor rape.

Fucking Jesus, aren't there truly significant free speech issues that deserve the attention wasted on this BS? I can't play Don Imus as Rev. Billy Sol Hargis and one sacred chicken to go on the radio without fear of fines for broadcasting 'offensive' material. National Geographic is allowed to air naked aboriginal breasts yet Janet Jacksons teat is forbidden. Pigz eating banannas are censured because some fat ape is 'offended'.

Fucking MORONZ

is the dismantling of CBS's attempt to flaunt the(obiviously) fake National Guard memos

Of course, none of those examples allow left-wing bloggers to pimp their "outing" of some who-dat journalist whose biggest crimes seem to be asking questions from a conservative viewpoint.

Sure, we could of pushed the "instant win" button.

Drafting troops, calling up new troops? It'd take at least a year. That's about how long it takes to train a modern infantry trooper up to standards. Our troop mix is not up to the task of limited strikes in that amount. There are also substantial costs in terms of control and coordination. Extra supplies and equipment would have to be obtained too.

I see it taking 10-20 years before we can withdraw. We have to train up the Iraqi military from pretty much scratch, and senior officers and a good NCO core take years. I will say that we're taking more and more of a back seat to the Iraqies, letting them handle things. But building the trust, the skills, of government by the people takes time.

Middle America even approved of the Abu Ghraib attrocities. 57 million of them

Say WHAT? We approved? That's news to me! I cheered when I heard that the first soldier was convicted with maximum penaties. I ask why the highest ranking person being charged was an E-6. I expected at least a captain (note: the military can and often does hold an officer responsible for the acts of the troops under him or her).

A more credable statement would be that the Midwesterners saw the matter as "being handled". Investigation was done, people being punished, and besides, the terrorists are beheading people! Murder is worse than some idiots doing the equivalent of fraternity pranks.

Right Wing News Allah Is In The House Little Green Footballs Cavalier's Guardian WatchBlog Iraq The Model Instapundit Power Line Michelle Malkin Ace Of Spades HQ A Small Victory The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Israpundit Jihad Watch IMAO Moxie Niel Boortz Lonewacko Wizbang Dumb Celebs Fear And Loathing In Iraq Kim du Toit PABAAH Ann Coulter La Shawn Barber Mark Steyn David Limbaugh

Here's an informative link.

The New Soldier

For some strange reason, Kerry does not really want us to read this book...

Oh well, information wants to be free and all that.

I can still do this until the INDUCE act gets passed.

These files are in PDF format:

Here is the Intro

Here is the Main Section

Here is the Epilogue

Here is the Pics

When moderation time comes around, we will see who supports "banning" books.

Doubtless, there will be whiny replies of "But you are infringing this poor mans copyright!! You deserve to be modded down!!"

Yawn.

The New Soldier

For some strange reason, Kerry does not really want us to read this book...

Oh well, information wants to be free and all that.

I can still do this until the INDUCE act gets passed.

These files are in PDF format:

Here is the Intro

Here is the Main Section

Here is the Epilogue

Here is the Pics

When moderation time comes around, we will see who supports "banning" books.

Doubtless, there will be whiny replies of "But you are infringing this poor mans copyright!! You deserve to be modded down!!"

Yawn.

The New Soldier

For some strange reason, Kerry does not really want us to read this book...

Oh well, information wants to be free and all that.

I can still do this until the INDUCE act gets passed.

These files are in PDF format:

Here is the Intro

Here is the Main Section

Here is the Epilogue

Here is the Pics

When moderation time comes around, we will see who supports "banning" books.

Doubtless, there will be whiny replies of "But you are infringing this poor mans copyright!! You deserve to be modded down!!"

Yawn.

when crashing the system, allways ensure you have a scratch monkey plugged in

I remember when it was Multimedia. Now it's open source. So why are we celebrating that IBM is using new hype words to motivate its workers?

So what about their past sins?

"As a Usenet [or /.] discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one. There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress."

Dammit, I leave my screen unattended for a couple of minutes and get baggy pantsed. :-) It's the first time (and I hope the last) - though while the moderation is fair enough it could just as easily have been +1, funny if the moderators knew their jargon file...

What I care about is when I suffer from the Slashdot effect (transposing of letters when I type)

Transposing letters is not (and never has been) the 'Slashdot effect'.

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...

Why is it that when someone attempts to lock stuff they deem propritary so it won't get copied all over the place, so they can make a buck, someone has to come along to nullify it?
Instead of spending all your time trying to ruin someone's hard work, why don't you use your time and make something that *you* can sell? Hhhhmmmmm?
I hope you get sued and you go to jail.

You **MUST** be a suit. Comeon, you **HAVE TO BE** a suit. Will you **ADMIT** that **YOU ARE** a suit? **ONLY A SUIT** would think that conservatively.

But in any case, it's not really important. Even though you are a suit, it's no importance. Suits are always the first one to say no whenever someone comes with a bright idea, but whatever they say, it's of no importance, because bright ideas triumph by their own merit.

If it were not the case, suits would still lead us (from behind, of course - what does a suit knows better than his behind???) to the mammoth chase, and the hunters would still marvel why mammoths never have to peel suits from the bottom their feet...