Slashdot Mirror


Matrix-Style Brain Interface Closer To Reality

atkulp writes "According to this Wired article, a private company, Cyberkinetics is seeking permission from the FDA to test a product called BrainGate that implants in the brain and can control actions on a computer. So far it works for monkeys and they'd like to see it as viable for quadriplegics and others in need. How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card? Sign me up!"

567 comments

  1. screw the matrix by proj_2501 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can get a remote-controlled monkey?!

    1. Re:screw the matrix by Naffer · · Score: 1

      I hope it works better then those laptop-robots.
      Robots

    2. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandpa: Oh thank you son, this monkey is going to change my life.
      Homer: Uhh, yea. Would you mind if i took him for a ride?
      Grandpa: Sure, I'll just wait right here.
      Grandpa: (saying to himself) Mmmboy. I can't wait to eat that monkey.

    3. Re:screw the matrix by welshwaterloo · · Score: 1

      meh.. I don't trust any of this cybernetics lark unless it involves Kevin Warwick..

    4. Re:screw the matrix by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a beawulf cluster of US.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:screw the matrix by nih · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    6. Re:screw the matrix by 2MinutesForRoughing · · Score: 1

      Cross Monkeys with Robot Wars and you've got yourself an Emmy, well as long as you can get Simon Cowell to host.

    7. Re:screw the matrix by Codeboi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Flash! PETA activist beaten to death by R/C Monkey. News at 11!

    8. Re:screw the matrix by Coneasfast · · Score: 0

      ugh, who's the whacko that marked the parent 'insightful' , it's not like there is a thin line between 'funny' and 'insightful'

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    9. Re:screw the matrix by wastaz · · Score: 0

      A Beowulf cluster of the US?
      Ok, I can see how you were going for "a huge beowulf cluster of humans" and how cool that would be...but for (insert deity of choice here)'s sake, the US?

      Couldn't you at least take a country that had somewhat educated people in it?
      Or were you trying to poke at the monkey thing at the same time? in that case, good job man!

    10. Re:screw the matrix by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Funny

      What would you do with a robot on your lap? Never mind. I don't think I'd want to know....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    11. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he meant 'us,' like you and me. As in, the entire slashdot community: us.

    12. Re:screw the matrix by wondafucka · · Score: 1
      How many remote controlled monkeys?

      One at first, but he'll train more.

    13. Re:screw the matrix by Squarepusher · · Score: 1

      Tad Williams anyone? I want a T jack...

      --
      Every hour wounds. The last one kills.
    14. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No educated people in the United States? Please! How can you sit there and post that on a website that's part of an internet that wouldn't exist if it wasn't for educated people in the United States.

      And no, you monkeys from the rest of the world wouldn't have gotten around to doing it eventually. You accomplish precious little on your own and what does get done pales in comparison to the accomplishments of America.

      All the rest of you are our bitches to do as we please with. We own you. We dictate your new culture to you and watch you lap it up. Eat your McDonalds like good little Americans and shut the fuck up before we decide to go looking for weapons of mass destruction where you live.

    15. Re:screw the matrix by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      My God, I think you may have just made his point for him Mister AC. Good on you!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    16. Re:screw the matrix by odeee · · Score: 0

      Better.. a remote-controlled controlled quadraplegic!

    17. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beacuse marking it insightful IS funny.

    18. Re:screw the matrix by k0d0 · · Score: 0

      can I get a remote-control for my woman? :)

    19. Re:screw the matrix by caballos2 · · Score: 1

      looks like the first remote-controlled monkey has discovered the internet! please cut this nationalistic american crap.

    20. Re:screw the matrix by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about monkey's, but you can find some videos of remote-controlled rats on the net. Google for remote controlled rats video. Some news site have short clips of rats going through the "obstacle course". :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    21. Re:screw the matrix by p3d0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Those that modded this funny might want to consider that it appeared 12 minutes earlier here with the correct spelling of "Beowulf".

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    22. Re:screw the matrix by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beawulf cluster of US.

      Imagine a spellchecker.

      -MJ

    23. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I WANT a remote-controlled monkey!

    24. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's an un-controlled monkey personally

    25. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go back to whatever pathetic little shithole you come from, eat you fucking crossiants and whine so much about the US of A while secretly wishing you were here and not in your little backward fucktard of a country?

    26. Re:screw the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His post was rather rude, but which of his points do you disagree with?

      1. Educated people in the United States created the Internet. This is true.

      2. By many standards, America has historically had more significant technical accomplishments than any other country.

      3. American Culture spreads throughout other nations at an incredible pace, despite some great efforts to prevent it.

      4. McDonalds is popular everywhere.

      5. America has proven that it can go to war with someone for no reason whatsoever, just because it wants to. So many countries have basically been put on notice to watch their behavior.

      I'm not saying that these are good things or that I agree with them, but they are definitely true.

    27. Re:screw the matrix by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Well, honestly when you put it that way I have to admit that much of what he said was true.

      I would only submit that a person who was "educated" (in a well rounded manner that included some interpersonal communications skills) might have said these things in a less caustic manner or, upon giving it a thought or two might have chosen to not say them at all. I guess that means I disagree with his decision (which I judge to be a poor one) to post this information in the first place.

      But yes, those are all things I would generally accept as being true.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Yes, but .. by Autonomous+Cowherder · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. will I be able to run Linux?

    1. Re:Yes, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine a beowulf cluster of brain-implanted Natalie Portman clones! You can run linux on them!

    2. Re:Yes, but .. by SamiousHaze · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe, but you'd be fucked if you botched installing a new kernel.

    3. Re:Yes, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Better! A beowulf cluster of brain-implanted Natalie Portman clones covered in Hot Grits running Linux!!!

    4. Re:Yes, but .. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      No, but you WILL be able to play Ogg Vorbis files.

    5. Re:Yes, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or if you got hacked by chinese!!!

    6. Re:Yes, but .. by diersing · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, Linux RUNS you!!, or something

    7. Re:Yes, but .. by dustmote · · Score: 1

      You might have some trouble with hardware support. And don't believe the spams that say they can help with this problem, either!

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    8. Re:Yes, but .. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      that was the first funny take on the joke I've seen here EVER! :)

    9. Re:Yes, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is, will Darl McBride send you an invoice for $699 for each time you think of SCO?

    10. Re:Yes, but .. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > A beowulf cluster of [...] covered in Hot Grits running Linux!!!

      I tried that once, but the grits kept clogging the fans and burning her out. Maybe I should not have overclocked her brain(s). Next step is watercooling.

    11. Re:Yes, but .. by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't read any of the Jon Katz articles.

    12. Re:Yes, but .. by NeoThermic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or a direct link to your brain got posted on slashdot...

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    13. Re:Yes, but .. by zephc · · Score: 1

      Johnny Mnemonic: "Whoa, I can hold 80 gigabytes of MP3s in my head!"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    14. Re:Yes, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, i was thinking...
      fdisk /dev/brain
      mkreiserfs2 /dev/brain1
      mkswap /dev/brain2
      mkreiserfs2 /dev/brain3

      that would be cool
      i could keep a backup of my important thoughts
      just incase i had to .....
      never mind, i forgot :)

    15. Re:Yes, but .. by boelthorn · · Score: 1

      NetBSD, for sure.

    16. Re:Yes, but .. by VoidVector · · Score: 1

      even if you do, I bet you will be slashdotted in seconds.

    17. Re:Yes, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would SCO say? If you hurry you might manage to get sued!

    18. Re:Yes, but .. by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      format c:

    19. Re:Yes, but .. by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      But, then you'd be dying.

    20. Re:Yes, but .. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Never mind my brain, put those things in my pants and then turn on slashdot, yeah!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    21. Re:Yes, but .. by gilrain · · Score: 1

      Actually, humans are already watercooled! I guess liquid nitrogen would work. Or some good air conditioning. ;p

    22. Re:Yes, but .. by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      FUCKING HILLARIOUS!

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    23. Re:Yes, but .. by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > humans are already watercooled!

      D'oh, of course you are right :)

      > I guess liquid nitrogen would work

      That would give a whole new level of meaning to the phrase "Brain freeze."

    24. Re:Yes, but .. by prozaic · · Score: 1

      No. But "of course you [can] run NetBSD".

  4. Not exactly the Matrix by Orion442 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This would enable handicap people to control machines, not vice-versa. It would be killer for fighter pilots though...

    1. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      This would enable handicap people to control machines, not vice-versa.

      Isn't that basicaly what the Matrix is, at least half of it? Humans controlled their virtual beings inside the machines. The only difference is that the machines also presented an alternate view of reality, which this technology would not do (though there is work on that as well, especially for the blind/deaf/etc.).

    2. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
      It would be killer for fighter pilots though

      I thought so too, until I realised that the human brain has a tendency to wander. Sure, in the middle of aerial combat they'd be focused, but can you imagine what would happen in the case that some pilot is cruising along and thinks of his girlfriend back home? Yeah that's right... a very sharp climb into a stall.

      --
      IAALS.
    3. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by MagicM · · Score: 1

      With the average male thinking about sex every seven minutes, I don't know if their brain should be controling a machine that goes Mach X...

    4. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is the proof that handicapped people don't have problems controlling their machines (or should I say "boxen"?).

    5. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Orion442 · · Score: 1

      The only difference is that the machines also presented an alternate view of reality
      Until an Agent totally fucked up their perception of reality...
      which this technology would not do
      that's why I tried to rebut the technology being compared to it...

    6. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I think the plane would dump all of it's fuel. ;)

    7. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by dustmote · · Score: 1

      You mean I can't learn Kung Fu instantly? I'll wait until the next version comes out, thank you.

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    8. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Damn! I need to be able to control handicapped people with a machine. I was planning to enter my great uncle in robot wars.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 seconds

    10. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fire all it's missles (a little early of course)?

    11. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Zelet · · Score: 1

      I know this was a bit of joke but controlling a machine with your mind is a lot like controlling a body part. If you are walking down the street and start thinking about that hottie right a head of you, you don't raise your arms... you raise... um... other things.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    12. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > 6 seconds

      Myth

    13. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by mirko · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of something...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    14. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      This would enable handicap people to control machines, not vice-versa.

      Well good, because the thought of handicapped machines controlling people frightens me...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    15. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by JamesP · · Score: 0

      This would enable handicap people to control machines, not vice-versa
      Because machines controlling handicapped people is not what we can call useful...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    16. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      can you imagine what would happen in the case that some pilot is cruising along and thinks of his girlfriend back home? Yeah that's right... a very sharp climb into a stall.

      Speak for yourself

    17. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by MukiMuki · · Score: 0

      There there, I'm sure it happens to a lot of fighter jets.

    18. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by TMLink · · Score: 1

      Does that mean the landing gear will extend out then?

      --
      Every time a guy gets a threesome, somewhere in heaven an angel gets his wings. --Cary Tennis
    19. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Gherald · · Score: 1

      With the average male thinking about sex every seven minutes, I don't know if their brain should be controling a machine that goes Mach X

      It is a popular Sci-Fi concept that female pilots will come to dominate.

      This could be the start... :\

    20. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by hublan · · Score: 1

      This would enable handicap people to control machines, not vice-versa.

      Although it did allow a handicapped actor to control machines.

      --
      My spoon is too big.
    21. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, the Matrix is fictional.

    22. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by octal666 · · Score: 1

      More likely to run out of ammo.

      --
      DON'T PANIC
    23. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the insensitivity; I forgot that some people don't and will never have girlfriends.

    24. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by TroyFoley · · Score: 1

      When the plane is under his control much like his own hand is, it's not like he can't keep his hand from slipping down into his boxers. A mind wandering would just result in loosening whatever control he has on the plane, which wouldn't result in much.

      --
      After I have received the wisdom of good teaching, I will untiringly teach all people. - The Teachings of Buddha
    25. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by w3weasel · · Score: 1

      It would climb very sharply and then eject the pilot

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    26. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by meridian · · Score: 1

      It would allow a computer interface to be implanted into somebodies head and monitor what activity was happening. Its a good first step at least. We could have it put into Terrorists and if they were thinking bad thoughts zap em like labrats. Of course this would probably need a warrant for this unlike being able to look at all our emails sms's and phone calls without one. After all they need to keep an eye on us. Or when we get used to the idea they could use it in schoolkids to stop em thinking the wrong things. I'm all for it. This is the next step for technology. I wonder what the step after this is going to be. The Goverments of Australia, England and the USA are leading the world to the furture I can see it already!

      --
      meridian at tha.net
    27. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Saeger · · Score: 1
      It would be killer for fighter pilots though...

      No, it wouldn't. Pilots will sooner be replaced by unmanned aircraft than be retrofitted with BCI. The human brain & body won't be able to compete with UAVs.

      (Sorry Pilots).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    28. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by whittrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      human assisted neuro devices

      The government is working on something similar.

    29. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by grgyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Fox 2, why is your refueling boom extended? Fox 2, do you receive?"

      --
      ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
    30. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Senator_B · · Score: 1

      Originally, I believe that this was because women had slightly better sight than men. Men were given other equally important roles (navigation I think, probably others) that utilized their strengths.

    31. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself!

    32. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1
      With the average male thinking about sex every seven minutes, I don't know if their brain should be controling a machine that goes Mach X


      It is a popular Sci-Fi concept that female pilots will come to dominate.

      This could be the start... :\

      Why the sad face?
      As far as I'm aware, the same research that said that women think about sex less also said that it depended on the frequency with which they had it. The less she has, the more she thinks about it, and vice versa. So if that's the reason why women come to dominate in piloting...

      Ever wanted to date a pilot? :)
      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    33. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by AlphaPB · · Score: 1

      There's quite a high level of neural plasticity in the sensory cortex, and I'd imagine that the adjacent and similarly homunculi-mapped motor cortex would be the same. In the sensory cortex, any change in a afferent input (e.g. linking the sense of touch in two fingers by sewing them together) leads to a gradual (partially reversible, I believe) merging in the two adjacent bits of sensory cortex. Another example is removal of one of the sources of input (like by losing an arm). It can lead to "phantom limb" syndrome, but there's also some remapping of the affective circuitry, such that touching parts of the body can actually "stimulate" the missing limb. See some of Ramachandran's papers for more on this.

      So what I'm getting at is that the brain seems to be quite good at managing its connections, and after learning to provide the right input to the neural interface, it should be rather similar to controlling one's own limbs or perhaps wiggling your ears. Of course, since one wouldn't be getting the feeling of *really* moving a limb, immediate kinesthetic feedback would have to be replaced by other information, say a HUD in the plane.

      Assuming that the neural connections are sufficiently plastic and the neural interface is "rich" enough for the implantee to activate consistently, I don't think there will be problems related to attention. At least not any more so than when doing other visuo-spatially demanding tasks like driving. After training, the fighter pilots wouldn't be "thinking" about flying, they'd be activating the relevant bits of motor cortex just like when they move their arms.

      Somewhat related: Michael Swanwick and William Gibson co-wrote a short-story, called "Dogfight", about neural interfaces for controlling airplane simulations.

    34. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Gherald · · Score: 1

      > Why the sad face?

      :\ == Undecided; Sceptical

      > Ever wanted to date a pilot? :)

      I don't really have a criteria. Maybe I'll start worrying about it if a woman ever looks at me twice :P

    35. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Klanglor · · Score: 1

      ya and if its MS embed, well the blue screen of death is the last thing you'll see...

      no more tunel of lights :( how sad :P

    36. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I thought so too, until I realised that the human brain has a tendency to wander.

      Not the brain of a military pilot...at least not with all of the speed they're given these days...

    37. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 1

      It would be killer for fighter pilots

      Don't fighter pilots already have enough dangers threatening their survival? Something about being shot down, and the effects of gravity spring to mind.

      But nevermind those dangers, the technology is cool.

      --
      "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
    38. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. It turns out that most neural interface systems have something like a half-second delay, due to the tremendous amount of electrical noise. This was shown decades ago with the Boston Arm.

      Unless these folks have gotten physically viable electrodes down to the size and resolution where they can read single neurons' output, they are going to be unable to match typical human motor skills.

      Now, using them for *input* is another story. Cochlear implants work well, there's also some interesting work going on for visual implants ,although they keep trying electrodes on the retina, which is just not viable due to the current spread through the aquaeous humor (the fluid in your eye). It's like plugging in your USB cable in a bowl of salt water: it doesn't work well....

    39. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't know that. We could be in it right now. And /. is run by the Merovingian.

    40. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      No, that's what happens when someone gets a missle lock on you ;)

  5. Nice, they've got Matlab routines... by tcopeland · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...for processing the data from the microelectrode arrays.

    Yes, the above link goes to another web site called "bionictech.com", but the two companies merged in 2002.

    1. Re:Nice, they've got Matlab routines... by blakestah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep. John Donoghue (of Brown) has been working on this stuff for a few years, and his former postdoc, implant engineer Nikos Hatsopoulos is another key person at Cyberkinetics. But this is really Donoghue's baby.

      They've adopted the Richard Normann's (of Bionic Tech) implants (the Utah grid), and they are working fairly well for time periods up to a year. You can expect them to be the first to do human studies, and for quite a lot to be learned about the brain in the process, as well as dramatic improvements in the lives of their test patients.

      I'm quite excited to see how it goes for them, and hope for the best.

    2. Re:Nice, they've got Matlab routines... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? There is already another company with a much less complex interface that is already FDA approved and doing human studies. Cyberkinetics' device certainly seems far more advanced and likely to produce usable results, but they won't be the first to do human testing.

      bkr

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    3. Re:Nice, they've got Matlab routines... by blakestah · · Score: 1

      Who would this other group be?

  6. This begs for... by Enze6997 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "I think I brained my damage"... "And the scientists gave me this spiffy nerd outfit!!"

  7. Wow... by Undaar · · Score: 4, Funny

    So far it works for monkeys...

    Can they use it to teach the monkeys to program?
    That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!
    *ducks*

    --
    ~ "When I'm of that age I'm just going to live up a tree."
    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Wow... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Hey, I have enough problems finding work without having to worry about primates.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But Indian monkeys will still work for less bananas than the American monkeys.

    4. Re:Wow... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Wow... by McLoud · · Score: 1

      ...and probably IT droids-like that do what you tell them to do, instead of something else

      --
      sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
    6. Re:Wow... by killermal · · Score: 1

      Microsoft could improve there productivity ten fold.

    7. Re:Wow... by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny
      That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!

      One time I hired a code monkey to write code for me at work. I would just sit there with my mind a complete blank while the monkey typed on a little keyboard. At the end of the project my boss said "Team, I want you to give a presentation on your code." So I made some PowerPoint slides that said "Hello, my name is Bingo. I like to climb on things. Can I have a banana? Eek eek." I got fired and my job was transferred to India. When I told my wife about it she said, "I told you, never trust a monkey!" The end.

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    8. Re:Wow... by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hate to break it to you, but all your competition in the job market consists of primates.

      We're talking monkeys working for other talking monkeys, making things that will convince yet other talking monkeys (who could be anywhere on the planet of the talking monkeys) to part with their monkey money in exchange for whatever you are making. Really, your whole life is all about whatever pleases a talking monkey.

      It boggles the monkey mind.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    9. Re:Wow... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      primate != monkey.

      primate:
      1: a senior clergyman and dignitary [syn: archpriest, hierarch, high priest, prelate]
      2: any placental mammal of the order Primates; has good eyesight and flexible hands and feet

      Primates \Pri*ma"tes\, n. pl. [NL.] (Zo["o]l.)
      The highest order of mammals. It includes man, together with the apes and monkeys. Cf. Pitheci.

    10. Re:Wow... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Can they use it to teach the monkeys to program?
      That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!


      Where do you think Windows came from? Duh.

    11. Re:Wow... by son_of_asdf · · Score: 1

      Nah...we'll just stick 'em in a room with a bunch of terminals and hope that we get some new Shakespeare out of the deal.

      --
      Don't Panic!
    12. Re:Wow... by cygnus · · Score: 2, Funny
      Can they use it to teach the monkeys to program?
      That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!
      *ducks*
      that's just not right.

      code monkeys have to be *monkeys*, not ducks!

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    13. Re:Wow... by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      I guess I'd better climb down from this tree then.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    14. Re:Wow... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1
      Primate != Monkey...

      huh? did u read your own post?

      "The highest order of mammals. It includes man, together with the apes and monkeys"

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    15. Re:Wow... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      Does a car equal vehicle? That would make a truck, a motorcyle and a segway a car. The set that contains man, apes and monkeys is called primates. But a subset man does not equal the whole set primates. If that were true than monkeys, man and gorillas would be the exact same species! They are not.

  8. If it works for chimps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's good enough for Keanu.

  9. Finally! by starvingcodeartist · · Score: 1

    I can get a army of remote contolled monkeys! Its about damn time, I'll say. The world is mine! Muhahahaha!!

  10. Ugh... by ManicGiraffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    So....imagine a Beowulf cluster of *me*!

    [rimshot...]

    1. Re:Ugh... by dasheiff · · Score: 2, Funny

      So....imagine a Beowulf cluster of ...us...

      Restance is Futile.

    2. Re:Ugh... by martyros · · Score: 1

      Didn't Agent Smith already try something like this in The Matrix?

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

  11. Bad news for tech industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you know it, the new wave will be hiring foreign minds. Just the minds, brains to be exact, floating in tanks. Outsourcing will pale in comparison. Floor space issues will be a thing of the past. A 1500-employee software firm will fit into a small outbuilding.

  12. Steve mann by phrostie · · Score: 1

    has anyone told steve yet?

    1. Re:Steve mann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      told him? he's a fucking professor researching on that field. I thing he possibly knew it before slashdot...

  13. sign me up by rogabean · · Score: 3, Interesting

    sign me up as well! i have wondered though when they seriously would start implementing computer based implants in our brains. it actually seems quite logical as a "next step" sorta thing. i remember when me and friends used to joke that one day we'd be able to add extra memory (RAM) to our brains. watch this have DRM on it! (lol)

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    1. Re:sign me up by JediDan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately believable... The company pays for a brain upgrade that's enabled/disabled at the door and it makes for a more efficient and capable worker. Wrong or right?

      --
      - Dan
    2. Re:sign me up by rogabean · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I guess I better get to filing a patent on my brain now. I wouldnt want SCO to say they own the rights to my thought process years later, or M$ sueing me because by telling someone what I thought I violated the EULA.

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  14. Similar to the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except there is no central controlling computer, humans aren't batteries, there is no destroyed landscape, and geeks aren't getting hot hacker chicks (because the "hot hacker chicks" are, in actuality, people like Fyodor's nemesis.

  15. GET SOME PRIORITIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Get some priorities people! Right now our commander-in-chief, George W Bush, is setting our great nation on a new course in space exploration and you talking about crap like this!

  16. Oh great! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Now when I run around telling eveyrone that the government put a chip in my brain, it won't mean anything!

  17. Hackers... by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They better make it pretty secure. It would really suck to have someone hack your brain, especially since backing up your brain is a bit difficult right now.

    --
    Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    1. Re:Hackers... by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not the backup that causes the problem, it's the restore.

    2. Re:Hackers... by Orion442 · · Score: 1

      Right...definitely NOT something you want the operating system of a certain company based in Redmond, WA controlling.

      Kind of shocked not to see any blonde jokes yet!!!

    3. Re:Hackers... by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      And certain other OS's haven't been hacked? This is something where "more secure" is not secure enough.

    4. Re:Hackers... by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      backing up your brain is a bit difficult right now.

      Pshaw.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    5. Re:Hackers... by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      Would it be so much better to have to hack your own brain?

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    6. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever see Ghost In the Shell?

  18. No M$ for mine... by BitWarrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm game as long as it's not controlled by Windows. I can see it now, it's the ultimate experience in VR except for the minor annoyance of crashing and killing the connected users after a few days.

    1. Re:No M$ for mine... by SpyderPSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm game as long as it's not controlled by Windows. I can see it now, it's the ultimate experience in VR except for the minor annoyance of crashing and killing the connected users after a few days.

      You think it would take that long? ; )

    2. Re:No M$ for mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Reboot Grandma, she bluescreen'ed again!"

    3. Re:No M$ for mine... by astro-g · · Score: 1

      when crashing the system, allways ensure you have a scratch monkey plugged in

    4. Re:No M$ for mine... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      You think it would take that long? ; )

      49.7 days to be exact.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  19. Matrix-Style Brain Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean its Rube Goldberg complicated and begins to let you down about half-way into it?

  20. Gateway to wetware? by SerialHistorian · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would work backwards? Is this the gateway to using the human brain as a computer? (After all, we only use a portion of it...)

    --

    --
    Vote for your hopes, not for your fears - Vote Third Party

    1. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder if this would work backwards? Is this the gateway to using the human brain as a computer? (After all, we only use a portion of it...)

      No, we don't.

      http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm

      -W
      --

      --
      All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
    2. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      After all, we only use a portion of it... ...at any given moment.

      Over the course of a year, you use almost every part of your brain. Maybe over the course of a day.

    3. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      is the a href tag really that fuggin complicated?

      parent's clickable link

    4. Re:Gateway to wetware? by brasten · · Score: 1

      So we can have millions of people out there using their un-used brain cycles to process Seti@Home data?

    5. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "After all, we only use a portion of it..."

      No, we only know what a portion of it is used for. There's a diference.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you whouldt want to overheat your brain whould you? ;)

    7. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part do you not use?

    8. Re:Gateway to wetware? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      No, but that's what anonymous coward monkeys are for.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    9. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I wish I had moderator access right now.

      Speak it, brother!

    10. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Coulson · · Score: 1

      We know in general what most of the different parts of the brain are used for, through electrode stimulation and case studies of people with selective brain damage (surgery, accident, birth defect, epilepsy, etc.) We even know how a lot of the little bits work. We just don't have much of system-level understanding of it.

      Of course, we're only actively using 10% of it or so at any given time -- or so fMRI tells us.

    11. Re:Gateway to wetware? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      It's a simplistic explanation, but it may hold some water.

      Even if we consider there is activity all around the brain, it may not involve all neurons.

      The way neural nets work suggests that we don't use a large number of neurons because using them would be counterproductive - the correct connection paths we evolved in our lives and which we need to function as humans don't use them.

      If I suddeltly decided to put all my neurons back to work (assuming that could be done - it can't), I would end-up forgetting everything I ever learned and doing a full reboot of my brain. All programs and data would be gone.

      Maybe I could use the implants to make back-ups for later restoration ;-)

    12. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know where the "10% of the brain" meme came from. Probably from someone who's brain is truly limited to 10% .

      Now, on a more serious note. How much brainpower is required for a typical human being to function within the framework established by society? We're not very individually driven. Most of us bump through life simply realizing the demands and expectations placed upon us by the people we observe and encounter. We try very hard to fullfill those things. Try so hard, that by the end of our lives, there's nothing left of whatever it is that a free human being requires.

      I believe feminists had some concept of this but somehow got misdirected. Got the problem mixed up and assumed women were the only ones battered into conforming to the hive mind.

      Who's to blame? Is there anyone to blame? I don't think this is a product of some master plan to control. It's just a natural part of how human beings function in groups. Makes us vulnerable to those who seek to extract things from us. Marketers, politicians, and so forth. Got us figured out pretty good, and are leveraging that knowledge for all it's worth.
      The scary thing is, how far can it go? How much free will can a human being lose before becoming aware of something amiss? All of it?

      It's not easy being a human being, no matter how simple they make it look on TV.

    13. Re:Gateway to wetware? by danila · · Score: 1

      Yes, we do.

      Although I applaud your efforts at ignorance fighting, we do, in fact, use only a portion of our brain.

      First, 99.99999% is still only a portion.
      Second, ever seen those brain scans that show which parts are active, while you are doing some thing? It might be a bit of an oversimplification, but it shows that we only use a portion of our brain at a time.

      Even if you dig deeper into the meaning of the 10% myth, you will still be surprised at how true it is. It usually implies that there are hidden reserves from which you can tap to do some cool stuff. And I don't think you can argue with that. Almost any human being have potential to become a virtuos pianist, to learn to memorize whole page of text by looking at it once, to speak 50 languages, etc. If you can potentially learn to do it, but can't do it now, this means there ARE those hidden reserves, even if they are not literally parts of the brain lying dormant.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    14. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 1

      First, 99.99999% is still only a portion.

      First of all, where did this number come from? And second, if it's accurate, I would think that last 0.00001% couldn't be all that useful, and it certainly doesn't imply that we might have MAGIC PSYCHIC ABILITIES if we could only tap into it. Sounds like having an extra byte of RAM available that's unused in my computer! Think of the possibilities!

      Second, ever seen those brain scans that show which parts are active, while you are doing some thing? It might be a bit of an oversimplification, but it shows that we only use a portion of our brain at a time.

      With good reason. I doubt we could just use the rest of our brain to do other stuff at the same time for any useful purpose.

      Even if you dig deeper into the meaning of the 10% myth, you will still be surprised at how true it is. It usually implies that there are hidden reserves from which you can tap to do some cool stuff. And I don't think you can argue with that. Almost any human being have potential to become a virtuos pianist, to learn to memorize whole page of text by looking at it once, to speak 50 languages, etc. If you can potentially learn to do it, but can't do it now, this means there ARE those hidden reserves, even if they are not literally parts of the brain lying dormant.

      That's like saying "we only use a portion of our muscles." In general, we use all of them. We may be able to push ourselves and do things we didn't think we were capable of doing, but that doesn't mean there's all sorts of mysterious untapped potential.

      --
      All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
    15. Re:Gateway to wetware? by danila · · Score: 1

      First of all, where did this number come from?
      It's just a nice round number. Well, may be not that round, but nice nevertheless. It would be quite surprising, if we used (BTW, "use" needs to be defined) exactly 100.0000000000% of our brains, i.e. every single neuron and every single neuronal connection. Since neurons die all the time, we would be extremely unfit if we depended on all of them working.

      And second, if it's accurate, I would think that last 0.00001% couldn't be all that useful
      Recently some scientists have shown that you can use TCP/IP overhead to do calculations. Surely there must be a way to use those unused neurons in some way.

      With good reason. I doubt we could just use the rest of our brain to do other stuff at the same time for any useful purpose.
      Quite the opposite. Again, we would be extremely unfit if we used our brains at 100% of capacity all the time. I think we would tend to die rather quickly. Imagine an OS that would use 100% of CPU cycles even when idle. Not a very competitive one, is it? So I am quite sure that there are ways to use the free capacity, just like spies are trained to pay attention to license plates and stuff like that even though they are concentrating on some other task at the moment. Another point is that we might be able to reorganise our thought processes and use the freed up time to do calculations for the Matrix. :)

      That's like saying "we only use a portion of our muscles." In general, we use all of them. We may be able to push ourselves and do things we didn't think we were capable of doing, but that doesn't mean there's all sorts of mysterious untapped potential.
      Well, I don't know what "in general" means to you, but we definitely do not use all our muscles all the time. Because, if we did, we would be unable to move. ;)

      I never said there is anything mysterious about this. But there is untapped potential - when we are "able to push ourselves and do things we didn't think we were capable of doing", that's called untapped potential.

      And my point is that this potential is very real and is present in everybody. So the parent's post was technically true (he didn't mention 10%, just said "a portion") and to some extent true in principle (although snopes is right too), because we can learn new tricks, some of them extremely impressive.

      This potential is not in the form of some mysterious 90% of unused neurons (like the "third eye"), it's our ability to use all neurons (and the brain as a whole) more efficiently.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  21. Not like The Matrix at all by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This really isn't Matrix-like at all, though. The implant doesn't feed information to your brain, it only gets information from it. Still, it's VERY cool if it works and is safe. I like the idea they mention of also putting implants into paralyzed limbs to allow the brain implant to move them. Eat it, paralyzation!

    -W
    --

    --
    All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
    1. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, scientists have recently plugged implants into the brain of two deaf people (normally they plug into the auditory nerves but this experiment is new). They expect 30% improvement in lipreading with 1 channel (they tried for 8 channels but the others didn't quite work).

    2. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by SpyPlane · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it can get information from my brain, can I finally prove to my wife that I have no f-ing clue what she is talking about most of the time, or that I REALLY don't care where we go eat friday!

      Let me know.

      --
      "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
    3. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by 6.023e23 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      True, this application is for reading data, not writing data, but can the other be far behind? (Well, yes it can, but the idea is there.)

      I'm somewhat disturbed that some people's first thought is how this could be used in the military. While there's no doubt that the DoD will be first on the list to play with such toys (that is if they're arent' already in some hidden lab), I'd prefer the focus to be on the medical and scientific uses, especially dealing the quad- and paraplegics, ALS, Parkinson's, etc. I can also think of many applications that, while similar in nature to how a fighter pilot would use it, would be non-military.

      This is still EXTREMELY rudimentary and we have a very long way to go before such input/output can be done on a truly reliable basis with what would be considered a true neuro-computer interface. This is a good step though.

    4. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by myg · · Score: 1
      Actually, there have been some similar things done for blind people where they are "writing" data to the brain.

      About 10 years ago I remember seeing an article on a computer letting blind people see a green dot. I understand things have progressed a little since then but not that much.

      It may very well be possible to combine these two technologies.

    5. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by vida · · Score: 1

      funnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy mod him up!

      and true...

    6. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, that is the funniest thing I have every read

      -Lurkermod: +1 Funny!

    7. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Yes, very cool. This probably has been discussed before, but another potential application might also be the study of sleep and dreams. Getting a more accurate picture of what goes on inside one's head during bedtime could help develop all sorts of insights into psychology and brain chemistry.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    8. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by tkg · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer the focus to be on the medical and scientific uses, especially dealing the quad- and paraplegics, ALS, Parkinson's, etc.

      True. Imagine what this could do for someone like Stephen Hawking. His paralysis must make it excuciatingly and frustratingly slow to enter anything into his computer now. This could allow him to log, analyze and communicate his thoughts much quicker, even if it didn't give him much more mobility.

  22. er? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can i run Seti@home on it?

  23. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by thelaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "what happens if i die in the matrix?"

    "the body cannot live without the mind."

    jon the "morpheust"

    --
    -- http://www.cerastes.org
  24. Regretting... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card? Sign me up!"

    Damned ISA interface! I was told when it was welded on that it was all I would need. That and 640K!

    1. Re:Regretting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering if it'll be USB 2.0, or FireWire 800.

  25. You insensitive clod! by sailboatfool · · Score: 0

    I don't have a brain!

    --
    He is the best sailor who can steer within fewest points of the wind, and exact a motive power out of the greatest obsta
  26. I want my math coprocessor by ITR81 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Doesn't everyone need this??

    Don't forget ram doubler. I would love to store memories.

    1. Re:I want my math coprocessor by mblase · · Score: 1

      Don't forget ram doubler. I would love to store memories.

      Like in Johnny Mnemonic ? (Which, ironically, is one movie I would most definitely like to forget.)

    2. Re:I want my math coprocessor by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Won't work.

      the Digital restrictions management will not allow you to remember anything you see or hear.

    3. Re:I want my math coprocessor by Fr0mZer0 · · Score: 1

      "Your storage capacity is now 160 gigabytes. Warning! Do not exceed capacity!" -Johnny Mnemonic

    4. Re:I want my math coprocessor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like in the movie Paycheck.

    5. Re:I want my math coprocessor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugger the RAM doubler, think about connecting to that terabyte drive of pr0n!

  27. We are the Borg by NetDanzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So let's see. First, we connect our brains to the computer. Then we create Internet 3, by directly linking our brains. Then a new anti-terrorism bill outlaws firewalls, and our brains will be wide open to each other. Can anybody say "collective consciousness"?

    1. Re:We are the Borg by shuz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      www.theafternow.com this radio drama does this! Its pertty good! 17 hours long total.

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    2. Re:We are the Borg by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      3 words...read only memory.

    3. Re:We are the Borg by 6.023e23 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I've read more than one sci-fi book along similar lines (the titles escape me at the moment - guess I need a database driver to issue some SQL to my memory).

      People have been talking about the existing Internet in terms of "collective consciousness" already. Such connectivity would take it several levels further.

      Is such a shift the evolutionary future of humankind?

    4. Re:We are the Borg by canfirman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Reminds me of an episode of "The Outer Limits" called "Stream of Consciousness". It dealt with people in society hooked up to a super-computer to look up any information ever stored in the world as well as non-verbal communication. Unfortunately, it meant the loss of the ability to read, as books became redundant. However, the computer went haywire, making people do strange things (like counting the grains of sand on the beach - becuase it wanted to know), resulting in people's death. The only way to survive was to get "unplugged".

      I don't watch "The Outer Limits" on a regular basis, but I caught this one. Very interesting.

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
    5. Re:We are the Borg by seanmckay · · Score: 1

      _Vacuum Flowers_. Michael Swanwick. Earth gets consumed, but has problems with wireless range and doesn't finish absorbing the orbital habitats.

    6. Re:We are the Borg by wafwot · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out the David Gerrold novels about the Chtorr invasion (sci-fi). He references a "collective consciousness" via the PsiCorps, which allows people who move their conscious self from body to body -- women can experience being men, vice versa, feelings, etc. can be recorded (even death). It's possible that this could ultimately lead to that, but I think before we get to any sort of "entertainment" purposes, a more helpful use should be further developed. Computers didn't come out of a need for games, and I don't think this should be viewed that way either. And, as someone said before, it's not a system that can control the user, but a system that can be controlled by a user. Once its medical/practical uses are in thier most developed stages, then we can move onto it as an entertainment device. Imagine the art that could be produced directly from the mind, or (speaking as a composer) the music? Hook me up, baby.

    7. Re:We are the Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the scariest part, ROM isn't actually READ ONLY, with the correct programming of course you could rewrite your ROM. Now, imagine if with the correct programming you could re-write the ROM areas of your brain (function, control, thought, etc..)... OUCH!

      Anyone know what MKChaos, MKUltra, etc leads to? It seems as though the private sector is once again playing catch-up to the CIA. Now let's factor Carniovre in, imagine if they could datamine your mind!!!!

    8. Re:We are the Borg by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

      I feel a song coming on....

      We are the Borg,
      We are the children
      We are the ones who assimilate
      So quit resistin'

      It's a choice we're makin,
      Connecting our own brains,
      But it's true we'll make a bigger hive
      Just you and me!

    9. Re:We are the Borg by cfuse · · Score: 1
      So let's see. First, we connect our brains to the computer. Then we create Internet 3, by directly linking our brains. Then a new anti-terrorism bill outlaws firewalls, and our brains will be wide open to each other. Can anybody say "collective consciousness"?

      I don't know about "collective consciousness", how about collective stupidity?

      Seriously, I can't name one person I would be happy being connected to but I can think of at least a hundred I wouldn't wish to connect to in a million years.

      I'm in therapy, suffer from depression, I'm medicated and I am a sadomasocist. Do you really want to know what I'm thinking?

    10. Re:We are the Borg by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      So let's see. First, we connect our brains to the computer. Then we create Internet 3, by directly linking our brains. Then a new anti-terrorism bill outlaws firewalls, and our brains will be wide open to each other. Can anybody say "collective consciousness"?

      Sweet! Sign me up anytime. Come across a hard question during a college exam ... access the collective and get the answer. Want to know how to prepare a certain meal to impress your date ... access the collective. Too drunk to determine if the chick your about to take home from the bar is a sea donkey ... look at her then upload her image and ask for some advice from the collective. Of course other people could always be dicks and tell you to take her home anyway.

    11. Re:We are the Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's all love Lain.

    12. Re:We are the Borg by cyt0plas · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I also saw this one - I found the show enjoyable, but the ending could have been better.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    13. Re:We are the Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont be an idiot, the sea donkey would be connected too -- gonna ask her for advice on herself? ;)

    14. Re:We are the Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've read more than one sci-fi book along similar lines

      There's no shortage. The Conjoiner faction from the books of Alastair Reynolds are one that immediately comes to mind - a faction of humans who have started by using machine implants to boost mental capacity, and later extended that with networking. I believe someone describes them as "cybernetics researchers with a penchant for self experimentation".

    15. Re:We are the Borg by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Can anybody say "collective consciousness"?

      and that's bad, why? Because some television writer in the 20th century said so? Being able to read everyone's thoughts will bring about a new era of communication where people will actually be able to see through the bullshit of regular language and maybe actually get something accomplished. That would be a nice change.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    16. Re:We are the Borg by slaida1 · · Score: 1
      I think transfering a mind barely makes a copy of it and kills the original and that copy would believe he survived and nothing went wrong so he would eventually transfer again and so on.

      This occurred to me while I was thinking that if a mind cn be transferred then it also could be copied and what would determine into which copy your consiouness would transfer? Nothing. There'd be many happy copies but no original. I'll pass that part thankyou.

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
    17. Re:We are the Borg by Pendersempai · · Score: 1

      Outlawing firewalls to protect against terrorism would be like outlawing locks to protect against burglary.

    18. Re:We are the Borg by hplasm · · Score: 1
      I'm in therapy, suffer from depression, I'm medicated and I am a sadomasocist. Do you really want to know what I'm thinking?

      Yes, Mistress..

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    19. Re:We are the Borg by canfirman · · Score: 1
      I also saw this one - I found the show enjoyable, but the ending could have been better.

      Just out of interest, how would you have ended the episode? Personally, I kinda liked the ending. It seemed to prove a point at the end (and I'm a sucker for happy endings :) ).

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
  28. Link to article explaining the monkey mind control by shuz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I could make a long comment about it but everyone will just go to the link anyways. here ya go!
    http://www.health24.co.za/news/Brain_Neurolog ical/ 1-896,25078.asp

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  29. real or virtual viruses to make the leap first? by keot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is scary, although at least at the moment when you're plugged in you are able to communicate with the machine and the real world, unlike the matrix, where you are either fully in or fully out.

    think what would happen if a virus made a leap from our reality to the machine reality; or the other way round...

  30. I'll pass by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who are eager for this sort of thing puzzle me. Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible. I don't say this to be a luddite, but there are definite limits to where I would personally go with technology.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    1. Re:I'll pass by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      If I lost a limb, I'd try anything to get it back, even something crazy like this.

      Conversely, there will likely come a day when artificial limbs are superior to natural ones (and advanced brain surgery like this would likewise be easier, safer, and more commonplace).

    2. Re:I'll pass by nodwick · · Score: 4, Informative
      People who are eager for this sort of thing puzzle me. Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible. I don't say this to be a luddite, but there are definite limits to where I would personally go with technology.
      I think you're mistaking the application for this. Dozens of Slashdot posts about the Matrix notwithstanding, this isn't an elective surgery targeted towards geeks who want to get one step closer to their machines. The company line is that it's aimed primarily at quadriplegics who have a choice of either continuing to be unable to interact with their environment or having a shot at gaining some more function.

      In spirit, it's similar to prosthetic devices that people have already been developing that operate using nerve impulses, such as prosthetic legs with knees that "bend" via sensors which pick up nerve impulses in the quadriceps. It's just that with people who are more severely disabled, you're going to have to move closer to the brain to pick up live nerve impulses. It'll probably be a long time (if ever) before this moves into being an elective procedure for entertainment purposes; the Matrix-speak from the Wired article seems to be just typical media sensationalization to give the story a little more juice.

    3. Re:I'll pass by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible

      You may not have a choice, IF you want to stay competetive.

      Real Soon Now(tm) the implants will be able to be "read' by our brains. Then you have two-communication with a computer just by thinking about it.

      So, instant:
      1. computations, including complex transforms
      2. reference look up. Who needs a library?
      3. communications (holy shit, can you imagine the spam???)
      And these are just off the top of my head (pun?). I am sure that once this becomes common the applications will be endless. Just like the first computers did math (shell trajectories), then later came the cool stuff.

      I will want this!
      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    4. Re:I'll pass by miketang16 · · Score: 1

      I agree for the most part with the parent. I'm all for advancing technology and new things, but when it comes down to implants, that could possibly be used for other purposes, no thanks. The only way I could possibly see possibly considering it would be if they found a way for it to interface WITHOUT a permanent implant. (Yes, very unlikely I know..) Or maybe even something that could be removed at will. Can you say Plug 'n Play human?

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    5. Re:I'll pass by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      Your fears are not unfounded. The more powerful a technology becomes the greater the necessity that we absolute ensure that said technology does not become abused.

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance"... and technology such as this only serves to underscore that statement.

    6. Re:I'll pass by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      I understand that this could be a godsend for some people. What prompted me to post was the quote on the front page: How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card? Sign me up!. My feeling is something along the lines of "Ewww! If I don't need it, I don't want it!"

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    7. Re:I'll pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible.

      Maybe I'm a little compassionate, but I'd like to see this technology advanced as far as possible to aid, as the article clearly points out, people with physical disabilities who have no other practical means for 2-way interaction with wheelchairs, appliances, voice synthesizers, a computer, etc.

    8. Re:I'll pass by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      We'll see. Real Soon Now usually means "sometime in the distant future, if ever", right? :-)

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    9. Re:I'll pass by Dread_ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father was crippled by a severe case of polio. He caught the disease when he was only 10 years old. Because of the nerve and muscle tissue dammage he did not walk until highschool, and then only with full braces and crutches. Now that he is getting older, the neurological and muscular symptoms he had when he was 10 years old are resurfacing and he is again confined to a bed, unable to even help himself sit up, or to breathe on his own (he has a respirator connected to a trache).

      If this technology was proven and could help my father to walk or to even breathe better on his own I think it would be fantastic. DEspite his condition, my father earned three degrees (chemical engineering, mathematics, computer science). I can only imagine what he could have acomplished without his phisical limitations.

      As for being eager for it, I don't presume to know your mind, but I bet you would entertain the idea quite seriously if you were in my father's position.

      I can only imagine how someone who is paralyzed would feel if given the ability to move again. I can even see a system that would not only allow someone to transmit motor neuron function from the brain to the muscles, but also to transmit sensory neuron information to the brain from the extremeties. In essence this could be a complete loop that could allow those with spinal cord damage to actually feel again.

      I think that this is exactly where technology needs to go in this century. Not only will it allow doctors to overcome some of the most tragic and vexing medical conditions, but I believe that it will result, ultimately, in benefits to people who do not suffer from any type of ailment.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    10. Re:I'll pass by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Well, I am not going to hold my breath or anything.....

      Yet just a few years ago this was totally science fiction. Progress is being made.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    11. Re:I'll pass by YukioMishima · · Score: 0

      I think "eager" might be a strong word for my position, but this will very likely be technology that you simply can't live without.

      Sure, there will still be communes where people can get back to nature - meaning the position where the slow process of evolution has left us - but for most of us, we'll be in the same position we are when it comes to upgrading our RAM (on our computers) or submitting to the biometric handprint stations at work. I sit at work and am amazed at how people got along without the internet to do the same job. How was it even possible to be even relatively informed?

      The final point is this = even if you're not comfortable with the idea, you need to stay informed about where this process is heading - you may not be eager to do your taxes or manage your budget, but your quality of life is greatly increased if you do, and you make choices rather than being forced into a decision at the last minute. Hopefully it's less eager than it is common sense.

    12. Re:I'll pass by dustmite · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that some people appear to be 'wired' for high-risk behaviour (most exploration and most development and pioneering of new technologies), while others seem naturally more risk-averse. If it weren't for the risk-takers, we most likely wouldn't have progressed as far as we have now, yet it seems a bit strange that high-risk behaviour (and it's naturally higher death rates) would have, over a long period, selected for more risk-averse humans. Perhaps the relatively large tribes, and the traditional teamwork within a tribe, allowed for a combination with the best of both worlds, with both 'paths' evolving and developing in parallel, and humans reaping the benefits of having both. That is, most humans are risk-averse, but some percentage have remained in society, with everyone reaping the benefits of having risk-takers (i.e. new technologies, discoveries, inventions, new places etc). Many people find risk-taking behaviour sexy (i.e. attractive to mates), while many other people seem to prefer risk-averse individuals. It seems there will always be people in society pushing the limits, often risking their lives, and yet we all learn from the results.

    13. Re:I'll pass by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Maybe there are limits, but where the brain-limb connection is no longer serviceable, this technology could provide a means of controlling intelligent prosthetics, which would be of immense aid to victims of spinal injuries.

      Having said that, as a confirmed Luddite, one of my favourite lyrics is:

      Watch out for the man with the silicon chip,
      Hold on to your job with a good firm grip.
      'Cause if you don't you'll have had your chips,
      The same as my old man.

      ('My old man', Ewan McColl - Britain's answer to Woody Guthrie).

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    14. Re:I'll pass by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...this isn't an elective surgery targeted towards geeks who want to get one step closer to their machines.
      It'll probably be a long time (if ever) before this moves into being an elective procedure for entertainment purposes;


      Just like plastic surgery was only used for birth defects and accident reconstruction
      Just like stomach stapling was only to be used on the morbidly obese
      Just like Viagara was only to be used for serious erectile problems

      Given a procedure, there will be some who want it (and very early on) simply because it's 'cool'. And there will be doctors who will supply it for the right sum.

    15. Re:I'll pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite possible for quite different behavioural "strategies" to develop in a population over time. Case in point: red deer . Main strategy consists of the big, strong and aggressive male deer controlling a harem of females and fighting each other for the right. But the other strategy, the cheaters, consists of the smaller males not able to compete with the bigger males. Basically the wimpy deer hang around whilst the tough guys slug it out (the rut) and then nip in when the winner is exhausted (from having fought a few days of running battles) and humps a few does.
      Doesn't work that often, but often enough that sufficent amounts of the fathers gene's are passed on to make this a viable strategy - something like 85% : 15% fighters : cheaters ...

    16. Re:I'll pass by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Conversely, there will likely come a day when artificial limbs are superior to natural ones

      There will also come a day not too long after that when transcendental virtual life is superior to the cyborg bodies of meat-space. IMO, our cyborg stage will be very short-lived.

      The dead matter and energy of the old "natural" world will be put to better use when reconfigured (w/nanotech) into intelligent matter.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    17. Re:I'll pass by dr_canak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work with spinal cord injured individuals. One patient in particular is a "locked-in" quadraplegic. What this means is that, in addition to not being able to move anything from his neck down (he is on a ventilator), he cannot speak. Because of a surgery complication, he bled into his lower brainstem, preventing any sort of muscular control of his mouth. It has also left him with a significant astigmatism and eye spasms preventing him from looking in one direction or controlling his eye gaze for any length of time (even short lengths of time like a few secs).

      So in addition to being completely paralyzed, he can't speak and can't use any eye gaze adaptive devices. He can't use his mouth for tongue depressed switches, and because of facial muscle spasms, even EMG biofeedback has been ruled-out. He is a very rare patient (condition wise) but this is the kind of technology that would really be appropriate/needed for a patient with his level of disability. So gloom and doom matrix/personal privacy issues aside, these kinds of technology can be of paramount importance to paralyzed individuals.

      And for those wondering, he communicates using an upward eye gaze and memorized letterboard.

      1 a b c d e
      2 f g h i j
      3 k l m n o
      4 p q r s t
      5 u v w x y z

      You basically go, "line 1, line 2, line 3,..." etc until he looks up (for "yes"). You then move across the correct row until he looks up to designate the letter. In this way, he can spell his way through communication. I once joked with him its like Wheel of Fortune meets Jeopardy on steroids. Cumbersome, but its the only way, and you can get surprisingly good at it with practice.

      jeff

    18. Re:I'll pass by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Real Soon Now usually means "sometime in the distant future, if ever", right?

      You need to familiarize yourself with The Law of Accelerating Returns.

      The future is closer than you think, and getting closer all the time.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    19. Re:I'll pass by LoneGunner · · Score: 1

      Imagine trying to drive a car, but instead of sitting behind the wheel you have to use these long sticks to turn the wheel, push the gas, and push brake. Even after to getting accustomed to it, there would still be a larger delay in reaction, more likelihood of missing the gas or brake, and far less control in fine steering. This is the way we are with computers at the moment, putting a keyboard and mouse in our hands, simply because we are to far away from the computer (interface wise). Right now the technology is very limited to just controlling a mouse. How long does it normally take you to think about closing a website page, to actually clicking the button? 1 - 2 seconds? Even longer for those with muscle control problems. Now think about being able to do that as soon as you thought it. In the course of the day you just saved half an hour of web browsing. Think about doing that with a keyboard. 300 words per minute will be child's play. And that's just changing the interface from muscle movements to thought for a keyboard and mouse. Now think further down the road when we learn even more, and improve the connections. People that can't speak can now synthesize their own voice with just thought. Programming would no longer be typing in lines of code, simply thinking of a conditional statement, or looping structure would create it. No more having to get up to turn off the lights, or stumbling over something in the dark to reach the switch. Instead of being limited by hardware interfaces, we would only be limited in how fast we can think, and the hardware we are interfaced with.

    20. Re:I'll pass by wondafucka · · Score: 1

      So we'll have an army of quadriplegics and the blind? Awesome.

    21. Re:I'll pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm quite sure that is where this will start...but I would not pass up a chance to become immortal using technology. This is one step in that general direction. Let's face it...things are going to start getting really weird really fast....body piercings in the 80's...biotech implants in the 2010's There's a market for it and it will happen eventually.

    22. Re:I'll pass by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      I think its a pretty big step between saying "I can make an arm, and a leg, and a heart, and hell, everything else" that is better than a human one,

      AND

      "I can put your brain into a computer"

      Now I could see, putting your brain in a box, with a big pipe connected to it, and living via a robot you controlled by RC, and having thousands of eyes (webcams) all over the world that you were seeing through simultaniously. But actually living in the computer (ala Lawnmowerman) is a long long way away.

      Robocop I could see in the next 50 years.

    23. Re:I'll pass by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      nice post, and an excellent example of how very simple communication through a prosthetic implant could dramatically improve someone's abilities. even a binary communication would probably be much quicker for him than having to communicate with muscles he has difficulty controlling. i wonder if devices of this sort will supercede new regenerative biological treatments, which are also advancing quite quickly. i would assume that it will be a combination of both, with different approaches used to treat specific patients, and the possibility of helping so many people (although as you mentioned patients with this particular pathology are rare) is very exciting.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    24. Re:I'll pass by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      perhaps there is some selctive advantage for being a latent carrier of that gene.

    25. Re:I'll pass by Saeger · · Score: 1
      But actually living in the computer (ala Lawnmowerman) is a long long way away.

      *sigh* ... You're still stuck in the thinking that technological progress is linear, when history shows that it's in fact exponential, and that we're just now on the steep knee of the curve. i.e. We've reached the Tipping Point and the future isn't as far away as you think it is.

      I'm doing my best to help this unpopular meme spread.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    26. Re:I'll pass by Coulson · · Score: 1

      I think telepathy is a real goal. It's a natural outgrowth of the cell phone phenomenon. Just think a person's name to open a channel, then, if they pick up, you can communicate silently.

      On the plus side, this means no more people talking annoyingly in airports, restaurants, etc. You can just zone out and hold a mental conversation, entirely within your head. Cell phones would be instantly accessible, never forgotten.

      On the minus side, rings could be very distracting. You'd need to make it easy to turn off.

      Trite but also important, you would need to come up with a system for controlling what gets sent and what can be "thought" without being communicated. Don't want the wrong thoughts slipping through! Self-censorship is an extremely important part of communication. Hopefully the system could distinguish between words which are sent to the pre-motor cortex and inhibited just prior to the speech act, and those which are simply "thought," planned to the point of fixing syntax, without ever being brought "to the tip of the tongue."

    27. Re:I'll pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just zone out and hold a mental conversation, entirely within your head.

      The first thing I thought of was browsing a porn site while having actual sex.

    28. Re:I'll pass by rlwhite · · Score: 1

      But who says our brains can handle all of that well?

      The point about doing it to stay competitive reminds me of an Isaac Asimov short story from the Gold Anthology (believe it was called The Smile of the Chipper). Asimov wrote about a future where some people upgraded their brains with computer power that included the ability to project images onto other people's minds (even those not wired up). Those who were augmented "burned out" in a few years and were left mentally handicapped. Asimov's ideas about competition between the computer-augmented were amusing.

      If 2-way communication is accomplished for anything more than a novelty, the testing needed could be huge. Spam's bad enough now, but what if the brain doesn't have defenses at that level to reject direct suggestion? We don't know that much about how thoughts propagate in the mind.

      I have a feeling we'll need the kind of hardware security Palladium is supposed to provide, only for our own brains, and I don't trust Microsoft to make it. On the flip side, imagine a security system where your password can actually be one of your own private long term memories as you see it in your head. Easy to remember and virtually impossible to duplicate without using a sniffer.

    29. Re:I'll pass by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      And that's what seperated you (and me) from our kids (or our kid's kids). Just like my parents/grandparents don't understand and don't want much to do with computers, we don't want much to do with interfacting them with our own biology...

    30. Re:I'll pass by cyt0plas · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I would imagine it's all in how you are wired up. Perhaps if it were physically hooked into the optic nerve (after beging dampened). You could hear them, but the risk of "mind control" would be minimal (at least, nothing that they couldn't just do with a speaker and your natural hardware).

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    31. Re:I'll pass by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      You need to familiarize yourself with The Law of Accelerating Returns.

      What an interesting paper.

      Um, yes, I DID read the whole thing.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    32. Re:I'll pass by Fr0mZer0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible.

      My dad used to say the same thing about computers, ATM machines, credit cards, etc. Its a natural reaction to fear technological leaps like this. But the next generation of people will be more willing to accept it.

      The 12-30 years old will dictate if the next 20-30 years will be dubbed the cybernetic age. After all they are the early adopters, more willing to take risks to get ahead in live.

      I want to know when, in that future, will society not only accept cybernetic implants but demand them. How well will you fair at a job interview against a cyborg who codes at the speed of thought. Today's blobbing in boardrooms could foreshadow a time when employees think-chat their brainstorm sessions. The un-enhanced employee will be left behind the 8-ball. Eventually he will be looked at as a second-class citizen who is becoming more and more difficult to interact with.

      I remember there was an Outer Limits, or new Twilight Zone episode where 99% of humans were implanted and connected to a global network. The few that weren't had a brain abnormality that did not allow the enhancement. All interaction was done through the implants. All media was electronic. One scene shows an cyborg girl and un-enhanced boy go into an outdoor cafe, and the waitress is already their with her plate before she even sits down, and the waitress looks at him puzzled as to why she only got 1 order. The girl says something, sympathetically, to the effect of "Oh! I'm sorry I would have orders for both of us, but I keep forgetting you're not implanted."

    33. Re:I'll pass by Niten · · Score: 1

      I imagine this sort of thing could also eventually allow secretaries to be really fast at "typing"...

    34. Re:I'll pass by tubs · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr Retro Geek

      On 23/5/2022 you thought about a book you had previousley read. The copyright for this book resides with us, and duly you have been charged $222.

      On 23/5/2022 you hummed the tune to one of our songs. We remind you that you have not purchased a licence for humming this tune, only for listening. There were also a number of people within hearing distance of you, we remind you that sharing this tune is also a licence that you do not have, and subsequently you will be charged with contributery copyright infringement.

      We thank you for your time.

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    35. Re:I'll pass by danila · · Score: 1

      luddite (2) - One who opposes technical or technological change. You are a luddite, because you oppose the change. You don't mind technology, as long as it doesn't really change anything. You may accept bigger TV, faster and more efficient car, cheaper computers, but you don't want change, you are afraid of it, you hate uncertainty. That is normal, most people feel this way, but that is because they are weak, stupid and cowardly.

      This technology has the potential to change the world. It will change the world, or rather one of it's next iterations. The exponential growth in the number of people connected to computers and in total brain-computer traffic has already started. We don't notice it, like we didn't notice Internet in 1970s, but it is here. Expect brain-computer networking to be a bigger hit in 2015 than Wi-Fi was in 2000.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    36. Re:I'll pass by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1
      Just because I may oppose this particular change does not mean that I oppose all change. My life has already been changed by technology and I look forward to more of it in the future, especially in the field of medicine. I would rather see development done to help the body heal from injuries than to bypass the body with electronics and turn people into cyborgs.

      Also, maybe you should try to be a little less mean spirited in your replies. Calling someone weak and stupid is a little heavy handed, don't you think?

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    37. Re:I'll pass by dustmite · · Score: 1

      reference look up. Who needs a library?

      Hmm... and of course, all that traffic gets intercepted and parsed by FBI Carnivore, too. Gives a whole new meaning to the term "thought police".

      And tin-foil hats aside: it's coming, it's only a matter of time.

    38. Re:I'll pass by danila · · Score: 1

      Also, maybe you should try to be a little less mean spirited in your replies.

      Good point. Though my style varies depending on how many luddite posts I read before replying. :) Still, sorry for being too harsh.

      Regarding the main point, first and foremost, I don't think there is anything wrong with being a cyborg. Just think for a moment - where are you getting your cyborg-related ideas from? My bet would be on sci-fi books and movies. Am I right? If so, than you must realise that the authors had very little reason to be objective and all the reasons to be entertaining. There are very few authors who tactfully handled this issue, very few books which were nautral and matter-of-factual towards the cyborgisation. Too much attention was paid to how cyborgs would be different and too little to how they would be the same (in a good sense). So if your concerns about it are really based on fiction, better think again about the pros and cons.

      Next, your partially (or overall) positive attitude towards tech doesn't mean you are not at all a luddite. The people led by Ned Ludd in early 19th century might have been extremely positive towards such exciting developments as steam locomotive, city lighting, photography, battery but would like engineers and scientists to leave the textile industry alone, thank you very much. So, excuse me, but you still look very much like a luddite, and there is no principal difference between you and christian fundamentalist opposing stem cells research. Because of your personal beliefs (cyborgs are BAD) you oppose the technological developments. I don't like that, but the worst thing is that you are doing this because you are not informed very well. :(

      BTW, Dictionary.com, which I used to look up the years when luddites first appeared, had a very fitting ad:

      Supersize your brain (tm)
      Subscribe to Dictionary.com Premium for exclusive features & services!

      Don't you think it would be great if we had instant access to Dictionary.com and thousands of other reference sources? Would that make us inhuman? Should we stop trying to do that? Even though some people like the idea?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  31. Cloning next ... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Then I can have a beowulf cluster of me!

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
    1. Re:Cloning next ... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0, Redundant

      no no.

      Imagine a baewulf cluster of US.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  32. Slashdot Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone noticed that 90% of the posts for each article are dedicated to someone using the standard "Slashdot Cliches"? .. will I be able to run Linux?

    So....imagine a Beowulf cluster of *me*

    etc, etc, etc...

    1. Re:Slashdot Cliche by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1, Informative
      I propose a filter that eliminates any posts that mention:

      1. Ogg Vorbis
      2. Bluetooth
      3. Beowulf Clusters
      4. Soviet Russia
      5. RIAA
      6. Insensitive Clods

      Since that obviously includes this post, it will self destruct in 5 seconds...

    2. Re:Slashdot Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      add 127.0.0.1 slashdot.org to your hosts file.. that ought to do it.

    3. Re:Slashdot Cliche by jaynor · · Score: 1

      You're new to here, aren't you? :)

    4. Re:Slashdot Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While listening to Oggs (from RIAA's members) on a beowulf cluster of bluetooth enabled handhelds in Soviet Russia, the posts would eliminate YOU, you insensitive clod.

    5. Re:Slashdot Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot

      x) Profit!

    6. Re:Slashdot Cliche by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

      You Forgot SCO.

    7. Re:Slashdot Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would advise you to sell your petrified hot grits to Natalie Portman for a profit! I, for one, welcome our new Slashdot Cliche-using overlords!

      P.S. Does it run Linux?

      This comment dedicated to Ninnle Linux.

    8. Re:Slashdot Cliche by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I also forgot 7. Lego was so much better when I was young, because the pieced were not all specialized, etc.

  33. I'd love one. by nate1138 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My biggest complaint about computing is that my brain->computer interface (hands to keyboard that is) is VERY low bandwidth and VERY high latency. And I know I can't be the only one that has this problem. Anybody that codes knows what I mean, you can visualize and solve the problem in your head much faster than you can get that solution into the computer.

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    1. Re:I'd love one. by tommck · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah... it would be really cool to think about code and have it written and debugged for me... :-) It would be like a manager, only better!

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    2. Re:I'd love one. by moquist · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      ...but sometimes low bandwidth and high latency help to encourage more careful thinking, resulting in higher quality.

      Compare the quality of thought in the average email today (ignoring the ones about your P3N15) to the average handwritten letter, and you'll see what I mean.

      I think the above post about how the mind wanders is apropos; I don't think I want just *everything* from my mind able to fall right out without some sort of filter, and the fingers and the keyboard make a pretty decent filter.

      Perhaps more importantly, I don't want to have to see all the junk that spills out of somebody *else's* mind when they have Brain Broadband.

    3. Re:I'd love one. by godefroy · · Score: 1

      "Bandwidth" would be still a lot better than when using hands, especially if you have bad keyboard.

      I think the machine's power and speed would cause a lot more pain than brain <-> computer connection speed. Imagine coding in a less than a second and then waiting more than 15 for the code to compile. This is already annoying when I use keyboard...

    4. Re:I'd love one. by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Learn to touch type. I'm usually limited by the thought process, not by the typing. And typing runs "in the background", without much conscious thought.

    5. Re:I'd love one. by _Spirit · · Score: 1

      This might not be entirely true. I once read an article about airplane design. The workstations becoming faster meant that designers could make changes to designs and see the results much faster. Research showed that the designers would consider more options because of this and ended up with better average end results.

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    6. Re:I'd love one. by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      I already touch type. And pretty darn fast too. Just not fast enough to keep up with my brain. I guess the problem is more manifest during the early stages of a project, where I'm just cranking out the basic design. It's much less of a problem when debugging or adding functionality.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    7. Re:I'd love one. by higginsm2000 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your points about bandwidth and latency, but coding is not a good example of an activity where these are real limitations.

      All but the most trivial of development is very thought intensive. I have never witnessed anyone coding as fast as they can touch type, so I would have to argue that your two hands are not the bottleneck you seem to suggest they are. You may have spurts of productivity, but on average two finger typing can get code into the computer quicker that you can think it.

      Conversely, I have seen code that was obviously developed quickly, and that was not a good thing.

      Games on the other hand, would most probably benefit from a faster interface.

    8. Re:I'd love one. by Jon_MrJR · · Score: 1

      I recently installed and tried mouse gestures for mozilla firebird. This is brain -> computer via mouse, it works great but gets your wrist tired...

      They mention working on non-intrusive brain-computer interfaces. I'd be willing to try these to move my little cursor! :)

    9. Re:I'd love one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hummm... If every programmer had one of these, how much room would there be for programmers in this tiny planet?

    10. Re:I'd love one. by axxackall · · Score: 1
      With dialup modem we squized every bit in UDP packets. Now we don't count how much we do spent on MIME ecoding inside XML messages full of namespacing tags.

      Wait until you brain-computer interface will get higher speed and see how soon will you migrate to ontological querying in RDF format.

      --

      Less is more !
    11. Re:I'd love one. by fitzsimj · · Score: 1

      I'd be impressed if you could train yourself to stimulate areas of your brain in a sequential fashion quicker than you can touch type.

      After all, we aren't talking about interpreting thoughts, but rather reading signals. You're still going to have to mentally process, "W W W . S L A S H D O T . O R G", not simply think, "go to nerdy website..."

    12. Re:I'd love one. by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it'd be hard at first, but I think you'd adapt pretty quick. And I don't think one would have to spell out W W W . whatever any more than I have to think open hand, move arm 10 degrees up, etc to get my beer off of the bar. It would become second nature, or maybe like little brain macros.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    13. Re:I'd love one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "to stimulate areas of your brain in a sequential fashion"

      what do you think you are doing when you type?

    14. Re:I'd love one. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      but sometimes low bandwidth and high latency help to encourage more careful thinking, resulting in higher quality.

      Ok, that's it. Hand over your modem, you're back to snail mail!
      : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:I'd love one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'd be willing to try these to move my little cursor! :)

      LOL... So, is that what you call yours? ;-)

    16. Re:I'd love one. by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      My biggest complaint about computing is that my brain->computer interface (hands to keyboard that is) is VERY low bandwidth and VERY high latency.

      I'd just love to be able to type without using my hands - years of keyboarding have left with with a lot of repetitive stress injuries. And I'm only 22 : (


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

  34. One Question... by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... How can we try to control things with our brain when science doesn't fully understand the brain?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:One Question... by shiznitmatt · · Score: 1

      I think it follows by deduction that enough is understood for this application.

    2. Re:One Question... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I'm not a brain researcher. I don't work for this company.

      I would guess, however, that it is correlational. I.e. you could start with "move the mouse up the screen." Then train either the brain, the "box" that interprets the signal, or both.

      Detailed understanding of the "why" and "how" of the brain are not require to make this happen.

      -Peter

    3. Re:One Question... by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We dont have to fully understand the brain in order for this to work. It's a hack, trial and error. When something works, stick with it, if it doesnt work, try something else. We dont fully understand nuclear physics, but reactors work pretty well.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    4. Re:One Question... by TheTick · · Score: 1

      ...How do we write code in C++?

      --

      --
      bachiatari na torisetsu o yome!

    5. Re:One Question... by El · · Score: 1

      How can you walk, when you don't have a clue how your brain controls your legs?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    6. Re:One Question... by atkulp · · Score: 1

      I read about a few other similar efforts, including some that worked inductively (no implant). The inductive options only had around 70% accuracy and could be used to "type" on a virtual keyboard or that sort of thing. There is no 100% accurate interpretation of thought by any means, but for more specialized thoughts such as from the motor cortex (this application) there are fewer possibilities so accuracy is higher. Implanting as this does also ensures more targeted sensing of the impulses.

    7. Re:One Question... by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Please explain how you/your brain understands moving your arm/fingers. The same mechanism will be used to control the computer.

      In other words, as your brain has lerned to use your hands, you aree able to learn to control the computer.

    8. Re:One Question... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I might ask you, how can you ride a bicycle, when you aren't capable of explaining to me how you accomplish it?

      Why are we able to send spacecraft to Mars when we don't fully understand gravity?

      Why are we able to build quantum computers when we really have no understanding of the actual nature of quantum particles?

      Etc etc...

    9. Re:One Question... by radish · · Score: 1

      We don't fully understand the electron, but this computer seems to be working OK for me right now.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    10. Re:One Question... by scotch · · Score: 1
      Science doesn't fully understand genetics, evolution, breeading, or species specific gene maps. but we've been breeding plants and animals for thousands of years.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    11. Re:One Question... by cryms0n · · Score: 0

      HILARIOUS! :)

    12. Re:One Question... by wcdw · · Score: 1

      Researchers at MIT were able to have a person manipulate a dot on a CRT (up/down/left/right) back in the 80's, using nothing more than a helmet-like device over the person's head.

      It is not necessary to understand the brain in order to recognize and respond to repeatable patterns. The biggest impediment to this type of research has long been the speed of pattern recognition -- brain waves are quite complex.

      It sounds like this company has resolved that somewhat by focusing in on a smaller set of signals more deeply integrated in the process.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    13. Re:One Question... by sielwolf · · Score: 1

      The same could be said of acupuncture I guess. The rotten library had a great point: what is more disturbing? That acupuncture seems to work or that someone thought sticking pins into your body was a good idea in the first place ;p

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    14. Re:One Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's more or less correct, but it is even a bit better than that. Neurons in the motor cortex are well known to be "directionally tuned" with movements. What this means is that the firing rate of an individual motor neuron varies as a function of movement angle, say, arm movement. Therefore, one way to get accurate predictions of arm movements you simply sample a large enough population of motor neurons, compute a movement vector from the population, and use this to move a cursor, drive a neuroprosthetic, etc.

      (I do not work for this company, but I am a brain researcher.)

    15. Re:One Question... by JordanH · · Score: 1

      Science doesn't even fully understand Fire and we use that pretty well, too.

    16. Re:One Question... by pbridger · · Score: 1

      While it's true we don't fully understand the brain, we do understand it enough to be able to do stuff like this.

      In particular we understand the part of the brain the researchers are utilising (motor cortex) quite well. The motor cortex is a strip of cortex running over your head pretty much from ear to ear. Your entire body is mapped onto this region in a generally consistent manner: adjacent body parts map to adjacent brain regions. The function of this part of the cortex is as a final relay as impulses are sent down the spinal cord to muscles.
      Luckily, this area is plastic/malleable and is self organising based on activity. If you implant electrodes to record impulses from a bunch of these neurones and have those electrodes affect something visible, then theoretically you should be able to learn to control the electrodes just like you learned to control your muscles when you were a baby.

      This may work more effectively in a patient in whom some of the motor cortex is dormant.

    17. Re:One Question... by Phekko · · Score: 1

      Silly thing. Your brain already controls numerous appendixes such as your eyes (hope you got them, otherwise sorry for being an insensitive clod) without science fully understanding all of the brain.

      Sorta like the Wright brothers: they didn't have all the complex flow equations for the wings. Instead they thought to wing it ;)

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  35. CTRL-ALT-DEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can I think all three at the same time? Ahh ... I see a blue screen on the horizon.

    1. Re:CTRL-ALT-DEL by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      Gives a whole new meaning to "Blue Screen of Death" does it?

  36. Wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Surgenor said the whole system eventually will be wireless.

    ...and the wardrivers rejoice

  37. Military uses by v_1_r_u_5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is really the first step towards cyborgs, instant control for fighter pilots, enhanced soldier response, etc. When you stop to think about the potential, it's pretty fascinating and a bit scary.

  38. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, if you want realistic fighting with the chance of possible brain damage, just join the army.

  39. Excellent! by killermal · · Score: 1

    I'm counting down the days until i can *have* sex!

    1. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So right now you're neither male nor female?

  40. Memory by mfisher · · Score: 1

    I want a smart media slot in my head.. Calculus test on friday :>S I hope this tech comes out for real use soon sounds really cool and we are slowly starting to live up to what the movies in the 80's said 2010 would be like!

    1. Re:Memory by lukior · · Score: 0

      I think Sci-Fi writers are often correct. They just get it off by a couple decades. The real question is are the Sci-Fi writers predicting the future or are scientists researching to fulfill the writers fantasy?

      --
      I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
  41. bluetooth by g-to-the-o-to-the-g · · Score: 1

    A think a technology like this used in conjunction with something such as bluetooth could be really cool. Maybe, it could eliminate a need for a keyboard and mouse someday, making computing much more comfortable. Of course, there are the obvious advantages for special needs people. Without the limitations of a keyboard and mouse, productivity might reach a new level. Writing letters and such might become a lot easier for those of us who think faster than they type or write.

    1. Re:bluetooth by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... You have to consider the error-corrected outgoing bandwidth of the brain. This will require training for you too, and probably on a similar scale to learning to use a keyboard.

  42. Hmmm... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new cyborg overlords.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that in Soviet Russia, out cyborg overlords welcome us.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I, for one, plan to be a new cyborg overlord!

  43. reminds me of.. by fabio · · Score: 0

    Meatnurse, the epic geek saga

    its a quite cool net story, that takes all our important geek discussions warps them, and then makes fun of them, and i even contributed to chapter
    16 !! (sortah!)

    www.meatnurse.com

    and yeah when wil we end up like the borg with all these implants were about to get?

    --
    *resistance is futile, or fuzzy, i dunno*
  44. One small step for man by lukior · · Score: 1

    Although the immediate uses are for para/quadrapalegics and the like this will eventually work into a much better user interface for the average joe. Imagine being able to type by just thinking the words. Much better than speech recognition. Eventually, you will control the computer screen in your contact lense with the implants in your brain. Wireless communication is done silently with a computer synthesising the words you think in your own voice. The productivity these types of devices can eventually create is amazing.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    1. Re:One small step for man by godefroy · · Score: 1

      Actually - keyboard control is enough. Plus some extra control-characters maybe.
      Typing with a speed of a thought makes things easy... And with your own personal GPRS cell phone virtual terminal you could do almost everything - from displaying a map of town with your location onto the inner-side on your sunglasses to chatting with friends without even a single move.

      On the other hand: how is it possible we know about it while Army doesn't have it already? I think the company's info is premature OR the whole thing is already in use for a long time, but hidden from public eyes.

      Just a bit of my conspiracy theories...

  45. Screw the monkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on now, is it really THAT hard to get a woman?

    Just take a bath once in a while, really... you *nix types are hopeless.

  46. Just be sure to run Ad-aware every week . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Funny
    . . . or you're just asking to be turned into a walking, talking spam bot:

    "Carbon units, take heed: Lengthen your reproductive extension! Wealthen yourself through expediting currency transfer for expired-dictator spouse-counterpart! Observe vixen-type hu-mans frolicking in their dorm-units!"*

    Stefan

    * Stilted borg language added for comedic effect.

    1. Re:Just be sure to run Ad-aware every week . . . by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      -1 GREAT GOOD GOOGLY MOOGLY MAKE IT STOP mod added for grumpy old fart effect.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
  47. Please DON'T sign me up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I need. Spam, piped directly into my brain.

  48. Doubt it.. by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Funny

    I doubt you meet the system requirements ;) you need at least a 386...

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  49. Encryption by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 3, Funny
    How do they come up with the encryption keys?

    "Alright, now think of any number between 0 and 18446744073709551615."

    OR, if you're using 128-bit encryption:

    "...between 0 and 3.4028236692093846346337460743177x10^38"

    --
    Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    1. Re:Encryption by magicslax · · Score: 1

      ...and everybody ends up picking 37.

      Except for the really smart people. They'd pick 47.

  50. Gimme Gimme Gimme!!!! by Stonan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Arthritis is really hindering my FPS ability!!

    --
    The GEEK shall inherit the earth...
  51. Cross Monkeys with Robot Wars and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got yourself an Emmy, well as long as you can get Simon Cowell to host.

  52. One step closer to immortality! by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 1

    Now all we need to do is figure out how to keep the brain cells replicating as quickly as they die. We won't need weak HOO-MAN bodies anymore (except the brain)!

    --
    Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
  53. "Tests" to be done.... by Tagren · · Score: 0

    Nice friend: WTF is that!! An arm growing out of your head!?!

    other:
    Sssh. I accepted one of Microsofts EULA without reading again so im not alowed to.. Bssshht (painful electrical shock).
    ---

  54. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought brain damage was a requisite to join the Army...

  55. Another article on the same topic at PopSci by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was the cover story of the Popular Science that I just received in the mail. You can read the article here.

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  56. This is something we want? by Cranx · · Score: 1

    We want a matrix-style brain interface? Can I also get a crystal for my hand that changes color as I age? Where's my damn moffit?

  57. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can download pr0n with BOTH HANDS FREE!

  58. Sigh by blogboy · · Score: 1

    How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card? Sign me up!

    Yet another one for the Social Side-Effects Of Internet Use ...

  59. Direct Neural Interface by Aggrajag · · Score: 0

    One step closer to DNI and one step closer to the day when I can fulfill my dream and actually move to the 'Net and kiss Real Life goodbye. I just hope someboy will come to feed me and change my diapers from time to time ;)

    1. Re:Direct Neural Interface by tommck · · Score: 1
      you'll just have a feeding tube, a catheter and a colostomy... no need.

      It'd be just like being in the Matrix.... Not sure if that weird fluid is needed though...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  60. mynuts won? to hell with the won-eyed girl & t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    illegal aliens too. let's get gooing on diss won?

    turnbulltax.con indicates that the illegal alien version of their 'product' is moving like moleasses, so who needs 'em?

  61. So... by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    Are the monkeys going to take all the Visual Basic jobs out there?

    1. Re:So... by shubert1966 · · Score: 1

      Uh - where exactly are those VB Jobs? Not in Toldeo - thatz fer shur.

      No, I don't know Jamie Farr.

      --
      Stuff that matters.
  62. Re:GET SOME PRIORITES, Part Deux!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who the hell would want to see a Tom Cruise movie?

    Are you gay or something?

  63. person-to-person communication by cantabrigian · · Score: 1
    Perhaps more interestingly, integration with Bluetooth or other wireless communication technologies will open the door for person-to-person communication using this system.

    What sorts of things would people transfer to each other? Thoughts better left unsaid? A new form of pirated music?

  64. hi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Miriam, Abe, what's up? You dudes are on slashdot. Sweet. Donohughe let wired cover him? wtf?

  65. Hey! by El · · Score: 1

    It was bad enough when they outsourced my job to India... now you want them to outsource it to the primate exhibit at the zoo!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was bad enough when they outsourced my job to India... now you want them to outsource it to the primate exhibit at the zoo!

      No, the Monkeys will be moving into your old office.

    2. Re:Hey! by El · · Score: 1
      No, the Monkeys will be moving into your old office.

      They can't... the SPCA and PETA would object!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  66. Feeling old... by bigattichouse · · Score: 1


    I would have titled it "Neuromancer style...", ahh the days playing Cyberpunk with paper and pencil have long gone the way of the Dodo... Steve Jackson Games - where for art thou?

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Feeling old... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      They're still there, and still publishing GURPS Cyberpunk (they're on the 3rd edition, I think).

      And if you want some fantasy in your Cyberpunk there's always Shadowrun.

      I don't know if R. Talsorian is still publishing their Cyberpunk game though. Anyone know anything about that?

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:Feeling old... by MisterMook · · Score: 1

      As far as I know R Talsorian is just one guy with a day job now.

    3. Re:Feeling old... by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      Is it a sign of slashdot that one of the guys I used to play Cyberpunk with responded to my thread?

      --
      meh
    4. Re:Feeling old... by MisterMook · · Score: 1

      No, it's a sign that the people who used to play Cyberpunk with you occassionally check to see what you're posting on Slashdot.

  67. Constantly referencing The Matrix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is a whole new way to sound stupid for the new millennium.

  68. Not to worry by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    a very sharp climb into a stall

    They have counseling for that.

    *ducks*

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  69. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by lukior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think if the implants improved to the level for use in video games they would be banned just like performance enhancing drugs like steroids are in sports.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
  70. Speaking of monkeys: From G. W. Bush +1, True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Slashdotters:

    I don't a brain implant. I have hearing aid implants for all my press conferences and speeches.

    Regards,

    President G. W. Bush

  71. American Woman.. by Nadsat · · Score: 1

    stay away from me, hee.

    Why does technology for purposes of automated control always sound so cute when first released? Then you face the reality of a life filled with biometric monitoring chips and automated traffic light camera police.

    For your safety, help take a bite out of true crime. Fight technocracy.

  72. No-brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign me up? Uhh, no thanks... maybe in another decade. The thought of 100 implants makes me go all wobbly. All of that just to have the ultimate TuxRacer controller...?

    On a side note: I'd not want to tie this in with a PC for handicapped users. Given how much time and maintenance is required to keep a modern OS running, it would really be a drag to be dependent on today's computers for communication. A dedicated device sounds like a better approach - not something prone to kernel panics or BSODs.

  73. Looking at how Mapping will take place... by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Anybody have any more substantial links to the information contained in the article? I'm curious to understand how they are planning to map the individual motor functions from the brain to the chip.

    Maybe I'm remembering too much of "The Terminal Man", but you can't stick this chip into somebody's brain and then expect it to hit a useful nerve bundle that is either surplus/redundant (I guess not a big concern with a quadraplegic) and, because of loss, the "normal" connections to it have not been rerouted/atrophied.

    Even with something like an MRI and telling a person to lift a (useless) leg and mapping the brain areas that respond would probably be horribly imprecise.

    I suspect that Steve Ausin's limbs are still very very far away.

    myke

    1. Re:Looking at how Mapping will take place... by Ygorl · · Score: 1

      You stick the array into the proper area of the brain; the 40% or so of electrodes that are contacting useful neurons are recorded from while the monkey (or, at some point in the future, the human) performs (or imagines performing) the appropriate actions - in the present case, following a moving spot on a screen with a joystick-controlled cursor. Do that for a while, and after you've got enough data it's basically just a big overblown math problem to find the relationships between neural activity and physical motion. Figure this out, and you can cut out the middleman - i.e. have the neural activity directly control the cursor on the screen. Or, in the not-too-distant future, control the artificial limb. It's very cool. (A lot of the folks working on this are on the same hall as I am)

  74. A world like GitS by mr_rattles · · Score: 1

    Where do I sign up for my cyberbrain implant? Now I just need to find some thermoptic camouflage and a Tachikoma...

  75. Just Remember.... by hardgeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just remember our experiences from the computer world...

    NEVER use BrainJack v1.0

    Always wait for the point release!

    1. Re:Just Remember.... by slaida1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean we should use DirectBJ 2018a? Or maybe cracked (with keygen) version of it which we could not patch without new crack/keygen? Then without patches we would get brainworms sending our private stuff to random people or making us zombies so we must then get firewalls and then my ping would not pass it unless configured, it would loop pinging in my brain back and forth and quite possibly make a DoS in there or should I say Denial of Brain, DoB?

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  76. How about feedback by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    I RTFA, but couldn't find any mention of feedback travelling back to the brain, like our normal limbs do.

    Looks to me like the main form of feedback that the action has been completed would be in the form of audio and visual signals.

    Ofcourse, wiring information into the brain so that it can understand it would be *much* more difficult than interpreting information from the brain and translating it into signals that feed into devices we already understand.

    If feedback to the brain can really be made to work, that would open up huge possibilities for misuse -- you could make a person believe anything you wanted to, just by writing a virus/malicious code to send the right signals to the brain.

    Just some food for thought.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:How about feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just some food for thought.

      I saw that movie too:-)

    2. Re:How about feedback by Ygorl · · Score: 1

      There is no feedback to the brain. It's all visual, which is still good enough for decent precision.

    3. Re:How about feedback by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      With sufficient skill, you can do that now. It's called "social engineering".

      That sort of thing would just lower the bar for entry quite a bit.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    4. Re:How about feedback by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1
      If feedback to the brain can really be made to work, that would open up huge possibilities for misuse -- you could make a person believe anything you wanted to, just by writing a virus/malicious code to send the right signals to the brain.
      I have a suspicion that writing virii or other malicious for the brain is going to turn out to be a hell of a lot harder than writing it for any existing computer hardware/software combination. There's a huge gap between sending some small amount of input into the brain and making people "believe anything you wanted to."

      It's not like someone comes and installs a pristine version of Microsoft HumanBrain 2004 (Service Pack 1) onto standardized neural hardware when a child is born. Everybody's brain is constructed and programmed from scratch, and I think it's probably too early for us to make the assumption that there's going to be a one-size-fits-all solution for feeding data into the brain. The best analogy I can think of to argue against worrying about virii at this point is this: writing a virus to infect and control many human brains would be like trying to write a virus to infect a networked population of computers that are custom-built from homemade parts, each running its own custom-written OS.

      Maybe once we understand in some detail how brains work from the neuron level all the way up to conscious thought, we might spot some common patterns in human minds that might allow us to control people, but I think that's a long way off. Until then, I guess we'll just have to stick with old-fashioned things like advertising, bribes, and blackmail. :)
      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  77. Seems great at first ... by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... until you realize your being hooked up to a microsoft product. Takes the blue screen of death to a whole new level.

  78. kung fu by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    I know.. kung fu.

    1. Re:kung fu by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Geez, who do you think you are, Johnny Mnemonic or something?

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  79. New pickup lines at bars by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

    New pickup lines:

    Hey babe, nice RJ45
    Check out my "RAM"
    Let's interface

  80. There are upsides and downsides to this by Polarism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm going to speak on less scientific terms because i'm a cryptologist, not a nanotechnician/computer science genius ;) I see it like this: This can lead to a TON of great things that we've only seen in sci-fi movies and books and games and what not. Perhaps not exactly the same, but this is quite exciting indeed. Think about being "wired" 24/7/365, having a HUD (heads-up display) overlayed onto your vision everywhere you go, interfacing with everything it sees, no longer will we need credit cards or wallets or anything, just interface with the bank network right then and there. We will have a new level of education, kids won't have to do the K-12 thing anymore as they'll already have access to basically all known information with a single thought. They can concentrate on other things instead (which could be bad...they'd lose their innocence at a very young age). Also opens the door for nanotech, however dangerous that could prove to be. I won't elaborate on that though as this is all guesswork and just a bunch of personal theory anyway. This could also cause a devastating breakdown of society and culture, if this tech is developed enough I imagine it would really be possible to put people in a "matrix-like" state, total VR. People wouldn't want to leave. Would also cause massive changes in the political world, governments would completely change to accomodate this because your average citizen wouldn't just be running blind most of the time anymore. They'd be able to see unbiased news if they wanted instead of being brainwashed by Fox or CNN or what not. Just a few thoughts, most of them probably BS but worth thinking about.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
    1. Re:There are upsides and downsides to this by Brill · · Score: 1

      They would have instant access to unbiased news? hah are you joking? That was the idea behind the internet, still is. People turn to the news they want to hear, not the best ones. Besides, the government would have mad control over what it's citizens watch and what they THINK is the truth.

    2. Re:There are upsides and downsides to this by Polarism · · Score: 1
      Yeah i'm talking theory here of course.

      I wanted to avoid the 1984 discussion if possible because you know it's almost a given.

      And sure, they would have instant unbiased access to news...the only requirement would be that they are smart enough to find it.

      If not, then oh well.

      --
      All your base are belong to Google.
  81. Sure thing by msimm · · Score: 1

    GRANDPA!

    ;-)

    Oh, wait..

    --
    Quack, quack.
  82. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far it works for monkeys

    I guess that means we can use it to read /.?

  83. connection to the sorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't it just suffice with a connection to the source?

  84. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would imagine that there would probably be separate arenas/competitions for physical-interface games and (not sure what the word is) neural-interface games. Just because, like the top-level poster said, it would generate an unfair advantage.

    Frankly, I'd prefer to see neural-interface match-ups because then the games become less of a matter of how well you can properly wield a mouse, but it relies more on strategy. Presumably, all the characters would have the same "physical" (in the game) abilities, so it would be up to the players' strategies and luck to determine who would win.

    --
    True story.
  85. To quote Randy Quaid by MajorDick · · Score: 2, Funny

    "every time the wife would turn on the microwave, I'd piss my pants and forget who I was for half-an-hour."

    Not to mention static electricity would probably be a SERIOUS phobia

  86. Sorry I forgot I had to do html formatting(redone) by Polarism · · Score: 1
    I'm going to speak on less scientific terms because i'm a cryptologist, not a nanotechnician/computer science genius ;)

    I see it like this: This can lead to a TON of great things that we've only seen in sci-fi movies and books and games and what not. Perhaps not exactly the same, but this is quite exciting indeed. Think about being "wired" 24/7/365, having a HUD (heads-up display) overlayed onto your vision everywhere you go, interfacing with everything it sees, no longer will we need credit cards or wallets or anything, just interface with the bank network right then and there.

    We will have a new level of education, kids won't have to do the K-12 thing anymore as they'll already have access to basically all known information with a single thought. They can concentrate on other things instead (which could be bad...they'd lose their innocence at a very young age). Also opens the door for nanotech, however dangerous that could prove to be. I won't elaborate on that though as this is all guesswork and just a bunch of personal theory anyway.

    This could also cause a devastating breakdown of society and culture, if this tech is developed enough I imagine it would really be possible to put people in a "matrix-like" state, total VR. People wouldn't want to leave. Would also cause massive changes in the political world, governments would completely change to accomodate this because your average citizen wouldn't just be running blind most of the time anymore. They'd be able to see unbiased news if they wanted instead of being brainwashed by Fox or CNN or what not. Just a few thoughts, most of them probably BS but worth thinking about.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  87. Re: If monkeys by Jonny+Cat · · Score: 1

    were jacked in randomly for a sufficient amount of time, they would eventually produce the entire works of Microsoft, including all of its errors, without error.

  88. Erectile dysfunction by msimm · · Score: 1

    is no laughing matter. ;-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  89. Computer control? by Englabenny · · Score: 1

    As a human, I'd prefer a one-way link from me to the Computer, that is, I'm in charge. As a computer, uplinked to a human, would I care? ;)

  90. Re:y35, bu7!!!!1 by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0

    (POTENTIAL SPOILER FOR MATRIX REVOLUTIONS)

    In Matrix Revolutions, program executes you!

    --
    True story.
  91. Cyberkinetics by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    ... soon to be the largest pr0n provider on the Internet.

    (You know its going to happen)

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  92. Not the Matrix, but Hyperion by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking it'll be more like the 'Hyperion' series of novels by Dan Simmons. Where the artificial intelligences use our brain power to exist and compute when we transfer locations thru the network.

    --



    I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
  93. I didn't see a link for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    signing up... my website will surely get slashdotted if I have my brain to firewire 800 project up on the web(with pictures). I want to be able to type by just looking at a page!!!

    The next step of course would be feedback. I always wanted to experience a BFG10K

  94. Wha? by mateo+demoni · · Score: 1

    I'm not quite sure I see what is so "Matrix-style" about this? Machines controlling a human brain, sure, I can see how that would be, but not the other way around...

  95. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by hesiod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > I would imagine that there would probably be separate arenas

    Too bad you post at zero, because that was a good point.

  96. Why memory chips won't be added to the brain by 3cents · · Score: 1

    While some users here have quiped about having to add another 512 MB ram to their brain this is not likely to happen. All a user needs is a communication medium with the brain, then you can plug in anything you want, memory, cpu, cell phone, etc... think of it as usb for the brain, but probably done wirelessly. we'll see though, i might be wrong, but thats never stopped anyone else from posting on slashdot :)

    1. Re:Why memory chips won't be added to the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about that 512MB or ram is nothing compared to the storage capacity of our brain...

      Our brain can pretty much hold our entire life as long as you don't get bad sectors and end up with Alzheimer's. Seriously... we only use 10 percent of our brain... we got lots of room for expansion... if someone wants to rent out the other 90 percent of my brain... its cheap

  97. I know Kung-Fu! by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    But I'm a quadriplegic...

  98. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Rallion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, the reason I play laser tag is because I suspect it's the closest to that kind of thing that I'll ever live to see.

  99. You've doomed us all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We can defeat the monkeys. We can defeate the robots. But not at the same time! Damn scientists."

  100. But... by Afbc0m · · Score: 0

    Will we be able to receive stimulus through it, IE for a fighter pilot speed and altitude data, or even something as simple as a another inner ear, sensing which direction is down...

    If you think about it, we can adapt to stimuli easily, will we be able to use it to enhance our perception???

    Forget video goggles, I want direct input!

  101. B2B! by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 1

    As in, Brain2Brain!

    If I get one of these, I'll figure out how to run BitTorrent on it. Then I can download anime fansubs with a mere thought!

    --
    Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
  102. Controlling and getting controlled -- three links by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    - Weapons against the mind: Electromagnetic Weapons and Mind Control from CNN's Special Assignment, anno 1985 (which litterally tells: in Soviet Russia, weapons control YOU)

    - Controlling Robots with the Mind

    - ... and an old Slashdot article :-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  103. 0n3 w3rd by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0

    Outsourcing.

    --
    True story.
  104. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brings new terror to the term "Blue Screen of Death"

  105. Wow. by adun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gives the phrase Blue Screen of Death a whole new lease on terror, doesn't it?

    1. Re:Wow. by ubermod1 · · Score: 1

      Actually the only thing that the interface does is "listen" to the signal the neurons are sending so I dont think you have to worry about a Blue Screen of Death frying your brain.

    2. Re:Wow. by FJ · · Score: 1

      Maybe OS/2 had it correct as well. Their BSOD was called the "Grey Tombstone" by some.

  106. Hacking by Unnngh! · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but what happens when someone hacks you?

  107. imagine the possibilities here: by draco+ni · · Score: 3, Insightful
    On the one hand, we have the very very scary.


    The company's system, called BrainGate, could help patients with no mobility to control a computer, a robot or eventually their own rewired muscles

    ...


    Surgenor said the whole system eventually will be wireless.


    Stray EMI could give you a tic. Someone malicious could actually block/redirect/subvert control of your own body, remotely.


    On the other hand... telerobotics, maybe? Use your brain to control a robot doing a dangerous job somewhere! Going into a hazardous environment from the safety of your control lab...
    Or maybe even a totally virtual environment.

    1. Re:imagine the possibilities here: by whovian · · Score: 1

      OK, you mentioned doing things remotely.

      How about the age-old sci-fi themes of teleportation (imagining where you want to be) or time travel (when you want to be)?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    2. Re:imagine the possibilities here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are the ol' speed of light lag issues - otherwise I agree...

    3. Re:imagine the possibilities here: by daveisoverlord · · Score: 1

      Stray EMI could give you a tic. Someone malicious could actually block/redirect/subvert control of your own body, remotely.

      Dude, I need help. I just have visions of some deranged cracker having a blast in the mall by making all kinds of people just take a dump in their pants while they're walking around.

      --
      The perception of reality is more important than reality itself.
  108. You're using a keyboard! How quaint! by raceface · · Score: 1

    Todays fortune may not be so far from truth.

    --
    Ride recklessly only when safe to do so.
  109. Safety concerns for future versions: by Rallion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Surgenor said the whole system eventually will be wireless.
    And we think cell phones are bad because they're close to out brains?
  110. Plug in the brain? by aled · · Score: 1

    You people are getting it wrong. After they mess in your brain with electrodes you are reduced to a monkey or end in a wheel chair.

    --

    "I think this line is mostly filler"
  111. My Teacher Flunked The Planet by Wired9_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An interesting book by Bruce Coville points to a similar situation...where all humans were once linked. Eventually the need for privacy grew and we created a Psyonic Barrier....I could see just such a scenario playing...

    --
    -Wired9_99
  112. Comparable to Voicemail recognition. by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I laud the effort, it will be a long time before this becomes a proper human interface. Take computer voice recognition... it's still in it's infancy despite years of 'progress'. The issues at hand:
    i) How long it takes the computer to learn how to interpret the signals and what they relate to(its training).
    ii) The training involved for the human to keep a 'steady mind'. How does the system bypass clutter?

    If those two issues are resolved or mitigated, this is a cool prospect.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    1. Re:Comparable to Voicemail recognition. by octal666 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not familiar with this technology, but in something similar I saw in a congress, the thing was that the computer learned to discriminate a very small number of mind states, in that case were, for quadraplegic, moving the arm up, down, left, right, and the like. You don't have to keep a steady mind all the session, but try to think not in the wrong things, and it's simple, I can refuse to move my arm with no problem for hours. I'm with you in that it won't be a proper user interface for many time, but for disabled people, it can be great, i mean, check this blowing interface in gnome, i wouldn't use it, but I can use a keyboard, not everyone can. Another thing, about speech recognition, try to be coding by voice for ten hours in a row, and see your throat bleed.

      --
      DON'T PANIC
    2. Re:Comparable to Voicemail recognition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, teaching a monkey is one thing, getting an unrulely human mind under control, now that....hey cool what's this shiny thing over here?

    3. Re:Comparable to Voicemail recognition. by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

      It's probably directly connected to the part of the brain that regulates motion. I doubt there'll be problems with clutter if it's done properly.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
    4. Re:Comparable to Voicemail recognition. by chuck54 · · Score: 1

      This is one step closer to the ULTIMATE digital camera. A direct interface with the optic nerve. I guess this is only a small step. But it is the biggest one so far, there may be alot more to go from here.

  113. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the boost. If I had said anything to that effect, I would have been modded off-topic and/or troll. Posting at 0 is very difficult because whenever you make a controversial point or you're trying to make a joke it gets modded down. (To be fair, I probably deserved the 0, but I am now in full control of my faculties =)

    --
    True story.
  114. What kind of hardware interface? by eggoeater · · Score: 1

    So instead of a long rod inserted into the back of my head, would I have a USB port on my neck?
    Maybe fire-wire?
    What about blue-tooth?
    Maybe good ol' serial port would be best.
    Would we have docking stations?

  115. Workplace evil by Storm · · Score: 1
    Can you imagine all of the evil tricks I could do with one of these? Like shutting down all of my coworkers' Windows PCs with nothing more than an evil glare?

    Reminds me of Scott Adams' The Dilbert Future, where he was discussing Star Trek Technology:

    It would be great to be able to beam your molecules across space and then reassemble them. The only problem is that you have to trust your co-worker to operate the transporter. These are the same people who won't add paper to the photocopier or make a new pot of coffee after taking the last drop. I don't think they'll be double-checking the transporter coordinates. They'll be accidentally beaming people into walls, pets, and furniture. People will spend all their time apologizing for having inanimate objects protruding from parts of their bodies.

    Now that I think about it, maybe there should be some long consideration before releasing this on humanity...

    --
    --Storm
  116. How do you think windows was coded? by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    They just hooked up a million monkeys with brain implants to some development tools, masturbated them- and the result was Windows XP.
    True story....

  117. Re:brain r00t by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As opposed to Windows which just runs all of your thoughts as admin by default? Imagine someone crashing your optical input to get full access to your brain a la smashing SQL Server to grab a whole server.

    AAAGHH!!!! I'm blind!!!

    But, on the other hand, I'm being used to host pr0n... so is it really that bad?

    Imagine a ping o' death on your brain...

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  118. Slashdot Effect by Wheat.Thin · · Score: 1

    If someone gets slashdotted, I dont want to be the one to clean the mess up.

  119. Dream Slashdot by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I dream of a slashdot world where there are millions of users, but I always get first post, +5 Funny and god-like karma.

    Then the slashdot servers are also running on linux beowulf clusters. Bill Gates will also be wearing a penguin suit. And all the people who mod me down goes straight to hell.

  120. TPM by temp7890 · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that we have to start putting down "Thoughts Per Minute" (TPM) in our resumes intead of WPM (Words Per Minute)? Boy, I'm glad that I'm ADHD! :)

  121. Can it be overclocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the brain already has a liquid cooling system can it be overclocked?

    If so how? Would slushies be required for a brain freeze?

    And what about the Blue Screen of Death?
    Would it have a new meaning?

    1. Re:Can it be overclocked? by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

      it is so simple...
      Methamphetamine. You might overheat, so drink water.

  122. How can I get in on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So all I have to do to test this is become a quadriplegic, right?
    Where do I sign up, and where's the nearest 4 story building with adjoining hospital?

  123. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Paintball is more realistic, you get the recoil action and the pain of getting marked.

  124. I wonder.... by dustmote · · Score: 1

    I wonder what it feels like to control something with this thing? Like you're controlling part of your arm or something?

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
  125. Code monkeys? It's been done... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    See here.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  126. ray kurzweil by hamoe · · Score: 1

    Kurzweil's very interesting piece The Age of Spiritual Machines details exactly how this technology will lead to a very Matrix-like future. Figured it was worth mentioning the book since everyone here was seeing this as being analogous to the Matrix even though its in such infancy. Definitely an interesting and applicable book to take a look at in light of the technology that's finally starting to emerge (nanotech, advances in distributed networks, advances in neural networks, and of course this sort of psuedo matrix stuff).

  127. "Matrix" style???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe that movie would get credit for wetware... it was bad science fiction, using ideas that have been written about, filmed, and talked about for decades...

    Are people's attention spans that short, or do they only care about something when it's been popularized in a lame movie?

    Sorry, to flame, it's just ridiculous...

  128. Re:brain r00t by fader · · Score: 0

    Imagine someone crashing your optical input to get full access to your brain

    Someone imagined that already.

    --
    - fader
  129. creators' newclear power, planet/population rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mandates a current reality.

    you may continue to pretend if you must/are afraid/afraud, but it won't help/could make things worse, if that's even possible.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators... the ultimate interface.

  130. Imagine a... by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Beowolf cluster of THESE bad boys. Damn, that would be SWEET!
    What are the grphics chips on these things?
    (no spell check)

  131. If I were a quadriplegic... by djeaux · · Score: 1
    ...and this option were available to make me able to be more productive, I'd take whatever risks are entailed in having a piece of hardware installed in my braincase.

    OTOH, the risks of an invasive procedure such as this would involve would probably preclude any applications for healthy people. We live in a litigious society & the risk of medical malpractice would scare off any physicians who might think about installing the equipment in the noggins of people who didn't have serious, serious physical problems already.

    Is this why politicians are jumping on the tort reform bandwagon? Limit people's ability to sue doctors for malpractice & you might wind up with voters whose brains are all hooked to a network. Wow! And we thought voting machine fraud was an issue!

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  132. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Implant a monkey with BrainGate technology.
    2) Integrate the monkey's computer with the control for a remote controlled rat on a keyboard.
    3) Repeat 1 & 2 a million times.
    4) ...
    5) Profit!

  133. I'd rather have a "Brainstorm" interface by Ruger · · Score: 1

    Remember that old movie with Christopher Walken? Just put a "walkman" on your heah and you're jacked in...rather than having a spike shoved into your brain. Ruger

  134. thoughts privacy / spyware by ongeboren · · Score: 1
    What if I have an accident, I go to a hospital and they implant this thing in my head without my knowlende? They would be able to know important things I wouldn't want to share with somebody.

    What if we start implanting those chips into the heads of accused murderers? Will we be able to get the truth?

    It could be quite a spyware in my opinion.

    --
    First I wanted to be a chef. Then I wanted to be Napoleon. My ambitions have continued to grow ever since.
    1. Re:thoughts privacy / spyware by taradfong · · Score: 1

      You really have nothing to worry about, Mr. Anderson.

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  135. Great, but... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    ... the Windows version requires a reboot of the user.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  136. Similar technology by octal666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, about a year ago, in the Catalan Congress on Artificial Intelligence, I attended to an invited conference of a technology very similar to this. Since it was an invited conference it's not in the lecture notes, and I can't rememeber the name of the researcher, but he had a helmet that readed thoughts and could discriminate between many more than up/down, left/right and the like. The main difference was it required no surgery, they were applying it to humans, since with no surgery, it's easier to make experiments and had some pretty impressive videos. The research was being done in a European Union research facility.

    --
    DON'T PANIC
  137. Credit where credit is due... by Cutriss · · Score: 2, Informative

    For anyone that doesn't recognize this, it's an adaptation of a monologue done by Brak from the Space Ghost crew on Cartoon Network. Here's the original:

    One time I hired a monkey to take notes for me in class. I would just sit there with my mind a complete blank while the monkey scribbled on little pieces of paper. At the end of the week the teacher said, "Class, I want you to write a paper using your notes." So I wrote a paper that said "Hello, my name is Bingo. I like to climb on things. Can I have a banana? Eek eek." I got an F. When I told my Mom about it she said "I told you never trust a monkey!" The end.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  138. Robin Williams... by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

    Yesterday: "When I was gorwing up we weren't online, we did lines!
    YEAH, and there were ninjas on the fucking lawn TRYING TO KILL US!!"

    Tomarow:"When I was growing up we weren't online we were on computers!
    YEAH, and there were remote-controlled-ninja-monkeys on the fucking lawn TRYING TO KILL US!!"

    --
    md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
    d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
  139. Starbucks need not apply.. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I can see it now - hijacked cafe antennas that repeatedly command you to walk to the counter, order another latte, swipe the card, and sip and enjoy with every mouse click...

    Yikes.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  140. Obviously this is premature and paranoid, but: by Gannoc · · Score: 1


    Do you really want DRM, Microsoft and the government INSIDE YOUR HEAD?

    Maybe you'll be scanned for terrorists thoughts, but don't worry, someone will only look at the thought if it poses a threat to national security. If you're not a terrorist, you have nothing to worry about. Frankly, if it prevents another 9/11, i'm happy to provide our government protectors full access to my mind.

    1. Re:Obviously this is premature and paranoid, but: by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Frankly, if it prevents another 9/11, i'm happy to provide our government protectors full access to my mind.

      Frankly, I'm not.Not until they could distinguish between subconscioud thought and consciout decision. Just 'cos someone contemplates (or even thinks about) blowing up a building doesn't necessarily mean they're a terrorist.
      Never mind the people who just consider this non-seriously, what about police, architects, structural engineers, explosives experts, SFX designers. All of these kind of people may have legitimate reasons for wondering exactly how a building may be blown up or similarly destroyed. (Either for prevention, risk assessment, or simulation)

      The way I see it, whilst thought are in my head, and only in my head then it's no-one's business what those thoughts are unless I want people to know.
      The moment it ceases to be just "in my head" and starts to be hostile action, that would be the time whe I hould be "considered dangerous". But not whilst it's mere speculation.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  141. Subject is misleading by bradbury · · Score: 2, Informative
    While it is beginning to be quite feasible to begin to connect neurons in the brain or motor cortex to neurons or muscles whose normal connections to the brain have been disrupted this is a far cry from a Matrix-like interface.

    Current estimates by Robert Freitas suggest that it is going to require at least a trillion nanorobots in place within the brain and most probably the installation of an extensive fiber optic network to handle the required bandwidth to provide a matrix-like interface (either for real time full bandwidth human-computer interfaces or for brain/mind uploading into a computer). This may be documented to a limited extent in Ray Kurzweil's forthcoming book The Singularity is Near (est. publication early 2005) and perhaps to a greater extent in several years when Nanomedicine Volume III is published.

  142. Warcraft3 sux by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Starcraft had some strategy depth to it.

    If you plugged your brain into Warcraft3, it'd be like,"This is your brain. This is your brain in a microwave."

    For real, I competed on a world class level for a while, so I know my shit. First one to 1500 wins.

    Blizzard must have lucked out with Starcraft, because the way they balanced Warcraft was borderline retarded.

    1. Re:Warcraft3 sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]First one to 1500 wins.[/i]

      rofl? is that sarcasm or are you really a bgh nub?

      And wc3 sux0rz my b0xorz!!? pos...all my anticipation went down the toilet when I played beta.

      gg mixing rts, rpg and fps caliber graphics. phuktards!!!?! !

      Do like a submarine...die die die!!!

    2. Re:Warcraft3 sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like another Starcraft sackrider to me!

      Maybe you didnt realize it, but Starcraft was pretty imbalanced until a patch or two into the expansion. And that seems to be the way Warcraft 3 is as well.

  143. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hence my preference for laser tag, yes.

  144. Convergence: Cellphones + PDAs + Grids + Wetware by eer · · Score: 1
    [prophet-mode]
    While it won't take hold until the next decade, enthusiasts interested in privacy concerns should wonder now - "How will I control which collective(s) I join?"

    This convergence will lead to a new round of truely "personal computing", where once again industry will "leave security until later" with catastrophic results. Self organizing grids need to learn to deal, now, with developing healthy doses of suspicion, doubt, identity and mistrust of "others".

    You have been warned! Don't let there be just one.
    [/prophet-mode]

  145. Keeping up with the jones... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Could be a real problem.

    Could you get into Harvard with last year's brain chip?

    Would all your friends stop talking to you because you "chip" was to slow?

    And then of course there would be the hackers that insist on over-clocking their personal brains.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  146. We're not fat enough? by ShadyG · · Score: 1

    Ok, so right now the only exercise I get during work hours is typing, and occasionally moving and clicking the mouse. Now I'm just going to sit still all day and think code? Gonna need a bigger chair.

  147. Expansion card? by unassimilatible · · Score: 1
    How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card?

    Technically, isn't the person really just a glorified keyboard and mouse? Unless, of course, the BrainGate is able to use one's brain as RAM or CPU...

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  148. bio-neural interface by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until I can interface with my computer like in Tom Clancy's Net Force and my senses will also interface with it. It will be like the holodeck except for I can be dormant. Me wants :)

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  149. This just in: SCO demands license for brain-use by jeffcm · · Score: 1

    So how long will it be before SCO begins demanding that people purchase licenses for controlling Linux with their brains?

  150. Microsoft Brain 1.0 Beta by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1

    Anyone gonna sign up for the Microsoft Brain 1.0 Beta? :)

  151. Eerie... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    I just watched that episode of Cowboy Bebop with the "Brain Dream" virtual reality system, which was really just a conspiracy by a cult that called itself SCRATCH and promised to turn your brain into electrical signals so you wouldn't need a body anymore. Turns out the Brain Dream was just a way to hypnotize users. Yikes.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  152. Solve a few problems by anarchyboy · · Score: 1

    Finaly this might stop women complaing that the computer did what thy told it instead of what they wanted it to do.

  153. Good by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Maybe some of the dumbasses I work with can get a much needed 'firmware update'.

    "Excuse me, can I connect you to my ibook for a minute?"

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  154. Yes by lysium · · Score: 1
    Well, as a human is made up of billions of individual units, centralled connected by electrical systems.....what are billions of individual humans, centrally connected by electrical systems?

    Now that is a true incorporation. Or is it the face of (a) god?

    ============

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Yes by shayne321 · · Score: 1

      Well, as a human is made up of billions of individual units, centralled connected by electrical systems.....what are billions of individual humans, centrally connected by electrical systems?

      Now that is a true incorporation. Or is it the face of (a) god?

      Sounds like you either have read God's Debris, or need to.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
  155. Ahhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far it works for monkeys

    Ah, that explains the latest Microsoft security strategy

  156. "The Feed" by kamelkev · · Score: 2, Informative

    M.T. Anderson wrote a satire about this sort of thing. The book was called "The Feed". It's next on my list, haven't gotten to it yet.

    Amazon describes it as:

    "This brilliantly ironic satire is set in a future world where television and computers are connected directly into people's brains when they are babies. The result is a chillingly recognizable consumer society where empty-headed kids are driven by fashion and shopping and the avid pursuit of silly entertainment--even on trips to Mars and the moon--and by constant customized murmurs in their brains of encouragement to buy, buy, buy."

    Sounds interesting, and inevitable....

    1. Re:"The Feed" by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      Actually, sounds a lot like today's society ;) The only difference, of course, is that right now the marketing industry uses tv and radio. I just dread the day when all media are > 60% advertising.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  157. Bollocks to help... by Skiron · · Score: 1

    ...a market he believes to be worth about $2 billion

    So all this work not to help the helpless, but just to make mon(k)ey...

    Sort of sucks seeing that statement stuck in there.

    Nick

  158. Could it be used for something else? by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

    Couldn't this tech be used to interpret the commands coming off the inferior end of the superior region of a spinal cord injury (sorry, a little confusing) and send it to the 'dead' region of the spinal cord?

    If they could find a way to do this, it would also be beneficial to those who have lost limbs and the nerves would still send the signal, just that there would be a need for an artifical arm that can read this signal. I think it would be preferable to receive the commands directly from the nerve (at least for now) instead of ignoring it and going directly to the brain. Grabbing it from the nerves means that the brains has already done its work and not much (if any) of a learning curve would be necessary.

    --

    "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
  159. I want to get into the test group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but is it really necessary to become quadriplegic before?

  160. Uh - oh by jcrash · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna need a new PSU!

    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
  161. Just think of the possibilities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool!

    The RIAA can demand royalties everytime a copyrighted song goes through your head!

    And once they add Digital Rights Management, they can stop you from thinking any thought that violates their IP!

    Gee, makes Orwell sound quaint, doesn't it?

  162. Wireless and power... by BlueSteel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So now this device communicates over wires, which I'm assuming is also what carries power to the implant. They had said in the article they are planning on producing a self-contained wireless version (which would be really cool). My only question is how it might be powered? Would you need to go under surgery every few months to replace the battery?

    Maybe they would use glucose from our bodies to power the device? I would think though that sending a RF signal would consume a lot of juice. Anyone else have any thoughts on how they might supply power to a wireless implant?

  163. $12,500? by tim_mathews · · Score: 1
    FTA:
    About 160,000 people in the United States have no use of their arms and legs, a market he believes to be worth about $2 billion.

    So, $12,500 for the implant and associated software. I'm sure that doesn't include the surgery either. That's a pretty hefty fee, but perhaps if/when anyone can get it the prices will come down a bit.

    And of course, as the research advances they'll be able to interact with other parts of the brain, which would mean upgrades. This just doesn't seem practical for people who don't have a physical need for it. Of course, perhaps prices will come down if lots of people sign up. I somehow doubt insurance will cover this for most people.

    Doesn't mean it wouldn't be really freakin' cool though. ;-)

  164. Re:Sorry I forgot I had to do html formatting(redo by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately this just won't make people that much smarter... you can have access to all the information in the world, and it won't really help you to synthesize that information. You don't know how to look for patterns unless you've been taught how to process information and integrate it into what you already know -- so if you don't even know you knew something, it won't be so helpful in letting you come up with new connections and creative reworkings of previous ideas. This goes especially for the liberal arts, but even for mathematics like geometry -- I personally already know that I can look up the solution of complex integral formulae, but because I've used that as a crutch and not learned to manipulate the symbols well myself, I still need to work at integrating more complex formulae that involve substitutions. Only practice gets you that.

    For that matter, so much of learning is about process. For instance, I know full well how to do multiplications of two digits by two digits. But, because I haven't put in the time and the experience to memorize those parts of the tables, I have to work it out. But I can't imagine that working it out is that much slower than fighting the slashdot effect when everybody in my class taking the same final exam tries to 'wget http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=25+times+37'... besides which, the latter isn't very likely to teach me anything. But if I work it out by hand enough, I'll learn not just what that particular product is, but I'll learn how to rely upon myself to do mathematics.

    If anything this is a threat to primary education. Kids aren't challenged enough in these classes. I wish I'd been pushed more, and it's only getting worse.

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  165. Makes me think of The Mark of The Beast by grioghar · · Score: 1

    Fanatics Galore believe we're entering Armeggedon, and that these technologies are the beginning of the end.

    I think the technology's damn cool, personally. Just a few things to think about.

    --
    Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
  166. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Frankly, I'd prefer to see neural-interface match-ups because then the games become less of a matter of how well you can properly wield a mouse, but it relies more on strategy.

    I don't see why this would be the case. Just because the interface wouldn't be based on a mouse and keyboard doesn't mean that different people wouldn't have varying levels of skill operating the interface. It's easily conceivable that people's succeptiblity to biofeedback signals would vary just as widely as hand eye coordination.

  167. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't like your UID is particularly elite. Why not just make another account?

  168. Primate Programming by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    http://www.newtechusa.com/ppi/main.asp

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  169. Collective unconsciousness by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

    I've actually had horror story scenarios based on this. Imagine someone else's' ID integrating with yours and steady state of info feeding it. Combined neurosis and being unable to differentiate your thoughts from someone else's', and starting to lose any point of referrence. ("why do I want to kill my child? I don't even have a child.")...

    It was never addressed how the Borg would respond assimilating a mental ward. Would you really want your thoughts intermingling with Dahlmer's?

    Bringing the equivalent of the godhead into a singular consciousness... Looking into the abyss and all it entails.

  170. Re:Sorry I forgot I had to do html formatting(redo by Polarism · · Score: 1

    Aye, it will not make people smarter. It'll just leave them with more access to information. I think my problem is that I was looking at this from a current standpoint, I mean you and I and most everyone here has already gone through the education system and we already understand the learning process. My thinking that this would help future generations is flawed because they would not be recieving the same experience as we did.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  171. Dvorak ! by Choron · · Score: 1

    I was already touch typing quite fast before I switched to the Dvorak keyboard layout, that did make a big difference. QWERTY was designed to make typing slow unlike Dvorak. Try it, if you haven't yet, it's much safer than holes in your head too ! :)

    --
    "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
  172. a lot of neural network stuff is done w/ matlab by sbma44 · · Score: 1

    when I did some work in a NN lab in undergrad most other labs were using matlab for their simulations. We used a home-rolled C++ app, but used matlab for all the analysis. it's pretty essential for NN stuff as things stand today (unless they've changed considerably in the last year or two)

  173. Get back to me... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    ...when I can waste an hour and then know kung-fu.

  174. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the Army still has not figured out how to Save and Reload games. You can't even Quicksave a game. Until there's at least an Undo option, count me out.

  175. Uhhh, crapflooding? by d3m057h3n35 · · Score: 1

    For quadriplegics, this is a fantastic idea. For everyone else who wants a direct link to their computer to execute thoughts faster and faster, there will come a time when you will stop having to think in order to record your thoughts. What then? Billions of comments on every /. article that go something like this:

    jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj etc.

    There is still a lot to be said for typing by hand, and pen and paper in extreme circumstances as well!

  176. It's been a long time coming by X-Nc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Those of us who were dreaming of this back in the late 70's/early 80's will probably not get a chance to try this technology. Bummer.

    I remember when I first read a Gibson novel and he described "jacking into the Matrix"... All I could think was, I want one!

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  177. Someone is beating me too it. by suso · · Score: 1

    I guess I need to be quicker on the draw, I was planning to do exactly what this Cyberkinetics place has already done. Oh well. I still have a few more ideas related to that under my belt though. ;-)

  178. *Proctoprod* anyone? by ervinocus · · Score: 1

    As lons as it doesn't become *mandatory* to use the Proctoprod form the fantastic Bruce Bethke book "Headcrash"... :D http://www.spedro.com/novels.html

  179. Can anybody say "collective consciousness"? by Quirk · · Score: 1

    I believe Carl G. Jung said it best

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  180. Brainfingers.com No Surgery Req'd by mikegroovy · · Score: 1

    http://brainfingers.com/ I think I'd rather have the Brainfinger's solution. Except for the shaving your head part.. they basically have electodes that sense certain brainwaves.. you learn how to control those brainwaves using biofeedback(basically a graph on the screen, once you learn how to alter the levels of those brainwaves you can control the Brainfingers) it adds 10 different Controls that you can use... Looks like the price has gone down too ($ 2,050.) Although, surely with technological advances, the detection electrodes will become more sensitive.. I don't want to have surgery or shave my head... :/ now I suppose Surgery would be required if we eventually wanted some sort of Video and audio input directly to our brains.. A nice little DataJack that connects to the spine? Hmmm Video prolly needs to be connected to the visual cortex. Cochlear implants already exist maybe we just need to install a mini-SPD/IF optical jack for audio input? maybe use Bluetooth for a Personal Area Network(PAN) Heart Attacks are dangerous.. I could deal with a Preventitive Pacemaker that monitors also Monitors Blood for Sugar, protien, temperature, and Heart Rate. Come to think of it my eyes aren't very good for seeing in the infrared or UV Spectrum.. or for reading newspapers a few miles away, Geordi's Visor would work, but maybe just new eyeballs would do. Actually there is a whole list of neat bio-implants from the Shadow Run RPG that would be nice to have Adreniline Pump? super efficient kidney and liver so I can eat fish with mercury? Lungs with a compressed O2 reserve? Anyone else have that dream where you are underwater and swimming up towards the surface, but never get there? Not to mention the ability to hold your breath when on an elevator with a bean eating fiend! Small and large intestines that are ultra effcient so you can eat less and create less waste when on your interstellar voyage. my $.02

  181. 'plugging in' by Rockenreno · · Score: 1

    all I really want to be able to do is learn how to fly a helicopter while standing next to it in under 10 seconds... maybe learn some kung fu? :) load the jump program!

    --

    Forecast for tomorrow: A few sprinklings of genius with a chance of DOOM!
  182. Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In SOVIET RUSSIA, brain implants control YOU.

  183. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

    Just consider yourself always playing in "Hardcore" mode. You get ONE character....

    Of course even then, we can always re-install the game. I suppose as long as you believe in reincarnation, you should be okay!

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
  184. Concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't know why, but something about it kinda creeps me out. Then again, I don't have any non-functioning appendages and I have no eyesight problems.

    For some reason, the idea of having someone grow me a new arm is a whole lot less disturbing than having someone attach a mechanical one to me.

    I realize this is really off topic... ahh fuckit. AC it is.

  185. You WILL be assimilated... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1
  186. My dreams are comming true... by lordmetroid · · Score: 1

    just gotta get all the competitor that are infront of me in the queue elimated! When am I gonna get assimilated into the collective?

  187. Because of... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...the difference between knowing that it exists, and why it exists. If they can measure a signal that I can control, like if they can measure my brain to see when I'm looking left, rather than filming my eye, what's the difference?

    They don't need to understand the rest of the brain, the thought process of *how* or *why* I look left, as long as they can identify the areas of the brain activated by looking left.

    Same with speech. If they could tap into our speech center, read it before we actually spoke it, that would be same as natural speech recognition. They don't need to understand the thought process leading up to it, as long as they can understand the words.

    So far they've basicly identified output. I don't think they've understood the inner workings of the brain. For the time being, think of it simply as avoiding the digital/analog/digital conversion going from digital signals in the brain, to analog movements by our bodies, to digitally measured results in a computer.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  188. Though I fear... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...that they'll insist we take a look at whatever goes on inside *their* minds. I suspect permanent insanity or brain meltdown would ensue.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  189. I don't like it... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Science and technology often come head to head with the inevitable moral question that just because we _can_ do something, does that mean we _should_? But let's just say that we do go down this road, and once they've been tested and proven safe, how long will it be before they are foisted upon us as mandatory, with the ulterior motive that the powers that be would not only hold us accountable for what we do, but even the way we think?

    I generally embrace new technologies, but the potential disasters that this could create for humanity gives me the total creeps.

    1. Re:I don't like it... by paragon_au · · Score: 0

      I don't think there should be a moral question. For new technologies, I think we should always "We can do it, so we should do it". Almost everything has a negative use. We could split the atom, so should we? Hell yes, it can be used as one of the worst weapons, or it can be used as a great source of energy. We could make rockets, so should we? Hell yes, it can be used to launch weapons, it can also be used to get into space. We could fly, so should we? Hell yes, it can be used to drop bombs or crash into buildings. But it can also be used as a great form of transport. Etc. I think you are also forgetting that most governments are still elected, so if we ignore Florida. If the majority of people don't want something MAJOR to happen it won't. If most people don't want mandatory implants, and their brains to be available to the government. Then they whoever is saying they will do that won't get elected. (And if they try do it, without saying they will, they won't be in power long).

  190. Re:Yes, but ..slashdoted brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many other linked brains does it take to slashdot another brain?
    Does that mean we can sit at work doing nothing because we are being slashdoted?

  191. Upgrade by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    I would really love cybernetic implants, especially ones that allow me to interface directly with a computer. However, what happens when it becomes obsolete, or I want to upgrade?

    I have a feeling this isn't as easy as swapping out the old graphics card for a new one. Will I even be ABLE to upgrade? Will I be stuck with a bunch of legacy ports on my head? Will it damage my brain to upgrade?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  192. In need of upgrading? by Uplore · · Score: 0

    How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card?

    How long until the card you have implanted becomes obsolete and the newest version comes out with more IDE slots and capability to handles heaps more memory.
    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
  193. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believing something does not make it so.

  194. You don't want to be an early adopter by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

    Not on this one. First of all, wait until they're really advanced and give you lots of cool features. Don't be stuck with the equivalent of an AT in your brain that can't be taken out. I think I'd rather be the 1 millionth customer than that 1 hundredth, or even one thousandth customer.

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

  195. feedback is coming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now it's just visual feedback. But I would guess that feedback in the form of brain stimulation (in animals) is only a few years away.

  196. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0

    Except that the neural interface is based solely on brain impulses. For example, with a mouse, you have to translate the impulses into muscle movements which, I'm assuming, decreases their accuracy. Also, optical mouses occasionally have problems detecting motion.

    And what about picking the mouse up to continue moving? That's another hardly intuitive inconvenience of the current physical interface to FPSs.

    Lastly, I'll give you the example of Trespasser. If you played the game, you would know how incredibly annoying the controls were (there were buttons to twist your wrist, move your forearm, etc.) Much of my frustration with the controls came about from the fact that the controls were digital. With a neural interface, you can have essentially unlimited unconstrained analog axes. Currently, the physical interface boasts two (x and y axes on the mouse).

    Just a few examples. So while I'm still skeptical that people would be so unresponive to biofeedback, even if that were true, an unparalleled amount of control is theoretically possible with a neural interface.

    --
    True story.
  197. Re:In Soviet Russia....Re:Yes, but .. by zelphior · · Score: 0, Troll

    I, for one, welcome our new robotic overlords.

    --
    If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
  198. Manna by Marshall Brain by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Allow me to recommend Manna, a short story by Marshall Brain that explores some interesting ideas about technology and technology interfaces for the near, and not so near future.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  199. screw voice recognition by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    just get thought recongnition.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  200. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you are a christian.

  201. Re:brain r00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to Windows which just runs all of your thoughts as admin by default?

    Get with the program. This isn't 1998 anymore. If you are going to bash windows find a real reason to bash it.

  202. Tax time! by MoriarGryphon · · Score: 1

    Can you see installing TurboTax onto your brain, in that manner?

    "Oh, this portion of the brain isn't known to be used. We'll write our copy protection code there.", at which point you a)find squirrels strangly sexy, b)only see green, or c)discover the virtue of /, trolls and set your life goal to marrying one.

  203. mod parent up! by themusicgod1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sean Kennedy is The Fucking Man!
    *cough notice sig *
    |
    V

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  204. no need firewalls by axxackall · · Score: 1
    Properly installed linux do not need any external firewall. First, good hands have closed all holes already anyway. Second, iptables are in the kernel, what other firewall do you need?

    My brains do not have any holes (I hope) - I do not answer any inproper questions. And I can recognize suspicious questions too.

    But I guess that users of Microsoft brains might keep having problems. I wish them good patching :)

    --

    Less is more !
  205. Shoving Wires Into Your Brain? by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Sorry, ain't gonna happen for most people. You'd have to be really messed up to earn the right to try to get this done to you.

    What'll make this possible for widespread use is an external interface based on EEG/MEG (and most likely the former, because the magneto-EGs require extremely sensitive cryogenic quantum semi-conductors).

    And even when this is possible, chances are what you'll be able to do with it will be no more than you could do more easily and a whole lot cheaper with your hands.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  206. Old news by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Blind man can see thanks to a camera implanted in his brain
    I thought I read somewhere they're unable to understand the processes in the brain,
    but can reproduce the Outcome of the electronical / neurological process by chips in hopes to once understand how *that gray matter* actually works.
    Neurochips detect brain's reaction to learning

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Old news by Yunalesca · · Score: 2, Insightful


      What concerns me is the neuropsychological reactions this will induce in human brains. For example: if a person is without sight for a very long time - say, from early childhood until adulthood - then when that person regains vision, it can be extremely disconcerting, and he/she may actually be unable, either biologically or mentally (both, most likely) to deal with it.

      Just because you can connect the circuitry or add new parts, doesn't mean that the signals will be processed well, or that the machinery for using the signals will be able to handle the new load. How well it works will depend a lot on the individual with the implants. And it may take a whole lot of work and training the affected individual in order to make the implants effective.

      --
      The floggings will stop when morale improves.
  207. No... easy to control by odeee · · Score: 0

    Acutally I predict that it will be developed quite easily... see you don't need to train the computer to understand the signals the brain is sending. Instead you simply hook it up and then let the person get used to it.

    The brain is actually very good at working out how to use things it is connected to. A similar thing happens with bionic prosthetics; once hooked up the brain sort of just 'fiddles' with the nerves until it gets it right.

    I remember reading about a guy years ago who connected a radio transmitter/receiver to a set of nerve bundles into his arm and the other end into a bundle in his wife's arm. After a while they learnt to feel each others emotions even though they didn't know exactly how they did it.

  208. FUCK! by satanum · · Score: 0, Troll

    Man I would apply for getting one myself, too. But I bet you the monkey would not! HATE! Why the fuck don't they test on humans? Do please imagine the work of those guys for the last couple of years:

    Wake up at 6 o'clock. Breakfast. Bus. Office (lab? dachau? auschwitz?). Put on plastic clothes (so you don't seem a "fucking maxipad" when you leave home). Grab an axe. Grab a monkey. Hit. Repeat until head is open, brain exposed. Grab oscilloscope, variable power supply, function generator, Grab wires and nails, plug in randomly. Start electroshocks. Read output. Repeat twice. Wait. Hit with axe. Repeat. Error. Remove nails. If monkey breathing and heart pumping, pin nails randomly again. Repeat. Stop at 2PM. Make sandwiches with dead monkeys. Boss gets Roasted Brain Biff Sandwich....

    Man can they sleep at night? How do they manage not to see monkeys everywhere? Maybe they are monkeys. Or else... FUCK'EM!

  209. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Or volunteer to chaperone Bush's daughter.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  210. Why the unhappy face? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1
    With the average male thinking about sex every seven minutes, I don't know if their brain should be controling a machine that goes Mach X


    It is a popular Sci-Fi concept that female pilots will come to dominate.

    This could be the start... :\

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  211. In Summary: YOU ARE STUPID by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ha ha! Children, point and laugh at the funny, trolling anonymous coward who knows nothing about Windows, much less how most people wind up having to run it! He's what we call a "technology have-not". He likely believes that Microsoft Windows is somehow technologically capable of putting up a fight against the traditional and modernized POSIX systems. He is a fool, and his blood will run in the streets during the next plague of Windows-only viruses and worms.

    Or, in short. You're an idiot. Get a life. Stop trolling me.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  212. Re:brain r00t by rifter · · Score: 1

    As opposed to Windows which just runs all of your thoughts as admin by default?

    Get with the program. This isn't 1998 anymore. If you are going to bash windows find a real reason to bash it.

    Someone should tell Microsoft that, since their latest products indeed run everything as admin by default. And the services cannot be made to do otherwise!

    Actually, I thought it was cute that XP was finally able to switch users without logging out. I thought "Welcome to 1967 Microsoft!" :)

  213. It's already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just saw a story about this on one of the Discovery channels last night. A man had an implant in his brain and could move a cursor on a computer screen just by thinking about moving his hand. And his implant was done, IIRC, in 1998!

  214. Re:brain r00t by t0ny · · Score: 0
    Someone should tell Microsoft that, since their latest products indeed run everything as admin by default. And the services cannot be made to do otherwise!

    Thats surprising to me. Im a network architect with microsoft products, and nothing I work with runs admin by default.

    Maybe you should work with something more tech-savy than XP Home, since that seems to be the extent of your IT experience.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  215. Protoculture at Last! by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Finally, i can control my veritech without a throttle and stick!

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  216. Works on Monkeys, Huh? by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 1
    Well...that explains the reason that computer is acting up and, in general, just going bananas.

    :: waits for the applause ::

    ;-)

  217. Singularity, right? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    It's commonly known among intelligent people.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  218. Can you say... by gabraham · · Score: 1

    Real life One Must Fall?

  219. hmmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. install on an army of monkeys
    2. make them fight other countries
    3. sell them to the U.S
    4.?????
    5. Profit $$$!!!

  220. what about the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you listen to a copyrighted song, can RIAA go into your brain and erase it?

  221. Reminds me of another Keanu film by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    Remember Johnny Mnemonic? Instead of lugging a terabyte in a metallic case the size of a cigarrete pack, why not use the spare neurons in your brain (we slashdotters have plenty of these) to smuggle petabytes of data around?????

    However, Keanu`s head could only carry a few Mb, if I remember (it was so pre-CDRW!). I could have paid more attention to the flick, but when I saw the talking dolphin... it was a little too much.

  222. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by luigi22_ · · Score: 1

    Just what we need, lag in full virtual reality.
    Imaginge how that'll turn out.....

    --
    On /., first you get the karma, then you get the power, then you get the women.
  223. How long till... by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    this interface tech evolves into something that can connect you with other people and share memories and significant knowledge with others, like your SO?

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
  224. Potential Problem by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

    What actions are being taken to ensure that I won't be spammed in my sleep?

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  225. Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a link to your brain got posted here and you got slashdotted, then you would be braindead...

  226. All your brains are belong to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait till someone finds out how to hack these things ;-)

  227. WOAH there! by strider_starslayer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think were seeing a lot of enthused people, but the technology is not what you seem to think it is.

    It's a sensor implated into the back of your head that will take directions from the you, and move around the cursor to match those directions- essentially it will at its best remove the mouse from the computer (it will probabally work as a stylus/mouse once you get used to it).

    Now this might solve a lot of RSD and Carple tunnel problems, but it's not going to let you 'download' massive ammounts of code from your brain into your computer, and it definatly isin't going to send anything back.

    And the technology isin't ever going to do that (well this particularly strain of technology, someone else will work on brain signal decoding some day- this process dosen't decode anything), this technology may however build better prostetic limbs or weelchairs, and it will allow the paralized slow, but functional, access to the itnernet (try typing on a virtual keyboard with your mouse, it's goign to be slow not matter what compared to a touch typer)

    So slow down there, I like you, cannot wait to be able to interface directly with my computer; I'm even interested in this technology (I'm starting to feel the progression of RSD on my 'mousing fingers' (I switch which hand uses the mouse every 6 monthes) and wrists), but I don't expect THIS technology to ever evolve into direct some form of neural interface, that will have to wait for someone else to develop a way to decode/encode human transmission signals.

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  228. Monkey Brains? by arothmanmusic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how long it would take an implanted monkey connected to a computer running MS Word to type up the script for "Hamlet"?

  229. All the top rated replies are "Funny"... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    ... just goes to show no one who is anyone is taking this seriously, just yet.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  230. Higher bandwidth codes??? Re:I'll pass by cphoenix · · Score: 1

    Can he control the timing of his "yes" signals? If so, this could be made considerably more efficient. Currently it takes on average six inputs and two outputs to specify a letter. But if he can look up either immediately, with a delay, or not at all after hearing a stimulus, then he could signal in Morse code, getting a letter out in (usually) only two or three inputs and the same number of outputs. With better control of his timing, he could signal any of several choices with a single carefully-timed motion.

    --
    Ask me about Nanotechnology, Dyslexia Correction. Tell me about A.I., robotics, infrastructure.
    1. Re:Higher bandwidth codes??? Re:I'll pass by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting idea, and for someone with slightly less disability it might be viable. The difficulty in this patient's case is the spasm acticity in his face, which means he has *alot* of extraneous eye movements, eye twitching, eye blinks etc... And it's fairly random, varying from moment to moment in frequency and intensity.

      I made the letter board sound simple, and in theory it is. In practice with this patient it's not so simple ;-). We have to go back a lot, and there are quite a few false positives when trying to identify line/letter.

      The other advantage of a letter board is that everyone who comes in contact with the patient can use it. The learning curve is very shallow. So new friends, family, guests at the home etc... can speak with him if they choose to take the time to learn it. Were he to use some sort of morse code like system, you'd want to have a computer interpreter in place so that people around him didn't have to learn his system.

      An interesting idea though. There's been a surprising amount of stuff in slashhdot over the past few years, and developments in the linux community, demonstrating technologies that could be important to a disabled community.

      jeff

  231. Geekcode by KinkyClown · · Score: 1
    As my geekcode says:

    C++++

    I'll be first in line to get the new cybernetic interface installed into my skull.

  232. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believeing in reincarnation is an exception, it is true! Just try it and you'll see I'm sure. Countless happy cust.. vict.. uh, reincarnatees already!

  233. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude, if you want realistic fighting with the chance of possible brain damage, just join the army.

    Soldier,

    I object to your scanty claims that being in the army causes brain damage. Now get back to work! I want that toilet bowl so clean I could eat off it - because I plan to.

    sincerely,

    General Failure

    --
    "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
  234. Not quite the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This more on the lines of a shadowrun (http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/) item..

  235. Re:brain r00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many people out there have already been hit by DOS attacks on their brains

  236. Gaming for Lazy Bums... by Vexler · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  237. Thought Crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Sir,

    It appears you have had an idea that violated one of our patents (#230592: "Process for Establishing World-wide Peace").
    As IP holders we demand that you pay us a lot of money and refrain from thinking that idea again.

    Yours faithfully,
    Phile & Sue Ltd.

  238. Re:brain r00t by rifter · · Score: 1

    Someone should tell Microsoft that, since their latest products indeed run everything as admin by default. And the services cannot be made to do otherwise!

    Thats surprising to me. Im a network architect with microsoft products, and nothing I work with runs admin by default.

    Maybe you should work with something more tech-savy than XP Home, since that seems to be the extent of your IT experience.

    Riiiight. So tell me what user the RPC service runs as? IIS? MSSQL? EVERY service on windows runs as system or administrator by default and AFAIK this cannot be changed. Also, by default the only user you have is administrator. Granted most normal people create new users. But in the case of desktop windows, especially with the XP Home you would mention, it is more likely the user will just sally forth with Administrator.

    In fact with the XP it is not immediately obvious to a non-sysadmin what user is the administrator or that that is indeed what is happening. Perhaps that is why you missed it.

    Perhaps you should go back to MCSE school or learn to use a real operating system so you understand what the rest of us are on about.

  239. Re:brain r00t by t0ny · · Score: 1
    So tell me what user the RPC service runs as? IIS? MSSQL? EVERY service on windows runs as system or administrator by default and AFAIK this cannot be changed.

    Boy, you really are stupid. The IIS service runs as IUSR account, or an account you specify (you can changed it from the default). Likewise with the FTP service. SQL uses an SQLAGENT account.

    cough... bullshitter... cough... Advice for anyone who might believe a know-nothing like rifter, try taking a serving of "Expert" with your expert opinions, because that guy doesnt know Jack, or Shit.

    Also, the account ANY service runs under can be changed. Its as simple as going to the "service" control panel or MMC snap-in. Again proving that you dont have the faintest idea of what you are talking about. Also, NOT ONE SINGLE service runs as Administrator by default. If you WANT it to, you have to change that. Why? Because MS doesnt set services to run as user accounts, and Administrator is a user account.

    Also, by default the only user you have is administrator

    No, because it asks you at install to create a new user account. It must really suck not knowing anything, but having to act like you do. I pity you.

    In fact with the XP it is not immediately obvious to a non-sysadmin what user is the administrator or that that is indeed what is happening.

    OMG, you mean that people need to understand how to use a computer in order to use it? When did this happen? It explains you, of course. Anyway, I dont see Linux being all that user-friendly to people who dont know how to use Linux, nor OSX. So it seems that no matter what OS you are using, you need to know how it works.

    Perhaps you should go back to MCSE school or learn to use a real operating system so you understand what the rest of us are on about.

    Well, aparently I understand MS products far better than you do. All you are doing is spewing ignorant misinformation, confirming my statement that you get your computer knowledge on Slashdot rather than from a reliable source.

    Keep going to school, kid. Maybe once you actually learn the facts you can start having conversations with us adults who actually work in IT. Because you are obviously only at the hobbyist level.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  240. Re:brain r00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that you recognize that the majority here believes that you are a stupid fuck. Why are you bothering us with your presence? Just kill yourself, but don't tell us about it.

  241. cyber-psychics? by sf2turbomaster · · Score: 1

    This could be the beginning of so many possibilites, it's mind-boggling albeit far off. If perfected sometime in the future humans might actually be able to transmit thoughts to others wirelessly and even move objects by controlling nanomachines with our minds. cybertelepathy and cybertelekenisis here we come

  242. Re:brain r00t by jasonbowen · · Score: 1

    Do those accounts you talk about have full administrator privileges or do they have a mechanism similar to sudo on UNIX? The default account you create does have administrative privileges. I think you'll find Microsoft touting ease of use and a shallow learning curve as benefits to their software. The reality is that Microsoft ships with user created accounts running as administrator. Why do you think it's to hard for them to implement a concept such as SUID to avoid this?

  243. Re:brain r00t by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Do those accounts you talk about have full administrator privileges or do they have a mechanism similar to sudo on UNIX?

    No, they just have privileges limited to whatever they need access to. the IIS account gets read privileges to the directory storing the web pages, for example. Sometimes I have problems come up because somebody changes something and it doesnt work- this usually ends up being an issue where the IIS service account doesnt have permission to access files that the web designer specified: the IIS account doesnt even get Domain User privileges (because as a further restriction the default account is a local account and not a domain account).

    The default account you create does have administrative privileges.

    Ya, but the difference is that a user account with admin privileges can get locked out if it fails a specified number of bad password attempts, whereas the Administrator account cant. BTW, one of the basic steps I always take is to change the name of the administrator account and set up a 'fake' admin account. This isnt a Windows-specific tip, either- its basic security.

    Why do you think it's to hard for them to implement a concept such as SUID to avoid this?

    They already did. Hold down Shift, than Right-Click. There will be an option there called "Run As..."

    And there you go.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  244. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by Deflagro · · Score: 1

    Also, i'm sure mods are looking at your sig. Promoting Anti-Slash usually gets a negative view. You know, free speech and all...oh wait...

    But yea, what the other guy said, just make a new account and start over. You can recover though i'm sure.

    --
    Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
  245. Re:brain r00t by jasonbowen · · Score: 1

    The default account had administrative privileges and they don't require a password either. Your shift click method isn't the same as SUID, not even close.

  246. Realisation of the ultimate vapor ware by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    This to me seems like the ultimate vapor ware concept of humans being able to directly interface with microchip calculators and dictionaries. Promised by scientists for so long and never actually delivered. We will see if this one will break the trend...