Slashdot Mirror

Scientologists always tell you, if you want to know anything go straight to the source, so wikileaks has a copy of theirs that the freezoners pulled together from their collections of OT documents when they left the 'Church'.

Firehose story with more details : http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=591182

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology_collected_Operating_Thetan_documents

And just for fun, here's a story on the Church of Scientology trying to make hyperlinks to copyright documents illegal, they lost the court battle : http://www.news.com/Scientology-loss-keeps-hyperlinks-legal/2100-1028_3-5072581.html?tag=txt.1

(Funny they never go to the real source of information when it comes to Psychiatry, they only go to the 'Church' when it comes to that)

Wikileaks is doing it's part:
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Wikileaks_releases_over_120_censored_videos_and_photos_of_the_Tibet_uprising

Claim that your physics thesis uncovers corruption in the Bush administration and pass it on to Wikileaks!

It's the only way to be sure!

(Wait, technically, that *would* be effective in this case. Reprehensible, but effective.)

This court order has blocked the Wikileaks.org DNS. But the site is still up and running at its IP number, which is 88.80.13.160 .

Spread the word. DNS can be replaced, with some inconvenience, with manual labor.

Hey, even minor abuses should not be tolerated. If you ever get it in writing, or in an email you can print out discretely, I would direct you here.

Here's a link to the documents the government prefer you not to know about.

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/National_Identity_Scheme_Options_Analysis_Outcome

Here is what they call the "mountain of sodium". This is a frame of the video, 6 min 12 sec in: http://download.yousendit.com/5B82D57A7547637B

https://secure.wikileaks.org/leak/Project_Wing_-_Northern_Rock_Executive_Summary.pdf

grab it before it gets taken down.

when i lived in the usa i got quite peeved by the way bills were just put into place by companies who "owned" congressmen and senators (dmca is a prime example). now i'm back in the uk the practice seems to have followed me - it wasn't my fault honest!

Indeed, linking to the full Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks page is more useful, because it contains links to the all (hilarious) letters that have been received in that context

At the end of that page, you find links to:

• Category:Series/Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks, which links to:
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-11-23
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-12-11
• Project Wing - Northern Rock Executive Summary, the leaked memo.

Being able to read the letters in the right context is much more useful. The first censorship demand (a fax in PDF format) is well worth reading.

Indeed, linking to the full Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks page is more useful, because it contains links to the all (hilarious) letters that have been received in that context

At the end of that page, you find links to:

• Category:Series/Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks, which links to:
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-11-23
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-12-11
• Project Wing - Northern Rock Executive Summary, the leaked memo.

Being able to read the letters in the right context is much more useful. The first censorship demand (a fax in PDF format) is well worth reading.

Indeed, linking to the full Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks page is more useful, because it contains links to the all (hilarious) letters that have been received in that context

At the end of that page, you find links to:

• Category:Series/Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks, which links to:
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-11-23
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-12-11
• Project Wing - Northern Rock Executive Summary, the leaked memo.

Being able to read the letters in the right context is much more useful. The first censorship demand (a fax in PDF format) is well worth reading.

Indeed, linking to the full Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks page is more useful, because it contains links to the all (hilarious) letters that have been received in that context

At the end of that page, you find links to:

• Category:Series/Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks, which links to:
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-11-23
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-12-11
• Project Wing - Northern Rock Executive Summary, the leaked memo.

Being able to read the letters in the right context is much more useful. The first censorship demand (a fax in PDF format) is well worth reading.

Indeed, linking to the full Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks page is more useful, because it contains links to the all (hilarious) letters that have been received in that context

At the end of that page, you find links to:

• Category:Series/Northern Rock vs. Wikileaks, which links to:
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-11-23
  • Northern Rock Bank vs. Wikileaks - censorship demand 2007-12-11
• Project Wing - Northern Rock Executive Summary, the leaked memo.

Being able to read the letters in the right context is much more useful. The first censorship demand (a fax in PDF format) is well worth reading.

See the full Wikileaks story here!

His cousin Odinga of Kenya is a radical muslim that signed the following paper for Jihad!!!:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/01/05/muslim_kenya.jpg

It says:

"ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL MUSLIM LEADERS FORUM (NAMLEF) ABDULLAH ABDI (chairman)"
(signed)

"ON BEHALF OF THE ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT (ODM) HON.ENG.RAILA AMOLLO ODINGA"
(signed)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/leak/MOU_between_Ralia_Odinga_and_Muslims.pdf

Obama released the Indonesian translation of his 2nd book "Assault Hope: From Jakarta to the White House".
(indonesians see it as the Jihad for White House!!!)

Obama released his 1st book: "The Dreams of my Father", <--- I suspect him of it as "the Jihad of my muslim dad!" (dreams of dad = Jihad, Father = my dad is muslim).

If Obama is U.S. Muslim President or U.S. Muslim Vicepresident then he is a GREAT RISK for the National Unsecurity and for millions of americans due to he has access to the eyes-only top secret documents of the maps and weapons of White House, Pentagon, C.I.A. etc for giving to the muslim terrorists in backdoors as from Indonesia!!!

You can imagine the hundreds of muslims of the family of Obama surrounding inside of the unprotected White House.

He IS NOT a christian black! He IS a muslim brown weared as black and as christian!

Obama is pro-Kenyan and pro-Indonesian.

Obama = jihadist brother of Osama Bin Laden to White House!

Who cares? Be less stupid american!

I think the novelty of the diff comparison is why this particular link was posted on Slashdot. For a more significant analysis of the changes between the two documents see: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Changes_in_Guantanamo_Bay_SOP_manual_(2003-2004)

The wikileaks site has documentary evidence that the US violates the chemical weapons convention in Iraq.

Wow. They went in there, and either duplicated every violation they were sent in to suppress - or created it wholesale where it did not before exist.

Criminal nation. Rogue regime. The new Nazis goose step across the planet - this time, they are hicks from Alabama and Montana. Thanks for all the "freedom".

Direct link to the document:

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Camp_Delta_Standard_Operating_Procedure

Wikileaks actual article on the leak

Related article on the leak: "US violates chemical weapons convention"

Wikileaks actual article on the leak

Related article on the leak: "US violates chemical weapons convention"

Related article on the leak: "US violates chemical weapons convention"

Related article on the leak: "US violates chemical weapons convention"

The folks at wikileaks.org http://wikileaks.org/ should be prosecuted for being party to endangering National Security.

The user talk page for that IP claims it is part of the "Wikileaks anonymizing network".

The user talk page for that IP claims it is part of the "Wikileaks anonymizing network".

Hmm, the realatively few edits of the person(s) at 1.0.22.53 talks against the reverse NAT hypothesis. Also, the first such edit was done as recently as 31st July 2007.

# (cur) (last) 20:56, 7 October 2007 1.0.22.53 (Talk) (7,349 bytes)
# (cur) (last) 19:22, 3 October 2007 Wikileaks (Talk | contribs) m (6,644 bytes)
# (cur) (last) 15:18, 29 September 2007 Wikileaks (Talk | contribs) m (6,624 bytes)

$ whois 1.0.22.53

OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
OrgID: IANA
Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
City: Marina del Rey
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90292-6695
Country: US

NetRange: 1.0.0.0 - 1.255.255.255
CIDR: 1.0.0.0/8
NetName: RESERVED-9
NetHandle: NET-1-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: IANA Reserved
Comment:
RegDate:
Updated: 2002-09-12

OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgAbusePhone: +1-310-301-5820
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@iana.org

OrgTecHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgTechPhone: +1-310-301-5820
OrgTechEmail: abuse@iana.org

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-10-06 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/index.php?title=On_the_take_and_loving_it&oldid=6476

One would think it would be better for slashdot discussion if TFA was not a moving target. To think slashdot is ten years old. That's one hell of a slow clue train.

Now when your slinging mud if you have facts to back you up, you can democratically exercise your right to participate in the process. If your mud makes it to Wikileaks then you can be rest assured that the scumballs will eventually be weeded out by the voices of citizens. I'm trying to hit all those words that seem to have lost their meanings in recent years - suggestions on any I missed?

Okay, I started investigate. A number of things don't ring fully true. They are very careless about discussing physical and local security for the whistleblowers. I found this worrying but decided to try to correct it. I noticed that they claim to be a normal open wiki and so I tried to sign up... no sign up page on the login page. Then I tried forcing the link by copying from wikipedia: https://wikileaks.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special :Userlogin&type=signup&returnto=Wikileaks:Main_Pag e "You are not allowed to create an account / To be allowed to create accounts in this wiki you have to log in and have the appropriate permissions.". https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Advisory_Board shows that the Advisory board has some credibility, but does it really exist? Interestingly several of them have blogs http://iq.org/ http://www.wangdan1989.com/ http://www.links.org/ but I haven't been able to find any references to Wikileaks. Why is there no information from the EFF or other similar bodies?

Okay, I started investigate. A number of things don't ring fully true. They are very careless about discussing physical and local security for the whistleblowers. I found this worrying but decided to try to correct it. I noticed that they claim to be a normal open wiki and so I tried to sign up... no sign up page on the login page. Then I tried forcing the link by copying from wikipedia: https://wikileaks.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special :Userlogin&type=signup&returnto=Wikileaks:Main_Pag e "You are not allowed to create an account / To be allowed to create accounts in this wiki you have to log in and have the appropriate permissions.". https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Advisory_Board shows that the Advisory board has some credibility, but does it really exist? Interestingly several of them have blogs http://iq.org/ http://www.wangdan1989.com/ http://www.links.org/ but I haven't been able to find any references to Wikileaks. Why is there no information from the EFF or other similar bodies?

What about this?

First, I ever heard about wikileaks, but they make a few good points in there (albeit a bit cynical and paranoid).

Hey, as long as someone doesn't leak the fact that I use depends, I got no problem with it. Err. Wait. Oops. Literally!

I looked all over the linked site. No wiki to be seen. It says something about using FreeNet, Tor, and PGP. Last time I checked none of these were wiki software packages.

05/01/07: WikiLeaks gets leaked

Due to a single blog posting of just a few words, Wikileaks has been thrust into the spot light far earlier then expected.