Slashdot Mirror

Spacewar! came out in 1962 for the DEC PDP-1.

I find it extremely unlikely that "the code got changed", and now I am starting to question your entire description of the incident. What flight number was this? When did it occur? There seems to be no record of it.
As far as I know the code got changed. The incident is probably 15 - 20 years back, happened either in Germany or in Poland, I only remember the pilot was German (probably the airline, too).

Here I found it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 1993, September 14th. The german version explains the software problem and change: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

It was Warsaw, Poland.

I find it extremely unlikely that "the code got changed", and now I am starting to question your entire description of the incident. What flight number was this? When did it occur? There seems to be no record of it.
As far as I know the code got changed. The incident is probably 15 - 20 years back, happened either in Germany or in Poland, I only remember the pilot was German (probably the airline, too).

Here I found it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 1993, September 14th. The german version explains the software problem and change: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

It was Warsaw, Poland.

We just found out what again? If you are talking about the Steele dossier, we've known since before McCain was dead that McCain and his team had their hands on the dossier and had given it over to the FBI. An associate of McCain had given it to Buzzfeed as was revealed recently, who were the ones who finally published it after the election in 2017, but the dossier was an open secret bouncing around well before then, and David Corn at Mother Jones was reporting on it before the election.

But again, it was public knowledge well before the twitter fight with the dead that McCain and his team were passing around that dossier, and they weren't the only ones who knew about it.

We knew about Gennifer Flowers before the 1992 election. It was not disclosed by an investigation. Gennifer came forward on her own.

It was a consensual affair, so most voters didn't care. Americans tend to be selectively prudish, tolerating indiscretions in their allies while finding fault with their adversaries.

Rabbit Hole
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Agreed that this is security theater that offers very little real protection. But I disagree that it's wasted time and money (aside from some of the people doing it taking their jobs way too seriously). If you've lived through a riot, you realize that the "protection" offered by the police is mostly an illusion. And that if things really get out of hand, there is really nothing that the police can do. The role of the police is more to calm the public and create the self-fulfilling prophecy of the illusion of peace, so that people don't go nuts looting and destroying stuff because they have no fear of retribution.

Likewise, the role of TSA is security theater. But while it is theater, it is effective in keeping the traveling public calm about the safety of air travel. The threat itself is minuscule (air travel is the safest for of travel, and yet many more people are killed by random airliner accidents than by terrorists blowing up planes). The threat is just exaggerated in people's minds by disproportionate media coverage and media hype.

So security theater is the proper response - illusionary safety measures for assuaging people's illusionary fears.

It's important to avoid selection bias. The best example I've seen was a city wondering if subway funding needed to be increased or decreased. They thought measuing how much the subway was used would be good information for making this decision, so they hired someone to poll the city's residents to see how often they rode the subway. The person initially asked people at random in public spaces how often they rode the subway. He grew frustrated that very few people rode the subway, meaning he was collecting very little data for the number of people he was asking. That's when he got the brilliant idea of going onto the subway and asking people there.

The problem is, asking people riding the subway how often they use the subway introduces two selection biases. (1) It eliminates everyone who doesn't use the subway from your sample. And (2) people who ride the subway more often are more likely to be encountered in your polling (you're 10x as likely to randomly encounter someone who rides 10 hours a week as you are someone who rides 1 hour a week), skewing your polling data high. To properly measure subway ridership, you have to do a random sample orthogonal to subway use, which means asking random people in public places was the proper way to do it. A random telephone poll would probably have been best.

Similarly when you target one specific country for investigation, you're introducing a sampling bias. If you accuse a restaurant of being infested with roaches, and that prompts an investigation that finds roaches in the restaurant, that doesn't prove your accusation. All that proves is that the restaurant has roaches, not that it is "infested." Other restaurants may have roaches too. In fact, for all you know, the restaurant you accused may actually be the cleanest building in the city, and even your own house has more roaches than that restaurant. But by limiting the investigation to just that one restaurant, you can misleadingly create the impression that your accusation that the restaurant is infested with roaches is true.

Over and over, I saw this sampling bias being abused by those wishing to push the Russian interference story. e.g. Google and Facebook reported they searched their 2016 records for ads purchased by Russian agents, and found some. But in order for that to mean anything, they should have also searched for ads purchased by anyone else, and compared. I suspect if they had, they would've found attempted interference by China, by the EU, by Mexico, by Canada, by Anonymous, etc. The magnitude of the "Russian interference" (a few dozen to a few hundred people, and around six dollar figures in magnitude ) makes me suspect all these investigations found was the random noise that just happens everywhere all the time.

I didn't vote for Trump and I think is Presidency has been a travesty. But I think the abuse of statistics and manipulation of facts through selection bias by the media and those pushing this story is an even bigger travesty. If you really, truly believe that those few Russians managed to affect the outcome of the election using that little money, then every politician would be tripping over themselves to hire those guys. The amount of money spent in that election was staggering - tens to hundreds of dollars per vote. Trump actually spent close to the lowest at $5 per vote. Yet these people pushing this Russian interference angle somehow believe that these Russians were able to affect the election for pennies per vote.

If this report had found that the Russians had spent tens or hundreds of dollars per vote to interfere with the election, then I'd agree there was something worrying going on. But the amount of interference I've seen reported seems more like just the normal noise that comes from normal people from the sketchy side of the population's bell curve doing their normal sketchy things.

Congratulations, you've just reinvented the Amateur Press Association, commonly referred to as an APA. Yet again, history repeats itself.

Do you happen to know the name of this compound? I was thinking bananadine, but it turns out that's something different.

It's not bananaphone, either ;)

I searched Wikipedia for "artificial banana flavor" and it redirected me to Isoamyl acetate.

Actually, Manafort and Cohen both been convicted of cheating on their taxes in cases unconnected to Trump and his campaign.

Cohen was ALSO convicted of campaign finance violations. And lying to congress (about the campaign).

Though to my knowledge you are correct that Manafort's convictions were unrelated to Trump's campaign.

Wow! That's the exact opposite of what you said! There was no underlying crime of "collusion" or "conspiracy", AND there was no evidence that Trump attempted to obstruct any investigation even if there had been one.

Actually, except for the Manafort bit, the AC was fairly on-base your counter is either irrelevant or overblown.

The AC didn't claim collusion, he claimed that Trump encouraged Russian attacks on TV, which is true.

As for the obstruction charge, there's definitely evidence. What Mueller basically said is that he didn't find evidence of collusion in the campaign, and if you don't have proof of the crime that was being investigated it's harder to prove that efforts to kill that investigation were obstruction of justice.

But he explicitly says that it doesn't exonerate Trump, and the AG could decide otherwise (though he naturally won't of course).

And while we're at it, since the Trumpists are so fond of playing this game, lets point out another few things.

1) Mueller established that Manafort lied after agreeing to cooperate, but didn't seem to try for additional info. Manafort had some very fishy ties to Russian oligarchs connected to Putin and very easily could have had more info.
2) Mueller doesn't seem to have tried questioning Trump Jr and Kushner about the Trump tower meeting.
3) Despite the fact there's judicial precedent to subpoena a sitting President for questioning Mueller never tried. Instead he negotiated a list of questions and let Trump and his lawyers craft answers.
4) Papadopoulos was bragging about the emails that Russia stole to the Greek Foreign Minister, do you really think he didn't blab about it to other members of the campaign? Who did he tell? How did they use that information?
5) You had a Republican investigator, reporting to a Republican supervisor, reporting to a Republican AG, investigating a Republican President. I'm not saying that Mueller was trying to cover anything up, but he certainly seems to have treated Trump with kid gloves.

A bit amplified. What would the guy do with a "loaded magazine"?

I would assume he'd read it.

Don't forget the Lectron blocks.

Politicians lie during campaigns all the time. Why is this case special? If that's the problem, fix the system, penalties for misrepresentation of facts. Voting again is not addressing the core problem.

Democracies also vote on things all the time as well.

Select the wrong party, change it next election.

Lose a referendum on separating?

Then hold another one.

And if you lose that as well you can keep proposing new ones for years after.

Do you really think Scottish separatists think they can never have another referendum? Hell, if Brexit happens they'll start scheduling it the next week.

I don't see why a "yes, separate" vote is the only one you're not allowed a second crack at.

Politicians lie during campaigns all the time. Why is this case special? If that's the problem, fix the system, penalties for misrepresentation of facts. Voting again is not addressing the core problem.

Democracies also vote on things all the time as well.

Select the wrong party, change it next election.

Lose a referendum on separating?

Then hold another one.

And if you lose that as well you can keep proposing new ones for years after.

Do you really think Scottish separatists think they can never have another referendum? Hell, if Brexit happens they'll start scheduling it the next week.

I don't see why a "yes, separate" vote is the only one you're not allowed a second crack at.

Should Washington Post be considered a journalistic endeavor?

The WashPo is without question a propaganda piece for the left and Democratic party. It should have to adhere to the laws of any other PAC. It is harmful to a democracy when "Journalists" with a clear political agenda are afforded such protections and status.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Any reasonable person can see they are not in least bit unbiased in their reporting or coverage.

So, you've never heard of Keith Bostic, nor of BSD, then?

I heard of BSD. It is that other OS that used to be compiled with GCC.

It used to be compiled with cc.

Exactly. On BSD cc was symlinked to GCC since BSD 4.4, the parent of all "modern", open source BSDs. CC and cc were and are always symlinks to some other compiler, e.g. PCC or GCC or Sun C compiler.

There was also Project Ara which aimed to bring the concept to cell phones. Google killed it off a while back though. That gives me a good enough understanding that I don't think the approach is anything that consumers really care about doing. It works okay in children's toy market or in the hobbyist community, but most consumers don't possess the time, knowledge, or desire to cobble together their devices from parts.

At least it's a convenient place for people who do want stuff like this to shop. Sure there are plenty of other companies like CPC, Mouser, or Digi-Key that will probably sell you the same stuff, the selection here is a lot more limited and easier to get exactly what you want or need.

I think this is terribly mischaracterized even in the paper. They say that the assumption they think is violated is something like "there is an objective reality" and so the reality can be different for the two observers. But, as best I can tell, what they mean by an "objective" answer is that there is a hidden variable. We already knew that there are no hidden variables, so it's not surprising that this experiment also shows the assumption of a hidden variable must be violated. While this is a really nice realization of this thought experiment, I don't see how it adds anything new to our understanding of quantum mechanics, it just confirms what we already knew. I'm pretty sure that one of the things we already knew is that phrasing things in terms of "wave function collapse" is not a good way to think about it (easily leads to misleading conclusions). This is why the many-worlds interpretation already exists.

For a little more clarity on the subject, this is a physical realization of the "Wigners Friend" experiment. The "state" referred to in the summary is "superposition/collapsed waveform", and not the specific information about the photon such as its spin.

In the experiment, one scientist ("Wigner's friend") observes a photon in a superposition of states, which collapses the state, while a second scientist observes the first scientist. This uses entangled photons, so that observing the first photon collapses the state of the second.

The first scientist observes one photon, thereby collapsing its state to reveal information. Does the second scientist see his photon in a superposition or collapsed state? The first scientist might even tell the 2nd that he has observed the photon, collapsing its state - but not sating what state information was seen.

According to the experiment, the 2nd scientist still sees his photon in a superposition of states even though he knows that the first scientist has observed the photon and that the first scientist knows what the collapsed state is.

You need to catch up. Cheap mass-manufacturing hasn't prevented us from having easy to configure circuitry. In fact, the development of FPGAs has made it possible to create and test extremely complex circuits easily and quickly.

Little Bits:
https://littlebits.com/

Gakken EX:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Snap Circuits:
https://www.elenco.com/brand/s...

Then there are the domain specific building block electronics - Arduino shields, raspberry pi blocks, MakerBlocks, mBot modules...

And, of course, all the modules for Mindstorms, both from LEGO and third-party.

These look kind of neat, though. Price is right!

We don't even have a driverless metro system in the US. And you would think that with no steering, driverless underground trains would be a no-brainer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automated_urban_metro_subway_systems#Grade-of-Automation_4_systems

I never claimed SpaceX was the first to launch a self-landing rocket, although they are the first to use such a rocket to actually reach orbit and deliver a payload. So please, before God and this vast court of public opinion, please illuminate my lie...

As for your assertion:

Self landing rockets isn't any better than the alternative, which is why no one else continued making them since they were first introduced 40 years ago.

Based on this: SpaceX Falcon 9 Capabilities and Services

and this:

ULA Atlas V costs.

ULA's cost summarized (emphasis mine):

ULA suggests that customers will have much lower insurance and delay costs because of the high Atlas V reliability and schedule certainty, making overall customer costs close to that of using competitors like the SpaceX Falcon 9.

Close. Not equal, not less. Just "close".

Thus, SpaceX's re-usable rockets continue to beat ULA in price, despite ULA's best attempts to cut costs and appear to be more competitive. Re-usability is a major factor in SpaceX's superior price.

I do not believe you are intentionally lying, although your very strong opinion against SpaceX seems to have congealed from a very different and likely much older organic stock. To each their own.

Doesn't seem that way. It's caused by a bacteria, transmitted by insects.

Sealed Indictment :An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

Cringly is a familiar old idiot.

Watson & Crick predicted it was going to take 30 years to sequence the human genome. Venter did it in a fraction of that time, because he thought outside the box.

Just a few years ago I had the pleasure of being surrounded by crusty old defense contractor types who prattled on about how Elon Musk and his stupid little rockets were literally nothing but a flash-in-the -pan publicity stunt. They insisted that self-landing re-usable rockets were not feasible or we'd already be doing it....

Same argument here. Self driving cars are stupid, they don't work well enough, they'll get people killed, they are years away from being practical, Tesla sucks, blah blah blah.

Cringly is a familiar old idiot.

Watson & Crick predicted it was going to take 30 years to sequence the human genome. Venter did it in a fraction of that time, because he thought outside the box.

Just a few years ago I had the pleasure of being surrounded by crusty old defense contractor types who prattled on about how Elon Musk and his stupid little rockets were literally nothing but a flash-in-the -pan publicity stunt. They insisted that self-landing re-usable rockets were not feasible or we'd already be doing it....

Same argument here. Self driving cars are stupid, they don't work well enough, they'll get people killed, they are years away from being practical, Tesla sucks, blah blah blah.

Or they don't want another "Big Mike" banana incident.

For those that do not know the reason why banana candy doesn't taste like bananas? Is because it DOES taste like bananas, it just tastes like bananas that were once the banana you got in the stores that has since nearly been wiped out by disease. The Gross Michael or "Big Mike" banana was THE banana you found in stores from the mid 1800s-1950s, but then Palm Blight attacked the fields and nearly wiped them out completely as it spread. Now remember this was in the 40s and 50s, a time when it could take weeks to get from one side of the world to another, can you imagine how much quicker disease can spread these days, when you can hop on a plane and be on the other side of the world in a few days?

Now I haven't done enough research on the disease attacking the citrus plants to see if its another Gross Michael style disease (and I bet the writer of the article hasn't either) but if its a similar style attack? You could see this spread like wildfire and if that happened all the citrus plants affected could go the way of the Big Mike banana. Remember that nearly all these fields are made from clones so if one plant is susceptible to this disease? They ALL are. So unless you want another "Yes we have no bananas" song (written because for many years bananas simply could not be found anywhere) and to have to explain to your kids why we have citrus candy but no more actual citrus fruits? I'd want to have more information and see whether this is just a random disease or a possible Big Mike style threat.

Yeah, and worse than a computer having to deal with all those things, can you imagine what would go wrong if we had normal everyday people deal with all those things? It would be a disaster. Hundreds of thousands of people would die.

Yea, it's weird that Cameron went along with the 50%+1 to win in both cases. I could see Scotland arguing that 50%+1 was enough.
We had similar here in Canada when Quebec held referendums except it was Quebec claiming that 50%+1 was enough. Eventually the Federal government got a ruling from the Supreme Court that Quebec could not unilaterally secede according to both the Canadian Constitution and international law and the Federal then passed the clarity law which amongst other things,says it has to be a clear majority and a clear question, without actually stating what a clear majority is.
IIRC, it was also decided that for a Province to secede, would require all the other Provinces to agree. Under that idea, Brexit may have failed due to only 2 of the 4 members of the UK not agreeing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

Even good o'l Gnuplot has done function graphing since the 80s.

And it scripts really well with BASH/TCSH/etc... Oy, Microsoft, reinventing... Ya know, I just can't even go there anymore. It's just too sad.

Is this all that happens - people inciting violence are being silenced? I hear Jordan Peterson's had his invitation of a visiting fellowship at Cambridge University rescinded." I have seen quite some videos of JP but none advised violence. OTOH when a group of white boys from a catholic school has been doxed and received death threats everybody (at least most of media and political class) found this jolly good..I wonder why the discrepancy?
There is more - every time a person starts shouting in German 'alles machbar' there is nothing to see - it is usually a deed by a single disturbed person etc. Here we do not even know for sure who this guy in NZ was - he used language that could be seen as left wing radical, certainly eco-fashists (this is what he called himself) are green and left in my country. Yet we all have to wear headscarf as a sign of solidarity? I do not have anything to do with this guy even if I am a white man. I do not subscribe to acts of senseless violence against other people. I may have a different view when it comes to politicians - after all attempt to kill Adolf is celebrated in some places. What I mean is this: we have a lot of lunatics on the right wing side of political spectrum. We have significantly bigger group of lunatics on the left side however. Plus the violence loving radicals of religion of peace variety do have significant support in their communities - nobody seems to be addressing this issue. Or rather - some people do and get banned. Quite frankly I do not care about chan or whatever the site in question is called. I think however that erosion of our free speech rights have to be discussed. While we are at it we shall also discuss the spread of Marxist ideology in politics, media and academia and we can also touch the problems that love of violence among certain religious community causes.
If you want to block all sites that incite violence go ahead and do Please be consistent while doing so!

"Linear" means different things in different contexts. In high school, a "linear equation" in fact means affine equation. "Linear" doesn't gain the specialized meaning related to the superposition principle until college.

Typically, online petitions and opinion polls only have a tiny participation rate.

So do referendums, but the one to leave the EU was the largest vote in favour of any issue in the history of the country.

Largest turn-out by percentage of the eligible voters, yes. But "largest vote in favour" is misleading. It won ~52% to ~48%. In comparison, the vote to join the EU in 1975 won with 67% in favor, a total of ~17 million votes, very close to the number who voted for Leave in 2016 despite having 6 million fewer people voting in that referendum.

Typically, online petitions and opinion polls only have a tiny participation rate.

So do referendums, but the one to leave the EU was the largest vote in favour of any issue in the history of the country.

Largest turn-out by percentage of the eligible voters, yes. But "largest vote in favour" is misleading. It won ~52% to ~48%. In comparison, the vote to join the EU in 1975 won with 67% in favor, a total of ~17 million votes, very close to the number who voted for Leave in 2016 despite having 6 million fewer people voting in that referendum.

The arguments against leaving center mostly on the transition, and not the end result. It's always what will happen "in the next 6 months" or "in the following year" and whatnot. No one will admit that the UK could voluntarily implement all the agreements it currently has with the EU - such as unrestricted travel between nations - and there would be little hardship.

No, the goals Brexit were always impossible. Freedom of movement is inescapably tied to the customs union which means that the EU has a large amount of control over the UK trade agreements. The hard border in Ireland or the North Sea is unacceptable and not having it means giving up sovereignty to the EU over trade which is also unacceptable to the eyes of Leave.

That's what drove the vote to Brexit and if you held the referendum again you would find *more* people would vote for it, simply because the changes have become worse in the past 2 years.

That's a surprising claim given that recent polling numbers consistently give a majority against Brexit.

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

So far although I have seen people mention the already-existing Microsoft Mathematics, I havenâ(TM)t seen anyone mention the Microsoft Powertoy Calculator that has existed since Windows XP: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

MS is *way* ahead of you.

They already had it, discontinued it in 2011, and now re-inventing it. (Unfortunately still without Blackjack and Hookers.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

You mean windows will get a feature that's been built-in to every Mac I've ever owned?

(to those who don't own a Mac - I'm speaking of Grapher).

So amazing... so revolutionary... please do let me know when windows get another feature that real operating systems have had for a quarter century.

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets. Keep mentioning Hillary when you go to prison, try for a crazy defense. Keep trying to fuck your ugly daughter meanwhile I guess.

Before they take you off to die in prison a traitor.

In 2016, a guy called Micah Xavier Johnson shot at Dallas police officers, and killed five of them. From Wikipedia:

Johnson told police during a standoff that he was upset about recent police shootings of black men and wanted to kill whites, especially white officers. After hours of negotiation failed, police resorted to a robot-delivered bomb, killing Johnson inside El Centro College.

Johnson might have killed more people, if the robot hadn't him first.

I don't agree with banning killer robots, if using them to defend yourself would be forbidden.

I understand their concern about programming errors, but I still want the good guys to be able to defend themselves.

Sealed Indictment : An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.

Even Fox News agrees with me : Fox News’ Chris Wallace: Rudy Giuliani ‘Awfully Optimistic’ To Think Mueller Probe Is Over
The attorney’s conclusion that the special counsel’s report is good news for President Trump is premature, the Fox News host warned.

Bring lube, traitor, when they come for you with the shiny bracelets.

I miss Aardvark. It was magnificently useful.

Tho I kinda suspect - based on Aardvark's former userbase - that Google didn't so much shut it down, but rather sold it to Uncle Sam for private use.