Slashdot Mirror

[Keick wrote: "So your choice is really; Some loud mouth bozo with a 95% success rate in running businesses of all types, or a useless puppet with not a single success in her life." ]

Puppet?!!

Will this change or reinforce your opinion:

https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

The raw version:
https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):
https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

[Keick wrote: "So your choice is really; Some loud mouth bozo with a 95% success rate in running businesses of all types, or a useless puppet with not a single success in her life." ]

Puppet?!!

Will this change or reinforce your opinion:

https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

The raw version:
https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):
https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

[Keick wrote: "So your choice is really; Some loud mouth bozo with a 95% success rate in running businesses of all types, or a useless puppet with not a single success in her life." ]

Puppet?!!

Will this change or reinforce your opinion:

https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

The raw version:
https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):
https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

They basically are, did you watch the Sanders speech? Then there was this, (which overall was a good speech). If Hillary came out today, it wouldn't have surprised me at all to see her get boos

Wooosh!

Glasses-free 3D has potential in a number of applications and it's surprising to me how little penetration it has in the market at large.

Back to the Future - 8 seconds.

That's what you're going to end up with from the wonderful advertizers who think their ad is the most important thing eva! in the history of humankind. After a fair number of people die as a result of the distractions, well, the bribes will flow and nothing will change. Except the ads will get bigger. Imagine a large building chasing you to sign up for MOAR! "free" crap. Yep. ~

Captcha: subsidy.

Bernie will cave in and endorse Hillary so he is not ostracized

He did: check it out. He got booed for nearly 30 seconds. Of course, these are hardcore fans who went all the way to Philadelphia, so may not be representative.

Look at the fawning press in these videos:

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Original speed:
https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the woman on the left):
https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

This is a scandal of epic proportions, particularly since the MSM have kept completely silent about it.

These two articles may shed some light:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/06/law-enforcement-officials-medical-professionals-theres-something-seriously-wrong-hillary-clintons-health/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/13/is-hillary-clinton-fit-for-command/

Look at the fawning press in these videos:

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Original speed:
https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the woman on the left):
https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

This is a scandal of epic proportions, particularly since the MSM have kept completely silent about it.

These two articles may shed some light:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/06/law-enforcement-officials-medical-professionals-theres-something-seriously-wrong-hillary-clintons-health/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/13/is-hillary-clinton-fit-for-command/

Look at the fawning press in these videos:

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Original speed:
https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the woman on the left):
https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

This is a scandal of epic proportions, particularly since the MSM have kept completely silent about it.

These two articles may shed some light:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/06/law-enforcement-officials-medical-professionals-theres-something-seriously-wrong-hillary-clintons-health/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/13/is-hillary-clinton-fit-for-command/

Official theme song for parent post.

Hillary already had a detailed response in an interview:

https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):

https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Hillary already had a detailed response in an interview:

https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):

https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Hillary already had a detailed response in an interview:

https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):

https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

["Let's ask Hillary. She is kind of an export on that subject."]

Hillary already had a detailed response in an interview:

https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):

https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

["Let's ask Hillary. She is kind of an export on that subject."]

Hillary already had a detailed response in an interview:

https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):

https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

["Let's ask Hillary. She is kind of an export on that subject."]

Hillary already had a detailed response in an interview:

https://youtu.be/lJjHTeo6mVw

From another angle (look at the facial reactions of the journalist on the left):

https://youtu.be/jtU5nMbEsQ4?t=18s

In slow motion:
https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

content creators

If you want me to care about "content creators", you're going to have to call them something other than "content creators". I find that appellation irritating in the extreme. It says absolutely nothing about what they've done to deserve my money.

I mean, I work very hard on adding value to Slashdot with my shitty comments, so I am also a "content creator". So pay me my money, motherfucker. GIVE ME MY GODDAMN MONEY.

https://youtu.be/0N4b2dmLZII

Here's the section from the speech, notice the reactions from the crowd, too. Trump says the letters "LGBTQ" rather awkwardly, but he also opposed the bathroom bills in Carolina, for example. Whether he is or not, being "anti-gay" is a losing proposition for a national politician these days, so he has to at least pretend he is in favor.

Gatcha Suckers! https://youtu.be/NQFMeyWVe3g?t...

Education and Reminders.

The younger crowd doesn't know of or use /. but some of us do use other forums such as reddit. Educating helps reddit grow from the cesspool it is.

I've far seen too many posts -- that I disagree with but have a very interesting viewpoint -- get down modded into oblivion simply because it was "unpopular".

I recently came across this video 5 Banned YouTubers You Can't Watch Anymore that had this brilliant commentary:

Political Philosopher John Stewart Mill made an argument for free speech including that of hate speech for a good reason.

He argued that if we censor hate speech our fundamental beliefs of what is right and wrong are not tested. If our beliefs are aren't argued against then we don't attempt to rationalize what we believe to be true. We don't think about why our beliefs are right. When we don't question our beliefs we don't think about them. And when we don't think about our beliefs we don't learn new things. We don't advance and improve our thoughts about what is right and wrong.

Even if someone's argument is wrong it still serves a purpose of making us rationalize and check our beliefs and even improve them. Being able to listen to an argument that is wrong lets us understand what makes an argument wrong and improve our own beliefs from learning from someone else's failure.

If you assume that your phone has been compromised to the point that you can't trust the indicator that says that you're radio is turned off then it would be trivial to just log your route and upload it whenever you turn the physical circuit back on.

In the Vice news interview, Snowden demonstrates physically removing the cameras and mics from the phone. My point was rather than have to go to this extreme, the next best thing would be mods to be able to toggle those features or radios without having to trust the phone's OS. Even just a switch instead of having to pull the battery would be a big improvement.

Yes, it totally was! This is how it was done.

Morons From Outer Space Theatrical Trailer

There are such things as jet cars than don't depend on wheel grip. You can reach 5 seconds with just one engine. Now if you don't care about dying, you can strap an SRB to your back and go even faster. And if you really, really don't care, you can use explosives in place of rocket fuel.

The far left is just as racist and bigoted as the far right but at least the far right doesn't consist of a bunch of violent thugs running around assaulting people and trying to assassinate candidates:

https://youtu.be/0t7PnrelFdY

Buzzfeed is by far the most racist MS outlet out there and should be banned.

Reminds me of watching Tom Cruise climb Burj Khalifa in Mission Impossible, and thinking, "enh, the CGI is not really believable".

It may caused by jump cuts and other bad directing choices, but somehow, CGI is managing to ruin real stunts now.

If you're afraid of heights, don't even think of watching Lloyd's famous clock scene

His sexual preference as with the entire GLBT movement is just a distraction.

https://youtu.be/iPis68U7bdo

The guy is just a nut. A nut with a lot of money pulling a lot of strings.

The horror

Sorry, NOTHING beats the cat copter, well maybe the cat copter chasing the bird drone: https://youtu.be/uJfM23iChzs

Here's the one I liked https://youtu.be/WvtEXMlQQtI?t...

Dear Newt: the sick and the tired need to get out of government.

Please hand over the matches and head for the nearest exit, and don't get cranky if security decides to perform a strip search.

Just a question. What's Arabic for "glasnost?"

2525: https://youtu.be/zKQfxi8V5FA

This Mythbusters episode might help you with the turd polishing problem.

Your little safe will be cracked before you can say aber-cadaver

Hocus Pocus!

YouTube 8k already works in both Chrome and Firefox, in both webm and mp4 format https://youtu.be/sLprVF6d7Ug

To be fair, the child was given 20 seconds to comply.

I will NEVER understand why any Jew is a liberal.

https://youtu.be/BUh-djbgRx4?t...

Mir vern gehast un getribn
mir vern gepflogt un farfolgt.
un alts nor derfar vayl mir libn
dos oreme shmakhtnde volk.

We are despised and driven away,
We are tortured and dispersed;
And why? For only one reason:
because we love the poor.

We are shot and hanged,
robbed of our lives and our rights,
and for only one reason:
because we demand freedom for downtrodden slaves.

Put us into iron chains,
tear us apart with blood;
you can only kill our bodies;
not our ideas.

You can murder us, tyrants,
but new fighters will come in our place;
we will fight, fight until
the entire world is free.

I too have worked on a C++ compiler (PS3).

While it sounds like you are very knowledgeable in the first 3, sadly, it sounds like you don't understand the 4th level of optimization aka Data-Oriented-Design. :-/ The levels of optimization are:

1. Use a lower level language
2. Micro-optimization or bit-twiddling
3. Algorithm
4. Macro-optimization or cache-orientated aka Data-Orientated Design

I think you'll enjoy these links:

* Pitfalls of Object Oriented Programming

and

Code Clinic 2015: How to Write Code the Compiler Can Actually Optimize

> or perhaps recoding Java into C++.

Unfortunately, this is the 1st level of optimization by the inexperienced and is the *wrong* place to start.
You need to look at the *data first*, NOT the code before you start optimizing.

Switching implementation languages is (usually) a symptom of NOT understanding the problem.

"Show me your flowchart and conceal your tables, and I shall continue to be mystified.
Show me your tables, and I won't usually need your flowchart; it'll be obvious."
-- Fred Brooks, The Mythical Man-Month.

The modern vernacular paraphrase is:

"Show me your code which obfuscates the data (structures) and it will take a while before I can understand / optimize it.
Show me your data and I won't need to see your code."

Here is my post where I explain the 4 levels of optimizations in greater detail.

Whoops, forgot the link to Mike Acton's talk:

Code Clinic 2015: How to Write Code the Compiler Can Actually Optimize
* https://youtu.be/GPpD4BBtA1Y?t...

Yeah, but is there a gene for "does stupid/reckless/dangerous shit"?

I'm pretty sure it has more to do with the XY chromosome.

https://youtu.be/6w5t6hktyqI

Only shitty programmers continue to make excuses why they are shitty.
Arrogance is assuming you THINK you already know.

> In Java you have no influence in caches etc.

FALSE.

Do you actually understand _anything_ about cache lines???

HOW you access memory determines your maximum throughput.

Proof: Here are two different ways to sum up an array:

1. In the first example we access every 0th, 16th, 32nd, 64th element. Then 1st, 17th, 33rd, etc. Then the 2nd, 18th, 34th, etc. Our stride is 16 elements.
2. In the second example we access every element in a contiguous fashion. Our stride is 1 element.

If one "had no influence in caches" like you ignorantly assume the timing would be identical. However one is SLOWER then the other.

Copy and paste into an online Java compiler

public class HelloWorld{
 
    public static void main(String []args){
        final int _K = 1024;
        final int N = 2048 * _K;
 
        int[] a = new int[N];
        int sum;
 
        long start, end, dur;
 
        for( int i = 0; i < N; i++ )
            a[i] = i & 0xFF;
 
        start = System.nanoTime();
        sum = 0;
        for( int j = 0; j < 16; j++ )
            for( int i = j; i < N; i += 16 )
            {
                sum += a[ i ];
            }
        end = System.nanoTime();
        dur = (end - start) / 1000000; // milliseconds.
        System.out.format( "Sum: %d, Time: %d\n", sum, dur );
 
        start = System.nanoTime();
        sum = 0;
            for( int i = 0; i < N; i++ )
                sum += a[ i ];
        end = System.nanoTime();
        dur = (end - start) / 1000000; // milliseconds.
        System.out.format( "Sum: %d, Time: %d\n", sum, dur );
    }
}

> Your "lack of understanding of memory access patterns" has nothing to do with assembly or C++.

If you would actually _watch_ and _learn_ you would recognize this is false.
https://youtu.be/rX0ItVEVjHc?t...

> libraries that tried to exploit caching behaviour (1993 or so?). However that has nothing to do with assembly ;)

Here's your cookie for missing the point"

Assembly language programmers tend to be more knowledgeable of when and where their code is slow. C++ and Java programmers tend to be more ignorant of high performance because they generally don't have a clue _how_ the compiler is generating the corresponding asm for their code -- and then they wonder why it is slow.

A good programmer learns assembly to better understand how to write simpler, smaller, and faster code.
A shitty programmer makes excuses for why they don't understand assembly.

That's a pretty good argument if you have never told a lie or made a misleading statement

You've now crossed into apologist territory. I tell you that I'm going to vote for her but you still can't let it go, you have to defend her at all costs.

Guess what? I'm not running for elected office!!!! She fucking lied, repeatedly, about an issue of public interest, while running for the highest office in the land. Why is it so hard for you to unequivocally condemn such behavior? We have the right to expect better from those that would lead us. The worst part is the lies weren't necessary. She could have simply said, "I make a mistake." and left it at that, but she has too much hubris to do that.

Here's another video that's telling.

H-U-B-R-I-S

Sadly, a candidate with no brain actually seems like the safest bet this election.

Relevant video:

https://youtu.be/3rUCKKVGvFg?t...

I could care less about the company I work for. they could care less about me.

Watch and learn something, then you might have a better job finding employment...

https://youtu.be/om7O0MFkmpw

That's the Cosmic Shame.

Good stats on this are hard to find. Perhaps there already has been a drop:

The article is about a dip in the number of "personal shares" where people share something or tweet something about themselves, personally. More people are using both platforms as passive news/media sites. If you visit any of the main Conservative hubs on Facebook, you'll find that most of the entries aren't personal shares anyway, but are usually them re-sharing pictures of Hillary photoshopped riding a broomstick or variations on various racist or antisemitic themes. Occasionally one will share something like this:

https://youtu.be/8Yagjf5B2tw

You're despicable.

https://youtu.be/PfsTk5i7mPw