Slashdot Mirror
Thief of Time
As always, attempting to explain the plot behind a Prachett novel is ... difficult. Lemme do the best I can: In Discworld, where the series takes place, Time is a resource that is managed by the Monks of History. They store, divvy it out and generally make it so that the world has enough time. However, outside forces are trying to stop Time, by constructing the Discworld's most perfect clock -- if the clock starts ticking, then the world will stop.
Our heroes include one of the preeminent cleaners from the Monks of History, his young "grasshopper," Susan, the Granddaughter of Death, oh, and the fifth member of the 4 Horsemen. And I nearly forgot the Son of Time. Or Sons. Or something like that. Yes, it's a Prachett novel at it's best. Also make regular appearances are series perennials DEATH and DEATH OF MICE. Personally, I've never been a huge fan of DEATH OF MICE, but I do find DEATH to be one of the best characters.
Plot of this particular book aside, here's the lowdown on the Discworld series -- it's satire. Yes, Virginia, even in this day and age of heavy cyncism, there's still good authors writing satire. In the past, the Discworld series has dealth with such fun issues as freedom of the press, gender relations, international relations, the telephone/telegraph/internet and role of government. The thing that's fun about the Discworld series is that Prachett's usually right on, at least from my point of view. Thief of Time is a look at that resource that everyone in our day and age claims to have not enough of, and is scrambling around for. While Prachett's satirical devices can be a bit cutesy at time -- some of the Monks of History parts, in particular, I thought were a bit over the top -- the underlying point is still the same: people create the sense of time deprivation around us. We are the ones responsible for making ourselves feel like we don't have time.
Beyond just our own interactions with time, the main anatognists in the book, the people behind the scenes, also have a serious issue with human life and all that entails. In dealing with them in the book, I get the feeling that Prachett is trying to tell us to wake up and smell the morning coffee. Being human is pretty darn cool, and we should appreciate all the crazy stuff that's around us, and enjoy life.
The Discworld series is not written for those with a dour sense of life or themselves. This, and the other books in the series are easy reads, and don't take long to go through -- but you are almost always guaranteed to laugh out loud at least several times. And somehow, despite the humour, he still manages to make a point about life, and lampoon what's around us. And hopefully the next book will have Captain Carrot.
You can purchase this book at Fatbrain.
The Watch Books: Guards! Guards!; Men At Arms; Feet of Clay; Jingo; The Fifth Elephant; The Truth (to a certain extent, although in a way it is not a Watch Book).
The Witches Books: Equal Rites; The Wyrd Sisters; Witches Abroad; Carpe Jugulum; Lords and Ladies; Maskerade.
The Death Books: Mort, Reaper Man, Soul Music, Hogfather, Thief of Time.
The Rincewind Books: Colour of Magic, Light Fantastic, Sourcery, Eric, Interesting Times, Last Continent.
The Other Books: stuff that doesn't fit into any of the above, but is still part of the discworld ouvre...notably: Small Gods, Moving Pictures, Pyramids, The Truth.
Then there's the Other Other Books...notably, Good Omens.
-d.
b) I thought this was one of his best recent books.
All that glitters has a high refractive index.
I've been getting concerned with pratchett's recent books, which have been more and more along the lines of "look! I've introduced something into this world which is permenant!" as opposed to his previous discworld books which were "Let's introduce an outside concept which we're familiar with into the world, play with it, satirize it, and the have the characters eradicate it because they know deep down that their world is supposed to be there like it always has been so that people can dream about it". moving pictures is an example of the last one, the bit where the clacks towers were introduced is my most frustrating example of the first.
I've always like Death, and I've been growing to like Susan more and more. Ronnie, the fifth horseman is very nifty as well. This novel particularly interested me because I've always wondered about the history monks, especially after Small Gods. I can't wait until they release the rest of his books to the States...it's driving me nuts waiting for them piecemeal, and it's so fscking expensive to get them from overseas...
thanks for letting me rant...and damn you for reviewing it before i got a chance.
----------------------------------------------
You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
http://propheteer.org
...when "Thief of Time" came out. As a potential journalist, I loved "The Truth"!
Also, did anyone reading "Thief of Time" get the theme song to Bard's Tale III: Thief of Fate stuck in their head? I did... "dum-dum-dum *dum-dum-dum!* dum-dum-dum..."
-- haaz.
... at the Barnes & Noble appearance in NYC a coupla weeks ago. He's HILARIOUS.
And if he's lurking (as he's known to lurk, at least on alt.fan.pratchett)... WELL DONE!
Your Working Boy,
- Otis (GAIM: OtisWild)
- You'd think enough of us would have bitched by now that they'd have gotten the clue, but no, they went from interesting but not great covers to FSKING UGLY ones.
As PTerry pointed out when I saw him speak a couple of weeks ago and this question was asked -- A number of different covers have been tried on the books in the States, and the fact of the matter is, with the current covers, more books are being sold than with any of the other covers. And no matter what they look like, you can't argue with sales.There are other things that could account for this, but they're harder to nail down for the publisher than something concrete like a graph showing covers on the x-axis, and sales on the y-axis. If the book publishing industry is anything like the music industry and the the movie industry in these united states, well...
> Initially, these books were a parody of "Conan the Barbarian"-style fantasy
Among other styles - there's a bit very like the Lankhmar books, and another Pern-like bit. But yes, anyone who picks up one of the first two and decides its ok but a bit lightweight ought to try a later one before rejecting them.
> the "Mandala" is clearly derived from the Mandelbrot set
Maybe. But it's also derived from a mandala.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?mandala
"1 : a Hindu or Buddhist graphic symbol of the universe"
> Death is a fun character, but he lacks personality by his very nature.
That's not entirely true - there's quite a bit about how the anthropomorphic personifications do pick up personalities because they are anthropomorphic.
Death says (or thinks) at one point that it's a good thing _he_ hasn't ever changed, but that doesn't mean it's true.
--
rant
I SHOULD WARN READERS WHEN I AM ABOUT TO SPOIL A BOOK
And no, I'm not going to make it worse by pointing out where you spoiled it, but you spoiled it big time.
And it's not the death of mice, it's the Death of Rats. Does this look like "mice" to you? SQUEAK!
And while on the s ubject of Death's sidekicks, Quoth has to be mentioned. "Croak" (read the book and you'll understand why the quotes).
It should be mentioned that this Carrot fellow Hemos mentions is part of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch, which has been masterfully portraied in Guards! Guards! and Men at Arms, as well as the more recent The Fifth Elephant.
About Prachett's books it has to be said that there are two publishing companies printing the hardcovers, one at each side of the pond. One is Doubleday (Transworld Publishers) and the other is Harper Prism. One of them sucks and the other is pure joy. It's a matte r of lenghtly discussions which one is which. Another source of discordance is Paul Kidby vs Josh Kirby as the cover art artist.
And the for dessert, pay a visit to L-space.
They were able to comment on their governments with little fear of reprisal, since it was in the context of a science fiction piece.
Heinlein is also a master at this, particularly when he confronts a theocracy.
Although I can do something similar, thanks to a friend - look at this message, where Douglas asks who wrote it, and then this message where the author explains that he wrote it, DNA didn't, and it was in part inspired by "The Lost Continent" by TP. He also mentions how it became attributed to DNA.
Tim
That was not written by Douglas. It was written as an article for h2g2.com by a guy using the nickname Orinoco, and he admitted some of it was inspired by Terry Pratchett's writing. I know this because I edited the article before it went live on h2g2.
The original is here.
If I was really wired and used IMAP for my email, I'd be able to include the text of the email DNA sent round the office saying something like "Who wrote this? It's funny, but it wasn't me, and people think it was."
But I'm not and I don't, so I can't.
But it's true.
Sorry.
Tim
His books are so humorus, I tend to buy them straight from amazon.co.uk to get them ASAP.
This one did not disappoint.
I'm still waiting for Pratchett to pair off Susan with Ponder Stibbons. Imagine it: the ultimate geek/goth thing...
Yeah, I tried to put in spoilerspace but /. compressed it all to one line. I should have used preview. Sorry. I did at least *warn* readers not to read the rest of my comment, which is more than this reviewer did.
I'm now going to put in some actual spoilerspace before discussing why I believe the review was a spoiler...
some
text
that
hopefully
will defeat
the lameness
filter
foo
However, if you're reading the book, and you got to the bit where you find out that Time has a son - the first thing you wonder is *which* of the two possible characters is the son. There's no inkling that "both" is a possibility -- and it's very clear (once you do find out) that you were never *meant* to guess it - it's supposed to come as a surprise. If you've read this review, you've heard "son (or sons)" and so you *know*, consciously or not, that "both" is a possible answer. It is a legitimate spoiler.
Stuart.
Damn, watch the spoilers! My advice to anyone who hasn't read ToT yet is to not read the above review... or the rest of this comment.
"And I nearly forgot the Son of Time. Or Sons. Or something like that." - you just gave away the most carefully-kept secret in the whole book! First off it's not even revealed that Time has a son until a long way into the book, and even after that, Pterry is VERY careful to avoid hinting at plurals until Lobsang is actually about to meet Jeremy: "He's your brother" is the very first time we find this out, and up until that point one of the major items of suspense is *which* of the two actually is Time's son. Nicely spoilt, without any warning whatsoever.
I'm pretty sure that the fact that the clock will stop time is also not given away until later in the book, and I'm not entirely sure about the Fifth Horseman either.
I'm just glad that I'd read the book before I read this review, or I'd be mighty pissed off.
Stuart.
Well. To quote a reliable source (and to stick a header on this because /. won't let me post all-caps and is ruining the gag:
THERE IS NO JUSTICE. THERE'S JUST ME.
Another damned comic
+++ NO CARRIER
On Amazon.co.uk pricing: I don't know that I've found the shipping to be "a bugger" at all. Seems every time I've ordered, the shipping has been pretty much swallowed up by the exchange rate. Sure, I end up paying the equivalent of US cover price instead of the "standard" 30% discount from Borders or Amazon US, but cover price for a good cover is easily worth it even if you aren't a raving loony. At least that's what the voices keep telling me.
7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
I am sad to see Mr. Adams gone too, but his handful of books were largely rushed at the end. In particular I wanted to throw the last Dirk Gently book out a nearby window when I got to the end and it tied up a mystery in 3 pages without bothering to tell ME clearly what the solution was (I'm not dense, if it was obvious to anyone I have no clue how). He had a great sense of a scene and humor, but not of novel writing.
Pratchett, on the other hand, knows how to plot a book. Beginning/Middle/End, tension/release, etc. He does an excellent job. Sometimes his plots or characters end up a bit thin, but I can only think of one or two of the 26 Discworld books that I felt I had to *work* at reading, and the vast majority of them have been complete joys to read.
Bottom line: it's quality, not quantity, that counts, and Pratchett manages excellent quality, in many cases surpassing any of Adams' work.
7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
If someone's too lazy to read a book, why would they want an introduction to Pratchett?
---
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
Douglas Adams only writes a handful of books and is taken far too soon. This hack Pratchett turns out at least one a year and goes unpunished for his crimes.
Sigh.
DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
I've been an avid Pratchett fan since I read Reaper Man and Guards! Guards! around '95 or so. And ever since Reaper Man has been my favourite book in the series. I mean who can resist: "DEATH is missing. Presumed...... Er.. Gone." And at the same time a tall skinny man comes to a small farm outside of Ankh Morpork and he can really wield a scythe...
:)
So If you haven't read Pratchett before, go do so now! You will not regret it. I love his humour and especially all his cool footnotes riddled all over the books. I can't remember which book it was in, but one book has 4 lines of normal text and the rest of the page is one footnote
Every time a new book by Pratchett is published I grab a copy ASAP and lock myself in my appartment and read it from start to finish non-stop.
I never knew that the American editions has a different cover... they suck! :-) The original covers are excellent - Kirby's (I think - the book I have here doesn't credit the artist) amazingly dense cartoons and his rather... literal[1] style combine to produce very interesting covers.
[1] In the Colour of Magic, Twoflower is described as having "four eyes". Everyone, including Pratchett, read this as "wearing thick glasses". Except Kirby. Cue Twoflower, running down the stairs on the cover with four eyes in a row...
That's fast! Seems I just read The Truth a few weeks ago...
Well, brace yourself since there are going to be a number of discworld releases in short-order, including the first Discworld childrens novel.
Think PTerry has finally got back to the 6 month release schedule he used to maintain.
EZ
"Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
That essay can be found here.
I'm got good news and bad news, then...
The good news is that his current publishers are on the ball, and the American Hardcover editions are now released at the same time as the English hardcovers. In fact, the American edition of "Thief of Time" came out about a half-week BEFORE the English edition.
The bad news is that the American edition covers are bad. And by bad, I mean hideous. And have little to do with the actual story. The cover for Thief of Time has as iconography four squares contaiing a picture of a rat. Since there are no rats in the story (except the Death of Rats), it makes no sense to me.
Because of the covers alone, I'll keep ordering my Discworld books from England. The difference in cost? $5/book or so. Not bad on a $20 hardcover.
I still enjoy reading Pratchett books enough to buy the hard cover editions when they first come out, but does anyone else think they are getting a tiny bit repetative.
The last two have been a bit better, the new main characters provide a venier of originality but they are still the same old:
Something lifted straight from our world but dangerously different under discworld rules threatens the existence of the universe/disc.
Plucky Hero/Heroine saves the day.
I'm trying to think of a recent example were this was not the case, but you have to go way back into the early books to find one.
Cheers
Tim
Aside from the title, I can't see any similarities whatsoever between Discworld and Ringworld. They're even different genres - one is science fiction which strives to be at least plausible, and the other is fantasy/humor.
Not quite related to the original post, but try reading Strata, sometime, for a link between a Discworld and Ringworld :-)
--
Repton.
Repton.
They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
Aside from the title, I can't see any similarities whatsoever between Discworld and Ringworld. They're even different genres - one is science fiction which strives to be at least plausible, and the other is fantasy/humor. Care to elaborate on what similarities you see?
--
Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
It's a bit nitpicky, but it's not the Death of Mice, it's the Death of Rats. When Death decided to quit quite a few books ago, all the little sub-Death's were released to do their job. Near the end of the book, Death comes back, and reabsorbes all the sub-contractors... except Death of Rats who hung onto a beam while the sub-contractor Death's were absorbed. Death let Death of Rats continue being a separate entity.
SQUEAK.
because DEATH of RATS never gets the good squeeking parts. *ahem*
// TODO: fix sig
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Kiwaiti
Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
Ah, but who can know the mind of the once and future king? I think if he revealed too much about Carrot's inner workings, the whole foundation of the inevitable conclusion to the Discworld series would be put in jeopardy.
I've been of the firm belief for a number of years now that the final book will be Carrot's coronation. He held off on Magrat marrying Verence for a little while, but not quite long enough. Obviously writing has become so much fun that he wants to stretch things out a bit further and not take any of the available outs he's built into the story. Another would be Susan taking the job of Death so he can retire and be nice to cats. In the tradition of his buddy Neil Gaiman, things would hopefully come to a head all at once. But hopefully not at the risk of an "I can't be having with this" or a "woof, bloody woof: Millenium Hand and Shrimp."
Pratchett has his main characters, through whom the story is lived. Some other characters are despicable creatures like you and me, while others are just too large to really include in the run of human emotion. Vimes will always be his Rocky Balboa, while Carrot will always be a distant superhero. And while Vimes is an excellent narrator, it's left to the bottle in his desk drawer to really paint alot about him, and Granny has to be left out of the royal christening for us to see her vulnerability. Carrot is also irrational when Angua disappears, but to reveal too much about Carrot's mind would be too reveal far too much about the entire Discworld.
Well, possibly not as much as Nobby's..
toeslikefingers.com - because
Josh Kirby and Paul Kidby are two different human beings. Josh Kirby is the official cover artist, Paul Kidby is the guy who does alot of art based on Discworld and has worked on some of the illustrated guides. Confusing, I know!
toeslikefingers.com - because
I bought my copy from the Science Fiction Book Club for $12.50 + S/H. Didn't want to wait any longer than necessary just to get the Josh Kirby cover.
The Death of Rats ... and other small furry creatures whose lives end in a truncated squeak :)
I think Science Fiction is a great genre for satirical works. Although I can't stand the Scientologists, L. Ron Hubbard's Mission Earth was a brilliant piece of work. Absolute must reading for any PR person (but after you get done, you might reconsider your career).
I love that book, it was the only thing that got me thru the flight from hell (ATL->JFK (4h lay over 2h delay -> 6h of crying children -> BXL)
Its funny as hell and it actualy has a lot of intresting sci. facts
42
Basically, in the 20 or so previous DiscWorld books, Pratchett has built a very rich and detailed history through the events of the characters. However, as would happen with almost any author, there are small timeline mistakes and such that creep into the series, which very devout fans love to point out on USENET.
Thief of Time starts with the explanation of an event in the past of the DiscWorld that caused the Timeline to crash (which explains all the little inconsistancies, since it had to be patched back together). Since then, it's been up to the Monks of History not to merely record history as it happens, but to ensure that history continues to happen at all!
Main characters in the book are Lu Tze (a History Monk patterned after Lao Tzu), Susan Sto Helit (Death's grand-daughter), DEATH, Lobsand Ludd (Lu Tze's apprentice), and The Auditors.
Anyone who enjoys the sort of satirical humor that was present in Hitchhiker's Guide should check this out, and then read the rest of Pratchett's work.
More information about Terry Pratchett and his works can be found at
- L-Space
- alt.fan.pratchett
or any number of other online resources.Project ELF - Anonymous Distributed Filesharing
If it's anything like Pyramids, don't stand in my way in the bookshop queue or you'll get run down! :-)
;-)
As far as the internal monologue goes, sometimes this is bcos the character _is_ complex. Carrot for instance appears whiter than white, but certain scenes (killing Cruces, the end of Fifth Elephant) show that good doesn't always mean nice (the classic line of "Pray you never meet a good man. He'll kill you without a word."). And an internal monologue for Granny Weatherwax, who's essentially nasty but knows she has to be good, would be mindbending! IMO, adding any kind of internal monologue to the Patrician was a mistake - he's another character who should just _be_ and you work him out from what he does.
I'm quite a fan, but sometimes the humanist bits get a bit tiring when they're forced down your throat. Reading a few back-to-back, I'm come away on a couple with the distinct feeling of the same theme in different clothes. Maybe Pterry should be forced to re-read his last dozen books every month while he's writing a new one, then he won't be tempted to re-use themes!
Grab.
I'm still dissapointed about the usual 6 months delay before PTerry's books appear in a merkin bookstore. I used to keep up with his 2 books a year release schedule back in The Netherlands. Now I have completely missed the launch of a book and stumble upon it in a review at /.
---------------------------------
Do a deja news (groups.google.com) search for adams, pratchett, unseen, and you should get an article (the third one on the list when I did it) written by Terry, about his reaction to the news. It ends, "I spent the rest of the day with the sense that the world had faded to grey, and feeling very, very angry."
I felt a dull sense of betrayal by the universe, myself.
-- Still waiting for the Nike endorsement
There are some things in the books that suggest Prattchet has read Adam's works. For example if you look into Death's eyes you can see infinity - and it looks blue.
No. :) I didn't like Hogfather (except for the bit with Death giving out stuff at the store), nor Fifth Elephant, nor Last Continent. In fact I was getting worried that Pterry was losing his touch. But he restored my faith with The Truth and Thief of Time, which I think are two of the better books in the series.
Science, huh? Nice try, editors.
Stupid like a fox!
All this sounds suspiciously like a takeoff on Larry Niven's Ringworld and The Science of Ringworld, except the plots are decidedly different. On the other hand I read a short story some 30 years ago in Galaxy or Analog or one of the old SF mags that sure sounds like the Discworld plot. Anybody remember that? Last line something like "Above them the stars began winking out..." But Pratchett sounds like he may be worth a read.
It is not Death of Mice but Death of Rats
(Critical mode)
Um.. I enjoyed the book..
The plot unfortunately jumps about a bit halfway in a slightly distracting manner but otherwise it is a typical pterry Discworld book.
(Perl mode resumed)
Solution: buy your copies from amazon.co.uk instead. The shipping's a bugger, of course, but a Pratchett purist will appreciate the trouble spent.
Thief of Time is the twenty-sixth book in the seemingly neverending Discworld series of books by Terry Pratchett. Initially, these books were a parody of "Conan the Barbarian"-style fantasy, then evolved into satires about pop culture and contemporary politics, and eventually developed a peculiar knack for murder mysteries and cosmic crises of metaphysical proportions. Thief of Time is about one of these crises.
Susan Sto Helit, granddaughter (by adoption) of the anthropomorphic personification Death, has been trying to preserve her sense of humanity ever since she discovered her family history. Previously, in Hogfather, she was a governess; she's now taken the next logical step into elementary school teaching. But Death hasn't forgotten her, nor her usefullness in situations involving the Auditors.
The Auditors are grey, shapeless, nameless beings who have been harassing Death for some time now. Their self-appointed job is to keep things neat and tidy in the universe, and life in all its shapes and forms is exactly the opposite of that--unpredictable, nondeterministic, and full of intangible things like love and hope. They want to do away with it, but can't through direct intervention. And Death likes life, because without it he's out of a job. But he can't directly intervene, either. So he calls on Susan to help out.
This time, the Auditors are attempting to re-create a special clock--one that can measure the "cosmic tick" of the universe and trap Time herself within it. Stop time, and you stop change, preserving the universe in a tidy and calculable form that the Auditors can enjoy. There's even a clockmaker in exile from his Guild, a man by the name of Jeremy, who's uniquely suited to building such a device.
Susan's not the only one trying to find Jeremy before he can build the clock, though. The Monks of History, last seen behind the scenes of Small Gods, have been taking care of time for... well, it doesn't matter how long, shuttling time away from where it's not needed and adding it to where it is, all across the Disc. They were responsible for restoring history the last time a clock like this was built (and broke), and they're determined to keep it from happening again. The trouble is, it's hard to find a clock that can stop time before it's even built, and it's harder to stop it after it's started working....
Thief of Time will delight geeks because of its well-disguised references to chaos theory (the "Mandala" is clearly derived from the Mandelbrot set), quantum mechanics (the "tick of the cosmos" = Planck's constant), and the movie "The Matrix" (the monks can "slice time" to move ultra-fast, and know more wacky-sounding martial arts than an entire Jackie Chan film festival). You don't have to know the references, fortunately, because Pratchett has to explain them in such a way that his own mythology can interact with it. But knowing where his ideas come from makes the book that much more fun.
The book didn't conclude as well as I'd liked, because a few of the minor characters weren't really tied up. But the major characters were all great. Lu Tze, the monk that played the important part in Small Gods, should be a character we'll enjoy seeing again in future books. Susan is spot-on her usual personality, harassing the mortals she's forced to interact with on a daily basis. Death spends some time chasing down his fellow Horsemen. And the Death of Rats is there mainly because (a) he's how Death always contacts Susan, and (b) to make a not-too-subtle "hickory dickory dock" joke halfway through the book.
Susan's first apperance in Soul Music was a bit of a disappointment, but her role here, like in Hogfather previously, is perfectly suited to her. Death is a fun character, but he lacks personality by his very nature. Susan acting on his behalf is much more enjoyable. More books with her will be welcome in the Pratchett audience, and this one's worth the purchase.
If anyone's looking for a good introduction to Pratchett, and is too lazy to read a 200 page book, check out this Wyrd Sisters video. This mini-series captures Pratchett's style very well (it has DEATH). Definately worth a look.
Well, your fingers weave quick minarets; Speak in secret alphabets;
std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
"THE DEATH OF RATS", not "THE DEATH OF MICE"? Any you call yourself a Pratchett fan. On an unrelated note, I was sad to read in the Douglas Adams interview that he had never read Pratchett. I wonder if Pratchett ever read Adams? I bet he has.
Well, your fingers weave quick minarets; Speak in secret alphabets;
std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
I see the Statesider covers occasionally in used bookstores and wonder where people are getting them, since all the fresh ones have always been Kirbys.
Ordering Canadian should be really cheap, considering our drowning dollar and the fact that Corgi Canada now prints the paperbacks, reducing cover price (we used to get pbs from the UK, too).
I'll recommend White Dwarf Books (never mail-ordered from them, but they're in Vancouver and I've bought from the store) and Nebula Books in Montreal (haven't ordered from them either, but emailed an inquiry once and got prompt, polite response), they've an entire page devoted to Pratchett, with cover gallery. Hope this helps.
Chapters alternate: One chapter has Rincewind and the other wizards tinkering with an experiment gone wrong that's turned in to an explorable solar system, the next has a real world science explanation of the concepts. There's just something about mixing in Discworld ridiculousness that makes the science more memorable.
The beloved Hex also turns up (Obligatory /. comment: Gee, imagine if I had a Hex cluster!), with it gaining insights in to the future. As a result it starts getting messages along the lines of "Make money fast!" "Send $1 to each of these five people and you'll make $millions" etc. I guess some things never change then.
Title: The Science Of Discworld.
Authors: Terry Pratchett, Lian Stewart & Jack Cohen
ISBN: 0 09 187477 7
Publisher: EBURY PRESS Pages: 368
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
"Hi! My name is Teatime, what's yours?"
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
One more for the shopping list.
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
The troll reached for his keyboard, as he had a thousand times before, but something was different as his hands passed right through the letters f-r-i-s-t-p-s-o-t. He tried again and then noticed the head leaning off to one side. SQUEAK!
"Um, d00d, y3r a r4t!"
IKK IKK IKK SQUEAK!
"Uh, wh0's t00, bu5y t0 b3 h3r3?"
SQUEAK SQUEAK IKK EEK!
"N0 way! I d1dn't th1nk j00 c0uld d13 fr0m n3g m0d p01nt5!"
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
In Momo, a small girl and her turtle stop the time thieves who hoard people's time in their grey vaults and smoke it in their cigars...and so on...
Satire? Hm. Okay, a very friendly suburban version of satire, nothing hurtful or mean. No slashdot trolls anywhere...
For satire, I really prefer Robert Rankin - 'Armageddon, the Musical' or 'A Dog Called Demolition' or 'Sex and Drugs and Sausage Rolls.' More in the vein of Monty Python.
Terry was the first to make Death comical, way before Bill and Ted came onto the scene.
:-).
Just wanted to point that out
It's certainly a lot more like 'Pyraminds' than any of the other Pratchet books, both in plot, tone, and style. You remember that Djelibebe (sp?)spent the last third of Pyramids in 'folded' space in between Tsort and Ephebe? A lot of 'Theif' takes place after the Glass Clock starts ticking.
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
...In my opinion at least. While the emphasis is still on parody and satire, 'Theif' harkens back to some of the earlier pratchet books, 'Light Fantastic' and 'Pyramids' in particular, in that it doesn't focus on the parody as much as the story and characterization. Compare this to 'Soul Music' and 'Hogfather', which were mostly parody, with a little bit of plot thrown in.
The characters, while many of them appeared in previous books, are all quite nicely fleshed out in this one. Susan was flat in 'Soul Music' and at best a cardboard cutout in 'Hogfather', but she really takes on quite a bit of depth in this one. Other characters, most notably Lady LeJean, are entertaining to read and are not jokey as much as they are dynamic. Lu Tze is a little over the top and Jeffery and Lobsang didn't nearly get the time they deserved, however.
This is probably because Pratchet has a bad habit of not giving equal dialogue or internal monologue to some of his characters. For example, Sam Vimes internal monologue will comprise a good fifth of any given watch book, and Angua will get quite a bit too. Carrot Ironfoundersson's internal monologue, like Lobsang and Jeffery's is never indicated, and their thoughts are *only* shown by their actions and dialogue. This would be okay if Pratchett did this consistently with all or just one of his characters.
All in all, 'Theif' is probably the best book Pratchet has written since 'Small Gods'. I would reccomend it for new and experienced Pratchett readers.
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
Good Omens was amazing. Neil Gaimen and he worked together to produce something that literally had me drop the floor and giggle hysterically.
I know... I need help... ... book... first...
Must... read... new
After yesterday's debacle, I expected this review to be about how poor the binding was or how the reviewer's book light would not clip on to this book, and thus why this is the worst book ever.
--
If I had a sig, it would likely be here
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
This is a really good book just like every other pratchett book. I do however prefer to get my pratchett books from amazon.co.uk mainly because the covers are nicer in my opinion. -Chris
--MarkusQ
Has the reviewer read much Pratchett? It's the Death of Rats, not Mice. Anyway, nice to see the review up - No doubt I'll be visiting 'le bookshop' quite soon. My vote for best Pratchett book has got to be... [trumpet fanfare] The Hogfather [aplause][please?] This one sounds along those lines (DEATH, Susan, mysteries of the universe, journey into morality and the nature of man and of the universe, sausages inna bun.... Whatever you do, don't say monkey - ohshit
From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...