Slashdot Mirror


Mystery of Loch Ness Solved?

ewhac writes "The San Francisco Chronicle is reporting that Geologist Luigi Piccardi will present a paper in Edinburgh, Scotland, today which asserts that sightings of the Loch Ness Monster can be explained as surface disturbances caused by seismic tremors. Loch Ness sits on an active fault, and eyewitness sightings of the monster correlate closely with recorded seismic activity. Don't expect the search for Nessie to be called off any time soon, however. (Can anyone out there with a good fluid dynamics model run an earthquake simulation on Loch Ness and see what happens?)" Maybe this makes more sense than the temperature explanation, but anyway you gotta love the fake photos.

49 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Another article by rleyton · · Score: 5

    The BBC have a good article on this too.

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
  2. This proves NOTHING!!! by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2
    Loch Ness Monster can be explained as surface disturbances caused by seismic tremors...

    Exceptin' that maybe twas tha Loch Niss monstarrr that caused those seismic tremarrrs, what? We nevar claimed she was a quiet lass, now, did we?

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  3. Cause and Effect? by clickety6 · · Score: 4

    So there is seismic activity reported whenever the monster is sighted? Obviously the monster is causing seismic upheavals as it stomps round the bottom of the lake. Ain't the guy ever seen a Godzilla movie?

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Cause and Effect? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Or else seismic activity is pissing it off, making it move around and try to find a more comfortable spot.

      --

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  4. Nessie will live on. by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 3

    I don't think the search for Nessie will ever end. For one thing, it's too big of a local cash cow, like Roswell. Each have become tourist attractions and spawned several books and t.v. shows. For another thing, it's just a lot more fun to imagine that a leftover relic from the Mesozoic era managed to survive millions of years undetected. Earthquake and weather balloon explanations aren't quite as ripe for mass consumption.

    1. Re:Nessie will live on. by jmichaelg · · Score: 2
      ...too big of a local cash cow .... it's just a lot more fun to imagine...

      And those two reasons are why religion will never die. There will always be people who prefer to believe in gods over more prosaic explanations. As long as someone stands to benefit finanically, there'll be preachers of the faith-du-jour catering to that preference.

      Step right up and git your levitating gurus, silver lizards and Nessies here! Don't push! There's enough for everybody...

  5. All the news that snoozes by unitron · · Score: 5
    "It's interesting," chuckled Hrvoje Tkalcic, a graduate student working at the University of California at Berkeley seismology laboratory last night.

    "Hey boss, I can't get ahold of any experts for a quote."
    "Well then just find somebody who's awake."

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  6. New poll: Your favorite monster by smaughster · · Score: 4
    • King Kong
    • Godzilla
    • Loch Ness
    • Seismic disturbances near Loch Ness
    • Bill Gates
    • CowboyNeal
    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
    1. Re:New poll: Your favorite monster by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Hey, no "Telly"?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  7. No way! by jsse · · Score: 5

    Nonsense! They are incurable skeptics! I saw it, I really saw it. Too bad I didn't carry a camera, so I have my friend draw it according to my description.

    Scary, isn't it?
    &nbsp_
    /. / &nbsp&nbsp |\/| |\/| |\/| / Run, Bill!

  8. Why is it.. by RAruler · · Score: 3

    That everytime something unexplainable happenings.. UFO's, lights, strange dreams, an NT Server that doesn't crash, and other such paranormal activies happen, theres always some guy that says its seismic. Everytime, but maybe thats just because when you compare a certain recurrance of events, your likely to find a pattern with something. A large creature living in a lake seems unlikely as hell, but stranger things have happened.

    ---

    --

    --
    Insert Witty Sig Here
    1. Re:Why is it.. by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2
      theres always some guy that says its seismic

      what else would explain it? an act of god? :) the press needs something to put on the front page :P the more bizzare, the more "cooler" it seems to the readers.. and, the more "distracted" from reality the more likely it'll have some believers. :P

      My money is on an escaped pet Brazilian Giant Otter.

    2. Re:Why is it.. by jsse · · Score: 2

      .. UFO's, lights, strange dreams, an NT Server that doesn't crash...

      NT Server crash may be a hoax. No one shows a picture of it, rather I saw lots of people showing pictures of UFO.

      May be people are too shock to take picture at time of crashing.
      &nbsp_
      /. / &nbsp&nbsp |\/| |\/| |\/| / Run, Bill!

    3. Re:Why is it.. by aculeus · · Score: 2

      How about actually finding one living off the coast of Madagascar? Check out the Coelacanth page.

    4. Re:Why is it.. by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Project BLUE SCREEN, ye eedjit!

      /Brian

  9. loch ness? its been over 50 years! by ardiri · · Score: 2
    while i am a fan of mythical stuff - the lochness monstor "thing" i have always conceived as a hoax primarialy to bring tourists into a dead and boring area of the world. the scenery is nice, but that doesn't cut it for most travellers :)

    secondly, first sightings (apparent) were 50 years ago.. is this beast still alive? dont read anywhere the expected life-span of a lochness monster.. maybe it died :)

    1. Re:loch ness? its been over 50 years! by wangi · · Score: 4
      first sightings (apparent) were 50 years ago.. is this beast still alive?
      I think you should read-up a bit more... Legend goes back as far as the 7th century (at least) when it was spotted by St. Columba (you know, the guy who brought Christianity to the Scots).

  10. Actually Loch Ness EXISTS! by fonky · · Score: 2

    And from what I read here, he make a lot of noise, euhm tremors, each times he surfaces.

  11. Giant Squid Exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    We know Giant Squid exist but have never actually been able to film or capture a live one. We know dinosaurs existed once on this planet and all the stories about the Cylocanth(sp?). I think the concept of dinosaurs actually having walked the earth at one time is the concept that is causing most of the doubt in people. To find bones is one thing, but to actually acknowledge that these gigantic creatures actively ran around on Earth can be a somewhat disturbing and terrifying thought. Monsters by todays animals standards, there are still things on Earth, like the Giant Squid, that still fit into the "monster" animal category. It's existence isn't too fantastic, just a little bit unsettling.

    1. Re:Giant Squid Exist by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Coelacanth. (Though I think coelo- is acceptable as well -- I get hits for both.)

      The thing about Nessie: if there is such a beast, in all likelihood there are a number of them, with a decent-sized gene pool. If that's the case, how is it that we have never seen anything that fits the description? Surely the bottom of Loch Ness has been dragged a number of times -- how is it that we've never found anything resembling a Nessie skeleton? No mystery carcasses washed up on the beach (like, say, giant squids), no locals salting them down and eating them (like the above mentioned ancient fish).

      I can't quite tell whether you're defending or discounting the Nessie hypothesis, so I can't say whether I'm strengthening or rebutting your point. But the idea that there are real monsters on Earth doesn't mean that we're going to find Nessie.

      /Brian

    2. Re:Giant Squid Exist by connorbd · · Score: 2

      You're assuming Nessie is in fact a predator. I've never gotten the sense that the legend was ever particularly clear on that point. Besides, the predator isn't always the big fish in the pond, so to speak -- a lot of times the prey is bigger.

      /Brian

    3. Re:Giant Squid Exist by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Well even in terms of biomass there isn't much there; I don't think Loch Ness has that many aquatic plants. Maybe one or two could be supported, but not a viable population.
      --

  12. It's a shame by spooky_cbs · · Score: 2

    It might be for the sake of science, but soon we will have no more myths to tell... nothing to dream about... Is it just me, or our life becomes too boring?

    --
    Spooky of the CyBurial Squad
  13. What a waste of 25 cents by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 3

    I bought the paper today for the first time in a while. One look at the papers headline and I needed to see what this once respectible (but very bias) newspaper had on the front page. After reading the article I was pretty pissed. I payed .25 cents for some guys opinion, who really didnt have much to say anyway. Its amazing what papers have sunk to these days. I felt like I was reading a tabloid. This person got published in this paper on very little other then "hey I am a scientist!" but as far as I can tell he is just as crazy as the other kooks.

    I should have given my quarter to a person asking for change.


    The Lottery:

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  14. Re:Specialist subject: The bleedin' obvious by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 3

    There is no Loch Ness monster. Get over it and do something useful with your time.
    This is one of the cool things about living today. We don't have to dedicate 100% of our time to surviving. We have some time that we can use for things that serves no other purpose than amuse us.
    Of course this extra time sometimes produce very strange results, like links starting with g and ending with x, television, you name it. And then of course evil things like Napster(kidding :-))
    So it is ok not to be productive all the time. I have a problem with that, I can't sit and stare at the TV for hours, the least productive thing I can spend my time on, is posting here. I know that I should learn that it is ok to be bored from time to time and just relax, but its so hard to be bored in these xDSL days.
    Anyway to sum it up, all these things that are not useful are often very fun, and we need fun.

    --------

  15. Balance . . . by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 2
    It does seem that for every crazed fanatic, trying to convince us of space brothers and ancient sunken cities based on the flimsiest of "evidence", there's at least one crazed skeptic, going to any length to explain away everything as sunspots, swamp gas and weather balloons.

    Ah well . . . at least it keeps them busy and off the streets.

  16. Join the club, or watch the show by rleyton · · Score: 2
    Hey, if you're not swayed by this (or any other) theory, and figure Nessy's alive and well, you could always join The Official Loch Ness Monster Fan Club.

    No, I'm not a member, just stumbled on the link whilst reading around the story.

    You might also remember the cartoon series based around loch ness monsters... The Family-Ness - classic stuff. I always liked silly-ness...

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
  17. please... by the_pres · · Score: 3

    Please, don't try to disprove this theory saying that a sea monster could cause sismic tremors.
    Have you an idea of how much energy is released in even a small quake (the one you don't feel but it's registered only by seismographs)? Either the monster is blowing nukes under that lake, or...

    By the way, I don't think that this is the right explanation for the sightings. People easily see what they desperately want to see. Think of UFO abductions and things like that.

  18. Family-Ness by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2

    Yeah, we all know that this seismic temor theory is as much rubbish as all the other theories. If only this scientist dude had had an secret thistle-whistle (just like Eslbeth and Angus) to use to summon the Nessies, then he wouldn't have needed to waste his research grant.

    --

    1. Re:Family-Ness by ethereal · · Score: 2

      I have to ask: are the space brothers always getting oppressed by the [deep breath] Pigs...In...Space...?

      Caution: contents may be quarrelsome and meticulous!

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  19. Be your own judge.... by NTSwerver · · Score: 5


    Go to the live Nessie-cam and wait patiently until you witness the Loch Ness Monster/seismic activity for yourself!

    ----------------------------

    --
    -----------------------
    Moderator's essentials
  20. actually ... its simple chaos theory by jstockdale · · Score: 5

    the /. effect caused a server in san francisco to fall over lowering the overall temperature of the room enought to cause the heating system to kick on. naturally, the heating system was hot water driven, and requiring the intake of additional water. this lowered the overall level of a californian lake causing a down-river pond to dry up. the ducks who's habitat included that pond were forced to fly away, creating a turbulence within the wind. this caused a monarch butterfly to flap its wings, thereby causing a tsunami off the coast of japan^H^H^H^H^H scotland which when colliding with the shore produced seismic tremors which converged, forming a standing wave, in the bedrock below loch ness. the kinetic energy of the vibrating surface caused the surface molecules to spontaneously rearragne into a disturbance which when viewed from approximately level, appeared to look remotely like a vague figure resembling a monster.

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  21. There will always be mystery creatures by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    Loch Ness Monster is no more. But there's the sightings of the fat programmers in silicon valley who jump up and down and make the earth shake. I saw it on Discovery Channel.

  22. Nessie - the real story by MavEtJu · · Score: 2

    Last summer my gf and I got a bed & breakfast in Perth, Scotland and the host told us about a 100% guarantee on meeting Nessie method:

    Most people go to Loch Ness, drive around for hours, don't see anything, feel sad, go to a local pub and drink a lot of Scottish Whiskey.

    This is not the right way, because Nessie is attracted to whiskey-fumes and when you're in the pub she can't smell them.

    So you should go to the lake of Loch Ness, enter a local pub, drink a lot of Scottish Whiskey, walk to the lake, breath out and watch Nessie coming to you... The more you drink, the better your chances!

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  23. Drain the loch? by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
    OK, so Mr Burns managed, but that wasn't real life. Seriously, IIRC the loch is a saltwater one that's open to the sea (as well as having rivers flowing into it) - that's one hell of a drainage operation.

    Good luck to any tycoons trying this to boost their popularity : )

    --

  24. Re:A Plausable Explanation ( was: Re:Hmm) by pizen · · Score: 2

    Tsk, tsk. The so called 'Loch Ness' phenomenon is caused by the interaction between neutrinos and drowned haggis.

    Mmm, Haggis. I once had a friend in Scotland tell me that Haggis is a small mountain animal where two legs are shorter than the others from running around the mountains all the time (to which I responded, "You tell all the tourists that, don't you?"). Perhaps Nessie eats the little Haggises that run too close to the water's edge?
    ---

  25. There's always Champ! by jonathanjo · · Score: 2
    Hey, if you're looking to go searching for a big mythical aquatic pleiosaur, there's no need to fly over the Atlantic. Just head up to Vermont or NY and check out Champ!

    I've read more detailed, recent reports of Champ sightings than anything from Nessie enthusiasts. They've even figured out his (her?) taxonomic identity and given it a scientific genus (Champtanystropheus). If you go to the lakeside park in Burlington there's a statue commemorating all the sightings. Champ has even been commemorated by Uhaul!

    And the Green Mountains and the Adirondacks are gorgeous this time of year. ;-)

  26. Re:A Plausable Explanation ( was: Re:Hmm) by pizen · · Score: 2

    Q: What's worn under a kilt?
    A: Nothing, it's all in perfect working order
    da dum dum
    ---

  27. Re:Pictures of Nessie faked by Malc · · Score: 2

    After some digging, I found this reference to the "Surgeon's Photograph", the most famous picture of the monster: http://www.unmuseum.org/nesshoax.htm

  28. reminds me of my theory... by option8 · · Score: 3

    when i used to go skiing and swimming at a large local lake, i would often come upon large, seemingly solitary waves out in the middle of an otherwise calm channel

    these "monster waves" were usually the result of an infrequent combination of boat wakes or one wake interfering with itself in an inlet. the odd triangular waves would perpetuate themselves, and travel across the lake until finally diminishing on the far shore, or by coming upon another boat's wake.

    it was a fun pastime to track these guys down whilst on skis and jump them, but i thought nothing of the phenomenon until a few years later. that's when i read something (i think it was in popular science or discover magazine) about these large mysterious (and dangerous, as in iceberg dangerous) triangular waves in the north atlantic. study had proven that these were the result of converging currents and strong winds. until then, they were a mystery.

    i thought, hey, if the same thing can happen in the north atlantic, and nobody knows until now how they form, maybe it's the same thing that's happening at my lake.. and maybe at other lakes - like loch ness - that have boat traffic on them.

    anyhoo, i still want to see someone pull a live one out of the loch in a net, but until then i think a lot of the "humps" people see are just caused by wind, or temperature inversion, or seismic activity, or my monster waves...

  29. Berkeley fortune by LocalYokel · · Score: 2
    It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail.

    --

    --

    --
    E2 IN2 IE?

  30. Re:A Plausable Explanation ( was: Re:Hmm) by guinsu · · Score: 2

    Don't forget the weather balloons that go off course and end up hovering over the lock at low altitudes.

  31. Re:even the physical ones? by nomadic · · Score: 3

    Well if the tremors around the lake created the myth of the dragon, then a lot of people in the area would be conditioned to interpret whatever they see in the lake as a dragon/dinosaur.

    Personally I think people are just seeing other animals and just assuming it's a dinosaur. Remember, Loch Ness IS connected to the ocean through canals, and various ocean creatures such as seals, porpoises, eels, etc. do get in...
    --

  32. Elvis in a UFO (offtopic) by dkoyanagi · · Score: 3
    Every time I see a story about Loch Ness it reminds me of the following story.

    Up here in Canada there's a national lottery called the 6/49. The odds of hitting the jackpot is approximately 1 in 14 million, yet thousands of people buy tickets every week.

    Anyway, about 6 years ago I heard a story on the radio about how London bookies sets odds for weird things happening. I can't remember the exact odds but they went something like this:

    Elvis being found alive - 400:1
    Loch Ness monster being captured - 600:1
    A UFO landing on the White House lawn - 1000:1

    And the biggest of all

    A UFO driven by Elvis crashing into Loch Ness and killing the monster - 14 million to 1

    which are the same odds as hitting the 6/49 jackpot. Kinda puts things into perspective.

  33. The sieche theory by Spasemunki · · Score: 3

    This sounds compatible with, but distinct from, a theory offered up several years ago in an issue of scientific american. The idea was that there was a sieche (could be spelling this incorrectly), or a standing water wave, oscillating inside Loch Ness. These waves produce some very weird wave forms, such as waves in the apperant absence of wind, glassy calm at odd times, et cetera. At times, they 'go exponential', and the waves grow to a size where they begin dragging debris up off the bottom of the lake, such as sunken tree trunks. The combination of weird looking waves, weird water patterns, and dark colored, water-logged debris surfacing can make for a very convincing monster show.

    What makes the theory more interesting is the fact that the same sort of wave has been identified in Lake Champlain in Vermont, which is, as all good Vermonters know, the home of Champy, the Lake Champlain monster. Both Champlain and Ness are deep, narrow lakes, of the sort given to producing sieches. Of course, on at least one instance, the monster in Champlain has been a gigantic sturgeon (it was shot and killed by a woman who saw it thrashing in the water behind her house), but a wave of this sort, periodically disturbed by seismic activity, would seem to be likely to produce the off shapes in the water that people have reported seeing.

    And as someone may have mentioned, the best argument against there being a Nessie in the sense of a giant monster is the ecology of the lake. Several studies have been done of the lake, and every one of them finds that the food chain in the lake could not support a large predator, much less the breeding stock that would be neccesary to keep the sightings going for hundreds of years.

    "Sweet creeping zombie Jesus!"

  34. Proves nothing! by FTL · · Score: 3
    So they've found a posative correlation between earthquakes and Nessie sightings. One interpretation is that the earthquakes are causing ripples in the water which look like a monster. But another interpretation is that Nessie (like most animals) doesn't like earthquakes and is forced to the surface whenever there is one. :-)

    Disclaimer: I live five miles from Loch Ness
    --

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  35. Re:even the physical ones? by FTL · · Score: 2
    > Remember, Loch Ness IS connected to the ocean through canals, and various ocean creatures such as seals, porpoises, eels, etc. do get in...

    I live just a few miles from Loch Ness, and I can tell you, it would be extremely improbable for seals or porpoises to get through the Caledonian canal. The canal isn't the problem, it is the ridiculously long set of locks that they'd have to navigate. They don't call it the "Highlands" of Scotland for nothing.
    --

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  36. Re:even the physical ones? by nomadic · · Score: 2

    I've heard that seals sometimes arrive through the River Ness, but I could be mistaken. Anyway, I should have said "can" instead of "do" get through the canal.
    --

  37. Re:"Scottish" Picts? by nomadic · · Score: 2

    But they were IN Scotland. They'd probably consider themselves more genuine than later Celtic groups...
    --